Submitted to Chinese Physics C
Study of distribution uniformity of laser-accelerated proton beams
J.G.Zhu, K.Zhu*, L.Tao, X.H.Xu, C.Lin, W.J.Ma, H.Y.Lu, Y.Y.Zhao, Y.R.Lu, J.E.Chen, X.Q.Yan**
State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Corresponding author：
E-mail address: *[email protected];
**[email protected]
Comparing with conventional accelerator, laser plasma accelerator can generate high energy ions in a greatly reduced scale
due to its TV/m acceleration gradient. A compact laser plasma accelerator (CLAPA) has been built at Institute of Heavy Ion
physics in Peking University, based on which application researches like biological irradiation, astrophysics simulation etc. will
be carried on. A beamline system with multi group of quadrupoles and analyzing magnet for laser accelerated ions is proposed
here. Since laser accelerated ion beams have broad energy spectrum and large angular divergence, the parameters (beam waist
position in Y direction, beam line layout, drift distance, magnet angles etc.) of the beamline system is carefully designed and
optimised to obtain a radially symmetric proton distribution at the irradiation platform. Requirement of energy selection and
differences in focusing or defocusing in application system have great influence on evolution of proton distribution. With optimal
parameters, radially symmetric proton distribution can be realized and protons with different energies have similar transverse
areas at experiment target.
PACS numbers: 41.75.Jv, 41.85.Lc, 52.59.-f, 87.56.bd
Keywords:
laser plasma accelerator, beam line, magnetic system, medical applications, cancer treatment, proton distribution
1. Introduction
Narrow energy spectra are necessary in many applications,
Intense laser pulses impinging on solid targets can produce
high-energy
particle
beams
[1].
Interaction
hence selecting out particles to get desired energy spectra is
between
primary. Many kinds of devices have been tried and tested to
ultra-intense laser and plasma has the potential to acquire
cope with the wide energy spectra, such as permanent magnet
TV/m accelerating electric field gradient [2] and realize
quadrupole lens [11,12], solenoid magnet [13–15], laser
compact and economical accelerations.
triggered micro-lens [16], bending magnet [17], a set of dipole
Thousands of patients with cancerous tumors are treated by
magnets [18–22] or combination of magnets [23–25].
proton radiotherapy each year now. Proton (and ion) cancer
A compact laser accelerator (CLAPA), based on RPA-PSA
therapy equipment based on conventional accelerator, which
mechanism [26,27] or other acceleration mechanisms [28], is
is installed at hospital, usually has large scale. In recent years,
under construction in Peking University. A 200 TW, 5 Hz Ti:
many theoretical simulation works have achieved encouraging
sapphire laser system based on the double Chirped Pulse
results [3–7], which stimulates proposals to use laser
Amplification (CPA) technology has been installed. The laser
acceleration as a new and attractive technology for radiation
system delivers pulses with 5 J energy, 25 fs duration, a focal
therapy [8].
spot of about 4μm diameter (full-width at half-maximum
In contrast to the ion beams with small energy bandwidth
delivered
from
conventional
accelerators,
(FWHM)) and contrast of 10-10 at 100 ps. Many investigations
laser-based
will be carried on CLAPA: researches on basic theory of
accelerators inherently yield proton beams with broad energy
physical mechanism of laser-plasma acceleration, transmitting
spectra and large angular divergence [9,10]. Moreover, these
of beams with broad energy spectra and large angular
drawbacks are not propitious for obtaining uniform proton
divergence, preparation and application of self-supporting
distribution at experiment target, which thwarts applications
ultra-thin target, ultrathin carbon nanotube foam (CNF)
of proton cancer therapy. Therefore beam transportation to
targets [29], metal target [30], application research in
achieve uniform proton distribution would be very important
medicine and radiotherapy [9,31], inertial confinement fusion
in these applications.
(ICF) [32], astrophysics etc.
Submitted to Chinese Physics C
To realize these investigations with this laser system, a
beam line is designed with magnetic devices to transmit
proton beams with energy of 1~44 MeV.
2. Beam line
The beam line is designed to deliver proton beams with
energy of 1~ 44 MeV, energy spread of 0~±5% and 106-8
protons per pulse to satisfy requirement of different
experiments, especially on request of biomedical irradiation.
The transport of proton beams is simulated mainly around the
energy of 15MeV. Referring to theoretical simulation and
literatures [3,33], the initial transverse radius of beam spot is
Fig. 2.
Simulation transport result of 15MeV proton beam with energy
set as 0.005 mm, which is almost identical to that of laser spot.
spread of ±5%.
The initial pulse duration is set as 20 ps. Correspondingly
initial longitudinal length is about 1 mm.
2.1 The collection system
The beam line consists of three sections, a Collection
System,
namely
a
quadrupole-triplet
lens
and
a
Proton beam generated by laser acceleration generally
has big divergence angle and energy spread more than ±5%.
quadrupole-doublet lens which help to collect high energy
An aperture is utilized to screen particles with big divergence
particles, an Energy Selection System including a 45°bending
angle. In the presence of a proper aperture, the proton beams
magnet and two slits, and an Application System, namely
drift into quadrupole-triplet lens with divergence angle of ±50
another quadrupole-triplet lens or quadrupole-doublet lens to
mrad, transverse emittance of 0.25 πmm.mrad and current of
focus and deliver particles to experiment target with an
1×106~8 proton/ pulse.
adjustable final beam size (Fig. 1).
The quadrupole-triplet lens is inserted into chamber to
close to the target, collecting protons with energy up to 19
MeV. A quadrupole-doublet lens maybe will be set 40cm away
from the quadrupole-triplet lens outside the target chamber to
assist focusing if the proton beam energy is below 44MeV.
2.2 The energy selection system
The proton beam produced by laser accelerator has a wide
energy spectrum and different ions species. However, many
applications require that high energy proton beam has small
energy spread. Proton beam is focused by collection system to
Fig. 1.
Schematic of beam line layout
form a beam waist in X direction at the object point of
bending magnet in energy selection system, where a slit is
The precise energy spectrum of the beam may vary under
placed to roughly remove particles with big energy spread.
different acceleration conditions, while it shows like Gaussian
Then the beam is analyzed by a 45°bending magnet without
spectral shape in some energy ranges in experiments [34].
edge angles and converged to form a beam waist at the image
Hence the initial beam distribution is set as 6D waterbag
point in X direction. At this point, protons with different
without loss of generality. Program Track is used to simulate
energies have been separated in X direction and a slit is set to
beam transmitting [35]. The evolution of beam envelope is
screen unwanted particles (Fig. 1).
shown in Fig. 2.
The radius of bending magnet is designed as 65 cm. Other
bending angles, such as 60°and 90°, are also investigated.
2.3 The application system
After being analyzed and screened at the image point, the
proton beam needs to be focused by quadrupoles to
Submitted to Chinese Physics C
experiment target. A quadrupole-triplet lens or
quadrupole-doublet lens with 5 cm radius is put 20 cm away
from the image point and can be adjusted to move beam waist
in different experiments. The length of each quadrupole is 30
cm. Distance between the first and second quadrupoles is 20
cm. The third quadrupole is set 70cm away from the second
one. Between the third quadrupole and final experiment target,
there is a 100 cm drift space.
3. Beam waist in Y direction and uniformity of
particle density distribution
Fig. 3. (a) Envelope of proton beam contracting ±5% energy spread
with ±1% energy spread when the location of beam waist in Y direction is
Uniformity of particle density distribution is very
inside bending magnet. (b) distribution of protons with ±1% energy spread
important in many applications, such as proton cancer therapy.
at experiment target. (c) distribution of protons with ±5% energy spread at
Dose distribution of protons in organic tissue will be uneven
experiment target.
and the effectiveness of cancer therapies will be unreliable if
the proton distribution is malformed. The nonuniform proton
After the beam is analyzed by a 45°bending magnet and
density distribution is a major drawback in plenty of
converges to form beam waist at the image point in X
experiments and simulations [18], as protons have broad
direction, protons with different energies have been separated
energy spectra and large angular divergence in laser
in X direction. At this time, distribution of protons with
acceleration. Consequently, realization of uniform distribution
energy spread of ±5% is shown in Fig. 4(a). Vertical axis
of protons with large energy spread is significant and
indicates the energy difference with protons of 15 MeV.
important. Up to now, the study of distribution uniformity of
protons in beam line designed for laser acceleration is scarce.
Then protons enter application system and are focused by
quadrupole-triplet lens. Fig. 4(b) shows the proton transverse
After protons come out of collecting lens, they drift a
distribution 20 cm away from the first quadrupole of the lens.
long distance in Y direction before entering application system.
After focusing in X direction, defocusing in Y direction and
It is better to converge to a beam waist in Y direction to
20 cm drift, the total envelope contracts in X direction and
control envelope during this drift. After study, it is found that
expands in Y direction.
location of beam waist in Y direction has a crucial influence
on proton distribution.
Figs. 4(c), (d), (e) and (f) show the proton transverse
distributions at the point coming out of the second quadrupole,
If the first quadrupole in application system focuses in X
20, 40 and 70 cm away respectively. It shows the envelope
direction, a quadrupole-triplet lens is needed to deliver all
contracts in Y direction and expands a little in X direction
protons to final experiment target.
before entering the third quadrupole. But most protons with
large energy spread still contracts in X direction. Apparently,
3.1 Beam waist in Y direction inside bending magnet
defocusing effect in the second quadrupole in X direction
Usually when the location of beam waist in Y direction is
cannot counteract focusing effect in the first quadrupole.
in the middle of bending magnet, the envelope in Y direction
Magnet field gradients in the first and second
inside bending magnet will be minimum, namely radius of
quadrupoles are respectively 1.59 and -1.66 kG/cm. While in
about 1 cm for ±5% energy spread, which can reduce airgap
Fig. 3 envelope of protons with ±5% energy spread in second
width to save costs. In this case, after adjusting parameters of
quadrupole is almost only half of that in first quadrupole in
quadrupole-triplet lens in application system, envelope size in
application system, hence protons with large energy spread
X and Y direction can be close at final experiment target. At
get more focusing in first quadrupole and less defocusing in
this point, density distributions of ten thousand protons are
second quadrupole in X direction, as the magnet field
extremely not radially symmetric (Fig. 3). Moreover, beam
gradients are close. For the same reason, protons with energy
spot sizes of ±1% and ±5% energy spread have remarkable
spread less than ±1% have larger envelope in second
distinctions. The process of these results is represented in Fig.
quadrupole and get more defocusing. Protons with different
4.
energies should be separated at the image point in X direction
and this inevitably leads to envelope and focusing distinctions
in the first and second quadrupoles in application system.
Submitted to Chinese Physics C
and get more focusing in X direction in the third quadrupole.
Then these protons pass beam waist and defocus in X
direction. Finally protons with different energies have
different beam spot areas at experiment target and proton
distributions are not radially symmetric.
3.2 Beam waist in Y direction in front of bending
magnet
If beam waist in Y direction is positioned before bending
magnet, it will increase diverging angle in Y direction and
lead to bigger envelope (Fig. 5(a)). Not only proton
distribution at experiment target becomes more uniform, but
also proton beams with different energy spread have close
distribution areas. Losses of protons with ± 5% energy
spread is about 5%. If beam waist in Y direction is posed a
little behind the object point, the losses of protons will be less,
but the proton distribution uniformity gets worse (Fig. 9(a)).
Fig. 5.
(a) Envelope of proton beam contracting ±5% energy spread
with ±1% energy spread when beam waist in Y direction is positioned before
bending magnet. (b) final distribution of protons with ±1% energy spread. (c)
final distribution of protons with ±3% energy spread. (d) final distribution of
Fig. 4. Evolution of proton transverse distribution in application system
when the location of beam waist in Y direction is inside bending magnet. All
protons with ±4% energy spread. (e) final distribution of protons with ±5%
energy spread.
figures have the same coordinate system. Horizontal plane is XY plane.
Vertical axis indicates the energy difference with protons of 15 MeV. (a)
protons at the image point in X direction. (b) protons 20 cm away from the
first quadrupole. (c) protons coming out of the second quadrupole. (d) protons
3.3 Beam waist in Y direction in back of bending
magnet
If beam waist of proton beam with 1% energy spread in
20 cm away from the second quadrupole. (e) protons 40 cm away from the
Y direction is located behind bending magnet, uniformity of
second quadrupole. (f) protons 70 cm away from the second quadrupole. (g)
proton distribution gets worse (Fig. 6), as a smaller diverging
protons coming out of the third quadrupole. (h) protons 30 cm away from the
angle in Y direction has greater impact and it is not easy to
third quadrupole. (i) protons 60 cm away from the third quadrupole. (j)
disperse these protons.
protons at final experiment target, namely 100 cm away from the third
quadrupole.
Figs. 4(g), (h), (i) and (j) show the proton transverse
distributions at the point coming out of the third quadrupole,
30, 60 and 100 cm away respectively. The total envelope
changes little in Y direction and contracts in X direction.
Protons with large energy spread in Fig. 4(f) are still focusing
Submitted to Chinese Physics C
Fig. 6.
(a) Envelope of proton beam contracting ±5% energy spread
with ±1% energy spread when beam waist in Y direction is positioned behind
bending magnet. (b) final distribution of protons with ±1% energy spread. (c)
final distribution of protons with ±5% energy spread.
3.4 No beam waist in Y direction before entering
application system
If proton beam coming out of collecting lens diverges in
Y direction before entering quadrupoles in application system,
the final proton distribution is not radially symmetric (Fig. 7).
Fig. 8. Envelope of proton beam with ±5% energy spread and final
proton distributions when length of drift before experiment target is 34 cm.
From (a) to (e), beam waist in Y direction is formed increasingly later, till
proton beam with ±1% energy spread diverges in Y direction before entering
quadrupoles in application system in (f).
4.2 Envelope control in X direction
In application system, the first and third quadrupoles of
Fig. 7.
(a) Envelope of proton beam contracting ±5% energy spread
the lens focus in X direction. To control envelope in X
with ±1% energy spread when proton beam diverges in Y direction before
direction, we may increase magnetic field strength in the first
entering application system. (b) final distribution of protons with ±1% energy
or the third quadrupole. Final proton distribution areas are
spread. (c) final distribution of protons with ±5% energy spread.
both round in Figs. 9(a) and (b), but the magnetic field
strength in the first quadrupole is smaller and the envelope in
4. Envelope control in application system
X direction in the third quadrupole is bigger in Fig. 9(a). It is
4.1 Length of drift before arriving at experiment
obvious that final beam spot is smaller and proton distribution
target
The lengths of drift between the third quadrupole in
uniformity is better in Fig. 9(a).
In Fig. 9(b), magnet field gradients in the first and
application system and final experiment target in above
second quadrupoles in application system are respectively
simulations are all 100 cm. If the drift space is shortened, such
1.59 and -1.68 kG/cm. While envelope of protons with ±5%
as 34 cm, the radius of final beam spot size can be reduced,
energy spread in second quadrupole is almost only half of that
from 0.92 cm to 0.37 cm (Fig. 8).
in first quadrupole, hence protons with large energy spread get
In order to improve distribution uniformity, in this
more focusing in first quadrupole and less defocusing in
situation the best beam waist position of proton beam with ±
second quadrupole in X direction, as the magnet field
1% energy spread in Y direction is a little behind bending
gradients are close. For the same reason, protons with small
magnet (Fig. 8(c)). Hence different drift space has different
energy spread have larger envelope in second quadrupole and
optimal position of beam waist in Y direction.
get more defocusing. Then protons with different energies will
evolve inconsistently, which leads to a bigger beam spot at
Submitted to Chinese Physics C
final target. Hence a smaller magnetic field strength in the
entering focusing lens in application system.
first quadrupole and similar envelope size in the first and
second quadrupoles are better.
Fig. 10. Proton distributions with energy spread of ±0.0000000001%:
(a) before entering bending magnet. (b) after coming out of bending magnet.
(c) 20 cm away from the image point in X direction. (d) 150 cm away from
the image point in X direction without the existence of focusing lens in
Fig. 9.
Envelope of proton beam contracting ±5% energy spread with
application system.
±1% energy spread and circular proton distribution areas at final target. (a)
Magnetic field strength in the first quadrupole in application system is smaller
If the first quadrupole in downstream in application
and the envelope in X direction in the third quadrupole is bigger. (b).
system defocuses in X direction, these protons can be easily
Magnetic field strength in the first quadrupole in application system is bigger
scattered and the distribution becomes radially symmetric at
and the envelope in X direction in the third quadrupole is smaller.
the final target (Fig. 11). This can be explained that proton
beam is defocused in first quadrupole in X direction and
5. Changing beam line layout in application system
dispersed, then focused in the second. Protons will obtain
In
re-distribution and be decentralized in Y direction in drift
application
system,
comparing
with
quadrupole-doublet lens, a quadrupole-triplet lens has stronger
space behind quadrupole-doublet lens. If the first quadrupole
focusing ability and reduces particle losses. However,
in application system focuses in X direction, protons cannot
distribution of protons at experiment target is not radially
be easily scattered (Fig. 3).
symmetric when the location of beam waist in Y direction is
As most protons are more close to X axis than to Y axis,
inside bending magnet (Fig. 3). In this situation, if the first
focusing or defocusing in Y direction has much less influence
quadrupole in application system defocuses in X direction,
on distribution uniformity.
final proton distribution can be easily radially symmetric. At
this point, a quadrupole-doublet lens is needed, at the cost of
losses about 10% protons. The reason can be demonstrated
below.
Figure 10 depicts the distributions of protons with
negligible energy spread at different locations along the beam
line without the existence of focusing lens in application
system when the location of beam waist in Y direction is
inside bending magnet. From these figures, it is evident that
position of most protons in Y direction changes little even
after long drift. The reason is that diverging angle in Y
Fig. 11. Envelope of proton beam with ±1% energy spread and final
direction is relatively small and most protons are almost
proton distribution when the first quadrupole in application system is
collimated in Y direction, as protons drift 585 cm before
defocusing in X direction. The location of beam waist in Y direction is inside
Submitted to Chinese Physics C
bending magnet.
final distribution of protons with ±1% energy spread. (c) final distribution of
protons with ±2.9% energy spread. (d) final distribution of protons with ±
In Fig. 12, the focusing lens in application system is
quadrupole-doublet and the first quadrupole is defocusing in
3.6% energy spread. (e) final distribution of protons with ±3.98% energy
spread.
X direction. The length of drift between the second
quadrupole in application system and experiment target is 50
cm. Similar to result in Fig. 8(c), to get better uniformity, the
6. Bending angle of sector magnet
The proton beams produced in laser acceleration are
best beam waist in Y direction is in back of bending magnet.
typically characterized by a huge energy spread and a big
Radius of final beam spot size is not more than 0.4 cm. As
divergence. Energy Selection System consisting of four
there are losses of protons with large energy spread, energy
dipoles is widely applied [18–22] to select proton energy
spread at final target is smaller than initial energy spread.
accurately. This type of system is very effective if the beam is
collimated. While beams with a large divergence angle will
result in mix of protons with different energies at the point
where the energy should be selected.
Sector magnet is exceptional among lots of energy
analysis magnetic devices, as such sector magnet has huge
advantage of converging protons with the same energy and
diverse angular divergence at the image point, meantime
separating protons with different energies.
In practical applications of proton cancer therapy, sector
Fig. 12. (a) Envelope of proton beam contracting ±5% energy spread
magnets with different bending angles may be needed. The
with ±1% energy spread when there is a quadrupole-doublet lens in
replacement by 60°and 90°sector magnets in this beam line
application system and drift space before experiment target is 50 cm. (b) final
are simulated and the results are given in Fig. 14 and Fig. 15.
distribution of protons with ±1% energy spread. (c) final distribution of
protons with ±2.9% energy spread. (d) final distribution of protons with
±3.45% energy spread. (e) final distribution of protons with ±3.7% energy
spread.
When the length of drift between the second quadrupole
in application system and experiment target is 200 cm, the
proton distribution uniformity is better and radius of final
beam spot size is much bigger, about 1 cm (Fig. 13). Protons
with initial ±1%, ±3%, ±4%, ±5% energy spread have close
transverse areas, which facilitates the overlays of proton shots
Fig. 14. (a) Envelope of proton beam contracting ±5% energy spread
in cancer therapy. Losses of protons with initial ±5% energy
with ±1% energy spread when bending angle is 60°. (b) final distribution of
spread are about 10%.
protons with ±1% energy spread. (c) final distribution of protons with ±5%
energy spread.
Fig. 13. (a) Envelope of proton beam contracting ±5% energy spread
with ±1% energy spread when there is a quadrupole-doublet lens in
application system and drift space before experiment target is 200 cm. (b)
Fig. 15. (a) Envelope of proton beam contracting ±5% energy spread
Submitted to Chinese Physics C
with ±1% energy spread when bending angle is 90°. (b) final distribution of
different drift distance, beam line layout in application system
protons with ±1% energy spread. (c) final distribution of protons with ±5%
and angle of sector magnet.
energy spread.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The bigger the bending angle is, the shorter the total
This work was supported by National Natural Science
beam line will be. For instance, total length of beam line with
Foundation of China (Grant No. 11575011), and National
90°sector magnet is 187 cm shorter than that with 45°sector
Grand Instrument Project (2012YQ030142). The authors
magnet with 65 cm bending radius.
thank professor Ostroumov, Peter (Argonne Physics Division)
for his help in program Track.
7.
Summary
In summary, the beam line of CLAPA is designed with
traditional transport elements and able to deliver most protons
[1]
with energy of 1~44 MeV and energy spread within ±5%.
Proton distribution at experiment target can be regulated by
Snavely R A, Key M H, Hatchett S P et al, Phys. Rev.
Lett. ,85 :2945 (2000)
[2]
many parameters.
Mulser P, Bauer D et al, Phys. Rev.
Lett. ,101 :225002 (2008)
It is found that envelope in Y direction converging to
[3]
beam waist before entering bending magnet is favorable to
Zhou M L, Liu B et al, Phys. Plasmas 23: 083109
(2016)
obtaining distributed protons in Y direction, when focusing
[4]
Hu R, Liu B et al, Sci. Rep. 5:15499 (2015)
lens in application system is quadrupole-triplet and the length
[5]
Lan K, Liu J, Li Z et al, Matter Radiat. Extrem. 1:
of drift is 200 cm before experiment target. Protons with
different energies should be separated at the image point in X
8–27 (2016)
[6]
direction and they have different envelope and get different
focusing or defocusing in the first and second quadrupoles in
Extrem.1: 82–87 (2016)
[7]
application system, which determines evolution of proton
distribution. A smaller magnetic field strength in the first
[9]
[10]
[11]
If the first quadrupole behind the image point is
When
the
focusing
lens
in
application
system
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
The best position of beam waist in Y direction depends on
Nishiuchi M, Sakaki H, Hori T et al, Phys. Rev. Spec.
Top. Beams 13: 71304 (2010)
[18]
have critical impacts on proton distribution. Envelope in Y
direction has more room for adjusting to get better uniformity.
Toncian T, Amin M, Borghesi M et al, AIP Adv. 1:
22142 (2011)
beam line markedly.
In a word, envelope controls in X and Y direction both
Roth M, Alber I, Bagnoud V et al, Plasma Phys.
Control. Fusion 51: 124039 (2009)
with big divergence angle. Bending magnets of 60°and 90°in
this beam line are simulated and they can reduce length of
Harres K, Alber I, Tauschwitz A et al, Phys. Plasmas
17: 23107 (2010)
therapy.
Sector magnet has advantages to analyze proton beams
Agosteo S, Anania M P, Caresana M et al, Nucl. Inst.
Methods Phys. Res. B 331: 15–19 (2014)
200 cm, protons with different energies have close transverse
areas, which facilitates the overlays of proton shots in cancer
Nishiuchi M, Daito I, Ikegami M et al, Appl. Phys.
Lett. 94: 61107 (2009)
[13]
is
quadrupole-doublet and drift space before experiment target is
Schollmeier M, Becker S, Geißel M et al, Phys. Rev.
Lett. 101: 55004 (2008)
[12]
defocusing in X direction, protons can be easily dispersed.
Hofmann I, Meyer-ter-Vehn J, Yan X et al, Phys.
Rev. Spec. Top. Beams 14: 31304 (2011)
direction relating to this shorter drift distance should appear
later in these simulations.
Kraft S D, Richter C, Zeil K et al, New J. Phys. 12:
85003 (2010)
distance before experiment target is shortened. To get better
distribution uniformity, the best beam waist position in Y
Bulanov S V, Khoroshkov V S Plasma Phys.
Reports 28: 453–456 (2001)
smaller final beam spot and better proton distribution
uniformity. Final beam spot size can be reduced when drift
Huo W, Li Z, Yang D et al, Matter Radiat. Extrem. 1:
2–7 (2016)
[8]
quadrupole and close envelope size in the first and second
quadrupoles in X direction in application system can get
Toncian T, Wang C, Mccary E et al, Matter Radiat.
Yogo A, Maeda T, Hori T et al, Appl. Phys. Lett. 98:
53701 (2011)
[19]
Hofmann K M, Schell S, Wilkens J J J. Biophotonics
5: 903–911 (2012)
Submitted to Chinese Physics C
[20]
Scuderi V, Jia S B, Carpinelli M et al, Nucl.
[27]
Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel.
Spectrometers, Detect. Assoc. Equip. 740: 87–93
107: 265002 (2011)
[28]
(2014)
[21]
Romano F, Schillaci F, Cirrone G A P et al, Nucl.
Schell S, Wilkens J J Phys. Med. Biol. 54: N459
[30]
Busold S, Schumacher D, Brabetz C et al, Nat. Publ.
[31]
Yong S, Kun Z, Chao C et al, Chinese Phys. C 38:
[32]
Masood U, Bussmann M, Cowan T E et al, Appl.
[33]
Yan X Q, Wu H-C, Sheng Z M et al, Phys. Rev. Lett.
103: 135001 (2009)
Zhao S, Lin C, Wang H Y et al, Phys. Plasmas 22:
73106 (2015)
[34]
Phys. B 117: 41–52 (2014)
[26]
Roth M, Cowan T E, Key M H et al, Phys. Rev. Lett.
86: 436 (2001)
117011 (2014)
[25]
Fuchs J, Cecchetti C A, Borghesi M, et al, Phys. Rev.
Lett. 99: 15002 (2007)
Gr. 5:12459 (2015)
[24]
Gaillard S A, Kluge T, Flippo K A et al, Phys.
Plasmas 18: 56710 (2011)
(2009)
[23]
Ma W, Song L, Yang R et al, Nano Lett. 7: 2307–11
(2007)
(2016)
[22]
Mackinnon A J, Sentoku Y, Patel P K et al, Phys.
Rev. Lett. 88: 215006 (2002)
[29]
Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel.
Spectrometers, Detect. Assoc. Equip. 829:153-158
Wang H Y, Lin C, Sheng Z M et al, Phys. Rev. Lett.
Kim I J, Pae K H, Choi I W et al, Phys. Plasmas 23:
070701 (2016)
[35]
Ostroumov P N, Aseev V, Mustapha B ANL, March
27 (2006)