FDIC Bows to Industry on Reciprocal Deposits | American Banker
Law & Regulation
Today's Paper | Magazine | Video | Web Seminars | White Papers
DEALMAKING &
STRATEGY
COMMUNITY
BANKING
NATIONAL/
REGIONAL
LAW &
REGULATION
Women in Banking | FinTech Forward
CONSUMER
FINANCE
BANK
TECHNOLOGY
BANKTHINK
Welcome, ROB | My Account | Log Out
CONFERENCES
& EVENTS
DATA &
RESEARCH
RESOURCE
CENTER
FDIC Bows to Industry on Reciprocal Deposits
By Lalita Clozel
January 21, 2016

Twitter

LinkedIn

Facebook

Google +

Email

Comments

Print

Reprints
WASHINGTON — The Federal Deposit Insurance
Corp. handed community bankers a critical win on
Thursday by rescinding a plan to treat reciprocal
deposits as brokered deposits in the calculation of
small-institution assessments.
The agency's board voted unanimously to reissue a
proposal that would revamp the insurance assessment
rate for banks with less than $10 billion of assets. The
initial plan, which was unveiled in June, would have
effectively penalized reciprocal deposits — which allow
banks to offer additional deposit insurance beyond the
$250,000 limit — by treating them the same as riskier
brokered deposits in determining premiums.
But in response to more than 400 public comments
criticizing the plan, the FDIC backed down, issuing a
new proposal that would treat reciprocal deposits the
same as core deposits.
"Community banks scored a major victory," said Bert
Ely, an independent banking consultant in Alexandria,
Va.
Christopher Cole, the senior vice president and senior
regulatory counsel for the Independent Community
Bankers of America, agreed, saying the new plan is
"going in a positive direction."
Comptroller Thomas Curry praised an interim final rule
that allowed certain small banks to qualify for an 18month exam cycle. IMAGE: BLOOMBERG NEWS
RELATED
How FDIC Would Change Premiums for Small
Banks
What Bankers Won (and Lost) in Highway Bill
How FDIC Is Taking a Tough View of Brokered
Deposits
11 Policymakers to Watch
in 2016
What Big Banks Are
Giving to Presidential
Candidates
Where the Presidential
Candidates Stand on
Banking Issues
At issue is how the FDIC calculates assessments on
small banks. The agency's June proposal was designed
to alter premiums so that riskier banks would pay more
while the overall level of premiums paid by the industry
remained static. As part of that calculation, brokered
deposits were viewed as a higher-risk category, forcing banks that held more such deposits to pay
higher premiums.
But the industry argued that reciprocal deposits were not higher-risk and should be treated the
same as core deposits. During the board meeting, regulators said they were persuaded by the
hundreds of commenters on the issue.
"Given the number of comments received on the first [proposal] on the changes that you're offering
today, I do think it's appropriate to go out for a new or second [proposal] for an additional 30-day
http://www.americanbanker.com/...nker:e5958732:577264a:&utm_source=newsletter&utm_campaign=daily%20pdf-jan%2022%202016&st=email&eid=1ddc8965fbf2f13553bcda28d2de17cd[1/25/2016 2:54:48 PM]
FDIC Bows to Industry on Reciprocal Deposits | American Banker
comment period," Comptroller of the Currency Thomas Curry said during the board meeting.
The revised proposal also modified the assessment formula to increase rates only as a result of
growth if a bank's assets rise by more than 10% within a year.
Still, other unpopular aspects of the plan survived, including a loan-mix index designed to force
banks with riskier loans to pay higher premiums. Under the plan, banks with large amounts of
commercial real estate loans are expected to pay more.
"The conspicuous thing that was missing [to the modified rule] was any change to a loan-mix
index," Cole said.
The revised proposal is open for comment for 30 days. The agency has also provided a calculator
tool for banks to evaluate what they would pay under the revised plan.
If approved, the final rule would go into effect a quarter after the FDIC's Deposit Insurance Fund
reaches 1.15%, which is expected soon. Alongside an assessment reduction for small banks
required by the Dodd-Frank Act, the proposal could cause a drop in premiums for more than 93%
of small banks, the FDIC said.
Separately, the FDIC board also voted to fast-track the implementation of a portion of the
transportation bill signed late last year that would extend the exam cycle for some small banks.
Institutions with assets of $500 million to $1 billion — 617 banks, according to the FDIC — could
qualify to space out exams to every 18 months, rather than every year.
Instead of awaiting public comment, the FDIC voted unanimously to push the measure through as
an interim final rule, which will be implemented on the day it is published in the Federal Register.
Regulators praised the rule, saying it made sense for supervisors and banks alike.
"While the 18-month cycle will reduce the burden on well-managed community banks and thrifts, it
will also allow the federal banking agencies to focus our supervisory resources on those
institutions that need it most—those that present capital, managerial or other issues of significant
supervisory concern," Curry said. "We don't have unlimited supervisory resources, and it's
important that we manage those resources wisely. This rule will help greatly in that effort, and I'd
like to thank the staff at the OCC, the FDIC and the other agencies for the work they've done to
move it forward."
Curry said he signed a letter making the change effective immediately on Thursday for federally
chartered banks and thrifts.
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Director Richard Cordray noted that it was a measure with
little to no political opposition.
"[T]he agencies were able to express their support for a measure of this kind in Congress with
virtually no dissenting voices," he said. "That's a great example of how we can speak back and
forth and reach constructive results."
Industry representatives were also pleased.
"My hat's off to the FDIC and now to the other agencies implementing this quickly," Cole said.

Twitter

LinkedIn

Facebook

Google +

Email

Comments

Print
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
SEE MORE IN
RELATED TAGS
COMMENT
LAW & REGULATION
Community Banking,

Reprints
IN PICTURES




http://www.americanbanker.com/...nker:e5958732:577264a:&utm_source=newsletter&utm_campaign=daily%20pdf-jan%2022%202016&st=email&eid=1ddc8965fbf2f13553bcda28d2de17cd[1/25/2016 2:54:48 PM]