Reports for Natomas Unified School District (2011-12)
No emergency facility needs/sufficient textbooks
Emergency facilities needs or textbook insufficiency
Emergency facilities need/textbook insufficiency has been addressed
School Name
Review Date
H. Allen Hight Elementary
8/31/11
Jefferson Elementary
8/31/11
Natomas High
9/13/11
Textbooks
Facilities
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
343
FACILITY INSPECTION TOOL (FIT)
STATE ALLOCATION BOARD
OFFICE OF PUBLIC SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION
SCHOOL FACILITY CONDITIONS EVALUATION
(REV 05/09)
SCHOOL DISTRICT/COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION
COUNTY
Natomas Unified School District
Sacramento
SCHOOL SITE
SCHOOL TYPE (GRADE LEVELS)
H. Allen Hight Elementary School
INSPECTOR’S NAME
INSPECTOR’S TITLE
Sharon Ketcherside
PART III:
NUMBER
9:30 AM
Sunny and Warm
CATEGORY TOTALS AND RANKING (round all calculations to two decimal places)
B. INTERIOR
CATEGORY
TOTALS
GAS LEAKS
MECH/HVAC
SEWER
OF AREAS
EVALUATED

29
Michael Cannon Assistant Superintendent
WEATHER CONDITION AT TIME OF INSPECTION
A. SYSTEMS
TOTAL
49
NAME OF DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE ACCOMPANYING THE INSPECTOR(S) (IF APPLICABLE)
Supervisor
DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTION
8/31/2011
NUMBER OF CLASSROOMS ON SITE
K-5
C. CLEANLINESS
D. ELECTRICAL
INTERIOR
OVERALL
PEST/VERMIN
SURFACES
CLEANLINESS
INFESTATION
ELECTRICAL
E. RESTROOMS/FOUNTAINS
RESTROOMS
SINKS /
FOUNTAINS
F. SAFETY
FIRE SAFETY
G. STRUCTURAL
HAZARDOUS
STRUCTURAL
MATERIALS
DAMAGE
ROOFS
H. EXTERNAL
PLAYGROUND
WINDOWS/
/SCHOOL
DOORS/
GROUNDS
FENCES
Number of s
29
29
29
29
29
29
27
16
29
28
29
29
29
1
29
Number of D’s
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
Number of X’s
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Number of NA’s
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
27
0
Percent of System in Good Repair
Number of “P”s divided by
(Total Areas - “NA”s)
Total Percent per Category
(average of above)*
Rank (Check One)
Good=90%-100%
Fair=75%-89.99%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 93.10%
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
84.21%
100.00% 96.55%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 50.00%
93.10%
92.11%
98.28%
GOOD
FAIR
GOOD
FAIR
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
100.00%
75.00%
GOOD
FAIR
GOOD
FAIR
Poor=0%-74.99%
* Note: An extreme deficiency in any area automatically results in a “poor” ranking for that category and a zero for “Total Percent per Category.”
OVERALL RATING:
DETERMINE AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF 8 CATEGORIES ABOVE

94.81%
SCHOOL RATING *

Good
** For School Rating, apply the Percentage Range below to the average percentage determined above, taking into account the rating Description below.
PERCENTAGE
99%-100%
DESCRIPTION
The school meets most or all standards of good repair. Deficiencies noted, if any, are not significant and/or impact a very small area of the school.
90%-98.99% The school is maintained in good repair with a number of non-critical deficiencies noted. These deficiencies are isolated, and/or resulting from minor wear and tear, and/or in the process of being mitigated.
RATING
Exemplary
Good
75%-89.99% The school is not in good repair. Some deficiencies noted are critical and/or widespread. Repairs and/or additional maintenance are necessary in several areas of the school site.
Fair
0%-74.99% The school facilities are in poor condition. Deficiencies of various degrees have been noted throughout the site. Major repairs and maintenance are necessary throughout the campus.
Poor
COMMENTS AND RATING EXPLANATION:
Site is in excellent condition with a few minor issues
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
344
FACILITY INSPECTION TOOL (FIT)
STATE ALLOCATION BOARD
OFFICE OF PUBLIC SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION
SCHOOL FACILITY CONDITIONS EVALUATION
(REV 05/09)
SCHOOL DISTRICT/COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION
COUNTY
Natomas Unified School District
Sacramento
SCHOOL SITE
SCHOOL TYPE (GRADE LEVELS)
Jefferson Elementary School
INSPECTOR’S NAME
INSPECTOR’S TITLE
Sharon Ketcherside
PART III:
NUMBER
11:00 AM
Sunny and hot
CATEGORY TOTALS AND RANKING (round all calculations to two decimal places)
B. INTERIOR
CATEGORY
TOTALS
GAS LEAKS
MECH/HVAC
SEWER
OF AREAS
EVALUATED

21
Michael Cannon, Assistant Superintendent
WEATHER CONDITION AT TIME OF INSPECTION
A. SYSTEMS
TOTAL
24
NAME OF DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE ACCOMPANYING THE INSPECTOR(S) (IF APPLICABLE)
Supervisor
DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTION
8/31/2011
NUMBER OF CLASSROOMS ON SITE
K-5
C. CLEANLINESS
D. ELECTRICAL
INTERIOR
OVERALL
PEST/VERMIN
SURFACES
CLEANLINESS
INFESTATION
ELECTRICAL
E. RESTROOMS/FOUNTAINS
RESTROOMS
SINKS /
FOUNTAINS
F. SAFETY
FIRE SAFETY
G. STRUCTURAL
HAZARDOUS
STRUCTURAL
MATERIALS
DAMAGE
ROOFS
H. EXTERNAL
PLAYGROUND
WINDOWS/
/SCHOOL
DOORS/
GROUNDS
FENCES
Number of s
21
21
21
20
21
21
20
7
21
21
21
21
21
1
21
Number of D’s
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
Number of X’s
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Number of NA’s
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
0
0
0
0
0
19
0
Percent of System in Good Repair
Number of “P”s divided by
(Total Areas - “NA”s)
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 95.24%
Total Percent per Category
(average of above)*
Rank (Check One)
Good=90%-100%
Fair=75%-89.99%
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
95.24%
GOOD
FAIR
100.00% 100.00% 95.24%
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
87.50%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 50.00%
95.24%
93.75%
GOOD
FAIR
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
100.00%
75.00%
GOOD
FAIR
GOOD
FAIR
Poor=0%-74.99%
* Note: An extreme deficiency in any area automatically results in a “poor” ranking for that category and a zero for “Total Percent per Category.”
OVERALL RATING:
DETERMINE AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF 8 CATEGORIES ABOVE

94.90%
SCHOOL RATING *

Good
** For School Rating, apply the Percentage Range below to the average percentage determined above, taking into account the rating Description below.
PERCENTAGE
99%-100%
DESCRIPTION
The school meets most or all standards of good repair. Deficiencies noted, if any, are not significant and/or impact a very small area of the school.
90%-98.99% The school is maintained in good repair with a number of non-critical deficiencies noted. These deficiencies are isolated, and/or resulting from minor wear and tear, and/or in the process of being mitigated.
RATING
Exemplary
Good
75%-89.99% The school is not in good repair. Some deficiencies noted are critical and/or widespread. Repairs and/or additional maintenance are necessary in several areas of the school site.
Fair
0%-74.99% The school facilities are in poor condition. Deficiencies of various degrees have been noted throughout the site. Major repairs and maintenance are necessary throughout the campus.
Poor
COMMENTS AND RATING EXPLANATION:
School is in good condition
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
350
FACILITY INSPECTION TOOL (FIT)
STATE ALLOCATION BOARD
OFFICE OF PUBLIC SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION
SCHOOL FACILITY CONDITIONS EVALUATION
(REV 05/09)
SCHOOL DISTRICT/COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION
COUNTY
Natomas Unified School District
Sacramento
SCHOOL SITE
SCHOOL TYPE (GRADE LEVELS)
Natomas High School
INSPECTOR’S NAME
INSPECTOR’S TITLE
Sharon Ketcherside
PART III:
NUMBER
8:30 AM
Sunny and Warm
CATEGORY TOTALS AND RANKING (round all calculations to two decimal places)
B. INTERIOR
CATEGORY
TOTALS
GAS LEAKS
MECH/HVAC
SEWER
OF AREAS
EVALUATED

55
Michael Cannon, Assistant Superintendent
WEATHER CONDITION AT TIME OF INSPECTION
A. SYSTEMS
TOTAL
77
NAME OF DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE ACCOMPANYING THE INSPECTOR(S) (IF APPLICABLE)
Supervisor
DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTION
9/13/2011
NUMBER OF CLASSROOMS ON SITE
9-12
C. CLEANLINESS
D. ELECTRICAL
INTERIOR
OVERALL
PEST/VERMIN
SURFACES
CLEANLINESS
INFESTATION
ELECTRICAL
E. RESTROOMS/FOUNTAINS
RESTROOMS
SINKS /
FOUNTAINS
F. SAFETY
FIRE SAFETY
G. STRUCTURAL
HAZARDOUS
STRUCTURAL
MATERIALS
DAMAGE
ROOFS
H. EXTERNAL
PLAYGROUND
WINDOWS/
/SCHOOL
DOORS/
GROUNDS
FENCES
Number of s
55
55
55
38
55
55
51
17
53
53
55
55
55
0
55
Number of D’s
0
0
0
17
0
0
4
3
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
Number of X’s
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Number of NA’s
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
35
0
0
0
0
0
55
0
85.00%
96.36%
96.36%
Percent of System in Good Repair
Number of “P”s divided by
(Total Areas - “NA”s)
Total Percent per Category
(average of above)*
Rank (Check One)
Good=90%-100%
Fair=75%-89.99%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 69.09%
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
69.09%
GOOD
FAIR
100.00% 100.00% 92.73%
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
92.73%
90.68%
98.18%
GOOD
FAIR
GOOD
FAIR
GOOD
FAIR
100.00%
100.00%
GOOD
FAIR
GOOD
FAIR
Poor=0%-74.99%
* Note: An extreme deficiency in any area automatically results in a “poor” ranking for that category and a zero for “Total Percent per Category.”
OVERALL RATING:
DETERMINE AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF 8 CATEGORIES ABOVE

93.84%
SCHOOL RATING *

Good
** For School Rating, apply the Percentage Range below to the average percentage determined above, taking into account the rating Description below.
PERCENTAGE
99%-100%
DESCRIPTION
The school meets most or all standards of good repair. Deficiencies noted, if any, are not significant and/or impact a very small area of the school.
90%-98.99% The school is maintained in good repair with a number of non-critical deficiencies noted. These deficiencies are isolated, and/or resulting from minor wear and tear, and/or in the process of being mitigated.
RATING
Exemplary
Good
75%-89.99% The school is not in good repair. Some deficiencies noted are critical and/or widespread. Repairs and/or additional maintenance are necessary in several areas of the school site.
Fair
0%-74.99% The school facilities are in poor condition. Deficiencies of various degrees have been noted throughout the site. Major repairs and maintenance are necessary throughout the campus.
Poor
COMMENTS AND RATING EXPLANATION:
This school is in dire need of new carpets in all classrooms (extremely worn and stained, bunching); one hallway in gymnasium area is in need of immediate attention