X-RAY DIFFRACTION STUDY ON LIQUID AND NON CRYSTALLINE SOLID GALLIUM, BISMUTH AND MERCURY A. Bererhi, A. Bizid, L. Bosio, R. Cortes, A. Defrain, C. Segaud To cite this version: A. Bererhi, A. Bizid, L. Bosio, R. Cortes, A. Defrain, et al.. X-RAY DIFFRACTION STUDY ON LIQUID AND NON CRYSTALLINE SOLID GALLIUM, BISMUTH AND MERCURY. Journal de Physique Colloques, 1980, 41 (C8), pp.C8-218-C8-221. <10.1051/jphyscol:1980856>. <jpa-00220363> HAL Id: jpa-00220363 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00220363 Submitted on 1 Jan 1980 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers. L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés. JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE ColZoque C8, supplBmeni: au n08, Tome 41, aoCt 1980, page Cg-218 X-RAY DIFFRACTION STUDY ON L I Q U I D AND NON CRYSTALLINE SOLID GALL1 UP?, B l SYUTH AND PIERCURY A. Bererhi, A. ~ i z i d * , L. Bosio, R. Cortes, A. Defrain and C. Segaud Groupe de Recherche n04 du CNRS "Physique des Liquides e t Electrochimie", assoeie' ri l'llniversitd Pierre e t Marie Curie, 4 place Jussieu, 75230 Paris Cbdes 05, France. *Universite' de Tunis, Facult6 des Sciences, Ddpartement de Physique, Campus Universitaire 1006 Le Belvdde're, Tunis, Tunisie. Abstract.- An attempt is made to compare the structures deduced from X-ray measurements on some pure metals, both in the liquid and the non crystalline state. With Ga and Bi, the liquid and the amorphous solid structures show some similarities and seem to be correlated with the solid phase which occurs when crystallisation takes place. Different behaviour is found with Hg : the liquid structure factor differs from the structure factor in the amorphous state whose main peak is symmetric in form. INTRODUCTION The p r o p e r t i e s of most o f t h e l i q u i d metals r i d e monochromator i n t h e d i f f r a c t e d beam. The r a d i a t i o n s were CuKa and NoKa. By d i v i d i n g t h e sam- have been s u c c e s s f u l l y described by a hard sphere p l e i n t o small d r o p l e t s , i t was p o s s i b l e t o study d e s c r i p t i o n i n c o n j o n c t i o n w i t h p e r t u r b a t i o n tech- t h e s t r u c t u r e o f supercooled l i q u i d s : f o r Cia and Hg t h e d i s p e r s i o n s were prepared by using an u l t r a - niques [I]. Concerning t h e non c r y s t a l l i n e s o l i d s t a t e , t h e dense random packing o f hard spheres[2] sonic generator t o disperse t h e molten metals w i t h i n i s apparently a s a t i s f a c t o r y approach t o model 1ing e t h y l alcohol s a t u r a t e d w i t h sodium o l e a t e , thus atomic arrangements i n metal 1i c glasses. However, a1 l o w i ng experiments under t h e normal me1ti ng p o i n t these d e s c r i p t i o n s completely f a i l when c r y s t a l l i - a t supercooling o f 140 and 61 K r e s p e c t i v e l y ; f o r s a t i o n does n o t form c l o s e packed s o l i d s ; i n these B i , t h e procedure o f forming d r o p l e t s t o achieve cases, t h e l i q u i d s t r u c t u r e f a c t o r o f t e n has a l a r g e supercooling [41 was n o t convenient f o r X-ray shoulder o r a hump on t h e high-angle s i d e o f t h e i n v e s t i g a t i o n because o f extraneous Braggs peaks p r i n c i p a l peak and, i n amorphous s t a t e , n e i t h e r t h e provided by the oxyde-coated drop1 e t s : t h e d i sper- s t r u c t u r e f a c t o r nor t h e p a i r c o r r e l a t i o n f u n c t i o n sions were prepared by shaking show t h e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s p l i t t i n g o f t h e second hexadecanol w i t h some s t e r o l s as s u r f a c t a n t s , t h e max imum . t h e molten B i i n maximum supercooling was thus l i m i t e d t o 68 K. The present paper describes t h e t y p i c a l behav i o u r of t h r e e o f these metals (namely Ga, B i and I n a l l cases, samples were cooled o r heated in VaCUUum chamber i n which t h e pressure could be Hg) which o f f e r t h e experimenters t h e unique opport u n i t y o f i n v e s t i g a t i n g by X-ray d i f f r a c t i o n mea- reduced surements t h e s t r u c t u r e ( i ) o f t h e normal and su- torr except f o r Hg where t h e cham- b e r was f i l l e d w i t h helium [51. Nominally pure amorphous metals a r e o n l y avai - percooled l i q u i d , ( i f ) of t h e amorphous s o l i d Pre- l a b l e by vapour d e p o s i t i o n onto l i q u i d helium c o o l d pared by vapour d e p o s i t i o n onto substrates cooled s u b s t r a t e s [21 : the low temperature condensation a t very low temperature. apparatus, c o n s i s t i n g ofan i o n i c u l t r a - h i g h vacuum system w i t h an e l e c t r o n gun and a l i q u i d helium EXPERIMENTS An X r a y s diffractometer c r y o s t a t , i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h t h e X-ray d i f f r a c t o m e o p e r a t i n g i n a symne- t r i c a l r e f l e c t i o n mode has been used t o determine t e r b u i l t on t h e pumping system, has been described t h e s t r u c t u r e o f b o t h l i q u i d and amorphous s o l i d elsewhere [61 ; t h e o n l y m o d i f i c a t i o n s consisted i n t h e use o f a post-specimen monochromator and a spe- metals. c i a 1 device f o r mercury d e p o s i t i o n . The experimental arrangement f o r t h e measure- Though t h e y were t h i n ( r e s p e c t i v e l y 3, 0.2 and ment o f t h e s c a t t e r e d i n t e n s i t i e s by l i q u i d s consis- 0.1 pm For Ga, B i and Hg) t h e amorphous f i l m s were t e d o f a t h e t a - t h e t a d i f f r a c t o m e t e r [31 w i t h a sta- t h i c k enough f o r X-ray d i f f r a c t i o n study. Three t i o n a r y , h o r i z o n t a l sample and a bent l i t h i u m f l u o - Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphyscol:1980856 1 I"" -- &-'I 2 4 ilqur. 5 Pal- c l v . l r r l a 6 funcllon for , l o u l d and 8 10 aorawr IIINUI - c8-220 JOURNAL DE P H Y S l Q U t wavelengths were used, CrKa, CuKa and MoKa, t o ob- f r e e z i n g occurs i n supercooled l i q u i d Ga i t i s r a - t a i n r e l i a b l e d a t a i n t h e low and h i g h wavevector t h e r t o t h e metastable @-phase whereas t h e normal q = 4nsine/X and a l s o t o t a k e advantage of t h e s t a b l e form has always been observed t o occur when wavelength dependence o f X-ray absorption. c r y s t a l l i s a t i o n takes p l a c e i n supercooled l i q u i d Hg and B i ; moreover, some authors used t h e c r y s - RESULTS AND DISCUSSION t a l l i n e l a t t i c e as a framework f o r d e s c r i b i n g li- The s t r u c t u r e f a c t o r S(q) o f l i q u i d Ga, B i and Hg are shown i n F i g . 1, 2 and 3. Both Ga and B i q u i d Ga 181, B i 191 and Hg [5, 101 by a quasi c r y s t a l l i n e s t r u c t u r e model : t h e y a l l e s t a b l i s h a e x h i b i t a shoulder on t h e r i g h - a n g l e s i d e whereas close correspondence between the l i q u i d and corres- Hg o n l y shows a hump ; i n Ga, t h e shoulder gradual- ponding c r y s t a l l i n e s o l i d s t r u c t u r e . The sane conclusions may be transposed t o t h e l y increases when t h e temperature i s lowered b u t i n Hg and B i these anomalies remain unchanged though n o n - c r y s t a l l i n e s o l i d Ga and B i : i n amorphous they a r e l e s s e v i d e n t a t h i g h temperature because s t a t e these two metals show e v i d e n t resemblances t o o f the broadening o f t h e f i r s t maximum. The most t h e corresponding l i q u i d b o t h i n s t r u c t u r e f a c t o r s n o t i c e a b l e e f f e c t o f t h e temperature on t h e s t r u c r e d u c t i o n o f t h e f i r s t peak h e i g h t S(qo) as tempe- ( F i g . 1 and 2) and i n p a i r c o r r e l a t i o n f u n c t i o n s ( F i g . 5 and 6) ; because o f t h e absence o f d i f f u s i v e displacements i n t h e s o l i d s t a t e , t h e observed r a t u r e r i s e s ; t h e temperature dependence of S(qo) o s c i l l a t i o n s a r e more pronounced and t h e shoulders i s i d e n t i c a l f o r these t h r e e metals, as shown i n seen i n 1i q u i d s appear b e t t e r defined. t u r e f a c t o r s i s t h e damping i n h i g h q range and t h e F i g . 4 where t h e r a t i o o f t h e h e i g h t [ S ( q o ) l T t o that Observed at the point [S(qo)l~m are p l o t t e d as a f u n c t i o n o f t h e reduced temperature IJe t h i n k t h a t such a s i m i l a r i t y between t h e l i q u i d and t h e amorphous s t r u c t u r e s -supported by t h e f a c t t h a t t h e amorphous f i l m s do c r y s t a l i i z e t o t h e same v a r i e t i e s t h a t supercooled l i q u i d s - must be connected w i t h t h e process used t o o b t a i n amorphous samples. Indeed, i n p r e p a r i n g Ga and B i f i l m s by vapour deposition, atoms ( o r i o n s ) impinge o n t h e [O B i cooled s u b s t r a t e w i t h an i n i t i a l k i n e t i c energy wnnous s u f f i c i e n t t o d i s t u r b t h e atoms p r e v i o u s l y deposit e d and t o r a i s e temperature l o c a l l y up t o t h e mel- 8 H~ t i n g p o i n t ; o b v i o u s l y t h i s e f f e c t concerns few atoms around t h e p o i n t s o f impact and t h e quench r a t e i s r a p i d enough t o garantee n o n - c r y s t a l l i n e 1L T I T~ I 0.5 rlqur. 4 atl lo o f me U r p n r siq,: factor 1:mat Wsennt I 1.5 I 1.0 - s o l i d f o r m a t i o n w i t h some reminiscence o f l i q u i d s t a t e . Because o f t h e h i g h vapour pressure o f merc u r y i t i s p o s s i b l e t o produce f i l m s w h i l e the eva- of :M *frtt oeak of cne I ~ g u l dsmmctum r l t l m mtnt in. rlw:d rr a c?os. um ' u n c t m a t tn, reducnt t-raure - / ~ n In. f u l l ltn -n>ch reorerents tne c u n e qlv.n ¶y llqnr [ I l l for l a am.? s u i r N s C N n w o l ~ * t *In~ta. rurrcmlca %ram p o r a t i o n c r u c i b l e i s maintained a t low temperature; From S(q) , t h e p a i r c o r r e l a t i o n f u n c t i o n s , g ( r ) ( F i g . 5, 6 and 7), can be obtained i n t h e standard way by F o u r i e r t r a n s f o r m a t i o n : t h e s t r u c t u r e o f l i q u i d Ga and Hg remains q u i t e unchanged when t h e temperature i s lowered except some i n c r e a se i n t h e l a r g e range c o r r e l a t i o n . I t i s o f p a r t i - atoms reach t h e s u b s t r a t e w i t h o u t ~ r o d u c i n at o o < much damage : t h e s t r u c t u r e f a c t o r o f t h e amorphous f i l m thus obtained ( F i g . 3) e x h i b i t no shoulder on t h e f i r s t peak and r a t h e r looks l i k e t h e hard spher e d e s c r i p t i o n and t h e n o n - c r y s t a l l i n e s o l i d s t r u c t u r e o f mercury ( F i g . 3 and 7) n o t a b l y d i f f e r s f r a n t h a t i n the l i q u i d state. c u l a r i n t e r e s t t o n o t e t h a t e x ~ e r i m e n t s on Ga and The normalized f i r s t peak h e i g h t o f t h e s t r u c - Hg have been performed i n t h e s t r o n g l y supercooled state close ti, the ul stability limit of the l i q u i d s t a t e b u t no s t r i k i n s feature is seen either " t u r e f a c t o r obtained from t h e experiments c a r r i e d Out On the three are in i n S(q) o r i n g ( r ) concerning any i n c i p i e n t ordered F i g . 4 : t h e r e i s s t r o n g evidence t h a t t h e p l o t s s t a t e as suggested by mean f i e l d theory corresponding t o t h e non c r y s t a l l i n e s t a t e do n o t ~h~~ l i e on t h e curve expected from e x t r a p o l a t i o n o f the l i q u i d s t a t e ; i t seems probable t h a t t h i s occur- REFERENCES rence stems from a more o r l e s s r e l a x e d s t r u c t u r e [I] YOUNG, W . H., Third International Conference i n these amorphous f i l m s , which s u f f e r no annealing s i n c e they are observed t o be unstable on heating. on Liquid Metals, B r i s t o l 1976. Solid S t a t e Physics 30 [ 2 ] CARGILL 111, G . S., Advances i n research and appzication (Academic CONCLUSION We s t r o v e t o perform experiments on pure me- Press, London 1975). [ 3 ] BIZID, A., BzZZ. t a l s s i n c e we a r e concerned w i t h o n l y one k i n d o f atom so t h a t d a t a r e d u c t i o n and s t r u c t u r a l r e s u l t s [ 5 ] BOSIO,L., v i o u r we a t t r i b u t e d t o t h e p r e p a r a t i o n mode of t h e amorphous f i l m s : i t i s p o s s i b l e t o assume t h a t a l l non c r y s t a l l i n e metals m i g h t e x h i b i t a hard sphere s t r u c t u r e i f , i n vapour d e p o s i t i o n , atoms reach a cooled s u b s t r a t e w i t h no i n i t i a l k i n e t i c energy. SEGAUD, C., 9. (1975) J . Chem.Phys. BOSIO, L., CORTES, R., crystalline Solids 30 Phys. Rev. L e t t . [ 8 ] BIZID, A., [lo] KAPLOW, R., Rev. A138 3 (1970) THOtlAS, H., FEDER, J., 1423. DEFRAIN, A,, BELLISSENT, R., TOURAND, G., [ 9 ] SEGAUD, C., J . Non- (1979) i 5 3 . [7] SCHNEIDER, T., BROUT, R., has q u i t e i d e n t i c a l temperature dependence. I n t h e non c r y s t a l l i n e s t a t e , Hg shows a d i s t i n c t beha- CORTES, R., [ 6 ] BERERHI, A., i n these p a r t i c u l a r metals, t h e d i s t o r t e d s t r u c t u r e f a c t o r whose e x p l a n a t i o n gave r i s e t o many attempts, 23 71 (1979) 3595. - s i z e d t h e s i m i l a r i t i e s between t h e l i q u i d s t r u c t u r e and the f u r t h e r c r y s t a l l i n e phase i n Ga, B i and Hg; 100 (1977) Acta Met. 1215. the f u l l p a r t i c u l a r i t i e s o f the s t r u c t u r e deduced from experiments o r from modelling. We o n l y empha- Soc. Mineral. C~vistaZZog. [ 4 ] RASMUSSEN, D., LOPER, C., are e a s i e r t o handle. We have no p l a c e here e i t h e r t o d e t a i l t h e experimental procedure o r t o describe BOSIO, L., CORTES, R., DEFRAIN, A., J . Phys. 3 (1978) 554. Ing. Doctorat P a r i s (1980). STRONG, S.L., AVERBACH, B.L., Phys. (1965) 1336. [ll] 1,14C;NER, C.N. J., Third Tnternationa? Confel~ence on Liquid Metals, B r i s t o l 1976.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz