Swedish Export Credit Corp. Primary Credit Analyst: Sean Cotten, Stockholm (46) 8-440-5928; [email protected] Secondary Contact: Alexander Ekbom, Stockholm (46) 8-440-5911; [email protected] Table Of Contents Major Rating Factors Outlook Rationale Related Criteria And Research WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT OCTOBER 2, 2014 1 1362458 | 301539251 Swedish Export Credit Corp. SACP a- Anchor a- Business Position Capital and Earnings Risk Position Funding + +5 GRE Support +5 + Additional Factors 0 Issuer Credit Rating Moderate -1 Very Strong +2 Moderate -1 Group Support 0 Sovereign Support 0 AA+/Stable/A-1+ Average 0 Liquidity Support Adequate Major Rating Factors Strengths: Weaknesses: • Extremely high likelihood of government support. • Very good loan asset quality. • Robust capitalization. • Concentration on large individual exposures. • Low profitability. • Total reliance on wholesale funding. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT OCTOBER 2, 2014 2 1362458 | 301539251 Swedish Export Credit Corp. Outlook: Stable The stable outlook on Swedish Export Credit Corp. (SEK) reflects Standard & Poor's Ratings Services' current view that ongoing regulatory initiatives (banking resolution and recovery directive) for credit institutions in the EU are unlikely to significantly hinder the Swedish government from providing timely support to SEK. The outlook also reflects our expectation that the bank's asset quality will remain strong and its capitalization robust. Moreover, we believe that there is an "extremely high" likelihood that the Swedish government would provide timely and sufficient extraordinary support to SEK, if needed. Given this level of extraordinary support and our 'AAA' rating on Sweden, we could revise our assessment of SEK's stand-alone credit profile (SACP) downward by four notches without it affecting the rating. We could consider a negative rating action if we saw that SEK's role for, or link with, the Swedish government were weakening. This would be the case if, in our view, the final resolution regime presented meaningful impediments for the government's provision of extraordinary support to the bank. We consider a positive rating action unlikely at this stage. However, we could raise the ratings if the Swedish government provided a timely guarantee for SEK's liabilities, in line with our criteria. We expect that the Swedish krona (SEK)80 billion ($11 billion) funding backup line for the Commercial Interest Reference Rate (CIRR) portfolio will be renewed as part of the ongoing support we factor into our analysis of SEK's stand-alone credit profile and more specifically its funding and liquidity profile. Rationale The ratings on SEK reflect our opinion that there is an extremely high likelihood of extraordinary support for the company from Sweden (AAA/Stable/A-1+). Consequently, we factor into the long-term rating five notches of uplift from SEK's SACP. We also base the ratings on our view of SEK's business position as moderate, as defined in our criteria, given the company's somewhat narrow focus on export lending. Its capital and earnings position is "very strong," in our opinion. We believe it will reach a Standard & Poor's risk-adjusted capital (RAC) ratio of about 16.5% over the next 18-24 months. We assess SEK's risk position as "moderate," reflecting our view of its unsecured concentration risk to some large Swedish corporates and international financial institutions, as well as the complex nature of its funding structure. Our views of SEK's funding as "average," and liquidity as "adequate," reflect its link with the Swedish government, which supports the external wholesale funding profile, and its substantial liquidity portfolio. Anchor: Blended economic risk owing to net exposure after guarantees The anchor we assign to SEK is 'a-', reflecting its regulatory headquarters in Sweden and its net credit exposure after guarantees to different markets worldwide, according to what it disclosed in its Pillar III report as of year-end 2013. Although our blended economic risk score for SEK is higher than that for banks operating only in Sweden, due to SEK's external exposures, this does not lower the anchor. Our bank criteria use our Banking Industry Country Risk Assessment's economic risk and industry risk scores to determine a bank's anchor, the starting point in assigning a bank a long-term rating. The anchor for a financial institution operating only in Sweden is 'a-'. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT OCTOBER 2, 2014 3 1362458 | 301539251 Swedish Export Credit Corp. We view Sweden as a highly competitive and diverse economy, with high household debt levels and a history of appreciating housing prices. Despite relatively high economic imbalances, we believe the private sector represents low credit risk. In terms of industry risk, the Swedish banking sector benefits, in our view, from its institutional framework, relatively conservative regulatory environment, and a high level of industry stability. A low degree of deposit funding and a high degree of reliance on cross-border funding are partly offset by a deep domestic debt capital market and the authorities' capacity and propensity to provide support to the domestic covered bond market. Table 1 Swedish Export Credit Corp. Key Figures --Year-ended Dec. 31-(Mil. SEK) 2014* 2013 2012 2011 2010 Adjusted assets 315,478.0 306,435.3 313,021.2 319,614.2 339,687.6 Customer loans (gross) 190,807.7 187,280.3 174,088.8 174,818.8 159,468.8 15,156.3 14,643.1 14,185.6 13,012.9 12,183.6 1,097.7 1,958.1 1,372.4 2,391.6 1,830.9 Adjusted common equity Operating revenues Noninterest expenses 259.3 511.3 544.5 500.4 464.4 Core earnings 649.2 1,090.1 684.4 1,306.1 1,084.8 *Data as of June 30. SEK--SEK-Swedish krona. N.A.--Not available. N/A--Not applicable. N.M.--Not meaningful. Business position: Export lender with a generally narrow mandate In our view, SEK's business position is "moderate," reflecting the company's low-margin operating environment and its relatively narrow role of supporting Swedish export companies, particularly through loans at the CIRR under the rules of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). SEK's business derives from the mandate by the Swedish government, its 100% owner, to support the country's export sector, which contributes 50% to Sweden's GDP, with either direct or end-client long-term financing. SEK is an important pillar for the success of Swedish exporters. It played an especially important role during the difficult market conditions in late 2008 and 2009 (see chart 1 below) when traditional bank financing was scarce. The subsequent recovery and return of bank financing explains why SEK's loan exposures have grown to a much smaller extent than in 2009. We expect SEK's lending book to grow by SEK10 billion-SEK15 billion annually should new lending remain at its current level of SEK55 billion-SEK60 billion. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT OCTOBER 2, 2014 4 1362458 | 301539251 Swedish Export Credit Corp. Chart 1 SEK's balance sheet of SEK315 billion as of June 30, 2014, depends on a number of large Swedish exporters for a significant part of its revenues. SEK's product range, mainly comprising loan syndications in a low-margin environment, is narrow in our view. We expect the relative concentration risk to gradually reduce over time due to new business opportunities created by Basel III which makes commercial banks less likely to commit to long-term export financing syndications and more likely to work together with SEK to create financing solutions for the export sector. We see SEK's management and strategy as stable, despite the 2013 change in CEO, and view ownership by the Swedish state as positive for the rating. In 2011, SEK's strategy was realigned toward a greater focus on the export business and we believe that management has executed this more defined strategy. In addition, SEK has strengthened its corporate governance and risk management substantially and is now in a better position to supervise SEK's complex operations and balance sheet. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT OCTOBER 2, 2014 5 1362458 | 301539251 Swedish Export Credit Corp. Table 2 Swedish Export Credit Corp. Business Position --Year-ended Dec. 31-(%) 2014* 2013 2012 2011 2010 Total revenues from business line (currency in millions) 1,097.7 1,958.1 1,392.3 2,500.4 4,395.9 65.2 113.3 158.1 94.0 42.9 8.5 7.4 5.0 10.5 22.2 Commercial & retail banking/total revenues from business line Return on equity *Data as of June 30. N.A.--Not available. N/A--Not applicable. N.M.--Not meaningful. Capital and earnings: Very strong capital ratios supported by the ample use of guarantees, reducing balance sheet risk We consider SEK's capital and earnings to be "very strong" and we estimate its RAC ratio will reach 16.5%-17.0% over the next 18-24 months from its current level of 16.1%, supported by its high-quality capital base. This high projected ratio reflects SEK's extensive use of sovereign and bank guarantees that reduce its corporate exposure and risk weightings. We expect SEK to post healthy annual after-tax earnings in the coming two years, supporting the capital base. However, as a result of SEK's planned expansion into more residual risk-taking in export syndications, we are increasing our estimate of risk-weighted assets for the company, which will to some extent counterbalance its growing capital base. SEK's regulatory common equity tier 1 ratio was 17.1% in June 2014 and it targets a ratio of 16%. The ratio dropped from 19.5% at year-end 2013, explained by the introduction of higher risk weights on bank exposures, due to higher correlation factors, and the increasing direct exposure to corporates. This compares against the newly established requirement under Basel III of 8.7%. We believe SEK's earnings composition to be sound and dominated by net interest income. Revenues are almost exclusively generated through loan syndications and returns on bonds issued by large Swedish exporters that SEK has invested in and that we consider to be part of lending activity to support the sector. Margins are low in SEK's business, reflecting the low level of risk and we expect some margin pressure as banks are starting to come back to the market from a period of deleveraging. In addition, and as a result of the shift in SEK's liquidity portfolio, overall net interest margin has decreased during recent years and we expect the current level at 60 basis points to remain for the coming two years. Given its large liquidity and derivatives portfolio and the use of the option to fair value its own debt, SEK's net financial gains/losses (unrealized) have been substantial in some years, including 2013 and 2014. However, we believe that these effects will even out because, in general, SEK's earnings volatility has no economic impact since its portfolio is largely held to maturity and over time should be earnings neutral. In addition to fair value changes, a settlement between SEK and Lehman Brothers Finance AG resulted in a positive SEK290 million effect in the second quarter of 2014, following an earlier dispute on the valuation of certain derivatives contracts. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT OCTOBER 2, 2014 6 1362458 | 301539251 Swedish Export Credit Corp. Table 3 Swedish Export Credit Corp. Capital And Earnings --Year-ended Dec. 31-(%) 2014* 2013 2012 2011 2010 Tier 1 capital ratio 17.1 19.5 23.0 23.3 22.4 S&P RAC ratio before diversification N.M. 16.1 16.2 16.8 14.6 S&P RAC ratio after diversification N.M. 16.0 13.5 14.8 12.8 Adjusted common equity/total adjusted capital 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Net interest income/operating revenues 65.6 79.4 137.0 78.2 103.7 Fee income/operating revenues (0.4) (0.3) 0.0 (0.1) (0.0) Market-sensitive income/operating revenues 34.8 20.9 (37.0) 21.9 (3.7) Noninterest expenses/operating revenues 23.6 26.1 39.7 20.9 25.4 Preprovision operating income/average assets 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.4 Core earnings/average managed assets 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.3 *Data as of June 30. N.A.--Not available. N/A--Not applicable. N.M.--Not meaningful. Table 4 Swedish Export Credit Corp. Risk-Adjusted Capital Framework Data Exposure* Basel II RWA Average Basel II RW (%) Standard & Poor's RWA Average Standard & Poor's RW (%) 170,912 1,013 1 6,172 4 Institutions 67,352 17,300 26 13,834 21 Corporate 71,855 42,675 59 54,896 76 1 0 0 1 66 0 0 0 0 0 7,804 8,750 112 10,184 130 0 0 0 0 0 317,924 69,738 22 85,086 27 Equity in the banking book† 0 0 0 0 0 Trading book market risk -- 0 -- 0 -- -- 0 -- 0 -- -- -- -- 0 -- -- 3,400 -- 6,004 -- Basel II RWA Standard & Poor's RWA % of Standard & Poor's RWA 74,766 91,090 100 -- 529 1 (Mil. SEK) Credit risk Government and central banks Retail Of which mortgage Securitization§ Other assets Total credit risk Market risk Total market risk Insurance risk Total insurance risk Operational risk Total operational risk (Mil. SEK) Diversification adjustments RWA before diversification Total Diversification/Concentration Adjustments WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT OCTOBER 2, 2014 7 1362458 | 301539251 Swedish Export Credit Corp. Table 4 Swedish Export Credit Corp. Risk-Adjusted Capital Framework Data (cont.) RWA after diversification (Mil. SEK) 74,766 91,620 101 Tier 1 capital Tier 1 ratio (%) Total adjusted capital Standard & Poor's RAC ratio (%) Capital ratio before adjustments 14,640 19.6 14,643 16.1 Capital ratio after adjustments‡ 14,640 19.5 14,643 16.0 Capital ratio *Exposure at default. §Securitisation exposure includes the securitisation tranches deducted from capital in the regulatory framework. †Exposure and Standard & Poor's risk-weighted assets for equity in the banking book include minority equity holdings in financial institutions. ‡Adjustments to Tier 1 ratio are additional regulatory requirements (e.g. transitional floor or Pillar 2 add-ons). RWA--Risk-weighted assets. RW--Risk weight. RAC--Risk-adjusted capital.SEK--Sweden Krona. Sources: Company data as of Dec. 31, 2013, Standard & Poor's. Risk position: Moderate due to concentration and complexity We consider SEK's risk position "moderate," on the basis of the company's concentration risk, arising from largely unguaranteed corporate exposures, bond investments that we consider to constitute lending, and its complex operational structure, which results from substantial activity in the structured funding market. However, the company's loss history is exceptional and should continue being strong, in our opinion. SEK has, in our view, concentrations to unguaranteed corporate exposures to large Swedish export companies in the form of bond investments. We also believe SEK faces further concentration risk, deriving from financial institutions, through the guarantees they provide and the counterparty exposures in its derivative transactions, an element of concentration which is not captured in our RAC framework. However, we note that there is a counterbalancing effect, which is the double default risk mitigation, requiring both the guarantor and the underlying guaranteed corporate to default in order for a loss to materialize in a lending transaction and note that the vast majority of losses the bank has faced have been due to bank failures and investments in collateralized debt obligations in its liquidity portfolio. SEK has, in our view, a complex operational setup, with a large part of its funding being structured. This requires extensive use of complex and fairly illiquid derivatives, which in some circumstances can be difficult to value and renew if necessary. However, the company has strengthened its resources significantly over the past few years and is well equipped to manage these risks and valuations in our view. SEK's loss experience has been exceptional. It had almost no losses until 2008, when it wrote down two collateralized debt obligations and its loss from its exposure to an Icelandic bank (through its liquidity portfolio). SEK has indicated its intention to increase its participation in syndicated loans, resulting in slightly more residual risk. These transactions would typically involve large international end-clients of Swedish exporters, which might increase potential risks in the loan book. However, we believe SEK is likely to manage these new risks conservatively. Losses should continue being very small, in our opinion, given the guaranteed nature of the business SEK underwrites and its current de-risking of the liquidity portfolio to comply with the liquidity coverage ratio. Table 5 Swedish Export Credit Corp. Risk Position --Year-ended Dec. 31-(%) Growth in customer loans WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT 2014* 2013 2012 2011 2010 3.8 7.6 (0.4) 9.6 (3.0) OCTOBER 2, 2014 8 1362458 | 301539251 Swedish Export Credit Corp. Table 5 Swedish Export Credit Corp. Risk Position (cont.) Total diversification adjustment / S&P RWA before diversification N.M. N.M. 19.8 13.7 13.6 Total managed assets/adjusted common equity (x) 20.8 20.9 22.1 24.6 27.9 New loan loss provisions/average customer loans 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 (0.0) Net charge-offs/average customer loans 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 (0.1) Gross nonperforming assets/customer loans + other real estate owned 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 *Data as of June 30. N.A.--Not available. N/A--Not applicable. N.M.--Not meaningful. Funding and liquidity: Supported by SEK's link to the government, mitigating the wholesale profile, and its substantial liquidity portfolio We consider SEK's funding "average" on the basis of its link with the Swedish government and the backup facilities at the company's disposal. We expect the company to remain entirely wholesale funded, to continue to rely on nondomestic capital markets, and to keep its large exposure to the structured funding market, factors we consider to be weaknesses. Conversely, we see the link to the government and the diversity of SEK's funding sources as supportive factors, which have worked effectively in the past when conditions in certain markets became difficult. SEK's stable funding ratio of 86% as of year-end 2013 is below the Swedish banking system average. This reflects on the one hand SEK's short-term financing of the CIRR portfolio, roughly constituting SEK40 billion, and our conservative assumptions regarding rollover of the project-based loan portfolio, which does not capture the company's policy of effectively matching assets and liability redemptions and, as such, reducing refinancing risk. In line with the mandate from the state, SEK has funded the loan portfolio related to CIRR loans (with an average duration of seven years), which it administrates on behalf of the government, with short-term borrowings that have maximum tenors of one year. While profitable for the government, the structure gives rise to a duration mismatch and refinancing risk, which is mitigated by the SEK80 billion 10-year credit facility provided by the Swedish National Debt Office. As contingent financing, the facility is not included in our funding and liquidity ratios. This facility is renewed on a yearly basis, dependent on a decision in parliament. On the basis of such availability, we consider the funding profile to be average, despite a ratio that is well below the industry average. SEK has reported a net stable funding ratio of around 100% since year-end 2013 and we expect the ratio to remain at that level, considering SEK's financing structure. We consider SEK's liquidity to be "adequate" despite its low liquidity ratio of 75% at year-end 2013 (broad liquid assets to short-term wholesale funding). As for the funding assessment, this ratio ignores the backup facility provided by the government. As such, we believe the short-term financing of CIRR loans is not the result of an opportunistic strategy jeopardizing SEK's liquidity situation. Excluding the part dedicated to the CIRR loans, the liquidity ratio would go above 90%. In our opinion, SEK could cover additional liquidity requirements, if needed, particularly in view of its close ties with the Swedish government. SEK's regulatory liquidity coverage ratio, which is a binding requirement in Sweden since Jan, 1 2013, amounted overall to 621% on June 30, 2014, with levels in euros at 3,456% and 317% in U.S. dollars. This measure is, in our view, very volatile and influenced by the timing of the company raising funding in the capital markets. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT OCTOBER 2, 2014 9 1362458 | 301539251 Swedish Export Credit Corp. Table 5 Swedish Export Credit Corp. Funding And Liquidity --Year-ended Dec. 31-(%) 2014* 2013 2012 2011 2010 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Core deposits/funding base Customer loans (net)/customer deposits 311,927.5 314,520.4 304,688.9 294,657.5 823,356.0 Long term funding ratio 66.8 66.8 62.7 59.2 59.0 Stable funding ratio 89.6 86.1 82.9 77.9 87.7 Short-term wholesale funding/funding base 35.0 35.0 39.2 42.9 42.7 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.7 Broad liquid assets/short-term wholesale funding (x) Net broad liquid assets/short-term customer deposits Short-term wholesale funding/total wholesale funding (36,817.5) (39,387.3) (68,063.0) (83,849.5) (196,939.9) 35.0 35.0 39.2 42.9 42.7 2.8 2.6 1.2 1.3 1.6 Narrow liquid assets/3-month wholesale funding (x) *Data as of June 30. N.A.--Not available. N/A--Not applicable. N.M.--Not meaningful. External support: Five notches of uplift, owing to SEK's government-related entity status We qualify SEK as a government-related entity (GRE) under our criteria. According to our methodology for rating GREs, we consider that SEK: • Plays a "very important" role for the Swedish government in providing financing to the export sector (which generates about 50% of Sweden's GDP), especially in times of scarce credit availability. • Has an "integral" link with the Swedish government, reflecting its 100% ownership of SEK and its supportive stance toward the company, as well as its mandate to act as the country's sole provider of CIRR export loans to the Swedish exporters and effectively function as an arm of the government in supporting the sector. This results in our view that the likelihood that the Swedish government would provide timely and sufficient support, if needed, to SEK is "extremely high." Our long-term rating on SEK consequently incorporates five notches of uplift above the SACP. Additional rating factors: None No additional factors affect this rating. Related Criteria And Research • • • • • Bank Hybrid Capital And Nondeferrable Subordinated Debt Methodology And Assumptions, Sept. 18, 2014 Banks: Rating Methodology And Assumptions, Nov. 9, 2011 Banking Industry Country Risk Assessment Methodology And Assumptions, Nov. 9, 2011 Bank Capital Methodology And Assumptions, Dec. 6, 2010 Rating Government-Related Entities: Methodology And Assumptions, Dec. 9, 2010 WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT OCTOBER 2, 2014 10 1362458 | 301539251 Swedish Export Credit Corp. Anchor Matrix Economic Risk Industry Risk 1 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 a a a- bbb+ bbb+ a a- a- bbb+ bbb bbb - - - - bbb bbb- - - - 3 a- a- bbb+ bbb+ bbb bbb- bbb- bb+ - - 4 bbb+ bbb+ bbb+ 5 bbb bbb bbb- bb+ bb bb - bbb+ bbb 6 bbb bbb bbb- bbb- bb+ bb bb- b+ bbb 7 - bbb bbb- bbb- bbb- bb+ bb bb bb- b+ bbb- bbb- bb+ bb+ bb bb bb- b+ b+ 8 - - bb+ bb bb bb bb- bb- b+ b 9 10 - - - bb bb- bb- b+ b+ b+ b - - - - b+ b+ b+ b b b- Ratings Detail (As Of October 2, 2014) Swedish Export Credit Corp. Counterparty Credit Rating AA+/Stable/A-1+ Commercial Paper Foreign Currency A-1+ Senior Unsecured Greater China Regional Scale cnAAA Senior Unsecured A-1+ Senior Unsecured AA+ Senior Unsecured AA+/A-1+ Short-Term Debt A-1+ Subordinated BBB Counterparty Credit Ratings History 04-Sep-2009 Foreign Currency AA+/Stable/A-1+ 06-Jul-2009 AA+/Watch Neg/A-1+ 06-Jun-2003 AA+/Stable/A-1+ 04-Sep-2009 Local Currency AA+/Stable/A-1+ 06-Jul-2009 AA+/Watch Neg/A-1+ 06-Jun-2003 AA+/Stable/A-1+ Sovereign Rating Sweden (Kingdom of) (Unsolicited Ratings) AAA/Stable/A-1+ *Unless otherwise noted, all ratings in this report are global scale ratings. Standard & Poor's credit ratings on the global scale are comparable across countries. Standard & Poor's credit ratings on a national scale are relative to obligors or obligations within that specific country. Additional Contact: Financial Institutions Ratings Europe; [email protected] WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT OCTOBER 2, 2014 11 1362458 | 301539251 Copyright © 2014 Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC, a part of McGraw Hill Financial. All rights reserved. No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an "as is" basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P's opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof. S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription) and www.spcapitaliq.com (subscription) and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT OCTOBER 2, 2014 12 1362458 | 301539251
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz