Power shifts and cultural conflict Colin Sparks Department of Journalism Hong Kong Baptist University Introduction • Give some comparative facts about the “power shift” – Size of economies – Rates of growth – Income and income distribution • Consider the implications for media and communication – – – – Size of advertising expenditure Structure of the newspaper market Situation of journalists Trajectory of newspapers industry • Discuss briefly other “power shifts” – Consider their cultural consequences School of Communication 2 Relative GDP at Current US Dollar Prices Brazil Russian Federation India China South Africa Japan United States Source: The World Bank 1991 2001 School of Communication 2010 3 Percentages of World GDP for Selected Countries 1980 2010 Brazil Russia India China South Africa Japan United States Rest of world Source: IMF World Economic Outlook Database School of Communication 4 2010 GDPs in US$bn at PPPs 16000 14527 14000 12000 10128 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 4070 2187 2237 527 186 0 Brazil Russia India China Source: IMF World Economic Outlook Database School of Communication South Africa USA Finland 5 2017 Projected GDPs in US$bn at PPPs 25000 20336 20000 19704 15000 10000 5000 7574 3171 3295 752 239 0 Brazil Russia India China Source: IMF World Economic Outlook Database School of Communication South Africa USA Finland 6 Patent applications 2009 500000 456106 450000 400000 350000 314604 300000 250000 200000 150000 100000 50000 21944 38564 34287 6383 0 Brazil Russia India China South Africa USA World Intellectual Property Organization 2012 WIPO IP Fact and Figures School of Communication 7 2011 per capita GNI in 2005US$ at PPPs 50000 45000 40000 35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 43017 32438 10162 13439 7476 9469 3468 Brazil Russia India China South Africa USA Finland Source: United Nations Development Programme Human Development Report 2011 School of Communication 8 UNDP Estimates of Gini Coefficients 2000-2011 Country Gini Coefficient Brazil 53.9 Russia 42.3 India 36.8 China 41.5 South Africa 57.8 USA 40.8 Hong Kong 43.4 Sweden 25.0 Finland 26.9 Japan (1993) 25.0 Singapore (1998) 42.0 Source: United Nations Development Programme Human Development Report 2011 School of Communication 9 In summary • There is an economic shift going on – It is not as large yet as is sometimes claimed – China is by far the most important BRIC – The shift is likely to continue into the future • The US is today by far the dominant economy – Much larger size even than China – Much higher per capita income – The most innovative economy • Both the BRICS and the advanced world are marked by great and growing inequality School of Communication 10 Advertising Expenditure 2000-2010 at Constant 2005 $USm 160000 150160 140000 127692 120000 Brazil 100000 Russia India 80000 China South Africa 60000 USA Finland 40000 25206 20000 13392 5620 4759 1277 4754 1094 1071 5510 2950 3004 1814 0 2001 Source: World Advertising Research Centre School of Communication 2011 11 Per capita adspend in $US in 2011 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 470 412 93 85 62 23 4 Brazil Russia India China Source: Derived from World Advertising Research Centre School of Communication South Africa USA Finland 12 700 Circulation of paid-for daily newspapers per 1000 of adult population in 2008 612 600 482 500 400 300 200 200 100 142 73 111 51 No data 0 Brazil Russia India China South Africa USA Japan Finland Source: World Press Trends 2009 School of Communication 13 A rough measure of media freedom Lower score = more media freedom 160 136 140 120 100 80 66 60 40 58 35 20 12 14 South Africa USA 0 -20 Brazil Russia India China Finland -10 Source: Reporters Without Frontiers Press Freedom Index 2011-12 School of Communication 14 Persecution of Journalists in Selected Countries Imprisoned Journalists 2011 Murders of journalists 1992-2011 Brazil 0 21 Russia India China South Africa USA Finland 0 2 27 0 0 0 53 28 2 3 5 0 Country Source: Committee to Protect Journalists School of Communication 15 A rough measure of corruption Lower score = more perceived corruption 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 9,4 7,1 3,8 2,4 Brazil Russia 3,1 India 3,6 China 4,1 South Africa USA Finland Source: Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2011 School of Communication 16 US daily press circulation 65000 60000 55000 50000 45000 40000 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Source: Newspaper Association of America (Note: Figures for 2010 are interpolated.) School of Communication 17 Chinese daily press circulation Cumulative annual circulation of `daily' newspapers published 5, 6 & 7 times weekly 37 000 000 000 35 000 000 000 33 000 000 000 31 000 000 000 29 000 000 000 27 000 000 000 25 000 000 000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Source: General Administration of Press and Publishing (GAPP) 2001-2010 School of Communication 18 In summary • Low per capita income means lower potential for subscription revenue • Low advertising expenditure means poorer mass media – High Gini co-efficients mean large market for elite media • Media struggle to achieve similar levels of freedom as in the advanced world – Level of repression of journalists relatively high – Level of corruption of journalists relatively high • Media still in a phase of national expansion unlike in the advanced world • Likely still to be relatively weak compared to US media in international terms for some time School of Communication 19 There have been earlier power shifts • Incumbents and challengers a common pattern – Results do not always result in a lasting victory for the challenger – Victors and benefactors not necessarily the same • Late 19th to early 20th Century – – – – UK economy surpassed by Germany and USA in late 19th Century Primary conflict between UK and Germany Short term victor UK (at least in 1918) Main benefactors USA and USSR after 1945 • Late 20th Century – Primary conflict between USA and USSR – Short term victor USA (at least after 1989-1991) – Main benefactors USA and China? • In the longer term? – It is possible that China’s economy will surpass that of the USA in the foreseeable future – There are already obvious signs of conflict School of Communication 20 Not yet a military balance Estimated expenditure in $billion 2010 800 698,3 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 121,1 34,4 58,6 46,1 Brazil Russia India 4,6 0 China South Africa 3,4 USA Finland Source: SIPRI 2012 School of Communication 21 Economics and culture • A major reason for international cultural influence is economic and political power – Language – Sport – Movies • The economic rise of the BRICS will be accompanied by increasing cultural influence – On what timescale? • Economic rise leads to conflict – – – – Cultural rise will also lead to conflicts Already visible in things like internet governance China’s “going out” strategy Think about popular culture during the Cold War School of Communication 22 Some conclusions • There is an economic shift going on – It is not as dramatic as some pretend – It is not replicated in politics, culture or military power • This shift in the balance of power is likely to continue – Will result in conflicts – Some of these conflicts (hopefully all) will be about culture – Will involve both international competition and national popular cultures School of Communication 23
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz