Mahnomen Community Water System Disinfection By-Products (DBPs)…….. What, why, risks Options Questions???? Current Wells & Treatment Plant Population: ~236 Connection Types: 52 residential 1 commercial 2016 Annual Water Production: 4,622,400 Avg. gallons per day (gpd): 12,664 Per capita rate of ~53 gpd Source Water: Two (2) wells: 6” casings Well 1- 166’ (cased to: 157’) Well 2- 158’ (cased to: 148.5) Treatment: Three (3) softening units to remove Originally: Iron, Manganese, and Tannins (i.e. a type of organic) Currently: Hardness, Iron, Manganese & Ammonia Storage: Two (2) Hydro-pneumatic tanks providing 1,584 gallons of capacity Post-chlorinate, fluoridate , and inject clearitas (after softening treatment) Distribution: 2,160 LF of 8” water main 1,086 LF of 4” water main 8,288 LF of 6” water main The what?? DBPs are by-products that are formed when organic matter comes in contact with chlorine. Two (2) types are monitored in your drinking water: Total trihalomethanes or TTHMs Haloacetic Acids or HAA5 Not tested for because they are the most dangerous or harmful, rather they are common and easy to test for. The Why?? Where does the organic matter originate? Two (2) sources Anthropogenic: Naturally occurring: Man-made sources Water ……the ‘universal solvent’ “leaches” various minerals and chemical from its surroundings….i.e. woody debris, leafy matter, microbes, soils, others…….. Mahnomen source water is high in Total Organic Carbon (TOC) or Natural Organic Matter (NOM) Common scenarios that can cause DBP MCL exceedances when chlorinating water: High TOCs or NOM (terms are used interchangeably in some online public literature) Long contact time between TOCs and chlorine o o • o Example: slow turnover of water towers, or long residence time in watermains Higher chlorine dosing Chlorinate for disinfection o Protects against bacteria, viruses, and other pathogens Why are they regulated by the EPA then? As a precautionary measure to protect public health and safety. Suspected to be, but are not yet conclusively proven to be a carcinogen. What are my risks? • USEPA uses a risk benchmark to help set drinking water regulations (Maximum Contaminant Levels) based on the lifetime probability of developing cancer 10-6 or a 1 in 1 ,000,000 (0.000001%) • chronic low level doses Lifetime (70 years) People with compromised immune systems, have an infant, are pregnant, or are elderly, should seek advice from your health care provider(s) about drinking this water. The FDL Medical Director issued a letter and identified one potential high risk group. “There is a concern for risk for short term exposure to these by-products during pregnancy. The amount of risk is not certain. If pregnant women are concerned, it is recommended they drink bottled water during their pregnancies.” How much is a microgram per liter (µg/L)? One part per billion or ppb 1 ppb = 1 drop of water in an Olympic-size swimming pool Mahnomen Community Water System: Contaminant EPA MCL TTHMs Mahnomen WTP RAA 129.6 µg/L HAA5s 61.5 µg/L 60 µg/L 80 µg/L Removing DBPs? There are two (2) proven removal options: Aeration Activated carbon filters These types of treatment would have to be installed at each home. Not operationally optimal for maintenance Becomes less optimal as community grows Reducing DBPs in the interim…….. Operational controls Increase water main flushing via hydrants Reduces contact time Decrease chlorine dosing at the water treatment plants Reduces chlorine concentrations Required to maintain a minimum 0.2 µg/L free residual----again, to maintain disinfection Other options considered: Stop Chlorinating (short-term or long-term solution) By doing this, DBP precursors (aka organic matter) will not have a chance to combine with the chlorine and form DBPs We would now lack disinfection and no longer be protected from bacteria, virus contamination and other pathogens. Long-term solution: Finding a better source via new wells Reevaluate water treatment options. All positive effects on our water treatment plant Would allow us to chlorinate without exceeding the DBP Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs). Use less chlorine and other products to treat our drinking water which makes your WTP more efficient. Short-term: Continued operational adjustments (i.e. flushing and chlorine concentrations) -Increased quarterly monitoring per USEPA Safe Drinking Water Act -Increased chlorine residual sampling at sample taps Researching Point-of-Use water solutions: Berkey Water filter/purification units Pur (FM-4500L) Culligan (Culligan FM-15A) Brita (42202) Bottled water Long-Term: Commence with surveying of the area (April/May 2017) Ice pigging this spring/summer (contractor dependent) Awarded $41,000.00 from IHS Drilling of pilot wells (4) and source water testing (June 2017) Awarded $83,000.00 from USEPA Planning activities will follow well testing this (Fall 2017) Planning will depend on water quality results Proposed Pilot Well Sites Proposed Pilot Well Sites Contact FDL Water & Wastewater Department Jordan Vandal, FDL Water/Wastewater Mgr. 218-878-7595 Surveying of your neighborhood Ongoing IHS and FdL staff performing survey Provide accurate data for Ice pigging of the water mains Planning activities, short-term and long-term Ice pigging Uses an ice slurry to clean water mains IHS Special Project funding obtained for $41,000.00. Work anticipated for spring or summer 2017 Dependent on contractor’s schedule We will notify residents of any water outages in advance. Exploratory Well Drilling IHS funded planning project for $83,000.00. Drill 4 wells to test for viability as a new water source. capacity and water quality Contractor bids received today 4/17/2017 Anticipate construction soon, spring 2017 Planning activities Results of planning project will be used to determine possible solutions. Evaluates water quality and capacity tests Evaluates community growth Evaluates 20-50 year plan Anticipated to occur this fall and winter.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz