ERubin_Presymbolic Emerging Language in

Addressing Social Competence in Children and Adolescents with Au�sm Spectrum Disorder at Pre-­‐symbolic and Emerging Language Stages Presented by Emily Rubin, MS, CCC-­‐SLP The neurology of social competence
—  When neurotypical children look at peoples
faces, regions in the limbic system “light up”
with endorphins and reward that child.
The neurology of social competence
—  By 10 months of age, a child begins to shift
gaze from a caregiver to objects of reference
to predict and anticipate the actions of others.
The neurology of social competence
—  Contemporary research in the
neurodevelopment of social competence has
fostered a greater understanding of those with
vulnerabilities in these areas.
The neurology of social competence
—  By 6 months of age, a child begins to follow gaze and
can recognize when they have lost a caregiver’s
attention
The neurology of social competence
—  By 12 months of age, a child will initiate
shared attention on desired items or items that
are of interest to the child.
1
The neurology of social competence
Unique neurological differences in social and
emotional development
—  These capacities foster expertise about the
social world.
—  Children with social and emotional
vulnerabilities show limited neural sensitivity to
social stimuli and tend not to look toward
people’s faces.
Unique neurological differences in social and
emotional development
—  Children with these vulnerabilities tend to look
at the mouths of the speaker. They miss gaze
shifts between people and objects. They have
difficulty predicting actions and initiating bids
for engagement.
Unique neurological differences in social and
emotional development
—  Individuals with social and emotional
vulnerabilities may process social stimuli (e.g.,
faces, speech sounds) in regions of the brain
typically reserved to process images and sounds
that are non-biological.
—  This makes predictions of actions, intentions,
Unique neurological differences in social and
emotional development
—  Similarly, when neurotypical children hear
speech sounds, these are processed as social
or intentional stimuli, while children with
vulnerabilities simply hear sounds, making the
intentions of individual words more ambiguous.
Unique neurological differences in social
and emotional development
How do these neurological differences impact social communication?
—  Difficulty with communication - Neurological differences limit
shared attention and the intrinsic reward for engagement with
others; thus, reduced rates of spontaneously initiated
communication are evident and compromise language
development.
and emotions less efficient and more intellectual.
Implication – Increase functional, spontaneous communication
2
Pre-symbolic stages;
sample intervention goals
Child will communicate for a range of functions across
activities, contexts, and partners including:
—  Initiating bids for interaction,
—  Sharing negative and positive emotions,
Pre-symbolic stages
sample intervention goals
Child will share intentions across activities,
contexts, and partners using:
—  imitation of actions or sounds
—  Requesting desired objects,
—  proximity to others
—  Requesting help or other actions,
—  simple motor actions / physical manipulation,
—  Protesting undesired actions or activities,
—  a give gesture, push away, a touch gesture,
—  Requesting comfort, social games, and greetings,
—  a show gesture, a point, or a wave gesture,
—  Commenting on objects.
Unique neurological differences in social
and emotional development
How do these neurological differences impact social communication?
—  Difficulty with expressive language - Neurological differences limit
gaze between people and objects and awareness of what others
are thinking; thus, children with ASD may learn nouns and noun
phrases, but struggle with subject + verb sentence structure,
which is essential for creative language acquisition.
Implication – Increase language related to people and actions
Emerging language stages;
sample intervention goals
Emerging language stages;
sample intervention goals
Child will communicate for a range of functions across
activities, contexts, and partners including:
Child will share intentions across activities, contexts,
and partners using:
—  Securing attention prior to expressing intentions
—  words, pictures, or signs to represent people, action
—  Comments on actions or events
—  Combining words, pictures, or signs to form creative
using others’ names
—  Sharing emotion and interests
words, modifiers, and a range of object labels.
word combinations such as subject + verb and
subject + verb + noun sentences.
3
The Picture Communica�on Symbols ©1981-­‐2009 by Mayer-­‐Johnson LLC. All Rights Reserved Worldwide. Used with permission. The Picture Communica�on Symbols ©1981-­‐2009 by Mayer-­‐Johnson LLC. All Rights Reserved Worldwide. Used with permission. Unique neurological differences in social
and emotional development How do these neurological differences impact emotional
regulation?
—  Difficulty with transitions – Predicting the sequence of tasks
initiated by others is a challenge in the absence of clear
visual support.
The Picture Communica�on Symbols ©1981-­‐2009 by Mayer-­‐
Johnson LLC. All Rights Reserved Worldwide. Used with permission. Implication – Increase visual supports to indicate sequence of activities and
steps within activities
Transition Objects of Reference
Music
4
Unique neurological differences in social
and emotional development How do these neurological differences impact emotional regulation?
—  Difficulty with active engagement – Predicting the purpose of a social or
academic activity is a challenge. Thus, motivation for task engagement
is affected.
Implication – Increase intrinsic reward value of activities (e.g., hands on
sensory-based, embed special interests, and ensure functional application is
clear)
Unique neurological differences in social
and emotional development How do these neurological differences impact emotional regulation?
Unique Neurological Differences How do these neurological differences impact emotional
regulation?
—  Unpredictable situations = heightened anxiety & decreased
interest in social stimuli = boredom
—  Reliance on immature or unconventional coping – When others
are not a predictable source of emotional support, coping
strategies tend not to be learned by observation. Repetitive
sensory motor soothing behaviors (rhythm and pressure) and/or
special interests develop.
Reference:
Implication = Provide explicit guidance for developing more conventional
coping strategies
Contact the presenter: [email protected] American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2006).
Guidelines for speech-language pathologists in diagnosis,
assessment, and treatment of autism spectrum disorders
across the life span. Available from http://www.asha.org/
members/deskref-journal/deskref/default
5
Checklist for Differentiating Instruction
for Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders in the Classroom
Student Name:
Date:
Follow-up Date:
Target Activity / Subject:
Describe what the student did well…
Visual Structure & Organization
Is the student predicting…
the purpose of the task (sensory
exploration / cause & effect / tied to special
interests or functional outcomes)
the sequence of activities (activity
the steps within the activity (count
their role in the activity (clear visuals
What supports are
working
Next steps
What supports are
working
Next steps
What supports are
working
Next steps
baskets, photo/picture schedules, written day
planner)
down strips, visual timers, written help box)
indicate expectations, turn-taking, and roles)
Social Communication Supports
Is the student predicting…
when to initiate (the activity includes
what to say (visuals such as objects, photos,
opportunities for student participation)
pictures, written words remind the child how to
ask for help, comment, respond to questions,
etc.)
Emotional Regulation
Is the student predicting…
how to regulate their emotions
that others are responsive and a
source of emotional support
(access to sensory supports, visuals choices of
coping strategies)
Copyright 2012 – All Rights Reserved; Prepared by Emily Rubin, MS, CCC-SLP; Derived from the SCERTS assessment process
6