EUROPEAN ACADEMIC RESEARCH
Vol. IV, Issue 8/ November 2016
ISSN 2286-4822
www.euacademic.org
Impact Factor: 3.4546 (UIF)
DRJI Value: 5.9 (B+)
Criticalness of the title "A Doll" in connection to
Nora; in Henrik Ibnen's play "A Doll's House"
SHAGUFTA KHURRAM
Lecturer and M.Phil Scholar
Department of English, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities
Benazir Bhutto Shaheed University Lyari
Karachi, Pakistan
Abstract:
This paper is being intended to center the criticalness of "A
Doll" in association with Nora; in Henrik Ibnen's play "A Doll's
House". The play is composed by him in 1879. This study reveals
insight into feminist analysis in European society during the Victorian
time. A Doll's House furthermore demonstrates Ibsen's sensitivity
towards women's rights and for human rights when all is said in done.
A Doll's House is a three-act play in prose. The play is likewise critical
for its focal edge towards nineteenth-century marriage standards. In A
Doll's house, Ibsen composes that the foundation of his anticipated
drama "is a totally manly society with legitimate rules composed by
males and with prosecutors and judges who respect female tendencies
from a manly perspective. The primary motivation behind this
examination study is to share the significance and humorous
importance of the "Doll" which was utilized for a young lady as a part
of male ruling society. A Doll's House' relates to power, it addresses a
doll being played with and asserted. This doll is controlled; everything
its strength does is outlined. The title is basic to society and
humiliating circumstance inside the house. Ibsen addresses Nora as a
doll. Nora along these lines reacts in an indistinct way from a doll, got
in a house. The play comes in its defining moment when Nora
abandons her husband and kids to discover her way to the new world
where no confinements or limits are being made for ladies.
6479
Shagufta Khurram- Criticalness of the title "A Doll" in connection to Nora; in
Henrik Ibnen's play "A Doll's House"
Key words: Feminism, Realism, Symbolism, Doll, Henrik Ibsen
1. INTRODUCTION
Henrik Johan Ibsen (March 20, 1828 – May 23, 1906) was a
greatly persuasive Norwegian dramatist who was to a great
extent in charge of the ascent of the forward-looking sensible
dramatization. His plays were viewed as shocking in quite a bit
of society at the time, when Victorian opinions of family life and
appropriateness. Ibsen's work inspected the substances that lay
behind numerous a front walls, which the general public of the
time did not have any desire to see. In 1879, while living in
Italy, Ibsen distributed his perfect work of art, A Doll's House.
A Doll's House was composed in exposition. It is generally
viewed as a point of interest in the advancement of what soon
turned into a very common type of theater—realism, which
endeavors to depict life precisely and avoids admired dreams of
it. In A Doll's House, Ibsen utilizes the topics and structures of
established disaster while writing in composition about regular,
unexceptional individuals. A Doll's House additionally shows
Ibsen's sympathy toward ladies' rights, and for human rights
when all is said in done. The play is significant for its central
angle towards nineteenth-century marriage norms. It aroused
nice controversy on the time, because it concludes with the
protagonist, Nora, leaving her husband and children in view
that she needs to discover herself. The mingled subject matters
of A Doll's House recur throughout most of Ibsen's works. The
targeted crisis of this drama deals with the hindrance of
maintaining a character personality — on this case a female
character — within the confines of a stereotyped social function.
The problem is personified as Nora, the doll, strives to emerge
as a self-motivated individual in a lady-denying man's world. A
Doll's house, Ibsen writes that the background of his projected
drama "is a completely masculine society with legal guidelines
EUROPEAN ACADEMIC RESEARCH - Vol. IV, Issue 8 / November 2016
6480
Shagufta Khurram- Criticalness of the title "A Doll" in connection to Nora; in
Henrik Ibnen's play "A Doll's House"
written by males and with prosecutors and judges who regard
female habits from a masculine point of view. Henrik Ibsen's A
Doll's House reveals a stunning mystery: a few dolls don't get
the opportunity to assume the parts they truly need. Ibsen's
Nora Helmer is a doll caught in her home, a condition
underscored by the way that the whole play takes place in her
own living room. Controlled by her husband who expects her to
fulfill her wifely and motherly roles under the strict guidelines
of ethical quality and appearance, Nora finds she has her very
own will. At last, Nora acknowledges there is stand out way
that prompts her actual character, and that way starts outside
the doll house.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
According to Cambridge Dictionary ―Feminism is the belief that
women should be allowed the same rights, power, and
opportunities as men and be treated in the same way, or the set
of activities intended to achieve this state. Human rights‖ and
Ibsen‘s Doll‘s house is the best play to examine the feminism in
European society. Baseer, A., Alvi, S. D., & Zafran, F. (2013)
share in their paper that the main view of this play is that
patriarchy makes the ideas of labor and lady's otherliness on
the premise of typical or social idea and not the characteristic
ones. The play is loaded with numerous expressions and
conditions which are the markers of man's craving of control
over lady, and his constantly apparent wish to be obeyed and
submitted to. In the first demonstration of the dramatization
we are educated of Nora's preferring for macaroons and
Helmer's strict requests against this confectionary thing.
According to Jeanne, M., McGlinn and James E. A Doll‘s House
is a realistic drama that highlights the cultural conflicts of the
nineteenth century. With its stunning and controversial
conclusion, it marks an enormous, historical shift within the
function of theater. But Ibsen‘s masterpiece stays a celebration
EUROPEAN ACADEMIC RESEARCH - Vol. IV, Issue 8 / November 2016
6481
Shagufta Khurram- Criticalness of the title "A Doll" in connection to Nora; in
Henrik Ibnen's play "A Doll's House"
of the artwork of theater. With its emphasis on man or woman
characters, costumes and personal props comparable to Nora‘s
macaroons and tarantella gown. Ibsen‘s play transforms
fashioned stage conventions right into a prophetic vision of a
brand new society, one where members, all men and ladies, are
free from the restraint of taking part in pre-determined roles.
According to Michael C., Wiseman (2010) Nora as a Doll in
Henrik Ibsen's A Doll's House, Nora Helmer spends the
majority of her dramatic time as a doll: a dull, uninvolved
character with little identity of her own. Her entire life is a
build of societal standards and the desires of others. Until she
goes to the acknowledgment that her life is a sham, she spends
her entire life in a fantasy world. In this fantasy world, Nora
does not consider life important, a disposition that prompted a
significant number of the plot's confusions.
Until her change, Nora is exceptionally honest and
capricious. Her first follow up on stage is her paying the
conveyance body. In spite of the fact that his administration
just costs 50-p., she gives him a hundred. In spite of the fact
that an extra 50-p. is not a lot of cash, the easygoing path in
which she offers it to him is demonstrative of her financial
volatilities (Cummings). She gives him the hundred and before
he can express gratitude toward her, she chooses amidst the
exchange that she is not sufficiently tolerant to sit tight for
change. The way this apparently unremarkable event is
exhibited as the principal activity in front of an audience
showcases the rash demeanor suggested. Haugen, E. I. (1979)
remarks that Ibsen‘s Nora is not just a woman arguing for
female liberation; she is much more. She embodies the comedy
as well as the tragedy of modern life.
Michael, B. (2012) reviews that Carrie Cracknell's
creation without doubt puts a brand new spin on Ibsen's 1879
basic. As if to remind us that this is a play about domestic
revolution. In this timeless gain knowledge of the need for
domestic honesty and non secular liberation, Ibsen's normal
EUROPEAN ACADEMIC RESEARCH - Vol. IV, Issue 8 / November 2016
6482
Shagufta Khurram- Criticalness of the title "A Doll" in connection to Nora; in
Henrik Ibnen's play "A Doll's House"
constructing block is the long scene. A basic instance occurs
when Nora, aware that her forged signature on a financial
document is about to be printed, appears to her platonic
admirer Dr Rank for support. Simply at the very second she is
set to ask him for money, he openly publicizes his love – which
kills her request stone dead. As written, there's a natural
rhythm to the scene, which is not helped here by using an extra
twist of the set as the characters exchange rooms. Wheeler, D.
(2013) states that in late decades feminist critics have
endeavored to fitting A Doll's House as a feminist play, yet they
have been met with a flood of feedback from a few scholars who
like to stretch different parts of the play. In one sense to call it
a feminist play is, obviously, a time misplacement, since the
feminist movement did not begin until the late 1960s and early
70s, be that as it may, in any case, Nora's surrender of Torvald
and her kids toward the end of the play can even now be viewed
as a defiance to the predominant patriarchal estimations of
European culture.
3. SCOPE OF THE STUDY
The study consists of an evaluation of the title "A Doll" in
Henrik Ibsen's play "A Doll's House". It specializes in cure with
women persona Nora, the protagonist in her dwelling and loved
ones. The writer depicts the emotional, social, Psychological
and economic issues of women living in 19th Century. The
study mirrors up the male dominating society where the entire
ideas and insurance policies have been made by way of men and
even ladies had been handled consistent with the rules and
moods of men of their homes. This study shall be helpful to
provide extensive analysis of the remedy of women as the dolls
when they had been at their fathers' properties earlier than
marriage and had been handled as the dolls of their husbands'
houses after their marriage. This paper also specializes in a
feminist evaluation of Henrik Ibsen‘s A Doll‘s House in relation
EUROPEAN ACADEMIC RESEARCH - Vol. IV, Issue 8 / November 2016
6483
Shagufta Khurram- Criticalness of the title "A Doll" in connection to Nora; in
Henrik Ibnen's play "A Doll's House"
with Nora. Throughout the play, we study of struggles, secrets,
and self-deceptions, as we to parent Nora‘s relationships. After
an extended, suspenseful progress that leaves the viewers
anxious in regards to the Nora‘s security and well-being, the
tension is eventually resolved, best to carry about an additional,
sudden turning point.
4. RESEARCH
QUESTIONS
METHODOLOGY
AND
RESEARCH
The Qualitative Research Methodology has been adopted to
critically analyze the title "A Doll" in connection to Nora; in
Henrik Ibnen's play "A Doll's House". The work has also been
adopted to evaluate the depiction of women in 19th century
related with the emotional, psychological, social and financial
problems related with their existence, and survival in the
society they breathe in during Victorian era. This research tries
to answer the following questions:
a. What were the circumstances for a woman during
Victorian era?
b. How did Ibsen focus emotional, psychological, social and
financial problems related with
women during the era ?
c. How does Ibsen depict a woman in his play in relation
with Nora?
d. What is the symbolical meaning of a doll in the play?
5. DISCUSSION
The main purpose of this research study is to share the
importance and ironical meaning of the ―Doll‖ which was used
for a girl in male dominating society. The title of A Doll's House
is typically enormous and also exceedingly suggestive of the
message that Ibsen appears to have proposed to pass on
through the play. There are two imperative parts of the play,
EUROPEAN ACADEMIC RESEARCH - Vol. IV, Issue 8 / November 2016
6484
Shagufta Khurram- Criticalness of the title "A Doll" in connection to Nora; in
Henrik Ibnen's play "A Doll's House"
which the title straightforwardly indicates: the doll and the
house. The doll speaks to Nora the focal character, and the
house remains for the place of Helmer where Nora lives.
Pretend is by all accounts the name of the diversion in Henrik
Ibsen's A Doll's House. The principle characters in the play
claim to be somebody who others might want them to be, rather
than being their actual selves. The individual that emerges the
most as a character whose pretend is practically perfect to the
point where it appears she drives two changed lives is Nora.
This title speaks to and identifies with the entire play. 'A Doll's
House' identifies with power, it speaks to a doll being played
with and claimed. This doll is controlled; everything its might
do is delineated. The title is critical to society and embarrassing
situation inside the house. Ibsen speaks to Nora as a doll. Nora
in this way responds in an indistinguishable path from a doll,
caught in a house. Helmer has control over Nora and regards
her as a doll, his doll. A doll's home can look great and
impeccably honest all things considered, however what about
within? Amid this play we recognize reality underneath the
beauty of 'A Doll's House'. The importance in the title is urgent
to comprehension the relationship amongst Nora and Torvald.
She is Torvald's cherishing and infantile spouse, and
accidentally, a solid, free lady. As the play advances, Nora's
persona shifts from that of the regular energetic, trophy spouse
seen by Torvald and companions, to that of a self-enabling,
willing lady.
The contention of the story is driven by forging of loan
documents to raise money for an expensive trip to Italy;
Krogstad, who had handled the advance, tries to force Nora
over the way that she twisted the records. Another part of the
wrongdoing, which was not expounded on so much, is that
regardless of the possibility that the records were not twisted,
Nora did not have any way to reimburse the credit at any rate.
Nora could be pardoned for trusting Krogstad not to force her,
but rather not perceiving that the advance would need to be
EUROPEAN ACADEMIC RESEARCH - Vol. IV, Issue 8 / November 2016
6485
Shagufta Khurram- Criticalness of the title "A Doll" in connection to Nora; in
Henrik Ibnen's play "A Doll's House"
reimbursed is indefensible. In spite of the fact that at one guide
we are driven toward trust that at whatever point Nora would
interfere money far from Torvald, she would hold half of it to
reimburse the obligation, when Krogstad defies her, she admits
that she is not, indeed, possessing the rest of the adjust.
A critical part of a fantasy world is the suspension of
circumstances and end results. Nora's lazy approach is
exceptionally unmistakable all through the story. One case of
her negligence for others is the point at which she is scolding
Mrs. Linde1 for reproducing prohibited macaroons into the
house. In spite of the fact that she is simply attempting to
conceal her thoughtless activities, she couldn't care less whom
she harms all the while.
In the event that we read the play deliberately and
comprehend it basically, we feel that "doll" has been utilized as
a part of the title in a somewhat humorous way. "Doll" means
lack of involvement, excellence, and the fundamentally ladylike
nature which is seen in Nora when we take a gander at her
from outside. Without a doubt, from the perspective of Helmer,
who is essentially a generally possessive spouse, Nora the doll
is something like a lifeless protest with which he can play and
appreciate. As Nora says toward the end of the play, she had
been her father's doll until her marriage and she has been
Helmer's doll for eight long years since her marriage. The
typical importance of the title, "A Doll's House," alludes to the
female characters in the story. Every lady has a part, and she is
relied upon to satisfy that part without question. The ladies
through the title are depicted as dolls, lifeless articles
dispossessed of unrestrained choice, nobility, or knowledge.
Nora is the story's best illustration while portraying her
association with her father, "He used to call me his doll-child,
and he played with me the way I played with my dolls," and "he
let me know every one of his conclusions, so I had similar ones
as well." This was the means by which she carried on with her
whole life in connection to men. She did what she was told, and
EUROPEAN ACADEMIC RESEARCH - Vol. IV, Issue 8 / November 2016
6486
Shagufta Khurram- Criticalness of the title "A Doll" in connection to Nora; in
Henrik Ibnen's play "A Doll's House"
she acted in the way that was normal. She was a belonging not
a person. "Doll" suits Nora in the event that we take a gander
at her with the conventional or uncritical eye, as Helmer or
Mrs. Linde would look, or rather as they might want Nora to
be. Actually however that Nora has all the capability of being a
genuine individual, looking for personality and nobility, and
aware of the considerable number of impediments forced by her
better half and his general public's conventions. Nora is not a
genuine doll but rather an evident one. She is subservient; she
is outlined according to the request and wishes of Helmer, who
might want to imagine that he makes her what he needs her to
be; she is likewise impeccable and constant, insentient and
simple to handle like dormant dolls, that is, according to Mr.
Helmer. Her conclusions and interests are completely decided
and controlled by him. She is his doll, similar to she was her
father's doll till marriage, Helmer has her, fundamentally and
just for no particular reason. Nora has herself clarified the fun
that her husband acquired while their playhouse.
Nora: "...But our home has never been anything but a
playroom, I've been your doll-wife, just as I used to be Papa's
doll-child. And the children have been my dolls. I used to
think it was fun when you came in and played with me, just as
they think its fun when I go in and play games with them.
That's all our marriage has been…. ―(Act III, last scene)
Another unexpected sign in the utilization of "dolls" is that the
house does not have a place with the doll. Nor is it made or kept
up for her. The house, not home, is Mr. Torvald Helmer's. In
one sense, he has the house, alongside the doll! The house, in
this way, appears to have a place with the doll; regardless it is
her enclosure. It is just in that feeling that the house has a
place with the doll. Along these lines, Nora is the doll, and the
house is a cage or "case" for her. Without a doubt, the topic of
the play recommends that her home (or home, or family) is a
hurdle on her opportunity and prospects of life.
EUROPEAN ACADEMIC RESEARCH - Vol. IV, Issue 8 / November 2016
6487
Shagufta Khurram- Criticalness of the title "A Doll" in connection to Nora; in
Henrik Ibnen's play "A Doll's House"
Ibsen has depicted this character Nora in such a way, to the
point that is by all accounts a part modular for each lady.
Einar's comment is absolutely right; as we see amid the play in
act I toward the starting when Nora hiding to eat Makarooni
and as she hear Trovald coming, she rapidly puts away
everything and carries on as though she has never utilized
anything what her husband had prohibited. This act of Nora
doesn't indicate resistance for the battle of a lady's rights, yet it
is obviously a demonstration of adoration for a husband that a
wife has. There can be numerous more scenes which can be said
when Nora spends a considerable measure of cash, after her
better half demonstrates a little unwillingness, Nora announces
that things for the most part incorporate materials of family
unit products and for her significant other and kids and
including Christmas shows, and embraces her better half with
cherishing look as though she is sad, more than that if Nora a
squanderer, she would purchase things of no utilization or for
her own self. Everything she does is for her better half and
children.
It's a truly strong choice, most definitely which Nora has
taken. Some may even call it silly. She doesn't have an
occupation. Not a stack of attractive aptitudes. No home. No
prospects of any sort. By settling on this decision, she's avoiding
herself from the general public she's dependably been a part of.
Most "respectable" individuals simply aren't going to fall out
with her. It appears like Nora has experienced a sort of
individual arousing. She's reached the decision that she's not a
completely acknowledged individual. She needs to invest some
energy making sense of her identity as an individual or she'll
never be much else besides somebody's really little doll. This
would be unthinkable under the covering nearness of Torvald.
She should drive herself to confront the world alone.
In any case, is there any desire for Torvald and Nora
getting back together? The last line of the play appears to
propose that perhaps there is. Torvald is separated from
EUROPEAN ACADEMIC RESEARCH - Vol. IV, Issue 8 / November 2016
6488
Shagufta Khurram- Criticalness of the title "A Doll" in connection to Nora; in
Henrik Ibnen's play "A Doll's House"
everyone else in the lounge room. Organize bearings let us
know that, ""A hope flashes across his mind"" and after that
Torvald says, "The most wonderful thing of all?" (Act III,
pg.381). He's referring to the discussion he and Nora had just
before she left the room. Nora says that in the event that
they're ever to be more than outsiders "the most wonderful
thing of all would have to happen," that their "life together
would be a real wedlock". (Act III, pg.376)
All in all, has Torvald acknowledged what this implies? Has
he made sense of that they both need to regard each different as
people keeping in mind the end goal to have a genuine
marriage? Has he taken a bite of the forbidden fruit as well?
Ibsen doesn't let us know without a doubt. Perhaps Torvald
runs out into the snow and improves it all. Perhaps his pride
keeps him in the house.
6. CONCLUSION
It is said when there are prose there are cons. So is the
situation with Nora. It is difficult to decline that Nora is a
perfect housewife, with minding state of mind, adoring acts and
an impeccable mother and a spouse. She has got all that a wife
could request or a lady may require. Never the less, the last
stride is a stage that has overwhelmed the critics. Here we can
say, somehow, if not totally agreed with the critics who support
Nora as entire, may not be right.
Marker, F., & Marker, L. L. (1970) stated that "A doll
house did not need to be taken as a genuine articulation about
lady's rights in light of the fact that the courageous woman of
act 3 is a limitless change of the heroin of acts 1 and 2." In the
last demonstration Nora unquestionably appears to have
changed all. When we experience the play, in act 1 and 2, she is
by all accounts so urgent to spare her marriage; is by all
accounts so gravely with her better half, and does whatever she
can do to keep up her marriage life. Be that as it may, when we
EUROPEAN ACADEMIC RESEARCH - Vol. IV, Issue 8 / November 2016
6489
Shagufta Khurram- Criticalness of the title "A Doll" in connection to Nora; in
Henrik Ibnen's play "A Doll's House"
move to the peak, when even her better half argues her to stay,
not to abandon him, since he in outrage said something to her,
similar cherishing Nora acts totally unanticipated, as she is not
alike Nora whom we found in act 1 and 2.
We could experience the profundities of a dramatization
by Ibsen and the character of Nora. Nora in this play was
without a doubt a doll to love. She is a young lady who each
lady may wish to be, as she so courageously helps her husband
through extreme time, when he is gravely wiped out and
substantiates herself a perfect and overcome lady. We became
acquainted with how minding and cherishing she is, with her
husband and her children. She had to go through a lot to keep
the secret a secret, she had to endure a lot, but yet how long
will you keep a secret a secret? What's more, when at long last
the ugly truth is let out in the open the entire situation changed
and similar Nora, who we however cherishing and minding,
ended up being acting so in an unexpected way; that impelled
us to think her a lot distinctive character. Nora is fed up and
breaks the chain of unfortunate connections, declining to be a
casualty of her conditions any more. Keeping in mind the end
goal to escape her life as a toy of the men throughout her life,
Nora must expel herself from the impact of her significant
other, who is himself controlled by what the world expects of
him. Here Ibsen criticizes the European culture and society
with relation to Nora that a woman is not toy or puppet which
is played or controlled by men in every walk of her life. The
emotional, psychological, social, financial and moral aspects of a
woman life are highlighted in a best manner.
In spite of the fact that Nora is at last ready to split far
from her life as a doll, she does as such to the detriment of her
kids. Nora's extraordinary activity of deserting her kids "is both
triumphantly right and appallingly wrong‖. She does what she
accepts is important to get herself and make a fresh start, yet
in the process forsakes her cultivating compulsions. At last, it
appears that the control that exploited Nora throughout recent
EUROPEAN ACADEMIC RESEARCH - Vol. IV, Issue 8 / November 2016
6490
Shagufta Khurram- Criticalness of the title "A Doll" in connection to Nora; in
Henrik Ibnen's play "A Doll's House"
years burdens her kids too. We can reason that the
circumstances turned, however nor was it the mix-up of the
spouse the wife yet that is the manner by which a few times life
can change and with this surprising change, so change the
general population, where their demonstrations may be
tremendous or to the point of making us even puzzled.
REFERENCES:
1. Adams, R. M. (1957). Henrik Ibsen: the fifty-first
anniversary. The Hudson Review, 10(3), 415-423.
2. Baseer, A., Alvi, S. D., & Zafran, F. (2013). The Use of
Symbolic Language in Ibsen's A Doll's House: A
Feministic Perspective. Language in India, 13(3).
3. Bennett, L. (1910). Ibsen as a Pioneer of the Woman
Movement.Westminster Review, 173, 278-85.
4. Bull, F., Koht, H., & Seip, D. A. (1972). Ibsens drama:
innledninger til hundreårsutgaven av Henrik Ibsens
samlede verker (Vol. 35). Gyldendal.
5. Crawford, O. (1891). The Ibsen Question. Fortnightly
Review, 55, 727-40.
6. Dietrich, R. F. (1981). Nora‘s Change of Dress+ Female
Character in Ibsen, Henrik' Doll House'-Weigand
Revisited. Theatre Annual, 36, 20-40.
7. Feminism, Cambridge Dictionary. Retrieved from
http://www.dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/f
eminism
8. Haugen, E. I. (1979). Ibsen's drama: Author to audience.
U of Minnesota Press.
9. Ibsen, H. (1989). A Doll's House
10. Jeanne, M., McGlinn and James E. A Teacher‘s Guide to
the Signet Classics Edition of Henrik Ibsen‘s A Doll‘s
House
EUROPEAN ACADEMIC RESEARCH - Vol. IV, Issue 8 / November 2016
6491
Shagufta Khurram- Criticalness of the title "A Doll" in connection to Nora; in
Henrik Ibnen's play "A Doll's House"
11. Marker, F., & Marker, L. L. (1970). The first ‗Nora':
Notes on the world premiere of" A Doll's House".
12. McCarthy, M. (1956), The will and testament of
Ibsen. Partisan Review, 23, 74-80.
13. Michael C., Wiseman (2010), Nora as a Doll in Henrik
Ibsen's A Doll's House, Inquiries VOL. 2 NO. 03, PG. 1/1
14. Michael, B. (2012), A Doll‘s House –Review, the
Guardian's theatre.
15. Wheeler, D. (2013). To what extent is Henrik Ibsen's" A
Doll's House" a feminist play?. Grin Verlag Ohg.
EUROPEAN ACADEMIC RESEARCH - Vol. IV, Issue 8 / November 2016
6492