Unlggtpsd
Aukee
O
t rwheor 
sf …
Tnttee  ei:
• 
• 
• 
• 
CONTENTION TYPE STYLE/TONE PERSUASIVE TECHNIQUES • 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
HEADLINES GRAPHICS Appeals to … A;acks/Praise Clichés/Colourful language EmoGons EmoGve language Evidence – stats/graphs/diagrams ExaggeraGon GeneralisaGons Reason/Logic RepeGGon Rhetorical quesGons •  EFFECT ON PROSPECTIVE AUDIENCE Inft ravthqss  erc l
BACKGROUND KNOWLEDGE TO ANALYSE THIS ARTICLE: BULLYING/CYBER BULLYING DEBATE Inft ravthqss  erh l
Raises the quesGon: Will he/the business survive? Stereotypical representaGon of “Underbelly” criminal mastermind escaping “the sinking ship” Pu`ng money in front of people Money is the main emphasis of people smugglers “Rats leaving a sinking ship” Use of colour: “all at sea”; lighter to darker The name of the ship “PEOPLE SMUGGLING BUSINESS MODEL” Sinking ship = going out of business/ business is “sunk” No asylum seekers present Boat deliberately drawn to look like a rickety coastal fishing boat used by people smugglers TONE = unsympatheGc, causGc & criGcal of people smugglers Cartoonist’s opinion: tables turned on people smugglers BACKGROUND KNOWLEDGE TO ANALYSE THIS CARTOON: ASYLUM SEEKER DEBATE