Talent Identification Tool Kit Table of Contents Talent Identification ................................................................................................................................ 2 Equipment for Talent Identification........................................................................................................ 3 Body Composition ................................................................................................................................... 4 Average Height for Girls and Boys .................................................................................................. 4 Average Weight for Girls and Boys ................................................................................................. 4 BMI .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Body Measurements ....................................................................................................................... 5 Somatotyping .................................................................................................................................. 5 Body Fat Percentage ....................................................................................................................... 7 Functional Movement Assessments ....................................................................................................... 8 Running ........................................................................................................................................... 8 Hitting.............................................................................................................................................. 8 Throwing ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Kicking ............................................................................................................................................. 9 Hand eye co-ordination .................................................................................................................. 9 Balance (One leg stance)................................................................................................................. 9 Physical assessment .............................................................................................................................. 10 Speed ................................................................................................................................................ 10 35m Sprint Test ............................................................................................................................. 10 Repeat Sprint Ability (Anaerobic Power) ...................................................................................... 10 Agility ................................................................................................................................................ 11 T- Test............................................................................................................................................ 11 Illinois agility test .......................................................................................................................... 11 Endurance ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Cooper Test (Aerobic Capacity) .................................................................................................... 12 Strength Tests ................................................................................................................................... 13 Push up Test .................................................................................................................................. 13 1min Sit up test ............................................................................................................................. 14 Power Tests ....................................................................................................................................... 15 Vertical Jump................................................................................................................................. 15 Standing Long Jump ...................................................................................................................... 15 References ............................................................................................................................................ 16 Appendix A ............................................................................................................................................ 17 Data Collection Sheet............................................................................................................................ 17 Page 1 of 19 Talent Identification Talent identification is recognising current participants with the potential to become elite performers. Predict performance over various periods of time by measuring physical, Physiological, psychological and sociological attribute. (Regnier ect al, 1993) Talent Development is providing athletes with a suitable learning environment so that talent can be realised. (Wolstencroft, 2002) Talent identification programs are used around the world in selected sports to identify talented athletes at a young age. These athletes should be given the support to become world class athletes. Talent identification can also be used as a tool to increase participation in sport and reduce the number of drop outs in amateur sport. Advantages of talent identification Talent identification is seen to help accelerate an identified individuals progression to an elite level and aiding them in reaching high performance level by the time they reach international level It can assist athletes to select a sport they are best suited for Coaches are better able to focus training time on athletes with higher levels of talent and ability for the particular sport For small countries it assists in finding the best athletes from limited sporting resources (Burges) Disadvantages of talent identification In order to find a few talented individuals a large number of people need to be tested Some individuals show all round talent however this makes it very difficult to identify the particular sport that the individual is best suited for (Burges) The diagram below shows the different areas that should form the basis of the testing that is used to identify talented athletes. (Faber et al 1993) For this talent identification project we are only going to focus on three of the above five areas. These areas are: Anthropometry Motor skills/Functional Movement Physical qualities Page 2 of 19 These areas of were chosen on the basis that they can be easily tested in the field without needing highly qualified professionals and large amounts of equipment. In this context we have identified the following age groups for talent identification: Boys 15 to 20 Girls 13 to 18 These age groups have been chosen based on maturity of the genders as well as that in previous research has shown it to be detrimental for children under the age of 13 to specialise in any particular sport. Equipment for Talent Identification Equipment Pen Clip Board Note Pad Calculator Whistle Scale Stop Watch Measuring Tape Cones Soccer Ball Tennis Balls Cricket Bat Chalk Powder Page 3 of 19 Quantity 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 x 5m Set of 50 2 Tin of 4 1 1 1 x 50m Individual Cost R 20 R 60 R 10 R 170 R 30 R 250 R 100 R 100 R 200 R 280 R 70 R 50 R 150 R 130 Total Cost R 40 R 60 R 20 R 170 R 60 R 250 R 200 R 300 R 280 R 140 R 50 R 150 R 130 R 1850 Body Composition Body size and composition is one of the main fitness components and is important for success in many sports. For many athletes, this is an area that they concentrate on to reach an optimal body shape for their sport. Consequently, many training or exercise programs are geared solely to modify body size and composition in some way. Body composition, such as the amount of body fat and muscle mass, can also significantly affect sporting performance. Body size and composition can be considered important in sports where you have an advantage of being tall (e.g. basketball) or small (jockeys), heavy (sumo wrestling) or light (gymnastics). In many other sports, including team field sports, correct body composition and size is also very important as part of the overall fitness profile. It must however be kept in mind that body composition is used as a guild line in talent identification as it can be change with training and diet. If a child falls outside of the norms it is not necessarily an indicator that they will be poor performers. Average Height for Girls and Boys Age 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Boys 150cm 156cm 163cm 169cm 173cm 175cm 177cm Girls 150cm 155cm 158cm 158cm 159cm 160cm (http://www.fpnotebook.com/endo/exam/hghtmsrmntinchldrn.htm) Average Weight for Girls and Boys Age 12 -13 years old 14 – 15 years old 16 – 17 years old 18 – 20 years old Boys 39 – 45 Kg 45 – 56 Kg 56 – 68 Kg 58 – 68 Kg (http://www.fpnotebook.com/Endo/Exam/WghtMsrmntInChldrn.htm) BMI BMI = weight / (height (m))2 Example BMI = 65 / (1.69)2 BMI = 22.72 BMI References Score Result Less than 17 Too low 17–20 Underweight 20–25 Perfect 25–30 Minor obesity 30–35 Unhealthy obesity 35–40 Extremely unhealthy obesity Page 4 of 19 Girls 43 – 45 Kg 45 – 52 Kg 52 – 56 Kg 56 – 60 Kg More than 40 Severe obesity Body Measurements Head Upper arm flexed Chest Upper Thigh Ankle Arm span Inner Leg Length Left and Right Girths (cm) Neck Forearm Waist Mid-Thigh Lengths (cm) Arm Length Left and Right Body length Upper arm relaxed Wrist Hip Calf Leg Length Left and Right Somatotyping Somatotyping is a simple way to describe an individual’s body shape, but not size. Somatotyping deals with body type or physical classification of the human body. Everybody is made up of three extreme body types. These types are endomorph, mesomorph and ectomorph. These body components have the following characteristics. Ectomorphy An ectomorphic person is tall and thin, with a narrow body, thin arms and legs, little body fat and wiry muscles. An example of an ectomorphic person in the sporting world would be a typical long distance runner or basketball player. In general, ectomorphs rank high on endurance, flexibility and agility. Mesomorphy A mesomorphic person would be strongly built, with a broad muscular chest and shoulders, very muscular arms and legs, and little body fat. An example of a mesomorphic person in the sporting world would be a typical weightlifter or shot putter. In general, mesomorphs rank high on strength, endurance, power and agility. Endomorphy An endomorphic person is generally stocky, with a large round body, a short thick neck, short arms and legs, and with a tendency to store body fat. Sports people tend not to be in this category, being either more mesomorphic or ectomorphic. Generally, endomorphs rate poorly on physical fitness assessments and so make poor athletes. Still, it is possible that someone who is rated as an endomorph can modify their rating though diet and exercise to become more mesomorphic. Calculation In order to classify a person’s somatotype they are assigned a three digit number between one and seven. A one indicating that the person shows little of none of the characteristics of the classification and a seven indicating the person shows many or all of the characteristics. The first digit indicates endomorph characteristics, the second digit indicates mesomorph characteristics and the third digit indicates ectomorph characteristics. This three digit number is then plotted onto the graphic below. Page 5 of 19 Page 6 of 19 Body Fat Percentage Body fat percentage represents the amount of a person’s total weight comprised of fat. A high percentage of body fat is associated with numerous health issues. A low percentage of body fat is associated with reduced energy and impairment of immune system function. A healthy body fat range for men is between 10 and 25%. For optimal function men should maintain a minimum fat percentage of 5%. Athletes tend to have a body fat percentage of between 5 – 13 %. A body fat percentage of 25% or greater for men is considered to be obese. A healthy body fat range for women is between 18 and 30 %. For optimal function women should maintain a minimum fat percentage of 8 %. Athletes tend to have a body fat percentage of between 12 – 22%. A body fat percentage of 30% or greater for women is considered to be obese. Calculation Males: % body fat = 495/ (1.0324-0.19077 (log (waist-neck)) + 0.15456 (log (height))) -450 Females: % body fat = 495/ (1.29579-0.35004 (log (waist + hip-neck)) + 0.22100 (log (height))) -450 The table below is an indication of percentage body fat seen as ideal for a variety of different sporting codes. Sport Baseball Basketball Body building Cycling Gymnastics High/long Jumpers Ice/field Hockey Marathon running Male 12-15% 6-12% 5-8% 5-15% 5-12% 7-12% Female 12-18% 20-27% 10-15% 15-20% 10-16% 10-18% Sport Rowing Shot Putters Sprinters Soccer Swimming Tennis Male 6-14% 16-20% 8-10% 10-18% 9-12% 12-16% Female 12-18% 20-28% 12-20% 13-18% 14-24% 16-24% 8-15% 12-18% Triathlon 5-12% 10-15% 5-11% 10-15% Volleyball 11-14% 16-25% (http://www.humankinetics.com/excerpts/excerpts/normal-ranges-of-body-weight-and-body-fat) Page 7 of 19 Functional Movement Assessments In order to prepare an athlete for the wide variety of activities needed to participate in sport, the analysis of fundamental movement needs to be incorporated into talent identification in order to determine who possesses, or lacks, the ability to perform certain essential movements. Fundamental movements’ assessment will include: Running Hitting Throwing Kicking Hand eye co-ordination Balance If a person is unable to perform these basic functional movements it is unlikely that the person will be able to participate in sport and can then be excused from further assessment. Running The assessor will measure out a straight line of 20 meters. The athlete is instructed to run the 20 meters. Scoring The scoring is very simple all the assessor needs to note is whether or not the athlete can. Hitting In this assessment the assessor will throw a tennis ball (under arm) softly to the athlete at about waist level. The athlete is told to hit the ball. The athlete is given ten attempts to hit the ball. Scoring The assessor records the number of balls the athlete is able to hit the athlete should be able to hit at least five of the balls. Throwing In this assessment the athlete stands stationary and is instructed to throw the ball as far as possible the athlete is given five attempts. Scoring The distance is measured from where the athlete is standing to where the ball first lands. The measurement is recorded to the nearest meter. The best three throws are recorded. Page 8 of 19 Kicking This assessment is two phased the first is to determine if the athlete can kick a stationary ball. The second phase of the assessment is to determine if the athlete can from a stationary position kick a ball that has been rolled towards them. In both cases the athlete needs to kick the ball as far as possible. The athlete will be given three attempts at each phase. Scoring The assessor will record the best stationary ball distance and the best two distances of the moving ball. The measurement is recorded to the nearest meter. Hand eye co-ordination This assessment requires the athlete to throw and catch a tennis ball off a wall. The athlete stands two metres away from a wall The assessor gives the command "GO" and starts the stopwatch The athlete throws a tennis ball with their right hand against the wall and catches it with the left hand, throws the ball with the left hand and catches it with the right hand. This cycle of throwing and catching is repeated for 30 seconds The assessor counts the number of catches and stops the assessment after 30 seconds The assessor records the number of catches Poor Below Average Average Above Average Excellent 15 – 16 years <20 sec 20 – 24 sec 25 – 29 sec 30 -35 sec >35 sec Balance (One leg stance) This assessment requires the athlete to balance on one leg for as long as possible. The athlete stands comfortably on both feet with their hands on their hips The athlete lifts the right leg and places the sole of the right foot against the side of the left kneecap The assessor gives the command “GO”, starts the stopwatch and the athlete raises the heel of the left foot to stand on their toes The athlete is to hold this position for as long as possible The assessor stops the stopwatch when the athlete’s foot touches the ground or the right foot moves away from the left knee The assessor records the time Poor Below Average Average Above Average Excellent Page 9 of 19 15 – 16 years <10 sec 10 – 24 sec 25 – 39 sec 40 – 50 sec >50 sec Physical assessment Speed 35m Sprint Test The assessment involves running a single maximum sprint over a set distance, with time recorded. The athlete runs 35m in at their fastest pace possible Male >5.60 sec 5.30 – 5.60 sec 5.10 – 5.29 sec 4.80 -5.09 sec <4.80 sec Poor Below Average Average Above Average Excellent Female >6.20 sec 5.90 – 6.20 sec 5.60 -5.89 sec 5.30 -5.59 sec <5.30 sec Repeat Sprint Ability (Anaerobic Power) Marker cones and lines are placed 30 meters apart to indicate the sprint distance. Two more cones placed a further 10 meters on each end. At the instructions of the assessor, the athlete places their foot at the starting line, then on 'go' two stopwatches are started simultaneously, and the athlete sprints maximally for 30m, ensuring that they do not slow down before reaching the end. One stopwatch is used to time the sprint, the other continues to run. Record the time. The athletes use the 10 meter cone to slow down and turn, and return to the 30m finishing point. The next sprint will be in the opposite direction. The next 30 meter sprint starts 30 seconds after the first started. This cycle continues until 10 sprints are completed, starting at 30 sec, 1 min, 1.5 min, 2 min etc. after the start of the first sprint. Scoring The fatigue index is calculated by taking the average speed of the first three trials and dividing it by the average speed of the last three trials. This will give a value approximately between 75 and 95%. Use the table below to determine the rating. Rating Poor Average Above Average Excellent Page 10 of 19 Fatigue Index <80 % 80 - 84 % 85 – 89 % >89 % Agility T- Test The athlete starts at cone A. On the command of the assessor, the athlete sprints to cone B and touches the base of the cone with their right hand. They then turn left and shuffle sideways to cone C, and also touches its base, this time with their left hand. Then shuffling sideways to the right to cone D and touching the base with the right hand. They then shuffle back to cone B touching with the left hand, and run backwards to cone A. The stopwatch is stopped as they pass cone A. Poor Average Above Average Excellent Male >11.5 sec 10.5 -11.5 sec 9.5 – 10.5 sec <9.5 sec Female >12.5 sec 11.5 -12.5 sec 10.5 -11.5 sec <10.5 sec Illinois agility test The assessor sets up the course as detailed in the diagram The athlete lies face down on the floor at the “Start” cone The assessor gives the command “GO” and starts the stopwatch. The athlete jumps to his/her feet and negotiates the course around the cones following the red line route shown in the diagram to the finish The assessor stops the stopwatch and records the time when the athlete passes the “Finish” cone Page 11 of 19 16 – 19 years old Male >19.3 sec 18.2 -19.3 sec 16.2 – 18.1 sec 16.1 – 15.2 sec <15.2 sec Poor Below Average Average Above Average Excellent Female >23 sec 21.8 – 23 sec 18 -21.7 sec 17 – 17.9 sec <17 sec Endurance Cooper Test (Aerobic Capacity) Place markers at set intervals around the track to aid in measuring the completed distance. Athletes run for 12 minutes, and the total distance covered is recorded. Walking is allowed, though the athletes must be encouraged to push themselves as hard as they can. Male Age 13-14 15-16 17-19 Excellent >2700m >2800m >3000m Above Average 2400-2700m 2500-2800m 2700-3000m Average 2200-2399m 2300-2499m 2500-2699m Below Average 2100-2199m 2200-2299m 2300-2499m Poor <2100m <2200m <2300m Excellent >2000m >2100m >2300m Above Average 1900-2000m 2000-2100m 2100-2300m Average 1600-1899m 1700-1999m 1800-2099m Below Average 1500-1599m 1600-1699m 1700-1799m Poor <1500m <1600m <1700m Female Age 13-14 15-16 17-20 VO2max = (22.351 x kilometers) - 11.288 Page 12 of 19 Strength Tests Push up Test Boys should use the standard "military style" push up position with only the hands and the toes touching the floor. Military style push up Place your hands right beneath your shoulders. Lift your body off the ground, and distribute your weight through your toes and hands. Press off the ground while maintaining a flat back. Exhale at the top of the push-up. Slowly lower yourself down toward the ground while inhaling. Girls have the additional option of using the "bent knee" position. To do this, kneel on the floor, hands on either side of the chest and keep your back straight. Ladies push up Ladies push-ups are performed by supporting the lower body on the knees instead of the toes, which reduces the difficulty. Do as many push ups as possible until exhaustion. Count the total number of push ups performed. Use the chart below to find out how you rate. Push Up Test (Boys) Age Excellent Good Above average Average Below average Poor Very Poor Page 13 of 19 17-19 > 56 47-56 35-46 19-34 11-18 4-10 <4 20-29 > 47 39-47 30-39 17-29 10-16 4-9 <4 Push Up Test (Girls) Age Excellent Good Above Average Average Below average Poor Very Poor 17-19 > 35 27-35 21-27 11-20 6-10 2-5 0-1 1min Sit up test Starting Position: Lie on a carpeted or cushioned floor with your knees bent at approximately right angles, with feet flat on the ground. Your hands should be resting on your thighs. Technique: Squeeze your stomach, push your back flat and raise high enough for your hands to slide along your thighs to touch the tops of your knees. Don't pull with you neck or head and keep your lower back on the floor. Then return to the starting position. Boys Age Excellent Good Above average Average Below Average Poor Very Poor 18-25 >49 44-49 39-43 35-38 31-34 25-30 <25 Girls Age Excellent Good Above average Average Below Average Poor Very Poor Page 14 of 19 18-25 >43 37-43 33-36 29-32 25-28 18-24 <18 Power Tests Vertical Jump The athlete stands side on to a wall and reaches up with the hand closest to the wall. Keeping the feet flat on the ground, the point of the fingertips is marked or recorded. This is called the standing reach height. The athlete then stands away from the wall, and leaps vertically as high as possible using both arms and legs to assist in projecting the body upwards. The jumping technique can or cannot use a countermovement. Attempt to touch the wall at the highest point of the jump. The difference in distance between the standing reach height and the jump height is the score. The best of three attempts is recorded. Very Poor Poor Below Average Average Above Average Very good Excellent Male <21 cm 21 – 30 cm 31 – 40 cm 41 – 50 cm 51 - 60 cm 61 -70 cm >70 cm Female <11 cm 11 -20 cm 21 – 30 cm 31 – 40 cm 41 -50 cm 51 – 60 cm >60 cm Standing Long Jump The athlete stands behind a line marked on the ground with feet slightly apart. A two foot take-off and landing is used, with swinging of the arms and bending of the knees to provide forward drive. The subject attempts to jump as far as possible, landing on both feet without falling backwards. Poor Below Average Average Above Average Excellent Page 15 of 19 Male <190 cm 211 – 220 cm 221 – 231 cm 231 – 250 cm >250 cm Female <160 cm 161 – 170 cm 171 -180 cm 180 -190 cm >191 cm References Burgess, R Talent Identification Faber, Irene, Oosterveld, Frits and Nijhuis-Van der Sanden, Ria (2011) A first step to an evidencebased talent identification program in the Netherlands; a research proposal Regnier, G., Salmela, J. & Russell, S.J. (1993). Talent detection and development in sport. Wolstencroft, Elaine (ed.) August 2002Talent Identification and Development: An Academic Review www.humankinetics.com/excerpts/excerpts/normal-ranges-of-body-weight-and-body-fat www.humankinetics.com/excerpts/excerpts/normal-ranges-of-body-weight-and-body-fat www.fpnotebook.com/Endo/Exam/WghtMsrmntInChldrn.htm www.fpnotebook.com/endo/exam/hghtmsrmntinchldrn.htm Page 16 of 19 Appendix A Data Collection Sheet Data Sheet Date School Name Age Time Venue Gender BODY COMPOSITION Height Body Fat % Head Upper Arm Flexed Chest Upper Thigh Ankle Arm Span Right Leg Left Inner Leg Weight Somatotype Neck Upper arm relaxed Waist Mid-Thigh BMI Left Arm Left Leg Ilio axilla (Body Length) Right Arm Right Inner Leg Forearm Wrist Hip Calf FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT ASSESSMENT Running Yes no Hitting Number Throwing (Best 3 distances in meters) 1 2 3 Hitting (Best 3 distances in meters) 1 2 3 Kicking (Best 3 distances in meters) 1 2 3 Hand eye coordination Number Rating Poor Below Average Average Above Average Excellent Average Above Average Excellent Above Average Excellent Balance Time (seconds) Rating Poor Below Average PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT SPEED TESTS 35m Sprint Time (seconds) Rating Time (seconds) Rating Poor Poor Below Average Average Repeat Sprint Ability Average AGILITY TESTS Page 17 of 19 Above Average Excellent T-Test Time (seconds) Rating Time (seconds) Rating Poor Poor Average Illinois Agility Test Below Average Average Above Average Excellent Above Average Excellent Above Average Excellent ENDURANCE TEST Cooper Test Distance Rating VO2 Max Poor Below Average Average STRENGTH TEST Push Up Test Number Rating Very Poor Poor Number Rating Very Poor Poor Below Average Average 1 min Sit Up Test Below Average Average Above Average Good Excellent Above Average Good Excellent Above Average Good Excellent POWER TESTS Vertical Jump Height Rating Distance Rating Page 18 of 19 Very Poor Poor Poor Below Average Average Standing Long Jump Below Average Average Above Average Excellent
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz