Crime & Criminal Justice w/ Ellis Godard @ CSUN Admin Individualistic Accounts Biology Traits & Psychology States Crime & Criminal Justice w/ Ellis Godard @ CSUN Admin Classical Biology Psych Both Focus 54% A. 17% B. 4% C. 24% D. 2% E. 4 Psych Both Focus 19% 16% 38% 25% Beccaria & Bentham Becker & Gordon Black & Godard Marx & Weber Montesquieu & Voltaire Currently a cop 2. Want to be a cop Alts. Admin In other law enforcement 4. Want to be in other L.E. 5. None of the above Biology Psych Both Focus 6 Alts. Mixed at best Other factors: family, self-concept, conscience Classical 7 Biology Psych Both Focus Alts. Crime from individualistic forces Internal flaws Not free agents who choose behavior “Positivism”/Scienticity Move away from reform (for a time) Shift away from philosophy, to data Major thrusts NOT sociological SOC355 @ CSUN w/ ELLIS GODARD Irrational behavior Non-material rationality Overemphasize agency (vs. structure) Overemphasize law (vs. other controls) Fits for property, not violent or expressive Post-Classicism 3. Classical Crime & Criminal Justice w/ Ellis Godard @ CSUN Pick the 1st that applies to you… 1. Alts. Empirical support Biology Focus Adequacy Structural Theories Process/Developmental Theories Critical Theory Social Geometry 2% Both Critique of the Classics Classical Psych SOC355 @ CSUN w/ ELLIS GODARD Admin Alts. Biology Psychology Sociology Next: Admin Biology 1 Lecture Outline Classical Q1. With what two names is classical criminology most associated? Biology and Psychology 5 Crime & Criminal Justice w/ Ellis Godard @ CSUN 8 1 Crime & Criminal Justice w/ Ellis Godard @ CSUN Admin Classical Biology Psych Both Focus Admin Alts. Q2. Which matter(s) did classical explanations ignore? 20% 5% 12% A. Situations in which crime happens B. Who commits crimes C. Which people commit crimes Classical Biology Psych Both Focus Alts. Later Biological Strategies Genetic influences Body types – William Sheldon Ectomorph/endomorph/mesomorph Crime and human nature – misc. Adoption studies XYY theory – extra Y chromosome 20% 43% D. When is crime committed? E. All of the above SOC355 @ CSUN w/ ELLIS GODARD Admin Classical Biology Psych Both Focus 9 12 Alts. Admin Post-Classicism Biology Psych Both Focus Alts. Biological Strategies, cont’d Crime from individualistic forces Classical Internal flaws Not free agents who choose behavior Others Autonomic Nervous System Deficiency Brain dysfunctions Sex Hormones – PMS Dietary conditions – hypoglycemia “Positivism”/Scienticity Move away from reform (for a time) Shift away from philosophy, to data 10 Admin Classical Biology Psych Both Focus 13 Alts. Admin Classical Phrenology 1% skulls/brains 5% Cartography Franz Joseph Gall – 6% A.M. Guerry – ecological maps Adolphe Guetelet – societal constancy, mechanics Transmitted behavior Psych Both Focus Alts. Q3. Phrenology… Earliest “Positivists” Biology Isaac Ray – deficient mental faculties Richard Dugdale – biologically inherited depravity Cesare Lombroso – atavism & born criminals A. B. C. 86% D. 1% E. Extends Darwin’s ideas on evolution Involves maps and cartography Is a psychological account of crime Relates crime to brain/skull shapes Was based on study of the Jukes family SOC355 @ CSUN w/ ELLIS GODARD Crime & Criminal Justice w/ Ellis Godard @ CSUN 14 11 2 Crime & Criminal Justice w/ Ellis Godard @ CSUN Admin Classical Biology Psych Both Focus Alts. Admin Probs w/ Biological Accounts Theoretical Methodological Too diverse - Loose findings; no cohesive theory Small/bad samples Measurements Replications Classical Biology Psych Both 3% A. 8% B. 3% C. 35% D. 51% E. Alts. Id Personality development Superego Unconscious Underego Empirical Not account for relativity Group-rate differences SOC355 @ CSUN w/ ELLIS GODARD 15 Admin Classical Biology Psych Both Focus Alts. Admin Psychological Drives/States Focus Q4. Which is not part of Freud’s theory of crime? Psychoanalytic Psych Both Focus Alts. Other pieces Identification of criminals – abnormality? Agency – ignores inequality & soc. structure Policy implications – WTF to do? Subsequent developments (instinct) (rational/learned) superego (internalized moral code) ego But antisocial behavior isn’t mentally disordered Childhood Poor Biology Freud – personality development, 3 parts: id Classical 18 experiences aren’t paramount methodology (esp. case histories) 16 Admin Classical Biology Psych Both Focus Alts. Admin Psych. Drives/States, cont’d From institutionalization, not cause? Bio & psych are micro; Soc is macro? Eh… biological evolution is macro, and plenty of sociological explanations are micro “whether you think it is more important to understand the smaller picture or the larger one” That should be an empirical (or theoretical) question: 17 Alts. Neoclassical is about free will Biol & psych place cause(s) within individual Soc IDs causes in social environment, outside individual not predict who acts on it Focus False dichotomies Temperament Both Eh, not really: Serious methods probs Personality Intelligence/IQ Psych Yes: Piaget – 4 stages Kohlberg – moral development [ack] Biology Barkan’s Comparisons Moral development Classical What is it that you’re trying to explain? What claim(s) explain(s) the most? 20 3 Crime & Criminal Justice w/ Ellis Godard @ CSUN Admin Classical Biology Psych Both Focus Alts. Admin Law inherently individualistic Enacting of “the law”, but not “law in action” Emile Durkheim (“social fact”) unfulfilled Psych Both Focus Alts. Beyond Individualism Language – rights, actions, standing Assumptions – best interests, system “works” Criticism – police brutality, race relations “Sociology of Law” typically is, too Biology Pure Sociology Crime, Law, & Individualism Classical No psychology – only observable, social facts No tautology – don’t explain w/ goals/purposes No people as such – “the person is dead” Treats Law as Observable Quantity Not abstract force, or codified body of rules Varies (distributed unevenly in time & space) Exists beyond individuals Social fact that behaves in its own r ight Can describe its variation, explain its distribution Can use that understanding to solve “problems” 21 Admin Classical Biology Psych Both Focus 24 Alts. Admin Individualism Flawed Empirically 16% Inconclusive research Methodological problems Vast sociological knowledge ignored (context!) 8% Theoretically “Oversocializes” or “undersocializes” Causal order unclear Scientifically Practically Classical Biology Psych Both 15% Less simple, general, testable, valid, & original 48% Inhibits/Precludes “solutions” to “problems” 13% A. Adoption studies B. Body type theories C. Human nature theories D. Social Geometry E. XYY Theory Classical Biology Psych Both Focus Alts. Admin Sociological Explanations Biology Points 3.17 Team Currently a cop 2.51 Want to be in other L.E. In other law enforcement Want to be a cop None of the above 2.28 Subcultural Learning Control 2.27 2.27 Meso: Ecology & Disorg Strain & Anomie Micro: Classical Psych Both Focus 25 Alts. Team Scores Macro: Alts. SOC355 @ CSUN w/ ELLIS GODARD 22 Admin Focus Q5. All but which provide biological accounts of crime? Points Team Life Course Integrated Etc: Critical & Geometric 23 SOC355 @ CSUN w/ ELLIS GODARD 26 4
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz