ROLE OF BEAK MORPHOLOGY IN IMPACT PROTECTION OF WOODPECKER BRAIN – A FINITE ELEMENT STUDY Lizhen Wang1, Jason Tak-Man Cheung2, Fang Pu1, Deyu Li1, Ming Zhang3, Yubo Fan1,* 1 Key Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, 2 Li Ning Sports Science Research Center, Beijing 3 Department of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; *email: [email protected] INTRODUCTION Human head impact injuries caused by a sudden force impact are very common in aviation lifesaving, car crash accident, war or sports activities. Yet, an intriguing example of nature is woodpecker which is free from head injury even it drums trunk continually at a speed of about 6-7 m/s and a deceleration of about 1000g [1,2]. Woodpecker must have special morphology to attenuate repetative impact force to sustain rapid pecking without skull or brain injury. In this study, the biomechanical role of woodpecker beak morphology during impact was investigated using the finite element (FE) approach. METHODS A three-dimensional (3D) FE model of woodpecker head was developed (Fig.1-b) based on the actual geometry of woodpecker obtained from micro-CT images (Skyscan1076, Skyscan, Belgium) with spatial resolution of 18 μm. (a) (b) which was considered as one single body within the skull without considering the cerebral-spinal fluid (CSF). The FE results were validated based on kinematics measurements. Different FE simulations were done having the whole head collided with a rigid wall at an initial velocity of 0.05m/s, 0.5m/s, 1m/s, 3m/s and duration of 10-20 ms. Parametric analysis was done by changing the relative length of the upper and lower beak of the FE model (Fig.1-b,c,d) to evaluate its biomechanics effects on brain displacement and strain during beak impact. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The outer tissue layer covering the upper beak was 1.6 mm longer than that of the lower beak; on the contrary, the high strength bone structure of the upper beak was about 1.2 mm shorter than the lower beak. It was expected that length variation with upper and lower beaks would influence the impact mechanics with the tree trunk and load transmission to the brain. Brain injury was shown to correlate with strain and strain rate [4]. By comparing the FE predicted strain at the anterior and posterior cerebrum as well as the anterior cerebellum during impact (Fig. 1-b,c,d), it was found that equal upper and lower beak length consistently induced higher Green Lagrange strains at all three locations of woodpecker brain. Table 1: Predicted peak Green Lagrange strain of three selection regions of the brain during pecking. Peak Green Lagrange Three location on the brain strain ( μ ) BeakLower>BeakUpper BeakLower=BeakUpper BeakLower<BeakUpper (c) (d) Anterior cerebrum Posterior cerebrum Anterior cerebellum 0.04 0.69 0.08 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.11 0.18 CONCLUSIONS Of the many features characterizing birds, the beak is iconic especially for the woodpecker. A longer lower beak bone was found to reduce the strain of the brain effectively during impact. Beak morphology was found to affect impact mechanics and tissue strain, which might play an important role for preventing woodpecker brain injury. REFERENCES Figure 1: (a) The micro-CT image of great spotted woodpecker head; and FE model of the (b) BeakLower>BeakUpper, (c) BeakLower=BeakUpper, (d) BeakLower<BeakUpper. The model consisted of skull, upper/lower beak, hyoid and brain. The material properties of skull and beak, hyoid were derived from mechanical tests. Viscoelastic properties of human brain [3] was assumed for the woodpecker brain, 1. Spring, L. W. Condor 67, 457-488, 1965. 2. May, P. R.et al. Archives of Neurology 36, 370-373, 1979. 3. Stalnaker,R. Mechanical properties of the head, West Virginia University. 1969. 4. Lee, M.C. et al. Journal of biomechanics 22, 537-542, 1989. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.10925208) and the National Key Lab of Virtual Reality Technology for funding.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz