Midwives and Nurses Compliance with Standard Precautions in

Open Journal of Nursing, 2016, 6, 294-302
Published Online April 2016 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojn
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2016.64030
Midwives and Nurses Compliance with
Standard Precautions in Palestinian
Hospitals
Imad Fashafsheh1*, Ahmad Ayed2, Mahdiah Koni3, Safaa Hussein1, Imad Thultheen1
1
AL-Farabi Colleges, Dentistry-Medicine-Nursing, Riyadh, KSA
Department of Nursing, Arab American University, Jenin, Palestine
3
Department of Nursing, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
2
Received 6 November 2015; accepted 19 April 2016; published 22 April 2016
Copyright © 2016 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract
Midwives and nurses should use the standard precautions as the basic level of infection control
precautions when delivering care to all patients, regardless of their presumed infection status.
Therefore midwifes and nurses should have sound knowledge and compliance with standard
precaution. Aim of the study: The study aimed to assess the level of the compliance of standard
precautions among the midwives and nurses in the Palestinian Hospitals. Method: A cross sectional study was conducted from May to June 2015 on 81 midwives and nurses from Palestinian
hospitals. The data were collected from labor rooms and postpartum departments of Palestinian
hospitals. Data were collected using pretested questionnaire on 81 midwives and nurses selected by convenience sample. Results: The current study showed that the average of standard
precautions knowledge level and compliance are 74.6% and 83.8% respectively. There are an association between age, education, work experience, and compliance with standard precautions at
p < 0.05 (0.000, 0.031, and 0.043) respectively. At the same time no significant association between training courses and compliance to standard precautions at p < 0.05 (0.191). Conclusion:
The midwives and nurses in the current study for both knowledge and compliance have high level
regarding standard precautions. There is an association between age, education, work experience, and compliance with standard precautions. Recommendations: Knowledge of midwives
and nurses should be updated; the importance of latest evidence-based practices of infection control in continuing education/training program should be emphasized; and training programs for
newly midwives and nurses about standard precaution and at regular intervals should be provided.
*
Corresponding author.
How to cite this paper: Fashafsheh, I., Ayed, A., Koni, M., Hussein, S. and Thultheen, I. (2016) Midwives and Nurses Compliance with Standard Precautions in Palestinian Hospitals. Open Journal of Nursing, 6, 294-302.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2016.64030
I. Fashafsheh et al.
Keywords
Nurses, Midwives, Compliance, Standard Precautions
1. Introduction
Health care workers are constantly exposed to various microorganisms which caused for them serious or even
lethal infections [1]. Increased infant mortality in developing countries resulted from hospital acquired infections which is one of the main causes as some studies have shown [2].
Statistics reported by World Health Organization (WHO), 1,400,000 people suffer from complications related
to HAI. The rate of preventable hospital acquired infections in developing countries due to medical care is estimated to be about 40% or above [3]. Nosocomial infections, such as endometritis, postoperative pelvic infection,
urinary tract infections, neonatal sepsis, etc., are serious complications in normal vaginal delivery.
The incidence of postoperative infections approaches 38%. Surgical site infection which is the third most
common nosocomial infection includes obstetrics and gynecological sources [4]. An understanding of the fundamentals of the host, surgical risk factors and vaginal flora can aid in prevention of postoperative infections
which result in significant morbidity and mortality [4].
It has been reported that the risk of health care-associated infection is 2 to 20 times higher in developing
countries in comparison with developed countries and 5% to 10% of patients admitted to hospitals in developed
countries acquire these infections (WHO, 2008) [5].
Infection control measures include appropriate hand hygiene and the correct application of basic precautions
during invasive procedures are simple and of low-cost, but need health staff accountability and behavioral
change, in addition to improve staff education, reporting and surveillance systems [6].
The human element stays the efficient role in increasing or decreasing the chances of catching HCAI [7].
Healthcare workers compliance with standard precautions has been recognized as an important means to prevent
and control health care-associated infections in patients and health workers [8].
Standard precautions are defined as a set of infection prevention practices that apply to all patients, regardless
of suspected or confirmed diagnosis or presumed infection status [9]. These precautions considered the basic
level of infection control precautions which are to be used, as a level of precautions [10].
Standard precautions are recommended when delivering the care to all clients, regardless of their health condition. It is also recommended that when handling equipment and instruments are contaminated or suspected of
contamination, and in situations of contact risk with body fluids, blood, secretions and excretions except sweat,
without considering the presence or absence of visible blood and skin with solution of continuity and mucous
tissues. They included precautions against agents that are transmitted by the following routes of transmission:
droplet, air-borne, and contact routes [10] [11].
Standard precautions aim to prevent and/or reduce transmission of HAI, and, at the same time, to protect
nurses from sharp injuries. These aims can be achieved by the application of standard precaution measures
which consist of the following elements: hand hygiene, prevention of sharp injuries, and personal protective
equipment (gloves, gown, gaggle, facemasks, head protection, foot protection and wearing face shields) [10].
Nurses are often exposed to several infections during the course of carrying out their nursing tasks [12]. Nosocomial infection or Health-care-associated infection (HCAI) refers to infection that is acquired during hospitalization, the process of care and not manifested at the time of admission to a hospital or other health-care facility
[13].
Nurses and midwives are directly worked with patient and susceptible to acquire infections from patients especially blood borne diseases. It has been estimated that more than 170 million people worldwide are infected
with Hepatitis C and about 40 million are living with HIV/AIDS [14].
The critical role of nurses in patient care emphasis on the role of the control hospital acquired infections. So
the nurses are the key members of infection control team in hospitals. Therefore, nurses should have good
knowledge and skills in the field of infection control [15].
As revealed from evidence, the proper compliance with Standard Precautions can protect health care workers
from various kinds of Occupational Blood Exposure, Hospital Acquired Infections including pneumonia and
295
I. Fashafsheh et al.
intravascular catheter infections [16]. [17] presumed that 38.2% had fair knowledge of standard precaution, and
77(37.8%) had good knowledge. However 24.0% of the studied sample had poor knowledge level. According to
their compliance 52.9% had fair level, 45.6% had good level and only 1.5% had poor level.
A study conducted by [18] about hand hygiene among health care staff noted that nurses’ knowledge about
standard precautions is insufficient and many of them believed that by wearing gloves no need for washing
hands). Another study results revealed that only 43% of nurses had a good knowledge in this regard [19]. A descriptive and cross-sectional study conducted by [20] reported that the participants have an acceptable level of
knowledge regarding hand hygiene. The work experience and history of previous training were the most important predictors of participants' knowledge about hand hygiene.
A cross sectional study conducted among nurses in governmental hospitals of Palestine revealed that, around
half of the subjects had fair knowledge level and the most of them had good practice level of infection control
[21].
2. Subjects and Method
2.1. Aim of the Study
The study aimed to assess the level of the compliance of standard precautions among the midwives and nurses in
the hospitals of Palestine.
2.2. Research Questions
The following three research questions were formulated to achieve the aim of the current study:
1. What are levels of midwives’ and nurses’ knowledge about the standard precautions at the selected Palestinian hospitals?
2. What are levels of midwives’ and nurses’ compliances of the standard precautions at the selected Palestinian hospitals?
3. Are there relationship between the standard precautions knowledge and compliance with age, gender, education, years of experience, and training course on standard precautions?
2.3. Research Design
It is a descriptive, cross-sectional study.
2.4. Study Setting
The data were collected from labor rooms and postpartum departments of Palestinian hospitals, eight of them
governmental (Alia hospital in Hebron city, Al Husain hospital in Beit Jala, and Abu Al Hassan hospital in Yatta, Rafedia in Nablus city, Thabet Thabet n Tulkarm city, Khaleel Solaiman in Jenin city, Darweesh Nassal in
Qalqellia city, and Yaser Arafat in Salfit city) and three private hospitals (Al-Ahli Hospital in Hebron city, Al
Mizan Hospital in Hebron city, and Arab Society hospital in Bethlehem city)
2.5. Study Period
The study was conducted from May to June 2015 in the targeted hospitals.
2.6. Study Sample
A convenience sample includes 81 midwives and nurses.
2.7. The Inclusion Criteria
Palestinian midwives or nurses who work in the selected departments of the targeted hospitals with full time
employment.
2.8. Tool of the Study
A self-administrative questionnaire was developed by researchers and used to assess:
296
I. Fashafsheh et al.
a) Socio-demographic characteristics of subjects consist of age, marital status, Hospital, Qualification, Department of work, working experience, Special sharps disposal box in your department, Hepatitis B vaccine, and
Infection control training course.
b) Subjects’ knowledge consists of 32 items, each item had a group of answer points, one point was awarded
for correct answer; incorrect or I don’t know answer took zero. The correct responses were summed up to get a
total knowledge scores for each participant. Total score for all questions reached 32 grades and transformed to
100%.
c) Compliance consist of 23 items using a 3-item Likert scale (every time (3), sometime (2), and never (1)).
The compliance scores were summed up to get total scores and transformed to 100%.
3. Validity and Reliability of the Study
To assure the content validity of the questionnaire, it was revised and validated by panel of 5 experts in academic and health field; they agreed and no comments. Internal consistency among the questionnaire items was assessed 0.88 Cronbach’s alpha (α) and it was considered acceptable.
4. A Pilot Study
Ten midwives from the labor department of Nablus special hospital as a pilot study was included to assess the
clarity of the questions, effectiveness of instructions, completeness of response sets, time required to complete
the questionnaire and success of data collection technique. Pilot subjects were asked to comment on the applicability and appropriateness (validity) of the questionnaire. All questions were answered no clarity of questions
were required. Then, the researchers determined that it would take 20 minutes to complete the questionnaire.
5. Ethical Considerations
This study was approved by the nursing department, Arab American University. This emphasized by MOH
agreement with their permission for the investigators to utilize the targeted hospitals. Approval from midwives
and nurses were obtained. Several strategies were utilized to protect the nurse’s rights who agreed to participate
in this study. First, oral verbal consent of the midwives and nurses was obtained prior to the administration of
the questionnaire. The midwives and nurses were informed of the purpose of the study, and that they had the
right to refuse to participate. Also the voluntary nature of participation was stressed as well as confidentiality.
Furthermore, the midwives and nurses were told that they can refrain from answering any questions and they
can terminate at any time. Anonymity of them was maintained at all times.
6. Results
Table 1 presents demographic characteristics of the studied sample. It clarifies that the majority of the studied
nurses 64 (79.04%) were in the age group of 20 - 30 years, and 57 (70.4%) had bachelor degree. However,
around two thirds 52 (64.2%) were single, and 53 (65.4%) had less than five years of experience. All of the
samples assured that they have sharp box 81 (100.0%). Regarding attendance of training courses, the most of the
studied sample 70 (86.4%) were received training course about infection control and 77 (95.1) had vaccinated
against hepatitis B.
Table 2 presents the knowledge and compliance mean of the universal precautions among midwives and
nurses in the targeted settings. It clarified that the knowledge mean was 74.57% while compliance mean was
83.8%. Hand washing knowledge and compliance items had the highest mean 91.8% and 86% respectively while
the knowledge about infection microorganisms had the lowest mean 56.9%. At the same time, both sharp box and
needle using compliance items had the lowest mean according to universal precautions compliance 78.2%.
Table 3 shows percentage distribution of the participants according to their knowledge and compliance of
standard precautions. It clarifies that around half of the participants 40 (49.4.0%) had fair knowledge level, 33
(40.7%) had good knowledge, and 8 (9.9%) had poor knowledge level. On the other hand, it indicated that two
thirds of the participants 51 (63.0%) had good compliance, 27 (33.3%) had fair compliance, and the rest 3
(3.7%) had poor compliance.
Table 4 shows a comparison between the mean of the knowledge scores and the socio-demographic characteristics of the studied sample. It displays that high mean knowledge scores were found among those who were at
297
I. Fashafsheh et al.
Table 1. Assessment of the socio-demographic and characteristics of the sample.
Parameters
Age
Education
No.
%
20 - 30 years old
64
79.0
31 - 40 years old
10
12.3
More than 40
7
8.6
Nursing diploma
21
25.9
Bachelor
57
70.4
Master
3
3.7
Single
52
64.2
Married
29
35.8
Marital status
Department
Experience
Labor room
52
64.2
Post partum ward
29
35.8
5 years or less
53
65.4
6 - 15 years
18
22.2
more than 15 years
10
12.3
Yes
81
100.0
No
0
00.0
Yes
70
86.4
No
11
13.6
Yes
77
95.1
No
4
4.9
Sharp box
Training course
Hepatitis B vaccine
Table 2. Assessment of the knowledge and compliance of the universal precaution among midwives and nurses.
Knowledge and compliance mean of universal precautions
Universal precautions
Knowledge
N
Mean
Std. Deviation
Universal precautions
compliance
Mean
Std. deviation
Hand washing
81
91.8210
11.71946
Hand washing
86.0082
15.34399
Wearing gloves
81
58.8477
19.73548
Wearing gloves
85.9259
17.70122
Needles using
81
77.7778
19.00292
Needle using
78.1893
20.96767
Sharp box
81
74.0741
35.45341
Sharp box
78.1893
23.07024
Medical waste disposing
81
82.2222
29.83287
Gown and mask
80.4527
21.04726
Gown and mask
81
82.0988
31.92632
Total compliance
83.8075
15.78778
Knowledge about
infectious microorganisms
81
56.9959
32.36770
Total knowledge
81
74.5756
12.70105
Table 3. Assessment of the midwives and nurses knowledge and compliance level of universal precautions.
levels of standard precautions
Total
Item
Poor
Fair
Good
Knowledge
8 (9.9%)
40 (49.4%)
33 (40.7%)
81 (100.0%)
Compliance
3 (3.7%)
27 (33.3%)
51 (63.0%)
81 (100.0%)
298
I. Fashafsheh et al.
Table 4. The relationship between the age, education, experience, and training course of the midwives and the nurses towards the knowledge of universal precautions.
Items
Age
Education
Experience
Training course
N
Mean
Std. deviation
20 - 30 years old
64
74.7559
12.21532
31 - 40 years old
10
78.4375
7.13371
More than 40
7
67.4107
20.55996
Diploma
21
72.7679
12.30881
Bachelor
57
74.5614
12.89064
Master
3
87.5000
0.00000
5 years or less
53
75.9434
10.28414
6 - 15 years
18
72.2222
14.96353
Above 15 years
10
71.5625
19.17629
Yes
70
75.3125
12.15733
No
11
69.8864
15.57948
F
Sig
1.607
0.207
1.801
0.172
0.895
0.413
1.751
0.190
the age group of 31 - 40 years, master degree, had years of experience 5 years or less, and had attended training
courses with means of (78.4375, 87.5000, 75.9434, and 75.3125) respectively. No significant statistical differences were found in mean knowledge scores in relation to age, education, experience, and training course (F =
1.607, 1.801, 0.895, and 1.751) at p < 0.05 (0.207, 0.172, 0.895, and 0.190) respectively.
Table 5 shows the comparison of mean compliance scores in relation to socio-demographic characteristics of
the studied sample. It displays that high mean practices scores were found among those who were at the age
group 20 - 30 years old, bachelor degree, had years of experience 5 years or less, and attended training courses
with means of (87.6585, 86.6260, 86.9292, and 84.7205) respectively. No significant statistical differences were
found between mean practice scores towards training course (f = 1.740) at p < 0.05 (0.191). At the same time,
significant statistical differences were found between mean practice scores towards age, education, and experience (f = 14.294, 3.620, and 3.276) at p < 0.05 (0.000, 0.031, and 0.043) respectively.
Table 6 shows that there was significant statistical difference found between knowledge and compliance of
standard precautions of the studied sample (t = 4.590) at p < 0.05 (0.000).
7. Discussion
Hospital acquired infection is a common problem all over the world. Therefore, up to date knowledge and nurses
midwives skills can play important roles in standard precautions. Midwives and nurses should have the opportunity to practice standard precautions on a day-to-day basis as an integral part of patients’ care. The outcome of
this study showed that the average of the knowledge level with standard precaution among the midwives and
nurses was 74.6%. The finding of this study is different from [21] which revealed that knowledge level rate of
standard precaution by nurses is around 54% in Palestine.
According to the compliance with standard precaution among the midwives and nurses the average was 83.8%.
It could be said from this result that the level of compliance with standard precaution is high. This may due to the
work climate of the hospitals. This finding consistent with [22] study which discovered that promotion of safety
climate often time leads to compliance to standard precaution. Another study, [23] supports these finding which
reported that wearing of sterile surgical gloves by health workers is very conducive for the patient and for the
protecting against occupational risk caused by blood borne infections from patients as well as cross-infection.
Also, this finding is in line with the work of [21] which showed that the majority of the Palestinian midwives and
nurses had good practice towards infection control. The finding of this study is inconsistent with [24] which revealed that compliant rate of standard precaution by nurses is less than 38% in London.
The findings of the study revealed that the average of the knowledge level of hand washing, wearing gloves,
needle using, sharp box, medical waste disposing, gown and mask, and knowledge about infection microorganisms
299
I. Fashafsheh et al.
Table 5. The relationship between the midwives and nurses age, education, experience, and training course towards the
compliance of universal precautions.
Items
Age
Education
Experience
N
Mean
Std. deviation
20 - 30 years old
64
87.6585
12.33539
31 - 40 years old
10
63.4783
21.95598
More than 40
7
77.6398
10.54614
Diploma
21
76.1215
20.45286
Bachelor
57
86.6260
13.28288
Master
3
84.0580
0.00000
5 years or less
53
86.9292
12.35483
6 - 15 years
18
78.9050
23.73723
Above 15 years
10
76.0870
9.88274
Yes
70
84.7205
15.78504
No
11
77.9974
15.22523
Training course
F
Sig
14.294
0.000
3.620
0.031
3.276
0.043
1.740
0.191
Table 6. The relationship between the midwives and nurses knowledge and compliance of universal precautions.
Item
Mean
N
Std. deviation
t
df
Sig.
knowledge
74.5756
81
12.70105
4.590
80
0.000
Compliance
83.8075
81
15.78778
were (92%, 59%, 78%, 74%, 82%, 82%, and 56%) respectively. The implication of this finding is that the
knowledge level of the standard precautions is well in hospital settings except the knowledge of microorganisms
which need more attention on it.
It was observed from the findings that the midwives and nurses adhered strictly to the use of the standard
precautions of hand washing, wearing gloves, needle using, sharp box, gown and mask (86%, 86%, 87%, 78%,
and 80%) respectively. The implication of this finding is that the use of the standard precautions of hand washing
is well established in the clinical and hospital settings. This is in line with the previous findings of [25] that
compliance on the part of healthcare workers with standard precautions has been recognized as an efficient means
to prevent and control health care-associated infections in patients and health workers.
Lastly, the outcome of this study revealed an association between age, education, work experience, and compliance with standard precautions. At the same time no significant association between training courses and
compliance with standard precautions. This may due to that these training courses not specific for standard precaution.
8. Conclusion
Knowledge and compliance of standard precaution of midwives and nurses cannot be neglected as it has proved to
be of great importance as they are susceptible to different infection and diseases when precautious measures are
not properly. Based on the findings of this study, it can be concluded that midwives and nurses in the current study
for both knowledge and compliance have high level regarding standard precautions. There is an association between age, education, work experience, and compliance with standard precautions.
9. Recommendations
The study recommends
 Keep updating knowledge and compliance of midwives and nurses according standard precaution through
continuing in-service educational programs.
300
I. Fashafsheh et al.
 Emphasizing the importance of the latest evidence-based practices of infection control in continuing education/training programs.
 Training programs for newly nurses and midwives according standard precautions and must be at regular intervals.
 This study should be replicated using observation checklist to assess the level of compliance.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the hospitals administrating team who helped in facilitating conduction of this study. Great appreciation as well is to the midwifery and nursing staff who accepted to
participate in the current study.
References
[1]
Twitchell, K.T. (2003) Blood Borne Pathogens. What You Need to Know—Part II. AAOHNJ, 51, 89-97.
[2]
Huis, A., Hulscher, M., Adang, E., Grol, R., van Achterberg, T. and Schoonhoven, L. (2013) Cost-Effectiveness of a
team and Leaders-Directed Strategy to Improve Nurses’ Adherence to Hand Hygiene Guidelines: A Cluster Randomised Trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50, 518-526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.11.016
[3]
World Health Organization (2014) Improved Hand Hygiene to Prevent Health Care Associated Infections.
http://www.who.int/gpsc/tools/faqs/evidence_hand_hygiene/en/2014
[4]
Faro, C. and Faro, S. (2008) Postoperative Pelvic Infections. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America, 22, 653-663.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2008.05.005
[5]
World Health Organization (2008) The First Global Patient Safety Challenge: “Clean Care Is Safer Care”. WHO, Geneva. http://www.who.int/gpsc/background/en/index.html
[6]
Boullègue, O., Naija, W., Said, H., Nouria, A., Jaidane, N., Dhidah, L. and Boujaafar, N. (2013) Incidence of ICU Acquired Nosocomial Infections in University Hospital of Sahloul (Sousse-Tunisia). Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, 2, 233.
[7]
Cole, M. (2007) Infection Control: Worlds apart Primary and Secondary Care. British Journal of Community Nursing,
12, 301, 303-306.
[8]
Garner, J.S. (1996) Guideline for Isolation Precautions in Hospitals. The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory
Committee. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 17, 53-80.
[9]
Center of Disease Prevention and Control (CDC) (2012) Glossary of Terms .Atlanta, USA.
[10] Center of Disease Prevention and Control CDC (2007) Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of
Infectious Agents in Healthcare Settings. US, 136 p. http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/pdf/isolation/isolation2007.pdf
[11] Vaz, K., McGrowder, D., Lindo, R.A, Gordon, L., Brown, P. and Irving, R. (2010) Knowledge, Awareness and Compliance with Universal Precautions among Health Care Workers at the University Hospital of the West Indies, Jamaica.
International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1, 171-181.
[12] Kosgeroglu, N., Ayranci, U., Vardareli, E. and Dincer, S. (2004) Occupational Exposure to Hepatitis Infection among
Turkish Nurses: Frequency of Needle Exposure, Sharps Injuries and Vaccination. Epidemiology and Infection, 132,
27-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268803001407
[13] Nejad, S.B., Allegranzi, B., Syed, S.B., Ellis, B. and Pittet, D. (2011) Health-Care-Associated Infection in Africa: A
Systematic Review. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 89, 757-765. http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.11.088179
[14] Richmond, J.A., Dunning, T.L. and Desmond, P.V. (2007) Health Professionals’ Attitudes toward Caring for People
with Hepatitis C. Journal of Viral Hepatitis, 14, 624-632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2893.2007.00849.x
[15] Joukar, F. and Taherri Ezbarami, Z. (2007) Nursing Student and Staff Knowledge about Nosocomial Infection. Iranian
Journal of Infectious Diseases, 12, 83-86.
[16] Tetali, S. and Choudhry, P. (2006) Occupational Exposure to Sharps and Splash: Risk among Health Care Providers in
Three Territory Care Hospitals In South India. Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 10, 3540. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5278.22894
[17] Ayed, A., Eqtait, M., Fashafsheh, I. and Ali, G. (2015) Knowledge & Compliance of Nursing Staff towards Standard
Precautions in the Palestinian Hospitals. Advances in Life Science and Technology, 36, 21-30.
[18] Malekmakan, L., Haghpanah, S., Askarian, M., Jowkari, M. and Moalaee, M. (2008) Hand Hygiene in Iranian Health
Care Workers. American Journal of Infection Control, 36, 602-603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2008.01.006
[19] McLaws, M.L., Maharlouei, N., Yousefi, F. and Askarian, M. (2012) Predicting Hand Hygiene among Iranian Health
301
I. Fashafsheh et al.
Care Workers Using the Theory of Planned Behavior. American Journal of Infection Control, 40, 336-339.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2011.04.004
[20] Asadollahi, M., Arshadi Bostanabad, M., Jebraili, M., Mahallei, M., Seyyed Rasooli, A. and Abdolalipour, M. (2015)
Nurses’ Knowledge Regarding Hand Hygiene and Its Individual and Organizational Predictors. Journal of Caring
Sciences, 4, 45-53.
[21] Fashafsheh, I., Ayed, A., Eqtait, F. and Harazneh, L. (2015) Knowledge and Practice of Nursing Staff towards Infection Control Measures in the Palestinian Hospitals. Journal of Education and Practice, 6, 79-90.
[22] Kermode, M., Jolley, D., Langkham, B., Thomas, M.S., Holmes, W. and Gifford, S.M. (2005) Compliance with Universal/Standard Precautions among Health Care Workers in Rural North India. American Journal of Infection Control,
33, 27-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2004.07.014
[23] Osborne, S. (2003) Influences on Compliance with Standard Precautions among Operating Room Nurses. American
Journal of Infection Control, 31, 415-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mic.2003.68
[24] Gammon, J. and Gould, D. (2005) Universal Precautions. A Review of Knowledge, Compliance and Strategies to Improve Practice. Journal of Research in Nursing, 10, 529-547. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/136140960501000503
[25] Aniebue, P.N., Aguwa, E.N. and Obi, E.I. (2010) Universal Precautions: Awareness and Practice of Patent Medicines
Vendors in Enugu Metropolis, South East Nigeria. Nigerian Medical Journal, 51, 30-34.
302