AUCKLAND COUNCIL WEONA COASTAL WALKWAY VEGETATION ASSESSMENT OF THE COASTAL TRACK SECTION. Auckland Council Weona Coastal Walkway Vegetation Assessment of the Coastal Track Section. SEPTEMBER 2012 FOR : AUCKLAND COUNCIL BY : BIORESEARCHES GROUP LTD Graham Don, M.Sc Hons Rhys Gardner, Ph.D CONTENTS Page No. 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1 2 VEGETATION AND FLORA .................................................................................... 4 3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................... 6 1 1 INTRODUCTION It is proposed to form a walkway around the Westmere coast on the eastern side of the Motions Creek inlet, from Lemington Reserve to Weona Reserve and on to Garnet Road. Its easternmost c. 250 m, from Lemington Reserve to a point of relatively high ground below the eastern arm of Sunnybrae Crescent (Nos 24/26), passes through coastal scrub that lies between the residential properties and a mangrove-filled inlet. This report only describes the vegetation along the easternmost c. 250 m of Stage III of the walkway. The assessment was undertaken in order to determine whether formation of a walkway might have any adverse botanical effects. The City of Auckland – District Plan Isthmus Section – Operative 1999 lists the “Weona/Lemington Coastal Edge Forest” as a Significant Ecological Area (SEA) in its Appendix C. The areas contributing to the SEA are as follows from the Plan – ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION CATEGORY MAP REF. Weona / Lemington Coastal Edge Forest 40a Lemington Road (Lemington Reserve) Lot 103 DP 20641; Pt Allot 10 Sec 9 Suburbs of Auckland; Lot 4 DP 48055 A C05-22 Adj 60a Sunny Brae Crescent Accessway to Lot 4 DP 48055 A C05-22 36 Westmere Park Avenue (Westmere Park) Lot 1 DP 20641 A C05-22 A review of Council information on this area was undertaken but there was no explanation of the reason for its registration as an SEA. As a precaution a botanical survey was recommended by the Feasibility Assessment report (Bioresearches, September 2012)a to determine whether any significant species or plant communities would be affected. The proposed route more or less follows an existing unformed foot-track. Most of it is situated a short way above the high tide level but rises to c. 10 m above sea level at the point below Sunnybrae Crescent (which is where the inlet up to Lemington Road reaches the main part of the Motions Creek estuary). [a Bioresearches, September 2012 An Ecological Feasibility Assessment of the Proposed Weona Reserve Walkway Development at Westmere. 27pp. (For Auckland Council)] 2 The route is indicated on the plan “Weona Coastal Walkway Stage 3 Detailed Plan, April 2012, Frame Group Ltd” (Figure 1). It was marked out on the ground by tape and pegs prior to this survey being undertaken. 3 Figure 1. Weona Coastal Walkway- Stage III. 4 2 VEGETATION AND FLORA 2.1. The first 30 m or so of the route (at c. 681 m) passes across relatively open ground, above a willow-filled watercourse. Onion weed (Allium triquetrum) is the principal ground cover, through which small shrubs of Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) and other exotic herbaceous and woody species are scattered. There are no significant native botanical values here. 2.2. The route then enters tall coastal scrub, and this kind of vegetation carries on mostly continuous and uniform for the next c. 220 m. The canopy is generally at c. 5–8 m high and its composition is equally divided between exotic and native tree species. Most abundant among the former are shining privet (Ligustrum lucidum) and hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna). No very old individuals of either species were noted, but a fair number reach c. 12 m tall and 20 cm dbh (diameter at breast height). The largest natives here are kowhai (Sophora chathamica), the half dozen or so trees seen reaching a similar size to the privet and hawthorn. All seem to be in good health and were flowering copiously at the time of survey. Much more frequent than kowhai is mapou (Myrsine australis). It is the more common regenerant too and can be considered the characteristic native tree of the site. Coastal fivefinger (Pseudopanax lessonii) is common; some drawn-up individuals reach c. 8 m tall but mostly it forms large sprawling bushes. Karo (Pittosporum crassifolium) is also common, although no large trees of it were seen. At several places towards the edge of the house-properties upslope, silver tree fern (Cyathea dealbata) of up to c. 8 m tall forms dense groves, but this species is relatively uncommon as a regenerant in the privet-mapou stands. The native understorey, shrub and ground layers of this scrub have largely been replaced by weeds, particularly climbing asparagus (Asparagus scandens). However, as noted, mapou is regenerating well and hangehange (Geniostoma ligustrifolium) is common in the least degraded places. In these places, hookgrass (Uncinia uncinata) is frequent along with the native sedges Carex lambertiana and C. flagellifera, and 5 scattered, not particularly extensive, colonies of the ferns Doodia media, Phymatosorus pustulatus, Asplenium lucidum and A. flaccidum. Other native species seen within 5 m each side of the proposed route in the coastal scrub were: Coprosma grandifolia (uncommon), Coprosma lucida (locally common), Coprosma macrocarpa var. minor (uncommon, no large trees), cabbage tree (Cordyline australis), cutty grass (Gahnia lacera), mingimingi (Leucopogon fasciculatus; juveniles only), mahoe (Melicytus ramiflorus; uncommon; no old trees seen), pohuehue (Muehlenbeckia complexa), flax (Phormium tenax), leather leaf fern (Pyrrosia eleagnifolia) and kauri sedge (Schoenus tendo). 2.3. Manuka (Leptospermum scoparium) occurs only at one low-lying place (half a dozen or so young individuals, to c. 3 m tall 5 cm dbh). Kanuka (Kunzea ericoides), karaka (Corynocarpus laevigatus), pohutukawa (Metrosideros excelsa) and kawakawa (Macropiper excelsum) are absent. 2.4. The above composition of native species defines the site as one of fairly low fertility that is subject to droughty periods. 6 3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3.1. None of the native species along the proposed route is uncommon in the Auckland region or the Tamaki Ecological District. 3.2. The proposed route stays well clear of the site's best botanical feature, its several large kowhai trees. It hardly seems worthwhile to uplift, remove offsite and grow on the rather few saplings the route passes over, but when the track is being formed such plants could be translocated wherever they are encountered. 3.3. Where the route passes between closely adjacent canopy trees, it will be necessary to fell one of them. The choice is usually between hawthorn, shining privet and mapou. The former two species do provide habitat for puriri moth larvae (that are not of conservation concern) but are so common here as to make felling them (rather than mapou) the right choice. Because the regrowth of hawthorn is very thorny, any cut stumps of it should be treated with herbicide. 3.4. Construction and use of a track through this section of coastal vegetation would not diminish its botanical values or reduce its significance as a Significant Ecological Area. The presence of the walkway is likely to result in a higher degree of pest plant control and general vegetation maintenance than occurs at present and that would be a positive ecological effect. GD/1283 WEONA WALKWAY VEGETATION ASSESSMENT REPORT 25 SEPTEMBER 2012
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz