BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 53, 186-192 (1995) Stem Cell Kinetics in Rat Testis after Irreversible Injury Induced by 2,5-Hexanedione' Elizabeth K. Allard, Susan J. Hall, and Kim Boekelheide 2 Departmentof Pathology and LaboratoryMedicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island ABSTRACT Stem cells provide a continuous supply of committed progenitor cells for the process of spermatogenesis. In rodents, stem cells have been identified as single, undifferentiated type A spermatogonia. The rate of stem cell division has not been definitively determined because of difficulty in locating stem cells among a normal compliment of germ cells. The testicular toxicant 2,5-hexanedione (2,5-HD) induces irreversible testicular atrophy with only Sertoli cells and spermatogonia remaining after injury. Stem cell kinetics could be assessed in this toxicant model because of the absence of most mature germ cells. It is also not known if 2,5-HD-exposed rats possess an active stem spermatogonia population. Charles River CD rats were exposed to 1%2,5-HD in drinking water for 5 wk. At 7 or 35 wk following toxicant exposure, rats were exposed to bromodeoxycytidine continuously via Alzet mini-pumps for 1-28 days. Serial cross sections of testis were used to identify single stem spermatogonia and to determine whether the cells were positive or negative for bromodeoxyuridine incorporation. We obtained a continuous labeling index for stem cells from rats 7 and 35 wk after 2,5-HD exposure and found that stem cells had a cell cycle time of approximately 8-14 days at both time points after toxicant exposure. In conclusion, we have developed a method forthe assessment of stem cell kinetics and verified the presence of an actively dividing stem cell population in irreversibly injured testes. INTRODUCTION [1]. Furthermore, A4 cells had a stage-specific peak labeling index and cell number that preceded a stage-specific increase in the number of A, and In spermatogonia [2]. In contrast, work carried out by Oakberg in mouse [3] and Huckins in rat [4-7] suggested that there were additional classes of type A spermatogonia with type A cells functioning as the true stem cell population. In this model, isolated type A cells (termed type A~) divided about once per cycle to form pairs (Apr) and eventually chains of precursor cells (Aai), which then differentiated into A, cells. Stem cell renewal occurred when Apr cells separated by more than 25 gtm to form new Ais cells. Germ cell kinetics have been difficult to discern in testes. Huckins [4, 6, 7] determined the cell cycle time of subclasses of type A spermatogonia in rat testis. Cells could only be followed through certain stages of the cycle by "continuous labeling," which was achieved by repeated injections of 3HTdR. Type A,-A4 spermatogonia had a cell cycle time of 42 h, while type A, cells were found to have a longer cell cycle time of 114-169 h [4]. Of the undifferentiated type A cells, types Apr and A had a cell cycle time of 55 h, while type Ai cells had a division time of greater than 60 h [6]. These data added further support to the Huckins model, which has become the more accepted model of stem cell division Spermatogenesis occurs throughout the lifetime of the male animal. This process takes place in the testis within the seminiferous epithelium, which consists of Sertoli cells and concentric layers of germ cells. As the germ cells mature, they are pushed towards the apical portion of the tubule. Spermatogonia, the most immature germ cells, line the basement membrane of seminiferous tubules. In the rat, there are three types of spermatogonia-A, intermediate (In), and B. Stem cells, a subclass of type A spermatogonia, provide a continuous supply of committed progenitor cells that differentiate and divide into mature spermatozoa. Two opposing models have been proposed for the differentiation process of stem cells in spermatogenesis. Studies have been based primarily on cell morphology, the stage-specific appearance of cells, and cell kinetics parameters. Using rat seminiferous tubule whole mounts, Clermont and coworkers morphologically differentiated five distinct classes of type A spermatogonia-Ao4 [1]. Type A0 cells were termed the reserve stem cell population because they divided infrequently [1], had a low mitotic index, and had a low labeling index after tritiated thymidine (3HTdR) exposure [2]. Therefore, the number of type A0 cells was insufficient to function as the sole source of spermatogenic precursors. Type A4 spermatogonia were proposed to be the true stem spermatogonia because they divided at a specific stage to become both In and Al spermatogonia [8]. n-Hexane exposure in the rat has been shown to induce peripheral polyneuropathy and testicular germ cell loss through the action of the toxic metabolite 2,5-hexanedione (2,5-HD) [9]. The proposed target of 2,5-HD toxicity in the testes is the Sertoli cell, the supportive cell of the seminiferous epithelium. Sertoli cell microtubules are altered after exposure to 2,5-HD [10-13], followed by a decrease in seminiferous tubule fluid secretion and subsequent germ cell loss [14, 15]. After exposure to 1% 2,5-HD for 5 wk, peak Accepted March 7, 1995. Received May 10, 1994. 'This publication was supported by grant numbers R01 E505033 and K04 E500193 from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH. 2Correspondence: Kim Boekelheide, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Biology and Medicine, Brown University, Box G-B518, Providence, RI 02912. FAX: (401) 863-1971. 186 STEM CELL KINETICS AND RAT TESTIS germ cell loss occurred 7 wk later [16], suggesting a time delay between exposure and testicular injury. Germ cell loss persisted up to 75 wk after 2,5-HD exposure [17], indicating that the injury was irreversible. Some germ cells, principally type A spermatogonia, remained after 2,5-HD exposure. Based upon the frequency and isolated position of the type A cells, it was suggested that the majority of the remaining germ cell population were stem spermatogonia [17]. In addition, it was implied that the type A cells were dividing because a few In and type B spermatogonia were also present in the atrophic seminiferous tubules [171. Thus, the 2,5-HD-treated rat provides an intriguing model of testicular injury because of the presence of persistent spermatogonia in the face of nearly lifelong testicular atrophy. This manuscript describes a novel method for the assessment of stem cell kinetics in 2,5-HD-treated rats. The 2,5-HD model of irreversible injury provides a facile system by which to assess stem cell kinetics. Since the seminiferous epithelium is devoid of mature germ cells after irreversible injury, it is relatively easy to identify single germ cells. Moreover, it is of interest to determine whether or not stem spermatogonia are dividing after 2,5-HD exposure. Using the definition that stem cells are single, undifferentiated type A spermatogonia, these cells were identified in serial testis cross sections. The labeling index of stem spermatogonia was determined using continuous bromodeoxycytidine (BrdCyd) exposure. BrdCyd is converted to bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) in cells, which is then detected by immunohistochemistry. MATERIALS AND METHODS General All chemicals were purchased from Sigma Chemical Company (St. Louis, MO) unless mentioned otherwise. Photomicrographs were taken using a Zeiss Axiovert 35 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Inc., Thornwood, NJ) and Kodak Technical Pan 4125 film (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY). Animals and Toxicant Exposure Young adult (150-175 g, 42-46 days old) male Charles River (Wilmington, MA) CD rats were housed in wire cages and provided with food (Pro-Lab Rat, Mouse, Hamster chow No. 3000; Farmer's Exchange, Framingham, MA) and water ad libitum. The rats were maintained at 22 + 1IC under a 12-h light-dark cycle with 35% to 70% humidity. All rats were acclimated for 1 wk prior to the onset of 2,5-HD exposure. Rats were exposed to 1% 2,5-HD (Aldrich Chemical Co., Milwaukee, WI) in drinking water for 5 wk followed by return to normal drinking water for the recovery period. 187 BrdCyd Exposure Beginning 7 and 35 wk following 2,5-HD exposure, rats were exposed to BrdCyd via Alzet minipumps (Alza Corp., Palo Alto, CA). The minipumps were used for short (up to 7 days, 1 l/h, Model 2001) and long-term (up to 28 days, 2.5 il/h, Model 2ML4) exposures. Short-term pumps were filled with 0.3 M BrdCyd, while long-term pumps were filled with 0.12 M BrdCyd; both nucleotide concentrations were diluted in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). For shortterm exposures, the pumps were filled and then incubated in sterile saline at 37°C for 4 h to begin the continuous release of BrdCyd. Rats were anesthetized with methoxyflurane (Pitman-Moore, Mundelien, IL), and the pumps were implanted s.c. into the subscapular region. The incisions were closed with surgical wound clips. Groups of rats were exposed to BrdCyd 7 wk after 2,5-HD exposure for the following numbers of days: 1 (n = 3), 2 (n = 3), 4 (n = 3), 7 (n = 6), 14 (n = 3), 21 (n = 3), and 28 (n = 3). Other groups of rats were exposed to BrdCyd 35 wk after 2,5-HD exposure for the following numbers of days: 7 (n = 4), 14 (n = 4), and 21 (n = 3). Following BrdCyd exposure, the rats were killed. Serial Section Preparationand Staining Both testes were removed, and the tunica albuginea was punctured several times with a 26-gauge needle (Becton Dickinson and Co., Franklin Lakes, NJ); the testes were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and then embedded in glycol methacrylate (Reichart-Jung). The tissue was serially sectioned, with use of a Histocut microtome (ReichartJung), into one of two combinations (m): 10-10-3-3-310-10 or 10-6--3-3-3--6-10. Sections were placed on poly-L-lysine-coated slides. The middle 3-gm section was immunohistochemically stained to detect BrdUrd. Sections were hydrolyzed in 1 N HCI at 60°C for 20 min followed by etching in xylene. Next, the sections were digested with 0.25 mg/ml protease XIV for 90 min at 37 0C. PBS containing 5% normal goat serum and 1% BSA was used as a nonspecific blocking agent. Mouse monoclonal anti-BrdUrd (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) was used as a primary antibody; biotintylated goat antimouse IgG (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) was used as a secondary antibody; and an ABC elite kit (Vector, Burlingame, CA) was used to label the complex. All antibody incubations were carried out at 37 0C. A peroxidase substrate consisting of 0.25 mg/ml diaminobenzidine, 1% imidazole, and 0.033% H2 02 was used to detect the complex. These sections were counter-stained with periodic acid-Schiffs (PAS). The remaining serial sections were stained with PAS and hematoxylin (PAS/H). Data Quantitation Each serial section was divided into 10 quadrants using a fine-tipped pen. Up to 2 stem spermatogonia were iden- 188 ALLARD ET AL. FIG. 1. Testicular atrophy induced by 2,5-HD. Light micrograph of seminiferous tubule cross sections, stained with PAS/H, from a rat 35 wk after a 5-wk exposure to 2,5-HD. Seminiferous tubules contained Sertoli cells (arrows) and a few spermatogonia (arrowheads). The interstitial space (I)and seminiferous tubule lumens (L)are indicated. x 500. tified per quadrant with a range of 9 to 20 stem cells identified per animal. Labeling indices were determined in each animal and averaged for each time point, and the standard error was calculated. StatisticalAnalysis All statistical analyses were performed using StatViewSE + Software (Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, CA). Cell kinetics parameters were derived, with modifications, from the continuous labeling curve as described previously [18]. RESULTS Method to Assess Stem Cell Kinetics Rats were exposed to 2,5-HD for 5 wk and then observed postexposure for 7 or 35 wk. Testes from these rats showed variable atrophy, as previously described [17], with most seminiferous tubules containing only Sertoli cells and oc- casional spermatogonia (Fig. 1). In order to determine the cell cycle kinetics of stem spermatogonia in atrophic testes, rats were continuously exposed to BrdCyd. In cells, BrdCyd is converted into BrdUrd, which is incorporated into newly synthesized DNA during S phase. Actively dividing cells could be identified immunohistochemically using an antiBrdUrd antibody. To determine if stem spermatogonia had incorporated BrdUrd, testes were serially sectioned into the following thicknesses or a slight modification thereof (pm): 10-10-33-3-10-10. The middle 3-pm section was immunostained to detect BrdUrd, while the remaining sections were stained with PAS/H. Analysis of the serial sections provided the means to identify stem cells as true isolated type A spermatogonia in all three dimensions. A flow chart of the decision-making process for the identification of stem spermatogonia is shown in Figure 2. A potential stem cell was identified in one of the outer 3-pm sections, which appeared single on the horizontal plane of the section. The same cell had to be identified in the other outer 3-pm section so that, by default, the cell was known to traverse the middle BrdUrd immunolabeled 3-pm section. Next, the four 10-pm sections were used to determine if the cell was actually single. The thickness of the serial sections permitted the identification of any neighboring germ cells in the vertical plane. If no other germ cells were seen within 25 pm in all directions, the BrdUrd immunostained section was used to determine if the identified stem spermatogonia had incorporated BrdUrd (Fig. 3). Using this procedure, up to 20 stem cells were identified per animal. Labeling Index 7 and 35 Weeks after 2,5-HD Exposure Two time points, 7 and 35 wk after 2,5-HD exposure, were chosen for the assessment of stem cell kinetics. The first time point was chosen based on the observation that percent germ cell loss is greatest at 7 wk after a 5-wk exposure to 2,5-HD [16]. A second, later time point was chosen in order to determine whether or not stem cell kinetics changed over the course of irreversible atrophy. Rats were exposed continuously to BrdCyd via Alzet minipumps for 1 through 28 days. The stem cell labeling index for each time point was determined using the serial section method. Stem cells were actively dividing at 7 wk after 2,5-HD exposure as indicated by the labeling index curve (Fig. 4). Labeling index increased rapidly up to 7 days and then slowed to a plateau phase, which is commonly observed in continuous labeling index curves. The labeling index curve was the same for stem spermatogonia in rats 35 wk after 2,5-HD exposure. Multiple regression analysis showed that the data from 7 and 35 wk were not significantly different from each other and could be pooled for further calculations. A linear regression analysis of the pooled data was performed to test 189 STEM CELL KINETICS AND RAT TESTIS the fit to a linear model. The resulting quadratic coefficient was negative and significantly different from zero (p < 0.05), indicating that the curve did not fit a linear model. Growth fraction (GF), the percentage of cells actively dividing, as well as cell cycle time minus cell synthesis time (Tc-T s) were calculated using the point where the plateau phase of the curve begins. This point was estimated using the intersection of two linearly fitted lines to the rapidly rising (Days 1-7) and plateau portions (Days 14-28) of the curve (Fig. 5). The slopes of each portion of the curve (rapidly rising portion, m = 0.049 days-1 ; plateau portion, m = 0.014 days- 1) were shown to be significantly different from each other within 85% confidence intervals (rapidly rising portion, 2.9-6.8; plateau portion, 0.3-2.5). Using the intersection point yielded a GF of 0.42 and a (Tc-Ts) value of 8.4 days. Cell cycle time was also estimated using the following equation: slope of the rapidly rising portion of the curve = 2[11n(1 + GF)]/Tc [19]. Using this approach, Tc was calculated to be 14.3 days. DISCUSSION Using rat testes serial cross sections, a method was developed for the identification of stem spermatogonia after testicular injury. Further, continuous BrdCyd exposure was used to assess the continuous labeling index of stem spermatogonia. This method verified the existence of a viable stem spermatogonia population in the face of irreversible testicular atrophy. The implications of this result may be relevant 1) to normal stem cell kinetics, 2) to characterizing the 2,5-HD model, and 3) to understanding human infertility. After exposure to 2,5-HD, approximately 40 percent of stem spermatogonia were actively dividing. The remaining 60 percent of the stem cells were either quiescent or slowly cycling. Huckins provided evidence for the existence of a slowly cycling stem cell population in normal testis, since a small subset of As cells did not become labeled with 3 H-TdR after a 48-h exposure [7] and some A,, cells were observed to divide only once every 13 days [7]. The data presented here support the observation of a quiescent or slowly cycling population of stem spermatogonia and suggest that a higher proportion of stem cells are quiescent. From this data, it cannot be discerned if there is a higher proportion of slowly cycling cells because of the 2,5-HD-induced injury. In addition, the current data indicate that stem spermatogonia have a cell cycle time of approximately 8-14 days after 2,5-HD exposure, compatible with a cell cycle time of greater than 60 h as demonstrated by Huckins for normal rat testes [6]. Rats exposed to 2,5-HD for 5 wk do not recover up to 75 wk after injury [171, yet a few spermatogonia persist in the seminiferous tubules. This investigation demonstrated that a subset of these cells, the stem cells, are actively dividing, and that they have a similar Tc and GF at 7 or 35 wk after 2,5-HD exposure. However, this finding does not ex- f ~~~ ~ ~ ~ Find a single undifferentiated type A spermatogonia ina 3 um PAS/H section not within 25 urn of any other spermatogonia, adjacent to the peritubular cells, having a visible cytoplasm. No I Check to make sure that the same cell I isin the other 3 um PAS/H section. Yes Check to make sure that no other unairrerenuatea spermatogonia are located inthe four 10 urn thick sections within a 25 urn radius around where the original cell was located. 1 es Check the 3 urn BrdU immunostained section to determine whether or not the single cell ispositive or negative Ifor BrdU immunostaining. . ._ j FIG. 2. Flow chart for identification of single stem spermatogonia and determination of BrdUrd uptake. The algorithm is depicted by which germ cells in seminiferous tubule cross sections were first identified, verified as single cells, and then assessed for BrdUrd uptake. Up to 20 stem cells were assessed per animal. plain the failure of spermatogenic recovery after 2,5-HD exposure and instead suggests that there is an impediment to successful spermatogenesis. Since stem cells are dividing, their progeny must be dying in order for atrophy to persist. The death of differentiating spermatogonia suggests a failure of normal paracrine factors needed to support this population. The normal compliment of paracrine growth factors, especially those made by Sertoli cells, could be absent from the seminiferous tubules due to the effect of the toxicant and subsequent injury to Sertoli cells. Spermatocytes and spermatids have been shown to be important modulators of Sertoli cell function [20], raising the possibility that the atrophy persists because of the absence of these cells. 190 ALLARD ET AL. STEM CELL KINETICS AND RAT TESTIS However, after irradiation or experimental cryptorchidism, spermatids and spermatocytes are eliminated from the seminiferous epithelium, but full recovery can occur. Assessment of stem cell kinetics is important to the field of male infertility because stem spermatogonia are a crucial target of cytotoxic injury. The number of stem cells remaining after cytotoxic injury may determine the possibility for, and rate of, recovery [211. If there are no stem spermatogonia remaining after injury, obviously, the azoospermia will be irreversible [21]. Likewise, it has been suggested that if there are stem spermatogonia present after injury, recovery will occur at a rate proportional to the percentage of stem spermatogonia remaining after injury [21]. However, testicular germ cell recovery is also species-specific [22]. In mice, exposure to chemotherapeutic agents [231 or radiation [24-271 resulted in temporary azoospermia and a relatively rapid recovery of spermatogenesis. These observations fit well with the model that stem cells remaining after toxic exposure will lead to recovery. In contrast, in humans, exposure to chemotherapeutic agents [28, 29] or radiation [30, 31] have resulted in an extended period of azoospermia before recovery. Clearly, stem cell recovery in humans differs from mice because of the extended window of azoospermia. In rats, exposure to various toxicants [17, 32, 33] has resulted in irreversible testicular atrophy in the presence of stem spermatogonia. These observations argue strongly against the model that the presence of surviving stem cells predicts recovery in this species. Moreover, the data presented here have shown that there are stem cells in testes irreversibly injured by 2,5-HD, and that a portion of these stem cells are actively dividing. It will be of interest to assess stem cell kinetics in other models of irreversible atrophy in order to determine if this state of atrophy can result from more than one toxicant. In summary, we have developed a method for the assessment of male stem cell kinetics in atrophic rat testes. This method can be applied to models of testicular atrophy in order to characterize the irreversibility of injury. In rats exposed to 2,5-HD, the stem cells had a cell cycle time of 8 through 14 days at both 7 and 35 wk after 2,5-HD exposure. The existence of an active stem cell compartment sug- FIG. 3. Serial testis cross sections were used to identify a single stem spermatogonium and to assess BrdUrd uptake. These light micrographs depict a portion of a seminiferous tubule cross section containing an isolated stem spermatogonium positive for BrdUrd immunostaining. A) 10-,pm section stained with PAS/H; B) 10pm section stained with PAS/H; C)3-pm section stained with PAS/H; D)3-pm section immunostained to detect BrdUrd and counterstained with PAS; E)3-pm section stained with PAS/H; F) 10-pm section stained with PAS/H; and G) 10-pm section stained with PAS/H. The seminiferous tubule lumen (L)and interstitial space (I)are marked. An arrow identifies the isolated stem spermatogonium, which appears in C, D,and E. x 589. 100 191 /I I -- ---- 35 weeks 75- x a, 'O Q C 50- -J 250 -· E g 0 E I 7 E I m I 14 21 Days i I 28 FIG. 4. Labeling index of stem spermatogonia after 2,5-HD exposure. Graph of labeling index versus time for stem spermatogonia from animals 7wk (solid circles) and 35 wk (open circles) after 2,5-HD exposure. Each point represents the mean + SEM of 3-6 individual animals. 1 X 0) Z C Q _J 0 7 14 21 28 Days FIG. 5. Estimation of intersect of rapidly rising and plateau portion of the continuous labeling index curve used to determine (T,-T,) and GF. Plot of labeling index versus time for the mean of the pooled 7- and 35-wk 2,5-HD data showing linear curve fits for rapidly rising (Days 1-7, open circles) and plateau portion (Days 1428, solid circles) of the curve. (T-T,) and GF are indicated on the graph. 192 ALLARD ET AL. gests that it may be possible to induce recovery by maintaining the population of committed progenitor cells. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors wish to thank Dr. Eric Hall, Dr. John Richburg, and Ruth Rusch for their time-saving technical assistance, and Drs. R. Allen White (University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center) and Bernard Cole for their expert assistance with data analysis. REFERENCES 1. Clermont Y,Bustos-Obregon E. Re-examination of spermatogonial renewal in the rat by means of seminiferous tubules mounted "in toro". AmJ Anat 1968; 122:237-248. 2. Bartmanska J, Clermont Y. Renewal of type A spermatogonia in adult rats. Cell Tissue Kinet 1983; 16:135-143. 3. Oakberg EF. Spermatogonia stem-cell renewal in the mouse. Anat Rec 1971; 169:515532. 4. Huckins C. Cell cycle properties of differentiating spermatogonia in adult Sprague-Dawley rats. Cell Tissue Kinet 1971; 4:139-154. 5. Huckins C. The spermatogonial stem cell population in adult rats. I. Their morphology, proliferation and maturation. Anat Rec 1971; 169:533-558. 6. Huckins C. The spermatogonial stem cell population in adult rats. II1.A radioautographic analysis of their cell cycle properties. Cell Tissue Kinet 1971; 4:313-334. 7. Huckins C. The spermatogonial stem cell population in adult rats. III. Evidence for a long-cycling population. Cell Tissue Kinet 1971; 4:335-349. 8. Meistrich ML, van Beek MEAB. Spermatogonia stem cells. In: Desjardins C, Ewing LL (eds.), Cell and Molecular Biology of the Testis. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993:266-295. 9. Krasavage WJ, O'Donoghue JL, DiVincenzo GD, Terhaar CJ. The relative neurotoxicity of methyl-n-butyl ketone, n-hexane and their metabolites. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1980; 52:433-441. 10. Boekelheide K. 2,5-Hexanedione alters microtubule assembly. I. Testicular atrophy, not nervous system toxicity, correlates with enhanced tubulin polymerization. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1987; 88:370-382. 11. Boekelheide K. Rat testis during 2,5-hexanedione intoxication and recovery. II. Dynamics of pyrrole reactivity, tubulin content, and microtubule assembly. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1988; 92:28-33. 12. Sioussat TM, Boekelheide K. Selection of a nucleation-promoting element following chemical modification of tubulin. Biochemistry 1989; 28:4435-4443. 13. Boekelheide K, Eveleth J, Neely MD, Sioussat TM. Microtubule assembly is altered following covalent modification by the n-hexane metabolite 2,5-hexanedione. In: Witmer CM (ed.), Biological Reactive Intermediates IV. New York: Plenum Press; 1990: 433-442. 14. Johnson KJ, Hall ES, Boekelheide K. 2,5-Hexanedione exposure alters the rat Sertoli cell cytoskeleton. I. Microtubules and seminiferous tubule fluid secretion. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1991; 111:432-442. 15. Richburg JR, Redenbach DM, Boekelheide K. Seminiferous tubule fluid secretion is a Sertoli cell microtubule-dependent process inhibited by 2,5-hexanedione exposure. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1994; 128:302-309. 16. Boekelheide K. Rat testis during 2,5-hexanedione intoxication and recovery. I. Dose response and the reversibility of germ cell loss. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1988; 92:1827. 17. Boekelheide K, Hall SJ.2,5-Hexanedione exposure in the rat results in long-term testicular atrophy despite the presence of residual spermatogonia. J Androl 1991; 12:18-26. 18. Wright N, Alison M. Methodology in epithelial cell kinetics. In: The Biology of Epithelial Cell Populations, vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1984: 97-202. 19. White RA, Fallon JF, Savage MP. On the measurement of cytokinetics by continuous labeling with bromodeoxyuridine with applications to chick wing buds. Cytometry 1992; 13:553-556. 20. Sharpe R. Experimental evidence for Sertoli-germ cell and Sertoli-Leydig cell interaction. In: Russell L, Griswold M (eds.), The Sertoli Cell. Clearwater, FL: Cache River Press; 1993: 391-418. 21. Meistrich ML. Critical components of testicular function and sensitivity to disruption. Biol Reprod 1986; 34:17-28. 22. Meistrich ML. Effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy on spermatogenesis. Eur Urol 1993; 23:136-142. 23. van Keulen CJG, de Rooij DG. Spermatogenic clones developing from repopulating stem cell surviving a high dose of an alkylating agent. Cell Tissue Kinet 1975; 8:543-551. 24. Meistrich ML, Hunter NR, Suzuki N, Trostle PJ, Withers HR. Gradual regeneration of mouse testicular stem cell after exposure to ionizing radiation. Radiat Res 1978; 74:349362. 25. van den Aardweg GJMJ, de Ruiter-Bootsma AL, Kramer MF, Davids JAG. Growth and differentiation of spermatogenic colonies in the mouse testis after irradiation with fission neutrons. Radiat Res 1983; 94:447-463. 0 26. Erickson BH. Survival and renewal of murine stem spermatogonia following Co y radiation. Radiat Res 1981; 86:34-51. 27. Huckins C, Oakberg EF. Morphological and quantitative analysis of spermatogonia in mouse testes using whole mouse seminiferous tubules. Anat Rec 1978; 192:529-542. 28. Meistrich ML, Wilson G, Brown BW, de Cuhna MF, Lipshultz LI. Impact of cyclophosphamide on long-term reduction in sperm count in men treated with combination chemotherapy for Ewing and soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer 1992; 70:2703-2712. 29. Schilsky RL, Lewis BJ, Sherins RJ,Young RC. Gonadal dysfunction in patients receiving chemotherapy for cancer. Ann Intern Med 1980; 93:109-114. 30. Rowley MJ, Leach DR, Warner GA, Heller CG. Effect of graded doses of ionizing radiation on the human testis. Radiat Res 1974; 59:665-678. 31. Meistrich ML, van Beek MEAB. Radiation sensitivity of the human testis. Adv Radiat Biol 1990; 14:227-268. 32. Ku WW, Chapin RE, Wine RN, Gladen BC. Testicular toxicity of boric acid (BA): relationship of dose to lesion development and recovery in the F344 rat. Reprod Toxicol 1993; 7:305-319. 33. Boekelheide K. Sertoli cell toxicants. In: Russell LD, Griswold MD (eds.), The Sertoli Cell. Clearwater, FL: Cache River Press; 1993: 551-575.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz