Main Roads Western Australia Cape Leveque Road Upgrade (SLK 25 - 102.6) Response to comments on the Draft Preliminary Documentation March 2015 Table of contents 1. 2. 3. 4. Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Context and background ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of this report........................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Limitations ............................................................................................................................ 2 Public submissions......................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Submissions received .......................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Response to submissions .................................................................................................... 3 Additional consultation by DotE ..................................................................................................... 4 3.1 van Leeuwen and Southgate ............................................................................................... 4 3.1 Response to van Leeuwen and Southgate advice .............................................................. 5 Finalising the Preliminary Documentation ...................................................................................... 6 Table index Table 1 List of public submissions............................................................................................................ 3 Appendices Appendix A – Copy of the public submissions Appendix B – Response to public submissions Appendix C - Advice from van Leeuwen and Southgate Appendix D - Response to advice from van Leeuwen and Southgate GHD | Report for Main Roads Western Australia - Cape Leveque Road Upgrade (SLK 25 - 102.6), 61/30593 | i 1. Introduction 1.1 Context and background The Cape Leveque Road is located in the Shire of Broome and runs from the Broome Highway, east of Broome town-site to the northern Dampier Peninsula for a length of approximately 200 kilometres. Various sections of the Cape Leveque Road have been upgraded to a sealed standard over the last ten years. There is 77.6 kilometres of unsealed road (SLK 25 to 102.6) which is proposed to be constructed to a sealed standard over the next 3 to 4 years, depending on the allocation of funding and required environmental approvals being obtained. This project was referred under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) to the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water Population and Communities (now Department of the Environment (DotE)) on 22 August 2013, with a revised referral form provided on 2 September 2013 (EPBC Ref:2013/6984). On 27 September 2013, DotE confirmed the proposed action would be a controlled action and therefore required assessment and a decision on approval under the EPBC Act before it can proceed. DotE confirmed on 4 December 2013 the project would be assessed on preliminary documentation and requested additional information to allow this to occur. The additional information requested focused on the Greater Bilby (Macrotis lagotis), Gouldian Finch (Erythrura gouldiae), Red Goshawk (Erythrotriorchis radiatus) and the Masked Owl (Tyto novaehollandiae kimberli). With the exception of the Gouldian Finch, which is listed as endangered and migratory under the EPBC Act, the other three species are listed as vulnerable. DotE requested additional information on the level of impact, if any, to the four species identified by potential sources of impact arising from the proposed project. For impacts identified, DotE requested appropriate mitigation measures be proposed to reduce the level of impact and provide a discussion of the efficacy of these mitigation measures. Where significant residual impacts remained for any of the above listed species following application of the proposed mitigation measures, DotE stated offsets should be proposed with an explanation as to how they meet the intent of the EPBC Act Environmental Offsets Policy (October 2012) and the Offsets Assessment Guide. In accordance with Section 95A(3) of the EPBC Act, Preliminary Documentation related to the proposal was made available for viewing and comment in the Department of Environment Regulation Library’s, the City of Broome’s offices and the Main Roads Western Australia’s (Main Roads) website. Public Notice advertisements were placed in Saturday’s West Australian on the 6 December and Broome advertiser on the 4 December 2014. The comment period ended on the close of business Friday 19 December 2014. The preliminary documentation included: Part 1: Referral package Part 2: Response to request for additional information Part 3: Revised offset proposal 1.2 Purpose of this report The purpose of this report is to summarise the stakeholder submissions received and present Main Roads’ response to these comments. This information will be provided to DotE and attached to the Finalised Preliminary Documentation for re-advertising. GHD | Report for Main Roads Western Australia - Cape Leveque Road Upgrade (SLK 25 - 102.6), 61/30593 | 1 1.3 Limitations This report has been prepared by GHD for Main Roads and may only be used and relied on by Main Roads for the purpose agreed between GHD and the Main Roads as set out in Section 1.2 of this report. GHD otherwise disclaims responsibility to any person other than Main Roads arising in connection with this report. GHD also excludes implied warranties and conditions, to the extent legally permissible. The services undertaken by GHD in connection with preparing this report were limited to those specifically detailed in the report and are subject to the scope limitations set out in the report. The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this report are based on conditions encountered and information reviewed at the date of preparation of the report. GHD has no responsibility or obligation to update this report to account for events or changes occurring subsequent to the date that the report was prepared. The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this report are based on assumptions made by GHD described in this report. GHD disclaims liability arising from any of the assumptions being incorrect. GHD has prepared this report on the basis of information provided by Main Roads and others who provided information to GHD (including Government authorities), which GHD has not independently verified or checked beyond the agreed scope of work. GHD does not accept liability in connection with such unverified information, including errors and omissions in the report which were caused by errors or omissions in that information. 2 | GHD | Report for Main Roads Western Australia - Cape Leveque Road Upgrade (SLK 25 - 102.6), 61/30593 2. Public submissions 2.1 Submissions received Main Roads received four submissions on the Preliminary Documentation made available for comment. The list of respondents is provided in Table 1, with their individual submissions provided in full in Appendix A. Two of the submissions were provided by local commercial / tourist operations in the region; one was received from a Traditional Owner group, the Goolarabooloo people; and the fourth was from a conservation organisation focused on the Kimberley region. Table 1 List of public submissions Submission No. 1 2 3 4 2.2 Stakeholder Contact Contact Title Willie Creek Pearls Goolarabooloo Cygnet Bay Pearl Farm Environs Kimberley Paul Birch Phillip Roe James Brown Martin Pritchard General Manager – Operations Senior Law Boss and Ranger Chief Executive Officer Executive Director Response to submissions Main Roads’ response to the submissions received is presented in Appendix B. Each submission focused on various aspects of the proposal and / or associated Preliminary Documentation. To allow appropriate consideration of these comments, the submissions were categorised into the following aspects where appropriate: General comment Context Socio-economic Safety / accessibility Significance of Bilby population Impact to the Bilby Management approach On-ground activities Mitigation measures Delivery of management plan Each comment within the submission was responded to separately so as not to overlook an important element of the submission. As there is some minor overlap in the comments received, this approach has resulted in some duplication in the responses provided. GHD | Report for Main Roads Western Australia - Cape Leveque Road Upgrade (SLK 25 - 102.6), 61/30593 | 3 3. Additional consultation by DotE 3.1 van Leeuwen and Southgate During the public consultation period (December 2014) DotE consulted with Dr Stephen van Leeuwen, who is with Department of Parks and Wildlife (DPaW). DotE also consulted with Dr Rick Southgate of Envisage Environmental Services in January 2015. The purpose of these discussions was to receive additional information to inform DotE’s recommendation to the Minister regarding the acceptability of the proposal. The advice provided to DotE was forwarded to Main Roads for consideration and comment. This has been reproduced in Appendix C. DotE requested the advice be reviewed and addressed in parallel to preparing the response to public submissions, so as to avoid the need to stop the assessment process to seek additional information at a later stage. 3.1.1 van Leeuwen Stephen van Leeuwen was asked to comment on the potential contribution and impacts associated with increasing vehicle speeds, vehicle volume and night time traffic. He was also asked to comment on the efficacy of culverts and the other mitigation measures proposed for the Cape Leveque Road Upgrade project and provide any suggestions regarding alternative effective mitigation measures or ways in which the proposed mitigation measures could be improved. Stephen van Leeuwen responded to these questions; however it was noted that no alternative effective mitigation measures were proposed or suggestions as to how Main Roads’ proposed mitigation measures could be improved. 3.1.2 Southgate The response from Rick Southgate indicated the Bilby distribution on the Dampier Peninsula is uncertain, but it was suggested that it is a scattered population in low densities and that the species is quite mobile throughout the area as they move to find better quality habitat. The detectability of the species is also low due to its cryptic nature and behaviour, which makes monitoring difficult. It was noted the impact of roads on the Bilby is not conclusively known, although there is evidence that road verges can produce favourable landforms which can attract certain species. The notes from the discussion with Rick Southgate indicated it was not known whether the road kill mortality of Bilby individuals could affect the viability of a population without more baseline data; nor was it known if Bilbies concentrate along roadways relative to non-road ways in the region. A possible mitigation measure may be to make habitat more attractive elsewhere in the region through fire management. The notes from the discussion suggest it is not clear if the potential increased risk of direct impact of road kill mortality will be more or less significant than the potential risk of indirect impacts, such as increased tourism opportunity. Fire management was identified as likely being the most effective broad scale means to improve habitat for Bilbies. However, there is uncertainty how Bilbies on the Dampier Peninsula will respond to fire compared to populations in other areas. The conversation with Rick Southgate indicated the focus should be on identifying where Bilbies occur, as it is key to determine distribution and occupancy of the Dampier Peninsula Bilby population so as to implement effective adaptive management. It was noted research conducted in the Pilbara region may not be particularly comparable/adaptable to the Dampier Peninsular due to differences in landscape. It is suggested that an aerial survey to search for 4 | GHD | Report for Main Roads Western Australia - Cape Leveque Road Upgrade (SLK 25 - 102.6), 61/30593 digging and burrow sign, coupled with 2 ha plot ground surveys to validate observations would be the most effective means to determine Bilby distribution and occupancy. 3.1 Response to van Leeuwen and Southgate advice Main Roads’ response to the advice resulting from DotE’s consultation with Stephen van Leeuwen and Rick Southgate is presented in Appendix D. Consistent with the response to the public submissions, each comment was responded to separately so as not to overlook an important element of the advice. It should also be noted that Main Roads has actively discussed the proposed upgrade of Cape Leveque Road with DPaW (with Stephen van Leeuwen directly involved in these discussions). Main Roads sought advice regarding an appropriate environmental offset for the significant residual impacts expected once the mitigation measures had been implemented. GHD | Report for Main Roads Western Australia - Cape Leveque Road Upgrade (SLK 25 - 102.6), 61/30593 | 5 4. Finalising the Preliminary Documentation Based on the limited number of public submissions received and the issues raised, Main Roads does not propose to amend the Draft Preliminary Documentation released for public comment. There were no additional issues identified within the public submissions that have not already been discussed in the Preliminary Documentation, with the exception of the socio-economic benefits of the project to the local community. Main Roads accepts the proposed road upgrade may result in an increase in vehicle numbers and speeds which will increase the risk of vehicle strike over time. However, there is no evidence to indicate the upgrade of the road will result in an exponential increase in traffic. An exponential increase would be unlikely since there is restricted accommodation availability on the Peninsula. Cape Leveque Road does not encourage campers who are not travelling to a local community or fixed accommodation, with the road not proposed to supporting camping in roadside rest areas. Main Roads and Shire of Broome have not been informed of any significant developments north of SLK 25, supporting the unlikelihood of an exponential increase in vehicle numbers. Moreover, the additional advice sought from Stephen van Leeuwen and Rick Southgate does not provide any suggestion as to how Main Roads’ proposed mitigation measures could be improved or identify alternative effective mitigation measures for consideration. The gaps in knowledge regarding Bilby distribution on the Dampier Peninsula, the actual impact of roads on the Bilby and the most effective management measures at a regional scale are acknowledged in the Preliminary Documentation. The objectives and methodology outlined in the revised offset proposal (included in the Preliminary Documentation) are consistent with the comments and advice received regarding the need to better understand these knowledge gaps. Main Roads has made a commitment to update Willie Creek Pearls bi-annually on the progress of the proposed road upgrade. Furthermore, Main Roads will work with DPaW to ensure where activities associated with the offset proposal are being undertaken on Goolarabooloo Country DPaW will work with the Goolarabooloo Millibinyarri Indigenous Corporation to seek the best outcome for the Bilby. The advice received from Stephen van Leeuwen questioning the efficacy of fauna underpasses, as well as Bilby persistence near the road was also considered by Main Roads and GHD when producing the Preliminary Documentation. Within the Cape Leveque Road Upgrade Greater Bilby Management Plan (GHD October 2014) Main Roads has made a commitment to conduct Bilby surveys annually for 5 years to assess the level of use of the fauna underpasses and the presence of Bilbies near the upgraded road. 6 | GHD | Report for Main Roads Western Australia - Cape Leveque Road Upgrade (SLK 25 - 102.6), 61/30593 Appendices GHD | Report for Main Roads Western Australia - Cape Leveque Road Upgrade (SLK 25 - 102.6), 61/30593 Appendix A – Copy of the public submissions GHD | Report for Main Roads Western Australia - Cape Leveque Road Upgrade (SLK 25 - 102.6), 61/30593 Willie Creek Pearls PO Box 116 Broome Western Australia 6725 ABN 16 396 958 741 T +61 8 9192 0000 F + 61 9192 0099 E [email protected] 10th December 2014 Marni Baetge Environment Officer Main Roads Western Australia PMB 959 Derby WA 6728 [email protected] Dear Marni RE – UPGRADE TO UNSEALED SECTION OF CAPE LEVEQUE ROAD Willie Creek Pearls would like to register our interest in the proposed upgrade of the unsealed section of the Cape Leveque Road. As a tourism operator in the local area preservation of the natural flora and fauna is of upmost importance for the future of our operations and would like to continue to be updated of any developments with regards to proposed upgrade. Should you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter further, please do not hesitate to contact me on 9192 0000 or alternatively via email at [email protected] Yours Sincerely Paul Birch General Manager – Operations Broome Cable Beach| Chinatown | Willie Creek Pearl Farm Perth Hillary’s Boat Harbour | Subiaco www.williecreekpearls.com.au December 19, 2014 Marni Baetge Environment Officer Main Roads Western Australia PMB 959 Derby WA 6728 Email: [email protected] Dear Marni, Main Roads Western Australia – Goolarabooloo - Cape Leveque Road proposal Goolarabooloo are responsible for a large area of the Dampier Peninsula associated with the body of Aboriginal Law known as the Northern Tradition, within the Goolarabooloo claim and surrounding areas. This area, known as the Song Cycle Buru, is of ultimate cultural, social and spiritual importance to Goolarabooloo and other Indigenous people across the Dampier Peninsula. It remains the cultural responsibility of Goolarabooloo to look the Song Cycle Buru, and its surrounding areas. This is not a responsibility which is limited to the past, it is connected to a living cultural heritage tradition which is integral to the Law and Culture of the Goolarabooloo and other aboriginal people living on the Dampier Peninsula today. Goolarabooloo have an active ranger group who work to maintain the ecological and cultural integrity of the Song Cycle and its surrounding areas. Cape Leveque Road proposal We note that the proposal has been determined to be a ‘controlled action’ by the Federal Minister for the Environment. We are concerned that the proposal would have a detrimental impact on the Bilby. Given the new road is likely to be built we propose that mitigation of environmental impacts include funding for: 1|P ag e Bilby surveys to determine the population and distribution on the Dampier Peninsula Development of fire management plans Development of weed management plans Fire management Weed control Feral animal control Education We respectfully request that any work regarding the above on our Country be undertaken in conjunction and in consultation with us. The Goolarabooloo Rangers are a fledgling group and is available to undertake fee for service work on our Country. Should you have any queries please contact us at [email protected] or on 0467 039 319. Yours sincerely, Phillip Roe Senior Law Boss and Ranger, Goolarabooloo. 2|P ag e Ph: 08 9192 4283 Fax: 08 9192 4810 PO BOX 70, BROOME WA 6725 [email protected] 18 December 2014 To whom it may concern, Cygnet Bay Pearl Farm is an operational pearl farm and tourism venture situated 200km north of Broome on the Dampier Peninsula, with access via the Cape Leveque Road, subject of the invitation to public comment published in the Broome Advertiser dated 4 December 2014. We have read with interest the published report and wish to commend the stakeholders in this project on the work they have done in identifying the risks and associated mitigation strategies relating to the Greater Bilby, Gouldian Finch, Red Goshawk and Masked Owl. I wish to comment on the proposals relating to the Cape Leveque Road as a representative of the community of staff who live and work at Cygnet Bay and our visitors to the farm, and also in the context of my involvement as Chairman of the Broome Tourism Strategy Group. While I understand that the focus of the current invitation to public comment is some of the environmental considerations regarding the proposed upgrade, my comments relate to socio-economic benefits to be had from a timely upgrade of the work and the potential negative effects of delayed action on this issue. I believe that these issues should be to the forefront during the consideration of the entire project. The employee base at Cygnet Bay varies from over 70 people during the Dry season to approximately 30 people during the Wet season, and in addition we welcomed 5000 accommodation and 9000 tickets sold for our tours in the calendar year to date (this doesn’t include any figures for visitors to the farm who dined at our restaurant or went to the pearl showroom without participating in any tours). The general trend for our business over the past five years is to see a year on year increase in visitors as our profile within the tourism industry grows. We are open year round and while our Wet season tour and accommodation numbers are substantially lower than during the peak Dry season, our experience is that we cater to the corporate market for accommodation during this time of the year (government agencies and private businesses working within the indigenous communities locally), and are one of the very few tourist attractions open to visitors to Broome during the Wet. Tourism activities in the Dampier Peninsula area have been in a development phase over the past few years – this is both a reaction to the increasing number of visitors to Broome who are choosing to explore the Kimberley Coast as part of their trip, and in preparation for the anticipated increase in numbers of tourists who desire to experience indigenous culture – as evidenced by initiatives through Tourism Australian and Tourism Western Australia. Providing every visitor with the opportunity to enjoy an authentic Indigenous tourism experience is an integral component of the State Government Strategy for Tourism in Western Australia 2020, and Tourism Australia describes one of their objectives as encouraging trade to consider including a distinctive Aboriginal experience in every Australian itinerary. The Broome Tourism Strategy Group has also identified ‘high potential indigenous products’ as a key Ph: 08 9192 4283 Fax: 08 9192 4810 PO BOX 70, BROOME WA 6725 [email protected] part of their strategy over the next three years, and cultural/historical experiences are identified as important aspects of a unique ‘Broome visitor experience’. The issue of access along the Cape Leveque Road is of crucial importance to the continued development of the tourism industry in Broome and on the Dampier Peninsula, with road closures and road safety as the main concerns. In May 2013 and June 2014 there were road closures due to rain which had a big impact on locals and visitors, with people stranded in Broome and on the Peninsula for over a day at a time of the year when visitor numbers were on the increase. During the 2013/14 Wet season communities on the Peninsula were left without the scheduled food deliveries on three occasions due to road closures. Likewise, the road has seen a number of accidents over the past few years, with some reported fatalities. The proposed road upgrade of the Cape Leveque Road would serve to underpin the strategies which have been put in place to reinvigorate and develop the tourism industry in Broome and on the Dampier Peninsula, leading to increased visitation and revenue for local business, as well more employment opportunities for local communities on the peninsula as the number and standard of tourism product offerings continues to increase. Cygnet Bay is the largest employer on the Peninsula at the moment, and we see potential for growth both here and across the community once the correct infrastructure to support the population is in place. The benefit to the broader community should also not be underestimated. As a business owner providing staff transport from Broome to Cygnet Bay I know first-hand the wear and tear and cost associated with transport and freight along the Cape Leveque Road, and the time and safety considerations increase greatly as we get further into Wet season. In fact, we know that our freight costs from our current suppliers will approximately halve once the road upgrades are complete. In addition the ease of access to education and health opportunities will greatly increase. These considerations are shared by all residents of the Peninsula, as well as those corporate and NGO agencies who work with the communities year round. Thank you for your consideration of our submission. Yours sincerely, Cygnet Bay Sales Pty. Ltd. (ACN 008 720 634) as trustee for Cygnet Bay Pearls Unit Trust Trading as Cygnet Bay Pearls. www.cygnetbaypearls.com.au PO Box 2281 Broome WA Phone: 08 91921922 Fax: 08 91925538 [email protected] www.environskimberley.org.au December 18, 2014 Marni Baetge Environment Officer Main Roads Western Australia PMB 959 Derby WA 6728 email: [email protected] Dear Marni Main Roads Western Australia - Cape Leveque Road upgrade Thank you for the opportunity to comment. This proposal would have a significant impact on the Greater Bilby Macrotis lagotis and we recommend that substantial mitigation be implemented. Please find reasons below as to why there should be substantial mitigation. The Dampier Peninsula It is important to understand the context of the current status of mammals on the Dampier Peninsula: “A number of species have disappeared or become rare on the Peninsula since European settlement.” “Since ca. 1890 the Dampier Peninsula has been subjected to intensive pastoral management involving intensive grazing, very frequent and widespread burning and some localized clearing...” “…the activities of the pastoral industry during the last 90 years (since European Settlement) have caused changes in the environment of the Dampier Peninsula which could well have resulted in important changes in its mammal fauna.” Source: Wildlife Research Bulletin no. 11 (1983) Wildlife of the Dampier Peninsula. South West Kimberley, Western Australia 1|Page Significance of the Dampier Peninsula Greater Bilby population The Dampier Peninsula Greater Bilby population is critical to the survival of the species given that it represents the only part of their range where a population can persist without the need from intensive management. The northern edge of the Bilby distribution (Dampierland, northern edge of the Great Sandy and Tanami Deserts) is of considerable importance to the conservation of the species because it represents the only part of their range where a population can persist without the need from intensive management.1 Greater Bilby records over the 20 year period from 1971 to 1990. Records obtained from the national greater bilby database. Source: National Recovery Plan for the Greater Bilby Macrotis lagotis (Dampier Peninsula in red square). Significant impact on Matters of National Environmental Significance This proposal would threaten the Bilby through increasing the number of predators through the introduction of more domestic animals such as cats and dogs given the substantial increase in traffic that could be expected to travel a new sealed road. The addition of a sealed road in parallel with the existing dirt road will provide another corridor for predators such as foxes and feral cats. Foxes are anecdotally becoming more prevalent in the Broome area with recent sightings near the Port of Broome and a new housing estate, Broome North. Southgate. Dr R (2012) Peer review of the Browse Bilby Review, a report detailing the consolidated information relating to the occurrence of the Bilby Macrotis lagotis near the proposed Browse LNG Precinct (close to James Price Point) and more broadly on the Dampier Peninsula. 1 2|Page The exponential increase in traffic will also lead to an increase in mortality through collisions and a sealed road will mean that vehicles will travel significantly faster than they would on the dirt road thus making collisions with Bilbies less avoidable. It is likely that an increase in traffic will also lead to an increase in wildfires that would have a negative influence on Bilbies when vegetation recovers and becomes homogeneously dense over large tracts, preventing them from foraging and moving through the landscape. The sealed road is also likely to bring with it weeds which would exacerbate wildfires. Some of these threats are detailed in the National Recovery Plan for the Greater Bilby Macrotis lagotis below: 1. A potential increase in predation through creating a corridor for predators to move along “The impacts of predation may be increased by pastoral activity, mining and other development. These activities may facilitate the movement of predators (e.g. along railway corridors), provide access to water and scavenging opportunities (e.g. at rubbish dumps), and dingo/wild dog control carried out on pastoral properties and mine sites may increase the abundance of foxes and cats.”2 2. Habitat destruction and degradation resulting from mining and other development “…the location of mines adjacent to paleodrainage systems, which appear to be important habitat areas for bilbies (e.g. Paltridge & Southgate 2001), may have an impact on regional populations in the longterm…Other developments, including the recently completed Alice Springs to Darwin railway, major roads (e.g. Stuart Highway), and inland gas pipelines (Jackson to Mt Isa) occur within bilby habitat. Construction of these structures has destroyed bilby habitat and introduced a number of negative indirect consequences (see Predation above).”3 3. Road mortality “Haul roads constructed and operated during mining operations may be a significant cause of bilby mortality at a local scale because of a combination of vehicles operating on these roads throughout the night and the location of mining operations adjacent to favoured bilby habitat. Collisions with vehicles on haul roads at night have been a cause of bilby mortality in the Tanami Desert. Bilby mortalities from collisions with private vehicles have also been recorded on public roads including the Stuart Highway (NT) and Peron Peninsula, where at least 6 mortalities have been recorded (C. Simms personal communication).”4 Pavey, C. (2006). National Recovery Plan for the Greater Bilby Macrotis lagotis. Northern Territory Department of Natural Resources, Environment and the Arts. 3 Ibid. 4 Ibid. 2 3|Page The proposed sealed road could end up being a population sink for the Greater Bilby which would lead to what is arguably the most significant population of the species declining significantly and thus the species as a whole suffering significantly. Management approaches The proposal is to build a sealed road in parallel with the existing dirt road because the cost of building a sealed road on the existing alignment is prohibitively expensive because of the in-fill that would be required to raise it to a suitable height (pers. comm. Main Roads WA). Building on the existing alignment would have less of an impact on the Bilby. Given the cost saving of building on a new alignment and the increase in threat that this poses, if the proposal is approved, we believe there should be substantial, additional mitigation. We also note with concern that the provision of underpasses for Bilbies needs to be considered very carefully due to: 1. The possibility they will not be used 2. The possibility that they would become a predator sink – the proponent needs to demonstrate how underpasses would not become predator sinks We outline below what other mitigation measures could be implemented through the development of a Bilby management plan. These are (amended) recommendations5 for the development of an effective Bilby management plan on the Dampier Peninsula. Mitigation measures for the new Cape Leveque road 1. Clearly determine occupancy of the Bilby and predator species and their relationship to habitat and fire pattern. Management of threatened fauna such as the Bilby requires good information on distribution and occupancy. Low intensity in situ forms of management around a wild population are better for the conservation of a species than high intensity management on ex situ populations e.g. predator exclusion or control around a reintroduced population. 5 Southgate. Dr R (2012) Peer review of the Browse Bilby Review, a report detailing the consolidated information relating to the occurrence of the Bilby Macrotis lagotis near the proposed Browse LNG Precinct (close to James Price Point) and more broadly on the Dampier Peninsula. 4|Page A survey of bilbies and other terrestrial medium-large fauna using 2 ha track based monitoring plots (Moseby, Nano and Southgate 2009) is necessary throughout the Dampierland Bioregion. This monitoring technique enables the occurrence of a range of species to be recorded simultaneously including invasive predators and herbivores. The majority of plots need to be spaced at least 4 km apart. Multiple repeat visits to a sample plot are required to accurately determine occupancy because detection is imperfect (MacKenzie et al. 2006). Plots should be randomly located but stratified in relation to access tracks, vegetation community and fire age mapping. The relationship between the Bilby, habitat, fire age and association with other species can be determined through the application of this approach. The existing road network on Dampier Peninsula and elsewhere in the Bioregion would probably enable the sampling of a sufficient number of stratified plots to allow a robust spatial analysis. Track-based monitoring provides an opportunity for the engagement and employment of Traditional Owners. 2. Implement fire management in parts of the Dampier Peninsula to increase the spatial and temporal heterogeneity fire in the landscape. There is a reasonably strong positive association between Bilby prevalence and dietary food plants. A number of the important food plants used by the Bilby are promoted by fire and hot summer fires followed by rain are most favourable conditions for production. Large wildfires are a threat to Bilbies not from the immediate lack of cover (unlike many other species) but when vegetation recovers and becomes homogeneously dense over large tracts, preventing Bilbies from foraging and moving through the landscape. 5|Page Mapping of fire pattern in relation to Pindan shubland, woodland, open forest extent and landscape features to determine if and where persistent natural fire edge boundaries and ecotones occur. A regional fire management plan would need to include the provision to conduct hot summer fires within a proportion of the landscape each year. Monitoring for Bilby activity on these burns and those of different age burns would be important to determine the efficacy of the fire management plan. Provision would be necessary to reduce the spread of wildfires in the Dampier Peninsula through mosaic burning to augment the effect of natural fire boundaries. Reduction and control of buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris) would be important to reduce wildfire and fire age homogenisation within the landscape. Monitoring to determine the influence of tracks to service facilities including bore fields, pipe lines and electricity on fire pattern and weed dispersal. 3. Implement measures to ensure construction, development and ongoing operations do not allow predator populations to increase in abundance, particularly those of feral cats and foxes. Foxes are currently considered absent or uncommon vagrants on the Peninsula however, their range across Australia is continuing to extend northward (see reference to anecdotal evidence above) A build up of fox and feral cat numbers would have a severe negative impact on threatened species. The continued presence of dingoes is of less concern. A dingo population in low abundance is not threatening to species like the Bilby and may act to reduce the abundance of foxes and feral cats. A road network may increase predator activity within an area. Management would require ongoing predator monitoring on the Peninsula using track-based monitoring and remote camera techniques. Regular trapping to target feral cats and foxes around the sealed road. Free-standing water should be fenced or contained to prevent access by foxes and feral cats. Dingo/dogs should be tolerated unless their impact proves detrimental to target populations. Monitoring to determine the influence of tracks to service facilities including bore fields, pipelines and electricity on predator movements. Potential delivery mechanisms of a management plan - Dampierland Bilby Conservation Fund We recommend the establishment of a Dampierland Bilby Conservation Fund of $5 million through funding from Main Roads WA. This fund could be made available to groups that are currently undertaking natural resource management work in the Dampierland bioregion and would complement and significantly enhance existing on-ground work. This fund could be made available to groups that can demonstrate successful projects and ongoing work such as: Indigenous Ranger Groups NRM groups Conservation NGO’s The type of work that could be undertaken would also include an education programme which would target: Local community – flyers developed in conjunction with remote communities Schools – through a Bilby education programme Tourists – displays at local visitor centres and flyers with information on how to avoid killing Bilbies withy encouragement to support a Dampierland Bilby Conservation Fund Monitoring We recommend monitoring of underpasses for at least three years with camera traps to determine: 1. Use by native animals and/or feral animals 6|Page 2. That they do not become predator sinks i.e. places where predators learn to wait for animals to exit in order to feed on them We would welcome further discussion on any of the matters raised above. We can be contacted at 08 9192 1922 or you can contact me on 0427 548 075. Yours sincerely Martin Pritchard Executive Director 7|Page Appendix B – Response to public submissions GHD | Report for Main Roads Western Australia - Cape Leveque Road Upgrade (SLK 25 - 102.6), 61/30593 Sub No. Stakeholder Aspect Stakeholder Comments/Recommendations Summary Main Roads Response 1 Name: Willie Creek Pearls Address: PO Box 116 Broome Western Australia 6725 Contact: Paul Birch Contact title: General Manager – Operations General As a tourism operator in the local area preservation of the natural flora and fauna is of upmost importance for the future of our operations. Willie Creek Pearls would like to continue to be updated of any developments with regards to the proposed road upgrade. Main Roads will provide bi-annual updates to Willie Creek Pearls of the proposed road upgrade. Various management plans have been developed to mitigate impacts to native flora and fauna. 2 Name: Goolarabooloo Address: [email protected] Contact: Phillip Roe Contact title: Senior Law Boss and Ranger General Goolarabooloo are responsible for an area of the Dampier Peninsula associated with the body of Aboriginal Law known as the Northern Tradition, within the Goolarabooloo claim and surrounding areas. This area is known as the Song Cycle Buru. Goolarabooloo have an active ranger group who work to maintain the ecological and cultural integrity of the Song Cycle and its surrounding areas. Main Roads acknowledges the importance of working with Traditional Owner groups and Rangers when undertaking on-country environmental activities. Mitigation measures Goolarabooloo are concerned that the proposal may have a detrimental impact on the Bilby and propose that mitigation of environmental impacts include funding for: • Bilby surveys to determine the population and distribution on the Dampier Peninsula • Development of fire management plans • Development of weed management plans • Fire management • Weed control • Feral animal control • Education Main Roads has worked with the Department of Parks and Wildlife (DPaW) to produce an offset proposal that includes both direct and indirect commitments. The approach will include monitoring occupancy and abundance of Bilbies, monitoring key threatening processes on the Dampier Peninsula and initiating on-ground actions to reduce impacts to the Bilby from key threatening processes. Approximately half of the proposed funding is attributed to direct offset outcomes, which include: • Engagement with Traditional Owners to deliver training and capacity building opportunities oncountry for their land management Rangers • Assessing and monitoring threats, so appropriate management strategies can be developed • Implement management strategies to deliver on-ground outcomes (this may include management strategies for threatening processes such as fire, weed and feral animals) On-ground activities Goolarabooloo requested that any work regarding the above on their Country be undertaken in conjunction and in consultation with them. The Goolarabooloo Rangers are available to undertake fee for service work on-country. The offset proposal is currently being considered for approval by the Department of the Environment (DotE). Once the offset proposal has been approved it is proposed the program would be delivered by DPaW. DPaW would coordinate the delivery of all on-ground monitoring and threat management activities in collaboration with Traditional Owners. Where activities associated with the offset proposal are being undertaken on Goolarabooloo Country DPaW will work with the Goolarabooloo Millibinyarri Indigenous Corporation to seek the best outcome for the Bilby. General Cygnet Bay Pearl Farm is an operational pearl farm and tourism venture situated 200 km north of Broome on the Dampier Peninsula, with access via the Cape Leveque Road. The employee base at Cygnet Bay varies from 70+ people during the dry season to approximately 30 people during the wet season. For 2014 there were 5000 accommodation visitors and 9000 tickets sold for tours, not including visitors to the farm who dined at the restaurant or went to the pearl showroom without participating in any tours. While wet season tour and accommodation numbers are substantially lower than during the peak dry season, the general trend over the past five years is to see a year on year increase in visitors as our profile within the tourism industry grows. This submission focuses on the socio-economic benefits associated with the proposed upgrade of Cape Leveque Road, which should be considered as part of the project assessment. Main Roads agrees that socio-economic aspects related to the road upgrade should be considered in parallel with potential environmental impacts. Socioeconomic Tourism activities in the Dampier Peninsula area have been in a development phase over the past few years, a reaction to the increasing number of visitors to Broome who are choosing to explore the Kimberley Coast, and in preparation for the anticipated increase in numbers of tourists who desire to experience indigenous culture. Providing every visitor with the opportunity to enjoy an authentic Indigenous tourism experience is an integral component of the State Government Strategy for Tourism in Western Australia 2020, and Tourism Australia describes one of their objectives as encouraging trade to consider including a distinctive Aboriginal experience in every Australian itinerary. The Broome Tourism Strategy Group has also identified ‘high potential indigenous The focus on and importance of Tourism in Broome and Dampier Peninsular area is noted; however this is not the driving factor for the proposed road upgrade. Instead road user safety and reduced maintenance are two of the key reasons for the proposed upgrade. Main Roads acknowledges the proposed road upgrade will improve accessibility to the region, but the actual impact is difficult to predict as there as many other external factors also impacting the tourism sector. 3 Name: Cygnet Bay Pearl Farm Address: PO Box 70 Broome Western Australia 6725 Contact: James Brown Contact title: Chief Executive Officer GHD | Report for Main Roads Western Australia - Cape Leveque Road Upgrade (SLK 25 - 102.6), 61/30593 Sub No. Stakeholder Aspect Stakeholder Comments/Recommendations Summary Main Roads Response products’ as a key part of their strategy over the next three years, and cultural/historical experiences are identified as important aspects of a unique ‘Broome visitor experience’. 4 Name: Environs Kimberley Address: PO Box 2281 Broome Western Australia 6725 Contact: Martin Pritchard Contact title: Executive Director Safety / accessibility The issue of access along the Cape Leveque Road is of crucial importance to the continued development of the tourism industry in Broome and on the Dampier Peninsula, with road closures and road safety as the main concerns. In May 2013 and June 2014 there were road closures due to rain which had a big impact on locals and visitors, with people stranded in Broome and on the Peninsula. During the 2013/14 Wet season communities on the Peninsula were left without the scheduled food deliveries on three occasions due to road closures. Likewise, the road has seen a number of accidents over the past few years, with some reported fatalities. Main Roads agrees upgrades to Cape Leveque Road will improve road user safety by sealing the road. It is expected the proposed road upgrade will improve accessibility for local communities. Socioeconomic The proposed road upgrade of the Cape Leveque Road would serve to underpin the strategies which have been put in place to reinvigorate and develop the tourism industry in Broome and on the Dampier Peninsula, leading to increased visitation and revenue for local business, as well as more employment opportunities for local communities on the peninsula as the number and standard of tourism product offerings continues to increase. Cygnet Bay is the largest employer on the Peninsula at the moment, and we see potential for growth both here and across the community once the correct infrastructure to support the population is in place. The focus on and importance of tourism in Broome and Dampier Peninsular area is noted; however this is not driving factor for the proposed road upgrade. Main Roads acknowledges the proposed road upgrade will improve accessibility to the region, but the actual impact is difficult to predict as there as many other external factors also impacting the tourism sector. Socioeconomic The benefit to the broader community should also not be underestimated. As a business owner providing staff transport from Broome to Cygnet Bay I know firsthand the wear and tear and cost associated with transport and freight along the Cape Leveque Road, and the time and safety considerations increase greatly as we get further into Wet season. In fact, we know that our freight costs from our current suppliers will approximately halve once the road upgrades are complete. In addition the ease of access to education and health opportunities will greatly increase. These considerations are shared by all residents of the Peninsula, as well as those corporate and NGO agencies who work with the communities year round. Noted and agreed. Impact to Bilby This proposal would have a significant impact on the Bilby and we recommend that substantial mitigation be implemented. Main Roads accepts the proposed road upgrade may have a significant residual impact to the Bilby and has worked with DPaW to produce an offset proposal that includes both direct and indirect commitments. The proposed approach includes monitoring occupancy and abundance of Bilbies, monitoring key threatening processes on the Dampier Peninsula and initiating on-ground actions to reduce impacts to the Bilby from key threatening processes. Context It is important to understand the context of the current status of mammals on the Dampier Peninsula: “A number of species have disappeared or become rare on the Peninsula since European settlement.” “Since ca. 1890 the Dampier Peninsula has been subjected to intensive pastoral management involving intensive grazing, very frequent and widespread burning and some localized clearing...” “…the activities of the pastoral industry during the last 90 years (since European Settlement) have caused changes in the environment of the Dampier Peninsula which could well have resulted in important changes in its mammal fauna.” Noted. Significance of Bilby population The Dampier Peninsula Greater Bilby population is critical to the survival of the species given that it represents the only part of their range where a population can persist without the need from intensive management. Main Roads agrees the survival of the Bilby species is important. Various mitigation measures to reduce impact to the Bilby population have been presented in the Cape Leveque Road Upgrade Greater Bilby Management Plan (GHD October 2014). It is acknowledged these measures will not completely mitigate the impact to the Bilby and therefore Main Roads has also developed a proposal to offset the significant residual impact. Impact to Bilby This proposal would threaten the Bilby through increasing the number of predators through the introduction of more domestic animals such as cats and dogs given the substantial increase in traffic that could be expected to travel a new sealed Main Roads has committed to implementing management measures during construction to reduce the potential attraction of introduced fauna species during the construction phase of the Project. The key program objective of the offset proposal is to monitor the occupancy and abundance of GHD | Report for Main Roads Western Australia - Cape Leveque Road Upgrade (SLK 25 - 102.6), 61/30593 Sub No. Stakeholder Aspect Stakeholder Comments/Recommendations Summary Main Roads Response road. The addition of a sealed road in parallel with the existing dirt road will provide another corridor for predators such as foxes and feral cats. Bilbies as well as key threatening processes on the Dampier Peninsula, while initiating on-ground actions to reduce the impacts from key threatening processes. If introduced predators are identified as a key threat, priority will be given to implementing management activities to control introduced predators. Impact to Bilby The exponential increase in traffic will also lead to an increase in mortality through collisions and a sealed road will mean that vehicles will travel significantly faster than they would on the dirt road thus making collisions with Bilbies less avoidable. Destinations on the Dampier Peninsula such as Kooljaman, Lombadina, One Arm Point and Middle Lagoon have restricted capacity, which limits the number of tourists who can visit at any one time. Main Roads understands these destinations reach their full capacity during the dry (peak tourist) season. Main Roads and the Shire of Broome are not aware of any significant tourist developments proposed north of SLK 25 along Cape Leveque Road that would significantly increase the accommodation capacity and traffic on the Dampier Peninsula. There is no evidence to indicate the upgrade of the road will result in an exponential increase in traffic (given the restricted fixed accommodation availability on the Dampier Peninsula) or travel patterns will alter significantly (i.e. it is expected that daytime travel will remain the preference when Bilbies are not active). It is also important to note the current road during peak tourist periods is a well maintained dirt access route with speeds of 60 - 100 km/h obtainable. Although the sealed road would allow speeds of up to 110 km/h, the road conditions should also allow drivers to take evasive action to avoid collisions more safely. Main Roads accepts the proposed road upgrade may result in an increase in vehicle numbers and speeds which will increase the risk of vehicle strike over time. However, Main Roads has incorporated fauna underpasses and signage into the upgrade design in an attempt to mitigate potential impact from vehicle strikes. With the mitigation measures proposed and the existing relatively low vehicle counts for the road, the risk to Bilby population from vehicle strike is not expected to increase significantly. Impact to Bilby It is likely that an increase in traffic will also lead to an increase in wildfires that would have a negative influence on Bilbies when vegetation recovers and becomes homogeneously dense over large tracts, preventing them from foraging and moving through the landscape. The sealed road is also likely to bring with it weeds which would exacerbate wildfires. Due to the lack of weeds observed during the GHD field surveys the impact to Bilby foraging habitat and altered fire regimes is considered low during construction provided the mitigation measures outlined in the Cape Leveque Road Upgrade Greater Bilby Management Plan (GHD October 2014) and Revegetation Management Plan (GHD October 2014) are implemented. Specific weed control measures and monitoring commitments have been incorporated into the above mentioned management plans. Management approach The proposal is to build a sealed road in parallel with the existing dirt road because the cost of building a sealed road on the existing alignment is expensive due to the amount of in-fill needed. Building on the existing alignment would have less of an impact on the Bilby. Given the cost saving of building on a new alignment and the increase in threat that this poses, if the proposal is approved, we believe there should be substantial, additional mitigation. In the initial concept phase of the proposal, Main Roads considered there would be a cost saving from constructing a new alignment as opposed to sourcing and transporting fill to seal the existing dirt road. The lengthy environmental and heritage approvals process to construct a new road as opposed to sealing the existing dirt alignment has made cost savings questionable. It should be noted that to seal the existing dirt road would require sourcing a significant amount of fill material. No previously disturbed areas with suitable fill material have been identified by Main Roads. Sourcing fill material would require removal of material from an undisturbed area which would involve clearing of vegetation and subsequent impact to flora and fauna. Therefore, impact to the environment and associated flora and fauna would result from either constructing a new alignment or sealing the existing alignment. Construction of a table drain parallel to the alignment (whether a new alignment is being constructed or the existing alignment is being sealed) is necessary to divert water. Construction of a new alignment allows half the redundant alignment to be established as a table drain. Where the existing alignment was to be sealed, Main Roads would still be required to clear 10 m width approx. for the length of proposed road works (77.6 km) to construct the table drain. It is acknowledged the mitigation measures and revegetation works are unlikely to completely mitigate the impact to the Bilby and therefore Main Roads has also developed a proposal to offset the significant residual impact. Main Roads has worked with DPaW to produce an offset proposal that includes both direct and indirect commitments. Through consultation with DotE the initial offset proposal was revised substantially to contribute more funds to direct on-ground commitments. Management approach The proposed incorporation of underpasses should be considered carefully due to the possibility they will not be used by the Bilby and the possibility they would become a predator sink. Main Roads proposed the incorporation of underpasses into the road design to mitigate potential impacts to the Bilby through vehicle strike and barrier effects. It is acknowledged that Main Roads or its consultant was not able to identify any published studies GHD | Report for Main Roads Western Australia - Cape Leveque Road Upgrade (SLK 25 - 102.6), 61/30593 Sub No. Stakeholder Aspect Stakeholder Comments/Recommendations Summary Main Roads Response Underpasses should be monitored for at least three years with camera traps to determine use by native or feral animals and that they do not become predator sinks. assessing the use of culverts (underpasses) by Bilbies. Specific Bilby culverts have been incorporated into the construction of infrastructure in the Pilbara region (FerrAus 2011), but no assessment of use has been undertaken. Most culvert examples are restricted to southern Australia for Southern Brown Bandicoots (Ecologia-Environmental-Consultants 1995, Harris, et al 2010, Chambers and Bencini 2013), where all studies show use by the species. Since Bandicoots are closely related to Bilbys (both members of the Peramelidae family) it is conceivable that similar use of culverts by both the Bandicoot and Bilby can be predicted. Harris et al (2010) recorded predation by foxes at culverts on Southern Brown Bandicoots along the Roe Highway, however these culverts were fenced creating a funnelling effect into the culvert. This allowed foxes to patrol the openings of the culverts where wildlife is concentrated. The fencing was undertaken because of the high risk of road fatality on a heavy use highway. It is not proposed the culverts on Cape Leveque Road will be fenced, allowing fauna and Bilbies to utilise the culverts at will, reducing any opportunistic predation by feral predators. It is acknowledged the lack of fencing may reduce the use of the underpasses. Harris and Bamford (2011) undertook a review of all underpass literature in Australia and concluded that insufficient data was available to determine that feral species utilised culverts as a regular food source. However they do state that predation was recorded at culverts and that predators will utilise culverts for movements within the environment where predation may occur. Within the Cape Leveque Road Upgrade Greater Bilby Management Plan (GHD October 2014) Main Roads has made a commitment to conduct Bilby surveys annually for 5 years to assess the level of use of the fauna underpasses and the presence of Bilbies near the upgraded road. Mitigation measures It is recommended that occupancy of the Bilby and predators in relationship to habitat and fire patterns be implemented through the development of a Bilby management plan. Management of threatened fauna (Bilby) requires information on distribution and occupancy. Low intensity in situ management forms around wild populations are better for the conservation of a species than high intensity management on ex situ populations e.g. predator exclusion or control around a reintroduced population. A survey method that employs a 2 ha track based monitoring plots, with multiple repeats was proposed. The Cape Leveque Road Upgrade Greater Bilby Management Plan (GHD October 2014) has been developed for the proposed road upgrade to reduce the impact to the local Bilby population. The plan outlines mitigation and management measures to address the impacts from the proposed road upgrade during the design, construction and post- construction phases. Main Roads agrees research into Bilby occupancy and key threatening processes (such as predators and fire) is important in order to effectively implement on-ground monitoring and threat management for the Bilby population across the Dampier Peninsula. However, these threatening processes are not exclusively linked to the proposed upgrade of Cape Leveque Road. Official records of Bilbies from the Dampier Peninsula are limited and spatially constrained to the main road and proposed industrial development sites with the remainder being historical records. Stakeholders and State government environmental agencies appear to agree that additional research is required to inform regional management approaches. Main Roads has worked with DPaW to produce an offset proposal that includes both direct and indirect commitments. The offset proposal includes monitoring occupancy and abundance of Bilbies; and monitoring key threatening processes on the Dampier Peninsula (Project 1 of the offset proposal) consistent with that proposed by Southgate and Environs Kimberley submission. A two-pronged approach is proposed, namely: • Plot surveys: An array of 2 hectare plots focussed on likely Bilby habitat across the Dampier Peninsula will be surveyed for sign of Bilbies (tracks, diggings, burrows, scats) and introduced predators (tracks, scats). Habitat characteristics, fire history and grazing pressure will also be recorded. Traditional Owner Ranger Teams employed through this program would be heavily involved in the plot surveys. • Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) survey: Areas that are inaccessible to on ground plots will be surveyed using RPA to detect the presence/absence of Bilby burrows using live-feed video imagery. Live-feed video imagery negates the need for lengthy post-processing, and provides immediate on-ground results. Mitigation measures Implement fire management in parts of the Dampier Peninsula to increase the spatial and temporal heterogeneity fire in the landscape. • Mapping of fire pattern in relation to vegetation and landscape features to determine if/where persistent natural fire edge boundaries and ecotones occur. • Regional fire management plan including the provision to conduct hot summer fires • Monitor Bilby activity at these burns and different age burns to determine efficacy of fire management plan Main Roads agrees research into key threatening processes such as fire management is important in order to effectively implement on-ground management for the Bilby population across the Dampier Peninsula. However, these threatening processes are not exclusively linked to the proposed upgrade of Cape Leveque Road, nor should Main Roads be solely responsible for this research or on-ground management. Based on discussion with DPaW, informed by the current and new draft Bilby recovery plan, there is still a requirement to better understand the threats to Bilby populations, the role of introduced predators and fire management as a threatening process and what cost-effective strategies can GHD | Report for Main Roads Western Australia - Cape Leveque Road Upgrade (SLK 25 - 102.6), 61/30593 Sub No. Stakeholder Aspect Stakeholder Comments/Recommendations Summary Main Roads Response • Reduction and control of buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliarisl) • Monitoring to determine influence of tracks to service facilities (bore field, pipeline, electricity) on fire pattern and weed dispersal be implemented to manage these threats. At this stage three possible management activities have been identified in the offset proposal (Project 3 of the offset proposal), these being introduced predator control, fire management and stock grazing pressure. It would therefore be premature to implement on-ground management actions (Project 3), without having implemented Projects 1 and 2 of the offset proposal. The offset proposal is currently being considered for approval by DotE. Once approved it is proposed the program would be delivered by DPaW. DPaW would coordinate the delivery of all on-ground monitoring and threat management activities. If fire management is found to be the most significant threatening process it is proposed this will be implemented. Mitigation measures Implement measures to ensure predator numbers do not increase through development and ongoing operations. • Ongoing predator monitoring (track based & remote camera) • Regular trapping • Free-standing water to be fenced to prevent predator access • Dingo/dogs tolerated unless impacts are detrimental • Monitoring to determine influence of tracks to service facilities (bore field, pipeline, electricity) on predator movements Based on discussion with DPaW, informed by the current and new draft Bilby recovery plan, there is still a requirement to better understand the threats to Bilby populations, the role of introduced predators and fire management as a threatening process and what cost-effective strategies can be implemented to manage these threats. At this stage three possible management activities have been identified in the offset proposal (Project 3 of the offset proposal), these being introduced predator control, fire management and stock grazing pressure. It would therefore be premature to implement on-ground management actions (Project 3) focusing on predators, without having implemented Projects 1 and 2 of the offset proposal. The offset proposal is currently being considered for approval by DotE. Once approved it is proposed the program would be delivered by DPaW. DPaW would coordinate the delivery of all on-ground monitoring and threat management activities. Delivery of management plan Establish Dampierland Bilby Conservation Fund of $5 million from Main Roads WA funding. Available to natural resource management groups working in the bioregion and education programs. Main Roads generally supports the need for research into key threatening processes and effective targeted on-ground management for the Bilby population across the Dampier Peninsula. Main Roads has worked with DPaW to produce an offset proposal that includes both direct and indirect commitments. Through consultation with DotE the initial offset proposal was revised substantially to contribute more funds to direct on-ground commitments. Main Roads believes this revised proposal as presented is a reasonable offset for the significant residual impacts predicted to the Bilby from this proposed road upgrade. Chambers, B and Bencini, R 2013, The Factors Affecting the Use of Fauna Underpasses by Quenda and Bobtail Lizards. Report to Main Roads Western Australia, October 2013. Ecologia-Environmental-Consultants 1995, Kwinana Freeway Wildlife Underpass Study Fauna Monitoring Program - Report to Main Roads Western Australia. FerrAus 2011, Report to support assessment under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, Referral 2011/6036. FerrAus Pilbara Project, Preliminary Documentation, Harris, I. M., Mills, H. R. and Bencini, R 2010, Multiple individual southern brown bandicoots (Isoodon obesulus fusciventer) and foxes (Vulpes vulpes) use underpasses installed at a new highway in Perth, Western Australia. Wildlife Research 37, pp.127–133. Harris, I and Bamford, M 2011, Roads and Wildlife; A Review of Purpose-Built Fauna Underpasses. Bamford Consulting Ecologists prepared for: City of Armadale, 10th July 2011 GHD | Report for Main Roads Western Australia - Cape Leveque Road Upgrade (SLK 25 - 102.6), 61/30593 Appendix C - Advice from van Leeuwen and Southgate GHD | Report for Main Roads Western Australia - Cape Leveque Road Upgrade (SLK 25 - 102.6), 61/30593 Stephen van Leeuwen’s e-mail (extract) to DotE From: Van Leeuwen, Stephen [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, 13 January 2015 12:13 PM To: Kuntsi, Matthew Subject: RE: Further advice on Greater Bilby impacts and mitigation [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Matthew … In respect to your questions I provide the following comments: 1. The road sealing project in the Pilbara was about 20 -25 years ago. It was the sealing of part of the access road between Nimingarra Ridge (mine) and Shay Gap (townsite). Sealing meant that traffic speed increased, especially at night. I don’t actually think it was a vehicle movement or increase in vehicle numbers impact as mine vehicle used the road irrespective of whether it was sealed or not as it was the only link between the mine and the town. I think it was because vehicle speeds increased, or at least the ability to travel faster increased especially at night (no more corrugations!). Coincidentally there was an increase in the reported number of bilbies killed on the road after it was sealed. In the mid-90s a team from our Department went to the Nimingarra area to investigate this population of Bilbies with a plan to relocate some to a captive breeding colony in Broome however I don’t think this happened as numbers were too low. A check of the population 12 months later found no animals at all and to my knowledge several checks in the area over the past two decades have not identified any active colonies. 2. I can’t see how culverts on the Cape Leveque Road will have any benefit for Bilby as the road will not be built up on a large/high embankment and thus will not be an impediment to bilby movements. Given the final landform or design of the road will be similar to the surrounding landscape to ensure bilbies use a culvert system to cross the road would require many kilometres of fencing to direct animals to dedicated crossing points. Such fencing would obviously impact on the movement of other animals, and would be a logistical and financial millstone to maintain given fires, cyclones and perhaps damage by livestock such as cattle and/or ferals such as camels. The fence itself is also an expensive exercise as it would require a buried skirt to prevent bilbies and other animals from digging under it and thus compromising the integrity of the whole mitigation strategy. Directing bilbies and consequently other animals to culverts as crossing points may also increase predation risks as has been demonstrated for southern brown bandicoots on the Forest highway south of Perth. The culvert crossings became a favourite place for foxes to wait in ambush for unsuspecting bandicoots and possums. I have attached three papers (one is a review) dealing with fauna underpasses, their design, utility and management effectiveness which may be of interest and informative to your deliberations. 3. I think the biggest risk to the bilby population along the road will be an increase in vehicle speed particularly at night when bilbies are active which will result in a higher incidence of collisions. Yes vehicle movement will also increase, especially during the tourist season and some of this will be at night. An increase in vehicle movements at night may also increase the potential take of bilbies by traditional owners as they are likely to encounter more animals along the road because they are travelling faster in their vehicles. Not sure what mitigation strategies will be successful at reducing speed as the area is somewhat remote and I suspect at night most vehicle will be travelling in excess of 80km/hr. Signage, speed bumps, etc may slow some GHD | Report for Main Roads Western Australia - Cape Leveque Road Upgrade (SLK 25 - 102.6), 61/30593 but unlikely to have a significant impact and perhaps more importantly a long term impact on driver behaviour. At the end of the day I think the upgrading of the Cape Leveque road will result in an increase in the take of bilbies as a result of collisions with vehicles and this take may even result in the local extinct of the population. However what I believe is more important is the size of this local populations, how it is coping with existing pressures and how it will respond to another threat. I suspect the population will probably move away as its habitat changes. In the Pilbara we have seen the on-mass movement of two populations following a fire which burnt out the population and its preferred habitat. Hope these comments are useful Regards Stephen Dr Stephen van Leeuwen Science Partnerships Manager Keiran McNamara Conservation Science Centre Science & Conservation Division Department of Parks and Wildlife Postal Address: Locked Bag 104, BENTLEY DELIVERY CENTRE WA 6983 Street Address: Room 2.44, 17 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151 Phone: +61 8 9219 9042 Fax: +61 8 9334 0135 Mobile: 0438 757 556 Email: [email protected] Discussion with Dr Rick Southgate re: Greater Bilbies at the Dampier Peninsula (16/01/15) The document prepared by GHD for the Cape Leveque Road Upgrade project indicates that GBs are broadly distributed throughout the Dampier Peninsula. The Dampier Peninsula and northern edges of the Great Sandy and Tanami Deserts is described as very important for GB habitat largely due to the low levels of rabbits, foxes and pastoralism in this area. A clear understanding of GB distribution on the Dampier Peninsula is uncertain, but it is suggested that it is a scattered population in low densities and that GBs are likely to be quite mobile throughout the area as they move to find better quality habitat such as recently burnt areas and thus have relatively low site fidelity. The detectability of the species is also low due its cryptic nature and behaviour. Sign of the species’ presence (eg. digging, burrows and tracks) is easier to detect rather than the species itself. The relative scarcity and low site fidelity makes GBs challenging to monitor in the area. Many sites need to be monitored with repeat visits to determine robust estimates of detectability and occupancy. One can’t monitor a few sites over time to adequately monitor the species. The impact of roads on GB’s is not conclusively known. However, it is known that road verges can attract certain species by, amongst other factors, providing landforms that pool water and GHD | Report for Main Roads Western Australia - Cape Leveque Road Upgrade (SLK 25 - 102.6), 61/30593 by disturbing earth in a manner that produces flora and fauna that provide foraging opportunities for the species. It is not known whether the road kill mortality of GB individuals could affect the viability of a population without more baseline data. Determining whether GBs are concentrated along roadways relative to non-road ways in the region would be required plus an estimation of relative mortality in each situation. One way to mitigate against mortality from GBs using the roadside verges and crossing the road, may be to make habitat elsewhere in the region more attractive to GBs possibly through fire management. It is possible that the direct impact of road kill mortality on GBs in the region will be less than the broader scale impacts of brought about by upgrading the road. Improved road quality and will probably result in expansion of tourism and pastoralism infrastructure and this in turn will increase the availability and accessibility of permanent water and increased predator and cattle abundance which will negatively impact of the on the GB population in the region. Fire management is identified as probably the most effective broad-scale means currently available to improve habitat for GBs. However, it is uncertain how GBs respond to fire in the region of the Dampier Peninsula compared to other areas. Example provided that trials conducted in the Tanami Desert found that GB populations in the northern area (where fire was frequent eg. every 3-10 yrs) displayed a positive association with recently burnt areas while those in the central Tanami (where fire was infrequent eg. every 10-30 yrs) did not. In order to better understand the requirements of the GB population on the Dampier Peninsula, the focus should be on identifying where GBs occur, particularly young as this is an indicator of suitable breeding habitat. It is key to determine distribution and occupancy of the Damper Peninsula GB population so as to implement effective adaptive management. Research conducted in the Pilbara region may not be particularly comparable/adaptable to the Dampier Peninsular landscape as the vegetation structure, soils etc. are quite different. It is suggested that an aerial survey to search for digging and burrow sign, coupled with 2 ha plot surveyed on the ground to validate observations would be the most effective means to determine GB distribution and occupancy. The 2 ha plot survey technique has been and is being used quite widely in the Tanami, Little Sandy and Great Sandy Deserts, often with good results. Better access, consolidation and interpretation of these data would provide information to assess the importance of the Dampier Peninsula for conservation of the GB. GHD | Report for Main Roads Western Australia - Cape Leveque Road Upgrade (SLK 25 - 102.6), 61/30593 Appendix D - Response to advice from van Leeuwen and Southgate GHD | Report for Main Roads Western Australia - Cape Leveque Road Upgrade (SLK 25 - 102.6), 61/30593 Sub No. Separate advice to DotE Aspect Stakeholder Comments/Recommendations Summary Main Roads Response 1 Name: Dr Stephen van Leeuwen Previous road sealing project results Sealing part of the access road between Nimingarra Ridge (mine) and Shay Gap (townsite) allowed for an increase in traffic speed, including at night. It was thought that the sealing of the road did not alter vehicle movement or increase vehicle numbers as mine vehicles used the road as the only link between the mine and the town. Coincidentally there was an increase in the reported number of bilbies killed on the road after it was sealed. In the mid-90s the Bilby population was investigated with a plan to relocate some to a captive breeding colony in Broome however I don’t think this happened as numbers were too low. A check of the population 12 months later found no animals at all and to my knowledge several checks in the area over the past two decades have not identified any active colonies. Main Roads accepts the proposed road upgrade may result in an increase in vehicle numbers and speeds which could potentially increase the risk of vehicle strike over time. Main Roads has incorporated fauna underpasses and signage into the upgrade design in an attempt to mitigate potential impact from vehicle strikes. With the mitigation measures proposed and the existing relatively low vehicle counts for the road, Main Roads believes the risk to the Bilby population from vehicle strike is not expected to increase significantly. Within the Cape Leveque Road Upgrade Greater Bilby Management Plan (GHD October 2014) Main Roads has made a commitment to conduct Bilby surveys annually for 5 years to assess the level of use of the fauna underpasses and the presence of Bilbies near the upgraded road. Efficacy of underpasses/ culverts It was not evident how culverts on the Cape Leveque Road would benefit the Bilby as the road will not be built up on a large/high embankment and thus will not be an impediment to Bilby movements. To ensure Bilbies use a culvert system to cross the road would require many kilometres of fencing to direct animals to dedicated crossing points. Such fencing would impact on the movement of other animals, and would be a logistical and financial millstone to maintain given fires, cyclones and perhaps damage by livestock and/or ferals. The fence itself is also an expensive exercise as it would require a buried skirt to prevent Bilbies and other animals from digging under it and thus compromising the integrity of the whole mitigation strategy. Directing Bilbies and consequently other animals to culverts as crossing points may also increase predation risks as has been demonstrated for southern brown bandicoots on the Forest highway south of Perth. Main Roads proposed the incorporation of underpasses into the road design to mitigate potential impacts to the Bilby through vehicle strike and barrier effects. It is acknowledged that Main Roads or its consultant (GHD) was not able to identify any published studies assessing the use of culverts (underpasses) by Bilbies. Specific Bilby culverts have been incorporated into the construction of infrastructure in the Pilbara region (FerrAus 2011), but no assessment of use has been undertaken. Most culvert examples are restricted to southern Australia for Southern Brown Bandicoots (Ecologia-Environmental-Consultants 1995, Harris, et al 2010, Chambers and Bencini 2013), where all studies show use by the species. Since Bandicoots are closely related to Bilbys (both members of the Peramelidae family) it is conceivable that similar use of culverts by both the Bandicoot and Bilby can be predicted. Harris et al (2010) recorded predation by foxes at culverts on Southern Brown Bandicoots along the Roe Highway, however these culverts were fenced creating a funnelling effect into the culvert. This allowed foxes to patrol the openings of the culverts where wildlife is concentrated. The fencing was undertaken because of the high risk of road fatality on a heavy use highway. It is not proposed the culverts on Cape Leveque Road will be fenced, allowing fauna and Bilbies to utilise the culverts at will, reducing any opportunistic predation by feral predators. The incorporation of fencing would also introduce a significant barrier effect. It is acknowledged the lack of fencing may reduce the use of the underpasses. Harris and Bamford (2011) undertook a review of all underpass literature in Australia and concluded that insufficient data was available to determine that feral species utilised culverts as a regular food source. However they do state that predation was recorded at culverts and that predators will utilise culverts for movements within the environment where predation may occur. Within the Cape Leveque Road Upgrade Greater Bilby Management Plan (GHD October 2014) Main Roads has made a commitment to conduct Bilby surveys annually for 5 years to assess the level of use of the fauna underpasses and the presence of Bilbies near the upgraded road. Five years was proposed so that survey results can account for temporal and spatial shifts in population demographics. Impact to Bilby It is Stephen van Leeuwen’s opinion that the biggest risk to the Bilby population along the road will be an increase in vehicle speed particularly at night when Bilbies are active which will result in a higher incidence of collisions. It is also his opinion that vehicle movement will increase, especially during the tourist season and some of this will be at night. An increase in vehicle movements at night may also increase the potential take of Bilbies by traditional owners as they are likely to encounter more animals along the road because they are travelling faster in their vehicles. Stephen van Leeuwen is not sure what mitigation strategies will be successful at reducing speed as the area is remote and suspects at night most vehicle will be travelling in excess of 80km/hr. Signage, speed bumps, etc may slow some vehicles but this is unlikely to have a significant impact or alter longer term driver behaviour. The most recent vehicle count data indicates there is currently limited night time vehicle movement along Cape Leveque Road. The vehicle count data shows approximately 10 nocturnal vehicle movements over a week period (approximately 1.5 vehicles per night) with little variation between peak and non-peak periods. Main Roads acknowledges the sealed road would allow speeds of up to 110 km/h, however the road conditions should also allow drivers to take evasive action to avoid collisions more safely, including at night. Consistent with this comment from Stephen van Leeuwen, there are no additional practical design measures available to slow vehicle speeds to mitigate vehicle strike, without introducing additional adverse impacts (e.g. fencing and barrier impacts). GHD | Report for Main Roads Western Australia - Cape Leveque Road Upgrade (SLK 25 - 102.6), 61/30593 Sub No. 2 Separate advice to DotE Name: Dr Rick Southgate Aspect Stakeholder Comments/Recommendations Summary Main Roads Response Conclusion It is Stephen van Leeuwen’s opinion the upgrading of the Cape Leveque Road will result in an increase in the take of Bilbies as a result of collisions with vehicles and this take may even result in the local extinction of the population. However what is believed to be more important is the size of this local population, how it is coping with existing pressures and how it will respond to another threat. Stephen van Leeuwen suspects the population will probably move away as its habitat changes. This has been observed in the Pilbara where two populations have on-mass relocated following a fire which burnt out the population and its preferred habitat. Main Roads accepts the proposed road upgrade may have a significant residual impact to the Bilby, even after the mitigation measures proposed are implemented. Main Roads has worked with DPaW (and specifically Stephen van Leeuwen) to produce an offset proposal that includes both direct and indirect commitments in response to these residual impacts. The proposed approach includes monitoring occupancy and abundance of the Bilby, monitoring key threatening processes on the Dampier Peninsula (which based on Stephen van Leeuwen should include the road) and initiating on-ground actions to reduce impacts to the Bilby from key threatening processes. General Clear understanding of Bilby distribution on the Dampier Peninsula is uncertain, but it is suggested that it is a scattered population in low densities and that the species is quite mobile throughout the area as they move to find better quality habitat such as recently burnt areas and thus have relatively low site fidelity. The detectability of the species is also low due to its cryptic nature and behaviour. Sign of the species’ presence (eg. digging, burrows and tracks) is easier to detect rather than the species itself. Noted and agreed. Monitoring Issues Relative scarcity and low site fidelity makes monitoring Bilbies difficult. Sites need repeat visits to determine robust estimates of detectability and occupancy. Main Roads has worked closely with the Department of Parks and Wildlife (DPaW) staff (including Stephen van Leeuwen) to produce an offset proposal that includes both direct and indirect commitments. A key aspect of this proposal includes monitoring occupancy and abundance of Bilbies on the Dampier Peninsula, which includes repeat site visits to assist with determining occupancy. It is anticipated that learnings from the Pilbara work, of which DPaW are an important participant, will inform the monitoring methods employed as part of the offset proposal. Road impacts The impact of roads on the Bilby is not conclusively known. There is evidence that road verges can produce favourable landforms (pooling water and foraging opportunities) which can attract certain species. It is not known whether the road kill mortality of Bilby individuals could affect the viability of a population without more baseline data. Determining whether Bilbies are concentrated along roadways relative to non-road ways in the region would be required plus an estimation of relative mortality in each situation. A possible mitigation measure may be to make habitat more attractive elsewhere in the region through fire management. It is possible that direct impact of road kill mortality will be less than broader scale impact from upgrading the road. An improved road will probably result in increased tourism, pastoralism, infrastructure increasing accessibility of water, predator and cattle abundance which will negatively impact Bilby populations. Main Roads accepts the impact of roads on the Bilby is not conclusively known and there are potential external factors which may result in confounding findings. The offset measures proposed for this Project include monitoring key threatening processes on the Dampier Peninsula and initiating on-ground actions to reduce impacts to the Bilby from key threatening processes. The impact of the road upgrade on the Bilby will be considered as part of this suite of actions. Fire Management Fire management is probably the most effective broad scale means to improve habitat for Bilbies. However, there is uncertainty how Bilbies on the Dampier Peninsula will respond to fire compared to populations in other areas. Trials in the Tanami Desert resulted in variable results depending on region and fire frequency. Based on discussion with DPaW, informed by the current and new draft Bilby recovery plan, there is still a requirement to better understand the threats to Bilby populations, the role of introduced predators and fire management as a threatening process and what cost-effective strategies can be implemented to manage these threats. At this stage three possible management activities have been identified in the offset proposal (Project 3 of the offset proposal), these being introduced predator control, fire management and stock grazing pressure. Main Roads suggests it would therefore be premature to implement on-ground management solely focused on fire management (Project 3), without having implemented Projects 1 and 2 of the offset proposal (defining the area of occupancy and population monitoring). Recommendations Focus should be on identifying where Bilbies occur, particularly young as this is an indicator of suitable breeding habitat. It is key to determine distribution and occupancy of the Dampier Peninsula Bilby population so as to implement effective adaptive management. Research conducted in the Pilbara region may not be particularly comparable/adaptable to the Dampier Peninsular due to differences in landscape. It is suggested that an aerial survey to search for digging and burrow sign, coupled with 2 ha plot ground surveys to validate Agreed and noted. This recommendation is consistent with the approach detailed in the offset proposal. A key aspect of the offset proposal includes monitoring occupancy and abundance of Bilbies on the Dampier Peninsula. A two-pronged approach is proposed, namely: • Plot surveys: An array of 2 hectare plots focussed on likely Bilby habitat across the Dampier Peninsula will be surveyed for sign of Bilbies (tracks, diggings, burrows, scats) and introduced predators (tracks, scats). Habitat characteristics, fire history and grazing pressure will also be recorded. Traditional Owner Ranger Teams employed through this program would be heavily involved in the plot surveys. • Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) survey: Areas that are inaccessible to on ground plots will be surveyed GHD | Report for Main Roads Western Australia - Cape Leveque Road Upgrade (SLK 25 - 102.6), 61/30593 Sub No. Separate advice to DotE Aspect Stakeholder Comments/Recommendations Summary observations would be the most effective means to determine Bilby distribution and occupancy. Main Roads Response using RPA to detect the presence/absence of Bilby burrows using live-feed video imagery. Live-feed video imagery negates the need for lengthy post-processing, and provides immediate on-ground results. Chambers, B and Bencini, R 2013, The Factors Affecting the Use of Fauna Underpasses by Quenda and Bobtail Lizards. Report to Main Roads Western Australia, October 2013. Ecologia-Environmental-Consultants 1995, Kwinana Freeway Wildlife Underpass Study Fauna Monitoring Program - Report to Main Roads Western Australia. FerrAus 2011, Report to support assessment under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, Referral 2011/6036. FerrAus Pilbara Project, Preliminary Documentation, Harris, I. M., Mills, H. R. and Bencini, R 2010, Multiple individual southern brown bandicoots (Isoodon obesulus fusciventer) and foxes (Vulpes vulpes) use underpasses installed at a new highway in Perth, Western Australia. Wildlife Research 37, pp.127–133. Harris, I and Bamford, M 2011, Roads and Wildlife; A Review of Purpose-Built Fauna Underpasses. Bamford Consulting Ecologists prepared for: City of Armadale, 10th July 2011 GHD | Report for Main Roads Western Australia - Cape Leveque Road Upgrade (SLK 25 - 102.6), 61/30593 GHD GHD House, 239 Adelaide Tce. Perth, WA 6004 P.O. Box 3106, Perth WA 6832 T: 61 8 6222 8222 F: 61 8 6222 8555 E: [email protected] © GHD 2015 This document is and shall remain the property of GHD. The document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Terms of Engagement for the commission. Unauthorised use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited. G:\61\30593\WP\148262.docx Document Status Rev No. Author Reviewer Name 0 D Farrar 1 2 Approved for Issue Name Signature Date C Grabham D Farrar 18/02/2015 D Farrar C Grabham D Farrar 03/03/2015 C Grabham D Farrar D Farrar 04/03/2015 Signature www.ghd.com
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz