August 2014 Clinical Practice Today from Duke Medicine CASE STUDY Thoracic Aortic Surgery: Improving Outcomes 8 Surgical experience and volume are key for optimal patient outcomes Concierge Medicine: Exploring Traditional and Newer Models 4 Part 2 11 Repairing Vaginal and Uterine Prolapse Caring for Your Blood and 12 Marrow Transplant Patients Clinical Practice Today Duke Medicine Marketing and Communications Editor Mary Jane Gore, MA Publisher Med-IQ in Clinical Practice Today Concierge Medicine: Exploring Traditional and Newer Models Editorial Management Laura Espinoza Lisa R. Rinehart, MS, ELS The second article in this 2-part series delves into the ins and outs of direct primary care Writers Frank Celia Meredith Kleeman Emily Paulsen Shelly K. Schwartz New therapies can help patients better control their seizures About Duke Medicine U.S. News & World Report consistently ranks Duke University Medical Center in its Honor Roll of top hospitals in the United States. We strive to transform medicine and health locally and globally through innovative scientific research, rapid translation of breakthrough discoveries, educating future clinical and scientific leaders, advocating and practicing evidence-based medicine to improve community health, and leading efforts to eliminate health inequalities. To refer patients, call 800-MED-DUKE. For more details on the services we offer your patients, please visit DukeMedicine.org. Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC Duke Regional Hospital, Durham, NC Duke Raleigh Hospital, Raleigh, NC Duke University, 3100 Tower Blvd., Suite 1008 Durham, NC 27707-2575 Materials may not be reprinted without written consent from the publisher. If you wish to be removed from the mailing list, please email [email protected] or call 866-858-7434. ©2014 Duke Medicine. All rights reserved. Page 4 Advances in Epilepsy Care Present More Therapeutic Options Page 6 Reducing Turnover in Your Practice A welcoming and productive working environment can minimize staff turnover Page 7 CASE STUDY Thoracic Aortic Surgery: Improving Outcomes Duke’s Thoracic Aortic Surgery Program has significantly decreased operative mortality rates Page 8 Building Better Relationships With Hospitalists Clear and open communication with hospital-based physicians can help improve patient care Page 10 Repairing Vaginal and Uterine Prolapse Extensive experience and innovation result in successful prolapse procedures Page 11 Caring for Your Blood and Marrow Transplant Patients These recommendations can help your patients remain healthy for as long as possible Page 12 Streamlining Appointment Setting and Reminding Automated systems can reach more patients and save money Page 14 When to Refer for Scoliosis The orthopaedic team at Duke can help evaluate patients with scoliosis Page 15 To learn more or to refer a patient, call 800-MED-DUKE News Briefs Imaging for Alzheimer’s Risk Murali Doraiswamy, MD, professor of psychiatry and geriatrics at Duke Medicine, and team recently showed that PET scans using the radioactive dye florbetapir (Amyvid) to image amyloid brain plaques can predict Alzheimer’s disease (AD) risk. The researchers published data in Molecular Psychiatry on 121 people who were cognitively normal or had mild cognitive impairment (MCI); they were followed for 36 months. Amyloidpositive subjects with MCI were more than 3 times as likely to be diagnosed with AD dementia at follow-up, but amyloid-negative subjects in both groups had minimal cognitive decline. The Duke team recently used this technique to save the life of a young, competitive athlete with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); her lungs had been normal before ARDS. Her status didn’t improve with standard ECMO. Doctors brought her out of an induced coma, but she panicked because of her inability to breathe on her own. After 10 days on ECMO, she was able to walk on her own and had strengthened enough for the transplant. (Image above shows donor lung in ice water.) “We recommend a scan be performed if a diagnosis is unclear in a patient with progressive cognitive decline. A negative scan suggests that the cause of cognitive decline is unlikely to be AD,” Doraiswamy says. Infections Need More Accurate Treatment ECMO and an Athlete’s Double-Lung Transplant Patients with chronic lung disease who are awaiting lung transplantation on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) often have poor outcomes. In 2010, Duke started an ambulatory ECMO program as an effective bridge to lung transplantation so patients can exercise before surgery. Outcomes dramatically improved as a result. Duke performed transplants in 13 patients with a 100% survival-to-discharge rate, says Ira Cheifetz, MD, who pioneered the program and directs the Duke Pediatric Critical Care Program. August 2014 A Duke study recently provided the most complete picture of bloodstream infections (BSIs) in United States (US) community hospitals to date. Over time, the types of BSIs have changed. Staphylococcus aureus is now the most common cause of infection, but 1 in every 3 BSI patients receives inappropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy. “Based on our data, it would be valuable to set a physician performance metric for appropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy,” says Deverick Anderson, MD, MPH, an infectious disease specialist at Duke who was the lead author of the study, published in PLoS One in May 2014. Electronic data about risk factors and daily activities could be entered into a system that notifies ordering physicians, the study suggested. 3 PART 2 Concierge Medicine: Exploring Traditional and Newer Models by Frank Celia In this second installment of our 2-part series, we explore a new model of concierge medicine that’s quietly gaining traction. Part 1 (see the June 2014 issue) focused on the traditional concierge style. This second article focuses on direct primary care. Imagine never working with another third-party payer again: no more payer-related paperwork, coding, or billing. Now imagine keeping your current revenue while reducing your overhead to 10% of your gross profit. Finally, imagine spending 30 minutes with every patient. 4 Expanded Scope Does it sound too good to be true? Not according to proponents of “direct primary care,” or DPC, a subspecies of retainer-based medicine that might offer doctors these benefits and more. Sometimes referred to as “concierge medicine for the masses,” DPC is gaining footholds in certain markets, especially rural ones. Like other forms of “concierge care,” DPC models ask patients to pay a flat monthly or annual fee. DPC contributions tend to be much lower, however, than for standard concierge models—around $40 to $60 per month for adults and often less for children. DPC patients receive an enhanced array of services, such as 24/7 physician access, extended visits, email communication, and, in some cases, house calls. Excluded from these offerings are the “luxury” services that are often associated with traditional concierge care: therapeutic massages, a spa-like atmosphere, and so on. Approximately 500,000 patients across the country are being cared for under DPC models, according to a 2013 study by the California HealthCare Foundation. Some of these DPC practices have succeeded in cutting costs, improving outcomes, and offering patients and physicians a more rewarding experience. In one sense, DPC practices are no-frills, meatand-potatoes operations, but in other ways, they greatly expand upon primary care’s traditional role. For instance, many DPC practices provide wholesale pharmaceuticals, laboratory testing, x-rays, ECGs, and minor procedures. What is unclear, however, is whether this approach can be scaled to a national level amid diverse markets and patient populations. Its refusal of third-party insurance, Medicare, or Medicaid is perhaps DPC’s single-most distinguishing characteristic. This policy is unusual Clinical Practice Today from Duke Medicine because the vast majority of retainer-based primary care practices augment patient fees with some form of third-party payer income. But DPC devotees claim that relying solely on patient fees is the very lynchpin of their success. “The ‘sure thing’ boat never gets far from shore,” says Josh Umbehr, MD, who has run a DPC practice in Wichita, KS, for 3 years. In other words, retainer-based practices that hedge their bets by accepting insurance never achieve the vast reductions in overhead that DPC offers, he says. His practice charges $600 per year for an adult, and each doctor is expected to care for 600 patients, which equates to $360,000 in gross revenue for each physician. “At first we estimated overhead of $120,000 per doctor, but that goes down as you add more doctors. We now have 3 doctors, and our total overhead is somewhere around $180,000 to $200,000 on gross revenues of $1.08 million per year. We’re getting close to 10% overhead…and most medical practices run at 60% to 70% overhead—and that’s going to get worse when ICD-10 arrives.” DPC patients can visit as often as they like and drop out and rejoin at any time, penalty free, regardless of preexisting conditions. Umbehr offers both wholesale drugs and laboratory testing at a cost and can handle many cases that would normally warrant a trip to the emergency room. All this with negligible paperwork, zero insurance hassles, and no interaction with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Most patients retain some form of insurance for catastrophic conditions, such as cancer or heart failure, which remain the domain of specialists. But by removing primary care from the insurance world, DPC achieves enormous cost savings, both in paperwork and in downstream services like emergency and specialty care. True believers hail DPC not just as a discrete solution for certain August 2014 markets, but as a broad solution that can help curb rising health care costs and administrative requirements on a national level. “The country needs this,” says Umbehr, who has helped convince a few local insurers and employers to switch to DPC. “We often lower health insurance premiums by $1,000 a month.” Mainstream Barriers Not everyone agrees. The most frequent criticism leveled against a more widespread adoption of DPC is that it would create doctor shortages. If primary care physicians reduce patient panel sizes by two-thirds or more, won’t many patients be left without health care? DPC advocates believe that the decreased need for emergency and specialty care physicians could create manpower efficiencies to bridge the gap, but how this would work in real-world scenarios remains uncertain. Medicare patients pose another big challenge. After a lifetime of paying into a system, the idea of having extra, unanticipated expenses for primary care would understandably frustrate many seniors. In addition, many of these patients are on limited incomes and simply do not have the extra money for DPC’s out-of-pocket monthly fees. But even if these major roadblocks can be overcome, it remains unclear whether DPC can flourish on a macro level as it has on a micro one. “I’ve studied the direct-pay model, and it has done extremely well in certain rural communities,” says Wayne H. Lipton, CEO of Concierge Choice Physicians in Rockville Centre, NY. “If it saves enough on paperwork, direct-pay can work. But there are all kinds of challenges.” In the end, however, physician competence is more important than the model in which the physician practices, notes Lipton. “It’s good care that saves money, regardless of what model it’s practiced under.” 5 Advances in Epilepsy Care Present More Therapeutic Options Advances in epilepsy treatment have created therapies that didn’t exist as little as 1 year ago. Patients who have a fairly certain diagnosis of epilepsy and have tried 3 or 4 medications but are still seizing should be referred to epileptologists. About 1 out of every 3 patients who have seizures don’t respond to medication, says Saurabh R. Sinha, MD, PhD, director of Duke’s Epilepsy Monitoring Unit. “If a patient tries 4 medications and they all fail, the chance of the next medication working is less than 5%,” he says. Patients whose diagnoses are less certain should also be referred to epilepsy centers. In many of these patients, multiple seizure medications have failed. “We perform testing and find that nearly one-third of these patients don’t have epilepsy, but they may have cardiac or psychological issues, for example,” Sinha says. Patients are evaluated for all possible treatments after medication and testing histories have been taken. If a single area in the brain is found to be the source of seizures and the location is not performing critical functions, a craniotomy is commonly performed as noninvasively as possible. Extensive testing is needed to make sure that the area can be removed safely. 6 Clinical Practice Today from Duke Medicine If a single spot cannot be pinpointed noninvasively, electrodes may be implanted to locate the seizure focus. For patients who cannot have surgery, a vagus nerve stimulator, similar to a pacemaker, implanted in the neck, may help prevent seizures. Two new antiseizure therapies are now available at Duke: MRI-guided stereotactic laser thermal ablation (manufactured by Visualase) is a minimally invasive surgery in which a 3-mm hole is made in the skull and a fiber optic wire is inserted with MRI guidance. The fiber optic is then heated in multiple locations to ablate the region in question. “Responsive neurostimulator,” or RNS (manufactured by NeuroPace), is a device that uses implanted electrodes to record brain waves. It delivers a preemptive shock to a specific brain region at the first sign of seizure activity. The device is for patients whose seizure focus is in an area that is too critical to be removed or those with more than 2 seizure foci. Each potential surgical case is discussed by a team of 6 epileptologists, 2 neurosurgeons, a neuropsychologist, and other staff, which ensures that every patient is evaluated from multiple perspectives. (Image above depicts removal of brain mass causing seizures.) Reducing Turnover in Your Practice By Shelly K. Schwartz Performance reviews and opportunities for growth play key roles in motivating your staff to succeed. But practices that take the time to develop their team also gain a direct financial benefit: lower turnover. Indeed, employees who work in a positive and productive environment are far less likely to leave. If your office is experiencing financial difficulty or conducting meetings with a potential partner, speak with your team as early as you can. The truth is better than the fear of the unknown, which can result in the loss of your best and brightest. Owen Dahl, a practice management consultant in The Woodlands, TX, says most medical practices spend between 70% and 200% of a departing worker’s annual salary to recruit and train a replacement. That speaks nothing of the burden the process creates for your staff while a new colleague learns the ropes. Here are some simple suggestions that can help enhance staff retention. Create Training Opportunities. Employees should be given opportunities to develop their skills through continuing education. “More than anything else, staff need to feel that they have a chance to develop professionally,” says Claypool, noting that cross training your team to perform multiple jobs within your office also creates scheduling flexibility when someone calls out sick. Establish a Collaborative Environment. One of the most effective retention-boosting strategies is collaboration, says Jamie Claypool, a practice management consultant in Spicewood, TX. “Employees take more ownership of major changes or decisions when they are involved in the process,” she says. Solicit input from your billing staff on the selection of new software for their department, for example, and include staff members who will be working with new recruits in the interviewing process. Avoid Micromanaging. Once they’re trained, however, get out of the way. “Do not micromanage your staff,” advises Claypool, emphasizing that excessive oversight is among the most common reasons for high turnover. “You should expect a level of professionalism from everyone on your staff. If they are trained well, you do not have to be there to continuously oversee them.” Talk to Staff in Challenging Times. Communicate with your staff, especially in times of turmoil. August 2014 Excessive turnover, and the costs incurred as a result, can be dramatically reduced by maintaining an open dialogue with staff members and encouraging them to take an active role in your practice. 7 CASE STUDY Thoracic Aortic Surgery: Improving Outcomes Angiogram showing aneurysm in the aorta (red, at top) just above heart (pink). Surgical experience and volume are key for optimal patient outcomes More thoracic aortic repairs are being performed due to an aging population as well as the more frequent use of CT and MRI imaging, which leads to more instances of disease recognition. New aortic-repair procedures that often use complex endovascular techniques are emerging. (STS ACSD). This study developed the first-ever risk models for patients undergoing proximal (aortic root, ascending aorta, and aortic arch) thoracic aortic surgery, which clinicians may find useful when counseling patients about risks and benefits prior to elective and non-elective surgery. Refer Early and Assess Risk High Surgical Volume = Better Outcomes Patients with newly recognized thoracic aortic disease should be referred to a specialist early because those undergoing elective repair procedures have better outcomes than those undergoing required surgery, according to a study of more than 45,000 patients who received proximal aortic replacement. The findings were published in the Sept. 2012 issue of Journal of the American College of Cardiology by researchers from Duke University who used the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database 8 Clinical Practice Today from Duke Medicine Many hospitals perform thoracic aortic surgery, but often do so in low numbers, according to STS ACSD data. A separate study from the STS ACSD that examined outcomes for elective aortic-root surgery in North America showed that hospitals with higher volumes have better outcomes. Findings, published in the Jan. 2013 issue of Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, showed that patients who had surgeries at hospitals performing fewer than 30 to 40 such procedures annually had a greater risk-adjusted mortality than similar patients in the highest-volume hospitals. Duke was one of only 22 centers in North America that fell into the highest-volume category for aortic-root surgery. Additional studies demonstrated that this volume-outcome relationship also exists for other types of aortic surgeries such as descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal repair, as well as Type A dissection repair. Minimizing Risk Associated With Aortic Dissections Aortic dissections are tears that allow blood to flow between the layers of the aortic wall. Type A (involving the ascending aorta) and Type B (involving the descending aorta) aortic dissections require extensive experience to achieve the best outcomes. Patients who undergo surgery at Duke benefit from that experience; operative mortality rates for acute Type A dissection repair have been dramatically reduced since Duke launched its Thoracic Aortic Surgery Program (TASP). Type B aortic dissection and has one of the largest programs with experience in these conditions. More Experience and Options Benefit Patients Because of its ability to offer both conventional open and endovascular repairs, as well as its extensive experience repairing all segments of the aorta, Duke’s thoracic aorta surgery team takes both a patient’s pathology and physiology into consideration when making precise treatment decisions. Furthermore, team members have published numerous evidence-based papers on surgical outcomes, risk models, and frailty assessment, outlining under which conditions patients may need a particular procedure. Hybrid surgeries combining open and endovascular techniques to minimize surgical risk are becoming more common, and Duke’s experts can evaluate your patients to determine whether they are candidates for an endovascular, open, or hybrid repair. We had an 8-fold reduction in observed-to-expected in-hospital mortality rates with the TASP team. According to the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection risk model, the expected operative mortality rate is 18.2%. After TASP was implemented at Duke, operative mortality rates fell to 2.8%. “We found an 8-fold reduction in observed-to-expected 30-day in-hospital mortality rates once the TASP team was established,” says G. Chad Hughes, MD, a thoracic aortic surgeon who leads the team. “This improvement in survival has persisted over long-term follow-up as well, with a 30% increase in overall survival at 5 years.” Duke published outcomes for the endovascular management of acute and chronic complicated August 2014 Duke also takes special care to avoid complications. Neurologist Aatif Husain, MD, and his staff of experienced technologists conduct neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring (NIOM) to reduce the risk of damage to the brain and spinal cord To learn more or during aortic repair. As Husain notes, “NIOM to refer a patient, has been shown to please call reduce neurologic 800-MED-DUKE morbidity in these types of surgeries. The NIOM team at Duke, with the aortic surgery and anesthesia teams, has developed monitoring paradigms for safer surgeries.” 9 Building Better Relationships With Hospitalists By Emily Paulsen A natural disconnect may exist between hospitalists and community physicians. Indeed, physical separation, busy schedules, and complex cases all conspire to make communication between these two groups difficult. According to Win Whitcomb, MD, co-founder and past president of the Society of Hospital Medicine, systems such as value-based payment or shared electronic health records can help, but there’s no substitute for good old-fashioned relationship building. Here are some tips that may prove useful. Set the Stage. Many patients are still unfamiliar with the hospitalist concept. Whitcomb recommends that community-based physicians talk with patients—particularly those with a high risk of hospitalization—ahead of time about how hospitalists and community-based physicians work as a team. “There’s already a trust relationship between physician and patient,” says Whitcomb. “The trick is to transfer that trust to the hospitalist.” A telephone check-in with hospitalized patients can reassure them that you’re still in the loop. Keep Contact Info Up-to-Date. It sounds obvious, but Whitcomb says hospitalists do not always have up-to-date contact information for communitybased physicians, including preferred office and cell phone numbers, secure email addresses, and current fax numbers. 10 Clinical Practice Today from Duke Medicine Provide Hospitalists With Your Contact Requirements and Preferences. This step can be especially important for consulting specialists. When is an in-hospital consultation necessary and when will a next-business-day phone call suffice? Also, although many physicians prefer telephone communication, email or fax may work better for routine matters. Whitcomb suggests developing a list of guidelines and distributing it or posting it on the hospitalist bulletin board. Communicate Verbally for Challenging Situations. Clear communication is especially important when managing patients with complex illnesses or high readmission risks or when disagreeing about treatment approaches. Pick up the phone or stop by the hospital to speak with the hospitalist in person. Create Opportunities for Interaction. “It’s really important to get to know each other,” notes Whitcomb. Make a point to stop by during rounds or regular hospitalist staff meetings. Attending a staff social or lunch-and-learn conducted by a hospitalist may seem like a luxury in an already busy schedule, but the face-to-face conversations that occur at these events can improve communication—and patient care. Repairing Vaginal and Uterine Prolapse Nonsurgical treatments for pelvic prolapse include Kegel exercises or internal devices (pessaries) to strengthen vaginal muscles. If surgery is needed, 3 minimally invasive approaches are available: A vaginal repair without mesh A vaginal repair with mesh An abdominal robotic sacrocolpopexy All 3 procedures are indicated to treat even advanced pelvic organ prolapse, which allows surgeons to tailor their approach to the particular needs of their patients. In addition, a urethral sling can be added to any of these procedures to treat urinary stress incontinence. Surgeons must be appropriately trained in these procedures so they can anticipate and respond quickly to complications that might arise. “The success rates are favorable, and complications are low with any of these options,” says Anthony Visco, MD, past president of the American Urogynecologic Society and current Duke urogynecologist. Duke’s Expertise Duke pioneered the open sacrocolpopexy procedure and continues to innovate as an early developer of the robotic version. urogynecologists are fellowship trained and have received training in robotic sacrocolpopexy. Advances in Mesh-Based Repair The abdominal robotic sacrocolpopexy is a minimally invasive surgical advance that helps patients quickly return to normal function. Five small laparoscopic incisions are made to attach mesh to the front and back walls of the vagina, and then the mesh is attached to a ligament overlying the sacrum, providing a high level of support. It is frequently performed as an out‑ patient procedure, with less pain, little blood loss (< 25 mL), and a low risk of infection. In addition, mesh products have improved in recent years. For instance, they now include weave patterns designed to provide support and minimize complications. They are placed with direct suturing for improved delivery and are being studied to demonstrate superiority to older mesh devices. “We receive a fair number of patients with recurrent prolapse after a previous procedure, and they are sometimes seen here shortly after the initial procedure,” Visco says. Duke is currently offering a randomized trial to study vaginal repair with or without mesh, and related trials are also underway. Duke’s fellowship program was one of the first accredited programs in the nation and has consistently graduated fellows since 1994. Duke To refer a patient or learn about trials, call 800-MED-DUKE. (Image above depicts uterus rotated to show prolapse.) August 2014 11 Caring for Your Blood and Marrow Transplant Patients The number of adult patients who have had blood and marrow transplants (BMT) is steadily rising. Referring physicians providing care for this growing population should consider the following recommendations to keep their patients as healthy as possible. Care After BMT Physicians must monitor their patients to be sure that their blood counts remain within a healthy range. Some may experience briefer periods of remission than others. Another medical condition that doctors should be aware of is chronic graft-versus-host disease, which can occur if a patient has received a donor transplant. Sun exposure can activate the disease, so patients must be vigilant about their exposure to sunlight and wear an SPF 30 (or higher) sunscreen. Physicians should be alert to laboratory results or symptoms that may indicate patients are coming out of remission. “It’s generally possible to match a patient to a potentially beneficial treatment.” 12 Once patients return home after a transplant, they must remain alert to the risk of infection, particularly viral infections. One of the best things patients can do is avoid crowds and continue good hand-hygiene practices. “There are two big issues when referring patients who are no longer in remission,” Chao says. “One is to contact specialists as early as possible so they can help to manage the patient’s case as early as possible. The other is to begin looking for the right donor even before a patient really needs the donor.” “It takes about 1 year for the immune system to fully mature after a transplant, so it is best to stay away from large groups or people who are ill or have been exposed to pathogens,” says Nelson Chao, MD, MBA, chief of the Duke Division of Hematologic Malignancy and Cellular Therapy. The more aggressive the disease, the earlier a donor needs to be established, because the chances of relapsing are relatively high. Chao notes that patients with low-grade lymphomas may be able to wait longer for a donor because the pace of the disease is slower. Clinical Practice Today from Duke Medicine Physicians in the Duke Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy Division encourage referring physicians to contact them to discuss their patients’ cases so they can get them help as soon as possible. Donation and Matching Duke uses 4 types of donors: Matched related Matched unrelated Partially matched (haplo) related Umbilical cord blood Similarly, it offers 3 preparatory regimen types: Ablative Reduced intensity Nonmyeloablative “There are many possibilities, given the donor type crossed with the preparatory regimen options, so it’s generally possible to match a patient to a potentially beneficial treatment,” Chao says. The science for partially matched donations has improved. Complications that previously arose from partial matches have been partially or fully solved in most cases, and such treatments have become more effective, Chao explains. He says that if a patient is Caucasian, there is usually a 75% chance or higher of being matched; African American, a 25% chance; Asian or Native American, less than a 25% chance. Cord blood requires less-stringent matching and therefore further increases the potential to find a match. The ideal donors are younger, rather than older, because their bone marrow is more effective. Donors are evaluated for indicators that show heart, lung, and kidney health to be sure that they can donate safely. Duke’s adult BMT team, which includes the pioneers who performed the first umbilical cord August 2014 Active Clinical Trials 53 42 41 25 ABMT Hematologic Malignancies Open Actively Accruing ABMT = adult blood and marrow transplants blood transplant, offers a combination of effective clinical care and academic research to provide patient-centered delivery and tailored care. Patients may be enrolled in more than 1 clinical trial to continue their access to treatments; some patients may ultimately be enrolled in 3 or 4 trials to obtain the best individualized treatment possible. “We strive to deliver the most optimal care and latest regimen choices to patients,” Chao says. “There is a strong dedication to Call 800-MED-DUKE care for both patients for an appointment; and their families that 919-668-1002 is a reflection of the to reach a physician specialists, nurses, for consultation and support staff, who are highly committed to the psychosocial side of care and to care delivered in a team approach. If you are interested in sending a patient here or have questions, call whenever you wish. We are accessible.” (Image on the previous page shows erythropoiesis in the bone marrow.) 13 11:46 AM Message Doctor’s Office Edit Appointment reminder for 8:30 am tomorrow. Reply CONFIRM to confirm. CONFIRM Send Streamlining Appointment Setting and Reminding By Meredith Kleeman Patients today are savvier than ever—they expect doctors to deliver both high-quality care and excellent customer service. Meeting these two expectations, however, doesn’t have to require more time and money. Customized technology tools can strengthen the doctor-patient bond, and—at the same time—make life a little easier for front office staff. One type of tool that is particularly useful in this regard is the automated reminder or recall system, which can send text messages or emails and make phone calls in the evening when staff is gone for the day, but when patients may be more likely to answer. 14 automated systems that work with their existing scheduling software. Before implementing an automated system, look at current staff costs versus the recall system’s estimated monthly cost, compare the number of phone calls staff is making per month with the total the automated system would make, and determine the current missed appointment rate. It’s also wise to research several automated systems and find out how automated the software really is, when the software would make the calls, what its connection rate is, and whether it can provide monthly reports or data. These systems can save practices money and reach a greater number of patients, explains David Zetter, a practice management consultant based in Mechanicsburg, PA. “Using staff to [make reminder calls] is time consuming and very expensive,” he says, and recommends eliminating that process altogether. “If you make the change and you don’t have data, there’s no way of knowing whether it’s benefitting you,” says Zetter. After deploying an automated system, Zetter’s health care clients typically see their no-show rates reduced to nearly 2%. Zetter suggests finding an automated system that’s customizable. He cautions that many of the automated services in practice management software are ungainly or outdated and recommends finding a program that uses voice actors instead of recordings to deliver personalized scripts. Doctors should also look for As for waiting-list calls, staff calls trump most technology solutions. “The only solution I’ve seen that works really well is [when] you’ve got a staff member looking at the holes in a physician’s schedule, and—right away—checking the appointment list and making that phone call to the patient,” notes Zetter. Clinical Practice Today from Duke Medicine When to Refer for Scoliosis Scoliosis affects about 5% of the population. New data from clinical trials show that providing children with individualized treatment for scoliosis can be effective. “It’s important to note that the vast majority of scoliosis findings do not warrant intervention,” says Benjamin Alman, MD, a pediatric orthopaedist and chair of the Duke Department of Orthopaedic Surgery. “If you suspect a case is worsening, orthopaedists can assist with evaluation.” Alman says surgery may be needed for those with scoliosis of more than 50 degrees. The goal is to prevent progression to a 90-degree curve, where compression could interfere with heart and lung function. It’s imperative to ascertain whether a scoliosis case is truly idiopathic, Alman says. Tumors in nerves, neurologic disorders, or muscular disorders such as muscular dystrophy can involve a curve in the back. Scoliosis may also be related to the growth of bones that are longer than normal. The younger children are, the worse their scoliosis may become with more years of growth. Although girls experience scoliosis more often than boys, girls have a lower risk of poor outcomes because they typically stop growing at a younger age than boys. Decisions about whether patients should be braced are still debatable. The 2013 Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Trial found that the suggested 18-hour-a-day bracing time significantly reduced the risk of curve progression in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Primary study outcomes were skeletal maturity without curve progression to 50 degrees or more (treatment success) and curve progression to 50 degrees or more (treatment failure). Seventy-two percent of subjects in the bracing group had success after wearing a brace; benefits increased with longer wear times. Notably, however, 48% of patients in the observation group and 41% of patients in the bracing group who wore braces infrequently also met the success criteria. To refer a patient for consultation or surgery, call 800-MED-DUKE. (Image above shows marked scoliosis.) Because schools no longer screen for scoliosis, primary care providers often discover spinal conditions that may warrant referral. A simple visual test can be performed to examine patients’ spines when they bend over from the waist. August 2014 15 Duke Medicine DUMC 3687 Durham, NC 27710 Non-profit Org. U.S. Postage PA I D Durham, NC Permit No. 60 800-MED-DUKE SAVE THE DATE! Duke Medicine Interactive CME Workshops Join a multidisciplinary panel of Duke Medicine faculty members and fellow community clinicians for two live, case-based CME workshop series. Oncology Series: Updates in the Management of GI Cancers Cardiology Series: Updates in the Prevention and Management of Cardiovascular Disease Columbia, SC Wilmington, NC Friday, October 17, 2014 Saturday, December 13, 2014 Activity Medical Director Hope E. Uronis, MD, MHS Duke University Medical Center Activity Medical Director Zubin J. Eapen, MD, MHS Duke University Medical Center Workshops run from 8:00 am to 12:15 pm. These live activities are approved for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM. For more information, please call 866-858-7434 (toll-free) or email [email protected]. Sponsored by the Duke University School of Medicine The Duke University School of Medicine is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The Duke University School of Medicine designates this live activity for a maximum of 4.0 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditsTM. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. © 2014 Duke School of Medicine®. All rights reserved.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz