chapter 8 safety element

CHAPTER 8
SAFETY ELEMENT
1.0
INTRODUCTION
The Safety Element identifies and evaluates potential hazards in the City of
Placentia. The Safety Element examines natural and man-made hazards that could
endanger the public safety and welfare.
Natural hazards include flooding,
earthquakes, ground rupture and liquefaction. Man-made hazards can result from
hazardous and toxic materials, fires and crime. The Element serves as a guide to
reduce the potential risk of death, injuries, property damage and the economic and
social dislocation that may result from hazards. The Safety Element establishes
goals and policies to reduce the impacts of hazards.
2.0
AUTHORITY FOR THE ELEMENT
The State of California Government Code Section 65302(g)(1) requires that a
General Plan include:
“...a A safety element for the protection of the community from any
unreasonable risks associated with the effects of seismically induced surface
rupture, ground shaking, ground failure, tsunami, seiche, and dam failure;
slope instability leading to mudslides and landslides; subsidence, liquefaction
and other seismic hazards identified pursuant to Chapter 7.8 (commencing
with §2690) of the Public Resources Code, and other geologic hazards
known to the legislative body; flooding; and wild land … and urban fires...”
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Page 8-1
Safety Element
Policies and information for this element are contained in the Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Act (Public Resources Code Section 2621, et seq.), the
Seismic Hazards Mapping Act (Public Resources Code Section 2690, et seq.), and
the Unreinforced Masonry Law (Government Code Section 8875, et seq.).
3.0
SUMMARY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
The Safety Element addresses both natural and man-made hazards. This section
identifies natural hazards including flooding, seismic activity, geology and soils and
man-made hazards including fire, crime, hazardous materials and aircraft over-flight.
This section of the Safety Element addresses the existing conditions of these
hazards and the programs currently in place.
3.1
CITY PLANS AND PROGRAMS
Several plans and programs contain information that relates to the City of Placentia
Safety Element. A brief synopsis of relevant documents is provided below.

Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS)
California Code of Regulations requires local compliance with the
Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) “…to be documented
in the areas of planning, training, exercise and performance”. To be in
compliance, emergency plans should address management, operations,
logistics, planning/intelligence and finance/administration.

Placentia Emergency Operations Plan
The Placentia Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) provides guidance during
emergency situations associated with natural disasters, technological
incidents and nuclear defense operations. The Plan does not address normal
day-to-day emergencies or the established and routine procedures used in
coping with such emergencies. Rather, the EOP analyzes potential largescale disasters that require a coordinated and immediate response. The EOP
incorporates and coordinates all the facilities and personnel of the City into an
efficient organization, as defined under the Standardized Emergency
Management System (SEMS). Placentia’s EOP is designed to be in
compliance with Government Code 8607(a) for managing response to a
multi-agency and multi-jurisdictional emergency in California.
Aid during emergency situations is available within the local government
structure and associated agencies. An Emergency Operation Center (EOC)
is located at City Hall for seismic and other disaster situations. The EOP
identifies key personnel and groups in the Placentia Emergency Management
Organization that are organized to protect life and property in the community.
The Plan also identifies sources of outside support that might be provided
through mutual aid by other jurisdictions, State and Federal agencies and the
private sector.
Page 8-2
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Safety Element
All emergency evacuation activities are coordinated by the Evacuation
Coordinator (the Chief of Police). The Chief of Police will issue evacuation
orders based on information gathered from emergency experts. Law
enforcement agencies, highway, road and street departments and public and
private transportation providers conduct evacuation operations. The City’s
evacuation routes are shown on Exhibit 8-1, Emergency Evacuation Routes.
ORANGE COUNTY HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Current government responsibilities for hazardous waste management are divided
among Federal, State and local levels. The Orange County Hazardous Waste
Management Plan, adopted in 1989, addresses those issues having local
responsibilities and involvement. In addition, the Plan discusses hazardous waste
issues and analyzes current and future hazardous waste generation in the County.
The purpose of the authority is to coordinate local implementation of a regional
action program to effect comprehensive hazardous waste management throughout
Southern California. The action program focuses on the development of programs to
equitably site needed hazardous waste management facilities; to promote on-site
resource reduction, treatment and recycling; and to provide for the collection and
treatment needs of small quantity hazardous waste generators.
An important component of the County Hazardous Waste Management Plan is the
monitoring of hazardous waste management facilities for compliance with Federal
and State regulations. Siting criteria and subsequent environmental documentation
required pursuant to CEQA will also ensure the mitigation of adverse impacts
associated with the siting of hazardous waste facility.
3.2
NATURAL HAZARDS
FLOODING
The City of Placentia is within the 500-year flood zone. Therefore, large scale
flooding within the City is highly unlikely. The City does periodically experience
flooding during winter weather events. The last recorded flood damage in the City
occurred in 1995, when a pedestrian bridge was destroyed at Parque de los
Vaqueros. Flood abatement measures to reduce the likelihood of flooding have
been implemented by the Orange County Flood Control District. According to the
Flood Insurance Rate Map for Orange County, the projected 100-year flood for
Placentia is contained within the Carbon Creek, Carbon Creek Channel, Attwood
Channel and Tri City Lake. The channels are located in the southern and southeast
portion of Placentia. However, like most of Orange County, the projected 500-year
flood may result in widespread flooding throughout the entire City. Exhibit 8-2, Flood
Zones, provides a summary of areas within the 100- and 500-year floodplain.
The City of Placentia contains no natural, permanent water features. However, a 10acre man-made lake exists in Tri-City Park, and numerous small man-made water
features are located in Alta Vista Country Club golf course. In addition, Carbon
Creek and a number of storm drain channels traverse the City and transport water
intermittently.
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Page 8-3
Safety Element
Insert Exhibit 8-1
Emergency Evacuation Routes
8.5 x 11
Page 8-4
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Safety Element
Insert Exhibit 8-2
Flood Zones
11 x 17
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Page 8-5
Safety Element
This page intentionally left blank.
Page 8-6
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Safety Element
DAM INUNDATION
Dam inundation occurs as a result of the structural failure of a dam. This failure may
be a result of seismic activity, severe flooding or other catastrophic events. The City
of Placentia is within the dam inundation area of the Carbon Canyon Dam and the
Prado Dam. Potential areas of inundation are illustrated in Exhibit 8-3, Carbon
Canyon Dam Inundation Area and Exhibit 8-4, Prado Dam Inundation Areas.

Carbon Canyon Dam
The Carbon Canyon Dam, an earthfill structure with a capacity of 6,614 acrefeet, is located approximately one (1) mile north of Placentia. The drainage
area above the dam is 19.3 square miles. The structure provides flood
protection to the cities of Placentia, Brea, Yorba Linda, Anaheim, Fullerton,
Buena Park and unincorporated areas of the County of Orange. The Carbon
Canyon Dam rarely contains threatening quantities of water. However, when
the dam is filled to its capacity, the reservoir could create some potential
upstream flooding problems.
If an inundation event should occur as a result of dam failure, floodwaters are
expected to generally follow the path of the Carbon Canyon Creek Channel.
Floodwaters may potentially reach the SR-91 Freeway in the southern portion
of the City. Exhibit 8-3, Carbon Canyon Dam Inundation Areas, shows the
inundation areas of the Carbon Canyon Dam.

Prado Dam
Prado Dam, designed in the 1930s, is located approximately 18 miles east of
Placentia in Riverside County. The functioning capability of the Dam was
increased (as of November 1999) due to the completion of the Seven Oaks
Dam located approximately 40 miles upstream on the Santa Ana River.
During a flood, Seven Oaks Dam will store water intended for Prado Dam for
as long as the reservoir pool at Prado Dam is rising. Once the flood threat at
Prado Dam passes, Seven Oaks Dam will begin to release its stored
floodwater at a rate that does not exceed the downstream channel capacity.
Working in tandem, the Prado and Seven Oaks Dams provide increased
flood protection to Orange County. Exhibit 8-4, Prado Dam Inundation Areas,
shows the inundation areas of the Prado Dam.

Mainstem Project
The Santa Ana River Mainstem project is designed to provide flood protection
to Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties.
The proposed
improvements cover 75 miles from the headwater of the Santa Ana River,
east of the City of San Bernardino, to the mouth of the river at the Pacific
Ocean between the cities of Newport Beach and Huntington Beach. The
Mainstem Project will increase flood protection to more than 3.35 million
people within the three counties. The project includes seven independent
features: Seven Oaks Dam, Mill Creek Levee, San Timoteo Creek, Oak
Street Drain, Prado Dam, Santiago Creek and the lower Santa Ana River.
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Page 8-7
Safety Element
Insert Exhibit 8-3
Carbon Canyon Dam Inundation Areas
8.5 x 11
Page 8-8
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Safety Element
Insert Exhibit 8-4
Prado Dam Inundation Areas
8.5 x 11
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Page 8-9
Safety Element
The City has prepared emergency evacuation plans for the Prado and
Carbon Canyon Dams. These plans are detailed in the City of Placentia
Emergency Operation Plan and are located at the Emergency Operations
Center at City Hall.
SEISMIC HAZARDS
This section describes the presence and characteristics of seismic hazards in
Placentia, including earthquake faults, surface rupture and ground shaking,
liquefaction, potentially hazardous buildings and seismic response.
Earthquake Faults
Active faults, structural zones and historically destructive earthquakes characterize
this area of Southern California. According to the Department of Conservation,
Division of Mines and Geology, six faults are located within close proximity to
Placentia. These include the Whittier-Elsinore, Norwalk, Newport-Inglewood, Sierra
Madre, Palos Verdes and San Gabriel faults. The San Andreas and San Jacinto
faults are located some distance from Placentia, but have the potential to deliver
larger magnitude earthquakes. The closest fault to Placentia is the Whittier-Elsinore,
approximately 1,000 feet north of Placentia. There are no identified Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zones within the City limits. A map illustrating the location of
faults and fault zones in the proximity of Placentia is shown in Exhibit 8-5, Regional
Fault Map.

Whittier-Elsinore Fault Zone. The Whittier-Elsinore Fault is approximately
1,000 feet northeast of the City. The Whittier Fault extends over twenty miles
from the Whittier Narrows near the City of Whittier, southeasterly to the Santa
Ana River where it merges with the southeasterly trending Elsinore Fault.
Together, these two faults combined with smaller faults are known as the
Whittier-Elsinore Fault Zone. There have been several minor earthquakes
along this fault zone. Seismic history reveals that the fault is able to produce
a seismic event of magnitude 6.0 or greater.

Norwalk Fault. The Norwalk Fault is approximately 16 miles long and is
located near the northwest boundary of the City. Seismic activity has
occurred along this fault and the fault may have been the cause of a 4.7
magnitude earthquake.

Newport-Inglewood Structural Zone. The Newport-Inglewood structural zone
is a series of northwesterly trending folded hills and echelon faults extending
from the southern edge of the Santa Monica Mountains southeastward to the
offshore area of Newport Beach. This structural zone is approximately 17
miles west/southwest of Placentia. Fault segments for this zone include:
▪
▪
▪
▪
Page 8-10
Charnock Fault;
Avalon-Compton Fault;
Overland Avenue Fault;
Cherry Hill Fault;
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Safety Element
Insert Exhibit 8-5
Regional Fault Map
8.5 x 11
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Page 8-11
Safety Element
▪
▪
▪
Inglewood Fault;
Seal Beach Fault; and
Potrero Fault.
Numerous seismic events of 4.0 magnitude or greater, including the historic 6.3
magnitude Long Beach earthquake in March 1933, have been generated within this
fault zone and suggest an active seismic history. Although there has been no
observed ground displacement associated with the Newport-Inglewood structural
zone, there may have been subsurface fault displacement of approximately seven
inches associated with the October 21, 1941, and June 18, 1944, earthquakes. This
structural zone could generate a 7.6-plus magnitude maximum credible earthquake.
San Andreas Fault. The San Andreas Fault extends over 600 miles, encompassing
virtually the entire length of California. The fault is divided into segments that have
distinctive behavior patterns. The southern segment of the fault is over 300 miles
long and occasionally delivers large earthquakes. This fault is located approximately
35 miles north/northeast of Placentia.
The last significant earthquake on this segment was the 1857 Fort Tejon earthquake
that is believed to have caused a surface rupture extending 200 miles. Several other
earthquakes have been attributed to the San Andreas Fault. The latest event
affecting Southern California was a 6.7 magnitude quake in 1899. It is estimated by
geologists that this fault may have the potential to generate an earthquake of
magnitude 8.5 on the Richter scale, which is designated as the maximum credible
earthquake.
San Jacinto Fault. The San Jacinto Fault branches from the San Andreas Fault on
the north side of the San Gabriel Mountains and parallels the San Andreas to the
Mexico-California border. The San Jacinto fault has been very active, with damaging
earthquakes occurring along its entire length. The last earthquake on this fault
exceeding a magnitude 6.0 occurred in 1968. Ten damaging earthquakes have been
attributed to this fault since the 1800s, ranging from 5.4 to 6.8 on the Richter scale.
This fault is located approximately 34 miles northeast of Placentia.
SURFACE RUPTURE AND GROUND SHAKING
Surface rupture resulting from earthquakes is unlikely to occur in Placentia because
no faults have been identified within the City boundaries. Typically, surface rupture
occurs in near-surface materials, reflecting differential compaction or liquefaction of
underlying materials. The potential for ground cracking exists, especially in those
areas of the City which have moderate to high potential for liquefaction.
Ground shaking impacts on Placentia depends on several factors. The particular
fault, fault location, distance from the City and magnitude of the earthquake all
determine the degree of shaking that will occur in the City. In addition, the soil and
geologic structure underlying Placentia influences the amount of damage that the
City may experience. Exhibit 8-6, Geologic Conditions, provides an overview of
geologic conditions within the City.
Page 8-12
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Safety Element
Insert Exhibit 8-6
Geologic Conditions
11 x 17
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Page 8-13
Safety Element
This page intentionally left blank.
Page 8-14
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Safety Element
The Newport-Inglewood Fault is anticipated to generate the most destructive ground
shaking in Placentia. The Whittier-Elsinore and Norwalk Faults, though closer to the
City, are predicted to generate smaller magnitude earthquakes. The San Jacinto
Fault is very active and has historically produced 6.0 to 7.0 magnitude earthquakes.
However, as Placentia lies approximately 30 miles to the southwest, the distance
between the City and this fault would alleviate the ground shaking impact.
LIQUEFACTION HAZARDS
Liquefaction is the result of strong ground shaking of water-saturated, loose to
moderately dense sand and silty sand. Strong ground shaking causes sediment,
saturated with groundwater, to lose strength and behave as though it was a liquid.
Liquefaction occurs where the water table is high and soils are generally loose.
Liquefaction is generally associated with shallow ground water conditions and the
presence of loose and sandy soils or alluvial deposits. The California Department of
Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology provides mapping of liquefaction
hazard zones for the City of Placentia. Exhibit 8-7, Potential Liquefaction Hazards,
illustrates those areas in the City of Placentia subject to liquefaction.
Placentia, like most of Orange County, has granular sandy soil with high water
content. Areas with these conditions may experience liquefaction during extreme
ground shaking. Areas of high liquefaction potential occur within the central,
southernmost and easternmost portions of Placentia
STRUCTURE FAILURE
During a seismic event, Placentia may be subjected to high levels of ground shaking.
As a result, structures within the community could sustain substantial damage.
Some structures are particularly susceptible to earthquake damage, including tilt-up
structures, unreinforced masonry buildings, older buildings, buildings over four
stories and mobile homes. Concrete tilt-ups built prior to 1974 may be especially
susceptible.
SEISMIC RESPONSE
The possible geologic effects of a major earthquake on Placentia include rupture of
the ground surface associated directly with movement on geologic faults, ground
failure due to liquefaction, ground shaking with moderate to high lateral accelerations
and in general, collapse of buildings as a result of groundshaking. Partial to total
collapse of buildings could occur among pre-1933 buildings and partial collapse of
some tilt-up and concrete block buildings could occur among buildings built prior to
March 1972. Buildings constructed under modern building codes, where current
state-of-the-art seismic evaluations and where disaster preparedness is being
maintained, are expected to survive the maximum expected earthquake with
relatively moderate losses.
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Page 8-15
Safety Element
LANDSLIDE HAZARDS
The City of Placentia is characterized by a relatively flat topography. Approximately
68 percent of total land in the City has slopes of less than three percent. 1 According
to the State of California Division of Mines and Geology, Official Map of Seismic
Hazard Zones (1998) 2, no earthquake induced landslides are likely to occur within
the City’s boundaries based on the area's predominately flat terrain.
3.2.2
MAN-MADE HAZARDS
A number of hazards present in the City of Placentia are a result of man-made
facilities or activities. This section explores hazardous materials, fire, crime and rail
safety.
HAZARDOUS AND TOXIC MATERIALS
Hazardous materials are any substance(s) or combination, which, because of
quantity, concentration or characteristics may have the potential to cause or
significantly contribute to an increase in death or serious injury, or pose substantial
hazards to humans and/or the environment. Local governments have little control
over the production and use of these materials because they are necessary products
or by-products of everyday functions. Even household wastes can be hazardous
materials and pose a threat to public health.
Emergency response plans are in place with the City in the event a hazardous or
toxic materials event occurs. In addition, the Orange County Fire Authority provides
emergency response to incidents involving hazardous materials. The Orange
County Fire Authority Hazardous Materials Response Team (HMRT) directly
responds to hazardous materials incidents. However, if another city’s fire station (i.e.
Anaheim), equipped and trained to handle hazardous materials releases, is within
closer proximity to the release, then the corresponding fire station would provide
emergency response.
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TRANSPORT
Hazardous materials incidents may be a result of accidents that occur during
transport of hazardous materials via truck or rail transportation. State Route 91 and
State Route 57 traverse the western and southern boundaries of the City and provide
the primary regional transportation corridors for the transport of hazardous materials.
In addition, industrial facilities located near major transportation routes are more
susceptible to spills of hazardous materials than are other parts of the community. A
release could also occur along existing rail lines that traverse the City.
1
Placentia General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element, 1973. Page 5.
2
http://www.consrv.ca.gov/dmg/shezp/maps/m_ora1.htm
Page 8-16
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Safety Element
Insert Exhibit 8-7
Potential Liquefaction Hazards
11 x 17
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Page 8-17
Safety Element
This page intentionally left blank.
Page 8-18
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Safety Element
Fixed Facilities
There is the potential for hazardous materials spills or incidents within or directly
adjacent to facilities that warehouse, manufacture and process hazardous or toxic
materials within or directly adjacent to Placentia. The use of hazardous materials in
these facilities can pose a significant threat however, Federal, State and local
regulatory requirements and site-specific contingency and evacuation plans reduce
these potential threats.
The Orange County Fire Authority Hazardous Materials Disclosure Office identifies
facilities that contain or handle hazardous materials. According to the City’s
Emergency Operations Plan Hazard Assessment for Hazardous Materials,
approximately 251 facilities have been identified as containing or handling hazardous
materials.
Two facilities have the greatest potential to threaten the health and safety of
Placentia residents:

Pargas Propane Distribution Facility
The Pargas Propane Distribution Facility is an aboveground propane gas
distribution facility located in the southwestern portion of the City. Release of
hazardous materials from this center could result in a highly volatile situation.
Prevailing winds may also pose a potential threat from several industrial
complexes in the vicinity of Orangethorpe Avenue and Melrose Street.
The Pargas facility contains five liquid transfer locations. These facilities
include transport unloading, railcar unloading, cylinder charging dock, truck fill
riser and dispensing unit.

Unocal 76 Research Center
The Unocal 76 Fred L. Hartley Research Center, located north of Placentia in
the City of Brea poses a potential risk to Placentia residents. The Unocal
facility utilizes a number of hazardous materials, including anhydrous
ammonia, technical grade solvents, fuels and miscellaneous cylinder gases
and other materials. The City of Placentia has evaluated the potential
impacts of a hazardous materials incident and has determined a Sphere of
Influence for the potential release of hazardous materials. Exhibit 8-8,
Unocal Chemical Plant Sphere of Influence, illustrates the areas in Placentia
that may be directly affected by a hazardous materials incident.
Illegal Dumping
Illegal dumping of hazardous materials pose significant threats to the health and
safety of Placentia residents. It is assumed that occasional illegal dumping activities
will occur within the City as the City has experienced unauthorized dumping in the
past. Since this type of dumping is clandestine in nature, it is difficult for the City to
anticipate when and where such activities will occur. Illegal dumping poses threats
to the health and safety of residents and may cause damage to underground water
supplies, sewage and stormwater conveyance systems and other public facilities.
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Page 8-19
Safety Element
Insert Exhibit 8-8
Unocal Chemical Plant Sphere of Influence
8.5 x 11
Page 8-20
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Safety Element
Pipeline and Well Hazards
Oil recovery operations occurring within the City limits pose a threat to the health and
safety of Placentia residents. Regulation of these oil recovery operations has
progressed in recent times with an emphasis on environmental protection and public
safety. These regulations promote safe oil recovery and production in urbanized
areas. Local regulations are found within the Uniform Fire Code (UFC) and the
Placentia Municipal Code.
The City of Placentia has numerous wells and pipelines that extract and transport
potentially hazardous materials. Exhibit 8-9a, Well Locations and Exhibit 8-9b,
Pipeline Locations, illustrates the locations of well facilities. Pipelines represent a
hazard due to the contents of the pipelines and the potential for them to rupture,
causing chemical leaks, explosions or fires.
Household Hazardous Waste
Household hazardous wastes pose a potential risk to all Placentia residents. Many
everyday cleaners, chemicals and other household products have the potential to
harm residents or pollute the environment. The improper disposal of household
hazardous wastes can be extremely harmful to the human and natural environment.
To assist residents with the disposal of household hazardous waste, the City of
Placentia offers a residential collection program for seniors and disabled residents.
Items are picked up from the resident’s home at no charge. For residents who do
not qualify for this program, a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Center,
located at 1071 North Blue Gum Street in Anaheim, accepts hazardous waste
materials in their original containers. In addition, Placentia residents can contact a
recycling center to pick up used motor oil from their home for recycling.
3.3
FIRE, POLICE PROTECTION AND MEDICAL
EMERGENCIES
3.3.1
FIRE PROTECTION
FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES
The Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) provides services to the City of Placentia
under a joint powers agreement (JPA) to provide fire prevention, suppression and
emergency services to 22 jurisdictions within Orange County. The OCFA has served
the City of Placentia since May 16, 1980. Fire Station 34, located at 1530 North
Valencia and Fire Station 35, located at 110 South Bradford, provide fire service to
the City (refer to Exhibit 8-10, Fire Station Facilities). In addition to Fire Station 34
and Fire Station 35, resources are deployed based upon a regional service delivery
system, assigning personnel and equipment to emergency incidents without regard
to jurisdictional boundaries. The equipment used by the department as the versatility
to respond to both urban and wildland emergency conditions. Contracted fire
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Page 8-21
Safety Element
Insert Exhibit 8-9a
Well Locations
8.5 X11
Page 8-22
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Safety Element
Insert Exhibit 8-9b
Pipeline Locations
8.5 X 11
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Page 8-23
Safety Element
Insert Exhibit 8-10
Fire Station Facilities
8.5 x 11
Page 8-24
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Safety Element
services include community safety services, finance, administration and human
resources services, technical services and fire operations. 3 The OCFA responded to
4,117 incidents within Placentia in 2000.
FIRE STATION FACILITIES
Table 8-1, Fire Station Facilities, identifies the equipment and personnel provided by
fire stations serving Placentia. Station 34 is equipped with one paramedic engine
with four personnel per shift, one truck with four personnel per shift and one battalion
chief per shift. Station 35 is equipped with one engine (squirt) with 3 personnel per
shift.
Table 8-1
City of Placenta Fire Station Facilities
Station #
Equipment
Staffing Per Shift
34
1 paramedic engine, 1 fire truck
9 personnel – 4 paramedic, 4 firefighters, and 1
battalion chief
35
1 squirt engine
3 personnel
According to the OCFA, the standard response goal throughout the OCFA is for the
first engine to reach the emergency scene within five minutes 80 percent of the time
and a paramedic to reach the scene within eight minutes 90 percent of the time. 4
This standard is met and exceeded in the City of Placentia. The current ISO rating
for the City of Placentia is Class 3.
FIRE HAZARD POTENTIAL
The City of Placentia is an urbanized community with a minimal inventory of natural
open space and vegetation. Therefore, the threat of wildland fires within the City
limits is significantly diminished. Fires occurring in the urban environment pose the
largest threat to Placentia residents.
Building materials and wind speeds can contribute significantly to the spread of
urban fires. According to the OCFA, a significant portion of Placentia’s housing stock
contains wood shingled roofs. The majority of these housing units are concentrated
in the northern portion of the City. The City is occasionally subject to periodic high
winds, which contribute to the spread of fire. However, the separation and setback
requirements that were in effect when most houses in the City were constructed
assist in minimizing fire risk. Additionally, the OCFA has identified the following
significant hazards within Placentia:
3
City of Placentia Department and Services. http://www.placentia.org/city_offices/offices_fire.htm.
4
Orange County Fire Authority, Michele Hernandez, October 15, 2003.
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Page 8-25
Safety Element
3.3.2
▪
Fire spread potential in attached buildings in “Old Town”;
▪
Older packing house style construction near Bradford and Placentia;
▪
Pargas - A LPG storage and transfer facility on Melrose Avenue;
▪
Substantial oil field development, wells, tanks, pipelines, etc., throughout
the city; and
▪
Main-line BNSF rail corridor on the south side of the City.
POLICE PROTECTION
The City of Placentia operates its own police department at the City Hall complex.
The City’s Police force serves Placentia with a current (2003) staff of 53 sworn fulltime officers, 18 non-sworn full-time personnel (including civilians), 7 non-sworn parttime personnel, (including civilian employees) and 5 volunteers. The Police
Department is divided into two divisions: Operations and Support Services.
The ability to quickly and effectively respond to emergency situations is a primary
objective of the Placentia Police Department. Quick and effective response to
emergency situations is an important means in evaluating police service in the
community. The City of Placentia regularly evaluates response times to ensure
police services respond effectively to the needs of the population. Table 8-2, Police
Department Response Times, illustrates the Departments response times based on
the type of call.
The Placentia Police Department takes pride in the level of service provided to the
community. In addition to crime and safety services, several community programs
and services are provided to enhance the Police Department’s level of service to the
community. These programs and services include Fingerprinting, a Bicycle Safety
Program, Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE), a Burglary Prevention Program
and a Robbery Prevention Program.
Table 8-2
Police Department Response Times
Call Type
Priority One – Emergency Response
Priority Two – Urgent Response
Priority Three – Non-Emergency Response
Average Response Time
2 Minutes
2 to 7 Minutes
7 Minutes
Source: City of Placentia Police Department, October 2001.
Page 8-26
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Safety Element
The Placentia Police Department encourages public involvement through a variety of
programs including the Neighborhood Watch Program, Radio Watch, Crossing
Guard Program, Reserve Officer Program, volunteers in Police Program and the
Ride Along Program.
Through these programs, citizens work directly with
Department personnel to better serve the community.
3.4
RAIL SAFETY
Rail safety is of primary concern to the City of Placentia. With increased demand for
commuter and commercial rail services, additional rail traffic is expected. Currently,
more than 50 trains per day travel through the Orangethorpe rail corridor that serves
the ports of Los Angeles and the Midwest (refer to Exhibit 8-11, Rail Line and
Crossings). This corridor, which is the point of intersection of the San Bernardino
Subdivision and the Orange/Olive Subdivision in the Placentia and Anaheim area, is
referred to as the Orange County Gateway. The number of trains traveling through
the Gateway is projected to increase to 135 per day by the year 2020. Train traffic
currently halts auto and pedestrian traffic at the intersections it crosses. Increases in
train traffic would result in further delays at these intersections. In addition, delays
occur for commuters and emergency-response traffic such as police cars and
ambulances.
OnTrac was formed in April of 2000 to build and sustain support for the
Orangethorpe Avenue Grade Separation and Trade Corridor project. OnTrac is a 5mile long railroad-lowering project that will be a complete grade separation at 11 rail
crossings in the cities of Placentia and Anaheim. The project will connect the ports
of Los Angeles and Long Beach to the transcontinental rail network, creating a
faster, more efficient method of distributing the expected $250 billion in trade. For 5
miles through Placentia and Anaheim, freight and passenger trains will travel through
a trench, allowing local passenger and business traffic to flow unimpeded at rail
crossings. The Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) has approved an
Agreement recognizing OnTrac as the implementing agency for projects utilizing the
funding appropriated to the State Traffic Congestion Relief Program. OnTrac is
working closely with OCTA and State transportation officials on a comprehensive
Southern California trade corridor plan.
4.0
PLANNING FACTORS, GOALS AND POLICIES
The Safety Element’s goals and policies provide direction for specific actions to
protect the community from natural and man-made hazards.
FLOODING
Planning Factor
Flooding and dam inundation has the potential to affect the safety of Placentia
residents. It is important to ensure that new development is constructed to minimize
flood and dam inundation hazards.
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Page 8-27
Safety Element
Insert Exhibit 8-11
Rail Line and Crossings
8.5 x 11
Page 8-28
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Safety Element
Goal
SAF-1
Protection of residents, workers, and visitors from flood
hazards, including dam inundation.
Policies SAF-1.1
Manage development to ensure that flooding concerns have
been considered prior to development.
SAF-1.2
Minimize flood hazards by working with the Orange County
Department of Public Works to construct and maintain needed
local and regional storm drain improvements.
SAF-1.3
Minimize dam inundation hazards through engineering and
construction.
SAF-1.4
Review on an annual basis the emergency evacuation plan to
ensure its continued effectiveness.
SAF-1.5
Support the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ improvements to
the County’s flood control system and to the Santa Ana River
Mainstem project.
SEISMIC HAZARDS
Planning Factor
Seismic hazards are a concern to all California residents. The City understands the
importance of protecting its citizens from the effects of seismic events. Placentia
seeks to reduce the potential for loss of life, injuries and property damage to its
residents as a result of seismic events.
Goal
SAF-2
Protection of life, property and public well being in
Placentia from seismic events and resulting hazards.
Policies SAF-2.1
Maintain, retrofit (whenever necessary), and enforce existing
standards and criteria to reduce or avoid all levels of seismic
or other geologic risk, whether it be unacceptable, tolerated, or
avoidable risk.
SAF-2.2
Evaluate the compatibility of existing zoning as well as future
land-use allocation, with known geologic risk zones, or those
which may be identified in the future.
SAF-2.3
Identify and evaluate existing structures for structural safety.
Encourage building owners to undertake necessary seismic
retrofit improvements.
SAF-2.4
Support the most current Uniform Building Code’s seismic
standards for construction of new buildings and maintain
seismic safety of existing structures.
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Page 8-29
Safety Element
SAF-2.5
Require the review of soils and geologic conditions, and if
necessary on-site borings, to determine liquefaction
susceptibility of a proposed project site.
SAF-2.6
Provide greater safety for important or critical-use structures
(such as hospitals, schools, public assembly facilities, dams
and utility corridors).
SAF-2.7
Prohibit development of important or critical-use structures in
any active or potentially active fault zones, unless no other
more suitable site can be located, and the site is shown to be
safe for the intended use.
SAF-2.8
Study the potential for liquefaction within the City, as identified
by the State of California and adopt policies that minimize the
potential damage of structures and injury of citizens.
SAF-2.9
Provide public education materials
community’s preparedness for a disaster.
to
increase
the
SAF-2.10 Improve inter-jurisdictional cooperation and communication,
especially in regard to safety aspects related to dams,
reservoirs, state highway and freeway structures, oil wells,
regional fault studies, legislative matters, and disaster
response or emergency plans.
SAF-2.11 Work with the county and other local agencies to improve
response times for emergency rescues (mutual aid
agreements).
SAF-2.12 Advocate improved earthquake insurance programs and seek
qualification of the city for Federal mudslide insurance.
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Planning Factor
Hazardous materials are a byproduct of industrial activities and daily household
operations. The City of Placentia understands the importance of protecting its
citizens from the risks associated with these materials.
Goal
SAF-3
Policies SAF-3.1
Page 8-30
Minimized risks to life and property associated with the
handling, transporting, treating, generating, and storing of
hazardous materials.
Locate new and relocate existing land uses that utilize,
produce, transport, or store hazardous materials a safe
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Safety Element
distance from other land uses that may be adversely affected
by such activities.
SAF-3.2
Encourage and support the proper disposal of household
waste and waste oil. Monitor dry cleaners, film processors,
auto service establishments, and other businesses generating
hazardous waste materials to ensure compliance with
approved disposal procedures.
SAF-3.3
Provide community awareness and education programs for
proper disposal of hazardous waste.
SAF-3.4
Prosecute unlicensed dumping of toxic or hazardous materials
into the ground or water in Placentia. Increase the fines levied
for illegal dumping. Encourage citizens to report dumping
when they observe it.
SAF-3.5
Support efforts to enforce State "right to know" laws, which
outline the publics right to information about local toxics
producers.
PIPELINES
Planning Factor
Several pipelines exist within the City of Placentia, posing a threat to the residents.
The City understands the importance of protecting its residents from possible
property damage and injury to persons resulting from an emergency event. The City
implements a variety of safety measures to ensure the safe operation of pipeline
facilities.
Goal
SAF-4
Minimized property damage and injury to persons from
underground pipeline hazards.
Policies SAF-4.1
Ensure that the County Fire Authority and other disaster
response agencies have access to route, depth, and shut-off
information about each pipeline.
SAF-4.2
Ensure that the Disaster Response Plan includes procedures
to deal with a pipeline accident.
SAF-4.3
Consult with agencies operating these lines, as well as the
Public Utilities Commission and the Office of Pipeline Safety of
the Department of Transportation, to determine the real
potential for explosion or rupture in case of accident or
earthquake.
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Page 8-31
Safety Element
SAF-4.4
For new development, maximize building setback from existing
pipelines or new/established pipeline routes.
FIRE PROTECTION
Planning Factor
Protecting Placentia residents from the threat of urban fires is a high priority for the
City. The high quality service provided by the fire authority contributes to the
protection of Placentia residents.
Goal
Page 8-32
SAF-5
Protection of life and property in Placentia from urban
fires. Maintain the Orange County Fire Authority’s high
level of service to community businesses and residents.
Policies SAF-5.1
Support the Orange County Fire Authority response time
standards for the first responder engine and paramedic
service.
SAF-5.2
Evaluate the effects of new development on the County Fire
Authority’s response time. Ensure through the development
review process that new development will not result in reduced
emergency service levels.
SAF-5.3
Maintain and periodically review procedures for dealing with
fire emergencies in the City's Disaster Plan.
SAF-5.4
Establish evacuation routes for an urban fire.
SAF-5.5
Maintain mutual aid agreements with surrounding jurisdictions
for fire protection.
SAF-5.6
Provide adequate fire equipment access to structures within
the community.
SAF-5.7
Support an ongoing fire inspection program to reduce fire
hazards associated with older buildings, critical facilities, public
assembly facilities, and industrial and commercial buildings.
SAF-5.8
Promote the utilization of fire-safe building materials and
enforce the City's fire sprinkler ordinance.
SAF-5.9
Implement a Fire Prevention and Awareness Education
Program for businesses and residents.
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Safety Element
POLICE PROTECTION
Planning Factor
Safety is a primary concern for the City of Placentia and its residents. The high
quality service provided by the Placentia Police Department contributes to this safety
and the overall protection of Placentia residents.
Goal
SAF-6
Maintain the police department’s high quality of service to
the City.
Policies SAF-6.1
Assess the impacts of incremental increases in development
density and the resulting traffic congestion on emergency
response time. Ensure through the development review
process that new development will not result in reduced
emergency service levels.
SAF-6.2
Support the police department’s response time for emergency
calls and for non-emergency calls.
SAF-6.3
Enhance public awareness and participation in crime
prevention. Develop new and expand existing educational
programs dealing with personal safety awareness.
SAF-6.4
Continue to support citizen programs that fight crime and
promote citizen involvement, such as Citizens Emergency
Response Team, Neighborhood Watch and DARE.
SAFETY THROUGH DESIGN
Planning Factor
The physical design of public spaces contributes to its safety and ability to prevent
crime. The City of Placentia understands that implementation of design criteria and
guidelines enhancing the safety of public spaces, can minimize risks to residents.
Goal
SAF-7
Provision of design criteria in the Zoning Ordinance or
design guidelines relating to the prevention of crime
prevention through appropriate physical design solutions.
Policies SAF-7.1
Use sound principles of design to promote safety for residents,
employees and visitors to the City.
SAF-7.2
Provide exterior lighting that enhances safety and night use in
public spaces, but minimizes impacts on surrounding land
uses.
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003
Page 8-33
Safety Element
Page 8-34
SAF-7.3
Promote the use of defensible space (e.g., site and building
lighting, visual observation of open spaces, secured areas) in
project design to enhance public safety.
SAF-7.4
Identify safety prevention measures to prevent accidents
associated with roadway crossing barriers and activities along
the rail right-of-way.
Administrative Draft ▪ November 2003