Operational review on the 10-year (2003-2012) typhoon surveillance flight observation with dropsondes and their statistical feature of outer core in western Pacific region Po-Hsiung Lin1 Chun-Chieh Wu1 Kun-Hsuan Chou2 1National Taiwan University 2Chinese Culture University OUTLINE Part I: • Phases of DOTSAR Project • Operation Flow of DOTSTAR Part II: Some Statistics Numbers (2003~2012) Characteristics of Typhoon Outer Core eye crossing flights and Inner core of typhoon Summary and next step Phases of DOTSAR Project Pre-Phase: 2002 summer (visiting NOAA/RHD, AOC) Phase 1 : 2003-2005 (NTU, supported by NSC) Phase 2: 2006-2012 (NTU, supported by CWB + 2008 TPARC + 2010 ITOP) Phase 3: 2013~ (TTFRI, supported by CWB) Pre-Phase: 2012 NOAA/RHD, NOAA/AOC/G4 Atlantic 2002 • TD EDOURAD • TD FAY Phase 1 : 2003-2005 Funding support by NSC • • • • • • Airplane owners: Japan Diamond Air Service, Taiwan AIDC AIDC ASTRA Jet AVAPS setup Interface for flight path making (Virtual Basics, Windows-Based) Onboard flight-aid software (NTU-Madonna , NCAR-ASPEN) 1st test flight: May 23, 2003 1st typhoon mission: Dujuan (Sept. 1, 2003) ASTRA (Gulfstream 100) Windows Interface for flight path making (Virtual Basics) Flight domain Naha FIR Philippines FIR Operation Flow of DOTSTAR DB 5~3 days Storm Watch (CWB, NTU) DB 3~2 days Flight path making (NTU) Flight plan sending to NAHA, Philippines, HK FIR (AIDC) DB: Day Before DA: Day After DB 2~1 days Crews Call (NTU) Decision making (Go or not) (NTU+CWB) DB 5~2 hrs Ground transportation Taipei---Taichung (NTU) DB 2~1 hrs Final ground check (AIDC + NTU) DB 1hr Mission + Weather briefing (AIDC + NTU) DA 0~6hrs Drop + onboard code editing + voice communication (NTU, AIDC, CWB) ASTRA (Gulfstream 100) RD94 dropsonde AVAPS operator System Engineer Code editor Launcher + PI (visitor) pilots gate Satcomm Code editor SE internet launcher AVAPS operator PI / Visitor toilet Onboard data processing Astra Jet flight Information RD94 dropsonde in-air data Pilot console AR-429 Bus-Card AVAPS (Airborne Vertical Atmospheric Profiling System ) Vaisala Madonna (2003-2006) (realtime airborne and dropsonde data ploting & diagnosis system ) ASPEN (Atmospheric Sounding Processing Environment ) NCAR Britney (2007~) (Bright tool for onboard enjoy) NTU DCF NTU (Data Compress and FTP sending ) Satcomm FTP TTFRI CWB Phase 1~3 2004 “e-Taiwan” Film by Government Information Office 2008 ”T-PARC” 2008 “National Geography” TV program 2009 “NSC-50th” film program 2010 “ITOP” 2012 “Follow me” TV children program 2013 Technical transfer from NTU to TTFRI Some Statistics Numbers (2003-2012) Dropsonde: 946/1051 (10% bad, most of this number contributed by old RD93 dropsonde before 2009) Flights: 64 TY : 49 Dropsonde impact study by NCEP GFS 2003-2009 45 TCs (35 cases) Improvement of track error 12~18% The case-averaged track error statistics of 2003–2009 DOTSTAR cases at every 24-h forecast time for different periods. Bars represent the case-averaged track error of control (NCEP-O) and denial (NCEP-N) forecasts (in km). The solid line indicates the case-averaged track error improvement (in %) and the dashed line the number of cases in each forecast time. The single (double) asterisk shown on the abscissa indicates that the forecast error difference between the control and denial runs is statistically significant at the 90% (95%) confidence level. (Chou et al.,2011) Dropsonde impact study by CWB-TWRF 2008-2012 22 TCs (34 cases) Improvement of track error ~8% track errors (km) 300 250 TWRF_45_DP 200 TWRF_45_NODP 244 177 151 150 114 87 100 50 67 13 55 0 (34) 12 (34) 13 221 167 140 115 82 0 24 (34) 36 (32) 48 (30) 60 (28) 72 (24) forecast hours (case no.) 增加dropsonde資料34個案,TWRF平均颱風路徑誤差改進 7.9%。 鄭浚騰, 陳得松,蕭玲鳳 ,黃康寧, 洪景山 ,馮欽賜 ,Xiang-Yu Huang, Hongli Wang, 葉天降 (2013,天氣分析與預報研討會 ) Some Statistics Numbers (2003-2012) • • • • Distance to eye / dropsonde number 0-100 km (inner core) / 17 100-300 km (outer core) / 314 300-500 km / 399 Target observation > 500 km / 216 for sensitivity regions Characteristics of Typhoon Outer Core Tangential velocity DR DL UR UL 1100m DL: shallow and small DR: deep and larger UR: maxi wind at ~1100m height and 1.4 times more than DL Characteristics of Typhoon Outer Core Tangential velocity (UR) DR DL UL UR Typhoon intensity defined by CWB 1100m light : strong (1 : 1.4 ) DR UR In-situ measurement of wind speed by Aerosonde in Typhoon Longwang 2005 (Lin and Lee, 2008) DL UL Characteristics of Typhoon Outer Core Relative Humidity DR DL UR UL 600m Compared with wind field, moisture profiles are more symmetric in outer core of typhoon DR DL Characteristics of Typhoon Outer Core Relative Humidity (UR) UR UL 500m light : strong (1 : 1.03 ) DR DL UR Characteristics of Typhoon Outer Core Virtual Potential Temperature UL 500m Compared with wind field, thermal profiles are more symmetric in outer core of typhoon Unstable level height is about ~ 500m height DR DL Characteristics of Typhoon Outer Core Virtual Potential Temperature (UR) UR UL 500m Stability below 500m in different intensity of typhoon needs more study eye crossing flights and Inner core of typhoon *2003 Melor N S N S N S Comparison of vertical profiles between Inner core and outer core lower and stronger windshear + more humid Summary and next step • tangential wind : maximum speed close to 1000m height and asymmetric in quadrants (stronger at UR, weaker at DL) • humidity : more symmetric than wind field • The profiles in different intensity of typhoons are under studied. • More data from inner core should be collected DR UR DL UL Summary and next step DORIS: A mini AXBT(airborne XBT) in same size of RD94 dropsonde is under developed by NTU, TORI and TTFRI DORIS will be dropped from ASTRA after RD94 to measure OCPI (Ocean Coupling Potential Index) for typhoon intensity study Questions ? ∗ Any possibility to have typhoon joint flights among western Pacific countries ? ∗ Joint Program for Western Pacific Typhoon Observation (JP-WPTO) ?
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz