International Conference „CONTROLLING in SMEs– beyond numbers“, April 25, 2014, Prague MODELLING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ADDED VALUE CONTROLLING IN SMALL AND MIDDLE ENTERPRISES CONTINUITY Jiří F. Urbánek* and David Král, STING Academy in Brno, *University of Defence Brno, Czech Republic Resources: ISO 9001-4: 2000/2008; UML - Unified Modelling Language + UP - Unified Processes © DYVELOP Dynamic Vector Logistics of Processes Friendly Language for the Analysis, Evaluation, Heuristics, Modelling, Simulation, Scenarios and Engineering of any Entity´s Relationships in a Blazon © on Process Scene (Theatre). Entity is it what exists, or what is possible to imagine even in human mind on any scene. Dominance is predominant aspect on the scene Domains = real time, space and environments, are dominant entities absolutely independent on a controlling of human perception. Environment (ENV © ) is entity´s 1st kind, having a role of principal domain of any scene without defined controlling actor. Process System (PrS©) is entity´s 2nd kind, having a role of a transformation of inputting things to outputting new-things and its external controlling actor operates from its defined ENV. Five types of the PrS are: managementPrS / commonPrS / logisticPrS / eventPrS / operationalPrS, differing by their composition & controlling actors. © CASE is entity´s 3rd kind, having a role of a complex situational set of process´s entities, requiring the purpose or action fruition in certain circumstances and conditions, according its inherent controlling actor, from of whose perspective it is initiated and composed. Two types are: a use CASE / a activity CASE, differing by their compositions & controlling actors. Operation© represents the chains/nets of many entities and processes, running in dominant real time & ENVs, needing a work of process factors (agents, actors, participants…). Scenario is formal record of the operations on scene & arena environments. Scene is exact specified framework of scenario entities. Libretto is one-sentence scenarios summary. Arena is spatial specified framework of scenario entities. Scenery represents instant perception of the scene and arena. Event is manifestation of operational scene of PrSs realization, as well as situational symptom or occurrence of the CASE. Circumstance affects and guides event´s processes. Map is survey arrangement of entity´s portfolio. Blazon© is scenic meta-model, representing the entities´ roles, semantics and namely their relationships in pictographic mind maps, similar to relationship´s expressions in nobility blazons. Interface is relative domain, symbolising (defined and demarcated) typological differences among entities. Situation characterizes quality, state, case, frame, events, circumstances, attributes, symptoms, constitution, arrangement, disposition, organization and behaviour of process´ entities portfolio in defined environments. Controlling is generalized capability to have control over situational policy. Controlling actor is an executor of controlling functions. ©Jiří F. Urbánek, 1998 ENV XYZ (3D) DYVLOP Entity´s SEMANTIC RELATIONS, using Boolean algebra operators: ´ AND, &´, , , ´OR´, /, , Interface of a negation ´NOT´, , x DYVLOP Entity´s STRUCTURAL RELATIONS, using common flow-lines: the Association the Dependency the Generalization the Realization space real time PrS of Thing´s Transformation (defined) ENV X STAKEHOLDERs OPERATORs Ctrling INTERFACE PrS of Things‚ Transformation x/y z/t MNGMNT logisticPrS (pentagonal symbol) managementPrS (triangular symbol) LAWs of NATURE EVENT eventPrS (hexagonal symbol) commonPrS (tetragonal symbol) PROCESS´ MANAGERS The OPERATION operationalPrS (hepta/&moregonal symbol) Material subsystem Control subs. Information subsystem space Material subs. controllingActor = Semiproduct real time Information subs. controllingActor = Plan Activity CASE© (globoid symbol) Use CASE© (corner rounded polygonal symbol) Process Cell CASE © (one puzzle) Producing Value Added (VA) controllingActor = DIRECTOR to do InputBatch a/b meta PrS ENV XYZ space information real time to do Output c/d a b c d ≠ output batch t1 c1/d1 Distributing phase t2 Consuming phase 3 Pmax Pmin t3 Recycling phase 4 a b c d real time t4 VA on Product Life Cycle ´funnel´ model c h a n g e Doing QualitativeChange Producing phase 1 a0/b0 h i n g s x/y t0 2 input batch LogisticCONTROLLING z/w via 100% VAi T viaLogisticINTERFACE 0 quantitative TransfomationCONTROLLING Dominance qualitative Controlling x yz w Logistic Flow ´pipeline´ model Controlling Dominance tg dVA dt TRANS VA TRANS a b c d VA on Product Life Cycle ´funel´ model c h a n g e x/y Logistic controlling Interface = Ćontrolling Actor z/w Pt *100[%] Pmax Pmin = 0; x/y …sourcing batch ; z/w…targeting batch VAt h i n g s q qu ua a ll ii tt a a tt ii vv e e ... than VAt VATRANS VALOGIS ai /bi, VA...process Value Added; 0;100% process transformation rate 0; ; 2 1; ci /di …product´s batches; P…price -; + ; if 0 LOGISTIC COTROLLING T viaLogisticINTERFACE via quantitative TransfomationCONTROLLING if 0 than VAt VALOGIS x yz w Logistic Flow ´pipeline´ model International Conference „CONTROLLING in SMEs– beyond numbers“, April 25, 2014, Prague Conclusions A thesis „The controlling in SMEs - (is also) beyond numbers“ was confirmed. Here the Controlling is taken as a „generalized capability to have control over situational policy“. Controlling actor is an executor of controlling functions, being as quite new necessary process attribute, providing the capability and profit for SMSs - to live (or just survive) in global competitiveness environment. The continual improvement of SME´s transformation and logistic processes and their overall performance, efficiency and quality increasing, as well as their continual planning improvement, they all are derived from: - a value (process transformation rate) evaluation as a quite new and purposeful production controlling actor and - controlling interface (crossing fluent flow of batches productivity) as a practical logistic controlling actor. Jiří F. Urbánek* and David Král, STING Academy in Brno, *University of Defence Brno, Czech Republic International Conference „CONTROLLING in SMEs– beyond numbers“, April 25, 2014, Prague Conclusions In competitive environments, the sustainable development of SMEs is necessary that the PLC´s continuity must be repeated without end, even in crisis situations, resulting from natural, man-made or economic disturbances and crisis. The continuity of a never-ending SME´s Product Life Cycles (PLCs) must be ensured through the Business Continuity Management [ISO/DIS 22 301-303: 2012], through the Continuity and Crisis Scenarios [Urbánek, J. F., Král, D. et al. Crisis Scenarios. Brno: University of Defence, Monika Promotion Ltd. 2013, ISBN 978-80-7231-934-3], delivering an adequate level of Societal Security. PLCs continuity must be repeated without end - must continue by the never-ending cycling! However, this problem can be discussed in the next paper. I thank you for your interest. Jiří F. Urbánek* and David Král, STING Academy in Brno, *University of Defence Brno, Czech Republic Terrorist Threats Phases*: Peril Abundance Ratio* t0* principalActor* = unidentified TERRORIST* PAR*0=0 (PARt) PARmin= 0 1 t s* PARmax= 100% t1* 2 Functioning * Crisis Culmination t2* FirstResponders PerformOperation* Standard* geared FR Launching* Settling* 3 t3* tsc* Restoring* tf* 4 t4* time First* life cycle of new terroristic threats birth i** = (4; 5; 6; 7; 8); PAR*max PAR6**; PAR4 ** PAR8 ** Terrorist Threats Phases**: PAR*max EU SecurityCorps AwarenessOperation** 5 6 t5 Restoring** t4** Actor**= NEW TERRORIST** PAR*4= PAR**4 0 56; Functioning * * Settling ** t7 Special* * geared EU FR 7 Standard* geared Nat FR IntropFirstRespsPerformOperation** t6 EU Crisis** Scene Interface Tracing up** 8 t8** EU Repressive** ENV II R8** EU Awareness** ENV III time Second** life cycle of terroristic peril in EU PAR8** = PAR8*** PAR PAR12***
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz