BY PHILIPPA KELLY, RESIDENT/PRODUCTION DRAMATURG ”O, take the sense, sweet, of my innocence!“ says the devoted young lover, Lysander, to Hermia. “Love takes the meaning in love’s conference... by your side no bed-room me deny—for lying so, Hermia, I do not lie.“ In Lysander’s lines above, the playwright displays his fascination with wordplay (as well as his acumen for coinage—this is the first recorded approximation of the word we now know as “bedroom”). Our words are all too easily misconstrued; and yet how often do we end up depending on words, these untrustworthy emissaries of intention, because actions are even less reliable! Misunderstanding is the key to the intense and often hilarious dramatic action in A Midsummer Night’s Dream. “Lord what fools these mortals be,“ says Puck. Mortals might not always be fools—but foolishness is mortal, and as we laugh at the characters in this play, we can’t help laughing at ourselves, at the reveries we take as real and the “reality” that all too quickly seems like a dream. The complications of A Midsummer Night’s Dream all take place in the forest. It is no coincidence that the play was written at the heart of a demographic transformation. Young people were moving from the country to the city to fill the employment gaps that had opened as the plague wreaked havoc on a closely-packed urban population. As the cities expanded, food prices doubled and tripled; and at the same time enclosure laws were passed, meaning that farmers could no longer freely graze their herds on common land. People looked to the forest and the woodlands as a source of nostalgia for fastvanishing values of freedom, for a fantasy “green world” unspoiled by urban values and by the ravages of the plague. The world of trees and moonlight releases the dark sides of dreams as well as their glistening luster. 2 WWW.CALSHAKES.ORG In the forest, characters can walk on the wild side. A Midsummer Night’s Dream draws on these “green world” associations. In the forest, characters can walk on the wild side. They can chase each other about as they haven’t done since childhood; they can fall in and out of love with no explanation beyond a juice having been wiped over their eyelids; in the forest you can even find yourself in love with an ass. In this “green world” all things are possible, and we witness as “true” what may be, in the cold light of day, wildly implausible. But the forest in A Midsummer Night’s Dream is not just a place for fanciful nostalgia. It is also a place of menace. “I’ll run from thee and hide me in the brakes,“ says Demetrius to Helena, who has followed him with passion, “and leave thee to the mercy of wild beasts.“ The world of trees and moonlight releases the dark sides of dreams as well as their glistening luster. When we enter the woodland world and fully allow ourselves to dream, we can’t control what comes out; and so we see revealed the astonishing (and sometimes unwelcome) complexities, as well as the simple needs, that we all share. Most of us, at sometime or another (or maybe all of the time!) experience unfounded passions that spring up from nowhere. Many of us are susceptible to feelings that defy all notions of reasons and proportion. And even if we can see the craziness of such feelings, we’re often powerless to control them until some other aspect of “reality” steps in to divert and clear our focus. We don’t need a forest to make us crazy—we can be crazy anywhere. But Shakespeare’s forest, on a midsummer’s night beneath the light of the moon, reveals all the madness of love and emotion. ”The moon methinks looks with a watery eye,” says Titania as she gazes fondly at an ass, preparing, in the dizziness of love, to take him to her bed. “And when she weeps, weeps every little flower…” Shakespeare’s forest is a place of dreams. Dreams are for singing, dreams are for weeping, they take over our world and—in the blink of an eye—they are gone. n CALIFORNIA SHAKESPEARE THEATER 3 The Forgeries of Jealousy Somebody let a green-eyed monster loose in A Midsummer Night’s Dream. BY LAURA HOPE, DRAMATURG Being jealous of someone is an obsession that leaves your brain racing with torturous thoughts and absurd scenarios. Jealousy gives you a sick, empty feeling in your stomach, as if a sucking void has opened in your abdomen, threatening to pull you under into a vacuum of self-loathing, a black hole of mental ugliness as horrific as Medusa’s snake-riddled head. That’s right, I said self-loathing. You see, jealousy reveals the jealous as small, insecure, neurotic malcontents, fearing insignificance and desperate for attention. Today’s colloquial term for the jealous is “Haters,” and that’s right on the mark. Watch a jealous person closely: They are pathetic, really, eating themselves alive with envy, becoming a dangerous canker hell-bent on destroying somebody else’s beautiful garden. As some unknown wise person once said: “Jealous people poison their own banquet, and then eat it.” Jealousy is the disease of a rotting psyche. Yet while jealousy may eat away one’s mind like a life-threatening case of flesh-eating bacteria, the subject has proved quite fertile for writers, who often view it as a disease. John Dryden wrote, “Jealousy is the jaundice of the soul.” Socrates referred to it as the “ulcer of the soul.” “Jealousy,” B.C. Forbes asserts, “…is a mental cancer.” Emma Goldman even likened the Jealous to dope fiends, admonishing: “Jealousy is indeed a poor medium to secure love, but it is a secure medium to destroy one’s self-respect. For jealous people, like dope-fiends, stoop to the lowest level and in the end inspire only disgust and loathing.” That woman had a way with words. Shakespeare wrote quite a bit on the subject of jealousy—it makes great fodder for both comedy and tragedy. In Othello, Shakespeare coins one of the most enduring images of jealousy: the green-eyed monster. Iago warns Othello with Machiavellian zeal: O! beware, my lord, of jealousy; It is the green-eyed monster which doth mock The meat it feeds on. that cuckold lives in bliss Who, certain of his fate, loves not his wronger; But, O, what damned minutes tells he o’er Who dotes, yet doubts, suspects, yet strongly loves! Have you ever been jealous of anyone? Of course you have. It’s awful, isn’t it? Why is jealousy green? By Shakespeare’s time, green had long been associated as the color of illness: Bile is green, a greenish tinge to the skin was often thought a sign of serious illness, and green was also associated with unripe or rotten food that, once eaten, had unseemly effects. It’s a suspicious color. Who wants to be peagreen with envy? Dragons and other predators were often said to have green eyes. You’d see those glowing orbs just before they ate you. Jealousy and envy run amuck in A Midsummer Night’s Dream. Something seems wrong with the way relationships in Athens are conducted right from the first scene. Shakespeare gives us the marriage of Theseus and Hippolyta as the backdrop for all the ensuing action. Like any doting fiancé, Theseus turns to wifeto-be and tells her, Hippolyta, I wooed thee with my sword, And won thy love doing thee injuries; One of these days, Titania and Hippolyta are going to turn into green-eyed tigers. But I will wed thee in another key, With pomp, with triumph, and with revelling. Wait. What? Instead of giving us fairytale lovers as the backdrop for this midsummer madness, Shakespeare gives us Theseus and Hippolyta: Duke of Athens and Queen of the Amazons. The Amazons in Greek mythology were a tribe ruled by warrior women descended from Ares, the god of war. It was a matriarchal society in which the women lopped off one breast in order to use their bow and arrows more successfully. Thus altered, they infamously defeated male warriors from other tribes. Their only use for men was as stud stock, raising only the girl offspring and killing the boys. According to Greek mythology, Theseus kidnapped Hippolyta and trounced her troops in battle. This explains quite a bit about the first scene. The Hippolyta Shakespeare writes does not appear to be a blushing, happy bride. She seems strangely subdued in the first scene, almost like those white tigers in Vegas. One sits there, looking at a rare, beautiful, predatory, yet endangered species riding a tricycle and spinning atop a disco ball next to a man in a sequined cape and wonders, “How long before the tiger snaps out of it?” It’s the same with Hippolyta. One wonders when she too will jump off the disco ball and, like Montecore the tiger, go “Siegfried and Roy” on Theseus. Although he never shows it on stage, Shakespeare knew that tale did not have a happy ending. So what on earth is he doing? This odd engagement scene is interrupted by the intrusion of yet another plot—the Hermia/Lysander/ Helena/Demetrius debacle that fuels much of the rest of the play. These four are trapped in a seemingly endless cycle of jealousy. As mishap follows mishap, each one of them spends time as both a jealous “Hater” and the hunted prey of whom somebody else is jealous. It’s a modern-day reality TV show in the making. This foursome may provide laughs over the excesses of jealousy, but through the fairy world, Shakespeare makes a more brutal comment on jealousy. The estranged king and queen of the fairies, Oberon and Titania, have both come to witness the marriage of Theseus and Hippolyta. They trade jealous barbs over the fact that Oberon had a thing in the past with Hippolyta, just as Titania and Theseus were once an item. Yet the source of their current jealous battle is over a small Indian boy—a changeling. The child’s mother was a priestess of Titania’s who died in childbirth. Titania now wants to raise the boy herself, but Oberon suspiciously wants the child as his “henchman.” As Titania makes clear, during the custody battle which has ensued, “the forgeries of jealousy” have been devastating. Their jealousy has turned the natural world up-side-down: The wind has sucked contagious fogs from the sea, causing rivers to flood, drowning the crops men and oxen have worked so hard to plant. The cattle have become sickly from the weather and lie rotting in the fields. With “rheumatic diseases” abounding, humans are not faring much better. Even the seasons are altered by Titania and Oberon’s jealous war. Spring, summer, winter, and fall are in confusion, coming one atop the other. As Titania notes with dismay, …this same progeny of evils comes From our debate, from our dissension; We are their parents and original. Despite this, Oberon will not be satisfied. His jealousy will not be sated until he has humiliated and defeated Titania, just as Theseus has defeated and domesticated Hippolyta. Out of this progeny of evils eventually comes a wedding celebration. Hermia marries Demetrius, Helena marries Lysander, Theseus marries Hippolyta, Oberon domesticates Titania and takes the Indian boy. Order is restored. The play has a happy ending. Jealousy gives way to love, or at least marriage. And yet … I find myself suspicious of Shakespeare’s allegedly happy ending. When does jealousy ever really lead to contentment and closure? Call me a cynic, but I think there is another act to this story, one that may play out in our minds as we drive home. Sooner or later, Hippolyta is going to want her freedom, and Titania is going to want that baby back—their losses will scorch them from inside. One of these days, Titania and Hippolyta are going to turn into green-eyed tigers. As the author Michael Beer wrote, “Jealousy is a tiger that tears not only its prey, but also its own raging heart.”n SYNOPSIS Marriage and Mayhem: A Midsummer Night’s Dream BY PHILIPPA KELLY, RESIDENT/PRODUCTION DRAMATURG A Midsummer Night’s Dream has three interlocking plots, all involving A MIDSUMMER NIGHT’S DREAM COSTUME SKETCHES BY OLIVERA GAJIC marriages. The first is the marriage between Duke Theseus and the Amazonian queen, Hippolyta, to be celebrated on this midsummer evening. The second involves a mad scramble between four young lovers who fall rapidly in and out of love as they run between the trees in the depths of the night; and the third is the marriage between Titania and Oberon, two fairies who believe that their own marital struggles are the cause of the misadventures that occur in the forest. In the play’s first scene we are introduced to the world of Theseus’ Athenian court. Hermia, a spirited young woman, refuses to marry Demetrius, the man her father (Egeus) has chosen for her. Egeus calls on Athenian law, which states that a girl must accept her father’s choice of a suitor or else face death. Feeling sorry for Hermia, Theseus gives her another choice—to live forever a virgin and worship the goddess Diana. Not liking either choice, Hermia decides to elope to the forest outside Athens with her lover, Lysander. She tells her friend Helena of the plan that she and Lysander have hatched; and Helena, recently rejected by Demetrius in favor of Hermia, decides to disclose the information so as to try to win him back. When Helena reveals to Demetrius Hermia’s plans, however, she doesn’t get the effect she expects: Demetrius pursues Hermia and Lysander into the forest, closely followed by a lovelorn Helena. Next there opens the storyline shared by Titania and Oberon, the fairies who live in the forest. Titania has refused to give up to Oberon her Indian changeling boy, whom Oberon wishes to use as his servant. To punish her, Oberon orders the fairy Puck to wipe a love juice on Titania’s eyelids while she is sleeping, so that when she awakens, she will fall in love with the first vile creature she sees. The two plots converge when Oberon witnesses Demetrius cruelly spurning Helena. Oberon orders Puck to wipe the juice on Demetrius’ eyes while he sleeps, and, true to comic misadventure, Puck makes a mistake, wiping the juice on Lysander’s eyes instead. When Lysander opens his eyes he falls in love with Helena! Oberon sees this and commands Puck to put the flower potion on the right young man’s eyes. Puck finds Demetrius asleep, puts the love potion on, and sure enough he wakes up just as Helena arrives—pursued by Lysander—and, of course, immediately falls for her as well! Both young men are now in love with a girl whom neither had wanted just hours before (and suffice it to say that neither Hermia nor Helena can believe what has happened.) Once the lovers fall asleep on the forest floor, Puck has some corrective measures to implement. Meanwhile, things have been moving from the sublime to the ridiculous, with Titania awakening from the sleep in which she too has been ”treated” to Puck’s love juice. She falls in love with an ass! The donkey is in fact Bottom, one of the ”rude Mechanicals” who are busy rehearsing in the forest a play they want to perform for Theseus’ and Hippolyta’s wedding feast. Mischievous as well as magically powerful, Puck has transformed Bottom to an ass for his own amusement (and ours). Eventually, all is sorted out, with the lovers’ desires successfully realigned, Oberon getting the changeling boy he wants, and Titania receiving another dose of restorative love juice. When Theseus and Hippolyta come to the forest for a morning hunt, they awaken the four young lovers. Since Demetrius no longer loves Helena, Theseus overrules Egeus’ edict and declares that Lysander should marry Hermia and Demetrius should marry Helena. The lovers decide that they have not been foolish, but merely caught in a dream; and with great self-satisfaction they all sit and watch the unintentionally comic performance of the tragedy, Pyramus and Thisbe, by the Mechanicals. n A PAINTING OF PYRAMUS AND THISBE ENTITLED ASK ME NO MORE (1906) BY SIR LAWRENCE ALMA-TADEMA (1836-1912). The WHO, The WHERE FROM, The WHEREFORE BY PHILIPPA KELLY, RESIDENT/PRODUCTION DRAMATURG A Midsummer Night’s Dream was preceded by the three Henry VI plays, Titus Andronicus, The Comedy of Errors and Love’s Labour’s Lost. Written between 1594 and 1596, this play about the crazy distortions of love emerged at about the same time as Romeo and Juliet (of which it is an inversion: Romeo and Juliet begins as a comedy of misplaced desire and moves through romance into tragedy; while A Midsummer Night’s Dream begins with tragic overtones and ends up as a comedy). Shakespeare’s Dream is believed to have been first performed before Queen Elizabeth I, although we have no firm record of this; but it is tempting to imagine the queen, over 60 years of age at this point, elaborately painted and powdered as she presided over this tribute to the alluring magic of love. The play would also have paid tribute to the graciousness of Elizabeth’s English court, so different from the male-dominated strictures of PYRAMUS AND THISBE BY NIKLAUS MANUEL. Athens. Athens may have been the Classical seat of reason, but a young noblewoman there was nonetheless expected to accept her father’s choice in marriage. Elizabeth, in contrast, famously declined to accept all manner of potential husbands carefully picked out for her by her advisors, preferring to portray herself as the bride of the nation and the mother of the English people, far too committed to her subjects to give herself to any man. A Midsummer Night’s Dream is one of those rare Shakespeare plays for which there are no known textual sources. Shakespeare does, however, evidently draw on Chaucer’s The Knight’s Tale, which has a story of Theseus (“gretter was ther noon under the sonne”) and his Amazonian bride Ypolita. The tragedy of Pyramus and Thisbe had appeared in many other contexts, and in A Midsummer Night’s Dream, in the hands of the Mechanicals, we find it distorted into a hilariously miscast hodge-podge of malapropisms. This turning of tragedy into comedy feeds into the general theme of A Midsummer Night’s Dream: that nothing is essentially as it appears, and everything, through a mere twist or two of language and emphasis, is potentially something quite other than it seems. The lovers believe themselves to be infinitely grander and more intelligent than the Mechanicals, yet they behave with just as much silliness. Indeed, through their escapades of misplaced affection, the lovers are just as much objects of our mirth as the ludicrous Thespians from the forest. n
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz