SEI Investment Management Unit Commentary June 18, 2012 Greek Election Results—The Relief Is Temporary The Greek elections reduce the danger of a near-term exit by Greece from the eurozone (EMU), but there has been no change to the bigger picture. The cycles of panic, policy actions, relief, and more panic will continue. Europe‟s recession is in danger of deepening due to capital flight and banks‟ growing risk aversion. Hopes of a grand policy gesture will likely be disappointed. We still have a negative view of the euro and believe U.S. stock markets remain a better bet than most other developed markets. A eurozone-friendly outcome in this past weekend‟s Greek elections merely puts off the eventual day of reckoning, as the country‟s two basic problems remain unchanged: It cannot pay back its debt under any conceivable scenario without debt forgiveness and/or fiscal transfers from other eurozone countries. It cannot improve its competitive position in the confines of the currency union without severe downward adjustments to economic output and incomes. As long as Greece remains in the eurozone, growth of its gross domestic product (GDP) will be negative for some time, which could increase its already sky-high unemployment rate and contribute to further political upheaval. Of the five political parties that won the largest share of the vote, only one—the communist KKE—currently 1 advocates abandoning the euro and restoring the drachma. Most polls indicate that a majority of Greek citizens want to remain in the eurozone. However, we continue to believe that Greece will eventually have no choice but to depart the single currency union. Implications for Europe For the eurozone as a whole, Spain and Italy remain the biggest threats, as they are simply too big to save should a worst case scenario come to pass. More bank and debt guarantees and even massive outright fiscal transfers would be needed, but it remains to be seen how far Germany and the other creditor nations will bend. The current funding mechanisms designed to backstop eurozone government debt, the EFSF and ESM, do not have even half the firepower needed to rescue Greece, Portugal, Spain and Italy. Proposals to grant the ESM a banking charter in order to leverage its capital would technically solve this problem, but also create a whole new set of risks. Data from the European Central Bank (ECB) and 2 national central banks show that investors and depositors have been pulling financial capital out of the financial systems of periphery nations in earnest over the past twelve months. While the resulting imbalances are not a serious problem in normal times, in a worst case breakup scenario, they would have to be netted out between national central banks, and it is not clear that periphery central banks would have the necessary resources to make their counterparts whole. If they do not, then a breakup could be rather messy, and taxpayers in core nations would be forced to absorb significant financial losses. Clearly, no eurozone country is likely to escape unscathed should the euro project fall apart. Such an outcome would mark Europe‟s „Lehman moment,‟ and would also be reminiscent of the Asian financial crises of 1997, when a large number of national currencies experienced devaluations and extreme volatility. Of course, the eurozone crisis is unique, especially in light of its complex private, sovereign and supra-sovereign entanglements and the region‟s tradition of generous 2 1 “Greece poll: Pro-bailout party‟s narrow win hailed,” BBC, 18 June 2012, < http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-18482415> , accessed 6/18/2012. EMU nations have central banks that can be thought of as „branches‟ of the ECB. This structure is somewhat similar to the U.S. Federal Reserve system, which has 12 regional Federal Reserve Districts, each with its own Federal Reserve Bank, that report to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors in Washington, D.C. 1 © 2012 SEI FOR FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARY USE ONLY. NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION. entitlement systems, so this story will continue to have its own twists and turns. At the very least, we would expect capital controls to be implemented with the possibility of countless financial assets remaining frozen for months if not years—events that would act as an additional drag to a region already struggling with recession. As noted in previous commentaries, ultimately, the ECB is the only entity capable of backstopping the entire EMU financial system, and it has already crossed the Rubicon of balance-sheet expansion. However, those efforts are meeting with increasingly limited success, as shown in Exhibit 1. The money multiplier, which can be thought of as the ratio of broad money, including that created through economic and financial activities, to money created only by the central bank, has been falling precipitously since 2011. Similar to the U.S. in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, the normal transmission mechanisms through which central bank actions impact the real economy are not functioning like they used to. Thus, ECB policy actions are unlikely to be as supportive of economic activity as they once were. It‟s also important to keep in mind that supporting economic activity is not part of the ECB‟s official mandate—it is charged only with keeping the overall price level stable. Exhibit 1: A Sinking Money Multiplier Exhibit 2: Slipping Into Recession? Our View We continue to hold a negative view on the euro and are still cautious on equities despite yields on safe haven fixed-income securities falling to record lows. As noted in a recent commentary (“Big Divergences, Still Looking for a Catalyst,” May 2012), we have yet to identify sufficient catalysts for a durable rebound. Thus, we expect markets to remain news-driven and volatile for the balance of the year. We are still relatively optimistic about the U.S. economy as exports to the EMU account for only about one percent of U.S. GDP (two to three percent for the broader European Union). As a result, we believe U.S. equities will remain a better bet for investors than international stock markets for the foreseeable future. Our Funds As a result, there has been eurozone-wide deterioration in economic activity, as shown in Exhibit 2. Industrial production is falling, and purchasing manager surveys indicate this is likely to continue. Unfortunately, we believe this could persist for some time. The SIT International Fixed Income Fund remains overweight Financials, but managers have continued to pare those positions with the intention of putting the proceeds back to work if and when spreads in certain sectors approach their highs of late 2011. Our international and global equity funds continue to have minimal direct exposure to Greece, and as shown in Exhibit 3, remain underweight the Financials sector. Exhibit 3: Fund Allocations to Financials Sector Fund Weight (%) Benchmark SIT MSCI EAFE International 15.37 (Net)(USD) Equity SIIT MSCI EAFE International 15.42 (Net)(USD) Equity SIIT World MSCI All Country 18.66 Equity ex-US World ex-US SIMT Global MSCI World Managed 6.13 (Net)(Hedged, Volatility USD) Sources: BlackRock, SEI Month-end weights as of 31 May 2012 Weight (%) Difference 21.91 -6.54 21.91 -6.49 23.41 -4.75 18.31 -12.18 2 © 2012 SEI As shown in Exhibit 4, though slightly overweight to the stocks of eurozone-based companies, the SIT International Equity Fund continues to have minimal direct exposure to Greece and is underweight Italy and Spain. Exhibit 4: SIT International Equity Fund EMU Exposure Country Fund (%) Benchmark (%) Difference Netherlands 3.76 2.41 1.35 Belgium 1.84 1.04 0.80 France 9.25 8.88 0.37 Ireland 0.56 0.28 0.28 Germany 8.39 8.33 0.06 Greece 0.06 0.07 -0.01 Portugal 0.05 0.2 -0.15 Austria 0.01 0.24 -0.23 Finland 0.53 0.79 -0.26 Spain 1.62 2.56 -0.94 Italy 1.05 2.11 Sources: BlackRock, SEI Month-end weights as of 31 May 2012 Benchmark is MSCI EAFE Index (Net)(USD). -1.06 3 © 2012 SEI This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific point in time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events, or a guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research or investment advice regarding the Funds or any stock in particular, nor should it be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell a security, including futures contracts. There is no assurance as of the date of this material that the securities mentioned remain in or out of the SEI Funds. Allocations are subject to change. There are risks involved with investing, including loss of principal. In addition to the normal risks associated with investing, international investments may involve risk of capital loss from unfavorable fluctuation in currency values, from differences in generally accepted accounting principles or from economic or political instability in other nations. Emerging markets involve heightened risks related to the same factors as well as increased volatility and lower trading volume. Bond and bond funds will decrease in value as interest rates rise. Information provided by SEI Investments Management Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of SEI Investments Company. SEI Investments Management Corporation (SIMC) is the adviser to the SEI Funds, which are distributed by SEI Investments Distribution Co. (SIDCO). SIMC and SIDCO are wholly-owned subsidiaries of SEI Investments Company. For those SEI Funds which employ the ‘manager of managers’ structure, SEI Investments Management Corporation has ultimate responsibility for the investment performance of the Fund due to its responsibility to oversee the sub-advisers and recommend their hiring, termination and replacement. To determine if the Fund(s) are an appropriate investment for you, carefully consider the investment objectives, risk factors and charges and expenses before investing. This and other information can be found in the Fund's prospectus, which can be obtained by calling 1-800-DIAL-SEI. Read it carefully before investing. Index performance returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. One cannot invest directly in an index. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Not FDIC Insured No Bank Guarantee May Lose Value 4 © 2012 SEI
© Copyright 2024 Paperzz