17-30 (25 min.) Weighted-average method. 1. Since direct materials are added at the beginning of the assembly process, the units in this department must be 100% complete with respect to direct materials. Solution Exhibit 17-30A shows equivalent units of work done to date: Direct materials Conversion costs 100 equivalent units 97 equivalent units 2. & 3. Solution Exhibit 17-30B calculates cost per equivalent unit of work done to date, summarizes the total Assembly Department costs for October 2007, and assigns these costs to units completed (and transferred out) and to units in ending work in process using the weightedaverage method. SOLUTIO EXHIBIT 17-30A Steps 1 and 2: Summarize Output in Physical Units and Compute Output in Equivalent Units; Weighted-Average Method of Process Costing, Assembly Department of Global Defense, Inc., for October 2007. (Step 1) Flow of Production Work in process, beginning (given) Started during current period (given) To account for Completed and transferred out during current period Work in process, ending* (given) 10 × 100%; 10 × 70% Accounted for Work done to date Physical Units 20 80 100 90 10 (Step 2) Equivalent Units Direct Conversion Materials Costs 90 90 10 7 100 97 100 *Degree of completion in this department: direct materials, 100%; conversion costs, 70%. 17-1 SOLUTIO EXHIBIT 17-30B Steps 3, 4, and 5: Compute Cost per Equivalent Unit, Summarize Total Costs to Account For, and Assign Total Costs to Units Completed and to Units in Ending Work in Process; Weighted-Average Method of Process Costing, Assembly Department of Global Defense, Inc., for October 2007. (Step 3) (Step 4) (Step 5) * † Work in process, beginning (given) Costs added in current period (given) Costs incurred to date Divide by equivalent units of work done to date (Solution Exhibit 17-30A) Cost per equivalent unit of work done to date Total costs to account for Assignment of costs: Completed and transferred out (90 units) Work in process, ending (10 units) Total costs accounted for Total Production Costs $ 580,000 2,935,000 Direct Materials $ 460,000 2,000,000 $2,460,000 Conversion Costs $ 120,000 935,000 $1,055,000 100 24,600 ÷ 97 $10,876.29 ÷ $ $3,515,000 $3,192,866 322,134 $3,515,000 (90* × $24,600) + (90* × $10,876.29) (10† × $24,600) + (7† × $10,876.29) Equivalent units completed and transferred out from Solution Exhibit 17-30A, Step 2. Equivalent units in work in process, ending from Solution Exhibit 17-30A, Step 2. 17-31 (10 min.) Journal entries (continuation of 17-30). 1. 2. 3. Work in Process––Assembly Department Accounts Payable Direct materials purchased and used in production in October. 2,000,000 Work in Process––Assembly Department Various accounts Conversion costs incurred in October. 935,000 Work in Process––Testing Department Work in Process––Assembly Department Cost of goods completed and transferred out in October from the Assembly Department to the Testing Department. 2,000,000 935,000 3,192,866 Work in Process––Assembly Department Beginning inventory, October 1 580,000 3. Transferred out to 1. Direct materials 2,000,000 Work in Process–Testing 2. Conversion costs 935,000 Ending Inventory, October 31 322,134 17-2 3,192,866 3,192,866 17-32 (20 min.) FIFO method (continuation of 17-30). 1. The equivalent units of work done in the current period in the Assembly Department in October 2007 for direct materials and conversion costs are shown in Solution Exhibit 17-32A. 2. The cost per equivalent unit of work done in the current period in the Assembly Department in October 2007 for direct materials and conversion costs is calculated in Solution Exhibit 17-32B. 3. Solution Exhibit 17-32B summarizes the total Assembly Department costs for October 2007, and assigns these costs to units completed (and transferred out) and units in ending work in process under the FIFO method. The cost per equivalent unit of beginning inventory and of work done in the current period differ: Direct materials Conversion costs * Beginning Inventory $23,000 ($460,000 ÷ 20 equiv. units) $10,000 ($120,000 ÷ 12 equiv. units) Cost per equivalent unit (weighted-average) Cost per equivalent unit (FIFO) Direct Materials $24,600* $25,000** Work Done in Current Period $25,000 $11,000 Conversion Costs $10,876.29* $11,000** from Solution Exhibit 17-30B from Solution Exhibit 17-32B ** The cost per equivalent unit differs between the two methods because each method uses different costs to calculate the numerator of the calculation. FIFO uses only the costs added during the period whereas weighted-average uses the costs from the beginning work-in-process as well as costs added during the period. Both methods also use different equivalent units in the denominator. The following table summarizes the costs assigned to units completed and those still in process under the weighted-average and FIFO process-costing methods for our example. Weighted Average (Solution Exhibit 17-30B) Cost of units completed and transferred out $3,192,866 Work in process, ending 322,134 Total costs accounted for $3,515,000 17-3 FIFO (Solution Exhibit 17-32B) Difference $3,188,000 –$4,866 327,000 +$4,866 $3,515,000 The FIFO ending inventory is higher than the weighted-average ending inventory by $4,866. This is because FIFO assumes that all the lower-cost prior-period units in work in process are the first to be completed and transferred out while ending work in process consists of only the higher-cost current-period units. The weighted-average method, however, smoothes out cost per equivalent unit by assuming that more of the higher-cost units are completed and transferred out, while some of the lower-cost units in beginning work in process are placed in ending work in process. So, in this case, the weighted-average method results in a higher cost of units completed and transferred out and a lower ending work-in-process inventory relative to FIFO. SOLUTIO EXHIBIT 17-32A Steps 1 and 2: Summarize Output in Physical Units and Compute Output in Equivalent Units; FIFO Method of Process Costing, Assembly Department of Global Defense Inc. for October 2007. (Step 1) Flow of Production Work in process, beginning (given) Started during current period (given) To account for Completed and transferred out during current period: From beginning work in process§ 20 × (100% − 100%); 20 × (100% − 60%) Started and completed 70 ×100%, 70 × 100% Work in process, ending* (given) 10 × 100%; 10 × 70% Accounted for Work done in current period only § Physical Units 20 80 100 (Step 2) Equivalent Units Direct Conversion Materials Costs (work done before current period) 20 0 8 70 70 10 7 80 85 70† 10 100 Degree of completion in this department: direct materials, 100%; conversion costs, 60%. 90 physical units completed and transferred out minus 20 physical units completed and transferred out from beginning work-in-process inventory. *Degree of completion in this department: direct materials, 100%; conversion costs, 70%. † 17-4 $ 580,000 88,000 668,000 2,520,000 3,188,000 327,000 $3,515,000 $3,515,000 17-5 *Equivalent units used to complete beginning work in process from Solution Exhibit 17-32A, Step 2. † Equivelant units started and completed from Solution Exhibit 17-32A, Step 2. # Equivalent units in work in process, ending from Solution Exhibit 17-32A, Step 2. Work in process, beginning ($460,000 + $120,000) (Step 3) Costs added in current period (given) Divide by equivalent units of work done in current period (Solution Exhibit 17-32A) Cost per equivalent unit of work done in current period (Step 4) Total costs to account for (Step 5) Assignment of costs: Completed and transferred out (90 units): Work in process, beginning (20 units) Costs added to beg. work in process in current period Total from beginning inventory Started and completed (70 units) Total costs of units completed & transferred out Work in process, ending (10 units) Total costs accounted for Total Production Costs $ 580,000 2,935,000 Conversion Costs ÷ 85 $ 11,000 ÷ 80 25,000 (10# × $25,000) + (7# × $11,000) (70† × $25,000) + (70† × $11,000) (0* × $25,000) + (8* × $11,000) $ $935,000 $2,000,000 (costs of work done before current period) Direct Materials SOLUTIO EXHIBIT 17-32B Steps 3, 4, and 5: Compute Cost per Equivalent Unit, Summarize Total Costs to Account For, and Assign Total Costs to Units Completed and to Units in Ending Work in Process; FIFO Method of Process Costing, Assembly Department of Global Defense, Inc., for October 2007. 7-35 (25 min.) Weighted-average method. Solution Exhibit 17-35A shows equivalent units of work done to date of: Direct materials Conversion costs 2,500 equivalent units 2,125 equivalent units Note that direct materials are added when the Forming Department process is 10% complete. Both the beginning and ending work in process are more than 10% complete and hence are 100% complete with respect to direct materials. Solution Exhibit 17-35B calculates cost per equivalent unit of work done to date for direct materials and conversion costs, summarizes the total Forming Department costs for April 2007, and assigns these costs to units completed (and transferred out), and to units in ending work in process using the weighted-average method. SOLUTIO EXHIBIT 17-35A Steps 1 and 2: Summarize Output in Physical Units and Compute Output in Equivalent Units; Weighted-Average Method of Process Costing, Forming Department of Star Toys for April 2007. (Step 1) Flow of Production Work in process, beginning (given) Started during current period (given) To account for Completed and transferred out during current period Work in process, ending* (given) 500 × 100%; 500 × 25% Accounted for Work done to date * Physical Units 300 2,200 2,500 2,000 500 (Step 2) Equivalent Units Direct Conversion Materials Costs 2,000 2,000 500 125 2,500 2,125 2,500 Degree of completion in this department: direct materials, 100%; conversion costs, 25%. 17-6 SOLUTIO EXHIBIT 17-35B Steps 3, 4, and 5: Compute Cost per Equivalent Unit, Summarize Total Costs to Account For, and Assign Total Costs to Units Completed and to Units in Ending Work in Process; Weighted-Average Method of Process Costing, Forming Department of Star Toys, April 2007. Total Production Costs (Step 3) Work in process, beginning (given) Costs added in current period (given) Costs incurred to date Divide by equivalent units of work done to date (Solution Exhibit 17-35A) Cost per equivalent unit of work done to date (Step 4) Total costs to account for (Step 5) Assignment of costs: Completed and transferred out (2,000 units) Work in process, ending (500 units) Total costs accounted for * † $ 9,625 112,500 Direct Materials Conversion Costs $ 7,500 70,000 $77,500 $ 2,125 42,500 $44,625 ÷ 2,500 $ 31 ÷ 2,125 $ 21 $122,125 $104,000 18,125 $122,125 (2,000*× $31) + (2,000*× $21) (500† × $31) + (125† × $21) Equivalent units completed and transferred out from Solution Exhibit 17-35A, Step 2. Equivalent units in work in process, ending from Solution Exhibit 17-35A, Step 2. 17-7 17-40 (45 min.) Transferred-in costs, weighted-average and FIFO methods. 1. Solution Exhibit 17-40A computes the equivalent units of work done to date in the Drying and Packaging Department for transferred-in costs, direct materials, and conversion costs. Solution Exhibit 17-40B calculates the cost per equivalent unit of work done to date in the Drying and Packaging Department for transferred-in costs, direct materials, and conversion costs, summarizes total Drying and Packaging Department costs for week 37, and assigns these costs to units completed and transferred out and to units in ending work in process using the weighted-average method. 2. Solution Exhibit 17-40C computes the equivalent units of work done in week 37 in the Drying and Packaging Department for transferred-in costs, direct materials, and conversion costs. Solution Exhibit 17-40D calculates the cost per equivalent unit of work done in week 37 in the Drying and Packaging Department for transferred-in costs, direct materials, and conversion costs, summarizes total Drying and Packaging Department costs for week 37, and assigns these costs to units completed and transferred out and to units in ending work in process using the FIFO method. SOLUTIO EXHIBIT 17-40A Steps 1 and 2: Summarize Output in Physical Units and Compute Output in Equivalent Units; Weighted-Average Method of Process Costing, Drying and Packaging Department of Frito-Lay Inc. for Week 37. (Step 1) (Step 2) Equivalent Units Direct Conversion Physical Transferredin Costs Materials Costs Flow of Production Units Work in process, beginning (given) 1,250 Transferred in during current period (given) 5,000 To account for 6,250 Completed and transferred out during current period 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 Work in process, ending* (given) 1,000 1,000 × 100%; 1,000 × 0%; 1,000 × 40% 1,000 0 400 Accounted for 6,250 Work done to date 6,250 5,250 5,650 *Degree of completion in this department: transferred-in costs, 100%; direct materials, 0%; conversion costs, 40%. 17-8 $174,300 23,360 $197,660 $197,660 17-9 Equivalent units completed and transferred out from Solution Exhibit 17-40A, Step 2. †Equivalent units in work in process, ending from Solution Exhibit 17-40A, Step 2. * (Step 3) Work in process, beginning (given) Costs added in current period (given) Costs incurred to date Divide by equivalent units of work done to date (Solution Exhibit 17-40A) Equivalent unit costs of work done to date (Step 4) Total costs to account for (Step 5) Assignment of costs: Completed and transferred out (5,250 units) Work in process, ending (1,000 units) Total costs accounted for Total Production Costs $ 38,060 159,600 ÷ 5,250 $ 4.80 ÷ 6,250 $ 20 ÷ 5,650 $ 8.40 Conversion Costs $ 9,060 38,400 $47,460 (5,250*× $20) + (5,250*× $4.80) + (5,250*× $8.40) (1,000†× $20) + (0† × $4.80 ) + (400† × $8.40) Direct Materials $ 0 25,200 $25,200 Transferred -in Costs $ 29,000 96,000 $125,000 SOLUTIO EXHIBIT 17-40B Steps 3, 4, and 5: Compute Cost per Equivalent Unit, Summarize Total Costs to Account For, and Assign Total Costs to Units Completed and to Units in Ending Work in Process; Weighted-Average Method of Process Costing, Drying and Packaging Department of Frito-Lay Inc. for Week 37. SOLUTIO EXHIBIT 17-40C Steps 1 and 2: Summarize Output in Physical Units and Compute Output in Equivalent Units; FIFO Method of Process Costing, Drying and Packaging Department of Frito-Lay Inc. for Week 37. Flow of Production Work in process, beginning (given) Transferred-in during current period (given) To account for Completed and transferred out during current period: From beginning work in process§ 1,250 × (100% − 100%); 1,250 × (100% − 0%); 1,250 × (100% − 80%) Started and completed 4,000 × 100%; 4,000 × 100%; 4,000 × 100% Work in process, ending* (given) 1,000 × 100%; 1,000 × 0%; 1,000 × 40% Accounted for Work done in current period only § (Step 1) Physical Units 1,250 5,000 6,250 (Step 2) Equivalent Units TransferredDirect Conversion in Costs Materials Costs (work done before current period) 1,250 0 1,250 250 4,000 4,000 4,000 1,000 0 400 5,000 5,250 4,650 4,000† 1,000 6,250 Degree of completion in this department: Transferred-in costs, 100%; direct materials, 0%; conversion costs, 80%. 5,250 physical units completed and transferred out minus 1,250 physical units completed and transferred out from beginning work-in-process inventory. *Degree of completion in this department: transferred-in costs, 100%; direct materials, 0%; conversion costs, 40%. † 17-10 $ 37,980 8,065 46,045 127,432 173,477 22,103 $195,580 $195,580 $ 37,980 157,600 † 17-11 Direct Materials Conversion Costs ÷ 5,250 $ 4.80 ÷ 4,650 $ 8.258 (1,000# × $18.80) + (0# × $4.80) + (400# × $8.258) (4,000† × $18.80) + (4,000† × $4.80) + (4,000† × $8.258) (0* × $18.80) + (1,250* × $4.80) + (250* × $8.258) ÷ 5,000 $ 18.80 (Costs of work done before current period) $94,000 $25,200 $38,400 Transferred -in Costs Equivalent units used to complete beginning work in process from Solution Exhibit 17-40C, Step 2. Equivalent units started and completed from Solution Exhibit 17-40C, Step 2. # Equivalent units in work in process, ending from Solution Exhibit 17-40C, Step 2. * Total costs accounted for Work in process, beginning ($9,060 + $0 + $28,920) (Step 3) Costs added in current period (given) Divide by equivalent units of work done in current period (Solution Exhibit 17-40C) Cost per equiv. unit of work done in current period (Step 4) Total costs to account for (Step 5) Assignment of costs: Completed and transferred out (5,250 units): Work in process, beginning (1,250 units) Costs added to beg. work in process in current period Total from beginning inventory Started and completed (4,000 units) Total costs of units completed & transferred out Work in process, ending (1,000 units) Total Production Costs SOLUTIO EXHIBIT 17-40D Steps 3, 4, and 5: Compute Cost per Equivalent Unit, Summarize Total Costs to Account For, and Assign Total Costs to Units Completed and to Units in Ending Work in Process; FIFO Method of Process Costing, Drying and Packaging Department of Frito-Lay Inc. for Week 37.
© Copyright 2024 Paperzz