Pepperdine Law Review
Volume 27
Issue 4 Beyond Tobacco Symposium: Tort Issues in
Light of the Cigarette Litigation
Article 13
5-15-2000
Volume 27 Index
Derek Brown
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr
Part of the Other Law Commons
Recommended Citation
Derek Brown Volume 27 Index, 27 Pepp. L. Rev. 4 (2000)
Available at: http://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr/vol27/iss4/13
This Index is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at Pepperdine Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in
Pepperdine Law Review by an authorized administrator of Pepperdine Digital Commons. For more information, please contact
[email protected].
VOLUME XXVII INDEX
ARTICLE INDEX
Compulsory Employment Arbitration and the
EEOC, Richard A. Bales ............................................. 27:1
Cigarette Litigation's Offspring: Assessing Tort Issues Related
to Guns, Alcohol, & Other Controversial Products in
Light of the Tobacco Wars, Gary T. Schwartz ........................... 27:751
Economic and Causation Issues in City Suits Against
Gun Manufacturers, Frank J. Vandall ................................. 27:719
From Cigarettes to Alcohol: The Next Step in Hedonic
Product Liability, Robert F. Cochran, Jr ................................ 27:701
Justice As Right Relationship: A Philosophical and
Theological Reflection on Affirmative
Action, Rev. Robert John Araujo, S.J .................................. 27:377
Protected Petitioning or Unlawful Retaliation? The Limits of First
Amendment Immunity for Lawsuits Under the
Fair Housing Act, David K. Godschalk ................................ 27:477
Remand: One Constitution,
One Standard, Stephen E. Abraham, William M. Hensley ................. 27:263
The Remoteness Doctrine: A Rationale For a Rational Limit
on Tort Liability, Victor E. Schwartz .................................. 27:759
State Medical Reimbursement Lawsuits After Tobacco: Is the Domino
Effect for Lead Paint Manufacturers and Others
Fair Game, Richard L. Cupp, Jr . ..................................... 27:685
Succession by Estoppel: Hong Kong's
Succession to the ICCPR, Peter K. Yu .................................. 27:53
Taking Aim: The Impetus Driving Suits Against
Gun Manufacturers, Mark Barnes .................................... 27:735
Transcript from Beyond Tobacco Symposium, Comments on
Hamilton v. Accu-Tek, Denise Dunleavy ................................ 27:74
The Unreliability of Testimony From a Witness With Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD): Why
Courts Must Acknowledge the Connection
Between Hypnosis and MPD and Adopt a "Per Se"
Rule of Exclusion for MPD Testimony, Mark Anthony Miller .............. 27:193
AUTHOR INDEX
Abraham, Stephen E.
Hensley, William M.
Remand: One Constitution, One Standard .............................. 27:263
Aruajo, Rev. Robert John, S.J.
Justice As Right Relationship: A Philosophical and
Theological Reflection on Affirmative Action ........................... 27:377
Bales, Richard A.
Compulsory Employment Arbitration and the
EEOC ........................................................... 27:1
897
Barnes, Mark
Taking Aim: The Impetus Driving Suits
Against Gun M anufacturers .........................................
Brown, Derek
Litigating the Holocaust: A Consistent Theory
in Tort for the Private Enforcement of Human
Rights Violations .................................................
Bragg, Kathleen
The Termination of Transfers Provision of the 1976 Copyright
Act: Is it Time to Alienate it or
A m end it? ......................................................
Cochran Jr., Robert F.
From Cigarettes to Alcohol: The Next Step in Hedonic
Product Liability .................................................
Corrington, John
Burlington Industries,Inc. v. Ellerth: "Whole-cloth
Creation" or Manifestation of Congressional Intent ......................
Chapman, Karen
Brogan v. United States "No" Means "No Defense":
Brogan's Elimination of the "Exculpatory No"
D octrine ........................................................
Cupp Jr., Richard L.
State Medical Reimbursement Lawsuits After Tobacco: Is the Domino
Effect for Lead Paint Manufacturers and Others
Fair G ame ......................................................
Dale, Joshua
Televised Political Debates and Arkansas Educational
Televison Commission v. Forbes:
Excluding the Public from
Public Broadcasting ...............................................
Devlin, Gary
NEA v. Finley: Explicating the Rocky Relationship
Between the Government and the Arts .................................
Dunleavy, Denise
Transcript from Beyond Tobacco Symposium, Comments on
Hamilton v. Accu-Tek .............................................
Evans, Stefanie
Making More Effective Use of Our
Prisons Through Regimented Labor ..................................
Godschalk, David K.
Protected Petitioning or Unlawful Retaliation? The Limits of First
Amendment Immunity for Lawsuits Under the
Fair Housing Act .................................................
Jones, Jill
The Christian Executioner: Reconciling "An Eye
For an Eye" with "Turn the Other Cheek". ............................
Kline, Michael
Wading in the Sargasso Sea: The Double Jeopardy Clause,
Non-Capital Sentencing Procedures, and California's
"Three Strikes" Law Collide in
Monge v. California ..............................................
Kuehn, Tomas A.
Human "Wrongs"?: The U.S. Takes an Unpopular Stance in
Opposing a Strong International Criminal Court .........................
McFarland, Robert L.
898
27:735
27:553
27:769
27:701
27:175
27:155
27:685
27:629
27:345
27:743
27:521
27:477
27:127
27:861
27:299
[Vol. 27: 897, 2000]
Volume XXVII Index
PEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW
The Milwaukee Parental Choice Program: A Constitutional
27:107
Victory for School Choice ..........................................
Miller, Mark Anthony
The Unreliability of Testimony From a Witness With Multiple
Personality Disorder (MPD): Why Courts Must Acknowledge the Connection Between
Hypnosis and MPD and Adopt a "Per Se"
27:193
Rule of Exclusion for MPD Testimony ................................
Neil, Paul
California v. Deep Research: Leashing in the Eleventh Amendment
to Keep Sinking Shipwreck
27:657
Claims Afloat ....................................................
Richelieu, William
Gray Days Ahead?: The Impact of Quality King Distributors,Inc. v.
27:827
L'Anza Research International,Inc . ..................................
Schwartz, Gary T.
Cigarette Litigation's Offspring: Assessing Tort Issues Related
to Guns, Alcohol, & Other Controversial Products in
27:751
Light of the Tobacco W ars ..........................................
Schwartz, Victor E.
The Remoteness Doctrine: A Rationale For a Rational Limit
27:759
on Tort Liability ..................................................
Spindler, Kester
Shareholder Demands for Higher Corporate Earnings Have Their Price:
How Courts Allow Employers to Fire Older Employees for
27:807
Their Achievements ................................................
Stewart, Morgan
Commercial Access Contracts and the Internet: Does the Uniform
Computer Information Transactions Act Clear the
Air with Regard to Liabilities when
27:597
an On-Line Access System Fails .....................................
Vandall, Frank J.
Economic and Causation Issues in City Suits Against
27:719
Gun M anufacturers ...............................................
Vanse. Jennifer
California Wrongful Discharge Law Turns
27:281
Toward The Plaintiff ..............................................
Watson, Brett D.
Bragdon v. Abbott: The Supreme Court's
Anti-discrimination Advocacy and the
27:323
Reopening of Pandora's Box ........................................
Williams, Nancy
Analyzing an Experiment Gone Awry: A Unique Application of
Bacon's Corrective Model to the First Amendment Protection of Essential Rights and
27:889
Liberties ........................................................
Yu, Peter K.
Succession by Estoppel: Hong Kong's
27:53
Succession to the ICCPR ............................................
899
BOOK REVIEW
Analyzing an Experiment Gone Awry: A Unique Application of Bacon's
Corrective Model to the First Amendment Protection of Essential
Rights and Liberties, Nancy Williams .................................
27:889
CASENOTES
Bragdon v. Abbott: The Supreme Court's
Anti-discrimination Advocacy and the
Reopening of Pandora's Box, Brett D. Watson ..........................
Brogan v. United States "No" Means "No Defense":
Brogan's Elimination of the "Exculpatory No"
Doctrine, Karen Chapman ..........................................
Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth: "Whole-cloth
Creation" or Manifestation of Congressional Intent,
John Corrington ..................................................
Californiav. Deep Research: Leashing in the Eleventh Amendment
to Keep Sinking Shipwreck
Claims Afloat, Paul Neil ...........................................
Gray Days Ahead?: The Impact of Quality King Distributors,Inc. v.
L'Anza Research International,Inc, William Richelieu ...................
NEA v. Finley: Explicating the Rocky Relationship
Between the Government and the Arts, Gary E. Devlin ....................
Televised Political Debates and Arkansas Educational
Televison Commission v. Forbes:
Excluding the Public from
Public Broadcasting, Joshua Dale ....................................
Wading in the Sargasso Sea: The Double Jeopardy Clause,
Non-Capital Sentencing Procedures, and California's
"Three Strikes" Law Collide in
Monge v. California,Michael Kline ..................................
27:323
27:155
27:175
27:657
27: 827
27:345
27:629
27:861
COMMENTS
California Wrongful Discharge Law Turns
Toward The Plaintiff, Jennifer Vanse .................................
The Christian Executioner: Reconciling "An Eye
For an Eye" with "Turn the Other Cheek", Jill Jones ......................
Commercial Access Contracts and the Internet: Does the Uniform
Computer Information Transactions Act Clear the
Air with Regard to Liabilities when
an On-Line Access System Fails, Morgan Stewart .......................
Human "Wrongs"?: The U.S. Takes an Unpopular Stance in
Opposing a Strong International Criminal Court,
Gaining Unlikely Allies in the Process, Tomas A. Kuehn ..................
Litigating the Holocaust: A Consistent Theory
in Tort for the Private Enforcement of
Human Rights Violations, Derek Brown ................................
Making More Effective Use of Our
Prisons Through Regimented Labor, Stefanie Evans ......................
The Milwaukee Parental Choice Program: A Constitutional
900
27:281
27:127
27:597
27:299
27:553
27:521
[Vol. 27: 897, 2000]
Volume XXVII Index
PEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW
Victory for School Choice, Robert L. McFarland ........................ 27:107
Shareholder Demands for Higher Corporate Earnings Have Their Price:
How Courts Allow Employers to Fire Older Employees for
Their Achievements, Kester Spindler .................................. 27:807
The Termination of Transfers Provision of the 1976 Copyright
Act: Is it Time to Alienate it or
Amend it?, Kathleen M . Bragg ...................................... 27:769
SUBJECT MATTER INDEX
Admiralty Law
California v. Deep Research: Leashing in the Eleventh
Amendment to Keep Sinking Shipwreck Claims Afloat .................... 27:657
Civil Rights
Analyzing an Experiment Gone Awry: A Unique Application
of Bacon's Corrective Model to the First Amendment
Protection of Essential Rights and Liberties ............................ 27:889
Bragdon v. Abbott: The Supreme Court's Anti-discrimination
Advocacy and the Reopening of Pandora's Box ......................... 27:323
Brogan v. United States "No" Means No Defense": Brogan's
Elimination of the "Exculpatory No" Doctrine ........................... 27:153
Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth: "Whole-cloth Creation" or
Manifestation of Congressional Intent? ...... ................ ........ .. 27:173
Justice As Right Relationship: A Philosophical and
Theological Reflection on AffirmativeAction ............................ 27:377
Litigating the Holocaust: A Consistent Theory in Tort for the
Private Enforcement of Human Rights Violations ........................ 27:553
Protected Petitioning or Unlawful Retaliation? The
Limits of First Amendment Immunity
for Lawsuits Under the Fair Housing Act ............................... 27:477
Succession by Estoppel: Succession to the ICCPR in
Hong Kong After 1997 .............................................. 27:51
Commercial Law
Commercial Access Contracts and the Internet: Does the
Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act Clear
the Air with Regard to Liabilities when an On-line
Access System Fails ............................................... 27:597
Constitutional Law
Making More Effective Use of OurPrisons Through Regimented Labor ................ 27:521
The Milwaukee Parental Choice Program:
A Constitutional Victory for School Choice ............................. 27:105
Protected Petitioning or Unlawful Retaliation? The
Limits of First Amendment Immunity
for Lawsuits Under the Fair Housing Act ............................... 27:477
Remand: One Constitution, One Standard ......................................... 263
Televised Political Debates and Arkansas EducationalTelevison
Commission v. Forbes:Excluding the Public from
Public Broadcasting ...............................................
Wading in the Sargasso Sea: The Double Jeopardy Clause, Non-Capital
Sentencing Proceedings, and California's'Three Strikes" Law
Collidein Monge v. California .......................................
27:629
27:861
Copyright
The Termination of Transfers Provision of the 1976 Copyright Act:
Is it Time to Alienate it or Amend it? .................................
27:769
Criminal Law
The Christian Executioner: Reconciling an "Eye
for an Eye" with "Turn the Other Cheek" .................
Human "Wrongs"?: The U.S. Takes an Unpopular Stance in
Opposing a Strong International Criminal Court,
Gaining Unlikely Allies in the Process .................................
Justice As Right Relationship: A Philosophical and
Theological Reflection on AffirmativeAction ............................
Making More Effective Use of OurPrisons Through Regimented Labor ...................
California v. Deep Research: Leashing in the Eleventh
Amendment to Keep Sinking Shipwreck Claims Afloat ....................
.
Criminal Procedure
Brogan v. United States "No" Means No Defense": Brogan's
Elimination of the "Exculpatory No" Doctrine ...........................
The Unreliability of Testimony From a Witness With'Multiple
Personality Disorder (MPD): Why Courts
Must Acknowledge the Connection Between
Hypnosis and MPD and Adopt a "Per Se"
Rule of Exclusionfor MPD Testimony .................................
Employment
Bragdon v. Abbott: The Supreme Court's Anti-discrimination
Advocacy and the Reopening of Pandora's Box .........................
Burlington Industries,Inc. v. Ellerth: "Whole-cloth Creation" or
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Manifestation of Congressional Intent? ..
California Wrongful Discharge Law Turns
Toward The Plaintiff ...........................................
Compulsory Employment Arbitration and the EEOC .................................
Justice As Right Relationship: A Philosophical and
Theological Reflection on Affirmative Action ...........................
Shareholder Demands for Higher Corporate Earnings Have
Their Price: How Courts Allow Employers to Fire Older
Employees for Their Achievements ...................................
Federal Funding
NEA v. Finley: Explicating the Rocky Relationship Between the
Government and the Arts ...........................................
International Law
Gray Days Ahead?: The Impact of QualityKing Distributors,
Inc. v. L'Anza Research International,Inc............................
Human "Wrongs"?: The U.S. Takes an Unpopular Stance in
Opposing a Strong International Criminal Court,
902
27:125
27:299
27:377
521
27:657
27:153
27:193
27:323
. . . . . . . . . . . .
27:173
27:281
27:1
27:377
27:807
27:345
27:827
[Vol. 27: 897, 2000]
Volume XXVI1 Index
PEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW
Gaining Unlikely Allies in the Process .................................
Sexual Harassment
Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth: "Whole-cloth Creation" or
Manifestation of Congressional Intent? .. . . . . . . . . .
27:299
. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .
Torts
Cigarette Litigation's Offspring: Assessing Tort Issues Related to
Guns, Alcohol, & Other Controversial Products In Light
of the Tobacco Wars ..............................................
Economic and Causation Issues in City Suits Against Gun
M anufacturers ...................................................
From Cigarettes to Alcohol: The Next Step in Hedonic
Product Liability? ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Litigating the Holocaust: A Consistent Theory in Tort for the
Private Enforcement of Human Rights Violations ........................
The Remoteness Doctrine: A Rationale For a Rational Limit on
Tort Liability ....................................................
State Medical Reimbursement Lawsuits After Tobacco: Is the
Domino Effect for Lead Paint Manufacturers and
Others Fair Game? ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Taking Aim: The Impetus Driving Suits Against Gun Manufacturers .................
Transcript from Beyond Tobacco Symposium, Comments on
Hamilton v. Accu-Tek .............................................
27:173
27:751
27:719
. . . . . . . .
27:701
27:553
27:759
. . . . . . . .
27:685
27:735
27:743
903
CASE INDEX
Agostini v. Felton ..................................................
A guilar v. Felton .......................................................
Albemarle Paper Co. v. M oody .............................................
Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co ....................................
Almendarez-Torres v. United States ............................................
Anderson v. Baxter Healthcare Corp ........................................
Arkansas Educational Television Commission v. Forbes ....................
27:115, 116, 120
27:115, 116
27:34, 35
27:13-15, 17, 19,32
27:872
27:817, 821
27:629, 630, 642,
646, 647, 651-656
Bell v. Wolfish ............................................................
27:533
Benton v. M aryland ........................................................
27:864
Bialas v. Greyhound Lines, Inc ................................................
27:817
Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. NLRB ...................
27:481,494, 495,497-501, 503,
504, 506-508, 511-516, 519
BMG M usic v. Perez .......................................................
27:841
Board of Education v. Allen ..................................................
27:111
Bobbs-M errill Co. v. Straus ..................................................
27:838
Boos v. Barry .............................................................
27:634
Bragdon v. Abbott ..............................................
27:323, 324, 340-343
Brogan v. United States ......................
27:153, 154, 162-165, 167, 168, 170, 172, 173
Brown v. Superior Court ....................................................
27:710
Brown v. Board of Education .................................................
27:465
Bullington v. Missouri ...................
27:862,863,866,869-874,877,879,880,882,883,886
Burger-Fischer v. Degussa ...............................
27:554, 575, 582, 589, 592, 594
Burks v. United States ...................................................
27:873,875
Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth ........................
27:173, 174, 180-186, 188-191
California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited .....................
27:492, 493,496,
512, 516
California v. Deep Sea Research ........................
27:657, 658, 672, 674-679,681-684
Cantwell v. Connecticut .....................................................
27:892
Casa Marie Inc. v. Superior Court of Puerto Rico .............................
27:485, 513
Caspari v. Bohlen ..........................................................
27:871
CBS, Inc. v. Democratic National Committee ............................
27:639, 644, 650
CBS, Inc. v. FCC
..................
27:640
Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local 776 v. NLRB ..........................
27:501, 502
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense
Council, Inc ...............................................
27:28-30, 33, 35
Chilsolm v. Georgia ........................................................
27:660
City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising ..................................
27:502
Coker v. Ge orgia ..........................................................
27:531
Columbia Broadcasting System v. Scorpio Music Distributors ................
27:839-842, 852
Committee for Public Education and Religious Liberty v. Nyquist ................
27:113, 114,
118, 122, 123
Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc ...............
27:635, 646, 647
Cosmair, Inc. v. Dynamite Enterprises, Inc ...................................
27:840, 842
Creek v. Village of W esthaven ................................................
27:488
Dace v. ACF Indus., Inc . ....................................................
27:812
Diamond Walnut Growers, Inc. v. NLRB ........................................
27:499
Dred Scott v. Sandford ..................................................
27:439, 465
Duffield v. Robertson Stephens & Co....................................
27:40, 187, 188
904
[Vol. 27: 897, 2000]
Volume XXVII Index
PEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW
Eastern Rail Road Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight,
Inc . ............................................
27:491-493, 497, 499, 502,
503, 505, 506, 511, 512
EEOC v. Arabian American Oil Co ...........................................
27:35, 37
EEOC v. Chrysler Corp .................................................
27:813,814
EEOC v. Commercial Office Products Co ........................................
27:35
EEOC v. Frank's Nursery & Crafts, Inc .......................................
27:50, 52
EEOC v. Goodyear Aerospace Corp .......................................
27:44, 46, 48
EEOC v. Harris Chernin, Inc ................................................
27:47, 48
EEOC v. Kidder, Peabody & Co..............................................
27:48-51
EEOC v. McLean Trucking Co ..............................................
27:43, 46
EEOC v. River Oaks Imaging & Diagnostic ...................................
27:38, 39
EEOC v. United Parcel Service ................................................
27:44
EEOC v. U.S. Steel Corp ...................................................
27:46, 48
EEOC v. Waffle House, Inc .................................................
27:48, 49
EEOC v. World Savings & Loan Association, Inc ..................................
27:50
Employment Division v. Smith ...............................................
27:893
Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co ...............................................
27:713
Estelle v. Gam ble ..........................................................
27:531
Everson v. Board of Education .......................
27:110, 111, 113, 116, 120, 892, 894
Faragher v. City of Boca Raton ...........................................
27:174, 186
Farmer v. Brennan .....................................................
27:532, 546
FCC v. League of Women Voters of California ...........................
27:641, 650, 654
Fera v. Village Plaza, Inc .....................................................
27:610
Filartiga v. Pefia-Irala ...................................................
27:563, 564
Fisher Music Company v. M. Witmark & Sons ...........................
27:773, 778, 794
Fitch v. Schubert ..................................................
27:776, 779, 780
Florida Dept. of State v. Treasure Salvors, Inc ................................
27:672, 677
Foley v. Interactive Data Corp .................................................
27:284
Forsyth County v. The Nationalist Movement ................
27:637, 638, 648, 649, 651, 652
G. Ricordi & Co. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc ..............................
27:776, 779, 780
Gantt v. Sentry Insurance Co.......................................
27:284-287,293, 297
Gardner v. Florida .........................................................
27:883
General Electric Co. v. Gilbert ..............................................
27:34, 35
General Telephone Co. v. EEOC ...............................................
27:42
Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp ........................
27:2, 16-19, 21, 23, 25, 27,
29, 30, 32, 36,41,42,45
Green v. Ralee Engineering Co.........................................
27:283, 286-296
Gregg v. Georgia ..........................................................
27:883
Griggs v. Duke Power Co . .................................................
27:34, 35
Gryger v. Burke ...........................................................
27:872
Hadley v. Baxendale .....................................................
27:608-610
Hall v. E.I. de Nemours and Company ..........................................
27:743
Hamilton v. Accu-Tek .......................
27:724, 726, 733, 735, 738, 740, 741, 743-747
H ans v. Louisiana ..........................................................
27:661
Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins ...............................................
27:816-818
Helling v. M cKinney .......................................................
27:532
Hergenrether v. East ....................................................
27:724, 725
Holt v. Sarver .........................................................
27:532, 545
Hubbard v. United States ................................................
27:157, 158
Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian And Bisexual
905
Group of Boston .......................................... 27:638, 652, 653
27:500, 502
International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. NLRB ................
27:635, 646
International Society for Krishna Consciousness v. Lee .........................
27:754
J'Aire Corp. v. Gregory ......................................................
Jackson v. Benson .......................................... 27:107, 108, 119,123-125
27:763
Kingsman Transit Co. v. City of Buffalo ........................................
27:729
Knight v. Jewett ...........................................................
27:636, 637, 648, 649, 651, 652
Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co ...................
27:734
Langridge v. Levy ..........................................................
27:813
Leftwich v. Harris-Stowe State College .........................................
27:112-115, 120, 122
Lemon v. Kurtzman .............................................
27:274-280
Lewis v. Tim e, Inc .......................................................
27:759
Li v. Yellow Cab ..........................................................
27:503
Linn v. Plant Guard Workers .................................................
27:883
Lockett v. O hio ............................................................
27:807, 818, 826
Marks v. Loral Corporation ..........................................
27:735
M cCarthy v. Olin ..........................................................
27:110
M cCollum v. Board of Education ..............................................
27:811
M cDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green ............................................
27:173, 178
Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson ......................................
27:727, 729, 731-733
M errill v. Navegar, Inc . ..........................................
27:814-816, 819, 822
M etz v. Transit M ix, Inc ..........................................
27:15-19, 21, 30,
Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc ..................
36,51,52
27:861-863,865,868,871,876-879,882,884-886
Monge v. California ........................
27:488
.............
NAACP v. Button .............................................
27:515
National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie ............................
27:345, 359, 364,366-371, 375
National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley ...................
27:275, 511
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan ..........................................
27:309
N icaragua case ............................................................
27:872
Nichols v. United States .....................................................
27:498
NLRB v. International Union of Operating Engineers Local 520 ......................
27:498
NLRB v. Vanguard Tours, Inc .................................................
27:864,865,872
North Carolina v. Pearce .............................................
27:485
Northside Realty Associates v. Chapman ........................................
27:168
Nunley v. United States .....................................................
27:710
O'Brien v. M uskin Corp .....................................................
27:574
O 'Keefe v. Snyder .........................................................
27:586
Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co . ..............................................
27:841
Parfums Givenchy, Inc. v. Drug Emporium, Inc ...................................
27:160, 161
Paternostro v. United States ..............................................
27:871
Pennsylvania v. Goldhammer .................................................
27:881
People v. M onge ...........................................................
27:591
Perkins v. Texas and New Orleans Ry. Co.......................................
27:634, 646
Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'n .........................
27:293, 294
Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 396 ..................
27:493, 499, 502, 518
Pictures Industries, Inc . .........................................
27:384, 427, 439, 442, 444, 446, 465
Plessy v. Ferguson .................................
27:573
Pollack v. Siemens AG ......................................................
27:533
Procunier v. M artinez .......................................................
27:493, 499, 502, 518
Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia ....................
Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. L'Anza Research
27:827, 829, 830, 842, 850,852, 858
International, Inc ...........................
27:638, 639
Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC ........................................
27:450
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke ..................................
906
[Vol. 27: 897, 2000]
Volume XXVII Index
PEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW
Rhodes v. Chapman ........................................................
Richardson v. Ham .................................................
Riggs v. Palmer .......................................................
27:531
27:724, 725, 730
27:391, 392
Rodriguez de Quijas v. Shearson/American Express,
27:15-18, 21, 30, 36, 52
Inc . ...............................................
27:777-785
Rohauer v. Killiam ......................................................
Rosenburger v. Rector and Visitors of University of
27:355, 356, 359,363, 364
Virginia ..........................................
27:729
Rowland .v Christian .......................................................
27:781
R ussell v. Price ............................................................
Scheuer v. Rhodes ......................................................... 27:270
27:885
Schiro v. Farley ...........................................................
27:335
School Board of Nassau County v. Arline .......................................
Sebastian International Inc. v. Consumer Contacts
27:841, 842, 844, 853, 858
(PTY) Ltd .......................................
27:39
Seus v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc . ...............................................
27:15-18, 21, 30,36, 52
Shearson/American Express, Inc. v. McMahon ......................
27:637, 648, 649
Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham .........................................
27:590, 723, 724
Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories ........................................
27:818
Snow v. Ridgeview M edical Center ............................................
27:485
Sofarelli v. Pinellas County ..................................................
27:863
State v. Felch .............................................................
27:278-280
Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment .................................
27:731, 732
Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co. ............................................
27:782-786, 801
Stewart v. Abend ...................................................
27:883
Strickland v. Washington ....................................................
27:592
Sum m ers v. Tice ...........................................................
27:284, 290
Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co ..........................................
27:811
Texas Dep't of Community Affairs v. Burdine ...................................
27:385, 446
Toyosaburo Korematsu v. United States .....................................
27:530, 534
Trop v. D ulles .........................................................
27:641
Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCC .......................................
27:491-493,497, 499,
United Mine Workers of America v. Pennington .......................
502, 503,506, 511,512
27:156, 158
United States v. Bramblett ...............................................
27:861,862,864,866,873
United States v. DiFrancesco ...................................
27:155, 165
United States v. Gilliland ................................................
27:160, 161
United States v. M cCue .................................................
27:162
United States v. M edina De Perez .............................................
27:504, 507
United States v. Robinson ...............................................
27:157
United States v. Rodgers ....................................................
27:484
United States v. Scott .......................................................
27:762, 763
United States v. Standard Oil of California ..................................
27:156, 160
United States v. Stark ...................................................
27:504, 505, 507
United States v. Wagner .............................................
27:862,872
United States v. Watts ...................................................
27:631
United States v. Zenith Radio Corp .............................................
27:12-14
United Steelworkers of Am. v. American Mfg. Co. ...............................
27:12-14
United Steelworkers of Am. v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp ........................
27:12-14
United Steelworkers of Am. v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co ......................
907
United Steelworkers of Am. v. Weber ..........................
27:379, 380, 411,420, 454,
455, 458, 463, 470
Watson v. Kentucky & Indiana Bridge & R.R. Co .................................
Weems v. United States .....................................................
W idm ar v. Vincent .........................................................
Wilko v. Swan .....................................................
Williams v. New York ......................................................
W ilson v. Seiter .......................................................
Y ounger v. Harris ..........................................................
Zorach v. Clauson ..........................................................
908
27:591
27:530
27:633
27:11-13, 16,30
27:879
27:531, 532
27:513
27:111