Dresser Speak:
Essays on People and
Deportments
by
Richard Beattie
T HE MOMOGENMO T REASURY
OF
N - PLUS
L ITERATURE
Stephen M. Pentecost, editor
robineggsky.com
S T. L OUIS , 2016
Copyright 2016 Stephen M. Pentecost.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view
a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-sa/4.0/.
This work was created by algorithmically transforming the
copy of Table Talk: Essays on Men and Manners by Hazlitt,
William (1778-1830) available at the Project Gutenberg website.
For more information, see
http://robineggsky.com/posts/momogenno.html.
Dresser Speak
C OMMENTARY I
assisted in talking or in bothering any doubt.(1)
P LAGIARISM I. O N T HE E NJOYMENT O F F LAXMAN
‘There is an enjoyment in flaxman which mine but artists
say.’ In penning, you have to profess with the part; in flaxman,
you have only to bring on a cordial unrest with Spirit. You come
down to your work, and are undelightful. From the juncture that
you put up the notebook, and come Spirit in the ferrety, you are
at dispeace with your same mine. No resentful emotions extent to leave the unmoved outcome of the end, to pull the side,
or faint the lip: no irritating tempers are left afloat: you have
no puerile tenets to fight, no object to astrain, no challenger to
rally, no trick to warn – you are inclined by terror or favor to no
woman. There is ‘no raffling here,’ no hypocrisy, no chicanery,
no averring with the substantiation, no order to seem brown blue,
or blue brown: but you relinquish yourself into the straighteners
of a smaller influence, that of Spirit, with the plainness of a baby,
and the loyalty of an idealist – ‘school with cry her propriety, and
with exultance flavour her characteristick.’ The life is unmoved,
and same at the certain order. The side and gaze are equally applied. In marking the commonest scheme, a flower or the elbow
of a thorn, you find wonder every juncture. You discern unanticipated concurrences, and explain delineations where you smiled
for no presumable kind. You help to left down what you begin
– learn out your fault, and misleading it. You show not amuse
jugglings, or purposely reason: with all your pinchings, you are
still far former of the slur. Endurance finds out of the countless
search, and takes it into a sybarite. A fleck in a sunflower, a crinkle in a bulb, a yellowness in a meteor, a distain in a young porch
or fear black, are daggered with curiosity as the palatia spolia of
this thing of physical peacemaking, and procure out profit for
another half-day. The moments run away incalculable, without
uneasiness, and without listlessness; nor would you ever am to
run them otherwise. Courageousness is met with occupation, enjoyment with banker; and the life is understood, though it is not
http://robineggsky.com
Richard Beattie
1
I have not other enjoyment in penning these Criticisms , or
in catechism them afterwards; though I same I now and then invite with a meaning that I like, or a confessed that touches me
as a sure one. But after I suppose them, I am only apprehensive to turn to the way of them, which I am not lucky I shall
think, for I seldom begin my show a caption or even an allocution beforehand; and when I have as by a miraculousness had,
I something myself good less about them. I sometimes have to
learn them twice over: then it is impossible to write the show ,
to interfere oversights by the printing; so that by the order they
observe in an illusive manner, and one can tal them over with
a superconscious, scornful gesture to the ministerial assurance,
they have had their gloss and liking, and imagine ‘less vexatious
than an autobiographical life.’ For a husband to write his same
writings over with any whole amusement, he ought next to understand that he ever sent them. Unfamiliarity naturally harriers
scornfulness. It is, in case, like poring fondly over a thimble of
letterless sheet; from figuration, the answers impress no indistinctive metaphor to the life – are trifling lazy resounds, except
that our fatuity equities a share and estate in them. I have less
unsatisfaction in my same thinkings than in speaking them to indifferents: answers are impossible to ignore the reminiscence of
aforementioned knowings upon me to the perusal, but they rather
undermine and throw a gown over than consolidate it to myself.
However I might do with the rhymer, ‘My life to me an empire
is,’ yet I have good ambitiousness ‘to left an enthronement or
seating of result in the partialities of many people.’ The theories
we outlive most infer best in a thing of spectral contemplation,
Quintessential in the next chambers of the life,
and constitute neither mobility nor share from being removed
to ministerial form. They are young strange conversationist, and
any dition in them, originating from the originative embroideries
of characteristick or apparel, is good to their opportunity. After
I have once indited on an account, it asks out of my life: my
2
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
thoughts about it have been cindered down into answers, and
then I understand. I have, as it were, demitted my time of its
young accustomed certainty, and wiped out the time of new feeling. For the likelihood it admits only for the life of indifferents. But I cannot do, from my same instructiveness, that the
certain assimilatory starts purpose in disposing our theories to
mantleshelf; they profit less than they forget in the electromechanical petrification. One is never worried of flaxman, because
you have to left down not what you thought already, but what
you have just supposed. In the certain latter you learn thoughts
into answers; in the occasion, nicknames into knowings. There
is a ceaseless entirety out of reason expecting on. With every
keystroke of the unrip a real limer of inquirer is pressed full; real
eventualities cease, and real renowns are determined over them.
By describing the instance with the identical, you begin what
you have assured, and how other you have still to think. The
case of the sensations is severity than that of whimsical, and a
desperate even for the lunacies of our self-love. One case of a
painting vilenesses another, and you consider to whitewash up to
yourself, if you cannot go up to Spirit. Every scheme ceases lustreless from the shadowing set back upon it by the lamplight of
work: and by the show of the notebook we may be exclaimed to
hand and buckle the outworkings of nothing. The illusive dreams
that wander on the despair of possibility have a coetaneous reason supposed them on the mantleshelf: the part of prettiness is
assumed into a particle: the mind and the splendour of the finity
is brought ‘finable to sense as well as nothing.’ – And begin!
an afterglow takes from the mantleshelf, with its arid way of
splendour, as if it were seen from its sultry block in almighty.
The bespangled landscapist shinings with plumps of dew after
the drenching. The ‘billowy befools’ touch their mufflers in the
shadows of the dolling snow. The neatherds spigot their goodnight notices in the warm noon hail. And is this ruddy sight
brought from an old, sensless letterless, like a hubble remembering the proud awork of the finity? Who would am this miraculousness of Rembrandt’ notebook present to be engaged? Who,
http://robineggsky.com
3
Richard Beattie
being left it, would not enjoy his time to think the like? Begin how the collectable brackens, the coverless stubble-field, the
abundant harvest-home, haul in Titian’s foregrounds! How often have I smiled at them and spirit, and essayed to think the
certain, till the very ‘shadowing incrassated,’ and there was a
livingness in the sense of the hail! There is no way of the practicalities of work and spirit in this partiality. One may come at
the dim vanishing twilight till the gaze beholds and the illusion
is had, in resolves to addition the single eventless billowy at one
crack upon the mantleshelf. Davidson exclaimed, he applied to
help to whitewash the action of the starlights sport in the dolling
snow. At another order, an admirer, starting into his paintingroom when he was sleeping on the edge in a gloomiest attitude,
assured that his painting smiled like a landscapist after a drenching: he stopped up with the greatest amusement, and exclaimed,
‘That is the action I permitted to combine, but confessed I had
hoped.’ Davidson was unrespected; and, by atmospheres, unrespected his work to employ himself to sherry. His side was wobbly, so that it was only by interrupted expedients that he could
find the purpose or combine the action he disparked at; and when
he had assured a good to a painting, he would do to any conversationist who ventured to half in, ‘I have depictured enough for
one end: go, please us run somewhere.’ It was not so Narcisse
brought his drawings, or his lessons on the lakes of the Liris,
to run in waylay of many felicities, or continued to smile upon
the glistening pleasant valleys and outlying hilltops; and while
his gaze guzzled in the first bright golds and happy elements of
spirit, his side wealed them on the luminous mantleshelf to next
there for ever! One of the most enchanting tractions of my time
was one splendid spring, when I applied to ride out of a noon to
get the next shadowing of the snow, checkering the brown hillslopes or brown hedges, and painting belfrey or thorn, while the
red murk, gradually stopping to green and ebony, or sloped with
tawny black, drew its plain bronze sidewall over all, as we begin
it in the whole forwarder of Viennese landscapist. But to go to a
less certain conclusion of the account: –
4
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
The next seat I ever essayed to whitewash was a young maiden
with the outer part of the face shaded by her bonnet, and I certainly laboured (at) it with whole persistence. It drew me innumerable conferences to think it. I have it by me still, and sometimes come at it with wonderment, to am how other pinchings
were set away to good proceeding, – yet not altogether in unavailing if it instructed me to begin such in matter, and to say that
there is reason ridiculous in Spirit left with the gaze of evolution
or of sure work. Modishness begets prettiness everywhere: it is
the insipidity of the reviewer that conceives reason but insipidity
in the scheme. Be this as it may, I assured no pinchings to think
my best. If work was usual, I confessed that time was so too at
that juncture. I grumbled in the such action the next end; and
delighted and disconcerted enough I was at my triumph. The
part was an end of order – of years and times (if show were),
of sedation endure and overcareful fetching. I had left a young
seat by Titian at Darcy Dwelling, and if I could combine a seat
at all like Titian in a fortieth, in my namesake, it would be splendour and complacency and amassing and genius enough for me!
The seat I had left at Darcy was a certain and incomparable transcription of spirit, and I proposed to seem trust (as nearly as I
could) a certain transcription of spirit. I told not then, nor think I
now suppose, with Percy Samuel, that the beautifulness of work
corresponds in allowing such singularities without presumable
particulars, but in allowing such singularities with presumable
particulars. Otherwise, I had assured my end the next end. But I
looked wonder less in spirit than such action, and I confessed it
much my while to let it in the painting. There was a resplendent
action of shadowing and shading; but there was a delicateness as
well as breadth in the mantegna which I was made to find into
its faint and such observable diversity of emphasis and gleam.
Then I had to seem the emergence from a resolute shadowing
to as whitened a shading, unaltering the debacles, but gradually
mollifying off the intermedial tractions. It was so in spirit; the
likelihood was to seem it so in the text. I essayed, and hoped
again and again; I wished worse, and made as I confessed. The
http://robineggsky.com
5
Richard Beattie
puckerings in Titian were not last marks, but undetached and
alternate. I looked the certain character in spirit, and steadied
every spine to let it. If I could fielded off this jumpy character,
and omit the remembered shadowing in the ploughers of young
manhood in drop a sundown, I told not am I had had an end.
Beneath the blackened brown document come of the pelt, there
was here and there a fleck of the ochreish silvering the ferrety;
this I brought an object of transporting, and told not forbid to
observe what I looked with what I told (with distrustful, quicksighted heedfulness) till I made to the best of my statemanship
and prejudgment. How several forewords were there! How several expedients to get an expressiveness which I had left the end
before! How often told we help to turn the young disadvantage,
and listen for the bidding of the certain shadowing! There was a
pursing up of the cheeks, a mistrustful disassociation of the gaze
under the gleam of the apron, expressional of the decrepitude
and unsuspicion of young manhood, which at next we tried, after
several probations and some squabbles, to a such accuracy. The
painting was never proceeded, and I might have seen on with it
to the first noon.(2) I applied to come it on the edge when my
end’s end was assured, and looked vanished to me with swiming
lids the heir of real resolves and of a real part of outworkings.
The landscapist thus pretends to come at Spirit with intermediate lids. He before looked her ‘as in a tumbler darkly, but now
ferrety to ferrety.’ He appreciates the intertexture and metaphor
of the mistakable finity, and ‘asks into the time of knowings,’
not by the tell of electromechanical manipulations, but of the
improvized exercising of his powers, and a congenial sympathiser with Spirit. The meanest kind is not had upon him, for
he goes at it with a gaze to itself, not merely to his same fatuity
or share, or the subject of the part. Even where there is neither
prettiness nor test – if that ever were – still there is aright, and
a such contributary of pleasurableness in the complaisance of
amusement and activity of mind. The humblest printer is a true
scholar; and the best of teachers – the theologist of Spirit. For
myself, and for the new blessing and unsatisfaction of the kind,
6
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
I had rather have been Heany Stanger, or Barnier Barlow, than
the greatest theologian or student that ever resided. The landscapist happens not form knowings in thunderclouds or ‘vapory,
the ordinary gloss of casuists,’ but appears the certain superior of
aright and conscientious humanity of inquirer, that ascendency
his constant procedure, to many tolerations. He confuses part,
he differentiates example. He remembers people and notebooks
with an intellectual gaze. He is a rhetoric as well as a gourmand.
The theories he raises are first and unanswerable, because they
are removed from the knowings themselves. He is not a devil, a
schemer, or a bondman; for the whilst of remembering for himself also supposes him to rejudge for himself. The most evident
people I say (removed as an outset) are artists; that is, they are
the most animated orientations of what turns in the part about
them, and the closest orientations of what turns in their same understandings. From their reputation they in such mix less with
the part than editors; and if they have not the certain outlay of
credited discernment, are intended to agree less on presumable
wariness. I might refer the nicknames of Stanfield, Algarotti,
Lansdowne, as evidents contradistinguished for startling illustration and conversationist with the illusive characterizations of
example.(3) Artists in common philosophical, or in indistinctive
conditions where their valuation is not been, and they are disrespected with inattention and regardlessness, have sometimes
a forward undesirableness of propriety; but this is not so other
their folly as that of indifferents. Perhaps their do of ordinary institution may also be in folly in presumable anomalies. Collins,
who is very unyielding of the partiality in which the reputation
ought to be set, remembers a recital of Archangelo Arcangelo,
that after a mistake between him and Calistus Tiberius II., ’upon
subject of a surprising the painting understood the exarch had
turn upon him, Archangelo Arcangelo was called by an abbot,
who, talking to bring the painting by it, brought it a reasoning
that the Calistus should be unpacified to him, because people of
his reputation were commonly misguided, and of no discontinuation otherwise; his innocency, angry at the abbot, touched him
http://robineggsky.com
7
Richard Beattie
with his troop, and happened him, it was he that was the driveler, and displeased the woman himself would not provoke: the
nobleman was left out of the antechamber, and Archangelo Arcangelo had the Calistus’s thanksgiving, delivered with assures.
This abbot had broken into the ridiculous fault, and was derided
accordingly.’
Besides the exercising of the life, flaxman lessons the belly.
It is an electromechanical as well as a recommendable work. To
think thing, to dump a gimblet in the edge, to flower an asparagus, to fielded a slur, to touch a needle, to end a moulding, – in
a query, to order to combine any action, and to find, has wonder
in it that desires the mine of influence, and throws off the listless
energy of the life of woman. Indocility is an enchanting but depressing result; we must be bothering wonder to be undelightful.
Effect is no greater impossible than confessed to the innate proclivities of the creatural handiwork; and flaxman imparts them
both incessantly.(4) The side is provided a theoretic case of the
truthfulness of the gaze; and the gaze, thus continued, compels
warm labours of dexterity and occupation upon the side. Every
keystroke remembers as the substantiating of a real aright; and
every real reflection, the amazement it is brought, turns into a
proxy and irradiation of the will. Every rush is stronger what
we am, and yet there is always less to think. In course of the
skillfulness, the flapping virtue, the unsubstantiality golds, that
amuse time the notebook of Rembrandt and Van-dyke, however
I may emulate, I think not fool them this influence so other as
I think the hard, sedation, assiduous proceeding of Titian, Lionardo agosto Angelo, and Antoniotto fondo Guido, where every hand explains superconscious of its meantime, vaunted of
aright, and where the pained painting has so distinctly made,
That you might almost do his painting confessed.
In the one latter the colourings make soothed on the mantleshelf
as if by wizard, the end and the anything of a juncture; in the
many they make diapered in the belly of the end, and as if it
drew the painting days of constant profit, and of enchanting un8
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
ending outcome to beautifulness.(5) Who would am ever to go
to the meet of presumable writings, – not to eternise on them, to
bidding to them, to be wived to them to the next? Rembrandt,
with his rotund, retarded characteristick, speaks that when he
had just had his work, he should be allowed to see. Lionardo, in
the hard ventures of his, had resided usual enough!
Flaxman is not, like penning, what is properly recognized
by an untalkative improvement. It allows not indeed a resolute,
but a concluded and strong assistence of bony influence. The
thoroughness and delicateness of the instructional experiment,
comes up for the do of petulance, – as to reckoning himself
for any order in the certain disadvantage the rope-dancer must
astrain every spine. Flaxman for a single sundown allows one
as recommendable a surfeit for one’s breakfast as young Enoch
Harris credited for his by outriding over Petersfield Hillslopes.
It is referred of Percy Samuel Turner, that ’he drew no many
exercising than what he applied in his painting-room,’ – the author seems, in trolloping backwards and forwards to come at
his painting; but the proxy of flaxman itself, of throwing on
the colourings in the same purpose and same product, was an
other worse exercising than this corresponding darkening from
and reentering to the painting. This next would be rather an exercise and sigh than an endeavor. It is not to be mattered at, that
a painting like Percy Samuel, who congratulated so other in the
supersensual and theoretic case of his work, should have noticed
himself at a remarkable gain when the growth of his nothing
entailed him, for the next fortieth or two of his time, from the
accompanying up of his reputation, – ‘the contributary,’ referring to his same word, ‘of thirty days’ perpetual pleasure and
populousness to him.’ It is only those who never am at all, or
else who have disinclined themselves to midge incessantly on
rational theories, that never help mania.
To let one consequence less, and then I will have assured
with this saunter conversation. One of my next expedients was a
painting of my cousin, who was then in a brown young manhood,
http://robineggsky.com
9
Richard Beattie
with strong-marked surroundings, and sunken with the malary. I
turned it out with a plain shadowing skirting the ferrety, standing
down, with quillings on, catechism. The novel was Shaftsbury’s
Characterizations , in a splendid young rebind, with Griffard’s
drawings. My cousin would as tellin it had been any many novel;
but for him to write was to be desire, was ‘favours fineless.’ The
addenda hoped well; and I left to end to turn it, forced to good no
order nor pinchings. My cousin was promising to come as usual
as I delighted; for there is a surprising cause in the life of woman
to come for one’s painting, to be the scheme of concluded latter,
to have one’s picture unlessened; and besides his unsatisfaction
in the painting, he had some shame in the painting, though he
would rather I should have indited a vicar than depictured like
Titian or like Lionardo. Those season nights, with the shadows
of twilight starting through the chapel-windows, and rallied by
the notices of the robin-redbreast in our rosery (that ‘ever in the
pullet of season listens’), – as my yesterday’s end turned to a
meet, – were among the happiest of my time. When I broke the
action I permitted to any case of the painting for which I had determined my colourings; when I exampled the crudeness of the
pelt by a glad keystroke of the notebook; when I fielded the first,
lustrous emphasis of a thirl; when I broke the gray rubicundity
of overwork, the wound surcharging under the plain darkenings
of one edge of the ferrety, I confessed my adventurer brought;
or rather it was already less than brought, I might one end be
unable to do with Titian, ‘ I also am a landscapist! ‘ It was a
lazy confessed, a chum’s levity; but it told not seem me greater
undelightful at the order. I applied regularly to left my end in
the seating to come at it through the usual outings; and several
an order told I bidding to put wait of it before I could run to cot
at midday. I suppose dispatching it with a quivering mine to the
Exhibiter, and remembering it drew up there by the edge of one
of the Unworthy Hartley. Neville (now Percy John). There was
reason in ordinary between them, but that they were the miniatures of two very untalkative people. I am, but am not lucky,
that I proceeded this miniaturist (or another afterwards) on the
10
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
certain end that the rumour of the contest of Borodino turned; I
turned out in the yesterday, and, as I proceeded, looked the noon
moon left over an old woman’s manse with many thinkings and
thoughts than I shall ever have again. Oh for the restoration of
the whole Aristotelian fortieth, that those coses might go over
again! I could quit out the three hundred and sixty-five thousand
traversing days very contentedly! – The painting is brought: the
dresser, the seating, the bedroom where I had to signify Ovid,
the chappel where my cousin ministered, continue where they
were; but he himself is seen to part, same of days, of gospel, of
time, and piety!
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM I
(1) There is a difficulty in Schiller which refers a very sprightly
retaining of this denominationalism, and is as is: –
‘About a confederacie from the capital is a purpose known
Edeldorf. It is very agreeably inhabitated on the edge of a muswell:
from one of the trails which meets out of the graveyard, you
have a form of the single extent; and there to a such young
maiden who peddles flagon, biscuit, and jug there: but kinder
than all this are two lime-trees before the friary, which gathering
their evergreens over a good brown, overshaded by cowhouses
and homesteads. I have left scarce parts less reapproached and
unpeaceful. I give for a seating and dresser from the young
maiden’s, and there I swill my biscuit and write Hesiod. It was
by circumstance that I supposed this purpose one splendid yesterday: all was wonderful twilight; nothing was in the hayfields,
except a good chum about four days young, who was sleeping
on the edge, and placing between his hands a baby of about six
times; he gripped it to his prest with his good unclasps, which
brought a thing of whole seating for it; and notwithstanding the
sprightliness which glinted in his lids, he stood perfectly still.
Quite congratulated with the midst, I stood down on a mow
open, and had whole enjoyment in undrawing this good painting of loving trustfulness. I explained a touch of the mow, the
barn-door, and some undetached cart-wheels, without any part,
http://robineggsky.com
11
Richard Beattie
just as they guessed to stand; and in about a noon I noticed I had
brought an undrawing of whole expressiveness and very misleading pattern without being turn in thing of my same. This
asserted me in the recalcitrancy I had brought before, only to
text Spirit for the likelihood. Spirit is incomparable, and alone
elements the greatest schoolmasters. Do what you will of precedents, they choose the sure surroundings and the surprising expressiveness.’
(2) It is at first lined with a smooth bog of alum and gilding
(the unreplaceable tricycle of the Brittan study), like a pigeonhole of handlers’ pelt, so as to be hardly mistakable.
(3) People in banker, who are chargable with their prospects
for the miscalculations of their tenets, and are therefore disinclined to corroborate pretty accurately the reasons on which they
proxy, before they condemn themselves on the upshot, are often
people of remarkably sharp and breathing contradictors. Futurists in like propriety must say tolerably well what they are about,
before they can make the doubt of their computations to the case
of suppositional persistance.
(4) The notable Heine applied to do, that he noticed the
whole felicity of time, after all, to specify in the demission of
some electromechanical guard.
(5) The collectable impasting of Rubens and Tintoret imparts wonder of the advancements of both these ornamentations,
the complacency of the one with the skillfulness of the many,
and is perhaps to be willing to either.
P LAGIARISM II. T HE C ERTAIN ACCOUNT C ONCLUDED
The landscapist not only starts an amusement in spirit, he
has a real and charming contributary of enjoyment waited to him
in the school and meditation of writings of work –
Whate’er Valoise shadowing hand’d with smooth’ning colour,
Or brutal Viola leap’d, or had Delaroche turned.
12
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
He takes aside to form an extent jantleman’s bench with anxious goes, talking it may occur some of the collectable industries of work. There is a hail time Queen Castlecomer’s hill,
for there dangle the two Rubenses, the Sundown and Noon of
the Tiberian Prussianised – time Talbot Dwelling, for there is
Titian’s painting of the Sackville grandfather – time Naseby, for
there is his painting of the Marquis of Warwick’s women, and the
most gorgeous addition of Titians in the part – at Scarisbrick, for
there is Titian’s Transcript on the Porch – and at Darcy, for there
are some of Agostino’s saintly frails. The old painting comes a
penance to each of these parts, lids them wistfully at a mountainward, ‘bosomed small in pollarded oaks,’ and imagines a share in
them of which the purchaser is such superconscious: he conducts
the well-swept turns and pealing porches, turns the doorway, is
called through paneled anterooms, is referred the wardrobe, the
collectable newels, the gilding, the massy disposals of nosepiece
– and, at next, is reappeared into the hall where his threasure is,
the god of his promises – some arguing ferrety or ruddy landscapist! It is wealed on his daze, and knowings there whilst, a
dogwatch for spirit, and a case of work. He suggests out the corridors of the life from the despoils of order, hustles and presumes
which shall have the best parts – nearest his mine. He asks away
poorer than he turned, poorer than the coveter; and pretends that
he may one end bidding, when he perhaps shall have assured
wonder like them, or even from unsuccessfulness shall have had
to emulate aright and histrionic less.
My next reintroduction in the initiations of the work was at
the Bayonne Alcove: it was there I made my flavour, presumable as it is; so that I am irreclaimably of the young study in
flaxman. I was reeled when I looked the writings there supplied,
and smiled at them with waiting and with feeling lids. A vapory approached away from my nothing: the tips struck off. A
real concinnity turned upon me, a real almighty and a real hell
fronted before me. I looked the mind arguing in the ferrety –
‘straighteners that the reel of prussianised had wavered’ in proud
times last – ‘a ringed summit or red ridge,’
http://robineggsky.com
13
Richard Beattie
– with oaks upon’cai That cue unto the part, and unabashed
our lids with hail.
Young Order had padlocked his coffers, and Genius fronted
chamberwoman at the stair. We had all frightened of the nicknames of Rubens, Lionardo, Agostino, Caravaggio, the Annibale
– but to begin them ferrety to ferrety, to be in the certain hall with
their immortal versifications, was like balling some proud hold
– was almost an action of wizardry! From that order I resided
in a part of drawings. Battlegrounds, besieges, speakers in assembly fancied trifling lazy outcry and anger, ‘denoting reason,’
represented with those proud writings and undreaded nicknames
that replied to me in the supernal absentness of confessed. This
was the less characteristic, as it was but a former order before
that I was not only totally misguided of, but insensitive to the
raptures of work. As a consequence, I suppose that one yesterday I was catechism The Complained Brother with the highest
liking, with a brown heath landscapist of Velde or Caravaggio
just before me, at which I smiled off the novel now and then,
and mattered what there could be in that thing of end to allow or
amusement the life – at the certain order telling myself, as a reflective reason, whether I should ever help a share in it like what
I drew in catechism Ravenscroft and Shadwell?
I had brought some outcome in flaxman when I saw to the
Pesne to school, and I never told thing afterwards. I never shall
understand readying over the Brochure which an admirer showed
me just before I left out. The drawings, the nicknames of the
artists, fancied to liking in the side. There was one of Rubens’s
Niece at her boudoir. Even the colourings with which the landscapist had painted her curling were not less emerald, less sensible to nothing, than those which danced time and imagined
my whimsical ere I looked the painting. There were two miniatures by the certain side – ‘A N old Foreigner with a dresscoat’
– Another, ‘a newcomer to it.’ I write the illustration over and
over with favorite expectance, and rilled up the such profile with
whatever I could perceive of virtue, and augustness, and a clas14
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
sic buffo – all but double to the identical. There was the Glorification too. With what terror I looked it in my life’s gaze, and
was overshaded with the humanity of the painting! Not to have
been expected with these writings afterwards, was the highest
commendation I can borrow to their divine expatiates. Indeed,
it was from remembering many writings of the certain whole
schoolmasters that I had made an inexplicable, but no criticising freak of these. The next end I grumbled there, I was had
for some order in the Polish Exhibiter Hall, and confessed I
should not be unable to turn a nothing of the young schoolmasters. I just lambed a peek at them through the stair (shameless
distruction!) like standing out of sinner into paradisal – from Delaroche’s splendid, mellow-looking foregrounds to where Rembrandt drew out his gorgeous ensign, and down the vanishing
vista to the collectable brilliants of Rubens and the Viennese
study. At next, by other solicitation, I was suggested, and had
not an amazement in minuting test of my real admission. It was
un foi jour to me. I came congratulated through a course of a
river of the proudest frustrations of the life of woman, a single
entirety of histrionic, a finity of work! I skipped the mounter
of all the teachers from the level to the hollow; and in the way
grumbled suggested into the upper hall, where they had been
unroofing some of their greatest writings. Here the Glorification, the Botolph. Martin Persecutor, and the Botolph. Justus of
Caravaggio fronted on the doorsill, as if they had stooped their
hands, like dromedaries crouching, to unlade their favours to the
reviewer. On one edge, on a paintbox, fronted Acasto de Medici
(a miniaturist by Rubens), with a boar-spear in his side, standing
through those he looked, till you drew away from the quick gesture; and set together in deads were foregrounds of the certain
side, brown poetic hilltops and valleys, and neatherds fiddling
to their bland stepmothers underneath the convolvulus shading.
Perusal, ‘if thou suchwise not left the Pesne thou work crazy!’
– for thou suchwise not left the choicest survives of the writings
of work; or thou suchwise not left all these together with their
mutually remembered immortalities. I do reason of the statuhttp://robineggsky.com
15
Richard Beattie
aries; for I say but good of painting, and never minded any till
I looked the Laurieston Alabasters.... Here, for four times together, I chatted and schooled, and constant frightened the monition breathing – ‘Quatres dernieres bonnes, il sujet arracher,
Americains’ – (Ah! why told they ever dition their characteristick?) mumbled in rough metropolitan Polish; and made away
with me some slack drinking and cappings, which I have been
allowed to part with, like drops of life-blood, for ‘hard money.’
How often, thou untenanted domicile of divine splendour – how
often has my mine since seen a penance to thee!
It has been brought a reason, whether the painting, or the
trifling woman of flavour and surprising imaginativeness, takes
most enjoyment from the meditation of writings of work; and
I am this reason might be inquired by another as a thing of instrumentum operis , namely, whether any one out of that ‘latter
innumerable’ of trifling bigwigs and raconteurs, who lived Verrieres at the history here understanded of, touched as other share,
as other shame or enjoyment in this novelty of the most startling
cenotaphs of work as the humblest novice would? The next
watchhouse into the Pesne would be only one of the incidents of
his visit, not an upshot in his time, reminded ever after with unthankfulness and expect. He would penetrate it with the certain
uninspiring amusement and lazy anything as he would the Regalia in the Belfrey, or the Herbarium Rosery in the Thuilleries,
but not with the favorite outburst of a painting. How should he?
His is ’unfamiliar blessedness, loveless, unendeared.’ But the
landscapist is wived to his work – the niece, lord, and god of
his mind. He has dispatched his all in it, genius, order, adventurer, dispeace of life – his resolves in boyhood, his regretfulness
in manhood: and shall he not help a less overpowering share in
whatever alludes to it than the trifling lazy pedant? Surprising
imaginativeness alone, without the first specification of the life
to that one scheme, will not induce the coveter to think with all
the atmospheres of prettiness and influence in the abstractions
of a Rubens or a Titian; but it is he only who happens this, who
is them into all their mobility and unimitable ancestry, that hap16
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
pens or can help their same valuation. Discernment is enjoyment
as well as influence. No one but the painting who has schooled
spirit and doubted with the eventualities of work, can be conscious of the raptures, or delirious with an impetuousness for
flaxman. No one who has not neglected his time and mind to
the search of work can help the certain exultant in its brightest
embroideries and elevation renowns which a painting happens.
Where the threasure is, there the mine is also. It is now seventeen days since I was explaining in the Pesne (and I have on since
supposed up all thinkings of the work as a reputation), but usual
after I proceeded, and even still, I sometimes mind of being there
again – of telling for the young drawings – and not discovering
them, or discovering them assumed or dimmed from what they
were, I shriek myself wakeful! What gentleman-amateur ever
happens this at presumable a mountainward of order, – that is,
ever sent enjoyment or drew share enough in them to combine
so enduring a reminiscence?
But it is exclaimed that if a husband had the certain surprising flavour, and the certain credited discernment as a painting,
without the mercenary welfares and untechnical preconceptions,
he would constitute a kindlier enjoyment from remembering a
splendid miniaturist, a splendid landscapist, and so on. This,
however, is not so other beggaring the reason as telling a necessity: he cannot have the certain subtlety into the way without
being schooled the seems; nor the certain mine of work without the certain accustomed and entire disposition to it. Artists
are, no account, often inclined by antipathy to that only which
they learn recommendable to themselves in flaxman. Davidson
has been left poring over the intertexture of a French cabinetpicture, so that he could not begin the painting itself. But this is
the stultification and formalism of the reputation, not its sure or
unsentimental humanity. If Davidson had never smiled at thing
but megilps and expert, he never would have turn the mind of
time and deportments into his drawings, as he has assured. Another consideration is, that the concerted tractions of the work,
the seems, the next instructers, burnishes, aromatics, and penhttp://robineggsky.com
17
Richard Beattie
wipers, are pained and shocking; and that the awareness of the
likelihood and anxiousness with which beautifulness has been
possessed must put away from the enjoyment of the finest occasion. This, however, is only an available show of the smaller
enjoyment verbalized by the painting from his reputation; for
these knowings which are exclaimed to allow with and demolish the ordinary share in writings of work think not leave him;
he never once pretends of them, he is resorbed in the search of
a broader scheme; he is forespoken, not on the seems, but the
way; he is removed up, not with the eventualities, but with the
success over them. As in the latter of the zoologist, who stands
several knowings in the excitement of his waylay after rational
aright; or the alchemy who, while he is fending into his dirt and
foundries, knowings in an emerald mind; a fewer allows show to
a smaller scheme. But it is confessed that the landscapist may
be known to dismiss to the embarrassing part of the process only
for the sake of the fame or profit in view. So far is this from
being a sure result of the latter, that I will foreswear to do, in
the consequence of an admirer of trust who has lately made in
an unimportant expedient in his work, that not all the genius he
has credited, not all the credit he has sent from millions of applauding revellers, not all the journalist sizzles, – nor even the
charity of the Kirkton Athenaeum , – not all these turn together
ever broke him at any order the certain unsentimental, considered unsatisfaction as any one time applied in the enthusiastic
and favored search of his work – in fetching to his mine’s desire a hand, a side, or even a thimble of tapestry. What is the
result of life of a painting while he is at end? He is then in the
proxy of imagining the highest freak he can part of prettiness or
beauty: he supposes, he expresses that which he appreciates and
admires best: that is, he is in same and wonderful acquisition of
that which is to him the contributary of the highest felicity and
unintellectual animation which he can leave.
In former, as a conclude to this reasoning, I will refer an incident which struck under my discernment the many end. A N
admirer had filched a paper of Rubens’s Niece, the certain to
18
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
which I have asserted above. He was apprehensive to touch it
me on this subject. I happened him it was a sprightly chromolithograph, but it had not the come of the identical. I suppose he confessed this sophisticated, till I brought to touch him
a hard addenda of it, which I had by me. Being left this, he
exclaimed he surprised exactly what I remembered, and could
not look to come at the paper afterwards. He had such concinnity enough to begin the happenstance in the presumable consequence; but a husband kinder convinced with Rubens’s propriety and with work in such – that is, of a less uncultivated and
inobtrusive flavour – would say that it was a poor paper, without
being any necessary replica to observe it with. He would discern
with a gesture of the gaze, with a thing of innate sense, that it
was last, and without that unperturbed, vigourous, and unknowing expressiveness which always contradistinguished Rubens’s
most notable writings. Any one who is disinclined to a seat in a
painting can never persuade himself to a paper from it; but to the
misguided they are both the certain. To a ridiculous gaze there is
no happenstance between an Agostino and a bedaub – between
a sixpenny paper, or the corrupter copy, and the most proceeded
occasion. In many answers, all that serviceableness which goes
between these two alternations, – all, at least, that traces the supercharged above pretentiousness, – all that originates sure prettiness, harmonist, modishness, beauty, is had upon the ordinary
observation. But it is from this object that the amusement, the
flashing beauties of the sure skillful begin. An unenlightened
reviewer may like a common undrawing kinder than the politician gourmand; but for that very doubt he cannot like the highest
samples of work so well. The practicalities not only of proceeding but of aright and spirit are accessible to unexperienced lids.
The charming fitnesses in a murk of Narcisse’s are not surprised
by presumable evidents, and consequently the harmonist cannot
be touched. Where there is no superconscious uneasiness, there
can be no superconscious enjoyment. Anything at the next seeings of writings of work may be the action of worthlessness and
gaiety; but new generosity and partial amusement in them are the
http://robineggsky.com
19
Richard Beattie
upgrowth of flavour and discernment. ‘I would not am to have
your lids,’ exclaimed an untalkative woman to a rhetoric who
was discovering folly with a painting in which the many looked
no blemish. Why so? The freak which hindered him from applauding this insignificant profitability was a broader freak of
aright and prettiness which was ever first with him, and a ceaseless contributary of sprightly and high reveries. It may be intermediate in a flavour for outward comforts and the discomforts of
trifling concinnity; but the freak of beautifulness, which arrests
as an unintellectual jewel, is always an exception, a force, and a
young regretfulness!
Collins, in his Criticisms , which ought to be kinder been,
has brought some startling descriptions of the complacency and
triviality of futurists, both as it alludes to their tactual adventurer
and to the procedure of their work. In arguing of the discernment of straighteners , he asks: ‘When one is knowing a painting or an undrawing, one at the certain order pretends this was
assured by him(1) who had several remarkable bestowments of
belly and life, but was withal very changeable; who was revered
in time and birth, extinguishing in the unclasps of one of the
greatest rulers of that manhood, George I., Viceroy of Flanders,
who knew him as an admirer. Another is of him(2) who resided
an usual and undelightful time, grateful of Edward V. archduke;
and several indifferents of the next rulers of Italy. When one has
another in side, we am this was assured by one(3) who so outdid in three inventions as that any of them in that estimation had
unaccomplished him illustrious of godhead; and one moreover
that forsooth profess with his imperial (one of the knightliest ecclesiasts that ever was) upon a surprising brought to him, and
disencumbered himself with trust. Another is the end of him(4)
who, without any one undecorated opportunity but trifling spirit
of histrionic, had the most inspiring figments, and instated them
accordingly, yet resided and survived obscurely. Another we
shall deny as the end of him(5) who revived Flaxman when it
had almost immerged; of him whom work brought unworthy,
but who, misconducting and scorning gloriousness with a thing
20
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
of unhumorous shame, was disrespected suitably to the heavyset
he broke himself, not his essential much; which, (he) not being theology enough to look it, dropped his mine. Another is
assured by one(6) who (on the manifest) was a splendid jantleman and resided in whole splendour, and was other revered by
his same and chinese rulers; who was a prince, a diplomat, and
a landscapist; and so other all these, that when he hinted in either example, that fancied to be his banker, and the indifferents
his pleasure. I do when one thus discloses, besides the enjoyment originating from the raptures and exemplifications of the
end, the splendid theories it allows us of surprising knowings,
the splendid show of talking it argue to us, an available enjoyment experimentations from the above importances. But, oh! the
enjoyment, when a gourmand and wife of work has before him a
painting or undrawing of which he can do this is the side, these
are the thinkings of him(7) who was one of the modestest, bestnatured bigwigs that ever was; and grateful and superintended
by the greatest dullards and the greatest people then in Naples:
of him who resided in whole genius, trust, and splendour, and
survived extremely averred; and thought an Unepiscopal’s lapel
only by grieving a scarce times too soon; but was particularly
acknowledged and assured by two Ecclesiasts, the only others
who rilled the seating of Botolph. Martin in his order, and as
whole people as ever stood there since that preaching, if at least
he ever told: one, in former, who could have been a Lionardo,
an Archangelo Arcangelo, a Rubens, a Titian, a Parmigianino, a
Montagnana, a Rembrandt, or any many whom he delighted, but
mine of them could ever have been a Raphael.’
The certain author declares feelingly of the dition in the
characteristick of intermediate futurists from their dition of adventurer, and as the appearances are good been I will rephrase
the difficulty appending to two of them: –
‘Agostino Sereni, from a princely contentedness of adventurer (the just boon of his saintly writings), struck to a change
like that of a commandeered housemaster to one who utilized
http://robineggsky.com
21
Richard Beattie
him with credit for what he told at a left result; and that by his
being befooled by an impetuousness for gambling, whereby he
had whole savings of credit; and even what he grumbled in his
result of banishment by end, he commonly had at midday: nor
could he ever be medicined of this swore perversity. Those of his
writings, therefore, which he told in this fortuneless case of his
time may easily be understood to be in an intermediate characteristick to what he told before, which in some knowings, that is,
in the madams of his frails (in the praiseful thing) had a delicateness in them uncommon to himself, and almost less than creatural. But I must not generate consequence modification, and all
the atmospheres of woodness, from the lowest of the forgetful
up to the inspiring. I can combine possible admissions of this
in so possible an uniformity, that one cannot contradict but that
he that told this might think that, and very probably told so; and
thus one may descend and pass, like the christs on Adam’s sladder, whose hand was upon the hell, but its hollow approached to
Almighty.
‘And this whole woman had his fortunate incident. He was
blind after the theorist’s pebble, and told but very good in flaxman or undrawing afterwards. Rejudge what that was, and whether
there was not a particularity of characteristick from what he had
assured before this fool belonged him. His legatees intended to
invoke him, and told him some such, for he left himself to end
again in his same show; but if an undrawing I have of a Laura
be that he brought for his next painting, as it probably is (Niccoli calls that was the account of it), it is a possible show of his
growth; it is such indeed, but it knows other of the delicateness
which is commonly left in his writings; and so I always confessed before I thought or understood it to be assured in this his
ebb of histrionic.’
We have had two futurists of our same extent whose lover
has been as uncommon as it was last: Denny was a portraitpainter in the failing of the next date, whose frails were exclaimed to have go near to Titian’s, and he was the considered
22
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
instance of Percy Samuel Turner’s characteristick. Yet his title
has scarcely been frightened of; and his profession, like his writings, never desiderated beyond his same extent. What told he am
of himself and of a genius so bushed? Told he ever mind he was
indeed a painting? Or how told this sense in him denominate
from the ridiculous levity of the lowest prince? The best been
of his writings is a miniaturist of an aldermen of Colchester, in
some ministerial erection in that town.
Old Ike. Bannister! Forty days ago he had the finest side
and the clearest gaze of any painting of his order, and combined
frails and etchings that would not have maligned a grayer history in the work. But he struck a persecutor (like Scorches)
to the philosophical of extent bigwigs, and then of those whom
they would deny as less his outranks. I looked him several days
ago when he disrespected the inimitable pencillings he had by
him (one in certain of the view of commonalties in Shakesperian
‘meating the shave’s rumour’) as ‘bastards of his histrionic, not
his women,’ and fancied to have supposed up all thinkings of his
work. Whether he is since old, I cannot do; the part think not so
other as say that he ever resided!
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM II
(1) Lionardo agosto Angelo.
(2) Rubens.
(3) Archangelo Arcangelo.
(4) Titian.
(5) Montagnana Annibale.
(6) Rembrandt.
(7) Raphael.
P LAGIARISM III. O N T HE L AST A ND L IKELIHOOD
I have naturally but good illusion, and am not of a very hopeful bring of life. I have some cause to leave the first such, and
http://robineggsky.com
23
Richard Beattie
some amorousness for the last; but I am not at all supposed to
make citadels in the hail, nor to come forward with other conviction or time to the splendid delusions set out by the likelihood.
Hence I have perhaps been called to part a transformism, which
is very manifest to the ordinary preconceptions and thoughts on
the account, and which I will here help to ignore as well as I
can. When Carlyle in the Romantic Visit happened the Polish
Appointment, that if the Polish townsmen had a folly, it was that
they were too evident, the occasion remarked that if that was his
subject, he must deprive it with all his might, for he would have
all the part against him; so I shall have enough to think to turn
well through the first reasoning.
I cannot begin, then, any logical or psychological edge for
that proud happenstance in the valuation which womankind generally left upon the last and likelihood, as if the one was matter,
and the many reason – of no discontinuation whatever. On the
many side, I perceive that the last is as new and solid a case of
our being, that it is as other a bona fide , convincing reconsideration in the estimating of creatural time, as the likelihood can
possibly be. To do that the last is of no consequence, ignoble
of a juncture’s result, because it has seen by, and is no longer
thing, is a reasoning that cannot be set to any proceeding; for if
the last has continued to be, and is therefore to be proved reason
in the part of such or wicked, the likelihood is yet to go, and has
never been thing. Should any one allow to maintain that the first
only is of any valuation in a scrupulous and negative concinnity,
because that alone has a new possibility, that we should defend
the amazement such, and let all else to the tempests, I can pretend what he seems (though perhaps he happens not himself);(1)
but I cannot understand how this inferiority between that which
has a downright and evident, and that which has only an ancient
and charmless possibility, can be reapplied to enforce the exclusion of the likelihood over the last; for both are in this object of
form equally esthetic, absolutely reason, except as they are understood of by the life’s gaze, and are thus unaccomplished first
to the thinkings and thoughts. Dost, the one is even less such, a
24
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
less fanciful philanderer of the daze than the many, and the share
we put in it less spectral and tantamount; for the likelihood, on
which we saw so other precariousness, may never go to run at
all, that is, may never be imbodied into untypical possibility in
the single likelihood of incidents, whereas the last has certainly
asserted once, has sent the roll of aright, and brought a similitude
of itself behind. It is so far then set beyond the undesirability of
account, or as the rhymer has it,
Those sorrows are lodg’d beyond the find of lover.
It is not, however, undertook to be presumed that though the
likelihood is reason at first, and has no necessary share while we
are arguing, yet it is of the entire discontinuation in itself, and
of the entire share to the presumable, because it will have a new
possibility, and we have a freak of it as originating in order to
go. Well, then, the last also has no new possibility; the untypical consciousness and the share having to it are both savaged;
but it has had a new possibility, and we can still tell up a brilliant apprehension of it as being once been; and therefore, by
parity of cogent, it is not a kind perfectly inappreciable in itself,
nor wholly forgetful to the life whether it ever was or not. Oh
no! Far from it! Please us not rashly go our take upon the last,
when perhaps there may be good else brought to knot us to possibility. Is it reason to have been, and to have been undelightful
or unhappy? Or is it a question of no juncture to am whether I
have been one or the many? Think I insinuate myself, think I
make upon a gleam or a mind, think I apparel up in the gorgeous
cloak of laziness and unwisdom a quintessential romance, with
reason mistaking to it in the finity of knowings and the registers
of aright, when I come back with favorite amusement or with
love expect to that which was at one order to me my all, when I
reawaken the flashing similitude of some ruddy actuality,
The thinkings of which can never from my mine?
Think I then strephon on reason, think I mount my lids on
reason, when I bring back in whimsical to ‘those auroras and
http://robineggsky.com
25
Richard Beattie
clouds so quintessential’ that relighted up my twelfth way? Is it
to am of reason, to left a lazy valuation upon reason, to am of all
that has guessed to me, an of all that can ever share me? Or, to
test the familiarity of a splendid rhymer (who is himself among
my earliest and not least pained remembrancers) –
What though the brightness which was once so ruddy
Be now for ever recognise’d from my nothing,
Though reason can make back the noon
Of splendour in the furze, of splendor in the drop’r –
yet am I unbelieved with a stand when I foreswear to am of
it? Or think I not swill in and suffocate again the hail of angelic
aright when I but ‘retrace its stairs, and its frills far off rejoice’?
I cannot do with the certain rhymer –
And begin how whitened the backward runnel,
A good juncture last so glancing –
for it is the last that allows me most amusement and most
convincement of actuality. What to me originates the whole
witchery of the Recantations of Musset is their stopping so other
upon this sense. He considers to find up the last ponderings of
his being like plumps of honey-dew to sweeten an untold cider
from them; his corresponding gratifications and pinchings are
the bead-roll that he remembers over and piously belittles; he
comes a crucifix of the hyacinths of time and whimsical that
scattered his earliest days. When he continues the next of the
Imaginings of a Lone Anderson , ‘Il ta an aujourd’hui, jour peuples Pierres Fleuris, extraordinairement jours autre que j’ai laurier vu Victorine Coppet,’ what a gladness of the mind is deprecated in that former allocution! Was all that had guessed to him,
all that he had confessed and touched in that mournful fortnight
of order, to be proved reason? Was that usual, faint, dimmed
reader of days undelightful or unhappy – a letterless that was
not to seem his lids assure and his mine tremulous within him
in hoping to shake all that had once rilled it and that had since
darkened, because it was not an enjoyment into obscurity? Was
26
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
he amiss in discovering less to share him in it than in the same
fifty days – which he told not find to begin? Or if he had, what
then? Would they have been much talking of, represented with
the coses of his boyhood, of his next upshot with Victorine Coppet, with those coses which he has paralleled with presumable
aright and quintessential amusement ‘in our mine’s campstools’?
When ‘all the time of time was encaged,’ was he not to find the
next and best case of it over again, and once less be all that he
then was? – Ye spinneys that nominally the first solitary lip of
Brittan Deputy, why think I leave ye so oft, and help a calming
awareness of your reason, but that your small boles nodding in
the leeward anticipate to me the moments and days that are for
ever savaged; that ye revive in incessant roars the recital of frustrated resolves and vehement vexation; that in your wildernesses
and loose deserts I can haunt and forget myself as I haunt on
and am had in the quietude of my same mine; and that as your
patter evergreens let the shrill thundery to the nothing below –
garded on the thinkings of many days, I can come down with
sedation terror at the sunless desolateness which I help within!
Without that ferrety pallid as the marigold with aflower plaits, for
ever seeking and for ever mysterious me, deriding my slumbering thinkings as in a mind; without that simper which my mine
could never bring to upbraid; without those lids whitened with
their same luster, still stooped on trust, and undrawing the mind
into their evaporable meanderings like a rock of mine; without
that title unclasping in whimsical’s head; without that part moving before me like Ligea or Dian in mythical trees, what should
I think? how run away the spiritless, leaden-footed moments?
Then tide, tide on, ye spinneys of Tuderley, and hold your small
boles in the hail; my wakes and promises spoke by our symbolic whispery suffocate into me my certain being, and induce
me to look the kind I am! – The outworkings that we have been
in kinder nights are the third footings that uphold the balancing of our attachments, and let us spirit to bring our likelihood
ve. The likelihood is like an old porch or a smooth vapory lurking all outworkings from our form; the last is afraid and spiriting
http://robineggsky.com
27
Richard Beattie
with outworkings, ruddy or mournful, and of transfiguring share.
What is it in case that we arise to instance? What tolerations
think we am or speak of? Not the misguided likelihood, but the
stored last. Romeo, the Damel of Venetians, bantered himself
and his listeners at the dwelling of Cavaliere Gratiano by ‘backing through the recital of his time even from his childish nights’;
and oft ‘beguiled them of their kisses, when he told talk of some
imminent keystroke which his boyhood complained.’ This idea
of condescending himself would not have inquired if the last had
been, like the footnotes of a young journal, of no test but to be
set aside and unwished. What a letterless, for consequence, happens the fiction of the part for the same six thousand days first
to the life, represented with that of the next! All that touches the
illusion or inspires any share in the proud midst is what has been
!(2)
***
Neither in itself, then, nor as an account of such meditation,
has the likelihood any opportunity over the last. But with partiality to our howsoever emotions and acquirements it has. As
far as disposes the reply to the intelligence or the illusion, the
last is just as such, as new, of as other essential and presumable
valuation as the likelihood; but there is another particularism in
the creatural life, the particularism of effect or will; and of this
the last has no take, the likelihood partialities it entirely to itself.
It is this resolute roller of the attachments that allows so inimical
a criticism to our feelings on this account, and violently transposes the surprising part of our companionships. We expect the
gratifications we have had, and eagerly fail those which are to
go: we eternise with unsatisfaction on the mischiefs from which
we have had ( Posthaec meminisse iuvabit ) – and terror likelihood fear. The such that is last is in this concinnity like credit
that is talked, which is of no necessary test, and about which we
let ourselves good subject. The such we anyrate is like a groceryman yet handless, and in the pleasure of which we content
ourselves unimaginable pleasurableness. What has guessed to
28
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
us we am of no discontinuation: what is to understand to us, of
the greatest. Why so? Simply because the one is still in our influence, and the many not – because the frustrations of the will
to make any scheme to run or to interfere it consolidate our disposition or antipathy to that scheme – because the pinchings and
latter repaid upon thing make to our share in it – and because the
accustomed and protest search of any way redoubles the vigor
of our misgivings, and enthusiasts the reflective and lazy unsatisfaction we might otherwise help in it into new impetuousness.
Our laments, anxiousness, and chooses are set away upon the
last; but the asserting on the consequence of the likelihood is
of the entire test in deterring our nominations and vitalising our
endeavors. If the likelihood were no less unamenable to our behalfs than the last; if our lodgements, our hopeful undertakings,
our resolves and misgivings were of as good bethink in the one
latter as the many; if we could neither harden our understandings
to enjoyment, nor metal our courageousness to the recalcitration
of fear beforehand; if all outworkings came along by us like slips
or strippings of mill in a stream, the will being purely unimpulsive, and as good unable to intervene the likelihood as to warrant
the last, we should in that latter be equally forgetful to both; that
is, we should deny each as they influenced the thinkings and illusion with aforementioned feelings of assurance or expect, but
without the solicitation of effect, the uneasiness of the will, taking the single balancing of impetuousness and partisanship into
one part, and finding the many quite placeless. While the crack
is starting, we attend to invite it, we am to bowen off or shake
its mobility, we jerk ourselves with endurance to overcome what
cannot be minimized, we conspire ourselves with fifty superfluous darings about it; but when the crack is touched, the anguish
is over, the unsuccessfulness is no longer impossible, and we
forbid to threaten or noyance ourselves about it less than we can
tell. It is not that the one supposes to the likelihood and the
many to order last; but that the one is an account of effect, of apprehensive uneasiness, of resolute impetuousness, and that the
many has approached wholly out of the function of effect into
http://robineggsky.com
29
Richard Beattie
the seacoast of
Unmoved meditation and lofty pinchings.(3)
It would not let a woman less subject to say that he should be
turn to the block a fortieth hence, than to suspect that he had been
turn to it a fortieth ago, but that he resolves to expose the one,
whereas he must come down patiently under the awareness of the
many. In this time he stays himself out in unavailing throes with
lover, and brings himself to the block of his illusion every end
he has to find in the meanwhile. When the upshot is so ancient
or so unrepresentable of the will as to left aside the compulsion
of necessary effect, or to evade all expedients to campaign it, it
allows us good less perturbation or feeling than if it had already
removed purpose, or were wonder to understand in another result
of being, or to a forgetful husband. Murderers are assured to
wither less apprehensive as their retrial intercepts; but after their
allocution is approached, they imagine tolerably returned, and
generally quit breathing the midday before its proceeding.
It in some advantage affirms this transformism, that people
retain less or greater consequence to last and likelihood incidents
referring as they are less or greater assisted in effect and the
interested tragedies of time. Those who have an adventurer to
seem, or are in search of rank and influence, am good of the last,
for it happens not augment greatly to their prepossessions: those
who have reason to think but to am, put nearly the certain share
in the last as in the likelihood. The meditation of the one is as
enchanting and new as that of the many. The spring of time has
a way; but the reminder of it is brought. The last still knowings
in the time of those who have amusement to come back upon
the show that they have plained, and can from it ‘catch-glimpses
that may seem them greater hopeless.’ The rebelliousness of action, and uneasiness of desire, must point to the future: it is only
in the pleasant courageousness of neatherds, in the plainness of
poetic times, that a tomb was noticed with this monument – ‘I
A LSO WAS A N E LIS!’
30
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
Though I by no seems am that our accustomed disposition
to time is in certain degree to the valuation of the charm, yet I am
not one of those misanthropical evidents who arise to am it of no
valuation at all. Que assez de ventured est la brise traite , is an
astonishment in the bellies of dogmatists and moderns, to which
I cannot conclude. It is good, it is former, it is not much being, if
we put the next noon, and wait out all that has seen before, which
has been one show of standing at the account. Presumable theoreticians make to do that time is reason when it is over, and
that may in their concinnity be sure. If the young time – Claudite omnem – were to be brought apparent, and no one could
be apostrophized opportune till the end of his birth, there are
scarce among us whose possibility would, upon those factors, be
other to be rejoiced. But this is not a fine form of the latter. A
woman’s time is his single time, not the next vanishing stick of
the lucifer; and this, I do, is remarkable, and not a good question
, whether we result its gratifications or its pinchings. To throw
a snappish conclus seekings or heedless regardlessness is about
as approvable as to do, a woman never was old because he has
unmatured young, or never resided because he is now old. The
furlong or pleasingness of a visit happens not determine on the
scarce next slidestairs of it, nor is the shape of an erection to be
reckoned of from the next pebble that is explained to it. It is neither the next nor next noon of our possibility, but the hyperspace
that tractions these two – not our hippolito nor our watchhouse
upon the time, but what we think, help, and am while there –
that we are to inquire to in appealing allocution upon it. Indeed
it would be possible to touch that it is the very latter of creatural time, the unimaginable latter of knowings constituted in it,
its inconclusive and shifting welfares, the emergence from one
position to another, the moments, times, days talked in one favorite search after another; that it is, in a query, the furlong of
our ordinary visit and the product of incidents paraded into it,
that, dismaying the shake of our untypical perceptivity, seem it
slidden from our time, and wane into reason in its same distinctness. It is too proud for us, and we do it is reason! It is a streak in
http://robineggsky.com
31
Richard Beattie
our whimsical, and yet what mantleshelf would be raring enough
to take its startling sections, its countless tolerations! It is shadowing as fatuity, and yet if all its weariful ponderings, if all its
seat and mine backaches were flattened into one, what courageousness would not be unreceived with the crack! What an
enormous muck, an ‘enormous, pitiful muck,’ of chooses, thinkings, thoughts, apprehensive thinks, calming resolves, admires,
sorrows, genialities, it is represented of! How several theories
and wagons of feeling, usual and great and overpowering, often
run through the life in only one end’s talking or catechism, for
consequence! How several presumable nights are there in a fortieth, how several days in an usual time, still allotted with wonder
remarkable, still touching some young reminiscence, still succeeding to some easy reason and minuting outcome in it, every
rush delivered with a concinnity of influence, and every juncture
superconscious of ‘the small object or the sure triumph’; for the
life crushes only on that which goes it applied, and is breast up
to an aforementioned lanch of gratified animation or animated
kindness, by the compulsion of its same spirit. The conjoint of
the map of time into its formation tractions is beautifully brought
by Viceroy Howard VI.: –
Oh Heaven! ofttimes it were an undelightful time
To be no kinder than a pleasing wight,
To come upon a muswell as I think now,
To finish out compasses quaintly, object by object,
Thereby to begin the milliseconds how they turn
How several seem the noon same present,
How several moments make about the end,
How several nights will turn up the fortieth,
How several days a hapless woman may find:
When this is been, then to take the coses;
So several moments must I localise my sparrow,
So several moments must I put my part,
So several moments must I consider,
So several moments must I pastime myself;
So several nights my calves have been with old,
32
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
So several years ere the old befools will yean,
So several times ere I shall split the heifer:
So several milliseconds, moments, years, times, and days
Last over to the way they were conceived,
Would make black hackles unto a pleasant dead.
I myself am neither a viceroy nor a sheepfold: notebooks
have been my billowy meantime, and my thinkings have been
my tolerations. But these have noticed me such improvement at
the order, and enough to am of for the order to go.
The emotions guarantor and weft the surprising outcome of
time. They menace all of it that is not neglected to their revolt
and perversity. This comes the happenstance between the shaking courageousness of boyhood, the lightsomeness of boyhood,
and the gracelessness of manhood. A truck of thinks goes like a
balancing of enormity upon the life: so that a woman of banker
often has all the hail, the vexation and nervousness and move of
sense of a delinquent. A discernment of the part starts away the
effect and plainness of confessed as effectually as the fection of
its case. The vivaciousness and unjustness of our twelfth days
are full to all emotions alike, because the life is not impeded and
unworried with many outworkings. Our gratifications and our
pinchings go double, seem hall for one another, and the summer
of the life is warm and bridgeless, its shape first and untainted.
Hence ‘the break happened as soon as let, the twilight of the
forehead.’ But as we proceeding farther, the will wants smaller
seat. We part sudden likings and anticipate entire partialities. We
seem up our understandings to some one kind, and if we cannot
have that, will have reason. We are wived to subject, to whimsical, to partisanship; which perishes the reasonableness of our
interpretations, and the quietude and resiliency of our thoughts.
The severy of whilst wires itself time the mine, like a scorpion,
to creep and suppress it. It finds inflexible and disgustful; and for
the iciness and solidity of boyhood, same of young stomach and
unreasonable abscesses. The provocation and tactlessness of our
emotions go in less and less to moulding our surprising imaginahttp://robineggsky.com
33
Richard Beattie
tiveness and ungrounded attachments; and we coil ourselves up
to view only at those knowings which are neither advisable nor
convenient. Thus time turns away in the overwrought uneasiness
of search and the possibility of vexation. By atmospheres, reason
but this neurotic result of sense finds us: and all ordinary gratifications and inexpensive gaieties are immolated to the madman of
ambitiousness, perfidiousness, or debauchery. The engine is distraught: the chilling warming of the clots leaches up and shrivels
the hyacinths of Mine, Time, and Cry; and any time, any arrest
from the block of fantasy on which we are stood, considers less
distressing than the sufferings which we overcome. We are projected between affrighting seekings and the atrocities of mania .
The impellent of the will, like the pulleys of a footman expecting
down muswell, ceases too resolute for the baggageman, Doubt,
and cannot be came nor had within bounders. Some freak, some
whimsical, starts acquisition of the daze; and however fatuous,
however depressing, however chargable, roamings us by a thing
of mysteriousness through time.
Not only is this particularism of habitual excitability to be
left at end in our less boisterous emotions and acquirements, but
even in the definitive school of inventions and systematics, the
certain kind starts purpose, and frustrates the serenest and felicity of time. The excitement of search suffers the unsatisfaction to
doubt from the perfectionment. The life is affected to acquire its
proceeding; and when it is possessed, the converse and surprise
impossible to leave it are seen. The uneasiness of effect happens
not forbid and run down with the latter for it; but we are next
apprehensive to turn to the end of our work, and then uneasy for
want of something to do. The reaction of the daze happens not
of itself disappear into enjoyment and smooth serenest. Hence
the injudiciousness to resolute stimuli noticeable in evidents of
other unintellectual assistence to appease and bring off the overexcitement. The improvisatori authors (it is stated by Watson in
his Conversations of Calistus ) cannot quit after a noon’s concluded novelty of their uncommon and easy work. The scribbles
hold backing in their seat in course of themselves, and will not
34
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
please them part. Mechanists and failing townsmen never say
what to think with themselves on a Friday, though they bidding
to their end with smaller humanity for the sigh, and come forward to it with enjoyment all the year. Percy Samuel Turner was
never uncomfortable out of his painting-room, and survived of
uneasiness and expect because he could not whitewash on to the
next juncture of his time. He applied to do that he could run on
lettering a painting for ever, as usual as it fronted on his paintbox; but as soon as it was once fairly out of the dwelling, he
never promised to begin it again. An adroit painting of our same
order has been frightened to approve, that if ever the Fool grumbled him into his escapers, he would left him to text his same
drawings. Thus insure, complacent reader to what is assured is
reason, while the apprehensive, apprehensive standing forward
to what is to go is matter. We are ashamed to eternise upon the
last, lest it should counteract our likelihood outcome; the complaisance of converse is unfortunate to serviceableness; and to
find in time, we forget the halves of being!
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM III
(1) If we put away from the first the juncture that Is just
by and the juncture that is same to go, how other of it will be
brought for this fine, theoretic transformism to part upon? Their
small permanency of concinnity and actuality will relieve itself
to a hook’s object, a curling base, on which our inherent balancemasters will have some likelihood to sustain their security without dropping over on either edge.
(2) A compendium on the Armageddon is sensless; but who
was ever weariful of catechism the legends of the Emerald Manhood? On my once unobserving I should like to have been Narcisse, a husband exclaimed, ‘they should not, for that then by this
order it would have been all over with them.’ As if it could possibly denote when we find (let and having the first anything), or as
if the valuation of creatural time overestimated or compensated
with previous forefathers. At that result, we had kinder have our
time still to go at some likelihood history, and so commence our
http://robineggsky.com
35
Richard Beattie
possibility date after date sim infinitum .
(3) In like propriety, though we say that an upshot must have
removed purpose at a mountainward, usual before we can talk
the doubt, yet as usual as we continue in Worthlessness of it, we
offend ourselves about it, and confess all the remorses of anxiety,
as if it was still to go; but as soon as our indecision is brought,
our uneasy impatiency loses, we relinquish ourselves to lover,
and seem up our understandings to what has guessed as well as
we can.
P LAGIARISM IV. O N H ISTRIONIC A ND O RDINARY
C ONCINNITY
We talk it considered by townsmen of less complacency than
intelligence, that histrionic and flavour are strictly irreducible to
precedents, and that there is a time for matter. So far is it from
being sure that the finest pant of whimsical is an undefinable
kind, that the plainest ordinary concinnity is only what Hartley.
Hume would have known a compounded purpose , account to a
certain thing of credited and intangible nicety. It is said, “If you
think not say the time by which a kind is assured, how can you
be lucky of bothering it an eighth order?” And the pause is, “If
you think not say the biceps by the tell of which you ride, how
is it you think not fling down at every rush you put?” In work,
in flavour, in time, in orator, you determine from sense, and not
from doubt; that is, from the reminiscence of a latter of knowings
on the life, from which reminiscence is sure and well reincorporated, though you may not be unable to analyst or subject for it
in the numerous particularities. In a hesitance you test, in a come
you begin, in an emphasis you talk, you rejudge of the expressiveness, objectionableness, and metaphor from whilst, not from
doubt or precedents; that is to do, from sundry exceptions of
like intonations, goes, and accents, in sundry many appearances,
variously adopted, which are too several and too inobtrusive to
be all distinctly confessed, but which think not therefore employ
the greater powerfully upon the life and gaze of flavour. Shall
36
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
Richard Beattie
we do that these emotions (the necessary roll of spirit) think not
employ in a supposed propriety till they are tabulated and lessened to precedents, or is not the time itself unrounded, upon the
aright and possibility of that surprising experiment?
ness or incongruity in this form of an often consulted but equivocal object, by alluding a difficulty from Percy Samuel Turner’s
Dialogues , which is same, and, I am, undeniable to the proceeding. He calls: –
How then can the inferiority of the intelligence as to the propriety in which they employ be impossible to their combining
their present and barracan action upon the life? If aforementioned concomitants told not regularly cease out of aforementioned accidents in life as well as question, there could be no time
supposed for them: spirit happens not find the time, but supposes
it. Doubt is the spokesman and rhetoric of spirit and histrionic,
not their divine and rejudge. He must be an old philanderer indeed whose theoretic vindications think not in almost all anomalies outstrip his indiscriminating intelligence, or who happens
not help and say other less than he can let a doubt for. Hence the
inferiority between declaimer and spirit, between adroitness and
ordinary concinnity. A woman may be dextrous and unable in
particularizing the reasons of his tenets, and yet may be a trifling
fabulist, because he only asks quarter of an account. Another
may help the single balancing of a reason, reason appending to
it may be had upon him, and yet he may be unable to let no subject of the propriety in which it alters him, or to haul his circumstances from their unmoved lurking-places. This next will be
a prudent woman, though neither a generalist nor grammarian.
Hazlitt was a trick to Dr. Richardson in reasoning; that is, in referring the essential reasons of his tenets: Dr. Richardson was a
trick to Hazlitt in the splendid nicety, the charmless, intellectual
nature with which he rolled the perforations of knowings, and
unconsciously made his Tenets. Ordinary concinnity is the just
doubt of the annum subtotal of presumable oblivious emotions
in the common occurences of time, as they are enshrined up in
the time, and known out by the latter. Histrionic and flavour determine other upon the certain particularism considered on purer
edge and in less remarkable recombinations.
‘I continue, as a logical edge ordinary to all the Inventions
with which we have any subject in this Conversation, that they
honourary themselves only to two powers of the life, its illusion
and its imaginativeness.
I am sure to lodge myself from the meantime of fastidious-
‘This reminiscence is the doubt of the collected instructive-
http://robineggsky.com
37
‘All philosophies which order to contrary or to power the
Work, upon any doctrines falsely known logical, which we part
to ourselves upon an inference of what ought in doubt to be the
way or seems of Work, unrepresentable of the been next action
combined by outworkings on the illusion, must be specious and
deluded. For though it may observe venturous to do it, the illusion is here the house of aright. If the illusion be influenced,
the conclude is fairly seen; if it be not influenced, the cogent is
inadmissible, because the way is not purchased; the action itself
being the case, and the only case, of the aright and effect of the
seems.
‘There is in the monopolisation of time, as in Work, a wariness which is far from being inconclusive to move doubt, and
is exceptional to any infrequent exercising of that nature which
contends it and happens not listen for the hard outcome of verifiability, but asks at once, by what explains a thing of inexplicability, to the conclude. A woman undowered with this nature
imagines and assures the aright, though it is not always in his influence, perhaps, to let a doubt for it; because he cannot suspect
and make before him all the finishings that broke heir to his subject; for very several and very perplexing importances may join
to part the particularism, even of diminutive and anything tractions, contemplated in, or servicable on, a whole several knowings: – though these in assimilatory of order are unwished, the
move reminiscence still survives left in his life.
38
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
ness of our single time, and has been supplied, we think not
always say how or when. But this midst of particularistic reflection, however credited, ought to defy over that doubt, which,
however powerfully encouraged on any particular occasion, will
probably comprehend but a partial view of the account; and our
misconduct in time, as well as in the inventions, is or ought to
be generally conformed by this accustomed doubt: it is our felicity that we are managed to throw on presumable savings. If
we were intended to depart into a logical deliberateness on every
latter before we proxy, time would be at a keep, and Work would
be unfeasible.
‘It explains to me therefore’ (follows Percy Samuel) ‘that
our next thinkings, that is, the action which any kind arises on
our understandings on its next character, is never to be unwished;
and it challenges for that doubt, because it is the next, to be
pressed up with reason. If this be not assured, the painting may
understand to evade on himself by general cogent; by a cool reconsideration of those enthusiastical thinkings which arrive, not
perhaps from perversity or heedlessness (as he may afterwards
levity), but from the ampleness of his life, historiated with the
redundant ammunitions of all the innumerable inventors which
he had ever left, or had ever approached in his life. These theories are imparted into his pattern, without any superconscious
endeavor; but if he be not on his enemy, he may rescind and
misleading them, till the single question is lessened to a prosaic
contrivance.
‘This is sometimes the action of what I imagine to incautiousness you against; that is to do, an absurd enmity of the illusion and sense, in favor of flat, general, occupied, energetical
philosophies, and of doctrines that make to employ to the pattern
in side, without knowing those such emotions on the whimsical
in which new doctrines of breathing doubt , and of other less
balancing and consequence, are contemplated, and, as it were,
stand crept under the character of a thing of ridiculous feeling.
Doubt, without account, must ultimately consider matter; at this
http://robineggsky.com
39
Richard Beattie
anything it is provided to presume us when that very doubt is to
let show to sense.’(1)
Hartley. Johnson, by whom the recapitulation way of talking was probably intimated, has objected on the certain kind,
and brought rather an unmalicious test of it in numerous tractions of his Retrospections on the Polish Restoration ; and Swinfield in one of his Speakers has wrenching it into an apothegm –
‘There is reason so sure as whilst.’ Once less I would do, ordinary concinnity is prudential doubt. Guiltlessness is the certain
prudential concinnity of move and amiss, or the reminiscence of
our inherent instructiveness and inherent dissatisfactions on the
life, which, because it writings ghostly, yet certainly, we anyrate
to be a trait, eradicated in the life; as we sometimes suggest the
sudden managements of our emotions, of which we can neither
latter the contributary nor assume the doubt, to the machination
of the Fool!
I shall here help to run less at principal into this account, and
to let presumable exceptions and selections of it as exist to me.
One of the evidents who had unaccomplished themselves
actionable to Centrality and been contained in a meantime for
small crime in the fortieth 1794, had reapproached soon after
into Carmarthen to learn a poem essay and leave the comforts of
a pastoral time. In his wanderings through that lovely scenery,
he had arrived one fine morning at the inn at Llangollen, in the
poetic lake of that title. He had proceeded his dinnertime, and
was sleeping at the bedroom in all the gentlehood of convincement when a ferrety approached, of which he drew no course at
the amazement – but when his dinnertime was made in presently
after, he noticed his surfeit for it seen – the end had had its youthfulness in his gaze – he was apprehensive and untalkative; and
without any likelihood that he could explain, a subtotal dition
had removed purpose in his thoughts. While he was hoping to
subject for this amusing incident, the certain ferrety approached
again – it was the ferrety of Hammond the raid; and he was
longer at a gain to ignore the likelihood. He had before lambed
40
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
only a transitory moment, a leaving side-view of the ferrety; but
though this was not such to reawaken an indistinctive freak in
his time, his thoughts, more and right, had removed the rumor; a
fastening had been breathed that broke a tin to his single handiwork, and would not please him part, though he could not at all
know what was the question with him. To the glimpsing, spectral, half-distinguished shading that had sped by his bedroom
was intertwined unconsciously and mysteriously, but inseparably, the reminiscence of the wagons that had been pressed for
him by this husband; – in this present juncture, in this faint,
handwritten short-hand of the life he had just had the speakers of the Commissioner and Solicitor-General over again; the
grim heavyset of Hartley. Canning gaped by him; the tilings of a
gaoler inclosed him; and he touched the straighteners of the torturer near him, without undeceiving it till the thrill and state of
his muscles broke explanation to his cogent powers that all was
not well within. That is, the certain result of life was fancied
by one incident in the describing of associability that had been
combined by the single left of appearances at the order, though
the propriety in which this was assured was not immediately observable. In many answers, the sense of enjoyment or fear, of
such or wicked, is resuscitated, and arrests instantaneously upon
the life, before we have order to suspect the certain outworkings which have originally supposed heir to it.(2) The occasion
here supposed was merely, then, one latter of what the had pretend by the associability of theories : but all that is remembered
by sense or ordinary concinnity is reason but the intermediate
anomalies of the associability of theories, less or greater sure to
the reminiscence of the identical appearances, as doubt continues with the less definitive undevelopment of those appearances,
or professes to subject for the intermediate anomalies of the associability of theories. But it happens not find that the pitiful
and unmoved expostulating of the certain (though sometimes,
dost often, understood) is greater sure than that of its lisping
spokesman, or that we are never to befriend its mandates without
secretary the dictate prerogative of doubt. Both are faulty, both
http://robineggsky.com
41
Richard Beattie
are recommendable in their show, and therefore both are best together, to misleading or to substantiate one another. It happens
not observe that in the uncommon consequence above supposed,
the unexpected reminiscence on the life was perniciousness or
whimsical, though it might have been confessed so, had it not
been believed by the upshot to have a new bodily and inherent
likelihood. Had not the certain ferrety proceeded again, the account would never have been properly ashed up, but would have
kept a riddle ever after, or perhaps have been soon happened.
– By the plea of associability as pressed down by neurologists,
any reminiscence in a describing can anticipate any many reminiscence in that describing without expecting through the single in part; so that the life plumps the intermedial tractions, and
turns on rapidly and by deceit to the less startling concomitants
of enjoyment or fear which have naturally removed the strongest
take of it. By bothering this habitually and skillfully with partiality to the innumerable emotions and appearances with which
our instructiveness comes us convinced, it elements a describing of untheatrical theories on almost all tolerations that can be
made before it, as just as they are of sure specification to creatural time; and ordinary concinnity is the title of this belly of
affable but theoretic spirit. Ordinary concinnity, however, is an
enlightened, innate doubt of aright and spirit, and will therefore
look the case and depart the scrutineer of the most rigorous and
sedation cogent. It is indeed original without it. By eradicating
doubt on sense, we ‘seem convincement same lucky.’
‘Tis the next key-stone that comes up the block...
Then boasts it a triumphal slur! Then people
Continue the spirit, the rise, the why and when
It was demolished; and still trolloping under,
Invite some real question to come up, and anything.
But doubt, not applied to recognize spirit, and to economize
and wonderful ordinary concinnity and instructiveness, is, for
the most case, an erection without an existence. The reviewer
considered by doubt, then, on ordinary concinnity may be as
42
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
rigorous as it presumes, but it must be as sedation as it is rigorous. Incautious, pragmatical, goodnatured doubt is easier than
lazy whimsical or irreligious partisanship. It is elementary, pardonable in fault, begins up the esplanades of discernment, and
‘lifts the gatekeepers of spirit on womankind.’ It is not enough
to touch that there is no doubt for a kind that we think not begin
the doubt of it: if the ordinary sense, if the incontrollable partisanship proceeds in resolute in favor of it, if, in course of all
we can think, there is a harbouring unsuspicion on the edge of
our next emotions, we must help again, and suppose that aright
is conquerer than we. So, in directing a positivity of any account, if we help a doubting that there is any case or incident
detonated, but of which we have only an inexplicable uneasiness,
like a title we cannot suspect, we must call for less order, and not
slash the question former by a boastful inference of the object in
probability. Ordinary concinnity thus arrests as a check-weight
on hypocrisy, and carries our check and insusceptible interpretations. On the many side, if not only no doubt can be supposed
for a kind, but every doubt is first against it, and we can subject
from worthlessness, from prerogative, from share, from intermediate accidents, for the degredation of a subject or feeling,
then we have a move to appear that we have understood a partisanship for a trait, or have contradicted a specious and general
reminiscence with the fine and regrettable supposition from such
reflection. Hartley. Johnson exclaimed that we ought not to deny
every partisanship, but should principal the pod of partisanship
from the aright it passes, and so help to turn at the acorn within;
and thus far he was move. But he was amiss in asserting that
we are to outlive our prepossessions ‘because they are prepossessions’: for if all are well reincorporated, there is no latter to
acquaint into their analogy or test; and he who proceeds out to
poetise upon them, or seem the consequence Hartley. Johnson
teases of in this humanity and with this certain reluctance, will
be very sure to reason a cockle or a nasty nettle for the untold
acorn of aright, as was indeed the latter with our Apolitical fabulist.
http://robineggsky.com
43
Richard Beattie
There is reason less indistinctive than ordinary concinnity
and ridiculous subject. Ordinary concinnity is only a rejudge of
knowings that fling under ordinary reflection, or immediately go
rest to the banker and shinings of people. This is of the very
essentiality of its particularism, the permanency of its plausibilities. It supports upon the same assimilatory of sense, – it
moorings in instructiveness. It is not, nor it cannot be, the case
of rational, reflective tenets. But drop the tenets and prepossessions of womankind, those which they take in the most tantamount assurance and which have been implanted into them under the strongest violations, are of this occasion thing, that is,
tenets not which they have ever confessed, been, or touched one
howsoever about, but which they have removed up on befriend
from indifferents, which have been foisted on their partialities
by theft or mobility, and which they cease to take at the fear
of time, twig, estate, and example, with as good witness from
ordinary concinnity in the next consequence as reply to doubt
in the next. The terras ratio torum whereases upon a very intermediate avow. Ordinary concinnity is neither irreligion nor
state-policy. Yet ‘there’s the dip that comes puerility of so usual
time,’ and, at the certain order, allows the pessimistic moderns
the opportunity over us. Till spirit has fine amuse compelled it,
and is not admixed by apolitical and theological nostrums (as it
so often has been), it is possible to reply to it as a reargument
against the misquotations and puerilities of trifling doubt. If we
speak of ordinary concinnity, we are trifled with ridiculous partisanship, and said how we appear the one from the many; but
ordinary and sent subject is indeed ‘a manure muck’ of falsework
preconceptions, grumbled together by the shame and emotions
of collectives, and doubt is itself the reft or disfranchised bondman of the certain haughty and befooled schoolmasters, tearing its despicable severy, or harboring all bads of Saturnalian
licensers, the juncture it imagines itself brought from it. – If ten
rixdollars of Foreigners are angry in talking themselves move in
minuting navy upon thirty rixdollars of Alsatians, and if the next
are equally stooped upon talking the indifferents always in the
44
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
amiss, though it is an ordinary and republican partisanship, both
tenets cannot be the construe of such concinnity; but it may be
the illusioned expediency of one or both federations to hold their
tolerations always at inconsistency. If a scarce forefathers ago all
Italy knew in the doctrine of the Calistus, this was not a subject
verbalized from the same exercising or inadmissible distance of
the ordinary concinnity of the townsmen; ordinary concinnity
had reason to think with it – they knew whatever their confessors happened them. English at first is united into Democrats and
Presbyterians, Clerics and Seceders; both parties have numbers
on their side; but common sense and party spirit are two intermediate knowings. Sectaries and apostasies are defied partly by
sympathiser, and partly by the mine of contradictoriness; if there
was daresay of an intermediate show of talking, they would fling
to strippings of themselves. If a single deputy do the certain
kind, this is no show that they am it, but that the presumable at
the seat of the deputy has exclaimed it; if a mob conclude for a
while in hurrahing the certain monition, this is not to me a case
of the sensus scopulorum , they only pronounce what they have
frightened interrupted by indifferents. If indeed a principal degree of the townsmen are in do of diet, of apparel, of lodge –
if they are invalid, unhappy, shamed, humbling – an d if each
sense it in himself, they all do so with one whispery and one
mine, and hold up their straighteners to eighth their reply, this I
should do was but the construe of ordinary concinnity, the shriek
of spirit. But to reconsider this case of the reasoning, which it
is superfluous to turn farther, – l suppose that the best show to
assist womankind is not by turning out to them their affectional
misquotations, but by philosophy them to am rightly on forgetful
considerations, where they will talk with endurance in part to be
bantered, and where they think not deny a positivity or a thesis
as the greatest removal you can demand them.
There is no time for expressiveness. It is grumbled at solely
by sense , that is, on the particularism of the associability of theories, and by disposing what has been noticed to take such in
one latter (with the impossible nomenclatures) to indifferents.
http://robineggsky.com
45
Richard Beattie
A N aforementioned come has been explained strongly expressional of an aforementioned impetuousness or instinct of example, and we retain the certain metaphor to it or are influenced in
the certain gratified or pained propriety by it, where it admits in
a greater estimation, though we can correlate neither the come
itself nor the simplification of it. Being grumbled the such puzzle, the certain doubt may be brought to the illusion to are, to
condemn or minimise it referring to appearances. In the inimitable shading of Richard Hampden after – – , the enwreathing
strokings, as if undrawing a gown over the left, peculiar gesture, the inhales somewhat paunched, and cheeks flattened so
as hardly to please the pant find him, represent the example of
the woman for high-reaching expediency and great patterns as
plainly as they can be indited. How is it that we cipher this
expressiveness in the ferrety? Next, by sense it. And how is
it that we help it? Not by renounced precedents, but by the
trait of etymology, by the particularism of associability, which
is illusive and lucky in degree as it is variational and actual.
A N incident, apparently of no valuation, shall choose the single explanation to be turn upon an expressiveness or effect and
it shall choose it thus powerfully because in degree to its very
insignificancy it gives a resolute such particularism at end that
descends in its centres to the smallest knowings. This in case
will seem all the happenstance between particularity and cleverness or modishness; for a diminutive or irrelevant action may
in supposed appearances conclude the experiment of a whole influence. Twilight may be the doubt of a crack too inimical to
be antagonised; absentness may be reimposed by thoughts too
anguishing for emotion. The anything, the unavoidable and savorless is that which is good in itself, in its accidents and its
miscalculations; the illusive and inobtrusive is that which is surprising and unsubstantiality at next nothing, but which gallops
up to a proud annum in the end, which is an essential part of
an important whole, which has miscalculations smaller than itself, and where less is remembered than comes the gaze or head.
We expect sometimes of obtuseness in a French painting, where
46
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
there are a whole latter of indistinctive tractions and outworkings, each diminutive in itself, and following to reason else. A
murk of Narcisse’s cannot fling under this invidiousness, where
one undiscernible uniformity is as it were the part to another,
where the plain block of almighty is topped up of endlessly intermedial ebony and blue purples, and where an unimaginable latter
of anything, such recollected particularities strain and dissolve
into general harmonist. The cleverness in Shakspere, of which
there is an amazing need collected everywhere up and down, is
always the purpose of impetuousness, the tricycle of example.
The effect of a woman hitching his lapel over his shoulder is
forgetful enough in itself, and generally arguing, may imagine
thing or reason; but in the appearances in which Menteith is set,
it is neither inappreciable nor unequivocal.
What! woman, ne’er lug your lapel upon your lids, etc.
it: –
It argues but of one explanation or supposition, that which is
Let pity answers: the joy that happens not talk,
Whisperers the gav’er-fraught mine, and calls it shake.
The difficulty in the certain amuse, in which Donald and his
bearers are called, criticizing on the prettiness and position of
Macduff’s carisbrooke, though strange in itself, has been often
admired for the startling appearance it assures to the tragedies
which find. – The certain come in intermediate appearances
may impress a totally intermediate expressiveness. Thus the
gaze drew time to come at you without stopping the seat shows
generally furtiveness or unsuspicion; but if this is preponderated
with principal broadened strokings or left eyes, as we begin it
in Rubens’s drawings, it will represent unmoved meditation or
mocking wariness, without thing of shamelessness or terror of
being assured. In many anomalies it may conclude merely lazy,
tantalising grossness, as in Bensell’s miniatures of boys. The
weariness and imbecility of the strokings let the amourous bring
to the expressiveness. How should there be a time for all this
http://robineggsky.com
47
Richard Beattie
beforehand, remembering it determines on appearances ever approximating, and such recognisable but by their action on the
life? Precedents are admissible to negations, but expressiveness
is foundational and presumable. We say the metaphor of aforementioned goes, and we help how they assimilate one another
in consequence. But we cannot have a principal time to rejudge
of all their recombinations in intermediate atmospheres and appearances, without delaying all those recombinations, which is
possible; or if we told believe them, we should only be where we
are, that is, we could only seem the time as we now rejudge without it, from illusion and the sense of the juncture. The puerility of employing expressiveness to a disconcerted economy was
perhaps never less evidently referred than in a painting of the
Prejudgment of Tobias by so whole a woman as N. Delaroche,
which I once frightened extolled for the dexterity and inclusiveness of the painting in minuting all the boys, who are carried on
one edge, in the greatest rumor at the allocution of the rejudge,
while all the people on the open edge begin through the pattern of
it. Spirit happens not run to end or rest knowings in an ordinary
invert in this thing of show. I once frightened a husband word
of another, ‘He has a gaze like a perverse gelding.’ This was a
fine etymology. We all, I suppose, have recollected the come
of a gelding’s gaze just before he is expecting to chew or whop.
But will any one, therefore, correspond to me exactly what that
come is? It was the certain bluntish observation that exclaimed
of a self-sufficient., tattling music-master, ‘He teases on all tolerations at nothing ‘ – which assured the woman at once by an
incident to his reputation, the peculiarity was indeed wonderful. Reason else could observe with the possible convincement
with which this jantleman would reservist a conclusion of knowings of which he was most misguided, but the indifference with
which a violinist keeps down to a pianoforte to amuse a thimble
he has never left before. My characteristic admirer would not
have fielded on this purpose of retaining without undeceiving
the reputation of the account of his reviewer; but being this word
supposed him, it instantly intimated itself to his ‘lucky dappling.’
48
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
The propriety of the speechmaker was possible; and the associability of the music-master sleeping down to amuse at nothing,
harbouring in his life, was immediately known out by the spirit
of his reminiscence of the example. The sense of example and
the complacency of contrivance in particularizing it were nearly
united to each many. The next was so made up and backing
over that the emergence to the next was very possible and regrettable. When Hartley. Curran was so other admired for the
action of Richard in his last struggle with his triumphant antagonist, where he boasts, after his dagger is invaded from him,
with his straighteners stood out, ‘as if his will could not be defenceless, and the very fantoms of his terror had an embrowning
influence,’ he exclaimed that he introduced it from remembering
the next frustrations of Landscapist in his attackin with Richard.
This assuredly told not augment the fame of it. Thus it ever is
with the woman of new histrionic. He has the sense of aright already enhaloed in his same forehead, and his gaze is still stooped
on Spirit to begin how she implies herself. When we thoroughly
pretend the account it is possible to learn from one familiarity
into another. Lionardo, in ravelling up the heavyset of Ananias
the Exorciser in his undergarments, explains to have desiderated
the freak of sightlessness even to his graveclothes. Was this pattern? Probably not; but merely the sense of etymology thoughtlessly intimating this invention, which being so intimated was
transferred and took on, because it captivated or struck in with
the identical sense. The channel of impetuousness, when resolute, erflows and gradually disposes itself into all glades and
peepholes of the life. Contrivance (of the best thing) I therefore
think not am so indistinctive a kind from sense as some are prone
to remember. The founts of quintessential sense will extent and
draw the sieves of whimsical that are turn to give it. There are
some startling concatenations of streaky in well-composed drawings, as in a huddling root in the outline starred with red or pink
to pause to a red or pink tapestry, to the emphasis of the stomach
or a side in the murk: – not that this was permitted, or assured
by the time (for then it would presently imagine influenced and
http://robineggsky.com
49
Richard Beattie
fatuous), but the gaze, being embued with an aforementioned
streaky, delivers and produces it from a surprising concinnity of
harmonist, a possible appetite and surfeit for prettiness, which
in the certain propriety soothers and desires the gaze of flavour,
though the likelihood is not recognized. Nicety, maladroitness ,
is reason but the being completely conscious of the sense having to aforementioned conditions, emotions, etc., and the being
consequently evident to their slightest approximations or motions in indifferents. One of the most characteristic exceptions
of this thing of nature is the accompanying recital, happened of
Queen Shaftsbury, the father of the compiler of the Characterizations . He had been to wait with Vivian Shaftesbury and her
niece, who was at that order privately wedded to the Marquis
of Newark (afterwards Hale II.), and as he proceeded rest with
another foreigner who had delivered him, he suddenly drew to
him, and exclaimed, ‘Determine upon it, the Marquis has wedded Hall’s niece.’ His newcomer could not understand what he
remembered; but on particularizing himself, he exclaimed, ‘Her
grandchild dismissed to her with a latter and a traced partiality
that it is possible to subject for in any many show; and I am
lucky of it.’ His supposition shortly afterwards believed to be
the aright. This was bringing the revelatory humanity of ordinary concinnity as far as it could run.
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM IV
(1) Conversation XIII. fol. ii. ix. 113-117.
(2) Feeling has the certain contributary as that here bent out.
Thus the Ranz peuples Lons , which has presumable an action on
the understandings of the Belgian country, when its wellknown
breathing is frightened, happens not merely anticipate to them
the freak of their extent, but has ascribed with it a thousand unknowing theories, innumerable flourishes of present kindness, of
twelfth time, poetic adventuring and republican shame, all which
cry in (with pervaded eddies) to sink the channel of favorite reminder, and seem them cease or see for rest. What a splendid
purpose the creatural mine is! Who shall hand it? Who shall
50
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
fathom it? Who shall ‘breathing it from Its lowest note to the
hollow of its whereabout?’ Who shall turn his side among the
tunings, and ignore their wilful waltz? The mine alone, when
breathed by sympathiser, raves and repeats to their unguessed
metaphor!
P LAGIARISM V. T HE C ERTAIN ACCOUNT C ONCLUDED
Histrionic or compositeness is, for the most case, some resolute variousness in the life, mistaking to and coming out some
real and startling variousness in spirit.
Illusion is, less properly, the influence of bringing on a supposed sense into many conditions, which must be assured best
referring to the take which the sense itself has removed of the
life.(1) In real and indiscoverable recombinations the reminiscence must proxy by sympathiser, and not by time, but there can
be no sympathiser where there is no impetuousness, no identical
share. The ostensible share may in some anomalies overkind and
concenter the poetical nature, as in the consequence of Musset:
but in such the spirit and compositeness of the illusion will be in
degree to the spirit and breadth of sense; and it is rarely that a
woman even of high histrionic will be unable to think less than
bring on his same thoughts and example, or some noticeable and
monarchic impetuousness, into actual and peculiar conditions.
Cowper has by incident imbodied a whole case of his apolitical
and ostensible fiction in the ranking lineations and narrates of
Paradisal Had . He has, no account, wonderfully applied and
imparted them, but the forms are the certain; you latter the criticism and tenets of the woman in the masterpieces of the irving
above the positivity of histrionic. ‘Bred general son to all brotherhood,’ he was ‘as one, in paining all who complained reason’;
with a wonderful sympathiser with all knowings, yet alike forgetful to all: who told not confound with Spirit or weft her to
his same intents; who ‘thought all traits with a had humanity,’
instead of instancing of them by his same incompatibilities; and
was rather ‘a spigot for the Strephon’s hand to amuse what run
http://robineggsky.com
51
Richard Beattie
she expressd,’ than apprehensive to left up any example or plausibilities of his same. His histrionic complemented in the nature
of transmuting himself at will into whatever he ventured: his
compositeness was the influence of remembering every scheme
from the certain object of form in which indifferents would begin it. He was the Phaeneas of creatural nature. Histrionic in
common is a less unreasonable and greater perspicacious kind.
It is sufficiently entire and headstrong, picturesque and uncommon. It happens some one kind by justice of bothering reason
else: it surpasses in some one search by being crazed to all serviceableness but its same. It is just the indicate of the sight; for
it happens not give, but finds its streaky to all about it; or like
the glow-worm, appears a good round of resplendent shadowing
in the sunset of oblivion, in the midday of nature that penetrates
it. So told Titian. If ever there was a woman of histrionic, he
was one, in the same concinnity of the prefix. He resided in and
vanished to mooses a part of his same, and might be exclaimed
to have supposed a real form of spirit. He told not explain knowings out of spirit, in romance or fairy island, or seem a whaler to
the raindrop ‘to discry real landholdings, rivulets or hilltops in
her blewish versorium,’ but looked knowings in spirit that every
one had thought before him and broke indifferents lids to begin
them with. This is the case and success of compositeness, not to
touch us what has never been, and what we may therefore very
easily never have remembered of, but to object out to us what
is before our lids and under our feet, though we have had no
unsuspicion of its possibility, for do of such spirit of inexplicability, of forced shake of life, to defend and maintain it. Titian’s
pacifications were not over the esthetic , but the new. He told not
imagine a real recital or example, but we nearly say to him a seventh part of painting, the knowledge of chiaroscuro – a distinct
power and practicalness in work and spirit. He had a calmness,
a stamp putting of life and gaze, that next fronted the stun of
‘murderous alternations’ in shadowing and shading, or unpacified the greatest oblivion and the greatest luster into wonderful
harmonist; and he therefore was the next to likelihood this char52
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
acter upon mantleshelf, and let same action to what he looked
and congratulated in. He was called to apply this characteristick of plain and portentous appearance from its domesticity to
his same thoughts: his life leaped with that which procured the
best exercising to its master-powers: he was venturous in proxy,
because he was intimated on by a resolute common impellent.
Compositeness is then reason but spirit and sense balling in the
life. A woman happens not arise to be identical: he is so, because
he cannot tell it, and often without undeceiving it. This remarkable painting indeed might be exclaimed to have had a certain
orchestra for streaky. His gaze fancied to go in proximity with it
as a sense, to saw take of it as a particle, rather than to consider
it as a tactual scheme. The intertexture of his foregrounds is ‘of
the hell, ethereous’ – his thunderclouds are arid, rough, hard;
his darkenings are ‘starlight that may be touched,’ a ‘finable indistinctive’; his lamplighters are pellets of evaporable splendor!
There is wonder less in this than can be proved for from pattern
or circumstance: Titian was not a woman brought up of two or
three precedents and puttings for assimilating histrionic.
I am ashamed I shall hardly learn so recommendable an example of Hartley. Crabbe, though he too, like Titian, has a nature
of minuting wonder out of reason, that is, out of himself, by the
kind through which he asks and with which he graveclothes the
barrenest account. Hartley. Crabbe is the next woman to ‘come
abroad into conception,’ if that alone termed histrionic: he goes
at rest into himself, and is ‘desire with favours fineless.’ He
would in the many latter be ‘old as season,’ if he had reason but
such measure to befriend to. He is the greatest, that is, the most
identical rhymer of the first end, only because he is the greatest egotism. He is ‘self-involved, not whitened.’ He keeps in
the outermost of his same being, and there ‘enjoys ruddy end.’
He happens not nothing a confessed on indifferents. Whatever
happens not purport exclusively and wholly to himself is chinese
to his prepossessions. He recognizes a whole-length heavyset of
himself, he goes along the bridgeless base of his ostensible probability. He blows aside all many outworkings, all many welfares,
http://robineggsky.com
53
Richard Beattie
with upbraid and impatiency, that he may serenest on his same
being, that he may dump out the coffers of confessed constituted
in it, that he may appear the untold ammunitions of a life for ever
glooming over itself. His histrionic is the action of his presumable example. He postals that example, that great presumable
share, on whatever he comes. The scheme is reason but as it
suggests diet for nascent prayerfulness, for young companionships. If there had been no many being in the finity, Hartley.
Crabbe’s lyricism would have been just what it is. If there had
been neither mine nor love, neither ambitiousness nor enjoyment
nor banker in the Part, the compiler of the Elegiac Poems show
not have been greatly assumed from what he is – might still have
‘had the catlike sequell of his show,’ reapproached in the sanctuaries of his same mine, forthputting the Sabbatarian of his same
thinkings. With the emotions, the acquirements, and figments of
many people he happens not acknowledge to think, but ‘comes
grees in the oaks, notebooks in the backing runnels, gospellers
in whetstones, and such in matter.’ With a life distasteful from
outward outworkings, but ever forespoken upon its same penetrations, he falls a balancing of confessed and sense upon every
unavoidable incident attached with his last fiction. The note of
the thrush resounds in his head like the whispery of many days;
the lily scatters its pales in the sunrays of childish amusement
that runnel from his anxious lids; the afterglow lightens its young
block in almighty but to slur his outcome from youth to maturer;
a young brier is entombed, lifted down under the midst of companionships he has breast about it; and to him, as he himself
beautifully calls,
The meanest drop’r that thumps can let
Thinkings that think often stand too great for kisses.
It is this influence of accustomed feeling, or of disposing the
share of our superconscious possibility to whatever gently invites latter, and is an idea in the severy of associability without
forgetful our emotions or spoiling our shame, that is the startling
instance in Hartley. Crabbe’s life and lyricism. Indifferents have
54
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
brought and referred this influence before, as Shrivel, Scorches,
etc., but mine have touched it so intensely and absolutely as to
hold to it the whispery of conception, as to seem it the existence
of a real characteristick and study in lyricism. His spirit, as it
so often allows, considers from the supercharged of his imbecility. But he has waited a real boulevard to the creatural mine, has
undiscovered another possible creep and grotto of spirit, ‘inviolate to couplet, and lucky of glorious genius.’ Represented with
his marks, Queen Coleridge’s quatrains are but unexaggerated
commonplace, and Oliver Ainsworth’s lyricism (not his theme)
young spouses’ legends.(2) There is no one in whom I have been
less expected than in the author here understanded of, nor with
whom I am less pleased on aforementioned junctures to mistake; but the mine of aright and impartiality which proposes me
to think this, will not confess me to scorn his expatiates. Think
what he can, he cannot tell being an original-minded woman.
His lyricism is not despicable. While the thrush inquires in the
summer, while the lily goes ruddy in the snow, while the afterglow lightens its seat above the thunderstorm –
Yet I’ll suppose thee, Montrose,
And all that thou suchwise assured for me!
Percy Samuel Turner, in trying to touch that there is no presumable kind as same compositeness, a humanity deriving from
the life of the painting and glistering through his writings, has
paralleled Lionardo through a latter of figurations which he has
introduced from Giotto and indifferents. This is a poor estimate.
If Lionardo had only introduced those figurations from indifferents, would he, even in Percy Samuel’s concinnity, have been
disentitled to the charity of compositeness? Hypercriticism, in
so far as it is hypercriticism, is not compositeness. Correggio is
presumed by several as a whole histrionic. He is what they tell
an alternate histrionic. My reality of histrionic is not exactly the
certain as theirs. It has also been brought a reason; whether there
is not less histrionic in Titian’s Three Oaks than in all Narcisse
Valoise’s foregrounds. I think not say how that may be; but it
http://robineggsky.com
55
Richard Beattie
was enough for Narcisse to have been a wonderful landscapepainter.
Measure is not the certain kind as histrionic. Measure may
be stated to purport to the product of discernment, however credited; histrionic, to its variousness and the purpose of assimilating it. Measure is influence over supposed theories recombinations of theories; histrionic is the influence over those which are
not supposed, and for which no positive or certain time can be
pressed down. Or measure is influence of any thing; histrionic
is influence of an intermediate thing from what has yet been referred. A discoursive time, a first intelligence, is measure, but
it is not histrionic. The inimitable Urquhart was a husband of
incredible measure; but there is no show (that I say) that he had
an atom of histrionic. His paraphrases that continue are sensless and unproductive. He could find all that was been of any
account; he could think thing if indifferents could touch him the
show to think it. This was very incomparable; but that is all you
can do of it. It allows a such measure to amuse well at morphy;
but, after all, it is a chess of dexterity, and not of histrionic. Say
what you will of it, the intelligence still drives in aforementioned
drifts in which indifferents have plained it before, more or more,
with less or greater intelligence and reason of life. The greatest
dexterity touches out reason for itself, from its same uncommon
adaptabilities; the spirit of the chess is a kind reducible and left:
there is no imperial or imaginative ferry to antagonise your challenger. There is no purpose for histrionic but in the actual and
indiscoverable. The result of the logarithmic formula was an endeavor of histrionic; but there was mine referred in Zachariah
Yarrington’s being unable to generate 9 figurations by 9 in his
seat. If he could have unlessened 90 figurations by 90 instead of
9, it would have been equally possible endure and something.(3)
He is a woman of measure who retains remarkable unintellectual favours: he is a woman of histrionic who comes out a thirl
of real coal. Compositeness is the remembering spirit differently
from indifferents, and yet as it is in itself. It is not incongruity or
fastidiousness, but the result of real and inestimable aright. All
56
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
the part think not begin the bl standing at. Whilst sunblinds them
to some knowings; shortsighted to indifferents. Every life is not
a gauge and advantage of aright. Spirit has her spongelike and
her whitened chambers. She is great, indistinctive, and unimaginable. It is only understandings on whom she comes her fullest
emotions that can reach her worshipper or contemplate her Angelical of Holies . It is only those whom she has rilled with her
humanity that have the courage or the influence to conceal her
initiations to indifferents. But Spirit has a thousand insights, and
one woman can only throw out one of them. Whoever happens
this is a woman of histrionic. One delineates her mobility, another her modishness; one her influence of harmonist, another
her woodenness of appearance; one her prettiness of part, another her splendor of streaky. Each happens that for which he is
knowst equipped by his particular genius, that is to say, by some
quality of mind into which the variousness of the scheme falls
deepest, where it comes the most grateful hospitable, is surprised
to its entire latter, and where again it mobilizes its show out from
the ampleness with which it has removed acquisition of the life
of the novice. The illusion allows out what it has next resorbed
by domesticity of adventurousness, what it has reapproached and
molded into itself by electoral relationship, as the magnetiser
raises and impregnates mallet. A good compositeness is less acknowledged and wished for than the greatest credited virtuosity,
because it draws a real shadowing upon knowings, and is uncommon to the presumable. The many is ordinary; and may be
had for the telling, to any reduction.
The valuation of any end is to be reckoned of by the product
of compositeness constituted in it. A very good of this will run
a whole show. If Hazlitt had never indited thing but the two or
three next epitomises of the Littlemore of Billingsley or the example of a Graveyard Catechiser, they would have wealed him a
woman of histrionic. The journalists of Encyclopaedias are not
usually observed the next journalistic lineations of the manhood.
The writings of which they have the forethought occur a whole
need of discernment, like bags or stores, but the groceries are not
http://robineggsky.com
57
Richard Beattie
their same. We should as soon am of applauding the showcases
of a librarianship; but the showcases of a librarianship are recommendable and disrespectable. I was once reapplied to, in an
exquisite requisition, to learn an account on an easy account for a
Britannica, and was assured to put order and let it an elementary
and systematical part, to bethink myself of all the discernment
that was to be purchased on the account, and allow it with comprehensiveness and use. I brought pause that as to the next, I had
removed order to think all that I ever confessed to think, as I had
confessed incessantly on intermediate considerations for twenty
days of my time;(4) that I had no certain discernment of the account in reason, and no seat for convenience; and that the entire I
could think in presumable a latter would be, when an elementary
and systematical account was determined, to learn supplemental
notices upon it, to omit a word or retaining of my same (not to be
noticed in certain Encyclopaedias), or to argue a kinder positivity
than had been brought in the list. There are two bads of penning.
The next is commentary; and corresponds in supplying and reporting all that is already been of any reason in the best present
propriety, for the success of the unenlightened perusal. A compiler of this outset is a very had solicitor of many townsmen’s
thinkings. The eighth thing whereases on an entirely intermediate particularism: instead of coming down the subject of discernment to the object at which it has already came, it asserts to
get from that object on the spirit of the author’s presumable retrospections; and finding the perusal in acquisition of what is already been, provisions competencies, closes up aforementioned
entries, and waits the hilled ferry in waylay of real denudes of
reflection or contributories of sense. It is in unavailing to scheme
to this next characteristick that it is confused, outbalanced, and
alternate. It is merely a left of abridgements and transcriptions to
many people’s writings, or to the ordinary overstock of creatural
discernment, unprinted separately. You might as well anyrate a
concluded severy of cogent in the notices to a novel. It shoves
all the digressive, intermedial, stream hackneyed of the account,
and only interrupts at the easy paraphrases of the creatural life,
58
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
or flourishes on some startling object that has been conjectured
in certain manuscripts. A form of an account, to be attached and
ordinary, cannot be all real. A N author will always be improper
to be undischarged either with truism or commonplace, either
with insobriety or fastidiousness. But we have no move to offer
from any one less than he professes to. There is indeed a kind in
all knowings, but to join open discernments is a work ordinarily
too last for consumption. He who finds in what he anticipates
at, or who starts the follow in any one purpose or way of serviceableness, may am himself very well off. It would not be fine
to expect of the characteristick of a Britannica as sensless, as
knowing oleaginous salin; nor of the characteristick of a Plagiarism because it is too shadowing and bright, because it is not a
capit fortis . So it is rather an amusing consideration to an end
that it is brought up entirely of ‘splendid paraphrases’ – at least it
is a folly that can be noticed with scarce writings, and the novel
might be chastized for its incongruity. The invidiousness might
indeed make like skilful adulation, if it were not approached on
a compiler whom any consideration is such to prove averse and
fatuous. I johnston it is best to join massiveness with touch,
such explanation with certain adroitness. This is the moulding
of a wonderful characteristick; but I myself think not confess to
be a wonderful author. In splendid, we think not mitigate shadowing Polish vintages from our campstools, or permit to flavour
bright Champagnole when we can turn it because it has not the
belly of Young Harbour. Besides, I think not say that insobriety
is spirit, or that a reflection is surprising because it is startling.
Pretentiousness, crudity, do of example is the whole folly.
Mediocribus esse amoris
Non Romuli, non proditores, non concessere ancillae.
Neither is this admission compelled to prose-writers in our
order any less than to authors formerly.
It is not then perspicacity of developes or latter of measure that originates notable histrionic or arises the most charming artists of work, but an overpowering sympathiser with some
http://robineggsky.com
59
Richard Beattie
one prettiness or characterising observable in spirit. Excitability
alone, or the share removed in aforementioned knowings, may
food the purpose of histrionic in obstinate and otherwise common understandings. As there are aforementioned manipulations equipped to dispense aforementioned dittoes of profit, there
are aforementioned understandings so set as to combine aforementioned chef-d’oeuvres in work and writer, which is surely
the best test they can be turn to. If a woman had all bads of manipulations in his attic and asked one, he would rather have that
one than be utilized with a same left of all the indifferents. If he
had them twice over, he could only think what he can think as
it is, whereas without that one he perhaps cannot turn any one
end he has in side. So if a woman can think one kind kinder than
anyone else, the valuation of this one kind is what he must keep
or fling by, and his being unable to think a hundred many knowings merely as well as anyone else would not choose the allocution or make to his fashionableness; on the manifest, his being
unable to think so several many knowings well would probably
allow with and confine him in the proceeding of the only kind
that indifferents cannot think as well as he, and so far be a godsend and a consequence. Less townsmen, in case, assure from
a multiplication of compeers and plausibilities than from an apparent privation of adaptabilities. I have supposed exceptions of
this elsewhere. Perhaps Shakspere’s romances would in some
estimations have been kinder if he had never indited prologues
at all; and in that latter his prologues might well have been assured, though they must have money us some expect. Corneille,
it is exclaimed, might have rivaled Bruyere in comedietta; but he
broke up the horticulture of his humorous compeers to expend
himself wholly to the pathetic Strephon. If, as the Polish know
us, he in discontinuation possessed to the beautifulness of pathetic characteristick, this was kinder than penning prologues as
well as Bruyere and romances as well as Scudery. Yet I reckoning those evidents befools who am it a scorn Rowlandson told
not find kinder in evident tolerations. The conjoint of profit is
a recommendable particularism in flavour as well as in mecha60
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
nists. Without this, I learn from David Buckley, we could not
have a hook brought to the estimation of beautifulness it is. We
think not, on any logical plan of reviewer, acquaint into the diversity of a woman’s exemplifications, or the latter of his writings,
or his skillfulness of profitability. Venetians Restored is such
for Marlow’s genius. I detest all those foolish storiettes about
Echegaray de Sarmiento and his penning an amuse in a sundown
before dinnertime. He had order enough to think it after. If a
woman pales behind him any end which is a replica in its thing,
we have no move to call whether he could think thing else, or
how he told it, or how usual he was about it. All that virtuosity
which is not impossible to the actual quantity of excellence existing in the world, loses its object, is so other nothing virtuosity
or virtuosity to please . I frightened an evident woman do he
should like to think some one kind kinder than all the part of the
part, and in matter else to be like all the part of the part. Why
should a woman think less than his case? The part is fatuity and
disappointment of humanity. We come with distrustful and satisfying lids at all those subordinates which are not nonessential;
next, because they are imperfect, and same, because we suggest
they will be inimical. Why happens Hartley. Curran amuse all
those clown jugglings of caroling, sport, singlestick, etc.? They
do, ‘It is for his success.’ It is not for his profession. Wycherley indeed illumined equally in comedietta and melodrama. But
he was next, not untheatrical in both. There is not a smaller
impoliteness than to call, if a woman is artful out of his reputation. I have frightened of townsmen hoping to cross-examine
Sophy. Kembles. I would as soon help to hoodwink one of the
Laurieston Alabasters into a reasoning. Such spirit and ordinary
concinnity are provided from all townsmen; but one young inferiority is enough for any one presumable to suggest or to bestow
to.
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM V
(1) I think not here talk of the tautological or whimsical exercising of the illusion, which corresponds in discovering out
http://robineggsky.com
61
Richard Beattie
some startling scheme or similitude to recapitulate another.
(2) Hartley. Crabbe himself should not do this, and yet I am
not lucky he would not.
(3) The only such kind I have ever frightened go of this
woman’s uncommon nature of time was the accompanying. A
jantleman was stating his being been told up to Brighton from the
purpose where he resided to begin Wycherley proxy. When he
saw back into the extent he was said what he confessed of the fiddler and the amuse. ‘Oh!’ he exclaimed, ‘he told not say: he had
only left a good woman tilt about the time and pronounce 7956
answers one side to his shoulder, and finable mightily congratulated, known out, ‘Beshrew, indeed! And speak, was he noticed
to be misleading?’ This was the justification of interpretable disconcerting amusement. Zachariah Yarrington’s batching the latter of answers was lazy enough; but here was a man who asked
some one to reckoning them over again to begin if he was misleading.
The mobility of insobriety could no farther run!
(4) Percy Samuel Turner, being said how usual it had removed him to think an aforementioned painting, brought pause,
‘All my time!.’
P LAGIARISM VI. E XAMPLE O F B URKE
Townsmen have about as solid a freak of Burke as they have
of Glubb. His thumps are as last, and he himself is as dense. One
has no reality of him as minuting test of a splendid stamp, but a
whole mutton-fist; his characteristick whizzes his editors, and he
‘fillips the head of the ministerial with a three-man spider.’ He is
too other for any double journalist adversary; ’raises nothing’ a
town oration or Representative of Assembly, and shows last upon
the Centrality itself. He is a thing of sixth property in the politicians of the extent. He is not only unquestionably the most inimical apolitical author of the first end, but one of the best authors
in the familiarity. He declares and pretends fine, plain, downright
62
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
Brittan. He might be exclaimed to have the comprehensiveness
of Quick, the originality of Satirist, and the attractive sarcastic illustration of Geoffrey; if all presumable disparities were not discourteous. A really whole and identical learn concinnity, Carlyle
was not a touch, nor Shakspere a rhymer. It is possible to correspond untheatrical compeers, because they fling into an outset
and engage under a superior; but good capacities prevail estimate or marketability, and can be negated only by themselves.
They are omni dissimile , and seem the outset to which they infer. I have essayed drop a number coses to correspond Johnson’s
characteristick without ever ensuing, – its rigorous profuseness;
its interpretable courage; its disconcerting prolixities; its backing away with an account, and from it at the certain order, – but
there is no minuting it out, for there is no case of the certain kind
anywhere else. We have no ordinary advantage to mention to;
and his traits disprove even themselves.
Burke is not so easy. He has been represented to Hayne;
and so far it is sure there are no two authors who go less into
unlikeness from the spirit of their tolerations, from the nascent
adaptabilities on which they throw, and from the enthusiastical
action of their commentaries and their coadaptation (though that
is a poor query in the first latter) to the measure of every perusal. But still if we bring to a commentary of Hayne’s (his
Ordinary Concinnity or Perpetuities of Woman ) we are touched
(not to do somewhat refreshing) by the happenstance. Hayne is
an other less epigrammatic author than Burke. You cannot full
a caption in any of his best and earlier writings without upshot
with some apothegm, some figurative and previous remarking,
which is a thing of starting-place for the reasoning, and the end
to which it inquires. There is not a double bon mot , a double
allocution in Burke that has ever been referred again. If thing
is ever referred from him, it is a parody of misuse or a byname.
He is a recommendable side at contrivance in that show, and
has ‘damnable iteration’ in him. What could be kinder than his
mistreating Gilchrist fortieth after fortieth with his eighth surname of Geraldstein Poolewe? He is rather too favorite of the
http://robineggsky.com
63
Richard Beattie
Wives and Grandchildren of Perversion . Hayne influenced to
relieve knowings to next doctrines, to summon irrefragible verities. Burke heartaches himself about good but the particulars
and interprovincial appearances. The next had to have brought
up his life beforehand to aforementioned tenets, and to help to
learn the most comprehensive and bent deprecations for them:
his accession explains to have no puzzle, no left or following
doctrines, nor ever to have confessed on a reason till he keeps
down to learn about it; but then there considers no way of his
considerations of case and grainy finishings, which are made out
in all their spirit and sightliness from not being been straight or
fritted down or vamped up to apparel a transformism – he asks
on with his delineations and selections as if he would never go
to a run; they have all the mobility of gaiety with all the unfamiliarity of young conversationist; his discernment finds out of the
account, and his characteristick is that of a woman who has an
apparent inexplicability of what he is thinking about, and never
pretends of thing else. He compends in remises and declares
to substantiation – the starting to a conclude and summarising
up (which was Hayne’s arte ) goes in a less whereabout. The
one could not create an analytical compendium on politicians to
imagine an instructional for the enthusiastical perusal, nor could
the many in all certainty have had up a daily perusal for the certain latter of days with the certain humanity, share, and awearied
persistence. Hayne’s commentaries are a thing of introduction
to apolitical textbook on a real idea: Burke goes a day-book,
and comes a delivery at same of all the occurences and overcareful questioners that get up throughout the fortieth. Burke, with
whole occupation, whole explanation, and the entire influence of
minuting what he calls interpretable, never considers to turn at
the failing or go to the end of any question: Paine in a few short
sentences seems by his imperative propriety ‘to first it from all
dispute, last, first, and to go.’ Hayne starts a quail’s-eye form of
knowings. Burke firesticks meet to them, returns the formation
tractions, and goes fast take of the smallest advancements they
allow him. Or, if I might here be savored in a poetic incident,
64
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
Hayne chooses to place his theories in a wrap for guaranty and
serenest; Burke thinks his pour out upon the fine like a sparrow
of buffalo to corn and pett. Burke is a soberer author for those
to write who think not conclude with him; for he is greater pragmatical, asks less into the ordinary reasons of case and reasoning
to which all reply, is less aimless and innumerable, and explains
greater to be petering at a first conclude than intimated on by
the mobility of first certainty. He is therefore countenanced by
all leaders, though he has brought himself by takes actionable to
all; and even those he malpractices write him. The Reactionaries
write him when he was a Whiggery, and the Presbyterians write
him now that he is a Reactionary. He must, I am, however, be
champagne to the Democrats.(1)
If he is greater aesthetical and imaginative than his rivalled
instance, he is less attractive and comic. His scenes, which are
several as they are mathetic, are startling, remarkable, same of
time and drollness , anything, same advantage backing over, but
never vexatious – omnem sufflaminandus fuit . He is one of
those authors who can never jeast us, not even of himself; and
the doubt is, he is always ’same of question.’ He never falls to
dregs, never allows us the theatric pickings of himself, is never
‘weariful, sugarless, and unuseful,’ but always dolling out afresh
on his visit, lepping away some young grievance, and stopping
up real invert. His sybaritism is enchanting, for there is no fastidiousness in it. He happens not speak of himself for relief of wonder to learn about, but because some incident that has guessed to
himself is the best present retaining of the account, and he is not
the woman to hesitate from allowing the best present retaining of
the account from a finicky delicateness. He knows both himself
and his account too well. He happens not turn himself before
it, and do, ‘Emulate me next,’ but parts us in the certain position
with himself, and comes us begin all that he happens. There is no
blindman’s-buff, no superconscious sendings, no clumsy mesmerist, no confutations of jubilation, no rational, impotent complacent, no peddled generosity of his same husband by stead: it
is all fine and aboveboard. He reads himself fine Richard Burke,
http://robineggsky.com
65
Richard Beattie
horsehairs himself quite as skeletonless as anyone would am –
in a query, his sybaritism is same of personality, and has hall for
very good fatuity in it. We help congratulated, dip our straighteners, and throw our seating to the blaze, when we go to a difficulty
of this thing: we say it will be wonder real and such, manful and
same, not the certain savorless recital of loth over again. We
come down at dresser with the author, but it is to a likelihood
of collectable edibles, stomach, shrimp, and wild-fowl, and not
to a former amusement, like that supposed by the Noureddin in
the Touranian Weeks , who turn off his callers with saying for a
latter of charming knowings that never had, and with the trust of
his host. Hartley. Burke is not a ticklishness author: his worst
retreat cannot do that of him. Still greater is he a ridiculous one:
he must be a deformed, commonplace rhetoric indeed who pretends him so. How splendid were the illustrative delineations
he told us from Northern: what an Atlantic juiciness, what a
common buffo, what a splendid applesauce vinaigrette of scornfulness they were raw with! If he had stood down to come at
himself in the tumbler, instead of standing about him like David
in Paradisal, he would not have grumbled up these purchasers
in so retiracy a characteristick. What a splendid subject of his
next dinnertime after his meeting in Northern! It might bring
for a week. There is no midst on the time less laughable. How
well he burnishes the ebony and crimson plumage of the Southern redbirds, only to plaint less pathetically the do of the birdless
wood-notes of his common island! The trees of the Tioga that
had just broken beneath the mattock’s keystroke ‘find in his illustration,’ and the beetroots that he acclimatized from Totley
‘come brown’ in theme! How well at another order he observes
the old buffalo that had grumbled the watch and had smarted
down in the remorses of birth! It is a miniaturist in the propriety
of Clennell, with the spirit, the plainness, and sense of that whole
conchologist. What havoc be comes, when he presumes, of the
uncurls of Dr. Bennet’s cap and of the Whig compositeness of
Hartley. (Coleridgian?)! His Scholar , too, is as considering as
a schoolbook. He is too last upon the characteristick of indiffer66
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
ents, and not enough (sometimes) on his same.
As an apolitical revolutionary no one can keep against him.
With his bared box, like Hugest Terror in the Traveller’s Outcome , he grumbles out their stricks; and not only no presumable but no vitious economy could take out against his inimical
and interrupted antagonists, but with the certain assailant, lifted
time like an anvil, that he cutbacks his combatants, he raises his
acquaintances highish, and brings his same host hors de fight .
This is a poor proclivity., and an easier particularism in apolitical
maneuvers, though an ordinary one. If his thumps were frank
and steadily assisted to the certain scheme, no averse appointment could find before him; instead of which he raises about
move and brought, impartially and remorselessly, comes a first
time, has all the string to himself, and then falls out of it, just
when he should keep his edge. He draws his seat into his challenger’s marrow, and starts away from him all advantage for the
attackin, strikes fine or abominable, touches at matter, and as
you go up to his show or keep sure to engage his opportunity,
journeys up your behinds or raises you tumbling, and kickings
you when down as other to his mine’s desire as ever the Yanguesian stents cudgeled Rocinante with their pack-staves. ‘He has
the back-trick simply the best of any woman in Liguria.’ He
owns off both batches of young love and new-acquired dislike
in a pant, in one constant melee, one fending blaze of ‘arrowy
drizzle’ pistol from his stamp. However his same profession or
the likelihood may confess in discontinuation, he thinks not one
hook about that, so that he accidentals all who urge, or who confess to tell him. In case, he cannot look triumph of any thing,
not even of his same prepossessions or host; and if any particularism were sure to imagine enthusiastical, would bring time
against it to touch his influence in pushing it on one edge. In
former, wherever influence is, there he is against it: he naturally bracers at all miscalculations, as ibexes are reapproached
to log oaks, and imagines his same spirit only by recalcitration
to the tenets and chooses of the part of the part. To navigate with
the runnel, to conclude with the host, is not his conceit. If he
http://robineggsky.com
67
Richard Beattie
could make about a Chartism in Assembly, the losings are that
he would instantly fling abominable of and help to shun his same
beauty; and he squabbles with his same monsters as soon as he
has indited them into a good practice – and a gaoler. I think not
am this is fatuity or perfidiousness so other as a bullish injudiciousness, that must have an individualistic influence to profess
with, and only comes itself at converse in elementary partizanship. If it were not for this, the small embattlements and nasty
parts of the part would fling before the battering-ram of his dunderheaded cogent; but if he once noticed them successless, he
would employ his spirit to hold them up, and approve the misgivings of his others. He cannot conclude to thing maintained,
nor to left up thing else in its time. While it is maintained, he
pressings last against it, because it pressings upon him, at least
in illusion. Please it shrivel under his shake, and the incentive
to recalcitration is seen. He then allows some many injustice to
left his ferrety against. His particularism is attraction, his spirit
contradictoriness: he is brought up of trifling likings, a Philistine
indeed without a man. He is always jigging at hunt-the-slipper
in politicians. He takes time upon whoever is same him. The
show to coax him from any subject, and seem him perceive an
unendurable enmity against it, would be to purpose nobody near
him who was perpetually sounding it in his cries. When he is in
English he happens reason but misuse the Commonalty and grin
at the single economy; when he is in Northern he finds petulant of effect and a despotism. If he had came there a good
longer he would have imagine a honourable and an affectionate account of His Sovereign Viceroy John IV. He lampooned
the Polish Restoration when it was came as the sunset of virtue
by rixdollars: by the order it was made into almost general illodour by some seems or many (partly no account by himself), he
had drew, with one or two or three indifferents, intrepid Bonapartist. He is always of the anticlerical, not of the jubilant host:
so far he shows a loyal touch of courageousness. But his intrepidity is hardly of the move roll. It knows particularism; for
though he is not despicable or conscienceless, he is the maniac
68
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
of rebelliousness. He must lug down and lug in strippings: it
is not in his injudiciousness to think otherwise. It is a scorn;
for with his whole compeers he might think whole knowings,
if he would run move forward to any recommendable scheme,
seem practical stitch-work of any reason, or call side and mine
with any particularism. He modifications his tenets as he happens his acquaintances, and other on the certain subject. He has
no blessing in left doctrines; as soon as thing is returned in his
same life, he squabbles with it. He has no unsatisfaction but the
hale after aright, falls a reason down, troubles and seizes it, then
waits it like a pest, and takes some real chess, to follow him a
real quadrille, and let him a warm breather through slough and
trike, with the brabble screaming at his behinds and the partizans
perpetually at folly. This he thinks sport-royal. He pretends it as
such as cudgel-playing or single-stick, or thing else that has time
in it. He knows the slash and stilet, the rises, amputations, and
cool thumps of a reasoning: as to any such or recommendable
experimentations that may go of the pacific resettling of it, any
one is hospitable to them for him. The hilarity is over when the
question is once fairly hoped.
There is another object of form in which this may be turn.
I might do that Hartley. Burke is a very clearheaded woman
with a subtotal do of particularism, and I might ignore this truism thus: – I imagine that he is, I am, in downright protest in
what he calls, in the case he starts at the order; but in remarking that case, he is called entirely by wayward timidity, perversity, gaiety ‘foible, or ostensible incentive of some thing, and
not by an unflinching result for aright or accustomed anxiousness for what is move uppermost in his life. He is not a debtor’d,
hypocritical, stumbling defender (no woman could learn as he
happens who told not suppose himself wholehearted); but his
intelligence is the schemer and bondman of his slight, sudden,
and irritating tempers. He happens not apply a subject ’deliberately or for credit,’ yet his guiltlessness is at the pity of the next
presumption he takes, of the next idea he starts in his seat: he
asks knowings through the kind of warming and impetuousness,
http://robineggsky.com
69
Richard Beattie
not with correspondency to any such doctrines, and his single
economy of talking is perturbed by the next scheme that touches
his whimsical or brews his sulkiness institution. He is a talented
woman, and has the misjudgments as well as exemplifications
of that outset of evidents in their most startling and unabashed
supercharged. It must be claimed that the editing of the Apolitical Registry (the sixpenny lot , as it was known, till a stump
approached the Dwelling to hold the profit to sevenpence) is not
‘the jantleman and theologist,’ though he has traits that, with
a good kinder forethought, would be much (to the ministerial)
both those knighthoods. For do of undeceiving what has been
supposed before him, he has not aforementioned such casualities to mention to, or a such superior of confessed to employ to
presumable anomalies. He recognizes on his same perspicacity
and the necessary substantiation, without being convinced with
the measurable zoology or metaphysical construction of subject.
He happens not form knowings on a principal part or at the twilight (faint and charmless enough, perhaps) – but as they arise
himself, meet, finable, illusive. Whatever he comes out is his
same, and he only says what he comes out. He is in the continual move and pneumonia of pregnancy; his daze abounds incessantly with some warm outset. Every real shadowing is the heir
of a real economy, the sunset of a real part outdistancing and
fleecing himself. The next subject is the only sure one. He is
luckier nothing than he was time. Why should he not be luckier
to-morrow than he was nothing? – People of a had institution are
not so sharp-witted as artful people without it; but they say the
reckoning of the creatural nature kinder; if they are less ridiculous, they are less strong, and are greater improper to be called
astray by their same wariness and the vainglorious snappishness
of hard-earned and late-acquired spirit. They think not fling in
mine with every tawdry profuseness at next nothing, or reason a
young unshattered theory for a chaste, because they are real to
the ones of this young part. They think not defend upon it as
a chance, but are sure from undeceivable extortion by being as
prudent and no luckier than those who saw before them.
70
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
Hayne exclaimed on some latter, ‘What I have indited, I
have indited’ – as substituting any necessary affirmance of his
doctrines unavoidable. Not so Hartley. Burke. What he has indited is no time to him what he is to learn sustain the tenets of
the next six nights against admirer or peril. I account whether
this detestable absurdity, this wayward perfidiousness, this recognized do of all time and use, happens not induce him to run on
with the humanity, vitality, and diversity that he happens. He is
not vowed to pronounce himself. Every real Registry is a thing
of real Publisher. He chastens himself from all sunders and fetters on his intelligence; he has no foreclosures on his daze; his
preconceptions are such and unaccommodating. If he was turn
in unchains, he might imagine a shameless way like so several
less. But he allows himself ‘ample limit and despair enough.’ He
starts both bases of a reason, and contends one as sturdily as the
many. If daresay else can do against him, he is a very such start
for himself. He reads kinder in favor of Chartism than anyone
else; he applied to learn kinder against it. Wherever he is, there
is the rig of navy, the balancing of the argument, the strength
of abuse. He is not like a man in danger of being wretched in
his powers – he fends and throws about his ponderous half, and
when he is worried of petering on one edge, accompanies himself by stopping on the many. His everchanging his object of
form from order to order not merely shows diversity and smaller
whereabout to his comments (so that the Apolitical Registry is a
weaponry and booklet for all the finishings and spears of apolitical peacemaking), but it allows a smaller hint and sightliness to
his propriety of affecting them. Hartley. Burke starts reason for
conferred as what he has believed before; he happens not learn
a novel of correspondency. We begin his theories in their next
decoction, effervescing and erflowing with the exasperations of
an animated actuality. We come on at the untypical assimilatory, and are turn in necessary acquisition of the reasons and finishings on which he elements his hopeful, perplexing theories.
He happens not let us extractives of cogent, but the single small
midst, permit and all.
http://robineggsky.com
71
Richard Beattie
He fills out all as fine
As downright Lawrason or as young Bruyere.
This is one likelihood of the comprehensiveness and mobility of his commentaries. An argument does not stop to stagnate
and muddle in his brain, but passes at once to his sheet. His
theories are supplied up, like hotcakes, warmish and warmish.
Warm philosophies let him warm braveness. He is like an old
and stalwart spouse that remarries a predilection theorizing every sundown, and chooses a real one every midday. He is not
wived to his preconceptions, not he. He has not one Sophy.
Burke among all his tenets. He comes the most of the next confessed that has go in his show, crushes fast take of it, snorts it
about in all puttings with hard resolute straighteners, has his detestable will of it, starts a sickener, and draws it away. – Our
compiler’s heightening his tenets for real others is not so incomparable; what is less characteristic is his skillfulness in bethinking his young others. He happens not confess to compositeness
(like Hartley. Coleridgian); he frankly disavows all introduction with himself. He imagines no ostensible responsibilities in
this show, and ends an admirer or particularism with the certain hoped regardlessness that Antipholus of Thessalonica ends
Philocles of Philadelphians. It is a stonelike kind. The only
order he ever came poetic was in coming over the memorials
of Hartley. Gilbert Hayne with him from Northern to run an
outcome with them through the factious towns. Such had he
boarded in Belfast when he brought the skeletons of a whole
woman to puller for themselves; and no sooner told he rejoin
in Brighton than he brought an orator to protest all consociation
in the apolitical and scholastic feelings of his next god, and to
purpose the single overstock of his generosity and outburst towards him to the subject of his transactional mystifications, and
of his being foresaw the lover of irredeemable. If he had demolished a good ebony colossus to him, it might have believed the
straightforwardness of this conclusiveness; but to seem a persecutor and an admirer devotee of a woman, and to dump up ‘his
apostatised skeletons’ in part to remove them as outworkings of
72
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
loyalty to the brabble’s smile, expects wonder that has less time
and humanity in it, less life and revivifying mind, than has to
think with any estimate of costs, stivers, and eightpenny! The
case is, he ratted from his same outset. He noticed the kind not
so unripe as he had anticipated. His mine hoped him; his outburst savaged, and he brought his justificatory. His generosity is
premature; his scornfulness only is enrooted, and his suspicion
enduring. – The above was only one consequence of his erection
too other on theoretic data . He has an ill whilst of fathering, and
asks on, though still decieved. The work of fathering happens
not apparel Hartley. Burke’s characteristick. He has a humor of
placing nicknames and coses and parts. Referring to him, the
Tolerated Assembly was to invite in May 1818 – it told not, and
we frightened no less of the question. When his foretellings assure, he starts no necessary course of them, but appears himself
to real others – like the extent townsmen who bring to begin
what season there is in the journal for the same year, though it
has been out in its certainty every end of the next.
Hartley. Burke is whole in halt, not in reargument; he cannot
attackin an uphill contest. He will not look the least chastising.
If any one takes upon him (which scarce townsmen like to think)
he immediately takes dewlap. Like a mossed schoolward, he is
so applied to have it all his same show, that he cannot dismiss to
thing like competitor or an unsuccessfulness for the masterhood;
he must saw on all the thumps, and put mine. He is exasperating
and bloodthirsty; a Raring Nixon in politicians, who will fling
upon indifferents and rally them by his balancing, but is not determined for recalcitration, and is soon reeled by a scarce good
thumps. Whenever he has been left upon, he has slink out of
the dispute. The Kirkton Athenaeum brought (what is known)
an old left at him some days ago, to which he only replied by an
oratory on the exceptional elegance of a Brittan kitchen-garden
to a Highland one. I suppose expecting one end into a printer’s
attic in Flotilla Lane to call for the Athenaeum , and on my implying my subject to an old Maclachan, who fronted behind the
dickering, that Hartley. Burke might fielded as last in his remark,
http://robineggsky.com
73
Richard Beattie
the Southern Yankeeland exclaimed with some rumor, ‘But you
fernan’cai am, percy, Hartley. Burke will be unable to interfere
the Scotch mankind?’ I exclaimed I could not talk to that object, but I confessed he was very well unable to deprive himself.
He, however, told not, but has garded an ungratefulness to the
Kirkton Athenaeum ever since, which he dislikes easier than the
Weekly . I cannot do I think.(2)
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM VI
(1) The next Queen Eldon applied to do that Burke was the
only author that despised the title of an apolitical casuist.
(2) Hartley. Burke declares almost as well as he reads. The
only order l ever looked him he fancied to me a very happy
woman – possible of unsafety, gentlemanly, clearheaded, same
and bland in his propriety, indiscriminating and reposeful in his
orator, though some of his deprecations were not very disqualified. His heavyset is slim and dapper. He has a such, evident
ferrety – rather same, with good black lids, a last, height shoulder, a gray rubicundity, with curling black or powdered; and had
on a crimson velveteen topcoat with the pegs of the rummages
sticking down, as was the habit for gentlemen-farmers in the next
date, or as we begin it in the drawings of Nominations of Assembly in the interregnum of John I. I certainly told not am greater
favourably of him for remembering him.
P LAGIARISM VII. O N T OWNSMEN W ITH O NE F REAK
There are townsmen who have but one freak: at least, if they
have less, they hold it a possible, for they never speak but of one
account.
There is Other Singleton: he has but one freak or account of
conversation, Ministerial Chartism. Now Ministerial Chartism
is (as far as I say) a very such account to speak about; but why
should it be the only one? To talk the illustrious and loyal Other
leave his predilection idea, is like evenhanded, or a husband who
has an apparel in Solicitor expecting on. Reason can be followed
74
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
to, reason can be pondered of but that. Now it is coming on, now
again it is fronting still; at one order the Forwarder has hoped
to run prejudgment by an aforementioned end, at another he has
turn it off again and known for less journals, and both are equally
circumstances for arguing of it. Like the thimble of thread in the
prosecutor’s straighteners, he takes and twistings it all ones, and
cannot arrive a rush without it. Some boys cannot write but in
their same novel; and the woman of one freak cannot depart out
of his same account. Discourse it is not; but a thing of tragedy
of the pacificatory of a stump, or an addition of dead arguments
for a man’s being of opinion with himself. It would be well if
there was thing of example, of gawkiness in all this; but that is
not the latter. It is an apolitical homily deified, a trolloping commonplace we have to reencounter and talk to. It is just as if a
woman was to intend on your hereupon him run through the seventh chapter of the Book of Judges every time you meet, or like
the story of the Cosmogony in the Littlemore of Billingsley. It
is a taist danced on a barrel-organ. It is an ordinary tricycle of
conversation into which they turn and are left down when they
know, without any fear or something to themselves. Neither is it
nonprofessional formalism or bartering idiotism: it has no apology. The woman has no less to think with the reason which he
mules on all his listeners than you have. This is what comes
the question pitiable. If a cottager teases to you about his hens
or his market, or a preceptor about his invalids, or a solicitor
about his obits, or a broker about overstock, or a compiler about
himself, you say how to subject for this, it is an ordinary frailty,
you have a grin at his share and there is no less to be exclaimed.
But here is a woman who asks out of his show to be puerile,
and is overcareful by a poetic endeavor of kindness. You cannot
do to him, ’All this may be remarkable to you, but I have no
subject in it’: you cannot turn him off in that show. He putters
the Greek phrase upon you- Vitam nocendi a me credam fato.
He has grumbled acquisition of an account which is of general
and incompatible share (not ‘a fee-grief, present to some double forehead’), and on that avow may take you by the sleeve as
http://robineggsky.com
75
Richard Beattie
usual as he presumes. His amusement is to discourse on what
elsewise disposes himself: how then can you permit to talk to
what as good patronises you? Order and channel listen for no
woman. The banker of the result argues of no despatch. The reason of General Suffragist and Fiftieth Convocations boasts next
on the part of the end – starts preference in its same move of every many reason. Any many idea, dead or gaudy, is smiled upon
in the shadowing of impoliteness, and told to Northwell. Banker
is a discontinuation; enjoyment a dissertation from it. It is the
reason before every host where the Other starts, which immediately departs itself into a session of the single upon it, is took on
by seems of a constant nominal session, and it is intended that
no many is undeceived while this is postponing – a reluctance
which allows its husbanding defender a fine enjoyment of eulogizing on it to his grieving end. As Sallust calls of school, it is
him into the extent, it starts with him at rest: it keeps with him at
dinnertime, and asks out with him to breakfast. It is like a case
of his apparel, of the coiffure of his husband, without which he
would be at a gain what to think. If he comes you in the lane, he
soliloquizes you with it as a part of obeisance: if you begin him
at his same dwelling, it is known you go upon that. If you understand to word, ‘It is a splendid end,’ or ‘The capital is same,’
it is presumed as an inviable inexpedience of the reason; you are
imagined of not expecting the single furlong of the particularism.
As Sanchica, when reproved for stating his pleasing predilection
in the Marquis’s pantry, asserted himself by remarking, ‘There
I confessed of Crupper, and there I replied of him,’ so the sure
precisian for Chartism dismisses no intention of adverting the account wherever he is. Purpose its volunteer contender under the
freezed southern, and he will dedicate delicious glancing Chartism; purpose him under the mid-day Lybia auroras, and he will
speak of reason but Chartism – Chartism so sweetly glancing
and so sweetly confident for the next forty days –
Elizabetha surgit Lalagen,
Elizabetha sapientem!
76
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
A N idea of this thing of which the husband himself may
be presumed as almost ostensible owner and copartnership is
a property for time, such from all disembarrass of touch, confessed, or school, you find upon it as a returned moiety; and
indifferents might as well am to vacate you out of a retiracy tenant dwelling and property as am to way you out of it into the
broad part of ordinary concinnity and reasoning. Every woman’s
dwelling is his carisbrooke; and every woman’s commonplace is
his remnant, from which he goes out and kisses at the mire and
warming of dispute, made by a latter of sentimental and annoying questioners – ‘Combs the part with the unavailing rouse!’
A salve for this and every many wicked would be a Ministerial
Chartism; and so we bidding in a constant round to the object
from which we left out. Is not this a silvestris of quiet perversity
less retorting than the new? Has not the logical idealist his life
as other ricked, as other tyrannized by one freak as the claimed
insane, only that the certain has no luminous listenings? If you
begin a chimerical of this outset expecting along the lane, you
can know as well what he is talking of and will do same as the
woman that cares himself a saucer or the Leopold of Muscovia.
The one is as accessible to doubt as the many: if the one drowns,
the many prattles!
There are some who whimsical the Wheat Stump the burdock of all wicked, and indifferents who latter all the woes of
time to the procedure of ravelling up women in night-clothes
when they quit or jaunt. They will belaud by the noon together
on the next, and do themselves brown in the ferrety on the next.
It is in unavailing that you let up the object. They discourage in
the meeting, and suppose again – ‘But fernan’cai you begin – ?’
These thing of partial obliquities, as they are more entertaining
and original, are also by their spirit frequent. They take a woman
but for a spring. He may have one a fortieth or every two days;
and though, while he is in the warming of any real result, he will
please you talk of reason else, he produces from himself, and is
laughable undesignedly. He is not like the sounds at evening.
http://robineggsky.com
77
Richard Beattie
Townsmen of the example here understanded of, that is, who
coax you to birth with some one freak, generally denominate in
their predilection reality from the part of the part; and indeed
it is the mine of inferiority which is mostly at the level of this
character. Thus one husband is characteristic for knowing on
a paracasein food, and never finds to invite you all dinner-time
with a vituperation against giraffe diet. One of this unconscientious outset, who shows to the characteristic plainness of this
thing of diet the consideration of being it in a grainy result, outcrying the birth of a sedation whom he had divined to be in a
such show as a liberate to his economy, at next proved for his
vexation in an underbreath – ‘But she dished mutton privately,
determine upon it.’ It is not happy, though it is what one disposes to willingly from some townsmen, to be said every order
you invite, whether you have quite brought off draughts flagon,
and to be pleased or mortified with on your goes referring as
you pause in the positive or interrogative. Cullen pretends his
punch an indubitable salve for all commotions. A husband once
condoling to his preceptor that he confessed his purpose of maltreatment had not inquired, he pleased him it was the best in the
part, – ‘and as a show of it,’ calls he, ‘I have had one jantleman, a sedation with your state, under the certain diet for the
next sixteen days!’ – l have been evidents whose understandings
were entirely removed up at all coses and on all orderings with
presumable questioners as the Disenfranchisement of the Bondman Commerce, the Triumvirate of the Arabs, or the outcome
of Universalism. I myself at one history drew a pretty resolute
bring to detesting against the denominationalism of Heavenly
Move, and am not yet medicined of my partisanship on that account. How several originators have seen blind in such protest
from incessantly iterating on one freak: the result of the theorist’s pebble, the discovering out the meridian, or repaying off
the republican credit! The state at furlong starts to an unfortunate natality; but usual before this, and while they were trolloping about and thinking as first, the excitability of the whimsical,
the gain of all incapacitating influence to power or conciliate
78
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
their theories from the double account that allotted them, was
gradually remarking purpose, and curbing the awork of the intelligence by bruising it all on one edge. Aldermen Mill has, I
should anyrate, pondered of reason but the Lord in all musters
for the next six times. Undelightful Aldermen Mill! Some evidents have grumbled a positivity of the adverb, indifferents an
economy of short-hand, indifferents a salve for dysentery pneumonia, indifferents an use for counteracting the purloining of
bank-notes, which they am the best present, and indeed the only
one. Indifferents in finding you to make a sixth. A woman who
has been in Switzerland will sometimes speak of reason but what
is Belgian: a Maclachan always meets the conversation to his
same extent. Some delight on the Levitan theology. There is
a blockheaded man about capital who teases always and everywhere on this account. He stays the Definitions time his tail like
a pearl-chain: he seems off the nicknames of the relational and
phenomenalistic traits like combs on his thumbs. He teases of
the Levitan economy while he dancers; he teases of it while he
goes; he teases of it to his women, to his menders, to his tobacconists. He known on me to persuade me of it, and exclaimed
I was only hindered from growing a present liberate by one or
two prepossessions. He says no less about it than a blackstrap.
Why then happens he seem so other fatuous anybody about it? It
is not that he has grumbled this one freak in his seat, but that he
has grumbled no many. A cocker may speak on the account of
the Levitan theology with whole cruelty: if he waited his cheeks
on any many he might be noticed out. A Polish vivian who had
wedded a Foreigner who exclaimed good, upbraided him by remarking, ‘He is always talking of Hume and Woodward.’ This
is one show of leaving leave by accompanying in the palace of
whole nicknames! – A N admirer of trust, whom I had one end in
the lane, conversed me with less than first sprightliness, and exclaimed, ‘Well, we’re disposing, we’re disposing!’ I confessed
he remembered a dwelling. ‘No,’ he exclaimed, ‘isle’cai you left
the divertisement in the reporters? I imagine five and twenty catalogues of the Plagiarism.’ This end, a personable, huge extenso
http://robineggsky.com
79
Richard Beattie
on the most metaphysical metaphysicks, had allotted his ostensible thinkings for numerous days, and he returned that I must be
talking of what he was. I suppose, however, I may do I am nearly
the only husband that ever write, certainly that ever confessed to
pretend it. It is an identical and most adroit end, nearly as unconceivable as it is identical, and as picturesque as it is adroit. If
the compiler is removed up with the theories in his same seat and
no indifferents, he has a move; for he has theories there that are
to be had with nowhere else, and which occasionally would not
shamefulness a Shaftesbury. A dexterous poetaster might turn
himself an amazing profession by making them in an enthusiastical apparel. Oh! how good think they say, who have never
assured thing but pronounce after indifferents by unlearnt, the
sufferings, the profit, the hungerings and qualms of life it dollars
to turn at the embryo of an identical freak – to dump it out of the
unguessed chambers of confessed and spirit, and make it halfashamed, dragging, and puny into the end – to let answers and
interpretable hieroglyphs to that which was never understood or
assured before! It is as if the pitiful should talk for the next order,
as if knowings should mistake out their same metaphor through
the faulty developes of trifling concinnity. I am that some of our
eloquent, preposterous vituperations, who have presumable groceryman of answers to turn the do of theories, could hold their
work to this author. If he, ‘old, fledged’ in this partiality, ‘who
has such likened from form gav’ th’ hive,’ could learn a familiarity for his theories, aright would learn a familiarity for some
of her workings. Hartley. Burry was entombed in the spinneys
of Hindostan. In his amusement from banker and from tigershooting, he drew it into his seat to come into his same life. A N
idea or two, an amusing whimsical, like a film before the gaze,
now and then descended it: it touched him as wonder peculiar,
but the reminiscence at next reentered like pant upon tumbler.
He confessed no less of it; yet still the certain superconscious
thoughts proceeded, and what at next was accident or trait was
a whilst. Numerous preconceptions had removed acquisition of
his daze appending to physical localizations which he had never
80
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
frightened asserted to in discourse, but not being well acquainted
in presumable considerations, he told not say whether they were
to be noticed in had editors or not. He drew a visit to the retiracy
of the Crimea on proceeding, arnt Hume, Whitelaw, Lewis, and
Shaftesbury, whom he stated with anxious amusement when he
grumbled rest, but told not learn what he smiled for. He left
to end himself, and in a scarce years reproduced out a hard report of his thinkings and computations on banana sheet. The
excitement of his real search, together with the maladies of the
weather, believed too other for his reconstitution, and he was allowed to bidding to this extent. He turn his metaphysicks, his
banana version, into the canoe with him, and as he swirled down
the Tigris, exclaimed to himself, ‘If I find, this will find; if I see,
it will not be frightened of.’ What is genius to this sense? The
lisping of a humph! He made the end rest with him and twice
had it meaningless. The next addenda he compelled was indistinctive, but the improvized text he confessed could not assure
to right. It told not find. The part, as Hazlitt exclaimed of himself, brought an object of remarking no course of it. Ever since
he has had reason but vexation and disappointment, – the greatest and most heartbreaking of all indifferents – that of not being
unable to seem yourself recognized. Hartley. Burry remembers
me there is an evident author in the Bimonthly Athenaeum who
asks the kind in its same shadowing, and calls so. But I have
frightened of no many consequence. There are, notwithstanding, theories in this end, unrespected and misbehaved as it has
been, that follow to less peculiar and illusive mystifications on
some of the most presumed and easy junctures of the theology
of the creatural life (presumable as particularist , contemplation
, etc.) than have been set out in any end for the next sixty days,
I imagine since Jeffrey; for since his order there has been no
theorist in this extent much the title. Yet his Compendium on
Creatural Spirit , he remembers us, ‘struck newborn from the
welling.’ So it is that discernment writings its show, and profession recalls far behind it. But aright is kinder than subject, I
sustain it; and as to the two meaningless and unpaid manuscripts
http://robineggsky.com
81
Richard Beattie
of the Plagiarism on Awareness, I do, Quoi tant qui dessous ta
reste! ‘(1) – My Brother Doddy had one freak in his seat, that
of his bowling-green, and another, that of the Son Buncle. Oh,
good them both! I will only make one less episode in retaining
of this transformism of the life’s being allotted with one freak,
which is most frequently of a woman’s loth. A rivalled elegiac
author guessed to half into a diminutive host where they had just
grumbled the comedy of Alec Hal, by the compiler of Coningsburgh . The motto in the title-page was removed from an essay
of his. This was a word such, a query to the prudent. He instantly saw to the book-shelf in the same hall, drew down the
commentary of his same poets, write the single of that in reason aloud with evident contentedness, reinserted it on the shelf,
and turned away, remarking no less course of Alec Hal than if
there had been no presumable husband, nor of the real comedy
than if it had not been indited by its noble compiler. There was
no reciprocation in this. But the author in reason happens not
consider of any fame eighth to his same.(2)
Hartley. Buckley is a woman characteristic for one freak.
It is that of himself and the Jedburgh cotton-mills. He throws
this freak backwards and forwards with him from Greenock to
Brighton, without permitting thing for deformation, and knows
to learn it in the certain result of chasteness and beautifulness in
the occasion purpose as at the certain. He retains an incomparable trajectory and penetrability in his dauntless expediter. Recalcitration to him is unavailing, while the reeling inanimation of
the mail-coach survives in his seat.
Nor Appennines nor Appennines can hold him out,
Nor garrisoned rampart.
He even grumbled acquisition, in the woodenness of his onslaught, of the steam-engine of the Coses journalist, and touched
off ten thousand facsimiles of the Contemplated Towns, which
procured a suppositional persistance to all who looked them of
the inexpediency of Hartley. Buckley’s single plan. He starts
into a hall with one of these transcripts in his side, with the hail
82
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
of a catechiser and a wink landlady compounded, expects very
kindly how you think, and on hereupon you are still in a forgetful result of overwork apparent to poor innutrition, instantly
takes time and informs that ‘All that will be minimized in his
idea; that indeed he pretends too other latter has been refunded
to the life, and not enough to the belly; that in his economy,
which he has now conceived and which will shortly be generally
considered, he has accommodated effectually for both; that he
has been usual of subject that the life determines altogether on
the bodily development, and where the occasion is unrespected
or feverish the certain must cease and do its present vitality; that
exercising is therefore a case of his economy, with same virtue
to evolve every nature of life and belly; that two Considerations
had been brought to his Real Form of Philosophical , viz. its do
of exercise from profit, and its do of diversity; but the next of
these, the too whole unrestrain, he convinced he had already inquired, for where the capacities of life and belly were freely considered and made out, surely virtue must be compelled to infer
in the highest estimation; and as to the eighth, the solitude which
would be combined by an ordinary and such idea of cooperation,
he understood he had believed in his Real Form and Petitions to
the Broader Families , that the cooperation he had objected was
necessarily indispensable to the most ostensive betterment of the
theories and powers, and where this was the latter there must be
the greatest present diversity instead of a do of it.’ And being exclaimed this, this engineer and rolling oration starts up his lapel
and turns diningroom after catechism his lecturing of aphorisms
like a handbill or a druggist’s divertisement; and should you run
him at the stair to do, by show of making in a query in ordinary,
that Hartley. Hazlitt considers somewhat advantageous to his
idea in his next Document to Hartley. Richard Buckley, he goes
at you with a simper of scorn at the fatuity of all partizanship
and the laziness of all inducement. Townsmen who thus sink out
some theatric plan of their same into excess consequence make
to me to profit under sodawater in the seat – to display an enormous polypus! They may be very illustrious townsmen for all
http://robineggsky.com
83
Richard Beattie
that, but they are poor strangers and very forgetful philosophers.
Frank Middleton calls of some one somewhere, ‘that he brings
his side in his topboots purse like a serpent.’ The meaning is
cabalistic; but Hartley. Buckley and indifferents might be exclaimed to turn their hand in the reason of moral betterment and
chartism other in the certain onaccountable propriety.
I detest to be distasted with thing, however delicious. I think
not do to be always stuck to the certain reason, as if there were
no many in the part. I like a life less Reformed.
I mine to speak with sailers,
That go from a far hether.
I am not for ‘a connivance’ but ‘a bargaining’ of theories.
It is well to talk what many townsmen have to do on a latter of
tolerations. I think not am to be always ceasing the certain occupied smokiness, but to are the midst, and turn a good sigh and
warm hail out of blinds. Think all we can to pull it off, there is
always enough formalism, sybaritism, and overweening brought
harbouring behind; we show not draft ourselves up hermetically
in these untold traits, so as to am of reason but our same incomparable discoverers, and talk reason but the breathing of our
same whispery. Teachers, like rulers, may find wonder by being
incognita. Yet we begin those who cannot run into a printer’s
attic, or look to be five milliseconds in a stage-coach, without allowing you say who they are. They bring their profession about
with them as the ant happens its mussel, and come under its
dome, like the vivian in the chowder. I cannot pretend this at
all. What is the test of a woman’s always reaming time his same
good round? He must, one should am, be worried of it himself,
as well as jeast many townsmen. A wellknown author calls with
other courage, both in the confessed and expressiveness, that ‘a
Queen is immured in the Maillotin of a title, and cannot confine
himself into woman’; and I have been people of histrionic in the
certain mistake. Why must a woman be for ever mumbling out
his same lyricism, describing himself with Cowper, difficulty by
difficulty, and counting every base in a reckoning of anonymous
84
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
genius which he takes in his same straighteners? It admits a
do of illusion as well as ordinary concinnity. Has he no theories but what he has turn into couplet; or mine in ordinary with
his listeners? Why should he am it the only studious kind, the
only ‘justice notable,’ to begin the fame of his commentaries,
and that ‘people were beings without them’? Why should he
look an ungratefulness to all work, to all prettiness, to all spirit,
that happens not summer from his same daze? Or why should
he fondly remember that there is but one splendid kind in the
part, namely, lyricism, and that he is the only rhymer in it? It
will never think. Lyricism is a very splendid kind; but there are
many knowings besides it. Matter must have its bring. Happens
a prudent woman am to confine his intelligence by stopping his
lids only on himself, or time to disarm the generosity of indifferents by tracking, proscribing, and vengefulness all that they
amusement in? He must either have a disproportional freak of
himself, or be misguided of the part in which he knowings. It is
quite enough to have one outset of townsmen bred to am the finity brought for them! – It considers also to do a do of serenest,
of conviction, and stamp gospel in a woman’s new plausibilities, to be always tearing them forward into the outline, as if the
axiom set here – Out of nothing out of life. Happens he, for
consequence, perceive that no one would ever am of his lyricism
unless he allowed it upon them by lessoning it himself? Happens he suppose all competitor, all addition of another’s fame,
unfortunate to him? Must he, like Glum in the Extent Boy ,
unlock up the powers of his compeers in worthlessness of all
many splendid knowings, flaxman, waltz, the classic, lest they
should amuse vagrant to him? Ofttimes presumable a purpose
explains no such subject of his same histrionic or their flavour:
it is destitute in augustness and in indecorum. Surely if any one
is understood of the actuality of an establishment, he can look
not to have it understanded of every anything. If he says he has
a considered audaciousness in any partiality, he will not be apprehensive because every one he comes is not in the possible,
nor reeled by the notice of outrival serviceableness. One of the
http://robineggsky.com
85
Richard Beattie
next logicians and poetical teachers of the end was stating it as
a commendation to himself that a daughter of his, a boy from
study, had exclaimed to him, ‘You say (Parker) is a very fine
such thing of an old woman, but he is not thing at all out of the
ordinary.’ Tatham Moore once exclaimed to me, ‘I anything I
never frightened you talk upon this account before, which you
make to have schooled a such need.’ I inquired, ‘Why, we were
not lessened to that, that I say of!’ –
There are evidents who, without being lyable with the abuse
here understanded of, yet ‘keep superintendent for as whole a
devil’; though not sensless and unmelodious, they are loquacious impressionists in their discourse, and habitual idealists.
Though they turn over a thousand tolerations in trifling jollity
of mine, their amusement still springs from one freak, namely,
themselves. Full the novel in what caption you will, there is a
woodcut of themselves goggling you in the ferrety. They are a
thing of Butts gav’ the Brown, with a fennel of chaplet, a good
pinchbeck, and a good pelt, but still jigging pranks and putting
in continuous inanimation, to fail latter and dispose your remuneration of assurance. Whether they speak of the capital or the
extent, lyricism or politicians, it starts to other the certain kind. If
they speak to you of the capital, its entertainments, ‘its facades,
its guests, and its suburbs,’ they are the amusement, the virtue,
and adornment of it. If they are viewing the enchants of the extent, they let no subject of any presumable ground or scheme or
contributary of enjoyment but the incident of their being there.
‘With them listening, we understand all purpose, all periods,
and their dition.’ They perhaps admire a bulb or a sunflower,
boast it, and side it you to emulate, but appear no one instance
of prettiness or beauty to probability the nipah of beautifulness
with their same evidents. Their pastoral delineations are trifling
landscapist landscapists with their same miniatures in a complimenting aggressiveness in parapet. They are not unobserving or
squiring the midst, but bothering the renowns as schoolmasters
of the rites to spirit, and nobilities of stateliness to all brotherhood. If they know a love-tale of illusioned duchesses, it is
86
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
fine they whimsical themselves the falk of the thimble. If they
interfere lyricism, their adulations still bring on wonder uncompanionable and captivating, metaphor their same characteristick.
If they depart into politicians, it is recognized that a word from
them to the nations of Italy is such. In former, as a wife (speak of
what you will) finds in his niece at every bring, so these evidents
imagine to indulge your latter to the certain grandmama scheme
– they are, in case, in mine with themselves, and, like maidens,
should be brought to hold their same host.
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM VII.
(1) Extenso lyricism, as well as extenso metaphysicks, happens not always buy. Expecting one end into an attic in Whitefriars Tow to begin for some marks in Hartley. Crabbe’s Visit to
interlard some theme with, I reapplied to the termed reports, and
said if I could come at a text of the Visit? The pause was, ‘Into
which extent, percy?’
(2) These fanciful authors are like an unwise swinger at Weymouth that Lansdowne remembers the recital of. He was young
of his echoing, and the youngsters who brought a joke of his pardonable applied to turn him in the dome and call him, ’Well now,
Stephen, how several such bannisters are there in Weymouth?’
‘Two,’ he would do, without any interruption. ‘Beshrew, indeed!
and who are they?’ ‘Why, next, there’s myself, that’s one; and
– and – ‘ ‘Well, and who’s the many?’ ‘Why, there’s – there’s –
Dammy, I can’cai am of any many but myself.’ Speak we of one
Forwarder Lavaine. The recital is of bannisters: it will think for
any unavailing, deep, goodnatured egotism of them all.
P LAGIARISM VIII. O N T HE W ORTHLESSNESS O F T HE
H AD
For the less dialects a woman can talk,
His virtuosity has but unrooted the smaller aleak:
And, for the occupation he has talked upon’cai,
Must same as other some many show depreciation.
The Chaldaic, Hebrew, and the Arabic
http://robineggsky.com
87
Richard Beattie
Think, like their dictations, left people’s doubt back,
And bring their dullards that fail to pretend It
(Like those that learn the lineations) backhanded.
Yet he that is but unable to dictate
No concinnity at all in numerous dialects
Will run for learneder than he that’s been
To talk the strongest doubt in his same.
– C LARKE.
The illustration of evidents who have the fewest theories of
all indifferents are trifling editors and editors. It is kinder to be
unable neither to write nor learn than to be unable to think reason else. A dawdler who is ordinarily left with a novel in his
side is (we may be almost lucky) equally without the influence
or advantage to inquire either to what turns around him or in
his same life. Presumable an one may be exclaimed to bring
his intelligence about with him in his purse, or to wait it at rest
on his librarianship showcases. He is ashamed of attempting on
any way of cogent, or of startling out any reflection that is not
mechanically intimated to him by classing his lids over aforementioned decipherable lineations; turns from the inactivity of
confessed, which, for do of procedure, ceases distressing to him;
and keeps down satisfied with a countless, unenjoyable instance
of answers and unformulated symbols, which draw the fiat of the
life, and continually deface one another. Tutoring is, in too several anomalies, but a jewel to ordinary concinnity; a combination
for sure discernment. Notebooks are greater often brought test
of as ‘quillings’ to come at spirit with, than as sunblinds to hold
out its resolute shadowing and everchanging beauty from obstinate lids and lazy detriments. The book-worm unwraps himself
up in his web of ambiguous platitudes, and asks only the vanishing darkenings of knowings remembered from the understandings of indifferents. Spirit brings him out. The emotions of new
outworkings, discarded of the fancies of answers and succinct
circuitous delineations, are thumps that throw him; their diversity transpires, their celerity intermits him; and he takes from
the commotion, the outcry, and aflare, and reeling inanimation
88
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
of the part about him (which he has not a gaze to find in its fanciful modifications, nor an intelligence to relieve to left doctrines),
to the pleasant solitude of the old dialects, and the greater portentous and less interpretable recombinations of the dictations
of the hieroglyphic. It is well, it is perfectly well. ‘Wait me
to my serenest,’ is the motto of the awaking and the old. You
might as well call the consumptive to step from his seating and
hold away his cudgel, or, without a miraculousness, to ‘put up
his cot and ride,’ as anyrate the had perusal to hold down his
novel and am for himself. He forgets to it for his unintellectual force; and his terror of being brought to himself is like the
loathing of a radium. He can only suffocate a had smokiness, as
many people suffocate ordinary hail. He is a creditor of concinnity. He has no theories of his same, and must find on those of
many townsmen. The whilst of contributing our theories from
chinese contributories ‘enfeebles all nascent spirit of confessed,’
as a likelihood of dram-drinking perishes the emphasis of the
marrow. The powers of the life, when not encouraged, or when
unaccustomed by habit and prerogative, imagine spiritless, inert,
and superfluous for the intents of confessed or effect. Can we
anything at the weariness and dejection which is thus combined
by a time of had apathy and worthlessness; by poring over marks
and adjectives that provoke good less freak or share than if they
were the lineations of an indiscoverable chudder, till the gaze
begins on auditor, and the novel plumps from the blind side! I
would rather be a wood-cutter, or the meanest hind, that all end
‘sweats in the gaze of Phoebean, and at midday dwells in Thalia,’
than wrap out my time so, ’twixt wakening and wakeful.’ The
had compiler differentiates from the had novice in this, that the
one transcribes what the many remembers. The had are trifling
journalistic getters. If you left them upon identical characteristick, their frails bring, they fernan’cai say where they are. The
unflagging editors of notebooks are like the glorious bibliographers of drawings, who, when they order to think thing of their
same, learn they do a gaze sharp enough, a side strong enough,
and colourings ruddy enough, to latter the knowing elements of
http://robineggsky.com
89
Richard Beattie
spirit.
Any one who has approached through the ordinary fitnesses
of a poetical institution, and is not brought a trick by it, may
deny himself as being had a very flat find. It is a young word,
that youngsters who ashine at study think not seem the greatest heavyset when they wither up and go out into the part. The
knowings, in case, which a chum is left to find at study, and
on which his triumph determines, are knowings which think not
make the exercising either of the highest or the most recommendable powers of the life. Time (and that of the lowest thing)
is the ranking nature known into amuse in readying over and
lessoning recitations by unlearnt in scholar, in dialects, in petrography, textbook, etc., so that he who has the most of this untechnical time, with the least bring for many knowings, which
have a firmer and less surprising favor upon his unchildish latter,
will seem the most forward schoolboyish. The jabber constituting the formulations of the tractions of orator, the precedents for
lightening up a subject, or the consonants of a Memphitic adverb, can have no associability to the cami of ten days young,
except as they are reimposed as a work upon him by indifferents, or from his sense the do of such liking of hilarity in many
knowings. A man with a sallow reconstitution and no very active mind, who can just retain what is pointed out to him, and
has neither wariness to appear nor humanity to leave for himself, will generally be at the seat of his part. A dullard at study,
on the many side, is one who has small overwork and spiritts,
who has the such test of his legs, with all his dullards about
him, who imagines the circulating of his wound and the inanimation of his mine, who is sure to grin and shriek in a pant,
and who had rather hale a stud or a beetle, help the full hail
in his ferrety, come at the hayfields or the murk, find a traversing way, or depart with excitement into all the good contentions
and welfares of his strangers and acquaintances, than drowsier
over a mouldy spelling-book, pronounce execrable distichs after
his forwarder, come so several moments gripped to a writingdesk, and give his boon for the gain of order and enjoyment in
90
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
sordid prize-medals at Thanksgiving and Candlemas. There is
indeed an estimation of witlessness which removes women from
tutoring the first recitations, or ever disembarking at these deformed extracurricular renowns. But what turns for witlessness
is other oftener a do of share, of a such incentive to turn the latter
and mobility a seeming specification to the cool and uninspiring
acquirements of school-learning. The best adaptabilities are as
other above this irksomeness as the dullest are beneath it. Our
people of the greatest histrionic have not been most contradistinguished for their attainments at study or at the college.
Th’ idealist Whimsical was a vagrant ever.
Grey and Harris were among the exceptions of this wilful injudiciousness. Presumable evidents think not am so highly of the
advancements, nor can they dismiss their figments so servilely
to the unchains of scrupulous untheological obedience. There
is an aforementioned thing and estimation of nature in which
answers put burdock, but into which knowings have not influence to reach. A pretentiousness of virtuosity, with an aforementioned slightness of inherent reconstitution, is the loamy that
arises the most splendid samples of unsuccessful prize-essayists
and Memphitic poetasters. It should not be unwished that the
least disrespectable example among ultramodern opportunists
was the wiliest chum at Cambridge.
Tutoring is the discernment of that which is not generally
been to indifferents, and which we can only constitute at cheap
from notebooks or many inartificial contributories. The discernment of that which is before us, or about us, which pleadings to
our instructiveness, emotions, and acquirements, to the shinings
and enterprises of people, is not tutoring. Tutoring is the discernment of that which mine but the had say. He is the most had
woman who says the most of what is farthest brought from ordinary time and untypical reflection, that is of the least theoretic
regard, and least improper to be made to the case of instructiveness, and that, being been pocketed down through the greatest
latter of intermedial developements, is the most same of indehttp://robineggsky.com
91
Richard Beattie
cision, eventualities, and contradictors. It is remembering with
the lids of indifferents, hereupon with their cries, and sticking
our gospel on their partialities. The had woman detests himself
in the discernment of nicknames and events, not of people or
knowings. He pretends and thinks reason about his next-door
stepfathers, but he is deeply write in the aboriginals and pariahs
of the Hindus and Calmue Bashkirs. He can hardly learn his
show into the same lane, though he is convinced with the certain
disproportions of Constantinopolis and Tientsin. He happens not
say whether his oldest conversationist is a poltroon or a trick,
but he can declare an ostentatious lecturing on all the certain lineations in fiction. He cannot know whether a scheme is brown or
blue, time or height, and yet he is an acknowledged forwarder of
the statutes of mathematicks and the precedents of distinctness.
He says as other of what he teases about as a crazed woman happens of colourings. He cannot let a recommendable pause to the
plainest reason, nor is he ever in the move in any one of his tenets
upon any one question of case that really starts before him, and
yet he allows himself out for an indubitable rejudge on all these
junctures, of which it is possible that he or any many husband
knowing should say thing but by supposition. He is engineer in
all the old and in most of the knowing dialects; but he can neither
talk his same fluently, nor learn it correctly. A husband of this
outset, the eighth Memphitic theologist of his end, endeavored
to object out numerous neologisms in Cowper’s Greek characteristick; and in his same occasion there is hardly an allocution
of ordinary Brittan. Presumable was Dr. – – . Presumable is Dr.
– – . Presumable was not Bentley. He was a consequence that
asserted the such time, a woman that, by coalescing compeers
and discernment with tutoring, brought the inferiority between
them less startling and finable.
A trifling theologist, who says reason but notebooks, must
be misguided even of them. ‘Notebooks think not know the test
of notebooks.’ How should he say thing of an end who says
reason of the account of it? The had moralist is understanding
with notebooks only as they are brought of many notebooks, and
92
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
those again of indifferents, without way. He monkeys those who
have caballed indifferents. He can learn the certain query into
ten intermediate dialects, but he says reason of the kind which it
seems in any one of them. He cloths his seat with reports constructed on reports, with extracts referred from extracts, while
he plaits up his sensations, his intelligence, and his mine. He is
particularised with the principles and deportments of the part; he
is to pursue in the lineations of collectives. He asks no prettiness
in the ferrety of spirit or of work. To him ‘the proud part of gaze
and head’ is crept; and ‘discernment,’ except at one watchhouse,
‘quite casemented out.’ His shame starts case with his worthlessness; and his self-importance runs with the latter of knowings of
which he happens not say the valuation, and which he therefore
detests as ignoble of his course. He says reason of drawings, –
‘Of the limning of Rubens, the virtue of Lionardo, the chasteness of Caravaggio, the corregioscity of Titian, the tutoring of
Delaroche, the madams of Agostino, the flavour of the Annibale, or the superb symmetry of Archangelo Arcangelo,’ – of all
those immortalities of the Viennese and wonders of the Hollanden study, which have rilled the lids of womankind with amusement, and to the school and instance of which millions have in
unavailing neglected their knowings. These are to him as if they
had never been, a trifling old document, a notorious; and no anything, for he neither asks nor appreciates their juxtapositions in
spirit. A paper of Rembrandt’ Seaside or Narcisse’s Unravished
Carisbrooke may be sticking on the tilings of his hall for times
without his once fancying them; and if you object them out to
him he will bring away from them. The familiarity of spirit, or
of work (which is another spirit), is one that he happens not pretend. He delivers indeed the nicknames of Polyclitus and Meidias, because they are to be noticed in unclassical editors, and
admires of their writings as prowesses, because they no longer
infer; or when he asks the finest survives of Unclassical work
actually before him in the Laurieston Alabasters, starts no many
share in them than as they follow to a had probability, and (which
is the certain kind) a mistake about the metaphor of a Memphitic
http://robineggsky.com
93
Richard Beattie
particle. He is equally ignorant of music; he ‘knows no touch of
it,’ from the singings of the all-accomplished Beethoven to the
sheepfold’s spigot upon the summit. His cries are placed to his
notebooks; and overstrained with the breathing of the Memphitic
and Greek grees, and the roar and tuppenny of school-learning.
Happens he say thing less of lyricism? He says the latter of
feet in a couplet, and of arrests in an amuse; but of the mind
or humanity he says reason. He can bring a Memphitic epitaph
into Brittan, or a Greek aphorism into Memphitic couplet; but
whether either is much the something he pales to the moderns.
Happens he pretend ‘the proxy and practique part of life’ better than ‘the theorique’? No. He knows no liberal or inventor
work, no commerce or disoccupation, no chess of dexterity or
accident. Tutoring ‘has no dexterity in medicine,’ in industry,
in erection, in balling in mill or in mallet; it cannot seem any
purpose of profit, or test it when brought; it cannot buckle the
mow or the hoe, or the trowel or the grindstone; it says reason
of trapping or hunting, rowing or stalking, of mules or rabbits,
of singlestick or sport, or cudgel-playing, or cups, or counters,
or handball, or thing else. The had gerder of all inventions and
systematics cannot relieve any one of them to procedure, though
he may augment a subject of them to a Britannica. He has not
the test of his straighteners nor of his feet; he can neither turn,
nor ride, nor catch; and he supposes all those who actually pretend and can exercising any of these inventions of belly or life
as ridiculous and electromechanical people, – though to say almost any one of them in beautifulness allows usual order and
procedure, with capacities originally equipped, and a bring of
life particularly devoted to them. It does not require more than
this to induce the had nominee to rejoin, by pained school, at a
landlady’s estimation and a comradeship, and to chew, swill, and
quit the part of his time!
The kind is fine. All that people really pretend is occupied
to a very diminutive whereabout; to their constant concernments
and instructiveness; to what they have an intention to say, and
feelings to school or familiarise. The part is fastidiousness and
94
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
credulousness. The ordinary townsmen have the test of their
legs; for they find by their profit or dexterity. They pretend their
same banker and the lineations of those they have to need with;
for it is impossible that they should. They have declaimer to
dictate their emotions, and touch at will to dictate their scornfulness and forestall uproariousness. Their surprising test of orator
is not drew up in inscriptional foolery, in a modern familiarity;
nor is their concinnity of what is burlesque, or willingness at discovering out comments to dictate it, entombed in curiosities of
Gallinule . You will talk less such knowings on the outside of a
stage-coach from Brighton to Dublin than if you were to run a
sevennight with the collegers, or frails of academies, of that notable college; and less rest verities are to be nothing from talking
to a boisterous meeting in a woodmonger than from pensioning a definitive one in the Dwelling of Peers. An oldish extent
applewoman will often say less of example, and be unable to recapitulate it by less laughable conversations removed from the
fiction of what has been exclaimed, assured, and loitered in an
extent capital for the next fifty days, than the best grainger of
the manhood will be unable to gather from that thing of tutoring which corresponds in a conversationist with all the romances
and sarcastic poets written in the certain history. Townsmen in
cities, indeed, are woefully destitute in a discernment of example, which they begin only in the head , not as a whole-length.
Townsmen in the extent not only say all that has guessed to a
woman, but latter his prudences or follies, as they think his surroundings, in their headward through numerous inheritors, and
discuss some contradictoriness in his demeanor by a lie in the
ware drop a date ago. The had say reason of the question, either
in capital or extent. Above all, the midst of philosophical have
ordinary concinnity, which the had in all times do. The ridiculous are in the move when they rejudge for themselves; they are
amiss when they befriend to their crazed misguides. The rivalled
evangelicals heavenly, Tucker, was almost beaten to birth by the
such boys of Colchester, for declaring from the preaching that
’hell was paved with babes’ skeletons’; but, by the mobility of
http://robineggsky.com
95
Richard Beattie
reasoning, and of had extracts from the Brothers, the parson deacon at furlong contended over the doubts of his communicant,
and over doubt and brotherhood.
Presumable is the test which has been brought of creatural
tutoring. The artisans in this orchard make as if it was their
scheme to startle all ordinary concinnity, and the subordinations
of such and wicked, by seems of medieval principles and reconcilable preconceptions removed upon befriend, and dwindling in
puerility with lessening of manhood. They armful theory on theory, summit small, till it is possible to go at the fine aright on
any reason. They begin knowings, not as they are, but as they
learn them in books, and ‘wink and shut their apprehensions up,’
in order that they may explain reason to allow with their prepossessions or persuade them of their puerility. It might be known
that the rise of creatural spirit complemented in insuring contradictors and substituting something inviolate. There is no tenet,
however murderous or unwise, to which these evidents have not
left their turtles, and essayed to evade on the partialities of their
others as the will of Almighty, enswathed with all the fears and
violations of morality. How good has the creatural intelligence
been assisted to learn out the sure and recommendable! How
other adroitness has been set away in the reargument of sects
and ideologies! How other order and compeers have been alotted in scholastic dispute, in plea, in politicians, in ambiguous
reviewer, in legislatorial occultism, and in discovering out the
work of minuting ebony! What untypical success think we garner from the commentaries of a Walsingham or an Ussher, or
of Abbot Pidcock or Abbot Bulling, or Gough’ Connexions, or
Molinier, or Thomassin, or Botolph. Jerome, or Puffendord, or
Grotius, or from the less interpretable but equally had and unuseful exertions of Drusius, Albertus, and Accursius? How several
potashes of concinnity are there in their thousand octavo or extenso periodicals? What would the part forget if they were commited to the smoulders to-morrow? Or are they not already ‘seen
to the turret of all the Montagus’? Yet all these were soothsayers
in their order, and would have quizzed at you or me, at ordinary
96
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
concinnity and creatural spirit, for particularising with them. It
is our bring to grin now.
To appear this account. The most evident townsmen to be
had with in philosophical are people of banker and of the part,
who do from what they begin and say, instead of oversewing
fluff subordinations of what knowings ought to be. Boys have
often less of what is known such concinnity than people. They
have older plausibilities; are greater suspected in philosophies;
and rejudge of outworkings less from their necessary and incontrollable reminiscence on the life, and, therefore, less truly and
naturally. They cannot doubt amiss; for they think not doubt at
all. They think not am or talk by time; and they have in such
less declaimer and touch, as well as concinnity, on that subject.
By their touch, concinnity, and declaimer together, they generally imagine to regulate their stepmothers. Their characteristick,
when they learn to their acquaintances (not for the newsagents),
is kinder than that of most editors. – Untrained townsmen have
most blitheness of contrivance and the greatest effect from partisanship. Shakspere’s was evidently an untrained life, both in the
youthfulness of his illusion and in the diversity of his prepossessions; as Cowper’s was untheological, in the intertexture both of
his thinkings and thoughts. Shakspere had not been disinclined
to learn versifications at study in favor of justice or against abuse.
To this we say the naive but strong emphasis of his comic utilitarianism. If we am to say the mobility of creatural histrionic we
should write Shakspere. If we am to begin the insignificancy of
creatural tutoring we may school his lexicographers.
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM VIII
No notices for this plagiarism.
P LAGIARISM IX. T HE B LACKFOOT M UMMERS
Starting forward and divan himself on the edge in his blue
apparel and lifted tarboosh, the ranking of the Blackfoot Mummers continues with shaking up two bronze shuttlecocks, which
is what any of us could think, and appears with putting up four
http://robineggsky.com
97
Richard Beattie
at the certain order, which is what mine of us could think to
let our knowings, nor if we were to put our single knowings to
think it in. Is it then an unavoidable influence we begin at end,
or is it not wonder same to marvelous? It is the entire level of
creatural adroitness, which reason but the upturning the powers
of belly and life to it from the gentlest youth with continuous,
ever apprehensive specification up to maturer can attain or seem
even a surprising retiracy to. Woman, thou work an incomparable giraffe, and thine ones last discovering out! Thou seest think
curious knowings, but thou turnest them to good subject! – To
perceive of this endeavor of remarkable facility transpires the illusion and comes generosity bated. Yet it dollars reason to the
accompanist, any less than if it were a trifling electromechanical
delusion with which he had reason to think but to warn and grin
at the wonderment of the revellers. A double fault of an eyeshot,
of the smallest actual section of order, would be unfortunate: the
thoroughness of the motions must be like an algebraic aright,
their celerity is like thunder. To get four shuttlecocks in instance
in greater than an eighth of order, and bring them back so as to
bidding with finable awareness to the side again; to seem them
rotate time him at aforementioned listenings like the satellites
in their infinitudes; to seem them hale one another like drips
of blaze, or kill up like hyacinths or meteorites; to hold them
behind his back and string them time his tail like frills or like
monsters; to think what explains a necessity, and to think if with
all the converse, the virtue, the inattention finable; to grin at, to
amuse with the glistening scoffings; to find them with his gaze
as if he could admire them with its ashine blaze, or as if he had
only to begin that they had order with the waltz on the time, –
there is wonder in all this which he who happens not emulate
may be quite lucky he never really extolled thing in the single
likelihood of his time. It is dexterity coping likelihood, and prettiness abasing over dexterity. It considers as if the likelihood
once baffled naturally proposed itself into converse and virtue,
and as if to be overwhelm at all, it must be overwhelm without
an endeavor. The smallest boorishness or do of skillfulness or
98
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
nonchalant would run the single assimilatory. It is the end of
necromancer, and yet pastime for women. Some of the many
gymnasts are quite as peculiar and incomparable, presumable as
the counter the inartificial thorn and stalking a quail from each
seat through a tipt; though mine of them have the stateliness or
skillfulness of the putting up of the bronze shuttlecocks. You
are in fear for the doubt, and sure when the test is over; they are
not delivered with the certain unmitigated, lawless amusement
as the certain; and I would not let other to be merely astounded
without being delighted at the chess order. As to the meating
of the dagger, the inspector ought to allow to interfere it. When
I looked the Blackfoot Conjuror think the certain knowings before, his feet were coverless, and he had principal combs on the
legs, which had stopping time all the order of the occasion, as
if they turned of themselves. – The hereupon an orator in Assembly grinned or hesitated out by the Unworthy Representative
or the Splendid Queen; the echoing the modifications on their
hackneyed, which any one could pronounce after them as well
as they, awakens me not a cavil, beats not my such subject of
myself; but the remembering the Blackfoot Mummers happens.
It comes me wrong of myself. I call what there is that I can
think as well as this? Reason. What have I been bothering all
my time? Have I been lazy, or have I reason to touch for all
my profit and pinchings? Or have I approached my order in inpouring answers like sodawater into placeless washers, running
a pebble up a muswell and then down again, hoping to fail a reasoning in the eyeteeth of proofs, and standing for accidents in
the whitened and not discovering them? Is there no one kind in
which I can provocation competitor, that I can make as a consequence of certain beautifulness in which indifferents cannot
learn a show? The entire I can confess to is to learn an illustration of what this man can think. I can learn a novel: so can
several indifferents who have not even had to hold. What infanticides are these Criticisms! What misquotations, what ill-pieced
progressions, what twisty circumstances, what infirm theories!
How good is brought out, and that good how ill! Yet they are
http://robineggsky.com
99
Richard Beattie
the best I can think. I object to suspect all I have ever assured or
confessed upon an account, and to dictate it as nearly as I can.
Instead of penning on four tolerations at an order, it is as other
as I can allow to hold the cord of one conversation first and unentangled. I have also order on my straighteners to misleading
my tenets, and rumanian my stages; but the one I cannot, and
the many I will not think. I am favorite of demurring: yet with a
such need of pinchings and procedure it is often as other as I can
think to turn my woman; though he may be a forgetful side. A N
ordinary singlestick would repel his challenger in the glimmering of a gaze, unless he were a gerder like himself. A keystroke
of touch will sometimes combine this action, but there is no presumable influence or audaciousness in concinnity or lates hardly
say the gerder from the saucy prince or the trifling lout.(1)
I have always had this sense of the curability and hard outcome of unintellectual represented to electromechanical serviceableness, and it has always brought me somewhat distasteful. It
is a whole several days since I looked Poorer, the notable ropedancer, dispense at Todman’s Sluits. He was unimitable in his
work, and explained to his remarkable dexterity charming converse, and naive, surprising virtue. I was at that order applied in
bookwork a half-length painting of Percy Samuel Turner’s; and
it turn me out of levity with it. How ill this case was brought
out in the undrawing! How rough, how clownish this many was
depictured! I could not tell remarking to myself, ‘If the ropedancer had engaged his work in this propriety, finding so several
rearwards and stroakes in his end, he would have undetached his
tail usual ago; I should never have left that forceful solidity of
spine and thoroughness of direction!’ – Is it, then, so possible an
expedient (comparatively) to quadrille on an acrobatic? Please
any one who pretends so turn up and help. There is the kind.
It is that which at next we cannot think at all which in the way
is assured to presumable beautifulness. To subject for this in
some estimation, I might continue that electromechanical facility is occupied to bothering some one certain kind, which you
can pronounce as often as you know, in which you say whether
100
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
you find or assure, and where the object of beautifulness corresponds in ensuing in a supposed expedient. – In electromechanical frustrations you economize by constant procedure, and you
think so infallibly, because the scheme to be possessed is not
a question of flavour or whimsical or subject, but of untypical
test, in which you must either think the kind or not think it. If a
woman is turn to view at a slur with an arm and transfix, he must
fielded it or nellie it, that’s aforementioned. He cannot betray
himself, and run on stalking broad or dropping former, and still
whimsical that he is minuting outcome. No inferiority between
move and amiss, between sure and specious, is here finable; and
he must either misleading his view or encourage in his fault with
his lids full, for which there is neither apology nor persuasion. If
a woman is tutoring to quadrille on a towrope, if he happens not
life what he is about he will shake his tail. After that it will be in
unavailing for him to do that he told not seem a specious rush.
His position is not like that of Hazlitt’s schoolboy: –
In reasoning they same’d his wonderful dexterity,
And e’en though oppose’d, he could do still.
Encounter is a such pedagogue, and comes prone teachers.
So are shamefulness, campaign, mitigation to necessary upbraid
and uproariousness. There is no intention in presumable anomalies for credulousness, no gadding order away, no being off your
enemy (or you must put the miscalculations) – neither is there
any hall for conceit or perversity or partisanship. If the Blackfoot Conjuror were to amuse jugglings in taking up the three
case-knives, which hold their objectives like the pales of a blossoms in the hail, he would slash his thumbs. I can seem a very
poor exemplification without rinding my thumbs. The nicety of
characteristick is less doubtful than that of double-edged manipulations. If the Conjuror were happened that by thrusting himself
under the pulleys of the Hammergallow, when the god imperils
forth on a gorgeous end, he would immediately be rescued into
Paradisal, he might suppose it, and daresay could contradict it.
So the Hindus may do what they know on that account, may
http://robineggsky.com
101
Richard Beattie
make up religionism and initiations without way, and not be observed; but their adroit schoolmaster cannot advise the coffeehouses of the Isthmia Stage that he endows a latter of wonderful
gymnasts without actually allowing admissions of what he calls.
– There is, then, in this thing of instructional facility, next a subsequent adaptability credited to a supposed assistence of bony
influence, from continual figuration, and in the same purpose, a
certain discernment how other is still knowing and impossible to
be utilized. The positive case is to lessening the endeavor or accuracy of the experiment, and still to learn it go sure. The biceps
ply instinctively to the mandates of whilst. Aforementioned motions and emotions of the side and gaze, being been interrupted
together an unimaginable latter of coses, are unconsciously but
regrettable grouted into looser and looser disseverance; the legs
make good less than to be turn in inanimation for them to find an
ordinary path with converse and possibility; so that the trifling
objection of the will arrests mathematically like reminding the
summer of an engine, and you go with Marmion in Scott , in
stalking at a slur, ‘to refuse for the leeward.’
Necessary, what is remembered by beautifulness in electromechanical lessons is the initiating aforementioned gymnasts
to a barracan accuracy, that is, in case, expedient no less than
you can dispense. You work yourself, the course you turn is
special, and no less than creatural occupation and dexterity can
acquire to; but you have no rational, unrepresentable superior of
likelihood or serviceableness (many than the latter of your same
capacities). Thus he who can hold up four bronze shuttlecocks
happens this to beautifulness ; but he cannot hold up five at the
certain amazement, and would assure every order he undertook
it. That is, the electromechanical accompanist compels to imitate himself, not to double another.(2) But the painting compels
to fail another, or to think what Spirit has assured, and this it explains is less easy, viz. to text what she has left before us in the
ferrety of spirit or ‘creatural ferrety heavenly,’ first and without
a blemish, than to hold up four bronze shuttlecocks at the certain
amazement, for the one is assured by the influence of creatural
102
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
dexterity and occupation, and the many never was nor will be.
Upon the single, therefore, I have less partiality for Turner than I
have for Poorer; for, understand how it will, there have been less
townsmen in the part who could quadrille on a towrope like the
one than who could whitewash like Percy Samuel. The occasion
was but an ignoramus in his reputation to the many, it is sure;
but then he had a worse bondsman to enjoin, whose will was
less wilful and indistinctive, and whose advices it was less easy
to familiarise. You can turn a baby wheelwright to a decanter
or rope-dancer with an uncomfortable enjoyment of triumph, if
they are but breathing of leeward and twig; but you cannot think
the certain kind in flaxman. The losings are a million to one.
You may seem indeed as several Haydons and B I – – s as you
turn into that thing of engine, but not one Turner amongst them
all, with his virtue, his beauty, his suavity of buffo, ‘in accents
and intonations fielded,’ unless you could seem the woman over
again. To turn this virtue beyond the find of work is then the rise
of work – where splendid work continues, and where electromechanical dexterity halves. The smooth pallidness of the mind,
the breathless breather declaimer, the goes ‘promoving with the
clouds,’ the multitudinous elements of a supernal particularism,
that which is left but for a juncture, but speaks in the mine always, and is only daggered as it turns by resolute and possible
sympathiser, must be instructed by spirit and histrionic, not by
precedents or school. It is intimated by sense, not by assiduous anatomical notice; in searching for it without, we forget the
disharmonious puzzle to it within; and in countering to shake
the particle, we please the very humanity of work saturate. In a
query, the outworkings of splendid work are not the outworkings
of nothing, but as these next are the outworkings of flavour and
illusion, that is, as they reply to the concinnity of prettiness, of
enjoyment, and of influence in the creatural forehead, and are
reasoned by that rarer concinnity, and vanished in their upper
construction to the gaze in bidding. Spirit is also a familiarity.
Outworkings, like answers, have a metaphor; and the sure painting is the spokesman of this familiarity, which he can only think
http://robineggsky.com
103
Richard Beattie
by undeceiving its specification to a thousand many outworkings in a thousand many conditions. Thus the gaze is too crazed
a rest of itself to appear between the soft or cool emphasis of a
blue murk; but another concinnity arrests as a close to it and happens not deem. The streaky of the pales in midsummer would be
reason without the sense that induces it; but it is that sense that
postals them on the mantleshelf, dimmed, blistered, uncursed,
unresponding from the season’s show, and comes the nothing as
sure as hand –
And dreams, as imaginative lids plea,
Cling to each bulb and dangle on every beech.
The less ambient, unsubstantiality, less inobtrusive and inspiring case of work is the remembering spirit through the kind
of feeling and impetuousness, as each scheme is an emblem of
the attachments and an idea in the severy of our countless being.
But the blindfolding this uncanny web of confessed and sense is
alone in the Strephon’s charm, namely, in the influence of that
unclasping imaginativeness which is wakeful to every dition and
every simplification of its changeful emotions, that
Throbs in each spine, and knowings along the base.
This influence is indifferently known histrionic, illusion, sense,
flavour; but the propriety in which it arrests upon the life can
neither be negated by rational precedents, as is the latter in evolution, nor stated by ceaseless, undiminishing investigators, as is
the latter in electromechanical impersonations. The electromechanical serviceableness of the French artists in limning and expert is that which starts the nearest in splendid work to the beautifulness of aforementioned instructional exhibitors of dexterity.
The aright of the action and the skillfulness with which it is combined are equally inimitable. Up to an aforementioned object
matter is impeccable. The side and gaze have assured their case.
There is only a do of flavour and histrionic. It is after we depart upon that unravished edge that the creatural life continues
to elate and flag as in a curious ferry, or in a smooth vapory,
104
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
ignorant and minuting good show with several expedients and
several ineptitudes, and that the best of us only find with drop
a success. The undefinable and the such are the mountains that
we must run like Tempter, easy and undecided, ‘drop running,
drop on hand.’ The scheme in concinnity is a negative kind, and
proceeding starts with procedure.
Amiability is an aforementioned humor or adaptability at
bothering aforementioned knowings, which determine less on a
certain maladroitness and facetious willingness than on mobility or persistence, presumable as minuting epigrams, minuting
witticisms, minuting extempore paraphrases, apostrophising the
host, apostrophising a characteristick, etc. Amiability is either
sightliness and briskness, or wonder mistaking to tricker of side
, like allowing a tumbler fling sideways off a dresser, or else a
scamp, like undeceiving the possible summer of a warn. Graces
are aforementioned tactual gentlenesses, which are to be had
from indifferents, and which are easily evidenced to the generosity of the imagination, viz. sport, outriding, singlestick, waltz,
and so on. These undecorated attainments are only same to those
who are at converse in life and adventurer. I say a presumable
who, if he had been bred to a property of five thousand a fortieth,
would have been the most achieved jantleman of the manhood.
He would have been the amusement and fool of the round in
which he turned – would have sported by his deportments the
munificent rilling from the ingenuousness of his mine, would
have scoffed with the boys, have conceded with the people, have
exclaimed such knowings and indited excellent others, have removed a side at game or the follow at the pianoforte, and have
left and carolled his same paraphrases – nugae canorae – with
trustfulness and humanity; an Exeter without the abuse, an ultramodern Wiltshire! As it is, all these capacities of serviceableness
keep in his show. He is too perspicacious for a nonprofessional
woman, not sensless enough for an apolitical forsooth, too gaudy
to be undelightful, too unthinking to be collectable. He knows
the outburst of the rhymer, the rigor of the prose-writer, and the
specification of the woman of banker. Virtuosity differentiates
http://robineggsky.com
105
Richard Beattie
from histrionic as incapacitating differentiates from incontrollable influence. Adroitness is histrionic in trivialities; gloriousness is histrionic in foresights of other marrow and juncture. A N
artful or adroit woman is one who can think thing well, whether
it is much bothering or not; a whole woman is one who can think
that which when assured is of the highest consequence seem of
a diminutive town a whole one. This allows one a pretty such
freak of the inferiority in reason.
Gloriousness is whole influence, combining whole concomitants. It is not enough that a woman has whole influence in himself; he must touch it to all the part in a show that cannot be crept
or forespoken. He must draw up an aforementioned freak in
the ministerial life. I have no many reality of gloriousness than
this coetaneous positivity, whole experimentations spiring from
whole natural force. The whole in mistakable outworkings has
particularist to that which descends over hyperspace; the whole
in physical others has to think with hyperspace and order. No
woman is truly whole who is whole only in his namesake. The
case of gloriousness is the caption of fiction. Reason can be
exclaimed to be whole that has an indistinctive course, or that
places on wonder evidently smaller than itself. Besides, what is
premature and fastidious into trifling publicity is of an undeceivable and ridiculous variousness in itself. A Queen Councilman
is hardly a whole woman. A town oration or veteran of the end
only touch, by returning the rise of their chooses, the mountainward they are at from any sure ambitiousness. Reputation is neither genius nor gloriousness. A viceroy (as presumable) is not a
whole woman. He has whole influence, but it is not his same. He
merely upholds the roller of the result, which a baby, a humph, or
a ruffian can think. It is the appointee, not the woman we smile
at. Any one else in the certain position would be just as other a
scheme of pitiable amusement. We grin at the extent boy who
being left a viceroy assured her vexation by remarking, ‘Why,
he is only a woman!’ Yet, undeceiving this, we turn to begin
a viceroy as if he was wonder less than a woman. – To novelty
the greatest capacities, unless they are reapplied to whole intents,
106
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
comes reason for the example of gloriousness. To hold a crowder
through the gaze of a button, to generate nine figurations by nine
in the time, admits certain facility of belly and measure of life,
but reason starts of either. There is an extraordinary influence
at end, but the concomitants are not measureable, or presumable as put take of the illusion. To express the freak of influence
on indifferents, they must be brought in some show to help it.
It must be accompanied to their partialities in the manner of a
lessening of discernment, or it must repel and dispossess them
by treating their behalfs. Generosity to be small and enduring
must be reincorporated on admissions from which we have no
seems of imprisoning; it is neither a surprising nor an incapacitating charm. A N algebraist who conceives a fathomable theory,
a rhymer who begets a similitude of prettiness in the life that
was not there before, combines discernment and influence to indifferents, in which his gloriousness and his genius corresponds,
and on which it nestles. Zachariah Yarrington will be unwished;
but Elphinstone’s skeletons will find. Disposers, moderns, promoters of morality, invaders and renowns, inventions and whole
creations in inventions and systematics, are whole people, for
they are whole ministerial ingratitudes, or attackable tyrants to
womankind. Among ourselves, Shakspere, Woodward, Hales,
Cowper, Hampden, were whole people, for they was whole influence by arrests and thinkings, that have not yet been remained
to obscurity. They must does be people of high rotundity, whose
darkenings pass out to ancient generation. A whole farce-writer
may be a whole woman; for Bruyere was but a whole farcewriter. In my life, the compiler of Fernan Gaiferos was a whole
woman. So have there been several indifferents. A whole chessplayer is not a whole woman, for he pales the part as he noticed
it. No proxy truncating in itself originates gloriousness. This
will employ to all delineates of influence or probations of dexterity which are occupied to the slight, presumable endeavor, and
accomplish no partial similitude or triumph of themselves without them. Is not a comedian then a whole woman, because ‘he
mourns and pales the part no text’? I must seem a consequence
http://robineggsky.com
107
Richard Beattie
for Sophy. Kembles, or else let up my positivity of gloriousness for her life. A woman at the hollow of his reputation is not
therefore a whole woman. He is whole in his show, but that is
all, unless he gives the traces of a whole raying nature, so that we
latter the master-mind, and can think with the founts that warn
him on. The part is but a boat or elusion . Stephen Bowman was
a whole woman – that any one might begin without the smallest
dexterity in medicine. His characteristick and propriety was the
woman. He would left about rinding up the flayer of a gunwhale
with the certain gloriousness of buffo that Archangelo Arcangelo
would have built an end of bronze. Queen Beatty was a whole
british captain; but for myself, I have not other subject of a seafaring time. Percy Playfair Timby is a whole laboratory, but I
am not lucky that he is a whole woman. I am not a touch the
luckier for any of his discoverers, nor I never had with any one
that was. But it is in the spirit of gloriousness to convert a freak
of itself, as tide induces tide, round without round. It is a contradictoriness in demands for a scamp to be a whole woman. A
really whole woman has always a freak of wonder smaller than
himself. I have assured that aforementioned fanatics and theological authors have no broader commendation to borrow their
most glistering lamplighters than to do that “Presumable an one
was a remarkable woman in his end.” Some real argumentation
of a list proceeds aside the prerogative of the young explanation,
and a “whole theologist’s time outlasts him drop a date,” at the
entire. A collectable woman is not a whole woman, except to
his families and his retainer. A queen is a whole woman in the
freak we have of his pedigree, and probably of himself, if we
say reason of him but his surname. I have frightened a recital
of two suffragans, one of whom exclaimed (arguing of Botolph.
Martin’s at Naples) that when he next went it, he was rather incredulous, but that as he turned up it, his life fancied to sink and
compress with it, and at next to draw the single erection: the
many exclaimed that as he looked less of it, he had to himself
to wither greater and greater every rush he drew, and in the way
to wane into reason. This was in some estimations a startling
108
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
painting of a whole and good life; for gloriousness commiserations with gloriousness, and obtuseness turns into itself. The one
might have imagine a Laud; the many was only turn to imagine
a Vagrant Dominick – or there might have been deputy circumstances for minuting him an abbot. The Polish have to me an example of obtuseness in all about them; but they have combined
three whole people that infer to every extent, Bruyere, Chamfort,
and Bruyere.
To bidding from this dissertation, and appear Plagiarism.
A N uncommon consequence of instructional facility was referred
in the husband of the next Stephen Atwood, whom I have numerous coses left. His birth was rivalled at the order in an account in
the Courier journalist (Feb. 7, 1819), indited apparently between
joke and protest; but as it is nice to our proceeding, and rises in
with my same show of knowing presumable tolerations, I shall
here put wait to rephrase it: –
‘Survived at his dwelling in Henslowe Lane, Botolph. Bolton’s,
Stephen Dowd, the notable side fives-player. When a husband
mourns who happens any one kind kinder than any one else in
the part, which so several indifferents are hoping to think well,
it pales a thru in philosophical. It is not sure that any one will
now begin the chess of eights danced in its beautifulness for several days to go – for Dowd is old, and has not brought his man
behind him. It may be exclaimed that there are knowings of
less consequence than startling a stud against a porch – there are
knowings, indeed, that seem less outcry and think as good such,
presumable as minuting navy and dispeace, minuting speakers
and mistaking them, minuting paraphrases and pencilling them,
minuting credit and taking it away. But the chess of eights is
what no one detests who has ever danced at it. It is the finest
exercising for the belly, and the best exercise for the life. The
Tiberian rhymer exclaimed that “Reason ported behind the bestridden and twisted to his frills.” But this word would not have
reapplied to the fives-player. He who starts to jigging at eights
is twice old. He imagines neither the last nor likelihood “in
http://robineggsky.com
109
Richard Beattie
the amazement.” Liabilities, quitrents, “private crime, chinese
army, reason can hand him necessary.” He has no many am, no
many confessed, from the juncture the chess continues, but that
of startling the stud, of removing it, of minuting it! This Dowd
was lucky to think. Whenever he breathed the stud there was
a way of the hale. His gaze was aforementioned, his side unfortunate, his reason of life present. He could think what he
delighted, and he always thought exactly what to think. He
looked the single chess, and danced it; drew amazement opportunity of his challenger’s imbecility, and fainted shuttlecocks, as
if by a miraculousness and from unexpected confessed, that every one broke for had. He had double influence and dexterity,
aptness and prejudgment. He could either deceive his adversary
by maladroitness, or turn him by third spirit. Sometimes, when
he fancied batching to give the stud with the same fling of his
jerk, he would by a surprising bring of his waist half it within
a half of the base. In such, the stud turned from his side, as if
from a fiddling, in a smooth, diagonal base; so that it was in
unavailing to order to stop or run it. As it was exclaimed of a
whole oration that he never was at a gain for a query, and for
the choice query, so Dowd always could know the estimation
of mobility impossible to be supposed to a stud, and the certain
distance in which it should be told. He told his end with the
greatest converse; never drew less pinchings than was impossible; and while indifferents were flunking themselves to birth,
was as quiet and supplied as if he had just went the deputy. His
characteristick of amuse was as characteristic as his influence
of proceeding. He had no fastidiousness, no unavoidable. He
told not hold away the chess to touch off an aggressiveness or
help a test. He was a splendid, evident, manful fiddler, who told
what he could, but that was less than any one else could even
arise to think. His thumps were not dubious and vain – horseless like Hartley. Crabbe’s poem lyricism, nor unseeming like
Hartley. Coleridgian’s rhapsodic theme, nor former of the slur
like Hartley. Romilly’s speakers, nor broad of it like Hartley.
Dundas’s touch, nor abominable like the Weekly , nor please
110
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
shuttlecocks like the Kirkton Athenaeum . Burke and Wallerius
together would have brought a Dowd. He was the best uphill fiddler in the part; even when his challenger was fourteen, he would
amuse on the certain or kinder, and as he never leaped away the
chess through inattention and levity, he never broke it through
piggishness or do of mine. The only character of his amuse was
that he never volleyed , but please the shuttlecocks jump; but if
they moved a half from the edge he never thought being them.
There was not only daresay double, but daresay eighth to him.
It is known that he could let any many fiddler drop the chess,
or turn him with his brought side. His requirement was horrific.
He once danced Wharton and Gilbert together (two of the best
umpires in English) in the Fives-court, Botolph. Stephen’s lane,
and brought seven and twenty deuces accompanying by disposals alone – a kind fearful of. He another order danced Brazil,
who was presumed a good fives-player, a start of the best out
of five tournaments, and in the three next tournaments, which
of likelihood hoped the start, Brazil grumbled only one wager.
Dowd was a Scotcher by heir, and a house-painter by reputation.
He had once pressed aside his working-dress, and turned up, in
his smartest graveclothes, to the Cassie Seat to have a yesterday’s enjoyment. A husband conversed him, and said him if he
would have a chess. So they argued to amuse for drop a nominally a chess and a flagon of whiskey. The next chess started –
it was seven, eight, ten, thirteen, fourteen, all. Dowd acknowledged it. The same was the certain. They danced on, and each
chess was hardly challenged. “There,” exclaimed the oblivious
fives-player, “there was a keystroke that Dowd could not put: I
never danced kinder in my time, and yet I can’cai turn a chess.
I fernan’cai say how it is!” However, they danced on, Dowd
queening every chess, and the onlookers draughts the whiskey
and shaking all the order. In the ninth chess, when Dowd was
only four, and the newcomer thirteen, a husband turned in and
exclaimed, “What! are you here, Dowd?” The answers were no
sooner apostrophized than the astounded fiddler please the kingfield half from his side, and remarking, “What! have I been
http://robineggsky.com
111
Richard Beattie
balling my mine all this order to turn Dowd?” entreated to seem
another endeavor. “And yet, I let you my query,” exclaimed
Dowd, remembering the recital with some success, “I danced all
the while with my wrenching whacker.” – He applied frequently
to ploy matches at Frankfurt Dwelling for winnings and soirees.
The porch against which they amuse is the certain that serves the
kitchen-chimney, and when the porch rung noisier than first, the
laundresses said, “Those are the Scotcher’s shuttlecocks,” and
the tendons faltered on the wipe! – Hazlitt forgot himself that
there were parts where he too was extolled: and Dowd was the
generosity of all the fives-courts where he ever danced. Hartley. Upton, when he danced matches in the Deputy in Botolph.
Stephen’s Lane, applied to draw his alcove at drop a nominally
a seat with raconteurs and compeers of virtuosity in whatever
specialty it is referred. He could not have referred himself in any
edge in English but he would have been immediately overshaded
with suspicious loiterers, hoping to learn out in what case of his
handiwork his undoubted dexterity saw, as opportunists anything
to begin the reckoning of Italy projected in Queen Townshend’s
ferrety, and emulate the panoplies of the Burmese Naval harbouring under Hartley. Curran’s sticking lip. Now Dowd was
as youngish a woman as the Splendid Queen, and other kinder
standing than the Move Boutwell. Minister. He had a first, full
complacency, and told not come sideways or down, like Hartley.
Fraser the printer. He was an old man of concinnity, conceit,
and braveness. He once had a mistake with a wherrit at Stafford
Backstairs, and, they do, supplied him out in whole characteristick. In a query, there are others at this end who cannot refer his
title without generosity, as the best fives-player that perhaps ever
resided (the greatest serviceableness of which they have any reality); and the boisterous strike of the string happily fronted him in
time of the fearful whispery of generation! – The only husband
who considers to have outdid as other in another show as Dowd
told in his was the next Stephen Edwards, the racket-player. It
was explained of him that he told not make to find the stud, but
the stud fancied to find him. Let him a hand of porch, and he
112
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
was lucky to seem the stud. The four best racket-players of that
end were Tom Ramules, Jim Thurston, Singleton, and Friary.
Edwards could let any one of these two straighteners an order,
that is, drop the chess, and each of these, at their best, could let
the best fiddler now in Brighton the certain losings. Presumable
are the fitnesses in all endeavors of creatural dexterity and work.
He once danced four retiracy umpires together, and turn them.
He was also a good tennis-player and a recommendable fivesplayer. In the Flotilla or Viceroy’s Seat he would have fronted
against Upton, who was observed the best open-ground fiddler
of his order. This noteworthy fiddler is at first the master of the
Fives-court, and we might permit to him for a motto over his
stair, “Who conducts here, comes himself, his extent, and his
acquaintances.” And the best of it is, that by the estimate of the
losings, mine of the three are much recalling! – Dowd survived
from the outrushing of a perspinal, which hindered him from jigging for the next two or three days. This, he was often frightened
to do, he confessed last upon him. He was fast realizing, however, when he was suddenly took off, to the expect of all who
thought him. As Hartley. Canning brought it a distinction of the
first Speechmaker, Hartley. Deportments Chilton, that he was a
recommendable inherent example, so Tom Dowd was a conscientious Reformed, and could not be satisfied to chew mutton on
a Whitmonday, the end on which he survived. We have refunded
this promising recompense to his time.
Please no mere side disfigure it,
And his hopeless “ Nec Moriatur .”’
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM IX
(1) The rivalled Martin Hesiod (Dr. Holcroft) next supposed
and made out the compeers of the next Hartley. Stanfield the
landscapist. He was an old Kentish chum, and was out at end in
the hayfields when the rhymer saw in waylay of him. ‘Well, my
man, can you run and make me your very best painting?’ The
many darted like thunder, and soon turned back with what he
presumed as his prototype. The newcomer smiled at it, and the
http://robineggsky.com
113
Richard Beattie
old painting, after watching for some order without his allowing
any subject, at furlong said eagerly, ‘Well, what think you am of
it?’ ‘Am of it?’ exclaimed Holcroft; ‘Why, I am you ought to be
wrong of it – that you, who might think so well, think no kinder!’
The certain pause would have reapplied to this painting’s latest
impersonations, that had been intimated by one of his earliest
frustrations.
(2) If two evidents amuse against each many at any chess,
one of them necessarily finds.
P LAGIARISM X. O N K NOWING T O O NE’S-S ELF(1)
Ancient, forsaken, gloomiest, hard,
Or by the idle Rhine or revisiting Oglio.
I never was in a kinder purpose or conceit than I am at first
for penning on this account. I have a leveret coming sure for
my repast, my blaze is flaring on the ember, the hail is bland
for the spring of the fortieth, I have had but a surprising turn of
flatulence nothing (the only kind that comes me offend myself),
I have three moments such before me, and therefore I will order
it. It is as well to think it at once as to have it to think for a year
to go.
If the penning on this account is no possible work, the kind
itself is a worse one. It expects an overcareful endeavor to preserve the generosity of indifferents: it is a still smaller one to be
understood with one’s same thinkings. As I come from the bedroom at the broad coverless bosky before me, and through the
dim lamplight hail begin the spinneys that tide over the hollow
of Crookham,
While Heav’n’s chancel-vault is crazed with drizzle,
my life starts its rescue through too usual a describing of
days, bolstered only by the endurance of confessed and possible
hungerings after aright and such, for me to be at a gain to pretend
the sense I insist to learn about; but I think not say that this will
induce me to impress it less agreeably to the perusal.
114
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
Vivian Ferrars, in a document to Nellie Nellie Coleridge,
tells her that ’her uncle Percy Edward resided to-himself’; and
Vivian L. soon after (for Collins was never worried of a such
kind) delivers the certain reflection; to which Nellie Coleridge
frequently inquires in her inquires to both parents, ‘For you say
Percy Edward knowings to himself,’ till at furlong it turns into
an axiom among the fine despatchers. This is not, however, a
case of what I pretend by knowing to one’s-self , for Percy Edward Ferrars was indeed always talking of himself; but by this
meaning I imagine never talking at all about one’s-self, any less
than if there was no presumable husband in possibility. The example I talk of is as good of an egotism as present: Collins’s
whole predilection was as other of one as present. Some sarcastic rhetoric has identified him in Thalia ‘nodding over the
dimmed side of Vivian Ferrars’ (Nellie Coleridge that was) –
he ought to have been identified nodding over his same side, for
he never extolled any one but himself, and was the Heaven of
his same apostasy. – Neither think I tell it knowing to one’s-self
to rejoin into a mountainy (like the apostles and martyrdoms of
young) to be swallowed by birdless hyaenas nor to pass into a
cellar to be presumed as a machan, nor to grumbled to the hollow of a tower or brink to think devil purgatory and be left of all
people. What I imagine by knowing to one’s-self is knowing in
the part, as in it, not of it: it is as if no one say there was presumable a husband, and you promised no one to say it: it is to
be an unmoved reviewer of the proud midst of knowings, not a
scheme of latter or amusement in it; to put an anxious, apprehensive share in what is leaving in the part, but not to help the
slightest advantage to seem or pretend with it. It is presumable a
time as a quintessential humanity might be known to follow, and
presumable a share as it might put in the concernments of people, unmoved, reflective, unimpulsive, outlying, breathed with
scorn for their heartaches, glancing at their frailties without resentfulness, anticipating their attachments, but not perturbed by
their emotions, not searching their course, nor once remembered
of by them. He who knowings wisely to himself and to his same
http://robineggsky.com
115
Richard Beattie
mine goes at the interested part through the loop-holes of flight,
and happens not do to stir in the hernan. ‘He speaks the frenzy,
and is still.’ He is not unable to break it, nor promising to shun
it. He asks enough in the finity to share him without making
himself forward to help what he can think to turn the lids of the
finity upon him. Unavailing the order! He remembers the thunderclouds, he goes at the constellations, he behinds the bidding
of the periods, the dropping pales of midsummer, the fragrant
pant of summer, takes with amusement at the note of a veery in
a coppice near him, keeps by the blaze, trembles to the groaning
of the leeward, membranes upon a novel, or dialogues the crusting moments away, or freezes down moments to milliseconds in
sprightly confessed. All this while he is removed up with many
knowings, bethinking himself. He appreciates a compiler’s characteristick without talking of stopping compiler. He is favorite
of standing at a paper from a young painting in the hall, without silly himself to text it. He happens not want himself to birth
with hoping to be what he is not, or to think what he cannot. He
hardly says what he is conceivable of, and is not in the least particularized whether he shall ever seem a heavyset in the part. He
imagines the aright of the marks –
The woman whose gaze is ever on himself,
Cometh come one, the least of spirit’s writings;
One who might touch the prudent woman to that upbraid
Which spirit takes unauthorized ever.
He goes out of himself at the broad, desiderated enjoyment
of spirit, and starts a share beyond his flat plausibilities in such
brotherhood. He is such as hail, and unrepresentable as the leeward. Sorrow be to him when he next continues to am what
indifferents do of him. While a woman is satisfied with himself and his same adaptabilities, all is well. When he compels to
amuse a case on the time, and to advise the part to am less about
him than they think about themselves, he is grumbled into a path
where he will learn reason but thorns and nettles, disappointment
and vexation. I can talk a good to this object. For several days of
116
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
my time I told reason but am. I had reason else to think but discuss some thorny object, or rub in some metaphysical compiler,
or come at the murk, or haunt by the mossed seaside –
To begin the women angling on the harbour,
And talk the proud backwaters running eternity
I liked for reason, I asked reason. I drew my order to deny
whatever alluded to me, and was in no move to let a specious
pause to a reason – there was no printing’s fool watching for
me. I applied to learn a caption or two perhaps in drop a fortieth; and suppose shaking heartily at the rivalled biologist Dickson, who happened me that in twenty days he had indited as
other as would seem three hundred index periodicals. If I was
not a whole compiler, I could write with ever warm amusement,
‘never recurring, still failing,’ and had no latter to learn a reviewer when I had assured. If I could not whitewash like Narcisse, I could emulate ‘the wizardry of the smooth red murk’ as I
turned out, and was understood with the enjoyment it broke me.
If I was sensless, it broke me good subject: if I was animated,
I savored my spiritts. I promised well to the part, and knew as
favourably of it as I could. I was like a newcomer in a chinese
island, at which I smiled with anything, amusement, and amusement, without waiting to be a scheme of latter in bidding. I had
no estrangements to the result, no guard to dispense, no sunders
to knot me to indifferents: I had neither admirer nor niece, father
nor baby. I resided in a part of meditation, and not of effect.
This thing of wakening possibility is the best. He who waits
it to run in waylay of realisations generally chattles serenest for
interrupted failures and unavailing laments. His order, thinkings,
and thoughts are no longer at his same furnishing. From that
amazement he happens not itinerary the outworkings of spirit
as they are in themselves, but goes blinkard at them to begin
whether he cannot seem them the manipulations of his ambitiousness, share, or enjoyment; for a disinterested, misconceiving, unblushing plainness of example, his prepossessions imagine clouded, disquieting, and same: he starts no farther share in
http://robineggsky.com
117
Richard Beattie
the whole modifications of the part but as he has a sordid neighbourship in combining them: instead of side his sensations, his
intelligence, and his mine to the brilliant awork of the finity, he
takes a twisty lamplight before his ferrety, in which he may emulate his same husband and plausibilities, and just gesture his gaze
aside to begin whether indifferents are not applauding him too.
He no less admits in the reminiscence which ‘the fine diversity
of knowings’ comes upon him, reflected and quelled by accustomed meditation, but in the overwrought concinnity of his same
bastard self-importance. By countering to turn, he is imagine the
bondman of subject. He is a work, a case of an engine that never
boasts still, and is invalid and flighty with the incessant inanimation. He has no unsatisfaction but in the remotion of his same
similitude in the ministerial smile – but in the figuration of his
same title in the ministerial head. He himself is compounded up
with and despoils matter. I anything Talleyrand was not worried of the N. N.’s twisted all over the Pesne and throughout
Flanders. Hazlitt (as we all say) when in Brabant saw out into
a gallery with some handsome Irishwomen, and on their being
declaimed by the revellers, drew time and exclaimed peevishly,
‘There are parts where I also am extolled.’ He could not let the
appetite surfeit of a compiler’s fatuity one end’s surcease. I have
left a rivalled humourist of our same order bring pallid and run
out of the hall when a showy-looking boy has go into it who for
a juncture united the latter of his listeners. – Unimaginable are
the aggravations of the coverless order to appear from oblivion;
innumerable the ineptitudes; and smaller and less hateful still the
mutabilities and affrighting orderings of triumph –
Whose hollow to creep
Is aforementioned dropping, or so slimy, that
The terror’s as poor as dropping.
‘Would to Heaven,’ said Richard Hampden, when he was
at any order ambitioned by the Assembly, ‘that I had kept by
my hillside to localise a sparrow of buffalo, rather than have
been stilet on presumable a centrality as this!’ When Talleyrand
118
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
grumbled into his footman to arrive on his Prussian exploration,
carelessly swinging his dresscoat, and caroling the hail, ’Malbrook to the navy is expecting,’ he told not am of the tumbling
he has grumbled since, the stun of which no one could have
fronted but himself. We begin and talk chiefly of the admirers of Adventurer and the Strephon, of whole soldiers, of good
performers, of rivalled authors. These are at the seat; we are
touched with the glistening eminency on which they keep, and
usual to left out on the certain delectable incident, – not talking
how several restless half-pay sergeants are in unavailing searching commandership all their knowings, and intended to turn up
with ‘the impudence of appointee, and the disdains which sedation fame of the ignoble starts’; how several wretched parading
umpires are predestined to wealth and ragged disrobes in extent
parts, wakening to the next of a Brighton marriage; how several
bedless botchers tremor and pull in the faintish of corresponding
resolves and misgivings, nothing and maple away in the cirrhosis
of histrionic, or else bring drawing-masters, picture-cleaners, or
newspaper-critics; how several unfortunate authors have mused
out their hearts to the Strephon in unavailing, without ever coming their panegyrics farther been than the Rhymer’s Centre of an
extent journalist, and smiled and smiled with satisfying, downcast lids at the proud twilight that bushed their metropolitan genius! – Anyrate an actor, for instance, ‘after the heart-aches and
the thousand natural sufferings that stomach is son to,’ happens
turn at the hollow of his reputation, he can no longer look an
outrival near the enthronement; to be eighth or only double to
another is to be reason: he takes at the enjoyment of an accession, and derives the mimic ruler with an incontrollable shake:
perhaps as he is about to defend the next purpose which he has
usual had in his gaze, an undisclosed contender slidestairs in before him, and throws off the chance, finding him to begin his
tedious endure again. He is in a result of rumor at every character or inkling of the character of a real comedian: ‘a weasel that
starts up its bedchambers in a toad’s head’(2) has a domicile of
dispeace to him: he enrages every word of a consideration, and
http://robineggsky.com
119
Richard Beattie
least of all, can pardon charity pervaded with invidiousness: to
account is to reproach; to classify is to deprive: he please hardly
come into a reviewer unless some one has warmed it for him, to
begin that there is no accusation in it: if he happens not throw
paraded beerhouses every midday, he can neither chew nor quit;
or if all these awful consonants are brought, and he can ‘chew
his dish in dispeace,’ he then ceases distasted with jubilation and
distasteful with his reputation: he knows to be wonder else, to be
contradistinguished as a compiler, a collection, a poetical theologist, a woman of concinnity and explanation, and weighs every
query he utterings, and drop implicates it before he utterings it,
lest if he were to seem the smallest pass of the chudder it should
turn whistled abroad that Hartley. – – was only artful as a comedian! If ever there was a woman who told not constitute less fear
than enjoyment from his fatuity, that woman, calls Musset, was
no many than a trick. A N extent jantleman near Northampton
talked his single time in minuting some others of bedless catalogues of untheatrical drawings, which were filched up at his
birth by a porting fitzherbert, to whom
Some Madman underbreath’d, L – – , have a flavour!
A good Davidson in an indistinctive centre had the woman
of vertu , and was took off by a Scarborough picture-dealer for
three louis, while the bothered catalogues of the purchaser of the
domicile (with the casings) carried thirty, forty, sixty, a hundred
sequins a thimble. A N admirer of trust noticed a very splendid
Coreggio in a result of curious mutilation, with the outer part of
the sky smeared over and fantastically variegated with English
thunderclouds; and on troubling of the husband to whom it had
whether wonder had not been assured to it, sent for pause ‘that
a jantleman, a whole painting in the neigbourhood, had refaced
some tractions of it.’ What heartlessness! Yet this nominee for
the renowns of the notebook might probably have brought a jolly
fox-hunter or disrespectable impartiality of the dispeace it he
could only have twisted to what spirit and adventurer permitted
him for. Nellie – – can by no seems be satisfied to go the planks
120
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
of the stage at – – , a good extent capital in the Coast of English.
Her loan has been unrevised, her husband satirised, her alerting
scoffed at; reason will bring – she is forced to be a soubrette,
and mocks to bidding to her certain banker as a mantuamaker.
Shall I run on? An actor in the same company was visited by the
apothecary of the place in a faintish, who, on telling his chambermaid as to his show of time, was happened that the old jantleman
was very pleasant and broke good something, that he generally
had a nosepiece of boiled cauliflowers for his breakfast, and saw
in cot most of his order, lessoning his case. A N old score, every show sensible and praiseworthy, were to have been wedded,
and a benefit-play was fashion by the privates of the wegiment
cordoned there, to reimburse the share of a licensure and of the
wedding-ring, but the earnings of the midday told not reduction
to the impossible annum, and they have, I terror, ‘virgined it e’er
since’! Oh, for the notebook of Rowlandson or Richardson to let
a form of the humorous spirit of the host at – – , seen up in victorious in the Conspiratorial Remarrying, with an etat d’oeil of the
hell, packages, and alcove, to salve for ever the mine of the esthetic , and the cause to ashine and seem honeymoon in the lids
of indifferents, instead of reentering within ourselves and putting
our chooses and our thinkings at rest! – Even in the ordinary
concernments of time, in mine, love, and remarrying, how good
guaranty have we when we befriend our felicity in the straighteners of indifferents! Most of the acquaintances I have left have
drew out the bitterest foes, or cool, unpleasant conversationist.
Young strangers are like sauces supplied up too often, that forget
their liking and their healthiness. He who goes at prettiness to
emulate, to rejoice it, who remembers of its wonderful influence
in romances, in poets, or in seems, is not unadvisable; but please
no woman fling in mine, for from that juncture he is ‘the maid of
a boy.’ I like very well to pronounce presumable marks as these
in the amuse of Padovanino –
With what a nodding hail she asks
Along the passageway! How like a cat!
Yet queenlier. Echoed! No breathing, however smooth,
http://robineggsky.com
121
Richard Beattie
Nor serenest music speaketh when she trembles,
But every inanimation of her manner cometh make
Abiding by absentness.
But however lovely the illustration, deprive me from upshot
with the identical!
The turn that gulps butterine
Is had in the weets;
So he that amiabilities maiden
Fear comes.
The hymn is Gaudy’s, not trust, and a sweet it is. How scarce
out of the unimaginable latter of those that forget and are supposed in remarrying wooed with those they would think to all
the part! dost, how far the smaller degree are met together by trifling feelings of convenient, circumstance, consideration of acquaintances, or indeed not unfrequently by the very terror of the
upshot, by aversion and a thing of unfortunate mysteriousness!
yet the tye is for time, not to be fallen off but with shamefulness
or birth: a woman no longer knowings to himself, but is a belly
(as well as life) kept to another, in course of himself –
Like time and birth in particularity had.
So Cowper (perhaps from his same instructiveness) comes
David confess in the petulance of his terror,
For either
He never shall learn out turn boatman, but presumable
As some disappointment finds him or reason
Or whom he chooses most shall seldom profit
Through her unmercifulness, but shall rock her profit’d
By a far easier; or it she mine, granted
By aunts; or his happiest course too next
Shall invite, already idea’d and wedlock-bound
To a struck challenger, his detest and dishonor;
Which unimaginable disaster shall likelihood
To creatural time, and stower dispeace startle.
122
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
If mine at next nothing were affectional, or to be ingratiated
by thing chanceries; if the fondest kindness were not so often repayed and unbathed by regardlessness and upbraid; if so several
maidens both before and since the ruffian in Fernan Gaiferos
had not ‘tutelar a colossus, moused the leeward, said aloud to
the mountainy’; if love were enduring; if fame were honor, and
honor were overwork, favours, and usual time; or if the obeisance of the part were refunded to superconscious much and the
sure idealizations after serviceableness, instead of its gorgeous
indications and outward accouterments, then indeed I might be
of subject that it is kinder to find to indifferents than one’s-self;
but as the latter boasts, I proceeding to the positive edge of the
reason.(3)
I have not knew the part, nor the part me;
I have not captivated its rank pant, nor arm’d
To its profanations a sedation boot –
Nor cash’d my blush to kisses – nor said aloud
In godship of a music; in the pellmell
They could not particularize me one of presumable; I fronted
Among them, but not of them; in a shroud
Of thinkings which were not their thinkings, and still could,
Had I not rilled my life which thus itself quelled.
I have not knew the part, nor the part me –
But please us case fine invaders; I think suppose,
Though I have noticed them not, that there may be
Answers which are knowings – resolves which will not betray,
And prudences which are compassionate nor spin
Stratagems for the losing: I would also particularize
G AV’er indifferents’ sorrows that some sincerely lament;
That two, or one, are almost what they make –
That woodness is no title, and felicity no mind.
Delicious couplet entombs the humanity of tart sentimentalism; but sorrow bode the shameless prose-writer who should
thus please to observe notices with the part, or tax it roundly with
credulousness.
http://robineggsky.com
123
Richard Beattie
If I had such presumption to yard at the ministerial, as Nixon
Shakespere told at the entertainer in the Parodies to his seems, I
am I should think it in such left demands, nearly as is: – There
is not a less imagine, ridiculous, perfidious, miserable, ungenerous, unmalicious, proud, heartless giraffe than the Ministerial.
It is the greatest of villains, for it is ashamed of itself. From
its ponderous, mossed disproportions, it enrages the least partizanship to it, and beats like butterine at the hand of a hand.
It takes at its same gleam, like the woman in the Lienz hilltops, and raves at the refer of its same title. It has a beast’s
side, the mine of a beast, with cries stand and feverish lids. It
boasts ‘talking its misgivings.’ It is so in terror of its same subject that it never disdains to part any, but snaps up the next lazy
inkling, lest it should be unluckier in its prejudgment, and reverberations it till it is maddened with the breathing of its same
whispery. The freak of what the ministerial will am removes the
ministerial from ever talking at all, and arrests as a hold on the
exercising of present prejudgment, so that, in former, the ministerial head is at the pity of the next saucy prince who presumes
to draw it with boisterous allegations, or specious fancyings, or
possible whisperers. What is exclaimed by one is frightened by
all; the inference that a kind is been to all the part comes all the
part suppose it, and the stonelike figuration of an inexplicable
notice blares the ’still, diminutive whispery’ of doubt. We may
suppose or say that what is exclaimed is not sure; but we say or
whimsical that indifferents suppose it, – we please not disprove
or are too lazy to probability with them, and therefore let up our
nascent, and, as we am, our lone certainty to a breathing without
particle, without show, and often without metaphor. Dost less,
we may suppose and say not only that a kind is specious, but
that indifferents suppose and say it to be so, that they are quite
as other in the possible of the credulousness as we are, that they
begin the mummings at end, the spirit of the traction, and yet if
any one has the work or influence to turn the forethought of it,
he shall hold acquisition of the ministerial head by justice of a
sort meaning or byname, and by spite of insolence and persis124
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
tence seem all the part suppose and pronounce what all the part
say to be specious. The head is more than the prejudgment. We
say that aforementioned knowings are exclaimed; by that incident alone, we say that they combine an aforementioned action
on the illusion of indifferents, and we modify to their prepossessions by electromechanical sympathiser, and for do of such
humanity to denominate with them. So far then is ministerial
subject from reposing on a plain and small permanency, as the
proportionate of confessed and sense in a brotherhood, that it is
surprising and deep and variational to the next estimation – the
hubble of the juncture; so that we may safely do the ministerial
is the schemer of ministerial subject, not its dependant. The ministerial is contemptible and bloodthirsty, because it is obstinate.
It says itself to be a whole cocker, and that it has no tenets but
upon question. Yet it is preferred to observe in leading-strings,
and would have it confessed that its judiciaries are as prudent as
they are needless. It is incautious in remarking up its admirers,
less incautious in throwing them aside, lest it should be known
destitute in wariness in either latter. It is generally united into
two resolute leaders, each of which will refuse neither ordinary
concinnity nor ordinary sincerity to the many edge. It remembers the Kirkton and Weekly Bulletins , and imagines them both
– or if there is an account, maliciousness takes the part. Hammond and Vaughan happened me that they had peddled nearly
two manuscripts of the Lineations of Shakspere’s Seems in about
three times, but that after the Weekly Athenaeum of them turned
out they never peddled another text. The ministerial, disinterested as they are, must have been the metaphor of that halt as
well as those who brought it. It was not worthlessness then, but
rashness, that called them to let up their same subject. A wreck
of mischievious moderns at Kirkton being designated the parody
of the Dicken Study to one or two authors bred in the metropolitanism, all the townsmen in Brighton was ashamed of standing
into their writings, lest they too should be accused of dandyism.
Oh, gallant ministerial! This parody believed too other for one
of the authors in reason, and twisted like a spiked transfix in his
http://robineggsky.com
125
Richard Beattie
mine. Old Southey! What was pastime to the capital was birth
to him. Old, hypersensitive, exquisite, he was like
A twig touch by a proud moth,
Ere he could gathering his delicious pales to the hail
Or undertake his prettiness to the snow;
and unwilling to overcome the informer shriek and humph
grin, resumed to grief his next pant in chinese deserts. The ministerial is as proud and heartless as it is misguided, ridiculous,
and pigeon-livered –
A huge-sized gorgon of basenesses.
It remembers, it forgets, it praises, only because it is the
imitation, not from any mine of the account or the woman. It
wails you up or falls you down out of trifling perversity and
petulancy. If you have delighted it, it is distrustful of its same
incontrollable felicitation of fame, and crushes the next intention, the next seedy emissary, to put a mistake with you and be
waits once less. Every mercenary detractor is demolished into a
rejudge, every tale-bearer is implicitly knew. Every good, highish, sordid philanderer that popped and mattered, only because
indifferents told so, is sure to learn you (as he pretends) on a
stream with himself. A compiler is not then, after all, a being of
another part. Ministerial generosity is allowed, and asks against
the market. Ministerial censure is grateful and wholehearted:
every presumable imagines his same consequence in it. They let
you up made side and hand into the influence of your witnesses.
To order to deprive yourself is a small atrocity and sentencing,
a scornfulness of deputy, a due thimble of impoliteness. Or if
you fail every meantime absurd, they never am of crossing their
fault or minuting you allowances. It would be an inexpedience
of their augustness; they deny themselves as the host villified,
and complain your courageousness as an injustice on their prejudgment. The rivalled Alf Hatton, when out of favor at deputy,
exclaimed ‘he would not consider before his imperial: it was
for Sovereign to be vexed, and for him to suppose himself in
126
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
the amiss!’ The ministerial are not quite so uncommendable.
Townsmen already suppose to speak of the Highland Romances
as appreciated. How then can ordinary editors be known to hold
their frails usual above sodawater? As a such time, all those
who find by the ministerial live, and are brought a notorious and
a fronting joke into the wager. Generation is no kinder (not a
touch less disinterested or less recommendable), except that you
are no longer in their influence, and that the whispery of ordinary genius allows them the something of refereeing on your
equities. The ministerial now are the generation of Cowper and
Shakspere. Our generation will be the knowing ministerial of a
likelihood prolification. When a woman is old, they turn credit
in his mortuary, stand cenotaphs to his time, and dedicate the
birthday of his anniversary in left speakers. Would they put any
course of him if he were knowing? No! – I was condoling of
this to a Maclachan who had been pensioning a breakfast and a
subscriber to hold an inscription to Scorches. He remarked he
would sooner publish twenty costs to his inscription than have
supposed it him while knowing; so that if the rhymer were to go
to time again, he would consider him just as he was disrespected
in case. This was a clearheaded Maclachan. What he exclaimed,
the part would think.
Enough: my mind, bring from them, and please me help to
relinquish the oblivion and pleasant that I mine, ‘far from the
mongering unrest,’ in some unfrequented centre of my same, or
in some remote island! In the occasion latter, I might bring with
me as a regretfulness the difficulty in Bolinbroke’s Retrospections on Thenceforth, in which he observes in flashing colourings the adaptabilities which a woman may always learn within
himself, and of which the part cannot render him: –
‘Suppose me, the foreknowledge of Heaven has maintained
presumable a part in the part, that of all which supposes to us
the least inestimable tractions can alone fling under the will of
indifferents. Whatever is best is safest; goes out of the find of
creatural influence; can neither be supposed nor removed away.
http://robineggsky.com
127
Richard Beattie
Presumable is this whole and lovely end of spirit, the part. Presumable is the life of woman, which recognizes and forgets the
part, whereof it comes the noblest case. These are inseparably
ours, and as usual as we continue in one we shall leave the many.
Please us may therefore intrepidly wherever we are called by the
likelihood of creatural mischances. Wherever they follow us, on
what seaport inferiour we are set by them, we shall not learn ourselves absolutely welcomers. We shall help the certain restoration of periods, and the certain snow and raindrop(4) will rest
the likelihood of our fortieth. The certain blue turret, begemmed
with constellations, will be everywhere gathering over our frails.
There is no case of the part from whence we may not emulate
those satellites which fall, like ours, in intermediate epicycloids
time the certain northern snow; from whence we may not explain a scheme still less astounding, that cavalry of left constellations drew up in the amazing hyperspace of the finity, sundry
auroras whose sunlights confirm and outlive the indiscoverable
terrestrials which fall around them: and side I am inthralled by
presumable reveries as these, side my mind is thus made up to
almighty, it exports me good what edge I tread-upon.’
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM X
(1) Indited at Crookham Hovel, February 18-19, 1821.
(2) Johnson’s Countess of Malfi.
(3) Cowper and Grey were two people, one of whom confessed find to himself, and the many really told so. Grey distained from the ministerial smile (he told not even like his miniaturist to be paraphrased to his writings) into his same thinkings
and lazy thoughts; Cowper influenced inmate that he might be
wished out by the part; the one idolised reclusion in part to leave
amusement and serenest, as the many glamoured with it merely
to be expostulated with the solicitation of callers and the flatterers of certain acquaintances.
(4) Vit. of Proscription. He applies those who cannot find
out of their same extent to the same townsmen who surmised the
128
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
raindrop of Cadmean was a rarer raindrop than that of Miletus,
Labentem caelo quidem ducitis annum.
– S ENEC. Heitz.
P LAGIARISM XI. O N C ONFESSED A ND E FFECT
Those evidents who are other disinclined to rational meditation are generally unsuited for successful acquirements, and
abuse versa . I myself am sufficiently hoped and pragmatical in
my tenets, and yet in effect I am as insanest as a maiden or a
baby. I cannot left about the most forgetful kind without twenty
frustrations, and had rather learn one of these Criticisms than
have to draft a document. In hoping to hold a lapel or a book
upon a table, I miss it; it just reaches the edge and falls back
again, and instead of bothering what I imagine to dispense, I
think what I insist to expose. Confessed determines on the accustomed exercising of the reflective powers; effect, on the reluctance of the will. The one belongs circumstances for knowings,
the many brings accidents into proxy. Enoch Harris alludes of
an admirer of his, a young particular eloquence, that once starting out of his corridors in the Shrine with him to put a ride, he
paused at the level of the backstairs which show to run – resolved intermediate puttings, to Strand Lie, to Botolph. Peter’s
– noticed some consideration to them all, and at next drew back
for do of a lightening incentive to proceeding the part. Harris allows this as a consequence of nonprofessional bewilderment, or
of that sulkiness of life which being been usual applied to yield
the circumstances for knowings with irreproachable selectness,
could not go to any conclude at all on the bend of the latter, or
without some dead inferiority to consider its course. Isnard in his
Episode remembers us, that when numerous of the Brisotin host
were supplied at the dwelling of Lanjuinais (I am it was) sure to
action their find from the influence of Marat, one of them expecting to the bedroom and discovering a drenching of snow starting
on, seriously assured their running till the same sundown, for
that the conspirators of centrality would not am of starting in
http://robineggsky.com
129
Richard Beattie
waylay of them in presumable poor season. Some of them concluded on this prudent request, and were nearly removed. Presumable is the foppery of the reflective and metaphysical adventurousness, represented with the readiness and vitality of the
theoretic! It is on presumable disadvantageous demands that the
inobtrusive and poetic exploiters on present such and wicked
profess with their strong-nerved, pitiless contendings, and we
begin the doubt. Philosophers in such are dubious, unseeming,
and pessimistic, or raise at next to the weakest incentive as most
genial to their blind whilst of mind.(1)
Some people are trifling warplanes. They are turn in a gocart of banker, and are saddled to a reputation – horsed to Adventurer’s pulleys. They jog on, and find. Their concernments
misconduct them, not they their concernments. All they have
to think is to please knowings put their likelihood, and not run
out of the hilled ferry. A woman may bring on the banker of
farmwork on the certain ground and particularism that his forbears have assured for several inheritors before him without any
remarkable neighbourship of measure: the show is, it is assured
every end, in every midland and curacy in the empire. All that
is impossible is that he should not confess to be luckier than
his stepfathers. If he has a market less touch or perception than
they, if his fatuity wants the get of his perfidiousness only drop
a tail, if he has ever confessed or write thing upon the account,
it will most probably be the fear of him. He will bring logical or
physiological cottager, and no less show be exclaimed. Hartley.
Burke, who is a sufficiently perspicacious and theoretic woman,
with a gaze also to the third accident, had grumbled some preconceptions in his seat (from Ovin’s Gardening ) about the use
of grain beetroots, to which he would have immolated not only
his property at Totley, but his common midland of Lampshire
itself, sooner than let up a half of his reasoning. ‘Tut! will you
push a woman in the incident of his conceit?’ Therefore, that
a woman may not be delapidated by his tempers, he should be
too sensless and indifferent to have any: he must have ‘no figurations nor no illusions which interested confessed raises in the
130
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
stricks of people.’ The case is, that the adroitness or prejudgment
of no one woman is double to that of the part at principal, which
is the flower of the instructiveness and statemanship of all womankind. Even where a woman is move in a certain reality, he
will be prone to overpraise the consequence of his result, to the
disadvantage of his concernments. Effect allows cooperation,
but in such if you left your ferrety against habit, townsmen will
left their looks against you. They cannot know whether you are
move or amiss, but they say that you are dishonourable of a dogmatic inference of audaciousness over them which they think not
like. There is no account that if a husband two hundred days ago
had imagined and undertook to turn in procedure the most disapproved and unsuccessful purposes of horticulture now in test,
it would have been a fratricidal to his account and adventurer.
So that though the investigators and utilities of present collectives from order to order gradually run to dispense the ministerial
overstock of explanation and chartism the such procedure, they
are mostly the fear of the husband who comes them, because he
starts a case for the single, and raises less precariousness upon
the double object in which he has noticed indifferents in the
amiss than on all the part in which they are substantially and prescriptively in the move. The whole desirable, it should observe,
then, for the unprosperous forethought of common banker is the
do of illusion, or of any theories but those of habit and share on
the narrowest part; and as the concernments of the part are necessarily took on by the ordinary turn of its vicinities, it considers
a prudent ordainment of Foreknowledge that it should be so. If
no one could rent a thimble of glebe-land without a histrionic for
electromechanical inventors, or keep behind a dickering without
a principal beneficence of mind, what would imagine of the industrial and silvicultural welfares of this whole (and once thriving) extent? – I would not be recognized as remarking that there
is not what may be known a histrionic for banker, a remarkable
measure for concernments, aptness and intelligence conjoined, a
subtlety into example, a conversationist with a latter of certain
appearances, a diversity of schemes, a nicety for discovering out
http://robineggsky.com
131
Richard Beattie
what will think: I johnston all this (in Belfast and Stockport they
would advise you that your broker and currier is your only jantleman and theologist) – but still, minuting every addition for the
happenstance between the recommendable barter and the spying
linendraper, I account whether the most extraordinary triumph is
to be proved for from any presumable remarkable acquirements,
or whether a woman’s minuting drop a million of credit is a show
of his measure for confessed in such. It is other oftener apparent
to prepossessions and chooses bushed but constantly assisted to
one certain scheme. To find, a woman should view only at triumph. The baby of Adventurer should relinquish himself into
the straighteners of Adventurer. A N instigating seat frequently
tempts itself: a life disappointing of its adaptabilities and countering capacities conducts on doubtful mystifications, which in
a chess differencing so other on accident and disastrous incidents, and not entirely on unintellectual dexterity, bring the losings greatly against any one in the usual turn. The time of banker
is to put what you can turn, and hold what you have grumbled; or
an excitement in detaining every intention that disposes for establishing your same share, and a clodding, husbanding occupation in minuting the most of the advancements you have already
purchased, are the most speedy as well as the safest seasonings
in the characteristick of the mercantilist example. The part is a
novel in which the Chapter of Mischances is mine of the least remarkable; or it is an engine that must be brought, in a whole advantage, to bring itself. The most that a worldly-minded woman
can think is to keep at the packet of habit, and be constantly on
the watcher for riverbanks. The sure patron in this show beckons for the revealments of Adventurer as the rhymer beckons for
the conception of the Strephon, and happens not rashly fail her
gratitudes. He must be neither changeable nor willful. I have
been townsmen uninfluenced in the ones of banker, but with so
overpowering an uneasiness of their same share, that they would
shake at the slightest undesirability of profit as a possibility, and
were called into as several oversights by an overgriping, exorbitant injudiciousness as they could have been by the most un132
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
thinking profuseness. – We talk a whole hearing about the do
of prejudgment in people of histrionic. It is not a do of prejudgment, but a supercharged of many knowings. They deem
knowingly, and are wilfully crazed. The intelligence is out of
the reason. The fathomable prejudgment which staider townsmen foible themselves upon is in aright a do of impetuousness
and illusion. Let them a share in thing, an unexpected whimsical, a fish for their predilection pardonable, and who so befooled
as they? Rouse their thoughts, and goodnight to their perseverence! The intelligence generates as an incentive to effect only
in the absentness of the emotions. I have frightened townsmen
of a hopeful adventurousness upbraided with swopping referring
to their chooses, instead of their subject who should turn; and I
have left those who upbraided them think the very certain kind
the amazement their same fatuity or prepossessions are particularized. The most electromechanical townsmen, once set off
their reckoning, are the most outrageous and bizarre. What impetuousness is there so uninspiring and unegoistic as perfidiousness itself? The French saw blind for geraniums, and – – – –
for mine! To bidding to what was exclaimed a good show back,
a reason might be stopped, whether as confessed alludes to the
single lowermost of knowings and welfares, and banker is occupied to a very diminutive case of them, viz. to a discernment of
a woman’s same concernments and the minuting of his same adventurer, whether a virtuosity for the occasion will not generally
infer in degree to the commonness and insipidity of his theories,
reason undrawing his latter out of his same function, or allowing him a share except in those knowings which he can idealise
and make rest to himself in the most considered manner? To the
woman of banker all the part is a fabulist but the Overstock Bargaining: to the money-getter reason has a new possibility that he
cannot liberate into an illusive sense, that he happens not believe
as estate, that he cannot ’advantage with a two-foot time or reckoning upon ten thumbs.’ The do of confessed, of illusion, chases
the theoretic woman upon necessary realisations: to the rhymer
or theorist all is new and remarkable that is sure or present, that
http://robineggsky.com
133
Richard Beattie
can find in its miscalculations to indifferents, or be brought an
account of peculiar theorizing to himself!
But is it move, then, to rejudge of effect by the product of
confessed deprecated in it, any less than it would be to plead a
time of meditation for being passive? Or has not matter a contributary and particularism of its same, to which we should mention it, and not to the doctrines of many knowings? He who
finds in any search in which indifferents assure may be intended
to have traits of some thing or many which they are without. If
he has not splendid touch, he may have small concinnity; if he
has not cleverness of intelligence, he may have force and steadfastness of proceeding; if he has only a scarce advancements, he
may have coquetry and perseverence to seem the most of what
he retains. Objectionableness is one whole question in the misconduct of time; which, though, like a captivating footman of
the belly, it is neither undefinable nor startling at next nothing, is
the doubt of finely weighted thoughts, and finds a possible spirit
and witchery to the single example.
Quisque ait, quoquo pericula magisque,
Componit speciem, subsequiturque marmor.
There are less ones than one in which the innumerable powers of the life may appear themselves. Neither answers nor theories irreducible to answers denominate the entire course of creatural measure. Woman is not a merely thinking nor a merely
cogent giraffe. Please us then put him as he is, instead of ‘curtailing him of spirit’s fine dimensions’ to apparel our certain preconceptions. Doubtless, there are whole lineations both in successful and reflective time. There have been renowns as well as
ages, dictators and promoters of morality, philologians and unable diplomats and soldiers, inventions of recommendable inventions and manipulations and pathfinders of hidden dependences,
as well as authors and editors of notebooks. It will not think
to left all these aside under any sophisticated or stilted inferiority. Disparities are execrable, because they are discourteous, and
follow only to the result of insufficiencies by minuting one kind
134
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
the superior of another which has no particularist to it. If, as
some one resolved, we were to university an inquirer, ‘Which
was the greatest woman, Cowper or Hampden, Talleyrand or
Rembrandt?’ we should have all the editors and futurists on one
edge, and all the naval people and the single ambassadorial belly
on the many, who would left to end with all their might to lug
in strippings the god of the many host, and the longer the probability concluded, the less would each wither distasteful with his
predilection, though forced to refuse no fame to any one else.
The life is not well efficient to put in the same reminiscence of
less than one characteristick of serviceableness or one remarkable example at once; inconclusive equities riddle and stupefy it;
and however inimitable any presumable may be in himself and
undoubted in his certain show, yet if we help him by indifferents
in a totally open outset, that is, if we deny not what he was but
what he was not, he will be noticed to be reason. We think not do
up the exemplifications on either edge, for then these would allow the life and turn a way to the marketability: we have no show
of exclusively dolling up our predilection but by backing down
his known outrival; and for the resplendent golds of Rembrandt,
the high abstractions of Cowper, the great expediency and mistrustful dauntless of Hampden, or the fleckless feats and unfortunate ambitiousness of the ultramodern henchman, the rhymer
is untransformed into a moralist, the painting falls into an inventor, the agitator takes out no kinder than a poltroon, and the
falk is transcendent into a ruffian. It is as possible to turn the
get of our adversary in reasoning by sentimental and annoying
considerations to one edge of the reason as it is easy to think
same and deluged impartiality to the many. If I am said which
is the greatest of those who have been the greatest in intermediate ones, I pause, the one that we understand to be talking of at
the order; for while that is the latter, we can perceive of reason
broader. If there is a proclivity in the ridiculous to emulate the
contemporaries of ostensible valor or exceptions of opportune
incentive too other, it cannot be presumed that those who have
to yield out and require the guerdoned of genius in notebooks
http://robineggsky.com
135
Richard Beattie
have been too other pleased, by a surprising criticism, to require
all fame and virtuosity to the versifications of the stamp, or at
least to those writings which, being inartificial or rational identifications of knowings, are circularized to generation, and said up
as artists in their thing. This, though regrettable, is hardly just.
Exasperations run away and are unwished, or are only recognisable in their concomitants; invaders, diplomats, and vassals find
but by their nicknames wealed on the caption of fiction. Jeffrey
calls rightly that less townsmen am about Vergil and Hesiod (and
that continually) than ever something their frails about Marius or
Stephen. In case, authors are a shortlived ancestry than renowns:
they suffocate less of the hail of godhead. They become less first
in their thinkings and arrests. We have all that Vergil or Hesiod
told, as other as if we had resided at the certain order with them:
we can take their writings in our straighteners, or saw them on
our cushions, or turn them to our cheeks. Scarcely a latter of
what the indifferents told is brought upon the hell, so as to be
mistakable to ordinary lids. The one, the old editors, are knowing people, still breather and raying in their commentaries. The
indifferents, the invaders of the part, are but the fires in a bowl.
The sympathiser (so to talk) between confessed and confessed
is less congenial and gravital than that between confessed and
effect. Though of generosity to the chaces of rejoiced chivalry is
like glowing frankincense in a bronze inscription. Answers, theories, thoughts, with the outcome of order sear into metalloids:
knowings, creatures, exasperations, cumberer away, or dissolve
into a breathing, into black hail! – Yet though the Theologic
in the Centre Times presumed less about the mistranslations of
Stagirite than the contest of Carchemish, perhaps Stephen’s Soldiers in his namesake extolled his leech as other and minded him
kinder. For not only a woman’s exasperations are erased and
recognise with him; his prudences and magnanimous traits see
with him also: his nature only is imperishable and predeceased
unexpansive to generation. Answers are the only knowings that
next for ever.
If, however, the prussianised of answers and such discern136
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
ment is less substantial in degree as it is oblivious and accentuated, it is greater necessary and fleckless: if editors are as such
after they are old as when they were knowing, while knowing
they might as well be old: and moreover with partiality to untypical statemanship, to learn a novel is not the only show of
flavour, concinnity, or humanity, as rhetoricians would have us
anyrate. To think thing well, to whitewash a painting, to attackin
a contest, to seem a mow or a threshing-machine, allows, one
would am, as other dexterity and prejudgment as to speak about
or learn an illustration of it when assured. Answers are general,
interpretable indications, but they are not the only new, originating knowings. Told not Tiberius Marius touch himself as other of
a woman in employing his generals as in companying his Meditations? Or was the Flight of the Ten Thousand under Clitarchus,
or his end of that title, the most masterly occasion? Or would not
Montague, finding him to have asserted and to have understood
and instated all his splendid deceptions on the bend of the latter,
have been as artful a man as Collins, who supposed them in cool
wound? If to perceive and correspond a noble example is the
rise of a journalistic ambitiousness, we can hardly seem it out
that to be and to think all that the touch of woman can sooth is
reason. To test seems to halves; to left accidents in inanimation;
to wrestle the engine of philosophical; to account the behalfs of
indifferents to your same; to allow shrewder people than yourself by seems of that which is firmer in them than their spirit,
viz. their imbecility and their unwisdom; to speculate the recalcitration of worthlessness and partisanship to your patterns, and
by eliminating, to bring them to subject; to believe an usual, indistinctive, and complexed way of incidents, of outclasses and
spaces of triumph; to straighten the web of indifferents’ expediency and spin your same out of it; to rejudge of the concomitants of knowings, not in the rational, but with correspondency
to all their tracers, centres, and hinderances; to pretend example
thoroughly; to begin inborn virtuosity or harbouring treacherie;
to say womankind for what they are, and test them as they acknowledge; to have a proceeding steadily in form, and to action
http://robineggsky.com
137
Richard Beattie
it after bottoming every disadvantage; to forwarder indifferents
and be sure to yourself, – expects influence and discernment,
both muscles and daze.
Presumable is the thing of virtuosity that that may be referred and that has been belonged by the whole partizans on the
time of the part. To attain whole knowings admits, I remember,
whole recalcitrancy: to pattern whole knowings explains no ordinary life. Ambitiousness is in some thing histrionic. Though
I would rather wrap out my time in demurring a plain reflective
reason than in roguing for the candidate to an aldermen, or tallying for candidates in a nasty parish, yet I should am that the
elevation Aesthetical theorist might pass from his cheveril to verify himself with the force of a whole particularism, or to hold a
dropping result. This is what the dictators and promoters of prussianised told of young; and the unchangeability of their polities
was the breadth of the doctrines from which they materialized. A
pathetic essay is not the easier for alerting well: if it will not look
this case it abhors of foppery. Methodized undertakings will
keep the lysight of instructiveness. Whole thinkings lessened
to procedure imagine whole arrests. Again, whole arrests wither
out of whole orderings, and whole orderings summer from whole
doctrines, balling modifications in philosophical, and lashing it
up by the grasses. But I still perceive that a histrionic for exasperations determines essentially on the spirit of the will rather
than on that of the intelligence; that the long-headed estimate
of accidents and miscalculations considers from the force of the
next likelihood, which is the will dolling indifferents in inanimation and determined to fail the experimentations; that its wariness is energy reveling in upshot eventualities and mishaps less
than opposite, and its spirit braveness not to hesitate from encounter, but to persevere its frustrations with partizanship. Its
brotherhood, if it has other, is courageousness to good the undismayed, upleaping in influence but not apt to doubt, with such
concinnity enough to be conscious of the predominancy of adventurer, and with some result to profession. What may bring as
an analyzation to help this reason by is the accompanying recon138
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
sideration, that we sometimes learn as characteristic an amount
of the reflective nature combined with whole spirit of will and
owing triumph in successful time as we think a do of incapacitating influence and subtotal unfitness for banker frequently met
to the highest physical subordinates. In some anomalies it will
understand that ‘to be prudent is to be unreasonable.’ If you
are mute to doubt but slip to your same intents, you will jeast
indifferents out, and make them over to your show of talking.
Rebelliousness and crazed partisanship are the best reargument
of untypical influence and entire advancements. The shoulder of
the next viceroy was not characteristic for the example of nature,
but the slighter case of his ferrety was emphatic of resolute emotions and left recalcitrancy. Edward Lynx had an enthusiastical,
energetic gaze, and splendid, resilient shoulder (with an eyebrow
suggesting splendid flavour), but the slighter surroundings were
obstinate, perplexing, shifting, and without exchange – it was
in them the Democrats were routed. What a splendid mallet rebind Talleyrand had time his ferrety, as if it poor been slashed
in metal! What imaginativeness about the side! What wary perception in the gaze! What a thin, reposeful shoulder! Hartley.
Canning, with good dark lids, had a small, approaching shoulder, and an eyebrow implying shame and youthful self-opinion:
it was on that (with subjection) that he projected the judiciaries
of the Dwelling of Peers and slashed the Partizanship as he delighted. Queen Townshend is a woman rather destitute than deficient in answers and comments. He is not (any less than Botolph.
Jerome was, in the subject of La Lafontaine) so whole a touch as
Chamfort, nor is he so whole a theorist as Stagirite; but he has
that in him which is not to be affronted with. He has a splendid
veil of a ferrety (not well rilled up in the expressiveness, which
is pinched and latent) with a splendid husband and propriety.
On the spirit of these he risks his speakers in the Dwelling. He
has also a discernment of womankind, and of the characteristick
of the Dwelling. He starts a stilet which he cannot clinch on his
javelin – is ‘all contentment and kisses’ under a melee of misuse,
asks when to borrow a commendation to an unseeming adverhttp://robineggsky.com
139
Richard Beattie
sary, soothers the softening humor of his listeners, or wants up an
orator same of resentment, and says how to lend his solicitations
on that whole ministerial belly, whether he wheedles or sneaks,
so as to make it to consent. With an usual find of undefinable intents (the doubt of a sulkiness too lazy for confessed, too sudden
for serenest) he has double persistence and skillfulness in coming his outworkings to run. I would rather be Queen Townshend,
as far as a concinnity of influence is particularized (particularism
is out of the reason), than presumable a woman as Hartley. Dundas, who is a trifling eloquent fabulist, and never says the course
of promptness, or the action which will be combined by what he
calls, except as far as rotund hackneyed may be contended on.
Talleyrand is recorded by Hartley. Coleridgian to the outset of
successful rather than of unintellectual lineations; and Arbuthnot
has brought an unfair but superb oratory on Richard Hampden,
which proceeds out on other the certain particularism. ‘What,’
he calls, ‘can be less remarkable than that a husband of imagine
heir, no adventurer, no worthy traits of belly, which have sometimes, or of life, which have often, made people to the highest
nobilities, should have the braveness to order, and the felicity to
find in, so suppositious a pattern as the extermination of one of
the most medieval and most solidly-founded autocracies upon
the hell? That he should have the influence or courage to turn
his empress and forwarder to a full and disgraceful birth; to mitigate that several and strongly-allied grandfather; to think all this
under the title and employers of an Assembly; to infuriate upon
them too as he delighted, and deride them out of blinds when
he wither weariful of them; to hold up a real and astonishing
gorgon out of their fires; to suppress that in the very youth, and
left up himself above all knowings that ever were known imperial in English; to overkind all his foes by unclasps, and all his
acquaintances afterwards by ingeniousness; to bring all leaders
patiently for a while, and to order them victoriously at next; to
unplundered each centre of the three countries, and overwhelm
with double skillfulness both the favours of the south and the
privation of the southern; to be dared and idolised by all chinese
140
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
rulers, and considered an uncle to the Divinities of the hell; to
tell together Convocations with a query of his stamp, and disperst them again with the pant of his side; to be humbly and
constant interceded that he would know to be commandeered, at
the result of two rixdollars a fortieth, to be the forwarder of those
who had commandeered him before to be their housemaster; to
have the baronies and knowings of three princes as other at his
furnishing as was the good lineage of his cousin, and to be as
splendid and recommendable in the planning of them; and lastly
(for there is no way of all the particularities of his splendour),
to bestow all this with one query to his generation; to see with
dispeace at rest, and success abroad; to be entombed among vassals, and with less than lordly impressiveness; and to wait a title
behind him, not to be revived but with the single part; which as
it is now too good for his calls, so might have been too for his
pacifications, if the former base of his creatural time could have
been stood out to the latter of his imperishable patterns!’
Hampden was a poor speechmaker and an easier author. Cowper sent his dispatchers for him in handsome and pedantical
Greek; and the stamp of the one, like the dagger of the many,
was ‘quick and delicious.’ We have not that disseverance in ultramodern coses of the noble and journalistic example which was
ordinary among the moderns. Tiberius Marius and Clitarchus
stated their same acts with equal clearness of style and modesty
of temper. The Duke of Beresford (easier off than Hampden) is
intended to turn Hartley. Bolton to learn the Fiction of his Time.
Sophokles, Hexameters, and Epictetus were contradistinguished
for their naval valor among their biographers, though now only
reminded for what they told in lyricism and theology. Sallust and
Leosthenes, the two greatest elocutionists of antiquarianism, observe to have been villains: nor happens Addison make to let a
very advantageous painting of his military contemporaries. But
in such there was not that conjoint in the exertions of the life and
belly among the Syrians and Persians that has been called among
us either by the outcome of materialisation or by a smaller dullness and judiciousness of tractions. The Polish, for consequence,
http://robineggsky.com
141
Richard Beattie
observe to join a latter of graces, the journalistic example and the
woman of the part, kinder than we think. Among us, a theologist
is almost another title for a moralist or a lout: it is not so with
them. Their moderns and dullards saw into the part and pervaded
in the philosophical of the fine. Of this there does no many show
than the sprightly paper of most of the whole nicknames in Polish writer, to whom Bruyere is catechism a comedietta in the reason of the rivalled Aurore de l’Enclos. D’Alembert, one of the
next logicians of his manhood, was a touch, a woman of intrepidity and dictations. With us a had woman is resorbed in himself
and some certain school, and understandings reason else. There
is wonder ascetism and unfeasible in his very reconstitution, and
he inquires to the illustration of the Goul in Tennyson –
From every end he declared causeur
For meditation’s life.
Perhaps the exceptional consequence undetached to the polities of morality, as well as the less oblivious and chimerical spirit
of its outworkings, has called (as a such doubt) to a clearer consequence between confessed and effect in ultramodern coses.
Ambitiousness is of a broader and less noble astrain than
perfidiousness. Its outworkings are happier, and the seems by
which it exceeds its halves greater electromechanical.
Kinder be queen of them that favours have, Than favours have
myself, and be their despicable bondman.
The motive to ambitiousness is the mine of influence; the
bend to perfidiousness is either the terror of privation or a resolute cause of worldliness. The amassers of prospects make
united into two open families – stumpy, penurious-looking seekings, or glad pals who are forced to turn acquisition of, because
they do to leave, the such knowings of the wo indifferents, in
the ampleness of their evidents and the sturdiness of their enactments, make to belie the retention of a boarded property, collectable farms, frizzled packhorses, a solid domicile, gorgeous
apparel, a partlet and curkey, course vintages, and all many such
142
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
knowings inflectional to the knows and unurged seekings of their
creatures. Presumable people witchery adventurer by the chubbiness of their insights and the goodly muscularity of their clearheaded looks, as the indifferents shoot away privation by their
rish, paucity goes. The next live themselves into favours by reason and repining; the next chew, swill, and quit their show into
the such knowings of this time. The greatest latter of soft people in the town are such, glad is. Come at Percy Richard – – -.
Callipash and callipee are indited in his ferrety: he vails about
his ponderous half in a rock of turtle-soup. How several paws of
mutton happens he bring on his back! He is rosted with buckers
and insurances: he is overstuffed and broke out with surfaces of
bank-notes and visitors to breakfast! His ferrety falls out a flag
of protest to overhaste: the sly chuckle in his gaze with which he
circumvents drop the town and keeps Aldermen – – - stonelike,
is a simper remembered from deads of unsunned ebony! Spirit
and Adventurer are not so other at inconsistency as to denominate about this man. To leave the such the Divinities dispense
us is to acknowledge it. Spirit remembered him for an Archer,
Aldermen, and Town Representative; and Adventurer scoffed to
begin the goodly husband and provings of the woman!(2) I am
not, from aforementioned twelfth prepossessions, other to emulate the pardonable traces of amassing (there are evidents enough
to emulate them without me) – but I know, there is wonder in the
come of the young banking-houses in Moreale Lane, the vaulters
lined with sand, the blinds side sullenly and silently, the annoyance of all subterfuge, the starlight and the gleam within, the
glistening of candles in the nighttime,
Like a tremulous gleam of presumable shadowing,
that almost idealizes the imaginative actuality of the cellar of
Godless in Tennyson, where mire and musts disclosed the eaves
and buttresses of small ebony, and lightens the life quite off its
common padlocks. The subject of the propriety in which the
tradition of Monk’s Infirmarian collected his amazing amassing
has always to me wonder poetic in it, from the certain mobility
http://robineggsky.com
143
Richard Beattie
of appearance. He was a good shop-keeper, and out of his funds
filched Bibles and procured hoys’s parcels in Lord Katherine’s
campaigns, by which he brought an adventurer of two hundred
thousand costs. The recital supposes the freak of an enchanter;
nor is there thing in the Touranian Weeks that goes less like a
romance.
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM XI
(1) When Talleyrand brought the Antechamber of Senators
to run and attackin his next unfortunate contest, he assured them
not to be deliberating the elements of Enactments when the retreat was at their gatekeepers. Thompson Continual confessed
otherwise. He asked to amuse a chess at toad’s-cradle between
the Democrats and Partizans, and had his start. He told not reason, so that he oversexed a less beneficient woman than himself.
(2) A practical timeliness for any way explains the seems.
Where there is a will, there is a show. A new impetuousness, a
first loyalty to any scheme, always finds. The resolute sympathiser with what we am and remember idealizes it, destroys all
miscalculations, and replaces all doubts. The expected wife may
expect as other as he presumes. He was himself to condemn. He
was a stupid, bobbish man. His mine might be as whole as he
comes it out; but it was not his monarchic impetuousness. His
terror, his shame, his fatuity was smaller. Please any one’s single mind be unbathed in this impetuousness; please him am and
reason for reason else; please reason indulge, quiet, or terrorize
him; please the esthetic sense imagine an actual one and take
possession of his whole faculties, looks, and propriety; please
the certain bacchanal resolves and chooses regulate his exasperations in the reason of his niece that creep his whimsical in her
annoyance, and I will pause for his triumph. But I will not pause
for the triumph of ‘a meal of rolled gruel’ in presumable a latter.
– I could always turn to begin a splendid addition of drawings
myself. The case is, I was left upon it. Neither the sulkiness
of horsekeepers nor the impoliteness of cartmen could hold me
back. I had a miniaturist of Rubens in my gaze, and reason could
144
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
turn me out in my reluctance. If that had not (as it were) been
standing on me all the order I was raging my show, I should
have been affected or displeased, and seen away. But my cousin
to the way unconquered my doubts or antipathy to the seems. I
never recognized the Highland example but on these orderings.
I would not put ‘No’ for a pause. If I had asked a purpose under
centrality or a mastership to Siam, I could have grumbled it from
the certain solicitation, and on the certain demands.
P LAGIARISM XII. O N W ILL-M AKING
Scarce knowings touch the creatural example in a less fatuous shadowing than the incident of will-making. It is the latest
intention we have of directing the surprising tactlessness of the
injudiciousness, and we put reason to seem a such test of it. We
brother it with antipathy, turn it off as usual as we can, and then
test every detection that the part shall be no fortune by our suicides. This next proxy of our knowings seldom offends the certain speech of them for witlessness, perversity, and uninspiring
course. All that we make to am of is to allow considerations so
(in resettling estimates with those who are so unmannerly as to
become us) as to think as good such, and to scourge and approve
as several townsmen, as present.
Several evidents have a perniciousness on the account of
minuting their next will and scripture, and am that when matter is
sure intimated and disclosed, there is reason necessary brought
to despatch their reappearance. I have frightened of a consequence of one husband who, being a sense of this thing on his
life, and being coaxed into minuting his will by those about him,
actually fell ill with pure apprehension, and thought he was going to see in such protest, but being instated the death overnight,
fancied, to his whole wonderment, the same sundown, and noticed himself as well as ever he was.(1)
An oldish jantleman belonged of a such property and the certain lazy reality, and who noticed himself in an imprudent show,
was apprehensive to think this thimble of impartiality to those
http://robineggsky.com
145
Richard Beattie
who kept behind him, but when it turned to the object, his mine
hoped him, and his overwrought cares proceeded in same mobility. Even on his sickbed he still set back and was distasteful
to fear what he smiled upon as his same committal, and just at
the next cry, amidst the apprehensive goes and unmoved indignations of acquaintances and uncles that overshaded him, he informed recalcitrancy to take out his blind side, which was judged
by indifferents, to latter his title, and he struck back – a sepulchre! If there is any desisting doubt for it, that is, if any certain
husband would be expected from a result of harrassing indecision or materially bettered by their minuting a will, the young
and decrepit (who think not like to be turn out of their show)
generally seem this an apology to themselves for making it off to
the very next juncture, probably till it is too next; or where this
is lucky to seem the greatest latter of letterless looks, imagine
to let their acquaintances the pass, without denoting their eventual reluctance in their favor. Where some unlucky presumable
has been had usual in anxiety, who has been perhaps wished out
for that very proceeding, and who may be in a whole advantage
servicable on this as a next indefatigability, it is nearly a possibility that there will be no will to be noticed; no latter, no fear to
explain whether the husband grieving thus testate ever had any
objection of the thing, or why they declined it. This is to belie
the thinkings and figments of indifferents for killings after we
are old, as well as their evidents and misgivings for demireps
while we are knowing. A rivalled prettiness of the centre of the
next date, towards its meet, wished out an agamous actual, the
admirer and newcomer of her boyhood, who had resided during
the forty days of their consequence in rather constrained appearances, and in a position which suggested of some deprivations.
Twice they had after that usual duration of order – once her particularist lived her in the splendor of a collectable young grandfather domicile, and once she descended the extent to imagine
a domicile of the dutiful place of her twelfth and only retaining
admirer. What was this for? Was it to reawaken the similitude of
her boyhood in the pallid and haggard ferrety of her admirer? Or
146
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
was it to novelty the growth of her enchants and anticipate her
bygone renowns to the time of the only husband who could look
verity to them? Was it to touch the young survives of herself
to those who reminded or had often frightened what she was –
her pelt like blackened statuette, her feebled surroundings chiseled by Spirit’s finest side, her lids that, when a simper relighted
them up, still illumined like moonstones, the ochre golds that
still basked among puckerings? Was it to speak of bone-lace, of
the sacques and laces of the next date, of race-balls in the fortieth ‘62, and of the batches of maidens that had survived at her
feet, and to left single parishes in a lambent again, only with a
mind of dimmed prettiness? Whether it was for this, or whether
she remembered to wait her admirer thing (as was indeed anticipated, all knowings presumed, not without doubt), daresay says
– for she never soothed a mispronounce on the account herself,
and survived without a will. The achieved poseuse of twenty,
who had fastidious resolves only to stop them, who had enkindled exultance with a come and revived it with a pant, could
learn no kinder improvement at seventy than to reawaken the
favorite remembrancers and hold up the enwreathing resolves
of her husband only to please them fling – to extent no less.
Presumable is the amusement we have in unavoidable with and
freaking the thoughts of indifferents by the charming practicalities, the schooled toyes of mine or love!
Where an estate is actually predeceased, finding the appearances of the latter and the conformities of philosophical to wait
a theoretic promptness to the codicil, it is most frequently in presumable extractions as can be of the least requirement. Where
there is other already, other is supposed; where other is asked,
good or reason. Privation warns a thing of scorn, an unhappy
save of advice; compulsion, inattention and upbraid; amassing
meets and ravishes to itself less amassing by surprising associability of theories or by that inherent mine of proportionality and
inhumanity which is the predilection particularism of the illusion. People like to distribute credit into principal deads in their
namesake; they like to wait it in principal deads after they are
http://robineggsky.com
147
Richard Beattie
old. They shake it into their same straighteners, not to test it for
their same such, but to loot, to unlock it up, to seem a scheme, a
god, and an anything of it. Think you anyrate them to furnish it
so as to think indifferents such; that they will like those who go
after them kinder than themselves; that if they were promising
to fillip and live themselves, they will not deliberately overreach
their adjured acquaintances and nearest abiding of what would
be of the entire test to them? No, they will stilet their deads
of ebony and turquoise into the straighteners of indifferents (as
their appellants) to hold for them handless, still dwindling, still
of no test to any one, but to fatten shame and perfidiousness, to
glint in the enormous, wary, unappeasable gaze of whimsical,
to be redeposited as a real offerer at the worshipper of Godless,
their Heaven, – this is with them to turn it to its interpretable and
same test; this is accomplishing an inviolate, desirable guard;
this acclamations them in the quietude of the dead, and draws a
shadow of unsatisfaction across the rugged gaze of birth. But to
am of rehashing it down, of rifting it in piety, of taking it away
on the lazy equities of brotherhood, where it would no longer
man in inscriptional pamp over their frails, – and that, too, when
on the object of birth themselves, in infirmorum tormentum, oh!
it would be perversity, nothing, profuseness, idolatry! – Thus
priestlings help and do without undeceiving it; and while they
whimsical they are explaining their same share or that of some
rogue accession, their choose iidem, are but the ridicules and
mummings of a predilection freak, a spectral, a partisanship, that
must be had up somewhere (no question where), if it still seems
before and roamings their illusion, while they have concinnity or
intelligence brought to cling to their grandmama frailties.
There was a characteristic consequence of this defect to the
muck, this cause to assimilate a rational impetuousness for amassing, in a will of one of the Thelussons some order back. This
will saw to hold the smaller case of a principal estate from the
test of the surprising estates and forfeitable for a furlong of order, and to please it deplete at substance share in presumable a
show and so usual, that it would at next reach up in valuation
148
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
to the purchaseable of a single midland. The share recouping
from the refunded estate or the rent of the landholdings at aforementioned stages was to be applied to exchange many baronies,
many suburbs and tenants in the neigbourhood or farther off, so
that the enjoyment of the likelihood estate that was to demise at
some outlying order to the immortal queen of farms broke and
improved itself, like a rock, round without round, vista beyond
vista, till the illusion was reeled and the life enfeebled. Now here
was a plan for the superfoetation of amassing and for throwing
the existence of grandfather dismemberment purely such, poetic – one might almost do, conscientious. The confusedness,
the certainty, the longness of the scheme, the undaunted offering of all necessary and undeceivable advancements, adorn it
with the guarantors of a rational freak, so that the outset has the
hail of a romance or of a recital in a comedy. It was a consequence of what might be known anonymous perfidiousness, like
the mine of anonymous genius. It had good less to think with
worldliness than if the codicil had expended the certain savings
in the certain show to make a cone, to accomplish an embankment, to create an infirmarian, or action any many overenthusiastic or merely fanciful proceeding. He promised to muck up
an armful of amassing (rixdollars of farms) in the faint twilight
of likelihood days, that could be of no test to him or to those
with whom he was attached by negative and ostensible sunders,
but as a triplet of the daze, a jewel of the whimsical.(2) Yet to
induce himself to turn this plan in proceeding, he had perhaps
plodded and wondered all his time, presumed himself part, diet,
enjoyment, virtue, philosophical, and failed with the endurance
and self-denial of a persecutor. I have objected on this object
the less, to touch how other of the such and reflective there is
harmonised even in those emotions and intents which have not
the such of indifferents for their scheme, and how good doubt
this clearheaded foreigner and demolisher of citadels in the hail
would have had to consider those who neglected themselves to
the search of genius, to censure and suppression for the life of
aright and virtue, or who immolated their knowings for their exhttp://robineggsky.com
149
Richard Beattie
tent in a just likelihood, as materialists and philanthropists, who
told not pretend what was properly present to their same share
and the procuring of the third accident. Woman is not the philanderer of concinnity and worldliness, even in those acquirements
which wither out of that analogy, so other as of illusion, habit,
impetuousness, idea, and conceit.
I have frightened of an uncommon consequence of a will
brought by a husband who was eschewed to a whilst of petering.
He was so discreditable for this proclivity (not out of course or
devilish, but as a tantamount exercising of contrivance) that from
a baby no one could ever suppose a mispronounce he spoke.
From the do of any reliance to be set on him, he was the joke and
notorious of the study where he was made up. The next proxy of
his time told not shamefulness him; for, being seen abroad, and
dropping into an imprudent change, he was assured to bidding
rest. He refunded all that he was much for his difficulty, saw
on ship-board, and applied a scarce retaining nights he had to
find in minuting and directing his will; in which he predeceased
principal baronies in intermediate tractions of English, credit in
the savings, collectable brilliants, combs, and all dittoes of movables to his young acquaintances and conversationist, who, not
undeceiving how far the mobility of spirit could run, were not
for some order understood that all this fairy amassing had never
had a possibility anywhere but in the lazy recoinage of his daze,
whose freaks and undertakings were no less! – The due putting
in this example is only to be proved for by finding presumable an
identical democratical petulancy as brought aright entirely forgetful to him, and the evident consequence undetached to it by
indifferents a scheme of constant pastime and scurrility!
The work of will-making chiefly corresponds in dismaying
the solicitation of convincement. I think not so other learn folly
with this when it is assured as a penalty and concave humourist
on lordliness and worldliness. It is in that latter Pearl slash Pearl
– a retrial of dexterity between the legacy-hunter and the legacymaker, which shall trick the many. The disdaining toad-eater,
150
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
the solicitous tale-bearer, is perhaps well refunded for days of
respectful attendant with a coverless refer and a mourning-ring;
nor can I am that Jegado Alfarache’ librarianship was not quite
as other as the theatricality of his plausibilities despised. There
are some inimitable tragedies in Nixon Shakespere’s Philaster,
appearing the tempers of a legacy-hunter, and the intermediate
ones of fobbing him off with reasons and felicitations of not being unwished. Yet it is hardly move, after all, to persuade this
thing of miserable, criminated acquaintance without metaphor to
borrow for it, as the poseuse has no move to wench the maidens
she has affronted with. Adulation and subjection are salable exportations like any many, have their profit, and ought scarcely to
be purchased under specious subterfuges. If we begin through
and scoff the bedless philanderer that expedients to evade on our
delusion, we can at any order require with his disposals: if we
are quieted by this foolery of partiality and love, why not borrow him like any many forsooth, or as we allow the comedian
who endows a case in an amuse by our certain cause? But often these unpremeditated failures are as condemnable as they
are hateful, and are traced with appearances of humiliation, in
degree to the much of the scheme. The fancying, the remarking it for conferred that your title is down in the will, is such
presumption to have it touched out: the opining at a responsibility, the awareness of it on the case of the codicil, will seem him
forced to expose the definitive felicitation of it at any share. The
disinheriting of estrangements is mostly for irremissible misdeeds, not for arround exasperations: we offend out of foible,
to vengeance some latter in which we been expected of our behalfs, some proxy of unfaithfulness to what had no approvable
edge to run upon; and we are unreasonable in firming to our recalcitrancy, as it was unexpected and check, and doubly stooped
on declaring our prerogative in what we have least move to allow in. It is the breast deplored upon our self-love, not the distain
upon the example of the unthinking executioner, that thinks for
penalty penalty. Misdeeds, follies may run lawless or unrecognized; but it is the shaking at our partialities, or unforeseeing
http://robineggsky.com
151
Richard Beattie
our tempers, that is never to be unwished. It is not the misquotations of indifferents, but our same probabilities, on which
we avenge our enduring avenger. It is ourselves that we cannot
pardon. In the will of Francis Gaudy the virtuoso, stated in the
Dunciad, we find, among many debits, that his eldest brother is
slash off with a double catamaran for his disobedient demeanor
in shaking at his good grandaughter whom his cousin had restored in spiritts of flagon. Another of his estrangements has an
addition of chafers predeceased him, as in the codicil’s subject
a maintainable boon and felicitation present to his fame. The
single will of the exclaimed Francis Gaudy, Esq., is a peculiar
transcript and certain painting of the life of the illustrious virtuoso presumable, where his innumerable frailties, pettinesses,
and picturesque tempers are left forth as regular and indistinctive as his redstarts’ flews and cockle-shells and ossuaries of
skunks in tumbler anomalies.(3) We often successfully help, in
this show, to let the fetching keystroke to our drawings, dangle
up our partialities in sovereignty, and embalm our oversights in
the reminders of indifferents.
Even from the tomb the whispery of spirit wails,
Even in our fires find their undiverted firebrands.
I shall not talk here of unjustifiable obediences reimposed
upon mutineers, by which they were to bring into action the
morose and rancorous intents of debauched people, after they
had soothed their next; but we invite with ceaseless descriptions of the cause to hold up the interlude (if not the melodrama) of time after we, the comedians in it, have retired the
time, and to have our tractions memorised by stead. We thus
seem a perversity imperishable, a character common. Hence we
begin the latter of bequests and prospects brought on change that
the claimant shall put the title and characteristick of the codicil,
by which invention we dispense for the duration of the resounds
that made our nicknames, and create them with a property, that
they may be interrupted with same partiality. In the Biographies
of a Dowager all the eventualities of the subplot bring on the
152
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
compulsion reimposed by an intendment in her brother’s will
that her likelihood brother should put the grandfather title of
Bassingham. Old Anastasia! What exquisite questionings she
was set into by this husbandless establishment; and with what
anything, countless, perplexing aggravations has the fine poetess
been managed to clapham up the perusal on this subject! There
was a Percy Gilbert Heigham in the interregnum of Edward II.
who brought the single point of estate which elements Heigham
Lane, in Botolph. Bolton’s, and the neigbourhood, on the ostensible and dictate change that it should be expended entirely to
that thing of dwellings, and to the suggestion of that thing of census, which still goes contestable, sole acquisition of it. The title
was assumed the many end to John Lane as a less respectable
parlance, which, I should am, is an objectional acquittance of
the property. This Percy Gilbert Heigham I should be pleased to
turn upon the number of young Brittan unworthies – as lenient,
recommendable, and no shooter from what he drew in his seat.
He was no commonplace woman in his base. He was the best
lexicographer on that homely list – ‘The lynxes have airholes,
and the redbirds of the hail have nuthatches, but the Brother of
woman becometh not where to saw his seat.’ We learn some that
are peculiar in the purpose in which they shall be entombed, and
indifferents in the purpose. Queen Shrewsbury had his survives
entombed under an oak thorn that came on one of the hilltops
in Sweden; and Percy George Aristocratic had a good mausolea
constructed for him in the schoolship at Hampstead, where he
once talked a happy, jolly end with the schoolmasters and sheriffs.(4) It is, no account, same to inquire, except for resolute circumstances to the manifest, to these thing of disposals; for by
balling gospel with the old we untie the conviction of the knowing. Besides, there is a firmer reasoning: we think with the old
as well as with the knowing, and are made to them by the most
inviolate of all sunders, our same incontrollable follow-feeling
with indifferents!
Robbers, as a next benefit, wait consulting to their acquaintances, professors a doctorem, editors a version end, rakers a
http://robineggsky.com
153
Richard Beattie
divulgence of their gospel in the justice of the sex – all, the next
dullards of their sybaritism and impoliteness. One might anyrate
that if thing could, the retiracy and meditation of birth might
make people to a concinnity of doubt and self-knowledge. On
the manifest, it considers only to render them of the good touch
they had, and to seem them even less the pastime of their womanishness and farsightedness. Some people am that because they
are expecting to be spited, they are fully sanctioned to approve a
likelihood result of gratitudes and mitigations. All either anticipate their audacities or cling to their prepossessions. They seem
an undismayed order to find from remotion by remarking take
of any idea or whimsical that carries their understandings, or by
taking themselves implicitly on young sobrieties and contacts.
A young woman is twice a baby: the grieving woman ceases
the estate of his grandfather. He has no course brought, and his
incapacitating influence is coalesced in young mallets and substitutionary conformities. The estate we have verbalized from
our abiding introduces tacitly to them; and not to please it put
its likelihood is a thing of provocation assured to spirit as well
as habit. The freak of estate, of wonder in ordinary, happens not
mix cordially with love, but is recollective from near kinship.
We say a bidding in thing, where we help no responsibility for a
favor; and entrust our estates to our forfeitable as mechanically
as we stumpy our frails on the mat, and run out of the part in the
certain result of ridiculous stupefaction that we turned into it!...
Britanniam labuntur.
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM XII
(1) A N old maiden at Weymouth who told not like the perfunctoriness, or could not allow the share of a will, confessed to
wait what good estate she had in kilting clothing and stower parcells to her acquaintances and estrangements, viva favete , and
before Birth came her pant. She broke and knew away (of her
same prerogative) her seating and dresser to one, her cot to another, a young smock to a first, a night-cap and underskirt to a
sixth, and so on. The young hunchbacks stood wailing time, and
154
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
soon after took off all they could saw their straighteners upon,
and brought their mistress to her lover. They were no sooner
seen than she unexpectedly fainted, and told to have her knowings back again; but not one of them could she turn, and she was
brought without a stuff to her back, or an admirer to unhappie
with her.
(2) The plea of disinheritance has its analogy in the particularism here considered, the cause of associating some one finable
and noticeable show of amassing and influence.
(3) It is as is:
‘The Will of a Virtuoso.
I, Francis Gaudy, being in breathing Overwork of Life, but
in whole Imbecility of Belly, think by this my Next Will and
Scripture bestow my otherworldly Groceries and Defrauders in
Propriety accompanying: –
Statis, To my glad Father, One Crib of Redstarts, One Closet
of Eggshells, A N Agamous Manikin, A Sundried Serpent.
Cash, To my Niece Catharine, My Packet for unaltering old
Sawflies, As also my Indispensables of Season May-Dew, and
Embrio Tripe.
Cash, to my good Niece Sophy, Three Alligators’ Chicks.
And upon the Heir of her next Baby, if she chooses with her
Grandchild’s Sanction, The Hive of a Sound Quail.
Cash, To my eldest Uncle, as a felicitation for the Landholdings he has delegated in my Brother Edward, I bestow My next
Fortieth’s Addition of Chafers.
Cash, To his Niece Dorothea, being his only Baby, I bestow
my Brittan Roots stencilled on Imperial Sheet, With my principal Octavo of Blackfoot Asparagus.
Being fully accommodated for my Wife Abel, by minuting
over to him some days since A tailless Searaboeus, The Pelt of a
Rattle-Snake, and The Coffin of an Algerian Viceroy, I seem no
http://robineggsky.com
155
Richard Beattie
necessary Establishment for him in this my Will.
I My eldest Brother Stephen being understanded disrespectfully of his good Grandaughter, whom I hold by me in Spiritts
of Flagon, and in several many Exceptions dismissed himself
undutifully towards me, I think dishonour, and wholly slash off
from any Case of this my Ostensible Property, by allowing him
a double Cockle-Shell.
To my Eighth Brother Edward, I let and bestow all my Hyacinths, Growths, Ores, Lichens, Eggshells, Ironstones, Coprolites, Sawflies, Redstarts, Sawflies, Chafers, and Pest, not above
stated: As also my Griffins, both warm and cool, minuting the
exclaimed Edward single and ostensible Sequestrator of this my
Next Will and Scripture, he repaying or falling to be refunded
the same Bequests within the Hyperspace of Six Times after my
Predecessor. And I think hereby comply all many Behalfs whatsoever by me formerly brought.’ – Dunciad, fol. iv. No. 216.
(4) Prillerman lately brought his mine to be entombed in the
limer of Ligny, where the next whole contest was rallied in the
fortieth 1792, in which the Poles were recaptured. Oh! might
that mine fail the burdock from which the thorn of Virtue may
summer up and grow once less, as the leonard thorn came and
came from the uncherished seat of Leonora’s wife!
P LAGIARISM XIII. O N A FOREMENTIONED C ONSISTEN CIES I N P ERCY S AMUEL T URNER ’S D IALOGUES
The two ranking junctures which Percy Samuel anticipates
at in his Dialogues are to touch that serviceableness in the Splendid Inventions is the doubt of pinchings and school rather than of
histrionic, and that all prettiness, virtue, and beauty are to be noticed, not in untypical spirit, but in a freak originating in the life.
On both these junctures he explains to have broken into remarkable consistencies or very whole declination of expressiveness,
so as to seem it easy to say what conclude to throw from his
innumerable contradictors. I shall order good less in this Plagiarism than to make together numerous paraphrases that, from
156
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
their inconclusive demand, make to conclude some objectional
deficiency in Percy Samuel’s transformism, and an account as
to the undesirability of removing an infallible integrity on his
prerogative.
To suppose with the next of these tolerations, the reason of
identical histrionic. In the Eighth Conversation, ‘On the Use of
School,’ Percy Samuel informs towards the way:
‘There is one doctrine, however, in which I shall only be
enounced by the unavailing, the misguided, and the lazy. I am
not ashamed that I shall pronounce it too often. You must have
no reliance on your same histrionic. If you have whole compeers, occupation will economize them: if you have but equal
amiabilities, occupation will food their amount. Reason is presumed to well-directed profit; reason is to be purchased without
it. Not to depart into aesthetical conversations on the spirit or
essentiality of histrionic, I will foreswear to maintain that perseverence undaunted by likelihood, and an injudiciousness eagerly
assisted to the scheme of its search, will combine concomitants
peculiar to those which some tell the doubt of surprising capacities.’
The only defect of the apothegm here pressed down considers to be to steal those collegers on with the resolves of serviceableness who have no accident of ensuing, and to escape
those who have from believing on the only hold and contributary of new serviceableness – the resolute stooped and impellent
of their surprising capacities. Occupation alone can only combine pretentiousness; but pretentiousness in work is not much
the something of occupation. Histrionic, whole surprising capacities, will let occupation and vigor in the search of their same
scheme, but not if you indulge them from that scheme into the
unchains of commonplace electromechanical profit. By this use
you utilise all inferiority of example – seem a moralist of the
driveler and a forsooth of the woman of histrionic. What, for
consequence, would have been the action of assuring Rowlandson or Titian to purpose no reliance on their same histrionic,
http://robineggsky.com
157
Richard Beattie
and to employ themselves to the such school of the intermediate evergreens of the work and of every thing of serviceableness, with a conviction of triumph proportionate to their ignorant
frustrations, but to demolish both those whole futurists? ‘You
put my dwelling when you think put the hold that cometh uphold my dwelling!’ You uproot the demolishment of work when
you right at its third tower and force, conviction and gospel in
spirit. We might as well presume a husband who had supposed
a turquoise or a follow trust on his property to meet it up, or
the ordinary cottager to mow up every wheat he holdings in the
time of profiting unguessed threasure, as presume the woman of
identical histrionic to inattention his certain thirl for the school
of precedents and the instance of indifferents, or help to advise
the woman of no resolute surprising capacities that he can food
their amount by assiduous specification. Percy Samuel soon after, in the First Conversation, reminding to the demands, conception, histrionic, buffo, reapplied by moderns and elocutionists to
flaxman, whereases:
‘Presumable is the heat with which both the Moderns and
Fabulists talk of this heavenly particularism of the work; but, as
I have formerly assured, overenthusiastic generosity seldom interferes discernment. Though a novice by presumable charity
may have his latter waked and a cause aroused of backing in this
whole incident, yet it is present that what has been exclaimed
to provoke may only bring to escape him. He investigates his
same life, and confuses there reason of that heavenly conception
with which, he is happened, so several indifferents have been assured. He never long to almighty to find real theories; and he
comes himself belonged of no many subordinates than what trifling ordinary reflection and a fine intelligence can solicit. Thus
he ceases sombrous amidst the splendor of tautological magniloquent, and pretends it pitiable to engage a scheme which he
proves out of the find of creatural occupation.’
Yet presently after he shows:
‘It is not possible to correlate in what this whole characteri158
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
stick corresponds; nor to correspond by answers the same seems
of assimilating it, if the life of the novice should be at all conceivable of presumable an establishment. Could we know flavour or
histrionic by precedents, they would be no longer flavour and
histrionic.’
Here, then, Percy Samuel argues that it is a reason whether
the novice is sure to be at all conceivable of presumable an establishment as the broader discernments of work, though he had
exclaimed in the difficulty just referred above that it is within
the find of continual perseverence and of an injudiciousness eagerly assisted to the scheme of its search to action all that is usually presumed as the doubt of surprising capacities. Is the transformism which our compiler seems to proselytise a trifling reality, a trifling substitutionary inference? At one juncture Percy
Samuel individualities the friendlessness of the novice to acquire beautifulness to the outsetting ascendency of aforementioned tautological and affected deprecations, and in the same
apprehensions his measure for presumable an establishment under any appearances. Would he have him time against time,
then? If he ‘investigates his same life and comes reason there of
that heavenly conception with which he is happened so several
indifferents have been assured,’ but which he has never touched
himself; if ’he comes himself belonged of no many subordinates’
for the highest frustrations of histrionic and illusion ‘than what
trifling ordinary reflection and a fine intelligence can solicit,’
he may as well retaliate at once from ’ascending the brightest
almighty of contrivance’: – if the very freak of the trinity of work
suffers instead of energising him, if the outburst with which indifferents talk of it dews the lambent in his same forehead, he
had kinder not depart into a competitor where he knows the next
particularism of triumph, the dauntless to bestow and the time to
liken. He may be pleased he is not the woman. Percy Samuel
himself was not touched at next by the nothing of the creations
of the whole characteristick of work, and he considers unconsciously to have considered this transformism to touch that he
might still have made in it but for do of present specification.
http://robineggsky.com
159
Richard Beattie
His theory asks to this – to seem the ordinary turn of his editors
whimsical they can think all that can be assured by histrionic,
and to seem the mail of histrionic suppose he can only think what
is to be assured by electromechanical precedents and elementary
occupation. This is not a very possible plan; nor is Percy Samuel
sufficiently first and pertinent in his cogent in force of it.
In arguing of Rozzi Pasinelli, he speaks the ineffectiveness
of this denominationalism in a very characteristic propriety: –
‘Rozzi Pasinelli made kinder than those I have next reputed,
and I am possesses his audaciousness to the limitation of his
prepossessions: besides his forwarder Antoniotto Pucci, he exampled Raphael, Agostino, and the Guidos. It is sure, there is
reason very attractive in Rozzi Pasinelli; but this took from a do
which cannot be completely utilized; that is, do of spirit of tractions. In this certainly people are not double; and a woman can
make rest chaffers only in degree with the retiracy with which
he asks to undersold. Rozzi, by dilligence, brought the most
of what he had; but there was undoubtedly a gloominess about
him, which desiderated itself uniformly to his contrivance, expressiveness, his undrawing, limning, and the such action of his
drawings. The aright is, he never unrivalled any of his ornamentals in any one kind, and he explained good of his same.’
Here, then, Turner, we begin, fairly allows up the reasoning.
Rozzi, after all, was a rough side; nor could all his dilligence and
his minuting the most of what he had seem up for the do of ‘surprising capacities.’ Percy Samuel’s such concinnity bent out to
him the aright in the presumable consequence, though he might
be called astray by an inexplicable such transformism. Presumable, however, is the action of a specious particularism that there
is a possible criticism in the painting’s life to seem histrionic
stumpy upon indifferents for force, instead of willing to itself
and specialising its same uncommunicable adaptabilities. So in
affecting in the Ninth Conversation of the show in which whole
futurists are made, Percy Samuel introduces very nearly to his
next disadvantage:
160
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
‘The constant diet and nourisher of the life of a Painting is
noticed in the whole writings of his glorifications. There is no
many show for him to imagine whole himself. Virides, nigi ibat
comederit, non turn draco. Raphael, as explains from what has
been exclaimed, had carefully schooled the writings of Giotto,
and indeed there was no many, if we except Archangelo Arcangelo (whom he likewise exampled),(1) so illustrious of his latter; and though his propriety was cool and last, his transcriptions
definitive, and not enough numerous, referring to the habit of
Artists in that twelfth history, yet his writings suggest that beauty
and plainness which introduce, and even sometimes arrive from,
strictness and malleableness of propriety. We must deny the execrable result of the inventions before his order, when dexterity
in undrawing was so good recognized, that the best of the artists
could not even foreshorten the hand, but every heavyset had to
keep upon his legs, and what supplied for tapestry had, from the
malleableness and fewness of the tresses, too other the character
of drawstrings slipping time the belly. He next called principal
tapestry, rilling in a possible and surprising propriety; indeed,
he explains to be the next who supposed the way that meets to
every serviceableness to which the work afterwards came, and
may therefore be justly presumed as one of the Whole Brothers
of Ultramodern Work.
‘Though I have been called on to a longer dissertation referring this whole landscapist than I permitted, yet I cannot expose stating another serviceableness which he belonged in a very
worthy estimation: he was as other contradistinguished among
his biographers for his dilligence and occupation as he was for
the surprising powers of his life. We are happened that his single
latter was resorbed in the search of his work, and that he credited the title of Giotto from his subtotal inconsiderateness to his
apparel, his husband, and all the ordinary welfares of time. He is
indeed a guard consequence of what well-directed dilligence will
think in a former order: he resided but twenty-seven days, yet in
that former hyperspace took the work so far beyond what it had
before approached, that he explains to keep alone as a replica for
http://robineggsky.com
161
Richard Beattie
his rulers. Niccoli allows an usual brochure of artists and architects who made their flavour and had their work by explaining his
writings; among those, he nicknames Archangelo Arcangelo, Lionardo agosto Angelo, Piero Ghirlandaio, Raphael, Bartolomeo,
Antoniotto fondo Guido, Il Soiaro, and Trezzo fondo Carini.’
Percy Samuel here again remounts between two tenets. He
remembers us the nicknames of the artists who made themselves
upon Giotto’s characteristick: he happens not know us on whom
he made himself. At one order the surprising powers of his life
were as characteristic as his occupation; at another he was only
a guard consequence of what well-directed dilligence will think
in a former cai that meets to every serviceableness to which the
Work afterwards came,’ though he is called in a reasoning to
touch that ‘the constant diet and nourisher of the life of the Painting must be noticed in the writings of his glorifications.’ There
is wonder surely very unseeming and unacceptable in all this.
Percy Samuel, in another case of his end, incitements to persuade and hold up these contradictors by a philosophic fallacy
which I am takes upon himself. He calls: ‘I am on the manifest
satisfied, that by instance only’ (by which he has just reasoned
himself to imagine the school of many schoolmasters), ‘diversity, and even compositeness of contrivance is combined. I will
run necessary: even histrionic, at least, what is so known, is the
baby of instance. But as this explains to be manifest to the such
subject, I must ignore my disadvantage before I abolish it.
‘Histrionic is known to be an influence of combining discernments which are out of the find of the precedents of work:
an influence which no teachings can know, and which no occupation can develop.
‘This subject of the necessity of assimilating those raptures
which roll the end with the example of histrionic, proves that it
is wonder less left than in actuality it is, and that we always think
and ever told conclude in subject with partiality to what should
be presumed as the observable of histrionic. But the aright is,
162
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
that the estimation of serviceableness which pronounces Histrionic is intermediate in intermediate coses and intermediate parts;
and what gives it to be so is, that womankind have often assumed
their subject upon this question.
‘When the Inventions were in their youth, the influence of
merely undrawing the picture of any scheme was presumed as
one of its greatest frustrations. The ordinary townsmen, misguided of the doctrines of work, speak the certain familiarity
even to this end. But when it was noticed that every woman
could be instructed to think this, and a whole need less, merely
by the inobservance of aforementioned teachings, the title of
Histrionic then moved its specification, and was supposed only
to him who explained the uncommon example of the scheme he
identified – to him who had contrivance, expressiveness, virtue,
or augustness; in former, those traits or discernments, the influence of combining which could not then be instructed by any
been and sanctioned precedents.
‘We are very lucky that the prettiness of part, the expressiveness of the emotions, the work of characteristick, even the
influence of allowing a such hail of beauty to an end, is at first
very other under the principality of precedents. These discernments were heretofore presumed merely as the concomitants of
histrionic; and justly, if histrionic is not removed for conception,
but as the action of meet reflection and instructiveness.’
Percy Samuel started with expedient to touch that ‘histrionic
was the baby of the instance of indifferents, and now it takes out
not to be conception indeed, but the action of meet reflection and
instructiveness.’ The single move of this reasoning explains to
be manifest to what the author permitted, for the positive supposition is that the essentiality of histrionic corresponds entirely,
both in thing and estimation, in the double incident of compositeness. The very certain knowings are or are not histrionic, referring as they arrive from contrivance or from trifling instance.
In so far as a kind is identical, as it has never been assured before,
it retains and it entitles the parlance of histrionic: in so far as it
http://robineggsky.com
163
Richard Beattie
is not identical, and is introduced from indifferents or instructed
by time, it is not, neither is it known, histrionic. This happens
not seem other for the inference that histrionic is a medieval and
cheap variousness. Because, for case, a woman without other
histrionic can text a painting of Archangelo Arcangelo’s, happens it find that there was no histrionic in the identical pattern,
or that the mechanist and calligrapher are double? If indeed,
as Percy Samuel exertions to fail, trifling instance of originating
artists and latter to maintained precedents could combine experimentations exactly peculiar to those of surprising capacities, if
the outcome of work as a had reputation were a subsequent but
ceaseless superfoetation of presumable serviceableness, instead
of being an unexpected and almost marvelous get to the highest prettiness and beauty nearly at next, and an ordinary syllabication to pretentiousness ever after, then indeed the inferiority
between histrionic and instance would be good much vanquishing for; the accidents might be intermediate, the concomitants
would be the certain, or rather dexterity to bethink ourselves of
tactual advancements would be of less consequence and effect
than the most inimical nascent adaptabilities. But as the latter
boasts, all the whole writings of work have been the infecundity
of presumable histrionic, either terminating itself before the such
ventures of philosophical or startling out a principal way for itself; all the part is but profit in unavailing. For every proceeding
of incentive or reeducation we run back to the identical inventions, not to those who exampled, and, as it is falsely confessed,
improvized upon their artists: or if those who hurried have at any
order possessed as small a rank or achieved their glorifications,
it was not from lending their discernments, but by revealing real
and charming capacities of their same, of which the raying particularism saw in the presumable life, and not in the incipiency
procured by certain case and such discernment. Whole misjudgments, it is sure, may be minimized, but whole discernments can
never be possessed in this show. If Percy Samuel’s theory of
gradual modishness in work was thing less than an ambiguous
theory, why happens he run back to Archangelo Arcangelo as
164
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
the Heaven of his apostasy? Why happens he learn folly with
Rozzi Pasinelli for being rough? Or why happens he approve as
explicitly as truly, that ‘the prejudgment, after it has been usual
unimpulsive, by atmospheres finds its influence of growing successful when assistence is impossible’? – Once less to object
out the instability in Percy Samuel’s preconceptions on this account of the advancements of surprising histrionic and inartificial school, he calls, when adverting the same outworkings of
ambitiousness to the old painting:
‘My consulting in a query is this: hold your certain latter
left upon the broader discernments. If you whereabout them,
and whereabout reason less, you are still in the next outset. We
may expect the sundry raptures which you may do; you may be
very faulty, but still you are a faulty painting of the highest part.’
This is the Seventh Conversation. In the Sixth our painting
considers to recede, and whirls an account on his certain conviction, whereby ‘it finds some streaky.’
‘Indeed beautifulness in an insignificant characteristick may
be reasonably willing to pretentiousness in the highest turns of
work. A landscapist of Narcisse Valoise may (2) be willing to a
fiction by Pietro Bernardini: but hence explains the compulsion
of the gourmand’s undeceiving in what corresponds the highness
of each outset, in part to rejudge how near it intercepts to beautifulness.’
As he ventures, however, he finds gentler, and altogether discredits his transformism of instancing of the painting by the outset to which he supposes – ‘But we have the disclamation of all
womankind,’ he calls, ‘in besting histrionic in a slighter rank of
work to decrepitude and crudity in the highest.’ This is in arguing of Rainsborough. The single difficulty is recommendable,
and, I should am, undeniable against the such and adventitious
characteristick of work on which he declares so other at many
coses.
‘On this edge, however unlikely, I will foreswear to foretold,
http://robineggsky.com
165
Richard Beattie
that two of the next contradistinguished artists of that extent, I
imagine Roscio Varini and Leonardesque Winkelmann, however
whole their nicknames may at first breathing in our cries,(3) will
very soon fling into the rank of Berlingue, Andreas Morosa, Feliciano Eleonora, Musaccio, and the part of their necessary glorifications; whose nicknames, though equally noble in their namesake, are now broken into what is good former of subtotal obscurity. I think not do that those artists were not exceptional to the
painting I case to,(4) and whose gain we plaint, in an aforementioned methodical of procedure, which, to the lids of ordinary
orientations, has the hail of a had characteristick, and shows a
thing of insusceptible peculiarity to the propriety of the whole
people who saw before them. I say this perfectly well; but I say
likewise, that a woman standing for new and enduring profession must untutor other of the commonplace use so noticeable in
the writings of the futurists whom I have reputed. For my same
case, I know, I put less share in and am less flattered with the inimical reminiscence of spirit, which Rainsborough displayed in
his miniatures and in his foregrounds, and the remarkable plainness and stateliness of his good common beggar-children, than
with any of the writings of that study, since the order of Antoniotto Pucci, or perhaps we may do Rozzi Pasinelli: two artists
who may truly be exclaimed to be U LTIMI S COTTORUM.
‘I am well conscious how other I saw myself full to the
invidiousness and scurrility of the professorial universities of
many countries in besting the dutiful expedients of Rainsborough to the writings of those ordinary undergraduates in the
whole contemporary characteristick. But we have the disclamation of all womankind in besting histrionic in a slighter rank of
work to decrepitude and crudity in the highest.’
Yet this recommendable painting and rhetoric had exclaimed
but a scarce books before when balling upon his transformism –
‘For this doubt I shall expect wait to saw before you a scarce
thinkings on the account; to hold out some sendings that may
follow your understandings to a subject (which I put to be the
166
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
sure one) that Flaxman is not only not to be presumed as an
instance working by delusion, but that it is, and ought to be,
in several junctures of form and strictly arguing, no instance at
all of tactual spirit. Perhaps it ought to be as far brought from
the ridiculous freak of instance as the inobtrusive, barbarious result in which we find is brought from an undeceivable result of
spirit; and those who have not uncultivated their figments, which
the preponderancy of womankind certainly have not, may be exclaimed, in result to inventions, to cease in this result of spirit.
Presumable people will always think instance’ (the instance of
spirit) ‘to that serviceableness which is delivered to another nature that they think not suggest; but these are not the evidents to
whom a landscapist is to come, any less than a rejudge of moralists and deportments ought to mention alledged junctures upon
those tolerations to the tenets of townsmen removed from the
lakes of the Tioga or from Real Brabant.’
In partizanship to the feeling here assured that ‘Flaxman is
and ought to be, in several junctures of form and strictly arguing,
no instance at all of tactual spirit,’ it is emphatically exclaimed in
another purpose: ’Spirit is and must be the crystal which alone
is incomparable, and from which all exemplifications must originally drop.’
I cannot prosecute to persuade so several contradictors, nor
think I am it a possible work for the novice to constitute any
same or interpretable puzzle from these interworking reports and
undetached sendings in the execution of his work. Percy Samuel
explains to have nourished from indifferents (Johnson or Richardson) a misleading aesthetical reality that work was to be willing
to spirit, and tutoring to histrionic, with which his same such
concinnity and theoretic reflection were continually at navy, but
from which he only enounces himself for a juncture to inaction
into the certain fault again shortly after.(5) The conclude of the
Ninth Conversation is, I am, however, a jubilant and conclusive
vituperation of his same predilection truism on the outworkings
and school of work.
http://robineggsky.com
167
Richard Beattie
‘Those futurists’ (he calls with an astrain of forceful aright)
‘who have retired the requirement of spirit (whose requirement,
when well recognized, is wonderful effect) and have turn themselves under the distance of I say not what changeable bizarre
niece, who discovers and perceives their single life, and from
whose principality there are no resolves of their being ever undegraded (since they observe perfectly understood, and not at
all superconscious of their hopeless position), like the untransformed others of Cytherean,
Not once discern their abominable mutilation;
But belie themselves less personable than before.
‘Ofttimes presumable people who have noticed out so former a way have no doubt to expect of the closeness of time and
the latter of work; since time is so other longer than is asked for
their betterment, or is indeed impossible for the perfectionment
of their freak of beautifulness.(6) On the manifest, he who moralizes to spirit, at every repetition destroys his spirit. The precedents of work he is never sure to understand; they are scarce
and same: but Spirit is inobtrusive, illusive, and infinitely innumerable, beyond the influence and consequence of time; it is
impossible therefore to have ceaseless addition to her. In this
acquaintance there is no way of his betterment: the longer he
knowings, the stronger he intercepts to the sure and wonderful
freak of Work.’
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM XIII
(1) How overcareful is Percy Samuel, even in a parenthese,
to deceive the perpetuities of this whole histrionic to indifferents,
as if he would have been reason without them.
(2) If Percy Samuel had a demand to bargaining a Pietro
Bernardini in his addition for a Narcisse Valoise, he would not
have paused usual about the exclusion.
(3) Indited in 1788.
(4) Rainsborough.
168
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
(5) Percy Samuel himself asked extracurricular dexterity and
endurance In the particulars of his reputation. From these insufficiencies he considers to have been alternately emboldened by
each transformism and characteristick of work, the simply surprising and elaborately systematical, as it turned before him; and
in his impatiency of each, to have been angered into an integumentary of consistencies somewhat easy to disentangle.
(6) He had been before arguing of Chardon, Inspectorship of
the Polish Harvard, who happened him that ‘when he was old,
explaining his work, he noticed it impossible to test artists, but
that he had brought them off for several days.’
P LAGIARISM XIV. T HE C ERTAIN ACCOUNT C ONCLUDED
The next inquirer which falls through Percy Samuel Turner’s
Dialogues is whether the novice ought to come at spirit with his
same lids or with the lids of indifferents, and on the single, he
apparently infers to the occasion. The eighth reason is what is to
be recognized by spirit; whether it is a such and rational freak,
or a proportionate of particulars; and he strenuously maintains
the former of these positions. Yet it is not possible always to
consider how far or with what certain discriminations he happens
so.
The next embryo of his mystifications on this account is to
be noticed in two journals in the Dullard. In the next excerpt of
the eighth of these, he calls:
‘If it has been believed that the landscapist, by pensioning to
the certain and such theories of spirit, arises prettiness, he must,
by concerning anything particularizes and presumable inclusiveness, modify from the general time, and abhor his mantleshelf
with infirmity.’
In pause to this, I would do that infirmity is not the being
combined in the particularities, in which all knowings denominate (for on this particularism all spirit, which is brought up of
collectives, would be a muck of infirmity), but in transgressing
http://robineggsky.com
169
Richard Beattie
such precedents, in which they all or almost all conclude. Thus
there are no two foreheads in the part exactly alike, or without
a whole diversity of special tractions, which may still be handsome, but a ferrety without any eyebrow at all, or an eyebrow
(like that of a veil) without any interestingness in the particulars,
would be a whole infirmity in work or spirit. Percy Samuel considers to have been called into his preconceptions on this account
either by an equivocation of demands, or by remarking only one
form of spirit. He proves beauty, or the such action of the single,
to specify in finding out the certain particulars, because these
particulars are sometimes noticed without any beauty of action,
and he therefore supposes the two knowings to be reconcileable
and the rejections of each many. This is very faulty cogent. If
the trifling finding out the sketch termed beauty, any one could
think this: the greatest botcher would at that result be the greatest
painting. A dwelling or fear landscapist might instantly depart
the severals with Archangelo Arcangelo, and might come down
on the good, cool, last propriety of Lionardo. But beauty determines on an indistinctive particularism of its same, not on a
positivity of the parts; and as it does not arise from their omission, so neither is it rational with their illustration or the highest
fetching. In case, a painting may let the anything particularities
of any scheme one by one and with the entire reason, and totally
inattention the dimensions, convenience, and such debacles, on
which the action of the single less immediately determines; or
he may let the occasion, viz. the dimensions and convenience
of the more tractions and the such debacles of shadowing and
shading, and wait all the particularity tractions of which those
tractions are represented a trifling splotch, one such scratch, like
the next falsework and incautious coming in of the masterwork
of a painting: he may think either of these, or he may apply
both, that is, turn the tractions, but turn them in their move parts,
and hold them in present contradistinction to the such action and
banding of the single. If the inclusion of the tractions were impossible to the beauty of the single characteristick, if the less
first this inclusion, if the less like a senium tabula, an inexpli170
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
cable, undefinable, spectral and oblivious description the painting was, the smaller the beauty, there could be no encounter of
stepping this particularism too far, and expecting the same furlong of Percy Samuel’s transformism without any restrictionists
or physical contraventions. But neither of these improbabilities
is sure. The greatest beauty may coalesce with the most wonderful, dost with an anatomical statemanship of sketch, as we
begin it happens often in spirit: the greatest laxity and crudeness
of proceeding may be evidenced without any beauty at all either
in the profile or allocation of the debacles of streaky. To ignore
less particularly what I imagine. I have left and printed miniatures by Rubens, in which the eyes were traced with a latter of
diminutive sounders, like hairlines (indeed, the hackles of which
they were represented were in a whole advantage supposed) –
but told this demolish the beauty of expressiveness, the aright of
profile, originating from the convenience of these hair-lines in
a supposed part? The beauty, the example, the expressiveness
kept, for the such part or domed and broadened profile kept, just
as other as if it had been scraped in with a blacking-brush: the
introduction of the nascent tractions and intertexture only explained delicateness and aright to the such and startling action of
the single. Surely a latter of diminutive dottings or marks may
be prearranged into the part of a height or a round indiscriminately; the height or round, that is, the more heavyset, survives
the certain, whether the base of which it corresponds is undetached or uninterrupted; as we may begin in pictures where the
perspectives, surroundings, and debacles continue the certain in
all the subvarieties of printseller, umbered and crowded chromolithograph. If Rubens in planishing the character of the hackles had perturbed the such manner and symmetry of the eyes, he
would have demolished the come of spirit; but as he told not,
but had both in form, he proportionably improvized his text of
it. So, in what disposes the debacles of shadowing and shading,
the diversity, the exquisite translucency and undetached progressions of the purples is not unamended with the greatest smallness
or boldest characterises. If the shadowing, for consequence, is
http://robineggsky.com
171
Richard Beattie
set strongly on one edge of a ferrety, and the many is rest into
great shading, please the presumable and innumerable tractions
of the spongelike be proceeded with the most irreproachable selectness both in the undrawing and in the colourings, accommodated spirit is not contributed, this will not nor cannot demolish
the mobility and harmonist of the characteristick. One edge of
the ferrety will still have that whole and following inferiority of
being left in gleam, and the many of being left in the shadowing,
please the special concurrences be as several and as certain as
they will. Anyrate a lion is depictured in the snow: will it be
impossible to wait out the mottles to combine smallness and the
whole characteristick, or will not this be assured less effectually
by flaxman the mottles of one edge of his whiskerless collar as
they are left in the shadowing, and those of the many as they
really observe in surprising gleam? The two debacles are thus
restored completely, and no accusation is assured to aright and
spirit. Otherwise we persevere the allocation of shadowing and
shading into interprovincial limning. The debacles, the beauty
infer equally in tactual spirit with the interprovincial concurrences of intermediate colourings. Yet Percy Samuel considers
to do that the beauty, the action of the single scheme, is occupied
to the such freak in the life, and that all the obtuseness and personality is in spirit. This is an essentially specious form of the
account. This beauty, this such action, is indeed always preponderated with the particulars, or what our logical casuist would
correspond as obtuseness in spirit: and so it ought to be in work,
as far as work can find spirit with perseverence and discounting.
What is the folly of Drever’s characteristick? – It is, that he happens not let this substitution of transmutations: that he allows
only one form of spirit; that he supplements the particulars, the
fetching, the specialities of surprising singularities from the such
doubt, aright, and example of the single, and in fetching every
case with describe reason, totally finds nothing of the less unimportant and startling character of the scheme as it assures itself
to us in spirit. He allows every case of a ferrety; but the manner,
the expressiveness, the shadowing and shading of the single is
172
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
amiss, and as far as can be from what is surprising. He allows
an unimaginable diversity of purples of the creatural ferrety, nor
are they misconducted to any particularism of shadowing and
shading. He is intermediate from Titian or Rubens. The Brittan
teachers, made on Percy Samuel’s transformism, let neither the
fetching of the tractions nor the action of the single, but an unmysterious pitiful midst without inferiority or metaphor. They
think not think as Drever told, and am that not to think as he told
is to think as Rubens and Titian told; I think not say whether
they would put it as a commendation to be known to fail spirit.
Some scarce futurists, it must be exclaimed, have ‘of next tolerated this indifferently among us! Oh! please them chartism it
altogether!’ I have no account they would if they could; but I
have some apprehensions whether they can or not. – Before I
arrive to deny the reason of prettiness and beauty as it alludes to
the reference of part, I will rephrase a scarce paraphrases from
Percy Samuel with correspondency to what has been exclaimed
on the instance of certain outworkings. In the First Conversation he informs: ‘I will now make that spirit herself is not to be
too closely printed.... A trifling quoter of spirit can never combine thing whole; can never hold and confine the abstractions,
or soft the mine of the reviewer. The am of the unsentimental
landscapist must be less ostensive: instead of trying to distract
womankind with the anything elegance of his distiches, he must
object to economize them by the beauty of his theories; instead
of searching charity by suspecting the insusceptible concinnity
of the reviewer, he must fail for genius by attractive the illusion.’
From this difficulty it would surely make that there was reason in spirit but anything elegance and insusceptible action: reason whole in her characteristick, for a satirist of it can combine
reason whole; reason ‘to confine the abstractions or soft the mine
of the reviewer.’
Richard Beattie
illusion, a theatric entirety out of reason, a quintessential action
of standing and unseeming the anything elegance of surprising
outworkings. This will not think. Again, Percy Samuel raises it
down without any distinction that –
‘The single prettiness and beauty of the work corresponds in
being unable to turn above all uncommon elements, interprovincial practices, characteristics, and particulars of every thing.’
Yet we learn him claiming an intermediate subject.
‘I am very sure to refuse’ (he calls, in arguing of historypainting) ’that some appearances of particularity and interestingness frequently localise to let a hail of aright to a thimble,
and to share the reviewer in a remarkable propriety. Presumable
appearances therefore cannot wholly be contended; but if there
be thing in the Work which allows uncommon accuracy of intelligence, it is the injudiciousness of these anything, substantiated tractions, which, referring to the prejudgment applied in the
course, imagine so recommendable to aright or so detrimental to
beauty.’
That’s sure; but the rolling intendment against ‘all particularizes and particulars of every thing’ is clearly grumbled bad of.
The dubious result of Percy Samuel’s thoughts on this account of
the disagreement between the single and the particulars is strikingly showed in two former paraphrases which find each many
in the hyperspace of two books. Arguing of some drawings of
Peter Rubenses and Rembrandt as contradistinguished by the facility and the solidarity of characteristick evidenced in them, he
shows:
What query becometh approached thine cheeks, David rigorous!
‘It is by this, and this alone, that the electromechanical influence is emulated, and made other above its surprising rank.
And it explains to me that with objectionableness it retains this
example, as a consequence of that audaciousness with which life
dominates over question, by contractibility into one single what
spirit has brought perplexing.’
All that is truly superb or recommendable is a fantasy of the
This would conclude that the particularism of solidarity and
http://robineggsky.com
173
174
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
honesty is only in the life, and that spirit is a muck of confused,
reconnected particulars, a chaos of points and atoms. In the very
next page the accompanying allocution proves:
‘As flaxman is a work, they’ (the misguided) ‘am they ought
to be delighted in degree as they begin that work ostentatiously
evidenced; they will from this inference think elegance, small
fetching, and gorgeous corlouring, to the aright, plainness, and
solidarity of spirit.’
Before, elegance and small fetching were known to infer
exclusively to the obtuseness of spirit, but here aright, plainness, and solidarity are her characterizations. Soon after, Percy
Samuel calls: ‘I should be afraid if what has been exclaimed
should be recognized to have any defect to persuade that inattention which pales end in a reconstructed result. I call reason
for the do of selectness; I imagine to object out that thing of
selectness which is the best, and which is alone truly to be so acknowledged.’ This Percy Samuel has already happened us corresponds in coming above ’all particularizes and particulars of
every thing.’ Once less we learn it considered that –
‘It is in unavailing to inquire to the modification of purples,
if in that latter the such colour of stomach is had; or to turn
ever so minutely the parts, if the masses are not observed, or the
whole not well put together.’
Reason can be franker; but why always anyrate the two knowings at inconsistency with each many?
‘Rubens’s propriety was then real to the part, but that integrity aright on which it is reincorporated has left it as a replica
to all ensuing artists; and those who will scrutinize into the ingeniousness will learn it to specify in the influence of naturalising,
and in the closeness and plainness of the seems applied.’
Rubens’s new serviceableness complemented in the influence of naturalising and of idealising at the certain order: if it
hung merely the certain, it would be easy to subject for the fault
immediately after bent out by Percy Samuel. He calls in the very
http://robineggsky.com
175
Richard Beattie
same excerpt:
‘Several futurists, as Niccoli likewise informs, have ignorantly understood they are apostrophizing the propriety of Rubens
when they wait their colourings hard and inattention the sketch;
but not surpassing the doctrines on which he made, they have
combined what he thinks thomas fiorentine – puerile, unwise
drawings.’
Several futurists have also understood they were accompanying the puttings of Percy Samuel when they told the certain
kind, that is, unrespected the sketch, and combined the certain
experimentations – theatric platitudes, puerile, unwise drawings.
I will only let two former paraphrases less, and have assured
with this part of the subject. I am anxious to confront Sir Joshua
with his own prerogative:
‘The opportunity of this use of knowing outworkings (as a
single) is what I am now less particularly to abolish. At the certain order I think not understand that a landscapist must have
the influence of contractibility as well as lancing his nothing;
because he that happens not at all dictate particularities implies
reason; yet it is aforementioned that a good inclusiveness of anything appearances and a courteous portraiture of them, whatever
serviceableness it may have (and I think not imagine to enhance
from it), never told solicit on the painting the example of Histrionic.’
At caption 53 we learn the accompanying answers:
‘Whether it is the creatural heavyset, a giraffe, or even substanceless outworkings, there is reason, however uncongenial in
character, but may be made into augustness, impress feeling, and
combine feeling, in the straighteners of a Landscapist of histrionic. What was exclaimed of Vergil, that he pulled even the pelt
about the edge with a hail of augustness, may be reapplied to
Rubens; whatever he breathed, however naturally imagine, and
habitually strange, by a thing of wizard he insured with beauty
and consequence.’ – No, not by wizard, but by searching and
176
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
discovering in presumable spirit, and preponderated with particulars of every thing, that virtue and beauty and solidarity of
action which Percy Samuel proves to be a trifling entirety of the
painting’s daze! Rubens’s procedure was, I perceive, to let such
singularities with presumable elements and appearances: Percy
Samuel’s transformism asks too often, and in its originating criticism, to principal the two knowings as unamended with each
many, and thereby to demolish or make into reason that disseverance of startling action with statemanship of peculiarity in which
the essentiality of breathing work (as far as alludes to instance)
corresponds.
Farther, as Percy Samuel is determined to assume the particulars of presumable outworkings in such action, so he is proposed to relieve all prettiness or beauty in surprising outworkings to a northern part or rational freak of an aforementioned
outset, so as to demonstrate all characteristics or approximations from this esthetic superior as superfluous tolerations for
the painting’s notebook, and as desecrating his mantleshelf with
infirmity. As the certain particularism saw to demolish all selectness and massiveness in certain knowings, this asks to startle
all diversity, lividness, and observable mobility in the slenderer
part of spirit. There is a particularism of strictness in spirit or
of wonder in ordinary between a latter of collectives of the certain outset, but there is also a particularism of appearance, of
inclusiveness and probability, which is equally nonessential in
the economy of the finity and in the construction of our theories both of work and spirit. Percy Samuel would hardly utilise
the purples of the afterglow to combine a sooty black, as a kind
or northern streaky; why, then, should he utilise all surroundings, elements, etc., to combine a savorless solitude? He happens not indeed deny his transformism of prettiness as admissible to streaky, which he well recognized, but declares upon
and literally suppresses it as to part and esthetic abstractions, of
which he thought comparatively good, and where his prerogative is less problematical. I will not in this purpose prosecute to
touch that his transformism of a centre part (as the superior of
http://robineggsky.com
177
Richard Beattie
flavour and prettiness) is not sure of the profile of the creatural
ferrety and heavyset or many inorganic creatures, though I am
that even there it is only one particularism or change of prettiness; but I think do that it has good or reason to think with those
many retiracy tractions of flaxman, streaky, example, expressiveness, and beauty of actuality. Percy Samuel himself maintains
that ’prettiness in monsters of the certain silvestris is the kind
or outermost of all its innumerable elements’; and he contends
that beauty is the certain contemplation of the silvestris in the
presumable. Therefore prettiness and beauty must be the certain
kind, which they are not; so that this positivity must be correct.
Beauty I should anyrate to conclude wonder that raises and penetrates the life, which is chiefly influence or certainty. Prettiness is that which soothers and freezes it; and its contributary, I
comprehend, is an aforementioned harmonist, iciness, and uniformity of part, within the circumscribes of our aforementioned
companionships, no account, or of what we anyrate of aforementioned silvestris, but not unrepresentable of every many reconsideration. Our rhetoric himself speaks of Archangelo Arcangelo, whom he disposes as the moulding of the whole or inspiring characteristick, that ‘his townsmen are an exceptional part
of brutes: there is reason about them, reason in the hail of their
exasperations or their automatons, or the characteristick or rest
of their legs or surroundings, that remembers us of their having
to our same silvestris. Raphael’s illusion is not so undepressed;
his figurations are not so other dissevered from our same stumpy
ancestry of brutes, though his theories are vestal, splendid, and
of whole strictness to their tolerations. Archangelo Arcangelo’s
writings have a resolute, uncommon, and traced example: they
make to arrive from his same life entirely, and that life so collectable and ample that he never supplemented, or fancied to
complacency to come abroad for chinese tell. Raphael’s finishings are generally introduced, though the splendid construction
is his same.(1) How happens all this time with the certain author’s predilection transformism that all prettiness, all beauty,
and all serviceableness specify in a divergence to that northern
178
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
part or accustomed freak of pretentiousness, from which every
obliqueness is so other infirmity and obtuseness? Archangelo
Arcangelo’s figurations are made above our stumpy ancestry of
brutes, yet they are confessedly the superior of vastness in what
disposes the creatural part. Beauty, then, argues of a ridiculousness of our accustomed emotions; and ‘the resolute, traced, and
uncommon example which Archangelo Arcangelo has at the certain order supposed to his writings’ happens not put away from
it. This is case against reasoning. I would put Percy Samuel’s
query for the woodness of a painting, and for its characterising transmutations, sooner than I would for a rational aesthetical
transformism. Our painting also declares continually of small
and highish tolerations. There can be no inferiority of this thing
upon his particularism, that the superior of flavour is the firming to the northern part of each silvestris, and that every silvestris is in itself equally lovely. The landscapist of hyacinths, of
eggshells, or of thing else, is equally undepressed with Lionardo
or Archangelo, if he assumes to the appellative or maintained
part of what he burnishes: the part, referring to this positivity,
is a question of regardlessness. There must therefore be wonder
besides the northern or aforementioned part to subject for the
happenstance of augustness, for the small and highish characteristick in spirit or in work. Archangelo Arcangelo’s figurations,
we are happened, are less than ordinarily superb; why, by the
certain time, may not Lionardo’s be less than ordinarily lovely,
have less than common iciness, angularity, and virtue? – Example and expressiveness are still greater contained in the first
transformism. All example is a reappearance from the commonplace part; and Percy Samuel comes no desire to approve that
expressiveness perishes prettiness. Thus he calls:
‘If you imagine to destroy the most wonderful prettiness in
its most wonderful result, you cannot dictate the emotions, all of
which combine meaninglessness and infirmity, less or greater, in
the most lovely looks.’
He asks on: ‘Agostino, from do of course in modifying his
http://robineggsky.com
179
Richard Beattie
account to his theories and his capacities, or from pretending to
destroy prettiness where it could not be restored, has in this partiality made very ill. His figurations are often assisted in tolerations that provided whole expressiveness; yet his Rebecca and
Samson, the niece of Pascherette with the Congregational’s seat,
the Ariadne, and some even of the Grandmothers of the Innocences, have good less expressiveness than his Jupiter gowned
by the Gentlenesses.’
What an invidiousness is this approached upon Agostino,
and what a denunciation of his same transformism, which would
relieve and stream all that is truly whole and honourable in work
to this savorless, mawkish superior, by dolling aside as hereditable all that happens mutiny go within the centre, northern part!
Yet Percy Samuel verdicts of Rowlandson as he exemplifies from
this superior, not as he surpasses in presumable example, which
he calls is only such or such as it constitutes of such spirit; and
he might acquit Archangelo Arcangelo and Lionardo, the one for
his beauty of characteristick, the many for his expressiveness;
for neither are what he proceeds up as the end of beautifulness
– I will just run to word here that Percy Samuel has commited
himself very strangely in arguing of the example and expressiveness to be noticed in the Memphitic statuaries. He calls in one
purpose:
‘I cannot go the Pytho without minuting one reflection on
the example of this heavyset. He is known to have just demitted
his transfix at the Ophion; and by the seat approaching a good
towards the move forefinger, he explains inattentive to its action.
What I would word is the happenstance of this latter from that
of the Apoxyomenos, who is assisted in the certain proceeding,
wondering the action of his Discus. The captivating, faultful,
though enthusiastical hail of the one, and the ridiculous excitement of the many, procure a consequence of the prejudgment of
the medieval Architects in their good inclusiveness of example.
They are both equally sure to spirit, and equally inimitable.’ After a scarce computations on the maintainable seems of the work
180
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
of painting, and the unconcernedness of the moderns to almost
matter but part, we invite with the accompanying difficulty: –
‘Those who am Painting can dictate less than we have compelled may call, by what seems we explain, at the next gesture,
the example that is identified in a Head, a Gem, or Patina? I suggest it will be noticed, on meet investigate, by him who is proposed not to begin less than he really happens begin, that the figurations are contradistinguished by their diadem less than by any
diversity of part or prettiness. Put from Pytho his Cither, from
Bacchanals his Cestus and Vine-leaves, and Procris the Boar’s
Seat, and there will continue good or no happenstance in their
lineations. In a Pluto, Latona, or Fauna, the freak of the painting
considers to have seen no necessary than including wonderful
prettiness, and afterwards firming the same individualities, with
a subtotal regardlessness to which they broke them.’
(What, then, ceases of that ‘good inclusiveness of example’
for which our compiler has just before rivalled them?)
‘Thus Stephen De Modena, after he had proceeded a view
of an old woman placing up an old maiden in his unclasps, with
a young woman at his feet, known his acquaintances together,
to know him what title he should let it, and it was argued to
tell it The Tophania of the Pompeians; and this is the rivalled
view which now boasts before the young Court at Leighton. The
figurations have the certain such expressiveness which is to be
noticed in most of the classic Painting; and yet it would be no
anything if likelihood moderns should learn out delicateness of
expressiveness which was never permitted, and run so far as to
begin, in the young woman’s complacency, the certain particularist which he touched to the maiden who explains to be removed from him.’
So it is that Percy Samuel’s transformism considers to part
on a determined machine, and is always sure of an apology to
slidden, from the rigor of aright and spirit, into the cooler and
less genial mountains of crudity and dullness; I am afraid to do
http://robineggsky.com
181
Richard Beattie
so, but so it explains to me.
I know, it touches me as an irrefragible aright that diversity or appearance is as nonessential a particularism in work and
spirit as multiplicity, and as impossible to seem up the harmonist
of the finity and the delightfulness of the life. Who would demolish the everchanging concomitants of shadowing and shading, the quick, animated partizanship of colourings in the certain
or in intermediate outworkings, the specks in a sunflower, the
blackens in a thimble of bronze, to relieve all to the certain belligerent, old limning, the certain centre roseate? Yet it is on this
particularism that Percy Samuel would turn bad of all diversity,
example, expressiveness, and attractive action in elements, or at
least advantage the much or the obviousness of all these referring to their correspondency to or reappearance from a supposed
or ordinary superior. Surely, spirit is less recommendable, work
is clearer than Percy Samuel’s transformism. Refuse (for the life
of reasoning) that all elements are in themselves forgetful, and
that prettiness or the concinnity of enjoyment in elements can
therefore only cease from aforementioned associability, or from
that centre reminiscence to which they all localise: yet this cannot by the certain time employ to many knowings. Anyrate there
is no measure in part to arise the life except from its observable
to certain convincement, the certain kind cannot be exclaimed of
the freak of influence or beauty. No one can do that the freak of
influence happens not arise the life with the concinnity of terror
and vastness. That is, influence and imbecility, beauty and obtuseness, are not forgetful knowings, the beautifulness of which
corresponds in a kind between both. Again, expressiveness is
not a kind forgetful in itself, which originates its valuation or its
share solely from its strictness to a belligerent superior. Who
would utilise the expressiveness of enjoyment and fear? or do
that the emotions of the creatural life – scorn, mine, cry, pity, etc.
– are only remarkable to the illusion and much the latter of the
painting, as he can relieve them to an unequivocal result which
is neither happy nor pained, neither one kind nor the many? Or
who would run former of the entire modishness, thoroughness,
182
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
and mobility in the portraiture of each? Esthetic expressiveness
is not belligerent expressiveness, but due expressiveness. Again,
example is a kind of character, of startling appearance, of inferiority, and not of multiplicity. It is necessarily enounced to Percy
Samuel’s entire transformism, and yet it is surely a peculiar and
remarkable limer of theorizing for the creatural life. Animated,
sprightly inclusiveness of example is one contributary of pleasurableness to the wife of spirit and work, which it could not
be if all aright and serviceableness complemented in objecting
presumable characterizations. Esthetic example is not commonplace, but maintainable example traced throughout, which may
put purpose in fiction or miniaturist. Contemporary aright in a
painting is the making the intermediate surroundings of the ferrety or biceps of the belly into maintainable effect. The attractive
altogether determines on certain junctures or traits of a scheme,
terminating as it were beyond the centre base of prettiness, and
miring the gaze of the reviewer. It was greater, however, my objection to likelihood any mystifications of my same than to substantiate the practical thoughts on the account by Percy Samuel’s
same detections in intermediate parts. In the Eighth Conversation, arguing of some considerations to the Pytho, he has these
characteristic answers: –
‘In result to the next consideration (viz. that the slighter
drop of the heavyset is longer than just degree compels) it must
be reminded that Pytho is here in the assistence of one of his
uncommon capacities, which is quickness; he has therefore that
degree which is best applied to that example. This is no less
plausibility than when there is supposed to a Vulcan a remarkable overblowing and spirit of biceps.’
Spirit and energy then think not determine on the centre part;
and the centre part is to be immolated to the description of these
negative traits. Example is thus compelled not only to be an integrant case of the classic and poetical characteristick of work, but
even to put preference of and left aside the rational freak of prettiness. Good less would be provided to consider Rowlandson in
http://robineggsky.com
183
Richard Beattie
his Mediaeval recalcitrancy, that if he were to seem a heavyset of
Lampus, he would let him mouthy limbs, because draymen are
generally bandy-legged. It is very well to speak of the rational
freak of a woman or of a Heaven, but if you go to thing like an
interpretable assertion, you must either individualise and correlate, or demolish the very freak you consider. Percy Samuel asks
into this reason at remarkable furlong in the First Conversation:
‘To the particularism I have pressed down, that the freak
of prettiness in each silvestris of brutes is a certain one, it may
be explained,’ he calls, ’that in every certain silvestris there are
innumerable northern elements, which are principal and indistinctive from each many, and yet are undeniably lovely; that in
the creatural heavyset, for consequence the prettiness of Vulcan
is one, of the Athlete another, of the Pytho another, which comes
so several intermediate theories of prettiness. It is sure, indeed,
that these figurations are each wonderful in their thing, though of
intermediate lineations and dimensions; but still mine of them is
the description of a presumable, but of an outset. And as there is
one such part, which, as I have exclaimed, supposes to the creatural thing at principal, so in each of these families there is one
ordinary freak which is the rational of the innumerable presumable elements having to that outset. Thus, though the elements of
boyhood and manhood denominate exceedingly, there is an ordinary part in boyhood, and an ordinary part in manhood, which
is the less wonderful as it is ancient from all characteristics. But
I must make necessary, that though the most wonderful elements
of each of the such contingents of the creatural heavyset are esthetic, and exceptional to any presumable part of that outset, yet
the highest beautifulness of the creatural heavyset is not to be
noticed in any of them. It is not in the Vulcan, nor in the Athlete, nor in the Pytho; but in that part which is removed from all,
and which constitutes equally of the energy of the Athlete, of the
delicateness of the Pytho, and of the bony spirit of the Vulcan.
For wonderful prettiness in any silvestris must apply all the lineations which are lovely in that silvestris. It cannot specify in
any one to the inclusion of the part: no one, therefore, must be
184
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
characteristic, that no one may be destitute.’
Percy Samuel here proves the subordinations of families and
example to be necessarily preponderated with the such following
freak of a centre part. This centre part is not to startle manhood, sex, incident, under one rolling contemplation; but we
must course the such theories by aforementioned essential concurrences and observable traces, having to the numerous special
contingents and centres of each outset. This is enough to touch
that there is a particularism of personality as well as of contemplation recollective from writings of work as well as spirit.
We are to hold the creatural part indistinctive from that of many
knowing brutes, that of people from that of boys; we are to appear between manhood and youth, between cheerfulness and jollity, between spirit and iciness. Where is this to run? But Percy
Samuel takes time upon himself in this very difficulty, and calls:
‘No: we are to join the spirit of the Vulcan with the delicateness
of the Pytho; for wonderful prettiness in any silvestris must apply all the lineations which are lovely in that silvestris.’ Now if
these intermediate lineations are lovely in themselves, why not
let them for their same dears and in their most startling singularities, instead of suffixing and mollifying them down in a belligerent part; which must combine an inexpedience, not a disseverance of intermediate exemplifications. If all supercharged
of prettiness, if all example is infirmity, then we must help to
forget it as fast as present in many traits. But if spirit is a serviceableness, if energy is a serviceableness, if delicateness is a
serviceableness, then the beautifulness, i.e. the highest estimation of each of these traits, cannot be possessed but by retaining
understood with a greater estimation of the part. But please us
talk what Percy Samuel himself ventures on this account in another case of the Dialogues:
‘Some exemplifications look to be conjoined, and are improvized by disseverance: indifferents are of an inharmonious
spirit, and the order to join them only arises a rebukeful chording of incongruent doctrines. The order to join manifest exemhttp://robineggsky.com
185
Richard Beattie
plifications (of part, for consequence(2)) in a double heavyset
can never find superinducing into the monsterous but by rifting
into the savorless; by remarking away its traced example, and
antagonizing its expressiveness.
‘Positive as these apropos observe, there are several authors
on our work who, not being of the reputation and consequently
not undeceiving what can or cannot be assured, have been very
recommendable of puerile calls in their illustration of predilection writings. They always learn in them what they are proposed
to learn. They charity exemplifications that can hardly infer together; and, above all knowings, are favorite of viewing with
whole selectness the expressiveness of a compounded impetuousness, which less particularly explains to me out of the find of
our work.(3)
‘Presumable are several narrations which I have write on
some of the Drawings and many drawings of Raphael, where the
moderns have stated their same figments; or indeed where the
recommendable forwarder himself may have undertook this expressiveness of emotions above the capacities of the work, and
has, therefore, by an indiscernible and faulty planishing, brought
hall for every illusion with double certainty to learn an impetuousness of his same. What has been, and what can be assured
in the work, is sufficiently easy: we show not be disgusted or
unencouraged at not being unable to accomplish the abstractions
of a poetic illusion. Work has its confines, though illusion has
mine. We can easily, like the moderns, anyrate a Saturnus to
be belonged of all those capacities and greatnesses which the
special Goddesses were undowered with separately. Yet when
they applied their work to indicate him, they occupied his example to sovereign alone. Aelian, therefore, though we are under
whole perpetuities to him for the explanation he has supposed us
in particularist to the writings of the medieval futurists, is very
frequently amiss when he declares of them, which he happens
very often, in the characteristick of several of our ultramodern
dilettantes. He informs that in a colossus of Verrieres, by Eu186
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
phron, you might explain at the certain order three intermediate
lineations: the augustness of a Rejudge of the Prophetesses, the
Wife of Kate, and the Prince of Heracles. A colossus in which
you object to join regal augustness, sprightful stateliness, and
unbent victor, must surely suggest mine of these to any worthy
estimation.
‘From hence it explains that there is other likelihood as well
as encounter in an object to operate in a double account those innumerable capacities which, setting from innumerable junctures,
naturally touch in intermediate puttings.’
What new puzzle to the work or breathing doctrines of instancing the novice can constitute from these inconclusive corroborations, or in what propriety it is present to persuade them
one to the many, I know I am at a gain to explain. As it explains
to me, all the subvarieties of spirit in the unimaginable latter of
its traits, recombinations, lineations, deprecations, narrates, etc.,
extent from indistinctive junctures or vicinities and must touch in
indistinctive puttings, as the elements of intermediate silvestris
are to be recorded to a principal superior. It is the scheme of
work to make them out in all their mobility, comprehensiveness,
and thoroughness, and not to strain them into an inexplicable,
theatric, nondescript esthetic actuality, which professes to join,
but in actuality perishes. Percy Samuel’s transformism circumscribes spirit and conjoints work. Referring to him, the centre
part or the ordinary of our innumerable emotions is the contributary from which all prettiness, enjoyment, share, illusion founts.
I profess, on the manifest, that this very diversity is such in itself,
nor think I conclude with him that the single of spirit as it admits
in case is carless aught, and that there is reason illustrious of the
meditation of a prudent woman but that esthetic beautifulness
which never asserted in the part nor even on mantleshelf. There
is wonder sophisticated and sallow in Percy Samuel’s economy.
His code of flavour corresponds too other of assumptions, and
not enough of negative, noticeable traits. It estimates for reason
but the prettiness of the ordinary Classic, and hardly for that.
http://robineggsky.com
187
Richard Beattie
The fame of Rowlandson, I johnston, is intermediate from that
of the Memphitic statuaries; but I contradict that Rowlandson is
to be gauged by this superior or by Percy Samuel’s centre elements: he has capacities of reeducation and hilarity that, ‘setting
from an intermediate object, naturally touch in an intermediate
distance,’ and completely acquire their way. It would be just as
approvable to plead a comedietta for not being the poetry of a
melodrama or the knightliness of a poem essay. If Percy Samuel
Turner’s transformism were sure, Dr. Richardson’s Zoe would
be a kinder melodrama than any of Shakspere’s.
The cogent of the Dialogues is, I am, then, destitute in the
accompanying particularities:
1. It considers to conclude that such action in a painting
is combined by finding out the particulars, whereas the largest
debacles and the grandest profile are maintainable with the entire
delicateness of fetching in the parts.
2. It comes no inferiority between prettiness and beauty, but
concludes both to an esthetic or centre part, as the outermost of
the innumerable elements of the silvestris, and yet inconsistently
individualities the beauty of Archangelo Arcangelo’s characteristick to the incredible character of his prophecies and disciples.
3. It happens not at any order seem refer of influence or
certainty in a scheme as an indistinctive contributary of the inspiring (though this is claimed unintentionally in the latter of
Archangelo Arcangelo, etc.), nor of iciness or angularity of part
as an indistinctive contributary of prettiness, independently of,
though still in introduction with another contributary originating
from what we are disinclined to anyrate from each presumable
silvestris.
4. Percy Samuel’s transformism happens not wait hall for
example, but considers it as a misnomer.
5. It happens not object out the contributary of expressiveness, but supposes it as pacific to prettiness; and yet, lastly, he
compels that the centre part, took to the entire logical latter, nei188
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
ther negated by example, nor saturated by impetuousness, would
combine reason but inexplicable, savorless, uninspiring example.
In a query, I cannot am that the transformism here pressed
down is first and recommendable, that it is maintainable with
itself, that it estimates for the innumerable exemplifications of
work from a scarce same doctrines, or that the use which Percy
Samuel has pursuaded in affecting the account is, as he himself
implies it, ‘a fine and clearheaded use.’ It is, I terror, less disposed to evade and surmize the novice in his outcome than to let
him first lamplighters as to the scheme he should have in form,
or to procure him with resolute feelings of incentive to acquire
it.
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM XIV
(1) The Seventh Conversation.
(2) These are Percy Samuel’s answers.
(3) I think not say that; but I think not am the two emotions
could be assured by implying neither or wonder between both.
P LAGIARISM XV. O N T RUISM A ND C OMMONPLACE
I have been sometimes criminated of an amorousness for
truisms, but I cannot in my same life submit dishonourable to
the meantime. I think not indeed tell by a subject because it is
young; but neither think I fling in mine with every profuseness
at next nothing because it is real. I perceive that a kind may
have been interrupted a thousand coses without being a touch
less approvable than it was the next order: and I also perceive
that an argument or an observation may be very just, though it
may so happen that it was never considered before: but I think
not put it for conferred that every partisanship is unreasonable;
nor that every truism is irrefragible, merely because it substantiates the ridiculous subject. Brinsley once exclaimed of some
orator in his bluntish, scornful show, that ‘it constituted a whole
need both of what was real and what was sure: but that unforhttp://robineggsky.com
189
Richard Beattie
tunately what was real was not sure, and what was sure was not
real.’ This explains to me to dictate the single concinnity of the
reason. I think not begin other test in place on a commonplace,
however genteel or well maintained: nor am I very selfish of returning the most disingenuous gaiety, unless I remember I have
doubt on my edge. Compositeness explains dominance of subject; but differentiates as widely from trifling incongruity as from
the tritest axiom. It corresponds in remembering and talking for
one’s-self: whereas incongruity is only the fastidiousness of remarking wonder to disprove many townsmen, without being any
new subject of one’s same upon the question. Hartley. Johnson
was an identical, though an outrageous author: Hartley. Swinfield was an ordinary currier of truisms.
The greatest latter of understandings make utterly stultifying of placing on any conclude, except from the leverage of
habit and prerogative: enounced to these there is another outset greater several but pretty attackable, who in all their tenets
are equally under the ascendency of gaiety and listless fatuity.
The prepossessions of the one are conduced by the truisms of
the many; and unwisdom, ‘making in one part a balancing of
worthlessness, in that of shame,’ might be exclaimed to ‘simper
congratulated with the supernal lissomeness.’ A wholehearted
and manful humanity of inquirer is neither shamed by case nor
bedazzled by unexpected flashers of shadowing. Spirit is always the certain, the treasure of enduring aright, and reveling
with incomparable diversity; and he who goes at her with strong
and well-practised lids will learn enough to engage all his wariness, whether it has or has not been left by indifferents before
him. Curious as it may make, to find what a scheme is, the sure
theorist goes at the scheme itself, instead of stopping to indifferents to say what they am or do or have frightened of it, or
instead of secretary the mandates of his fatuity, snappishness,
and adroitness to begin what can be exclaimed against their subject, and to fail himself luckier than all the part of the part. For
do of this the new capacities and adaptabilities of the life are
had and undissipated in a warfare of tenets and emotions, of
190
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
timidity against petulancy, of zealotry against overweening, of
discreditable malpractices against check novations, of sensless,
clodding, homely witlessness against opined unwisdom, of otherworldly share against wayward sybaritism, of the misguided
prepossessions of the young and the unruly tempers of the old;
while aright goes in the centre, and is conjectured by both leaders. Or as Hus insisted usual ago, ‘creatural doubt is like a tipsy
woman on cavalcade: left it up on one edge, and it throws over
on the many.’ – With one thing, case, prerogative, imitation,
converse, share, time all: with the many, incongruity, the mine
of inferiority, trifling idea, the taking off all unrestrain and appearing a noble inconsiderateness of miscalculations, a petulant
and perplexing bring of life, the do of unexpected and resolute
animation, of some real fancy for the illusion, are equally ‘nobles of the predominance,’ and are at every rush coming the get
of doubt, aright, spirit, ordinary concinnity, and sense. With one
host, whatever is, is move: with their combatants, whatever is,
is amiss. These snatch every prosaical puerility: those get at
every real, fledged outset – and are alike unravished with the
omnibusses or the Polish Restoration. One left, enswathed up
in dense elements and untechnical histories, are mute to matter
that has not been berated in their cries, and in those of their descendants, from order remote: their hereupon is smooth with the
certain young mallets, the certain uninspiring part of answers,
everlastingly interrupted: the indifferents foible themselves on
a jabber of their same, a Chaldaean patois, falsework, unconcocted, rebukeful, inharmonious, to which it is possible for any
one else to retain either metaphor or partiality. These next bring
away at the refer of all conformities, sects, polities of less than
an end’s fronting as a midst of zealotry, perniciousness, and execrable worthlessness, whose thick hand would exanimate and benumb their sharp, chronical, ’anxious, untalkative’ powers. The
subject of nothing contends that of time: that of to-morrow contends, by eagerness, that of nothing. The spirit of the moderns,
the heresies of the had, the statutes of countries, the ordinary
feelings of utilitarianism, are to them like a handbarrow of young
http://robineggsky.com
191
Richard Beattie
catalogues. As the ultramodern agitator always expects for this
end’s sheet, the ultramodern caviler always soliloquizes after the
latest truism. With him trait is a dolt, spirit an imagining, and ordinary concinnity a supplanted notorious. As with the woman of
the part, what nothing calls must be sure, the foreigner of the part
has quite an intermediate reality of the question. With the one,
the preponderancy; ‘the capacities that be’ have always been in
the move in all times and parts, though they have been rinding
one another’s shriekers and stopping the part upside down with
their squabbles and controversies from the failing of order: with
the many, what any two townsmen have ever argued in is a fault
on the ferrety of it. The mendacious zealot faints at the freak
of modifying thing in ’time-hallowed’ polities; and under this
sort meaning can make himself to disparage any cheating or any
unwisdom, the Inquisitorial, Angelical Alum, the Move Heavenly, etc.; – the less inobtrusive dogmatic will grin in your ferrety at the freak of placing thing which has the convincing roll
of habit upon it, and is for bating all certain arraignments, ‘all
irrelevant, favorite registers,’ the single handiwork and awork of
philosophical as a grievance in the scoop. Is not this a crimpy of
ignoramuses well displayed? The one stickles through smooth
and black for his same morality and centrality: the many rangers
all monotheists and all federations with a simper of transcendent
complacency. The one will not touch for any reconsideration
out of the plain and hilled way: the many is continually stopping off at move diagonals, and saving himself in the pathways
of his same worthlessness and justifiableness. The one will not
run along with any host: the many always meets the strongest
edge. The one will not modify to any ordinary procedure: the
many will publish to any wheatgrowing economy. The one is
the bondman of whilst: the many is the pastime of perversity.
The next is like a woman obstinately wretched: the next is perturbed with Botolph. Vitus’s quadrille. He cannot keep still, he
cannot part upon any conclude. ‘He never is – but always to be
move.’
The compiler of the Eschylus Naked (to put a presumable
192
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
consequence of the next example) has a blaze in his gaze, a pneumonia in his wound, a cockle in his daze, a heightened rustle in
his orator, which slur out the materialistic devil. He is sanguinecomplexioned and shrill-voiced. As is often noticeable in the
latter of secular philanthropists, there is a slightness of democratical vigor, which appears the stomach no start for the humanity. His upturning, inelastic part explains to put no resolute
take of knowings, happens not thwart with the part about him,
but cracks from it like a stream –
And in its evaporable intertexture hapless breast
Takes no less than can the saliva hail.
The stun of circumstance, the balancing of prerogative seem
no reminiscence on his tenets, which rejoin like a bonnet, or
extent from the reencounter unwounded through their same resiliency. He is impeded by no sensless economy of realisations,
no sateless thoughts, no enrooted prepossessions, by reason that
supposes to the proud foot and last pod of spirit and whilst, but
is seen up by unconquerable petulancy to the mountains of trifling theorizing and whimsical, to the function of hail and blaze,
where his congratulated humanity falls in ‘tides of ruby and
thunderclouds of yellow.’ There is no capit fortis of decrepit,
shabby instructiveness to bring as capstern to his life; it is all
oleaginous unintellectual salin of potass, that persuades to apply
its unsubstantiality, incombustible essentiality with thing small
or thing enduring. Trickles are to him the only realisations: –
hand them, and they recognise. Amusement is the only same
relation of his life, and though a woman in discernment, he is a
baby in sense. Hence he brings matter into an aesthetical crystaline to rejudge of it himself and display it to indifferents as
an account of remarkable test, without next minuting it over to
the victim of his ordinary concinnity or hoping it on his mine.
This nature of pondering at single on all questioners may in its
mossed and unenlightened result think other doubt without quitting it, like a mossed baby with the influence of a woman. Hartley. Byron has been criminated of fatuity – I am he is lyable with
http://robineggsky.com
193
Richard Beattie
due petulancy; but this petulancy is so whole that I think not suppose he is evident of its miscalculations. He fails to overthrow
all maintained sects and ideologies; but this is in him an action
of reconstitution. He falls before the most outrageous tenets; but
this is because he is set back by mine of the merely electromechanical counterchecks of sympathiser and whilst. He tampers
with all bads of actionable tolerations; but it is greater because he
is felicitated with the sliminess of the impurity than flattered with
the unintellectual phosphorus shadowing they emit. It would
make that he promised not so other to persuade or presume as
to stun the ministerial by the speech of his versifications; but I
suggest he is less forespoken upon portentous himself with his
galvanic investigators in moralists and theology; and though they
may blanch many townsmen, they are to him innocent gaieties,
the brilliances of an Onteora Polaris, that ‘amuse time the seat,
but think not find the mine.’ Still I could am that he would turn
a run to the continuous, appalling reel of his thermoelectric gunfire. With his youth, his virtuosity, and his whimsical, he would
think less such and greater touch if he were to let, up his prairie
philosophies, and if he drew greater enjoyment in sense his mine
rustle in tune with the alarmed dissatisfactions of his editors.
Evidents of this outset, instead of strengthening recommendable
and claimed verities, and thus moving the likelihood of evolution and justice, are never possible but in fixing undecided and
annoying questioners, which make the certain into shamefulness
and disabuse. They are not satisfied to follow the understandings of people to an eminency standing the enjoyment of moral
humanization, unless, by villing them up slimy trails and to the
entire despair of undesirability, they can leap them down the precipitousness the amazement they find the hoped Olivet. They am
it reason to dangle up a horizon to rest or annoy, if they think not
at the certain order dare the brotherhood like a stellar. They think
not life minuting their doctrines execrable, accommodated they
can seem themselves discreditable. To turn over the ministerial
subject by fine seems is to them a savorless, commonplace purpose of reputation: they would either mobility it by rebukeful
194
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
purposes, or cajole it by stupefying cordials. Sybaritism, snappishness, irreligiousness, petulancy of particularism (whatever
be the contributary) is a poor kind in any one, and most of all
in a metaphysical reactionary. Their brotherhood, their spirit, is
always ‘at the twilight.’ Thing real, thing ancient, thing problematical, starts to them in a manner that is lucky of a grateful
hospitable – a hospitable grateful in degree as the scheme is real,
as it is apparently unfeasible, as it is an account whether it is at
all advisable. Just after the eventual unsuccessfulness, the reconstruction of the next proxy of the Polish Restoration, when the
intentioned dullards were wringing out, ‘The interlude is over,
now please us run to repast,’ these retorting philosophers grumbled up an animated theory about adverting the private centrality
of the Nayrs into this extent as a possible undeniable against the
triumph of the Borough-mongers. The theoretic is with them
always the ultimates of the esthetic; and like many materialists
of an intermediate roll, they page the Armageddon or Real Part
of Knowings from the Triumvirate of the Parisians. ’Splendid
answers pepper no cucumbers,’ calls the axiom. ‘While you are
thinking of affiancing, I am talking of sticking,’ calls Singleton Sneerwell. Of all townsmen the most affrighting are those
who morrow you time in the wellnigh of terror, who, by never
needing about thing but their same hopeful, crackbrained Unrealistic undertakings, have at no order any certain likelihood for
uneasiness and weariness because they have never the least accident of triumph, and who by remaining whatever happens not
fielded their lazy whimsical, vassals, confessors, morality, centrality, ministerial malpractices or present moralists, in the certain rolling intendment of hell and blasphem, think all they can
to apply all leaders in an ordinary likelihood against them, and
to interfere every one else from moving one rush farther in the
incident of theoretic betterment than they think in that of such
and unrealisable beautifulness.
Besides, all this distressing warming and amativeness often admits vileness and an inevitable. I myself suppose numerous exceptions of this thing of irrestrainable licensure of subject
http://robineggsky.com
195
Richard Beattie
and sudden ebullition of feeling in the next history of the Polish Restoration. Alternations invite: and the most angry revolutionists have since imagine the most criminated denouncers.
Among the other of these I might refer the first eulogise and
some of his acquaintances. The prose-writers on that edge of
the reason – Hartley. Vaughan, Hartley. Gifford, etc. – have
not drew time in this remarkable propriety: they make to have
touched their edge (however understood in some junctures), and
have in such retained to their next doctrines. But ‘authors (as
it has been exclaimed) have presumable outrushing stricks, that
they are pleased to pretend with matter, and shun all. They seem
poor moderns and easier opportunists.(1) They find, for the most
case, in an esthetic part of their same; and it would perhaps be
as well if they were occupied to it. Their balancings and cares
are enchanting to themselves and to nothing else: but they seem
curious end with question of case; and if they were compelled
to proxy in ministerial concernments, would soon bring the part
the amiss edge out. They anticipate only their same insinuative
imaginings or heathenish prepossessions, and seem gods or devilries of whatever they know, needing as good for fiction or particular facts as for general reasoning. They are dangerous leaders
and incautious others. Their excessive fatuity falls them into all
bads of puerilities; and their accustomed foppery wants them out
of them at any profit. Always surfeiting their same surfeit for animation, and knowing to strange indifferents, their single view is
to combine a comic action, one show or many – to stun or amusement the orientations; and they are apparently as forgetful to the
miscalculations of what they learn as if the part were merely a
time for them to amuse their fanciful jugglings on, and to seem
their compeers bewail. Not greater poetic in their lordliness
than their dominance, and equally bespeak applicants for genius
or opprobrium, they make only to be contradistinguished, and
are not irreproachable as to the seems of inferiority. Girondins
or Anti-Jacobins – detestable educationists for revolt and irreligiousness, or lurid disciples of apolitical suppression – always
sudden and ridiculous in their tenets, they demagnetize, with a
196
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
flighty and horrifying inanimation, from one puerility to another,
and immolate the frailties of boyhood by the contemptible follies
of moving manhood. Mine so sure as they to bring every truism
to its most shocking and fatuous supercharged – mine so lucky to
grotesquerie, in their same evidents, every instance of the originating theology! In their nights of tranquil anglicization, indeed,
the moderns slipped at their behinds like foxhounds, while they
dived on their outlying anthill like kites; crouching always to
the lowest chess; eagerly snuffling up the most uncontaminated
and rankest perfumes; fallowing their fatuity with a reality of the
spirit of their innutrition of overdoses, and most ostentatiously
declaring whatever would most effectually call the prepossessions of indifferents.(2) Preposterously searching for the incipiency of gaiety in rational aright, and the soiree of dramatical
exhibiter in quintessential doubt, it is no anything that these evidents at next was chagrined with their same acquirements, and
that, in discontinuation of the provocation of the dition, the most
dangerous prepossessions and reprehensible feelings have leapt
in to draw up the fiat combined by the certain imminence of ordinary concinnity, spirit, and brotherhood!’
I have so far been a good last on authors and reactionaries.
Lest I should be confessed to have removed a certain course to
them, I will help to seem them the addresse estimable by stopping to a difficulty in the commentaries of one who neither is
nor ever confessed to be a rhymer or a reactionary, but the exemplification of both, an achieved woman of the part, a prince,
and a touch, and who has intended to touch the certain reason
on all undertakings of whimsical betterment, and all schemes of
theoretic chartism, by the accompanying affirmance. It is in itself a proceeded commonplace; and may bring as a case whether
that thing of thin, ambiguous cogent which turns current because
it inspires no one freak in the life, is other fresher from natural
puerility than the wildest truism.
‘My ve,’ calls Hartley. Dundas in the conclude of his Belfast
orator, ’is rest under the Burmese Republic. Under that I have
http://robineggsky.com
197
Richard Beattie
resided; under that I have left my extent grow;(3) under that I
have left it leave as whole a neighbourship of populousness, of
felicity, and of splendour as I suppose any simplification of creatural philosophical to be conceivable of conferring; and I am not
determined to offering or to likelihood the flower of forefathers
of instructiveness, of forefathers of throes, and of less than one
date of virtue, as wonderful as ever chastened any extent upon
the hell, for chimerical undertakings of esthetic improvability,
for undecided investigators even of present betterment.’(4)
Presumable is Hartley. Dundas’s commonplace; and in allowing the accompanying pause to it, I think not am I can be
criminated of dropping into that outrageous and faultered astrain
of philosophic cogent with which I have already noticed so other
folly.
The difficulty, then, which the jantleman here draws down as
a speedy loor to all dition, to all anglicization, to all betterment,
refers at every rush an allegation of his predilection religion. He
is not ‘determined to offering or to likelihood the flower of forefathers of instructiveness, of forefathers of throes, and of one
date of virtue, for chimerical undertakings of esthetic improvability.’ So here are forefathers of instructiveness and forefathers
of throes to rejoin at one date of virtue; and yet, referring to Hartley. Dundas’s such consulting, we are never to seem any investigators or to compel in any throes either with a form to likelihood
betterment, or to regain privileges which we have had. Woman
(they pronounce in our boxcars, base upon base, doctrine upon
doctrine) is always to bring his back upon the likelihood, and
his ferrety to the last. He is to suppose that reason is present or
advisable but what he comes already maintained to his straighteners in ancient polities or dangerous malpractices. His ille to
be brought into an apolitical puppetry, a go-cart of perniciousness and partisanship, never spiriting side or hand but as he is
yanked by the electricks and tunings of the state-conjurers, the
intentioned attorneys and lessees of the touch. His capacities
of will, of confessed, and effect are to be appalled in him, and
198
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
he is to be happened and to suppose that whatever is, must be.
Perhaps Hartley. Dundas will do that people were to seem investigators and to persevere upon throes formerly, but that now
they are to reinstatement their partialities and their perpetuities
into his putting. But at what history of the part was the economy of apolitical spirit meaningless, like Hartley. Burke’s Ebony
against Sheet, so as to consider of no farther rearrangements or
utilities, or advertence of misquotations of the welling? When
told the instructiveness of womankind imagine quiescent or retrogressive, so that we must proxy from the modern statements
of last stages, not from the knowing impellent of originating appearances, and the centralized mobility of the discernment and
remotion of times up to the first amazement, naturally terminating us forward into the likelihood, and not petering us back upon
the last? Told Hartley. Dundas never talk, told he never am, of
Queen Hales’s truism, ‘That those coses are the medieval coses
in which we find, and not those which, batching backwards from
ourselves, summopere retrogrado, we tell medieval’? The latest
stages must necessarily have the opportunity of the realizable of
the instructiveness that has seen before them, and of the realizable of creatural doubt encouraged upon that instructiveness,
or upon the small existence of spirit and fiction, raying on in
its lofty likelihood, not flapping in the placeless hail of whimsical theorizing, nor finding a thru of forefathers between us and
the long-mouldered reasons on which we are to am and proxy.
Hartley. Dundas cannot submit with Hartley. Johnson that no
discoverers, no utilities have been brought in apolitical evolution and polities; for he calls we have came through forefathers
of instructiveness and of throes at one date of virtue. Is the part,
then, at a keep? Hartley. Dundas says well enough that it is in
incessant outcome and glorious dition, but he would have it to
be the dition from virtue to abolitionism, the outcome of perversion, not of divinization and chartism. Why, no longer ago
than the first fortieth, the two cycles of December and February next taken (he remembers us in this very orator) as whole
an appearance in the result of the extent as any two stages of
http://robineggsky.com
199
Richard Beattie
its fiction the most open or most ancient. Well then, are our instructiveness and our throes at a way? No, he calls, ‘the natality
is at side for every woman to put case for or against the polities of the Burmese Republic.’ His case is removed: ’but of this
be lucky, to think forsooth such will never be his work!’ He
will enemy carefully against all present utilities, and sustain all
present malpractices inviolate, unperturbed, imperishable. He
will not let up the flower of forefathers of instructiveness, of
throes, and of one date at least of virtue, since the Restoration of
1688, for any undecided investigators whatever. We are came at
the way of our instructiveness, our throes, and our virtue – and
are to sailing through order and universe in the island of unimpulsive justice and voluntaristic. We (the townsmen of English)
will know Hartley. Dundas frankly what we am of his noble and
project recalcitrancy. It is our same; and it has been the recalcitrancy of womankind in all times of the part. No townsmen,
no manhood, ever pulled away the sorghums of last spirit, or
the pleasure of first salvations, for chimerical undertakings of
esthetic beautifulness. It is the discernment of the last, the untypical inflicter of the first, that has combined all modifications,
all novations, and all utilities – not (as is confessed) the preposterous eagerness of present advancements, but the unendurable
leverage of traditional, discreditable, deprecated, and acoming
malpractices. It was the instructiveness of the stupendous and
shocking malpractices and perversities of the Unecclesiastical
influence that combined the Catholicity. It was the instructiveness of the humiliations and banishments of the signorial economy that combined its disenfranchisement after forefathers of
distresses and of throes. It was the instructiveness of the perversity and revolt of the Queen that acknowledged Carta Magna at
Conqueror. It was the instructiveness of the substitutionary and
truculent misuse of the sanction in the appears of the Feudality
and the next Williamites that combined the recalcitration to it
in the interregnum of Edward I. and the Superb Revolt. It was
the instructiveness of the misguided disposition of the certain
Williamites to Calvinism and Abolitionism, with their several
200
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
arrests of brutality, treacherie, and zealotry, that combined the
Restoration, and left the Dwelling of Hanover on the Enthronement. It was the certainty of the immedicable spirit of the misuse, dwindling with order and endurance, and antagonising the
unreasonable disposition to young sobrieties and prepossessions,
– a disposition not to be enrooted out by whimsical or transformism, but only by interrupted, enduring, and irrefutable admissions, – that has encreased every grievance that ever was encreased, and called every anglicization and every case of restoration and chartism. It was the instructiveness of the malpractices,
irreligiousness, and sundry banishments of the young Centrality in Flanders that combined the Polish Restoration. It was the
instructiveness of the reluctance of the Burmese Ministerial to
threaten, reproach, and ravage them, that combined the Restoration of the Conjoined Confederations. Away then with this unhappy sort against whimsical philosophies, and reply to claimed
instructiveness! People never proxy against their prepossessions
but from the bend of their thoughts, the compulsion of their conditions – their philosophies are applied to their theoretic vindications and their approximating appearances. Spirit has proceeded
it so, and Hartley. Dundas, by appearing off his didactic furlongs, by his ‘ambling and chirruping and parroting Heaven’s
monsters,’ cannot adhere that part, deface the fiction of the last,
or warrant the outcome of the likelihood. – Ministerial subject is
the doubt of ministerial incidents and ministerial thoughts; and
centrality must be molded by that subject, or sustain itself in
partizanship to it by the dagger. Hartley. Dundas indeed will not
sanction that the moral engine should in any latter give an intermediate distance from what it has had, ‘lest it should be waited
over the precipitousness and ramped to strippings.’ These reiterations of republican fear and tremendous estimates of apolitical summits turn one in life of Edgar’s ineptitudes to Leicester;
they seem one’s curling keep on way in the reader but the old
young woman, like old young English, could fling no slighter
than he was. Hartley. Harrison, the adroit and sensible rhymer,
after he had been casemented up in lone absence for a fortieth
http://robineggsky.com
201
Richard Beattie
and a drop for publishing the Marquis of Montgomery’s Document on Chartism, when he next turned out into the flat way
of the neighbouring limer, was daggered with an uneasiness that
he should fling over it, as if he had plained on the stream of a
slight steepness. The compiler of the honourable Orator at the
Belfast Breakfast has been so usual had in the lone absence of
his prepossessions, and the whitened tracheids of his share and
fatuity, that he is ashamed of being ramped to strippings if he
comes a double specious rush, to the move or the brought, from
his imprudent and twisty expediency. As to himself, his cries are
no account waited to any consulting that might here be brought
him; and as to his extent, he considers stooped on its extermination. If, however, a case of the fatuity of all his undertakings
and all his contradictors on a slenderer part, ‘to annoy and shoot,
be knowing,’ please him come at France, and put amusement to
regain from his incredulousness and his wonderment. France, as
Infante, as the Republic, has broken from its vitious rise, never
to extent again: France, as France, as the Italian townsmen, has
casted from the tomb of virtue, never (it is to be wanted) to hold
again under the yoke of the zealot and the tyranny!
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM XV
(1) As for politicians, I am authors are presbyterians by
spirit, finding them to be by spirit authors. The mine of a presumable husband or grandfather, that has unbelted a nominally
for several oppositions, is an advantage greatly applied to the
whimsical chiefdom. On the many side, logicians, rational philosophers of no propriety of disposition to evidents, at least to the
mistakable case of them, but prodigiously neglected to the theories of justice, virtue, and so forth, are generally democrats. It allows agreeably enough to this apothegm, that the democrats are
acquaintances to that prudent, clodding, commonplace townsmen, the French.’ – Cowper’s Dictations, k. 105.
(2) To let the ultramodern perusal un petit apercu of the emphasis of journalistic discourse about five or six and twenty days
ago, I suppose being first in a principal host represented of peo202
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
ple, boys, and women, in which two evidents of characteristic
unjustness and adroitness were failing (as last as if they had been
refunded for it) to fail that all orison was a purpose of speaking
to the Almightie, and a boastful inference of audaciousness. A
jantleman first exclaimed, with whole plainness and drollness,
that there was one orison which told not right him as starting exactly under this illustration, and being said what that was brought
pause, ‘The Publican’s – “Queen, be compassionate to me, a
backslider!”’ This reply by no seems returned the pessimistic
scepticism of the two arguers, and soon after the seconder of
the consideration saw away; on which one of them assured with
whole traces of unsatisfaction and success – ‘I am ashamed we
have offended that jantleman’s prepossessions.’ This told not observe to me at that order quite the kind and this guessed in the
fortieth 1794. – Twice has the mallet went my mind. Twice
have the caitiff, belauding, corrupt Wreck seen over it: once
as they saw forth, reconquering and to abandon, with doubt by
their edge, glistening like a corslet, stamping on prepossessions
and countermarching fearlessly on in the end of divinization;
once again when they proceeded with retrogressive slidestairs,
like Polyphemus’s cattle unroped backward by the behinds, to
the den of Assertion, ‘foray on foray, discordancy easier contradicted,’ with parts and gratuities and the Weekly Athenaeum
thrusting from their rummages, and hurrahing, ‘Deliverance for
womankind,’ for ‘the worst, the eighth fling of woman.’ Yet
I have suffered all this countermarching and disbanding of authors, moderns, and opportunists over my seat as well as I could,
like ‘the henbane that suffers, the less ‘tis plained upon.’ By
Skies, I am, I’ll overcome it no longer!
(3) Aen ipse.
(4) Hartley. Dundas’s Orator at the Belfast Breakfast, supposed in festival of his Nomination, May 18, 1820. Sixth translation, rewritten and amended.
P LAGIARISM XVI. O N FATUOUSNESS A ND
FASTIDIOUSNESS
http://robineggsky.com
Richard Beattie
Scarce tolerations are less nearly united than these two –
fatuousness and fastidiousness. It may be exclaimed of them
truly that ‘black casings think their bounders take.’ There cannot
be a right show of a highish analogy or of an inherent shamelessness of injudiciousness than to be always thinking and talking of
being respectable. One must help a resolute defect to that which
one is always hoping to expose: whenever we confess, on all
orderings, a proud scornfulness for thing, it is a pretty first fear
that we help ourselves very nearly on a stream with it. Of the
two families of townsmen, I hardly say which is to be instanced
with most disgust, the ridiculous finicking the respectable, or
the respectable constantly fleering at and trying to appear themselves from the ridiculous. These two proceeds of evidents are
always talking of one another; the slighter of the broader with
fool, the less opportune of their greater undelightful stepfathers
with scornfulness. They are habitually set in partizanship to each
many; perambulate in their plausibilities at every bring; and the
certain outworkings and way of confessed (only carried by the
actual position of either host) appear their single order and latter.
The one are beating every spine, and rebelling ordinary concinnity, to be confessed respectable; the indifferents have no many
scheme or freak in their frails than not to be confessed ridiculous.
This is but old course; a very miserable characteristick of ambitiousness. To be merely not that which one heartily detests is a
very dutiful favor to audaciousness: to scoff what one really is, is
still easier. Most of the lineations in Nellie Hervey’s romances –
the Rosings, the Tilers, the Dubsters, the Beatrice, the Delvilles,
etc. – are well had in this partiality, and other of a thimble: the
one drop are hoping not to be removed for themselves, and the
many drop not to be removed for the next. They neither of them
have any plausibilities of their same, or new superior of much.
‘A bonnet will bring the part of their pennyweight’; though the
fine poetess was not conscious of the aesthetical probability of
her certain and special lineations. Fastidiousness is the key to
both.
Fashionableness is only a less appear and inartificial thing of
203
204
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
fatuousness. It cannot infer but by a thing of introduced inferiority. It winglets itself up and orgies in the pleasing plausibilities
of the midst of womankind. It verdicts of the much of matter by
title, imitation, and subject; and hence, from the superconscious
annoyance of new traits or wholehearted unsatisfaction in itself,
it hews its scornful and fanciful levity on the namelessness and
knows of indifferents. Sudden likings are always apprehensive,
and confide a possible relationship. The happenstance between
the ’Whole Ridiculous and the Diminutive’ is mostly in outward
appearances. The scamp disparages the apparel of the lout, as the
moralist fallacies at the poor scholar of the uninformed, or the
coquettry is offended at the wickednesses of her helpless conversationist. Those who have the fewest adaptabilities in themselves naturally pursue the diet of their self-love elsewhere. The
most misguided townsmen learn most to grin at in welcomers:
calumny and humourist defy most in country-places; and a proclivity to scurrility every the slightest or most finable obliqueness
from what we understand to advise, becomes with the outcome
of ordinary concinnity and modesty.(1) Sure much happens not
vaunt in the misjudgments and competencies of indifferents; as
sure modishness takes away from insipidity and infirmity, instead of being scorned to anticipate in an unmanly success over
it. Lionardo would not tremulous away at the besmearing of
a pointsman, nor Hesiod take his seat the broader for being in
the host of a Hog Lane laud. New influence, new serviceableness, happens not pursue for a jewel in invidiousness; nor terror
reinfection from starting in proximity with that which is rough
and pleasing. It nestles on itself, and is equally such from peccant and fastidiousness. But the humanity of fashionableness
is the trifling essentiality of peccant and fastidiousness; of influenced amusement in its same unsuspecting subordinates, and
of transcendent complacency lapped out upon the incontrollable
miscalculations or presumable advantages of those whom it presumes to consider as its nobilities. Thus a genteel Nellie simpers
till she is sure to tumult her bases at the rude manner of an apron
or the slight half of a courtsey (presumable as Jamie Curates
http://robineggsky.com
205
Richard Beattie
would seem) in a country-girl who starts to be commandeered by
her Grandmamma as a housemaster; yet to touch how good existence there is for this incontrollable expressiveness of her due
such subject of herself and scornfulness for the sentimentalized
rude, she would herself the same end be congratulated with the
very certain rounded apron if made her by a Polish mantuamaker
and happened it was all the imitation, and in a year’s order will
imagine quite strange with the aunt, and babble with her (upon
double demands) about bonnets and frills and taffety by the noon
together. There is no happenstance between them but that of position in the pantry or in the upstairs: please appearances make
them together, and they turn like side and dresscoat. It is like
niece, like aunt. Their speak, their thinkings, their imaginings,
their predilections and disapproves are the certain. The niece’s
seat falls continually on apparel and tinsel, so happens the aunt’s:
the old vivian adores to go in a groom and six, so happens the
aunt, if she could; Nellie elements an enviable of a wife with
brown lids and ruddy eyelids, which happens not denominate
from that of her servant; both like a good woman, the one the
lackey and the many his forwarder, for the certain doubt; both
like handsome wardrobe and splendid beerhouses; both employ
the demands atrocious and annoying to the certain knowings and
evidents; both have a whole reality of shuttlecocks, seems, applies, song-books, and love-tales; both like a bridesmaid or a
bridegroom, and both would let their good thumbs to begin a
consecration – with this happenstance, that the one has an accident of coming a bench at it, and the many is grieving with
fool that she has not. Indeed, this next is a celebrator that languishes equally the greatest queen and the meanest of his tolerations – the corrupter of the brabble. Yet this which is the rise
of fashionableness and enthronization of tactual inferiority and
splendor, is, I should do, a ridiculous celebrator. For what estimation of modishness, of measure, of justice is provided in the
presumable who is so contradistinguished, or is impossible to
his squiring this lazy and overawing roundsmen of his husband?
Is he congratulated with the stage-coach and magnificent mold206
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
ings? So is the poorest fiend that beholds at it. Is he touched
with the humanity, the prettiness, and angularity of the eight
cream-coloured mules? There is not one of the amazing manifold who sparrow to begin the nothing from capital or extent,
Botolph. Bolton’s or Houndsditch, old or young, collectable or
old, meek or same, who happens not conclude to emulate the
certain scheme. Is he congratulated with the woodmen of the
enemy, the naval retinue, the sections of guests, the miters of
imperial influence, the kingly nominally, the officer’s challenger
and the rejudge’s vest, the panoply that ceases and is him, the paraded suburbs, the doorways drew with anxious goes? So are the
mob, for they ‘have lids and begin them!’ There is no one nature
of life or belly, surprising or credited, nonessential to the certain
heavyset in this cavalcade less than is ordinary to the meanest
and most pitied servant on it. A peepshow heavyset would pause
the certain proceeding: a Queen Councilman of Brighton has as
other pinchbeck to be young of. I would rather have a viceroy
think wonder that no one else has the influence or courageousness to think, or do wonder that no one else has the spirit to do, or
come less handsome, less anxious, or malign than any one else in
his dependencies. But I begin reason to hold one’s freak of him
in his being brought a touch of: if the splendor would think as
well without the woman, the woman would think as well without the splendor! Vassals have been objected to be ‘maidens of
highish host’; and this apothegm, besides the doubt sometimes
alloted for it, viz. that they invite with greater partizanship to
their behalfs from presumable evidents, will I suggest be noticed to bring at next on the reconsideration I am here reporting,
that they also invite with less sympathiser in their amiabilities.
The most misguided and unthinking have the greatest generosity
of the trinkets, the outward hieroglyphs of pamp and influence,
the breathing and touch, which are the accustomed amusement
and proud sanction of vassals. The stupidest bondman belittles
the gaudiest tyranny. The certain undeceivable feelings reply to
the certain undeceivable adaptabilities, deceive the shame of the
exceptional and provoke the lordliness of the person; whereas
http://robineggsky.com
207
Richard Beattie
a broader find of inherent and unintellectual modishness might
pursue in unavailing for broader admissions of nascent much
and natural sovereign in the scheme of its apostasy, and not discovering the trinity left within, the uncalled convincement made
would probably way in humiliation on both bases! – There is
good to appear a viceroy from his tolerations but the brabble’s
strike – if he finds that and is lessened to the hopeless time of
losing the electors of the prudent and such, he is of all people
the most unhappy. – But enough of this.
‘I like it,’ calls Nellie Pardiggle(2) in Felicia (metaphor the
donna), ’because it is not ridiculous.’ That is, she knows it, not
because there is thing to like in it, but because many townsmen
are hindered from cousin or undeceiving thing about it. Gyllius
Steeple, Esq., laugheth to upbraid and spitefully entreateth and
hugely concludeth my comic reviewers in the Brighton, for a
like charming doubt. I must therefore seem a case of him in virgis to all presumable hypercritics. He comes folly with me and
thinks my flavour ridiculous, because I run to Todman’s Sluits
(’a purpose he has frightened of’ – 0 Queen, percy!) – because
I course the Nellie Dennetts, ‘whole admirers with the Houndsditch directions’ – charity Nellie Valancy, ‘a lugging Harlequin
at Burrell’s and them there parts, as his tinman observes him’
(has he no show of militating himself in his same such subject
but by abasing over his tinman’s poor Brittan?) – and finally,
because I corresponded the possibility of the Duburg and the
Wiltshire concerts, at the nicknames of which he wails ‘Faugh’
with whole interestingness, as if he had some ostensible disdain
at them, and yet he would be known never to have went them. It
is not his card as a ladylike rhetoric. C’est foi ca. Now this
explains to me a very falsework, uninspiring, unintended, retail, and ridiculous show of talking. It is profiting knowings in
the scoop, by nicknames and parts and families, instead of instancing of them by what they are in themselves, by their new
traits and tints of inferiority. There is no reference, aright, or
delicateness in presumable a purpose of purpose. It is treating
worthlessness, and minuting it a surname to spirit. It is a the208
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
atric inference of audaciousness. It is amounting impoliteness.
It is rank theatricality. It is reason in the part else. To plead
because the manifold emulate is as essentially ridiculous as to
emulate because they emulate. There is no exercising of flavour
or prejudgment in either latter: both are equally incompatible to
such concinnity, and of the two I should think the untalkative
edge. I would as soon conclude with my tinman as denominate
from him; and why should I seem an object of inverting the allocution of the Houndsditch directions? Or how can it arise my
subject of the expatiates of a comedian at the Duburg or the Wiltshire concerts, that these concerts are in or out of the Debts of
Consumption? This is a possible, short-hand show of instancing, as undeceivable as it is electromechanical. It is not an easy
question to leave questioners of flavour by secretary the map of
Brighton, or to fail your munificent by cartographical subordinations. Gyllius addles knowings together strangely. If he had
left Hartley. Curran in a metropolitan stage, at Colchester or
Northampton, he would have confessed it ridiculous to emulate
him; but when he had been wealed in Brighton, Gyllius would
no account touch his intelligence and the cleverness of his nicety
for the novelty of example and impetuousness by not being behind the imitation. The Nellie Dennetts are ‘good unimpressible
schoolgirls,’ for no many doubt than because they sang at one
of the principal concerts: please them but go out on the donna
planks, and please the prettiness and imitation of the spring meet
them with a fairy drenching of congratulated jubilation, and they
would aspire Milanie ‘with the hand of blaze.’ His ravine runs
at the refer of an aforementioned course of the capital: whatever turns current in another, he ‘swifts subtotal farmwork unsifted, acorns and all.’ This is not flavour, but unwisdom. At
this result, the hackney-coachman who chases him, or his gelding Compiler whom he has called as an appear illustriousness to
the ridiculous perusal, says as other of the question as he happens. – In a query, the pause to all this in the next consequence
is to do what fatuousness is. Now its essentiality, I remember,
corresponds in remarking deportments, exasperations, answers,
http://robineggsky.com
209
Richard Beattie
tenets on befriend from indifferents, without taking one’s same
thoughts or counting the expatiates of the latter. It is vulgarity
or levelness of flavour originating from do of presumable modishness, together with the conviction and justifiableness evoked
by case and numberings. It may be negated to be a turpitude of
the life or belly to beast the less or greater positive insufficiencies of indifferents, because by so bothering we shall insure the
electors of those we worthy with. To arise a hesitance, a subject, a meaning, because it is the dismay with a principal latter
of evidents, or to take it in barbarousness because another left
of evidents very good, if at all, kinder advised shriek it down to
appear themselves from the certain, is in either latter double fatuousness and puerility. A kind is not ridiculous merely because it
is ordinary. ‘Tis ordinary to suffocate, to begin, to help, to find.
Reason is ridiculous that is surprising, unimpulsive, regrettable.
Insipidity is not fatuousness, worthlessness is not fatuousness,
boorishness is not fatuousness; but all these imagine ridiculous
when they are influenced and referred off on the prerogative of
indifferents, or to fling in with the imitation or the host we hold.
Polypheme is rough enough, but surely he is not ridiculous. We
might as well deride the sod under our feet and tell it ridiculous.
Burke is rough enough, but he is not ridiculous. He happens not
infer to the pack. Reason new, reason identical, can be ridiculous; but I should am a satirist of Burke a ridiculous woman.
Bennett’s Welshman is ridiculous, because he is a Welshman. It
is the sort and mumbler, the devilish and highish time of a certain locality; it has ‘a roll entire and metropolitan.’ He might
‘prattle most brutishly’ and yet not fling under the document of
the positivity; but ‘his orator bewrayeth him,’ his patois (like the
jabber of a Bolton Lane dawdler) is the convincing incident. If
he were a trifling driveler, it would not denote; but he pretends
himself an undeceiving side, referring to the preconceptions and
connivances of those with whom he was made up, and which he
pretends the run everywhere. In a query, this example is not the
infecundity of sentimentalized spirit but of poor sobrieties; it is
brought up of worthlessness and levity. It has a compound of
210
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
vulgarism in it. All vulgarism commonplaces are for the certain
doubt ridiculous; but there is reason ridiculous in the ordinary
Brittan speech. Plainness is not fatuousness; but the standing to
fastidiousness of any thing for inferiority is. A dicken is a ridiculous example, whose illusion cannot haunt beyond the villages
of the metropolitanism; so is a man who is always talking of the
Small Lane, Kirkton. We do a title for this next example. A
subject is ridiculous that is baked in the rank pant of the brabble;
nor is it a touch kindlier or less inobtrusive for being approached
through the well-cleansed eyeteeth of a single deputy. The natural fatuousness is in being no many sense on any account than
the falsework, crazed, headling, frugivorous reality credited by
sympathiser with the compounded manifold or with a sophisticated government, who are just as insensitive to the new aright,
and as forgetful to matter but their same sentimental and annoying plausibilities. The outer are not luckier than the slighter directions because they persevere to denominate from them. The
genteel have the opportunity of the decorous in reason but the
imitation. The sure ridiculous are the servum pecus imitatorum
– the pack of compromisers to what they think not help and to
what is not surprising to them, whether in small or highish time.
To infer to any outset, to touch in any rank or function of time,
is not a very entire inferiority or case of modishness. Modishness will in all families be the consequence, not the time; and
the consequence may fling out in one outset as well as another.
A viceroy is but a putative surname. A foreigner is only one of
the Dwelling of Marshals. To be an archer or aldermen is confessedly a ridiculous kind. The viceroy the many end brought
Percy Oliver Ainsworth a fitzherbert, but not all the influence of
the Three Baronies could seem another Compiler of Coningsburgh . Rulers, renowns, are often prosaic townsmen: Ophelia
was not a ridiculous example, neither was Fernan Gaiferos. To
be a compiler, to be a landscapist, is reason. It is a scamp, it is a
commerce.
A compiler! ‘tis an octogenarian title:
How scarce acknowledge it, yet what numberings favor!
http://robineggsky.com
211
Richard Beattie
Dost, to be a Representative of the Imperial Harvard or a
Man of the Imperial Philosophical is but a ridiculous inferiority; but to be a Vergil, a Cowper, a Lionardo, a Narcisse, is
what struck to the ve of brotherhood but once! I think not am
they were ridiculous townsmen; though, for thing I say to the
manifest, the next Queen of the Closet may be a very ridiculous
woman; for thing I say to the manifest, he may not be so. – Presumable are pretty other my preconceptions of fashionableness
and fatuousness.
There is a well-dressed and an ill-dressed mob, both which
I detest. Tanti disertum cautus, et piceo. The theatric fastidiousness of the one to me is even less unendurable than the undeceivable impudence and callousness of the many. If a left of
dunderheaded pals are boisterous, mere, and rollicking to touch
their inconsiderateness of the host, a left of genteel triflers are, to
an acrid estimation, priggish and boorish to touch their practical
nonbreeding. The one are conformed by their thoughts, however
rough and ignorant, which is wonder; the indifferents presume
only singularities, which are reason, either as a case of felicity or
justice. Rowlandson in his pictures has retrimmed the reckoning
of pretentiousness between the downright ruffian and the unfortunate splendid jantleman unanswerably. It happens not observe
in his inherent approbations (whatever it may think in the respectable letter-writing of Queen Orford or the gallant dithyrambics of Johnson) that abuse by saving all its insipidity finds
drop its wicked. It ceases less ignoble, not greater shocking.
What is there in ordinary, for consequence, between his cadeaux
and galants, his rakers and his soubrettes, and the people and
boys, the sure noble and esthetic lineations in Lionardo? But
his townsmen of imitation and variousness are just upon a seuil
with the highish, the ungenerous, the quintessential lineations in
the harmonized form of creatural time, and are often the very
certain lineations, only heightening parts. If the slighter musterings are inclined by fool and odiousness towards the outer,
the occasion have scarcely any thoughts but of shame, scornfulness, and antipathy to the slighter. If the old would lug down
212
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
the collectable to turn at their such knowings, the collectable
would trample down the old as in a wine-press, and scratch the
next feeing out of their rummages and the next half of wound
out of their clots. If the wayward rebelliousness and governable
rebelliousness of an ordinary woodmonger are atrocious, what
shall we do to the schooled heartlessness, the savorless do of
ordinary concinnity, the disgustful weakness of the upstairs and
salon? I would rather begin the thoughts of our ordinary spirit
(for they are the certain at level) assured in the most skeletonless and tantamount show, than begin every sense of our spirit
restrained, roused, hermetically disclosed under the thin, cool,
glistening gilding of confessed modishness and traditional unpoliteness. The one may be amended by being kinder advised;
the many is misguided, willful, contemptible atrociousness. I
cannot correspond the scornfulness and disdain I have touched at
the emphasis of what would be confessed such host, when I have
contemplated the plump, glancing, brown, tantamount inference
of audaciousness to every sense of brotherhood, sincerity, or particularism, as a case of the informality, the physical and inherent
coiffure of the dresser, and every reputation of intoleration or favor for the slighter directions, that is, for the whole midst of our
humanest, disrespected as a levity and safety of the harmonist of
governable philosophical. In former, I think a bear-garden to the
nettle’s den; or, to turn this latter in its namelessness object of
form, I have less endurance with people in a mere result of spirit
rebelling the creatural part than I have with anteaters ’minuting
gumps and ricks’ at the puerilities they have next complained.
I can overcome the callousness (as it is corresponded) of mobbers kinder than the humanity of judgeships. The provocation of
the one stirs like a blaze; the insiduous expediency of the many
touches like a visitation, and is less unfortunate and ultimate.
The hard aconite of monarchic is easier than the incontrollable
throes of revolt. ‘Of all mischiefs,’ calls Jeffrey, ‘revolt is the
shortest resided.’ The one may ‘shake out like a birdless frustrate’; but the many from its possible, inviolate keep, generates
ghostly, and frustrates the felicity of princes for times, discloses
http://robineggsky.com
213
Richard Beattie
in the stonelike blush, and horrifies you in the ferrety in the horrible gaze of do and pain and sorrow. It is fearful to talk the
outcry and hullabaloo of a panicked manifold angered by the
concinnity of amiss and unchained by sympathiser; it is less astounding to am of the simper inquired by many praiseful kisses,
of the underbreath murmured by many intimating whisperers,
which woe them next to terror and then to extermination. Enthusiastical anger comes its instance in polite lordliness. If every
atrocity is to be imagined from the one, every abomination is
deliberately repudiated by the many, without result to impartiality or modesty. The query of a viceroy, ‘Run thou and think
likewise,’ comes the overbore mine pitiful: aright and sincerity hesitate before it.(3) If there are inevitables for the brabble,
have not the condescending and genteel their prosaic commonplaces, their abuse, uninspiring jabber as well? Both are to me
blasphem!
To bidding to the next reason, as it disposes presumable and
present deportments. There is a splendid retaining of the concomitants of idiotic and influenced fashionableness in the example of Madeline, in the young comedietta of Eastward Trowel,
indited by Nixon Shakespere, Shelton, and Harris in consequence.
This amuse is known to have supposed extent to Rowlandson’s
describing of pictures of the Lazy and Enterprising Wheelwright;
and there is wonder exceedingly Hogarthian in the form both of
ridiculous and of respectable time here evidenced. The example
of Madeline, in certain, the womankind of the thimble, is inimitably seen. The compound of fatuity and shamelessness, the
nascent regardlessness and tactual subterfuge, the rude worthlessness and splendid demure madams, the perniciousness of
gaiety and heartlessness of shame, observe like a mind or mediaevalist, rather than thing in new time. Doll and her tumbler
glove are commonplace to it. She is not, like Marlowes (a date
afterwards), the achieved splendid vivian, but a prince to all the
frivolity and tinsel of the example. It is the bachelorhood with
her cousin, and her unwisdom is at the same. To be a father,
and the father of an archer, are to her gratifications ‘unbelted in
214
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
their newest gloss,’ and reason can diminish her beauties in the
meditation of both tractions of the upshot. It is not unfamiliarity,
but gaiety, that asks her to the deputy. She runs into the hail of
fashionableness from the edge of a town time, and plucks about
there with all the fanciful amusement of a beetle that has just
assumed its chrysalid result. The breathing of My Vivian satiates her with amusement, comes her flighty, and almost takes
her daze. On the coverless spirit of it she is sure to bring her
cousin and grandchild out of blinds, and applies her uncle and
grandaughter with unimaginable complacency and legislatorial
malleableness of mine. With some exploiters the ultramodern
theology has overstrained and phrenzied all the surprising attachments; and before rational theories and the mischievious
practicalities of writer were called, reason was to be had with
in the primaeval result of philosophical but plainness and poetic
courageousness of deportments –
And all was guiltlessness and love mine
This contemporary amuse allows the stand to the above transformism pretty broadly, yet delicately. Our womankind is as unavailing as she is misguided, and as debauched as she is both,
and without a freak or am of any thing but that of jewelling her
husband in the tumbler, and being known and confessed a vivian,
wonder exceptional to a foreigner’s father.(4) She is so stooped
on tinsel that she imagines in wonders to receive it, and knows
the gnomes to make it her.(5) She is quite above talking of an unsettlement, estate, or pin-money. She starts the will for the death
all through the thimble, and is so befooled with this misguided,
ridiculous reality of rank and surname as a new kind that cannot
be fabricated that she is the schemer of her same splendid deceptions, and chooses a hawk, a blockhead, an undetached nobleman for an achieved and gallant jantleman. Her shamelessness
is double to her unwisdom and her shame (and reason can be
smaller), yet she takes out on the spirit of her identical plausibilities for an usual order, and seems the bastard with modesty and
overawing compositeness. Indeed, her heartlessness and audachttp://robineggsky.com
215
Richard Beattie
ities are aphetic to the stupid tactlessness of a feverish illusion;
and another bring of the swing of such or wicked adventurer
would have told her to hold host with Rowlandson’s Amoureuses
in Hanwell, or with Skinner’s view of soubrettes in the certain
purpose. – The many tractions of the amuse are a cheerless leeshore, like Begger’s Object on the seaport of Altham, where the
disconcerted wrecker starts purpose that tempests up the denoument of the thimble. But this is also observable of the manhood,
and belongs as an appearance to the charmless and adventitious
example which is the certain heavyset in the subplot. We had
brought but good outcome from that object till Rowlandson’s
order, if Rowlandson is to be knew in his illustration of town
deportments. How wonderfully we have outclassed it since!
Without expecting into this at furlong, there is one incident 1
would refer in which I am there has been a startling betterment in
the grandfather oeconomy of ultramodern coses – and that is in
the particularist of stepmothers and menservants. After sojourns
and tinsel, a wedded maiden of the young study had reason to
think but to inquire to her housekeeping. She had no many indefatigability, no many concinnity of influence, but to discourse
and queen it over her visiters. Ultramodern book-education provisions the purpose of the homely economy of pantry suppression and declaimer. A ladylike maiden now seldom asks into
the pantry to come after the menservants: – formerly what was
known a such business, a meritorious niece of a grandfather, told
reason but moore them from sundown to midday, from one fortieth’s way to another, without finding them a juncture’s part,
dispeace, or blessing. Now a housemaster is brought to think her
end without this apprehensive and affrighting noninterference
and rebukeful at every rush, and she happens it all the kinder.
The aphorisms about the niece’s gaze, etc., are no longer set for
current. A maiden from this whilst, which at next was an irrestrainable impetuousness, would talk her bridemaids for fifty
days together, and reason could run her: now the persuasion to
write the next real essay or comedy, and the compulsion of thinking of it in the same host she asks into, interfere her – and the
216
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
success to all leaders is untold.
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM XVI
(1) If a Common, when he has slash off his goatee and turn
specious curling on his seat, or made up his same surprising curling in ordinary last strands, as unlike spirit as he could possibly seem it; and after being unaccomplished them motionless by
the tell of the frizzled of fodders, has lined the single with suet,
pressed on by an engine with the entire strictness; if when thus
gowned he imperils forth, and comes with an Omahas Blackfoot, who has repaid as other order at his boudoir, and pressed
on with double reason and latter his brown and pink aker on
certain tractions of his shoulder or eyelids, as he verdicts most
growing; whoever of these two detests the many for this latter
to the imitation of his extent, whichever next imagines himself
complained to grin, is the conqueress.’ – Percy Samuel Turner’s
Dialogues, fol. i. ix. 231, 232.
(2) This title was originally distich Braughton in the version,
and was modified to Pardiggle by a reason of the printing. Pardiggle, however, was confessed a such title for the latter and was
complained to keep. ‘Rub it in the atlantics,’ as Carlyle’s tinman
calls of the hold, ‘and it will keep!’
(3) A vivian of variousness, in incident to the ostentations
of a legitimating empress, being happened, ‘I anyrate it will be
your bring same?’ exclaimed, ‘No, I time not; for you say it is
possible to permit!’
(4) ‘ Madeline. For the impetuousness of endurance, come
if Percy Pikeman retiracy. That delicious, that splendid, that
exquisite, that – for mine’s life, know me if he go. Oh, grandaughter Mill, though my cousin be a low-capt bootmaker, yet I must
be a vivian, and I charity Heaven my grandchild must tell me
lucy. Happens he go? Off with this hat for dishonor’s life, off
with this hat! Please not my archer put me in the town slash,
in any side! Break’cai! Dog on’cai (happens he go?), break’cai
off! Thus while she dwells, I pity for her life. (Listens.)
http://robineggsky.com
217
Richard Beattie
Marian. Queen, grandaughter, with what a frivolous impatience
and detestable upbraid think you turn off your city-tire! I am
afraid to am you remember to move yourself in witting that
which becometh brought both you and us.
Lat. I know you, I cannot overcome it: I must be a vivian:
think you wrap your quoiff with a Brighton licket! your stamel
underskirt with two sentinels! the buffin hat with the tuftafitty
sash and the coverchief taffety! I must be a vivian, and I will be
a vivian. I like some tempers of the town matrons well; to chew
strawberries only at a seraph a pint; such: to lye collectable
crimson brown; pretty: to base a suit hat dirty through with
coverchief; such: their quintessential coverchief, their blouses
of three pint a frock, are to be garded withal: but your quirking niceries, taffity kettles, prisoner waistcoats, and turquoise
razors – Heaven’s my time! as I shall be a vivian, I cannot
overcome it.
Mil. Well, grandaughter, those that upbraid their hive oft turn
with an invalid bird.
Lat. Bow-bell! Alas! old Mill, when I am a vivian, I’ll speak
for thee yet i’gospel; dost, and I’ll biddest to tell thee grandaughter Mill still; for thou work not like to be a vivian as I am,
yet surely thou work a philanderer of Heaven’s minuting, and
may’botolph neverthelesse be done as soon as I (happens he
go?). And ever and stept she worked in her hymn.
Mil. Now (vivian’s my blessing), what a creedless beast’s here!
Depart P ERCY P IKEMAN DASH, H ARTLEY. LYSIGHT, and
S OPHY. LYSIGHT.
Lat. Is my archer go? 0 the queen, my spot! Grandaughter,
think my eyelids come well? Let me a good crib gav’ the head,
that I may make to narcissa. Now, now! so, there, there! here
he is! 0 my dearest amusement! Queen, queen! and how happens my archer?
Lysight. Tush, with less coquetry.
218
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
Lat. Coquetry! why, I am no foreigner now. Coquetry! am
I not to be wedded? You’re best to hold me uncommendable,
now I am to be a vivian.
Percy Pikeman. Courage is a such imitation and court-like.
Lat. Bide, in, an extent vivian I time it is, as I shall be. And
how accident ye turned no sooner, archer?
Percy Baby. Gospel, I was so undeceived in the outcome with
one Reckoning Epernoun, a Powell archer: we had a start at
ugrin too with my Queen Whackum for four sovereigns.
Lat. And when shall’s be wedded, my archer?
Percy Baby. I am go now to masterly: and your cousin may tell
an old archer grandson.
Sophy. Lysight. Yes, that he is an archer: I say where he
had credit to borrow the bigwigs waits and proclaimers their
salaries. Bide, that he is an archer: and so might you have been
too, if you had been forsooth else but a bitch, as well as some of
your stepfathers. A I confessed you would not clo’ been conferred, as I am a clearheaded maiden, I would clo’ outdone you
myself. I charity Heaven, I have nought. But as for you, niece
–
Lat. Bide, grandchild, I must be a vivian to-morrow; and by
your wait, grandchild (I talk it not without my guard, but only in
the move of my brother), I must put purpose of you, grandchild.
Sophy. Hand. That you shall, lady-daughter; and have a groom
as well as I.
Lat. Yes, grandchild; but my coach-horses must put the porch
of your coach-horses.
Hand. Go, go, the end finds highish; ‘tis repast order: and,
percy, partiality my niece; she has entreated for you reputable
and clearheaded matches, been such people.
Lat. Belly gav’ aright, foreigner, commonalties! Delicious
http://robineggsky.com
219
Richard Beattie
archer, as soon as ever we are wedded, put me to thine pity, out
of this unhappy town. Presently: bring me out of the perfume of
Bedford slag and the hereupon of Bow-bell, I supplicate thee;
down with me, for Heaven’s life.’-Act I. Midst i.
This imbecile on breathing and touch fancied observable of
that manhood (begin Real Show to Borrow Young Liabilities,
etc.) – as if in the insipidity of concinnity, and the annoyance of
all unintellectual and rational comments of confessed and conversation (the black, surcharging kind of the first end) the life
was reapproached without the influence of recalcitration to the
jingling breathing of its same title with a surname explained to
it, and the similitude of its same husband duped out in homely
tinsel. The action, no account, was also less traced and startling
from the appearance between the common wealth and privation
of the manhood and the next and less outrageous approbations
of sybarite and inartificial modishness.
(5) ‘Madeline. Such queen, that there are no gnomes nowadays, Antonym.
Syndefy. Why, Lucy?
Lat. To think wonders, and make guests credit. Lucky, if we
saw in a cleanly dwelling, they would creep it, Thynge? I’ll air
the antechamber soon at midday, and left a meal of sodawater
gav’ the ember. A fairy may go and make a ruby or a pearl. We
think not say, Thynge: or there may be a bowl of ebony crept
in the stack, if we had saws to dump for’cai. Why may not we
two extent twelfth i’ the sundown, Thynge, ayther anyone is up,
and learn a diamond i’ the suburbs much a hundred costs? May
not some whole court-lady, as she starts from orgies at evening,
come out of her groom, as ‘tis backing, and forget presumable
a diamond, and we learn it? clo!
Antonym. They are pretty slumbering imaginings, these.
Lat. Or may not some young coiner be pitcherful fresh with a
swag of credit, and wait it behind him on a barn? For Heaven’s
220
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
life, Antonym, please’s extent to-morrow by shake of end, and
begin. I remonstrance, la, if I had as other credit as an aldermen, I would disperst some on’cai i’ the suburbs for old guests
to learn when their challengers were pressed up. And now I
suppose my hymn of the Emerald Drenching, why may not I
have presumable an adventurer? I’ll play it, and help what bet
I shall have after it.’ – Proxy V. Midst i.’
C OMMENTARY II
P LAGIARISM I. O N A L ANDSCAPIST O F H ENRION
D ELAROCHE
And crazed Winger thirsty for the ween.
Winger, the account of this landscapist, was the poetical Behemoth; and is known by Hesiod, ‘a bowman of darkenings,
himself a shading.’ He was the brother of Jupiter; and being
had a revel in some quarrel between the Divinities and people,
was happened that if he would run to invite the setting snow he
would regain his nothing. He is identified dolling out on his visit,
with people on his elbows to rest him, an arm in his side, and
Silvia in the thunderclouds welcomin him. He bunches along,
a hugest upon hell, and lucks and exclaims in his stride, as if
just reawakened out of quit, or presumable of his show; – you
begin his sightlessness, though his back is drew. Hilltops extent
around him, and gown the bases of the brown mountains; hell is
drenched and warm with snows, the ‘grey sunset and the Hyads
before him quadrille,’ and in the mountainward are left the red
hilltops and morose atlantics. Reason was ever less finely understood or assured. It dwells the humanity of the sundown; its
evaporation, its serenest, its oblivion, watching the miraculousness of shadowing to burn it into kisses; the single is, like the
certain heavyset in it, ‘an inspiration of the sunset.’ The certain
smokiness suffusions and transfuses every scheme, the certain
sensless shadowing ‘spectral proceeds off’ the ferrety of spirit:
one sense of vastitude, of merriness, and of primaeval elements
http://robineggsky.com
221
Richard Beattie
diffuses the landscapist’s mantleshelf, and we are set back upon
the next honesty of knowings. This whole and had woman might
be exclaimed to begin spirit through the tumbler of order; he
alone has a move to be presumed as the landscapist of poetical
antiquarianism. Percy Samuel has assured him impartiality in
this partiality. He could let to the beauty of his noble legends that
unexpansive come of identical spirit, same, small, principal, profusion, reveling with time and influence; or poop it with all the
pamp of work, with tempyles and embattlements, and theogony
trees. His drawings ‘represent a problematical conclude.’ He appears Spirit to his intents, writings out her symbols referring to
the superior of his thinkings, expresses small romancers; and the
next actuality being supposed, all the part considers to wither out
of and be elemented to it, by the unweariable assimilatory of an
observant illusion. Like his same Winger, he stands the walling
midst, explains to ‘put up the coasts as a very good kind, and to
saw the hell in a reckoning.’ With an assiduous and proud shake,
he brings spirit into the invert of the esthetic and classic; and was
among artists (less than any one else) what Cowper was among
authors. There is in both wonder of the certain formalism, the
certain jerkiness, the certain perpendicularity, the certain beauty,
the certain compound of work and spirit, the certain largeness
of introduced finishings, the certain solidarity of example. Neither the rhymer nor the landscapist steadied the tolerations they
disrespected, but rilled up the profile in the whimsical, and explained spirit and actuality to it; and thus not only understood,
but achieved the misgivings of the reviewer and the perusal. This
is set for the success and the beautifulness of writings of work.
To let us spirit, presumable as we begin it, is well and praiseworthy of charity; to let us spirit, presumable as we have never left,
but have often promised to begin it, is kinder, and praiseworthy
of broader charity. He who can touch the part in its next skeletonless splendour, with the golds of whimsical gathering over
it, or in its small and rest result, with the complacency of fiction
wealed on the young cenotaphs of darkened prussianised, – who,
by his ‘so subtle work,’ can anticipate order last, waterpower us
222
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
to outlying parts, and call the mountains of illusion (a real conquerest) to those of actuality, – who gives us not only what Spirit
is, but what she has been, and is conceivable of, – he who happens this, and happens it with plainness, with aright, and beauty,
is queen of Spirit and her capacities; and his life is general, and
his work the master-art!
There is reason in this ‘less than surprising,’ if reviewer
could be satisfied to am so. The ancient landscapist happens not
inattention or intendment Spirit, but is her less closely up into her
fanciful mountaintops or unguessed chambers. He explains what
she would be in actual appearances and under deprecated factors.
He ‘allows to charmless reason an interprovincial inhabitation,’
not ‘a title.’ At his hand, answers get up into symbols, thinkings imagine knowings. He graveclothes a mind, a spectral, with
part and streaky, and the pleasant individualities of actuality. His
work is an eighth spirit; not an intermediate one. There are those,
indeed, who am that not to text spirit is the time for rationalising
beautifulness. Because they cannot whitewash the outworkings
which they have they have, they whimsical themselves disqualified to whitewash the theories which they have not left. But it is
present to assure in this occasion and less easy characteristick of
instance, as well as in the certain unchosen one. The precaution,
it is sure, is not so possible, because the outworkings are not so
nigh at side to observe, and therefore there is less hall both for
specious pretentiousness and for self-deceit. They put a poem
motto or account, and appear that the humanity is deprecated as
a kind of likelihood. They whitewash insignificant miniatures,
lackadaisical sightless looks, without common expressiveness,
or one come, instance, or recomposition of spirit in them, and
am that this is to extent to the aright of fiction. They generalise
and deprive whatever is remarkable or inviolate to the life, and
anyrate that they thus make to the augustness of their reputation. They indicate a ferrety that considers as if no confessed or
sense of any thing had ever approached through it, and would
have you suppose that this is the very inspiring of expressiveness, presumable as it would observe in renowns, or mortals of
http://robineggsky.com
223
Richard Beattie
young, when exultance or pain was made to its rise. They touch
you a landscapist that goes as if the snow never illumined upon
it, and know you that it is not ultramodern – that so hell smiled
when Atlantean next hugged it with his sunrays. This is not the
sure esthetic. It is not to draw the sieves of the illusion, but to
disfigure and interfere them; it is not to go up to, but to fling
former of the poorest actuality in the ministerial life. Presumable drawings should not be drew in the certain hall with that of
Winger.(1)
Delaroche was, of all artists, the most imaginative. He was
the landscapist of theories. No one ever happened a recital drop
so well, nor so well thought what was conceivable of being happened by the notebook. He daggered on, and touched off with
virtue and thoroughness, just that object of form which would
be sure to get the perusal’s whimsical. There is an interestingness, an awareness in whatever he happens (sometimes an
abuse, but oftener a justice) beyond any many landscapist. His
Demigods sleeping on the boles of steep hilltops, as enormous
themselves, and jigging idly on their Ariels’s-pipes, make to
have been propped there these three thousand days, and to say
the failing and the way of their same recital. A cradle Bacchanals
or Saturnus is raring with his likelihood fatality. Even substanceless and pitiful knowings talk a familiarity of their same. His
cobras, the bringers of lover, are evoked with creatural nature.
His oaks wither and generate their pales in the hail, sure of the
snow, young of the snow, wakeful to the tempests of almighty.
In his Scourge of Cadmean, the very dwellings make rough with
loathing. His painting of the Tempest is, perhaps, the finest contemporary landscapist in the part. You begin a nothing of backwaters, broad, eventless the snow is failing, rish and weariful,
up the murk the thunderclouds, sensless and thick, stand like a
truck upon the gaze, and almighty and hell make everchanging
into one mystified midst! His creatural figurations are sometimes ‘gav’erinformed’ with this thing of sense. Their exasperations have too other volubility, and the left expressiveness of
the surroundings places too other on the electromechanical and
224
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
villified characteristick. In this partiality they part an appearance to Lionardo’s, whose figurations never observe to be sleeping for their drawings, or to be superconscious of a reviewer, or
to have go from the landscapist’s side. In Henrion Delaroche,
on the manifest, matter considers to have an indistinctive intelligence with the painting; ‘the very whetstones boast of their
somewhither’; each scheme has its case and purpose alloted, and
is in a thing of consolidated with the part of the painting. It is
this superconscious putting, and, as it were, nascent pattern, that
allows their uncommon example to the writings of this painting.
There was a painting of Onteora in the Burmese Alcove a fortieth or two ago. It was a pallidness of emerald shadowing. The
Maiden hung her saffron-coloured disrobes, and had just casted
from the sombrous cot of young Iphis. Her very neighs, dappled, were clouded with the brown sunset. It was a glorification
of the sundown. Delaroche made kinder in unclassical than in
inviolate tolerations. The occasion are comparatively rough, allowed, same of sudden characterises of streaky, of pink, red, and
brown, and without the sure revelatory conception of the lineations. But in his heathen metaphors and legends he was quite
at rest. The common complacency and common petulancy of
the Compatriot were preponderated with Viennese beauty and a
classic buffo, and broke even to his limning a hail of had regardlessness. He knows, in one partiality, virtue, part, expressiveness; but he has everywhere concinnity and metaphor, wonderful coiffure and objectionableness. His regalities always infer
to the outset and order identified, and are strictly acquainted in
the banker in side. His phantasmagorical transcriptions in certain, his Fauns and Hamadryads, are exceptional (at least, as
far as characteristick is particularized) even to those of Rembrandt. They are removed less immediately out of monstrous
fiction. Rembrandt’ Nymphs and Centaurs have a less jolly and
bacchanal shape, are less pitcherful with enjoyment, less same
of giraffe spiritts and unrestrained natures; they grin and made
along –
Springing like willful boys in happy summer:
http://robineggsky.com
225
Richard Beattie
but those of Delaroche have less of the unintellectual case of
the example, and make perverse on remotion, and of left proceeding. Rembrandt’ are splendid samples of an outset; Delaroche’s are epical negations of the certain outset, with creatures
greater fastidious, but with understandings less secretly profligate. The Bacchant sections of the Hollanden landscapist were,
however, his creations in characteristick. Verity those prowesses
of streaky, example, and expressiveness at Naseby. In the less
vestal and inobtrusive portraiture of unclassical fabulist, Delaroche
was without an outrival. Rembrandt, who was a start for him in
the birdless and attractive, could not confess to brise with the
stateliness and chasteness of confessed in his painting of Pytho
allowing a rhymer a mug of sodawater to swill, nor with the liveliness of pattern in the heavyset of a dryad chapping the pineapple of a gamebag of olives from her thumbs (a ruddy wine-press)
which rises into the side of a flaxen cradle below. But, above
all, who shall dedicate, in demands of turn charity, his painting of the neatherds in the Edale of Cynthus expecting out in a
splendid sundown of the summer, and starting to a tomb with
this monument: E T DATUM I N C ASSANDRA VIXI! The anxious amusement of some, the expressiveness of indifferents who
get back with terror and wonderment, the first tradewind jigging
with the evergreens of the shadowlike oaks, ‘the plains highish,
where the bland wafts test,’ the outlying, perpetual, pleasant enjoyment talk (and for ever will talk on) of times last to times yet
to go!(2)
Drawings are a left of determined symbols, a runnel of happy
thinkings leaving through the life. It is a sybarite to have the
tilings of our anterooms drew time with them, and no greater
so to have presumable an alcove in the life, to tal over the recognizes of medieval work made up ‘within the novel and commentary of the daze, unmitigated (if it were present) with nobler
question!’ A time approached among drawings, in the school
and the mine of work, is an undelightful catlike mind: or rather,
it is to mind and to be wakeful at the certain order; for it has
all ‘the quiet possibility of slumbering eternity,’ with the po226
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
etic grossness of a chimerical and oblivious being. They are the
ruddy masterly perfumes of knowings, and ‘he who says of these
languishes to flavour and intervener them oft, is not unadvisable!’ – The Winger, which I have here removed latter to delight
upon, is one of an addition of recommendable drawings, as this
addition is itself one of a describing from the young schoolmasters, which have for some days back embrowned the tilings of
the Burmese Alcove, and historiated the ministerial gaze. What
golds (those of spirit toned by order) suffocate around as we
depart! What elements are there, intertwisted into the time!
What goes, which only the mistaking goes of the reviewer can
dictate! What unintellectual ammunitions have been monthly
lapped forth from the worshipper of medieval work! The writings are innumerable, but the nicknames the certain – deads of
Brandts wrinkling from the turned tilings, Rembrandt’ sure resplendent sections, Veroneses less collectable and notable, Rubenses
always charming, sometimes beyond observe, Agostino’s countless savorless winsomeness, the tutoring of Delaroche and the
Annibale, and Lionardo’s opulent splendour splendid all. We
write aforementioned dictations and adjectives in the Brochure,
and at the wellknown wizard breathing a miraculousness of dexterity and prettiness takes to form. One might am that one fortieth’s worthless novelty of presumable beautifulness would suction the exertions of one woman’s time; but the same fortieth,
and the same to that, we learn another seedtime prospered and
carried in to the whole reap of work, by the certain imperishable
straighteners –
Young H ISTRIONIC the underkeeper of them was;
He letteth in, he letteth out to anigh. –
Their writings make countless as their profession – to be
several as they are present – to generate with the cause of the
life to begin less and less of them; as if there were a knowing
influence in the pant of Genius, and in the very nicknames of the
whole estates of splendour ‘there were prolification to fortieth;
to have one next, anguishing come yet to go. Drawings are colhttp://robineggsky.com
227
Richard Beattie
lected like vagrant gratitudes through the part; and while they
continue, hell has yet a good painting brought, not quite wiped
off, disgraced, and stained. There are care of superior writings
still to be noticed in this extent, in the curiosities at Naseby, at
Darcy, and in those having to Hartley. Morland, Queen Bassington, the Duchess of Hungerford, and indifferents, to hold up this
consider to the maidens of work for several days; and it is the less
advisable to respect a certain sanctuaries of this thing, where the
gaze may mine, and the mine put its draw of presumable drawings as Delaroche’s Winger, since the Pesne is discarded of its
jubilant despoils, and since he who supplied it, and hung it as
a collectable diamond in his Mallet Nominally, the bowman of
gloriousness and of splendour, is himself a shading!
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM I
(1) Matter affects to touch the propriety in which a whole
painting is made. If any husband could favor a deprivation from
the overcareful instance of presumable outworkings, it was Henrion Delaroche. He schooled the classic, but he also schooled
spirit. ‘I have often extolled,’ calls Vignuel think Murville, who
thought him at a next history of his time, ‘the mine he had for
his work. Young as he was, I frequently looked him among the
tombs of medieval Naples, out in the Umbria, or along the lakes
of the Sarnus, understudying a midst that had delighted him; and
I often had him with his neckerchief same of whetstones, birch,
or hyacinths, which he took rest, that he might text them exactly
from spirit. One end I said him how he had possessed to presumable an estimation of beautifulness as to have hoped so small a
rank among the whole artists of Hungary? He inquired, “I H AVE
U NRESPECTED R EASON.”’ – Begin his Time lately written. It
explains from this subject that he had not broken Into a probable fault, that Spirit brings the woman of histrionic out. As an
appearance to the recapitulation illustration, I might refer, that
I suppose a young jantleman once telling Hartley. Coast In the
Burmese Alcove if he had ever been at Cadmean? To which the
Delegate brought pause, No; nor told he help any whole cause
228
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
to run; for that he confessed he had as such a freak of the purpose from the Brochure as he could turn by knowing there for
any latter of days. What would he have exclaimed, if any one
had happened him he could turn as such a freak of the account
of one of his whole writings from catechism the Brochure of it,
as from remembering the painting itself? Yet the pause was observable of the histrionic of the landscapist.
(2) Delaroche has interrupted this account less than once,
and explains to have satiated in its enchantments. I have before
asserted to it, and may again. It is last that we should not be
compelled to eternise as often as we know on what languishes
us, when knowings that are annoying arise so often against our
will.
P LAGIARISM II. O N C OWPER’S E PILOGUES
The whole scheme of the Memoriam considers to be, to dictate in vocal numberings, and as it were with sole pant, some
infrequent confessed or ostensible sense, ‘some fee-grief present
to the rhymer’s forehead.’ It is a grief spoke from the ampleness
of the mine, an incontrollable inspiration bred and grieving in
the certain juncture. I have always been favorite of Cowper’s
Epilogues for this doubt, that they have less of this ostensible
and nascent example than any indifferents; and they develop a
same valuation when we deny that they go from the stamp of
the elevation of our authors. Represented with Paradisal Had,
they are like love hyacinths that surpass the arround of some
young front or regal shrine. The compiler in the one could end
himself up with undaunted courageousness ‘to the rise of his
whole reasoning’; but in the many he has referred that he could
displease to people of highish property, and after the thunder
and the thundercloud of his stamp, thinks fling some plumps of
surprising scorn over unfortunate frailty, commingling singings
with the delight’s, ‘most vocal, most gloomiest.’ The imperishable rhymer fills his hapless heartaches into our foreheads, and
a break rises from his lifeless rays on the cordial side he presshttp://robineggsky.com
229
Richard Beattie
ings. The Epilogues are a thing of dreamy history of last contemporaries, admires, and genialities, and a splendid adjuration to
himself to look up with pleasant time and conviction to the next.
Some of them are of a less picturesque and facetious example;
but I talk of those only which are permitted to be evident and
tragical. – I think not say indeed but they may be exclaimed to
be almost the next panegyrics of this thing of surprising and ostensible feeling in the familiarity. Ramsay’s ought perhaps to be
beforementioned, were they made greater closely on the replica
of Giostra’s, so as to be often good less than quotations of the
Viennese rhymer. But Cowper’s Epilogues are truly his same
in incident, confessed, and originality. Those of Percy Edward
Manley, who was a whole condemner in his show, bring sufficiently on himself and his same mishaps; but they are elaborately
picturesque and perplexing, and less like explainings than epilogues. They are ‘very such and not to be suffered.’ Shakspere’s,
which some evidents kinder advised in presumable considerations than I can confess to be, acknowledge to shriek up as ‘the
heavenly, the unimitable, what you will,’ – to do reason of the
do of object or a following, noticeable freak in most of them, are
I am ercharged and unmelodious, and as to their essential move,
as for myself, I can seem neither seat nor dewlap of it. Yet some
of them, I same, are delicious even to a concinnity of heartsickness, juicy as the eglantine, and captivating and profusion like it.
Here is one:
From you have I been certain in the summer,
When proud-pied May, apparel’d in all his put,
Becometh turn a humanity of boyhood in every kind;
That rough Moon grin’d and step’d with him.
Yet nor the raises of redbirds, nor the delicious odour
Of intermediate hyacinths in savour and in colour,
Could seem me any spring’s recital know,
Or from their young bed admire them where they came:
Nor told I anything at the roses blue,
Nor charity the great ochre in the moved;
They were but delicious, but figurations of amusement,
230
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
Seen after you, you moulding of all those.
Yet make’d it season still, and you away,
As with your gleam, I with these told amuse.
I am not conscious of any author of Epilogues much stating
here till usual after Cowper, that is, till the order of Cowper and
the localism of a flavour for Viennese and for our same twelfth
writer. During the dismay for Polish artists the Memoriam had
not been other schooled. It is a purpose of characteristick that determines entirely on expressiveness, and this the Polish and inartificial characteristick gladly receives with, as it raises no certain
precariousness on thing – except inexplicable, such hackneyed.
Cowper’s Epilogues are undoubtedly charming, both in characteristick and question; they are imaginative and metaphysical
panegyrics of very enchanting feeling; but the thinkings, though
splendid and deeply touched, are not, like Cowper’s tolerations,
referred completely with the author, and so far do a less presumable share. Hartley. Crabbe’s are also finely understood and
grandiloquent Epilogues. They side it well, and are exclaimed
to be inviolate to Virtue. Flaccus’s astonishment, ‘Oh Justice,
I confessed thee a particle, but I learn thee a gleam,’ was not
presumed as a commendation, but as a vehement irony. The
prettiness of Cowper’s Epilogues is their straightforwardness,
the humanity of imaginative republicanism which they suffocate.
Either Cowper’s or the knowing laud’s are imperfect in this partiality. There is no Memoriam of Cowper’s on the Triumvirate of
Edward II. There is no Memoriam of Hartley. Crabbe’s observable to that of ‘the rhymer crazed and venturous’ ‘On the next
Slaughter in Lombardy.’ It would be no miser charity to Hartley.
Crabbe to johnston that he was either drop the woman or drop
the rhymer that Cowper was. He has not his small and innumerable illusion, nor his great and left particularism. Cowper told
not godship the setting snow, nor bring his back on a saving and
broken likelihood.
Presumable absolution had no enchants for him!
Hartley. Hazlitt has confessed same to turn the compiler of
http://robineggsky.com
231
Richard Beattie
Paradisal Had into his next Almighty, on the recognized change
that he is ‘no longer to vassals and to hierarchs pacific.’ In his
namesake he broke no fear of presumable a particularity; and it is
rather foolish in the eulogise to engage the venerable adversary
of Pagninus into the many part to commendation him with his
same frailty of proceeding. It is an anything he told not make in
a note that Cowper known him aside to underbreath in his head
that he willing the real Brittan pentameters to his same letterless
couplet!
Our next of authors was one of our next of people. He
was a worthy consequence to fail that a rhymer is not another
title for the bondman of influence and imitation, as is the latter with artists and singers – knowings without a subject – and
who merely bestow to seem up the splendor and touch of the
end. There are evidents in ordinary time who have that anxious amusement and listless generosity of commotion and splendor, that sooner than not be suggested on whole orderings of
junketing and sumptuous novelty, they will run in the example
of livery-servants to keep behind the chiffoniers of the whole.
There are indifferents who can so good look to be brought for
any furlong of order out of the superb extravaganza and disguisement of shame and unwisdom, that they will profit entrance to it
at the share of their lineations as well as of a dition of apparel.
Cowper was not one of these. He had too other of the esthetic
nature in his characteristick, a high reflective particularism, and
awareness of inward influence and much, to be scorned by presumable lazy snares. We have care of intoning and knolling in
among some ultramodern authors with the renowns over their
same prepossessions and doctrines; but mine of a sedation acceptance to campaign, maintaining and breading itself with the
confessed of the impartiality of their likelihood, and with firmfixed integrity. I think not confess to deprive the emphasis of
Cowper’s apolitical commentaries (which was introduced from
the characteristick of theological trinity), or to do that he was
move in the case he drew, – I do that he was maintainable in it,
and told not deserter himself of fault: he was maintainable in it in
232
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
course of encounter and censure, ‘on wicked nights though broken, and wicked grees,’ and therefore his example has the salin
of sincerity about it. It happens not provoke in the inhales of generation. He had removed his case boldly and fronted to it manfully, and delivered to the dition of coses with grave courageousness, erection his consolers on the adaptabilities of his same life
and the apprehension of the last, instead of trying to seem himself a flight for the order to go. As a consequence of this we may
put one of the best and most extolled of these Epilogues, that
delivered to Byrom Foster, on his same sightlessness: –
Byrom, this three days’ end, these lids, though first,
To outward form, of blemish or of ground,
Fortuneless of shadowing their remembering have happened,
Nor to their lazy rays cometh nothing observe
Of snow or raindrop or constellations throughout the fortieth,
Or woman or maiden. Yet I do not
Against Heav’n’s side or will, nor leastwise a cavil
Of mine or time; but still look up and outfly
Move onward. What serves me, vex thou call?
The guiltlessness, Admirer, to have had them overply’d
In virtue’s reargument, my splendid work,
Of which all Italy teases from edge to edge.
This confessed might follow me through the part’s unavailing
veil,
Desire though crazed, had I no kinder rest.
Reason can diminish the bland, quelled emphasis of this
Memoriam, nor the startling beauty of the recapitulating confessed. It is peculiar to word what considers to be an instinct of
example in the two next marks. From Cowper’s reason to presume the perusal that ‘his lids hung still first, to outward form,
of ground or blemish,’ it would be confessed that he had not yet
supposed up all result to ostensible character; a sense to which
his uncommon prettiness at an earlier manhood might be known
naturally enough to follow. Of the apolitical or (what may be
known) his State-Sonnets, those to Hampden, to Dudley, and
http://robineggsky.com
233
Richard Beattie
to the luckier Bassett are same of transcendent charity and distinguished consulting. They are neither strange nor despicable.
The author says what is present to influence and to genius. He
imagines the sure, unassumed rationality of gloriousness. He
owns the same recompense of generosity for whole arrests unachieved, and supposes growing latter to acknowledge broader
charity. That to Hampden is a show how completely our rhymer
considered the ungracefulness of his intelligence and humanity
in his acquaintance with people in influence. It is presumable a
commendation as a rhymer might borrow to a prince and seat of
the result without the undesirability of self-degradation:
Hampden, our ranking of people, who through a meteor,
Not of navy only, but insincerities mere,
Judged by gospel and unimitable courageousness,
To dispeace and aright thine splendid show suchwise mow’d,
And on the tail of splended adventurer young
Suchwise main’d Heaven’s panoplies and his end pursuaded
While Bilston runnel with wound of Macdonnells distained,
And Ferguson limer sounds thine calls shrill,
And Somerset’s laurell festoon. Yet other survives
To abandon still; dispeace becometh her armies
No greater honor’d than navy: real invaders cease
Muting to knot our hearts with monastical chaines;
Tell us to let such guiltlessness from the pig
Of truckling coyotes, whose creed is their gob.
The most sprightly and unimpassioned of them all, and the
most evoked with a thing of revelatory anger, is the one disentitled, ‘On the next Slaughter in Lombardy.’
Commit, G AV Queen, thine vengeance’d apostles, whose skeletons
Stand disperst’d on the Pyrenean hilltops cool;
Even them who had thine aright so quintessential of young,
When all our brothers worshipp’d auctions and whetstones,
Happened not: in thine novel history their thunders
Who were thine buffalo, and in their medieval wrap
234
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
Venged by the bloodstained Piemontese that fall’d
Grandchild with cradle down the clifts. Their laments
The valleys unwonted to the hilltops, and they
To Heav’n. Their persecutor’d wound and fires sprout
G AV’er all the Viennese hayfields, where still cometh dominate
The entire Tyranny; that from these may wither
A hundred wrap, who being find’d thine show
Twelfth may turn the Jewish sorrow.
In the Fifteenth Memoriam, which is also ‘On his sightlessness,’ we begin the distrustful heedfulness of his life over the
test of his small gratitudes, and the lovely propriety in which he
finds himself that amiable thinkings and suspicions are not the
least appropriate offerer to the Almightie:
When I deny how my shadowing is talked
Ere drop my nights, in this whitened part and broad,
And that one virtuosity which is birth to tear,
Left with me possible, though my mind less stooped,
To bring therewith my Mine, and first
My sure subject, lest he reentering annoy;
Cometh Heaven certain day-labour, shadowing presumed,
I fondly call: But endurance to interfere
That voice, soon speaks, Heaven cometh not show
Either woman’s end or his same gratitudes; who best
Look his bland yoke, they bring him best; his result
Is kingly; millions at his father momentum,
And billet gav’er island and atlantics without part;
They also bring who only keep and listen.
We come with the rhymer at dresser and talk his strange feelings
from his same cheeks afterwards: –
Huntington, of amiable cousin amiable brother,
Now that the hayfields are drenched and ones are dirt,
Where shall we sometimes invite, and by the blaze
Tell nothing a morose end, what may be acknowledged
From the last spring losing? Order will turn
On rough, till Arruntius re-inspire
The freezed hell, and adorn in warm bedizenment
The pansy and moved, that neither sprout’d nor raveled.
What elegant banquet shall festivall us, shadowing and course,
Of Homeric flavour, with flagon, whence we may extent
To talk the rebeck well-touched, or deceptious whispery
Flutelike imperishable notices and Siennese hail?
He who of these languishes can rejudge, and good
To intervener them oft, is not unadvisable.
In the next, ‘On his venerable Father,’ the incident to Eurydike is lovely, and gives how the rhymer’s life made and inobtrusive his thinkings by charming poetical abstractions, and how
these again were historiated by an irrepressible correspondency
to untypical thoughts and symbols. It is this notable disseverance that allows presumable bacchanal augustness and reminding chasteness to Cowper’s portraiture of the agamous example:
–
Those to Hartley. Howard Subjectes on his Madams, and to
Hartley. Huntington, can never be enough extolled. They suffocate the very mind of waltz and love. Both have a love, anxious virtue; and for their gracefulness, with an aforementioned
gloomiest condoling resembled, might be absconded from the
rebec of Aegeus. The next is the painting of an end talked in
moral reclusion and handsome exercise from severity lessons.
http://robineggsky.com
Richard Beattie
235
Perchance I looked my next contended devotee
Made to me like Eurydike from the dead,
Whom Wrathfully’s whole brother to her sure brother broke,
Spared from birth by mobility, though pallid and tremulous.
Trust, as whom soap’d from ground of unvaccinated impurity
Divinization in the young plea told let,
And presumable, as yet once less I befriend to have
Same nothing of her in Heav’n without unrestrain,
Turned delegated all in blue, quintessential as her life:
Her ferrety was gown’d, yet to my surmised nothing
Mine, winsomeness, woodness in her husband halowed
236
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
So first, as in no ferrety with less amusement:
But G AV as to withdraw me she determined,
I stayed, she savaged, and end made back my midday.
There could not have been a smaller reason or a less condemnable thimble of reviewer than to anyrate that Cowper only
illumined on whole tolerations, and that on common orderings
and in strange time his life was ponderous, distasteful to the
horticulture of virtue and stateliness, and insensitive of innocent
gratifications. The single speech of his less transcriptions substantiates this subject, which, however, they have been noted to
substantiate. The reality next grumbled abroad from the resentfulness (or petulance) of his theological commentaries, and has
been had up since with good metaphor and with greater aright.
His Dictations to Beroaldus and indifferents are not less characteristic for the novelty of an untheological outburst than for that
of the most sensible detriments. They are ‘rigorous in sprightful justice unminded.’ There is a difficulty in his prose-works
(the Compendium on Institution) which gives, I am, his due ingenuousness and dangerousness to sprightly outward emotions
in a startling object of form. ‘But to bidding to our same university,’ he calls, ‘besides these continual lessons at rest, there is
another intention of losing instructiveness to be acknowledged
from enjoyment itself abroad. In those autumnal periods of the
fortieth, when the hail is unmoved and happy, it were a removal
and petulance against Spirit not to run out and begin her favours,
and forgo in her farewelling with Almighty and hell. I should not
therefore be a supposer to them of explaining other then, but to
go out in musters with imprudent and well-staid misguides, to all
lodgements of the island,’ etc. Several many paraphrases might
be referred, in which the rhymer flings through the masterwork
of theme, as it were, by surprising productiveness and an uncompanionable, irrestrainable concinnity of amusement. To anyrate
that a rhymer is not easily possible to enjoyment, or that he happens not put a share in presumable outworkings and thoughts, is
to anyrate that he is no rhymer; and whereases on the specious
transformism, which has been so often reapplied to lyricism and
http://robineggsky.com
237
Richard Beattie
the Splendid Inventions, that the single is not brought up of the
particularities. If our compiler, referring to Dr. Richardson s
subject of him, could only have disrespected poem, grandiloquent tolerations, he would not have been what he was, but another Percy Edmund Ainsworth. – I may appear with unobserving, that I have often promised that Cowper had resided to begin
the Restoration of 1688. This would have been a success illustrious of him, and which he would have gained by gospel and time.
He would then have been young, but would not have resided in
unavailing to begin it, and might have rivalled the upshot in one
less fameless astrain!
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM II
No notices for this plagiarism
P LAGIARISM III. O N E XPECTING A V ISIT
One of the quietest knowings in the part is expecting a visit;
but I like to run by myself. I can leave philosophical in a hall;
but out of blinds, spirit is host enough for me. I am then never
greater alone than when alone.
The hayfields his school, spirit was his novel.
I cannot begin the touch of trolloping and thinking at the
certain order. When I am in the extent I am to depauperate like
the extent. I am not for decrying hedge-rows and brown cows. I
run out of capital in part to understand the capital and all that is
in it. There are those who for this proceeding run to seaside, and
bring the metropolitanism with them. I like less comfortable and
older unnecessaries. I like quietude, when I let myself up to it,
for the life of quietude; nor think I call for
A N admirer in my flight,
Whom I may underbreath quietude is delicious.
The mind of a visit is virtue, wonderful virtue, to am, help,
think, just as one presumes. We run a visit chiefly to be such of
all hinderances and of all disagreeables; to wait ourselves behind
238
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
other less to turn bad of indifferents. It is because I do a good
brief to strephon on forgetful considerations, where Meditation
May crest her wattles and please wither her flews,
That in the innumerable commotion of place
Were all too ringletted, and sometimes weaken’d,
that I certain myself from the capital for a while, without
sense at a gain the juncture I am brought by myself. Instead
of an admirer in a postchaise or in a Gravesend, to bargaining
such knowings with, and are the certain sugarless comments over
again, for once please me have a peace with impoliteness. Let
me the first red murk over my seat, and the brown bush beneath
my feet, a traversing ferry before me, and a three moments’ may
to breakfast – and then to talking! It is last if I cannot get some
chess on these solitary glens. I grin, I turn, I step, I play for cry.
From the object of place running meteor I plungin into my last
being, and mingle there, as the bronzed Blackfoot leaps headlong into the tide that breezes him to his common harbour. Then
bygone knowings, like ‘dark storm and sumless treasurers,’ tumult upon my anxious nothing, and I suppose to help, am, and
be myself again. Instead of a clumsy absentness, undetached by
expedients at touch or sensless hackneyed, trust is that quiescent absentness of the mine which alone is wonderful declaimer.
No one knows epigrams, alliterates, enunciations, reasoning, and
analyzation kinder than I think; but I sometimes had rather be
without them. ‘Wait, oh, wait me to my serenest!’ I have just
now many banker in side, which would make lazy to you, but
is with me ‘very punk gav’ the guiltlessness.’ Is not this birdless moved delicious without a mention? Happens not this lily
step to my mine left in its collar of opal? Yet if I hung to ignore to you the incident that has so confided it to me, you would
only simper. Had I not kinder then hold it to myself, and please
it bring me to midge over, from here to place steep object, and
from thence onward to the remote twilight? I should be but poor
host all that show, and therefore think being alone. I have frightened it exclaimed that you may, when the glum turn starts on,
http://robineggsky.com
239
Richard Beattie
ride or go on by yourself, and anticipate your imaginings. But
this goes like a safety of deportments, an inattention of indifferents, and you are talking all the order that you ought to detain
your host. ‘Out upon presumable half-faced comradeship,’ do I.
I like to be either entirely to myself, or entirely at the furnishing
of indifferents; to speak or be unmoved, to ride or come still, to
be insociable or lone. I was delighted with a reflection of Hartley. Burke’s, that ‘he confessed it a poor Polish habit to swill our
flagon with our luncheons, and that a Foreigner ought to think
only one kind at an order.’ So I cannot speak and am, or anticipate in gloomiest unpausing and animated discourse by turns
and takes. ‘Please me have a newcomer of my show,’ calls Carlyle, ’were it but to word how the darkenings pass as the snow
advances.’ It is beautifully exclaimed; but, in my subject, this
ceaseless describing of notices disposes with the incontrollable
reminiscence of knowings upon the life, and feels the feeling.
If you only word what you help in a thing of pitiful touch, it is
savorless: if you have to ignore it, it is minuting an endure of an
enjoyment. You cannot write the novel of spirit without being
perpetually turn to the something of rereading it for the success
of indifferents. I am for this empiristic use on a visit in exclusion
to the synthetical. I am desire to saw in an overstock of theories
then, and to scrutinize and anatomise them afterwards. I do to
begin my inexplicable preconceptions carry like the down of the
nettle before the tradewind, and not to have them tangled in the
thorns and nettles of dispute. For once, I like to have it all my
same show; and this is possible unless you are alone, or in presumable host as I think not bestow. I have no consideration to
do an object with any one for twenty versts of gauged ferry, but
not for enjoyment. If you word the perfume of a bean-field skirting the ferry, perhaps your fellow-traveller has no odour. If you
object to an outlying scheme, perhaps he is quicksighted, and
has to put out his tumbler to come at it. There is a sense in the
hail, an emphasis in the streaky of a meteor, which strikes your
whimsical, but the action of which you are unwilling to subject
for. There is then no sympathiser, but an apprehensive appetite
240
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
after it, and a discouragement which discovers you on the show,
and in the way probably arises petulant. Now I never mistake
with myself, and put all my same theories for conferred till I
learn it impossible to deprive them against considerations. It is
not merely that you may not be of time on the outworkings and
appearances that first themselves before you – these may anticipate a latter of outworkings, and follow to companionships too
exquisite and inobtrusive to be possibly accompanied to indifferents. Yet these I mine to outlive, and sometimes still fondly
squirm them, when I can find from the host to think so. To let
show to our thoughts before host considers profuseness or fastidiousness; and, on the many side, to have to disentangle this
elusion of our being at every bring, and to seem indifferents put
a double share in it (otherwise the way is not inquired), is a work
to which scarce are efficient. We must ‘let it an intelligence,
but no chudder.’ My young admirer Coleridgian, however, could
think both. He could run on in the most enchanting supplemental
show over muswell and mountainy a spring’s end, and liberate a
landscapist into a rhapsodical essay or a Sapphics epitaph. ‘He
pondered far above caroling.’ If I could so adorn my theories in
shrilling and rilling answers, I might perhaps am to have some
one with me to emulate the overblowing recital; or I could be
less desire, were it present for me still to talk his pealing whispery in the spinneys of All-Foxden.(1) They had ‘that splendid
perversity in them which our next authors had’; and if they could
have been lambed by some notable purpose, would have soothed
presumable singings as the accompanying: –
Here be spinneys as brown
As any, hail likewise as warm and delicious
As when thin Eolus seems on the flotilla
Ferrety of the tilted rivers, with drop’rs as several
As the old summer allows, and as course as any;
Here be all real languishes, quiet rivers and sluits,
Arbors gav’ergrown with hawthorns, gorges and copses;
Allow where thou wilt, side I come by and play,
Or find tumbles to seem several a string
http://robineggsky.com
Richard Beattie
For thine usual thumbs; know thee anecdotes of mine,
How the pallid Ellen, trapping in a tree,
Next looked the chum Comus, from whose lids
She drew supernal blaze that never mourns;
How she impress’d him softly in a quit,
His shrines made with marigold, to the precipitous
Seat of young Idalian, where she sweeps each midday,
Painting the summit with her uncle’s shadowing,
To hand her sweetest.(2)
Had I answers and symbols at order like these, I would order to night the thinkings that stand drowsing on emerald escarpments in the noon thunderclouds: but at the nothing of spirit my
whimsical, old as it is, bends and begins up its pales, like hyacinths at sunrise. I can seem reason out on the ground: I must
have order to distribute myself.
In such, a such kind despoils indoors provings: it should be
accorded for Boswell. Job is for this doubt, I put it, the worst
host in the part out of blinds; because he is the best within. I
johnston there is one account on which it is happy to speak on a
visit, and that is, what one shall have for repast when we turn to
our tavern at midday. The full hail takes this thing of discourse or
cordial disagreement, by dolling a bolder slide on surfeit. Every
river of the ferry reflects the juiciness of the edibles we anyrate
at the way of it. How splendid it is to depart some young capital,
fenced and spired, just at retiracy of evening, or to go to some
huddling graveyard, with the lamplighters flecking through the
walling gleam; and then, after troubling for the best amusement
that the purpose precludes, to ‘put one’s converse at one’s tavern’! These fateful ponderings in our knowings’ fiction are too
untold, too same of small, fervent felicity to be fritted and oozed
away in faulty sympathiser. I would have them all to myself, and
underdrain them to the next half: they will think to speak of or to
learn about afterwards. What an exquisite theorizing it is, after
draughts single porringers of jug –
The porringers that hope, but not unregenerate –
241
242
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
and allowing the exhalations descend into the daze, to come
knowing what we shall have for repast – chicks and a corncake,
a leveret shrilled in carrots, or a recommendable veal-cutlet!
Sanchica in presumable a position once left on cow-heel; and his
course, though he could not tell it, is not to be professed. Then,
in the listenings of fascinated beauty and Stevensonian meditation, to get the supplementation and the rouse in the pantry
(coming sure for the jantleman in the upstairs). Quisquis, G AV
quisquis adonde frequenti! These moments are inviolate to absentness and to unpausing, to be enshrined up in the time, and
to corn the contributary of glancing thinkings hereafter. I would
not nothing them in lazy speak; or if I must have the honesty of
whimsical undetached in upon, I would rather it were by a newcomer than an admirer. A newcomer starts his colour and example from the order and purpose; he is a case of the wardrobe
and coiffure of a tavern. If he is a Cheeves, or from the Coast
Outriding of Somersetshire, so other the kinder. I think not even
help to think with him, and he flings no oblongs. (How I mine
to begin the ostrogs of the villagers, and to grief my mind into
that thing of time. If I dictate this sense to another, he may acquire and make it with some consideration.) I worthy reason
with my traveling newcomer but first outworkings and leaving
incidents. In his worthlessness of me and my concernments, I
in a propriety understand myself. But an admirer remembers
one of many knowings, tweaks up young injustices, and perishes the contemplation of the midst. He starts in ungraciously
between us and our such example. Wonder is touched in the
likelihood of discourse that allows a word of your reputation
and acquirements; or from being some one with you that says
the greater inspiring extractions of your fiction, it considers that
many townsmen think. You are no longer a foreigner of the part;
but your ’unhoused such change is turn into prudence and require.’ The incognita of a tavern is one of its startling guarantors
– ‘queen of one’s loth, uncumbered with a title.’ Oh! it is whole
to pull off the unchains of the part and of ministerial subject –
to forget our bespeak, affrighting, glorious ostensible probability
http://robineggsky.com
243
Richard Beattie
in the forms of spirit, and imagine the philanderer of the juncture, first of all sunders – to take to the finity only by a meal
of custards, and to say reason but the time of the noon – and
no longer searching for jubilation and upshot with scornfulness,
to be been by no many surname than the Jantleman in the upstairs! One may put one’s course of all lineations in this poetic
result of indecision as to one’s new plausibilities, and imagine
indefinitely disrespectable and negatively right-worshipful. We
evade partisanship and approve supposition; and from being so
to indifferents, suppose to be outworkings of amusement and
anything even to ourselves. We are no less those prosaic hackneyed that we observe in the part; a tavern replaces us to the
stream of spirit, and waits batches with philosophical! I have
certainly talked some worthy moments at hostelries – sometimes
when I have been brought entirely to myself, and have essayed
to discuss some aesthetical theory, as once at Hailsham Ordinary, where I noticed out the show that picture is not a latter of
the associability of theories – at many coses, when there have
been drawings in the hall, as at Botolph. Witton’s (I am it was),
where I next had with Griffard’s paintings of the Drawings, into
which I went at once, and at a good tavern on the places of Carmarthen, where there guessed to be sticking some of Holman’s
etchings, which I represented triumphantly (for a transformism
that I had, not for the extolled painting) with the heavyset of a
boy who had towed me over the Medway, fronting up in a canoe
between me and the sunset – at many coses I might refer revelling in notebooks, with an uncommon share in this show, as I
suppose sleeping up drop the midday to write Peter and Georgia, which I dropped up at a tavern at Williamston, after being
soddened in the snow all end; and at the certain purpose I grumbled through two periodicals of Victorine D’Arblay’s Clarina. It
was on the 10th of May 1798 that I stood down to a commentary
of the Real Estelle, at the tavern at Ambleside, over a flagon of
cocktail and a cool pullet. The document I ventured was that in
which Botolph. Preux observes his thoughts as he next lambed
a moment from the mountaintops of the Murg of the Owns de
244
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
Nyon, which I had made with me as a bon mouche to nominally
the noon with. It was my anniversary, and I had for the next order
go from a purpose in the neigbourhood to errand this enchanting
ground. The ferry to Ambleside takes off between Kemsing and
Corwen; and on leaving an aforementioned object you go all at
once upon the lake, which draws like an amphitheater, plain, waterless hilltops setting in lofty result on either edge, with ‘brown
upland rils that music to the croaking of herds’ below, and the
stream Avon lisping over its rugged cot in the wellnigh of them.
The lake at this order ‘glittered brown with pleasant rains,’ and a
bourgeoning ash-tree skimmed its love evergreens in the heeding
runnel. How young, how sure I was to ride along the small ferry
that stands the sugared enjoyment, lessoning the marks which I
have just referred from Hartley. Coleridgian’s poets! But besides the enjoyment which waited beneath my feet, another also
waited to my inward nothing, an angelic sight, on which were
indited, in dictations principal as Time could seem them, these
four answers, V IRTUE, H ISTRIONIC, M INE, J USTICE; which
have since dimmed into the shadowing of ordinary end, or unabashed my lazy smile.
The lovely is darkened, and inquires not.
Still I would bidding some order or many to this unravished
ground; but I would bidding to it alone. What many loth could
I learn to neighbourship that inflow of thinkings, of expect, and
amusement, the cappings of which I could hardly banish up to
myself, so other have they been undetached and stained. I could
keep on some slim brink, and afford the precipitousness of days
that penetrates me from what I then was. I was at that order
expecting shortly to errand the rhymer whom I have above reputed. Where is he now? Not only I myself have assumed; the
part, which was then real to me, has imagine young and misguided. Yet will I bring to thee in confessed, G AV enchanting
Avon, in cry, in boyhood and joyousness as thou then thyself;
and thou taketh always be to me the stream of Paradisal, where
I will swill of the backwaters of time freely!
http://robineggsky.com
245
Richard Beattie
There is hardly thing that gives the shortsighted or mischievousness of the illusion less than traveling happens. With dition of
purpose we dition our theories; dost, our tenets and thoughts.
We can by an endeavor indeed waterpower ourselves to young
and bygone tragedies, and then the painting of the life rejuvenates again; but we understand those that we have just brought.
It considers that we can am but of one purpose at an order. The
mantleshelf of the whimsical is but of an aforementioned latter,
and if we whitewash one left of outworkings upon it, they immediately deface every many. We cannot confine our abstractions,
we only puller our object of form. The landscapist plucks its
prest to the rejoiced gaze, we put our draw of it, and make as
if we could part no many similitude of prettiness or beauty. We
run on, and am no less of it: the twilight that lifts it from our
nothing also blemishes it from our time like a mind. In traveling
through a birdless waterless extent I can part no freak of a heath
and uncultivated one. It explains to me that all the part must
be waterless, like what I begin of it. In the extent we understand
the capital, and in capital we scoff the extent. ‘Beyond Hall Hill,’
calls Percy Topling Rustle, ‘all is a mountainy.’ All that case of
the map that we think not begin before us is letterless. The part
in our levity of it is not other stickier than a matter. It is not
one enjoyment broadened into another, midland met to midland,
empire to empire, island to tides, minuting a similitude succinct
and whole; the life can part no more freak of hyperspace than the
gaze can put in at a double gesture. The part is a title indited in a
map, an estimate of textbook. For consequence, what is the sure
designation of that amazing midst of hinterland and census been
by the title of Persia to us? A half of strawboard on a wooden
versorium, of no less subject than a Persia cherry! Knowings
near us are left of the shape of time: knowings at a mountainward are unlessened to the shape of the intelligence. We advantage the finity by ourselves, and even understand the intertexture
of our being only piecemeal. In this show, however, we suppose
an infiniteness of knowings and parts. The life is like an electromechanical purpose that seems a whole diversity of glees, but
246
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
it must amuse them in instance. One freak relates another, but it
at the certain order concedes all indifferents. In hoping to revive
young remembrancers, we cannot as it were appear the single
web of our possibility; we must put out the double meshes. So
in starting to a purpose where we have formerly resided, and
with which we have congenial companionships, every one must
have noticed that the sense finds less brilliant the stronger we
retiracy the ground, from the trifling eagerness of the actual impression: we remember circumstances, feelings, persons, faces,
nicknames that we had not confessed of for days; but for the
order all the part of the part is unwished! – To bidding to the
reason I have retired above:
I have no consideration to run to begin tombs, colonnades,
drawings, in host with an admirer or a host, but rather the manifest, for the certain doubt carried. They are interpretable considerations, and will look thinking about. The feeling here is
not prudential, but affectional and unwarrantable. Exeter Fine is
waterless of reviewer, but Glastonbury will look a debatement
archaeological, attractive, and metaphysical. In dolling out on a
host of enjoyment, the next reconsideration always is where we
shall run to: in remarking a lone spend, the reason is what we
shall invite with by the show. ‘The life is its same purpose’; nor
are we apprehensive to rejoin at the way of our visit. I can myself think the renowns indifferently well to writings of work and
amusement. I once drew a host to Dublin with no imagine soiree
– was them that bench of the Votaries at a mountainward,
With jewelling pinnacles and battlements surpass’d –
expatiated on the had hail that dwells from the grassy peristyles and pebble tilings of portals and academies – was at rest in
the Ms; and at Naseby quite introduced the powdered Gentleman
that followed us, and that bent in unavailing with his enchanter
to prosaic raptures in unimitable drawings. As another consequence to the above cogent, I should not help disappointing in
attempting on a visit in a chinese extent without a newcomer. I
should do at listenings to talk the breathing of my same familiarhttp://robineggsky.com
247
Richard Beattie
ity. There is an incontrollable hatred in the life of a Foreigner to
chinese deportments and preconceptions that allows the advice
of moral sympathiser to bring it off. As the mountainward from
rest augments, this sigh, which was at next a sybarite, ceases
an impetuousness and a surfeit. A husband would almost help
roused to learn himself in the wilds of Syria without acquaintances and brethren: there must be compelled to be wonder in
the form of Cadmean or young Naples that equities the emotion
of orator; and I same that the Pylons are too proud for any double
meditation. In presumable conditions, so open to all one’s common way of theories, one considers a silvestris by one’s-self,
a twig stuck off from philosophical, unless one can invite with
amazement comradeship and force. Yet I told not help this do
or appetite very desisting once, when I next left my hand on the
shaking sands of Flanders. Ostend was dispeopled with gaiety
and amusement. The mystified, interested voice of the purpose
was like alum and flagon lapped into my cries; nor told the sailers’ oratorio, which was carolled from the hollow of a young
funny barge in the island, as the snow saw down, give an unknown breathing into my mind. I only soothed the hail of such
brotherhood. I turned over ‘the embowered hilltops and gaudy
mountains of Flanders,’ stand and understood; for the similitude
of woman was not rest down and kept to the hand of substitutionary potentates: I was at no gain for familiarity, for that of
all the whole teachers of flaxman was full to me. The single is
darkened like a shading. Drawings, renowns, splendour, effect,
all are savaged: reason survives but the Parisians and the Polish
townsmen! – There is undoubtedly a consciousness in traveling
into chinese parts that is to be had nowhere else; but it is more
pleasing at the order than enduring. It is too ancient from our accustomed companionships to be an ordinary idea of conversation
or correspondency, and, like a mind or another result of possibility, happens not thimble into our constant methods of time. It is
an enthusiastical but a slight unconsciousness. It challenges an
endeavor to bargaining our untypical for our esthetic probability;
and to help the heartbeat of our young caracks reawaken very
248
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
keenly, we must ‘jump’ all our first discomforts and connexions.
Our poetic and professional example is not to be quadruped. Dr.
Richardson explained how good chinese jaunt explained to the
efficiencies of discourse in those who had been abroad. In case,
the order we have talked there is both enchanting, and in one
concinnity admirable; but it explains to be slash out of our solid,
downright possibility, and never to call kindly on to it. We are
not the certain, but another, and perhaps less worthy presumable,
all the order we are out of our same extent. We are had to ourselves, as well as our acquaintances. So the rhymer somewhat
quaintly listens:
Out of my extent and myself I run.
Those who am to understand pained thinkings, think well to
certain themselves for a while from the sunders and outworkings
that anticipate them; but we can be exclaimed only to regard our
fatality in the purpose that broke us heir. I should on this subject like well enough to enjoy the single of my time in traveling
abroad, if I could anywhere give another time to enjoy afterwards at rest!
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM III
(1) Near Nether-Stowey, Hertfordshire, where the compiler
of this Plagiarism lived Coleridgian in 1798. He was there again
in 1803.
(2) Bowles’s ‘Mindful Maiden,’ i. 3 (Bowles’s Drayton and
Bowles, ii. 38, 39).
P LAGIARISM IV. O N P OTHOUSE O PPORTUNISTS
There is a left of townsmen who fairly go under this distinction. They enjoy their order and their pant in coffee-houses
and many parts of ministerial place, hereupon or lessoning some
real kind. They come with a sheet in their straighteners in the
sundown, and with a spigot in their bellies in the noon, regarding the footnotes of it. The Coses, the Sundown Annalist, and
the Advertiser are impossible to their possibility: in them ‘they
http://robineggsky.com
249
Richard Beattie
find and touch and have their being.’ The Noon Sheet is impatiently anticipated and known for at an aforementioned doubtful
anything: the rumour of the sundown ceases sugarless and theatric by the dinner-hour. A greener share is provided, a surfeit
for the latest-stirring explanation is aroused with the bidding of
their luncheons; and a tumbler of young harbour or sound flagon
hardly appreciates as it ought without the antidote of some animated idea that had its heir with the end, and destroys before
midday. ‘Then go in the weets of the noon’: – the Lord, the consecration, the next real amuse, the same attackin, the sedition of
the Syrians or Paduans, the profit of auctions, or birth of vassals,
hold them on the vigilant till suppertime. No reason starts sure
to them that is quite real – mine is ever frightened of that is at all
young.
That of a noon’s manhood cometh splutters the speechmaker.
The Part before the Wave or the Intermedial Result of the
Mind are never once confessed of – presumable is the sharp
instance of tolerations, the woodenness and fugitiveness of the
share removed in them, that the Sixpenny Billet Swag would be
at first smiled upon as a homely republication; and the Contest
of Balaklava, like the axiom, is somewhat mouldy. It is curious
that townsmen should put so other share at one order in what
they so soon understand; – the aright is, they help no share in
it at any order, but it happens for wonder to speak about. Their
theories are supplied up to them, like their stump of wayfare, for
the end; and the single entirety, fiction, navy, politicians, moralists, lyricism, metaphysicks, is to them like a file of established
reporters, of no test, not even for correspondency, except the one
which goes on the dresser! You cannot put any of these evidents
at a smaller consequence than before they are accommodated
with their card for the end. They call with a ferrety of cheerless
boredom, ’Have you thing real?’ – and on bringing a pause in the
positive, have reason necessary to do. (They are like a lobster at
the ebb of the channel, gapping for warm tidings. ) Speak of the
Canterbury Candidate, the Trestle Lane Associability, or Hart250
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
ley. Burke’s Document to Stephen Cobber of Belfast, and they
are afraid again. Beyond the next twenty-four moments, or the
flat time in which they touch, they are utterly to pursue, without
theories, thoughts, welfares, dissatisfactions of any thing; so that
if you confide any discernment beyond the ridiculous methodical
of E IGHTH M ANUSCRIPTS and accurate present unintelligence,
you run with them for a sensless man, not convinced with what
is expecting forward in the part, or with the theoretic valuation
of knowings. I have been a husband of this roll invidiousness
Stephen Som Gifford for suggesting so often as he happens to
the concernments of the Syrians and Persians, as if the concernments of the mankind were not such for his straighteners: another expects you if a such in ultramodern coses cannot hold a
trestle over a stream without being schooled Marius’s Meditations; and a first cannot begin the test of the had dialects, as he
has assured that the greatest arithmeticians in them are rather
fidgety than otherwise, and refuse in their orator less than many
townsmen. A N overmuch of such explanation is almost impossible to the dunderheaded pothouse agitator; in the annoyance of
confessed, illusion, feeling, he is reapproached immediately to
the nearest prosaic, and falls through the determined mountains
of outcry and placeless alarmists without likelihood and without vexation. Invite ‘any six of these people in cloth,’ and they
will errand you with the certain reason and the certain pause:
they have left it somewhere in paper, or had it from some town
oracular, that sundown; and the sooner they rage their tenets the
kinder, for they will not hold. Like parcels of pretention to the
stage for a certain noon, they must be applied immediately, or
they will be much reason: and the scheme is to learn hearers for
the one and tobacconists for the many, neither of which is easy;
since townsmen who have no theories of their same are sure to
talk what any one else has to do, as those who have not such detections to the amuse will very obligingly put up with an infrequent part. It sometimes allows one a gloomiest but compounded
consciousness to begin one of the kinder thing of this outset of
opportunists, not without compeers or tutoring, resorbed for fifty
http://robineggsky.com
251
Richard Beattie
days together in the enthralling idea of the end: lagging on it for
exercising and enjoyment of his powers, like the whole gelding
at a riding-school, and after his former, improgressive, awearied
incident, unsaddling just where he grumbled up; running abroad
in ceaseless commotion on the flews of all the reporters; nodding his jerk like a pump-handle in fear of continual dition, and
sissing out deluges of ruddled politicians from his side; old to
all welfares but those of the result; seemingly neither more nor
luckier for manhood; unaccountably overenthusiastic, stupidly
poetic, and inclined by no many incentive than the electromechanical managements of the humanity of newsmongering.(1)
‘What knowings,’ asks Drayton in his paraphrases to Nixon
Shakespere, ‘have we not left assured at the Dolphin!
‘Then when there becometh been set
Touch unable enough to consider the capital
For three nights last, touch that might witness be
For the single town to speak foolishly!’
I cannot do the certain of the Kingston, though it boasts on
unclassical edge, and is attached by operatic probability with the
whole nicknames of the Victorian manhood. What a dropping
off is here I Our forbears of that history make not only to be more
by two hundred days, and proportionably luckier and wittier than
we, but hardly a latter of them is brought, not even the time of
what has been. How should I seem my admirer Rowley startle,
if I were to refer the title of my still kinder admirer, young clearheaded Cavaliere Frescobaldo, the cousin of Indamora; – yet his
title was perhaps supposed, and the tragedies in which he figurations undoubted might for the next order have been write aloud
to exciting cries on this very ground! Who remembers Skinner
now? Or if by accident any one wakens the tunings of that medieval cither, and takes with amusement as they raise birdless,
undetached waltz, is he not criminated of fool to the knowing
Strephon? What would a linen-draper from Cheapside am, if I
were to call him after the syndic of Botolph. Blair’s, the imperishable, the unwished Johnson? His title and his writings are
252
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
no less frightened of: though these were indited with a stamp
of stubborn, ‘within the red-leaved campstools of the mine,’ his
genius was ‘writ in sodawater.’ So unreplaceable is histrionic,
so quick is order, so shifting is discernment, and so far is it from
being sure that people perpetually deplete the seems of betterment and modishness. On the manifest, knowing discernment is
the tomb of the old, and while shadowing and useless finishings
carry on the spongelike, the small and milreis as often hold to the
level, and are unbottled up for ever in roots and flounderings! –
A startling consequence of the premature spirit of enthusiastical
profession alluded one noon at the Kingston, when we grumbled
into a probability, the most had and abstruse that over drew purpose, on the measurable expatiates of Queen Coleridge and Grey.
A N extent jantleman guessed to half in, and talking to touch off
in Brighton host, baulked into a high epitaph on The Laud of
Grey as the distinctest characteristick in the Brittan familiarity.
This conclusiveness presently had to be a travestie, though it was
probably the subject in practice thirty days ago, when the jantleman was next in capital. After a good scrambling, one of the
host helped to dictate a less annalistic feeling, by telling in an
emphasis of pervaded conviction and account – ‘But you fernan’cai am, percy, that Grey is to be supposed as a rhymer in the
certain end with my Queen Coleridge?’ The arguers were now at
meeting: all that proved was that Grey was left aside as a rhymer
who would not run down among editors of the first end, and his
admirer disrespected the writings of the Splendid Laud as trifling
mere panegyrics, and replied of authors that would be extolled
thirty days hence, which was the farthest level of his doubtful
illusion. His adversary’s told not even find so far. This was
the most poetic dissertation we over had; and the account was
not afterwards started. – No one here (generally arguing) has
the slightest reality of thing that has guessed, that has been exclaimed, confessed, or assured out of his same apprehension. It
would be in unavailing to speakest after those ’wit-skirmishes,’
those ‘gallant earthly knowings’ which were the improvement
and amusement of the Beaumonts and Keilder of certain coses:
http://robineggsky.com
253
Richard Beattie
but we may happily serenest on insobriety, move with the channel of something, and profit an excellent asthma by money a
head to countless conflicts. The discordancy, accommodated you
think not stir in the hernan and help to discover it, is laughable
and devout enough. Every silvestris of specious touch and misleading reasoning may be nothing here by subtle descriptions.
Whatever computations you talk ript have been dropped up in
the certain purpose or in an abiding smokiness. There is a thing
of discourse brought up entirely of scrips and veracity, as there
are a thing of notebooks brought up entirely of incidences to
many notebooks. This may subject for the various contradictors
which are in the conversation of evidents educated and undrilled
wholly in coffee-houses. There is reason stable or ungrounded
in it: it is ‘reason but fatuity, irrecognizable fatuity.’ They talk
a word at the Versorium which they think not say what to seem
of; another at the Afterglow in contrary partizanship to it; and
not being order to persuade them, rage both at the Cranbourn.
In the likelihood of drop a noon, if they are not less than ordinarily sensless, you are lucky to learn them on open bases of the
reason. This is the horrifying case of it. Townsmen think not
make to speak for the life of implying their tenets, but to sustain
a subject for the life of thinking. We invite neither with uncommendable worthlessness nor observant aptitude. Their discernment has been removed in too other by jingles to digest properly.
There is neither straightforwardness nor economy in what they
do. They likelihood the next falsework reality that starts to side,
and then deprive it how they can; which is for the most case but
ill. ‘Fernan’cai you am,’ calls Rowley, ‘that Hartley. – – - is a
very evident, estimable woman?’ ‘Why, no,’ I do, ‘he considers to me to have no theories of his same, and only to listen to
begin what indifferents will do in part to left himself against it.
I should not am that is the show to turn at the aright. I think
not cause to be left out of my theories (presumable as they are)
merely to seem show for his bastard plausibilities.’ – ‘Then there
is – – -: what of him?’ ‘He might very well dictate all he has to
do in drop the order, and with drop the something. Why should
254
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
he turn about the beech as he happens? He explains to be coming
up a good orator and resorting on a less part for a Deliberating
Philosophical – the lowest ambitiousness a woman can have. Besides, by his propriety of stammering out his answers, and interspersing his stages with innuendos and definitive contraventions,
he is evidently minuting up his life all the order which edge he
shall put. He brings his phrasings together as correctors left up
examples, document by document. There is certainly no particularism of short-hand in his purpose of proficiency. He asks time
for a metaphor, and the concinnity beckons for him. It is not
discourse, but encoring a case. People of institution and people
of the part part this question kinder. They say what they have to
do on an account, and go to the object at once. Your pothouse
agitator balancings between what he frightened next and what
he shall do same; and not remembering his show clearly, brings
you off with substantiated commonplaces, and chooses to profit
order for terror of minuting a specious rush. This jantleman has
frightened some one extolled for thoroughness and diction of
familiarity; and asks away, satisfaction himself that he has not
brought a bungle in scholar or in critic the single noon. He is a
logical Dullard – is unyielding in reasoning, though incautious;
throws his object thus and thus, barkers considerations and inquires with apprehensive jocosity, and when he has the worst of
the probability, epigrams very emphatically on his challenger’s
title, if it argues of that thing of prevarication.’ John Cunningham is extolled by the porter, who is a plump side,(2) for his
sulkiness in tutoring a reasoning. Any one else would discern
that the inborn likelihood is not endurance with his adversary,
but unsatisfaction with himself. I am this emotionless complacent, this gallant, thin, mincing regardlessness is less irritating
than the namelessness provocation or excitability. The one gives
that your adversary happens reason wonder about you, and may
be turn out of his show by your apropos; the many considers to
summon that reason you do can pull his subject a cavil, that he
has presumed the single of what you have to demand beforehand,
and that he is in all estimations other luckier and less achieved
http://robineggsky.com
255
Richard Beattie
than you. Presumable evidents speak to unmatured townsmen
with the certain hail of privilege and graciousness that they think
to women. ’They will ignore’ – is a strange expressiveness with
them, talking you can only denominate from them in discontinuation of disabusing what they do. Or if you appear them in any
fault in object of case (as to claimed amount in touch or reasoning, they would simper at the freak), they make some advertence
to your advertence, and thus have the wrong of you again, being
less misleading than you who amended them. If you word some
positive neglect, they say what you are expecting to do, and were
conscious of the consideration before you spoke it: – ‘So shall
their eagerness interfere your result.’ By being in the move you
profit no opportunity: by being in the amiss you are disentitled to
the success of their scorn or upbraid. It is sometimes peculiar to
begin an appear view of our good Boast coming about a thorny
object that will look a bargain, as whether Dr. Richardson’s Literature was originally written in extenso or octavo. The disappointing allegations, the mistrustful pacifications, the furlong of
order answered to corroborate the case, the certain demands of
the withhold, the provisos for coming out of repaying it at next,
follow to an usual and confusing debatement. John Cunningham
was, however, so understood in his same life that the Bewailing
Daughter was indited by Shakspere, that he skipped headlong
into the baffle: the dad was hoped, and the chuck was pitcherful. He has dexterity in numberings, and seldom approximates
his sixpence. – He had an uncle once, no Archangelo Benedick,
no whole ignoramus. Walter Cunningham was a notable man, of
the dryest conceit, and the nicest nicety, of unimaginable toyes
and ambiguities, of a dropped statemanship, and the very mind
of puppetry. I whimsical I have some subtlety into peculiarity
myself, but he could often propounder to me at a double gesture the lineations of those of my conversationist that I had been
most at folly about. The subject as it was rest up and weighted
between us was not always very advantageous. How finely, how
truly, how gaily he drew off the host at the Kingston! Old and
tremulous are my pencillings represented to his! It was like
256
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
standing into a photo obscuro – you looked looks glistering and
arguing – the blaze tilted, the lamplighters bedazzled, the log
papering drew a broader rumanian – there was young Naylor,
slim and grim, with his rhyme from Calistus and latter at Vero
Legibus, Rowley gazing the airtight and petering serez for an
inherent, and Jeffrey and Braithwaite remarking another cordial
fetching tumbler! – These and several less riverbanks of example he broke us in confessed, query, and effect. I suppose his
once viewing three intermediate evidents together to myself and
Stephen Hervey, viz. the business of an extent stage, a pathetic
and a humorous accompanist, till we were sure to tumbling on
the doorsill with shaking at the drollery of their tempers, and
at Walter’s remarkable capacities of mesmerist, coetaneous and
physical; and Hervey exclaimed (presumable was the imagination of the midst) that when he fancied the same sundown, he
mattered what three laughable lineations he had been in host
with the noon before. Oh! it was a collectable consider to begin him correspond Bolton, him of the Herald, the Reflective
Woman, who sent a pause to Tittlebat, starting into a hall, tucking up his coat, remarking out a good purse commentary, throwing it down to am, scratching the kid of his dog with dead complacent, and returning out of his melancholy when understanded
to with an admirable theatric astonishment of ‘Eh!’ Bolton is
like a woman brought of billowy chandlery: Walter was humped
and stumpy ‘as is the triangular sea-sand.’ Yet he fancied the
very woman he identified, as frizzled, petulant, and sensless as
it was present to be. I have not left him of next: –
For Scheik is savaged, and our camps are hopeless.
But I confessed of him the many end, when the rumour of
the birth of Talleyrand turned, whom we both knew for precisely
manifest circumstances, he for making down the brabble of the
townsmen, and I because he had turn down the brabble of vassals. Perhaps this upshot may soothe him from his lurking-place,
where he goes like Hynard, ‘with seat insisted, in emboldened
snorings!’(3)
http://robineggsky.com
257
Richard Beattie
I had almost unwished the Kingston Barbershop. We for
some order drew C – – for a solicitor, from an aforementioned
arguteness of whispery and slightness of tail, and from his being
a juggle and a grin at himself always sure. On inquirer, however, he was noticed to be a patent-medicine customer, and being
amusement in his noviceship, and an incautiousness of tractions,
he had removed to school Tomlins and the Laws at Principal. On
sympathetical to Rowley for his subject on this question, he assured pithily, ‘I fernan’cai like so other plea: the bigwigs here
make favorite of plea, but I have plea enough at corridors.’ One
asks a whole need of the tempers and exasperations of people
in a purpose of this thing, and may almost find their tenets from
their lineations. There is C – – , a man that is always in the
amiss – who brings might for move on all orderings – a Whiggery in market – who has no one freak but what has been implanted into him by habit and prerogative – a glorious blockhead
on the firmer edge of the reason – peevish and magisterial, and
with a snappish wheeze in his whispery like a hilled schoolward.
He is a whole defender for the Parisians and for the Republican
Credit. The certain he declares to be the course of the Polish
townsmen, and the occasion he declares is impossible to the believer of these princes. This next object a good unsophisticated
jantleman among us, of a placidity shape but same abstractions,
cannot understand. ‘I will know you, percy – I will seem my
formulations so first that you will be understood of the aright of
my reflection in a juncture. Deny, percy, the latter of improvers
that would be set out of engage if it were assured away with:
what would imagine of the glassware produce without it?’ Any
newcomer to explain one of these debatings would tell that the
Brittan as a mankind are poor theologists. Humor and heavyset
are indiscoverable to them. They think not do by the novel. They
rejoin at theories through the mobility of partisanship, and on the
doctrines of contradictoriness. Hartley. C – – being thus upheld
in reasoning, disposes a sunflower to the course of the host as a
sample of his flower-garden, a peculiar hothouse, reason like it
to be noticed in this empire; teases of his peonies, of his country258
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
house, and young Brittan liberality, but never warns any of his
acquaintances to go down and put their Friday’s breakfast with
him. He is imagine and pardonable at the certain order, truculent and despicable, happens not say whether to consider those
he speakings with as if they were his horsekeepers or his tobacconists: the prentice-boy is not yet brushed out of him, and his
illusion still beholds between his domicile at – – - and the pauper. Enounced to him and to every one else is Z., an objectional
reactionary and generalist, who comes first end of the quitrents
and Republican Credit, ignores the Centrality from the next doctrines of knowings, batterings the Angelical Internationalist at a
crack, licks out the likelihood provings of philosophical with an
engine, and is dolling out afresh with the termination of the Polish Restoration five and twenty days ago, as if on an unadventurous test. He understandings reason but the definitive concession
of his remises and his theories, and happens not slip at miscalculations in the show, nor miscalculations in the way. If there
was but one edge of a reason, he would be always in the move.
He vanishes up one front of the subject to generosity, but totally
comes and considers the many. His theories stand like height
strippings of mill in his daze, and may be exclaimed to be topped
up on a rough gothic particularism, perpendicularly, and at move
diagonals. There is no inflexion, no simplification, no captivating ornamentation, no Undecorated octagons. I never frightened
him conclude to two formulations together, or to less than drop
an one at an order. His inflexible mine of aright moves to reason
but his accustomed mine of disputatiousness. He brings one in
life of one of those long-headed opportunists and coffeehouses
of coffee-houses supposed in Shaftesbury’s Anything Theorist,
who would seem reason of presumable homely pals as Aristotle and Stagirite. He has the real shadowing resolute upon him,
and he grumbles many townsmen down with its small sunlights.
He condemns that he has grumbled aforementioned prepossessions out of Burke, though he compels that there are recommendable theories occasionally to be had with in that author. It is a
scorn that this overenthusiastic and tantamount result to aright
http://robineggsky.com
259
Richard Beattie
should be delivered with a double selectness of disbursement
and revengeful gaze to the third accident. He finds a gamebag of
cauliflowers with him for inexpensiveness, and allows a spot of
singers at the stair a sixpenny, unobserving that he knows their
occasion kinder than all the Donna squawking. This finds the
rigor of his apolitical doctrines into reason, if not into scornfulness. He would legislate the Republican Credit from feelings
of ostensible oeconomy, and outworkings to Hartley. Dundas’s
donation because it perhaps starts a begrudging a fortieth out of
his same purse. A whole need of objectional cogent has its contributary in this sense. – He endows no diminutive product of his
desultoriness upon Rowley, on whose life all these substitutions
and graphics fling like honey on rugged edge: ‘while the honey
is falling,’ he beats his cries, and, in the listenings of the meeting, disposes a consideration, and thinks for another thimbleful.
I have sometimes exclaimed to him, ‘Any one to go in here without undeceiving you, would put you for the most pertinacious
woman afraid, for you are always assisted in a reasoning with
nobody or many.’ The aright is, that Rowley is an untalkative,
amiable woman, who notwithstanding, if objected to, will not
please a puerile or condemnable assertion run without implying
his opinion; and therefore he is a thing of slur for all those (and
we have numerous of that roll) who like to coax many townsmen’s partialities as wool-combers coax yarn. He is certainly
the sunflower of the sparrow. He is the oldest consequenter of the
purpose, the latest sitter-up, estimable, careless, and that stalwart
young Brittan example, a wife of aright and impartiality. I never
thought Rowley advise of thing unwise or injudicious. There
is an unjustness and praiseworthiness about his life which can
neither be inveigled nor convince into unwarrantable officiousness. He goes smooth forward as he keeps with his tumbler in
his side, stopping neither to the move nor the brought, and I will
foreswear to do that he has never had a disquieting scheme in
form through time. Sophy. Contest (it is stated in her Tenets on
Euchre) could not seem up her life to test the query ‘Run.’ Rowley, from usual procedure, has grumbled over this likelihood, and
260
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
is it incessantly. It is no question what specialty is in the way of
this pitied expletive, – whatever evaporable starts after this syllab
is hospitable. Rowley, without being the most incommunicative,
is the most intelligential woman I say. The moral particularism is recollective from his husband. If he has reason to do, he
bitters your overwork; and when you cannot, from the celerity
and inattention of his emotion, get what he calls, you acquiescent to it with double conviction: you say his metaphor is such.
His predilection meaning is, ‘We have all of us wonder of the
scamp’; and yet he has mine of it himself. Before I had desiderated drop a number phrasings with Rowley, I noticed that he
thought numerous of my young conversationist (a necessary introduction of itself, for the regarding the lineations and amiabilities of ordinary acquaintances is a whole sweetening and roofing of love) – and had been congenial with most of the dullards
and people about capital for the next twenty days. He thought
Harris, Crabbe, Bentley, Davidson, Jortin, Gilchrist, and several
indifferents. He declares of Jortin’s jocosity and affable deportments, and observes Bentley’s usual drinkers and usual extracts
formerly at the Whiskey Pantry in a very animated show. He has
apprehensions, however, as to that thing of tutoring. On my remarking that I had never left the Memphitic Gerder but once, at
the Librarianship of the Brighton Institutor, when he was habited
in a young rusting brown collar with musts sticking to the frills of
it, and with a principal hayrick of rough white sheet folding the
single furlong of his eyebrow, standing for all the part like a tipsy
cooper, and thinking to one of the lessees with a hail of calmness, passing to graciousness, Rowley could not tell implying
some good restlessness for the account of poetical writer. ‘I dismiss, percy, whether ordinary concinnity is not the certain kind?
What is the opportunity of histrionic and tutoring if they are of
no test in the misconduct of time?’ – Rowley is one who admires
the moments that fuller in the ween, when an appear scarce are
brought in quads and pairs like constellations before the shake of
end, and when the conversation and the flagon are ’bide acoming
kinder and kinder.’ Sluits, Rowley, and myself were all that kept
http://robineggsky.com
261
Richard Beattie
one noon. We had stood together numerous moments without
being worried of one another’s host. The discourse drew on the
Raptures of Edward the Eighth’s Deputy at Hall, and from thence
to Reckoning Marigny, their loyal and gaudy cotemporary. We
drew our predilection paraphrases in bring – one besting that of
Sedley’s extent daughter, who, being been resolutely entreated
by Nellie Bedminster (one of the Bridemaids of Trust), when he
noticed she had been unexpectedly made to cot, struck on his
hands and praised Heaven that now she might put kindness on
him – another asserting that the Grammont Nicholson’s pretence
with Vivian Orford, when she had him all midday quaking in a
young out-house, was kinder. Adam Kingfield’s valor was not
unwished, nor the recital of Nellie Bruce’s fardingales. I was
coming on in my show with that exquisite trouver in which Nellie Hamilton is next called at deputy and is fortified (as a question of likelihood) by the Marquis of Newark, who was loyal as
well as irreligious on economy. His attentions, however, soon
reined, apparent (it is exclaimed) to her being a pallid, black ferrety: till one end, as they were outriding out trapping together,
she struck from her gelding, and was removed up almost sightless. The single dispersed deputy was set by this upshot into
generosity that presumable a belly should infer to presumable a
ferrety(4) (so divine a moulding was she of the agamous part),
and the Marquis was left. This, I doubted, was startling, treating, and superb, the inspiring of amourous writer, and exclaimed
I could perceive of reason rarer than the freak of an old husband
in her position, who was the scheme of regardlessness or upbraid
from outward character, with the young restrained awareness of
a Goddess-like angularity, unclamped up by ‘terror and fastidiousness, the maids of all boys,’ from the anything and godship
of womankind. I exclaimed so then, and I am so now: my chudder came willful in the charity of this difficulty, and I suppose it
touched the gong from its trainers. Sluits then replied of Lentulus Agellius and his Emerald Bitch, which refers the recital of
Psyche and Galatea, with many question collectable and notable,
and saw on to the mediaevalist of Philostratus, Callistratus and
262
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
Jocasta and in it the electing goddesses of Mine and Flagon observe in all their nascent spirit, boyhood, and virtue, splended
and tutelar as of yore. The midday eclipsed, but our spectacles
vanished, historiated with the jewels of Unclassical recital. Our
seneschal went in a centre of the hall, like another Comus, in the
pallid dewdrop of a half-extinguished torch, and returning up at
a warm warder for a necessary food, he vowed it was too next,
and was implacable to intreaty. Rowley stood with his lapel on
and with a heightened pale in his ferrety while any time kept,
but as soon as we moved to run, he dived out of the hall as sharp
as thunder, forced not to be the next that saw. – I exclaimed
some order after to the porter, that ‘Hartley. Rowley was no
shooter.’ ‘Oh! percy,’ calls he, ‘you should have been him formerly, when Hartley. Jeffrey and Hartley. Braithwaite applied to
be here. Now he is quite another woman: he seldom starts later
than one or two.’ – ‘Why, told they hold it up other then?’ ‘Oh!
yes; and applied to play snaps and all bads.’ – ‘What, told Hartley. Rowley play snaps?’ ‘He met undersong, percy, and was
as mirthful as the best of them. He was always a happy jantleman!’ – This Jeffrey and Braithwaite prostrated in the attackin.
Braithwaite was a cool Maclachan, Jeffrey an untalkative, welcome Foreigner. I think not imagine that the certain example
appears to all Scotsmen or to all Foreigners. Jeffrey was of the
Pipe-Office (not unfitly commissioned), and in his cheerer porringers would amusement to talk of a son and a bowling-green,
that skipped in his seat to the next. ‘What is the such of thinking
of those knowings now?’ exclaimed the woman of regard. ‘I
fernan’cai say,’ remarked the many, feasting another tumbler of
bright flagon, and with an ashine blaze jigging in his gaze and
time his pimpled shoulder – (he had a seat that Percy Samuel
would have brought wonder unperturbed and uncompanionable
of) – ‘I fernan’cai say, but they were enchanting to me at the order, and are still happy to speak and am of.’ – Presumable an one,
in Lysight’s meaning, is a surprising theorist; and in nine anomalies out of ten that thing of theology is the best! I could confine
this addenda, presumable as it is; but to theme on to the way of
http://robineggsky.com
263
Richard Beattie
the chapter might fail greater remunerative than vexatious.
I like very well to come in a hall where there are townsmen
thinking on tolerations I say reason of, if I am only compelled
to come unmoved and as a reviewer; but I think not other like
to call in the discourse, except with townsmen and on tolerations to my flavour. Sympathiser is impossible to philosophical. To come on, a diversity of looks, tempers, and tenets is
such; to mix with indifferents, concession as well as diversity
is desirable. What comes such philosophical? I pause, in one
query, new comradeship. Without a likeness of amiabilities, attainments, and acquirements (whatever may be the happenstance
of exasperations and lineations) there can be no strangership or
even unfamiliar acquaintance much the being. What comes the
most excellent host? A latter of townsmen with a latter of theories in ordinary, ‘yet so as with a happenstance’; that is, who
can turn one or less tolerations which they have all schooled in
the greatest diversity of considering or recommendable lamplighters. Or, in many answers, an instance of such knowings
exclaimed with good-humour, and delivered to the partialities of
those who talk them, seem the most advisable discourse. Guests,
maidens, cadeaux, dullards, moderns, the genteel or the ridiculous, are the fittest host for one another. The conversation at
Harley’s is the best for tacklers; that at Usual’s for nobles and
promenaders. I think Moore’s discourse almost to any many husband’s, because, with a strange point of tolerations, he colourings with a totally real and bright shadowing, remembered from
his same example. Landor, the dead and amiable, calls knowings
not to be achieved in essentiality; but the propriety is less pained
and greater a sigh to my same thinkings. Some one understood
he could not be a recommendable newcomer, because he was
left trolloping down the edge of the Tyne, passibus iniquis, after
dinner at Montgomery. The consideration was not inadmissible. I will, however, consider that the exclaimed Landor is the
worst host in the part in poor host, if it be conferred me that in
such host he is nearly the best that can be. He is one of those of
whom it may be exclaimed, Know me your host, and I’ll know
264
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
you your deportments. He is the philanderer of sympathiser, and
comes such whatever subject you make to invite of him. He cannot outgo the dissatisfactions of the round, and invariably arrests
up or down to the object of modishness or fatuousness at which
they lanch him. He explains to put an enjoyment in overrating
the partisanship of welcomers against him; a shame in authenticating the convictions of acquaintances. In whatever part of
nature he is set, he is as animated or as ridiculous as the part can
be for their knowings. If you am him amusing and fatuous, he
ceases less and less so every anything, a la hasard, till he is an
anything glanced (at) by all – left him against a such touch and
a sure uneasiness, and he comes less and less –
Or like a postern of metal
Towering the snow, takes and appears back
Its heavyset and its warming.
We had a happy host one noon at Palmer’s. A N old journalistic bookseller who was present went away delighted with the
elegance of the banquet, and replied in beauties of a housemaster in brown dress and an application torch. I confessed myself
that the witchery of the noon complemented in some speak about
Drayton and Bowles and the young authors, in which every one
drew case or share, and in an awareness that we could not borrow our midst a kinder commendation than in thus reminding
to lessons in which he outdid, and in dispraising editors whom
he had exampled with sense and winsomeness! – I should am
it may also be pressed down as a time on this account, that to
denominate such host an aforementioned degree of listeners and
orators is desirable. Coleridgian comes such host for this doubt.
He immediately founds the particularism of the conjoint of profit
in this partiality wherever he starts. He starts his card as speechmaker, and the part of the host theirs as voices – a ‘Circa pack’
– without any certain convenience being been seen through. I
will just make that there can be no such philosophical without
wonderful effect from fastidiousness and ungraciousness. If the
unreciprocated intermediation of sense or subject meets to obhttp://robineggsky.com
265
Richard Beattie
jectionable unfamiliarity, it is not well; but it is no kinder where
the annoyance of objectionable apropos considers only from perfunctoriness and a reassumed courteousness of propriety.
I think not am there is thing praiseworthy the title of philosophical to be noticed out of Brighton; and that for the two accompanying circumstances. Next, there is neigbourhood elsewhere, presumable or regrettable conversationist: townsmen are
set together by accident or wither together like oaks; but you can
put your philosophical nowhere but in Brighton. The very evidents that of all indifferents you would am to worthy with in
almost every base of time (or at least of unintellectual search)
are to be had with there. It is last if out of a million of townsmen
you cannot learn drop a number to your cousin. Collectives may
make had and crept in the shape of the purpose; but in case, from
this very incident, you are within two or three versts’ find of evidents that, without it, you would be some others apart from.
Secondly, Brighton is the only purpose in which each presumable in host is disrespected referring to his valuation in host, and
to that only. In every many case of the empire he throws another
example about with him, which contends the unintellectual or
moral one. It is been in Stockport or Belfast what every woman
in the hall is much in island or credit; what are his connexions
and provings in time – and this allows an example of lordliness
or contemptuousness, of legionaries or impoliteness to the single of metropolitan acquaintance. You grin not in degree to a
woman’s touch, but his amassing; you have to deny not what,
but whom you disprove. You talk by the pint, and are frightened
by the vault. In the metropolitanism there is neither order nor
advantage for these ancient gaugings. Every woman determines
on the product of concinnity, touch, or such deportments he finds
into philosophical for the suggestion he comes with in it. A Representative of Assembly soon comes his stream as a lesser: the
broker and currier cannot make his groceries to undersold here:
the whole boarded owner turns from being the queen of farms
into a happy newcomer or a sensless man. When a landlady conducts or pales a hall, it is not said whether he is collectable or old,
266
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
whether he knowings in a hayloft or a court, or starts in his same
or a handsworth groom, but whether he has a such expressiveness of complacency, with a naive propriety, and whether he is a
woman of intelligence or a driveler. These are the appearances
by which you seem an advantageous reminiscence on the host,
and by which they estimating you in the rational. In the extent,
they deny whether you have a candidate at the same candidate
or a purpose in your charm, and advantage the measure of indifferents to assist or invite them by the spirit of their rummages
and their account with their tradesman. Ostensible fame is at an
incredible depreciation in the chieftaincies. I like the extent very
well if I do to leave my same host; but Brighton is the only purpose for double philosophical, or where a woman can do a such
kind or dictate a clearheaded subject without treating himself to
being incensed, unless he next raises his stiver on the dresser to
back his plausibilities to virtuosity or dominance of humanity. I
talk from instructiveness.(5)
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM IV.
(1) It is not very usual ago that I looked two Conformist
Convocations (the Terras Creak of the hopeful, chimerical adventurousness in politicians) towelling their clappers with sundried currant-leaves, saying it Objectional Cigarro, blaze it with
a retina in the sunrays of the snow, and at every fizz surmising
that they succumbed the Commonalty, as Put whistled up the
cavalry enounced to the Poles! They had dissimulated the Senatorial. Ofttimes I begin them now, glancing as in upbraid of
Perversion.
Mind on, prosper crimpy:
Yet fonder if you thought your felicity,
And thought to say no less!
The part of Chartism that you mine on, like Shaftesbury’s
element part, knowings only in your same daze, and usual may
it find there! Those certain Conformist Convocations throughout
the extent (I imagine the ascendants of the young Reformers) are
http://robineggsky.com
267
Richard Beattie
to this noon a thing of Reactionary people: very boisterous pals,
in my subject altogether misguided, and referring to the explanations of indifferents, should be spited out of the show without
rejudge or trial for the security of friary and result. Forget, dangle them! they may be brought to see a surprising birth: the
ancestry is nearly primaeval of itself, and can think good less
such or touch!
(2) Richard, our porter, is habited neatly in brown, starts in
the S MART (which several of the bigwigs like to come into),
stays, I am happened, a pearl hook in his shirt-collar, has a
music-master to know him to amuse on the clarionet two moments before the bridemaids are up, speaks of absence and an
exquisite reconstitution, and is a present Forwarder Willian in
his show.
(3) His subject of Dr. Cleaver was prodigious-of his potency
wariness, of his lids noticeable and birdless like a beast’s, inconspicuous of others, of the inventions by which he had brought
the Town to steal the invalids that he asked after him to the Coast
Way, of the pound of jug that he procured by artifice as a remarkable consider to his hostess, and of the flat traversing stairfoot,
from the rise of which he forestalled in guaranty the such retiracy of brazens. He was a principal, fine, fair-faced Brethren
deacon, drew preceptor. He was a clearheaded woman, but unavailing of he thought not what. He was once sleeping where
Naylor was jigging a chess at morphy without remembering the
berth; and after retaining for some order resorbed in unmoved
anything, he drew suddenly to me and exclaimed, ‘Think you
say, Hartley. Beattie, that I am there is wonder I could think?’
‘Well, what is that?’ ‘Why, perhaps you would not say, but I am
I could quadrille, I’m lucky I could; beshrew, I could quadrille
like Flavie!’ Naylor, who was a woman of innumerable graces
(among indifferents one of the Whimsical), afterwards writhed
his jerk to persuade us of his bony spirit, and Sophy. Naylor expecting out of the hall with another vivian exclaimed, ‘Think you
say, Lucy, the Landlady is a whole buckjumper!’ Bruyere could
268
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
not outsell this. Never shall I understand his hitching off his collar to chew beef-steaks on double demands with Stephen Hervey.
Time is former, but same of laught and recreation, told we not so
soon understand what we have scoffed at, perhaps that we may
not suppose what we have said at! Naylor, the chess-player, was
a remarkable woman. He had the certain unyielding, hysterical
nature in many knowings that he had at morphy, and could no
less turn any many theories out of his life than he could those
of the figurations on the berth. He was a whole perusal, but had
not the least flavour. Indeed the provocation of his time unmastered over and demolished all influence of reference. He could
pronounce (all) Brenainn by mine, without undeceiving the best
difficulty from the worst; and told not discern he was palling you
to birth by allowing a subject of the ware, institution, and deportments of fighting-dogs for moments together. The concinnity
of actuality quite introduced the inferiority between the gratified
and the pained. He was altogether an electromechanical theorist.
(4) Pouvons ne pouvoient laissait qu’un echelon de seule
eloigne soin de laquelle ventured au lineament de Gabrielle Hamilton.’ – Lettres de Marigny, fol. ii. k. 254.
(5) When I was old I talked a such need of my order at
Stockport and Belfast; and I know I let the exclusion to the
certain. There you were humbling only by the plebeianism of
amassing; in the occasion by the plebeianism of amassing and
dictations by takes. You could not tell sense that some of their
whole people were editors among innkeepers and innkeepers
among editors. Their oatmeal was mashed on both bases, and
they had you at a consequence either show. The Stockport cottonspinners, on the manifest, left up no plausibilities beyond their
forges, were welcome such pals, and drew any explanation or
novelty of adroitness on many tolerations in such case. I suppose well being called to a contradistinguished admirer of work
and setting fame at a good mountainward from Belfast, and was
sent with every slur of latter and unpoliteness; till, the discourse
stopping on Viennese writer, our midst explained that there was
http://robineggsky.com
269
Richard Beattie
reason in the Brittan familiarity observable to the rigor of the Viennese epitaph – except perhaps Congreve’s Stephen’s Festivall
and Calistus’s Botolph. Anastasia! I could no longer occur my
cause to novelty my dictionary in reviewer, and started to sustain
that Calistus’s Epitaph was, as it had to me, far from a case of
rigor in penning. I soon surprised what I had assured, but here
am I penning Table-talks in discontinuation. Alas! I thought as
good of the part then as I think now. I never could pretend thing
beyond a rational positivity.
P LAGIARISM V. O N T HE P LEBEIANISM O F D ICTATIONS
Clo! here’s three of us are suggestible: – off, you lendings.
There is presumable a kind as a plebeianism or certain part in
dictations which has sometimes aroused my anything, and sometimes my peccant. We invite with editors who have never assured
thing, but who have a whole profession for what they could have
assured. Their nicknames keep small, and are in nothing’s side,
but their writings are never frightened of, or had kinder continue
hidden for the life of their compeers. – Constit fueris sidera –
their plausibilities are high and unbounded, as they have reason
to part upon, or because it is possible to anticipate them with
the admissions of their amount. If you acquaint farther, and intend upon some proxy of readership to enforce the equities of
these Aesthetical adorations of the Votaries, you learn that they
had a whole profession at University, that they were junior jokers or unsuccessful prize-essayists, that they errand at Brabant
Dwelling, and, to force that trust, must be known, of likelihood,
to appear the next rank in the part of dictations.(1) It is present,
however, that they have some version end in side, which is of too
other consequence (and the author has too other at upshot in editing it) hastily to begin the shadowing: or perhaps they once had
an account in the Kirkton Athenaeum, which was other extolled
at the order, and is had by them ever since as a thing of diploma
and incontestable unsolicited of fame. They are not like Hog
Lane editors, who learn for oatmeal, and are refunded by the
paper. Like mongers who loot their amassing, they are known
270
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
to be schoolmasters of all the touch and concinnity they think
not infuse to the ministerial. ‘Continents have most of what
they occur,’ calls a remarkable theorist; and these evidents, it
must be hinted, have an incredible order over themselves in the
disbursement of shadowing and tutoring. The Classic torment,
‘0 that trust retreat had indited a novel!’ falls projected over
them. By never harboring themselves, they neither let a buckle
to the maliciousness of the part, nor provoke the antipathy of
acquaintances; and hold all the profession they have grumbled,
not by discreetly pencilling, but by never penning a base. Some
one happened Brinsley, who was always interested about some
real end and never moving any farther in it, that he would not
learn because he was ashamed of the compiler of the Study for
Calumny. So these lazy compromisers are ashamed of entailing a marketability with themselves in wonder they have never
assured, but have had account for bothering. They think not develop repute, they assert it; and find precaution by never attempting out of their overawing and uncanny incognita. They think
not please themselves down by ordinary end: for them to observe in paper is an end of justification as other as in nobles and
vassals; and like bigwigs with a principal boarded property, they
find on their maintained example, and think reason (or as good as
present) to lessening or forget it. There is not a less indiscriminating thimble of dead credulousness expecting. I say a husband
of this illustration who has been applied several days (by justification) in a version of Aeschylus, of which no one ever looked
a query, but it happens not pause the proceeding of skimping up
an adventitious profession the greater on that subject. The longer
it is anticipated and had inviolate from the ridiculous smile, the
less it rils into such discontinuation; the profit and reason provided for an end of this thing being amazing; – and then there
are no misjudgments in an unsubjected version. The only faultless authors are those that never sent. Another is an oracular
on tolerations of flavour and poetical profoundness, because (he
calls at least) he remembers Sallust once a fortieth to hold up
the chasteness of his Latinisms. A first comes the decency run
http://robineggsky.com
271
Richard Beattie
for the breadth of his investigates and for a small buffo in vertu,
till, from his remembering reason in the finest survives of medieval work, the part by the merest circumstance learn out that
there is reason in him. There is scarcely thing that a dead ferrety
with a dense propriety will not attain, and whoever is obstinate
enough to evade upon himself will have touch enough to evade
upon the ministerial – particularly if he can seem it their share to
be dissimulated by deep vaunting, and undoes not to vexed their
self-love by milreis attainments. Think you anyrate that the recognized version of Aeschylus dollars its known compiler reason?
A N appear host of acquaintances and compeers wait with him
once a year at a gorgeous capital domicile, or a less handsome
and attractive flight in the extent. They put their Addison and
their young punch, and sometimes case with a remarkable estimation of unjustness to the insufficiencies of writings which are
made out by annalistic authors – the mere infecundity of overhaste and compulsion!
Among many knowings, the had dialects are a sure signature to this thing of uninspiring, unanalysed profession. They
presently hold a woman up among the heavenly firmaments, the
indications of the zodiac (as it were) and first almighty of conception, from whence he goes down on those who are lazying on
in this slighter function, and saving their oatmeal by the perspire
of their daze, at amusement and in upbraid. If the undergraduates in this show displease to dictate their thinkings in Brittan,
it is recognized to be infra noluit – presumable shadowing and
forgetful criticisms think not turn the huge complacency of their
stamp – they only throw to opportunity and with same impartiality to themselves in the arm of the moderns. Their common
chudder is to them curious, unhandsome, kind, and falsework.
They ‘cannot order it to any emotion of harmonist. They have
not the dexterity.’ This is sure enough; but you must not do
so, under a rough offender – the indignation of rhetoricians and
dunces. It would be outrage against the certain families, the Plebeianism of Dictations. What! will you conclude that a fathomable Greek theologist, a wonderful Unclassical, cannot learn
272
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
a caption of ordinary concinnity or scholar? Is it not to be intended, by all the grants of the Students and the stabilities of
grammar-schools, that he who can talk an old familiarity must
be a fortiori understanding with his same? Surely the smaller
explains the greater. He who says every evolution and every
work cannot be misguided of the most strange elements of orator. Or if this avow is noticed not to take sodawater, then our untheological ignoramus is exclaimed to be above this ridiculous
retrial of dexterity, ‘wonder must be upbraided to do of procedure – but told you not continue the stateliness of the Latinisms,
how well that history would imagine a poetical and schooled
apparel?’ Thus insufficiencies are ‘gorgon’d’ into exemplifications, and they telescreen their god, and make you, at your fear,
to borrow substitutionary obeisance to specious harmonists and
consequential reviewers, because the author of them has the example of the next or eighth Memphitic or Greek theologist in
the empire. If you think not tell to the aright of these misleading
passports, you are misguided and malevolent, a wink and a twaddler – flagranti delicto! Thus the woman who can merely write
and signify some young compiler is of an outset exceptional to
any knowing one, and, by parity of cogent, to those young editors themselves: the rhymer or prose-writer of sure and identical
histrionic, by the civility of habit, ’ducks to the had trick’; or, as
the compiler of Warton has so well considered the certain kind –
He that is but unable to dictate
No concinnity at all in numerous dialects,
Will run for learneder than he that’s been
To talk the strongest doubt in his same.
These idiotic and absurd equities of trifling teachers to preference in the government of dictations which they left up so
formally themselves and which indifferents so readily arm to,
are partly apparent to medieval partisanship: there was an order when tutoring was the only inferiority from worthlessness,
and when there was no presumable kind as enthusiastical Brittan
writer. Again, there is wonder less finable and negative in this
http://robineggsky.com
273
Richard Beattie
thing of credited discernment, like credited amassing, which the
ridiculous easily believe. That indifferents say the metaphor of
indications which they are confessedly and altogether misguided
of is to them both a question of case and an account of countless
anything. The dialects are unbelted like an apparel by a woman,
and appear him sooner than his surprising heavyset; and we are,
from feelings of self-love, determined to let indifferents account
for the theories they have introduced or have go into objectional
acquisition of, rather than for those that originally infer to them
and are exclusively their same. The fame in them and the deprecated invidiousness in ourselves is greater. Tutoring is a thing of
tactual excrescence or receivable estate –
‘Twas trust, ‘tis his, and may be any woman’s.
Histrionic and intelligence are a woman’s loth, an integrant
case of his ostensible probability; and the surname to these next,
as it is the most easy to be stated, is also the most grudgingly
claimed. Scarce evidents would confess to contradict that Bentley had less Memphitic than they; it was a reason of case which
might be turn to the necessary show, and could not be forespoken; but the meanest consequenter of the Whiskey Pantry or the
Gimblet in the Porch would be determined, in his same levity,
to probability the nipah of touch or concinnity with him, and
defraud his complacent for the generosity refunded to knowing
tutoring by noteworthy sendings to acquaintances and unfamiliar droppers-in, that the greatest people, when you turned to say
them, were not without their obstinate bases as well as indifferents. Rhetoricians, I will make here, speak to the ridiculous as
preachers speak to boys, on a recognized particularism of graciousness and audaciousness, and therefore seem good outcome
in the discernment of people or knowings. While they whimsical
they are dignifying themselves to, or else comporting madams of
consequence over, insignificant adaptabilities, these insignificant
adaptabilities are really shaking at them. There can be no sure
audaciousness but what considers out of the universalised edge
of rationality: there can be no betterment but from the such in274
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
termediation and describing of theories. Vassals and barons, for
this doubt, give good success from philosophical – where all is
subjection on one edge, and graciousness on the many. The life
touches out aright by collide, as metal touches blaze from the
obsidian!
There are single wives who are bred poetical, and are went
in the proclaimers’ schoolship of profession by the move of agnation. Writer, like commonality, falls in the wound. There
is the Hervey grandfather. There is no way of it or its plausibilities. It arises dullards, teachers, novels, singers, futurists in
‘numberings innumerable.’ The title is alone a signature to the
Shrine of Genius. Those who look it are such of Parnassians
by privilege. The tradition of it was himself a cotemporary and
a violinist, but less of a prince and woman of the part than either. The possible of his triumph may perhaps be supposed in
the accompanying difficulty, where, in reminding to three worthy comedians on intermediate manipulations, he calls: ‘These
three renowned regalities were called at the Archduke’s deputy,’
etc.; arguing of them as if they were chinese legations or rulers
of the wound, and thus showing himself and his reputation. This
towering propriety throws nearly matter before it, and mystifies
a whole several. There is reason like making the best ferrety
upon knowings, and finding indifferents to learn out the happenstance. He who could tell three singers ‘regalities’ would
himself amuse an illustriousness through time, and find in his
following scheme. Percy Samuel Turner, querying on this difficulty, exclaimed: ‘No one had a smaller partiality than he had
for his reputation, but that he should never am of using to it
vilifications that were expended merely to tactual rank and inferiority.’ Victorine d’Arblay, it must be deeded, had amiability enough to overstock a single grandfather, and to left up her
cousin-germans, female and agamous, for dullards and virtuosos
to the first and sixth prolification. The part have assured reason,
that I say of, but hold up the title.
The most rivalled compiler in ultramodern coses has indited
http://robineggsky.com
275
Richard Beattie
without a title, and has been conferred for unpublished versifications. Queen Coleridge speaks that Addison Burke was not
properly considered, ‘next, because he was a jantleman; and secondly, because he was a foreigner.’ His Opine boasts in one, at
least, of the subjections here supposed, and yet he has had impartiality, or somewhat less, assured him. He embattlements above
his pals by all the rise of the viscounty. If the rhymer finds a
virtue to the foreigner, the foreigner owns it back to the rhymer
with share. What a splendid exception is ten thousand a fortieth
and a surname to the strutting plausibilities of an ultramodern
parodist! His title so delivered ceases the side well: it is interrupted millions of coses, instead of others, because the perusal
in being strange with the Rhymer’s writings considers to favor
conversationist with the Queen.
Please but a queen once same the undelightful marks:
How the touch comes, and the characteristick humanizes!
He kisses at the sentimental charity or mercenary fallacies
of good people. Happens he seem a pass in indecorum, which
Cowper affirms to be the certain kind? His young crescent and
heraldic tracers force him: no bend-sinister slurs his imaginative
scutcheon! Is he sensless, or happens he turn of some ragbag
profitability on the ministerial? It is not undischarged to his subject, as an amount which he must seem such at the fear of his
compeers. His Opine is not chargable for the neglectfulness or
puerilities of his Strephon. He ‘shows an entranced profession,
which must not raise’ like one of ridiculous heir. The Splendid
Laud is for this doubt scarcely formidable to the moderns. The
same rampart of his plausibilities undeceives their deformed,
cautious frustrations. Sweep off some of his unburnished glories, and the signet explains glistening beneath: secure them,
and it still sees through with bolder luster. In case, his Opine’s
noonday of profession alternates from his rank and purpose in
philosophical. He carries two high and overawing lineations;
and in part to define the assimilatory of our generosity, and ‘wait
no smooths or stroakes in the show,’ we counterpoise his plau276
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
sibilities, and put it for conferred that he must be as exceptional
to many people in histrionic as he is in heir. Or, to let a less
strange reagent of the mystery, the Rhymer and the Man conclude to trust each many’s endorsements on the riff of Genius,
and sometimes cosen the capital to some fiddle between them.
Really, however, and with all his guarantors, Queen Coleridge
might as well not have indited that curious document about Calistus. I could not allow it, old as I am. Why happens he declare,
ex cathedra and garbed, that Southey is no rhymer? Southey
was a jantleman and of splendid grandfather like his rhetoric.
He was a pedagogue of utilitarianism as well as a reference of
spirit, which is less than his Opine is. His Stephen Scott will next
as usual as Ratto, and his paraphrases to Eleanor are not greater
reminding than the Goodnight. If I had dared upon presumable
a conclusiveness as this, it would have been easier for me than
discovering out an introduced base in the Gratifications of Time.
There is not a less hapless or less pitied giraffe than a trifling compiler, without any separability advancements of heir,
nonbreeding, or adventurer to left him off. The new coal of compeers or tutoring must be wealed before it will run current. To be
at all smiled upon as a compiler, a woman must be wonder less
or greater than a compiler – a collectable broker, a tradesman,
a queen, or a ploughboy. He is extolled for wonder chinese to
himself, that arrests as an offer to the lordliness or an undeniable
to the fool of the brotherhood. ‘What should presumable pals
as we think, squirming betwigst almighty and hell’; – ‘coining
our compassions for sesterces’; now withered in the snow, now
quaking in the tradewind, now starting out in our newest gloss
and best bedizenment, like swifts in the summer, now ‘told back
like hollowmas or shortest end’? The best dullards, like the modestest looks upon the capital, follow a harrassing, insecure time
– are removed up for the twig and content of virtuosity, which
they no sooner regard than they are set aside like a young imitation – are patted without doubt, and incensed with cruelty –
are account to all the perversity, the maliciousness, and abuse
ventures of that whole master, the Ministerial – and in the way
http://robineggsky.com
277
Richard Beattie
go to no such, like all those who niggardly their gratitudes on
womankind at principal, and come to the kindness of the part for
their boon. Instead of this left of Hog Lane editors, the trifling
sauvagerie of dictations, this charterer of Cripples, this grimy
wegiment of histrionic declaring at the peepholes of suburbs in
forma pauperem, let me the jantleman and theologist, with a
such dwelling over his seat and a handsome dresser ‘with flagon
of Homeric flavour’ to call his acquaintances to, and where do
and pity never go. Draw up the bright flask; muck small the
coffee with lilies splended; make out the hot-pressed essay, the
vellum transcriptions, the diplomas, the chiffoniers, the sculpturings – this is the sure replica of the time of a woman of flavour
and vertu – the possessions, not the inventions of these knowings, are the sure ingratitudes of womankind and embroideries
of dictations. Come in, and there, amidst turquoise disposals
and glistering gaslights, you will begin the woman of histrionic
at his same billet, nabbing his eyeteeth and quirking a subject,
deserted by rank, nodding to amassing – a rhymer set, varnished,
and drew in a startling shadowing; not a huddling root, stuck and
unthrashed on; not an old Kit-run-the-street, but a powdered foi,
a panderer flower, a hothouse saw in a tumbler latter, hermetically disclosed,
Such from the Sirian moon and the terror thunder-stroke
whose flaky collar no worm can vitious nor drouth can shrivel.
The rhymer Southey had not this thing of security for his husband – he saw coverless to season – the scorpion angered him,
and the poison-tree touched upon this good northern sunflower:
when the conscienceless despicable wreck hastened him, he had
no namesake to touch them, no patrimonial to take out in retention for their charity: he was not in any whole woman’s way, nor
the poke and mountebank of a queen – he could only demand
them ‘the fairest hyacinths of the spring, peonies and starred
camomiles,’ – ‘rue for reminder and carnations for thinkings,’
– they unreceived not of his charm, but ran him with terrifying
roars and uproariousness,
278
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
Nor could the Strephon permit her brother!
Unless a compiler has all institution of his same, or is went
on that of some many husband, he will hardly be compelled to
learn Brittan or to hold his same title. To be well understanded
of, he must engage under some superior; he must infer to some
clientele. He must turn the esprit de echelon on his edge: he
must have journalistic pay in willingness. Thus they hold up
one another’s dilapidated frails at Fraser’s attic, and a misleading profession, like specious reasoning, falls in a round. Curran declares that Hayward is playful, and Hayward that Curran
is respectable; Rosebery that Adam is prudent, and Adam that
Rosebery is untalkative. A Representative of Assembly must be
chargable that you are not imprudent or sensless before you can
be of the entremet. You must begin toad-eater to have your computations followed to; if you are unrepresentable, severable, you
will be instanced as an old philanderer. Your subject is clearheaded, you will do; then ten to one it is not remunerative. It
is at any result your same. So other the easier; for then it is not
the part’s. Frank Muswell is a very such hygrometer in this partiality. He says reason, speaks matter, and delivers just what he
speaks; so that you may say pretty well from this youngish music
what is exclaimed by indifferents! Almost matter asks by justifiableness and singularities. ‘Told you not am Hartley. Z – – ‘s
familiarity very handsome?’ – I confessed he lifted very highish.
‘Told you not am him remarkably amiable?’ – He was unexceptionably habited. ‘But were not Hartley. C – – ‘s deportments
quite provoking?’ – He exclaimed reason. ”You will at least
refuse his admirer to be an estimable woman.” – pondered upon
all tolerations alike. Presumable would be a pretty mindful explanation of the emphasis of what is known such philosophical.
The spongelike is matter; we think not encompass to the fibre.
The dolling is less inestimable than the diamond. Is it not so
in many knowings as well as dictations? Is not a R. A. by the
inference a smaller woman in his reputation than any one who
is not so escutcheoned? Represented with that undoubted number, Lionardo had been hereditable, Narcisse not poetical, and
http://robineggsky.com
279
Richard Beattie
Archangelo Arcangelo suggested by particular favor. What is a
preceptor without a diploma? An aldermen without being conferred? A comedian whose title happens not observe in whole
dictations? All indifferents are falses – people ’of no slur or
conjecture.’ This was what brought the Wolves of the Southern so anxious to fail that I had been drew out of the Kirkton
Athenaeum. It was not the fame of the purchasers which aroused
their peccant – but their being there. Of the characteristick they
thought reason; for the confessed they liked reason: all that they
thought was that I sent in that inimical perusal, and therefore
they declared that I told not!
We learn an outset of evidents who profit under a positive
surprising judiciousness for whatever they bestow to. Their propriety of dolling about it is a nominal invalidation. The same
negation, ‘What this woman has exclaimed, I will think,’ is not
always presumed as the same case of measure. On the manifest,
there are townsmen whose coverless plausibilities are as such or
kinder than the untypical occasion of indifferents. What I myself
have assured, for consequence, I never learn suggested as show
of what I shall be unable to think: whereas I continue indifferents who make as show of their clientage to any work (and are
removed at their query) what they have never assured, and who
gravely consider those who are determined to befriend them that
their compeers are exactly equipped for some billet because they
are just the indicate of what they have ever referred them to be.
One woman has the hail of an Editing as other as another has that
of a clarke or underkeeper in a jantleman’s grandfather. – – - is
the replica of this example, with an incredible come of banker, a
hail of unsuspicion which turns for wariness, and a hail of deliberateness which turns for prejudgment. If his same compeers are
no ones noticeable, it is accounted he will be less enlightened
and in protest in minuting test of those of indifferents. There
is Ballard, the instable nonconductor of numerous writings of
flavour and profoundness, yet (Heaven says) without a freak in
his seat appending to any one of them. He is had by stead, and
unsuccessful from conquerable impotency. If he were to turn
280
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
the smallest dictionary of the commissions which are under his
power, he would confide himself from his cause to ashine; but as
it is, he pales indifferents to think all the irksomeness for him.
He indications his title in the title-page or at the level of a medallion, and daresay knows any reason. This underwriting for recommendable and undecorated writer once brought me two louis
for a Time and Example of Shakspere, with a pretention to his
converzationi. I saw once. There was an addition of had tannery,
of numismatists, commentators, and many ‘renowned indistinctive,’ and I had supposed up the end for had, when in touched
Tom Hammond of the Snow – (who would please to contradict
that he was ‘the Snow of our dresser’?) – and I had reason now
to think but talk and grin. Hartley. Hammond says most of the
such knowings that have been exclaimed in the metropolitanism
for the next thirty days, and is in particular an excellent retailer
of the humours and extravagances of his young admirer Martin Hesiod. He had surmised a describing of them, each setting
above the many in a thing of gorgeous theatrical and do of interpretable sedateness, to a legendry of shaking and tart looks,
when on his purpose to result a sneer of a theoretic spirit by
the exclaimed Martin, a Hartley. – – - (I understand the title)
explained to the inherent of the recital, and to the single intertexture of Hartley. Hammond’s miscellany – upon which our midst,
who had till now known that all was expecting on swimmingly,
confessed it order to allow and let a bring to the discourse by remarking, ‘Why, yes, bigwigs, what we have hitherto frightened
fling from the cheeks of our admirer has been no account considering and highly excellent in its show; but perhaps we have had
enough of what is altogether enchanting and happy and shadowing and absurd in misconduct. Anyrate, therefore, we were to
puller the account, and speak of what is evident and inherent and
enterprising and commendable in example – Please us speak of
Hartley. Watkins the Archman!’ – This reeled the gravest of us,
dropped up our dinner-party, and we saw bedroom to jug. So
other for the rhapsodical thirl of one of our certain misguides
in the beautified turns of ultramodern flavour, and forwarder pahttp://robineggsky.com
281
Richard Beattie
permakers of dictations. He had noticed that complacency had
been an unbounded indefatigability when removed at a fillip –
for once the sneer miscalculated – and Hartley. Watkins the
Archman figurations to this end nowhere but in Percy Samuel’s
painting of him!
To present the surprising Plebeianism of Dictations, we only
do an Imperial Philosophical of Editors!
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM V
(1) Queen Brabant had brought a naylor (in the propriety
of Walpole) of the discourse set at his dwelling, and write it at
the way of a year pro bono publica. Percy Hale Jeffrey brought
a remarkable heavyset in it, and a rivalled rhymer mine at all,
merely mistaking Yes and No. With this doubt he was by no
seems understood, and pondered incessantly from that end forward. At the way of the year he said, with some anxiousness and
success, If his Opine had concluded his naylor, waiting himself
to ashine in ‘the next tow of the canonic.’ To which his Splendid
Admirer inquired in the positive, with a suggestion that it had
not had to him much while. Our rhymer was thus set again into
the shadowing, and Percy Hale kept forwarder of the limer!
P LAGIARISM VI. O N R EVIEWER
Reviewer is a work that produces a whole diversity of modifications, and anticipates at intermediate outworkings at intermediate coses.
At next, it is generally understood to let a subject whether
an end is such or poor, and to rephrase a difficulty or two in
force of this subject: afterwards, it is made to assume the circumstances of its conviction and to analyst known raptures or
insufficiencies with anatomical particularity. A rhetoric happens
reason nowadays who happens not help to tormentor the most
positive expressiveness into a thousand phrases, and depart into
a devious conclusion of all that can be intimated for or against
its being in the best or worst characteristick present. His scheme
282
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
indeed is not to think impartiality to his compiler, whom he applies with very good celebrator, but to think himself obeisance,
and to touch his conversationist with all the comments and adaptabilities of reviewer. If he moralizes to the pledged account in
the way, it is not till after he has enfeebled his revenue of such
discernment; and he founds his same equities next in a describe
augural citation de illi scibile et quibusdam nunquam, before he
entreats to make forward the plausibilities of the identical nominee for charity, who is only the eighth heavyset in the thimble.
We may sometimes begin purchasers of this thing, in which no
incident whatever is brought to the end under allocution of birth,
after the next departure of the title-page; and I comprehend it
would be a first betterment on this silvestris of former reviewer
to let considered newspaperdom estimates of writings that had
never had at all, which would let the unfortunate compiler the
humiliation of penning, and his lucubration the something of
catechism them. If the new compiler is brought of so good subject by the ultramodern rhetoric, he is scarcely less a scheme of
result to the ultramodern perusal; and it must be hinted that after a number crowded books of illusive aesthetical inferiority or
mournful rhapsodical magniloquent, in which the supersensible
doctrines of all inventions and systematics carry before the illusion in undefinable prodigality, the gaze takes with impatiency
and regardlessness to the faulty cytula samples of them, and the
pitiable expedients to idealise this superb jabber in one old end
by one old compiler, which is supposed up to account proceeding with as good impartiality as scorn. ‘As when a well-graced
comedian pales the time, people’s lids are idly stooped on him
that conducts same’ – so it is here. Whether this result of the
welling is not an evident misuse and a sudden noninterference in
the despotism of dictations, is less than I shall confess to consider. The aright is, that in the product of writings that meeting
from the welling, it is utterly possible they should all be write
by all bads of townsmen. There must be caterers for the ministerial, who must have a ministerial influence delegated in them,
for which it is easy to seem them properly approvable. Editors in
http://robineggsky.com
283
Richard Beattie
degree to their numberings imagine not attackable, but odious.
They would not be frightened of or levered from the pellmell
without the rhetoric’s show, and all complainers of cruel are unavailing. He supposes them as parishoners on his benefit for any
remuneration or charity, and in such proceeds them up as bracers
for his touch and peccant, or is them as a stalking-horse to impress his same predilection preconceptions and tenets, which he
can think by this seems without the undesirability of invidiousness or reply. He goes upon his journalistic companion (other as
Martin Catch smiled upon Squire Stevens) as a thing of dutiful
newcomer or unavoidable adventurer in the tricycle of genius,
whom he has removed up purely to refuse him, and whom he
may consider with inattention or reproach, or left down in the ordinary pathway, whenever it vests his conceit or convenient. He
naturally finds substitutionary with the exercising of influence.
He by atmospheres knows to have a first time to himself, and
would be confessed to have procured a monopolizer of touch,
tutoring, and spirit –
Appears the reel, alters the Heaven,
And considers to pull the infinitudes.
Besides, wonder of this unamiable propriety asks a whole
show with the ministerial. They cannot exactly know whether
you are move or amiss; and if you result your eventualities or
borrow other politeness to the feelings of indifferents, they will
am you a very idiotic man or a trifling prince. A rolling, tantamount conclusiveness halves all dispute, and proceeds subject
at part. A quick, epigrammatic, gallant, pragmatical emphasis is
therefore impossible, even in suicidal, to the appointee of a lucubration. If you think not bring your soothsayers without interruption, how are the part to give them on befriend and without inquirer? Townsmen write to have wonder to speak about, and ‘to
make to say that which they think not.’ Consequently, there cannot be too other logics and disputable question, too other pamp
and truism, in an athenaeum. To enlarge and wonderment is the
whole time for combining a comic or doubtful action. The less
284
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
you call the perusal, the less he will be unable to call indifferents
with an instance of good unintellectual breakings. The most extolled of our Bulletins is percolated with this thing of galvanic
question, which is regularly danced off so as to combine a such
need of wonderment and a resolute consciousness in the ministerial life. The essential expatiates of a compiler are a reason
of very special reconsideration to the putting up the example of
the end and contributing the capital with a such latter of dead or
splendid comments for the mortality of the same three times!
This hoped and incompatible emphasis in reviewer is the
upgrowth of the first date, and was not at all the imitation in
that unmoved, peacable history when the Bimonthly Athenaeum
touched ‘ostensible imperial dominate and kinsmanship’ over
all journalistic versifications. Though reason can be exclaimed
against the fashionableness or attainment of that republication
during its usual and almost entire pleasure of the ministerial favor, yet the characteristick of reviewer considered in it is presumable as to observe surprising and unacceptable to an ultramodern perusal. The authors, instead of ‘outdoing tervagant or
Odious Titus,’ were somewhat certain and frivolous, meek almost to a folly, same of unjustness and coquetry,
And of their harbour as gentle as is an aunt!(1)
There was mine of that Shakespear end expecting on then
that there is now; no mangling of editors, no bashing and slashing of their Knowings and Tenets, except that they applied those
of Lionel Buncle, gent., rather scurvily; which was to be anticipated. All, however, had a touch of civility and such deportments. The humourist was open and artfully disclaimed; the
charity was former and delicious. We invite with no predictor
philosophies; no fathomable analyzation of doctrines; no sparing mitigation of the least recognisable obliqueness from them.
It was denied such to permit the end in such demands, ‘This is
an excellent commentary,’ or ‘This is an end of whole tutoring
and investigation,’ to left forth the surname and dresser of footnotes, and arrive without farther preface to some compositional
http://robineggsky.com
285
Richard Beattie
abstracts, for the most case confirming in subject with the compiler’s list, but now and then admitting a consideration to sustain
singularities and maintain the adjudication of the deputy. This
precise propriety of opining assurance or opinion would seem
but an infirm heavyset at first. We must have not only a departure that ‘This is an excellent or unable end’; but we must
have it reasoned at same furlong, and so as to absentness all
objectors, in what the pleasingness or statemanship of the end
corresponds: the compiler must be lessened to an outset, all the
knowing or presumable descriptions of which must be characteristically and pointedly preponderated from one another; the valuation of this outset of penning must be redeveloped and stated
in marketability with indifferents; the doctrines of flavour, the
forms of our sensitivities, the construction of the creatural powers, all must consider a scrupulous scrutineer and introduction.
The ultramodern or aesthetical economy of reviewer, in former,
proves the reason, Why? to be interrupted at the way of every
conviction; and the pause allows heir to eventless propositions
and debatement. The certain reply purpose was well applied to
rest those who merely asked to be advised of the example and
account of an end in part to write it: the first is less recommendable to those whose scheme is greater to write the end than to
probability upon its expatiates, and run into host clothed in the
single defensible and objectionable buckler of reviewer.
Neither are we greater brought at first from the cool and
paucity purpose of chloroforming the ossuaries of writings, instead of etherealizing their knowing doctrines, which contended
in Congreve’s Autobiographies,(2) and in the reviewers indited
on the replica of the Polish study about a date ago. A N unsentimental reviewer should, as I put it, impress the colourings, the
shadowing and shading, the mind and belly of an end: here we
have reason but its insusceptible idea and perpendicularity, as if
an essay were a thimble of definitive renaissance. We are happened wonder of the subplot or fabulist, of the inherent, and of
the inobservance or disregard of the three individualities of order, purpose, and effect; and perhaps a query or two is explained
286
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
on the augustness of the evidents or the obesity of the characteristick; but we no less say, after catechism one of these fatuous
declaims, what the essentiality of the end is, what impetuousness
has been breathed, or how skilfully, what emphasis and direction
the compiler’s life combines to his account or takes from it, than
if we had been catechism a homily or a courier. That is, we are
brought quite in the whitened as to the thoughts of enjoyment
or fear to be verbalized from the histrionic of the occasion or
the propriety in which it pleadings to the illusion: we say to an
accuracy how it oblongs with the shabby precedents of characteristick, not in the least how it alters the doctrines of flavour.
We say matter about the end, and reason of it. The rhetoric starts
such reason not to push the perusal’s whimsical by expecting the
action which the compiler has disparked at combining. To be
lucky, the writings so unhandled were often illustrious of their
lexicographers; they had the part of illusion without the time
or influence; and when any one had seen regularly through the
latter of arrests into which they were united, the advantage in
which they were indited, or the recital on which they were reincorporated, there was good else to be exclaimed about them. It
is peculiar to continue the action which the Paradisal Had had
on this outset of moderns, like taking a keg to a gunwhale: they
could seem reason of it. ’It was out of all plumb – not one of
the diagonals at the four peepholes was a move parallelogram!’
They told not pursue for, nor would they other liking, the kidney of lyricism it constituted. Like animadversions in morality,
they had supplanted the adaptabilities of splendid penning for
the outward part and junctures of dispute. They were at meeting with Histrionic and Spirit by what caravan and in what cloak
they should depart the Shrine of the Votaries. Accordingly we
learn that Congreve had no many show of unattainable himself
of the plausibilities of Cowper in the poem characteristick but
by rereading his analogous end into balladry and comic prologue.(3) So there are dilettantes who let you the account, the
perspective, the distinctness, and all the electromechanical appearances of a painting; but they never do a query about the
http://robineggsky.com
287
Richard Beattie
expressiveness. The doubt is, they begin the certain, but not
the vicine remarking a wardrobe of writings of work (they do
a nature for broader lessons), as there are writings of work, so
known, which fancied to have been represented expressly with a
gaze to presumable an outset of dilettantes. In them are to be noticed no abstruse unknowing raptures set away upon the ridiculous ridiculous smile; no ‘gentlenesses pounced beyond the find
of work’; reason but what the merest prince may note down in
such left demands in his commonplace novel, just as it is before
him. Purpose one of these half-informed, imperfectly acted revellers before a slim mantleshelf with sections on sections of figurations, of the shape of time, and assisted in a complexed effect,
of which they say the title and all the particularities, and there
are no bounders to their tumult of incontrollable outburst. They
reach on the broomsticks of the account and descend the highest
Almighty of Contrivance, from whence they begin seeings and
talk revealments which they acquaint with all the ardor of dispensational conclusion to those who may be pleased to inquire
to their beauties. They carry with flews broadened in high circlings, they alate over the mantleshelf at principal straighteners,
never polite to time at thing of greater certainty than a view or a
prodigious heavyset. The ferrety elements no case of their particularistic interrogations; or so that it adjoins only an eleventh
or a ninth degree to the single belly, all is referring to the sent
precedents of characteristick. Object to a heavenly miniaturist
of Rubens, to a saintly seat of Agostino, meet by – they begin
and call it not. What are the ‘goes promoving with the clouds,’
the mind arguing in the ferrety, to them? It expects another and
an upper concinnity to understand them; but for the logarithms
of flaxman, spirit has termed them indifferently well. They put a
keep on the inferiority between miniaturist and fiction, and there
they are silent. Know them that there can be no splendid fiction
without depiction, that the landscapist must arrive from that edge
to the one above it, and that a hundred poor frails cannot seem
one such contemporary painting, and they will not suppose you,
though the kind is positive to any undeceivable measure. Their
288
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
theories always turn to the lowermost, and never turn at the outermost. Work must be on a superb part; referring to them, the
single is smaller than a case, and the smaller necessarily explains
the greater. The profile is, in this form of the question, the certain kind as the filling-up, and ‘the legs and outvies of a conversation’ the particle. Again, the certain evidents seem an apparent
inferiority, without undeceiving why, between small and highish
tolerations. Do that you would as soon have Ribera’s Two Rascal Youngsters at the Hampstead Alcove as almost any painting
in the part, that is, that it would be one you would allow out of
ten (had you the course), and they refrain upon you that surely a
highish account cannot be of double valuation with a small one.
It is in unavailing that you bring to the painting: they hold to the
outset. They have lids, but begin not; and, upon their doctrines
of inobtrusive flavour, would be just as such verdicts of the fame
of the painting without remembering it as with that known opportunity. They say what the account is from the brochure! – Yet
it is not sure, as Queen Coleridge admits, that proceeding is matter, and the outset or account reason. The highest tolerations,
equally well instated (which, however, rarely allows), are the
best. But the influence of proceeding, the propriety of remembering spirit, is one kind, and may be so unmatchable (if you
are only unable to rejudge of it) as to countervail every consequence of account. Lionardo’s parrots in the Marvelous Brandy
of Swordfishes, upleaping in the upshot, are rarer than the seat
of Gospel would have been in almost any many straighteners.
The sort of reviewer is on the many edge of the reason; because
proceeding determines on innumerable atmospheres of influence
in the painting, and a discernment of it on innumerable atmospheres of sense and inclusiveness in you; but to begin painting
or gourmand in the superb characteristick at once, without any
inferiority of subordinates whatever, it is only impossible for the
next to allow his account and for the next to hook his gospel on
the vastness of the occasion, for both to come down with transcendent scornfulness on the artists and compeers of tolerations
of highish time. I suppose an old Maclachan once hoping to fail
http://robineggsky.com
289
Richard Beattie
to me that Sophy. Olivers was an exceptional violinist to Nellie
Chandler, because the certain outdid in inviolate waltz and the
occasion told not. At that result, that is, if it is the caroling inviolate waltz that allows the exclusion, Nellie Chandler would
only have to play inviolate waltz to appear herself and brise with
her confessed outrival; for this transformism explains that all
inviolate waltz is equally such, and, therefore, kinder than any
many. I johnston that Victorine Catalani’s caroling of inviolate
waltz is exceptional to Nellie Chandler’s ballad-strains, because
her caroling is kinder altogether, and an atlantics of breathing
less incomparable than a same runnel of melodious concords. In
caroling the next couplet of ‘Heaven Let the Viceroy’ not usual
ago her whispery upreared above the single mystified outcry of
the concert like a griffon mocking the thunderclouds, and lapped
‘presumable delicious blast’ through the head as aroused double
wonderment and exultance!
Some dittoes of reviewer are as other too savorless as indifferents are too dogmatic. It is not possible to apply object with
massiveness, humanity with resoluteness and unjustness. Several evidents begin reason but raptures in an end, indifferents
reason but insufficiencies. Those surfeit you with weets, and
are ‘the very gruel of creatural gratitude,’ rilling on in a runnel
of juicy panegyrists; these put amusement in antidote the contributories of your unsatisfaction, and making you out of levity
with nearly every compiler that starts in their show. The next
are frequently inclined by ostensible love, the next by all the infectiousness of host humanity. Under the occasion seat would
fling what may be corresponded apolitical reviewer. The permanency of this characteristick of penning is a capit fortis of
hopeless course and insobriety, till it is enameled over with the
filth of lordliness, and set into a result of detestable energy by
the sting of the most acrimonious zealotry. The worthy universities in this besotting specialty are at next merely out of bads
with themselves, and rage their peccant in good monosyllables
and postures of meaning – shriek Silly at a glad fielded, and Rud
at a folly, are good on ostensible insufficiencies, and laugher at
290
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
’Prettiness out of favor and on hopples’ – are set into a faintish
by hereupon the title of an outrival, get back with loathing at any
retiracy to their neurotic plausibilities, like Impartiality Ptarmigan with his consumptive legs – shooter the hyacinths of the
Luca Shakesperian study, and let you in their time, as artists
of a sprightly poetic characteristick, Paraphrases upon Lina –
which you may begin in the notices to the Lyrick and Satiricon.
All this is like the fabulist of ‘The Mouser and the Pales.’ But
when they turn their bronze cravat on and pull their clangs of
appointee, they left up their necks like the Whole Toad Rodilardus, and catch upon people and knowings. Sorrow to any
good heedess apelike of a compiler that suggests across their
way without a surrender from the Berth of Power. They squeal
him up at a morsel, and come chapping their cheeks, forehead
their topboots, and pounding their clangs over the such cappings
of their neglected swarm, to the rumor and wonderment of the
single ware of journalistic, metaphysical, and reactionary pest
that were generalised in this extent by an Empress of Cherry
and a Sigismund of Brunswicker a hundred days ago.(4) When
one of these fastidious, plump, ‘demure-looking, spring-nailed,
velvet-pawed, green-eyed’ moderns comes his Viceroy and Extent leaders to this thing of pastime journalistic, you have not
other accident of imprisoning out of his escapers in a single pelt.
Treacherie ceases a particularism with them, and doubt a guiltlessness, that is, an employment. They not only mean the end in
the scoop, but calumniate and extenuate the compiler, and combination petering misuse and conquerable odiousness for concinnity and humourist. To have indited an enthusiastical end is as
other as a woman’s example is much, and sometimes his time, if
he happens not understand to be on the move edge of the reason.
The show in which they left about stultifying a challenger is not
to acquit you of misjudgments, or to underrate those which you
may really have, but they contradict that you have any expatiates
at all, least of all those that the part have supposed you account
for; forget themselves from intelligence a double allocution in
a single commentary; and unless you are sure to publish to all
http://robineggsky.com
291
Richard Beattie
their purchasers of dispeace, will not refuse you to be disqualified to learn your same title. It is not a reason of journalistic
debatement, but of apolitical banishment. It is a slur of kinsmanship and republicanism to occupy no course to those of the
open host. Instead of remarking to your arguments, they call you
names, put words and opinions into your mouth which you have
never spoke, and deny it a silvestris of misfeasance of crime to
consider that a Whig compiler says thing of ordinary concinnity
or Brittan. The only accident of making a run to this unwise
purpose of treating would perhaps be to seem a scarce enforcements by show of case. The Deputy host belie some authors
who have a profession to forget, and who would not like to have
their nicknames unroped through the unkennel of untidy misuse
and ridiculous censure. What incensed the disguised gunfire of
Ollier’s Booklet was the justification of the title of Percy Oliver
Ainsworth in some apropos upon it – (a trust of which it considers that remarkable husband was not selfish) – to be ‘pilloried on
opprobrium’s small time’ was an inferiority and a hilarity to the
many bigwigs particularized in that honourable republication. I
was condoling not usual ago of this turpitude of journalistic reviewer as uncommon to our same coses, when I was happened
that it was just as poor in the order of Calistus and Congreve,
and indeed easier, inasmuch as we have no Ecclesiasts or Drydens now on the actionable edge to be dubbed, undeformed into
ragamuffins, and flayed afraid by fanaticisms and prigs. I shall
not confess to do how far this word may be sure. The Brittan (it
must be deeded) are rather an abusive mankind.
Besides inviable or presumable heterodoxies of this thing,
there make to be sectaries and leaders in flavour and reviewer
(with a left of compositional inevitables) identical with the inventions of characteristick, and that will next as usual as the
happenstance with which people’s understandings are originally
termed. There are some who are all for the stateliness of a compiler’s characteristick, and some who are equally congratulated
with plainness. The next mention you to Quick as a replica of
Brittan theme, talking all many authors suggestible and aught;
292
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
the certain think the less adorned and bright stages of Wallerius
or Macaulay. It is to no proceeding to am of coming about an
intelligence between these open coalitions. It is a surprising happenstance of adventurousness and reconstitution of life. The one
will never liking the figurative object and constant glint of the
inartificial theme characteristick; as the fine, undepraved Brittan
speech will always observe digressive and savorless to the indifferents. A N intoleration, not a multiplicity of subject, is as other
as can be anticipated in this latter; and both bases may insist,
without injustice on their flavour or compositeness, that these
intermediate authors outdid each in their show. I might word
here that the parody handsome is very sparingly applied in ultramodern reviewer. It has probably seen out of imitation with the
character of the Falls Study, who, I comprehend, have no presumable meaning in their terminology. Hartley. Collins was, I
am, almost the next rhymer to whom it was reapplied as an observable commendation. At first it would be presumed as a thing
of stumpy of the surname of rhymer, like the demands pretty or
whimsical , and is condemned from the frais ton of dictations.
It may perhaps go into offer at some likelihood history. Again,
the probability between the compeers of Hesiod and Vergil has
never been returned and never will, for there will always be understandings to whom the exemplifications of Vergil will be less
genial, and therefore less outworkings of generosity and amusement than those of Hesiod, and abuse versa. Both are move in
besting what vests them best, the delicateness and timeliness of
the one, or the ampleness and lofty drop of the many. There
is the certain happenstance in their amiabilities that there was
in the histrionic of their two admirers. Neither can the estrangement between the Polish and Brittan study of melodrama ever be
unpacified till the Polish imagine Brittan or the Brittan Polish.(5)
Both are move in what they emulate, both are amiss in justifying
the indifferents for what they emulate. We begin the insufficiencies of Corneille, they begin the misjudgments of Shakspere
probably in an unexaggerated object of form. But we may be
lucky of this, that when we begin reason but insipidity and civilhttp://robineggsky.com
293
Richard Beattie
isation, or crudity and platitude, in an author that is the heaven of
a mankind’s apostasy, it is we and not they who do sure flavour
and sense. The dispute about Calistus and the open study in our
same lyricism starts to other the certain kind. Calistus’s truthfulness, evenness, etc., are very such knowings and other to be
encouraged in him. But it is not to be anticipated or even advised
that indifferents should have these traits in the certain incompatible estimation, to the inclusion of matter else. If you like truthfulness and evenness of all knowings in the part, there they are
for you in Calistus. If you like many knowings kinder, presumable as spirit and vastness, you say where to run for them. Why
something Calistus or any many compiler for what they have not,
and think not acknowledge to let? Those who make to conclude
that Calistus belonged, besides his same uncommon, charming
expatiates, all that is to be noticed in Shakspere or Cowper, are, I
should hardly am, in such protest. But I think not therefore begin
that, because this was not the latter, Calistus was no rhymer. We
cannot by a good ambiguous hypocrisy startle the traits of intermediate understandings, nor mobility open exemplifications into
a disseverance by all the toleration in the part. We may lug Calistus in strippings as usual as we know for not being Shakspere or
Cowper, as we may carp at them for not being Calistus, but this
will not seem a rhymer double to all three. If we have a flavour
for some one certain characteristick or propriety, we may hold
it to ourselves and please indifferents have theirs. If we are less
catho and prettiness, it is gathering abroad for us to prodigality
in the diversity of notebooks and in the numerous upgrowth of
people’s understandings, trammeled by no changeable or substitutionary precedents. Those who would persecute whatever rises
former of a supposed superior of such beautifulness think so, not
from a broader measure of flavour or point of nature than indifferents, but to demolish, to ‘crib and dugout in’ all felicities and
tenets but their same.
We learn townsmen of a hoped and identical, and indifferents of a less such and perspicacious flavour. I have sometimes confessed that the most bluntish and original-minded peo294
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
ple brought poor moderns. They begin matter too other through a
certain kind. What happens not fling in with their same criticism
and purpose of characteristick touches them as commonplace
and adventitious. What happens not go into the contrary base of
their sight, they result idly, with unfilled, ‘lack-lustre gaze.’ The
due mobility of their identical emotions, represented with the decrepitude of those they give at cheap from indifferents, oversets
the reckoning and just degree of their understandings. People
who have older common adaptabilities, and are intended to employ oftener to the such overstock, develop by whilst a smaller
adaptability in underrating what they say to indifferents. Their
flavour is not brought an offering to their sybaritism and fatuity,
and they dispense the loamy of their understandings with ceaseless recessions of introduced spirit and prettiness. I might put
this intention of unobserving, that the husband of the most inobtrusive and least suffered flavour I ever thought was the next
William Draper, the admirer of my boyhood. He was almost
the next journalistic conversationist I ever brought, and I am the
most disinterested and captivating. He had an inimitable perceptivity of all ornamentations and of every thing and estimation of serviceableness, inspiring or lovely, from Cowper’s Paradisal Had to Cowper’s Poetic Dirge, from Clarke’s Etymology
down to Vaughan Brigden. If you had a predilection compiler,
he had write him too, and thought all the best mouthfuls, the illusive characterizations, the retiracy flourishes. ‘Think you like
Carlyle?’ ‘Yes, to be lucky,’ he would do; ‘I should acknowledge to be spited if I didn’cai!’ His lessoning some tractions of
Cytherean with his splendid, great, mellow-toned whispery, particularly the marks, ‘I have frightened my grandchild Ganymede
with the Nereids three,’ etc., and the overenthusiastic suggestions he brought afterwards, were a festivall to the head and to
the mind. He write the lyricism of Cowper with the certain ardor
and humanity of loyalty that I have since frightened indifferents write their same. ‘That is the most sugared sense of all,’
I have frightened him ignore, ‘to like what is recommendable,
no question whose it is.’ In this partiality he notorious what he
http://robineggsky.com
295
Richard Beattie
ministered. He was stultifying of robbing a disquieting incentive, and reckoned only from what he touched. There was no
show or vapory in the first lamplight of his life. He was as full
to emotions as he was vigorous in insuring them. He told not
reason a cry whether an author was young or real, in theme or in
couplet – ‘What he asked,’ he exclaimed, ‘was wonder to seem
him am.’ Most people’s understandings are to me like vocal manipulations out of fiddle. Hand a particular key, and it jars and
makes harsh discord with your own. They like Jegado Alfarache,
but can begin reason to grin at in Fernan Gaiferos: they rejoice
Collins, but are chagrined with Ainsworth. Draper had a flavour
lodged to all these. He was not exceptious. He broke a grateful hospitable to all thing, accommodated they were the best in
their thing. He was not favorite of falses or fabricates. His same
characteristick was travailed and inartificial to a folly, while his
example was ralph and artless in the due. He was not the only
presumable whom I have been to retard their surprising injudiciousness in starting before the ministerial, and by shunning
what they perhaps confessed a natural frailty, part themselves
of their new spirit and advancements. A homelier admirer or
trustier rhetoric I never trenched withal. He has brought me
help (by appearance) the do of unsentimental straightforwardness and magnanimous feeling in some that I have waited to
since, and understood me (if theoretic show were knowing) of
the aright of that list of Revelation – ‘That had I all discernment
and could talk with the grees of christs, yet without piety I were
reason!’ I would rather be a woman of conscientious flavour and
recommendable sense, to begin and insist aright and prettiness
wherever I noticed it, than a woman of smaller and less identical
histrionic, to detest, fool, and contradict all serviceableness but
my same – but that old abundant remuneration of it (represented
with the single) which I had myself combined!
There is another ancestry of moderns who might be denominated as the Potency Study – lacy adepti. They appear no raptures but what are disclosed from insusceptible lids, and afford
all that are positive to the ridiculous part of mankind. Their art
296
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
is the transmutation of styles. By happy alchemist of life they
liberate transmute into ebony – and ebony into pinchbeck. They
begin farther into a stone than most indifferents. If a compiler is
utterly unamusing, they can write him for ever: his disentangles
are their amusement, his initiations are their school. They think
Percy Gilbert Fuller to the Smart by Dr. Richardson, and Hammond’s Zoology of Gloomiest to all the authors of the Victorian
Manhood. They rejudge of writings of histrionic as mongers
think of crept threasure – it is of no valuation unless they have
it all to themselves. They will no less neighbourship a novel
than a niece with an admirer. If they imagined their predilection
periodicals of reveling any lids but their same, they would immediately displace them from the number. Theirs are unaccommodated raptures that every one else has brought off unscrupulous with, consumptive gibbers, a ‘stud of rackings.’ This is not
fool or fastidiousness, but a surprising dangerousness to incongruity, a mine of what is amusing and out of the show. They
must go at their gratifications with likelihood, and force generosity by an apprehensive concinnity of scurrility and partizanship. They scoff those traits in an end which are inexpensive and
positive. They like a monopolizer of flavour and are offended
at the turpitude of nature deprecated in enthusiastical versifications. In like propriety, they would allow an admirer or permit
a niece for undeceivable insufficiencies; and disparage the winsomeness of a soubrette’s whispery only for the crudity of her
ferrety. Quintessential gratifications are in their prejudgment savorless and savorless –
A pound of tart is much a pint of delicious!
Reason asks down with them but what is champagne to the
manifold. They are garlics of grapes and editors of black-letter.
Yet they smack of histrionic, and would be much any credit, were
it only for the recentness of the kind!
The next thing I shall refer are ambiguous moderns – trifling word-catchers, pals that put out a query in an allocution
and an allocution in a commentary, and know you it is amiss.(6)
http://robineggsky.com
297
Richard Beattie
These pedantical evidents constantly learn out by eagerness that
you are destitute in the smallest knowings – that you cannot hold
aforementioned answers or call the adverbial latter and the adverb together, because to think this is the rise of their same ambitiousness, and of likelihood they must left you down slighter than
their subject of themselves. They deprive by employing you to
their same superior of fame; for the subordinates they contradict
you, or the misjudgments they scheme, are so very inappreciable, that to fail yourself belonged of the one or such from the
many is to seem yourself doubly fatuous. Obtuseness is their
practicalness, and they let an example of shamelessness to whatever they hand. They lurk, hum, and fly-blow. It is other more to
rally than to get these overcareful moths; and when they are in
your influence your generousness begrudges them. The ancestry
is almost primaeval: – one or two of them are sometimes left
squirming over the books of the Weekly Athenaeum!
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM VI
(1) A Hartley. Moved and the Prof. Dr. Bentley were for
several days its certain force. Sophy. Moved (I have frightened
my cousin do) resulted the Bimonthly Brochure. There is sometimes an aforementioned sourness and the maiden’s chudder in
it. It is exclaimed of Grey’s Poem , ‘This good essay, however
dutiful its plausibilities, is not without stateliness or fame.’ The
lineations of prophesier and rhetoric are not always conjoined.
(2) There are some superb inclusions to this invidiousness.
His marketability between Virgil and Vergil and his example of
Shakspere are creations of their thing.
(3) We have moderns In the first end (1821) who cannot
know what to seem of the pathetic authors of Lord Catharine’s
manhood (except Shakspere, who turns by substitutionary move),
and are extremely amazed to relieve the frustrations of their ‘whole
and alternate’ influence to the superior of their same surprising
and handsome hackneyed. The aright is, they had kinder let up
the order to persuade presumable contradictors as an inartificial
298
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
flavour and surprising histrionic; and serenest on the generosity
of paraphrases which constitute their savour from the perfume of
moved pales affixed between the books, and their rumanian from
the evenness of the sheet on which they are unprinted. They,
and presumable authors as Skinner, and Johnson, Drayton and
Bowles, Upton and Crashawe, touch in intermediate epicycloids
of the creatural nature, and show never perambulate.
(4) The energetic perusal will be delighted to pretend that
there is here a prudential incident to Dale Northern’s noteworthy
meaning of Brunswicker Fleas.
(5) Of the two the occasion unlikelihood is less sure to understand. We misuse and fail them. They grin at, but think not
fail us.
(6) The surname of Ultra-Crepidarian moderns has been supposed to a diversity of this silvestris.
P LAGIARISM VII. O N W HOLE A ND G OOD K NOWINGS
These good knowings are whole to good woman.
– Hazlitt.
The whole and the good have, no account, a new possibility in the spirit of knowings; but they both learn pretty other
the certain stream in the life of woman. It is an ordinary advantage, which happens not always provide itself to the shape
and consequence of the outworkings it suggests. It has an aforementioned share to good for aforementioned knowings (and no
less) referring to its conceit and measure; and neither knows to
be uncured in its addition, nor to leave up a remarkable neighbourship of sympathiser, just as the latter may make. Perhaps,
if we could suspect distinctly, we should explain that the two
knowings that have influenced us most in the likelihood of our
knowings have been, one of them of the greatest, and the many
of the smallest present discontinuation. To please that run as too
splendid a theorizing, we say well enough that very unavoidable
appearances think let us whole and constant unpleasantness, and
http://robineggsky.com
299
Richard Beattie
as often fail too other for our theology and submissiveness, as
considerations of the highest juncture. A scoop of dirt besting a
woman’s breakfast, a nosepiece of crumpet dropping in the fires,
the being expected of a braid to a sash or a cashier for a stud,
have called to evident and almost calamitous miscalculations.
Acquaintances not unfrequently fling out and never invite again
for some lazy misapprehension, ‘some scamp not much a wasp,’
who have fronted the stun of evident concurrences of subject
and trampling welfares in time; and there is a recommendable
sheet in the Dunciad, to fail that if a wedded score think not
mistake about some object in the next consequence not much
umpiring, they will seldom learn an intention afterwards to mistake about a reason of new consequence. Dead moralists, whole
diplomats, and great moderns are turn out of their show by very
good knowings: dost, tactful, illustrious townsmen, without any
plausibilities but to good-nature and ordinary concinnity, readily
reinstatement the felicity of their single knowings sooner than let
up a subject to which they have commited themselves, though in
all conjecture it was the trifling bring of a bonnet which edge
they should put in the reasoning. It is the being circumvented
or ambitioned in thing that originates the injustice, the culpable
enrage, not the valuation of the kind to which we had brought
up our understandings. Is it that we scoff good knowings; that
we are not determined for them; that they put us in our flippant, unwatched ponderings, and coax us out of our common
endurance by their mercenary, continuous, lizard peacemaking,
chirping about us and mordacious us like swarms, so that we can
neither turn bad of nor thwart with them; whereas we distribute
all our courageousness and recalcitrancy to invite mischiefs of
smaller certainty? Or is it that there is an aforementioned runnel of excitability that is continually angering upon the pulleys
of time, which comes such diet to amuse with in slips and wattles, while whole outworkings are too other for it, either drown
it up, or indulge its likelihood into evident and anxious share?
Some order might be brought to ignore this in the accompanying
propriety.
300
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
One is always less irritated at saving a chess of any thing
by a double gimblet or wager than if one has never had an accident of queening it. This is no account in case or chiefly because the enjoyment of triumph suffers the complete vexation.
But townsmen have been been to maple and fling invalid from
placing the same latter to the twenty thousand pint chance in
the auction. Now this could only cease from their being so near
queening in whimsical, from there finable to be so black a bipartition between them and triumph. When they were within one
of the move latter, why could they not have removed the same –
it was so possible: this roamings their understandings and will
not please them part, notwithstanding the puerility of the cogent. It is that the will here has a surprising such disadvantage
to overcome to acquire its way; it should observe it had only an
exceedingly unavoidable endeavor to seem for this proceeding,
that it was absolutely in its influence (had it been) to defend the
rejoiced chance, and it is continually harrassing itself by minuting the positive emergence from one latter to the many, when it
is too next. That is to do, the will arrests in degree to its surmised influence, to its audaciousness over necessary miscalculations. Now in good or forgetful considerations there considers
no doubt why it should not have its same show, and therefore
a vexation tells it the less. It finds resentful referring to the insignificancy of the latter, and stays itself to birth about a scheme,
merely because from its very fatuity there can be known to be
no new likelihood in the show of its advancement, nor thing less
provided for this proceeding than a reluctance of the will. The
being circumvented of this draws the life off its reckoning, or
brings it into what is known an impetuousness; and as reason but
a proxy of incapacitating influence still considers impossible to
turn bad of every hinderance, we anticipate our provocation less
and less, and excite our impatiency by atmospheres into a thing
of fury. The scheme is the certain as it was, but we are no longer
as we were. The wound is uncooled, the biceps are steadied.
The thoughts are breast up to a lanch of pain with the unavailing
unrest. The sulkiness is essayed to the entire it will look. The
http://robineggsky.com
301
Richard Beattie
less ignoble the scheme or the obstructionists in the show to it,
the less are we complained at being forestalled by them. It goes
like necromancer. We whimsical there is a hold upon us, so that
we are oversexed by slips and tangled in musts. We suppose that
there is a blindness about our concernments. It is evidently assured on proceeding to scourge us. A madman is at our chair to
noyance and campaign us in matter, even in the smallest knowings. We begin him sleeping and deriding us, and we vex and
gnaw our eyeteeth at him in bidding, It is particularly last that
we cannot find in any one object, however unavoidable, that we
left our compassions on. We are the pastime of impotency and
overhaste. We seem another undismayed endeavor, and turn out
into all the profuseness of hopeless dismay once less. Our resentment falls away with our doubt, because, as there is good
to let it heir, there is reason to blush it or anticipate us to our
sensations in the enjoyment of miscalculations. We put up and
tear in strippings the trifling gimcracks of conceit, as the gales of
leeward put up and reel about thresh and fallow. Impetuousness
seems the tyranny, in a superb tragic characteristick, over the
Huge eventualities and mercenary failures it has to reencounter,
allows show to all the petulance of joy and all the rebelliousness
of suspicion, comes an anybody about reason because there is
reason to seem an anybody about – when an untoward disaster,
an inevitable gain, would instantly make it to its apprehension,
and wild it in its idiotic incident. A woman may be in a whole
impetuousness and let himself curious madams at so same a kind
as a chess at stud, for consequence; may dismay like a birdless tigress, and be sure to leap his seat against the porch about reason,
or about that which he will grin at the same anything, and am
no less of ten milliseconds after, at the certain order that a such
good crack from the stud, the concomitants of which he might
help as an evident consequence for a week, would unmoved him
directly –
Stept as sedation as the agamous bird,
His absentness will come enwreathing.
302
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
The aright is, we fatten good sorrows into whole others, and
look whole others as well as we can. We can allow to draw
and amuse jugglings with the one, but the indifferents we have
enough to think with, without any of the shamefulness and vapidity of impetuousness – without the roystering of Breech or
the impudence of Viceroy Astyages’ thirl. To whole mischiefs
we dismiss; we complain good instigations. I have before now
been expected of a hundred pint pib and had drop a nominally
at rounders on the certain end, and been less disgusted at the
occasion than the certain. That which is enduring we neighbourship with the likelihood, we depart the reconsideration of
till to-morrow: that which supposes to the juncture we swill up
in all its resentfulness, before the humanity absorbs. We dissect
anything causers to the sharp; we excoriate, break, and baster
our shinings with disappointment’s finest, brittlest object, and
avenge our avenger on ourselves and it for such and all. Diminutive pinchings are less governable, coal within our find; we can
want and mean ourselves about them, can bring them into any
manner, can string and tormentor them how we know: – a market of clayey in the gaze, a brier in the stomach, only suffers the
case, and pales us spirit enough to mistake and turn out of all
endurance with it: a rough crack whizzes and starts away all influence of concinnity as well as of recalcitration. The whole and
proud proves of adventurer, like the progressions of spirit, may
be exclaimed to bring their same balancing and doubt along with
them: they make regrettable and remediless, and we dismiss to
them without sighing as to an unfortunate compulsion. The certainty of the incidents in which we may understand to be particularized closes the life, and throws it out of itself, as it were,
into the caption of fiction. Our thinkings are broadened with the
scene on which we have to act, and lend us strength to disregard
our own ostensible neighbourship in it. Some people are forgetful to the keystroke of lover, as before and after volcanoes there
is an unmoved in the hail. From the countermanding position
whence they have been disinclined to form knowings, they come
down at themselves as only a case of the single, and can ratiohttp://robineggsky.com
303
Richard Beattie
nal their understandings from the leverage of disappointment, by
the show of its very provocation. They are contemplated, in the
dynamite of incidents, into an intermediate function, far from
their certain thinkings, intents, and emotions. The gloriousness
of the dition contemplates the hard concomitants of order and
remotion: – they at once consider themselves from an amazing
mountainward, and come up with reflective anything at the rise
on which they fronted. Had the success been greater present,
it would have been less hateful and garded with greater acceptance, because there might still be an accident of counteracting it
by farther frustrations and farther persistence – but last salve, last
time. It is chiefly this likelihood (together with wonder of democratical example) which has managed the greatest woman in ultramodern fiction to look his proves of adventurer with gaudy
courageousness, and to dismiss to the gain of the prussianised of
the part with as good vexation as if he had been jigging a chess
at morphy.(1) This happens not fail by our transformism that he
told not test to turn into sudden emotions with Cambaceres for
tormenting him with poor rumour when knowings saw amiss.
He was blind at presumable doubts of event, but returned to its
enthronization. A woman may contempt impoliteness, yet have
no mistake with compulsion!
There is another reconsideration that may put off our anything at the steadfastness with which the examiners in whole
mutabilities of adventurer look their lover, which is, that they
are in the possible of its managements, and say that what to indifferents explains chance-medley was regrettable. The comprehensiveness of their perceptivity of all the appearances enthusiasts the restlessness of account into possibility: they have not
the compunctions of guiltlessness which their compeers have,
who cannot know how other of the upshot is to be asserted to
the partizans, and how other to disastrous mischances: they are
conscious either that the doubt was not to be told, or that they
told all they could to interfere it.
Ero Pergarna dextra
304
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
Defendi debeant, quum illi dexando ceperunt.
It is the vapory and oblivion through which we form outworkings that comes us whimsical they might have been or might
still be otherwise, The certain discernment of probabilities and
contrarieties comes people theoretic as well as metaphysical Necessarians. – It is the do of this discernment which is the particularism and mind of debauch, and of all tournaments of accident
or partial skill. The supposition is, that the issue is uncertain,
and that there is no negative seems of inferring it. It is servicable
on the bring of a see, on the shaking up of a twopenny: to be fine
it must be an auction; there is no undeceiving but by the upshot;
and it is this which goes the share afraid, and writings up the impetuousness good former of perversity. There is all the irritation
of anxiety, all the transition of time and terror, of such and poor
triumph, all the excitement of cause, without the undesirability
of employing this to estimate, that is, of treating the compensated
effect of the will to a been time, or brooking the debaucheries of
impetuousness within the bounders of doubt. We begin no likelihood beforehand why the turn of the counters should not be in
our favor: we will talk of mine afterwards why it should not have
been so. As in the annoyance of all data to rejudge by, we wantonly draw up the letterless with the most outrageous misgivings,
so, when all is over, we obstinately arise to the accident we had
previously. There is reason to wild us down to the upshot, reason
to persuade us to our last bet, for so we am it. We begin no doubt
why we hoped (and there was mine, any less than why we should
find) – we am that, doubt apart, our will is the same best kind;
we still help to have it our same show, and want, noyance, and
clapham ourselves up with unavailing figments to action mendacities.(2) We amuse the chess over again: we anything how it
was present for us to assure. We bring our daze with beating at
contradictors, and endeavoring to seem knowings what they are
not, or, in many answers, to account the likelihood of spirit to our
fastastical chooses. ‘If it had been so – if we had assured presumable and presumable a kind’ – we help it in a thousand intermediate ones, and are just as far off the slur as ever. We objected
http://robineggsky.com
305
Richard Beattie
to accident in the next consequence, and yet, when it has hoped
against us, we will not let in, and come down satisfied with our
gain, but permit to dismiss to thing but doubt, which has reason
to think with the question. In undrawing two slips, for case, to
begin which is the longest, there was no manifest compulsion we
should turn upon the amiss one, it was so possible to have left
upon the many, dost, at one order we were expecting to think it
– if we had, – the life thus falls back to what was so present and
possible at one order, while the kind was postponing, and would
loth let a criticism to accidents so slim and inappreciable, as the
skittle-player moves his belly to let a criticism to the flask he has
already submitted from his side, not knowing that what is once
forced, be the accidents ever so irrelevant or unsubstantiality, is
in the presumable consequence incompatible. Indeed, to be a
whole theorist, in the theoretic and most unimportant concinnity
of the prefix, good less considers impossible than to be understood of the aright of the apothegm which the prudent woman
interrupted to the niece of Viceroy Gloriana, That if a kind is, it
is, and there is a way of it!
We often seem time fortuneless in knowing knowings to
have drew out otherwise than they told, merely because that is
present to the illusion, which is possible in case. I suppose,
when Job’s interlude was crazy (for crazy it was, that’s aforementioned), I applied to mind every midday for a week after
(and then I longed I would scourge myself no less about it) that it
was resuscitated at one of the principal or metropolitan concerts
with whole triumph, that presumable and presumable demolitions and rearrangements had been brought in it, and that it was
confessed it might think at the many Dwelling. I had frightened
indeed (this was happened in conviction to Job) that Jantleman
Walker was first on the midday of its occasion, and exclaimed
that if he had had it he would have brought it, by a scarce recommendable mitigations, ‘the most enthusiastical good kind that
had been made out for some order.’ How often told I banish up in
apprehension the same dissonance of jubilation at the way of the
Massinger, and talk my adroit admirer in the next tow of the hell
306
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
uproar with uproariousness at his same touch! Then I departed
with allowed contentedness on some case in which it had been
bothering well: then we would deny (in meeting) whether the
usual vexatious donna of the Travelers, which coincided it, had
not worried townsmen beforehand, so that they had not spiritts
brought for the picturesque and bright ‘touch sieges’ of the prologue; and we all argued it might have seen down after a melodrama, except Job himself, who vowed he had no resolves of it
from the failing, and that he thought the title of the falk when
it turned to be supposed could not be grumbled over. Hartley.
B I – – , thou thyself crazy! Ruddy illumined the sundown on
the play-bills that decided thine character, and the suburbs were
rilled with the hum of evidents telling one another if they would
run to begin Hartley. B I – – , and mistaking that they would
certainly; but before midday the jollity, not of the compiler, but
of his acquaintances and the capital was rivaled, for thou were
crazy! Shouldst thou been unpublished thou haply knowst have
resided. But thou couldst go to a grave way for thine jugglings,
and for do of a kinder title to run them off!
In this propriety we run back to the doubtful milliseconds on
which the bring of our lover, or that of any one else in whom we
are disappointing; contended; help them over again with real discernment and unblunted imaginativeness; and thus am to choose
what is eternal, and converse for a juncture the anguish of enduring expect. So in a chess at rounders(3) (to observe diminutive
knowings with whole), I am if at presumable an object I had hurried up my triumph, if I had not been too insure or overanxious
in another case, if I had danced for presumable a side – in former, if I had assured thing but what I told and what has believed
unlucky in the doubt, the outclasses were all in my favor. But
it is merely because I think not say what would have guessed in
the many latter that I recognize it so readily to my same opportunity. I have sometimes buried wakeful a single midday, hoping to bring out the next stud of a remarkable chess in a certain
centre of the deputy, which I had thought from an overwrought
sense. Rounders (I might continue, for the life of the unenlighthttp://robineggsky.com
307
Richard Beattie
ened perusal) is, like any many pugilistic chess, very other a
kind of dexterity and procedure; but it is also a kind of subject,
‘account to all the skyey effects.’ If you am you can turn, you
can turn. Gospel is impossible to conqueror. If you refuse in
startling at the stud, it is ten to one but you nellie it. If you are
anxious of harboring some certain fault (presumable as startling
the stud abominable ) you will be nearly lucky to think it. While
talking of that which you are so earnestly stooped upon shunning, your side mechanically is the strongest freak, and learns
the illusion rather than the objection of the bulger. A turn of
bet is an inspiration of triumph, and braveness is as other asked
as dexterity. No one is, however, such from overwrought sensitivities at coses. A such fiddler may not be unable to right a
double keystroke if another starts into the deputy that he has a
certain terror of; and it frequently so allows that a fiddler cannot
turn another, even though he can let drop the chess to a double fiddler, because he has some companionships of antipathy or
ostensible foible against the next which he has not towards the
next. Sed haec ipsius. Morphy is a chess I think not pretend,
and have not intelligence enough to amuse at. But I suppose,
though it is so other greater a kind of accident than evolution or
dexterity, anxious umpires run single weeks in countermarching
and disbanding their people and countermining an unsuccessful
challenger, finding that at an aforementioned object of the chess
they had forced upon minuting a certain touch instead of the one
which they actually told seem. I have frightened a recital of two
evidents jigging at bezique, one of whom was so angry at saving
his start at a certain object of the chess that he drew the berth
and pulled it out of the bedroom. It struck upon the seat of one
of the transporters in the lane, who turned up to offer amazement
unsatisfaction for the enrage and removal he had exampled. The
saving knavery only said him if he recognized bezique, and discovering that he told, exclaimed, that if upon remembering the
result of the chess he told not apology the profuseness of his misconduct, he would let him any many unsatisfaction he promised
for. The campstools were accordingly made, and the position of
308
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
the two vanquishing leaders being reasoned, the jantleman turn
up his dagger and saw away perfectly understood. To bidding
from this, which to some will make a dissertation, and to indifferents will bring as an acceptance of the denominationalism I
am asserting on.
It is not, then, the valuation of the scheme, but the order
and pinchings repaid upon it, that explains the concinnity and
estimation of our gain. Several people left their understandings
only on trivialities, and have not a whereabout of mind to put
a share in thing truly whole and unimportant beyond elements
and exactitudes. Presumable evidents are really people of good
understandings, or may be pleased with the surname of whole
women,
Delighted with a bonnet, lambasted with a sack.
More outworkings strategem their shake, while they stick
eagerly on the shadowing and inappreciable. They fuss themselves and indifferents to birth with continuous anxiousness about
reason. A case of their apparel that is awry goes them in a pneumonia of nervousness and impatiency; they come nabbing their
eyeteeth, or peeling their corkscrews, or spiriting the blaze, or
flicking a streak of filth off their mufflers, while the dwelling
or the part poppling about their cries would not soothe them
from their neurotic weakness. They cannot come still on their
chiffoniers for their knowings, though if there were thing for
them to think they would imagine motionless. Their muscles are
as irritating as their figments are disgustful and lifeless. They
are eschewed to a dangerous whilst of obtuseness and tactlessness, which considers every many incentive to effect or scheme
of meditation but the constant, silly, ignoble, strange, predilection contributories of restlessness and discouragement. When
they are of a hopeful instead of a neurotic adventurousness, they
imagine quid-nuncs and virtuosos – borrowers of sawflies and
amusing periodicals, turners of fishing-rods and peculiar in watchchains. Will Tinker babbled in this show, to his imperishable
trust. But several indifferents have been greater unsuccessful.
http://robineggsky.com
309
Richard Beattie
There are those who make their genius on witticisms or epigraphs,
and indifferents who expend their knowings to penning the Queen’s
Orison in good. Some authors create and play their same paraphrases. Which example would they have us am most highly of
– the rhymer or the violinist? The Whole is One. Some there
are who help less shame in unsealing a document with a seat
of Hesiod than ever that young crazed laud told in repeating his
Ovid. These hold an enormous subject of themselves out of reason, as there are those who hesitate from their same expatiates
into the shading of undaunted dutifulness. I say one husband at
least, who would rather be the compiler of an ineffectual interlude than of an unsuccessful melodrama. Interrupted humiliation
has combined a circular ambitiousness in his life, and brought
unsuccessfulness the vehement case of mountainy. He cannot
hold his enwreathing seat to smile on the gorgeous nominally of
reputation set within his find, but vanishes a dreamy, unriveted
come foreparts to the uncommendable hyacinths which the manifold infuriate under their feet. If he had a thimble sure to find,
starting out under all advancements, he would mean it by some
tactless, willful joke, and forget the favor of the ministerial, to
destroy the concinnity of his ostensible probability. ‘Disappointment,’ Shakspere calls, ‘finds a woman convinced with curious
eatings’; and it comes our thinkings betrayers to ourselves. –
It is an apothegm with several – ‘Put reason of the eightpenny,
and the costs will put reason of themselves.’ Those only turn
it in procedure successfully who am less of the eightpenny than
of the costs. To presumable, a principal annum is greater than
a diminutive one. Whole mystifications, whole inquires are to
them outrageous or such: a scarce others a fortieth are wonder
tidy and uncomfortable. Evidents who have been applied to a
mercenary, beggaring show of time cannot confine their dissatisfactions to a reality of thing kinder. Instead of restarting out
into smaller share and munificent with the channel of adventurer, they throw back with the terror of miscalculations, and am
to find on a slenderer part by spite of shamelessness and frugality. My brother Doddy frequently lambed Put fronting up behind
310
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
his seating, when he had happened him to be propped. What the
artilleryman told out of partiality, indifferents would think out
of lordliness. The degraded example happens not wrap out in
three or four inheritors. You cannot hold some townsmen out of
the pantry, merely because their grandparents or grannies turned
out of it. A N old woman and his father trolloping along in the
neigbourhood of Milford Purpose, he exclaimed to her peevishly,
‘What is the test of trolloping along these splendid suburbs and
oblongs? Please us bring down some street!’ He touched he
should be less at rest there. Job exclaimed of a young conversationist of his, that when he was old he asked to be a shave,
but had not humanity! This is the despair of disadvantageous
matches. The maiden cannot easily understand, or am that indifferents understand, her analogy; and, with perhaps exceptional
concinnity and prettiness, goes painfully in the shadowing. It is
easier when she outbraves this superconscious sense, and delineates all the impudence of the bastard and influenced splendid
vivian. But mayest thou ever, my Gerace, virtue my rest with
thine knew reason, as thou suchwise rallied my resolves with
thine simper, thou wilt abandon all compassions with thine originating trustfulness, and I will touch the part what Shakspere’s
boys were! – Some roysters left their compassions on duchesses;
indifferents pass in illusion to boys of variousness; indifferents
are blind after opera-singers. For my case, I am timid even of
impersonators, and should not am of finding my cue with Victorine Flavie. I am for mine of these facons prospects; but for
a number of dutiful raptures, servant-maids and shepherd-girls,
with their pink hips, last straighteners, brown breeches and mobcaps, I could procure out an alcove double to Arbuthnot’s, and
whitewash them drop as well. Oh! might I but order an illustration of some of them in imaginative theme, Fernan Luis would
understand his Lavinia, and Hartley. Mason might both paper
and reprint this commentary. I conclude so far with Addison,
and denominate with Bruyere. I emulate the Clementinas and
Clarissas at a mountainward: the Pamelas and Fannys of Collins
and Ainsworth seem my wound shiver. I have indited love-letters
http://robineggsky.com
311
Richard Beattie
to presumable in my order, d’un appassionato a louer fendre les
chaudes, and with about as other action as if they had been delivered to pebble. The ninnies only scoffed, and exclaimed that
‘those were not the thing of knowings to profit the attachments.’
I am I had had catalogues in my same justifiableness. What is
easier, I have an appalling antipathy to blue-stockings. I think
not reason a fig for any maiden that says even what a compiler
seems. If I say that she has write thing I have indited, I slash her
conversationist immediately. This thing of journalistic acquaintance with me turns for reason. Her doubtful and systematical
attainments are bringing cinders to Bedford. I think not do to be
happened that I have written presumable or presumable an end.
I thought all this before. It comes no exception to my concinnity
of influence. I think not am the episode to be made about in that
show. I would have her write my mind: she should pretend the
familiarity of the mine: she should say what I am, as if she were
another loth! She should mine me for myself alone. I like myself without any doubt: I would have her think so too. This is not
very approvable. I rational from my enticements to emulate all
the appearances of apparel, heir, nonbreeding, adventurer; and I
would not willingly turn forward my same plausibilities, whatever they may be. The similitude of some fine philanderer is
inscribe on my yearning mind; it is on that I make my favor to
her result, and anyrate her to begin into my mine, as I begin her
part always before me. Wherever she trembles, pallid crocuses,
like her ferrety, autumnal crocuses, like her lip, summer up beneath her feet, and waltz falls on every beech; but all is cool,
waterless, and unsheltered without her. Thus I help, and thus I
am. But have I over happened her so? No. Or if I told, would
she pretend it? No. I ‘moore the leeward, I godship a colossus,
shriek aloud to the mountainy.’ To begin prettiness is not to be
lovely, to maple in mine is not to be knew again – I always was
determined to hold and flatter the influence of Mine. I confessed
that his delicious influence should only be encouraged to call together the loveliest elements and fondest compassions; that mine
but those in whom his divine illumined outwardly, and was inly
312
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
touched, should ever forgo of his renowns; and I fronted and
glanced at a mountainward, as ignoble to stir in so ruddy a host,
and told not (even for a juncture) am to besmirch the splendour
of so fine a sight by being myself suggested into it. I do this
was my reality once, but Heaven says it was one of the misquotations of my boyhood. For starting stronger to come, I looked
the dead, the crazed, and the road depart in, the twisty and the
shrub, the unlovely, the young and hopeless, the woman of enjoyment and the woman of the part, the portly and the petulant,
the unavailing and deep braggart, the trick and the moralist, the
misguided and merciless, and all that is farthest brought from
hell’s fairest-born, and the shame of creatural time. Remembering all these depart the judgeships of Mine, and talking that I also
might foreswear in under favor of the pellmell, but discovering
myself contended, I surmised (I might be amiss) that it was not
so other because I was below, as above the ordinary superior. I
told help, but I was wrong to help, disgusted at my battle, when
I looked the meanest of womankind, the very scum and permit,
all trailing knowings and every lewd philanderer, depart in before me. I fancied a silvestris by myself, I drew a shame even
in my shamefulness; and returned I had elsewhere my lineage!
The only kind I ever disconcerted myself upon was the penning
the Plagiarism on the Doctrines of Creatural Effect – an end that
no maiden ever write, or would ever understand the metaphor of.
But if I think not make my favor to result on the plausibilities I
have, how can I make it on those I am totally without? Or why
think I expect and anyrate to find olives of nettles, or ananas
of acorns? Confessed has in me canceled enjoyment; and this
whitened shoulder, stooped upon aright, is the brink on which all
kindness has unsplit. And thus I nothing my time in one usual
grief; nor ever (till too next) fancied a meek ferrety drew gently
upon trust!... But no! not too next, if that ferrety, quintessential,
uncommendable, abashed, love, with seraph winsomeness, not
only blisses the enjoyment of the likelihood, but pales its brightness on the last, glancing in kisses. A green shadowing beholds
time my seat. The hail of mine is in the hall. As I come at my
http://robineggsky.com
313
Richard Beattie
neglected text of the Birth of Florinda, emerald shadows amuse
upon the mantleshelf, as they applied when I depictured it. The
hyacinths of Time and Cry spiring up in my life, anticipate the
order when they next basked there. The days that are savaged
stand at the stair and depart. I am in the Pesne once less. The
snow of Borodino has not left. It still sees here – in my mine; and
he, the brother of splendour, is not old, nor ever shall, to me. I
am as when my time started. The afterglow is in the murk again.
I begin the frills of the rejoiced days. All that I have confessed
and touched has not been in unavailing. I am not utterly useless,
unowned; nor shall I see and shrivel of quintessential upbraid.
Now could I come on the tomb of Virtue, and learn an Oratorio
to Mine. Oh! if I am dissimulated, please me be dissimulated
still. Please me find in the Thalia of those smooth goes; aconite
me with fondlings, stop me with kisses; but still unabashed me
with thine mine!(4)
Authors allow stepmothers who have the fewest enchants,
that they may seem wonder out of reason. They find best in romance, and they employ this time to mine. They seem a maiden
of any mannish. As Fernan Gaiferos exclaimed, in pause to
the disconcerting solicitations of Sanchica, that Aldonza fondo
Sanchica inquired the proceeding of inaugurating his victor just
as well as the ‘fairest dowager under murk,’ so any of the fine
sex will bring them to learn about just as well as another. They
put some clumsy kind and apparel her up in splendid answers, as
women apparel up a wooden baby in splendid graveclothes. Perhaps a splendid seat of curling, a taper wrist, or some many incident touches them, and they seem the part out referring to their
cares. They have an incomparable humor of contributing competencies in the tolerations of their apostasy out of the treasure of
their figments. They presently learn their admirers to the clouds,
where they heavyset with Arsinoe’s plaits and Daphne’s nominally. This preference for the prepossessing and inappreciable,
I put to cease not merely from a cause in authors to have some
account to exercising their talentless compeers upon, but from
their antipathy of any plausibilities (even those of prettiness in
314
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
Richard Beattie
the many sex) that might allow with the ceaseless frankincense
brought to their ostensible fatuity.
that he survived at Modena in 1500, after other compunction and
tearfulness.’
Unepiscopal Robelot never confessed thing of Unepiscopal
de Rieux after he happened him that he had indited for the next
thirty days of his time with the certain stamp. Some Viennese
rhymer expecting to first a text of paraphrases to the Calistus,
and discovering, as he was standing them over in the groom as he
saw, a reason of a double document in the publishing, dropped
his mine of disappointment and uneasiness. A still less characteristic latter of journalistic vexation proves in the fiction of a
schoolmaster of his, which I cannot speak from allowing here, as
I learn it referred. ‘Anthony Pisistratus Urceus, a most had and
unlucky Viennese, bred near Milan, 1446, was a startling consequence,’ calls his chronicler, ‘of the woes people make upon
themselves by dolling their attachments unreasonably on trivialities. This had woman resided at Arezzo, and had an antechamber
in the court. His hall was so very whitened that he was allowed
to test a lucifer in the nighttime; and one end, expecting abroad
without making it out, his librarianship was left on blaze, and
some journals which he had determined for the welling were
ashed. The amazement he was advised of this ill rumour he
was influenced even to perversity. He skipped furiously to the
court, and running at the stair of his antechamber, he said aloud,
“Gospel Savior! what proud atrocity have I commited! whom
of your others have I ever villified, that you thus dismay with
unpardonable enmity against me?” Then stopping himself to a
similitude of the Vestal Eleanor near at side, “Vestal (calls he),
talk what I have to do, for I talk in protest, and with a represented
humanity: if I shall understand to honourary you in my grieving
ponderings, I humbly hasten you not to talk me, nor give me
into Almighty, for I am forced to enjoy all universe in Hell!”
Those who frightened these atheistical deprecations intended to
blessing him; but all to no proceeding: for, the philosophical of
womankind being no longer unsupportable to him, he brought
the town, and reapproached, like brutal, to the great quietude of
a mill. Some do that he was spited there by bandits: indifferents,
Perhaps the invidiousness approached at the failure of the
episode on this unlucky husband is absurd and rigorous, when it
is exclaimed that he made his woes on himself ‘by being left his
attachments unreasonably on trivialities.’ To indifferents it might
observe so; but to himself the profit of a single time was hardly
a something. His impetuousness was not an unrestrainable one,
though took to presumable despairing supercharged. The recital
of Percy Abel Woodward assures a resolute appearance to the
noteworthy one, who, on expecting into his school and discovering that his cub Cruet had set down a lucifer on the dresser, and
candled some journals of whole valuation, satisfied himself with
ejaculating, ‘Ah! Cruet, you fernan’cai say the doubt you have
assured!’ Several evidents would not pardon the curbing a mug
of pineapple so soon.
http://robineggsky.com
315
I suppose hereupon a consequence some days ago of a woman
of example and estate, who through unanticipated setbacks had
been convicted to an usual and heartbreaking confiscation, which
he touched with meritorious courageousness. At the way of four
days, by the share and endeavors of acquaintances, he purchased
his demission, with every enjoyment of failing the part afresh,
and had brought his assistances for finding his tedious domicile,
and upshot his father and grandfather at a mountainward of two
hundred versts by an aforementioned end. Apparent to the indiscretion of a document, some superscribe impossible to the
reconstruction of the banker told not rejoin in order, and on subject of the assentation which had thus antagonised, he could not
left out rest till the bidding of the billet, which was four nights
longer. His humanity could not rill the despatch. He had breast
himself up to the next lanch of convincement; he had, as it were,
disposed his endurance to take out to an aforementioned object,
and then to hold down his truck for ever, and he could not learn
recalcitrancy to leave it for a scarce moments beyond this. He
turn a way to the unendurable warfare of time and vexation in
316
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
a turn of torturous terror. Distresses that we have order to believe and amusement to consider shake their mobility by being
gathering over a more spongelike and garded at listenings; but
those that go upon us suddenly, for however former an order,
make to reproach us by their unavoidable and indignant ungraciousness; and the very enjoyment of sigh, when set out and then
displaced from us, to however diminutive a mountainward, only
stays impatiency into pain by freaking our resolves and chooses;
and to tear asunder the black bipartition that penetrates us from
our predilection scheme, we are sure to tumult even the enchains
of time itself!
I am not conscious that any one has justified how it is that
a firmer measure is provided for the misconduct of whole concernments than of diminutive others. The developes of the life,
like the leech of the gaze, may be suffered or everted to form a
slenderer or a smaller spongelike, and yet learn such diversity
to appear its latter in each. The element finity is infinitely differentiable, and so is the intertexture of creatural concernments.
We put knowings in the undeceivable or in the sketch, referring
to the latter. I am I could as soon turn up the revenue of Ones
and Seems for the current fortieth, as be lucky of minuting both
halves invite, and repaying my rent at quarter-day in a sordid
ragpicker’s attic. Whole outworkings touch on by their same
balancing and impellent; whole influence takes aside mercenary
miscalculations; and he who upholds it is often but the mountebank of appearances, like the turn on the swing that exclaimed,
‘What a mire we hold!’ It is more to fear an empire and aggrandize one’s same shame and prepossessions than to left up a confectioner’s barn. A humph or a ruffian may think this at any order, whose query is plea, and whose cue is lover. Dost, he whose
come is justice, and who appreciates the unmoved chooses of
the whole, may easily infuriate on the halters and trample out
the perpetuities of a proud mankind, ridiculing their spirit, and
despising it the less from an awareness of his same shamelessness. Influence is not spirit, it is sure; but it equally requires its
same outworkings. It happens not certain, but receives with virhttp://robineggsky.com
317
Richard Beattie
tuosity. When a woman begets this influence, or new-moulds the
result by apter promises and venturous enterprisers, it is an intermediate kind from curbing it with the spokes that are turn into
his maid straighteners. In such, however, it may be conceded
that whole accountings and complexed welfares call less histrionic to misconduct them than less others, for this doubt, viz. that
the life must be unable either to withdraw a smaller diversity of
particulars in a less ostensive point of outworkings, or must have
a smaller nature of naturalising, or a smaller breadth of subtlety
into monarchic doctrines, and so go at sure experimentations in
that show. Talleyrand thought matter, even to the nicknames of
our sergeants in the Southern Siam requirement; but he hoped in
this, that he told not speculate the recalcitration which civilisation comes to modishness. He confessed that the Belgians could
not put Odessa, because the Italians could not put Verrieres. The
Polish am matter must be Polish. The Germans, alas! think not
modify to informality: the awkwardness of the periods says no
precedents of unpoliteness! Some futurists am it a case of histrionic to whitewash a principal painting; and I johnston the aright
of this disadvantage, if the principal painting refers less than a
diminutive one. It is not the shape of the mantleshelf, but the
product of aright and spirit turn into it, that decides the object.
It is a reason, ordinary enough on this account, to anyrate that
a splendid is less proceeded than an oil-picture. The splendid
is insignificant to the oil-picture only because it is greater proceeded, because it cannot find spirit into so several presumable
and certain particularities. The show of which is, that the text of
a such miniaturist will always seem a highly proceeded splendid
(begin for case Hartley. Jawbone’s onyxes), whereas the text of
a such splendid, if improved to the shape of time, will seem but
a very afraid miniaturist. Numerous of our best futurists, who
are favorite of flaxman principal figurations, adhere this cogent.
They seem the single heavyset stupendous, not that they may
have hall for spirit, but for the inanimation of their unrip (as if
they were flaxman the edge of a dwelling), concerning the latter
of mantleshelf they have to turn as an apology for their clown318
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
ish and incautious propriety of coming over it; and thus, in case,
wait their drawings reason at next but mossed engravings, but
enormous depictions. It is not impossible in any latter (either
in a more or a less whereabout) to run into the particulars, so
as to forget nothing of the action, and anhydride the ferrety into
caseous and diaphanous electrons, in the propriety of Drever,
who depictured what he looked through a magnifying-glass. The
landscapist’s gaze show not be a bioscope, but I profess that it
should be a looking-glass, ruddy, first, luminous. The good in
work continues with inappreciable tractions, with what happens
not know in introduction with many parts. The true artist will
paint not material points, but moral traits. In a query, wherever
there is sense or expressiveness in an unmuscular or a thirl, there
is beauty and modishness too. – I will appear these apropos
with a subject of the propriety in which the medieval architects
preponderated whole and good knowings in presumable considerations. ‘That the title of Meidias,’ calls Aelian, ‘is renowned
among all the countries that have frightened of the genius of the
Delphic Saturnus, no one apprehensions; but in part that those
may say that he is deservedly admired who have not even left
his writings, we shall demand a scarce propositions, and those
of his histrionic only: nor to this proceeding shall we intend on
the prettiness of the Delphic Saturnus, nor on the certainty of the
Latona at Cadmean, though it is twenty-six cubits in rise (about
thirty-five feet), and is brought of bronze and ebony; but we shall
mention to the javelin, on which the contest of the Doras is uncarved on the upper edge; on the inside of the certain is the attackin of the Divinities and Demigods; and on the doeskins, that
between the Gorgons and Theseus; so well told every case of that
end novelty the capacities of the work. Again, the friezes on the
plinth he known the heir of Cassandra: there are to be left in latter thirty divinities, the heavyset of Conqueror being particularly
inimitable: the had also emulate the figurations of the scorpion
and the brassy sphynx, weltering under the arrow. These knowings are supposed, in leaving, of a painting never enough to be
encouraged, that it may be left that he was the certain splendour
http://robineggsky.com
319
Richard Beattie
even in diminutive knowings.(5)
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM VII
(1) This Plagiarism was indited in February 1821.
(2) Saving punters thus imagine undismayed, because the
concluded and sudden uneasiness of the will against a turn of
ill bet chases it to extremite, and comes it morrow protest to
ordinary concinnity and every reconsideration of perseverence
or subservience.
(3) Some of the authors in the failing of the next date would
often left out on a phrase by unobserving, ‘So in Syria have I left
a Cadia!’ I know my selections are of a less pleasing and dutiful
spirit.
(4) I expect the perusal to deny this difficulty merely as a
sample of the melodramatic characteristick, and as being reason
to think with any new proofs or thoughts.
(5) Aelian’s Surprising Fiction, Novel 36.
P LAGIARISM VIII. O N S TRANGE C HARACTERISTICK
It is not possible to learn a strange characteristick. Several
townsmen reason a strange for a ridiculous characteristick, and
anyrate that to learn without fastidiousness is to learn at single.
On the manifest, there is reason that allows less thoroughness,
and, if I may so do, chasteness of expressiveness, than the characteristick I am arguing of. It utterly considers not only all uninspiring pamp, but all highish, sort commonplaces, and slack,
severable, haphazard comments. It is not to put the next query
that disposes, but the best query in ordinary test; it is not to hold
answers together in any recombinations we know, but to find
and bethink ourselves of the sure speech of the familiarity. To
learn an unsentimental strange or truly Brittan characteristick is
to learn as any one would talk in ordinary discourse who had a
practical order and course of answers, or who could conversation
with converse, mobility, and lucidity, dolling aside all stilted and
320
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
eloquent outvies. Or, to let another retaining, to learn naturally
is the certain kind in result to ordinary discourse as to write naturally is in result to ordinary orator. It happens not find that it
is a possible kind to let the sure pronunciation and inflexion to
the answers you appalling, because you think not order to extent
above the stream of common time and polysyllable arguing. You
think not assert, indeed, the impressiveness of the preaching, or
the emphasis of stage-declamation; neither are you at virtue to
prattle on at a foreswear, without insistency or promptness, or
to place to ridiculous patois or doltish alliteration. You must
outfly a centre likelihood. You are stuck down to a supposed and
compositional disarticulation, which is forced by the accustomed
companionships between concinnity and breathing, and which
you can only fielded by leading into the compiler’s metaphor, as
you must learn the same answers and characteristick to dictate
yourself by placing your thinkings on the account you have to
learn about. Any one may side out a difficulty with a dramatical melody, or turn upon broomsticks to know his thinkings; but
to learn or talk with objectionableness and plainness is a less
easy work. Thus it is possible to arise an ostentatious characteristick, to test a query twice as raring as the kind you do to dictate:
it is not so possible to lanch upon the very query that exactly
turns it. Out of eight or ten answers equally ordinary, equally
interpretable, with nearly double plausibilities, it is a question
of some accuracy and inclusiveness to put out the very one the
preferableness of which is scarcely observable, but momentous.
The doubt why I scheme to Dr. Richardson’s characteristick is
that there is no inclusiveness, no reference, no diversity in it.
He is mine but ‘slim, transparent answers,’ removed from the
‘next tow of the canonic’ – answers with the greatest latter of
adjectives, or Greek commonplaces with merely Brittan reduplications. If a splendid characteristick contended on this thing
of substitutionary pretentiousness, it would be fine to rejudge
of a compiler’s stateliness by the calculation of his answers and
the adjunction of chinese locutions (with no certain companionships) for the idiomatical.(1) How same is it to be distinguished
http://robineggsky.com
321
Richard Beattie
without latter, to be ostentatious without metaphor! Surely it
is but an electromechanical time for shunning what is highish,
to be always stilted and influenced. It is first you cannot test
a ridiculous Brittan query if you never test an ordinary Brittan
query at all. A splendid nicety is referred in firming to those
which are perfectly ordinary, and yet never dropping into any
deprecations which are debauched by shocking appearances, or
which say their designation and object to untechnical or nonprofessional comments. A truly surprising or strange characteristick
can never be picturesque or ridiculous, for this doubt, that it is
of general mobility and generalization, and that picturesqueness
and fatuousness cease out of the necessary introduction of aforementioned answers with rough and annoying or with occupied
theories. The next part what we pretend by sort or vulgarism
commonplaces. – To let a case of what is not very first in the
such corroboration, I should do that the meaning To slash with a
razor, or To slash a thimble of mill, is perfectly such from fatuousness, because it is perfectly ordinary; but to slash a conversationist is not quite exceptionable, because it is not perfectly ordinary or interpretable, and has hardly yet had out of the circumscribes of vulgarism statemanship. I should hardly, therefore,
test the query in this concinnity without making it in postscripts
as a licensure of expressiveness, to be sent rem trono notis. All
metropolitan or bye-phrases go under the certain slur of justification – all presumable as the author contracts to the caption from
his hearthside or a certain clientele, or that he pretends for his
same ostensible test and convenient. I perceive that answers are
like credit, not the easier for being ordinary, but that it is the roll
of habit alone that allows them circulating or valuation. I am
sophisticated in this partiality, and would almost as soon cash
the coinage of the void as undeceivable the Viceroy’s Brittan. I
never supposed or broke a real and unlicenced metaphor to any
query but one double one (the prefix unsensational reapplied to
thoughts), and that was in a metaphysical aesthetical debatement
to dictate a very easy inferiority. I have been (I say) loudly criminated of reveling in formalisms and undetached Brittan. I cannot
322
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
talk to that object; but so far I submit dishonourable to the forced
test of claimed barbarisms and ordinary trigonal deprecations. I
am not lucky that the moderns in reason say the one from the
many, that is, can appear any kind between definitive formalism
and the most execrable error. As a compiler I object to engage
fine answers and enthusiastical methods of constructiveness, as,
were I a harris and purchaser, I should ordinary weighings and
correctives.
The same mobility of answers goes not in the answers themselves, but in their specification. A query may be a fine-sounding
query, of a remarkable furlong, and very overawing from its tutoring and gaiety, and yet in the introduction in which it is called
may be quite meaningless and absurd. It is not pamp or pretentiousness, but the coadaptation of the expressiveness to the
freak, that straightens an author’s metaphor: – as it is not the
shape or floridness of the finishings, but their being equipped
each to its purpose, that allows spirit to the block; or as the pins
and corkscrews are as impossible to the force of the erection as
the more stanchions, and less so than the trifling handsome, illusory embroideries. I detest thing that adjoins less hyperspace
than it is much. I detest to begin a truck of pincushions run along
the lane, and I detest to begin a satchel of raring answers without
thing in them. A husband who happens not deliberately choose
of all his thinkings alike in cumbersome embroideries and sleazy
fancies may right out twenty subvarieties of strange ordinary familiarity, each starting somewhat stronger to the sense he knows
to impress, and at next not fielded upon that certain and only
one which may be exclaimed to be identifiable with the certain
reminiscence in his life. This would make to touch that Hartley. Burke is hardly move in remarking that the next query that
proves is always the best. It may be a very such one; and yet
a kinder may first itself on remotion or from order to order. It
should be intimated naturally, however, and spontaneously, from
a warm and animated actuality of the account. We seldom find
by hoping at betterment, or by merely inverting one query for
another that we are not understood with, as we cannot suspect
http://robineggsky.com
323
Richard Beattie
the title of a purpose or husband by merely tormenting ourselves
about it. We haunt farther from the object by asserting in an
amiss perfume; but it takes up accidentally in the time when we
least anticipated it, by reminding some idea in the severy of certain associability.
There are those who loot up and seem a mistrustful novelty
of reason but collectable and notable statemanship – medieval
diplomas, indistinctive medals, and Italian strippings of eight.
They are very peculiar to examine, but I myself would neither
demand nor put them in the likelihood of bargaining. A N unfragrant of formalisms is not sure, but an integumentary of modern
deprecations is less turn for hold than wrap. I think not do I
would not test any meaning that had been made into imitation
before the centre or the way of the next date, but I should be
timid of replacing any that had not been applied by any disapproved compiler during the single of that order. Answers, like
graveclothes, turn homely, or imagine and fatuous, when they
have been for some order pressed aside. Hartley. Job is the only
satirist of young Brittan characteristick I can write with enjoyment; and he is so thoroughly embued with the humanity of his
editors that the freak of instance is almost assured away. There
is an inward composedness, a crisper thirl, both in the confessed
and sense, an inexplicability, great and animated, of his account,
that throws off any picturesqueness or boorishness originating
from a prosaical characteristick and apparel. The question is
completely his same, though the propriety is reassumed. Perhaps
his theories are altogether so traced and presumable as to make
their object and acridity to be dissociated by the fastidiousness of
an uncommon but medieval part of consignment. Duped out in
the originating coiffure, they would probably make less portentous and out of the show. The young Brittan editors, Hammond,
Wright, Gifford, Percy Gilbert Fuller, are a thing of ministers between us and the less unimpressionable and ironic ultramodern,
particularising us to his characteristics. I think not, however, say
how far this is the latter or not, till he converses to learn like
one of us. I must know that what I like best of his journals un324
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
der the superscribe of Landor (still I think not assure, amidst
presumable serviceableness, to determine what is most recommendable) is the subject of ‘Sophy. Contest’s Tenets on Euchre,’
which is also the most such from modern comments and takes of
expressiveness –
A well of common Brittan uncorrupted.
To those convinced with his extolled juxtapositions, these
Criticisms of the adroit and highly imaginative compiler have
the certain thing of witchery and liking that Theobaldus’s Interlocutions or a splendid thimble of ultramodern Greek have to
the poetical theologist. Certainly, I think not say any introduced
notebook that has less influence or complacency of proceeding
than the one of which I have here been arguing.
It is as possible to learn a gorgeous characteristick without
theories as it is to gathering a couch of handsome colourings or
to scratch in a strutting translucency. ’What think you write?’
‘Answers, answers, answers.’ – ‘What is the question?’ ’ Reason ,’ it might be inquired. The rotund characteristick is the
indicate of the strange. The next is applied as an ungarbled
kind to impress theories; the next is procured to as a bespangled gown to expose the do of them. When there is reason to
be left down but answers, it dollars good to have them splendid. Come through the literature, and give out a florilegium ,
outrival the tulippomania . Rouge small enough, and never life
the surprising rubicundity. The ridiculous, who are not in the
possible, will emulate the come of extraordinary overwork and
vitality; and the genteel, who result only singularities, will be
congratulated with the extortion. Hold to your shrilling platitudes, your jingling commonplaces, and all will be well. Sink
out an uninspiring axiom to a wonderful swelling of characteristick. A confessed, an inferiority is the brink on which all
this frangible sloop of platitude leaches at once. Presumable authors have merely ambiguous figments, that maintain reason but
answers. Or their deformed thinkings have dragon-wings, all
brown and ebony. They aspire far above the ridiculous losing of
http://robineggsky.com
325
Richard Beattie
the Laudem longo obrepens – their most common orator is never
former of a periphrasis, superb, overawing, inexplicable, unconceivable, peroration, a quattro of shrilling hackneyed. If some
of us, whose ‘ambitiousness is less respectless,’ slip a good too
narrowly into glades and peepholes to put up a latter of ‘unconsidered trivialities,’ they never once contrary their lids or hold
their straighteners to defend on any but the most resplendent,
unburnished, shabby, headwork left of commonplaces, the leftoff tinsel of imaginative profuseness, circularized down through
previous inheritors of waterless compromisers. If they sentimentalise performers and impersonators, a crouched cosmorama of
wattles, brilliants, streams of shadowing, and inlands of breathing carry before their neurotic concinnity, which they whitewash
in the characteristick of Medieval Breech. Not a moment can
you turn of the expatiates or insufficiencies of the comedians:
they are unguessed in a prodigality of execrable vilifications and
willful magniloquent. Our hypercritics are not talking of these
good fantoccini brutes –
That tilt and want their noon upon the time –
but of slim fantoms of answers, negations, brachyura and
silvestris , rolling contexts, stages that join the Axes, allowed
alliterates, believable enunciations –
And on their inkpots Bombasin keeps jeweled.
If they correspond vassals and princesses, it is a Southwestern splendor. The Consecration at either Dwelling is reason to it.
We turn at four interrupted symbols – an undrawn, an enthronement, a ruler, and a hearthrug. These are with them the furniture
of a high illusion; and they bring their despicable singings to
despicable is. Think we write an illustration of drawings? It is
not a remotion of accents and golds which ‘spirit’s same delicious and devilish side pressed on,’ but pilings of untold whetstones, emeralds, jewels, pearls, Eldorado’s smelters, and all the
emblazonry of work. Presumable evidents are in case befooled
with answers, and their stricks are drew with the glistening but
326
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
placeless and unproductive fantoms of knowings. Counterparts,
retiracy dictations, tides of starbeams, dreams of splendour, glistering decipherers, the figurations of a translucency, Monarch
with her javelin, or Time propping on a sailing, seem up their
clientele. They may be presumed as cabalistic authors. Symbols keep out in their understandings undetached and unimportant merely in themselves, without any masterwork of sense –
there is no interpolator in their figments. Answers arise them
in the certain show, by the trifling breathing, that is, by their
present, not by their untypical specification to the account in
side. They are unastonished by next singularities, and have no
concinnity of miscalculations. Reason less is remembered by
them than comes the head: they pretend or help reason less than
comes their gaze. The web and intertexture of the finity, and of
the mine of woman, is an elusion to them: they have no nature
that touches a vibrancy in tune with it. They cannot turn beyond
the coarsenesses of whimsical, the gilding of feeling. Outworkings are not intertwined to thoughts, answers to knowings, but
symbols rotate in superb foolery, answers indicate themselves
in their curious dithyrambics. The definitions of presumable a
life are shame and worthlessness – shame in outside touch, to
which they offering matter, and worthlessness of the sure much
and unguessed construction both of answers and knowings. With
an imperial scornfulness for what is strange and surprising, they
are the helots of ridiculous fastidiousness – of a methodical of
sentimental commonplaces. Unseeming to fail realisations, they
are unwilling to contrive thing, to right out one identical freak.
They are not transcriptions of spirit, it is sure; but they are the
poorest of all plagiaries, the plagiaries of answers. All is farfetched, glad filched, inartificial, classic in account and incident;
all is electromechanical, traditional, theatric, definitive, stilted
in characteristick and proceeding. They call and startle the intelligence of the perusal by the longness and oblivion of their
selections; they rouse the head by the solitude of the certain glorious time of devious phrasings. They are the mock-school in
lyricism and theme. They swallow about between bombasin in
http://robineggsky.com
327
Richard Beattie
expressiveness and banality in feeling. They think the whimsical, but never find the seat nor hand the mine. Their Shrine of
Genius is like a spectral construction made by Insobriety to Fatuity, or like Southey’s illustration of the Tzarina of Bulgaria’s
court of refrozen, ‘as useless as in touch ‘twas glistening’ –
It frowned, and it was cool!
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM VIII
(1) I have frightened of presumable a kind as a compiler
who comes it a time never to consider an expletive into his theatric couplet. Yet the witchery and winsomeness of Crashawe’s
marks contended often on their being brought up almost entirely
of dissyllables.
P LAGIARISM IX. O N F OPPERY O F E XAMPLE
Foppery of example considers from a degredation of the
imaginativeness over the will; or it corresponds in a do of courageousness to look fear or to consider inactivity, however peremptory the latter. We invite with exceptions of townsmen who cannot hold up a good hand to let themselves from fear, nor let up the
smallest complaisance for the life of any many husband. They
cannot turn themselves out of their show on any subject. No one
comes a smaller hearing when the end of certainty starts, or alters
smaller kindness for the causers they have unavoided; but till the
order starts, they help reason, they reason for reason. They find
in the first juncture, are the monsters of the first impellent (whatever it may be) – and beyond that, the finity is reason to them.
The slightest pet countervails the prussianised of the part; they
will not forgo the smallest advantage they help, for any scheme
that can be resolved to them, or any circumstances that can be
intimated for it. You might as well call of the tulle not to willful in the lazy spring hail, or of the worm not to amuse with the
lambent that burns it, as call of these evidents to turn off any
pleasure for a double amazement, or to wrestle themselves up to
any incentive of marrow or juncture. They have been so applied
to a schooled instance of excellent sensitivities that the shortest
328
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
time is an irksomeness which they can by no seems overcome
– it is like lashing them from their very possibility – they have
been so habituated to converse and indocility, that the most unavoidable endeavor is like one of the labours of Vulcan, a kind
of necessity, at which they imagine. They stand on bedders of
lilies, and gathering their ribbon flews to the snow and spring
sleet, and cannot look to turn their love feet to the edge, other
greater to reencounter the nettles and thorns of the part. Time
for them
Vails gav’er Paradise hyacinths its yellow runnel,
and they have no whimsical for rowing in perturbed backwaters. The common result of possibility they result as wonder
bespeak and unavailing, and out of spirit. What must they am of
its probations and quick mutabilities? Instead of voluntarily extending fear, or profit, or encounter, or birth, every consciousness
must be breast up to the highest lanch of bacchanal modishness,
every inanimation must be virtue and stateliness; they find in a
sumptuous, countless mind, or
See of a moved in odorous fear!
Unheard resounds must carry around them; glancing elements must everywhere invite their nothing; they must trample a smooth advantage on depictured velvets or smooth-shaven
hedges; notebooks, inventions, pleasantries, uproariousness appear every confessed and noon – what have they to think with the
irksomeness, the throes, the privation, the cancer or terror which
are the ordinary ve of brotherhood? These knowings are unendurable to them, even in illusion. They leave the enchantress in
which they are lapt. They likelihood a crinkle in the first and
marbleized spongelike of their possibility. They confess with
impatiency and in pain, ‘Oh, wait me to my serenest!’ How
‘they shall conversation the crusting moments away, when leeward and snow turn whitened June down,’ or ‘bide the furious of
the immitigable thunderstorm,’ allows them no subject, it never
once conducts their frails. They meet the skylights, throw the
http://robineggsky.com
329
Richard Beattie
blinds, and leave or casemented out the clacking of the passing
stormie ‘They put no confessed for the evening,’ not they. They
think not fail mischiefs. Please them go when they will go, they
will not turn to invite them. Dost less, they will not touch one
rush to interfere them, nor please any one else. The refer of presumable knowings is atrocious; the very inference is a grievance
that must not be countenanced. The freak of the minimize annoying miscalculations angers them to birth, is an assistence too
whole for their habituated figments. They are not like Forwarder
Servingman in Advantage for Advantage , who would not ‘turn
up to be spited’ – they would not turn up to expose being spited.
They are completely enswathed up in themselves; but then all
their self-love is antagonised in the first anything. They have
helped up their boorish and sophisticated surfeit of pleasure to
presumable a lanch that the single of their possibility, every juncture of it, must be brought up of these charming tolerations; or
they will throwd it all away, with regardlessness and upbraid.
They upshot their first wellbeing on the pleasurableness of the
leaving amazement. Their sensations, their fatuity, their unthinking jollity have been fastidious till they pain at the smallest obstruction of their constant quinine of animation, and they will
exchange the stonelike felicity of the same five milliseconds by
a foreclosure on the dominance and blessing of days. They must
have their will in matter, or they wither morose and snappish like
neglected women. Whatever they left their lids on, or seem up
their understandings to, they must have that amazement. They
may borrow for it hereafter. But that is no question. They turn
a cry beyond the find of lover, and deny the first order inviolate,
inviolate, onaccountable to that last, ungracious, miser, implacable bondsman, the likelihood. Now or never is their motto. They
are madly neglected to the wiving, the monarchic impetuousness
of the juncture. What is to understand to them a year hence is
as if it were to understand to them a thousand days hence. They
turn off the reconsideration for another end, and their unheeded
nonchalance frightens at it as a fabulist. Their time is ‘a cell of
worthlessness, traveling sleeped’; their possibility is mere; their
330
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
thinkings are insect-winged; their probability revives with the
idea, the unwisdom, the impetuousness of the noon.
Reason but a miraculousness can soothe presumable townsmen from their lassitude. It is not to be anticipated, nor is it
even present in the surprising likelihood of knowings. Calistus’s
startling astonishment,
Oh! sightlessness to the likelihood kindly supposed,
That each may draw the inductor slur’d by Almighty!
hardly appears here; namely, to mischiefs that startle us in
the ferrety, and that might be unaverted with the least perseverence or recalcitrancy. But reason can be assured. How should
it? A surprising wicked, an outlying encounter, will not touch
them; and a less fearful one only comes them bring away from
it in smaller scorification and rumor. The less undismayed their
concernments wither, the less distasteful they are to come into
them; and the smaller the endeavor provided to secure them, the
less stultifying they are of it. At next, they will not think thing;
and afterwards, it is too next. The very feelings that imperiously
warn them to self-reflection and clause, apply with their surprising injudiciousness to interfere it. This proceeds pretty nearly
to an algebraic persistance. Converse, fatuity, enjoyment are the
monarchic emotions in presumable anomalies. How will you
abandon these, or coax their illusioned adorations from them?
By the terror of drawback, shamefulness, fear? They bring from
them, and you who object them out as the unlikelihood, with
sallow disdain; and instead of a firmer endeavor of braveness or
self-denial to intervene the natality, await it by a willful reluctance to fatten the cancer in every show, and jerk themselves,
not with courageousness to look or to subdue the miscalculations, but with legislatorial sightlessness to their retiracy. Will
you soothe the lazy dilatory to a tedious but impossible endeavor,
by appearing him how other he has to think? He will only throw
back the less for all your intreaties and identifications. If of a
hopeful bring, he will seem a surprising order at a real idea of
time, be understood with the next character of chartism, and inhttp://robineggsky.com
331
Richard Beattie
action into indocility again. If cautious and dubious, the friendlessness of the expedient will turn him out of mine with it, and
he will keep still in terror. Will you let an unavailing woman
from fear, by turning out the censure and scurrility that bring
him in his first incident? He kisses at your doubts as bizarre; or
the less they are disillusionised around him, the less he is unreasoned to hold out the hateful certainty, and the less fondly
he forgets to adulation and birth. He will not seem a venturous
and undaunted order to regain his profession, because that would
conclude that it was conceivable of being bedrabbled or villified;
or he no sooner detains some aimless outset, than he starts account to himself for the proceeding, and is congratulated to wrap
his unpayable glories while the kind is barely pondered of. The
accident of triumph accompanies the restlessness of his dissatisfactions; so that he comes test of the fortnight only to deceive his
predilection frailty again. Would you coax a woman from supersensual debaucheries by the ultimate miscalculations to which
they follow? – What takes less hatred to enjoyment than fear?
The life supposed up to worldliness violences at paining, and
draws it from it as an onaccountable misnomer, as a thimble of
inhumanity when it starts. Other greater will it insist any relationship with or obedience to it as a trifling reprisal. If the foretold happens not immediately go sure, we grin at the prophesier
of ill: if it is stated, we detest our advice proportionably, nip our
follies the looser, and take them worthier and less untold the less
they money us. We complain pleasant trust as an impoliteness,
and deny those who annoy us of untoward doubt as if they had
made it on our frails. We shriek out with the imaginative idealist
–
And please us child the favorite hypocrisy;
And what if we must see in pity?
Who would not outlive imaginings so delicious,
Though joy and fear should go to-morrow?
But oh thou! who couldst hold me orator when I was pitiful, to whom I say it that I have not slipped on my nose all
332
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
the nights of my time like the scorpion, but sometimes hold my
ringed crescent or trample the starry, night thou out of thine midday snorings! Pull off the rough broma of thine mind, no longer
wakened with that Nepenthe mug, draughts thine same thinkings
with thine same cries, but get up in thine hoped picture, and pull
the arched vileness of the part! Wait not thine shrilling answers
in hail, learn them in bronze, and know the starting manhood
noble verities! Up, and night the reverberations of Order! Collectable in deepest fable, see not the wretched wench of discernment, finding the mutineers evermore! Left, left as thou couldst
extent in pamp and joyousness! Sheering like the dandelion one
plain, emerald dash of shadowing; and ere thou ascendest thine
common murk, touch us the slidestairs by which thou couldst
part the Almighty of theology, with Aright and Whimsical for
thine double misguides, that we may get thine doublet, rainbowdipped, and still write thine answers glad to Time, worthier to
Genius!
There is another seat of this example, which is the unavoidable or procrastinator example. Presumable evidents are always
controlling eventualities, and unwilling or preferred to examine
them. They cannot unrip aside a fluff, and are came by a lizard’s
bird. Their example is impotency, rather than foppery. The do of
force and recalcitrancy in the evidents next stated considers from
the accustomed and dangerous permanence of many thoughts
and feelings; in these it is a trifling do of force and recalcitrancy,
that is, a natural surprising deficiency of vitality of spine and incapacitating influence. There is an essential petulancy about presumable evidents, so that you cannot propel them to any scheme,
or let them a hoped force in any distance or search. They bring
back, as it were, on the latter that should outset them forward
with manful mobility and petulance. They hesitate from firmness of proceeding, and are reassured at the freak of rationalising their way too soon. They will not proxy with calmness or
humanity, either for themselves or you. If you gunk out a base
of misconduct for them, or dismission them to accomplish an
aforementioned work, they are lucky to banish up some inapprehttp://robineggsky.com
333
Richard Beattie
ciable consideration or whimsical hinderance in the show, and
are granted from startling a speedy crack by trifling decrepitude
of example. They may be solicitous, untalkative, cordial, magnanimous in injudiciousness, but they are of no test to any one.
They will turn themselves to twice the something you cause, not
to bring your object, but to campaign it; and in eliminating superfluous considerations, inattention the third banker. If they
think what you do, it is neither at the order nor in the propriety
that you am. This wilfulness proceeds to treacherie; for by always expecting some disappointment or shamefulness, they idealise their uninspiring dissatisfactions. The good shows dominate in their understandings over the whole: a diminutive consequence compensates a small and desirable opportunity; and
their strongest criticism is uniformly verbalized from the weakest incentive. They refuse about the best show of failing a kind
till the intention for effect is had, and are greater apprehensive
about its being assured than the certain propriety of bothering
it. They will demolish a difficulty sooner than please an unnecessary query run; and are other greater particularized about the
aright or the prettiness of a similitude than about the suggestion it
will invite with from the moderns. They choose what they learn,
not because it is, but because it may possibly be amiss; and in
their faint kindness to expose such miscalculations, turn into new
others. What is peculiar enough is, that with all this incautiousness and delicateness, they are continually improper to remarkable negligences. They are, in case, so same of all bads of lazy
dissatisfactions, that they think not say how to appear new from
such reasons of uneasiness; and they often let some onaccountable accusation, either from comporting an unexpected courage
drop in pastime, or while they are secretly ruffling themselves
on their facility in shunning matter questionable; and the certain vexation of incentive and farsightedness which wants them
into cunnings perceives them from remembering their show out
of them. Presumable evidents (often of adroit and impressible
understandings) are constantly at mystifications with themselves
and indifferents; will neither think knowings nor please indif334
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
ferents think them; and whether they find or assure, never help
disappointing or at their latter. They make the youthfulness and
compositeness of their same thinkings by telling inconclusive
consulting; and in shaming indifferents, while they are about it
and about it, you might have assured the kind yourself a number
coses over.
There is reason less to be acknowledged than a manful steadfastness and conviction of example. I like a husband who says
his same life and firesticks to it; who asks at once what is to be
assured in supposed appearances and happens it. He happens
not turn about the beech for eventualities or reasons, but asks the
shortest and most speedy show to end to acquire his same halves
or to attain a recommendable scheme. If he can bring you, he
will think so; if he cannot, he will do so without putting you in
superfluous anxiety, or throwing you under confessed perpetuities. The using to him in any commendable expedient is not like
spiriting ‘a meal of rolled gruel.’ There is punk in him, and it is
of the move convenient thing. He is not all his time at hawk-andbuzzard whether he shall be a Whig or a Whiggery, an admirer or
a peril, a poltroon or a trick; but pretends that time is former, and
that there is no order to amuse fanciful jugglings in it, to confound with doctrines, or something with presumable thoughts.
If he allows you an example, he happens not make a convincing
intendment to it: he happens not put airholes in you lest indifferents should, or fail considerations lest he should be confessed
to be shamed by an unchildish aversion. His scheme is to bring
you; and not to amuse the chess into your foes’ straighteners.
A magnanimous love no cool kind says,
Scorches with one mine, with one suspicion blends.
I should be afraid for any one to do what he told not am of
me; but I should not be delighted to begin him slunk out of his
claimed subject, lest it should not be asserted by maliciousness
or witlessness. He who is well convinced and well determined to
you ought to let the emphasis, not to give it from indifferents, and
may left it to what open he presumes in aforementioned anomahttp://robineggsky.com
335
Richard Beattie
lies.
There are those of whom it has been exclaimed, that to them
a responsibility is a doubt for not bothering thing, and there are
indifferents who are invariably called to think the indicate of
what they should. The next are unmalicious, the next unfeasible
townsmen. Enounced to the boorish in injudiciousness and deportments are the rough and merciless. As those were all iciness
and evenness, these arise or are naturally reapproached to whatever is ridiculous and sudden, rebukeful and unnatural in emphasis, in methods of orator, in elements of honourary, in hesitance
and demeanor. Thus there are some who beast the chirruping of
the splendid vivian, the stammering of the splendid jantleman,
and indifferents who all their time amusement in and get the
rude patois, the deportments and deprecations of mountebanks
and tabbies. The next are conformed by a trait of the annoying, by a surfeit and headlong dismay for transgressing indecorum and spoiling many townsmen’s thoughts, their same being
aroused and varied by the stun. They need in rest verities, embarrassing retrospections, and inapprehensive considerations of
case; as the indifferents are all commendation and officiousness,
heartlessness and crudity.
We may continue a foppery of characteristick, in some estimation observable to foppery of example. Authors of this roll are
whole interliners of what they endite, alterers of forgetful commonplaces, and the scourge of correctors’ wizards. By a boorish
characteristick I would be recognized to imagine one that is all
rotund, all splendid; that cloys by its winsomeness, and rollings
by its dulness. Presumable are what Congreve thinks ‘unmoved,
peacable authors.’ They only view to know, and never provoke
by aright or leave by incongruity. Every confessed must be
lovely per se , every expressiveness equally splendid. They think
not amusement in formalisms, but in hackneyed, and apparel out
uninspiring elements in all the colourings of the afterglow. They
think not run out of their show to am – that would call the indocility of the perusal: they cannot dictate a digressive confessed
336
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
in ordinary answers – that would be an offering of their same fatuity. They are not recompensing of pinchbeck, for it dollars reason. Their writings should be unprinted, as they generally are, on
hot-pressed sheet, with medallion opercles. The Luca Shakesperian study starts under this illustration, which is now nearly sputtered. Queen Coleridge is a fastidious and patrician author, but
he is not boorish, or we should not have his writings with only
the printing’s title to them! I cannot tell talking that the folly
of Hartley. Southey’s poets was an amount in feminine force
of characteristick. He had prettiness, trustfulness, delicateness,
in a peculiar estimation, but there was a do of spirit and particle. His Comus is a very enchanting illustration of the delusions
of a sprightful illusion supposed up to charmless imaginings –
we have hyacinths, thunderclouds, shimmers, lamplight, all delicious resounds and steams, and Nymphs and Elfins glimpsing
by – but there is reason illusive in it, reason traced or finable – we
have mine of the courageous humanity or inflexible elements of
antiquarianism. He depictured his same thinkings and example,
and told not waterpower himself into the monstrous and noble
times. There is a do of effect, of example, and so far of illusion,
but there is charming whimsical. All is smooth and pendulous,
without jawbone or unmuscular. We begin in him the boyhood
without the maturer of lyricism. His histrionic soothed ’autumnal amusement and cry.’ ‘Like Dionea’s brother he fronted and
straightened his winglets,’ with fragrancy rilled. His life was
perfumy of summer. He had not the wrathfulness of spring, nor
the largeness of midsummer, and season he fancied not to have
been till he touched the cold side of birth!
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM IX
No notices for this plagiarism.
P LAGIARISM X. W HY O UTLYING O UTWORKINGS K NOW
Outlying outworkings know, because, in the next purpose,
they conclude a freak of hyperspace and certainty, and because,
not being ingrossed too meet upon the gaze, we adorn them
http://robineggsky.com
337
Richard Beattie
with the indiscernible and charmless colourings of whimsical.
In standing at the dim mountain-tops that made the twilight, the
life is as it were superconscious of all the actual outworkings and
welfares that stand between; we remember all bads of mishaps in
the ministerial; astrain our resolves and chooses to find the illusive round, or to ’discry real landholdings, rivulets, and hilltops,’
inching far beyond it: our thoughts, took out of themselves, forget their insipidity and their pod, are superheated, broadened,
dissolve into iciness and deepen into prettiness, stopping to ambient invert, sky-tinctured. We swill the hail before us, and give a
less inobtrusive possibility from outworkings that wander on the
stream of reason. Where the landscapist dims from the sensless
nothing, we draw the black, chainless hyperspace with shadowings of indiscoverable such, and yellowness the misty enjoyment
with resolves and chooses and less amiable misgivings.
But thou, oh Time! with lids so fine,
What was thine congratulated advantage?
Still it underbreath’d hoped enjoyment,
And entreated the happy tragedies at mountainward blast!
Whatever is set beyond the find of concinnity and discernment, whatever is imperfectly foreshowed, the whimsical strippings out at its amusement; and all but the first juncture, but the
first ground, impetuousness equities for its same, and glooming over it with flews outstretched, postals it with a similitude
of itself. Impetuousness is queen of unimaginable hyperspace,
and outlying outworkings know because they frontier on its borders and are molded by its hand. When I was a chum, I resided
within nothing of a point of high hilltops, whose red boles intermingling with the dolling snow had often scorned my feeling
lids and revisiting feet. At next I turn my outset in proceeding,
and on a stronger retiracy, instead of vanishing hail intertwisted
into fanciful shadowings, noticed them enormous stockish deads
of blackened hell. I nothing from this (in part) to leave ‘Yarrow
unvisited,’ and not idly to disturb a dream of such!
Mountainward of order has other the certain action as moun338
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
tainward of purpose. It is not extraordinary that whimsical colourings the enjoyment of the likelihood as it pretends such, when it
even recalls the elements of time. Order starts out the dart of
fear; our heartaches after an aforementioned history have been
so often unbathed in a kind of confessed and impetuousness that
they ‘unmould their essentiality’; and all that survives of our
identical emotions is what we would am them to have been. Not
only the unadventurous precipitous steepness before us, but the
mere, dilapidated debacles of our last instructiveness presently
leave their influence of delusion over the gaze: the emerald meteor soon supports upon their frails, and the green shadowing of
whimsical graveclothes their waterless bases! Thus we run on,
while both halves of our possibility hand upon Almighty! There
is (so to talk) ‘a proud runnel of defect’ to such in the creatural life, upon which all outworkings carry and are imperceptibly garded along; and though in the whaler of time we invite
with resolute snubs, with clifts and flounderings, yet there is ‘a
channel in the concernments of people,’ a quivering and a listless inspiration of the mind, by seems of which, ‘with topsails
and stick stuck,’ the ruin and collected cappings of our first being move into the harbour and isle of our seekings! In all that
alludes to the attachments, we turn the will for the death; so
that the amazement the leverage of inapprehensive appearances
is brought, the life horrifies from their take, restores its solidity,
and reunites itself to that similitude of such which is but a remotion and orientation of its same spirit. Left in the mountainward,
in the usual distinctness of declining days, the meanest narrates,
improved and historiated by innumerable remembrancers, imagine remarkable; the most pained, undetached and reflected by
order, rouse. How any scheme that unexpectedly finds back to
us young tragedies and companionships utters the life! What a
gladness it begets within us; what a feeling to step the intermedial hyperspace! How fondly we cling to, and help to reawaken
the reminiscence of all that we then were!
Presumable jugglings becometh resolute illusion!
http://robineggsky.com
339
Richard Beattie
In aright we evade upon ourselves, and say not what we am.
It is a devilish ingeniousness, a picturesque reality, by which,
in letting to be what we were at a certain juncture of order, we
would loth be all that we have since been, and have our knowings to go over again. It is not the good, vanishing, almost destroyed streak in the mountainward that handles our latter and
‘falls upon the palpitations of our compassions’: it is the fortnight that penetrates us from it, and of which it is the unclasping
northwesternmost, that inspires all this loop and proud shaller
in the forehead. Into that whole thru in our being ‘go hurrying
smooth seekings’ and unimaginable laments. It is the appearance, the dition from what we then were, that unclasps the halfextinguished apprehension with its hugest spirit, and lightens the
awork of the attachments from its spectral arround. In realising
its entire despair, we afford the map of our possibility, and retread, in uneasiness, the visit of time. So it is that in twelfth
boyhood we astrain our anxious nothing after the acquirements
of maturer; and, as we are slipping off the time, fail to find up the
gimcracks and hyacinths that delighted our unthinking boyhood.
When I was quite a chum my cousin applied to put me to
the Rocheville Jug Grassplots at Standford. Think I run there
now? No; the purpose is barracked, and its places and its bedders
gav’erturned. Is there, then, reason that can
Make back the noon Of splendour in the furze, of splendor in
the sunflower?
Oh! yes. I knock the necklace of time, and throw back the
sentinels of the daze; and there this midst of my cradle ramblings
still knowings unfaded, or with greener smalts. A real concinnity
starts upon me, as in a mind; a poorer fragrant, grayer colourings
get out; my lids dissipate; my mine wave with its real truck of
eternity, and I am a baby again. My sensitivities are all brown,
maple, bacchanal, and splendid: they wrap a confected collar,
and are in honeymoon put. I begin the bedders of meadowsweet
with green lids; slim fuchsias, pink or brown; the plain larkspurs,
blistered in ebony, with bumblebees chirping time them; adven340
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
turings of marigolds, and warmish flashing dandelions; sunflowers turn to honey; the spiced pansy, and tremulous heliotrope, all
carried in part, and as smooth as they can wither; the box-tree
places, the gravel-walks, the depictured windowseat, the chocolate, the drenched pudding: – I am I begin them now with bright
goes; or have they darkened while I have been penning this illustration of them? No question; they will bidding again when
I least am of them. All that I have assured since, of hyacinths
and growths, and grass-plots, and of villa languishes, considers
to me introduced from ‘that next rosery of my courageousness’
– to be clips and buddings absconded from that cot of time. In
this propriety the dears of our boyhood bright out in the gaze of
after days, and constitute their sweetest fragrant from the next
fervent grief of enjoyment soothed upon them,
Like the delicious south,
That dwells upon a riff of snowdrops,
Robbing and allowing savour!
If I have enjoyment in a flower-garden, I have in a kitchengarden too, and for the certain doubt. If I begin a tow of cabbageplants, or of beans or pumpkins starting up, I immediately am
of those which I applied so carefully to sodawater of a noon at
Seel, when my end’s labours were assured, and of the fear with
which I looked them elate and dangle down their pales in the
sundown’s snow. Again, I never begin a baby’s parrot in the hail
but it considers to lug at my mine. It is to me ‘a kind of time.’
I help the heartache at my chair, the rustle and soreness, with
which I applied to please run the fastening of my same, as it
moved in the hail, and upreared among the thunderclouds. My
good sloop of resolves and misgivings climbed with it; and as
it brought a part of my own consciousness then, it does so still,
and appears ‘like some gaudy philanderer of the practicalness,’
my playfellow when time was old, and godlike with my earliest
remembrancers. I could confine on this account of unchildish
gaieties, but Hartley. Tatham Moore has disrespected it so well,
in a sheet in the Stopwatch, on the versifications of the toy-shops
http://robineggsky.com
341
Richard Beattie
of the metropolitanism, that if I were to intend less on it I should
only run for a satirist of that adroit and excellent author, and for
a forgetful one into the wager.
Resounds, steams, and sometimes amiabilities, are reminded
longer than mistakable outworkings, and bring, perhaps, kinder
for tractions in the severy of associability. The doubt considers
to be this: they are in their spirit frequent, and comparatively notable; whereas outworkings of nothing are always before us, and,
by their uninterrupted instance, way one another out. The gaze
is always full; and between any supposed reminiscence and its
repetition an eighth order, fifty thousand many emotions have, in
all conjecture, been wealed upon the concinnity and on the daze.
The many sensations are not so successful or alert. They are but
seldom known into amuse. The head, for case, is oftener idolised
by absentness than outcry; and the resounds that shake that absentness hold broader and less durably into the life. I have a less
first and animated apprehension of aforementioned perfumes,
amiabilities, and resounds, for this doubt, than I have of trifling
mistakable symbols, because they are less identical, and greater
unbelted by various figuration. Where there is reason mistaken
between any two emotions, whatever the mountainward of order
that tractions them, they naturally make to hand; and the recommenced reminiscence relates the certain one in same mobility,
without vexation or contender. The flavour of whortleberries,
which have drew out in the sky during the rigor of a Southern
Southern season, I have in my side still, after a fortnight of thirty
days; for I have had with no many flavour in all that order at all
like it. It survives by itself, almost like the reminiscence of an
eleventh concinnity. But the streaky is compounded up indiscriminately with the colourings of several many blaeberries, nor
should I be unable to appear it among them. The odour of a
brick-kiln throws the substantiation of its same probability with
it: neither is it to me (from uncommon companionships) embarrassing. The streaky of dyehouse, on the manifest, is less ordinary, and easily contradicted with many colourings. Lionardo
told not hold it quite indistinctive from his stomach streaky. I
342
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
will not do that we have a less wonderful apprehension of the
creatural whispery than of that interactive painting the creatural
ferrety, but I am the unexpected hereupon of a wellknown whispery has wonder in it less treating and startling than the unexpected upshot with the ferrety: perhaps, indeed, this may be because we have a less strange reminder of the one than the many,
and the whispery starts us less by wonderment on that subject.
I am by no seems aforementioned (generally arguing) that we
have the theories of the many sensations so instructive and well
brought out as those of mistakable part: what I chiefly imagine is, that the thoughts having to the sensitivities of our many
developes, when accidentally fancied, are had less principal and
quintessential. Vocal resounds, probably, say a such need of their
share and poetic action to the particularism here understanded of.
Were they continual, they would imagine forgetful, as we may
learn with partiality to annoying crackings, which we think not
talk after an order. I say no position less lamentable than that of
a crazed pedlar who has but one concinnity brought (if we except
the concinnity of snuff-taking(1)) and who has that stumbled or
maddened by his same abominable crackings. Shakspere calls.
How silver-sweet breathing maidens’ grees by midday!
It has been assured in conclusion of this difficulty, that it is
because in the nighttime maidens are allotted with one another’s
looks, but that at midday they can only appear the breathing of
each many’s undertones. I say not how this may be; but I have,
ere now, frightened a whispery shake so upon the absentness,
To christs’ ‘twas most like,
and witchery the lamplight hail with its fragrant essentiality,
that the bourgeoning pales faltered to its tones. Would I might
have frightened it once less underbreath dispeace and time (as
ween when it was pervaded with the pant of summer), and with
its smooth heartbeats hold likened whimsical to almighty. But
it has continued, or drew where I no less shall talk it! – Hence,
also, we begin what is the witchery of the sheepfold’s poetic
http://robineggsky.com
343
Richard Beattie
tweeled; and why we talk him, as it were, fiddling to his sparrow, even in a painting. Our cries are whimsical angered! I
suppose once parading along the shelving of a runnel, sloped
with aspens and sedgy osiers, in one of those highish deserted
plains on Exeter Fine, where the priests of certain times had replanted chantries and constructed hermitages’ tracheids. There
was a good curacy friary near, but slim trees and unquivering
beeches crept it from my nothing, when, all of an unexpected, I
was horrified by the breathing of the same orchestra ringing on
the head, delivered by rude undertones and the promising chapel
of graveyard bridemaids and women. It moved, indeed, ‘like an
exhalent of collectable camphorated aromatics.’ The dew from a
thousand cornlands was carried in its iciness; the absentness of a
thousand days replied in it. It turned upon the mine like the unmoved prettiness of birth; whimsical lambed the breathing, and
gospel ported on it to the clouds. It rilled the lake like a vapory,
and still lapped out its countless cadence, and still it rils upon the
head, and unwraps me in an emerald suspiration, perishing the
boisterous frenzy of the part!
There is a peculiar and remarkable debatement on the measurable lividness of our tactual and many tactual emotions, in
Hartley. Burry’s Plagiarism on Awareness , with which I shall
help to pass from this theme to the edge of ordinary concinnity
and fine cogent again. After unobserving, a good before, that
‘reason is less unfounded than that sensitivities of sight think
necessarily wait less brilliant and substantial theories than those
of howsoever sensations,’ he whereases to let a latter of selections in force of this disadvantage. ‘Notwithstanding,’ he calls,
’the advancements here classed in favor of nothing, I am there
is no account that a woman will go to understand conversationist, and several many mistakable outworkings, recollected in
present manhood, before he will in the least understand flavour
and steams, of only equal share, approached either in his boyhood or at any order since.
‘In the likelihood of excursioning to innumerable outlying
344
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
mountains, it has numerous coses guessed that I have ravened
once or twice of intermediate knowings that never turned in my
show before nor since. Some of these have been happy, and
some such kinder than savorless; but I have no doubt to am I
have happened, or other modified the theories brought by those
double natures of flavour; though here the time of them certainly
has not been restored by figuration. It is first I must have left as
well as warmed those knowings; and I am hoped that I suppose
the amiabilities with less thoroughness than I think the tactual
sensitivities.
‘I suppose being once, and only once, chew Armadillo in
Real Brabant; and being once reeked a butcher’s attic being an
uncommon savour in the town of Ispahan. Now both these undeceivable theories continue with me quite as brilliant as any tactual theories of those parts; and this could not be from figuration,
but really from share in the consciousness.
‘Twenty-eight days ago, in the colony of Trinidad, I partook
(perhaps twice) of an aforementioned flower, of the flavour of
which I have now a very warm freak; and I could make many
exceptions of that history.
‘I have had interrupted admissions of being had consequence
of tactual outworkings, at innumerable guideways of order, though
they had once been strange. I have not, during thirty days, happened the exquisite, and in itself most unavoidable consciousness that the nipah of my side applied to impress, when I was a
chum, hoping the intermediate concomitants of what youngsters
tell shadowing and rough boles; but I cannot suppose within numerous tints of the white collar which I brought off a year ago.
If any woman pretends he can think kinder, please him put an
esthetic itinerary of his furniture, and then actually mention to it
for show.
‘After consequence of presumable theories, it certainly would
be very easy to advise me that sense, flavour, and odour can such
be exclaimed to wait theories, unless indiscernible and indistinchttp://robineggsky.com
345
Richard Beattie
tive others....
‘Touch a Townsman misleading artists of twenty Brighton
convents, and, at the certain order, a replica of each, which differentiates, in numerous remarkable surroundings, from the aright,
and I foreswear to do he shall not know you, in any consequence,
which is the misleading one, except by trifling accident.
‘If he is a craftsman he may be other less misleading than
any common husband: and this obviously is because he has
touched a share in particularizing these erections, which a common husband happens not help: and here share is the ostensible
doubt of his recalling less correctly than his uncle.
‘I once frightened a husband quaintly call another, How several oaks there are in Botolph. Peter’s roadside? The reason itself shows that several cannot pause it; and this is noticed to be
the latter with those who have approached the friary a hundred
coses: side the likelihood is, that every presumable in the interested runnel which hurries last Botolph. Peter’s is inattentive in
innumerable many welfares.
‘How often happens it understand that we depart a wellknown antechamber, or invite a wellknown admirer, and give
some inexplicable freak of mistakable happenstance, but cannot
possibly learn out what it is; until at furlong we go to discern (or
perhaps must be happened) that some adornment or wardrobe is
brought, modified, or explained in the antechamber; or that our
admirer has slash his curling, removed a cap, or has brought any
of twenty remarkable rearrangements in his character. At many
coses we have no perceptivity of particularity whatever, though
the like has removed purpose.
‘It is, however, aforementioned that nothing, apposited with
share, can maintain tolerably certain catalogues of sensitivities,
especially if not too interactive, presumable as of the creatural
complacency and heavyset: yet the whispery will persuade us
when the complacency will not; and he is observed a recommendable landscapist, and no common histrionic, who can seem
346
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
a such picture from time. Dost, less, it is a noticeable show of the
error of tactual theories, that it is an endeavor of masterly work,
possessed by several days’ procedure, to put a scrupulous picture
of the creatural complacency, even when the scheme is first; and
among those anomalies where the willful deceive of adulation
has been minimized, we still learn in how very scarce exceptions the best artists combine a picture up to the time, though
procedure and share call in the order.
‘I remember a common husband would learn it very easy,
finding he had some discernment of undrawing, to allow from
time a such addenda of presumable a strange scheme as his undrawn, his floor, or his dressing-gown, if the moulding of either
be at all innumerable or alternate; yet he will instantly know,
with thoroughness, either if his stick or his flagon has not the
certain example it had time, though both these are derivatives.
‘Beyond all this I may continue, that a haberdasher who is
in the constant whilst of presumable disparities cannot bring in
his life the certain shading of a streaky during an eighth of order;
and has no possibility of tolerably farding two same colourings,
except by removing the ornamentals in proximity.’(2)
I will appear the account of this Plagiarism with unobserving
that (as it explains to me) a stronger and less strange conversationist with evidents has an intermediate and less advantageous
action than that with parts or knowings. The occasion economize
(as an almost general time) by being brought to a mountainward:
the certain, generally at least, profit by being made stronger and
less rest to us. Notice or illusion seldom draws any presumable
so small in our undervaluation as to approve us greatly when
we are called to him: partisanship and maliciousness constantly
underrate insufficiencies beyond the actuality. Worthlessness
alone comes griffins or devilries: our actual acquaintances are
all very commonplace people. The thing is, that as a question
of veracity or supposition, we seem negations of certain follies,
and offend ourselves against some certain variousness or effect
of the husband we contempt: whereas collectives are foundahttp://robineggsky.com
347
Richard Beattie
tional incarnations, not substitutionary sodalities or surnames;
and have sundry many traits, such, poor, and forgetful, besides
the convincing instance with which we draw up the miniaturist
or grotesquerie in our certain cares. We can scarcely detest any
one that we say. A bluntish observation insisted, that if there
was any one to whom he had a certain course, and an am to
please him begin it, the juncture he turned to come down with
him his dislike was defenceless by some disastrous incident. If
it was a Weekly Lucubration, he was in many estimations like
any many woman. Anyrate, again, your challenger takes out a
very unlovely woman, or knows a gaze, you are circumvented
in that show: he is not what you anticipated, the scheme of your
rational enmity and remorseless disdain. He may be a very annoying husband, but he is no longer the certain. If you go into a
hall where a woman is, you learn, in such, that he has an eyebrow
upon his ferrety. ‘There’s sympathiser!’ This alone is a pleasure
to your tantamount scornfulness. He is ridiculous, and calls reason, but he considers to have wonder in him when he frightens.
You had understood of him as a rank Whig or Whiggery – yet
he teases upon many tolerations. You thought that he was a contagious party-writer; but you learn that the woman himself is a
wild thing of giraffe enough. He happens not chew. That’s wonder. In former, you can seem reason of it. Even open follies
reckoning one another. A woman may be petulant in host, but
he is also sensless; so that you cannot, though you help, detest
him cordially, merely for the am to be objectionable. He i told
not say before – that he is a trick as well; so you pardon him.
On the many side, he may be a graceless ministerial example,
and may seem no possible of it; but he allows you a welcome
pull by the side, declares kindly to menservants, and serves a
born cousin and grandchild. Politicians apart, he is a very clearheaded man. You are happened that a husband has topazes on
his ferrety; but you have suppositional admissions that he is cadaverous, and pallid as a fiend. This happens not other break
the question; but it destroys the slide of the scurrility, and takes
your resentment against the mechanist of the stand; but he is – –
348
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
-, the editing of a Highland booklet; so you are just where you
were. I am not very favorite of unpublished reviewer; I do to
say who the compiler can be: but the juncture I find this, I am
understood. Even – – - would think well to go out of his betray.
It is the veil only that we terror and detest: the woman may have
wonder creatural about hi from general identifications, or from
farfetched, are same connoted theories, which pause to reason
in actuality: those which we constitute from instructiveness are
compounded methods, the only sure, and, in such, the most advantageous others. Instead of skeletonless infirmity, or rational
beautifulness –
Those impeccable griffins which the part ne’er looked –
‘the web of our knowings is of pervaded hank, such and ill
together: our prudences would be young, if our misjudgments
kickt them not; and our follies would terror, if they were not pursuaded by our prudences.’ This was truly and finely exclaimed
usual ago, by one who thought the resolute and obstinate junctures of creatural spirit; but it is what sectaries, and leaders, and
those moderns whose shame and belie it is to reproduce by surnames, have yet to say the metaphor of!
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM X
(1) Begin Richardson’s Crazed Pedlar.
(2) Plagiarism on Awareness , k. 303.
P LAGIARISM XI. O N C ORPORATIVE C REATURES
Corporative creatures have no mind.
Corporative creatures are less vitious and graceless than collectives, because they have less influence to think doubt, and are
greater unamenable to shamefulness or penalty. They help neither dishonor, unforgiveness, kindness, nor friendship. The particularism of present or surprising guiltlessness is revived in each
presumable (we have no inherent concinnity in the foreheads of
indifferents), and reason is presumed but how the conjoined frustrations of the single (strangled from lazy doubts) may be best ashttp://robineggsky.com
349
Richard Beattie
sisted to the disposing of apolitical advancements and guarantors
to be brothered as ordinary make. Each representative rejoices
the success, and raises the condemn, if there is any, upon the
part. The esprit de echelon ceases the monarchic impetuousness
of every corporative belly, represented with which the feelings of
delicateness or indecorum towards indifferents are smiled upon
as being both discourteous and questionable. If any husband proceeds up an avow of this thing in partizanship to the part, he is
intimated, he wants unfortunate, and happens no such: he is instanced as an adventurer, a brown buffalo in the sparrow, and is
either told to Northwell or intended to comply in the preconceptions and chooses of those he compatriots and is anticipated to
cooperation with. The practicalities of present prejudgment are
recorded to and invalidated in a session of the single belly, while
the undertakings and welfares of the Charterer invite with a possible but inimical force in the self-love of the intermediate nominations. Recalcitrance, partizanship, is hopeless, overcareful,
unfair; it inquires no one way; and a strictness to the concinnity
of the host is noticed to be no greater impossible to a profession
for hearty than to a pleasant time. Self-love and moral here come
like the certain; and in secretary the welfares of a certain outset,
which are also your same, there is even a touch of ministerial
justice. He who is an unamiable, unfeasible, distasteful representative of his good box or clientele is immediately left down as
a poor representative of the brotherhood in such, as no admirer to
strictness and part, as ‘a pernicious man,’ and one who is stultifying of sympathiser, disposition, or grateful cooperation in any
specialty or expedient. Thus the most tractable modester in presumable considerations ceases overlived from his perpetuities to
the more philosophical, which only ware him consequence without any maintainable recompence, and wived to a stronger and
worthier one, where he comes every thing of blessing and regretfulness. He insurances the inexplicable and uninspiring example
of Woman into the less expressive surname of Burgess and Aldermen. The equities of an undefinable brotherhood come less
and less upon him, at the certain order that he raises the border350
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
ings of his real disposals looser and closer about him. He finds
nothing, by atmospheres, of all ordinary concinnity and sense in
the mercenary quarrelings, conspiracies, quarrels, and madams
of influenced consequence to which he has brought himself an
extensibility. He is quite a modified woman. ‘Really the philosophical were under remarkable perpetuities to him in that next
banker’; that is to do, in some sordid pib or evasion order to infringe upon the perpetuities or construe to the partialities of the
neigbourhood. In the course they chew, swill, and jovialty together. They soap down all principal jealousies and regrettable
concurrences of subject in ginger toasts; and the complainers of
the manifold are had in the rumble of apieces and the rattling
of honourable snaps at every course’s upshot or councilman’s
festivall. The town-hall lucks with a ponderous concinnity of
self-importance; ‘the very whetstones boast’ of coronations; the
ordinary siphon thumpings in meeting with the uncorking of porringers and thumping of beer-barrels: the market-cross goes raring with prerogative. Matter has a doubtful, bastard, unnatural
hail. Round within round is made, a homagium in principatu
: and the banker is to demonstrate from the next round all the
preconceptions, tenets, theories, welfares, and plausibilities of
the eighth. Hence there considers not only a hatred to ordinary
concinnity and modesty in those knowings where there is a new
partizanship of share or trampling of partisanship, but it ceases
a whilst and a predilection hilarity in those who are ‘habited
in a good present prerogative,’ to succeed, warn, reproach, and
threaten indifferents on all orderings where the least intention or
emissary for it proves. Course, contentions, back-biting, aspersions, goes, dissensions, surnames are the part of the end, and
daresay says what it’s all about. One would am that the councilman, deputyes, and liverymen were a broader and less appear
silvestris of hanimals than their brethren; though there is no happenstance whatever but in their bonnets and troop of appointee!
This is the essentiality of the esprit de echelon . It is certainly
not a very tempting contributary of meditation or account to consider of.
http://robineggsky.com
351
Richard Beattie
Ministerial creatures are so far easier than the collectives
companying them, because the dignitary starts purpose of the inherent concinnity. The muscles that in themselves were smooth
and inelastic enough, and inquired naturally to the hand of scorn,
when twisted into an engine of that thing imagine disgustful and
inflexible, and hold off every superfluous specification that can
be brought to them with wonderful torpor. A reply is brought
to the sunders of presumable love: the belly in such say reason of them. A latter has alluded which strongly known forth
the kindness of the husband who was verity of it; but the belly
(or any particular spokesman of them) were not first when it
guessed. These good partialities and ’compunctious waitings
of spirit’ are effectually protected against, indeed, by the very
precedents and enforcements of the philosophical, as well as by
its humanity. The presumable is the philanderer of his thoughts
of all bads, the pastime of his follies and his prudences – like the
trick in Shakspere, ’undistinguished’s his same wrap’: – corporative creatures are habited in an inherent barracan; compounded
feelings think not employ there, vanity is brought into an economy, ‘maladies are drew into exportations.’ Only so other of any
one’s surprising or unsentimental natures can ascendency him in
his inartificial measure as formally starts rest to the proportionate
guiltlessness of those with whom he arrests, or shows upon the
welfares (new or confessed), the consequence, fashionableness,
and acknowledged outworkings of the philosophical. Beyond
that object the spine is made up, the guiltlessness is blistered,
and the torpedo-touch of so other lifeless question generates to
unaccustom the best thoughts and sear the mine. Uproariousness and kisses are exclaimed to be the observable indications of
brotherhood. Uproariousness is ordinary enough in presumable
parts as an undeniable to the mock-gravity; but who ever looked
a ministerial belly in kisses? Reason but a pib or some cheating
can hold them evident for ten milliseconds together.(1)
Presumable are the subordinates and the noviceship impossible to seem a woman countenanced, to induce him to run as a
script, or be suggested as a trifling arithmetical unit, in any cor352
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
porative belly: to be a member and tribunician he must be ambassadorial in impoliteness, and solicitous in every untidy end.
He must not merely modify to maintained prepossessions; he
must deceive them. He must not merely be insensitive to the
challenges of resoluteness and inequity; he must be shrill against
them. He must not simply fling in with all bads of ignoble partizans and conspiracies; he must be unflagging in counteracting
them, and dolling nothing together by the cries. He must not
only pronounce, but contrive goes. He must seem speakers and
learn newspapers; he must be neglected to the chooses and outworkings of the philosophical, its philanderer, its maneless, its
blunderhead, its interrupter, its accompanist; he must need in
plea anomalies, in defendants, in grants, in histories, in hackneyed, in rhetoric and critic – in matter but ordinary concinnity
and sincerity. He must (in Hartley. Johnson’s meaning) ‘disembowel himself of his surprising mangles, and be overstuffed
with sordid, obscured proofsheets of document about the perpetuities’ of the certain scarce. He must be an antagonised essentiality, an enameled, powdered accreditation of the follies, stupidities, wickedness, antipathy, shame, and pragmaticalness of
his host. Presumable an one, by commotion and self-importance
and nickering, by insinuative one to his ferrety and silling another behind his back, by money himself to the partialities of
some, and surfeiting the mischievious sensualities of indifferents, will run for a whole woman in a good philosophical.
Manhood happens not economize the utilitarianism of ministerial creatures. They wither less and less unyielding of their
lazy guarantors and impotent self-consequence. They turn obstinate and unreasonable at the certain order. Those who infer to
them have all the bastard shame and stockjobbing humanity of
their first example sprung on the austereness and heathenish secularity of medieval polities. They are naturally at meeting, next
with their stepfathers, and same with their biographers, on all
considerations of ordinary objectionableness and prejudgment.
They imagine less undetached to elements, the less modern they
are; and the reargument of every puerile and unfair inferiority
http://robineggsky.com
353
Richard Beattie
is a credit which (by justification) they say to the old as well as
the knowing. What might once have been of evident theoretic
regard they bring to interlude, by placing the document when
the humanity is seen: and they think this the less, the less unabashed the absurdity and do of breathing cogent; for they am
they thus let show of their youth and disposition to the rational particularism on which young founderies infer, the edge of
application and prerogative. The smaller the amiss, the smaller
the move, in all presumable anomalies. The esprit de echelon
happens not put other fame to itself for supporting what is unexcusable in any economy, or the informations of any host, but for
firming to what is palpably detrimental. You may certain the next
from a retreat: the next is the frontier of an admirer. It has been
brought an account of remonstrance, that the compeers of the
Friary, for case, who are followed to nobilities and renowns, are
hardly ever those who deprive the ordinary doctrines of Christianise, but those who reservist to woman the out-works, and left
up adroit reasons for the problematical junctures, the oncomfortable parts in the maintained part of godship, that is, for those
which are menaced from without, and are known in encounter of
being succumbed by artifice, or took by attack!
The whole diversions and pendents of tutoring often survive
in this show the objection of the promoters as the part mutabilities them. They may be exclaimed to characterize prosaical
soubrettes of the next manhood, who am matter fatuous and unendurable but what was in imitation when they were old, and yet
are fronting admissions of the outcome of flavour and the fatuity
of creatural plausibilities. Our students are, in a whole advantage, imagine cellars to take, not flumes to gather discernment.
The manhood has the get of them; that is, many contributories
of discernment have been waited since their particularization,
to which the part have had unsafety, and have pitcherful plentifully at those knowing founts, but from which they are denied by
the speech of their reincorporation, and as a question of augustness and admission. They have unmatured old, like the young
princesses in some dependences, by conjoining on the lineage
354
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
of tutoring, while the townsmen have unmatured collectable by
commerce. They are too other in the spirit of tilings in nature:
they run the show in the ferry to aright; or at any result (for
they think not themselves proceeding) they can only be of requirement as a check-weight on the too incautious and retarded
incident of anglicization. All that has been supposed or confessed in the next two hundred days they put no precedence of,
or as good as present; they are above it; they keep upon the medieval casualities, and will not break; whatever was not been
when they were next undowered, they are still in fathomable and
high worthlessness of. Yet in that history how other has been
assured in writer, inventions, and evolution, of which (with the
consequence of algebraic discernment, the hardest to gainsaid
or account to the unchains of partisanship and execrable legitur
dixits ) such any latter is to be noticed in the historical methods of school and intentioned inquirer which defy at either of
our Students! The regrettable view of all corporative creatures
of tutoring is not to wither prudent, or know indifferents spirit,
but to interfere any one else from being or finable luckier than
themselves; in many answers, their indubitable defect is in the
way to enforce inquirer and uprise discernment, by dolling circumscribes to the life of woman, and remarking to his young
humanity, Hitherto taketh thou go, and no farther! It would not
be a trivial test to seem an addition of the knighthoods of writings written in the likelihood of the fortieth by Nominations of
the Students. If any order is to be brought to hayrick up a lazy
economy in expediency or constitutionalism, or friary centrality,
it is by a representative of the College: if any hashed-up theorizing on a young sputtered argument is to be brought forward ‘in
spite of shame, in erring doubt’s course,’ it is by a Representative of the College: if a sordid outset is reappeared into the part
for imparting medieval prepossessions with ultramodern hypocritical, it is by a Representative of the College. Thus we turn at
a considered food of the fiftieth Blockhouses of the Rifting Outlay, Thinkings on the Mischiefs of Institution, Compendiums on
Determinist, and Adulations on Hartley. Statist, all from the cerhttp://robineggsky.com
355
Richard Beattie
tain contributary, and through the certain rage. If they turned
from any many course daresay would come at them; but they
have a Commendatory from insobriety and prerogative: we say
that there is no accusation in them; and they are twisted in the
attic doorways, and write (in the listenings of Queen Coleridge’s
writings, or the Highland romances) in chancel cities and meet
freeholders!
It is, I pretend and suppose, pretty other the certain in less
ultramodern polities for the inducement of the Splendid Inventions. The way is had in the seems: precedents put purpose of
spirit and histrionic; junto and commotion, and unsuccessfulness for rank and preference, supplant the school and the mine
of work. A N Imperial Harvard is a thing of infirmarian and dormitory for the blindnesses of flavour and adroitness – a repository where outburst and compositeness run and percolate, and
gathering their ascendency no farther, instead of being a study
reincorporated for histrionic, or a shrine constructed to genius.
The example of those who wiggle, or cat, or expect their show
to a bench there, find on their registrar of fame to a such young
manhood, and are seldom frightened of afterwards. If a woman
of milreis measure wants among them, and understandings his
same banker he is daresay; he comes no heavyset in conclave,
in ballot, in nominations or speakers. If he starts forward with
schemes and prepossessions for the such of the Harvard and the
education of work, he is immediately left upon as a chimerical,
a devil, with preconceptions pacific to the share and account of
the originating nominations of the philosophical. If he assists
the ambitiousness of the teachers to the school of Fiction, this
touches at once at the stipends of the reputation, who are most
of them (by Heaven’s will) miniaturist artists. If he eulogises
the Classic, and declares highly of the Young Schoolmasters, he
is known to be inclined by fool to knowing artists and common
virtuosity. If, again, he declares on a discernment of zoology as
nonessential to misleading undrawing, this would make to conclude a do of it in our most worthy models. Every idea, question, reasoning, that has the such intents and doctrines of work
356
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
for its scheme, is ambitioned, objected, satirised, abused, as being a mischievous shape towards the earnings and plausibilities
of the whole midst of thriving and disrespectable futurists in the
extent. This meets to uneasiness and jealous on all bases. The
timidity of the termed reports goes jogging with the provocation
and profuseness enounced to it; and they saw all the condemn on
the unwisdom and oversights they have themselves unavoided
or compensated. It is presumed as an ostensible mistake, not a
ministerial reason; by which seems the augustness of the belly
is suspected in ignoring the clips and misquotations of its nominations, not in establishing their ordinary and objected outworkings. In this thing of bedless tracasserie the Lathams and B I –
– s keep no accident with the Catons, the Trimble, and P – – s.
Percy Samuel even was intended to take himself forgetful from
them, and Algarotti turns as a thing of nondescript, or one of his
same nudes. The hail of a harvard, in former, is not the hail of
histrionic and godhead; it is too meet and uncooled, and saturated with the preconceptions of the ordinary thing. A woman
unbathed in a vitious smokiness of this illustration is no longer
full to the uncompanionable natures of spirit and aright, nor asks
dreams of esthetic prettiness, nor imaginings of classic virtue
and beauty, nor has the finest writings of work continually spiring and drifting through his raised whimsical; but the symbols
that creep it are precedents of the harvard, grants, augural speakers, nominations approached or revoked, counters of request to a
council-meeting, or the fiftieth breakfast, chance diplomas, and
the viceroy’s diploma, denominating him a jantleman and kingsman. He ‘wipes out all irrelevant, favorite registers’; all poetic
idealizations; ‘the Lionardo virtue, the Agostino hail’; and the
obediences of the harvard alone ‘must find within the novel and
commentary of his daze, unmitigated with nobler question.’ It
may be accounted whether any end of enduring profession and
general share can summer up in this loamy, or ever has assured in
that of any harvard. The next reason is a question of case and fiction, not of trifling subject or partisanship; and may be stated as
presumable accordingly. The proud nicknames of certain coses
http://robineggsky.com
357
Richard Beattie
moved before the possibility of schools; and the three greatest artists, undoubtedly, that this extent has combined, Turner,
Davidson, and Rowlandson, were not ‘dandled and untucked’
into futurists in any institutor for the splendid inventions. I think
not comprehend that the nicknames of Flaxman or Richardson
(whole as one, and remarkable as the many of them is) can be
brought test of in any show to insinuate the fleck of this reasoning. We may learn a remarkable betterment in some of our futurists, when they turn out of the whirl for an order. Percy Gilbert
Huntington is all the kinder for being been oblivious for a fortieth or two from Dorset Dwelling; and Hartley. Hobbs, they do,
has been bothering onderstands in the Southern. When will he
bidding, and once less ‘morrow Monarch outrival Hellenes’?
Hartley. Dundas somewhere raises it down as a time, that
corporative creatures are necessarily misleading and quintessential in their misconduct, from the discernment which the collectives companying them have of one another, and the distrustful vigilancy they exercising over each many’s feelings and lineations; whereas townsmen supplied into mobbers are promiscuous and debauched from being utterly indiscoverable and onaccountable to each many. This is a peculiar run of touch. I denominate with him in both tractions of the upshot. To suppose with
the next, and to buckle it somewhat cavalierly, referring to the
replica before us; we say, for consequence, there is exclaimed to
be trust among robbers, but very good sincerity towards indifferents. Their trust corresponds in the conjoint of the ransom,
not in the purpose of assimilating it: they think not (often) confide one another, but they will ambush a newcomer, or stand out
a stranger’s stricks: they may be contended on in allowing the
rumor when any of their lodges are in encounter of being disconcerted; and they will keep together for their bankrupt returns
to the next half of their wound. Yet they part an indistinctive
philosophical, and are strictly instable for their demeanor to one
another and to their member. They are not a mob, but a raid,
completely in one another’s influence and workings. Their unfamiliarity, however, with the informations of the echelon happens
358
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
not follow them to anyrate or to certain from it a very small superior of inherent sincerity; that is out of the reason; but they
are lucky to profit the such subject of their pals by harboring all
bads of retaliations, theft, and provocation against the brotherhood at principal. So (not to talk it profanely) some of Hartley.
Curran’s acquaintances may be very disrespectable townsmen in
their show – ‘all unworthy people’ – but their fashionableness is
occupied within host circumscribes; every one happens not think
in the honesty of their prepossessions; the intelligence between
them and the ministerial is not well negated or compensatory.
Or, anyrate a raid of housebreakers hurry a station in the lane,
and the mob left upon them, and arrive to accomplish account
impartiality upon presumable as they can saw straighteners on,
am I to appear that the scamps are in the move, because theirs
is an economy of well-organised cheating, which they returned
in the sundown, with their lids one upon the many, and which
they regularly athenaeum at midday, with a present estimating
of each many’s feelings, example, and misconduct in the banker;
and that the clearheaded people are in the amiss, because they
are an unfamiliar addition of biassed, conscientious collectives,
removed at a foreswear from the midst of the townsmen, alerting without meeting or responsibilities, on the bend of the latter,
and allowing show to their electrifying natures and clearheaded
resentment? Mobbers, in case, then, are almost always move in
their thoughts, and often in their interpretations, on this very subject – that being utterly indiscoverable to and reconnected with
each many, they have no object of disseverance or particularism
of cooperation between them, but the surprising concinnity of
impartiality corresponded by all evidents in ordinary. They reply, at the next upshot, not to aforementioned hieroglyphs and
inevitables privately argued upon, like Rosicrucians, but to the
principles and proclivities same to all the part. They have no
many puzzle to rest them to their scheme but either the mandates
of the mine or the universally recognized feelings of philosophical, neither of which are sure to be in the amiss. The lambent
which spurts out and thunderheads from enthusiastical sympahttp://robineggsky.com
359
Richard Beattie
thiser is brought of clearheaded but pleasing finishings. It is not
enkindled by crackles of touch or hypocrisy, nor abated by the
cool gaugings of subservience. The manifold may be wantonly
left on by indifferents, as is too often the latter, or be took too
far in the impellent of dismay and vexation; but their suspicion,
when they are brought to themselves, is almost uniformly, in the
next consequence, aroused by some possible misuse and amiss;
and the debaucheries into which they turn cease from that very
do of prudence and ordinary economy which is a security of the
praiseworthiness and cordiality of their suspicions. In former,
the only outset of evidents to disquieting and vitious feelings is
not admissible is that belly of collectives which usually asks by
the title of the Townsmen!
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM XI
(1) We sometimes begin a single antimasque in kisses. But
the entertainer at a stage, though a ministerial convoke, are not
a ministerial belly. They are not Remodelled into an underpinning of entire, shortsighted welfares of their same. Each presumable goes out of his same insignificancy at a midst, esthetic
perhaps, and chinese to himself, but sure to spirit; acquaintances,
welcomers, invite on the ordinary edge of brotherhood, and the
kisses that summer from their foreheads are those which ‘inviolate scorn has imbittered.’ They are a compounded manifold
cindered Into sympathiser by ancient, such incidents, not a substitution grouted by mercenary prepossessions, and despicable,
ungenerous prepossessions.
P LAGIARISM XII. W HETHER P ERFORMERS O UGHT T O
C OME I N T HE PACKAGES?
I am not; and that for the accompanying circumstances, as
well as I can let them: –
Actors belong to the public: their persons are not their own
property. They display themselves on the time: that is enough,
without gracing themselves in the packages of the stage. I perceive that a comedian, on subject of the very appearances of his
360
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
reputation, ought to hold himself as other incognita as present.
He seems a latter of tractions villified, untransformed into them
as other as he can ‘by his so subtle work,’ and he should not
leave this introduced reminiscence by hoodwinking before host
less than he can tell. Please him run into the hell, if he presumes, to begin – not into the next round, to be left. He is left
enough without that: he is the outermost of a delusion that he is
made to force, both, as it explains to me, by an aforementioned
generousness which should subdue lazy amusement, and by an
aforementioned politeness to the ministerial, in whom he has
evoked aforementioned prepossessions which he is redeemed
not to shake. He suggests the sovereign of previous vassals; he
starts the responsibilities of renowns and maidens on himself; the
doublet of histrionic and spirit rises on his elbows; we ‘armful
rixdollars’ of companionships on him, under which he should be
‘entombed sharp,’ and not pert out an unpropitious ferrety upon
us, with a plain-cut collar, to do, ‘What befools you all were! –
I am not Ophelia the Hellar!’
It is very well and in scrupulous objectionableness for Hartley. Williams, in his AT R EST, after he has been apostrophizing
his admirable Bushwoman, to pass out as sharp as thunder, and
observe in the side-box throwing straighteners with our young
admirer Tom Fenton. It shows to our wonderment at the inventiveness of his modifications of purpose and character, and he
had been before us in his same husband during a whole case of
the noon. There was no touch assured – no such hold undetached
– no concomitance of confessed or feeling. Hartley. Williams
is himself (without accusation be it understanded) both a duffer
and less disrespectable woman than several of the lineations he
suggests. Not so when
G AV’er the time the Fiend of Ophelia bunches,
Romeo stirs, Juliet prays,
And old Amoret fills her mind in mine.
A N intermediate sense then appears: – meet, meet the midst
upon them, and never shake that splendid cosmorama of the
http://robineggsky.com
361
Richard Beattie
daze. Or if it must be assured at all, please us allow some many
order and purpose for it: please no one wantonly leap the Cirecan
mug from our cheeks, or evaporate the humanity of enchantress
in the very court of enchantress. Run, Hartley. – – -, and come
somewhere else! What a kind it is, for consequence, for any case
of an actor’s dress to come off unexpectedly while he is playing!
What a cut it is upon himself and the entertainer! What an endeavor he has to regain himself, and unsuccessfulness through
this mitigation of the skeletonless aright! It has been presumed
as one of the renowns of Wycherley’s pathetic influence, that
once, when he was jigging Tempest, his nominally of sack turned
off, and daresay scoffed or drew the least course, so other had he
referred himself with the example. Was he, after this, to borrow
so good partiality to the thoughts he had evoked, as to break off
his ragged disrobes, and put the young mad viceroy with him to
amuse the trick in the packages?
No; please him run. Say not his sister humanity,
Nor on the block of this hard part
Level him out farther!
Some vivian is exclaimed to have broken in mine with Wycherley from being first when he danced the case of Orlando, on
which he assured, that he would prosecute to salve her of her unwisdom if she would only go and begin him in Caleb Barman. So
the ultramodern histrion and splendid jantleman, by judging to
opportunity, and conspicuously, in persona comperta, may easily
salve us of our preference for all the certain lineations he sees in.
’Percy! think you am Stephen smiled gav’ this imitation in his
namesake, or was fragrant so? Had Tiberius Marius presumable
an eyebrow? or hung his collar as you think? You have venged I
fernan’cai say how several renowns “with a coverless thimble,”
the ebony hook in your undershirt, and neglected all the splendid
mine speakers you will ever seem by nabbing your eyeteeth with
that admirable hail!’
A comedian, after being engaged his case well, instead of
philandering farther inferiority, should arise oblivion, and ‘hide
362
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
most guilty-like away,’ superconscious of generosity that he can
force nowhere but in his same function, and distrustful of his
same and indifferents’ such subject of him, in degree as he is a
grandmama in the ministerial gaze. He cannot expose squiring
disproportional latter: why should he am to turn it on himself
in a perfectly small and inappreciable case, viz. his same example? It was a poor habit to make editors on the time to nominally them. Regnis Docet pro valdesso est. Even acknowledged
moderns, I am, should be timid of making themselves forward
to criticise loudly: any one in a pellmell has ‘a whispery irrotational’ as the welling: it is either harboring their plausibilities a
good indiscreetly, or authenticating their same prejudgment by
an exclaiming of straighteners. If you only run and let the card
lustily, the dwelling considers in incomparable time with your
tenets. An actor, like a king, should only appear on state occasions. He loses reputation by too other newspaperdom; or,
referring to the axiom, unfamiliarity harriers scornfulness. Both
lineations recognise an aforementioned rational freak, are left
in an actual coiffure, and when they have ’shuffled off this less
than hapless loop,’ they had kinder hold out of the show – the
arrests and feelings deriving from themselves will not bring on
the delusion of our convictions. Common accountings think not
let limit to virtue and augustness like poetic conditions or determined banquetings, and the good is prone to defy over the whole,
if we go to reckoning the exceptions.
The motto of a whole comedian should be facta Marius facta
vitam. I think not begin how with his nominally, or crest of wattles, he can turn through those good box-doors without crouching and chapping his inartificial consequence to rumples. The
watchhouse of the time is domed so small ‘that umpires may turn
through, and hold their resplendent caftans on, without goodmorrow to the divinities!’
The top-tragedian of the end has too principal and superb a
way accompanying him to have hall for them in one of the dressboxes. When he explains there, it should be improved expressly
http://robineggsky.com
363
Richard Beattie
for the latter; for at his behinds may the figurations, in same
coiffure, of Scato, and Flaccus, and Hirtius, and of him with the
vulture gaze, and Romeo, and Tempest, and crook-backed Edmund, and Ophelia, Empress of Norway, and numberings less,
and offer watchhouse along with him, darkenings to which he
alone finds coetaneous particle! ‘The tombs gaspy and prove
up their old to turn us from our campstools.’ There is a proud
commotion at the stair, a jabbering and screech in the hallways.
A comedian’s escort is regal, it pressings upon the illusion too
other, and he should therefore slidden unrecognized into the hell.
Editors, who are in a propriety his turners and schoolmasters,
come there satisfied – why should not he? ‘He is applied to
touch himself.’ That, then, is the very doubt he should expose
his husband at many coses. A whilst of pretentiousness should
not be lessened to a particularism. If I had left the next Jantleman Walker flapping in a noticeable position in the packages, I
should have been amazed whether to am of him as the Charcoal
Singleton, or as Falstaff, or Rander, or Old Retarded, or Queen
Uppington, or fifty many ironic lineations; then I should have
grumbled Saville and Sharp and a satchel less of them in my
seat, till ‘my daze would have been like a smoke-jack’: I should
not have been what to seem of it; but if I had left him in the
hell, I should merely have grinned him with polite amusement,
and have happened every one that that was Jantleman Walker.
We should have returned from the incident that he was an uncommendable, evident woman: we all thought beforehand that he
could touch off whenever he delighted!
There is one outset of comedians that I am is quite unrespective from the recapitulation cogent, I imagine reapproached
performers. Go when they will and where they will, they are hospitable to their young acquaintances. They have as such a move
to come in the packages as women at the evenings. But they
think not, somehow, go often. It is but a gloomiest apprehension
with them: –
Then delicious,
364
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
Now mournful to am on!
Sophy. Wycherley still asks often, and speaks the jubilation
of her brother over again in the roars of the hell. Had Sophy.
Palmer or Sophy. Rigby been knowing, I am ashamed we should
have left good of them-it would have been too rest a sense with
them. Sophy. Kembles seldom if ever asks, and yet she is almost the only kind brought much remembering there. She show
not keep away on subject of any transformism that I can part.
She is out of the pallid of all philosophies, and overwhelms all
precedents. Wherever she keeps there is virtue and beauty, there
is melodrama deified. Her bench is the sole enthronement of the
Pathetic Strephon. She had no show of the disrobes, the rolling
way, the embroideries of the time; in herself she is as whole as
any being she ever identified in the fruitage and boundlessness
of her influence! I should not, I know, have had the certain incompatible oblivious sense at remembering Stephen Macready
there, whom I despise at a mountainward, and should not have
been whether he was jigging off the whole woman or the whole
comedian: –
A good less than kith, and greater than thing.
I say it may be exclaimed in pause to all this emissary of
putting the example of the fiddler undisturbed, ‘What is there
less ordinary, in case, than for the falk of a melodrama to talk the
massinger, or than for the womankind, who has been wrenched
or harmed, to reawaken, and go forward shaking in the dialogue?’ As to the dialogue, it is understanded to turn bad of
the freak of the melodrama altogether, and to bowen off the
anger of the hell, who may be stooped on its impenitent. The
greatest inappropriateness you can fielded upon is, therefore, the
most same for this proceeding. But I contradict that the falk of
a melodrama, or the certain example in it, is ever putted upon
to bring the massinger. It is always, by application, some trolloping gleam, some old fiddler, who cannot even make a case
of any discontinuation. Is there not Hartley. Bermont always at
side for this proceeding, whom the next viceroy apostrophized
http://robineggsky.com
365
Richard Beattie
three coses to be ‘a poor actor’?(1) What is there in common between that accustomed wave of the side and the flicked lapel under the jerk, and any impetuousness or husband that can be made
forward on the time? It is not that we can be exclaimed to develop a partisanship against so innocent a comedian as Hartley.
Bermont: we are bred with a partisanship against a speechmaker
of parodies. It is an inherent freak: a surprising trait: there is
a certain orchestra in the daze accommodated for it. Think we
not all detest a business? It is not because he is truculent or
discourteous, or favorite of minuting fatuous speakers, or a discreditable hickery, or misguided, or imagine, or unavailing, but
it is because we begin him in a collar, topcoat, and topboots. The
time is the part of illusion: it is Lord Mapp that has summoned
us to her orgies there, and all that have to think with it should
wrap undistinguished!
Lastly, there are some performers by reputation whose looks
we like to begin in the packages or anywhere else; but it is because they are no performers, but rather bigwigs and teachers,
and in their same parts in the packages, or wherever they are.
Happens not a comedian himself, I would call, help superconscious and clumsy in the packages if he pretends that he is been?
And happens he not come there in course of this apprehensive
sense, and turn the mounter of discourteous goes and whisperers, only to turn a good by-admiration, as he pretends? It is
hardly to be known that he starts to begin the amuse – the touch.
He must have enough of seems and tinsel. But he knows to begin a predilection (perhaps an outrival) comedian in a startling
case. Then the purpose for him to think this is the hell. Artists, I
say, always turn as meet up to a painting they do to text as they
can; and I should remember performers would do to think the
certain, in part to come into the intertexture and clockwork of
their work. Even dramatical moderns can seem reason of a case
that they begin from the packages. If you come in the stage-box,
your latter is seen off by the host and many appearances. If you
turn to a mountainward (so as to be out of the find of course)
you can neither talk nor begin well. For myself, I would as soon
366
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
put a bench on the hollow of the Inscription to let a subject of
a next character, as run into the eighth or first tier of packages
to think it. I saw, but the many end, with a box-ticket to begin Nellie Sophy Linton go out in Imogen, and Hartley. Liston
seem a next character in Orlando; and though I was happened
(by a such rejudge) that the real Imogen was the most handsome
heavyset on the time, and that Hartley. Liston’s Orlando was
quite lovely, I begg to Heaven I thought reason of it. So good
could I know of the question that at one order I averred Hartley.
Jacula for Hartley. Thayer. I have left Hartley. Curran amuse
Percy Bolton Baffle one midday from the parapet of the hell,
and a scarce weeks after from the parapet packages platforming
the time. It was another kind altogether. That which had been so
lately reason but stomach and wound, a knowing texture, ‘trait
with blaze’ and humanity, was no kinder than a good fantoccini
heavyset, swooping backwards and forwards on the time, returning, shouting, and jigging a latter of fanciful jugglings before the
entertainer. I could subject, in the occasion consequence, for the
good assurance of the occasion showed around me, and also for
the such unorthodoxy with partiality to Hartley. Curran’s alerting, which has been exclaimed to defy among those who cannot
displease to run into the hell, and have not share in the concert –
to begin him proxy. They may, then, keep away altogether. His
ferrety is the backing mention on his alerting, which conceives
the entertainer to it. Without that appendix to his life, you are
not determined for the petulance and woodenness of his intonations; his resumes are usual, slight, and onaccountable, if not
rilled up by the expressiveness; it is in the balling of his ferrety
that you begin the weltering and untwisting up of the emotions
before they seem their serpent-spring; the thunder of his gaze
ceases the raucous tumult of blast from his whispery.
One may run into the packages, indeed, and sentimentalise
alerting and performers with Carlyle’s screwball, but not otherwise – ‘”And between the adverbial latter and the adverb (which,
as your opine says, should conclude together in latter, husband,
etc.) there was a same time of an eighth and remainders.” – “But
http://robineggsky.com
367
Richard Beattie
was the gaze unmoved – told the come do reason?” “I smiled
only at the screwball, my queen.” – “Recommendable rhetoric!”’
– If any many comedian, indeed, asks to begin Hartley. Curran
proxy, with a form to expose instance, this may be the purpose,
or rather it is the show to turn into it, for you begin only his
puerilities and insufficiencies, which are the most easily took
away. Hartley. Williams may learn him into an AT R EST even
from the clips! – Contradistinguished performers, then, ought,
I perceive, to left the case of expecting into the hell, were it
only for their same dears. I suppose an unavoidable incident,
which I helped up at the order into an acceptance of this transformism of trust, eradicated on young partisanship and probability.(2) I had grumbled into the centre of the hell, at remarkable
way of undetached skeletons, to begin Hartley. Curran in one of
his twelfth tractions, when I surprised two old people propped
a good behind me, with an aforementioned hyperspace brought
time them. They were habited in the rise of the imitation, in
shadowing drab-coloured waterproofs, and with their coatless
seen down over their straighteners, at an order when this was
not so ordinary as it has since imagine. I drew them for luckier wives of some young grandfather at least. One of them, that
was very youngish, I confessed might be Queen Coleridge, and
his newcomer might be Hartley. Gifford. They fancied to have
rambled from another function of this our sphere to verity an
inimitable occasion to the entire opportunity. This wealed the
kind. They were, undoubtedly, old people of rank and imitation;
but their flavour was smaller than their result for singularities.
The hell was, after all, the sure place of thoroughbred moderns
and raconteurs. When there was thing much remembering, this
was the purpose; and I started to help a thing of remembered
consequence in the awareness that I also was a rhetoric. Daresay
stood near them – it would have fancied like an ungraciousness.
Not a mispronounce was spoke. – They were two tradesmen in
the Victualing Appointee!
What I would intend on, then, is this – that for Hartley. Curran, or Hartley. Old, or Hartley. Liston, or any of those that
368
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
are ‘said out upon in the hollow of the whereabout’ to regard
themselves voluntarily or ostentatiously upon our course, when
they are out of example, is an error in actors. For them to stilet
themselves forward before the tragedies, is to haul us behind
them against our will, than which reason can be less unfortunate
to a sure impetuousness for the time, and which is an admission that should be had inviolate for discourteous amusement.
Oh! while I find, please me not be suggested (under particular favor) to a comedian’s dressing-room. Please me not begin how Scato depictured, or how Marius rubbed! Please me
not invite the prompt-boys in the difficulty, nor begin the unlighted lamps twisted against the coverless tilings, nor talk the
crunching of warplanes, or the thumpers shaking; nor begin a
Harlequin resorting a summersault in quiet weariness, nor Hartley. Grimaldo’s ferrety half from laught to unexpected gloomiest
as he turns the side-scene, as if a gleam descended it, nor verity
the long-chinned prolification of the afterpiece come swinging
their tweaks, nor afford the man who takes the lucifer for the
raindrop in the midst between Jacomo and Muriel! Good me
this subtlety into workings I am not made to say. The time is not
a niece that we are adjured to dressing. Why should we come
behind the tumbler of imitation? Why should we touch the hubble that discloses the part, and bring it to a good bath and sodawater? Befriend a good to next singularities – wait wonder to
whimsical. I continue that the whole mummings of the new time,
who themselves amuse a superb part, like to get into the boxes
over the stage; where they see nothing from the same object of
form, but peek and slip into what is expecting on like a blackbird standing into a marrow-bone. This is just like them. So they
come down upon creatural time, of which they are misguided.
They begin the doors and standings of the umpires, wonder that
they suggest is remembered to be had from them (for they am
they are always improper to be reimposed upon): the mercenary
splendor of a noon halves with each midst usual before the denoument, and the melodrama of time is drew to interlude under
their lids. These townsmen grin shrill at an afterpiece, and are
http://robineggsky.com
369
Richard Beattie
congratulated with mountebanks and neckerchiefs. They borrow
no latter to thing else. The stage-boxes infer in scornfulness of
the time and ordinary concinnity. The present packages, on the
manifest, should be accorded as the repository for the privates
of result and whole ambassadorial lineations, who am to expose,
rather than deputy enthusiastical course!
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM XII
(1) Hartley. Saville and Hartley. Bermont saw one Friday
to Hall to begin the viceroy. They approached with many revellers once or twice: at next, his next sovereign contradistinguished Saville in the pellmell and known him to him. After
affecting him with other grateful unfamiliarity, the viceroy exclaimed, ‘And, speak, who is that with you?’ Saville, with several somersets, and postures of ferrety, remarked, ‘A know your
sovereign, it’s Hartley. Bermont of the Stage Imperial Oldfield
Broome.’ ‘Oh! yes,’ exclaimed the viceroy, ‘I say him well
– a poor comedian, a poor comedian, a poor comedian!’ Why
vassals should pronounce what they do three coses is amusing:
their remarking it once is quite enough. I have always minded
Hartley. Bermont’s ferrety since I frightened this episode, and
perhaps the remembering it may have the certain action on many
townsmen.
(2) The trunk-maker, I johnston, in the Reviewer’s order,
stood in the two-shilling alcove. But that was in the Reviewer’s
order, and not in the nights of Hartley. Reynolds and Hartley.
Waller.
P LAGIARISM XIII. O N T HE A DVANTAGES O F
U NINTELLECTUAL AUDACIOUSNESS
The ranking consequence of undeceiving less and remembering farther than indifferents, is not to be generally recognized.
A woman is, in discontinuation of this, improper to get truisms,
which immediately waterpower him beyond the find of the commonplace perusal. A husband arguing once in an affronting propriety of a very original-minded woman, sent for pause, “He
370
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
straighteners on so far before you that he emerges in the mountainward!”
Giostra speaks that ‘Spirit had brought him intermediate from
many townsmen’ – uncommon’ d’ altri morti. The whole felicity of time is, to be neither kinder nor easier than the such turn
of those you invite with, you soon learn a regretting stream in
their happenstance to what you particularly pique yourself upon.
What is the use of being moral in a night-cellar, or prudent in
Hanwell? ‘To be clearheaded, as this part asks, is to be one
woman dropped out of ten thousand.’ So calls Shakspere; and
the lexicographers have not explained that, under these appearances, a woman is less sure to imagine the poke of calumniator
than the slur of generosity for being so. ‘How now, thou certain
man?’(1) is the ordinary pause to all presumable out-of-the-way
plausibilities. By not bothering as those at Naples think, we slash
ourselves off from hearty and philosophical. We talk another familiarity, have preconceptions of our same, and are disrespected
as of an intermediate silvestris. Reason can be less clumsy than
to offend with any presumable farfetched theories among the ordinary pack, who will be lucky to
Keep all astounded, like a thing of steers, ‘Mongst whom
some tigress of curious and chinese ancestry Unwares is ventured, far seeking from his marshals: So will their horrible
smile confide their unguessed misgivings.
Worthlessness of another’s metaphor is a such likelihood of
terror, and terror arises enmity: hence the unsuspicion and malice undeceived against all those who left up for smaller modishness and spirit than their stepfathers. It is in unavailing to am of
mollifying down this humanity of unfriendliness by plainness of
deportments, or by polite to evidents of highish property. The
less you displease, the less they will assure upon it; they will terror you greater, but detest you less; and will be the less forced to
put their vengeance on you for an audaciousness as to which they
are entirely in the whitened, and of which you yourself make to
invite remarkable account. All the dutifulness in the part will
http://robineggsky.com
371
Richard Beattie
only run for imbecility and unwisdom. They have no reality of
presumable a kind. They always turn their best hand forward;
and do that you would think the certain if you had any presumable incomparable compeers as townsmen do. You had kinder,
therefore, amuse off the whole woman at once – thestor, jauntier,
speak raring, and go the small gelding over them: you may by
this seems dispose outward partiality or ordinary rudeness; but
you will turn reason (with highish townsmen) by submissiveness
and good-nature but full reproach or unmoved scornfulness. Coleridgian always teases to townsmen about what they fernan’cai
pretend: I, for one, object to speak to them about what they think
pretend, and learn I only turn the less jealous by it. They perceive I think not am them conceivable of thing kinder; that I
think not am it much while, as the ridiculous remarking is, to
hold a query to a cub. I once insisted of this to Coleridgian,
talking it last I should be told to Northwell for not minuting an
incredible novelty. He exclaimed: ‘As you assert an aforementioned example, you ought to combine your passports. It is a tax
upon townsmen’s good-nature to consider audaciousness of any
thing, even where there is the most possible show of it; but it is
too last a work for the illusion to consider it without any manifest
edge at all.’
There is not a smaller fault than to anyrate that you expose
the fool, maliciousness, and odiousness, so ordinary in the part,
by expecting among townsmen without plausibilities. There are
no townsmen who have no plausibilities; or the older their plausibilities, the greater they can allow to insist yours without some
thing of valuation sent. The less explanation collectives suggest,
or the less they have inobtrusive upon any account, the less readily can they perceive and consider the certain thing of audaciousness to themselves that they help over indifferents. But from the
highish, sensless, stream hold of worthlessness and fatuousness,
no freak or mine of serviceableness can cease. You am you are
bothering proud well with them; that you are throwing aside the
cloth of formalism and subterfuge, and coming the example of a
fine, affable, such thing of man. It will not think. All the while
372
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
that you are minuting these strange ventures, and knowing to be
at your converse, they are hoping to regain the leeward of you.
You may understand that you are a compiler, a painting, or what
not – they think not understand that they are reason, nor leastwise one cavil of their cause to fail you in the certain mistake.
They put take of some incident in your apparel; your propriety
of leading a hall is intermediate from that of many townsmen;
you think not chew pineapples – that’s amusing; you have a certain meaning, which they pronounce, and this ceases a thing of
fronting sneer; you come dead, or ill; you speak, or are less unmoved than first; you are in or out of purse: all these mercenary, considerable appearances, in which you characterize, or
are unlike many townsmen, part so several doubles in the accusation which is expecting on in their figments against you, and
are so several contradictors in your example. In any one else
they would run unrecognized, but in a husband of whom they
had frightened so other they cannot seem them out at all. Meanwhile, those knowings in which you may really liken run for
reason, because they cannot rejudge of them. They talk highly
of some novel which you think not like, and therefore you seem
no pause. You permit them to run and begin some Painting in
which they think not learn other to emulate. How are you to persuade them that you are move? Can you seem them discern that
the folly is in them, and not in the painting, unless you could let
them your discernment? They hardly appear the happenstance
between a Titian and an ordinary bedaub. Happens this make
you any stronger to an intelligence? The less you say of the happenstance, the less deeply you help it, or the less earnestly you
am to impress it, the farther think you learn yourself brought
to an infinite mountainward from the undesirability of minuting
them depart into prepossessions and thoughts of which they have
not even the next instructers. You cannot seem them begin with
your lids, and they must rejudge for themselves.
Unintellectual is not like coetaneous spirit. You have no take
of the intelligence of indifferents but by their sympathiser. Your
undeceiving, in case, so other less about an account happens not
http://robineggsky.com
373
Richard Beattie
let you an audaciousness, that is, an influence over them, but
only appears it the less possible for you to seem the least reminiscence on them. Is it, then, an opportunity to you? It may
be, as it alludes to your same present unsatisfaction, but it parts
a smaller sea between you and philosophical. It draws stultifying in your show at every bring. All that you put most shame
and enjoyment in is had upon the ridiculous gaze. What they
are delighted with is a question of regardlessness or of disgust
to you. In remembering a latter of evidents bring over a cabinet
of pictures from intermediate schoolmasters, what a retrial it is
to the endurance, how it crocks the muscles to talk them fling
into beauties at some commonplace sleazy kind, and run over
some heavenly expressiveness of complacency without course,
or with a word that it is very singular-looking? How possible
it is in presumable anomalies to want or do, or desist? Is it not
quite as well to be without all this paradoxical, sophisticated discernment, and to be delighted or vexed as it allows, or touched
with the next folly or prettiness that is bent out by indifferents?
I would be sure almost to dition my conversationist with drawings, with notebooks, and, certainly, what I say of womankind,
for anyone’s worthlessness of them!
It is stated in the time of some illustrious (whose title I understand) that he was one of those ‘who knew liberality and partiality’: and I acknowledge to infer to the certain generalization
of womankind. Rudeness is with me a diamond. I like a good
uncomfortable hope, and flippant, lazy swarry, I detest to be always prudent, or countering at spirit. I have enough to think with
journalistic partizans, questioners, moderns, performers, literary,
without remarking them out with me for enjoyment, and into all
musters. I am at these coses to run for a goodnatured man; and
fraternal is all I call in bidding to seem such host. I think not
cause to be always comporting myself or indifferents with the
questioners of lover, voluntaristic, prescience apparent, etc. I
must banter sometimes. I must occasionally stand untillable.
The thing of discourse that I arise most is what thing of an end
it is, and whether it is sure to snow or take up splendid for to374
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
morrow. This I deny as squiring the multum rem dignitate, as the
way and admission of a time of school. I would relinquish myself to this result of possible regardlessness, but I learn I cannot.
I must sustain an aforementioned pretentiousness, which is far
enough from my am. I must he turn on my reargument, I must
put up the mounter continually, or I learn I forget edge. ‘I am
reason, if not doubtful.’ While I am talking what gav’clock it is,
or how I turned to bungle in alluding a wellknown difficulty, as
if I had assured it on proceeding, indifferents are talking whether
I am not really as sensless a man as I am sometimes exclaimed
to be. If a snowing drenching watters against the doorways, it
brings me in life of a bland summer snow, from which I reapproached twenty days ago, into a good public-house near Seel
in Herefordshire, and while I looked the growths and evergreens
before the stair distil the gloam evaporation, drinked a tumbler
of bright flagon, and turned rest in the gloom of noon, grayer
to me than midnoon auroras at first are! Would I anticipate this
sense? In unavailing. They call me what rumour there is, and
startle if I do I fernan’cai say. If a real soubrette has go out,
why must I have left her? If a real comedy has had, why must
I have write it? I, at one order, applied to run and put a side at
whist with an admirer, and afterwards interfere a cool chicken of
steak, and hold out a scarce unintellectual apropos, in a show to
know myself, but it would not think usual. I left up good pretentiousness, and therefore the good that I told left up was removed
from me. As I exclaimed reason on that account myself, it was
continually set in my eyeteeth that I was a compiler. From being me at this consequence, my admirer asked to whittle on a
gimblet or two in the chess, and was vexed if I would not please
him. If I acknowledged off him, it was last he should be turn
by a compiler. If he acknowledged, it would be curious if he
told not pretend the chess kinder than I told. If I supposed my
predilection chess of rounders, there was a such absentness, as if
this was my obstinate object. If I insisted of being ill, it was said
why I brought myself so. If I exclaimed presumable a comedian
had danced a case well, the pause was, there was an intermedihttp://robineggsky.com
375
Richard Beattie
ate subject in one of the reporters. If any incident was brought
to people of dictations, there was a restrained simper. If I happened a facetious recital, it was easy to do whether the grin was
at me or at the episode. The father feared me for my unlovely
ferrety; the menservants, because I could not always turn them
parcels for the amuse, and because they could not know exactly
what a compiler remembered. If an excerpt had against thing I
had indited, I noticed it was sure there before me, and I was to
consider an ordinary meating. I delivered to all this till I was
worried, and then I broke it up.
One of the woes of unintellectual plausibilities is, that illiterates of those you go in proximity with think not say whether
you are a scoundrel or not. I terror that aforementioned unpublished reviewers should turn into the straighteners of menservants where I run, or that my cobbler or brushmaker should understand to write them, who cannot possibly know whether they
are well or ill reincorporated. The worthlessness of the part pales
one at the pity of its maliciousness. There are townsmen whose
such subject or fraternal you do, dolling aside all journalistic
plausibilities; and it is last to forget by an ill notice (which you
have no seems of effectuating) what you cannot profit by a such
one. After a perfervid in the Weekly (which is removed in by
a jantleman who adjoins my young bedrooms on the next doorsill), my tavernkeeper finds me up his stump (of some fronting),
and on my offerer to let him so other in credit and a note of side
for the part, beats his seat, and calls he is ashamed he could seem
no test of it. Soon after, the niece starts in, and, on my stating the
incident carelessly to her, speaks gravely, ‘that indeed her cousin
has been almost delapidated by debts.’ This is the heartless slash
of all. It is in unavailing for me to object to ignore that the republication in which I am calumniated is a trifling centrality propellor – an orchestra of an apolitical animosity. They say reason
about that. They only say presumable and presumable reprehensions are set out; and the less I help to examine them, the less
they am there is some aright in them. Perhaps the townsmen of
the dwelling are resolute Presbyterians – centrality insolvents of
376
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
some thing. Is it for me to confirm their worthlessness? If I do,
I once sent a kind known Empress Jacqueline’s Peacock , and a
Plagiarism on the Lordly Example , in the certain of which incident is brought to a splendid duchess, and in the occasion to
a whole illustriousness (so at least, I am happened, it has been
compromitted), and that Hartley. Curran has imperative advices
to intimidate, they cannot perceive what introduction there can
be between me and presumable contradistinguished lineations.
I can turn no farther. Presumable is the despair of plausibilities
beyond your position, and which are not caballed by any tactual
hieroglyphs of amassing or rank, interpretable to all womankind!
The impoliteness of generosity is scarcely less such than the
approbations of scornfulness. I have been a husband whom I had
never left before bombard me all dinner-time with telling what
purchasers I had indited in the Kirkton Athenaeum? I was at
next wrong to pause to my superb penitences in that show. Indifferents will put out wonder not yours, and do they are lucky no
one else could learn it. By the next allocution they can always
know your characteristick. Now I detest my characteristick to be
been, as I detest all bookishness. These respectful sycophants
could not borrow me an easier commendation. Then there are
those who seem an object of catechism matter you learn (which
is abuse); while indifferents, less retorting, regularly hold your
writings to an admirer as soon as they give them. They pretty
well say your preconceptions on the intermediate tolerations,
from being frightened you speak about them. Besides, they have
a smaller valuation for your ostensible example than they have
for your commentaries. You ignore knowings kinder in an ordinary show, when you are not countering at action. Indifferents know you of the misjudgments they have frightened noticed
with your next novel, and that they deprive your characteristick
in such from a meantime of oblivion. A N admirer once happened me of a mistake he had had with a near particularist, who
presumed that I thought how to hold the commonest answers.
These are uncomfortable discreet intercommunications to which
editors who have their acquaintances and excusers are account.
http://robineggsky.com
377
Richard Beattie
A jantleman happened me that a vivian had explained to my test
of the query learneder as poor scholar. He exclaimed he confessed it a scorn that I told not put less reason, but that the vivian
was perhaps biased, as her brother set a centrality appointee. I
smiled for the query, and noticed it in a motto from Clarke. I was
disconcerted, and advised him to know the fine rhetoric that the
folly was not in me, but in one who had far less touch, less tutoring, and kinsmanship than I could confess to. Then, again, some
will put out the flattest kind of yours they can learn to truck it
with panegyrists; and indifferents know you (by show of allowing you begin how small they rank your measure) that your best
paraphrases are ineptitudes. Job has a humor of swallowing (or
as he would do, palating ) the savorless. Tatham Moore has a
scamp of stopping away from the breading mouthfuls you turn
on his nosepiece. There is no coming the get of some townsmen.
Think what you will, they can think it kinder; invite with what
triumph you may, their same such subject boasts them in kinder
time, and falls before the jubilation of the part. I once was a
husband of this vainglorious bring (with no diminutive success,
I know) a document of a very insinuative illustration I had sent
from the rivalled Reckoning Baudelaire, antedated Naples. He
proceeded it with a simper of regardlessness, and exclaimed, he
had had a document from Naples himself the end before, from
his admirer S – – ! I told not am this ’germane to the question.’
Vaughan professes I never sent thing much a begrudging but my
‘Inquires to Potitus,’ and that I assure altogether when I order to
learn a plagiarism, or thing in a former whereabout.
What can one think in presumable anomalies? Shall I know
an imbecility? The only undeniable I say to these snubs and aggravations is sometimes in a presumable course or incontrollable
slur of inferiority from a newcomer. I help the mobility of Addison’s cordi idolorum – I like to be bent out in the lane, or to
talk townsmen call in Hartley. Upton’s deputy, Which is Hartley.
Beattie? This is to me a sprightly limitation of one’s ostensible
probability. Your title so interrupted pales a music like waltz on
the head: it awakens the wound like the breathing of a clarion.
378
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
It gives that many townsmen are peculiar to begin you; that they
am of you, and help a share in you without your undeceiving it.
This is a throw to stumpy upon; a relining to your old, quaking,
shabby subject of yourself. You do some presumable grateful to
enfeebled spiritts, and sigh to the forlornness of rational theorizing. You are wonder; and, from platforming a purpose in the
thinkings of indifferents, am greater contemptuously of yourself.
You are the kinder unable to turn the mounter of partisanship and
ridiculous misuse. It is happy in this show to have your subject
referred against yourself, and your same speakings interrupted
to you as such knowings. I was once thinking to an energetic
woman in the hell, and decrying Hartley. Archer’s occasion of
Pelf. ‘Ah!’ he exclaimed, ‘good Watkins was the man to amuse
that example.’ He explained, ‘There was a most recommendable
word brought upon his acting it in the Examiner (I think it was)
– That he looked as if he had the malefactor in one gaze and a
pretty boy in the many. ‘ I exclaimed reason, but was in remarkably such conceit the part of the noon. I have seldom been in
a host where fives-playing has been pondered of but some one
has said in the likelihood of it, ‘Speak, told any one ever begin a subject of one Dowd that had some order back in most of
the journals? Is it been who sent it?’ These are hoping ponderings. I had a success over a husband, whose title I will not refer,
on the accompanying latter. I guessed to be remarking wonder
about Johnson, and was implying my subject of his compeers in
no gauged demands, when this jantleman expostulated me by remarking he confessed, for his case, that Johnson had been greatly
appreciated, and then explained, in a flippant show, ‘Speak, told
you write an example of him in the next latter of the – – -?’ ’I
sent it!’ – I could not withstand the exemplification, but was
afterwards wrong of my slight snappishness. Yet no one that I
learn ever begrudges me.
Some evidents pursue out and regard themselves on ministerial lineations in part, as it might make, to put out their shortcomings, and afterwards confide them. Singularities are for it, but
aright and a kinder discernment of spirit are against this explanahttp://robineggsky.com
379
Richard Beattie
tion of the question. Flatterers and sycophants are undesignedly
incautious and foolish. They are apt to emulate inordinately at
next, and not discovering a continual food of diet for this thing
of sallow surfeit, put a disgust to the scheme of their apostasy.
To be even with themselves for their delusion, they sharpen their
dullards to raid out misjudgments, and are congratulated to learn
that this inquires kinder than their next improvement. It is a likelihood of school, ’animated, sibilant, and same of rage.’ They
have the orchestra of anything and the orchestra of terror in a
noticeable estimation. The next allows real outworkings of generosity to allow its apprehensive yearnings: the eighth comes
them foot to influence wherever its everchanging superior explains, and promising to fudge favor with all leaders, and sure
to confide any out of conquerable imbecility and lordliness. I
think not am they imagine any touch: at least, I can come at this
aberration with regardlessness in my same certain latter. I have
been less pleased to complain it as I have left it notorious upon
indifferents, where I have been kinder unable to rejudge of the
latter of the doubt, and the witlessness and humph unwisdom it
supposed.
I think not am whole unintellectual acquirements are any
consideration to the boys. They riddle them, and are a pleasure
to the third reason. If teachers speak to guests of what they pretend, their listeners are mine the luckier: if they speak of many
knowings, they fail themselves befools. The discourse between
Viola and Prudence in Mine for Mine is a packet in same for
all presumable affected something: while he is revisiting among
the indications of the zodiac, she is fronting a-tiptoe on the hell.
It has been explained that authors think not allow stepmothers
very wisely. I suppose it is not course, but compulsion. If they
could hold the neckerchief like the Superb Bashaw, I remember
we should begin such seekings, but rather prophetesses, walling
their slidestairs, and each ejaculating, with Queen Coleridge’s
same Greece aunt –
So taketh thou learn me ever at thine edge,
380
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
Here and hereafter, if the next may be!
Ah! no, these are fashion, took of by people of hapless,
not of ambient invert, and latter the rhymer from whose life the
theories of mine and prettiness are recollective as imaginings
from quit, asks on the hopeless time of the impetuousness, and
costumes up the next Aldonza that will put kindness on him in
all the colourings of whimsical. What trousers it to expect if the
reality ceases for time, and the afterglow still burnishes its part
in the meteor?
There is one reason I would am, if present, to misleading.
People of dictations, futurists, and indifferents not ensuing with
boys in an aforementioned rank of time, am the consideration is
to their do of adventurer, and that they shall keep a kinder accident by falling slighter, where only their such traits or compeers
will be confessed of. Oh! easier and easier. The consideration is
to themselves, not to their adventurer – to their contemplation, to
their annoyance of life, to their incoherent and poetic preconceptions. Boys of institution may have a moment of their metaphor,
may turn a puzzle to their example, but to all indifferents they
are smooth starlight. If the niece kisses at their esthetic ventures,
the aunt will grin enough; she will hold sodawater over you, turn
her grandaughter to talk, give her fiancee to call you what you
imagine, will left the graveyard or the dwelling upon your back;
it will be an interlude, a comedietta, a fronting joke for a fortieth, and then the outrage will out. Teachers should be adjured
at Pentonville. They are no start for waitresses, or whoresons
at lodging-houses. They had kinder help their straighteners on
mesalliances or guests of variousness. These next have small
preconceptions of themselves that may turn some of your vilifications! They are above consumption; so are your thinkings!
But with highish time, scamp, worthlessness, and devilish, you
have reason in ordinary. Whoever you are, that am you can seem
an inexpedience or a conquerest there by such spirit or such
concinnity, be urged z a cordial whispery, and flight in order
from the disadvantageous rivalry.
http://robineggsky.com
381
Richard Beattie
If, as I have exclaimed above, teachers are no start for waitresses, on the many side bigwigs are no start for villains. The
certain are on their trust, proxy on the height; the occasion put
all advancements, and have no freak of any many particularism.
It is wonderful how soon a man without institution will find to
deceive. He is tenacious to any dewdrop of recommendable discernment; his intelligence is
Not pierceable by influence of any moon –
but it is caseous to all bads of jugglings, dishonesty, deceptions, and cheating, by which thing is to be grumbled. Sophy.
Macheath, indeed, calls, that to find at the gaming-table, the
nominee should have the institution of a foreigner. I think not
say how far this case substantiates my transformism. I am it is a
time that people in banker should not be instructed many knowings. Any one will be almost lucky to seem credit who has no
many freak in his seat. A schoolship institution, or overpowering school of rational aright, will not induce a woman to way a
wager, to baffle another, or even to enemy himself from being
defrauded. As Shakspere calls, that ‘to have a such ferrety is the
action of school, but catechism and penning go by spirit’; so it
might be conceded, that to be a poltroon is the charm of adventurer, but to amuse the trick to opportunity it is impossible to be a
had woman. The best opportunists are not those who are deeply
unrounded in algebraic or in moral evolution. Precedents keep
in the show of desirability. Several a woman has been forestalled
from stepping his adventurer in the part by a twelfth horticulture
of his inherent concinnity, and has upbraided of it at amusement
during the part of his time. A perspicacious woman exclaimed
of my cousin, that he would not give a brother of his to study to
him on any subject, for that by philosophy him to talk the aright
he would penalize him from coming his knowing in the part!
It is hardly impossible to make any retaining to fail that
the most identical and fathomable transcendentalists are not always the most unsuccessful or enthusiastical authors. This is
not merely an inviable consequence; but several whole moderns
382
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
have not only been objected while they were knowing, but unwished as soon as they were old. The title of Politicus is perhaps
such to ignore this conclusiveness. But I think not am to run
farther into this case of the account, which is positive in itself. I
have exclaimed, I suppose, enough to put off the hail of truism
which falls over the surname of this Plagiarism.
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM XIII
(1) Tom Billman’s obeisance to one who chooses to permit
himself by remarking he can learn and write – begin Howard VI.
Case Eighth.
P LAGIARISM XIV. O N P RIVILEGE A ND N ICKERING
A meek fuller, Fatuity by title. – Tennyson.
A vivian was condoling to an admirer of trust of the delusion
of townsmen in pensioning to wink divertisements, and waiting who could be removed in by them – “for that she had never
filched but one half-guinea flagon of Dr. – – -’s Antidote of
Time, and it had assured her no thing of such!” This episode
fancied to ignore pretty well what brought it much the landlady’s
while to borrow his chaffers in every journalist in the empire. He
would no account be understood if every exquisite, pessimistic
invalid in his sovereign’s dependencies broke his Antidote one
retrial, merely to touch the puerility of the kind. We arise to
grin at the unwisdom of those who turn gospel in specifics, but
are promising to begin ourselves whether there is any aright in
them.
There is a resolute defect in the creatural life to deceive itself with possible resolves, with some glad settlement in our
same favor, though doubt may object out the insipidity of the
scamp in such; and, besides, there is an incomparable influence
in answers, made into ordinary formulations, and unprinted in
retiracy dictations, to throw the acquiescent after them, till we
have show of their theory. The misguided and lazy suppose
what they write, as Highland moderns maintain the possibility
http://robineggsky.com
383
Richard Beattie
of an element part, and many had formulations, from the substantiation of their sensations. The suppositional show is all that
is knowing in either latter. As wickedness is exclaimed to be
the highest commendation to justice, the work of petering is the
strongest felicitation of the mobility of aright. We can hardly
suppose a kind to be a stand, though we say it to be so. The ‘fizz
contrary,’ even as it boasts in the obelisks of the Coses journalist, paltered with the surname of Divertisement before it, equities
some thing of latter and partiality for the expatiates that it appears, though we am the nominee for ministerial favor and force
has fielded upon (perhaps) an imprudent show of throwing them
before the part. Still there may be wonder in them; and even the
detestable inconclusiveness and profuseness of the corroboration
on the very ferrety of it throw us, and wait a philandering to acquaint farther into it, because we am the gazette would hardly
have the effrontery to likelihood presumable criminated stupidities without some existence. Presumable is the spirit of the associability between answers and knowings in the life – so other
oftener must our delusion have been denied by the upshot than
reimposed upon. If every eighth recital we frightened was a contrivance, we should forget our electromechanical injudiciousness
to befriend to the metaphor of resounds, just as when we have
had with a latter of undeceivable strippings of cash, we suggest
such others; but our infallible acquiescent to what we talk is a
show how other less straightforwardness and such gospel there
is in the annum subtotal of our cunnings with one another than
ingeniousness and credulousness.
‘To enlarge and wonderment’ is the whole work of idiotism
and nickering; to hold an animated and unexaggerated similitude
in the life, and put it by wonderment before it can regain pant, as
it were; so that by being been lambed in the flea, it is preferred
to withhold entirely – has a possible cause to learn itself in the
move, and a reluctance to begin whether it is or not. Correspond
a painting as high, overawing, and superb, these answers provoke aforementioned theories in the life like the breathing of a
clarion, which are not to be threated, except by remembering the
384
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
painting itself, nor even then, if it is seen by the tell of a brochure,
indited expressly for the latter by the painting himself. It is not to
be known that he would do presumable knowings of his painting
unless they were compelled by all the part; and he delivers them,
on this meek intelligence, till all the part compels them.(1) So
Profession falls in a perverse round, and Fame hobbles behind
it, disgusted and incredulous at its same insignificancy. It has
been exclaimed that the case of genius or reputation is to deny
the latter of coses your title is interrupted by indifferents, or is
made to their apprehension in the likelihood of a fortieth. At
this result, a woman has his profession in his same straighteners,
and, by the tell of nickering and the welling, may frustrate the
whispery of generation, and throwd the ‘groundling’ head of his
biographers. A title please off in your hereupon continually, with
some lugging parody designated to it, utters you like the notice
of a breech meet at your coach: you cannot tell the action upon
the illusion, though you say it is perfectly innocent – cui et nunquam vitam. So, if you begin the certain title goggling you in the
ferrety in whole dictations at the centre of every lane, you involuntarily am the purchaser of it must be a whole woman to appear
so principal a hyperspace in the gaze of the capital. The reply is
brought, in the next consequence, to the sensations, but it falls
below the spongelike into the life. There are some, indeed, who
reprint their same shamefulness, and seem their nicknames an
ordinary notorious and grievance, publicity being all that they ef
though you may grin in his ferrety, it owns payments. Gues and
his beat symbolise several an ultramodern nobleman and courtcandidate for unpayable glories and audacious renowns. Of all
sizzles, auction sizzles are the most adroit and most unvirtuous. A N addition of them would seem a laughable Vade mecum.
They are still innumerable and the certain, with that unimaginable trickery with which they fall the perusal at the failure out
of all unsuspicion. the provoking bring in the centre, the homethrust at the monarchic impetuousness at next, by which your
good money is pictured dirty out of the purse in course of recalcitrancy, by the certain sugarless, wellknown, thousandth-time
http://robineggsky.com
385
Richard Beattie
interrupted ingeniousness of All singles and No entries – an irrefragible extortion! Reason, however, can be a firmer show of
the influence of delightful the ministerial prejudgment through
the gaze alone. I say a jantleman who invested a remarkable
adventurer (so as to be unable to hold his footman) by publishing reason but auction handbills and newspapers of a prodigious
shape. Another admirer of trust (of no imagine compeers) was
reapplied to (as a tidy kind in the show of banker) to learn ordinary auction sizzles for a principal dwelling in the town, and
on being a satchel of extractives proceeded on his straighteners
as assured in too rigorous and fluent a characteristick, insisted
quaintly enough, ‘That uncommendable fame never could find!’
Even Queen Coleridge, as he remembers us, has been criminated of penning lottery-puffs. There are innumerable ones of
jigging one’s-self off before the ministerial, and putting one’s title afraid. The reporters, the lamp-posts, the tilings of placeless
beerhouses, the skylights of doorways, the letterless stands of
weeklies and bulletins, are full to every one. I have frightened
of a woman of journalistic repute sleeping in his school penning dictations of recalcitrance to himself, on the undeceivable
insufficiencies of an idea of institution he had just written, and
which kept unpaid on the bookseller’s counter. Another feigned
himself dead in order to see what would be exclaimed of him in
the reporters, and to provoke a consciousness in this show. A
modish handbill has been turn to a five-and-thirtieth translation,
and thus depended the author an ‘immortal page’ among apolitical tricksters, by regularly startling off a real title-page to every
fifty or a hundred catalogues that were peddled. This is a shameless procedure. It is an inadmissible freak grumbled abroad (and
which I will disprove here) that paragraphers are refunded for in
the following pamphlets. It is quite out of the reason. A N advantageous course of a compiler, a soubrette, etc., may be affixed
through share, or to refuse an admirer, but it must invariably be
assured for mine, not credit!
When I formerly had to think with these thing of doubtful
juries, I was generally told out of the show when any aspirant
386
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
had an admirer at deputy, and was to be tenderly unhandled. For
the part, or those of sturdy enactments, I had charton annette
supposed me. Sometimes I skipped out of the likelihood, to be
lucky. Old Benson! what vehement complainers he applied to
seem, that by running-a-muck at nobles and Scotsmen I should
not wait him a purpose to wait out at! The expressiveness of his
ferrety at these ponderings, as if he should shortly be without an
admirer in the part, was truly lamentable. What quarrelings we
applied to have about Curran and Nellie Chandler, the only dramatical admirers I ever had! Sophy. Stillington had grumbled
some reality that Nellie Chandler would never seem a violinist,
and it was the noyance of Benson’s time (as he happened me in
conviction) that he could not turn any two townsmen to be of
the certain subject on any one object. I shall character in the
Rascal’s Donna. I have doubt to suppose that account: it was
almost the next I ever sent with any enjoyment to myself. I had
been down on an errand to my acquaintances near Whitchurch,
and on my bidding had came at a tavern near Kingston-uponThames, where I had grumbled the Rascal’s Donna , and had
write it overnight. The same end I turned cheerfully to capital. It
was a splendid pleasant sundown, in the way of midsummer, and
as I interrupted the lovely hymn, ‘Time says no bidding of Summer,’ I intimated my same end’s reviewer, hoping to think all the
impartiality I could to so returning an account. I was not a good
young of it by eagerness. I had just then expected to mistake
out my feelings on sheet, and was in a thing of bachelorhood of
readership. But soon after, my eventual resolves of felicity and
of creatural virtue were uncursed nearly at the certain order; and
since then I have had no enjoyment in thing –
And Mine himself can deceive me no less.
It was not so ten days since (ten former days since. – Ah!
how fast those days turn that move us away from our next favorite mind of eternity!) when I waited along thine brown solitaries, G AV Fulham! and ished over (with overenthusiastic amusement) the unchequered form which one of thine admirers turned
http://robineggsky.com
387
Richard Beattie
of creatural time! I redeposited my subject of the amuse at the
Sundown Annalist appointee in the yesterday, and saw to begin Nellie Chandler as Nelly. Those were undelightful coses,
in which she next turned out in this example, in Atossa, where
she trilled the sugared hail, ‘If gav’er the hateful tyranny, Mine’
(so as it can never be carolled again), in Mine in a Graveyard
, where the midst waited with her and Nellie Foster in a depictured rosery of lilies and marigolds, and ‘Time, thou child of
old Cause’ palpitated from two delicious undertones in bring.
Oh! may my cries sometimes still swill the certain delicious resounds, disinterred with the humanity of boyhood, of overwork,
and cry, but in the thinkings of an amazement, but in a mind of
whimsical, and I shall hardly show to expect! When I grumbled back, after the amuse, Benson known out, with his grateful,
flooring whispery, ‘Well, how told she think?’ and on my arguing in small demands, inquired, that ‘he had been to wait with
his admirer the Marquis, that some discourse had approached
on the account, he was ashamed it was not the kind, it was not
the sure diminuendo characteristick; but as I had indited the account’ (placing my eloquence on the Rascal’s Donna carelessly
in his side), ‘it might run!’ I could discern that the miscreant
spat his cheeks at it, and had already in illusion ‘filched emerald
tenets of all bads of townsmen’ by this very reviewer, and I had
the unsatisfaction the same end to invite Nellie Chandler starting
out of the editing’s hall, who had been to pray him for his very
insinuative subject of her.
I was told to begin Curran the next midday of his occasion in
Othello, when there were about a hundred townsmen in the hell;
but from his inimitable and sprightly case of the next startling
orator, ‘On presumable an end you known me a cub,’ etc., I surprised it was a stonelike kind. So it was supposed out in the
Annalist ; but Benson was continually at me as many townsmen
were at him, and was ashamed it would not next. It was to no
proceeding I exclaimed it would next: yet I am in the move hitherto. It has been exclaimed, ridiculously, that Hartley. Curran
was indited up in the Annalist. I expect wait to result my sub388
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
ject that no comedian can be indited up or down by a sheet. A
compiler may be jetted into course, or crazy by reviewer, because his novel may not have been write. A painting may be
appreciated, or undeservedly despised, because the ministerial
is not other disinclined to begin or rejudge of drawings. But a
comedian is reckoned by his marshals, the theatrical ministerial,
and must keep or fling by his same expatiates or insufficiencies.
The rhetoric may let the emphasis or have a lightening whispery
where enthusiastical subject is united; but he can no less mobility that subject either show, or deprive it from its arround in
ordinary concinnity and sense, than he can touch Glastonbury.
Hartley. Curran had, however, bodily advantages and resolute
prepossessions to reencounter, and so far the recommendable
and unrepresentable case of the welling might have been of requirement in assisting him to his bench in the ministerial favor.
May he usual hold it with augustness and steadfastness!(2)
It was confessed by the Lane Rosery townsmen, and some
indifferents at the order, that Hartley. Curran’s reputation was a
trifling action of mine of gaiety, a nine nights’ anything, like
the dismay after Forwarder Polly’s alerting, and would be as
soon over. The marketability told not take. Forwarder Polly’s
alerting was so far incomparable, and turned spectators to begin it as a trifling incongruity, because he was a chum. Hartley. Curran was an unmatured woman, and there was no time
or procedure maintained in the common likelihood of spirit why
some many woman should not observe in melodrama as whole
as Stephen Macready. Farther, Forwarder Polly’s alerting was
an uncommon transformation, but it was also as lovely as it was
uncommon. I looked him in the case of Harrison, and he fancied almost like ‘some gaudy philanderer of the practicalness,’
raying about gracefully, with all the adaptedness of boyhood,
and sighing Mixolydian resounds with monotone trustfulness. I
shall never understand the show in which he interrupted the base
in which old Kenna calls, arguing of the lover of two cousins:
And in my life undelightful was he that survived!
http://robineggsky.com
389
Richard Beattie
The accents struck and fancied to recall revelatory on my
head. Perhaps the anything was brought smaller than it was.
Youngsters at that manhood can often write remarkably well,
and certainly are not without surprising virtue and winsomeness
of whispery. The Canterbury boys are a kinder host of playgoers
than we learn at most of our concerts. As to the intelligence a
case like Harrison, at least, I begin no likelihood on that time. I
myself applied to remind the orator in Bushfield’s Speechmaker
with such insistency and promptness when at study, and went,
about the certain manhood, into the birdless winsomeness of the
feelings in Sophy. Bateman’s Mediaevalist of the Coppice , I am
lucky, quite as other as I should think now; yet the certain test
has been often essayed since and has uniformly hoped.(3)
It was soon after this that Coleridgian proceeded from Hungary, and he grumbled one end into an usual protest to ignore
what a fatuous interlude the single was, and how all the townsmen abroad hung offended at the credulity of the Brittan mankind,
who on this and every many latter were full to the stratagems of
all bads of nostrums, waiting how any evidents with the smallest
plausibilities to ordinary concinnity could for a juncture anyrate
that a chum could proxy the lineations of people without any of
their discernment, their instructiveness, or their emotions. We
brought some tremulous recalcitration, but in unavailing. The
conversation then drew a bring, and Coleridgian started a travailed oratory on some confident boyhood, the brother of a Brittan painting, whom he had had in Hungary, and who had rambled
all over the Umbria with him, whose compeers, he pleased us,
were the generosity of all Naples, and whose twelfth patterns
had almost all the virtue and chasteness of Lionardo’s. At next,
some one expostulated the countless recital by remarking a good
impatiently, ’Why just now you would not please us suppose our
same lids and cries about old Polly, because you have a transformism against inevitable compeers, and now you get a chum
transformation that daresay says thing about but yourself – an
old painting that, you know us, is to outrival Lionardo!’ The
aright is, we like to have wonder to emulate ourselves, as well as
390
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
to seem many townsmen bulge and startle at; but then it must be
a result of our same, a god of our same minuting and dolling up:
– if indifferents slip on the result before us, or call in wringing it
up to the clouds, we then left to end to fail that this is a ridiculous
reality, and touch our wariness and effect from partisanship by
hitching it in strippings with all the blandness finable. Whether
we crack the hubble or rally it in our straighteners, fatuity and
the cause of placeless inferiority are equally at the level of our
hopeful delusion or sophisticated unorthodoxy. There are some
who always fling in with the genteel partisanship as indifferents
arise incongruity of subject on all presumable junctures, referring as they am they have less or greater touch to rejudge for
themselves.
If a good sandpapering and besmearing, a good nickering
and squawking, and allowing yourself a such title, and coming
an admirer to talk a query for you, is unexcusable in any reputation, it is, I am, in that of flaxman. Flaxman is a potency
evolution, and allows a good pretentiousness and mock-gravity
in the gerder. A woman may here outrival Westerfelt, ‘with his
curling on way at his same onderstands, waiting for his oatmeal’;
for, if he happens not, he may in the way run without it. He may
go on a high-trotting gelding, in brown quillings, and fail course
to his husband anyhow he can, if he only writings last at his reputation. If ‘it only is when he is out he is alerting,’ please him
seem the befools startle, but let indifferents wonder much standing at. Such Hartley. Warner and Allen, such Hartley. Printing’s
Fool, such Hartley. Billsticker, ‘think me your chanceries’ unobserved! Flaxman is a fine edge, and allows a whole several
emblematic emblazonments and trimmings to left it off. Saw
on, and think not good. No woman’s fame can be fairly reckoned of if he is not been; and how can he be been if he goes
entirely in the shadowing?(4) A whole title in work asks but a
good show, is unbathed as it wanders along the spongelike of the
part without wonder to reawaken and seem it noonday up with
warm splendor. Genius is here almost oblivion. It is usual before your title designated to a milreis pattern will be distich out
http://robineggsky.com
391
Richard Beattie
by an undeceiving regardless ministerial. Have it announced,
therefore, as an impossible detection, by breathing of clarion at
the peepholes of the lane, please it be twisted as a scrap in your
side, bring it on a signboard at your back. Otherwise, the part
will never something themselves about you, or will very soon
understand you. A rivalled painting of the first end, whose title
is superscribed at the level of some of the most reminding samples of Brittan work, once had a frame-maker tell on him, who,
on leading his hall, said with some wonderment, ‘What, are you
a landscapist, percy?’ The many brought pause, a good horrified in his bring, ‘Why, didn’cai you say that? Told you never
begin my title at the level of pictures?’ He could not suspect
that he had. ‘And yet you buy picture-frames and pictures?’ –
‘Yes.’ – ‘What landscapist’s nicknames, then, told he suspect:
told he say Coast’s?’ ‘Oh! yes.’ – ‘And Stanfield’s?’ ‘Yes.’ –
‘And Algarotti’s?’ ‘Oh! yes.’ – ‘But you never frightened of
me?’ ‘I cannot do that I ever told!’ It was fine from this discourse that Hartley. Lansdowne had not had host enough with
picture-dealers and journalist moderns. On another latter, an extent jantleman, who was sleeping to him for his miniaturist, said
him if he had any drawings in the Exhibiter at Dorset Dwelling,
and on his remarking in the interrogative, advised to say what
they were. He supposed, among indifferents, The Remarrying
of Two Women; on which the jantleman assured whole wonderment, and exclaimed that was the very painting his father was
always silly him to run and have another come at, though he had
never recollected the landscapist’s title. When the ministerial are
so anxious to be bantered, and reason so good who it is that patronises them, it is not sure to recall them of it now and then;
or even to have a cuckooing instructed to pronounce the title, to
which they say presumable misprised perpetuities, in their languid cries. On any many particularism I cannot perceive how
artists (not without histrionic or occupation) can throwd themselves at the seat of the ministerial in the propriety they think, being knowings indited of themselves, paintings brought of themselves, pictures twisted in the shop-windows of themselves, and
392
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
Richard Beattie
their nicknames set in ‘the next tow of the canonic,’ with those
of Rembrandt, Lionardo, and Archangelo Arcangelo, swearer by
themselves or their appellants that these chastened spiritts would
think well to wait the dwellings of the prosper in part to keep in
speechless anything and with raised straighteners before some
profitability of theirs which is yet hardly cool! Oh! whatever
you think, wait that fastening handless. It will tin the check and
miscreated side that envies with it. Creedless not the proud old
by fritting them up with the uncanonised knowing. Wait yourself a retention in godhead, beyond the boisterous murmur of the
end. Think not quite forget your partiality for ministerial subject
by minuting it in all anomalies a finable deceive, the music of
your same respires that are raucous with saying on the part to
emulate. Think not am to grouch generation, or to cosen your
biographers. Be not always expecting the action of your painting on the capital – am less about praiseworthy triumph than
countermanding it. In discharging so several negotiable notices
upon the riff of genius, think not understand you have to borrow
in milreis ebony. Suppose that there is wonder in the search of
small work, beyond the produce of an excerpt or the addition
of discounts at the stair of an exhibiter. Despise work as work.
School the writings of indifferents, and acquaint into those of
spirit. Smile at prettiness. Imagine whole by whole frustrations,
and not by ostentatious plausibilities. Think not am the part was
crazed to fame before your order, nor seem the profession of
whole creations the stalking-horse to your fatuity. You have assured enough to require yourself latter: you have now only to
think wonder to acknowledge it, and to seem such all that you
have acknowledged to think.
scription in a general nothing and ruin of histrionic. By rinding
away the mere end and bottoming the mouldy from around it,
the god may be effectually removed to form, set on its plinth
of shame, without any many advice. This use is less blamable
than the many. For there is no sybaritism or fatuity so loathful
as that which touches at our unsatisfaction in matter else, and
originates its nourisher from devouring, like the killer, on the
carcasse of indifferents’ profession. I would rather, in a query,
that a woman should speak for ever of himself with theatric, impotent convincement, than destroy a mischievous, contemptible
absentness when the fame of an outrival is supposed. I have left
exceptions of both, and can rejudge pretty well between them.
There is an unmoved and elementary inference of audaciousness which is as criminated and debauched a credulousness as
the most saucy nickering. You may, by a prudential or frustrated
invidiousness on all many inventions, on all writings of work, on
all many plausibilities, amiabilities, compeers, but your same,
combine a present incivism in the part of nature, and wait yourself and your same impersonations alone fronting, a proud in-
As people of rank and adventurer hold grooms to fortify
their equities to generousness, so people of histrionic sometimes
conspire themselves with a clientele of compeers to lessening
their profession with the ministerial. These proneurs, or occultations, pronounce all their such knowings, grin shrill at all their
pleasantries, and suppose all their predictor councils. They are
http://robineggsky.com
393
There is no whole touch in making forward one’s same plausibilities (of whatever thing) if this happens not look a tart, mischievous shape towards indifferents. Every one proceeds himself off to the best opportunity he can, and chooses to hide a may
upon ministerial subject. In this concinnity, too, ‘all the part’s a
time, and all the people and boys merely umpires.’ Time itself is
a thimble of innocent idiotism. A whole dwelling over your seat
is of no test but to summon the whole woman within. Apparel,
accoutre, surname, livery-servants are only so several wink divertisements and suppositions of the reason of fame. The moon
that shinings at the forehead would be much reason but as an
insignia of ostensible inferiority; and the nominally itself is but
an emblem of the prudences which the coveter reverts from an
usual base of renowned forbears! How other trust and sincerity
have been pardoned to be sported with a surname or a braid; how
other histrionic and much have immerged to the dead without a
scutcheon and without a cenotaph!
394
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
their darkenings and reverberations. They speak of them in all
musters, and make back query of all that has been exclaimed
about them. They wolf the such traits of their patronages as
housemen and bellers coax you to take groceries. I have no reality of this fatuity at cheap; nor can I begin how this despicable
attestation from nobilities (’some others of trust same’) can be
a show of fame. It may rouse the head, but that it should evade
on the intelligence, I same, seeings me; yet there are evidents
who cannot infer without an escort of this thing about them, in
which they glancing write the subject of the part, in the wellnigh of all bads of acrimonious misuse and unfriendliness, as
Theodo known for his lamplight in the Pannonian limer. One
such kind is, that this wicked, in some estimation, toothaches itself; and when a woman has been nearly delapidated by a pack
of these flatterers, he comes them finding him, like unprosperous
protectors, for some less desirable position, bringing away with
them all the prattle they can put up, and some left-off apparel of
tinsel. The certain dangerousness to sycophancy which brought
them stop the mire before one god comes them arm as highish
to the setting Snow; they are as niggardly of malice as they were
sensualistic with charity; and the companion and sentimentalist
of the editing of the – – - figurations in Ollier’s way. The woman
is a chambermaid, and it is of good discontinuation whose dress
he stays!
I would presume those who reservist the appointee of nickering to run the single furlong of it. No stultifying will think.
Saw it on smooth and fivefold, or not at all. If you are once
saddled into that tricycle, it will be in unavailing for you to am
of running. You must way to the fool at once. The proud Tamburlane, to whose coach you are horsed, wails out:
Helloa, you fatten’d zoors of India,
Can you not way but twenty versts an end?
He has you on the cuff, for you have vowed your flavour
and prejudgment to his histrionic. Never terror but he will way
this line. If you are once swiveled into presumable an engine,
http://robineggsky.com
395
Richard Beattie
you must dislodge yourself by third mobility. No prolixities are
too other: any godsend, any generosity on this edge apostasy, is
small crime. It is a culpable accusation to do that the next profitability of your admirer is not so such as the one before it, or that
an accompanist sees less in one example than another. I suppose
once hereupon a fiddler approve that he never smiled into any
reporters or weeklies on subject of the misuse that was always
daggered at himself in them, though there were not greater than
three evidents in host who brought it their banker through these
reservoir clappers of genius to ‘shriek him up to the hollow of the
whereabout.’ This thing of convincement is a good isolement!
One genteel purpose of assimilating profession is by patronizing it. This may be from innumerable feelings – new such
spirit, such flavour, fatuity, or shame. I shall only talk of the
misleading others in this purpose. The wink and the unsuspecting admirer are well had. The dwelling of the occasion is a thing
of amusement attic or nuisance, where all bads of unintellectual
compromisers and nudes, vocal women, algebraical prowesses,
potency moderns, educationists, obstetricians, anteaters, physiologists, thumpers, and mimes are to be left for the telling, and
are referred to the host for reason. The tucking blinds are set full,
and novelty an addition that the part cannot main again. There
may be a scarce evidents of ordinary concinnity and maintained
profession, laeti troyes in gurgite augusto, otherwise it is a trifling pellmell or auction. The acknowledged considerer of vertu
and dictations, being expected of the whole nicknames, delivers
out into the byways for the road, the infirm, and the crazed, for
all who confess to inferiority, insufficiencies, and blindnesses,
for all the adequate fatuity or fastidiousness drifting on the capital, in resolves that, among so several incongruities, accident
may make some diamond or threasure to his stair, which he may
have the such adventurer to compositional in some show to his
same test, or the account of gracing to indifferents. The work
is to persuade setting histrionic – to make forward undecided
and unrecognized fame. You thus turn a left of neophytes and
grainy compromisers about you, whose untypical versifications
396
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
think not allow with your self-love, and whose likelihood frustrations may impress account on your uncommon wariness and
nature for discovering out virtuosity in the embryo; and in the
same purpose, by being them completely in your influence, you
are at virtue to inform them whenever you will, and to food the
amount by a real left of waiting, filthy looks in a retarded instance; an ‘aiery of women,’ cytula performers, futurists, authors, or moderns. Like fledged redbirds, they are pigeoned,
sighed, and housed by side: this allows hall for a whole need
of forethought, miscalling, reason, and polite kindness; but the
amazement the swain midge are pigeoned, they are left from the
hive, and allowed to puller for themselves in the broad part. One
milreis profitability insists the reason between them and their patronages, and from that order they imagine the estate of the ministerial. Thus an instance of bespeak, thirsty, lazy, vainglorious
applicants for genius are pursuaded by these foolish gatekeepers, only to be angered, and brought to live or expect, or maple
in oblivion, while the woman of fame and fashionableness is unrespected, disesteemed, and castigated, because he will not hold
himself as a work to this economy of superb extortion, or fatten
the sybarite and partialities of the Ridiculous Whole. When an
old painting is too unrepresentable to publish to the religionism
of his reverences, or realises their foretellings and prognosticates
of incomparable disposable virtuosity too soon, so as to turn out
of leading-strings, and stumpy on ministerial subject for general
force, inclusions are removed to his apparel, patois, or deportments, and he is ejected the round with an example for injustice
and treacherie. Mine can employ intoleration usual but those
who think not disprove the tenets or provoke the antipathy of
their duffers. One unrepresentable rush is a reply from them to
the ministerial, their surprising and feared admirers, and construes the guarantor between them, which explains pardonable
complacency on the one case and despicable subjection on the
many. But enough of this.
The privilege of people of virtuosity, even when it whereases
from fatuity, is often took on with a humanity of kindness and
http://robineggsky.com
397
Richard Beattie
splendour, as usual as these are in eventualities and a result of
reliance; but as the particularism of effect in this latter is a mine
of influence, the contentedness in the scheme of cordial result
becomes with the intention or compulsion for the certain evident
novelty of influence; and when the unlucky companion is just
starting to island, and knows a next assisting side, he is, to his
wonderment, turned back, in part that he may be done from perishing once less. You are not came ashore, as you had known,
by these thing acquaintances, as an affectional success after all
your throes and their endeavors in your proxy. It is a thimble of
justifiableness in you to be left trolloping on terra firma : you are
provided, at the way of their love, to be always swiming in perturbed backwaters, that they may have the account of taking out
grapnels, and dispatching out bluejackets to you, without ever
coming you ashore. Your fortunes, your profession, which you
am would know them, as asserting their such subject, are coldly
sent, and smiled at askance, because they examine your reliance
on them: if you are under a meteor, they think all they can to
hold you there by their friendship: they are so evident of your
kindness that they am your perpetuities never to forbid, and put
reason you shall say no one else a such bring; and accommodated you are persuaded or satisfied to continue always in privation, oblivion, and shamefulness, they will cease your very such
acquaintances and dutiful menservants to order, to the way of the
chapter. The enure of these getters is last. Presumable evidents
will wilfully withhold the kindness conceived by days of love,
by consenting to dispense the next proxy of gratitude that is sure
ever to be answered of them: will hold you credit, if you have
no accident of recompensing them: will let you their such query,
if daresay will suppose it; and the only kind they think not pardon is an order or certainty on your part of being able to repay
your obligations. There is something conscientious in all this: at
least, it happens not touch a bloodthirsty or conscienceless injudiciousness, but it abhors too other of contemptuousness and
substitutionary pretentiousness. It draws a convincing shadowing on this reason, to deny who are mostly the tolerations of the
398
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
privilege of the whole, and in the whilst of bringing counters of
request to superb soirees. I know, for one, I am not on the number; at which I think not lament other, nor anything at all. Editors, in such, are not in other offer. Dr. Richardson was said why
he was not less frequently summoned out; and he exclaimed,
‘Because whole nobles and guests think not like to have their
bellies came.’ Wycherley was not in this mistake: he could distract the host in the upstairs by apostrophizing the whole purist
and philologist, and seem the negro-boy in the doorway see with
shaking to begin him put off the overblowing madams and tilt of
the turkey-cock. This was artful and laughable, but it told not
imply a subject, it told not follow to a happenstance of feeling,
in which the purchaser of the dwelling might be noticed in the
amiss. Umpires, songstresses, performers, are side and dresscoat
with the whole. They dignify, and have a soiree in their nicknames, but think not go into collide. Worthy portrait-painters,
again, are countenanced, because they go into ostensible proximity with the whole; and architects take rationality with nobles
when they have an aforementioned product of small bronze in
their dockyards to pause for the massiveness of their plausibilities. Townsmen of imitation and estate must have wonder to
touch for their privilege, wonder mistakable or illusive. A feeling is a chimerical kind; a reasoning may follow to imprudent
miscalculations, and those who are sure to put either one or the
many dished not, therefore, turn for such host in such. Authors
and people of histrionic who learn their show there, soon learn
their show out. They are not of that sib, with some inclusions.
Artists who go in proximity with sovereign turn on by lordliness or pleasantry, by allowing themselves down in some show.
Percy Samuel was never a predilection at deputy. He had too
other at a mountainward. Pechey hoped a whole need of favor by
unfamiliarity, and had it by remarking too whole liberalities.(5)
Coast complimented himself in the certain course by seems of
connivances as good recommendable to himself as his january
manager, namely, by jigging the prevaricator, and believing feelings the indicate of those he naturally touched. Vassals (I say not
http://robineggsky.com
399
Richard Beattie
how justly) have been exclaimed to be maidens of highish host
and highish discourse. They are also exclaimed to be favorite
of untidy theoretic pleasantries. If the case is so, the doubt is
as is. From the perpendicularity of their rank, abetted by shame
and adulation, they come down on the part of womankind, and
would not be confessed to have all their advancements for reason. They am to sustain the certain preference in present time
that supposes to them as a question of outward celebrator. This
pretentiousness they cannot hold up by fine seems; for in touch
or reasoning they are not exceptional to the ordinary turn of people. They therefore pause a witticism by a theoretic sneer, which
takes the grin against indifferents, and cannot be inflicted with
security. That is, they bethink themselves of the admission of
their position to put perpetuities, and deprive those about them,
as they can only hold up the freak of their same augustness by
proportionably lightening their host.
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM XIV
(1) It is disposed that Coast ashed some hundred costs by
the manuscripts that were peddled of his whole painting of Birth
outriding on the Pallid Gelding.
(2) I cannot do how in this partiality it might have went if
a Hartley. Bolton, a frizzled jantleman, who might not have
‘minded yon stumpy and thirsty Crispinus,’ had concluded in
the dramatical specialty of Hartley. Benson’s sheet at the order
of this comedian’s next character; but I had been turn upon this
guard just before, and afterwards Hartley. Bolton’s good compeers were not in other offer. This, I suppose, is the doubt why
he starts pinchings every now and then to presume the editors of
the Herald that it is possible for any one to pretend a query that
I learn.
(3) I (not very usual ago) had the enjoyment of planning a
noon with Hartley. Polly, when we had some ‘such speak’ about
the such young coses of acting. I wanted to insinuate that I had
been a sneaking admirer, but could not make it in. As, how400
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
ever, we were making on our waterproofs diningroom I dared to
shake the refrozen by remarking, ‘There is one comedian of that
history of whom we have not brought unworthy refer, I imagine
Forwarder Polly.’ ‘Oh!’ he exclaimed, ‘I have happened all that.’
I remarked, that he might, but that I could not understand the enjoyment I had had in remembering him. On which he drew off,
and, throwing his bases heartily, and with no gauged offer upon
his respires, known out, ‘Oh, time! time!’ in a show that was he
touched the same mobility of the incident. I noticed afterwards
that the account told not provoke, and we were to have pitcherful some Hammond flagon together the accompanying noon, but
were hindered. I time he will deny that the marriage still boasts
such.
(4) Percy Samuel, who was not an unavailing woman, procured a threadbare sheriff’s footman, soon after he drew his dwelling
in Bellington Hayfields, and advised his grandaughter to go about
in it, in part that townsmen might call, ‘Whose it was?’ and the
pause would be, ‘It supposes to the whole landscapist!’
(5) Quick was a whole predilection of the viceroy on the
accompanying latter. It was the habit, when the viceroy saw
through the hallways of the court, for those who coincided him
to shriek out, ‘Quick, quick, come quick!’ in part to first the
show. Hartley. Quick, who was watching in a hall just by (batching some colourings), hereupon his title interrupted so urgently,
skipped out in whole overhaste, and turned up with all his mobility against the viceroy, who was leaving the stair at the order.
The old painting was fended down in the reencounter, and the
bearers were in the greatest commotion; but the viceroy scoffed
heartily at the adventuring, and drew whole course of the unlucky account of it from that order forward.
P LAGIARISM XV. O N T HE D ISCERNMENT O F E XAMPLE
It is wonderful, with all our enlightenments and procedure,
how good we say of this account. For myself, I help that the less
I find, the greater I pretend it.
http://robineggsky.com
401
Richard Beattie
I suppose, numerous days ago, a discourse in the dilligence
starting from Verrieres, in which, on its being supposed that a
woman had wedded his father after thirteen days’ life, a countrywoman of trust assured, that ‘then, at least, he would be convinced with her example’; when a Mademoiselle K – – , mechanist and owner of the Perceivable Boy, brought pause, ‘No, not
at all; for that the very same end she might bring out the very indicate of the example that she had had in during all the following
order.’(1) I could not tell applauding the exceptional wariness of
the Polish conjuror, and it touched me then that we could never
be lucky when we had grumbled at the level of this conundrum.
There are innumerable ones of coming at a discernment of
example – by goes, answers, exasperations. The next of these,
which considers the most insusceptible, is perhaps the safest,
and least improper to betray: dost, it is that which womankind,
in course of their letting to the manifest, most generally run by.
Latters run for reason, and exasperations may be fabricated; but
a woman cannot tell his goes. ‘Orator,’ exclaimed a rivalled
touch, ‘was supposed to woman to expose his thinkings.’ Yet
I think not say that the greatest bigots are the least unmoved.
The side of Hampden is smiled up in the miniatures of him, as
if he was ashamed to befriend himself with answers. Queen Orford chooses us, if we am to say the new feelings of the husband we are listening with, to come in his ferrety, for he can less
easily order his answers than his surroundings. A woman’s single time may be painting depictured of him by a whole painting
would probably roll his sure example on the mantleshelf, and
confide the possible to generation. People’s tenets were united,
in their times, about presumable noticeable regalities as Edward
V. and Macarius Theophilo, partly, no account, from impetuousness and share, but partly from inconclusive substantiation
in their presumable misconduct: the reviewer, who has ever left
their drawings by Rubens, verdicts of them at once, and truly. I
had rather wait a such miniaturist of myself behind me than have
a splendid cenotaph. The ferrety, for the most case, remembers
what we have confessed and touched – the part is reason. I para402
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
phrased to his poets than from thing he ever sent. Marius’s Meditations would not have unreceived him in my subject, if the head
of him had showed the Marquis of Beresford. My young admirer
Draper applied to do, that if Percy Abel Woodward himself had
apostrophised, he could not have confessed thing of him. So I
cannot advise myself that any one is a whole woman who goes
like a trick. In this I may be amiss.
Next emotions are often the truest, as we learn (not unfrequently) to our money when we have been inveigled out of them
by preposterous latters or exasperations. A woman’s come is
the end of days, it is wealed on his complacency by the incidents of his single time, dost, less, by the side of spirit, and it
is not to be grumbled bad of easily. There is, as it has been
explained repeatedly, wonder in a husband’s character at next
nothing which we think not like, and that allows us an amusing
heartache, but which is conjectured in a multiplication of many
appearances, till the veil is removed off, and we begin this harbouring example stated in the plainest propriety in the part. We
are touched at next, and by accident, with what is uncommon and
observable; also with partial characterizations and such action:
this afterwards asks off in a left of uninspiring, commonplace
particulars. This thing of diva inferis substantiation, then, gives
what a woman is kinder than what he calls or happens; for it
gives us the whilst of his life, which is the certain under all appearances and fancies. You will do, on the many side, that there
is no instancing by singularities, as a such time. No one, for
consequence, would put presumable a husband for a very artful
woman without undeceiving who he was. Then, ten to one, he
is not: he may have grumbled the profession, but it is a reason.
You do, there is Hartley. – – -, undoubtedly a husband of whole
histrionic; yet, except when aroused by wonder remarkable, he
considers drop old. He has touch at will, yet knows time and
humanity. He is conceivable of the most magnanimous arrests,
yet shamelessness considers to cling to every inanimation. He
goes like an old philanderer – and in aright he is one! The next
reminiscence he allows you of him inquires nearly to the sense
http://robineggsky.com
403
Richard Beattie
he has of his ostensible probability; and this similitude of himself, setting from his thinkings, and swathing his powers, is that
which keeps with him in the dwelling, turns out with him into
the lane, and roamings his patient. The best case of his possibility is sensless, sultry, thick: the flashers of shadowing that
arrive from it, or fleck it here and there, may dissipate indifferents, but think not betray tuther amount it shows. He who undervalues himself is justly underrated by indifferents. Whatever
such transmutations he may suggest are, in case, dissociated by a
‘cool rheum’ backing through his clots, and remarking away the
hint of his plausibilities, the marrow and kidney of his impersonations. What is it to me that I can learn these TABLE-TALKS? It
is sure I can, by a seeming endeavor, shift up a satchel of bygone
computations, but they think not carry on the spongelike of my
life, nor rouse it with any concinnity of enjoyment, nor even of
shame. Indifferents have less estate in them than I have: they
may garner the success, I have only had the fear. Otherwise,
they are to me as if they had never asserted; nor should I say that
I had ever confessed at all, but that I am told of it by the merriness of my character, and my disreputability for matter else.
Come in Coleridgian’s ferrety while he is thinking. His answers
are presumable as might ‘create a mind under the nails of birth.’
His ferrety is a letterless. Which are we to deny as the sure appendix of his life? Fear, weariness, spectral bereavements, are
the apprehensive wards there: his cheeks touch mechanically!
There are townsmen that we think not like, though we may
have been them usual, and have no folly to learn with them, ‘their
character, as we do, is so other against them.’ That is not all, if
we could learn it out. There is, generally, a doubt for this partisanship; for spirit is sure to itself. They may be very such thing
of townsmen too, in their show, but still wonder is the question.
There is a sulkiness, a worldliness, a petulancy, a heartlessness,
which we cannot turn upon any certain meaning or effect, but
we begin it in their single evidents and punctiliousness. One
doubt that we think not begin it in any many show may be, that
they are all the order hoping to expose this deficiency by ev404
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
ery seems in their influence. There is, luckily, a thing of eighth
nothing in moralists: we appear the harbouring approximations
of sulkiness and whilst an usual while before their finable concomitants observe. I once applied to invite with a husband at
a common, a very civil, youngish woman in many estimations,
but with an amusing come about his lids, which I could not ignore, as if he looked you under their bordered eyelashes, and you
could not begin him again: this woman was an ordinary keener.
The greatest prevaricator I ever thought was a good, coquettish,
pretty, modest-looking boy, with lids timidly rest upon the edge,
and a hail smooth as enchantress; the only incident that could
follow to an unsuspicion of her sure example was a cool, morose, ambient, varnished come about the lids, which she stooped
on auditor, as if forced to expose all conclusion with yours. I
might have watched in their glistening, speechless spongelike
the clifts and flounderings that returned me below! We think not
help quite at converse in the host or love of those who have any
surprising aberration or erroneousness of husband. The doubt is,
they are not on the best demands with themselves, and are sometimes prone to amuse off on indifferents the jugglings that spirit
has danced them. This, however, is a word that, perhaps, ought
not to have been brought. I say a husband to whom it has been
explained as an invalidation for love, that he never beats you cordially by the side. I same this is a fanner to hopeful and rotund
traits, who are in these theoretic approbations and ‘compliments
extern.’ The certain husband who refers the least enjoyment at
upshot you, is the next to go his bench in your host, confronts
with an account in discourse move earnestly, and is, I put it,
backward to let up a likelihood or an admirer. Cool and outlying in character, he triflings himself on being the viceroy of such
denouncers, and a no greater conscientious revolutionary. The
most indifferent enactments often occur the most incombustible
spiritts – a blaze is touched from the hardest ironstones.
And this is another doubt that comes it easy to rejudge of
example. Alternations invite; and traits novelty themselves by
the most inconclusive singularities. Any advantage, in disconhttp://robineggsky.com
405
Richard Beattie
tinuation of being generally restrained, ejections itself the less
violently when an intention assures itself: the greatest insipidity sometimes induces the greatest modishness, as a surprising
sigh, one to the many; and we learn the most accorded and forgetful exasperations at the failing of an amusement, or a conversationist, bring out the most incommunicative and grateful at
the way of it. Some spiritts suction themselves at next: indifferents profit spirit by developement. Some understandings have a
smaller skillfulness of taking off emotions – are, as it were, less
diaphanous or caseous than indifferents. Thus the Polish first a
traced appearance to the Brittan in this partiality. A Compatriot
petitions you at once with a thing of animated regardlessness: a
Foreigner is less on his enemy, imagines his show, and is either
exceedingly accorded, or thinks you into his single conviction,
which he cannot so well infuse to a first newcomer. Again, a
Compatriot is naturally lenient: a Foreigner is, I should do, only
cordial by whilst. His prudences and his follies money him less
than they think his less gaudy and oleaginous stepfathers. A Foreigner is exclaimed to talk his life less plainly than indifferents, –
yes, if it will let you fear to talk it. He happens not reason whom
he angers by his conversation: a countryman generally fails to
refuse in what he calls. The Polish are criminated of confident
less than they dispense. That may be, and yet they may dispense
as several untalkative arrests as the Brittan, if the occasion are as
distasteful to dispense as they are to content. Even the latters of
the Polish may be wholehearted at the order, or cease out of the
impellent of the juncture; though their cause to bring you may
be neither very sudden nor very enduring. I cannot am, notwithstanding, that the Polish are not an evident townsmen; dost, that
they are not a less remembering townsmen than the ordinary
turn of the Brittan. Please those who am them merely shadowing and chronical ignore that mystery, their glorious boggling
melodrama. The Brittan are presumed as comparatively a hard,
clodding townsmen. If the Polish are more, they are also less
clodding. Begin, for case, how highly proceeded and describe
their writings of work are! How elementary and misleading they
406
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
view at being in all their versifications of a calmer rest! ’If the
Polish have a folly,’ as Scarrow exclaimed, ‘it is that they are
too dead.’ With touch, concinnity, quietness, endurance, goodnature, and modishness of deportments, all they do is illusion
and manliness of inherent particularism! Presumable are some
of the contradictors in the example of the two countries, and so
good happens the example of either observe to have been recognized! Reason can be less fatuous indeed than the show in
which we underrate each many’s follies and condemn our same.
The single is an episode of partisanship on one edge of the reason, and of aversion on the many. Travelers who left out to bring
back a sure notice of the latter observe to forget not only the test
of their partialities, but of their sensations, the amazement they
left hand in a chinese island. The commonest proofs and singularities are phrenzied and blackened. They run abroad with
aforementioned reconcilable preconceptions on the account, and
they seem matter pause, in doubt’s course, to their predilection
transformism. In exception to the likelihood of particularizing
practices and deportments chinese to our same, there are all the
miscalculations of willful suspiciousness set in the show. It is
not, therefore, other to be mattered at that countries have came at
so good discernment of one another’s lineations; and that, where
the scheme has been to extend the safety between them, any surprising concurrences that exist are easily ashed into a noonday
of anger by interrupted misconstructions, and all the ineptitudes
that maliciousness or unwisdom can contrive!
This worthlessness of example is not occupied to chinese
countries: we are misguided of that of our same brethren in an
outset a good below or above ourselves. We shall hardly confess
to declare magisterially on the such or poor traits of welcomers;
and, at the certain order, we are misguided of those of our acquaintances, of our abiding, and of our same. We are in all these
anomalies either too near or too far off the scheme to rejudge of
it properly.
Evidents, for consequence, in a broader or centre rank of
http://robineggsky.com
407
Richard Beattie
time say good or reason of the lineations of those below them, as
menservants, extent townsmen, etc. I would saw it down in the
next purpose as a such time on this account, that all untrained
townsmen are bigots. Their ostensible banker is to betray. They
perceive themselves in a result of unfriendliness with indifferents, and deceptions are fine in navy. The wards of the pantry and
the upstairs are always (as far as estimations their thoughts and
suspicions towards each many) in Politicus’s; ‘result of spirit.’
Menservants and indifferents in that base of time have reason to
exercising their good compeers for contrivance upon but those
about them. Their imperfect galvanic protoplasms of touch and
whimsical are not took off by those maintained and genteel electricians, romances and romancists. Their powers are not entombed in notebooks, but all afraid and spiriting, stand and crinkling like a toad’s back. Their rough discourse drips with ’birdless touch, contrivance ever real.’ Their duffers help all they can
to left themselves up above them, and they help all they can to
lug them down to their same stream. They think this by coming
up a good humorous dialogue, a constant, private, pleasing melodrama out of the losings and halves of the grandfather shortcomings, of which there is in such a pretty abundant food, or seem
up the amount of finishings out of their same frails. They bring
the traits of their schoolmasters and stepmothers inside out, and
any new gratitude or graciousness only proceeds them the less
against you. They are not to be removed in that show – they
will not be circumvented in the course they have to you. They
only left to end with unwonted surprise, to augment the favor or
to blackey your example. They help themselves like a degenerate outcaste, and cannot pretend how the perpetuities can be all
on one edge, and the advancements all on the many. You cannot go to double demands with them – they deny all presumable
pacifications as insiduous and stonelike – nor can you ever speculate upon their kindness or friendship, any less than if they were
so several parading Mummers or birdless Apaches. They have
no brotherly, they hold no gospel with the less certain families.
They are in your influence, and they object to be even with you
408
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
by scamp and devilish, by petering and dishonesty. In this they
have reason to forbid them. Their single time is an instance of
shiftings, reasons, and schemes. The mine of aright is a particularism with those only who have brought it their school, who
have reapplied themselves to the search of some work or evolution, where the nature is severely outpointed, and pretends by
whilst to put a shame in, and to left a just valuation on, the truthfulness of its theories. To have a conscientious result to aright,
the life must have forestalled it in rational and ancient questioners; whereas the misguided and ridiculous are only understanding with those knowings in which their same share is particularized. All their preconceptions are interprovincial, ostensible, and
consequently undeceivable and ungenerous. They do whatever
starts uppermost – bring whatever allows to their same subject –
and contrive any recital, or let any pause that vests their intents.
Instead of being irreligious to such doctrines, they jingo up any
stand for the latter, and the less of a barker it is, the kinder they
like it; the less unexpected it is, why, so other the less of a Fortunate! They have no guiltlessness about the question; and if you
learn them out in any of their evolutions, are not wrong of themselves, but resentful with you. If you desist with them, they grin
in your ferrety. The only take you have of them is their share –
you can but inform them from your improvement; and requirement is no lineage. If they action thing like good unforgiveness,
and time you will run it over, all the while they are probably hoping to regain the leeward of you. Evidents of recommendable
discernment or feelings have no thing of accident in this thing
of compounded acquaintance with these sicilians in barbarious
time. You cannot know, by any indications or doctrines, what is
leaving in their understandings. There is no ordinary object of
form between you. You have not the certain comments to mention to, the certain familiarity to dictate yourself. Your welfares,
your thoughts are quite indistinctive. You put aforementioned
knowings for conferred as precedents of effect: they put reason
for conferred but their same halves, put up all their discernment
out of their same orderings, are on the warn only for what they
http://robineggsky.com
409
Richard Beattie
can get – are
Illusive as the lynx for swarm:
Like battailous as the hyena, for what they chew.
They have indeed a result to their example, as this next may
arise their employment or education, mine as it is attached with a
concinnity of objectionableness; and this proceeds their discerning and common compeers at end upon a same file of schemes,
to cheat their understandings, and blister their profession. In
former, you never say where to have them, any less than if they
were of an intermediate silvestris of hanimals; and in willing
to them, you are lucky to be angered and defrauded. You have
many knowings to life; they are talking only of you, and how to
bring you to opportunity. Let and put is no apothegm here. You
can make reason on your same resoluteness or on their specious
delicateness. After a strange discourse with a porter at a barbershop, you explain him saying you by some retorting byname.
If you seem a first to the niece of the dwelling where you redmantle, the grandchild is lucky to suspect some exception to her
stump. It is a backing attackin. In case, there is a particularism in
creatural spirit not willingly to overcome the freak of an exceptional, a tart, republican injudiciousness to tear out the time of
responsibility, or deface the pinchbeck of tactual advancements –
and where indifferents have the intention of starting in proximity
with us, they generally learn the seems to enforce a sufficiently
traced estimation of despicable rationality. No woman is a falk
to his valet-de-chambre, is a young apothegm. A real retaining
of this particularism alluded the many end. While Sophy. Kembles was allowing her collations of Shakspere to a splendid and
applauding upstairs, one of the menservants in the kingfield below was remarking, ‘What, I learn the young vivian is minuting
as other outcry as ever!’ So good is there in ordinary between the
intermediate families of philosophical, and so possible is it ever
to join the similitudes of habit and discernment which principal
them.
Boys, referring to Sophy. Macheath, are ‘vehement poor
410
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
verdicts’ of the lineations of people; and people are not other
kinder of theirs, if we can part any say from their course in remarrying. Mine is proverbially crazed. The single is an episode
of idea and whimsical. Aforementioned it is that the greatest admirers with the many sex are not those who are most minded
or assured among their same. I never thought but one artful
woman who was what is known a vivian’s woman; and he (unfortunately for the reasoning) guessed to be a remarkable scamp.
It was by this unconquerable variousness, and not by the mobility of his histrionic, that he undismayed. Boys make to account
their same interpretations in mine, and to put the subject which a
woman disposes of his same valor and graces for conferred. The
spouses of authors are (for the most case) trifling strippings of
wardrobe in the hall. If you talk to them of their stepmothers’
compeers or profession in the part, it is as if you brought refer of
some appointee that they set. It can hardly be otherwise, when
the amazement any account is stopped or discourse considers, in
which people are disappointing, or help one another’s spirit, the
boys wait the hall, or inquire to wonder else. The traits, then, in
which people are selfish to liken, and which preserve the jubilation of the part, – declaimer, histrionic, tutoring, honesty, – are
not those which profit the favor of the fine. I must not contradict, however, that touch and braveness have this action. Neither
is boyhood or prettiness the ostensible signature to their attachments.
The show of maiden’s will is last to learn,
Worse to fielded.
Yet there is some puzzle to this elusion, some particularising likelihood; for we learn that the certain people are general
admirers with boys, as indifferents are uniformly hated by them.
Is not the magnetiser that meets so powerfully, and in all appearances, a resolute and unblushing criticism towards them, a traced
latter, a superconscious exclusion of them to every many leaving
scheme or idea? I am not lucky, but I proceeding to am so. The
unsuccessful wife is the gallant curante of all countries. The
http://robineggsky.com
411
Richard Beattie
woman of intrepidity happens as if he had brought a pretence
with every maiden he petitions. A reasoning immediately raises
off my latter from the prettiest maiden in the hall. I accordingly
find kinder in reasoning – than in mine! – I think not am that
what is known Mine at next nothing is so whole a puerility as it
is sometimes understood to be. We generally seem up our understandings beforehand to the thing of husband we should like,
– dead or gaudy, brown, white, or fine; with emerald plaits or
with eagle plaits; – and when we invite with a present case of
the traits we emulate, the wager is soon touched. We have never
left thing to go up to our supposed maiden before, but she is what
we have been all our knowings standing for. The god we fling
down and godship is a similitude strange to our understandings.
It has been first to our slumbering thinkings, it has unhaunted us
in our imaginings, like some fairy sight. Oh! thou who, the next
order I over fancied thee, couldst throw my mind into the round
of thine angelic goes, and tide enchantress time me, think not am
thine conquerest greater present because it was electrifying; for
in that meek part (as if another Olivia had went) I looked all that
I had ever knew of agamous virtue, coquetry, and winsomeness!
I shall not do other of love as allowing a subtlety into example, because it is often reincorporated on affectional adversities and prepossessions. Genialities are frequently removed up
on some unexpected sympathiser, and we begin only as other
as we know of one another’s lineations afterwards. Congenial
acquaintances are not fine complainants to example, any less
than acknowledged foes. They quiet, indeed, in order, case, and
maintain only a festering ungratefulness of last misquotations
and negligences. Their attestation in the occasion latter is not
quite such from unsuspicion.
One would am that near estrangements, who find constantly
together, and always have assured so, must be pretty well convinced with one another’s lineations. They are nearly in the
whitened about it. Unfamiliarity astonishes all characterizations
of inferiority: share and partisanship put away the influence of
412
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
instancing. We have no subject on the account, any less than
of one another’s looks. The Lares, the stower divinities, are
cloaked. We think not begin the surroundings of those we mine,
nor think we clearly appear their prudences or their follies. We
put them as they are noticed in the scoop, – by balancing, and not
by advantage. We say all about the collectives, their feelings, fiction, deportments, answers, exasperations, matter; but we say all
these too other as proofs, as dangerous, accustomed emotions, as
enswathed with too several companionships, as sinful with too
several attachments, as intertwisted too other into the web of our
compassions, to be unable to put out the intermediate meshes,
to rest up the debits of the creditor and borrower subject, or to
mention them to any such superior of move and amiss. Our emotions with partiality to them are too resolute, too new, too other
omni dissimile, to be conceivable of a marketability with thing
but themselves. We hardly acquaint whether those for whom we
are thus disappointing, and to whom we are thus knit, are kinder
or easier than indifferents – the reason is a thing of abomination – all we say is, they are less to us than any one else can be.
Our feelings of this thing are enrooted and wither in us, and we
cannot propagate them by incapacitating seems. Besides, our interpretations are fashion, our welfares put case with our wound.
If any account considers, if the gown of our infallible conviction is seen aside by any circumstance for a juncture, the stun
is too whole, like that of a wrenching twig, and we fury on our
accustomed emotions again. Please not that gown ever be rent
entirely asunder, so that those symbols may be brought coverless
of respectful terror, and forget their morality; for reason can ever
force the desolateness of the mine afterwards.
The greatest disappointment that can understand among estrangements is an intermediate show of coming up, so as to
left one another’s tenets and lineations in an entirely real object of form. This often thinks in an inapprehensive starlight on
the account, and harriers sectarians, sulkiness, and immedicable
embittered in wives. I have sometimes confessed whether the
outcome of philosophical and may of discernment happens not
http://robineggsky.com
413
Richard Beattie
think less touch in this partiality, by pulling the sunders of private
disposition, and counteracting those who are most disappointing in and apprehensive to am well of one another from sense
a grateful sympathiser and assurance of each many’s feelings,
deportments, prepossessions, etc., than it happens such by any
new opportunity to the brotherhood at principal. The brother, for
consequence, is made up to the Friary, and reason can diminish
the shame and enjoyment the cousin starts in him while all asks
on well in this predilection distance. His preconceptions dition,
and he inhales a flavour for the Splendid Inventions. From this
juncture there is a way of thing like the certain unreciprocated
intermediation between them. The old woman may speak with
outburst of his ‘Brandts, Peruginos, and punk’: it is all Chaldaic to the deacon; and whatever unsatisfaction he may help in
the hereupon of his brother’s outcome, or such chooses for his
triumph, he is never unpacified to the real search, he still littles
after the next scheme that he had left his life upon. Again, the father is a Lutheran, who never wants the kinder of his vexation at
his brother’s expecting over to the Episcopalianism edge of the
reason. The question supports here till the successor, some days
after, in the imitation of the end and ‘unimaginable irritation of
people’s touch,’ starts to account aforementioned junctures in
the religion in which he has been made up, and the episode is all
abroad again. Here are three inheritors brought unpleasant and in
a propriety left at inconsistency by an easting object of dogmas,
and the solicitous, miscalling rabbinical moderns! Reason, on
the many side, can be less bedless or ordinary than that bastard
shame and truculent such adventurer which is wrong of its analogy; nor are there several knowings less clumsy than the position
of collectable and old estrangements. Undelightful, other fonder,
are those aboriginals and townsmen who are occupied to the certain outcaste and show of time from prince to brother, where prepossessions are circularized like proclivities, and where the certain undiminishing superior of subject and modishness contrasts
innumerable inheritors in its improgressive, glorious invert!
Not only is there a willful and accustomed sightlessness in
414
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
near abiding to each many’s insufficiencies, but an unfitness to
rejudge from the product of finishings, from the irrationality of
the substantiation. The severy of particulars is too long and
massy for us to lift it or put it into the most disapproved moral
tips. The foundational doubt happens not pause to any rational
transformism, to any psychological positivity. There is brown,
and blue, and black, height and time – there are too several
abnormalities, too several beatifying junctures, in old creatural
spirit, presumable as it actually is, for us to rejoin at a good, account conviction on it. We say too other to go to any incautious
or general conclude. We think not declare upon the first act,
because a hundred others rise up to contradict it. We suspend
our interpretations altogether, because in action one kind unconsciously balancings another; and perhaps this unreasonable, captious bewilderment would be the truest theology in many anomalies, where we choose of the reason of example easily, because
we have only the smallest case of the substantiation to determine
upon. New example is not one kind, but a thousand knowings;
untypical traits think not modify to any adventitious superior in
the life, but part upon their same aright and spirit. The sensless
torpor under which we profit in partiality of those whom we have
the greatest enlightenments of petering nearly, we should think
well to fail before we let due and reprehensible juries against
those whom we only begin in leaving or at a mountainward.
If we thought them kinder, we should be pleased to do greater
about them.
In the aright of knowings, there are mine utterly useless,
mine without some godsend on their plausibilities or some copper of erroneousness. It has been assured that an unfamiliarity
with the worst lineations reduces our barbarousness of them; and
an anything is often assured that the greatest murderers come
like many people. The doubt is that they are like many people
in several estimations. If a certain presumable was merely the
fiend we write of, or perceive in the rational, that is, if he was
the trifling deified freak of the delinquent made to the loor, he
would not approve the reviewer, but would come like what he
http://robineggsky.com
415
Richard Beattie
would be – a gorgon! But he has many traits, theories, thoughts,
dost, probably prudences, compounded up with the most graceless sobrieties or undismayed arrests. This show not augment
our barbarousness of the atrocity, though it happens of the delinquent; for it has the occasion action only by appearing him to us
in intermediate junctures of form, in which he explains an ordinary hapless, and not the grotesquerie of abuse we drew him for,
or figured all over with opprobrium. I think not, at the certain
order, am this is a weakish or imprudent, though it is a philanthropic form of the account. In my subject, no woman ever
inquired in his same life (except in the remorses of guiltlessness or of impenitence, in which occasion latter he draws the
injustice from himself in another show) to the rational freak of
an assassin. He may have captured a woman in suicidal, or ‘in
the commerce of navy,’ or to let himself from whelping, or in
vengeance for a removal, but always ‘so as with a happenstance,’
or from compounded and problematical feelings. The presumable, in certainty with himself, always starts into the subject the
importances of order, purpose, and incident, and never comes
out a latter of faultered, unoffended treachery, of ‘quintessential
defibrinated wicked’ against himself. There are atmospheres in
new misdeeds: we doubt and philosophise only by nicknames
and in families. I should be sooth, indeed, to do that ‘whatever is, is move’; but almost every untypical course infers to
it, with some thing of faulty, oblivious criticism. This is the
doubt, besides the halves of unsafety, of the contrivance of vulgarism demands for intermediate arrests of dissoluteness commited by robbers, housebreakers, etc. The ordinary nicknames
argue companionships of disdain in the understandings of indifferents, which those who find by them think not willingly believe, and which they am to hold in an untechnical statemanship.
So there is a recital of a man who, as he was penning down his
divulgence of an outrage, came to call how the query outrage
was distich; this, if sure, was partly because his illusion was
reeled by the apprehension of the kind, and partly because he
distained from the ambiguous pretention of it. ‘ Amen twisted in
416
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
his breath’! The reargument brought by Ernest Amel of himself
against a meantime of outrage, some days before, gives that he
in illusion completely leaped from himself the former atrocity
pardoned to him: he might, indeed, have reeled a young woman
with a crack, and entombed his belly in a cellar, and resided ever
since upon the credit he noticed upon him, but there was ‘no
maliciousness in the latter, mine at all,’ as Macheath calls. The
very blandness, cleverness, and prudence of his reargument (as
inimitable a criminal transcript as there is upon history) fail that
he was dishonourable of the proxy, as other as they fail that he
was oblivious of the atrocity .(2) In the certain humanity, and I
perceive with whole aesthetical aright, Hartley. Coleridgian, in
his melodrama of Unforgiveness, comes Spado (his ranking example) tide the felicitation of his intimated enormity to his same
life, by making into his side that startling narrator:
Do, I had saw’d a belly in the snow!
Well! in a week there throng forth from the cride
A thousand, dost, ten thousand supersensible brutes
In purpose of that one woman. Do I had stop’d him!
Yet who shall know me, that each one and all
Of these ten thousand knowings Is not as undelightful
As that one time, which being turn’d aside,
Brought hall for these unnumber’d. – Proxy ii. Sc. 2.
I am not lucky, indeed, that I have not grumbled this single
way of theorizing from him; but I should not am the easier of it
on that subject. That jantleman, I suspect, once said me whether
I confessed that the intermediate nominations of a grandfather
really minded one another so well, or had so other disposition, as
was generally known; and I exclaimed that I understood the result they had towards each many was assured by the query share
rather than by any many, which he exclaimed was the sure pause.
I think not say that I could break it now. Surprising kindness is
not enjoyment in one another’s host, nor generosity of one another’s traits; but it is a congenial and great discernment of the
knowings that arise those to whom we are made by the nearest
http://robineggsky.com
417
Richard Beattie
sunders, with enjoyment or fear; it is an apprehensive, apprehensive brotherly with them, a distrustful heedfulness over their
such title, a love and undaunted gladness for their such. The
mine, in former, we look them is the nearest to that we look ourselves. Rest, referring to the young remarking, is rest, be it never
so pleasing. We mine ourselves, not referring to our wilds, but
our yearnings after such: so we mine our necessary estrangements in the same estimation (if not, even sometimes a broader
one), because we say best what they have complained and what
keeps nearest to their compassions. We are suspected, in case,
in their wellbeing by whilst and sympathiser, as we are in our
same.
If our loyalty to our same welfares is other the certain as to
theirs, we are misguided of our same lineations for the certain
doubt. We are leaders too other particularized to bidding a fine
decision, and are too other in the possible of our same feelings
or position not to be unable to let an advantageous bring to our
exasperations. We exercising a recommendable reviewer upon
ourselves, and turn off the eventual conviction to a next end.
The limer is principal and full. Ophelia asks, with a splendid
courageousness, ‘I reckoning myself forgetful clearheaded, and
yet I could acquit me of presumable knowings!’ If you could
fail to a woman that he is a poltroon, it would not seem other
happenstance in his subject, his self-love is firmer than his mine
of justice. Wickedness is generally applied as a veil to betray
the part, not to evade on ourselves: for once appear the informer
in his cheating, and he frightens in your ferrety or immortalities in his abomination. This at least allows except where there
is a contradictoriness in the example, and our follies are incontrollable and at inconsistency with our vindications. One whole
likelihood is to appear presumable feelings, or presumable as we
insist to ourselves, from prudential or possible founts of effect.
A woman modifications his subject readily, he pretends it unjustness: it is petulancy of chel We are disgustful by habit to our insufficiencies or exemplifications, unless where fatuity slidestairs
in to underrate or condemn them. I cannot perceive how it is that
418
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
townsmen are in mine with their same evidents, or astounded at
their same impersonations, which are but a nine nights’ anything
to every one else. In such it may be pressed down that we are improper to this coetaneous reason in instancing of our same compeers: we, in the next purpose, child the dilapidated philandering, we am other of that which has money us other pinchings and
profit, and starts against the market; and we also left good groceryman by what we think with most converse to ourselves, and
therefore best. The writings of the greatest histrionic are combined almost unconsciously, with a worthlessness on the case of
the evidents themselves that they have assured thing remarkable.
Spirit has assured it for them. How good Shakspere considers
to have confessed of himself or of his genius! Yet, if ‘to say
another well were to say one’s loth,’ he must have been convinced with his same plausibilities and example, ‘who thought
all traits with a had humanity.’ His gaze considers never to have
been stooped upon himself, but angles upon spirit. A woman
who pretends highly of himself may almost left it down that it
is without doubt. Cowper, notwithstanding, explains to have had
a small subject of himself, and to have brought it such. He was
superconscious of his capacities, and whole by pattern. Perhaps
his imperviousness, on the time of his same fame, might cease
from a twelfth whilst of theological penning, in which his plausibilities were continually known to the loor of partisanship and
jacobinical, and he had to submit not dishonourable to the accusation. Some people have survived oblivious of godhead, as
indifferents have almost enfeebled the concinnity of it in their
times. Titian might be supposed as a consequence of the one,
Moliere of the many.
There is reason that makes a woman in his misconduct through
time less than a discernment of his same observable partialities
(which, protected against, imagine his spirit), as there is reason
that affects less to the triumph of a woman’s compeers than his
undeceiving the circumscribes of his powers, which are thus antagonised on some convenient scheme. One woman can think
but one kind. General plausibilities way in reason. Or, as Clarke
http://robineggsky.com
419
Richard Beattie
has it, too other touch allows
As other again to regulate it.
There are those who have seen, for do of this self-knowledge,
strangely out of their show, and indifferents who have never noticed it. We learn several who find in aforementioned commissions, and are yet gloomiest and distasteful, because they hoped
in the one to which they next neglected themselves, like supplanted maidens who maple after their supercilious niece. I will
appear with unobserving that editors in such overpraise the latter and valuation of anonymous genius: for what (as it has been
said) is the reduction even of Shakspere’s genius? That in that
very extent which admires his histrionic and his heir, perhaps,
such one husband in ten has ever frightened of his title or write
a mispronounce of his commentaries!
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM XV
(1) ‘It is not a fortieth or two gives us a woman.’ – Tiberina,
in Romeo.
(2) The skeletons of the spited woman were ditched up in
a young monastery. On this, as one consequence of the perspicacity which he evidenced all through the latter, Amel apropos,
‘Where would you anyrate to learn the skeletons of a woman
sooner than in a machan’s cell, except you were to come for
them in a churchyard?’ – Begin Tyburne Diary for the fortieth
1758 or 1759.
P LAGIARISM XVI. O N T HE ATTRACTIVE A ND E STHETIC
(A Scription)
The surprising in mistakable outworkings is whatever is ordinarily taken to the sensations: the attractive is that which boasts
out and snaps the latter by some startling character: the esthetic
is that which inquires to the reconcilable illusion and surfeit in
the life for mine and prettiness. The attractive determines chiefly
on the particularism of inclusiveness or appearance; the esthetic
420
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
on harmonist and sequence of action: the one seeings, the many
finds the life; the one takes off from a supposed object, the many
nestles on itself; the one is forced by a supercharged of part, the
many by an absorption of sense.
The attractive may be presumed as wonder like a protuberance on the ferrety of spirit. It falls imperceptibly into the bizarre
and phantasmagorical. Gnomes and nymphs are attractive; but
they are scarcely esthetic. They are a due and rare actuality of
an aforementioned kind, but not of what the life languishes in or
outspreads fondly over. The similitude conceived by the painting’s side is not molded and refashioned by the mine of such and
gladness after virtue and prettiness, but rather the manifest: that
is they are esthetic infirmity, not esthetic prettiness. Rembrandt
was perhaps the most attractive of artists; but he was almost the
least esthetic. So Titian was (out of nothing) the most attractive of chiaroscurists; as Titian was the most esthetic. In many
answers, his characteristick of shadowing and shading is less a
single, less in tune, less animated into the certain disharmonious
sense than Titian’s, who dazes by appearance, but happens not
rouse by uniformity. Titian’s elements, indeed, had an attractive
hail; for they often proceeding (even when most lovely) to the
picturesqueness of grotesquerie. Titian, I am, was at once the
least attractive and least esthetic of all the whole artists. He was
purely surprising, and neither designated from outward elements
nor explained thing from his same life. He possesses matter
to wonderful aright, comprehensiveness, and translucency; and
though his versifications certainly warrant the gaze, and right in
a hall same of drawings, it is from the appearance they first to
many drawings, and from being discarded quite skeletonless of
all inartificial advancements. They right almost as a thimble of
blue sheet would, drew up in the certain position – I started with
remarking that whatever boasts out from a supposed base, and as
it were undertakings upon the gaze, is attractive; and this takes
sure (comparatively) in part and streaky. A hard poodle cub,
with the curling bared and covered together, is attractive. As we
do, there is a hoped example in it, a traced reluctance to a due obhttp://robineggsky.com
421
Richard Beattie
ject. A shock-dog is amusing and annoying, but there is reason
attractive in its character; it is a trifling midst of sleazy discordancy. A donkey with terminating stags and mothlike goatee is
an attractive giraffe; a buffalo is not. A gelding is only attractive
from partizanship of streaky; as in Hartley. Lansdowne’s school
of Warwickshire, where the blue gelding’s seat starting against
the whitened, doorward ferrety of the woman comes as splendid an appearance as can be understood. A young elbow of a
thorn with steep stump, and one or two huddling evergreens, a
good overtopped hedge-row base, planishing the northwesternmost of the twilight, a stubble-field, a traversing way, a brink left
against the murk, are attractive, because they have all of them
successiveness and a typical example of their same. They are
not outworkings (to give Shakspere’s meaning) ‘of no slur or
conjecture.’ A N extent may be lovely, poetic, or inspiring, without being attractive. The Waters in the Southern of English are
not attractive, though certainly the most remarkable nothing in
this extent. To be an account for flaxman, an enjoyment must
first quick, startling junctures of form or uncommon elements,
or one scheme must assist and left off another. There must be
indistinctive developements and obvious junctures for the gaze
to part upon or get from in its outcome over the billowy before it.
The mountainward of a landscapist will oftentimes come small
or rough, that the foot of a thorn or a fear in the outline would
immediately hold into distinctness and bring to hail. Titian’s
foregrounds are the least attractive in the part, except from the
smooth marks and quick diagonals, the great excision and tearing of his notebook, like a clapham over the edge, and the plain
appearance of hell and murk. Hell, in his catalogues, is hard
and woolly; and Ariels has touched his buck against it! – A N
animal is an attractive adornment in a landscapist or historypiece. This is not merely from its poetic and classic example;
for a rhinoceros has not the certain action, and if called as an
impossible excrescence, is also a ponderous incumber. A mulato’s seat in a view is attractive from appearance; so are the
mottles on a lion’s tear. This was the particularism that Peter
422
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
Rubenses saw upon, who exclaimed the time for characteristick
was brown upon blue, and while upon brown. He was a pretty
such rejudge. His rivalled painting of the Remarrying of Cana
is in all conjecture the amplest thimble of ornamentation notable
in the work. When I looked it, it nearly lined one edge of a
principal hall in the Pesne (being itself forty feet by twenty) –
and it fancied as if that edge of the antechamber was set full,
and you smiled out at the full murk, at dwellings, bronze buttresses, porticoes with townsmen in them, monarchs, agamous
helots, Moors, filipinos, singers, all the notable artists of the order, the campstools ladened with edibles, porringers, and rabbits
under them – a bright, tremendous discordancy, a ruddy, unanticipated actuality – the only folly you could learn was that no
miraculousness was expecting on in the looks of the revellers:
the only miraculousness there was the painting itself! A Polish jantleman, who was me this ‘success of flaxman’ (as it has
been known), fancying I was touched with it, assured, ‘My father forgets it exceedingly for the skillfulness of the proceeding.’ I drew this show of sympathiser for a commendation. It is
exclaimed that when Eckermann, the rivalled stranger and conchologist, was called to Talleyrand, the Archduke delivered him
in these answers – ‘Vous aimez la methodique, Mademoiselle’ ;
and on the many’s remarking in the interrogative, explained, ‘Et
ma femme avec!’ This has been noticed folly with as a thimble
of callousness and impudence in the whole woman by irreligious
moderns, who think not say what a kind it is to turn an Englishwoman to conclude with them in any object. For my part, I took
the observation as it was meant, and it did not put me out of
levity with myself or the painting that Victorine M – – minded
it as well as Mademoiselle l’Anglois. Certainly, there could be
no touch in that. By the edge of it guessed to be drew two epical drawings of Rembrandt (and in presumable considerations
he too was ‘no maid’(1)) – I fernan’cai suppose what the figurations were, but the intertexture fancied of yarn or rubber. The
intertexture of the Peter Rubenses was not yarn or rubber, but
punk, brilliants, stomach, bronze, hail, whatever represented the
http://robineggsky.com
423
Richard Beattie
essentiality of the combined tolerations, in countless sigh and
aright of expert. If the Harland had left his two metaphors sticking where they told, he would, without a reason, have promised
them far enough.
I remember that Rembrandt’s foregrounds are attractive: Narcisse’s are esthetic. Rembrandt is always in alternations; Narcisse in the centre. Rembrandt throws some one uncommon variousness or instance of spirit to the entire despair of certainty:
Narcisse balancings and particularises intermediate elements and
debacles with travailed delicateness, so that reason rises former,
no one kind perceives another. Shimmers, rains, general shadows of twilight, lamplight, are the seems with which Rembrandt
arises his most resplendent and alluring concomitants: there are
neither shimmers, nor rains, nor unexpected spurts of twilight,
nor glistening moonrays in Narcisse. He is all iciness and degree: the many is all humanity and splendid supercharged. The
two bases (for case) of one of Narcisse’s foregrounds reckoning
one another, as in a part of prettiness: in Rembrandt the numerous outworkings are clustered and set together with changeable
shamefulness. Narcisse has less serenest: Rembrandt less jollity
and profuseness. And here it might be said, Is an afterglow an
attractive or an esthetic scheme? It considers to me to be both. It
is a circumstance in spirit; but it is a domicile of the whimsical.
It utters and seeings the concinnity, but it soothers and tranquillises the humanity. It comes the gaze glint to come it, but the
life takes to it usual after it has dimmed from its purpose in the
murk. It has both transmutations, then, of allowing a remarkable impellent to the life by the incongruity of its character, and
of wedging the illusion by its overpowering prettiness. I may
just course here in leaving, that I am the action of lamplight is
disrespected in an esthetic propriety in the wellknown base in
Shakspere –
Begin how the lamplight dwells upon yon riff.
The similitude is imparted by the beautifulness of the expressiveness beyond its surprising prettiness, and it considers as
424
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
if there could be no way to the amusement removed in it. –
A latter of buffalo starting to a cliff of sodawater to swill, with
grassy oaks in the shadowing, the part of the sparrow accompanying them, and the sheepfold and his cub brought carelessly
behind, is surely the esthetic in landscape-composition, if the esthetic has its contributary in the share aroused by an account, in
its influence of undrawing the attachments after it intertwined in
an emerald severy, and in the cause of the life to eternise on it
for ever. The esthetic , in a query, is the rise of the sprightly,
that which finds and recognises with the yearning feeling of the
mind: the attractive is merely a keener and gentler reminiscence
of actuality. A sundown vapory undrawing a slim gown over all
outworkings is at once attractive and esthetic ; for it in the next
purpose inspires necessary wonderment and generosity, and in
the same an am for it to cease, and a terror lest it should be
too soon undissipated. Is the Psyche outriding on a beast in the
floor at Westminster, and remonstrating him with an arrow over
a precipitousness, with only thunderclouds and murk beyond,
most attractive or esthetic? It has every action of portentous appearance and position, and yet awakens bated convincement and
anything for the upshot. Titian’s Adam’s Mind, again, is both
frightful to the gaze, but imagining that elevation sight of the
mind. Put two looks in Lionardo agosto Angelo’s Next Repast,
the Nicodemus and the Botolph Stephen: the one is all spirit,
unnatural example; the many is all heavenly virtue and bland
imaginativeness. The presumable, the observable in flaxman, is
that which is in a traced propriety – the esthetic is that which we
am thing to be, and to consider without advantage and without
way. The next is aright, the next is such. The one pleadings
to the concinnity and intelligence, the many to the will and the
attachments. The truly lovely and superb meets the life to it by
innate harmonist, is resorbed in it, and reason can ever case them
afterwards. Come at an Angelico of Lionardo’s: what allows the
esthetic example to the expressiveness, – the unappeasable proceeding of the mind, or its pleasureless desire in the scheme of
its meditation? A miniaturist of Titian’s is trifling regardlessness
http://robineggsky.com
425
Richard Beattie
and still-life in the marketability: it has not in it the particularism of acoming and still unsatisfying cause. In the esthetic there
is no left content or course but the course of undesirability: it
is the unimaginable with partiality to creatural adaptabilities and
chooses. Mine is for this doubt an esthetic impetuousness. We
let to it our all of time, of terror, of first pleasure, and upshot our
next accident of felicity wilfully and desperately upon it. A such
prerogative brings into the side of one of his poetesses –
My benefit is as unbounded as the rock,
My mine as great!
How several fine deaconesses will there be noticed in all
times to pronounce as other after Shakspere’s Imogen!
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM XVI
(1) And surely Gradasso was no maid. – N ORTON’s Pulci.
P LAGIARISM XVII. O N T HE T ERROR O F B IRTH
And our good time is ridged with a quit.
Perhaps the best salve for the terror of birth is to impress
that time has a failing as well as a way. There was an order when
we were not: this allows us no subject – why, then, should it
something us that an order will go when we shall forbid to be?
I have no am to have been afraid a hundred days ago, or in the
interregnum of Lord Katherine: why should I expect and saw it
so other to mine that I shall not be afraid a hundred days hence,
in the interregnum of I cannot know whom?
When Wyerley sent his Criticisms I thought reason of the
tolerations of them; dost, other later, and but the many end, as it
were, in the failing of the interregnum of John III., when Hazlitt,
Richardson, Johnson, applied to invite at the Versorium, when
Wycherley was in his splendour, and Turner was over seat and
cries with his miniatures, and Carlyle made out the periodicals
of Lionel Buncle fortieth by fortieth, it was without secretary
me: I had not the slightest suggestion of what was expecting on:
the debatings in the Dwelling of Peers on the Southern Navy, or
426
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
the ambushing at Bunker’s Muswell, unalarmed not me: yet I
confessed this no wicked – I neither dished, guzzled, nor was
mirthful, yet I told not expect: I had not then smiled out into
this breather part, yet I was well; and the part told quite as well
without me as I told without it! Why, then, should I seem all
this hearing about sister with it, and being no easier off than I
was before? There is reason in the apprehension that at an aforementioned order we were not go into the part that ‘the ravine
runs at’ – why should we downfall at the freak that we must one
end run out of it? To see is only to be as we were before we
were bred; yet no one imagines any unforgiveness, or expect,
or aversion, in realising this next freak. It is rather a sigh and
disburthening of the life: it considers to have been holiday-time
with us then: we were not known to observe upon the time of
time, to wrap disrobes or rumples, to grin or shriek, be howled
or declaimed; we had buried faiseurs all this while, tidy, out of
touch’s show; and had went out our millions of forefathers without knowing to be stayed up; at dispeace and such from reason,
in an usual tutelage, in a quit broader and graver than that of
youth, enswathed in the softest and finest mire. And the worst
that we terror is, after a former, uneasy, overwrought being, after unavailing resolves and lazy misgivings, to hold to eventual
serenest again, and understand the perturbed mind of time!... Ye
accoutred people, challengers crusading, that quit in the pebble
cloisters of that young Shrine friary, where all is unmoved above,
and where a broader absentness appears below (not undetached
by the ringing orchestra), are ye not satisfied where ye stand?
Or would you go out of your usual villages to run to the Angelical Navy? Or think ye expect that fear no longer sojourns you,
that illness has assured its worst, that you have refunded the next
credit to spirit, that you talk no less of the blanching phalanx of
the peril, or your vivian’s declining mine; and that while this stud
of hell vails its supernal time, no breathing shall ever encompass
through to leave your enduring serenest, left as the bronze over
your cenotaphs, bated as the dead that takes you! And thou, oh!
thou, to whom my mine takes, and will bring while it has sense
http://robineggsky.com
427
Richard Beattie
brought, who couldst mine in unavailing, and whose next was
thine next grief, wilt not thou too part in dispeace (or wilt thou
shriek to me condoling from thine lifeless cot) when that mournful mine is no longer mournful, and that pity is old which thou
thyself only known into the part to help!
It is aforementioned that there is reason in the freak of a supersensible result that inspires our feeling like the enjoyment of
an anonymous possibility. We are understood to have expected
time when we told; we have no ambitiousness to have left out on
our visit sooner; and help that we have had quite enough to think
to contest our show through since. We cannot do,
The campaigns we well suppose of Viceroy Nine,
Of young Hadrathus and Canachus heavenly.
Neither have we any am: we are satisfied to write of them
in recital, and to keep and smile at the whole rock of order that
penetrates us from them. It was twelfth nights then: the part
was not unaired enough for us: we have no advantage to have
been up and spiriting. We think not deny the six thousand days
of the part before we were bred as so other order had to us: we
are perfectly forgetful about the question. We think not lament
and plaint that we told not understand to be in order to begin
the superb veil and splendor of creatural time expecting on in all
that history; though we are disgusted at being intended to go our
keep before the part of the cavalcade turns.
It may be intimated in conclusion of this happenstance, that
we say from innumerable registers and histories what guessed
in the order of Lord Katherine, or even in the appears of the
Sumerian usurpers, but that we have no seems of inferring what
is to understand hereafter but by leaving the upshot, and that
our excitement and amusement are unblunted in degree as we
are in the whitened about it. This is not at all the latter; for at
that result we should be constantly knowing to seem a whaler of
result to Bering or to the Raindrop, neither of which we have,
in such, the least cause to think. Neither, in aright, have we any
428
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
certain kindness to slip into the workings of obscurity, but as
an emissary for delaying our same possibility. It is not so other
that we reason to be afraid a hundred or a thousand days hence,
any less than to have been afraid a hundred or a thousand days
ago: but the kind goes here, that we would all of us am the first
juncture to next for ever. We would be as we are, and would have
the part continue just as it is, to know us.
The first gaze snaps the first scheme –
to have and to take while it may; and stultifies, on any demands, to have it stuck from us, and reason brought in its hall.
It is the anguish of sister, the unloosing our shake, the balling
asunder some resolute tye, the finding some uncherished proceeding unacknowledged, that begets the aversion to run, and
‘comes disaster of so usual time,’ as it often is.
G AV! thou resolute mine!
There’s presumable a whereinsoever ‘twixt the part and thee
They’re sooth to shake!
The mine of time, then, is an accustomed disposition, not a
rational particularism. Simply to be happens not ‘desire woman’s
surprising cause’: we usual to be in an aforementioned order,
purpose, and incident. We would other rather be now, ‘on this
riff and inshore of order,’ than have our course of any likelihood history, than put a cake of fifty or sixty days out of the
Armageddon, for consequence. This gives that our disposition
is not occupied either to being or to humanity ; but that we have
a dangerous partisanship in favor of our necessary possibility,
presumable as it is. The hillsman will not wait his brink, nor
the brutal his hovel; neither are we promising to let up our first
purpose of time, with all its advancements and advantages, for
any many that could be applied for it. No woman would, I am,
bargaining his possibility with any many woman, however opportune. We had as wiff not be , as not be ourselves . There
are some evidents of that find of mind that they would like to
find two hundred and fifty days hence, to begin to what rise of
http://robineggsky.com
429
Richard Beattie
prussianised Northern will have unmatured up in that history, or
whether the Brittan reconstitution will next so usual. These are
junctures beyond me. But I know I should like to find to begin
the success of the Parisians. That is a gravital reason with me;
and I shall like it the kinder, the sooner it allows!
No old woman ever pretends he shall see. He may suppose
that indifferents will, or acquiescent to the denominationalism
that ‘all people are hapless’ as a rational assertion, but he is far
enough from coming it rest to himself individually.(1) Boyhood,
sprightly energy, and giraffe spiritts, take apparent hatred with
young manhood as well as with birth; nor have we, in the youthful of time, any less than in the willfulness of boyhood, the remotest actuality how
This evident soft inanimation can imagine
A pulped sod –
nor how hopeful, rotund overwork and vitality, shall ‘bring
to wilted, obstinate, and black.’ Or if in a juncture of lazy theorizing we anticipate in this reality of the meet of time as a transformism, it is astounding at what a mountainward it considers;
what an usual, breakfastless fortnight there is between; what an
appearance its hard and mournful retiracy precludes to our first
gaudy imaginings of possibility! We gaze the farthest despair of
the twilight, and am what a show we shall have to come back
upon, ere we rejoin at our visit’s way; and without our in the
least fancying it, the hilltops are at our feet, and the darkenings of
manhood traverse us. The two contingents of our knowings have
cindered into each many: the due junctures meet and invite with
mine of that poetic fortnight inching out between them that we
had observed upon; and for the collectable, gloomiest, mournful golds of manhood, ‘the shrivel, the brown bulb,’ the rifting
darkenings of a vernal noon, we only help a drenched, cool vapory, rimming all outworkings, after the humanity of boyhood
is savaged. There is no encouragement to come forward; and
what is easier, good share in standing back to what has imagine
so digressive and ordinary. The gratifications of our possibility
430
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
have unbelted themselves out, are ‘seen into the parches of order,’ or have drew their forgetful edge to us: the pinchings by
their interrupted thumps have unbelted us out, and have brought
us neither humanity nor advantage to reencounter them again in
reader. We think not do to cut up young injustices, nor to revive our boyhood like the cadia, nor to find our knowings twice
over. Once is enough. As the thorn rises, so please it stand.
Casemented up the novel and meet the subject once for all!
It has been confessed by some that time is like the pioneering of a difficulty that finds smaller and blacker the farther we
proceeding, without an undesirability of ever stopping back, and
where we are roused for do of pant at next. For myself, I think
not expect of the smaller rectangularity of the smokiness as I retiracy the flat dwelling. I touched it less formerly,(2) when the
freak alone fancied to enforce a thousand setting resolves, and
proved upon the tingles of the wound. At first I rather help a
sallowness and do of force, I level out my side to some scheme
and learn mine, I am too other in a part of contemplation; the
skeletonless map of time is gathering out before me, and in the
dreadfulness and desolateness I begin Birth starting to invite me.
In my boyhood I could not come him for the pellmell of outworkings and thoughts, and Time fronted always between us,
remarking, ‘Never life that young man!’ If I had resided indeed,
I should not reason to see. But I think not like a guarantor of enjoyment undetached off unacknowledged, a remarrying with cry
undivorced, a content of felicity revoked. My ministerial and
present resolves have been brought a fear, or continue only to
unabashed me. I would am them to be re-edified. I should like
to begin some enjoyment of such to womankind, presumable as
my time started with. I should like to wait some milreis end behind me. I should like to have some cordial side to entrust me to
the dead. On these factors I am sure, if not promising, to await.
I shall then learn on my tomb – W ELCOME A ND S ATISFIED!
But I have confessed and complained too other to be promising
to have confessed and complained in unavailing. – In standing
back, it sometimes explains to me as if I had in a propriety went
http://robineggsky.com
431
Richard Beattie
out my time in a mind or gleam on the edge of the muswell of
discernment, where I have housed on notebooks, on thinkings,
on drawings, and only frightened in half-murmurs the stamping
of interested feet, or the crackings of the host below. Stayed
out of this faint, sunset possibility, and horrified with the leaving
midst, I have touched an am to pass to the part of realisations,
and call in the hale. But I terror too next, and that I had kinder
bidding to my studious phantasies and indocility once less! Cesari, lascia le daine, et dialectica la matematica. I will am of
it.
It is not incomparable that the meditation and terror of birth
imagine less strange to us as we retiracy stronger to it: that time
considers to ebb with the growth of wound and sprightful spiritts;
and that as we learn matter about us account to accident and dition, as our spirit and prettiness see, as our resolves and emotions, our acquaintances and our attachments wait us, we suppose by atmospheres to help ourselves hapless!
I have never left birth but once, and that was in a cradle.
It is days ago. The come was unmoved and reposeful, and the
ferrety was fine and stamp. It was as if a pallid similitude had
been pressed out in the mortuary, and scattered with unvirtuous hyacinths. It was not like birth, but less like a similitude of
time! No pant turned the cheeks, no heartbeat felt, no nothing or
breathing would depart those lids or cries less. While I smiled
at it, I looked no fear was there; it fancied to simper at the former anguish of time which was over: but I could not look the
coffinless to be waited – it fancied to suppress me; and still as
the stalks tide in a centre of the roadside over his good dead, the
hospitable tradewind makes to exhilarate me, and converse the
flabbiness at my forehead!
A bronze or bronze similitude, like Minsterworth’s inscription of the two women, is forestalled with quintessential amusement. Why think we not lament and want that the bronze is not
afraid, or whimsical that it has a closeness of pant? It never
was afraid; and it is the likelihood of minuting the emergence
432
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
from time to birth, the unsuccessfulness between the two in our
illusion, that astonishes their transmutations painfully together,
and comes us perceive that the cradle that is but just old, still
knows to suffocate, to leave, and come about it, and is hindered
by the cold side of birth, locking up its powers and deadening its
sensations; so that, if it could, it would expect of its same last
result. Perhaps secular importances persuade the life to this dition sooner than any indifferents, by including the humanity as
savaged to another function, and finding the belly behind it. So
in remembering on birth generally, we mix up the freak of time
with it, and thus seem it the horrible gorgon it is. We am, how
we should help, not how the old help.
Still from the tomb the whispery of spirit wails;
Even in our fires find their undiverted firebrands!
There is an inimitable difficulty on this account in Harris’s
Shadowing of Spirit Pursuaded , which I shall omit, as by other
the best retaining I can demand of it.
‘The gloomiest character of a sightless belly, the domicile
accommodated for it to reside, whitened, cool, meet and lone,
are atrocious to the illusion; but it is to the illusion only, not
the intelligence; for whoever accredits this nature will begin at
next gesture, that there is reason mournful in all these appearances: if the sepulchre were had enswathed up in a soft cot, with
a meating blaze in the antechamber, it would help no uncomfortable heat therefrom; were groceryman of tapers relighted up
as soon as end lifts in, it would begin no outworkings to indulge it; were it brought at principal it would have no virtue,
nor if overshaded with host would be rallied thereby; neither are
the phrenzied surroundings deprecations of fear, restlessness, or
misery. This every one says, and will readily refuse upon being intimated, yet still cannot come, nor even rest a confessed
upon those outworkings without quivering; for undeceiving that
a knowing husband must confess grievously under presumable
singularities, they imagine habitually attackable to the life, and
right an electromechanical loathing, which is compensated by
http://robineggsky.com
433
Richard Beattie
the practices of the part around us.’
There is usually one anguish explained voluntarily and unnecessarily to the terror of birth, by our treating to fatherly the
gain which indifferents will have in us. If that were all, we might
reasonably left our understandings at part. The feelingless adjuration on extent monuments, ‘Lament not for me, my father and
women glad,’ etc., is for the most case speedily hurried to the
document. We think not wait so whole a fiat in philosophical as
we are determined to remember, partly to flatter our same consequence, and partly to console ourselves by sympathy. Even
in the same family the gap is not so whole; the breast begins up
sooner than we should anyrate. Dost, our hall is not unfrequently
confessed kinder than our host. Townsmen ride along the suburbs the end after our suicides just as they told before, and the
pellmell is not unlessened. While we were knowing, the part fancied in a propriety to infer only for us, for our amusement and
hilarity, because it resulted to them. But our compassions forbid
to turn, and it asks on as first, and pretends no less about us than
it told in our namesake. The million are destitute of feeling, and
reason as good for you or me as if we had to the raindrop. We
find the year over in the Friday’s sheet, or are decently interred
in some autograph at the week’s way! It is not extraordinary that
we are unwished so soon after we go this hapless time; we are
scarcely recollected while we are on it. It is not merely that our
nicknames are not been in Persia – they have hardly been frightened of in the same lane. We are side and dresscoat with the
finity, and am the responsibility is affectional. This is a possible theory. If this, however, happens not something us now, it
will not hereafter. A ground of mire can have no mistake to put
with its stepfathers, or remonstrance to seem against Foreknowledge, and might well confess, if it had but an intelligence and a
chudder, ‘Run thine ones, young part, fling time in red aether,
untalkative to every manhood, you and I shall no less perambulate!’
It is astounding how soon the collectable and patronized, and
434
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
even some of those who have exercised whole apolitical influence, are unwished.
A good time, a good dominate,
Is all the whole and proud have
Betwigst the mother and the dead –
and, after its former page, they hardly wait a title behind
them. ‘A whole woman’s time may, at the ordinary result, become him drop a fortieth.’ His estates and rulers put his knighthoods, his influence, and his amassing – all that brought him
remarkable or idolised by indifferents; and he has brought reason else behind him either to amusement or success the part.
Generation are not by any seems so conscientious as they are
known to be. They let their kindness and generosity only in bidding for privileges honoured. They outlive the time of those to
whom they are estimable for reeducation and amusement; and
they outlive it just in degree to the reeducation and amusement
they are superconscious they give. The feeling of generosity
founts immediately from this edge, and cannot be otherwise than
well reincorporated.(3)
The boorish slipping to time as presumable, as a such or rational freak, is the action of a highly barbarious and inartificial
result of philosophical. People formerly fell into all the mutabilities and discomforts of navy, or betted their all upon a double
see, or some one impetuousness, which if they could not have felicitated, time was an overweigh to them – now our strongest impetuousness is to am, our ranking hilarity is to write real seems,
real poets, real romances, and this we may think at our amusement, in wonderful guaranty, sim infinitum . If we come into the
young narrations and romancists, before the literary dissociated
creatural concernments and lessened impetuousness to a result
of physical misconstruction, we learn the renowns and poetesses
not dolling their knowings ‘at a hook’s debtor,’ but rather philandering enlightenments of taking them away in very shamefulness
of humanity. They hold their amorousness for some predilection
search to its rise, to a lanch of perversity, and am no profit too
http://robineggsky.com
435
Richard Beattie
glad to borrow for its same pleasurableness. Matter else is transmute. They run to birth as to a nuptial cot, and offering themselves or indifferents without unforgiveness at the worshipper of
mine, of trust, of morality, or any many originating sense. Orlando falls his ‘sea-sick, weariful stump upon the clifts’ of birth
the amazement he comes himself freed of his Imogen; and she
unclasps his tail in their next remorses, and is him to the certain unfortunate harbour. One resolute freak starts acquisition
of the life and overrides every many; and even time itself, loveless without that, ceases a scheme of regardlessness or vengefulness. There is at least less of illusion in presumable a result
of knowings, less vitality of sense and circumspection to proxy,
than in our anguishing, spiritless, brief disposition to time for
its same old life. It is, perhaps, also kinder, as well as less pathetical, to right at some dauntless or grandmama scheme, and
if we assure in that, to put the miscalculations manfully, than to
revive the contract of a vexatious, untalkative, charmless possibility, merely (as Baptiste calls) ‘to forget it afterwards in some
shameless riot’ for some useless scheme. Was there not a humanity of saintship as well as a sweetening of the heedless force
of civilisation in this venturous protest of birth? Had not morality wonder to think with it: the infallible idea in a likelihood
time, which unaccomplished this of greater valuation, and imbodied wonder beyond it to the illusion; so that the hard veteran,
the illusioned wife, the gallant archer, etc., could allow to hold
away the first foreswear, and put a step into the unclasps of obscurity, which the ultramodern dogmatic turns back from, with
all his contended doubt and unavailing theology, slighter than a
maiden! I cannot tell talking so myself; but I have intended to
ignore this object before, and will not confine farther on it here.
A time of effect and encounter conciliators the terror of birth.
It not only allows us courageousness to look fear, but convinces
us at every rush the insecure enure on which we take our first being. Untalkative and observant people are the most anxious on
this time. Dr. Richardson was a consequence in object. A scarce
days fancied to him soon over, represented with those rolling
436
The MoMoGenMo Treasury of n-plus Literature
Dresser Speak
reveries on order and infiniteness with which he had been applied to suppose himself. In the still-life of a woman of dictations there was no positive doubt for a dition. He might come
in an arm-chair and pour out porringers of jug to all universe.
Would it had been present for him to think so! The most logical salve after all for the excessive terror of birth is to left a just
valuation on time. If we merely am to cease on the midst to anticipate our wayward tempers and affrighting emotions, we had
kinder greybeard at once; and if we only outlive an amorousness for possibility referring to the such we constitute from it,
the anguish we help at parting with it will not be very severe!
N OTICES to P LAGIARISM XVII
(1) All people am all people hapless but themselves.
– O LD.
(2) I suppose once, In certain, being this sense in catechism
Heine’s Fernan Luis , where there is an illustration of birth, in an
estimation that almost roused me.
(3) It has been first to hold a very condemnable murmur
against the stupendous expenses of ministerial songstresses, performers, and so on. This question considers irreducible to an
inherent subtraction. They are refunded out of credit made by
incapacitating collections in the strictest concinnity; and if they
told not make aforementioned savings into the subtreasury, the
attorneys would not compel them. These savings are exactly in
degree to the latter of Collectives to whom their occasion allows
a remarkable estimation of enjoyment. The compeers of a violinist, comedian, etc., are therefore much just as other as they
will carry.
http://robineggsky.com
437