Bioimaging 6 (1998) 43–53. Printed in the UK PII: S0966-9051(98)90833-4 Near-field optical microscopy for DNA studies at the single molecular level M F Garcia-Parajo†, J-A Veerman, S J T van Noort, B G de Grooth, J Greve and N F van Hulst Applied Optics Group, Department of Applied Physics and MESA Research Institute, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands Submitted 2 December 1997, accepted 16 January 1998 Abstract. An aperture-type near-field optical microscope (NSOM) with two polarization detection channels has been used to image fluorescently labelled DNA with high spatial resolution and single molecule fluorescence sensitivity. The sample has been engineered such that there is only one rhodamine dye per DNA strand. Lateral and vertical DNA dimensions in the shear-force image are 14 ± 2 nm and 1.4 ± 0.2 nm, respectively. No sample deformation was observed under our imaging conditions. Near-field fluorescence imaging of individual fluorophores shows an optical resolution of 70 nm at full-width at half-maximum. Large intensity differences between individual rhodamine molecules attached to DNA are observed from the NSOM images. Statistics on rhodamine dyes in different environments (attached to glass, embedded in a polymer layer and attached to DNA) show bleaching rates of 10−5 . Total intensity line profiles together with in-plane angle orientation are used to characterize individual dyes. Rhodamine dyes show strong intensity fluctuations independent of the particular environment. These results are in contrast with the more stable photophysical behaviour as observed for carbocyanine molecules embedded in polymer matrices. The mobility of rhodamine—both lateral and rotational—is clearly influenced by its immediate surrounding and attachment to the surface. Keywords: NSOM, near-field fluorescent imaging, shear-force imaging, single molecule detection, DNA–dye interactions, photodynamics 1. Introduction Detection and spectroscopy of single molecules at ambient and biologically relevant conditions, combined with great advances in genetic engineering, has opened new opportunities of research in DNA analysis, diagnosis and fundamental studies. A particular challenge—within the context of the Human Genome project [1]—is the detection of biomolecules containing a single fluorophore as the molecule transits a focused laser beam [2]. Clearly, the final goal is fast DNA sequencing. Another challenging area of research is the understanding of molecular events involved in DNA transcription and gene regulation. In many of these events, the monitoring of structural and conformational changes of single biomacromolecules (proteins and/or the DNA itself) is of vital importance. Already the study of enzymatic reactions at a single molecular level [3–5] has started to offer detailed information regarding molecular interaction and dynamics information that would † E-mail address: [email protected] c 1998 IOP Publishing Ltd 0966-9051/98/010043+11$19.50 be virtually impossible to obtain from ensemble-averaged investigations. While scanning force microscopy (SFM) is becoming an increasingly used research tool to further the understanding of biomolecular processes by imaging the dynamics of the macromolecule structure and assembly in real time [6–8], chemical specificity is lost with SFM. Near-field scanning optical microscopy (NSOM) offers a powerful tool to combine the high spatial resolution of SFM with the spectroscopic information offered by optical methods. In 1993, imaging of individual dye molecules was achieved using an NSOM configuration [9]. Since then, a wealth of studies at the single molecular level, with superspatial and/or temporal resolution, has been performed [10–14]. Further advances in the field show that single molecule experiments do provide a sensitive tool for studying the local environment of a single molecule at ambient conditions [15]. Moreover, slow dynamic processes have been studied in the near field at the single molecular 43 M F Garcia-Parajo et al level, including translational and rotational diffusion [13, 16, 17]. In NSOM, an aperture probe of sub-wavelength dimensions is scanned in close proximity (within the near field, i.e. less than 10 nm) to the specimen under study. Using the probe as a near-field excitation source, the interaction with the sample surface induces changes in the far-field radiation, which is collected by conventional optics and directed to a highly sensitive detector to provide an optical image [18, 19]. An independent mechanism is used to control the distance separation between the probe and the sample within 1 to 10 nm, and generate simultaneously a topographic image [20]. In this way, a singular feature pertaining to NSOM is produced: correlative optical and topographical imaging with a spatial resolution mainly determined by the probe configuration. Another unique characteristic of the near-field excitation is given by the finite size of the probe itself: decreasing the area of illumination obviously reduces the interaction volume and background scatter, which is of major importance to minimize photodamage of the sample and to enhance the sensitivity for single molecule detection. The challenge of monitoring biochemical reactions using a NSOM imposes special demands on both sample preparation and data analysis. NSOM, like SFM, is a surface technique and therefore the biochemical reactions have to proceed on the surface, which might in turn negatively influence the process. Undesirable effects of the near-field probe on the process should also be minimized and taken into account when analysing the data. Individual dynamic events of a biomolecule will be observable only when one fluorophore is attached to the biomolecule. Additionally, fluorescence of a single dye displays rich dynamics associated with the molecular properties of the dye itself and its immediate surrounding. Therefore, in the study of biomolecule dynamics it is crucial to understand first the photophysical properties and dynamics of individual fluorophores under relevant conditions. This knowledge will then be used for distinguishing fluorophore dynamics from the biomolecule dynamics. In this paper we show that NSOM is a powerful technique for the identification of specific tagged sites on the DNA macromolecule. Individual DNA molecules tagged with only one fluorophore at one end of the DNA fragment are visualized with unprecedented optical and topographical lateral and vertical resolution, together with single molecule fluorescence sensitivity. Next, we present statistical data on the photodynamics of two biologically relevant dyes as a function of their different surroundings. Photobleaching rates, total emitted intensity and in-plane orientation per molecule are presented for both dyes, on the millisecond and second timescales. We find that rhodamine molecules exhibit, in general, much faster dynamic behaviour, independent of the surrounding (adsorbed on glass, imbedded in a thin polymer layer or attached to the DNA macromolecule) as compared to carbocyanine molecules. 44 2. Materials and methods 2.1. Sample preparation As a model system to demonstrate ultimate sensitivity imaging we chose double stranded (ds) DNA, 1 kb in length (∼340 nm) labelled at one end with rhodamine, i.e. one fluorophore per DNA fragment. The 1 kbp dsDNA were manufactured by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and already labelled with rhodamine 6G succinimidyl ester, R6G-SE (Eurogentec, SA, Belgium). The 50 -phosphate end of the synthesized dsDNA fragment was chemically modified using standard aminophosphoramidite modifiers to introduce a NH2 reactive group. A 6 methylene (CH2 ) linker was chosen between the terminal phosphate and the amino moiety. R6G-SE was then allowed to react with the NH2 group to form a carboxamide bond. Because of the selectivity of this reaction, only one fluorophore per DNA fragment is produced. Fluorescence strands have been purified by enhanced high-performance liquid chromatography (trade mark of Eurogentec) to remove unlabelled fragments. Labelling efficiency is better than 90%, as guaranteed by the manufacturer. Freshly cleaved mica disks (Ted Pella, CA, USA) (thickness ∼150 µm) were used as substrates for immobilizing the DNA. dsDNA fragments were diluted in a buffer containing 4 mM HEPES, 1 mM NaCl and 1 mM MgCl2 , pH 6.5 to a final concentration of 3.2 ng µl−1 for deposition. The buffers were made of MilliQ filtered deionized water. A 5 µl drop was deposited onto the freshly cleaved mica. After the sample settled for a couple of minutes, it was washed with water (0.5 ml of doubly distilled water from a squirt bottle) and then briefly dried in a stream of compressed air. SFM in the tapping mode was used to initially characterize the samples. In practice, we found between 30 and 65 DNA molecules µm−2 , in rough agreement with the calculated areal density of 80 molecules µm−2 , with the discrepancy probably attributable to the well known unevenness of the DNA binding to the mica surface [8]. After SFM inspection, samples were rigidly mounted onto a metallic support and fixed to the microscope scanning table with three small magnets. To gain understanding of the effect of DNA over the fluorophore photophysical properties and dynamics, we prepared samples in which the same fluorophore R6G-SE (Molecular Probes, C-6127) was spread on a previously acetone-cleaned silica glass cover slip at a concentration of 10 nM, and also embedded in a thin polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) layer. Similarly, as a reference calibration sample, carbocyanine dye molecules (DiI-C18 from Molecular Probes, D-282) were also investigated. The samples were prepared by embedding the dyes in PMMA as described elsewhere [21]. In all cases, the surface coverage was typically a few dye molecules per square micrometre. Near-field optical microscopy for DNA studies at the single molecular level to separate the fluorescence signal into two perpendicular polarization components. Both signals are then sent to photocounting avalanche photodiodes (APD, SPCM-100 from EG&G Optoelectronics, Canada). Excitation powers varied from 5 to 80 nW at the end of the near-field probe (depending on aperture diameter and throughput efficiency). Counts rates between 103 and 104 counts s−1 per detector from a single molecule were obtained with background signals of 102 –103 counts s−1 per detector. The single molecule detection sensitivity of the NSOM configuration was complemented with molecular resolution topographic imaging using shear-force detection. The shear-force feedback scheme is based on tuning fork piezoelectric elements [20] and on the detection of the phase difference between the driving excitation and the tuning fork signal. Improvements in tuning fork time response and sensitivity have been discussed elsewhere [17, 22]. Further sensitivity for DNA imaging has been achieved by increasing the quality factor Q of the tuning fork–probe configuration (between 800 and 1200), and by extending the bandwidth of the feedback and phase detection electronics (currently limited by the piezo-electric scanner resonance, at ∼2 kHz). A custom-designed metallic holder was used for sample mounting, providing high mechanical rigidity while leaving a 6 mm diameter opening for optical measurements. Mechanical vibrations have been kept below 0.3 Hz by suspending the entire microscope with elastic cords. Additionally, the microscope head is enclosed during measurements to reduce airflow. All measurements were performed at ambient conditions. Typical relative humidity is ∼65% during experiments. Figure 1. Schematic set-up of the aperture-type NSOM used in our experiments. The scanning stage is mounted on top of an inverted optical microscope. Shear-force feedback is used to control the tip-to-sample separation. Fluorescence is collected in transmission using a 1.3 NA immersion oil objective, split in two polarization directions and detected with two photon counting APDs. 2.2. The instrument The NSOM configuration used in these experiments has been described in detail elsewhere [16]. A schematic is shown in figure 1. Briefly, the scanning sample stage is mounted on a Zeiss, Axiovert 135 TV inverted optical microscope. Local excitation is achieved by coupling the 514 nm line of an Ar/Kr laser into the aluminium coated optical fibre probe (typical aperture diameter < 100 nm). A tuning fork based shear-force feedback scheme has been implemented to control the tip–sample distance separation and generate at the same time a topographic image. The optical detection path is similar to that found in any conventional far-field ultrasensitive fluorescence microscope, except from a broadband polarizing beamsplitter cube (Newport, 400–700 nm) which has been added 3. Results 3.1. Shear-force and near field fluorescence images of DNA/dye As an example of the high lateral and vertical resolution that can be obtained using the shear-force modality of the NSOM, figure 2 shows a 1.5 × 1.5 µm2 scan area image (200 × 200 pixels) of plasmid DNA deposited as described above. The image was obtained using an aluminium coated NSOM probe. The resonance frequency of the tuning fork– probe ensemble was f0 = 33 958 Hz with a quality factor, Q = 1200. The tuning fork was driven externally with dither amplitude of 0.1 pm peak-to-peak resulting in a lateral tip displacement of approximately 6 pm†. Phase feedback was used to control the tip–sample separation and to generate the topographic image [22]. The phase set point was chosen close to the out-of-contact value. The scan speed was 1.5 µm s−1 . The line trace in figure 2 shows a full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of 14 nm, and a † From macroscopic measurements we have determined the tip amplitude as a function of the dither piezo-amplitude. We have observed that the tip amplitude does not follow directly the amplification given by the fork Q factor, depending on the mechanical mounting of the tip onto the fork. 45 M F Garcia-Parajo et al Figure 2. A 1.5 × 1.5 µm2 (200 × 200 pixels) shear-force image of plasmid DNA as deposited on mica. The time per pixel is 5 ms. The width of the DNA is 14 ± 2 nm at FWHM, with a height of 1.4 ± 0.2 nm as seen from the line trace on the figure. height of 1.4 nm. These values are comparable to those obtained using conventional SFM techniques [23, 24]. Due to the metal grain structure at the tip end region which differs from tip to tip, it is difficult to obtain images with reproducible good quality. However, once a ‘good’ tip has been selected, the quality of imaging reproduces nearly 100% from image to image. The non-disturbing character of shear force microscopy has been pointed out by several workers [21, 25] despite the lack of understanding of the nature of the shearforce interaction. An estimation of the friction force transferred to the sample can be easily obtained using the harmonic oscillator model for the tuning fork–probe configuration [26]. With Q = 1200 and a static spring constant kstat = 15 kN m−1 (for a 32 kHz tuning fork), an effective spring constant within the resonance of kdyn = 1.25 N m−1 is obtained. The effective force is then 7.5 pN, close to the thermal noise of the drag force (the noise limited drag √ force detected by the fork is [26] Fn = [kstat kB Te ]1/2 / 3Q where kB is the Boltzmann constant and Te is the temperature of the fork. At Te = 300 K, with Q = 1200, Fn ∼ 4 pN). It has been established that deformation of proteins and many biological systems in aqueous solution using SFM techniques occurs at forces higher than 100 pN [27]. It is important to note that 46 the sensitivity of the technique is ultimately determined by the effective spring constant of the fork, therefore the importance of having large Q values, even if speed is sacrificed. Figure 3 shows a combined topographic (a) and fluorescence (b) image of 1 kbp dsDNA fragments labelled with a single R6G dye molecule at the 50 end of each fragment. The scan area is 1.5 × 1.5 µm2 , with 200 × 200 pixels per image and an integration time of 10 ms/pixel. Because of technical difficulties, the images were not acquired simultaneously, and therefore they do not correspond exactly to the same surface area. In figure 3(a), DNA fragments of 340 nm length (as expected) are clearly resolved with a filament height of 1.4 nm. In figure 3(b), the near-field fluorescence image of individual R6G dye molecules attached to one end of the DNA strands is shown. The diameter of the individual intensity peaks is 70 nm at FWHM. The averaged background is 40 counts/pixel, with a maximum R6G molecule signal of 240 counts/pixel. The measured number of counts per pixel is consistent with the emission expected from a single R6G molecule under our excitation conditions (with an excitation power of ∼10 nW at the end of the NSOM probe as measured in the far-field, an absorption cross section of 2 × 10−16 cm2 for R6G, an assumed emission quantum efficiency of 0.8 and estimated collection efficiency of the optimized optical path of 0.1, we expect to detect ∼104 counts s−1 , i.e. ∼100 counts/pixel per molecule). An interesting feature on the fluorescent image of figure 3(b) is the large difference in intensity emitted by individual R6G molecules. While some molecules emitted a maximum of 240 counts/pixel, some others can barely be distinguished from the background. Moreover, in correlation with the number of DNA molecules observed on the topographic image and with a fluorescence labelling efficiency of 90%, we expected to detect many more R6G dye molecules than the actual number detected. Both findings as well as ‘noisiness’ on the majority of the molecules were observed in most of the images. The next section presents and discusses some statistical data over these findings. 3.2. Dynamic behaviour of the fluorescent molecules To gain understanding over the markedly different behaviour of R6G on DNA as compared to more stable dyes like carbocyanine (DiI), we have imaged many molecules and extracted statistical information. Figure 4 shows the signal decay due to photobleaching for DiI molecules embedded in PMMA (a), R6G in PMMA (b), and R6G adsorbed on glass (c). The experiments were conducted using the same NSOM probe and the same excitation conditions (well below molecule saturation). The data were taken from consecutive 3 × 3 µm2 (200 × 200 pixels) fluorescence images over the same sample surface and counting the number of molecules Near-field optical microscopy for DNA studies at the single molecular level Figure 3. Shear-force image (a) and near-field fluorescence image (b) of 1 kbp (340 nm length) DNA fragments labelled with R6G. The scan size is 1.5 × 1.5 µm2 , with 200 × 200 pixels and an integration time of 10 ms/pixel. The sample consists of one fluorophore per strand. The shear-force image shows well resolved DNA strands with a resolution comparable to SFM techniques. The near-field fluorescence image shows the intensity of individual R6G dyes. The optical resolution (FWHM) is 70 nm. Note the variation of intensity for different dyes. The maximum signal is 240 counts/pixel. The background is 40 counts/pixel. present on each image. Taking 10 × 10 pixels for the typical emission spot of each molecule (tip diameter ∼150 nm), and an excitation time of 10 ms per pixel, each molecule is excited for one second in each image. Thus, we plot the number of molecules present in each image as a function of the illumination time per molecule. Figure 4(a) shows slow and gradual bleaching for DiI molecules embedded in PMMA. In fact, after 4 s of illumination only nine out of 59 molecules have been bleached. This is in contrast to what is observed for R6G dyes in the same environment, i.e. PMMA. As depicted in figure 4(b), 44% of the molecules are bleached after 1 s of illumination. More gradual bleaching is observed in seconds 2 and 3. Similar behaviour is observed for the same molecule R6G, but now adsorbed on glass, as shown in figure 4(c). In fact, during the first second of illumination approximately 30% of the molecules display discrete photobleaching and emit fluorescence during the first three or four line scans only. After 1 s of illumination approximately 50% of the molecules have been bleached. A slower and more gradual bleaching rate is observed for seconds 2 to 4. We have not been able to collect enough statistical data over the R6G-DNA samples, mainly because instrumentation adjustments are necessary during the first few scannings. Nevertheless, correlating the topographic images of DNA and taking into account 90% fluorescence labelling efficiency, we normally observed only half of the molecules that are expected to be present on the surface, consistent with the results found in PMMA and glass. Similarly, subsequent imaging can be performed with slow bleaching rates. A rough estimation of the number of photons emitted by a molecule during 1 s of illumination can be obtained by adding all the counts in each pixel. An average value is obtained by adding the counts of all molecules and dividing by the total number of molecules in one image. Taking into account a collection efficiency of 0.1, we obtain an emission of ∼3 × 105 photons per molecule per second in the case of R6G in glass. Based on the observation that approximately 50% of the R6G molecules photobleach after 1 s of illumination, we then estimate a photobleaching rate of ∼10−5 . In the case of DiI molecules we have measured a similar number of emitted photons per second of illumination, i.e. of ∼3 × 105 , but contrary to the R6G dyes, DiI molecules in PMMA live many more photocycles before photodissociation (emission > 106 photons, as estimated from our images). The distinct behaviour of DiI and R6G molecules is clearly displayed in figure 5. Both images are 200 × 200 pixels, with an integration time of 10 ms/pixel. Figure 5(a) is a 3 × 3 µm2 scan area of DiI molecules embedded in PMMA. The aperture diameter is approximately 120 nm. The orientation of the excitation polarization is along 45◦ , with polarization characteristics of the near-field probe greater than 1:13 for all directions when viewed in the farfield. Figure 5(b) is a 1.5 × 1.5 µm2 scan area of R6G molecules attached to DNA as deposited on mica. The image has been generated with a 70 nm aperture probe. The orientation excitation polarization is not exactly known due to the birefringence effect of mica. Nevertheless, we have adjusted the incoming polarization such that an equal amount of signal is obtained in transmission on both APD detectors. The diameters of the fluorescent spots 47 M F Garcia-Parajo et al Figure 4. Signal decay due to photobleaching for (a) DiI molecules embedded in PMMA, (b) R6G in PMMA and (c) R6G adsorbed on glass. Measurements were performed with the same NSOM probe and the same excitation conditions (well below molecule saturation). Plots have been generated by counting the number of molecules present in each 3 × 3 µm2 image. Each molecule is excited for 1 s in each image. Approximately 50% of the R6G molecules photobleach after 1 s of illumination. The photobleaching rate is ∼10−5 for R6G. DiI molecules in PMMA show more gradual and slow photobleaching behaviour. 48 correspond to the convolution of the molecule fluorescent intensity with the near-field probe profile. Each spot is approximately 10 × 10 pixels. Each image consists of two data sets, one for each fluorescence polarization direction. The data have been colour coded, red for the 0◦ detector and green for the 90◦ detector, and added up to create one image. As a result, the colour of each image reflects the relative contribution of each polarization component (i.e. equal amounts of red and green give yellow) while the brightness reflects the total fluorescence intensity. Two main observations can be drawn from these images. First, the different but defined in-plane orientation of individual DiI molecules when compared to R6G molecules. Figure 5(a) shows individual DiI molecules with significantly different in-plane orientations. As an example, three molecules have been outlined in the image: one with an orientation close to 0◦ (red molecule), one with an orientation close to 90◦ (green molecule) and finally one with an in-plane orientation close to 45◦ . Also, stationary dipoles are observed for most of the molecules, evidenced by the uniform colour within one fluorescent spot. In contrast, most of the molecules in figure 5(b) display an overall yellow scale colour. Individual green and red pixels are recognized within one fluorescent spot of 70 nm FWHM. A second observation is the quite stable and constant intensity emission of DiI molecules compared to the noisy and stripy behaviour of R6G dyes. In figure 5(b) we have outlined four different noisy molecules. Close inspection of the image reveals, however, that many molecules exhibit this behaviour. We next try to obtain some insight into the dynamics of DiI and R6G molecules immobilized on different surfaces. Figure 6 shows the total number of counts collected for four different molecules ((a), (c), (e), (g)) and their corresponding in-plane orientations ((b), (d), (f), (h)) as a function of sampling time. Figures 6(a) and (b) correspond to a DiI molecule embedded in PMMA, while figures 6(c)–(h) correspond to R6G molecules embedded in PMMA ((c) and (d)), adsorbed on glass ((e) and (f)) and attached to DNA ((g) and (h)). The first three molecules have been imaged with the same NSOM probe (tip aperture diameter ∼150 nm). The last molecule has been imaged with a ∼70 nm aperture NSOM probe. The graphs have been constructed taking a vertical line profile (perpendicular to the line scan) along the centre of the fluorescent spot of the molecule. We have taken between 14 and 22 pixels to describe a molecule. In figures 6(a)–(f) the pixel size is 15 nm, and in (g) and (h) the pixel size is 7.5 nm. The pixel time is 10 ms in (a)–(f) and 100 ms in (g) and (h). The time interval between pixels is 4 s. Despite heterogeneity of molecules in different environments, the data shown in figure 6 are quite representative of the behaviour exhibited by most of the molecules analysed (a total of 49 DiI molecules embedded in PMMA, 10 R6G molecules in PMMA, 73 Near-field optical microscopy for DNA studies at the single molecular level Figure 5. Near-field fluorescence images of individual dye molecules. Each image is 200 × 200 pixels, and the integration time is 10 ms/pixel. (a) A 3 × 3 µm2 scan area of DiI molecules in PMMA; (b) a 1.5 × 1.5 µm2 scan area of R6G molecules attached to DNA through a 6C linker. The data have been colour coded: red, 0◦ orientation (parallel to the x scan direction); green, 90◦ orientation; yellow, equal fluorescent signal in both polarization channels. Different but defined in-plane orientation is observed for individual DiI molecules as compared to R6G molecules. R6G molecules display more ‘stripy’ and noisy behaviour. Note that the FWHM of the fluorescent spot in (b) is 70 nm. R6G molecules on glass and 32 R6G molecules attached to DNA). Several observations can be drawn from these data. Stable spatial positioning of DiI molecules is evident from figure 6(a), where the molecule nicely maps the intensity profile of the NSOM probe, with a diameter of 150 nm at FWHM. The R6G molecules embedded in PMMA and attached to DNA are also mapping the Gaussian profile of the NSOM probe, as shown in plots (c) and (g), respectively. This is certainly not the case for the R6G molecule adsorbed in glass (plot (e)). There a much ‘flatter’ and abrupt profile is obtained. Different behaviour is also observed when looking at the individual intensity contributions per pixel. While (a) shows intensity fluctuations within the NSOM probe profile of less than 10%, much larger intensity fluctuations are observed in plots (c), (e) and (g). The total intensity per pixel seems to vary up to three times below or above the value given by the convolution of the NSOM probe profile. Plots on the in-plane angle also show some differences between molecules and their surroundings. Together with stable lateral positioning and stable intensity emission, the DiI molecule in plot (b) also has a stable angle orientation of 25.5◦ ± 3.5◦ . Despite intensity fluctuations of R6G in PMMA, its in-plane angle orientation (plot (d)) also seems rather stable with a value of 61.5◦ ± 6.5◦ . Plots (f) and (h) give values close to 45◦ . It is important to note that while DiI and R6G molecules embedded in PMMA show a clear defined angle which is away from 45◦ , all of the investigated R6G molecules adsorbed in glass give values around 45◦ , i.e. equal number of counts in both polarization channels. In the case of R6G attached to DNA a similar behaviour occurs, although occasionally a slight preference in one channel was observed. An additional effect is induced by the well known retarding effect of the mica substrate. This retardation influences the degree of polarization of the emitted light. As a result, it is hard to draw conclusions on the in-plane orientation and any fluctuation based on the present data. 4. Discussion 4.1. Shear-force and near-field fluorescence imaging of DNA We have shown in figures 2 and 3 that DNA imaging can be readily performed using the shear-force modality of NSOM, together with single molecule fluorescence sensitivity. As mentioned in the introduction, in order to consider NSOM as a useful instrument for fundamental studies at the biomolecular level, the influence of the tip over the sample should be minimized. The NSOM probe might influence the sample in two possible ways: by inducing sample deformation due to interaction forces during shear force imaging, and by inducing sample photodamage during NSOM imaging. We have calculated the interaction forces during imaging and compared with literature. We conclude that values below 10 pN will hardly affect the sample characteristics. However, interaction forces will grow inversely proportional to the tuning fork quality factor Q. Additionally, for small interaction forces the tip displacement should be kept as small as possible. It is therefore important to keep the Q factor of the fork as high as possible, and to optimize the pre- and post-amplification 49 M F Garcia-Parajo et al Figure 6. Total emitted intensity ((a), (c), (e), (g)) and in-plane angle orientation ((b), (d), (f), (h)) of four different dye molecules: (a), (b) a DiI molecule in PMMA; (c), (d) R6G in PMMA; (e), (f) R6G on glass; (g), (h) R6G on DNA as a function of sampling time. Graphs have been obtained taking a vertical line profile (perpendicular to the line scan) along the centre of the fluorescent spot. The integration time per data point is 10 ms (100 ms in (g) and (h)). The time interval between points is 4 s (see text for a discussion of the different plots). stages of the tuning fork signal for maximum signal-tonoise ratio. In our case we have shown that the detection limit of our electronics is close to the thermal noise of the fork. Other workers have also imaged DNA [28] and liquid crystal films at the liquid–vapour interface [25] using shearforce microscopy. In the latter case, even the movement of the liquid-crystal monolayers could be followed in the topography as a function of time. It is clear that shearforce microscopy is an extremely useful technique in its own right for the study of soft materials and/or samples that are loosely bound to the surface. The latter is actually a requirement for the study of DNA–protein interactions where steric hindrance by the surface might affect the biochemical reactions [8]. The fluorescence image shown in figure 3(b) shows a high optical resolution of 70 nm at FWHM, well beyond the optical diffraction limit. To our knowledge, this is the smallest single molecule fluorescence imaging spot reported. Most near-field single molecule fluorescence images have been generated with 100 nm apertures or larger. Because of the small excitation volume, the surface sample density can be much larger which is of advantage in the study of real biological systems. Moreover, the 50 fluorophore can be localized with an accuracy of a few nanometres. The differences in intensity obtained for individual fluorophores reflect the heterogeneity of the dyes and the interaction with their immediate surroundings [10, 14]. Different in- and out-plane orientations also lead to different excitation efficiencies and therefore different emission rates per molecule [16, 29]. 4.2. Photodynamics of individual molecules We have followed the behaviour of a large number of R6G dyes and DiI dyes at different conditions. Statistics over our data show that R6G and DiI molecules emit a similar number of photons per second, under equal excitation conditions. However, approximately 50% of R6G molecules photodissociate after emission of ∼105 photons, while DiI molecules exhibit a much longer lifetime. Furthermore, the results indicate that the photobleaching behaviour of R6G does not depend on the surface to which the molecules have been immobilized, but it is rather a photophysical property of the dye itself. While we do not have enough data to propose a specific model for the behaviour of R6G, the bi-exponential bleaching Near-field optical microscopy for DNA studies at the single molecular level Figure 6. (Continued) rate behaviour of R6G (and in general of most rhodamine dyes) is rather well known [30] and observed on molecules immobilized on different substrates. Our results agree with these observations. Results obtained on DiI molecules show the slow dynamics of these dyes when embedded in polymer matrices. Within the timescale of our measurements we only observed two out of 49 molecules that exhibit some rotational activity. We have recently shown that the dipole orientation of DiI molecules can be determined within a few degrees of accuracy with our NSOM configuration, and that stationary dipoles are obtained for periods of up to 1 h [16]. The results on R6G are more difficult to interpret. Our data suggest that lateral position and in-plane orientation are reasonably stable when R6G molecules are embedded in a polymer matrix, like PMMA. On the other hand, the ‘stripy’ aspect in most of our R6G–glass images, combined with the total intensity and angular orientation data presented here, indicate that the molecules do not sit fixed on the surface but move much faster than the timescale of our experiment. Because the adsorption of R6G on glass is through OH groups, it is reasonable to expect a large dependence of R6G adsorption/desorption upon humidity conditions. This fact might explain why some workers have reported fixed absorption polarization and fixed spatial positioning for rhodamines adsorbed on glass [10, 11] while some others observed that R6G molecules adsorbed on glass might have diffusion coefficients similar to the liquid situation [31]. If lateral diffusion occurs faster than our observation times, the same is expected with rotational diffusion. Within 10 ms of integration time a random orientation will be obtained, resulting in unpolarized emission. At present we are conducting experiments where sample preparation (hydrophilicity of the glass surface) and relative humidity conditions are being carefully controlled. As expected, R6G attached to DNA shows a stable lateral position within a few nanometres. The dye shows strong intensity fluctuations, comparable to the situation in the polymer and on glass. So far, we do not have enough data for definite conclusions about the behaviour of R6G when attached to DNA and the possible influence of the linker on the dye dynamics. 5. Conclusions We have demonstrated the usefulness of NSOM for dedicated studies where high spatial resolution combined with ultra high sensitivity are required. Lateral and vertical resolution is comparable to standard SFM techniques while 51 M F Garcia-Parajo et al negligible damage is produced on the sample. Near-field fluorescence imaging of individual fluorophores shows an optical resolution of 70 nm at FWHM. Taking into account current biochemical techniques, specific sequences and/or genes can be easily tagged with one or more fluorophores. Co-localization studies are readily possible where, in principle, single base pair resolution can be obtained. Simultaneous topography and fluorescence mapping at the molecular scale uniquely afforded by this technique will lead to new diagnosis and analytical methods. In a first approach to analyse the dynamics of a single fluorophore linked to DNA we have presented some statistical information on R6G dye molecules in different surroundings and compared to DiI molecules embedded in a thin polymer film. A direct conclusion from our data is the different photophysical properties of R6G molecules as compared to DiI: bleaching rates and intensity fluctuations are much larger in R6G than in DiI. These are mainly properties of the dye itself and do not depend on the particular environment. The environment clearly influences the mobility of the dye, both lateral and rotational diffusion. Systematic investigation of the (co)-localization and photodynamics of the DNA–dye system is the subject of current research. Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank K Karrai for fruitful discussions on shear-force detection and interactions forces, and T Ruiter, K van der Werf, F Segerink, W Rensen, O Willemsen and L Kuipers for their assistance and useful suggestions. MFG-P is partly financed by the European HCM network on ‘Near-field Optics and Nanoscale Science and Technology’. J-AV and SJTvN are supported by the Dutch Foundation for Fundamental Research (FOM). References [1] Lander E S 1996 The new genomics: global views of biology Science 274 536–9 [2] For an overview see the special section on single molecule detection: basics and applications in life sciences 1997 Bioimaging 5 87–152 [3] Funatsu T, Harada Y, Tokunaga M, Salto K and Yanagida T 1995 Imaging of single fluorescent molecules and individual ATP turnovers by single myosin molecules in aqueous solution Nature 374 555–9 [4] Vale R D, Funatsu T, Pierce D W, Romberg L, Harada Y and Yaganida T 1996 Direct observation of single kinesin molecules moving along microtubules Nature 380 451–3 [5] Pierce D W, Booher N H and Vale R D 1997 Imaging individual green fluorescent proteins Nature 388 338 [6] Guthold M, Bezanilla M, Erie D A, Jenkins B, Hansma H G and Bustamante C 1994 Following the assembly of RNA polymerase-DNA complexes in aqueous solutions with the scanning force microscope Proc. Natl Acad. Sci., USA 91 12 927–31 52 [7] Kasas S, Thomson N H, Smith B L, Hansma H G, Zhu X, Guthold M, Bustamante C, Kool E T, Kashev M and Hansma P K 1997 Escherichia Coli RNA polymerase activity observed using atomic force microscopy Biochemistry 36 461–8 [8] van Noort S J T, van der Werf K O, Elker A P M, Wyman C, de Grooth B G, van Hulst N F and Greve J 1998 Direct visualisation of dynamic protein–DNA interactions with a dedicated atomic force microscope Biophys. J. in press [9] Betzig E and Chichester R J 1993 Single molecules observed by near-field scanning optical microscopy Science 262 1422–5 [10] Xie X S and Dun R C 1994 Probing single molecule dynamics Science 265 361–4 [11] Ambrose W P, Goodwin P M, Martin J C and Keller R A 1994 Alterations of single molecules fluorescence lifetimes in near-field optical microscopy Science 265 364–7 [12] Ha T, Enderle Th, Ogletree D F, Chemla D S, Selvin P R and Weiss S 1996 Probing the interaction between two single molecules: fluorescence resonance energy transfer between a single donor and a single acceptor Proc. Natl Acad. Sci., USA 93 6264–8 [13] Bopp M A, Meixner A J, Tarrach G, Zschokke-Graenacher I and Novotny L 1996 Chem. Phys. Lett. 263 721–3 [14] Xie X S 1996 Single-molecule spectroscopy and dynamics at room temperature Acc. Chem. Res. 29 598–606 [15] Dunn R C, Holtom G R, Mets L and Xie X S 1994 Near-field fluorescence imaging and fluorescence lifetime measurement of light harvesting complexes in intact photosynthetic membranes J. Phys. Chem. 98 3094–8 [16] Ruiter A G T, Veerman J A, Garcia-Parajo M F and van Hulst N F 1997 Single molecule rotational and translational diffusion observed by near-field scanning optical microscopy J. Phys. Chem. A 101 7318–23 [17] Garcia-Parajo M F, Veerman J A, Ruiter A G T and van Hulst N F 1998 Near-field optical and shear-force microscopy of single fluorophores and DNA molecules Ultramicroscopy 17 (March) [18] Pohl D W, Denk W and Lanz M 1984 Optical stethoscopy: imaging recording with resolution λ/20 Appl. Phys. Lett. 44 651–3 [19] Betzig E, Trautman J K, Harris T D, Weiner J S and Kostelac R L 1991 Breaking the diffraction barrier: optical microscopy on a nanometric scale Science 251 1468–70 [20] Karrai K and Grober R D 1995 Piezo-electric tip–sample distance control for near field optical microscopes Appl. Phys. Lett. 66 1842–4 [21] van Hulst N F, Garcia-Parajo M F, Moers M H P, Veerman J A and Ruiter A G T 1997 Near-field fluorescence imaging of genetic material: toward the molecular limit J. Struct. Biol. 119 222–31 [22] Ruiter A G T, Veerman J A, van der Werf K O and van Hulst N F 1997 Dynamic behaviour of tuning fork shear force feedback Appl. Phys. Lett. 71 28–30 [23] Bustamante C, Vesenka J, Tang C L, Rees W, Guthold M and Keller R 1992 Circular DNA-molecules imaged in air by scanning force microscopy Biochemistry 31 22–6 [24] Bezanilla M, Manne S, Laney D E, Lyubchenko Y L and Hansma H G 1995 Adsorption of DNA to mica, silylated mica, and minerals: characterization by atomic Near-field optical microscopy for DNA studies at the single molecular level force microscopy Langmuir 11 655–9 [25] Williamson R L and Miles M J 1996 Studying topography and sub-surface structure of 8CB liquid crystal films with shear-force microscopy J. Appl. Phys. 80 3143–6 [26] Karrai K and Grober R D 1995 Tip–sample distance control for near-field scanning optical microscopes Proc. SPIE 2535 69–81 [27] Muller D J, Schoenenberger C A, Schabert F and Engel A 1997 Structural changes in native membrane proteins monitored at sub-nanometer resolution with the atomic force microscope: a review J. Struct. Biol. 119 149–57 [28] Kirsch A K, Meyer C K and Jovin T M 1997 Shear force imaging of DNA in a near-field optical microscope (NSOM) J. Microscopy 185 396–401 [29] Ha T, Enderle Th, Chemla D S, Selvin P R and Weiss S 1996 Single molecule dynamics studied by polarization modulation Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3979–82 [30] Schmidt Th, Schütz G J, Baumgartner W, Gruber H J and Schindler H 1995 Characterization of photophysics and mobility of single molecules in a fluid lipid membrane J. Phys. Chem. 99 17 662–8 [31] Wrachtrup J 1997 Oral communication 3rd Int. Workshop on Single Molecule Detection: Basics and Applications in Life Sciences (Berlin, 1997) 53
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz