Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 301: F708–F712, 2011. First published July 20, 2011; doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00183.2011. Translational Physiology Reduced diffusion of charge-modified, conformationally intact anionic Ficoll relative to neutral Ficoll across the rat glomerular filtration barrier in vivo Josefin Axelsson,1 Kristinn Sverrisson,1 Anna Rippe,1 William Fissell,2 and Bengt Rippe1 1 Department of Nephrology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; and 2Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio Submitted 5 April 2011; accepted in final form 15 July 2011 capillary permeability; sieving coefficient; glomerular basement membrane; FITC TRADITIONALLY, THE MAMMALIAN glomerular filtration barrier (GFB) is envisioned as being negatively charged. Evidence in favor of its charge selectivity is based on comparisons of glomerular sieving data for uncharged vs. anionic dextran and for uncharged vs. cationic dextran in rats (6, 7, 21). Thus sulfated, negatively charged dextran was found to be markedly retarded compared with neutral dextran, which in turn was less permeable across the glomerular barrier than polycationic (DEAE) dextran. However, these studies have been criticized on the ground that sulfated dextran can bind to plasma proteins (14) and cell membranes (28) and may be desulfated by glomerular cells before reaching the primary urine (30). This Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. Axelsson, Dept. of Nephrology, Univ. of Lund, Univ. Hospital of Lund, S-221 85 Lund, Sweden (e-mail: [email protected]). F708 implies that glomerular sieving coefficients () for sulfated dextran might have been erroneously underestimated. Hence, Schaeffer et al. (29) were not able to find any differences in rat glomerular for carboxymethylated (CM), anionic (nonsulfated) dextran vs. neutral dextran. They also assessed glomerular sieving curves for negatively charged hydroxy ethyl starch (HES). Anionic HES molecules showed lower for any given in vitro Stokes-Einstein molecular radius (ae) than did anionic dextran. Since both tracers were about equally negatively charged, the authors concluded that the glomerular barrier restricts the transport of polysaccharide molecules as a function of their size and configuration, but not due to their charge. In addition, a number of previous in vitro studies have demonstrated that the mammalian GBM does not seem to contribute to the charge selectivity of the entire GFB (4, 5). Also, it was recently shown that glomerular filtration of albumin is normal in the absence in the GBM of both agrin and perlecan-heparan sulfate (HS), both being negatively charged, and that reductions of anionic sites in the GBM by heparanase does not lead to proteinuria (12, 17, 31). Using charge-modified, but conformationally altered, polyanionic CM-Ficoll, we previously noted an increased fractional clearance of anionic Ficoll relative to uncharged Ficoll for the rat GFB in vivo (2). However, it seemed that the charge modification had significantly increased the molecular radius of the Ficoll molecules for all molecular weights (MW), in that CM-Ficoll eluted earlier than neutral Ficoll on high-performance size-exclusion chromatography (HPSEC), semiquantitatively confirmed using single-angle quasi-elastic light-scattering (2). Since molecules with an increased “frictional ratio” (ratio of ae over the radius of an ideally compact spherical molecule of identical MW) generally show increases in glomerular permeability (1, 24), we ascribed the enhanced transport of CM-Ficoll to a conformational difference between neutral and anionic Ficoll molecules, making the latter less “compact” and more flexible, and thereby, hyperpermeable across the GFB (32). A similar explanation can be given to the results of Guimarães et al. (15), who also found a markedly increased glomerular permeability for large CM-Ficoll molecules compared with conventional Ficoll for the rat GFB. This is in contrast to a number of previous studies demonstrating a negative charge of the GFB for differently charged protein probes, as recently reviewed (8, 16, 32). In testing glomerular charge selectivity, it is thus of utmost importance that charge-modified probes, compared with their neutral counterparts, show identical conformation in terms of e.g., frictional ratio (32). Recently, Fissell and coworkers (13) succeeded in charge modifying FITC-Ficoll-70 and FITCFicoll-400 in a way that resulted in negligible conformational changes, as checked by multiangle light scattering and size- 1931-857X/11 Copyright © 2011 the American Physiological Society http://www.ajprenal.org Downloaded from http://ajprenal.physiology.org/ by 10.220.33.2 on June 16, 2017 Axelsson J, Sverrisson K, Rippe A, Fissell W, Rippe B. Reduced diffusion of charge-modified, conformationally intact anionic Ficoll relative to neutral Ficoll across the rat glomerular filtration barrier in vivo. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 301: F708 –F712, 2011. First published July 20, 2011; doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00183.2011.—The glomerular filtration barrier (GFB) is commonly conceived as a negatively charged sieve to proteins. Recent studies, however, indicate that glomerular charge effects are small for anionic, carboxymethylated (CM) dextran vs. neutral dextran. Furthermore, two studies assessing the glomerular sieving coefficients () for negative CM-Ficoll vs. native Ficoll have demonstrated an increased glomerular permeability for CM-Ficoll (Asgeirsson D, Venturoli D, Rippe B, Rippe C. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 291: F1083–F1089, 2006; Guimarães M, Nikolovski J, Pratt L, Greive K, Comper W. Am Physiol Renal Physiol 285: F1118 –F1124, 2003.). The CM-Ficoll used, however, showed a larger Stokes-Einstein radius (ae) than neutral Ficoll, and it was proposed that the introduction of negative charges in the Ficoll molecule had made it more flexible and permeable. Recently, a negative FITC-labeled CM-Ficoll (CMI-Ficoll) was produced with a conformation identical to that of neutral FITC-Ficoll. Using these probes, we determined their :s in anesthetized Wistar rats (259 ⫾ 2.5 g). After blood access had been achieved, the left ureter was cannulated for urine sampling. Either polysaccharide was infused (iv) together with a filtration marker, and urine and plasma were collected. Assessment of FITC-Ficoll was achieved by high-performance size-exclusion chromatography (HPSEC). CMI-Ficoll and native Ficoll had identical elugrams on the HPSEC. Diffusion of anionic Ficoll was significantly reduced compared with that of neutral Ficoll across the GFB for molecules of ae ⬃20 –35 Å, while there were no charge effects for Ficoll of ae ⫽ 35– 80 Å. The data are consistent with a charge effect present in “small pores,” but not in “large pores,” of the GFB and mimicked those obtained for anionic membranes in vitro for the same probes. Translational Physiology THE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION BARRIER IS NEGATIVELY CHARGED exclusion chromatography (SEC), here denoted CMI-Ficoll-70 and CMI-Ficoll-400, respectively, where “I” stands for “intact” or “identical” (with respect to conformation). Using these probes in sieving experiments under well-controlled conditions in vivo, we demonstrate that anionic CMI-Ficoll was significantly retarded compared with neutral Ficoll across the rat GFB in a way mimicking the results recently obtained with these probes in vitro for precision made anionic synthetic membranes (13). MATERIALS AND METHODS AJP-Renal Physiol • VOL kidney was collected for 5 min, with a midpoint (2.5 min) collection of a plasma sample. Plasma and urine samples were assessed on a HPSEC system (Waters, Milford, MA) with an Ultrahydrogel 500 column (Waters) and calibrated as described in detail previously (2). The mobile phase was driven by a pump (Waters 1525), and fluorescence was detected with a fluorescence detector (Waters 2475) with an excitation wavelength at 492 nm and an emission wavelength at 518 nm. The samples were loaded to the system with an autosampler (Waters 717 plus), and the system was controlled by Breeze Software 3.3 (Waters). Ficoll were obtained by analyzing HPSEC curves from the plasma and urine sample for each experiment. The of Ficoll was determined as the fractional clearance, according to the formula ⫽ (CFU ⫻ CIP)/(CFP ⫻ CIU), where CFU represents the urine Ficoll concentration, CIP represents the inulin concentration in plasma, CFP the Ficoll concentration in plasma, and CIU the inulin concentration in urine. Glomerular filtration rate. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was measured in the left kidney during the experiment, using 51Cr-EDTA. A bolus dose of 51Cr-EDTA (0.3 MBq in 0.2 ml iv, Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, UK) was administered and followed by a constant infusion (10 ml·kg⫺1·h⫺1) of 51Cr-EDTA (0.37 MBq/ml in 0.9% NaCl) throughout the experiment, which yielded a stable plasma concentration of 51Cr-EDTA over time. Urine was collected from the left ureter repeatedly during the experiment, and blood samples, using microcapillaries (25 l taken for assessment of GFR), every 10 min. Radioactivity in blood and urine was measured in a gamma counter (Wizard 1480, LKP, Wallac, Turku, Finland). Hematocrit was assessed throughout the experiments to convert blood radioactivity (51Cr-EDTA) into plasma radioactivity. During the FITC-Ficoll sieving periods, GFR was also assessed from the urine clearance of FITC-inulin. The urinary excretion of 51Cr-EDTA and FITC-inulin per minute (Ut ⫻ Vu) divided by the concentration of tracer in plasma (Pt) was used to calculate GFR, where Ut represents the tracer concentration in urine, and Vu is the flow of urine per minute. Since the variability (coefficient of variation) for FITC-inulinassessed GFR was slightly higher than that for 51Cr-EDTA-assessed GFR, we present the latter consistently throughout the study. Two-pore analysis. A two-pore model (20, 25) was used to analyze the data for Ficoll (molecular radius 15– 80 Å). A nonlinear least-squares regression analysis was used to obtain the best curve fit, using scaling multipliers, as described at some length previously (20). Statistics. Values are presented as means ⫾ SE. Differences among groups were tested using nonparametric analysis of variance with the Kruskal-Wallis test and post hoc tested using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Bonferroni corrections for multiple comparisons were made. Significance levels were set at *P ⬍ 0.05, **P ⬍ 0.01 and ***P ⬍ 0.001. All statistical calculations were made using SPSS 18.0 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL). RESULTS Hemodynamic parameters. Animals showed a stable mean arterial pressure (MAP) over time (Fig. 1). Also, GFR was stable in both groups, but with a small tendency to decline with time. For neutral Ficoll experiments, GFR decreased from 0.69 ⫾ 0.04 at the start to 0.65 ⫾ 0.04 ml·min⫺1·g⫺1 (not significant; ns) at the end of the experiment (25 min), and for CMI-Ficoll experiments this slight decrease was from 0.67 ⫾ 0.04 to 0.58 ⫾ 0.04 ml·min⫺1·g⫺1 (ns). Sieving of FITC-Ficoll and FITC-CMI-Ficoll. Figure 2 demonstrates vs. ae for Ficoll vs. CMI-Ficoll (10 – 40 Å) plotted on a linear scale. For CMI-Ficoll, there was a reduced for molecules of radius ⬃20 –35 Å compared with neutral Ficoll in the same size range. For neutral Ficoll of radius 28 Å, was 0.56 ⫾ 0.01, and for CMI-Ficoll it was 0.47 ⫾ 0.02 (P ⬍ 0.05). 301 • OCTOBER 2011 • www.ajprenal.org Downloaded from http://ajprenal.physiology.org/ by 10.220.33.2 on June 16, 2017 Animals and surgery. Experiments were performed in 16 male Wistar rats (Möllegard, Lille Stensved, Denmark) with an average body weight of 259 ⫾ 2.5 g. The rats were given water and standard chow ad libitum. The animal Ethics Committee at Lund University approved the animal experiments. Anesthesia was induced with pentobarbital sodium (60 mg/kg ip). Body temperature was kept at 37°C by a thermostatically controlled heating pad, and a tracheotomy was performed to facilitate breathing. The tail artery was cannulated (PE-50 cannula) for continuous monitoring of arterial pressure and registration of heart rate on a polygraph (model 7B; Grass Instruments, Quincy, MA), and for maintenance administration of anesthesia. The left carotid artery was cannulated (PE-50 cannula) for blood sampling and the left jugular vein for infusion purpose. Access to the ureter was obtained through a small abdominal incision. The left ureter was dissected free and cannulated (PE-10 cannula) for continuous urine sampling. Furosemide (Furosemide Recip 0.375 mg/kg body wt) was administered in the tail artery to increase urine production and facilitate cannulation of the ureter. FITC-CMI-Ficoll. Carboxymethylation of Ficoll was performed using strong NaOH and monochloroacetic acid (MCA) in aqueous solution at elevated temperature. One gram of Ficoll 70 and 400 (catalog nos. 46326 and 46327, respectively, Fluka, St. Louis, MO) were each mixed with 26.5 ml of deionized water and stirred for 30 min at 40°C, after which 20 ml 10 M NaOH was slowly added. MCA was then added dropwise into the mixture. The mixture was stirred at 40°C for 3 h and then neutralized with 5 M HCl and dialyzed against distilled water for 4 days. The Z-potential for CMI-Ficoll was measured by a Brookhaven ZetaPlus (Brookhaven Instruments, Holtsville, NY). The (charge) characterization of the CMI-Ficoll (⫺20 charges/ molecule) has been presented previously (13). For comparison, the anionic CM-Ficoll used in a previous study had a charge of either ⫺40 or ⫺95/molecule, respectively (2). Labeling of CMI-Ficoll with FITC was performed according to Ohlson et al. (22). CMI-Ficoll was dissolved in a solution of AMC in DMSO-glacial acetic acid-sodium cyanoborohydride and incubated at 80°C for 2 h. After conjugation with AMC, CMI-Ficoll was recovered by a PD-10 column. Labeled samples were analyzed using HPSEC as described in previous papers (9, 10) with the excitation and emission set at 492 and 518 nm, respectively. FITC-Ficoll/FITC-CMI-Ficoll . FITC-Ficoll-70, FITC-Ficoll400, and FITC-inulin were bought from TdB Consultancy (Uppsala, Sweden). FITC-CMI-Ficoll-70/400 was produced as referred to above. Experiments were performed with either FITC-Ficoll (Ficoll, n ⫽ 7) or FITC-CMI-Ficoll (CMI-Ficoll, n ⫽ 9). A mixture of Ficoll-70 and Ficoll-400, or CM-Ficoll-70 and CM-Ficoll-400, in a 1:24 relationship was administered together with FITC-inulin as a bolus dose followed by constant infusion. The bolus contained 40 g Ficoll-70 or CMI-Ficoll-70, 960 g Ficoll-400 or CMI-Ficoll-400, 500 g FITC-inulin, and 0.3 MBq 51Cr-EDTA and was followed by a constant infusion (10 ml·kg⫺1·h⫺1) containing 20 g/ml Ficoll-70 or CMI-Ficoll-70, 0.48 mg/ml Ficoll-400 or CMI-Ficoll-400, 0.5 mg/ml FITC-inulin, and 0.3 MBq/ml 51Cr-EDTA. Ficoll was allowed to circulate in the animal for at least 20 min before sieving measurements to reach a stable concentration, after which urine from the left F709 Translational Physiology F710 THE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION BARRIER IS NEGATIVELY CHARGED For larger molecules (35– 80 Å), there were no significant differences between the groups (Fig. 3). Figure 4, A and B, demonstrates elugrams for Ficoll-70 vs. CMI-Ficoll-70 and Ficoll-400 vs. CMI-Ficoll-400, respectively. For Ficoll-70, there was no difference in elution time between the two differently charged probes. Figure 4A, however, demonstrates a very small (ns) difference between Ficoll400 and CMI-Ficoll-400 in elution time, indicating that a slight increase in molecular radius had occurred for the anionic prob. Pore parameters. The best curve fits of vs. ae for Ficoll according to the two-pore model were obtained using the parameters listed in Table 1. The major finding is that there was a significant reduction in diffusive transport, i.e., the unrestricted pore area over unit diffusion path length (A0/⌬X) in the CMI-Ficoll experiments compared with the Ficoll experiments. For both experiments, the small-pore radius was 45 Å, with a very slight (⫹0.9%), but significant, increase in the apparent small-pore radius for the CMI-Ficoll group. Fig. 3. vs. ae plotted on a semilogarithmic scale. There was no difference in for Ficoll35– 80Å vs. for CMI-Ficoll35– 80Å. Solid line, Ficoll; hatched line, CMI-Ficoll. glomerular capillary wall exhibits low discrimination ability with respect to differently charged, nonsulfated dextrans (2, 29). Hence, in two rather recent studies anionic CM-Ficoll was found to show an increased, not a decreased, glomerular permeability, compared with that for native Ficoll molecules. However, Asgeirsson et al. (2) noted that the CM-Ficoll molecules tested showed higher in vitro ae (relative to their molecular weight) compared with neutral Ficoll and suggested that the reduced “density” of the anionic Ficoll molecules DISCUSSION The charge-selective properties of the GFB are highly controversial. Generally, anionic proteins are retarded in the GFB compared with neutral or cationic proteins of equivalent size, as recently reviewed (8, 16, 32). However, it seems that the Fig. 2. Sieving coefficients () vs. Stokes-Einstein radii (ae) for Ficoll (solid line) and CMI-Ficoll (hatched line). There was a slight, but significant, reduction in for CMI-Ficoll of radius 20 –35 Å. AJP-Renal Physiol • VOL Fig. 4. A and B: elugrams of Ficoll-70 and CMI-Ficoll-70 (A; n ⫽ 2), and Ficoll-400 and CMI-Ficoll-400 (B; n ⫽ 2). Solid lines, Ficoll; hatched lines, CMI-Ficoll. 301 • OCTOBER 2011 • www.ajprenal.org Downloaded from http://ajprenal.physiology.org/ by 10.220.33.2 on June 16, 2017 Fig. 1. Mean arterial pressure vs. time in Ficoll and negative FITC-labeled carboxymethylated Ficoll (CMI-Ficoll) groups stayed constant throughout the experiment. Solid line and filled squares, uncharged Ficoll; hatched line and filled circles, CMI-Ficoll. Translational Physiology THE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION BARRIER IS NEGATIVELY CHARGED Table 1. Two-Pore Parameter Ficoll CMI-Ficoll rs, Å rL, Å ␣L ⫻ 105 JvL/GFR ⫻ 105 A0 /⌬X cm/g ⫻ 10⫺5 44.7 ⫾ 0.12 138.1 ⫾ 4.59 3.97 ⫾ 0.56 11.6 ⫾ 1.56 8.93 ⫾ 0.16 45.1 ⫾ 0.08* 142.1 ⫾ 12.1 4.36 ⫾ 0.83 12.9 ⫾ 2.59 4.02 ⫾ 0.49† Values are means ⫾ SE. CMI-Ficoll, negative FITC-labeled carboxymethylated (CM)-Ficoll; rs, small-pore radius; rL, large-pore radius; ␣L, fractional ultrafiltration coefficient accounted for by large pores; JvL/GFR, fractional fluid flow through large pores; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; A0/⌬X, effective pore area over unit diffusion path length. Statistical differences between Ficoll and CM-Ficoll: *P ⬍ 0.05, †P ⬍ 0.001. AJP-Renal Physiol • VOL organized than the mammalian GBM, thereby conceivably acting as a negatively charged interstitial gel. It has long been known that the interstitium in the systemic blood-lymph barrier acts as a positive charge barrier, although the capillary wall proper appears to be negatively charged (11, 25). Obviously, negatively charged proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans in the interstitium endow the tissue with ion-exchange column properties, causing negatively charged macromolecules to move faster than uncharged macromolecules across the meshwork of negatively charged gel elements, at least during non-steady-state conditions (1, 11). The much thicker interstitial gel-like tissue in the GFB of the salamander obviously shows properties similar to those of the systemic blood-lymph interstitial barrier, yielding anomalous electrical (positive charge barrier) behavior. The present results are in qualitative agreement with previous studies on the charge selectivity of the rat GFB in the cooled, isolated perfused kidney model. Ohlsson et al. (23) compared of neutral Ficoll36Å with that of negatively charged native albumin (ae 36 Å), and based on that, they calculated the fixed negative charge of the GFB to be 30 meq/l. However, comparing proteins with polysaccharides may be problematic, because polysaccharides generally show a higher “frictional ratio” (molecular extension compared with that of an ideally compact and spherical molecule) than do proteins, and thus can be predicted to be more permeable across the GFB (32). Hence, comparing proteins with polysaccharides could have influenced the large permeability differences seen. Thus, as extensively reviewed previously (32), polysaccharides, such as dextran (or Ficoll), should not be compared with proteins based on their in vitro as alone, except for large Ficoll molecules (as 50 – 80 Å), passing through “large pores” (shunt pathways) of the GFB (26). In the present study both Ficoll36Å (cf. albumin) and CMI-Ficoll36Å showed a marked hyperpermeability ( ⬃0.06) compared with albumin ( ⬃0.0001). This hyperpermeability of both Ficoll36Å and CMI-Ficoll36Å (⫺20 charges/ molecule) is likely to be due to the effects of molecular conformation alone (26). A parallel can be drawn to the marked glomerular hyperpermeability of the very asymmetric glycoprotein bikunin, showing identical ae and net charge to albumin in vitro, but being ⬃1,000-fold more permeable than albumin across the rat GFB in vivo (1, 19). In view of the recent results that the GBM does not appear to show any charge selectivity in vitro (4, 5) and that the total absence of the negatively charged GBM proteoglycans agrin and perlecan does not seem to affect the permeation of albumin across the GFB (12, 17), we speculate that the negative charge of the GFB may reside in the endothelial glycocalyx (16, 23). The charge-selective properties of the GFB seem, however, much less pronounced than previously conceived. However, for albumin being severely restricted in its passage across the small-pore equivalent (or through a “tight” fiber matrix) by size restriction alone, a negative charge may be critical in that it may normally totally exclude albumin from the small pore pathway. We have previously determined for neutralized albumin to be ⬃0.005 (20, 27), and mostly dependent on size-restricted clearance across the small pores. Hence, we speculate that total abolition of charge-selective properties in the small pores would increase for albumin from normally 2–3 ⫻ 10⫺4 (3) (large-pore transport) to 5 ⫻10⫺3 (large-pore ⫹ small-pore transport). Thus, to the extent that 301 • OCTOBER 2011 • www.ajprenal.org Downloaded from http://ajprenal.physiology.org/ by 10.220.33.2 on June 16, 2017 could have made the molecules less compact and more flexible, explaining their relative “hyperpermeability” (32). The results of the present study seem to corroborate these findings, because conformationally intact anionic CM-Ficoll of unperturbed ae, i.e., CMI-Ficoll (9), was found to be retarded compared with neutral Ficoll across the rat GFB. The present data agree, at least qualitatively, with the in vitro data obtained using the same probes for precision-made anionic membranes (13). According to the double-layer hypothesis, for which charge screening occurs in a field extending 8 Å away from the surface of the molecule and also 8 Å from the similarly charged membrane (or pore) surface, one would expect almost no charge effects in large pores, as also noted in this study. For small pores, however, charge effects would be most dominant at solute radii approaching the pore radius and decrease as the solute radius decreases. Both for the rat GFB and the precision-made in vitro anionic membranes mentioned above (13), the charge effects were about similar for Ficoll molecules of relative radius ranging from 0.3 to 1.1 of the pore radius (cf. from ⬃12 to ⬃40 Å for the rat GFB). Thus, neither in the present study in vivo nor in the mentioned in vitro membrane study did charge effects follow the double-layer hypothesis. This may indicate that charge-restriction effects are much less in magnitude and more complex than can be predicted by the simple double-layer hypothesis. The most conspicuous effect in the present study of the impact of negative charge was a 50% reduction in the diffusive transport (A0/⌬X) of CMI-Ficoll vs. neutral Ficoll, whereas the differences in were relatively small. Indeed, the charge effects peaked at 28 Å, the difference between for Ficoll and CMI-Ficoll being only ⬃20%. The (average) GFR during the CMI-Ficoll experiments was fortuitously slightly lower (averaging 0.62 ml/min) than that in the Ficoll experiments (averaging 0.67 ml/min). Adjusting for the impact of this GFR effect using the two-pore model, i.e., by lowering GFR from 0.67 to 0.62 in the Ficoll group, would theoretically increase for uncharged Ficoll28Å from 0.56 to 0.585, which would increase the separation of CMI-Ficoll from uncharged Ficoll by ⬃4% (to ⬃24%). The present data are seemingly at variance with recently published data on the electric behavior of the salamander (Necturus) GFB. Across the Necturus GFB, Hausmann et al. (18) measured a positive (Bowman’s space negative) transmembrane potential directly proportional to the filtration pressure, suggesting the presence of a positively charged bloodurine barrier. The reason for this “anomalous” electrical behavior of the Necturus GFB is not clear. However, the GBM in the Necturus GFB is at least 10-fold thicker and much less well F711 Translational Physiology F712 THE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION BARRIER IS NEGATIVELY CHARGED 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Kerstin Wihlborg is gratefully acknowledged for skillfully typing the manuscript. 19. GRANTS This study was supported by the Swedish Research Council (Grant 08285), the Heart and Lung Foundation, and the Medical Faculty at Lund University (ALF Grant). 20. DISCLOSURES 21. No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors. 22. REFERENCES 1. Asgeirsson D, Venturoli D, Fries E, Rippe B, Rippe C. Glomerular sieving of three neutral polysaccharides, polyethylene oxide and bikunin in rat. Effects of molecular size and conformation. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 191: 237–246, 2007. 2. Asgeirsson D, Venturoli D, Rippe B, Rippe C. Increased glomerular permeability to negatively charged Ficoll relative to neutral Ficoll in rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 291: F1083–F1089, 2006. 3. Axelsson J, Rippe A, Venturoli D, Swärd P, Rippe B. Effects of early endotoxemia and dextran-induced anaphylaxis on the size selectivity of the glomerular filtration barrier in rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 296: F242–F248, 2009. 4. Bertolatus JA, Klinzman D. Macromolecular sieving by glomerular basement membrane in vitro: effect of polycation or biochemical modifications. Microvasc Res 41: 311–327, 1991. 5. Bolton GR, Deen WM, Daniels BS. Assessment of the charge selectivity of glomerular basement membrane using Ficoll sulfate. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 274: F889 –F896, 1998. 6. Brenner BM, Hostetter TH, Humes HD. Glomerular permselectivity: barrier function based on discrimination of molecular size and charge. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 234: F455–F460, 1978. 7. Chang RL, Deen WM, Robertson CR, Brenner BM. Permselectivity of the glomerular capillary wall. III. Restricted transport of polyanions. Kidney Int 8: 212–218, 1975. 8. Comper W, Glasgow E. Charge selectivity in kidney ultrafiltration. Kidney Int 47: 1242–1251, 1995. 9. Fissell WH, Hofmann CL, Smith R, Chen MH. Size and conformation of Ficoll as determined by size-exclusion chromatography followed by multiangle light scattering. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 298: F205–F208, 2010. 10. Fissell WH, Manley S, Dubnisheva A, Glass J, Magistrelli J, Eldridge AN, Fleischman AJ, Zydney AL, Roy S. Ficoll is not a rigid sphere. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 293: F1209 –F1213, 2007. 11. Gilchrist SA, Parker JC. Exclusion of charged macromolecules in the pulmonary interstitium. Microvasc Res 30: 88 –98, 1985. 12. Goldberg S, Harvey SJ, Cunningham J, Tryggvason K, Miner JH. Glomerular filtration is normal in the absence of both agrin and perlecan- AJP-Renal Physiol • VOL 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. heparan sulfate from the glomerular basement membrane. Nephrol Dial Transplant 24: 2044 –2051, 2009. Groszek J, Li L, Ferrell N, Smith R, Zorman CA, Hofmann CL, Roy S, Fissell th WH. Molecular conformation and filtration properties of anionic Ficoll. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 299: F752–F757, 2010. Guasch A, Deen WM, Myers BD. Charge selectivity of the glomerular filtration barrier in healthy and nephrotic humans. J Clin Invest 92: 2274 –2282, 1993. Guimarães M, Nikolovski J, Pratt L, Greive K, Comper W. Anomalous fractional clearance of negatively charged Ficoll relative to uncharged Ficoll. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 285: F1118 –F1124, 2003. Haraldsson B, Nyström J, Deen WM. Properties of the glomerular barrier and mechanisms of proteinuria. Physiol Rev 88: 451–487, 2008. Harvey SJ, Jarad G, Cunningham J, Rops AL, van der Vlag J, Berden JH, Moeller MJ, Holzman LB, Burgess RW, Miner JH. Disruption of glomerular basement membrane charge through podocyte-specific mutation of agrin does not alter glomerular permselectivity. Am J Pathol 171: 139 –152, 2007. Hausmann R, Kuppe C, Egger H, Schweda F, Knecht V, Elger M, Menzel S, Somers D, Braun G, Fuss A, Uhlig S, Kriz W, Tanner G, Floege J, Moeller MJ. Electrical forces determine glomerular permeability. J Am Soc Nephrol 21: 2053–2058, 2010. Lindstrom KE, Blom A, Johnsson E, Haraldsson B, Fries E. High glomerular permeability of bikunin despite similarity in charge and hydrodynamic size to serum albumin. Kidney Int 51: 1053–1058, 1997. Lund U, Rippe A, Venturoli D, Tenstad O, Grubb A, Rippe B. Glomerular filtration rate dependence of sieving of albumin and some neutral proteins in rat kidneys. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 284: F1226 – F1234, 2003. Maddox DA, Deen WM, Brenner BM. Glomerular filtration. In: Handbook of Physiology. Renal Physiology. Bethesda, MD: Am Physiol Soc, 1992, sect. 8, vol. I, chapt. 13, p. 545–638. Ohlson M, Sörensson J, Haraldsson B. Glomerular size and charge selectivity in the rat as revealed by FITC-Ficoll and albumin. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 279: F84 –F91, 2000. Ohlson M, Sörensson J, Haraldsson B. A gel-membrane model of glomerular charge and size selectivity in series. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 280: F396 –F405, 2001. Ohlson M, Sörensson J, Lindström K, Blom AM, Fries E, Haraldsson B. Effects of filtration rate on the glomerular barrier and clearance of four differently shaped molecules. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 281: F103– F113, 2001. Rippe B, Haraldsson B. Transport of macromolecules across microvascular walls. The two-pore theory. Physiol Rev 74: 163–219, 1994. Rippe C, Asgeirsson D, Venturoli D, Rippe A, Rippe B. Effects of glomerular filtration rate on Ficoll sieving coefficients (theta) in rats. Kidney Int 69: 1326 –1332, 2006. Rippe C, Rippe A, Larsson A, Asgeirsson D, Rippe B. Nature of glomerular capillary permeability changes following acute renal ischemiareperfusion injury in rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 291: F1362–F1368, 2006. Santos HA, Garcia-Morales V, Roozeman RJ, Manzanares JA, Kontturi K. Interfacial interaction between dextran sulfate and lipid monolayers: an electrochemical study. Langmuir 21: 5475–5484, 2005. Schaeffer RC Jr, Gratrix ML, Mucha DR, Carbajal JM. The rat glomerular filtration barrier does not show negative charge selectivity. Microcirculation 9: 329 –342, 2002. Tay M, Comper WD, Singh AK. Charge selectivity in kidney ultrafiltration is associated with glomerular uptake of transport probes. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 260: F549 –F554, 1991. van den Hoven MJ, Wijnhoven TJ, Li JP, Zcharia E, Dijkman HB, Wismans RG, Rops AL, Lensen JF, van den Heuvel LP, van Kuppevelt TH, Vlodavsky I, Berden JH, van der Vlag J. Reduction of anionic sites in the glomerular basement membrane by heparanase does not lead to proteinuria. Kidney Int 73: 278 –287, 2008. Venturoli D, Rippe B. Ficoll and dextran vs. globular proteins as probes for testing glomerular permselectivity: effects of molecular size, shape, charge, and deformability. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 288: F605–F613, 2005. 301 • OCTOBER 2011 • www.ajprenal.org Downloaded from http://ajprenal.physiology.org/ by 10.220.33.2 on June 16, 2017 negative charges prevent small-pore permeation of albumin, pore charge may be critically essential in restricting albumin permeation across the GFB. In conclusion, comparing and diffusion properties across the rat GFB of conformationally identical Ficoll molecules having different electrical charges clearly indicates that the mammalian GFB is negatively charged. Yet, molecular conformation and flexibility, besides size, seem to be of greater importance than charge in determining the permeation properties of most macromolecules in the mammalian GFB. Nevertheless, a negative charge in the small-pore equivalent of the GFB can be predicted to critically affect the permeation of albumin from blood to urine under normal conditions, of importance for understanding the mechanisms of microalbuminuria.
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz