Missouri Law Review
Volume 17
Issue 1 January 1952
Article 5
1952
Table of Cases-1951
Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr
Part of the Law Commons
Recommended Citation
Table of Cases-1951, 17 Mo. L. Rev. (1952)
Available at: http://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol17/iss1/5
This Front Matter is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. It has
been accepted for inclusion in Missouri Law Review by an authorized administrator of University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository.
et al.: Table of Cases-1952
TABLE OF CASES-1951
Page
Page
Cornwell v. Wulff ............................ 183
Consentino v. Heffelfinger ............ 44
Abernathy v. St. Louis Public
Cox v. Terminal R.R. Assoc. of
417
Service Co ................................
37
St. Louis ..................
Acme Brick Co. v. Hamilton ...... 214
Cream Wipt Food Products Co.
393
Adelsberger v. Sheehy ...................
v. Federal Security AdminisAircraft and Diesel Corp. v. Hirsch 314
318
tration ..........................................
Allbritton v. Property ServicCruce v. Gulf, Mobile & Ohio
ing Co . ..................................... 415
Allen v. Aetna Life Ins. Co ........... 102
R.R. Co ....................... 393, 394, 395
75
Allgeyer v. Louisiana ..........
Davis v. Kansas City Public
436
Armbruster v. Sutton". ....
43
Service Co . ...............................
Asakura v. City of Seattle ........... 70
Davis v. Stouffer ............................ 400
Atwood v. Gillespie ....................... 341
98
Davis v. U.S .................................
Austin v. Hemperly ....................... 48
Dayton Mining Co. v. Seawell .... 169
Azzollini v. Watkins ..................... 301
Deeds v. Foster .............................. 376
Dejonge v. Oregon ........................ 197
Backwith v. Boyce .................. 342
DeMayo v. Lyons .......................... 377
Ballenger v. Windes ........................ 104
207
Dennis v. US .................................
Barksdale v. Morris ...................... 433
Dickey v. Volker ............................ 400
Bedell v. Daugherty ...................... 424
Dinger v. Burnham ........................ 221
Bennett v. Wood ............................ 376
Dister v. Ludwig .......................... 42
Blaser v. Coleman ....................... 37
....
360
Boasberg v. U.S.
Doughton v. Marland Refining Co. 321
Douglas v. St. Louis Public
37
Bobos v. Krey Packing Co."
49
Service Co ..............................
Bolton v. Gilleran .................... 146
Downey v. United WeatherBotiller v. Dominguez ................ 68
376
proofing, Inc . ........................
Brand v. Brand ............................. 377
Branscum v. Glaser ....................... 44
East St. Louis Ry. v. East St.
Bridges v. California ............... 196, 197
Louis ........................................... 156
.........198, 199
Bridges v. Wixon .
Edwards v. Douglas ...................... 60
Buehler v. Festus Mercantile Co. 47
Eld v. Ellis ...................................... 389
Burdict v. Mo. Pac. Ry. Co. -.344, 345
45, 390
Eller v. Crowell ..........
Burlington v. Beasley ................. 167
......... 419
Burlingame v. Landis
Farmers and Mechanics' Nat.
Burr v. Singh .......................... 393, 394
Bank v. Ridge Avenue Bank .... 191
Butterworth v. Mississippi ValFautin v. L. W. Hays ................. 46
..100, 396
ley Trust Co .............
141
Fergus v. Marks .............
Cable v. C. B. & Q. Ry. Co. 39, 43, 48
Fortner v. St. Louis Public
Cantrell v. City of Caruthersville 104
417
Service Co ..................................
Capps v. Adamson ......................... 425
71
Foster v. Neilson ..........................
Capital Transit Co. v. U.S ........... 308
Foulke v. McIntosh ...................... 107
.......
217
Carignan v. U.S. .....
360
France v. US ................................
Carr & Co. v. Edwards .............. 341
Francis v. US .............................. 360
Cates v. Haderlein .................. 294
Frandeka v. St. Louis Public
Century Electric Co. Case ........... 128
.............44, 50
Service Co .....
Cheek v. Durasteel Co................... 321
Fryear v. Kentucky Terminal
98
Clark v. The King ........................
144
Ry. Co . .....................................
Cloughly v. Equity Mutual In71
Fujii v. State . . ...........
396, 397
surance Co ..................
Furnish et = v. Mo. Pac. Ry. Co. 344
Cohen v. Commissioner of InGalveston Electric Co. v. Galveston 55
ternal Revenue ....... ................ 288
Gann v. C., R. I. &P. Ry. Co .... 36, 42
Cole v. City of La Grange .....167, 176
Geer v. Connecticut ...................... 69
Collins v. Reed Harlin Grocery Co. 308
68
Geofroy v. Riggs ..........................
48
Colvin v. Mills ....................
Gibbons v. Ogden ....................... 69
Commonwealth v. Mayhew ......... 220
Giers Implement Corporation v.
Cooper v. School District of
Investment Services, Inc ......... 388
Kansas City .............................. 374
Abrams v. US ..............................
200
Published by University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository, 1952
1
Missouri Law Review, Vol. 17, Iss. 1 [1952], Art. 5
TABLE OF CASES
Glidewell v. Glidewel .
Page
........... 227
Godwin v. Gerling
403, 471, 473, 474, 475
Goetz v. Anabs ...........................
Granger v. Barber .....................
342
402
Grigsby v. Russell ..............101, 102
........
408
Grimes v. Rush ....
435
Guidicy v. Guidicy ......................
Gulliver v. Vaux ...................... 178
Gurley v. Mo. Pac. Ry. Co ......... 344
Hammond v. City of El Dorado
.............. 422
Springs .................
Harrington v. Thompson 39, 40, 43, 47
Harrow v. Kansas City Public
48
Service Co ...............................
411, 430
Hart v. Parrish ..........
199
.............
Hartzel v. U.S .
Hawkinson Tread Tire Service
Co. v. Indiana Lumbermen's
Mutual Insurance Co ......... 396, 397
Hayton v. Hope ......................... 341
Hays v. Kansas City ................... 421
Head v. Amoskeag Manufactur166
ing Co ...........................................
Head Money Cases ................. 67,
68
Helvering v. American Dental
Page
Jones v. Thompson
.................... 225
Johnson v. Robertson .......... 341, 342
Johnson v. St. Louis Public
50
.
.
.....
Service Co
Johnston v. Johnston ..................
109
Kalamazoo v. Kalamazoo Co.
. ..........
153
Judge ..............................
69
Kansas v. Colorado ......................
Kansas City v. Liebi ............... 170, 175
392
Kast v. Kast ..................
Kennedy Name Plate CO. v.
Commissioner ......................... 302
King v. Fasching ......................... 475
Kunz v. Munzlinder ........................
392
La Guardia v. Smith ............. 141
433
Laret Investment Co. v. Dick174
................
man, M ayor ---------Lee v. Equitable Life Assurance
Lang v. Estorge ........
Society .....................
..
.
102
Lefkowitz v. Kansas City Public
Service
Co .
.........................
46
................ 315
Levers v. Anderson .
Levin v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. 434
Liese v. Sackbauer .....................
402
46
... 362
Lilly v. Boswell ...........................
197, 203
Herndon v. Lowry ....
195
Herndon v. State of Georgia.
Lipic v. Wheeler ...........................
431
Lois v. Cleveland Ry. Co .............
152
Magruder v. Suplee
135
..............................
Assoc.
Heusner v. Mutual Life Ins.
101, 102
Co ..........................
Higgins v. Terminal Railroad
Assoc. of St. Louis .................. 393
Hildebrand v. Beck ...................... 404
Hillhouse v. Thompson ............ 39,
40
Hoffman v. Charleston Five
Cents Savings Bank ................. 473
Holland Furnace Co. v. Connelley 212
Holmes v.
Godson ..................
178
Hoopeston Canning Co. v. Cullen 77
.......
..... 342
Hoyt v. Reed ........
Housman v. Lewellen ................. 433
Howard National Bank & Trust
Co. v. Jones
.....
. ..........
388
Hunt v. Chicago, Milwaukee,
St. Paul & Pacific Ry. Co .... 36, 40
Loyd v. H. & St J. Ry. Co ........... 344
Lucas v. North Texas Lumber Co. 117
..................
Malone v. Gardner ....................... 392
Marvel Industries v. Boatmen's
...
National Bank .
.......
..
404
Marzell v. Libby, McNeill and
Libby
....................-..........
290
McBee v. Twin City Fire Insurance Co. ............................
374
McCabe v. Black River Transportation Co ..........................
110
....... ..........
37
McClanahan v. St. Louis Public
Service Co
McDermott v. Commissioner 362, 363
McFarland v. Creath ...........101, 102
McGraw v. Whitson .....................
140
In re City of Kinloch .................... 389
McIlvain v. Kavorinos
388
In re Franz's Estate ...................... 430
In re Lipic's Estate ....................... 426
McNaghten's
In re Williams ....
.........
International
Trading
Co. v. Memphis .........
.........
Case
...................
95
393
Merrick v. Bridgeways, Inc ...........
Middleton v. Dudding ................
183
77
Middleton v. Reece .....................
436
Miller v. Hardin ..............................
Minnesota Commercial Men's
343
Stamp
Janssens v. Thompson ............. 37,
McNabb v. U. ...... 218, 219, 220, 221
146
International Shoe Co. v. Washington ........................................
..............
141
38
Jones v. Terminal Railroad Asso390
ciation of St. Louis ....------
Assoc. v. Benn ............75, 76,
79
Minnesota Mutual Life Ins. Co.
. ..... 102
v. Mantrei ............
Missouri v. Holland ........... 68, 69, 70
http://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol17/iss1/5
2
et al.: Table of Cases-1952
MISSOURI LAW REVIEW
Missouri Cafeteria v. McVey ........
Mothershead v. Milfeld ..................
Murdock v. Stickney ......................
Murrill v. Neill ..........
. .....
Page
393
395
166
189
Nabry v. Tiffany Stand Co ......... 321
N. C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. White .... 152
Nettleton Bank v. McGauhery's
Estate .........
..........
Newman v. St. Louis Public
Service Co ...
...
......40,
New York City Housing Author-
104
43
ity v. Muller ...................... 173, 175
N.L.R.B. v. Columbia Enameling & Stamping Co ................
318
N.L.R.B. v. Townsend .................. 305
Norris v. Bristow ............................ 435
Page
Ross v. Ross ................................... 181
Rothwell v. Love ........................... 436
Rudisaile v. DeBeughem .............. 403
Salvation Army v. Hoehn ............ 409
San Christina v. City and
County of San Francisco ..........
Santovincenzo v. Egan ............ 70,
Scaggs v. Uetrecht ........................
Schapaschnikoff v. DeGheest's
Estate ............................................
Schell v. Dubois ..............................
Schenk v. U.S ........................... 194,
Schmidt v. Rice-O'Neill Shoe Co. 321
Schneider v. St. Louis Public
Service Co ..........
.......
Schneidermann v. U.S ........... 199,
Schultz v. Schultz ..........................
Oliver v. Oakwood Country Club 414
Schupbach v. Fisher ......................
Orose v. Hodge Drive-It-YourScott v. Unknown Heirs of
self Co., Inc ............................. 144
Solomon Garrison ........................
Osborn v. Ozlin ........................
76
Scott
v. Wheelock Bros .................
Osborne v. Purdome .............. 387, 400
Scullin
v. Clark ..............................
Ott v. Pickard ............................... 408
Seabaugh's Dependents v. Garver Lumber Manufacturing Co.
Partnoy v. Western Union TeleSee
v. Wabash, St. Louis &
graph Co..............................
29
Pacific
R.R ........................... 389,
Pearson v. Kansas City Ice Co ....
49
Shaw v. Armstrong ................ 411,
Pearson v. Kansas City Public
Shackleford's Adm. v. Clark ..........
Service Co................................
38
Sisto v. Civil Aeronautics Board
Pells v. Brown ........................ 180, 181
Smith v. W., St. L. & P. Ry.
Pennekamp v. Florida .................. 197
208
97
425
Pew v. Price ..................................
474
Phillips v. Vrooman .....393, 394,
Pierce v. U.S ...............................
Pioneer News Service v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co _..
Pittsburgh S.S. Co. v. N.L.R.B ....
Pratt v. Blakely ................
420
206
Price v. Schnitker ...........................
423
28
303
342
Prince v. Commissioner .......... 310, 312
Prince v. Cothrum & Co. ......... 144
Ramsey v. City of Brookfield .......431
Rea v. Feeback .............................
363
Reed v. Commonwealth .............. 220
Reed v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas
R.R. Co ........................................
Rezabek v. Rezabek ........................
Riss & Co. v. U.S ........................
Roach v. Kohn ............................
Roach v. Stone ............
223,
Robertson v. California ................
Rodney v. St. L.-S.W. Ry. Co _...
Roofing Application Co. v. Investment Service, Inc .................
416
109
294
377
224
74
345
388
209
151
195
Schmidt v. Hess ............................. 230
Olin Industries v. N.L.R.B .... 290, 309
People v. Gitlow ......................
People v. McCann .......................
Peterson v. Bledsoe ........................
147
71
420
45
200
435
426
411
311
434
320
424
475
191
307
Co. .......................................... 343, 344
Smyth v. Ames ............................
56
Snyder v. Buck ................................
309
Starr v. Mitchell ............................. 377
State v. Allen ............................ 395, 396
95, 382
State v. Barton ..............
State v. Berry .................................. 386
State v. Bird .............................
385
State v. Church of God .................. 374
State v. Dunbar .............................
90
State v. Dupepe .............................. 383
State v. Eaves ...........................
382
State v. Ellis ................................. 221
State v. Eslinger ........................ 379
State v. Green ......................... 381, 389
State v. Griggs .......................... 384, 385
State v. Harmon ............................ 387
State v. Hagerman ........................
382
State v. Hardy ..........................
92
State v. Hinojosa ............................ 383
State v. Jordon ..... ............
382
State v. Lamb .......................... 378, 379
State v. Littler .............................
92
State v. McQuinn ............................ 380
State v. Menz ............................
221
99
State v. Murphy ............................
State v. Nelson ........................ 379, 405
Published by University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository, 1952
3
Missouri Law Review, Vol. 17, Iss. 1 [1952], Art. 5
TABLE OF CASES
Page
474
State v. Page ...................
...... 385
State v. Polakoff ..........
State v. Redding ....................... 386
State v. Redemier .......................
98
386
State v. Riggs ......................
. 96
State v. Sapp ......................
State v. Scott ............................ 96
State v. Smith ............................. 380
State ex rel. Abel v. Gates ........... 142
State ex rel. Bradford v. Dinwiddie 380
266
State ex rel. Igoe v. Joynt ..........
State ex rel. Keef v. Schmiege .... 155
State
ex rel. McDonald
Frankenhoff
v.
266
............................
State ex rel. North St. Louis
Trust Co. v. Stahlhuth .............. 425
State ex rel. Portnoy v. Public
Service Commission ................
27
State ex rel. Rice v. Public Service Commission ...................... 318
State ex rel. Schorr v. Kennedy .... 148
State ex rel. Taylor v. Nangle ..... 28
Steuernagle v. St. Louis Public
................374
Service Co .......
St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Herf 431
Stokes v. Carlson ...........................
419
Taylor v. Philadelphia .................. 156
Terrace v. Thompson ...........
71
Thomas v. Collins ................. 198, 199
Thomason v. Berry ..................... 436
Thompson v. Byers Transporta423
tion Co. .............
.
Thornhill v. Alabama
Tooker v. Missouri Power &
197
Light Co.................................
104
Traveler's
Virginia
Health
............
Assoc.
v.
79, 80, 81, 82, 83
Twitchell v. Home Owner's Loan
Corporation ...................... 473
Unger v. U.S ................................
309
Universal Camera Corp. v.
N.L.R.B .......... 308, 317, 318, 319
Upham & Gordon v. Allen ............ 110
Upshaw v. U.S .......................
U.S. v.
218, 219
Bailey ....... ............ ...
359
U.S. v. Certain Lands in Louisville 175
Page
U.S. v. Curtis-Wright Export
Corporation ................ 67, 68, 70, 71
U.S. v. Darby Lumber Co...... 69
U.S. Fidelity & Guar. Co. v.
155
Guenther ................. ....
U.S. v. Halseth ........................... 357
U.S. v. Mitchell ...................... 219
U.S. v. Morton Salt Co ................. 298
U.S. v. Rich .................................. 358
U.S. v. Robertson .................. 360, 363
. .......68, 69
U.S. v. Shauver .
U.S. v. Smith ................................. 297
U.S. v. Southeastern Under74
writers Assoc. ............................
U.S. ex rel. De Lucia v. O'Donavan 311
U.S. ex rel. Lindenau v. Watkins 324
71
Valentine v. U.S ............................
Vaughan v. Compton ....177, 184, 433
Venditti v. St. Louis Public
Service Co ........................ 388
Waldier v. H. & St. J. Ry. Co -.. 344
Walker v. Klopp ............................. 224
Walters v. Markwardt ........... 388, 414
67
Ware v. Hylton ............................
Warford v. Smoot ....................... 436
Waring v. Metropolitan Life
......
308
Ins. Co. .....................
101
Warnock v. Davis .............
391
Warriner v. Nugent .................
Wells v. Goff ......................... 213, 429
Whalen v. St. L., K.C. & N. Ry.
343
.......
Co ............................
Whitmore v. Supreme Lodge ....... 101
Whitney v. California ............... ... 198
Whitney v. Robertson ................ 68
Wicker v. Knox Glass Associates 376
.....390, 407
...
Wilcox v. Coons .
Willapoint Oysters, Inc. v.
Ewing .............. . ............ 288,
319
Wilson v. East Cleveland ........... 152
Winkler v. Macon Gas Co ........... 421
Wood v. Wagner Electric Corp .... 320
301
Wolf v. Boyd .
Woodson v. Scott ............................ 342
Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath 294, 301
Zeitinger v. Mitchell ..................... 428
Zinser v. Lucks ....................... 103, 401
http://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol17/iss1/5
4
et al.: Table of Cases-1952
Published by University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository, 1952
5