Important Court Cases in American History The year The ruling 1803 The case/important background info John Marshall/believed in strong National government Virginian Tended to promote business Supremacy of Fed over State Marbury v. Madison 1819 Darmouth college v. Woodward 1819 McCulloch v. Maryland 1831 Worcester v. Georgia 1857 Dred Scott v. Sanford 1873 1883 Slaughterhouse Cases Civil Rights Cases 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson Midnight appointments Declared an act of Congress “unconstitutional” Established the principle of “judicial review” over laws passed by the Federal Government NH tried to take over a private college Court ruled in favor of the Private college, protecting private enterprise from state takeovers To issues here. 1. Is the National Bank constitutional? 2. If it is, can a state tax a federal institution The Court ruled that congress had the power to establish the bank (favors implied powers and loose constructionism) The Court ruled that a state may not interfere (tax) a Federal institution. Congress had passed the Indian Removal act, calling for the forcible relocation of the 5 Civilized tribes (Cherokees) to a newly created Indian territory west of the Mississippi The court ruled in favor of the Cherokees….they were a “protected and dependent” nation John Marshall has made his ecision: now let him enforce it! Dred Scott, a slave who had lived in a free state for 20 years, asked to be set free after his master died Roger Taney’s ruling stated that slaves, as property, were not citizens, therefore not protected by the Constitution Since they were property, any law the interfered with owners rights to move their property were unconstitutional Invalidated (unconstitutional) the Compromise of 1820 (Missouri Compromise line) Both cases represented the Federal government backing away from enforcing civil rights under the 14th Amendment after the Republican party abandoned freedmen at the end of reconstruction Concerned allow black and whites to share sleeping cars on long train trips Said segregation was legal as long as it met the separate but equal test 1927 Sacco and Vanzetti Trial 1925 Scopes (Monkey)Trial 1944 Korematsu v. United States 19531969 Earl Warren “the biggest damn fool mistake I ever made” 1954 Brown v. Board of Education of Topkea 1962 Baker v. Carr 1965 Griswold v. Connecticut 1966 Miranda v. Arizona 1973 Roe v. Wade Opened the door for Jim Crow laws, that legally segregated all public facilities in the south Two Italian immigrants were accused of murder. Both of these men were also self-identified “anarchists” They were probably innocent Were executed after being found guilty. Because they were anarchist first, immigrants second A case in Tennessee orchestrated by the ACLU, who encouraged John Scopes, a biology teacher, to challenge Tennessee law that criminalized teaching evolution in school Clarence Darrow, a popular labor lawyer defended and William Jennings Bryan, political candidate and lawyer, to prosecute A case the challenged the legally of the Japanese-American internment camps during WWII The court upheld the right of the government to take extreme action during war The beginning of judicial activism, where the court reinterprets the law and constitution to bring about what id conceived as necessary social change and programs Brought by African American students whose school were inferior, if not dangerous to attend Supreme Court, while not denying Plessy v. Ferguson, concluded that separate could never by equal Banned segregation in public schools, opening the door to banning all legalized segregation. One man one vote Lead to counties and states have to reapportion districts to more fairly represent each person Struck down state bans on the sale and use of contraceptives Warren court decision that is still controversial No confession is legal unless the person arrested was told about their civil rights and the suspect understands and agrees to waive those rights Court upheld abortion as a civil right for women
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz