Western Oil Shale Has a High Mercury Content •Up to 5x the amount in western coal per BTU Goal: Determine the mercury content and disposition in Western Oil Shale Funding: Department of Energy – Cooperative Agreement: DE-FC26-98FT40323, Base Task 2H0 Background Experimental Design • Oil Shale, as a mineral, has all of the potential environmental issues with processing as other minerals • Mercury contamination in fuel sources has become an environmental focus in recent years • How do the mercury issues with oil shale compare to that of coal? • Oil shale samples were obtained from Wyoming, Colorado, and Utah • The shale was milled to a size of 200mesh • 100-gram samples were heated under an inert atmosphere – the vapor was analyzed for mercury concentration Objectives • Measure the mercury content of various western oil shales • Determine the disposition of the mercury during thermal processing • Compare the results to similar data for coal Mercury Emissions from Coal and Oil Shale Combustion Mercury Content Heating Value (µg/kg) (Btu/lb) Mercury (mg/MM Btu) PRB Coal 150 9000 7.6 Wyoming Oil Shale 98 1275 34.9 Utah Oil Shale 80 2521 14.4 Colorado Oil Shale 59 1741 15.4 The Mercury Vaporizes Quickly When Heated 1000 500 800 400 600 300 400 200 200 100 0 Test Results: 200°C Desorption Oven Temp (deg C) Hg Conc (ug/Nm3) •80% of the Mercury is Removed at 300oC •Much of the mercury entrains in the vapor phase 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 Test Time (hours) Hg data 103.6 g Final Sample Mass 101.4 g Mass Reduction 3.3 % Initial Mercury Content 98 µg/kg 0 0.0 Initial Sample Mass Temp data Final Mercury Content 72 µg/kg Mercury Liberated 28 % 100.2 g Final Sample Mass 96.9 g Mass Reduction 3.4 % 1000 500 800 400 600 300 400 200 200 100 Initial Mercury Content 98 µg/kg 0 Mercury Liberated 0 0.0 Final Mercury Content 18 µg/kg Oven Temp (deg C) Initial Sample Mass Hg Conc (ug/Nm3) Test Results: 300°C Desorption 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 Test Time (hours) 82 % Hg data Temp data 500 800 400 600 300 400 200 200 100 0 Oven Temp (deg C) Hg Conc (ug/Nm3) Test Results: 450°C Desorption 1000 Initial Sample Mass 101.9 g Final Sample Mass 93.0 g Mass Reduction 8.7 % Initial Mercury Content 98 µg/kg Final Mercury Content <10 µg/kg Mercury Liberated >91 % 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Test Time (hours) Hg data Temp data There May Be a Solution Summary: Most of the mercury present in oil shale will be liberated during thermal processing. Depending on conditions, the mercury could be released in multiple chemical states. There may be an off-the-shelf commercial solution. •Vapor Phase Oxidized Mercury (Hg2+) •Sorbent Technologies •Activated Carbon (Impregnated, Thief Carbon, Activated Char) •Metal Oxide Ceramics (Cobalt-Alumina, Chromium-Alumina) •Vapor Phase Reduced Mercury (Hg0) •Sorbent Technologies •Amended Silicates •Aqueous Mercury (Hg2+) •Water Treatment Technologies •Chemical Leaching, Precipitation, Amalgamation •Hydrocarbon Phase Mercury (Hg0) •Sorbent Technologies •Amended Silicates
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz