WP/09/54
Foreign Banks in the CESE Countries:
In for a Penny, in for a Pound?
Andrea M. Maechler and Li Lian Ong
© 2009 International Monetary Fund
WP/09/54
IMF Working Paper
Monetary and Capital Markets Department
Foreign Banks in the CESE Countries: In for a Penny, in for a Pound?
Prepared by Andrea M. Maechler and Li Lian Ong1
Authorized for distribution by Daniel Hardy
March 2009
Abstract
This Working Paper should not be reported as representing the views of the IMF.
The views expressed in this Working Paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily
represent those of the IMF or IMF policy. Working Papers describe research in progress by the
author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to further debate.
The aim of this paper is to construct a comprehensive and consistent dataset to analyze the
potential risks from foreign bank lending, for both the creditor and borrower countries of
Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe (CESE). We develop a picture of bank claims on
13 CESE countries by combining credit statistics from several sources. Our constructed data
suggest that some of these host countries have become more at risk from a sudden
withdrawal of short-term external funding, while home countries have significant aggregate
exposures to the region. Overall, we find that data on banking activity remain largely
inadequate for surveillance and policymaking purposes, and that a concerted effort to
improve data collection is needed at the international level.
JEL Classification Numbers: F3; F4; G2
Keywords: Contagion; cross-border claims, home, host, local affiliates of foreign banks
Authors’ E-Mail Addresses: [email protected]; [email protected]
1
The authors would like to thank Nada Choueiri, Daniel Hardy, Martin Muhleisen, Inci Otker-Robe, and
Christopher Towe; colleagues in the European Department at the IMF; and counterparts at the Austrian National
Bank, Bank of Estonia, Bank of Lithuania, Czech National Bank, National Bank of Poland , and Sveriges riksbank
for their very helpful comments; Patricia Gillett and Kalin Tintchev for excellent research assistance; and Brenda
Sylvester for invaluable administrative support.
2
Contents
Page
Glossary .....................................................................................................................................4
I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................5
II. The Data ................................................................................................................................8
A. Derivation of the Components of Bank Claims ........................................................8
B. Selection of Home and Host Countries ...................................................................12
III. Stylized Facts: An Analysis of the Data ............................................................................13
A. Local and Foreign Banks’ Claims on All Sectors...................................................13
B. Local and Foreign Banks’ Claims on the Private Sector ........................................18
IV. A Quantification of Home and Host “Exposures”.............................................................23
A. Short-Term Exposures ............................................................................................23
B. Longer-Term Exposures..........................................................................................29
V. Other Considerations...........................................................................................................32
A. Possible Implications of Banks’ Funding Sources..................................................32
B. Data Shortcomings and Areas for Improvement.....................................................33
VI. Concluding Remarks .........................................................................................................37
References................................................................................................................................61
Tables
1.
CESE: Claims of Foreign Banks on Major Host Countries, as at End-2007...............12
2.
CESE: Claims of Foreign Banks of Major Home Countries, as at End-2007 .............13
3.
CESE: Share of Total Foreign Bank Claims on Select Host Countries
as at End- 2007.............................................................................................................15
4.
CESE: Share of Total Foreign Bank Claims of Home Countries, as at End-2007......16
5.
CESE-13: Changes in the Maturity Structure of Total Foreign Bank Claims on
Select Host Countries, March 2005–December 2007..................................................17
6.
CESE-13: Changes in the Sectoral Structure of Total Foreign Bank Claims on
Select Host Countries, March 2005–December 2007..................................................20
7.
CESE-13: Quantification of Short-Term Foreign Bank Claims on the Nonbank
Private and Banking Sectors, by Sub-Region, as at End-2007 ....................................28
8.
CESE-13: Quantification of Longer-Term Foreign Bank Claims on the Nonbank
Private and Banking Sectors, by Sub-Region, as at End-2007 ....................................31
9.
Bank Claims: Stocktake of Data Availability and Sources .........................................36
A.1. Bank Claims: Summary of Data Series, Sources and Calculations .............................45
A.2. CESE-13: A Quantification of Short-Term Foreign Bank Claims on the Nonbank
Private Sector, by Home and Host Countries, as at End-2007 ....................................57
A.3. CESE-13: A Quantification of Short-Term Foreign Bank Claims on the Banking
Sector, by Home and Host Countries, as at End-2007.................................................58
A.4. CESE-13: A Quantification of Longer-Term Foreign Bank Claims on the Nonbank
3
A.5.
Private Sector, by Home and Host Countries, as at End-2007 ....................................59
CESE-13: A Quantification of Longer-Term Foreign Bank Claims on the Banking
Sector, by Home and Host Countries, as at End-2007.................................................60
Figures
1.
Components of Bank Claims on a Country .................................................................10
2.
Bank Claims Dataset Constructed From BIS and IFS Statistics..................................10
3.
CESE-13: Composition of Bank Claims on the Nonbank Private and Banking Sectors
by Sub-Region .............................................................................................................21
4.
CESE-13: Composition of Short-Term Foreign Bank Claims on the Nonbank Private
and Banking Sectors, by Sub-Region ..........................................................................26
5.
CESE New Member States: Loan-to-Deposit Ratio....................................................33
6.
CESE New Member States: Total Assets of Foreign Bank Branches and Subsidiaries33
A.1. CESE-13: Composition of Foreign Bank Claims on the Nonbank Private and Banking
Sectors, by Host Country .............................................................................................47
A.2. CESE-13: Composition of Short-Term Foreign Bank Claims on the Nonbank Private
and Banking Sectors, by Host Country........................................................................52
Boxes
1.
Deriving the Components of Bank Claims from BIS and IFS Data ............................11
2.
Discrepancies Among Sources of Banking Claims Data: The Estonia Example ........35
A.1. BIS Consolidated Banking Data ..................................................................................46
Appendices
I.
A Comparison of Data on Foreign Bank Claims .........................................................38
II.
Derivation of the Aggregate Claims Components on Host Countries.........................39
III.
CESE-13: Composition of Bank Claims on the Private Sector, by Host Country ......47
IV.
CESE-13: Composition of Short-Term Foreign Bank Claims on the Private Sector,
by Host Country...........................................................................................................52
V.
CESE-13: A Quantification of Foreign Bank Claims on the Private Sector, by Home
and Host Countries.......................................................................................................57
4
GLOSSARY
Baltics
CEE
CESE
CESE-13
Home country
Host country
LAFBs
OEE
SEE
Baltic countries (comprising Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania)
Central and Eastern Europe (comprising Czech Republic, Hungary,
Poland, Slovak Republic)
Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe (comprising Bulgaria,
Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland,
Romania, Russia, Slovak Republic, Turkey and Ukraine, plus Albania,
Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cyprus, Macedonia, Malta,
Moldova, Montenegro and Serbia)
Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia,
Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovak Republic, Turkey and
Ukraine
Creditor country to CESE
CESE debtor country
Local affiliates of foreign banks (i.e., local branches or subsidiaries)
Other Emerging Europe (Russia and Turkey)
South-Eastern Europe (Bulgaria, Croatia, Romania, Ukraine)
5
I. INTRODUCTION
The ongoing turbulence in global financial markets has highlighted the need for
comprehensive and detailed data to monitor cross-country exposures in an increasingly
integrated international financial system. The tightness in global liquidity conditions and
sharp revisions in the pricing of risk have increased the possibility of a sudden stop or
reversal in foreign-based lending to some emerging market countries.2 In this environment, it
has become increasingly crucial that policymakers and supervisors have sufficient
information to adequately assess banks’ risk management strategies, and formulate crisis
prevention and management policies. In Central, Eastern, and South-Eastern Europe (CESE),
rapid credit growth in recent years—largely attributable to the expansion activities of
international banking groups and with substantial funding from abroad—has clearly
increased the region’s vulnerability to financial risks.3
The presence of foreign banks has typically been considered a positive development in
emerging market countries.4 In addition to promulgating more efficient allocation of capital,
they also increase competition and improve the quality of financial services. In the CESE
region, for instance, many banks are owned by reputable, well-capitalized banks from the
EU-15 countries, which should provide banks with a second line of defense—after own
financial strength—against potential shocks.5 In deteriorating market environment, for
instance, banks with the support of healthy, well-diversified foreign parents may be betterplaced than local banks to weather the downturn. Additionally, the reputation risk to these
international banks also deters against any damaging actions in a particular country or group
of countries.6
However, as the current global financial crisis demonstrates, even the major international
banks are not immune to the sharp reversal in the credit cycle and the attendant fallout from
the widespread liquidity crunch. In many of the Western countries, governments have had to
provide support packages to boost banks’ capitalization and retain confidence in their own
financial systems. The banking systems in CESE, which had largely eschewed subprime
loans and more exotic credit products, had been able to side-step the problems that befell
2
See Reinhart and Kaminsky (2001) for a discussion on the pullout of foreign bank lending during the Asian
Crisis.
3
See Backe, Reininger, and Walko (2006); and Sorsa and others (2007).
4
See Giannetti and Ongena (2007); and Haas and Lelyveld (2004).
5
6
See Arcalean and others (2007).
For some home countries (e.g., Austria), the heavy involvement of their own non-financial enterprises in the
CESE region provides significant incentive for the international banking groups to ensure the ongoing provision
of banking services to the region.
6
their Western counterparts until recently. However, some spillovers from the turbulence in
international markets have manifested in recent months, in the shape of increasing tightness
in liquidity and credit conditions, and rising credit risk.
The latest developments are not surprising given the experience from previous crises which
demonstrated the potential for contagion across countries through their exposures to common
creditors.7 Although the extent and depth of the impact on CESE remain unclear at this point,
increased integration by CESE countries into international financial markets and the high
share of foreign ownership in their banking systems may increase their susceptibility to the
risk of cross border contagion.8 The concentration of borrowing from a handful of creditor
countries has also increased the region’s vulnerability to idiosyncratic shocks from these
countries and/or business decisions by individual parent banks. Conversely, the increasing
importance of CESE countries in the portfolios of creditor banks has also heightened the risk
of a feedback effect on home countries, especially if regional contagion occurs.
In recent years, much of the research on credit growth in CESE has focused on country
experiences with the rapid expansion in bank lending, notably by foreign banks. Work in this
area has largely centered on the policy measures taken to address this phenomenon, and the
roles of supervision and regulation in mitigating the associated risks.9 There has been little
empirical work done to quantify the extent of foreign versus local bank lending—and the
composition of that lending— in the region’s markets, and the potential impact to both host
and home countries of a sudden reversal in foreign bank lending to the region.10 Indeed,
shortcomings in existing international credit databases have made it difficult to properly
assess the risks and exposures associated with foreign banks in CESE for surveillance and
risk management purposes.11
Thus, the objective of our paper is to develop a comprehensive and consistent dataset to
analyze the risks associated with bank credit flows in the CESE region. First, we attempt to
put together a more comprehensive picture of private bank claims on individual CESE
7
See Kaminsky and Reinhart (2000); Kaminsky, Reinhart, and Vegh, (2003); and Van Rijckeghem and Weder
(2001).
8
See Gersl (2007). In countries such as Croatia, Estonia, and the Czech and Slovak Republics, foreign-owned
banks account for more than 90 percent of total banking sector assets; foreign banks hold more than two-thirds
of banking assets in Hungary, Lithuania and Poland.
9
See Enoch and Otker-Robe (2007) for examples of research in these areas.
10
Enoch (2007) provides a detailed discussion as to why the issue of rapid credit growth is a particularly
difficult topic to address.
11
See Appendix I for a more detailed discussion on the different aspects of private sector credit that various
databases capture.
7
countries using a combination of more standardized international databases.12 Specifically,
we use the claims data of foreign banks, as reported in the BIS’ Consolidated Banking
Statistics, supplemented with credit data from the International Financial Statistics (IFS) of
the International Monetary Fund (IMF).13 Next, we use this derived dataset to demonstrate a
simple quantification of the potential maximum losses from a regional contagion, for both
home and host countries of CESE. Specifically, we estimate the possible maximum size of a
funding shock on host countries, and the maximum possible losses to home country banks
from a regional contagion.14 We find that host countries in CESE have become more at risk
from a sudden withdrawal of short-term foreign claims, while home countries have
significant aggregate “captive” exposures to the region as a whole.
Our paper complements that of Arvai, Driessen, and Otker-Robe (2009). The authors use BIS
data to develop simple indices of exposure to regional contagion in order to identify pressure
points and assess the magnitude of cross-border exposures between emerging and Western
European countries. The authors also describe in detail the possible propagation channels of
regional shocks. They show that financial inter-linkages within Europe are economically
important, and that even where exposures are well-diversified, potential economic and
financial spillovers increases the overall exposure quite considerably.
Our analysis of the constructed dataset highlights the importance of the increasing interlinkages between home and host countries of CESE, and emphasizes the need for more
complete and better quality data for surveillance and policymaking purposes. Although the
use of a combination of data sources provides a more detailed picture of the composition of
foreign versus local credit for a particular country, discrepancies persist. Issues such as the
incompleteness of reporting countries and banks, inconsistencies in the availability of like
data series across countries, and differences in the definition and collection of data contribute
to their lack of reliability and comparability. The existing international databases are
inadequate for cross-border surveillance and policymaking, and a concerted effort is required
at the international level to improve data collection.
It should be noted that this paper does not presume to speculate about the ability of home and
host countries to absorb shocks and feedback effects to their respective banking systems. The
vulnerability of a country to any shock would depend on the strength of its macroeconomic
12
In this paper, we group the 13 CESE countries in our sample into the Baltic sub-region of Estonia, Latvia, and
Lithuania; the Central and Eastern European (CEE) sub-region of the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and the
Slovak Republic; the Southeastern European (SEE) sub-region of Bulgaria, Croatia, Romania, and Ukraine; and
the Other Emerging Europe (OEE) grouping of Russia and Turkey.
13
See McGuire and Wooldridge (2005) for a detailed discussion on the structure of the BIS consolidated
banking statistics.
14
Possible contagion channels are discussed in detail in Arvai, Driessen, and Otker-Robe (2009).
8
fundamentals, the general soundness of its financial system and institutions, and the capacity
of its contingency plans to absorb any sudden and significant stress. Nor do we assess the
probability of a shock of any given magnitude or the macroeconomic feedback mechanisms.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section II describes the dataset and provides a
brief description as to how it is constructed. Section III discusses the stylized facts on the
composition of claims on the CESE countries, followed by a quantification of home and host
country “exposures” to each other in Section IV. Section V concludes.
II. THE DATA
In CESE, the expansion of foreign banks into host countries, and the volume and persistence
of credit financing had largely been attributable to positive developments in macroeconomic
policy settings, structural reforms, and the strong positive economic outlook for the region. In
the early days of transition, the growth in credit had largely been attributable to the public
sector. In recent years, however, credit to the private sector has become the dominant
component, posting very strong rates of growth to both the corporate and household sectors.
Associated with this changing trend is the expansion in direct cross-border borrowing,
notably by creditworthy corporates which are able to access cheaper funding overseas.15
Meanwhile, foreign currency borrowing by households—largely through local affiliates of
foreign banks (LAFBs)—has also been growing in some countries, with demand driven by
lower foreign interest rates relative to those for local currency loans. Short-term direct crossborder claims (typically in foreign currency) by foreign banks represent an important source
of liquidity risk to the local financial system.
A. Derivation of the Components of Bank Claims
In order to better examine the structure of banks’ claims and their implications for financial
stability, we first construct a dataset of bank claims on the private sector for selected CESE
countries. We supplement the consolidated banking statistics from the BIS with data from the
IFS of the IMF to derive the four components of bank claims on a particular country, where
“foreign bank claims” are defined as the cross-border claims of foreign banks and the local
claims of LAFBs in all currencies (Figure 1):
•
Direct cross-border claims of foreign banks on the host country. This category
captures all foreign bank claims that are extended by the parent banks or other thirdparties (i.e., unaffiliated) foreign banks on a cross-border basis (“A”).16
15
See, for instance, Lang (2007) on Croatia; and Popa (2007) on Romania.
16
We assume these claims to be denominated in foreign currency.
9
•
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency. These claims are the foreign exchange
component of credit extended by LAFBs in the host country (“B”).
•
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency. This category represents credit extended in
local currency by the LAFBs in the host economy (“C”).
•
Local claims of local banks. This category covers loans extended by domesticallyowned banks in the host country (“E”).17
In this paper, we focus on the composition of bank claims on the nonbank private sector.
These comprise the share of claims on the nonbank private sector that is held by local banks,
LAFBs and banks located in the home country. In order to more accurately reflect where the
risks associated with foreign claims reside, we use BIS data on ultimate risk basis where
available. Where necessary, we apply explicit assumptions to the BIS data on immediate
borrower basis to bridge gaps in the ultimate risk data (Box 1).18 The extent to which these
claims are funded through (non-parent) inter-bank loans, as opposed to other sources such as
domestic deposits or capital markets, are also examined using BIS data. Claims by (nonparent) foreign banks on the banking sector of host countries are also analyzed.
We examine the maturity structure of foreign bank claims to obtain a clearer picture of the
potential liquidity risk faced by a particular host country, and the risk to asset quality. To do
so, we decompose the claims into short-term (maturity of one year or less) and longer-term
maturities (maturity greater than one year). The determination of short-term claims allows us
to quantify the host countries’ vulnerability to a sudden withdrawal of funding. Separately,
the quantification of longer-term claims helps us to estimate foreign banks’ exposures to
credit risk, that is, the deterioration of longer-term “captive” claims of foreign banks on host
countries, following the initial liquidity shock of a sharp withdrawal of short-term claims.
The full complement of data series derived for our analysis is presented in Figure 2.
17
In the absence of information on the currency composition of this type of credit, we are not able to
differentiate between foreign currency and local currency loans by these banks.
18
See Appendix II, Sections A–E for details of calculations and assumptions.
Figure 1. Components of Bank Claims on a Country
Local claims
of local banks
(E)
Total credit to "recipient" countries
(A + B + C + E)
Total claims of a foreign banking group
(A + B + C + D)
Foreign claims
(A + B + C)
Local claims of the banking group's
foreign offices
Domestic claims of
(B + C)
Cross-border
the banking group's
claims (A)
domestic offices
Local claims in
Local claims in
(D)
foreign currency
local currency
(B)
(C)
International claims
(A + B)
Available from BIS, on ultimate risk basis.
Derived from BIS immediate borrower and ultimate risk data.
Derived from BIS ultimate risk and IFS data.
10
Source: Bank for International Settlements.
Figure 2. Bank Claims Dataset Constructed From BIS and IFS Statistics
All claims on a country
Claims of foreign banks (BIS)
Claims of local banks
Cross-border claims (BIS, ultimate risk)
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency (BIS, ultimate risk)
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency (BIS, immediate borrower)
Local claims of local banks (IFS)
Banking
(BIS and authors' calculations)
Non-bank private
(BIS and authors' calculations)
Short-term
(BIS and authors' calculations)
Source: Authors’ calculations.
Longer-term
(BIS and authors' calculations)
Short-term
(BIS and authors' calculations)
Non-bank private
(IFS)
Longer-term
(BIS and authors' calculations)
11
Box 1. Deriving the Components of Bank Claims from BIS and IFS Data
We use a combination of BIS and IFS data to construct the different components of bank claims on a
particular country. Within the BIS database, statistics are available on ultimate risk and immediate
borrower bases, and a combination of both is applied in our derivations of claims by foreign and local
banks on a host country.
For the purposes of our calculations, BIS claims data are available on an ultimate risk basis for (i) total
foreign claims; (ii) cross-border claims of foreign banks; and (iii) all local claims of LAFBs; data is
available on an immediate borrower basis for: local claims of LAFBs in local currency:
1.
In order to separate the local claims of LAFBs into local and foreign currency series, we make
the assumption that the local claims of LAFBs in local currency on immediate borrower basis
are equal to the local claims of LAFBs on ultimate risk basis. Thus, we are able to derive the
following:
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency = All local claims of LAFBs –
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency.
2.
Next, we derive the local claims of local banks on the nonbank private sector. The IFS statistics
reports the claims of all depository institutions in the country on the nonbank private sector.
The local claims of local banks series are equal to this IFS series less the BIS data on all claims
of LAFBs.
3.
Thus, we have the following four components that make up the claims on a particular country:
(i) cross border claims of foreign banks; (ii) local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency;
(iii) local claims of LAFBs in local currency; and (iv) local claims of local banks.
As a next step, we calculate the claims on the nonbank private and banking sectors. We apply BIS
sectoral data to determine each sector’s amount in each foreign claims component; the data is available
for total foreign claims on ultimate risk basis for the banking, nonbank private and public sectors. We
make the assumption that each sector’s proportion in total foreign claims is the same as that in each of
the components of foreign claims.
We subsequently quantify the short- and longer-term claims of foreign banks on the nonbank private and
banking sectors. BIS statistics report total international claims (direct cross-border claims plus local
claims of LAFBs in foreign currency) on an immediate borrower basis according to their maturities. We
make the assumption that each maturity’s proportion in total international claims on an immediate
borrower basis is the same as that for each component of foreign claims on an ultimate basis on each
sector, and apply the proportions to derive the short- and longer-term claims amounts.
12
B. Selection of Home and Host Countries
Our analysis focuses on the main 13 CESE (“CESE-13”) countries which account for around
90 percent of region’s total foreign exposures to BIS-reporting banks (Table 1). Some 75
percent of these exposures are concentrated in five host countries (Poland, 15 percent;
Russia, 14 percent; the Czech Republic, 11 percent; Turkey, 10 percent; and Hungary,
9 percent). Foreign banks have their smallest exposures to Bulgaria, Ukraine, and the Baltic
countries, each accounting for less than 3 percent of total foreign claims on the region.
We select our dataset of BIS-reporting home countries based on their importance as creditors
to CESE. To do so, we calculate the share of each home country’s exposure to the CESE
countries as a percentage of the former’s total claims on the latter (Table 2).19 We find
Austria to be by far the most important creditor country for CESE, accounting for almost
19 percent of foreign bank funding to the region, followed by Germany and Italy. The 13
countries in our sample account for 96 percent of CESE liabilities to BIS-reporting banks.
Table 1. CESE: Claims of Foreign Banks on Major Host Countries,
as at End-2007
Country
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Poland
Russia
Czech Republic
Turkey
Hungary
Romania
Croatia
Slovak Republic
Ukraine
Bulgaria
Estonia
Latvia
Lithuania
Others
In Percent of Total Foreign
Claims on the Region
15.2
13.9
11.4
9.9
9.2
7.4
6.2
5.1
2.9
2.2
2.1
2.0
1.8
10.8
In Percent of Host
Country's GDP
49.7
15.2
90.7
20.7
93.1
63.5
157.2
94.1
29.3
77.9
142.2
103.6
64.8
--
Sources: Bank for International Settlements; International Financial Statistics, IMF; and authors’ calculations.
19
This is estimated using Table 9D of BIS consolidated banking statistics on an ultimate risk basis.
13
Table 2. CESE: Claims of Foreign Banks of Major Home Countries,
as at End-2007
Country
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Greece
Austria
Italy
Sweden
Belgium
Germany
France
United States
Netherlands
Switzerland
United Kingdom
Japan
Others
In Percent of Home Country's
Total Foreign Claims
76.7
49.3
17.5
12.4
9.0
4.8
4.0
3.9
3.6
2.4
1.6
1.2
--
In Percent of Home
Country's GDP
In Percent of Total Foreign
Claims on the Region
21.9
70.0
9.1
18.6
26.3
6.0
5.3
0.1
11.0
14.5
2.3
0.1
--
4.9
18.6
13.6
6.0
8.5
14.2
9.8
4.5
6.1
4.3
3.5
1.8
4.1
Sources: Bank for International Settlements; International Financial Statistics, IMF; and authors’ calculations.
III. STYLIZED FACTS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE DATA
The nature of financial intermediation in CESE has changed considerably over a relatively
short period of time. There have been noticeable shifts in terms of the origination (foreign
versus domestic banks), currency (foreign versus local currency), sector (public versus
private) and maturity structure of bank claims. In this section, we present the stylized facts on
the total exposures of major creditor (home) countries to CESE, and discuss the extent of the
reliance of CESE countries on foreign bank lending, and the maturity structure of these
foreign claims. We subsequently focus on developments in foreign bank lending to the
private sector in the 13 most important host countries in CESE. All data presented are on an
ultimate risk basis, unless stated otherwise.
A. Local and Foreign Banks’ Claims on All Sectors20
The reliance of CESE host countries on foreign banks
The size of foreign bank claims on CESE countries are significant relative to their respective
GDPs (see Table 1). Moreover, these countries tend to rely on bank financing from a
relatively small number of creditor countries. In all, fewer than a dozen countries account for
more than 90 percent of total foreign claims on each CESE country (Table 3). Specifically:
20
The trends observed in our analysis of the foreign claims data in this section are consistent with that of Arvai,
Driessen, and Otker-Robe (2009). The authors examine BIS international claims data (cross-border claims and
local claims in foreign currency by LAFBs), which are available on an immediate borrower basis, while we
focus on total foreign claims on an ultimate risk basis.
14
•
Austria is the most important foreign creditor to the region. It accounts for the largest
share of total foreign bank claims in 6 of the 13 host (debtor) countries in our sample
(Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania, Slovak Republic, and Ukraine). In
some instances, Austria accounts for more than 35 percent of total foreign bank
borrowing by these countries. Austria also figures prominently in Bulgaria, despite
being the third largest foreign lender there, accounting for 16 percent of foreign
claims on the country.
•
Sweden’s lending to the CESE region is highly concentrated in the Baltic countries.
Indeed, Swedish banks have provided over 90 percent of Estonia’s foreign bank
funding and account for 78 percent of both Latvia’s and Lithuania’s total foreign
borrowings.
•
France, Germany, and Italy are important creditors to most of the CESE banking
systems. France is a major lender to almost all CESE countries—Estonia, Latvia, and
the Slovak Republic being the exceptions—accounting for between 19 percent of
foreign claims on Ukraine and around 1 percent for each of the Baltic countries. The
shares of German banks’ claims range from 24 percent of total foreign claims on
Hungary, to around 2 percent on Estonia, while Italian banks are important creditors
to numerous CEE and SEE countries.
•
Greece is the most important foreign creditor for Turkey and Bulgaria. It accounts for
28 and 20 percent of total foreign claims on each country, respectively. It also has a
presence in many countries in the region, albeit small.
The exposures of home countries to CESE
Correspondingly, the exposures of some home countries to CESE are very significant relative
to their total foreign claims and GDP (see Table 2). Overall, home countries tend to be most
exposed to the more developed countries in CESE (Table 4).
•
Austria has, by far, the biggest exposure to the region relative to the size of its own
economy. Total claims on CESE account for 49 percent of its total foreign claims, and
some 70 percent of GDP. For Greece banks, the CESE countries account for almost
77 percent of their total foreign claims worldwide, or the equivalent of 22 percent of
the country’s GDP. The exposures of Swedish and Belgian banks to the CESE region
represent 12 and 9 of their respective total global claims, and 19 and 26 percent
respectively of their own GDP.
Table 3. CESE: Share of Total Foreign Bank Claims on Select Host Countries, as at End- 2007
(In percent of total foreign claims on host country)
Bulgaria
Home Country
Share
Croatia
Home Country
Share
Czech Republic
Home Country
Share
Estonia
Home Country
Share
Hungary
Home Country
Share
Latvia
Home Country
Share
Lithuania
Home Country
Share
Greece
Italy
Austria
Switzerland
Germany
France
Belgium
Netherlands
United States
United Kingdom
Japan
Sweden
Others
Austria
Italy
Germany
France
Belgium
Japan
United Kingdom
Greece
Switzerland
United States
Netherlands
Sweden
Others
Austria
Belgium
France
Italy
Germany
United States
Netherlands
United Kingdom
Japan
Switzerland
Sweden
Greece
Others
Sweden
Germany
Italy
Austria
France
Belgium
United States
United Kingdom
Netherlands
Switzerland
Greece
Japan
Others
Austria
Germany
Italy
Belgium
France
Netherlands
United Kingdom
United States
Switzerland
Japan
Sweden
Greece
Others
Sweden
Germany
Italy
Austria
France
United Kingdom
Japan
United States
Greece
Switzerland
Belgium
Netherlands
Others
78.10
12.73
3.77
2.51
0.79
0.67
0.46
0.22
0.18
0.14
0.10
0.01
0.30
Sweden
Germany
Italy
Austria
France
Switzerland
Belgium
Netherlands
United Kingdom
United States
Greece
Japan
Others
Total
27.99
22.13
16.05
10.91
8.24
5.78
5.73
1.55
0.93
0.27
0.19
0.02
0.21
100.00
Total
36.86
32.43
21.68
6.84
0.49
0.45
0.31
0.25
0.25
0.23
0.18
0.01
0.02
100.00
Total
29.31
24.74
17.34
11.59
6.46
3.57
3.42
2.07
0.61
0.38
0.10
...
0.41
100.00
Total
93.30
2.33
1.95
0.89
0.44
0.43
0.34
0.14
0.08
0.03
...
...
0.06
100.00
Total
25.33
23.89
18.11
13.06
7.01
4.25
1.90
1.84
1.81
1.36
0.23
0.06
1.14
100.00
Total
100.00
Romania
Home Country
Share
Russia
Home Country
Share
Slovak Republic
Home Country
Share
Turkey
Home Country
Share
Ukraine
Home Country
Share
Italy
Germany
Netherlands
Belgium
France
Austria
United States
Switzerland
Japan
Sweden
United Kingdom
Greece
Others
Austria
France
Greece
Italy
Switzerland
Netherlands
Germany
United States
Belgium
United Kingdom
Sweden
Japan
Others
Germany
France
Italy
Austria
Switzerland
Netherlands
United States
Japan
United Kingdom
Belgium
Sweden
Greece
Others
Austria
Italy
Belgium
Netherlands
Germany
France
United Kingdom
United States
Sweden
Switzerland
Japan
Greece
Others
Greece
United Kingdom
Netherlands
United States
Germany
Belgium
France
Switzerland
Japan
Austria
Sweden
Italy
Others
Austria
France
Switzerland
Germany
Italy
Netherlands
Sweden
United States
Japan
Greece
United Kingdom
Belgium
Others
Total
22.87
21.15
10.87
9.54
7.91
6.23
5.22
2.96
2.52
2.45
1.31
0.02
6.96
100.00
Total
40.09
17.52
14.31
9.33
6.70
5.77
3.37
1.49
0.90
0.17
0.07
0.04
0.24
100.00
Total
16.76
13.76
9.93
9.88
9.85
9.49
8.34
6.10
5.55
4.19
3.17
0.59
2.39
100.00
Sources: Bank for International Settlements; and authors’ calculations.
Total
38.93
22.14
17.24
5.95
5.79
5.55
2.25
1.87
0.12
0.03
0.03
...
0.11
100.00
Total
20.02
13.21
13.18
11.17
10.67
10.56
9.41
5.77
2.46
1.54
0.19
...
1.84
100.00
Total
27.68
19.16
17.70
9.25
6.16
5.95
4.30
2.92
2.02
1.65
1.41
1.15
0.65
100.00
100.00
15
Poland
Share
Home Country
Total
77.70
14.97
2.58
1.39
1.18
0.67
0.63
0.29
0.17
0.12
...
...
0.30
Table 4. CESE: Share of Total Foreign Bank Claims of Home Countries, as at End-2007
(In percent of total home country claims on region)
Austria
Host Country
Share
Belgium
Host Country
Share
France
Host Country
Share
Germany
Host Country
Share
Greece
Host Country
Share
Italy
Host Country
Share
Czech Republic
Romania
Hungary
Croatia
Slovak Republic
Russia
Poland
Ukraine
Bulgaria
Turkey
Others
Czech Republic
Poland
Hungary
Turkey
Slovak Republic
Russia
Bulgaria
Romania
Ukraine
Croatia
Others
Czech Republic
Russia
Romania
Poland
Turkey
Hungary
Ukraine
Croatia
Slovak Republic
Bulgaria
Others
Poland
Russia
Hungary
Croatia
Turkey
Czech Republic
Slovak Republic
Lithuania
Ukraine
Latvia
Others
Turkey
Romania
Bulgaria
Russia
Ukraine
Croatia
Hungary
Latvia
Poland
...
Others
Poland
Croatia
Hungary
Russia
Czech Republic
Slovak Republic
Romania
Bulgaria
Ukraine
Latvia
Others
25.5
14.8
12.3
10.1
9.7
8.2
5.1
3.6
1.3
0.6
9.0
Total
17.9
16.0
12.6
12.3
10.6
7.4
5.1
4.3
1.9
0.8
11.2
100.0
Total
33.1
17.0
14.2
12.3
10.3
6.8
1.5
0.8
0.4
0.4
3.2
100.0
Total
20.0
19.4
13.3
12.2
9.5
6.6
5.6
4.3
2.9
1.3
4.9
100.0
Total
22.6
16.4
15.6
9.5
7.4
5.2
2.1
1.9
1.9
1.8
15.7
100.0
Total
40.4
21.7
12.6
1.7
1.0
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
...
22.0
100.0
Total
100.0
Share
Netherlands
Host Country
Share
Sweden
Host Country
Share
Switzerland
Host Country
Share
United Kingdom
Host Country
Share
United States
Host Country
Share
Russia
Poland
Turkey
Hungary
Czech Republic
Ukraine
Croatia
Latvia
Bulgaria
Romania
Others
47.6
21.5
13.7
7.1
3.9
3.3
1.6
0.5
0.2
0.2
0.4
Poland
Russia
Turkey
Romania
Hungary
Czech Republic
Slovak Republic
Ukraine
Bulgaria
Croatia
Others
Estonia
Latvia
Lithuania
Russia
Poland
Ukraine
Hungary
Turkey
Czech Republic
Slovak Republic
Others
Russia
Turkey
Ukraine
Romania
Poland
Bulgaria
Hungary
Czech Republic
Croatia
Lithuania
Others
Turkey
Russia
Czech Republic
Poland
Hungary
Slovak Republic
Ukraine
Croatia
Latvia
Romania
Others
Russia
Turkey
Poland
Czech Republic
Hungary
Romania
Slovak Republic
Ukraine
Bulgaria
Croatia
Others
Total
100.0
Total
27.0
21.6
21.4
7.0
6.4
6.4
4.9
2.8
0.6
0.2
1.8
100.0
Total
Sources: Bank for International Settlements; and authors’ calculations.
33.0
26.1
23.3
7.3
6.2
2.1
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
1.1
100.0
Total
31.4
13.1
11.8
11.5
10.3
5.5
3.9
1.0
0.4
0.3
10.9
100.0
Total
37.4
22.1
6.7
5.7
5.0
3.3
1.2
0.5
0.4
0.4
17.3
100.0
Total
25.6
24.4
17.5
9.0
3.8
2.5
2.1
1.9
0.5
0.3
12.6
100.0
16
Japan
Host Country
17
•
The Czech Republic, Poland, and Russia are among the most popular destinations for
foreign bank lending. The Czech Republic is the most important market for Austria,
Belgium, and France, while banks from Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands are the
biggest lenders to Poland; Russia is the most important market for Swiss and U.S.
banks. For some of these lenders, Hungary also ranks among their largest exposures.
•
There is a concentration of claims by individual home countries. For almost all
creditor countries, 50 percent or more of their total claims on CESE are attributable to
three host countries (this ratio rises to 80 percent in the case of Greece, Japan, and
Sweden). Austria—the most prominent creditor to CESE—has the most diversified
loan portfolio among the major home countries, with its three biggest CESE
borrowers accounting for less than half of its total claims on the region.
The maturity structure of foreign bank claims
The maturity structure of foreign bank claims on the CESE region has changed over time and
across countries (Table 5). Between March 2005 and December 2007, maturities continued to
lengthen in five of the CESE-13 (Bulgaria, Croatia, Estonia and Lithuania); they shortened in
two countries (Czech Republic and Russia); and have remained relatively stable in two others
(Hungary and Poland).
Table 5. CESE-13: Changes in the Maturity Structure of Total Foreign Bank
Claims on Select Host Countries, March 2005–December 2007
(Longer-term foreign bank claims in percent of total foreign bank claims)
Country
March 2005
June 2007
December 2007
March 2005 –
June 2007
Bulgaria
Croatia
Czech Republic
Estonia
Hungary
Latvia
Lithuania
Poland
Romania
Russia
Slovak Republic
Turkey
Ukraine
49
62
66
69
73
70
71
76
52
55
58
43
56
60
64
63
74
71
48
75
74
41
53
63
57
63
61
70
61
80
71
68
78
75
45
50
58
54
48
↑
↑
↓
↑
↓
↓
↑
↓
↓
↓
↑
↑
↑
Maturity
March 2005 –
June 2007 –
December 2007 December 2008
↑
↑
↓
↑
→
↑
↑
↑
↑
↓
↓
↓
↓
↑
↑
↓
↑
↓
↓
↑
↓
↓
↓
→
↑
↓
Sources: Bank for International Settlements; and authors’ calculations.
Note: Maturity data are only available on immediate borrower basis; longer-term claims are defined as those with maturities of
more than a year.
The onset of the global financial crisis in the summer of 2007 has also played a role in
changing the maturity profile of foreign claims in some instances. In some countries, the
maturity structure of foreign claims has tended to change directions during this period, some
18
more markedly than others. In Latvia, the maturity of foreign claims lengthened significantly
between June 2007 and December 2007 after a sharp retrenchment following the build-up of
short-term claims up to June 2007. The opposite is true for Ukraine, with maturities declining
since June 2007, having lengthened between March 2005 and June 2007. Romania and
Ukraine have the biggest proportion of short-term foreign claims, of more than half, while
Estonia and Lithuania have the smallest, at 20 and 22 percent, respectively.
The sectoral structure of foreign bank claims
There has been a marked shift in the balance of foreign banks’ claims between the public and
private sectors, and even within the private sector in the 13 main CESE host countries.
Between March 2005 and December 2007, foreign banks’ claims on the public sector across
these countries fell as a percentage of their total claims on the region (Table 6). The observed
shift was, in part, due to improvements in the fiscal position of host countries and the
privatization of state-owned enterprises. The exceptions were the Czech Republic, where
foreign banks’ claims on the public sector increased, and Estonia and the Slovak Republic,
where the share was maintained. Foreign banks’ claims on the public sector are highest in
Poland and the Slovak Republic, at 28 percent of their total claims; and lowest in Estonia
(3 percent) and in Latvia and Russia (both 6 percent).
In general, the proportion of claims on the private sector in CESE has increased. It has
remained the same in Estonia and the Slovak Republic, and declined slightly in the Czech
Republic. Within the private sector, there has been a clear reallocation of claims between the
nonbank private and banking sectors—the proportion of claims on the former, relative to the
total, has increased across all countries. The importance of nonparent inter-bank claims has
declined, except in Lithuania (from 12 to 21 percent) and Russia (from 27 to 30 percent); the
proportion has been maintained in Poland.
B. Local and Foreign Banks’ Claims on the Private Sector
In this sub-section and for the rest of the paper, we focus on banks’ claims on the private
sector of the CESE-13. Overall, we find distinct differences in the composition of claims on
the private sector across the CESE-13 sub-regions and within each sub-region, in individual
countries (Figure3): 21
•
21
A typical measure of the depth of financial intermediation is total bank credit to the
nonbank private sector in percent of GDP. In CESE-13, this metric currently ranges
from around 120 percent in the Baltics, to about 60 percent in CEE and 70 percent in
SEE, and in other emerging Europe (OEE), just over 40 percent. In particular, total
See Appendix III, Figure A.1 for the composition of bank claims on the private sector of individual host
countries.
19
bank claims on the nonbank private sector amount to 162 percent of GDP in Estonia
and 126 percent in Latvia, compared to around 46 percent in Russia and 38 percent in
Turkey. In Croatia, this figure is also very high, at 119 percent of GDP.
•
The nonbank private sector in CESE-13 is increasingly dependent on foreign bank
funding. The share of credit to GDP generated by domestic banks has fallen
progressively over time. For example, foreign bank claims on the Baltic countries
have increased sharply from about 20 percent of total bank claims to almost
70 percent (or from 10 percent to 80 percent of GDP) over the March 2005–
December 2007 period. Specifically, claims on Latvia have posted the steepest rise
from 15 percent of total bank claims on the country (9 percent of GDP) in 2005 to
73 percent (92 percent of GDP) as at end-2007. In the Czech Republic, foreign bank
claims are at around 80 percent of total bank claims on the country, as a result of the
very high share of foreign bank ownership. At the other end of the spectrum,
domestic banks have continued to dominate in Russia and Turkey, accounting for
more than two-thirds of total claims on the nonbank private sector, although crossborder claims have been increasing.
•
Foreign bank claims on the nonbank private sector are increasingly denominated in
foreign currency. While the larger portion of aggregate foreign bank claims on the
CEE countries continues to be denominated in local currency, there has been a sharp
increase in foreign currency bank lending in the SEE and Baltic countries. The rise is
attributable to both a general expansion in cross-border lending, which is typically
denominated in foreign currency, and a rise in foreign currency lending by LAFBs.
The notable exceptions are in the Czech Republic, Lithuania and the Slovak Republic,
and to a lesser extent Romania, where local currency lending by LAFBs have
recorded the highest growth rates, up to end-2007.
•
Nonparent bank funding varies in importance as a source of financing for the CESE13 banking sector. Foreign nonparent inter-bank claims on CESE-13 banking sectors
are around 10–30 percent of GDP on average; they are highest in Estonia and Latvia
(42 and 34 percent of GDP, respectively) and lowest in Russia and Turkey (less than
5 percent of GDP).
•
Most of the nonparent inter-bank funding tends to be in the form of direct crossborder credit or local currency credit from other LAFBs. In most countries, foreign
currency lending by LAFBs to the local banking sector has been the least important,
except in Latvia where it has been at least as much as the other components.
Table 6. CESE-13: Changes in the Sectoral Structure of Total Foreign Bank Claims on Select Host Countries,
March 2005–December 2007
(Foreign bank claims on public and private sectors in percent of total foreign bank claims)
March 2005
Country
Private
Public
25
21
24
3
32
21
35
34
25
25
28
31
26
Private
Public
Non-Bank
Private
Banks
Total
58
54
50
57
45
52
53
49
46
48
25
38
38
17
25
26
40
23
27
12
17
29
27
47
31
36
75
79
76
97
68
79
65
66
75
75
72
69
74
Sources: Bank for International Settlements; and authors’ calculations.
Note: Maturity data are only available on immediate borrower basis.
16
14
26
3
27
6
13
28
13
6
28
20
12
Change in Structure,
March 2005 – December 2007
Private
Public
Non-Bank
Private
Banks
Total
69
68
61
70
53
69
66
55
63
64
46
59
55
15
18
13
27
20
25
21
17
24
30
26
21
33
84
86
74
97
73
94
87
72
87
94
72
80
88
↓
↓
↑
→
↓
↓
↓
↓
↓
↓
→
↓
↓
Non-Bank
Private
Banks
Total
↑
↑
↑
↑
↑
↑
↑
↑
↑
↑
↑
↑
↑
↓
↓
↓
↓
↓
↓
↑
→
↓
↑
↓
↓
↓
↑
↑
↓
→
↑
↑
↑
↑
↑
↑
→
↑
↑
20
Bulgaria
Croatia
Czech Republic
Estonia
Hungary
Latvia
Lithuania
Poland
Romania
Russia
Slovak Republic
Turkey
Ukraine
December 2007
21
Figure 3. CESE-13: Composition of Bank Claims on the Nonbank Private and
Banking Sectors, by Sub-Region
(In percent of GDP)
Baltics
(Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania)
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
140
140
120
120
100
100
80
80
60
60
40
40
20
20
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of local banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Central and Eastern Europe
(Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovak Republic)
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
140
140
120
120
100
100
80
80
60
60
40
40
20
20
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of local banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Sources: Bank for International Settlements; International Financial Statistics, IMF; and authors’ calculations.
22
Figure 3. CESE-13: Composition of Bank Claims on the Nonbank Private and
Banking Sectors, by Sub-Region (concluded)
(In percent of GDP)
South-Eastern Europe
(Bulgaria, Croatia, Romania, Ukraine)
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
140
140
120
120
100
100
80
80
60
60
40
40
20
20
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of local banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Other Emerging Europe
(Russia, Turkey)
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
140
140
120
120
100
100
80
80
60
60
40
40
20
20
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of local banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Sources: Bank for International Settlements; International Financial Statistics, IMF; and authors’ calculations.
23
IV. A QUANTIFICATION OF HOME AND HOST “EXPOSURES”
In this section, we derive the breakdown of short- and longer-term claims of home countries,
from the total claims data. Short term is defined as one year or less, and any period greater
than one year is considered long term. The aim is to determine:
•
The maximum possible amount of liquidity that could be withdrawn quickly from
host countries, in the event of an idiosyncratic shock to the home country or parent
bank, a loss of confidence in the CESE region or in the global outlook in general.
•
The maximum possible amount of losses that home countries could incur in the event
of a significant shock to the host country, which could result in a swift deterioration
in the asset quality of the remaining longer-term claims.
A. Short-Term Exposures
The aggregate short-term claims of foreign banks on CESE-13’s nonbank private sector
amount to 9 percent of CESE-13 GDP. 22 Furthermore, the majority share of this funding is in
the form of typically more volatile direct cross-border loans (4 percent of the region’s GDP).
However, the distinct differences across sub-regions and in the nature of claims should be
noted (Figure 4 and Table 7):
•
Among the sub-regions, the Baltic countries appear to have experienced some
withdrawal of liquidity by foreign banks. Since mid-2007, the sub-region has
experienced some withdrawal of short-term funding from its nonbank private sector.
The pullback has been most pronounced in Latvia where short-term funding fell from
45 percent of GDP to 30 percent of GDP, while some withdrawals also occurred in
Estonia. However, longer-term claims on these countries increased during this period,
suggesting a shift in banks’ maturity profiles. Short-term claims by foreign banks on
the nonbank private sector of the Baltic sub-region amount to almost 20 percent of
Baltic GDP, almost half of which in the form of direct cross-border loans.
•
The SEE countries are also exposed to the possibility of a sudden withdrawal of
short-term foreign bank funding from the nonbank private sector. This funding,
which accounts for more than 17 percent of the sub-region’s total GDP, is slightly
more than 20 percent of GDP for Bulgaria, Croatia, and Romania.
•
Short-term funding in the CEE countries is largely from LAFBs in local currency.
This form of funding amounts to almost 8 percent of host GDP, followed by crossborder funding of around 4 percent of GDP.
22
See Appendix IV, Figure A.2 for the composition of short-term foreign bank claims on the private sector of
individual host countries.
24
•
The OEE group of countries (Russia and Turkey) appears to be least dependent on
short-term funding by foreign banks. In aggregate, the total short-term liabilities of
the nonbank private sector amount to only 5 percent of GDP, albeit with direct crossborder borrowing making up about two-thirds of this amount.
Overall, the CESE-13 countries do not appear to be as significantly exposed to a sudden
withdrawal of short-term (nonparent) inter-bank funding, relative to the nonbank private
sector:
•
The banking systems in the Baltic and SEE sub-regions appear most reliant on interbank liquidity. Nonparent foreign bank funding represents approximately 7 percent of
Baltic GDP. Between mid- and end-2007, the Baltic countries experienced a
withdrawal of inter-bank funding; in Latvia alone, short-term inter-bank claims have
fallen to 11 percent of its own GDP, from more than 20 percent, with no offset in
longer-term claims.
•
Some countries may be less prone to a similar shock because of the composition of
their foreign bank claims. For example, while short-term non-parent bank claims on
the banking sector in the Slovak Republic amounts to 10 percent of its GDP,
70 percent of these claims are largely by LAFBs and denominated in local currency,
which is likely to be more stable. Similarly, inter-bank borrowing by the Czech
banking sector is largely from LAFBs and in local currency.
The short-term claims of foreign banks represent the maximum liquidity shock that a sudden
withdrawal of short-term funding could impose on CESE countries. An analysis of the shortterm exposures of individual home countries to the CESE region shows which home
countries could represent important pressure points for the region, in the even that their banks
are forced to withdraw short-term funds (see Table 7):23
•
Austria is the most important short-term creditor to the region’s nonbank private
sector.
¾ Austria’s outstanding short-term claims on the region amount to 1.7 percent of
aggregate CESE-13 GDP; Germany and Italy are next, each with short-term
claims amounting to 1.1 percent of the region’s GDP. These claims are largely in
the form of credit from LAFBs in local currency and in cross-border loans.
¾ Conversely, Austria is by far the most exposed in terms of short-term lending to
the region, with claims of almost 15 percent of its own GDP. Belgium and Greece
follow, with total short-term claims of 5.6 and 5.1 percent, respectively.
23
See Appendix II, Section F for derivation details.
25
•
The importance of individual home countries to the CESE nonbank private sector
changes somewhat when viewed from a sub-regional perspective:
¾ Sweden is the main short-term lender to the Baltics, with loans accounting for just
over 16 percent of Baltic GDP, with the largest proportion coming from crossborder loans. The Baltics are also the most important short-term debtor group for
Sweden, accounting for 3.1 percent of its GDP.
¾ Austria remains the most important creditor of short-term credit to CEE (loans by
LAFBs in local currency) and SEE (loans by LAFBs in local currency and crossborder loans), with short-term loans amounting to about 3 and 6 percent of their
respective GDP; its exposure to both sub-regions each represent 6.3 percent of
Austrian GDP. Italy is the second most important short-term lender to both the
CEE and SEE, having made loans to the amount of 2.3 and 2.5 percent of their
GDP, respectively.
•
At the individual host country level, Austria is the most important short-term lender
for a host of countries across the region:24
¾ In terms of host GDP, Croatia (8.4 percent), Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania
(8.8 percent), Slovak Republic and Ukraine receive their largest short-term loans
from Austria. In terms of Austria’s own GDP, it is most exposed to Romania
(3.9 percent) and Czech Republic (3 percent).
¾ Separately, Sweden is the key short-term creditor to each of the Baltic countries,
with Latvia having borrowed the equivalent of some 22 percent of its GDP, and
Estonia about 20 percent of its GDP, from Swedish banks. These loans amount to
1.3 and 1 percent of Sweden’s GDP, respectively.
•
The trends in home country lending to the banking sector of host countries are similar
to the nonbank private sector:25
¾ Austria is the key short-term (nonparent) lender to the region, accounting for
0.6 percent of CESE GDP, or 5.6 percent of its own GDP (see Table 7). It plays a
more important role for banks in the SEE, with short-term inter-bank lending
amounting to 2.4 percent of the sub-region’s GDP, compared to 1 percent of CEE
GDP. Austrian banks are the biggest counterparties to banks in the Slovak
24
See Appendix V, Table A.2 for a quantification of the meximum short-term exposures of individual home
countries to the nonbank private sector of individual CESE countries.
25
See Appendix V, Table A.3 for a quantification of the meximum short-term exposures of individual home
countries to the banking sector of individual CESE countries.
26
Republic, lending an equivalent of 4 percent of the latter’s GDP in short-term
funds, followed by Romania, at 3.4 percent of GDP.
¾ Sweden’s short-term (nonparent) inter-bank lending to the Baltics is largest, at 5.8
percent of Baltic GDP, or 1.1 percent of own GDP. Its claims on the Latvian and
Estonian banking sectors amount to around 8 percent of host GDP.
Figure 4. CESE-13: Composition of Short-Term Foreign Bank Claims on the
Nonbank Private and Banking Sectors, by Sub-Region
(In percent of GDP)
Baltics
(Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania)
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
35
35
30
30
25
25
20
20
15
15
10
10
5
5
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Central and Eastern Europe
(Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovak Republic)
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
35
35
30
30
25
25
20
20
15
15
10
10
5
5
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Sources: Bank for International Settlements; International Financial Statistics, IMF; and authors’ calculations.
27
Figure 4. CESE-13: Composition of Short-Term Foreign Bank Claims on the
Nonbank Private and Banking Sectors, by Sub-Region (concluded)
(In percent of GDP)
South-Eastern Europe
(Bulgaria, Croatia, Romania, Ukraine)
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
35
35
30
30
25
25
20
20
15
15
10
10
5
5
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Other Emerging Europe
(Russia, Turkey)
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
35
35
30
30
25
25
20
20
15
15
10
10
5
5
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Sources: Bank for International Settlements; International Financial Statistics, IMF; and authors’ calculations.
Table 7. CESE-13: Quantification of Short-Term Foreign Bank Claims on the Nonbank Private and Banking
Sectors, by Sub-Region, as at End-2007
CESE-13
Host
Home
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Baltics
Total
CEE
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Total
SEE
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Total
Other EE
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Total
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Total
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
Non-bank private sector
Austria
26,517
0.1
15,301
7,974
24,076
2.9
6.3
24,065
5.9
6.3
1,620
510
4,808
6,938
0.3
1.8
Belgium
14,003
1,602
10,148
25,754
0.8
5.6
19
10
29
59
0.1
0.0
11,592
604
5,640
17,836
2.1
3.9
373
232
411
1,016
0.3
0.2
2,020
756
4,067
6,843
0.3
1.5
France
14,594
3,532
16,152
34,277
1.0
1.3
43
38
60
140
0.2
0.0
7,557
412
3,579
11,548
1.4
0.4
3,758
1,976
4,326
10,061
2.5
0.4
3,236
1,106
8,187
12,528
0.6
0.5
735
1,845
2.1
0.1
8,233
1,881
5,032
Germany
Greece
Italy
15,222
6,593
4,878
22,277
17,653
55,387
37,752
1.7
1.1
14.6
1.1
84
564
107
308
0.3
800
9,512
5,176
9,377
15,146
1.8
0.4
2,590
1,148
2,074
5,812
1.4
0.2
3,834
1,304
9,811
14,949
0.8
0.4
5,615
3,103
7,432
16,150
0.5
5.1
3
7
4
14
0.0
0.0
7
3
7
18
0.0
0.0
2,825
1,977
3,051
7,853
1.9
2.5
2,779
1,116
4,369
8,265
0.4
2.6
17,235
4,605
14,047
35,887
1.1
1.7
142
169
206
516
0.6
0.0
11,248
1,682
5,885
18,815
2.3
0.9
4,424
2,326
3,437
10,187
2.5
0.5
1,421
428
4,519
6,368
0.3
0.3
Japan
2,101
612
3,877
6,590
0.2
0.0
0.0
765
173
412
1,350
0.0
125
25
178
328
0.0
1,203
397
3,276
4,876
Netherlands
8,188
2,385
10,299
20,872
0.6
2.6
7
2
10
19
0.0
0.0
3,981
674
1,946
6,601
0.8
0.8
1,068
582
1,326
2,976
0.7
0.4
3,132
1,127
7,017
11,277
0.6
1.4
Sweden
5,126
4,440
8,324
17,890
0.5
3.9
3,933
4,143
6,265
14,341
16.2
3.1
529
136
239
904
0.1
0.2
185
14
338
537
0.1
0.1
479
147
1,482
2,108
0.1
0.5
Switzerland
4,974
1,870
8,800
15,643
0.5
3.6
16
8
21
45
0.1
0.0
815
216
464
1,494
0.2
0.3
1,956
907
2,652
5,515
1.4
1.3
2,186
739
5,664
8,588
0.4
2.0
United Kingdom
3,904
1,125
6,026
11,055
0.3
0.4
17
27
24
68
0.1
0.0
1,206
106
625
1,938
0.2
0.1
109
33
149
291
0.1
0.0
2,571
959
5,228
8,758
0.4
0.3
United States
5,419
1,439
7,671
14,529
0.4
0.0
10
12
17
40
0.0
0.0
2,350
288
1,099
3,738
0.4
0.0
362
171
471
1,003
0.2
0.0
2,697
968
6,083
9,748
0.5
0.0
Others
2,223
646
2,303
5,173
0.2
12
13
16
41
0.0
1,556
401
733
2,690
0.3
66
29
91
186
0.0
590
203
1,463
2,256
0.1
36,829 135,008
296,959
4,858
5,098
7,517
17,473
65,142
7,376
33,636
106,153
27,353
14,596
27,882
69,830
27,769
9,759
65,974
103,502
5.5
5.8
8.5
7.8
0.9
4.0
6.7
3.6
6.9
1.4
0.5
3.3
29
39
42
5,075
347
3,562
1,833
4,433
Total (In millions of U.S. dollars)
Total (In percent of host GDP)
125,122
8.9
9
545
118
17
11
37
0.0
19.8
0.2
12.7
0.1
17.2
0.2
0.0
1.1
4.1
5.2
Austria
9,403
2,448
9,419
2,726
8,148
1.0
2.1
9,828
2.4
2.6
736
229
2,218
3,184
0.2
0.8
Belgium
4,350
610
3,571
8,532
0.3
1.8
6
4
10
20
0.0
0.0
3,435
251
1,745
5,432
0.7
1.2
121
66
153
341
0.1
0.1
787
289
1,663
2,739
0.1
0.6
France
4,992
1,371
6,715
13,079
0.4
0.5
15
14
21
49
0.1
0.0
2,055
168
1,025
3,248
0.4
0.1
1,548
729
2,050
4,327
1.1
0.2
1,374
461
3,620
5,455
0.3
0.2
Germany
5,334
1,734
7,464
14,533
0.4
0.4
191
198
251
640
0.7
0.0
2,638
648
1,704
4,991
0.6
0.1
869
342
1,157
2,368
0.6
0.1
1,636
546
4,353
6,534
0.3
0.2
0.9
Banking sector
21,271
0.6
5.6
110
0.1
0.0
Greece
1,969
1,060
2,654
5,683
0.2
1.8
1
2
2
5
0.0
0.0
3
1
3
6
0.0
0.0
966
656
1,064
2,686
0.7
0.8
999
400
1,586
2,985
0.1
Italy
5,933
1,547
5,914
13,394
0.4
0.6
49
62
73
184
0.2
0.0
3,823
578
2,046
6,448
0.8
0.3
1,394
707
1,677
3,777
0.9
0.2
666
201
2,118
2,985
0.1
0.1
819
243
1,720
2,783
0.1
0.0
3
6
4
13
0.0
0.0
228
58
130
415
0.0
0.0
62
8
107
178
0.0
0.0
527
171
1,479
2,176
0.1
0.0
222
0.2
1,268
447
2,985
4,701
0.2
0.6
Japan
Netherlands
3,042
893
1.0
2
1
3
6
0.0
0.0
1,312
223
655
2,190
0.3
0.3
460
Sweden
1,873
1,643
3,214
6,730
0.2
1.5
1,375
1,526
2,244
5,145
5.8
1.1
165
43
76
283
0.0
0.1
111
7
204
322
0.1
0.1
222
68
690
980
0.0
0.2
Switzerland
2,056
700
3,953
6,709
0.2
1.6
5
3
7
15
0.0
0.0
251
72
151
474
0.1
0.1
862
315
1,273
2,450
0.6
0.6
937
311
2,522
3,770
0.2
0.9
United Kingdom
1,447
430
2,445
0.1
0.2
6
10
United States
1,948
551
3,163
5,662
0.2
0.0
761
226
925
1,912
0.1
43,928
13,457
55,411
112,796
1.3
0.4
1.7
Others
Total (In millions of U.S. dollars)
Total (In percent of host GDP)
4,253
8,188
4,322
0.2
3.4
9
25
610
1,291
0.3
0.0
0.0
385
40
207
632
0.1
0.0
51
11
84
146
0.0
0.0
1,005
368
2,146
3,519
0.2
0.1
4
5
6
15
0.0
0.0
689
98
333
1,120
0.1
0.0
160
63
230
453
0.1
0.0
1,095
385
2,594
4,074
0.2
0.0
4
5
6
14
0.0
478
127
231
836
0.1
30
11
45
86
0.0
248
84
643
976
0.0
1,691
1,874
2,677
6,242
20,539
2,653
11,031
34,223
10,198
4,969
13,086
28,253
11,500
3,960
28,617
44,077
1.9
2.1
3.0
2.5
0.3
1.3
2.5
1.2
3.2
0.6
0.2
1.4
7.1
4.1
Sources: Bank for International Settlements; International Financial Statistics, IMF; and authors’ calculations.
Note: LC LC = local claims of LAFBs in local currency; LC FC = local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency; XBC = cross-border claims.
7.0
2.2
28
3.8
29
B. Longer-Term Exposures
Given the large exposures of some foreign banking groups to CESE, the asset quality of their
longer-term claims could be negatively affected by major negative shocks to their host
countries. These longer-term claims are calculated as the difference between the total claims
on the region, and the short-term claims discussed above. They represent the longer-term
losses on foreign banks’ credit portfolio that is “captive” in CESE countries:
•
When taken in aggregate, home countries’ longer-maturity exposures to the region’s
nonbank private sector are substantial. 26 Austria’s exposures to nonbank private
sector in the CESE-13 region amount to 23 percent of own GDP, followed by Sweden
(11 percent), Belgium (more than 9 percent), Greece (6 percent), and the United
Kingdom (4 percent).
•
From a sub-regional perspective, Sweden’s longer-term exposures to the nonbank
private sector in the Baltics alone amount to almost 10 percent of its own GDP, while
Austria’s exposures to the CEE and SEE nonbank private sectors amount to
12 percent and 9 percent respectively of GDP (Table 8).
•
The “captive” longer-term inter-bank claims of (non-parent) foreign banks are limited
in terms of any one CESE-13 country: 27 In each host country, longer-term foreign
inter-bank claims amount to around 1 percent of home country GDP or less. Austrian
banks have the largest exposures to individual countries’ banking systems, namely, to
Hungary and Romania, each amounting to 1.2 percent of Austria’s GDP.
•
However, the longer-term exposures of some home countries to CESE-13, taken in
aggregate, are not insignificant. Austrian banks have the largest total inter-bank
exposure to CESE, amounting to almost 8 percent of Austria’s own GDP. They have
mostly lent to banks in the CEE countries, to the amount of almost 4 percent of
Austria’s own GDP, followed by the banking sector in the SEE countries, at around
26
See Appendix V, Table A.4 for a quantification of the longer-term exposures of individual home countries to
the nonbank private sector of individual CESE countries.
27
See Appendix V, Table A.5 for for a quantification of the longer-term exposures of individual home countries
to the banking sector of individual CESE countries.
30
3 percent of its own GDP. Sweden’s exposure to the CESE-13 banking sectors
represents almost 4 percent of its GDP, most of which is concentrated in the Baltic
countries (3.5 percent of Sweden’s GDP). Except for Belgian banks, whose aggregate
inter-bank exposures to CESE-13 represent 3 percent of its own GDP, the exposures
of each of the other home countries are typically below 2 percent of their respective
GDP.
Table 8. CESE-13: Quantification of Longer-Term Foreign Bank Claims on the Nonbank Private and Banking
Sectors, by Sub-Region, as at End-2007
Host
Home
CESE-13
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
LC LC
Non-bank private sector
Austria
36,684
In
millions
of U.S.
dollars
86,632
In
percent
of host
GDP
In
percent
of home
GDP
2.6
22.8
LC LC
256
XBC
In
millions
of U.S.
dollars
346
837
In
percent
of host
GDP
0.9
SEE
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
percent
of home
GDP
26,406
LC FC
XBC
In
millions
of U.S.
dollars
In
percent
of host
GDP
In
percent
of home
GDP
5.3
11.5
43,850
Other EE
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
LC LC
XBC
6,163
16,454
In
millions
of U.S.
dollars
34,804
In
percent
of host
GDP
8.6
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
percent
of home
GDP
9.2
LC LC
1,678
LC FC
531
XBC
4,932
Total
In
millions
of U.S.
dollars
7,141
In
percent
of host
GDP
0.4
In
percent
of home
GDP
2,492
14,951
3,258
16,011
43,235
1.3
9.4
66
34
106
206
0.2
0.0
21,125
2,048
10,830
34,003
4.1
7.4
493
314
592
1,400
0.3
0.3
2,283
861
4,483
7,627
0.4
1.7
4,776
21,180
47,828
1.4
1.8
132
96
189
418
0.5
0.0
14,228
1,441
7,015
22,684
2.7
0.9
4,020
2,032
5,350
11,402
2.8
0.4
3,492
1,206
8,625
13,324
0.7
0.5
Germany
30,327
9,982
31,468
71,777
2.2
2.1
1,662
1,299
2,194
5,156
5.8
0.2
19,897
5,224
12,192
37,313
4.5
1.1
4,640
2,040
6,766
13,446
3.3
0.4
4,127
1,419
10,316
15,862
0.8
0.5
0.5
3.0
1.9
3,468
8,386
18,140
5.7
7
15
9
31
0.0
20
8
18
45
0.0
2,996
2,134
3,252
8,383
2.1
2.6
3,263
1,312
5,107
9,681
Italy
33,870
9,440
28,918
72,228
2.2
3.4
411
418
627
1,456
1.6
0.1
24,430
4,863
13,128
42,421
5.1
2.0
7,586
3,725
10,576
21,887
5.4
1.0
1,443
435
4,587
6,464
0.3
0.3
Japan
3,412
1,003
4,740
9,155
0.3
0.1
19
37
24
80
0.1
0.0
1,955
498
1,042
3,495
0.4
0.0
163
44
266
473
0.1
0.0
1,275
424
3,408
5,107
0.3
0.0
956
515
1,212
Netherlands
Sweden
0.0
12,187
LC FC
Total
23,967
0.0
0.2
LC LC
Total
21,872
0.5
235
LC FC
Total
France
6,286
9,443
XBC
CEE
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
Belgium
Greece
40,506
LC FC
Baltics
Total
13,744
3,766
13,397
30,907
0.9
3.9
24
8
34
67
0.1
0.0
9,294
1,981
4,586
15,860
1.9
2.0
2,684
0.7
0.3
3,470
1,262
7,565
12,297
0.6
1.6
14,451
11,801
23,282
49,533
1.5
10.8
12,293
11,239
20,789
44,322
50.1
9.6
1,497
398
671
2,566
0.3
0.6
170
13
311
494
0.1
0.1
491
151
1,510
2,152
0.1
0.5
Switzerland
6,530
2,385
9,845
18,760
0.6
4.4
54
21
68
142
0.2
0.0
2,178
609
1,210
3,997
0.5
0.9
1,952
954
2,625
5,531
1.4
1.3
2,346
801
5,942
9,089
0.5
2.1
United Kingdom
5,389
1,520
7,285
14,195
0.4
0.5
45
62
65
172
0.2
0.0
2,310
321
1,264
3,895
0.5
0.1
134
46
207
386
0.1
0.0
2,901
1,091
5,750
9,742
0.5
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
354
168
482
1,004
0.2
0.0
2,984
1,082
6,549
10,615
0.5
0.0
63
28
88
179
0.0
639
223
1,547
2,409
0.1
35,714
18,176
48,181
102,072
30,392
10,798
70,320
111,510
8.8
4.5
11.9
1.5
0.5
3.5
4,129
2,010
5,091
759
238
2,270
United States
8,518
2,174
9,539
20,231
0.6
Others
5,105
1,452
3,714
10,271
0.3
64,469 214,448
492,892
Total (In millions of U.S. dollars)
Total (In percent of host GDP)
6.4
1.9
6.5
13,615
3,321
12,589
14.9
0.1
0.1
15,014
13,550
24,559
53,123
17.0
15.3
27.8
81
94
122
60.1
0.1
2,449
8,488
1.0
2,032
7,570
0.9
132,855
21,945
71,388
226,188
15.9
2.6
8.6
8,645
979
27.1
5,105
14,729
5,423
13,937
0.4
3.0
22
13
37
71
0.1
0.0
6,283
761
3,395
10,439
1.3
2.3
145
82
177
404
0.1
0.1
881
327
1,814
3,023
0.2
0.7
7,954
16,738
0.5
0.6
44
35
65
144
0.2
0.0
3,968
523
2,071
6,562
0.8
0.2
1,543
705
2,030
4,279
1.1
0.2
1,468
497
3,787
5,753
0.3
0.2
3,397
11,173
740
1,764
1,763
3,731
0.9
588
4,545
6,877
0.2
0.3
0.9
0.7
0.7
2.0
0.1
1.5
0.4
0.1
1,744
1,128
2,896
6,149
0.2
1.9
3
5
3
12
0.0
0.0
7
3
6
16
0.0
0.0
944
650
1,037
2,631
0.6
0.8
1,171
470
1,849
3,490
0.2
1.1
9,458
23,586
0.7
1.1
142
153
222
518
0.6
0.0
8,073
1,632
4,474
14,179
1.7
0.7
2,196
1,051
2,611
5,859
1.4
0.3
676
204
2,150
3,030
0.2
0.1
Japan
1,226
371
1,987
3,584
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.0
596
163
334
1,093
70
13
113
196
0.0
554
181
1,531
2,266
Netherlands
4,796
1,334
5,255
11,384
0.3
1.4
8
3
11
22
0.0
0.0
2,992
643
1,514
5,149
0.6
0.7
405
191
542
1,138
0.3
0.1
1,391
496
3,187
5,074
0.3
Sweden
5,078
4,355
8,567
18,000
0.5
3.9
4,285
4,155
7,466
15,906
18.0
3.5
465
125
211
801
0.1
0.2
101
6
187
295
0.1
0.1
227
69
703
999
0.1
0.2
Switzerland
2,504
846
4,236
7,587
0.2
1.8
17
7
22
46
0.1
0.0
679
200
397
1,276
0.2
0.3
811
305
1,189
2,306
0.6
0.5
997
334
2,628
3,959
0.2
0.9
United Kingdom
0.2
0.2
United States
2,893
791
3,756
7,439
0.2
0.0
Others
1,655
481
1,373
3,509
0.1
71,327
22,575
77,531
171,433
2.1
0.7
2.3
Total (In millions of U.S. dollars)
Total (In percent of host GDP)
1,927
567
2,865
5,359
5.2
16
23
23
29
571
3,267
3,040
9
1,397
3.0
2,125
14
12,263
2.8
11,088
7
4,124
11,231
Italy
Greece
1,769
3.9
5.6
1,183
6,370
1.8
25.2
1,761
469
0.3
890
1,171
7,331
554
298
5,149
4,367
7,024
24,636
7.8
124
113
France
10,065
0.9
59
47
Belgium
Germany
29,525
34
30
0.1
0.0
11
13
22
46
0.1
0.0
12
11
16
39
62
0.0
5,203
4,995
8,760
18,958
5.9
5.6
9.9
21.4
731
115
419
1,265
0.2
0.0
56
14
87
156
0.0
0.0
1,124
416
2,336
0.2
0.1
1,533
293
754
2,579
0.3
0.0
150
58
214
423
0.1
0.0
1,199
426
2,766
4,391
0.2
0.0
1,349
369
640
2,358
0.3
28
10
42
79
0.0
267
91
675
1,033
0.1
41,691
7,574
23,445
72,710
11,975
5,669
15,085
32,729
12,458
4,338
30,242
47,037
5.0
0.9
2.8
3.0
1.4
3.7
0.6
0.2
1.5
8.7
Sources: Bank for International Settlements; International Financial Statistics, IMF; and authors’ calculations.
Note: LC LC = local claims of LAFBs in local currency; LC FC = local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency; XBC = cross-border claims.
8.1
3,875
0.6
2.4
31
Banking sector
Austria
213,975
31
35
32
V. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
A. Possible Implications of Banks’ Funding Sources
The nature of bank financing may have implications for funding stability for individual
countries, and the broader issue of capital flight. Banks typically fund themselves through
deposits, the inter-bank, wholesale and/or capital markets. Arguably, deposits are considered
to represent a more stable source of financing for banks, as long as the banking system and
financial safety nets are perceived to be credible.28 Other forms of financing, such as through
wholesale or inter-bank markets, tend to be more volatile especially during periods of market
stress, while direct loans from foreign parents may be withdrawn quickly.29 In some CESE
countries, foreign bank subsidiaries are largely funded by deposits, suggesting lower funding
risk for these countries (Figure 5).30 Although foreign bank branches tend to rely on funding
directly from their foreign parents, which may be more volatile, they represent a much
smaller proportion of the banking system in the region (Figure 6).31
Separately, the manner in which a foreign bank funds its balance sheet reveals little in terms
of the potential maximum losses it could suffer from lending in a host country. A foreign
bank’s net exposure to businesses and individuals in a particular host country should
theoretically equal the total loans made in that country, less the aggregate funding obtained
from that country, either in the form of deposits or other types of financing. However, given
that banks borrow from and make loans to different parties, the concept of close-out netting
is largely not applicable in the event that a collection of individual borrowers fail to repay
their loans. Where a foreign subsidiary fails altogether, the authorities in the host country
may even decide to ring-fence the remaining assets of the foreign banking group in that
country to mitigate losses to depositors and other local financiers.
28
See Kohn (2008).
29
There are various ways in which foreign bank subsidiaries could send funds overseas, namely: (i) making
direct loans to parent banks; (ii) purchasing bonds issued by parents banks; and/or (iii) repaying maturing loans
from parents; and (iv) lending directly to non-affiliated borrowers overseas, if more profitable opportunities
exist. In (i) and (ii), the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) of the Basel II Accord stae that credit
institutions’ exposures to related-party borrowers, such as parent banks, cannot exceed 20 percent of the
subsidiaries’ own funds. In (iii), repatriation could be up to the full amount of the loan from the parent. In (iv),
credit institutions may not incur an exposure to a client or group of connected clients that exceeds 25 percent of
its own funds under the CRD.
30
See Walko (2008) for a detailed discussion on the funding of balance sheets by banks in CESE and the
maturity structure of these liabilities.
31
Nevertheless, it should be noted that banks may still withdraw or withhold credit to the local economy,
irrespective of the source of funding, if credit risk is perceived to be rising or if there are few profitable loan
opportunities. Additionally, banks may also feel the need to hoard liquidity to buffer against any worsening in
market conditions.
33
Figure 5. CESE New Member States:
Loan-to-Deposit Ratio
Figure 6. CESE New Member States:
Total Assets of Foreign Bank
Branches and Subsidiaries
1.8
180
1.6
160
1.4
140
120
1.2
100
1.0
80
0.8
60
0.6
40
0.4
20
0.2
0
Poland
0.0
Estonia
Lithuania
Latvia
Hungary
Romania
Bulgaria
Poland
Slovakia
Czech
Republic
Czech
Hungary Romania* Slovakia* Bulgaria**
Republic*
Subsidiaries
Estonia
Lithuania
Latvia**
Branches
Sources: European Central Bank; and authors’ calculations.
* Non-EU subsidiaries are not included for confidentiality reasons.
** Some branches are not included for confidentiality reasons.
B. Data Shortcomings and Areas for Improvement
The banking statistics used in this paper provide a more comprehensive breakdown of the
claims of foreign banks on a particular recipient country, including direct cross-border
claims. However, they are not without shortcomings, and their interpretation is subject to the
following caveats:
•
The BIS claims of LAFBs include claims of both foreign subsidiaries and branches.
Given the typically different business nature and the type of funding of these
institutions and their potential implications for stability of lending to the host
economy, a separation of such claims would have been more informative.
•
The share of local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency as a proportion of the total
local claims of LAFBs on the nonbank private sector appears to be underestimated for
some countries when compared against national data from host authorities. This
weakness could be explained by the fact that BIS statistics do not include data for all
foreign banks operating in a host country, thus overstating the “residual” or local
claims (in local and foreign currencies) of local banks component of the data, relative
to foreign bank claims (Box 2).
•
The BIS claims data are reported in U.S. dollars. This means that the changes in
claims figures over time may be partly attributable to movements in the exchange rate
between the actual currencies of the claims and the U.S. dollar.
34
•
The derived sectoral and maturity data are based on strong assumptions of
proportionality using aggregate data from other series within the BIS database. In
reality, these proportions may not necessarily hold across the different components.
•
Our assumption that ultimate risk equals immediate borrower risk for the local claims
of LAFBs in local currency may impose an upward bias in the claims on countries
which are the recipients of significant foreign direct investments (where the ultimate
risk of the local currency loans made by the LAFBs foreign investors from other
countries is defined as a risk to the investor’s own country). This assumption could
partly explain why the local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency (the residual) are
negative for some countries, notably, the Czech and Slovak Republics.32
•
The local claims of LAFBs in local currency for some countries may also include
foreign currency-linked local currency-denominated claims. To the extent that such
claims are sizeable in some countries, the indirect credit risk arising from exchange
rate risk may be underestimated.
•
The IFS data does not break down claims according to local and foreign currencies.
Thus, the extent of foreign exchange and indirect credit risks for the local banks may
be underestimated in our assessment.
The gaps in the existing data used for international surveillance of country exposures and
vulnerabilities are evident in our analysis. This exercise reveals several areas in which
important data series are not available on a consistent and comprehensive basis to allow for
more reliable cross-border surveillance and cross-country comparisons (Table 9). Ideally,
banking statistics should be collected using standard and consistent methodology, subscribed
to by all member countries, along the lines of, for example, the IMF’s Special Data
Dissemination Standard (SDDS). Although the data collected by the BIS and the IMF
represent steps in the right direction, greater collaboration and cohesiveness at the
international level are required.
32
See Appendix V, Tables A.2 to A.5.
35
Box 2. Discrepancies Among Sources of Banking Claims Data: The Estonia Example
The Estonian case offers a very good example of discrepancies arising from the use of BIS and IFS data,
compared to those reported by national authorities. While the total local claims of all banks in the
country are broadly similar between the two datasets for the 2005 and 2006, albeit with a larger
divergence in 2007, the local claims of local banks show significant differences. The amounts reported
by the Bank of Estonia are less than 1 percent of GDP from 2005–07, while the derived amounts using
BIS and IFS data are between 30–52 percent of GDP over the same period. In other words, the claims of
LAFBs appear to be significantly underestimated in the latter case.1
Box Table 1. Estonia: Comparison of Banking Statistics from Different Sources
(In percent of GDP)
Components of Bank Claims
2005
2006
2007
(1)
(2)
(3) = (1) + (2)
(4)
Bank of Estonia
Local claims by local banks and LAFBs in local currency
Local claims by local banks and LAFBs in foreign currency
From both of which is derived: Local claim s by local banks and LAFBs in all currencies
Of which: Local claims by local banks in all currencies
14.0
42.9
56.9
0.36
18.2
59.8
78.0
0.56
20.0
69.0
89.0
0.73
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d) = (c) – (b) – (a)
(e)
BIS and IFS
Local claims by LAFBs in local currency
Local claims by LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims by local banks and LAFBs in all currencies
From all of which is derived: Local claims by local banks in all currencies
Cross-border claims by foreign banks
13.9
11.4
54.8
29.5
51.0
20.1
20.8
80.3
39.4
62.2
22.5
25.0
99.5
52.0
62.1
Sources: Bank of Estonia; Bank for International Settlements; International Financial Statistics, IMF; and authors’
calculations.
The banking statistics provided by country authorities are more complete in some ways, but
shortcomings exist in other areas. Like the BIS/IFS dataset, there is also a lack of granularity in the Bank
of Estonia data, albeit in different ways. Some of the key differences, based on reported claims on the
nonbank private sector, follow:
•
The Bank of Estonia provides data encompassing the claims of all banks on the nonbank private
sector in Estonia. In contrast, BIS statistics omit about 15 percent of the banking system in
Estonia, according to the central bank’s estimates, which is consistent with the fact that the BISreported claims of LAFBs are biased on the low side.
•
The Bank of Estonia reports banking sector claims in local and foreign currency, but do not
break down these local and foreign currency claims according to those of LAFBs and local
banks. The BIS reports all claims of LAFBs; the IFS data reports credit provided by all
depository institutions in the country to the nonbank private sector, and the difference between
these two represent the local claims of local banks.
•
BIS statistics include a separate series on the direct cross-border claims of BIS-reporting
foreign banks on Estonia, which is a crucial component in the surveillance of cross-border
credit flows. This data series is not provided by the Bank of Estonia.
Another possible source of discrepancies is the basis on which the data is reported. The BIS reports data
on ultimate and immediate borrower bases. The data reported by country authorities are likely reported
on an immediate borrower basis.
1
There are similar discrepancies in the claims data for Ukraine. While BIS data show that the total claims of foreign banks amount
to around 23 percent of the nonbank private sector, data from national sources suggest that the market share of these banks are
actually closer to 50 percent.
Table 9. Bank Claims: Stocktake of Data Availability and Sources
Local claims of local banks
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency on ultimate risk basis
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency on ultimate risk basis
Cross-border claims of foreign banks on ultimate risk basis
Local claims of all banks in the country
Claims of foreign parent bank on subsidiary/branch
Maturity Breakdown
Short-Term Claims Longer-Term Claims
All Banks
in the System
Breakdown by
Branch/Subsidiary
Breakdown by
Sector
Breakdown by
Currency
Breakdown by
Credit Instrument
Total Claims
National statistics
No
No
No
n.a.
No
No
n.a.
No
No
No
No
No
n.a.
No
No
National statistics
No
No
No
National statistics
No
No
BIS
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
National statistics
n.a.
National statistics
National statistics
No
No
IFS;
National statistics
No
National statistics
No
IFS;
National statistics
n.a.
National statistics
No
No
No
Sources: Bank for International Settlements; International Financial Statistics, IMF; national authorities.
Note: The data available from national authorities may differ from country to country in terms of coverage, level of detail and definition.
36
37
VI. CONCLUDING REMARKS
The global financial crisis has emphasized the importance of reliable banking statistics for
cross-border monitoring purposes. Such data have become of significant import for CESE,
where the increasing integration of the European financial system have increased the
exposure of the region to liquidity and credit shocks emanating from elsewhere. The
importance of foreign banks in many of the local economies and the concentration of lenders
to the region means that these countries may be susceptible to developments originating
elsewhere, which may induce a quick and significant reduction in lending to the region.
Withdrawals by foreign parents of maturing loans could take the form of a retrenchment of
cross-border loans, or in countries where funding is largely through local deposits, refusal to
roll over maturing loans to the private sector amid rising credit and counterparty risks.
The main objective of this paper is to develop a comprehensive and more consistent dataset
to analyze the risks associated with bank credit flows in the CESE region. Granularity in the
BIS data allows us to show the different components of claims by foreign banks on a
country, both on a sectoral basis and by maturity. Combined with the IFS data from the IMF
on local claims by local banks, we are able to examine the stability implications of bank
funding to the nonbank private sector.
Our analysis using the constructed data dispel any notion that rapid credit growth in CESE and
the region’s increasing dependence on foreign lenders should solely be the concern of the
host countries. While some of the host countries have clearly become more at risk from a sudden
withdrawal of short-term external funding, creditor banks also have significant incentives to
adopt a longer-term view of their assets in CESE, given their aggregate exposures to the region.
Any decision to withhold or quickly withdraw short-term lending could hurt economic activity in
the region, with potentially severe implications for the asset quality of the foreign banks’ larger
and more “captive” longer-term exposures, especially if it results in a regional contagion. The
data suggest that creditors have been differentiating across diverse countries in the region, as
suggested by the changing maturities of claims over time.
Against this backdrop, policymakers need to be vigilant and adequately prepared to manage
the risks arising from this inter-dependence between home and host countries. Specifically,
financial surveillance needs to pay closer attention to the sources of financing of credit, the
composition of that credit, its impact on a country’s external position, and the ability of
banking systems to absorb shocks from any significant tightening in liquidity and possibly, a
sharp reversal in the credit cycle. To this end, greater effort should be expended to improve
credit data collection on a multilateral level. Presently, it is difficult to conclude that one
source of data may be superior or more useful than another. Rather, the solution is to require
greater collaboration among country authorities and international financial institutions, such
as the BIS and the IMF, in a concerted effort to collect better-quality, and more complete and
comprehensive credit statistics.
38
APPENDIX I. A COMPARISON OF DATA ON FOREIGN BANK CLAIMS
Claims on a particular country are captured differently across databases such as those of the
BIS, the IMF, and national sources:
•
The IMF’s International Financial Statistics (IFS). The claims comprise those of
depository corporations in a particular country (both domestic and foreign) on the
resident nonbank private sector, in local currency. However, they exclude direct
cross-border claims from foreign banks to the domestic economy. Moreover, there is
no breakdown of local versus foreign currency claims.
•
The BIS Consolidated Banking Statistics. The claims reported by the BIS comprise
outstanding loans and deposits, holdings of debt and equity securities, traditionally
referred to as on-balance sheet claims. Claims are reported on an immediate borrower
and ultimate risk bases, the difference between the two being the presence of risk
transfers between the country of the immediate borrower to the country of ultimate
risk.
•
The International Investment Position statistics. Liabilities represent amounts owed to
all external creditors, not just to foreign banks. They are also recorded on an
immediate borrower, not ultimate risk basis. Additionally, granularities across the
different liability components are not standard across countries, with some providing
more detailed breakdown than others.
•
National banking statistics. These statistics, which are collected by central banks and
supervisors, tend to differ across countries in terms of their definitions, the type of
series and/or the comprehensiveness of the coverage. They do not capture loans that
are made directly from banks in foreign countries to local borrowers.
39
APPENDIX II. DERIVATION OF THE BANK CLAIMS COMPONENTS ON HOST COUNTRIES
The total bank claims on a particular country comprise those by foreign and local banks. The
foreign claims on a country are made up of cross-border claims and local claims of foreign
bank offices. In this paper, we require the following series of claims (Figure 1 from main
text):
•
Direct cross-border claims of foreign banks on the host country (“A”);
•
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency (“B”);
•
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency (“C”); and
•
Local claims of local banks (“E”).
Figure 1. Components of Bank Credit (repeated)
Local claims
of local banks
(E)
Total credit to "recipient" countries
(A + B + C + E)
Total claims of a foreign banking group
(A + B + C + D)
Foreign claims
(A + B + C)
Local claims of the banking group's
foreign offices
Domestic claims of
(B + C)
the banking group's
Cross-border
domestic offices
claims (A)
Local claims in
Local claims in
(D)
foreign currency
local currency
(B)
(C)
International claims
(A + B)
Available from BIS, on ultimate risk basis.
Derived from BIS immediate borrower and ultimate risk data.
Derived from BIS ultimate risk and IFS data.
Source: Bank for International Settlements.
A detailed description of our calculations and assumptions is presented below, and
summarized in Table A.1.
A. All Claims of Foreign Banks
We use a combination of BIS data, on ultimate risk and immediate borrower bases, to
construct more comprehensive data on the components of foreign credit in a particular
country. The availability of these two categories of data is presented in Box A.1. In
summary:
40
•
•
BIS data are available on an ultimate risk basis for:
¾
Total foreign claims (“A” + “B” + “C” in Box Figure 1);
¾
Cross-border claims, which we assume to all be in foreign currency (“A”);
and
¾
All local claims of LAFBs (“B” + “C”).
BIS data are available on an immediate borrower basis for:
¾
Total foreign claims (“A” + “B” + “C”);
¾
International claims (“A” + “B”); and
¾
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency (“C”).
Thus, we would still need to estimate the local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency (“B” in
Text Figure 1); the local claims of LAFBs in local currency (“C” in Text Figure 1); and the
local claims of local banks (“E” in Text Figure 1), all on an ultimate risk basis.
B. Foreign Bank Claims on an Ultimate Risk Basis
Local claims of LAFBs
The local claims of LAFBs are made up of local and foreign currency components. However,
the data for local claims in local currency are only available on an immediate borrower basis.
In order to derive the two separate components on an ultimate risk basis, we apply the
following steps:
1.
We make the assumption that the local currency claims of LAFBs are largely on local
borrowers; thus, any net risk transfer would be negligible.
2.
The local claims of LAFBs in local currency on an ultimate risk basis (“C” in Box
Figure 1) are therefore assumed to be equal to local claims of foreign banks in local
currency on an immediate borrower basis.
3.
The local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency on an ultimate risk basis (“B” in Box
Figure 1) are thus assumed to be equal to the difference between the total local claims
of LAFBs on an ultimate risk basis (“B” + “C”) and their local claims in local
currency (“C”).
41
Sectoral claims of foreign banks
For the purposes of this study, we are specifically interested in claims on the nonbank private
sector and claims on the banking sector (inter-bank loans). BIS data for total foreign claims
on a particular country are available in the following sub-series:
•
Foreign claims on the nonbank private sector;
•
Foreign claims on the public sector; and
•
Foreign claims on banks.
We derive the foreign claims on the nonbank private sector amount for each component
(cross-border, local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency, local claims of LAFBs in local
currency) using the following steps:
1.
We make the assumption that the proportion of total foreign claims for each sector is
the same for both the cross-border and local claims components of foreign banks.
2.
For each quarter, we calculate the foreign claims on the nonbank private sector as a
proportion of total foreign claims.
3.
These proportions are subsequently applied to the corresponding quarterly data for:
4.
¾
Cross-border claims (“A”) to obtain cross-border claims on the nonbank
private sector (hereafter “A_NBP”);
¾
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency (“B”) to obtain local claims of
LAFBs in foreign currency on the nonbank private sector (hereafter
“B_NBP”); and
¾
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency (“C”), to obtain local claims of
LAFBs in local currency on the nonbank private sector (hereafter “C_NBP”).
We repeat steps 1–3, using the proportion of foreign claims on the banking sector to
total foreign claims, to derive the individual foreign claims components for the
banking sector:
¾
Cross-border claims (“A”) to obtain cross-border claims on the banking sector
(hereafter “A_BK”);
¾
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency (“B”) to obtain local claims of
foreign banks in foreign currency on the banking sector (hereafter “B_BK”);
and
42
¾
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency (“C”), to obtain local claims of
foreign banks in local currency on the banking sector (hereafter “C_BK”).
Short-term claims of foreign banks
The derivation of short-term foreign claims, that is, claims maturing in one year or less,
provides an estimate of the amount of credit that could be withdrawn from a country at short
notice. BIS claims data on a particular country by maturity are available for total
international claims (“A + B” in Box Figure 1 above) on an immediate borrower basis only,
as follows:
•
Up to and including 1 year;
•
Over 1 year and up to 2 years; and
•
Over 2 years.
We initially derive the short-term foreign claims on the nonbank private sector for each
component (cross-border, local claims in foreign currency, local claims in local currency)
using the following steps:
1.
We make the assumption that the proportion of total international claims on an
immediate borrower basis for each maturity also applies to each total foreign claims
component on an ultimate risk basis, namely, for the cross-border and local claims
components of foreign banks.
2.
For each quarter, we calculate the international claims for maturities of up-to-andincluding-1-year as a proportion of total international claims.
3.
These proportions are subsequently applied to the corresponding ultimate risk basis
quarterly data for the nonbank private sector derived previously:
4.
¾
Cross-border claims on the nonbank private sector (“A_NBP”) to obtain shortterm cross-border claims on the nonbank private sector (“A_NBP_ST”);
¾
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency on the nonbank private sector
(“B_NBP”) to obtain short-term local claims of foreign banks in foreign
currency on the nonbank private sector (“B_NBP_ST”); and
¾
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency on the nonbank private sector
(“C_NBP”), to obtain local claims of LAFBs in local currency on the nonbank
private sector (“C_NBP_ST”).
We repeat steps 1–3 to derive the individual short-term foreign claims components
for the banking sector, by applying the proportion of international claims (immediate
43
borrower basis) for maturities of up-to-and-including-1-year as a proportion of total
international claims on:
¾
Cross-border claims on the banking sector (“A_BK”) to obtain short-term
cross-border claims on the banking sector (“A_BK_ST”);
¾
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency on the banking sector (“B_BK”)
to obtain short-term local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency on the banking
sector (“B_BK_ST”); and
¾
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency on the banking sector (“C_BK”) to
obtain local claims of LAFBs in local currency on the banking sector
(“C_BK_ST”).
C. Local Claims of Local Banks
The remaining component required to estimate the total loans to an economy is the local
claims of local banks (“E”). The data are available from the IFS database. In the IFS, line 32d
comprises the claims of depository corporations in a particular country (both domestic and
foreign) on the resident nonbank private sector, in local currency (“E_NBP”). Thus, we
estimate the local claims of local banks on the non-private sector of a particular economy in
the following manner:
1.
We convert the IFS series into U.S. dollars, using corresponding IFS quarterly
exchange rates, to match the denomination of the BIS data. This yields the local
claims of all banks (“B” + “C” + “E” in Box Figure 1), but on the nonbank private
sector only (“B_NBP” + “C_NBP” + “E_NBP”).
2.
Subsequently, the local claims of local banks (“E_NBP”) on the nonbank private
sector are estimated by subtracting the local claims of LAFBs on the nonbank private
sector (“B_NBP” + “C_NBP”) from the IFS series, local claims of all banks on the
nonbank private sector (“B_NBP” + “C_NBP + “E_NBP”).
D. Claims by Foreign Banks of Individual Home Countries on Individual Host
Countries
To this point, the components of foreign claims (cross-border, local claims of LAFBs in local
currency, local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency) on each host country have been
calculated, defined by sectors (banking and nonbank private), and further refined by maturity
(short- and longer-term). Next, we allocate these estimated aggregate claims components to
individual home countries as follows:
4.
We make the assumption that the share of claims by banks of individual home
countries on individual host countries presented in table 3 of the main text applies to each
44
claims component on an ultimate risk basis, namely, for the cross-border and local claims
components of foreign banks by sector and maturity.
5.
Taking the data series presented in Figure 3 and Appendix IV, Figure A.2 of shortterm foreign bank claims on the banking and nonbank private sectors, we multiply each
component by the corresponding home country share shown in Table 3 of the main text, to
arrive at the amount of claim by each home country on a particular host country, for each
component.
6.
Similarly, we calculate the longer-term foreign bank claims components for the
nonbank and banking sectors of each host country as the difference between the total foreign
bank claims components for each sector and their respective short-term amounts. These
series are also multiplied by the home country shares in Table 3.
Table A.1.Bank Claims: Summary of Data Series, Sources and Calculations
Definition
Claims by foreign banks
Total foreign claims, ultimate risk basis.
Series
Source
Derivation
A+B+C
Bank for International Settlements.
BIS Table 9C:S.
Local claims of local affiliates of foreign banks ("LAFBs"), ultimate risk basis.
B+C
Bank for International Settlements.
BIS Table 9C:U.
Cross-border claims, ultimate risk basis.
A
Bank for International Settlements.
BIS Table 9C:T.
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency, ultimate risk basis.
C
Bank for International Settlements.
BIS Table 9A:L; assume little net risk transfer so immediate borrower basis equals ultimate risk basis.
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency, ultimate risk basis.
B
Bank for International Settlements and
authors' calculations.
Difference between BIS Table 9C:U and BIS Table 9A:L.
Foreign claims by sector
Foreign claims on non-bank private sector, ultimate risk basis.
Foreign claims on banks, ultimate risk basis.
Bank for International Settlements.
BIS Table 9C:H.
Bank for International Settlements.
BIS Table 9C:F.
A_NBP
Bank for International Settlements and
authors' calculations.
Series "A" apportioned for foreign claims on non-bank private sector (BIS Tables 9C:S and 9C:H).
Cross-border claims on banks, ultimate risk basis.
A_BK
Bank for International Settlements and
authors' calculations.
Series "A" apportioned for foreign claims on banks (BIS Tables 9C:S and 9C:F).
Local claims of LAFBs on the non-bank private sector in local currency, ultimate
risk basis.
C_NBP
Bank for International Settlements and
authors' calculations.
Series "C" apportioned for foreign claims on the non-bank private sector (BIS Tables 9C:S and 9C:H).
Local claims of LAFBs on banks in local currency, ultimate risk basis.
C_BK
Bank for International Settlements and
authors' calculations.
Series "C" apportioned for foreign claims on banks (BIS Tables 9C:S and 9C:F).
Local claims of LAFBs on the non-bank private sector in foreign currency, ultimate
risk basis.
B_NBP
Bank for International Settlements and
authors' calculations.
Series "B" apportioned for foreign claims on the non-bank private sector (BIS Tables 9C:S and 9C:H).
Local claims of LAFBs on banks in foreign currency, ultimate risk basis.
B_BK
Bank for International Settlements and
authors' calculations.
Series "B" apportioned for foreign claims on banks (BIS Tables 9C:S and 9C:F).
International Financial Statistics.
IFS Line 32d.
E_NBP
International Financial Statistics and
Bank for International Settlements.
Difference between IFS Line 32d and local claims of the banking group's foreign offices on the non-bank private
sector.
International Financial Statistics and
Bank for International Settlements.
Difference between the claims of depository corporations in the banking group's home country on the resident
private sector (IFS Line 32d) and the local claims of LAFBs on the non-bank private sector in that country (BIS
Table 9C:U).
Local claims on the non-bank private sector
Local claims of all banks on the non-bank private sector.
Local claims of local banks on the non-bank private sector.
Domestic claims of LAFBs on the non-bank private sector.
Short-term foreign claims by sector
Total international claims, immediate borrower basis
International claims up to and including one year, immediate borrower basis
Bank for International Settlements
BIS Table 9A:A
Bank for International Settlements
BIS Table 9A:B
Cross-border claims up to and including one year on non-bank private sector,
ultimate risk basis.
A_NBP_ST
Bank for International Settlements and
authors' calculations.
Series "A_NBP" apportioned for claims of one year or less (BIS Tables A:A, 9A:B and 9C:H).
Cross-border claims up to and including one year on banks, ultimate risk basis.
A_BK_ST
Bank for International Settlements and
authors' calculations.
Series "A_BK" apportioned for foreign claims on banks (BIS Tables A:A, 9A:B and Table 9C:F).
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency up to and including one year on the nonbank private sector, ultimate risk basis.
C_NBP_ST
Bank for International Settlements and
authors' calculations.
Series "C_NBP" apportioned for foreign claims on the non-bank private sector (BIS Tables A:A, 9A:B and Table
9C:H).
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency up to and including one year on banks,
ultimate risk basis.
C_BK_ST
Bank for International Settlements and
authors' calculations.
Series "C_BK" apportioned for foreign claims on banks (BIS Tables A:A, 9A:B and Table 9C:F).
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency up to and including one year on nonbank private sector, ultimate risk basis.
B_NBP_ST
Bank for International Settlements and
authors' calculations.
Series "BNBP" apportioned for foreign claims on the non-bank private sector (BIS Tables A:A, 9A:B and Table
9C:H).
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency up to and including one year on banks,
ultimate risk basis.
B_BK_ST
Bank for International Settlements and
authors' calculations.
Series "B_BK" apportioned for foreign claims on banks (BIS Tables A:A, 9A:B and Table 9C:F).
International (foreign currency) claims
Local claims in local currency
Local claims in foreign currency
(A+B)
(C)
(B)
BIS
BIS
BIS and authors' calculations
Sources: Bank for International Settlements; International Financial Statistics, IMF; and authors’ calculations.
45
Cross-border claims on non-bank private sector, ultimate risk basis.
46
Box A.1. BIS Consolidated Banking Data
The data on consolidated foreign exposures of BIS reporting banks are available on immediate borrower and
ultimate risk bases (Table). These series are defined as follows:
• Claims on an ultimate risk basis are claims allocated to the country where the final risk lies. The
criterion is the residency of the ultimate obligor or guarantor; claims are cross border when the ultimate
obligor or guarantor resides in a country that is different from the residency of the reporting institution.
• Claims on an immediate borrower basis are claims allocated to the country where the original risk lies.
They are claims that are granted or extended to non-residents, which is defined with reference to the
residence of the counterparty of the head office, or of the foreign offices, of reporting banks.
Thus, the BIS’ immediate borrower basis data series only captures the default risk of the immediate borrower,
rather than that of the ultimate obligor to which the risk has been transferred. Comprehensive data on an
ultimate risk basis have only been made available from 2005 onwards.
The difference between the two series may be due to the presence of risk transfers between the country of the
immediate borrower to the country of ultimate risk, as a result of guarantees, collateral or credit derivatives
that are part of the banking book. Net risk transfers equal the difference between inward transfers of risk to
the country of the ultimate obligor and outward transfers of risk from the country of the immediate borrower.
In principle, there should be an equivalent inward risk transfer for every outward risk transfer of risk, so that
aggregate net risk transfers should equal zero. However, this equality does not hold in the consolidated
banking statistics because banks do not report risk allocations to or from their home country.
Box Table 1. Consolidated Foreign Exposures of BIS Reporting Banks, Positions Outstanding,
1
as at End-March 2005
(In billions of U.S. dollars)
Immediate borrower
By type of exposure
2
Claims (loans and securities)
Foreign claims (A+B+C)
Cross-border claims (A)
Local claims –in foreign currency (B)
–in local currency (C)
Derivative contracts
Contingent facilities
Guarantees extended
Credit commitments
International
3
claims
}
13,667.6
Basis for risk allocation
Net risk transfers
-321.7
9,044.8
4,622.8
}
Ultimate risk
13,344.4
8,125.3
5,215.8
1,702.8
674.9
2,661.2
4
Other breakdowns
Claims by sector
Public sector
Banks
Non-bank private sector
Unallocated
Claims by maturity
Up to and including 1 year
Over 1 year up to and including 2 years
Over 2 years
Unallocated
Memorandum: Starting date of time series
9,044.8
1,627.0
3,451.3
3,933.5
33.0
9,044.8
4,428.7
309.8
2,513.7
1,792.6
December 1983
13,344.4
2,095.3
4,206.5
3,549.5
493.1
June 1999
March 2005
Source: Bank for International Settlements.
1
Sum of positions reported by banks headquartered in Australia, Canada, Chile, Finland, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway,
Portugal, Singapore, Taiwan Province of China, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States.
2
Outstanding loans and deposits, plus holdings of debt and equity securities; historically referred to as on-balance sheet claims.
3
Cross-border claims denominated in all currencies plus local claims of foreign bank offices denominated in foreign currencies.
4
For claims on an immediate borrower basis, the breakdowns refer to international claims; for claims on an ultimate risk basis, the breakdowns refer to foreign
claims.
47
APPENDIX III. CESE-13: COMPOSITION OF BANK CLAIMS ON THE PRIVATE SECTOR, BY
HOST COUNTRY
Figure A.1. CESE-13: Composition of Foreign Bank Claims on the Nonbank
Private and Banking Sectors, by Host Country
(In percent of GDP)
Bulgaria
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
180
180
160
160
140
140
120
120
100
100
80
80
60
60
40
40
20
20
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of local banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Croatia
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
180
180
160
160
140
140
120
120
100
100
80
80
60
60
40
40
20
20
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of local banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Czech Republic
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
180
180
160
160
140
140
120
120
100
100
80
80
60
60
40
40
20
20
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of local banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Sources: Bank for International Settlements; International Financial Statistics, IMF; and authors’ calculations.
48
Figure A.1. CESE-13: Composition of Foreign Bank Claims on the Nonbank
Private and Banking Sectors by Host Country (continued)
(In percent of GDP)
Estonia
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
180
180
160
160
140
140
120
120
100
100
80
80
60
60
40
40
20
20
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of local banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Hungary
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
180
180
160
160
140
140
120
120
100
100
80
80
60
60
40
40
20
20
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of local banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Latvia
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
180
180
160
160
140
140
120
120
100
100
80
80
60
60
40
40
20
20
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of local banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Sources: Bank for International Settlements; International Financial Statistics, IMF; and authors’ calculations.
49
Figure A.1. CESE-13: Composition of Foreign Bank Claims on the Nonbank
Private and Banking Sectors, by Host Country (continued)
(In percent of GDP)
Lithuania
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
180
180
160
160
140
140
120
120
100
100
80
80
60
60
40
40
20
20
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of local banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Poland
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
180
180
160
160
140
140
120
120
100
100
80
80
60
60
40
40
20
20
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of local banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Romania
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
180
180
160
160
140
140
120
120
100
100
80
80
60
60
40
40
20
20
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of local banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Sources: Bank for International Settlements; International Financial Statistics, IMF; and authors’ calculations.
50
Figure A.1. CESE-13: Composition of Foreign Bank Claims on the Nonbank
Private and Banking Sectors, by Host Country (continued)
(In percent of GDP)
Russia
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
180
180
160
160
140
140
120
120
100
100
80
80
60
60
40
40
20
20
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of local banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Slovak Republic
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
180
180
160
160
140
140
120
120
100
100
80
80
60
60
40
40
20
20
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of local banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Turkey
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
180
180
160
160
140
140
120
120
100
100
80
80
60
60
40
40
20
20
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of local banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Sources: Bank for International Settlements; International Financial Statistics, IMF; and authors’ calculations.
51
Figure A.1. CESE-13: Composition of Foreign Bank Claims on the Nonbank
Private and Banking Sectors, by Host Country (concluded)
(In percent of GDP)
Ukraine
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
180
180
160
160
140
140
120
120
100
100
80
80
60
60
40
40
20
20
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of local banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Sources: Bank for International Settlements; International Financial Statistics, IMF; and authors’ calculations.
52
APPENDIX IV. CESE-13: COMPOSITION OF SHORT-TERM FOREIGN BANK CLAIMS ON THE
PRIVATE SECTOR, BY HOST COUNTRY
Figure A.2. CESE-13: Composition of Short-Term Foreign Bank Claims on the
Nonbank Private and Banking Sectors, by Host Country
(In percent of GDP)
Bulgaria
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
50
50
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Croatia
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
50
50
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Czech Republic
Banking Sector
Nonbank Private Sector
50
50
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Sources: Bank for International Settlements; International Financial Statistics, IMF; and authors’ calculations.
53
Figure A.2. CESE-13: Composition of Short-Term Foreign Bank Claims on the
Nonbank Private and Banking Sectors, by Host Country (continued)
(In percent of GDP)
Estonia
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
50
50
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Hungary
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
50
50
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Latvia
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
50
50
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Sources: Bank for International Settlements; International Financial Statistics, IMF; and authors’ calculations.
54
Figure A.2. CESE-13: Composition of Short-Term Foreign Bank Claims on the
Nonbank Private and Banking Sectors, by Host Country (continued)
(In percent of GDP)
Lithuania
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
50
50
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Poland
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
50
50
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Romania
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
50
50
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Sources: Bank for International Settlements; International Financial Statistics, IMF; and authors’ calculations.
55
Figure A.2. CESE-13: Composition of Short-Term Foreign Bank Claims on the
Nonbank Private and Banking Sectors, by Host Country (continued)
(In percent of GDP)
Russia
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
50
50
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Slovak Republic
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
50
50
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Turkey
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
50
50
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Sources: Bank for International Settlements; International Financial Statistics, IMF; and authors’ calculations.
56
Figure A.2. CESE-13: Composition of Short-Term Foreign Bank Claims on the
Nonbank Private and Banking Sectors, by Host Country (concluded)
(In percent of GDP)
Ukraine
Nonbank Private Sector
Banking Sector
50
50
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
0
Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 Sep-07 Dec-07
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Local claims of LAFBs in local currency
Cross-border claims of foreign banks
Local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency
Sources: Bank for International Settlements; International Financial Statistics, IMF; and authors’ calculations.
57
APPENDIX V. CESE-13: A QUANTIFICATION OF FOREIGN BANK CLAIMS ON THE PRIVATE
SECTOR, BY HOME AND HOST COUNTRIES
Table A.2. CESE-13: A Quantification of Short-Term Foreign Bank Claims on
the Nonbank Private Sector, by Home and Host Countries, as at End-2007
Host
Home
Bulgaria
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Croatia
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
Total
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Czech Republic
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
Total
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Estonia
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
Total
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Total
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
Austria
482
374
509
1,365
3.4
0.4
2,580
1,071
1,071
4,722
8.4
1.2
8,406
-433
3,426
11,398
6.4
3.0
9
10
24
42
0.2
0.0
Belgium
France
172
174
134
135
182
183
488
492
1.2
1.2
0.1
0.0
34
479
14
199
14
199
63
877
0.1
1.6
0.0
0.0
7,096
4,973
-366
-256
2,892
2,027
9,623
6,744
5.4
3.8
2.1
0.3
4
4
5
5
12
12
20
21
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
Germany
Greece
Italy
248
841
665
192
653
516
261
888
702
701
2,381
1,883
1.7
5.9
4.7
0.0
0.7
0.1
1,518
18
2,270
630
7
942
630
7
942
2,778
32
4,154
4.9
0.1
7.4
0.1
0.0
0.2
1,853
...
3,325
-95
...
-171
755
...
1,355
2,513
...
4,509
1.4
...
2.5
0.1
...
0.2
22
...
19
25
...
21
62
...
52
110
...
91
0.5
...
0.4
0.0
...
0.0
6
47
0
4
36
0
6
49
1
16
132
1
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
32
13
1
13
5
0
13
5
0
58
23
1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
176
982
28
-9
-51
-1
72
400
11
238
1,332
37
0.1
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
...
1
899
...
1
999
...
2
2,483
...
4
4,381
...
0.0
20.2
...
0.0
1.0
328
8
28
254
6
22
346
9
29
928
23
79
2.3
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
17
21
16
7
9
7
7
9
7
32
39
30
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
110
594
1,023
-6
-31
-53
45
242
417
149
805
1,387
0.1
0.4
0.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
1
3
0
1
4
1
4
9
1
7
16
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1
0
0
2
0.0
118
-6
48
161
0.1
1
1
2
3
0.0
2,906
5.1
2,906
5.1
12,811
-1,478
-0.8
11,689
6.5
21.7
964
4.4
1,071
4.9
2,661
12.3
4,696
22.7
28,684
16.0
38,896
21.0
7,000
12.4
Japan
Netherlands
Sweden
Switzerland
United Kingdom
United States
Others
Total (In millions of U.S. dollars)
Total (In percent of host GDP)
Host
Home
6
5
7
18
3,005
7.4
2,332
5.8
3,171
7.8
8,508
Hungary
Latvia
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Total
Lithuania
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Total
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
21.7
Poland
Total
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Total
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
Austria
1,821
916
2,444
5,181
3.7
1.4
47
92
60
199
0.7
0.1
28
5
34
67
0.2
0.0
1,205
328
512
2,045
0.5
0.5
Belgium
France
Germany
939
504
1,718
473
253
864
1,260
676
2,305
2,672
1,433
4,887
1.9
1.0
3.4
0.6
0.1
0.1
2
15
237
4
29
469
2
19
305
8
63
1,011
0.0
0.2
3.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
13
24
304
2
4
51
16
29
369
31
57
724
0.1
0.1
1.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
1,843
1,529
4,087
502
416
1,113
783
649
1,735
3,127
2,594
6,936
0.7
0.6
1.6
0.7
0.1
0.2
Greece
Italy
Japan
4
1,302
98
2
655
49
6
1,747
132
12
3,704
279
0.0
2.6
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.0
3
70
9
7
139
17
4
90
11
14
300
37
0.1
1.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
...
52
...
...
9
...
...
64
...
...
125
...
...
0.3
...
...
0.0
...
3
4,421
488
1
1,204
133
1
1,877
207
6
7,502
828
0.0
1.7
0.2
0.0
0.4
0.0
Netherlands
Sweden
306
16
154
8
410
22
869
47
0.6
0.0
0.1
0.0
0
1,455
0
2,879
0
1,869
1
6,203
0.0
22.4
0.0
1.3
6
1,579
1
265
7
1,913
14
3,757
0.0
9.6
0.0
0.8
2,101
473
572
129
892
201
3,566
803
0.8
0.2
0.5
0.2
Switzerland
United Kingdom
United States
130
137
132
66
69
67
175
184
178
371
390
377
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.0
3
13
4
5
25
8
3
16
5
11
54
18
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
14
3
3
2
1
0
16
4
3
32
8
6
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
571
253
1,009
156
69
275
243
107
429
970
429
1,713
0.2
0.1
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.5
Others
Total (In millions of U.S. dollars)
Total (In percent of host GDP)
82
41
110
232
7,190
3,617
9,647
20,455
5.1
2.5
Host
Home
6.8
14.4
6
11
7
24
1,863
3,686
2,393
7,942
6.7
13.3
8.7
Romania
LC FC
XBC
1
7
14
341
2,463
4,836
5.2
0.9
Russia
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
LC LC
28.7
6
2,032
Total
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
366
571
2,281
5,265
8,207
32,799
4.4
1.2
1.9
12.4
Slovak Republic
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
6.3
1,344
19,327
Total
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
7.5
Turkey
Total
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Total
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
Austria
Belgium
5,321
119
3,684
83
5,690
127
14,695
329
8.8
0.2
3.9
0.1
1,414
599
426
181
4,494
1,906
6,333
2,686
0.5
0.2
1.7
0.6
3,869
1,713
-11
-5
1,593
705
5,451
2,414
7.1
3.1
1.4
0.5
207
1,421
84
575
314
2,161
605
4,157
0.1
0.6
0.2
0.9
France
Germany
Greece
2,325
447
1,899
1,610
310
1,315
2,486
478
2,030
6,420
1,236
5,244
3.8
0.7
3.1
0.2
0.0
1.6
1,969
2,399
85
593
723
26
6,260
7,627
270
8,822
10,748
380
0.7
0.8
0.0
0.3
0.3
0.1
551
575
...
-2
-2
...
227
237
...
777
811
...
1.0
1.1
...
0.0
0.0
...
1,267
1,436
2,694
513
581
1,091
1,927
2,184
4,100
3,706
4,201
7,884
0.5
0.6
1.2
0.1
0.1
2.5
Italy
Japan
1,238
5
857
4
1,324
6
3,419
15
2.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
1,421
872
428
263
4,519
2,773
6,368
3,908
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.0
2,200
3
-6
0
906
1
3,100
4
4.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
...
331
...
134
...
503
...
967
...
0.1
...
0.0
Netherlands
Sweden
Switzerland
766
9
889
530
6
616
819
9
951
2,115
24
2,456
1.3
0.0
1.5
0.3
0.0
0.6
1,358
454
1,410
409
137
425
4,318
1,444
4,483
6,085
2,035
6,318
0.5
0.2
0.5
0.8
0.4
1.5
592
12
3
-2
0
0
244
5
1
834
17
4
1.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
1,774
25
776
718
10
314
2,699
38
1,181
5,192
73
2,270
0.8
0.0
0.3
0.7
0.0
0.5
United Kingdom
United States
Others
22
198
32
15
137
22
24
212
35
62
548
90
0.0
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.0
794
1,194
342
239
360
103
2,524
3,796
1,086
3,557
5,350
1,530
0.3
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.0
223
186
11
-1
-1
0
92
76
5
314
262
16
0.4
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
1,777
1,503
248
719
608
100
2,704
2,287
377
5,201
4,398
726
0.8
0.6
0.1
0.2
0.0
13,272
7.9
9,189
5.5
14,191
8.5
36,652
14,311
1.1
4,312
0.3
45,498
3.5
64,121
9,940
13.0
-29
0.0
4,093
5.3
14,004
13,458
2.0
5,447
0.8
20,476
3.0
39,381
Total (In millions of U.S. dollars)
Total (In percent of host GDP)
Host
Home
4.9
18.2
Ukraine
1,128
47
781
LC FC
XBC
5.8
CESE-13
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
LC LC
Austria
Belgium
France
21.9
Total
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Total
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
47
2
32
2,107
88
1,458
3,282
137
2,272
2.3
0.1
1.6
0.9
0.0
0.1
26,517
14,003
14,594
0.8
0.4
0.4
7.0
3.0
0.6
6,593
1,602
3,532
0.2
0.0
0.1
1.7
0.3
0.1
22,277
10,148
16,152
0.7
0.3
0.5
5.9
2.2
0.6
55,387
25,754
34,277
1.7
0.8
1.0
14.6
5.6
1.3
Germany
Greece
377
67
16
3
704
126
1,097
196
0.8
0.1
0.0
0.1
15,222
5,615
0.5
0.2
0.4
1.8
4,878
3,103
0.1
0.1
0.1
1.0
17,653
7,432
0.5
0.2
0.5
2.3
37,752
16,150
1.1
0.5
1.1
5.1
Italy
Japan
Netherlands
251
82
243
10
3
10
469
154
453
731
239
706
0.5
0.2
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.1
17,235
2,101
8,188
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.8
0.0
1.0
4,605
612
2,385
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.3
14,047
3,877
10,299
0.4
0.1
0.3
0.7
0.0
1.3
35,887
6,590
20,872
1.1
0.2
0.6
1.7
0.0
2.6
Sweden
Switzerland
United Kingdom
175
721
58
7
30
2
328
1,348
107
510
2,099
167
0.4
1.5
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.0
5,126
4,974
3,904
0.2
0.1
0.1
1.1
1.2
0.1
4,440
1,870
1,125
0.1
0.1
0.0
1.0
0.4
0.0
8,324
8,800
6,026
0.3
0.3
0.2
1.8
2.0
0.2
17,890
15,643
11,055
0.5
0.5
0.3
3.9
3.6
0.4
United States
Others
119
26
5
1
222
49
347
77
0.2
0.1
0.0
5,419
2,223
0.2
0.1
0.0
1,439
646
0.0
0.0
0.0
7,671
2,303
0.2
0.1
0.0
14,529
5,173
0.4
0.2
0.0
4,076
2.9
169
0.1
7,614
5.4
11,859
Total (In millions of U.S. dollars)
Total (In percent of host GDP)
125,122
8.4
36,829
3.8
135,008
1.1
296,959
4.1
Sources: Bank for International Settlements; International Financial Statistics, IMF; and authors’ calculations.
Note: LC LC = local claims of LAFBs in local currency; LC FC = local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency; XBC = cross-border claims.
8.9
58
Table A.3. CESE-13: A Quantification of Short-Term Foreign Bank Claims on
the Banking Sector, by Home and Host Countries, as at End-2007
Bulgaria
Host
Home
Croatia
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Total
Czech Republic
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
LC LC
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
81
110
295
0.7
0.1
1,812
3.2
0.5
39
105
0.3
0.0
9
4
11
24
0.0
0.0
1,543
-79
629
2,093
1.2
0.5
2
2
4
8
0.0
0.0
40
106
0.3
0.0
130
54
153
336
0.6
0.0
1,081
-56
441
1,466
0.8
0.1
2
2
5
8
0.0
0.0
24
42
0.2
0.0
16
0.1
0.0
53
41
56
151
0.4
0.0
0.0
9
10
141
192
514
1.3
0.2
5
2
6
12
0.0
0.0
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
144
111
152
407
1.0
0.0
615
255
724
1,594
2.8
0.1
723
-37
295
981
0.5
0.0
7
8
20
35
0.2
0.0
1
1
1
3
0.0
0.0
9
4
10
22
0.0
0.0
38
-2
16
52
0.0
0.0
...
...
...
...
...
...
214
-11
87
28
0.1
0.0
3
1
4
9
0.0
0.0
290
0.2
0.0
0
0
1
1
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
6
0
2
8
0.0
0.0
348
386
960
1,694
7.8
0.4
71
2
55
1
75
2
200
5
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
5
6
2
2
6
7
12
15
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
24
129
-1
-7
10
53
32
175
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
United States
6
5
6
17
0.0
0.0
4
2
5
11
0.0
0.0
222
-11
91
302
0.2
0.0
1
1
3
6
0.0
0.0
Others
1
1
1
4
0.0
0
0
0
1
0.0
26
-1
11
35
0.0
0
0
1
1
0.0
Total (In millions of U.S. dollars)
649
503
685
1,837
1,897
787
2,232
4,917
6,238
-321
2,542
8,458
373
414
1,029
1,815
Total (In percent of host GDP)
1.6
1.2
1.7
3.4
1.4
4.0
3.5
-0.2
1.4
1.7
1.9
4.7
Sweden
Switzerland
United Kingdom
8
Host
Home
11
0.3
9
182
10
546
4
Italy
Netherlands
164
3
Greece
Japan
-21
0.7
Total
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
29
403
1.4
XBC
29
0.0
2,479
LC FC
38
1.9
745
LC LC
37
1,066
-94
XBC
104
484
1,828
LC FC
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
France
171
823
LC LC
Total
Belgium
411
290
XBC
Estonia
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
Austria
Germany
699
LC FC
Total
4.5
Hungary
Latvia
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
8.7
Total
Lithuania
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
4.7
Total
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
8.4
Poland
Total
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Total
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
GDP
dollars
GDP
Austria
688
346
923
1,956
1.4
0.5
17
34
22
73
0.3
0.0
9
1
11
21
0.1
0.0
372
101
158
631
0.1
0.2
Belgium
355
178
476
1,009
0.7
0.2
1
1
1
3
0.0
0.0
4
1
5
10
0.0
0.0
569
155
242
965
0.2
0.2
France
190
96
255
541
0.4
0.0
5
11
7
23
0.1
0.0
7
1
9
18
0.0
0.0
472
129
200
801
0.2
0.0
0.1
87
172
112
371
1.3
0.0
115
226
0.6
0.0
1,262
344
536
2,141
0.5
0.1
Germany
Greece
Italy
Japan
Netherlands
1,845
1.3
95
16
2
1
2
5
0.0
0.0
1
2
2
5
0.0
0.0
...
...
...
...
...
...
1
0
0
2
0.0
0.0
492
649
247
660
1,398
1.0
0.1
26
51
33
110
0.4
0.0
16
3
20
39
0.1
0.0
1,365
372
579
2,316
0.5
0.1
37
19
50
105
0.1
0.0
3
6
4
13
0.0
0.0
...
...
...
...
...
...
151
41
64
256
0.1
0.0
870
58
155
328
0.2
0.0
...
...
...
...
...
...
2
0
2
4
0.0
0.0
649
177
275
1,101
0.3
0.1
6
3
8
18
0.0
0.0
534
1,057
686
2,277
8.2
0.5
493
83
598
1,174
3.0
0.3
146
40
62
248
0.1
0.1
Switzerland
49
25
66
140
0.1
0.0
1
2
1
4
0.0
0.0
4
1
5
10
0.0
0.0
176
48
75
299
0.1
0.1
United Kingdom
52
26
69
147
0.1
0.0
5
9
6
20
0.1
0.0
1
0
1
3
0.0
0.0
78
21
33
0.0
0.0
United States
50
25
67
142
0.1
0.0
2
3
2
7
0.0
0.0
1
0
1
2
0.0
0.0
312
85
132
529
0.1
0.0
Others
31
16
41
88
0.1
2
4
3
9
0.0
2
0
2
4
0.0
415
113
176
704
0.2
2,714
1,366
3,642
7,722
684
1,353
878
2,916
635
107
770
1,511
5,966
1,625
2,533
10,124
1.9
1.0
2.6
2.5
4.9
3.2
1.6
0.3
2.0
1.4
0.4
0.6
Sweden
Total (In millions of U.S. dollars)
Total (In percent of host GDP)
115
326
Host
Home
Romania
Total
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
LC LC
LC FC
200
XBC
2,107
Total
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
2,969
0.2
0.8
LC LC
LC FC
2,188
-6
XBC
2.3
Turkey
Total
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
4.0
LC LC
0.8
74
LC FC
30
XBC
112
Total
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
5,717
3.4
1.5
663
901
3,082
46
32
50
128
0.1
0.0
281
85
893
1,259
0.1
0.3
969
-3
399
1,365
1.8
0.3
506
205
769
1,480
0.2
0.3
904
626
967
2,498
1.5
0.1
923
278
2,934
4,135
0.3
0.2
312
-1
128
439
0.6
0.0
451
183
686
1,320
0.2
0.1
Germany
174
121
186
481
0.3
0.0
1,125
339
3,575
5,038
0.4
0.1
325
-1
134
458
0.6
0.0
511
207
778
1,495
0.2
0.0
Greece
739
511
790
2,040
1.2
0.6
40
12
126
178
0.0
0.1
...
...
...
...
...
...
959
388
1,459
2,807
0.4
0.9
Italy
482
333
515
1,330
0.8
0.1
666
201
2,118
2,985
0.2
0.1
1,244
-4
512
1,753
2.3
0.1
...
...
...
...
...
...
Sweden
2,214
Slovak Republic
France
Japan
1,433
XBC
3.9
Belgium
Netherlands
2,070
LC FC
10.6
Russia
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
LC LC
Austria
5.4
132
215
0.0
0.1
2
1
2
6
0.0
0.0
409
123
1,300
1,832
0.1
0.0
2
0
1
2
0.0
0.0
118
48
179
344
0.1
0.0
298
206
319
823
0.5
0.1
637
192
2,024
2,852
0.2
0.4
335
-1
138
472
0.6
0.1
632
256
961
1,848
0.3
0.2
3
2
4
9
0.0
0.0
213
64
677
954
0.1
0.2
346
240
370
956
0.6
0.2
661
199
2,101
2,962
0.2
0.7
2
0
1
2
0.0
0.0
276
112
420
808
0.1
0.2
9
6
9
24
0.0
0.0
372
112
1,183
1,668
0.1
0.1
126
0
52
178
0.2
0.0
633
256
963
1,852
0.3
0.1
United States
77
53
82
213
0.1
0.0
560
169
1,780
2,508
0.2
0.0
105
0
43
148
0.2
0.0
535
217
814
1,566
0.2
0.0
Others
13
9
13
35
0.0
160
48
509
717
0.1
6
0
3
9
0.0
88
36
134
258
0.0
5,163
3.1
3,575
2.1
5,521
3.3
14,259
6,709
0.5
2,021
0.2
21,328
1.6
30,058
-16
0.0
2,314
3.0
10.3
4,791
0.7
1,939
0.3
7,290
1.1
14,020
2.3
5,621
7.3
7,918
8.5
Switzerland
United Kingdom
Total (In millions of U.S. dollars)
Total (In percent of host GDP)
Host
Home
7
0
3
10
0.0
Ukraine
LC FC
XBC
9
4
14
26
0.0
0.0
2.1
CESE-13
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
LC LC
0.0
Total
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Total
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
Austria
Belgium
689
29
29
1
1,287
54
2,004
83
1.4
0.1
0.5
0.0
9,403
4,350
0.3
0.1
2.5
0.9
2,448
610
0.1
0.0
0.6
0.1
9,419
3,571
0.3
0.1
2.5
0.8
21,271
8,532
0.6
0.3
5.6
1.8
France
477
20
890
1,387
1.0
0.1
4,992
0.2
0.2
1,371
0.0
0.1
6,715
0.2
0.3
13,079
0.4
0.5
Germany
230
10
430
670
0.5
0.0
5,334
0.2
0.2
1,734
0.1
0.1
7,464
0.2
0.2
14,533
0.4
0.4
41
2
77
120
0.1
0.0
1,969
0.1
0.6
1,060
0.0
0.3
2,654
0.1
0.8
5,683
0.2
1.8
153
6
286
446
0.3
0.0
5,933
0.2
0.3
1,547
0.0
0.1
5,914
0.2
0.3
13,394
0.4
0.6
Greece
Italy
Japan
50
2
94
146
0.1
0.0
819
0.0
0.0
243
0.0
0.0
1,720
0.1
0.0
2,783
0.1
0.0
Netherlands
148
6
277
431
0.3
0.1
3,042
0.1
0.4
893
0.0
0.1
4,253
0.1
0.5
8,188
0.2
1.0
Sweden
107
4
200
311
0.2
0.1
1,873
0.1
0.4
1,643
0.0
0.4
3,214
0.1
0.7
6,730
0.2
1.5
Switzerland
440
18
823
1,281
0.9
0.3
2,056
0.1
0.5
700
0.0
0.2
3,953
0.1
0.9
6,709
0.2
1.6
United Kingdom
35
1
66
102
0.1
0.0
1,447
0.0
0.1
430
0.0
0.0
2,445
0.1
0.1
4,322
0.1
0.2
United States
73
3
136
212
0.1
0.0
1,948
0.1
0.0
551
0.0
0.0
3,163
0.1
0.0
5,662
0.2
0.0
Others
16
1
30
47
0.0
761
0.0
226
0.0
925
0.0
1,912
0.1
2,489
103
4,648
7,240
1.8
0.1
3.3
Total (In millions of U.S. dollars)
Total (In percent of host GDP)
43,928
5.1
13,457
1.3
55,411
0.4
112,796
1.7
Sources: Bank for International Settlements; International Financial Statistics, IMF; and authors’ calculations.
Note: LC LC = local claims of LAFBs in local currency; LC FC = local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency; XBC = cross-border claims.
3.4
59
Table A.4. CESE-13: A Quantification Longer-Term Foreign Bank Claims on the
Nonbank Private Sector, by Home and Host Countries, as at End-2007
Host
Home
Bulgaria
Croatia
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Total
Czech Republic
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
LC LC
2,494
XBC
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
9,032
17,533
31.0
Estonia
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Total
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Total
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
Austria
762
592
804
2,158
5.3
0.6
4.6
13,065
-673
5,324
17,716
9.9
4.7
35
39
97
171
0.8
0.0
Belgium
272
211
287
771
1.9
0.2
80
33
120
233
0.4
0.1
11,029
-568
4,495
14,956
8.4
3.2
17
19
47
83
0.4
0.0
France
275
213
290
778
1.9
0.0
1,115
463
1,677
3,255
5.8
0.1
7,729
-398
3,150
10,481
5.9
0.4
17
19
48
84
0.4
0.0
0.0
Germany
6,007
LC FC
Total
392
304
413
1,109
2.7
0.0
3,534
1,467
5,314
10,315
18.3
0.3
2,880
-148
1,174
3,905
2.2
0.1
91
102
252
445
2.1
Greece
1,330
1,032
1,403
3,764
9.3
1.2
41
17
61
119
0.2
0.0
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Italy
1,051
816
1,109
2,976
7.4
0.1
5,285
2,194
7,946
15,424
27.3
0.7
5,168
-266
2,106
7,008
3.9
0.3
76
85
210
371
1.7
0.0
9
74
7
57
10
78
26
208
0.1
0.5
0.0
0.0
74
30
31
12
111
44
216
86
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.0
273
1,526
-14
-79
111
622
371
2,070
0.2
1.2
0.0
0.3
...
3
...
4
...
9
...
16
...
0.1
...
0.0
0.0
3,652
4,059
10,087
17,799
82.1
3.9
Japan
Netherlands
Sweden
1
1
1
2
518
402
547
1,467
3.6
0.3
40
17
61
118
0.2
0.0
171
-9
70
232
0.1
0.1
1
1
3
6
0.0
United Kingdom
13
10
14
37
0.1
0.0
50
21
75
145
0.3
0.0
922
-48
376
1,251
0.7
0.0
5
6
15
26
0.1
0.0
United States
44
34
47
125
0.3
0.0
38
16
57
110
0.2
0.0
1,590
-82
648
2,156
1.2
0.0
13
15
37
65
0.3
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
Switzerland
Others
Total (In millions of U.S. dollars)
Total (In percent of host GDP)
10
8
10
28
4,750
3,686
5,013
13,449
11.7
9.1
12.4
Host
Home
0.0
0.0
33.2
1
1
3
1
4
8
6,765
24,504
47,566
28.8
12.0
43.4
Total
0.0
84.2
43
-2
LC LC
LC FC
Total
58
184
-9
75
250
44,581
-2,297
18,168
60,453
24.9
-1.3
10.1
0.0
2
3
6
11
3,915
4,351
10,811
19,077
18.1
20.1
49.9
33.8
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
0.0
88.0
Poland
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
GDP
GDP
dollars
XBC
17
Lithuania
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
XBC
0.0
Latvia
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
LC FC
4
16,297
Hungary
LC LC
2
Total
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
GDP
GDP
dollars
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Total
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
GDP
dollars
GDP
Austria
4,396
2,212
5,898
12,506
8.8
3.3
102
201
131
433
1.6
0.1
98
16
119
233
0.6
0.1
3,559
970
1,511
6,039
1.4
1.6
Belgium
France
2,267
1,216
1,141
612
3,042
1,632
6,450
3,459
4.5
2.4
1.4
0.1
4
32
8
63
5
41
17
136
0.1
0.5
0.0
0.0
45
83
8
14
54
100
106
197
0.3
0.5
0.0
0.0
5,443
4,515
1,483
1,230
2,311
1,917
9,237
7,662
2.1
1.8
2.0
0.3
Germany
4,147
2,086
5,563
516
1,021
662
2,199
0.1
1,055
177
1,279
2,512
11,796
8.3
0.3
10
5
14
29
0.0
0.0
7
15
9
31
0.1
0.0
...
...
...
...
...
...
10
3
4
17
0.0
0.0
3,143
1,581
4,217
8,941
6.3
0.4
153
302
196
652
2.4
0.0
182
31
221
434
1.1
0.0
13,056
3,557
5,544
22,157
5.1
1.0
Japan
237
119
318
673
0.5
0.0
19
37
24
80
0.3
0.0
...
...
...
...
...
...
1,441
393
612
2,445
0.6
0.0
Netherlands
738
371
Greece
Italy
8.0
6.4
0.1
12,070
3,288
5,125
20,483
4.7
0.6
990
2,098
1.5
0.3
0
1
1
2
0.0
0.0
21
3
25
49
0.1
0.0
6,206
1,691
2,635
10,532
2.4
1.3
40
20
53
113
0.1
0.0
3,164
6,260
4,063
13,486
48.8
2.9
5,477
920
6,639
13,036
33.3
2.8
1,397
381
593
2,372
0.5
0.5
Switzerland
United Kingdom
315
331
158
166
422
444
896
940
0.6
0.7
0.2
0.0
6
27
11
54
7
35
25
116
0.1
0.4
0.0
0.0
47
12
8
2
57
15
112
29
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.0
1,687
746
460
203
717
317
2,864
1,266
0.7
0.3
0.7
0.0
United States
320
161
429
909
0.6
0.0
9
18
12
39
0.1
0.0
9
1
11
21
0.1
0.0
2,981
812
1,266
5,058
1.2
0.0
Others
197
99
265
561
0.4
12
24
16
52
0.2
21
4
25
50
0.1
3,970
1,082
1,686
6,737
1.5
17,355
8,731
23,285
49,371
4,051
8,015
5,203
17,268
7,049
1,185
8,544
16,778
57,081
15,551
24,237
96,869
12.2
6.2
16.4
14.7
29.0
18.8
18.0
3.0
21.9
13.1
3.6
5.6
Sweden
Total (In millions of U.S. dollars)
Total (In percent of host GDP)
Host
Home
Romania
Belgium
France
Germany
Greece
Italy
Japan
Netherlands
Sweden
Switzerland
United Kingdom
United States
Others
Total (In millions of U.S. dollars)
Total (In percent of host GDP)
4,384
LC FC
3,035
4,687
12,106
7.2
Slovak Republic
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
3.2
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Total
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
GDP
GDP
dollars
LC LC
LC FC
-16
Total
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
GDP
dollars
GDP
XBC
2,218
22.2
Turkey
7,589
9.9
LC LC
2.0
244
LC FC
99
XBC
371
Total
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
1,435
432
4,561
6,428
0.5
1.7
5,387
98
68
105
271
0.2
0.1
608
183
1,934
2,726
0.2
0.6
2,385
-7
982
3,360
4.4
0.7
1,675
678
2,548
4,901
0.7
1.1
1,326
2,048
5,289
3.2
0.2
1,998
602
6,353
8,954
0.7
0.3
768
-2
316
1,082
1.4
0.0
1,493
604
2,272
4,370
0.6
0.2
713
0.1
0.2
0.1
369
255
394
1,018
0.6
0.0
2,435
734
7,741
10,910
0.8
0.3
801
-2
330
1,129
1.5
0.0
1,692
685
2,575
4,952
0.7
1,564
1,020
1,083
706
1,673
1,091
4,320
2,817
2.6
1.7
1.4
0.1
86
1,443
26
435
274
4,587
386
6,464
0.0
0.5
0.1
0.3
...
3,063
...
-9
...
1,261
...
4,315
...
5.6
...
0.2
3,176
...
1,286
...
4,833
...
9,295
...
1.4
...
2.9
...
4
3
5
12
0.0
0.0
885
267
2,815
3,967
0.3
0.0
4
0
2
6
0.0
0.0
390
158
593
1,140
0.2
0.0
631
437
675
2,092
847
3,182
0.8
1,743
1.0
0.2
1,378
415
4,382
6,176
0.5
0.8
824
-2
339
1,161
1.5
0.1
6,121
0.9
7
5
8
20
0.0
0.0
461
139
1,465
2,065
0.2
0.4
17
0
7
24
0.0
0.0
30
12
45
87
0.0
733
507
783
2,023
1.2
0.5
1,431
431
4,550
6,413
0.5
1.5
4
0
2
6
0.0
0.0
915
370
1,392
2,677
0.4
0.6
18
13
20
51
0.0
0.0
806
243
2,562
3,611
0.3
0.1
311
-1
128
438
0.6
0.0
2,095
848
3,188
6,131
0.9
0.2
163
113
175
451
0.3
0.0
1,212
365
3,853
5,431
0.4
0.0
258
-1
106
364
0.5
0.0
1,772
717
2,696
5,185
0.8
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
27
19
29
74
10,934
7,570
11,691
30,195
6.5
4.5
7.0
18.0
347
104
1,102
1,553
14,526
4,377
46,181
65,083
1.1
0.3
3.5
5.0
16
0
6
22
13,838
-40
5,697
19,495
18.0
-0.1
7.4
1,033
43
XBC
1,930
118
445
856
6,421
24,139
46,426
2.3
0.9
3.5
0.0
6.8
CESE-13
Total
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Total
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
GDP
dollars
GDP
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
LC FC
292
15,866
25.4
Ukraine
LC LC
Austria
Total
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
GDP
GDP
dollars
42.9
1,915
Host
Home
XBC
62.5
Russia
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
LC LC
Austria
34.8
3,007
2.1
0.8
40,506
1.2
10.7
9,443
0.3
2.5
36,684
1.1
9.6
86,632
2.6
22.8
Belgium
43
2
80
125
0.1
0.0
23,967
0.7
5.2
3,258
0.1
0.7
16,011
0.5
3.5
43,235
1.3
9.4
France
715
30
1,336
2,081
1.5
0.1
21,872
0.7
0.8
4,776
0.1
0.2
21,180
0.6
0.8
47,828
1.4
1.8
Germany
345
14
645
1,005
0.7
0.0
30,327
0.9
0.9
9,982
0.3
0.3
31,468
0.9
0.9
71,777
2.2
2.1
Greece
62
3
115
179
0.1
0.1
6,286
0.2
2.0
3,468
0.1
1.1
8,386
0.3
2.6
18,140
0.5
5.7
Italy
Japan
230
75
10
3
430
141
669
219
0.5
0.2
0.0
0.0
33,870
3,412
1.0
0.1
1.6
0.0
9,440
1,003
0.3
0.0
0.4
0.0
28,918
4,740
0.9
0.1
1.4
0.0
72,228
9,155
2.2
0.3
3.4
0.1
Netherlands
222
646
0.5
0.1
13,744
0.4
1.7
3,766
0.1
0.5
13,397
0.4
1.7
30,907
0.9
3.9
Sweden
161
7
300
467
0.3
0.1
14,451
0.4
3.1
11,801
0.4
2.6
23,282
0.7
5.1
49,533
1.5
10.8
Switzerland
661
27
1,234
1,923
1.4
0.4
6,530
0.2
1.5
2,385
0.1
0.6
9,845
0.3
2.3
18,760
0.6
4.4
53
2
98
153
0.1
0.0
5,389
0.2
0.2
1,520
0.0
0.1
7,285
0.2
0.3
14,195
0.4
0.5
109
5
204
317
0.2
0.0
8,518
0.3
0.0
2,174
0.1
0.0
9,539
0.3
0.0
20,231
0.6
0.0
0.0
5,105
0.2
1,452
0.0
3,714
0.1
10,271
0.3
United Kingdom
United States
Others
Total (In millions of U.S. dollars)
Total (In percent of host GDP)
9
415
24
1
45
70
3,734
155
6,974
10,862
2.6
0.1
4.9
213,975
7.7
64,469
6.4
214,448
1.9
492,892
6.5
Sources: Bank for International Settlements; International Financial Statistics, IMF; and authors’ calculations.
Note: LC LC = local claims of LAFBs in local currency; LC FC = local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency; XBC = cross-border claims.
14.9
60
Table A.5. CESE-13: A Quantification of Longer-Term Foreign Bank Claims on
the Banking Sector, by Home and Host Countries, as at End-2007
Host
Home
Bulgaria
Croatia
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Total
Czech Republic
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
LC LC
676
XBC
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
1,915
Estonia
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Total
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Total
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
Austria
165
128
174
466
1.2
0.1
4,219
7.5
1.1
2,841
-146
1,158
3,853
2.2
1.0
14
15
37
66
0.3
0.0
Belgium
59
46
62
166
0.4
0.0
22
9
25
56
0.1
0.0
2,399
-124
977
3,252
1.8
0.7
7
7
18
32
0.1
0.0
France
59
46
63
168
0.4
0.0
302
125
356
783
1.4
0.0
1,681
-87
685
2,279
1.3
0.1
7
7
18
33
0.2
0.0
0.0
Germany
1,628
LC FC
Total
85
66
89
239
0.6
0.0
958
398
1,127
2,482
4.4
0.1
626
-32
255
849
0.5
0.0
35
39
98
172
0.8
Greece
287
223
303
813
2.0
0.3
11
5
13
29
0.1
0.0
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Italy
227
176
240
643
1.6
0.0
1,432
595
1,685
3,712
6.6
0.2
1,124
-58
458
1,524
0.9
0.1
29
33
81
143
0.7
0.0
2
16
2
12
2
17
6
45
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
20
8
8
3
24
9
52
21
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
59
332
-3
-17
24
135
81
450
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.1
...
1
...
1
...
3
...
6
...
0.0
...
0.0
0.0
1,412
1,569
3,899
6,881
31.7
Japan
Netherlands
Sweden
Switzerland
United Kingdom
United States
Others
Total (In millions of U.S. dollars)
Total (In percent of host GDP)
0
0
0
0
112
87
118
317
0.8
0.1
11
5
13
28
0.1
0.0
37
-2
15
51
0.0
0.0
0
0
1
2
0.0
0.0
3
2
3
8
0.0
0.0
13
6
16
35
0.1
0.0
201
-10
82
272
0.2
0.0
2
2
6
10
0.0
0.0
10
7
10
27
0.1
0.0
10
4
12
27
0.0
0.0
346
-18
141
469
0.3
0.0
5
6
14
25
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2
2
2
6
1,026
796
1,082
2,903
2.5
2.0
2.7
Host
Home
Austria
Germany
Greece
Italy
Japan
Netherlands
0.0
7.2
0
0
Total
1
0
1
2
1,833
5,196
11,446
7.8
3.2
9.2
0.0
0.0
20.3
9
0
LC LC
LC FC
Total
13
40
-2
16
54
9,695
-499
3,951
13,146
5.4
-0.3
2.2
0.0
1
1
2
4
1,513
1,682
4,180
7,375
7.0
7.8
19.3
7.3
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
1.5
34.0
Poland
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
GDP
GDP
dollars
XBC
4
Lithuania
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
XBC
1
Latvia
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
LC FC
0
4,417
Hungary
LC LC
Belgium
France
0.0
Total
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
GDP
GDP
dollars
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Total
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
GDP
dollars
GDP
1,660
835
2,227
4,721
3.3
1.2
37
74
48
159
0.6
0.0
31
5
37
73
0.2
0.0
1,099
299
466
1,864
0.4
0.5
856
459
431
231
1,148
616
2,435
1,306
1.7
0.9
0.5
0.0
1
12
3
23
2
15
6
50
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
14
26
2
4
17
31
33
62
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.0
1,680
1,394
458
380
713
592
2,851
2,365
0.7
0.5
0.6
0.1
1,565
788
2,100
4,453
3.1
0.1
189
375
243
807
2.9
0.0
330
55
400
785
2.0
0.0
3,726
1,015
1,582
6,323
1.4
0.2
4
2
5
11
0.0
0.0
3
5
3
12
0.0
0.0
...
...
...
...
...
...
3
1
1
5
0.0
0.0
1,186
597
1,592
3,375
2.4
0.2
56
111
72
239
0.9
0.0
57
10
69
135
0.3
0.0
4,030
1,098
1,711
6,839
1.6
0.3
89
45
120
254
0.2
0.0
7
14
9
29
0.1
0.0
...
...
...
...
...
...
445
121
189
755
0.2
0.0
278
140
374
792
0.6
0.1
0
0
0
1
0.0
0.0
6
1
8
15
0.0
0.0
1,916
522
813
3,251
0.7
0.4
15
8
20
42
0.0
0.0
1,162
2,298
1,492
4,952
17.9
1.1
1,711
288
2,074
4,073
10.4
0.9
431
118
183
732
0.2
0.2
Switzerland
United Kingdom
119
125
60
63
159
167
338
355
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.0
2
10
4
20
3
13
9
43
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
15
4
2
1
18
5
35
9
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
521
230
142
63
221
98
884
391
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.0
United States
121
61
162
343
0.2
0.0
3
7
4
14
0.1
0.0
3
0
3
7
0.0
0.0
920
251
391
1,561
0.4
0.0
74
37
100
212
0.1
4
9
6
19
0.1
7
1
8
16
0.0
1,225
334
520
2,080
0.5
6,552
3,296
8,791
18,639
1,487
2,943
1,910
6,340
2,203
370
2,670
5,243
17,620
4,800
7,481
29,901
4.6
2.3
6.2
5.4
10.6
6.9
5.6
0.9
6.8
4.0
1.1
1.7
Sweden
Others
Total (In millions of U.S. dollars)
Total (In percent of host GDP)
Host
Home
Romania
1,705
LC FC
1,181
XBC
Total
LC LC
LC FC
203
XBC
13.4
Slovak Republic
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
GDP
GDP
dollars
1,824
22.9
Russia
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
LC LC
Austria
13.1
Total
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
GDP
GDP
dollars
LC LC
LC FC
Total
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
GDP
dollars
GDP
XBC
6.8
Turkey
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Total
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
4,710
2.8
1.2
673
2,138
3,013
0.2
0.8
3,046
-9
1,254
4,291
5.6
1.1
87
35
132
254
0.0
0.1
Belgium
38
26
41
105
0.1
0.0
285
86
907
1,278
0.1
0.3
1,349
-4
555
1,900
2.5
0.4
596
241
907
1,745
0.3
0.4
France
745
516
797
2,058
1.2
0.1
937
282
2,978
4,197
0.3
0.2
434
-1
179
612
0.8
0.0
532
215
809
1,556
0.2
0.1
0.1
Germany
143
99
153
396
0.2
0.0
1,141
344
3,629
5,114
0.4
0.2
453
-1
186
638
0.8
0.0
602
244
917
1,763
0.3
Greece
Italy
609
397
421
275
651
424
1,681
1,096
1.0
0.7
0.5
0.1
40
676
12
204
128
2,150
181
3,030
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.1
...
1,732
...
-5
...
713
...
2,440
...
3.2
...
0.1
1,131
...
458
...
1,721
...
3,309
...
0.5
...
1.0
...
2
1
2
5
0.0
0.0
415
125
1,319
1,860
0.1
0.0
2
0
1
3
0.0
0.0
139
56
211
406
0.1
0.0
246
170
263
195
2,054
745
301
1,133
Japan
Netherlands
Sweden
Switzerland
United Kingdom
United States
Others
Total (In millions of U.S. dollars)
Total (In percent of host GDP)
678
0.4
0.1
646
2,895
0.2
0.4
466
-1
192
656
0.9
0.1
2,179
0.3
0.3
3
2
3
8
0.0
0.0
216
65
687
968
0.1
0.2
10
0
4
14
0.0
0.0
11
4
16
31
0.0
0.0
285
197
305
787
0.5
0.2
671
202
2,133
3,006
0.2
0.7
2
0
1
3
0.0
0.0
326
132
495
953
0.1
5
8
20
0.0
0.0
378
114
1,201
1,693
0.1
0.1
176
-1
72
248
0.3
0.0
746
302
1,135
2,183
0.3
0.1
44
68
175
0.1
0.0
568
171
1,806
2,546
0.2
0.0
146
0
60
206
0.3
0.0
631
255
960
1,846
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
10
7
11
29
4,254
2,945
4,548
11,747
2.5
1.8
2.7
49
517
728
2,052
21,648
30,509
0.5
0.2
1.7
2.3
9
0
4
13
7,825
-23
3,222
11,024
10.2
0.0
4.2
631
LC FC
26
XBC
1,178
104
42
158
305
5,648
2,286
8,594
16,528
0.8
0.3
1.3
14.4
2.4
CESE-13
Total
LC LC
LC FC
XBC
Total
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
GDP
dollars
GDP
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
In
In
In
millions percent percent
of U.S. of host of home
dollars
GDP
GDP
Components
(In millions of U.S. dollars)
LC LC
Austria
7.0
162
6,809
Ukraine
Host
Home
0.2
7
64
1,836
1.3
0.5
13,615
0.4
3.6
3,321
0.1
0.9
12,589
0.4
3.3
29,525
0.9
7.8
Belgium
26
1
49
76
0.1
0.0
7,331
0.2
1.6
1,183
0.0
0.3
5,423
0.2
1.2
13,937
0.4
3.0
France
437
18
816
1,270
0.9
0.0
7,024
0.2
0.3
1,761
0.1
0.1
7,954
0.2
0.3
16,738
0.5
0.6
Germany
0.1
11,173
211
9
394
614
0.4
0.0
10,065
0.3
0.3
Greece
38
2
70
109
0.1
0.0
2,125
0.1
0.7
1,128
0.0
0.4
2,896
0.1
0.9
6,149
0.2
1.9
Italy
Japan
140
46
6
2
262
86
409
134
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.0
11,088
1,226
0.3
0.0
0.5
0.0
3,040
371
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
9,458
1,987
0.3
0.1
0.4
0.0
23,586
3,584
0.7
0.1
1.1
0.0
Netherlands
136
Sweden
Switzerland
United Kingdom
3,397
0.1
0.3
0.3
24,636
0.7
0.7
6
253
395
0.3
0.0
4,796
0.1
0.6
1,334
0.0
0.2
5,255
0.2
0.7
11,384
0.3
1.4
98
4
183
285
0.2
0.1
5,078
0.2
1.1
4,355
0.1
0.9
8,567
0.3
1.9
18,000
0.5
3.9
403
17
754
1,174
0.8
0.3
2,504
0.1
0.6
846
0.0
0.2
4,236
0.1
1.0
7,587
0.2
1.8
32
1
60
94
0.1
0.0
1,927
0.1
0.1
567
0.0
0.0
2,865
0.1
0.1
5,359
0.2
0.2
United States
67
3
124
194
0.1
0.0
2,893
0.1
0.0
791
0.0
0.0
3,756
0.1
0.0
7,439
0.2
0.0
Others
15
1
28
43
0.0
1,655
0.0
481
0.0
1,373
0.0
3,509
0.1
2,280
95
4,258
6,632
1.6
0.1
3.0
Total (In millions of U.S. dollars)
Total (In percent of host GDP)
71,327
4.7
22,575
2.1
77,531
0.7
171,433
2.3
Sources: Bank for International Settlements; International Financial Statistics, IMF; and authors’ calculations.
Note: LC LC = local claims of LAFBs in local currency; LC FC = local claims of LAFBs in foreign currency; XBC = cross-border claims.
5.2
61
REFERENCES
Arcalean, Calin, and others, 2007, “The Causes and Nature of the Rapid Growth of Bank
Credit in the Central, Eastern and South-Eastern European Countries,” in Rapid
Credit Growth in Central and Eastern Europe: Endless Boom or Early Warning?, ed.
by Charles Enoch and Inci Otker-Robe, Chapter 2, pp. 13–46 (Hampshire and New
York: Palgrave Macmillan).
Arvai, Zsofia, Karl Driessen, and Inci Otker-Robe, 2009, “Regional Financial Interlinkages
and Financial Contagion Within Europe,” IMF Working Paper No. 09/6
(Washington: International Monetary Fund).
Backe, Peter, Thomas Reininger, and Zoltan Walko, 2006, “Main Features of Recent
Banking Sector Developments in Selected Southeastern European Countries,”
Financial Stability Report, No. 11 (Vienna: Austrian National Bank).
Enoch, Charles, 2007, “Credit Growth in Central and Eastern Europe,” in Rapid Credit
Growth in Central and Eastern Europe: Endless Boom or Early Warning?, ed. by
Charles Enoch and Inci Otker-Robe, Chapter 1, pp. 3–12 (Hampshire and New York:
Palgrave Macmillan).
Enoch, Charles, and Inci Otker-Robe, 2007, Rapid Credit Growth in Central and Eastern
Europe: Endless Boom or Early Warning? (Hampshire and New York: Palgrave
Macmillan).
Gersl, Adam, 2007, “Foreign Banks, Foreign Lending and Cross-Border Contagion:
Evidence from the BIS Data,” Czech Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 57,
Nos. 1–2, pp. 27–40.
Giannetti, Mariassunta, and Steven Ongena, 2007, “Lending by Example: Direct and Indirect
Effects of Foreign Bank Entry in Emerging Markets,” ECGI Working Paper No.
91/2005 (Brussels: European Corporate Governance Institute).
Haas, Ralph de, and Iman van Lelyveld, 2004, “Foreign Bank Penetration and Private Sector
Credit in Central and Eastern Europe,” Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Vol. 3,
No. 2, pp. 125–51.
Kaminsky, Graciela, and Carmen Reinhart, 2000, “On Crises, Contagion and Confusion,”
Journal of International Economics, Vol. 51, pp. 145–68.
Kaminsky, Graciela, Carmen Reinhart, and Carlos A. Vegh, 2003, “The Unholy Trinity of
Financial Contagion,” NBER Working Paper No. 10061 (Cambridge, Massachusetts:
National Bureau of Economic Research).
62
Kohn, Donald L, 2008, “Restoring Financial Intermediation by Banks: The Role of
Regulators,” Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Speech at the Office
of Thrift Supervision National Housing Forum (Washington, December 8).
McGuire, Patrick, and Philip Wooldridge, 2005, “The BIS Consolidated Banking Statistics:
Structure, Uses and Recent Enhancements,” BIS Quarterly Review (September),
pp. 73–81 (Basel: Bank for International Settlements).
Popa, Cristian, 2007, “Fast Credit Growth and Policy Response: The Case of Romania,” in
Rapid Credit Growth in Central and Eastern Europe: Endless Boom or Early
Warning?, ed. by Charles Enoch and Inci Otker-Robe, Chapter 13, pp. 214–28
(Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
Reinhart, Carmen, and Graciela Kaminsky, 2001, “Bank Lending and Contagion: Evidence
from the Asian Crisis,” in Regional and Global Capital Flows: Macroeconomic
Causes and Consequences, ed. by T. Ito and A. Krueger, pp. 73–99 (Chicago:
University of Chicago Press for the NBER).
Sorsa, Piritta, and others, 2007, “Vulnerabilities in Emerging Southeastern Europe—How
Much Cause for Concern?” IMF Working Paper No. 07/236 (Washington:
International Monetary Fund).
Walko, Zoltan, 2008, “The Refinancing Structure of Banks in Selected CESEE Countries,”
Financial Stability Report, No. 16 (Vienna: Austrian National Bank).