Date: 13 July 2015 Author: Agnès Blust IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MINDER INITIATIVE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETINGS IN 2015 137 SPI COMPANIES COMPANIES INCLUDED IN THE ANALYSIS • 137 companies of the SPI including SMI, SLI and SMIM (smaller companies are not analyzed by proxy advisors): Companies analyzed Minder Implementation at the AGMs 2014 Page 2 COMPANIES INCLUDED IN THE ANALYSIS Company Index Company Index ABB SMI/SLI Swiss Life Actelion SMI/SLI Swiss Prime Site Adecco Credit Suisse Geberit Givaudan Holcim Julius Bär SMI/SLI SMI/SLI SMI/SLI SMI/SLI SMI/SLI SMI/SLI Nestlé Novartis Richemont Roche SGS Swatch Swisscom SwissRe Syngenta Transocean UBS Zurich Financial Services Baloise Clariant Dufry Kühne + Nagel Lonza Schindler Sika Sonova Company Index Company Index Company Index SLI/SMIM Belimo SPI Romande Energie SPI SPI SPI Schaffner SPI Aryzta Barry Callebaut DKSH EMS Chemie Galenica GAM SMIM SMIM SMIM SMIM SMIM SMIM Bellevue Berner KB BKW Bobst Bossard Bucher SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI Hügli Hypothekarbank Lenzburg Implenia Inficon Interroll Intershop Kaba Kardex SPI SLI/SMIM Bell SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SMI/SLI Georg Fischer SMIM Burckhardt Compression SPI Komax SPI SMI/SLI SMI/SLI SMI/SLI SMI/SLI SMI/SLI SMI/SLI SMI/SLI SMI/SLI SMI/SLI SMI/SLI SMI/SLI SLI/SMIM SLI/SMIM SLI/SMIM SLI/SMIM SLI/SMIM SLI/SMIM SLI/SMIM SLI/SMIM Helvetia Lindt Logitech Meyer Burger OC Oerlikon Partners Group PSP Swiss Property Straumann Sulzer Temenos AFG Arbonia Forster Allreal ALSO APG Ascom Autoneum Bachem Bank Coop Basilea SMIM SMIM SMIM SMIM SMIM SMIM SMIM SMIM SMIM SMIM SMIM SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI Burkhalter Calida Cembra Money Bank CFT Charles Vögele Coltene Comet Conzzeta CPH Chemie & Paper Dätwyler EFG International Emmi Evolva Flughafen Zurich Forbo gategroup Goldbach Gurit Huber & Suhner Kudelski Kuoni Reisen LEM Leonteq LifeWatch Looser Luzerner KB MCH Metall Zug Micronas mobilezone Mobimo Orascom Orell Füssli Orior Panalpina Pargesa Phoenix Mecano Rieter SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI Schmolz + Bickenbach Schweiter Technologies SFS Siegfried St. Galler KB Starrag Group Swiss Finance & Property Investment AG Swisslog Swissquote Tamedia Tecan Tornos u-blox Valiant Valora Vetropack Von Roll Vontobel VZ Holding Walter Meier Zehnder Züblin Immobilien Zug Estates SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI SPI Minder Implementation at the AGMs 2014 Page 3 ELEMENTS ANALYZED • Changes to the Articles of Association • • • • • Structure of the binding Say-on-Pay vote Number of external mandates Non-competition agreements Cap on variable compensation Voting recommendations of proxy advisors and voting results at AGM • Say-on-pay vote at 2015 AGM • Overview • Voting recommendations and voting results at AGM Minder Implementation at the AGMs 2014 Page 4 CHANGES TO THE ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION LEVEL OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MINDER INITIATIVE • As of 13 July 2015, 98% of companies have modified their articles of association (AoA) according to the provisions of the Ordinance • Six companies have not yet published their invitation to the 2015 AGM, out of which three companies had implemented the changes to their AoA at the 2014 AGM, leaving three companies having “not yet implemented” Minder Implementation at the AGMs 2014 Page 6 STRUCTURE OF THE BINDING VOTE ON COMPENSATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS • 90% of companies implemented a prospective vote: Minder Implementation at the AGMs 2014 Page 7 STRUCTURE OF THE BINDING VOTE ON COMPENSATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS Minder Implementation at the AGMs 2014 Page 8 STRUCTURE OF THE BINDING VOTE ON COMPENSATION EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT • 70% of companies implemented a prospective vote: • “Prospective different period” means a single prospective vote (one amount) with a compensation period that is not next year • “Prospective mix” means several prospective votes (each vote on one amount, for example one vote on fixed compensation and one vote on variable compensation) Minder Implementation at the AGMs 2014 Page 9 STRUCTURE OF THE BINDING VOTE ON COMPENSATION EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT Minder Implementation at the AGMs 2014 Page 10 NON COMPETITION CLAUSES: TIME LIMIT • 39% of companies included a provision on non-compete agreements with a time limit • Non-competition clauses which are not limited in time are criticized by the proxy advisors (potential hidden severance payments) • Non-competition clauses over 12 months are prohibited in the draft reform of the Swiss corporate law • 58% of the companies did not include a provision for non-competition agreement in their articles of association, mostly smaller companies (SPI) Minder Implementation at the AGMs 2014 Page 11 NON COMPETITION CLAUSES: TIME LIMIT Minder Implementation at the AGMs 2014 Page 12 NON COMPETITION CLAUSES: COMPENSATION • The amount of compensation provided during the period of non-competition varies from 50% to 100% of annual total compensation Minder Implementation at the AGMs 2014 Page 13 CAP ON VARIABLE COMPENSATION • 59% of companies did not define a cap on variable compensation in their AoA • Larger companies (SMI) are less likely to determine a cap on variable compensation in their articles of association than smaller companies (SPI) Minder Implementation at the AGMs 2014 Page 14 CAP ON VARIABLE COMPENSATION Minder Implementation at the AGMs 2014 Page 15 NUMBER OF EXTERNAL MANDATES – BOARD MEMBERS • Typically, board members can have 4 or 5 external mandates in other listed companies • Larger companies (SMI, SLI, SMIM) are more restrictive and have set a limit at 4 additional external mandates in other listed companies, while smaller companies (SPI) have set the limit at 5 additional external mandates Minder Implementation at the AGMs 2014 Page 16 NUMBER OF EXTERNAL MANDATES – BOARD MEMBERS Minder Implementation at the AGMs 2014 Page 17 NUMBER OF EXTERNAL MANDATES – EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT • Typically, executive management members can have 1 or 2external mandates in other listed companies • Larger companies (SMI, SLI, SMIM) are more restrictive and have set a limit at 1 additional external mandate in listed companies, while smaller companies (SPI) have set the limit at either 1 or 2 additional mandates Minder Implementation at the AGMs 2014 Page 18 NUMBER OF EXTERNAL MANDATES – EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT Minder Implementation at the AGMs 2014 Page 19 PROXY ADVISORS VOTING RECOMMENDATION AND VOTING RESULTS AT AGM • Level of positive voting recommendations on the changes to the AoA by proxy advisor (% of companies with positive voting recommendation): Index ISS Ethos zRating SWIPRA AGM (average) SMI 63% 37% 89% 84% 87% SLI 41% 34% 83% 86% 86% SMIM 22% 59% 74% 84% SPI 32% 54% 87% • More negative voting recommendations of proxy advisors for smaller companies (SMIM, SPI) but similar average voting results at AGM Minder Implementation at the AGMs 2014 Page 20 SAY-ON-PAY VOTE AT 2015 AGM SAY-ON-PAY VOTE AT 2015 AGM ADVISORY VOTE ON COMPENSATION REPORT • 60% of companies submitted the compensation report to a separate advisory vote: • Larger companies (SMI, SLI) are more likely to conduct an advisory vote on the compensation report than companies of the SMIM and of the SPI • This analysis does not include 6 companies who have not yet held their 2015 AGM Minder Implementation at the AGMs 2014 Page 22 SAY-ON-PAY VOTE AT 2015 AGM ADVISORY VOTE ON COMPENSATION REPORT Minder Implementation at the AGMs 2014 Page 23 SAY-ON-PAY VOTE AT 2015 AGM LEVEL OF INFORMATION PROVIDED TO SHAREHOLDERS • Companies of the SMI, SLI and to some extent the SMIM provided additional information to shareholders on the compensation votes, either in form of: • A separate say-on-pay booklet • An annex in the AGM invitation • Details in the AGM invitation • Other companies (SPI) tend to not provide any additional information to shareholders on the amounts of compensation being submitted to vote Minder Implementation at the AGMs 2014 Page 24 SAY-ON-PAY VOTE AT 2015 AGM LEVEL OF INFORMATION PROVIDED TO SHAREHOLDERS Minder Implementation at the AGMs 2014 Page 25 PROXY ADVISORS VOTING RECOMMENDATION AND VOTING RESULTS AT AGM: COMPENSATION REPORT • Level of positive voting recommendations on the advisory vote on the compensation report (% of companies with positive voting recommendation): Index Ethos zRating SWIPRA AGM (average) SMI 15.8% 36.8% 84.2% 88% SLI 24.1% 37.9% 75.9% 82% SMIM 21.7% 39.1% 52.2% 71% SPI 25.8% 51.7% 93% Minder Implementation at the AGMs 2014 Page 26 PROXY ADVISORS VOTING RECOMMENDATION AND VOTING RESULTS AT AGM: BOARD COMPENSATION • Level of positive voting recommendations on the binding vote on the compensation amount(s) for the board of directors (% of companies with positive voting recommendation): Index Ethos zRating SWIPRA AGM (average) SMI 57.9% 89.5% 89.5% 93% SLI 55.2% 82.8% 79.3% 84% SMIM 52.2% 78.3% 78.3% 88% SPI 59.6% 74.2% 96% Minder Implementation at the AGMs 2014 Page 27 PROXY ADVISORS VOTING RECOMMENDATION AND VOTING RESULTS AT AGM: EXECUTIVES COMPENSATION • Level of positive voting recommendations on the binding vote on the compensation amount(s) for the executive management (% of companies with positive voting recommendation): Index Ethos zRating SWIPRA AGM (average) SMI 15.8% 68.4% 84.2% 92% SLI 24.1% 65.5% 79.3% 93% SMIM 39.1% 69.6% 73.9% 92% SPI 60.7% 75.3% 95% Minder Implementation at the AGMs 2014 Page 28 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DISCLAIMER • Detailed overview by company can be found at www.agnesblustconsulting.com/news.html • This analysis has been developed by Agnès Blust Consulting on the basis of the published invitations to the Annual General Meetings in 2015 and 2014. Agnes Blust Consulting makes this overview available to clients and other third parties on a complimentary basis. In no event shall Agnès Blust Consulting be liable to any party for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of the data presented here or for any cost or damages arising out of or in connection with the use of this information Minder Implementation at the AGMs 2014 Page 29
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz