Domain 6: Great leaders who
individually and collectively can make a
real difference
Version 18| Internal Use Only
1
© Ipsos MORI
11-058203-01 Version 14 | Internal Use Only
Domain 6: Summary
Criteria 6.2A. Systems in place to sustain two-way accountability between members.
Base
How well, if at all, do you understand your responsibilities as a member practice, as
set out in Barking and Dagenham CCG's constitution?
90% (27) very/fairly well
All member
practices (30)
How well, if at all, do you understand the responsibilities of Barking and Dagenham
CCG's governing body towards you as a member practice, as set out in Barking and
Dagenham CCG's constitution?
80% (24) very/fairly well
All member
practices (30)
How, confident are you, if at all, in the systems to sustain two-way accountability
between the CCG and its member practices in Barking and Dagenham CCG?
73% (22) very/fairly
confident
All member
practices (30)
Are there clear arrangements in place for the delegation of functions within Barking
and Dagenham CCG, at the point of authorisation, or not?
73% (22) there are
arrangements
All member
practices (30)
How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the arrangements in place for the
delegation of functions within Barking and Dagenham CCG?
68% (15) very/fairly
satisfied
All member
practices where
arrangements are
in place (22)
Criteria 6.4C. Documented support of members for Chair of governing body.
How confident are you, if at all, in the leadership provided by the Designate Chair of
Barking and Dagenham CCG's governing body?
Base
73% (22) very/fairly
confident
All member
practices (30)
2
© Ipsos MORI
11-058203-01 Version 14 | Internal Use Only
Domain 6: Summary
• Views of governance structures within Barking and Dagenham CCG are very positive.
• Nine in ten member practices report a good understanding of their own responsibilities under the
CCG’s constitution, and four in five say they understand the responsibilities of the governing body
towards them.
• Similarly, three in four are confident in the systems to maintain two-way accountability. All these
findings appear to be better than the respective Wave 4 norms.
• The majority of member practices also say that arrangements are in place for the delegation of
functions within the CCG and those aware of them tend to be satisfied with them.
• Almost three in four member practices are confident in the leadership provided by the Designate Chair
of Barking and Dagenham CCG’s governing body, in line with the average across all Wave 4 CCGs.
This work was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the international quality standard for market research, ISO 20252:2006 and with the Ipsos MORI
Terms and Conditions which can be found here
3
© Ipsos MORI
11-058203-01 Version 14 | Internal Use Only