GOLF CART
TRANSPORTATION
An Analysis of the Use of
Golf Carts on Local Roads
Prepared for:
CITY OF SOUTH DAYTONA, FLORIDA
February 2009
Prepared by:
by:
Prepared
TMH Consulting, Inc.
Lassiter Transportation Group, Inc.
GOLF CART TRANSPORTATION
AN ANALYSIS OF
THE PROPOSED USE OF GOLF CARTS
ON LOCAL ROADS
Prepared for
CITY OF SOUTH DAYTONA, FLORIDA
February, 2009
Prepared by
TMH CONSULTING, INC.
97 NORTH SAINT ANDREWS DR.
ORMOND BEACH, FL 32174
LASSITER TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC.
123 LIVE OAK AVENUE
DAYTONA BEACH, FL 32114
SOUTH DAYTONA CITY COUNCIL
BLAINE O’NEAL, MAYOR
GEORGE LOCKE III, SEAT 1
NANCY LONG, SEAT 2
KENNETH D. McMILLEN, SEAT 3
RONALD CLIFTON, Jr., SEAT 4
CITY MANAGER
JOSEPH W. YARBROUGH
REDEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR
PATTY RIPPEY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................2
State Regulations ......................................................................................2
Survey Results and Estimate of Demand ..................................................2
Pilot Program ............................................................................................3
City Council Options ................................................................................4
GOLF CART SURVEY RESULTS .....................................................................6
Golf Cart Survey Results ..........................................................................6
Key Responses ..........................................................................................8
Other Survey Information .......................................................................10
ESTIMATE OF DEMAND FOR CART USAGE .............................................12
Cart and Operational Costs .....................................................................13
Perceived Safety......................................................................................14
Convenience............................................................................................14
Operating Limitations .............................................................................14
Community Culture Supporting Golf Cart Use ......................................15
GOLF CART PROGRAM DESIGN ..................................................................16
Operational Considerations .....................................................................16
Pilot Program Design ..............................................................................18
Financial Considerations.........................................................................21
OTHER FACTORS FOR CONSIDERATION ..................................................24
Comprehensive Plan Consistency ...........................................................24
Zoning and code Enforcement Considerations .......................................25
LIST OF FIGURES
Survey Analysis Zones .............................................................................7
Pilot Project Area ....................................................................................20
APPENDIX
Enabling Legislation
Survey Response Tabulations
Survey Form
Cart Travel Demand Map Series
i
INTRODUCTION
In late 2008 the City of South Daytona decided to explore the potential demand
for allowing the use of golf carts on local roads. The increasing cost of oil and the
associated higher costs for gasoline, along with the growing awareness of the need for
“green” alternatives for everyday activities, have led a growing number of communities
to seek out alternative transportation options for local and convenience trips. Golf carts
offer a readily available technology that can be adapted for this purpose.
The State of Florida has adopted regulations allowing local governments the
option to permit golf carts on local roads. Nationally the trend appears to be growing as
well with communities from California to Texas to Indiana having recently permitted golf
carts access to local roads. In Central Florida, The Villages development on the northern
fringe of the Orlando Metropolitan Area has shown how a community designed with golf
cart use in mind can create an opportunity that allows and encourages residents to use
alternative transportation options to dominate the travel patterns for local and
convenience travel. Closer to home, Lake Helen has approved golf cart use on City roads
and Flagler Beach is considering approval.
Golf cart use on local roads does not come without some concerns. Safety is a
primary consideration. Golf carts are not designed to withstand collisions, offer
relatively little protection for occupants and are relatively slow moving vehicles. Mixing
golf carts with vehicles on roads where traffic volumes are high and where traffic is fast
moving raises safety concerns if golf carts are allowed into the mix. To properly address
these safety concerns and other issues related to golf cart usage, South Daytona decided
to prepare a feasibility analysis that looked at the potential demand for golf cart use in the
City, where golf carts could be operated with a reasonable level of safety and the range of
anticipated capital and operational costs the City would incur in permitting golf cart
usage. TMH Consulting and Lassiter Transportation Group were retained to prepare this
analysis. The following report presents the findings from this study effort.
1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The golf cart study for the City of South Daytona included a survey of residents to
gather their views on the program, the likelihood that they would use carts, and the types
of trips that might be made if carts were permitted. This information was supplemented
with a review of the State statutes and a review of established programs in other
communities. City streets were evaluated for compatibility with golf cart use and the
demand patterns that emerged from the survey and associated analysis leading to a
potential program area. The capital and operational costs to implement a program have
been reviewed along with other issues the City should consider. The purpose of this
effort is to identify the choices the City Council needs to make in determining whether to
move forward with the program and to provide the City Council with basic information to
assist them in making these choices.
State Regulations
The operation of golf carts on public roads is guided by F.S. 316.212. A local
government may designate a municipal street for golf cart use provided the local
government first determines that golf carts may safely travel on or cross the public road
considering factors including the speed, volume and character of the motor vehicle traffic
using the road. The decision to allow golf cart use must be made by County government
for County maintained roads and by the Florida Department of Transportation for State
maintained roads. The State rules set forth some minimum standards for the equipment
required on golf carts, hours of operation and minimum qualifications for golf cart
drivers. The statute allows the local government to impose some more restrictive
guidelines for golf carts and drivers as well as determining the hours of use and those
roads eligible for use. A complete copy of the current State statute is provided in the
appendix.
Golf carts are distinguished from low speed vehicles (LSV) which must be
capable of achieving speeds of at least 25 MPH. LSV must have a title and be licensed
by the State. They are issued a motor vehicle tag and may drive without restriction on
any road where the speed limit is 35 MPH or less. These types of vehicles are often
referred to as “street legal” golf carts, but in actuality they are regulated by a different set
of State statutes. A copy of the low speed vehicle statute is provided in the Appendix as
well. This study focuses on golf carts and not low speed vehicles as the LSV units are
permitted on local roads by current state law.
Survey Results and Estimate of Demand
A mail-out survey of City residents was conducted during December 2008 in
association with the City’s bi-monthly community newsletter. The full survey results are
detailed in another section and the complete tabulations of each question are provided in
2
the appendix. About 80% of respondents were supportive or neutral toward the idea of
permitting golf cart use. Key results include:
•
Approximately 9% of respondents reported they already owned a golf cart.
•
A total of 131 respondents (58.5%) stated they were likely or very likely to
purchase a golf cart if carts could be used on local roads.
•
Approximately one-quarter (25.4%) of the respondents indicated they would
definitely not purchase a golf cart.
•
Within this last group about one-third of those who would not purchase a cart
themselves were still supportive of the idea or neutral towards golf cart use.
•
Primary destinations include Sunshine Park, Big Tree Shopping Center, Piggotte
Center, various parks, church and visiting friends.
•
For those intending to use carts about one-third would use a cart more than once
per day, about one-third would use a cart daily and one-third would use a cart
several times per week.
Overall estimated demand including those who currently own golf carts is projected
to be 55 to 95 golf carts during the initial year of operation. Subsequent growth in the
number of cart users will depend on the cost of carts, the perceived safety of the carting
network, the convenience of the network for the types of trips people want to make, and
the overall community culture supporting golf cart use.
Pilot Program
Should the City Commission elect to proceed with approval for golf cart use, a
pilot program has been proposed that offers a suggested grouping of streets where golf
carts could be allowed, recommended parameters for carts and drivers, and a registration
and inspection process to ensure users are knowledgeable of the basic cart and operator
requirements. Figure 2 shows the area where golf cart use could be permitted with key
crossings noted. The key features of the pilot usage area are:
•
Permission to use golf carts on City streets in the area north of Reed Canal Road
to Beville Road west of the FEC Railroad to Nova Road
•
Additional connections to Sunshine Park and Big Tree Shopping Center via
railroad crossings at Big Tree Road and Ridge Boulevard
•
Prohibition of cart use on Beville Road, Nova Road and U.S. 1
•
Prohibition of cart use on Big Tree Road and Reed Canal Road except for
designated crossing locations and any proposed cart paths
3
•
Cart crossings of Big Tree Road and Reed Canal Road will need to be designed
and approved by Volusia County
•
If crossings of Reed Canal Road can be approved, extension of service to Reed
Canal Park and the Lantern Park and Coventry Forest neighborhoods can be
added to the basic pilot area
To qualify for use on City streets golf carts should be equipped with all of the
minimum features required by State law plus headlights, tail lights, turn signals and a
windshield. This additional equipment enhances safety and meets the minimum
requirements to allow night use if the City Council elects to permit night driving. Drivers
should be licensed by the State to drive a motor vehicle or be of age to obtain a driver’s
license. It is recommended that drivers with a learner’s permit should be accompanied by
a licensed driver.
In addition to meeting the basic qualifications, the driver should be required to view a
safety and usage video to be prepared by the City. This video can be made available at
City Hall or provided on the City web site and should include information on the areas of
the City where carts may be used and areas where they are prohibited. Approved
crossing points for State and County roads should be specially noted. The video may also
cover key points on safety to remind the drivers of the need to be aware of traffic and the
safe operation of a golf cart. For example all carts come with safety instructions for use
and the drivers should be reminded to read these rules.
An annual registration process is suggested to allow the City to verify that carts
used on public roads have the required equipment and are in good working order. The
registration process also offers an opportunity to educate the operators about the details
of the permitted network, any changes to the program since the prior year and remind
them about basic driving safety.
City Council Options
This report is intended to serve as a feasibility study that estimates the potential
demand for golf cart usage and examines the issues relative to implementation of a
system permitting golf carts on local public streets if a decision is made to do so. In
considering this decision, the City Council has several key issues to address. These
include:
1. Is the potential demand for golf cart usage sufficient to support implementation of
a program permitting golf carts on local streets?
2. Can an area be identified that provides a reasonably safe opportunity to permit
golf carts to drive on City streets?
3. Are more stringent requirements for golf cart equipment, beyond the minimum
equipment required by State law, needed to meet safety demands?
4
4. Are more stringent qualifications for drivers, beyond the minimum qualification
required by State law, needed to meet safety demands?
5. Is night use to be permitted?
6. Is insurance to be required?
7. What kind of registration/inspection process, including fees, should be established
to verify compliance with City requirements and promote safe use of golf carts in
the City?
Clearly, if the answer to the first question is “no”, then the other questions become
irrelevant. If a determination is made to proceed with a program for golf cart use, this
report provides a suggested program to consider as a starting point for decisions on the
other questions.
5
GOLF CART SURVEY RESULTS
Golf Cart Survey Results
As one of the initial steps in gauging the potential demand for using golf carts on
local roads, a survey of residents was conducted through a direct mailing as part of the
City’s community newsletter. This survey was conducted in December 2008 with all
responses received as of December 31, 2008 included in the tabulations. A total of 7500
surveys were distributed and 252 surveys were returned. The return rate of 3.3 percent is
typical of direct mail surveys. The mailing included business as well as residential
addresses while the responses were received only from residents. When only residential
units are considered the overall response rate is slightly higher at 3.9% and when only
occupied residential units are considered the response rate is 4.3%. None of the
questions were answered by all respondents and therefore the individual response
analysis provided below is based on the number of respondents who answered that
particular question. Tabulations of the responses to each question are provided in the
appendix.
The survey was intended to gauge the general interest of residents in using golf
carts on City streets if permissible; determine where the most popular destinations would
be; and gather some general information about the willingness to invest in a golf cart. An
opportunity was provided to add comments about potential destinations within the City in
addition to a pre-determined list of options, and many respondents used this opportunity
to offer general comments about the golf cart use on City streets. As part of the survey,
the City was divided into 16 sub-areas or zones to allow a more refined level of analysis
regarding the origin and destination of potential golf cart trips. The zone map is
presented as Figure 1 and the zones will be referenced in the following discussions. No
single question received a 100% response so the number of answers will be different for
each question. Two zones generated no responses. These were Zone10 (west of U.S. 1
to the FEC Railroad and south of Reed Canal Road) and Zone 11 (west of U.S. 1 to the
FEC Railroad and north of Reed Canal Road to Ridge Boulevard). These two zones are
dominated by commercial and industrial development and have very few residents.
However, Zone 11 with the Sunshine Park Mall including Publix was identified as a
prime destination.
The survey simply asked the respondents to give answers about their interest in
the potential program including items of information related to the likelihood they would
use a golf cart and where and when they would be likely to use a cart. Background
information was not provided about the State statute limitations that prohibit golf cart use
on State and county roads without specific approval of these agencies. In South Daytona
this means that U.S. 1, Nova Road, Beville Road, Big Tree Road and Reed Canal Road
would require additional levels of approval beyond City action. This information was not
presented with the survey because it was important to determine if access to these
6
CITY OF SOUTH DAYTONA
LEGEND
A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L. South Daytona Elementary School
Piggotte Community Center
James Street Park
Magnolia Park
Melodie Park
Ned Wagner Park
City Hall
Sunshine Park Mall
Riverfront Park
Reed Canal Park
Big Tree Ball Park
Big Tree Shopping Plaza
J
K
D
E
F
A
B
C
H
L
G
I
City of South Daytona
Golf Cart Transportation Analysis
N
Zone Analysis Map
Lassiter Transportation Group, Inc.
Figure: 1
123 Live Oak Avenue – Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
Telephone: 386.257.2571 Fax: 386.257.6996 EB# 0009227
facilities would be considered critical by potential users. Based on unsolicited comments,
the result was quite the opposite. The predominant expressed opinion was that safety
concerns generated by the higher traffic volumes and traffic speeds on these roads should
require these roads be excluded if a program is considered.
Key Responses
The most critical information provided by the survey related to the interest by
residents in using golf carts as an alternative transportation mode, identifying the most
popular destinations and the areas where golf cart trips can be expected to originate. The
following sections provide more detail on each of these items.
Interest in Using Golf Carts
The first two key questions asked if people already owned golf carts and if they
did not own a cart what level of interest would they have in purchasing a cart if usage
was permitted on local roads.
•
Twenty-two respondents (9%) acknowledged that they already owned a golf cart.
These owners were located in eight different analysis zones, and information was
provided in a comment that an unreported cart is present in at least one additional
zone. The predominant zones were Zone 3 (7 carts), Zone 9 (5 carts) and Zone 5
(4 carts). The Zone 3 usage may be internal to the Big Tree Shores and Lakeview
Estates mobile home communities, but Zone 9 (East of Magnolia to Golf View
Boulevard north of Big Tree Road) and Zone 5 (Palm Grove) are areas dominated
by single-family homes. This level of existing golf cart ownership is higher than
was anticipated and indicates that residents may currently be using golf carts on
City roads to some degree.
•
A total of 131 respondents (58.5%) stated they were very likely or likely to
purchase a golf cart if they could be used on local roads. Along with the existing
cart owners, this group forms the most likely pool of potential users. Within this
group 36.6% of the total respondents considered themselves very likely to
purchase a golf cart. People offered this response without specific information
about the cost to buy and operate a golf cart, so it is likely that fewer people than
declared an interest would actually purchase a golf cart.
•
At the other end of the scale 25.4% of the respondents indicated they would
definitely not purchase a golf cart. This group of respondents is composed of two
sub-groups. There is one group that believes approval of golf cart usage on local
roads is undesirable and should not be permitted. Based on comments provided
on the returned surveys, this group comprised 16.5% of the total respondents, and
about two-thirds of the respondents in this group. Safety was most often cited as
the key concern of this group. The remaining 8.9% of the total respondents in this
group were either neutral to the idea or supported golf cart usage but did not
expect to participate themselves.
8
Respondents at both ends of the spectrum seemed to hold strong views about the
advisability of allowing golf cart usage as evidenced by taking time to write a specific
comment on the survey form. However, over 80% of the respondents were supportive or
neutral toward the idea. As noted, the primary objection raised by those opposed to the
idea was safety. Comments indicated concern about specific roads including Reed Canal
Road and U.S. 1 as primary examples of safety concerns. There is insufficient
information to determine if the exclusion of these roads and other arterial and collector
roads from the eligible areas would affect their opinion of the idea.
Potential Trip Destinations
The survey asked potential riders where they would be most likely to make a trip
in a golf cart. Several pre-set locations were offered but respondents were given an
opportunity to write in additional destinations. The primary destinations by zone were
Zone 11 (Sunshine Park), Zone 12 (Big Tree Plaza) and Zone 13 (James Street Park and
the Piggotte Center). The second tier demand zones included Zone 2 (Reed Canal Park),
Zone 14 (City Hall) and Zone 16 (Riverfront Park). Write-in comments added several
other potential destinations including:
•
•
•
Visiting friends in the immediate neighborhood
Attending church
Patronizing other commercial areas with the primary locations including
convenience shopping locations on Reed Canal Road, Big Tree Road at Magnolia
Avenue and several destinations along Beville Road.
The potential trip locations suggest primary usage would be for short-length trips to shop
for convenience goods or access local community facilities such as parks, churches and
City Hall. Trips will likely be highly weather dependent as carts offer limited protection
from rain and can be challenging in cold weather as well.
Trip Generation Areas
A trip not only has a destination but also has a source. Two elements of the
survey responses were combined to look at the areas likely to generate the most trips
based on these areas having the highest existing and potential number of carts. The
locations of current cart owners were combined with the zone locations of those who
indicated they were likely or highly likely to purchase a golf cart if use on city roads is
approved. The following table identifies those zones with the highest potential demand.
9
City of South Daytona Golf Cart Survey Results
Highest Ranking Trip Generation Areas
Zone
Description
Demand
Palm Grove area
28
5
East of Magnolia/North of Big Tree
25
9
Lantern Park/Coventry Forest
19
6
17
13 East of Golf View to FEC north of Big Tree
12
16 South Palmetto
Big Tree Shores/Lakeview Estates
11
3
Bryan Cave
10
2
Big Tree to Ridge west of FEC RR
10
8
Please note that the “demand” number is not an absolute number of potential users but
represents a rank order of the analysis zone by potential demand based on the survey
responses. This analysis identifies the higher priority areas to be served if the City elects
to proceed with a golf cart network.
Other Survey Information
In addition to the key responses discussed above, the survey gathered information
on a variety of other factors. These items are reported below.
Cart Equipment
While the sample is relatively small, the survey asked what type of equipment
people have on carts that currently exist in the community. Of the 22 carts declared in
the survey, 18 responses provided specific information on equipment. For those that
reported on their carts:
•
•
•
All carts have windshields, tail lights and headlights
Most carts have a rear view mirror (16), brake lights (13) and a horn (13)
Some carts have rear reflectors (8), front reflectors (6), seat belts (3) and turn
signals (2)
There may be some sense that reflectors are not needed if headlights and tail lights are
provided, but the reflectors are required by State law and should be provided by all
companies selling golf carts as after-market vehicles.
Age of User
The survey asked the likely age of a primary user if carts were permitted. The
largest user group fell within the 18-62 age range (54%) while seniors ages 63 and over
were 41%. Younger drivers ages 16 and 17 were five percent of the total. This question
was directed toward determining if youth would be a primary user group. The minimum
age set by the State to drive a golf cart on a public road where this is permissible is 14
years of age, but local governments can increase the minimum age if they believe safety
10
justifies the change. Establishing a minimum age for driving is always a difficult
decision and this was recognized by survey respondents. There were several comments
suggesting that, if cart use on local streets were allowed, drivers should be licensed to
drive a car and have insurance. There was one comment about current “reckless” driving
in a golf cart by local teens and there were several comments about the need to be aware
of the “rules of the road” when driving carts in traffic.
Frequency of Use
The responses to the question posed on the anticipated frequency of use indicate
that those drivers obtaining carts would use them on a regular basis. About one-third of
the respondents said they would use a cart more than once a day; about one-third said
they would use the cart daily; about one-quarter would use the cart one to three times per
week; and about ten percent would use the cart three to six times per week. The
frequency of use will be dependent on weather, but carts can be equipped with drop down
covers to provide added protection from rain and heaters to expand use in colder weather.
As would be expected those respondents who reported they were likely or very
likely to purchase a cart also reported the highest potential levels of use. The following
table provides a breakout of the reported frequency of use for each likely to purchase
grouping.
City of South Daytona Golf Cart Survey Results
Trip Frequency by Potential Ownership
Anticipated Frequency
Likelihood
to Buy
Very Likely
Likely
Unlikely
Definitely Not
1-3 Times
per week
3-6 Times
per Week
Daily
11
15
7
0
4
9
2
0
30
16
1
0
Multiple
Times
per Day
38
10
0
0
Night Time Use
State law provides an option for local governments to allow driving golf carts at
night. If night driving is permitted some additional equipment such as headlights is
required. This question was asked to determine if potential cart users would be willing to
spend more to upgrade a cart for night use. Nearly 90% of the respondents who reported
they were likely or very likely to purchase a cart indicated they would be willing to make
the upgrades, and as noted in the response to the equipment on carts currently located
within the City, all have headlights already.
11
ESTIMATE OF DEMAND FOR CART USAGE
With the resident survey data providing a measure of interest, this section provides an
estimate of the potential demand for using golf carts on public roads. There are a number
of factors that will impact the level of demand for residents to use golf carts as a
transportation alternative. Among these factors are:
•
The cost to acquire and operate a cart including the base cost for a cart, additional
required equipment upgrades and any registration fees and other costs to qualify
the cart and driver
•
The perceived safety of the carting network
•
The convenience of the network for the types of trips people want to make
•
Any limitations on who can operate a golf cart including age limitations and hours
of operation
•
The overall community culture supporting golf cart use
The trend toward local governments allowing the use of golf carts on local roads
is growing nationally. Recent examples are noted in California, Texas, Illinois and
certainly in Florida, and these examples are simply locations that have been recently
noted in the popular press. Where golf cart use has been designed into an overall
community plan, such as Peachtree City in Georgia or The Villages in Lake County,
Florida, golf cart trips have become a significant percent of internal community trips. In
communities where a simple authorization for use has been given, some local use is
evident, but golf cart trips tend to be a much smaller portion of total internal community
trips.
The increase in gasoline prices over the last year and the increasing concern about
the environmental impacts of automobile emissions are factors that will continue to
encourage people to look for “green” and cost efficient methods for neighborhood,
convenience level trips. The zoning and resulting land use patterns that dominated
community development in the second half of the 20th century have created many lower
density, single-use neighborhoods and cities that require residents to regularly travel by
vehicle to meet daily needs. In many areas the prevailing low density design and lack of
investment in mass transit have made transit options of limited value in meeting this
need. Thus the demand for a cost-efficient, environmentally friendly, personal use
vehicle has emerged and this demand is likely to strengthen. Golf carts fit this need and,
as a readily available technology, have rapidly increased in popularity.
The resident survey provides some insight into the initial level of local interest. The
survey identified 22 golf carts that are currently operating in the City, presumably using
12
city streets on some occasions. The survey also identified 131 respondents who were
sufficiently intrigued by the idea to indicate they would be likely or very likely to
purchase a golf cart for local use if permission is granted to use carts on local streets. Not
all of these respondents will ultimately elect to purchase and use a golf cart, but there are
certainly additional residents who did not respond to the survey who would buy and use a
golf cart once they see a system in operation. To the extent that the responses to the five
factors noted above are positive, demand and usage should increase over time.
A projection of the likely number of golf cart uses in the short term is made based
on the expressed demand and current cart ownership. A range of potential ridership has
been developed based on the assumption that current cart owners will participate at a
100% level and prospective cart users will participate at a rate of 25% to 50% of the
expressed demand. Expressed demand is defined as those survey respondents indicating
they were likely or very likely to buy a golf cart. Applying these criteria to the survey
results, an estimate of 55 to 95 carts would become active during the initial program year.
Program sustainability and program growth will depend upon how the impacting factors
affect the program over time. The following discussion looks at each of these factors in
turn.
Cart and Operational Costs
The most significant initial factor is likely to be the cost to purchase, register and
operate a golf cart. The cost to buy a cart is beyond the influence of the City and
will be controlled by local supply and demand. There are currently four active
vendors in Volusia County, one in Bunnell in Flagler County and one additional
vendor nearby in Sanford. Thus there is at least some level of selection and
competition in the local market place. The City will have some impact on the
overall cost structure by establishing minimum equipment requirements for the
carts and by establishing registration and inspection programs with attendant fees.
The survey indicates that most golf carts marketed in the area already have most
of the basic equipment the State requires and most of the basic equipment a City
program is likely to require. Registration fees are anticipated to be minor relative
to the cost of buying and operating a cart and should not be an obstacle to
participation.
Since the State laws and local enabling laws set some conditions for the operator
of a golf cart, this suggests that some type of registration process be in place to
determine the cart is operated by a qualified person. The requirements for having
some minimum types of equipment on the cart and the desire to have some level
of ongoing assurance that carts are maintained in serviceable conditions suggests
some type of regular inspection process. While the City does not need to actually
do the inspections, the City will want to verify the inspection has been done by a
qualified technician. Both of these functions will require a fee to cover costs.
These fees can also be used to amortize the capital costs involved in setting up a
network of roads eligible for cart use.
13
Perceived Safety
A second critical factor will be the perceived safety of the road network where
carts can be used. The more comfortable people feel using the carts, the more
likely they are to avail themselves of the opportunity. The City can fulfill a role
in this process in several ways. First, the City can and should conduct at least an
annual inspection to verify the carts are in good operating order and have the
required equipment. Second, the City can use the registration process to educate
golf cart drivers about the safety techniques, driving skill and driving etiquette.
This might be done by having cart operators watch a short safety video as part of
the registration process. Finally, the City can exclude specific roads from eligible
operating areas where it believes safety considerations outweigh the desirability
of allowing golf cart use.
This study provides a pilot project that excludes the heavily traveled arterial and
collector roads (except for limited crossing points on Big Tree Road and Reed
Canal). The pilot project is a balance between the most popular trip generation
areas and the most popular destinations where some limitations are proposed
based on safety considerations and initial capital costs.
Convenience
The more effectively a proposed network of eligible roadways conforms to the
destinations and types of trips people want to make, the more likely they are to
use carts. The recommended pilot project area links residential areas with key
shopping destinations (Sunshine Park and Big Tree Shopping Center) and key
civic locations (James Street Park, Piggotte Center). The pilot area also supports
interior neighborhood travel and convenience shopping locations that were among
the popular destinations suggested in the public comments.
The City has a well formed and highly integrated network of local streets that
provides a variety of options for cart drivers to choose depending upon their
home, intended destinations and comfort level on local roads. This close knit
road network allows users the opportunity to access locations on Reed Canal
Road, Big Tree Road and Beville Road from side streets thus avoiding the need to
use these higher volume roads for directional travel. Avoiding the major collector
and arterial roads, except for approved crossing points, can be a primary topic of
the suggested safety video.
Operating Limitations
The level of usage will be impacted by the ultimate determination on who is
eligible to operate a cart and what the allowable hours of operation will be. The
State law allows drivers as young as 14 years of age, but there seems to be a
consensus that drivers who are allowed on City roads should have a driver’s
license or at least a learner's permit. The City also needs to make a decision about
14
the ability to drive carts at night. Restricting cart use to daytime hours may affect
some resident decisions about participation.
Community Culture Supporting Golf Cart Use
The communities where golf carts have become the most successful in filling a
role in local transportation are those communities where golf cart use is
encouraged and supported as an integral part of community life. Not only is
travel allowed on roadways, but parking spaces are provided and access to key
business and civic locations is provided as well. To the extent that cart usage
becomes integrated into the community fabric, the volume of trips that are met by
this type of vehicle will increase.
15
GOLF CART PROGRAM DESIGN
Should the City Council determine the anticipated design is sufficient to proceed
with a program allowing golf carts on public roads, at least on a trial basis, this section
offers a comprehensive program that can serve as a starting point for program
implementation. The program design includes operational considerations, a pilot project
area, an analysis of financial parameters and several other considerations the City may
want to address.
Operational Considerations
In addition to determining if the demand is sufficient to encourage golf cart use
and the areas and roads best suited for golf carts, there are a number of operational
factors that need to be determined. These factors include the age and qualifications of the
drivers, the equipment the City wants to have as standard on the cart, the hours of
operation and how the registration and inspection process should work. This section
provides information and options on these choices.
Drivers and Driver Qualifications
State statutes permit drivers as young as age 14 to operate golf carts on public
roads. Otherwise the statute does not have any specific requirements for the drivers.
Section 316.212(2)(c)7 allows the City to include some more restrictive provisions for
drivers. Since total program safety includes the operators as well as the roads designated
for use, the more familiar the cart operators are with the basic tenets of operating vehicles
on public roads and intermixed with other traffic, the safer the overall program is likely to
be. The following provisions for drivers address this concern and reflect many of the
comments citizens offered in their survey responses:
•
The driver should be licensed in the State or be of sufficient age that they could
obtain a driver’s license. It is recommended drivers with a learner’s permit
should be accompanied by a licensed driver as they would with a regular vehicle.
•
The driver should be required to view a safety and usage video. This video can be
made available at City Hall or provided on the City web site and should include
information on the areas of the City where carts may be used and areas where
they are prohibited. Approved crossing points for State and County roads should
be specially noted. The video may also cover key points on safety to remind the
drivers of the need to be aware of traffic and the safe operation of a golf cart. For
example, all carts come with safety instructions for use and the drivers should be
reminded to read these rules.
16
•
The City should strongly consider requiring insurance for carts to be used on
public roads. This insurance appears to be readily available from current vendors
as an addition to automobile or homeowner’s insurance policies.
Hours of Operation
The City can choose to specify hours of operation for carts. The State statute
requires additional equipment should carts be permitted to operate at night. One
alternative is to begin the program in the sunrise to sunset period and then expand use to
night hours if demand warrants.
Minimum Equipment
The State statute sets forth the minimum equipment required for daytime use.
This equipment should be supplemented by some additional lighting and other equipment
as noted below:
Required Minimum Equipment
Efficient brakes
Reliable steering
Safe tires
Rearview mirror
Front and rear red reflectorized warning devices
Suggested Additional Equipment
Headlights
Tail lights
Turn signals
Windshield
All of the survey respondents who owned carts and reported on their current
equipment reported they had windshields, headlights and tail lights, so the items do not
appear too excessive a request. The only addition would be turn signals if added to the
requirements. Even if the City does not approve night driving, the presence of lights
will add to the ability of other drivers to identify carts on the road in the same manner
that motorcycles use lights at all times. To maximize this benefit however, the City will
need to require that lights be wired so as to be lit whenever the vehicle is in operation.
Requiring lights also allows for occasional instances where a cart user
underestimates his trip time and cannot get home by dark. Having a windshield will
allow some protection from wind and rain when these events occur. Most golf carts use a
fold-down windshield design that allows for open use in good weather. The suggested
additional equipment items are the additional items required by State statute to allow
17
carts to be driven at night and therefore prepare the carts for eventual night use if night
driving is not initially approved.
Registration and Inspection
Many communities require an annual registration for golf carts including a reasonable
registration fee. An annual registration seems reasonable to verify the cart has the
required equipment and that all of the equipment is in working order. The registration
process also provides an opportunity to remind drivers about safety requirements and
local rules. The annual registration process should be done by City staff and include
current information on the following items:
•
Basic information about the type of cart and the owner’s address and telephone
number so the owner can be notified if the need arises
•
It is recommended that an annual inspection of the cart be done and certified to
the City to verify that the golf cart has the required equipment and the equipment
is in working order. This process could be accomplished as a private sector
function with a report given to the owner to submit to the City. Use of a colorcoded permit displayed in a consistent location is recommended.
•
Verification of insurance if the City elects to require insurance be provided.
Should private sector inspection be selected, the City should conduct a qualification
inspection of the business proposing to do the inspection. The City should verify the
person doing the inspection is qualified for the type of carts he accepts and that he is
aware of the City requirements for private carts. It would be desirable to provide the
inspector with a checklist for the inspection. A copy of the completed checklist could
then be given to the owner for submittal with the registration renewal. By requiring a
qualification inspection the City could potentially expand the number of private sector
providers to include businesses in addition to golf cart sales agencies that currently do
this kind of work.
Pilot Program Design
In looking at potential areas where the City can consider allowing golf cart use, a
pilot project has been developed based on the trip generation and trip distribution
information generated by the resident survey. This information has been integrated with
a review of the safety characteristics of key roadways including speed, volume, roadway
width and the character of motor vehicle traffic using the road as well as the anticipated
capital cost to implement a pilot project. This analysis presents the proposed roadway
network. The suggested usage area is offered in concert with the suggestions on the
minimum equipment for individual golf carts, qualifications of drivers and initial hours of
operation to achieve maximum system safety.
18
The appendix includes a map series illustrating the golf cart travel demand for
each survey zone. The primary destinations are in Zones 11, 12 and 13 with secondary
destinations on the north side of Reed Canal Road, the south side of Beville Road and
along Big Tree Road where churches and convenience commercial opportunities exist.
Travel is also expected within zones and between adjacent zones. The pilot program is
intended to maximize the opportunity for golf cart travel within a safe environment and
with the least initial capital expenditure.
The suggested pilot program is graphically presented on Figure 2 and includes the
following elements:
1. Approval for golf cart use on City streets west of the FEC Railroad between
Beville Road and Big Tree Road
2. Approval for golf cart use on City streets west of the FEC Railroad between
Big Tree Road and Reed Canal Road
3. Exclusion of golf cart travel on Big Tree Road (except for crossing points),
Reed Canal Road, Nova Road, U.S. 1 and Beville Road
4. Approved crossing of Big Tree Road at Magnolia Avenue and James Street
(Requires Volusia County approval of the crossing locations and design.)
5. Approved crossing of the FEC Railroad at Ridge Boulevard and Big Tree
Road (Requires Volusia County approval of the FEC crossing at Big Tree
Road.)
This plan links most of the highest trip generation areas with the most popular
destinations. Capital costs will be limited to the required signage specified in State
statute and some minor improvements at designated crossing points. The pilot area
should provide a sufficient test area to gauge demand for this type of transportation
service and develop a body of experience in determining the actual numbers of users that
will take advantage of this transportation option. As experience is gained in working
with the program, additional areas of the City can be considered for service. This option
avoids the need to consider crossing a State road where FDOT approval will be required
for any crossing location and crossing design.
As an alternate to the basic pilot area, the City could consider a program to extend
the usage area south of Reed Canal Road. The Lantern Park/Coventry Forest area was
one of the higher potential trip generation areas, and Reed Canal Park was frequently
cited as a desired destination. The limiting factors in extending initial service to the area
south of Reed Canal Road are the relatively narrow usable right-of-way for Reed Canal
Road, the higher traffic volume on Reed Canal Road and the limited crossing
opportunities keyed to the four bridges. The bridge access points are also off-set from the
street network on the north side of Reed Canal Road. This condition will require some
limited travel within the Reed Canal Road right-of-way to affect a crossing. If the City
wishes to pursue this option, crossing designs should be prepared and submitted to
Volusia County for approval. A crossing of Reed Canal Road at Sauls Road should be
avoided due to the crossing location on a curve with poor visibility for on-coming
19
CITY OF SOUTH DAYTONA
LEGEND
Primary Pilot Project Area
Secondary Pilot Project Area
Golf Cart use prohibited at all times
Golf cart use prohibited except at designated crossings
Possible RR Crossing
J
DESTINATIONS
A. South Daytona Elementary School
B. Piggotte Community Center
C. James Street Park
D. Magnolia Park
E. Melodie Park
F. Ned Wagner Park
G. City Hall
H. Sunshine Park Mall
I. Riverfront Park
J. Reed Canal Park
K. Big Tree Ball Park
L. Big Tree Shopping Plaza
K
D
E
A
F
B
C
H
L
G
I
HALIFAX RIVER
City of South Daytona
Golf Cart Transportation Analysis
N
Pilot Project Study Area
Lassiter Transportation Group, Inc.
Figure: 2
123 Live Oak Avenue – Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
Telephone: 386.257.2571 Fax: 386.257.6996 EB# 0009227
vehicular traffic. If the proposed traffic signal at this intersection is implemented, the
crossing status can be reviewed.
The area between U.S. 1 and the FEC Railroad both north and south of Big Tree
Road is another area that might be considered for future access, but currently the area has
a poorly connected internal street network that might encourage drivers to consider
venturing onto US. 1 and the overall demand for golf cart usage in these zones is
relatively low.
The area east of U.S. 1 is a popular destination with Riverfront Park, but crossing
U.S. 1 may require a significant investment in capital improvements to create a crossing
environment that FDOT will approve. This area is another future service area if the
program receives extensive support and utilization. Travel might be considered within
the zone along Palmetto Avenue, but this option is not recommended for the pilot
program as it might encourage cart drivers to attempt crossings of U.S. 1 to access
Sunshine Park, Big Tree Plaza and other destinations before adequate crossing details are
worked out and implemented.
Financial Considerations
There are two basic financial considerations relative to operating and installing a
cart system. One issue is the related capital costs. The State requires at a minimum
signage be posted alerting drivers to presence of golf carts on the public road network.
There may also be some cost involved in implementing designated crossing of State and
County roads. While crossing of these roads is anticipated and permitted by State statute,
the actual crossing design requires approval from the appropriate agency. Operating
costs involve the staff and material costs to implement the suggested registration and
inspection program. The operating costs can be recouped through an annual fee. A
portion of the annual fee could also be allocated to recoup capital costs over time and
contribute to system maintenance.
Operating Costs
Operating costs include personnel costs to administer the registration and
inspections program along with the materials required for the program. Registration
activity needs to be assigned to staff that are readily available to the public on a walk-in
basis and are equipped and trained to accept payments. There are three logical locations
for this activity including Utility Billing, Development Services and the Police
Department. Each location has staff assigned to serve walk-in customers and is equipped
to accept payments. Assuming 15 minutes to process a registration transaction, the cost
to complete a registration will range from $4.50 to $5.00, depending on which staff is
assigned. The registration process is expected to include the following steps:
1. Review completed registration form to verify all information is provided
2. Verify the required vehicle inspection form is provided
3. Verify proof of insurance form is provided if insurance is required
21
4. Verify the applicant has viewed the program/safety video
5. Accept the payment/record transaction/provide registration decal to applicant
The clerk may need to assist the applicant in completing the forms. As noted
elsewhere, the program intent is to have the video available on-line and at the registration
site for the convenience of the applicant. The applicant will sign the form that he has
viewed the video or can watch it while the application is being processed. In addition to
the time to process the application there will be some minor costs for registration decals
and application forms.
The program is anticipated to operate similarly to motor vehicle registrations where
registration occurs throughout the year rather than as a batch process similar to the
occupational license tax where there is one renewal period each year. Having a
continuous registration process will require the City to develop a data base during the
initial registration period that will provide a reminder notice one or two months before
the registration expires so the cart owner can be notified by mail. Given the projected
volume of users, registrations should average one or two per week so that the additional
responsibility will not be an undue burden on the processing clerk.
Where registration fees are established in other communities, an annual fee in the
range of $25.00 to $30.00 is typical. At the projected volume of registrations, a $25 fee
should yield $1,400 -$2,400 per year. This income will offset the processing costs,
materials costs, and provide a small contribution to offset capital costs and maintenance
costs.
The remaining operational function is the qualification of firms to perform the annual
inspections. This function can be performed by the private sector companies that sell
and/or service golf carts or other firms that can demonstrate they are qualified to repair
golf carts. The City should perform an annual review of these firms to verify they are
qualified to conduct the inspection and to provide the firm with a checklist form that is
completed and provided to the golf cart owner for submission with his registration
application. The City inspection should be performed by staff with some engineering or
inspection background and a fee should be established that compensates the City for the
cost of the inspection. The inspection should include a visual review of the cart to verify
all required equipment is present and a test of the equipment to verify it is in working
order. If any items are missing or inoperable, the owner will be notified so he can take
steps to make the necessary repairs. Repairs will need to be completed prior to
registration with the City.
Capital Costs
Capital costs will involve the installation of signs as required by State law and any
costs that may be involved in the establishment of arterial and collector road crossings,
including any cart path improvements. Based on current City costs the unit cost to install
a sign is estimated at $78.50 per unit based on the following breakdown. The cost
22
estimate assumes a 30 minute installation time. A value is assigned to equipment use and
the labor cost includes direct labor and fringe benefit costs.
Sign
Pole
Truck
Labor
Total
$48.00
$15.00
$ 5.00
$12.50
$78.50
For the initial pilot project area, signage is expected to be the primary capital cost.
A detailed signage plan will need to be done as part of the program implementation and
proposed road crossing designs for Big Tree Road and Reed Canal Road (if selected) will
need to be detailed and submitted to Volusia County for review and approval. Specific
capital costs can be calculated for each crossing once the final design is completed and
approved. A conceptual signage plan was developed for seven crossing sites including
three on Reed Canal Road, two on Big Tree Road and two over the FEC railroad to
develop a capital cost range. The anticipated cost range is $6,000 to $10,000 to
implement a signage program and anticipated pathway improvements. As noted, the final
cost will be dependent upon more detailed designs. Over time the capital cost can be
recaptured as part of the registration fees.
Costs for capital expenditures for arterial and collector road crossings will depend
on the approved crossing design. In locations such as Magnolia Avenue at Big Tree
Road, there may be no additional cost to accommodate a crossing. Locations on Reed
Canal Road may require the construction of short sections of a widened cart path due to
the off-set of the bridges on the south side of the road from the road network on the north
side of the road. Each crossing will need to be individually designed and approved by
the appropriate agency. Specific costs can be estimated once an approved plan is
completed.
23
OTHER FACTORS FOR CONSIDERATION
A program that allows the use of golf carts on City streets is consistent with the
City’s comprehensive plan and its Transportation Concurrency Exception Area. The
following section provides specific citations linking the golf cart transportation concept
to the comprehensive plan. If the City elects to pursue the golf cart program there are
some zoning and code enforcement considerations that the City may wish to consider as
future action items.
Comprehensive Plan Consistency
There are two elements of the comprehensive plan that speak to issues related to
golf cart use on City streets. The first element is the Future Land Use Element and the
second element is the Transportation Element. The City’s adopted Transportation
Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) is addressed in both elements and both elements
have policies that speak to this type of program.
In the Future Land Use Element Objective 13 establishes the TCEA and links the
TCEA to the Ridgewood Corridor Redevelopment District. Policy 13-1(b)2 encourages
the City to “Develop a transportation system that supports the image and needs of the
community by encouraging alternative modes of transportation.” There is little doubt
that creating a network where golf carts may be used to supplant local convenience level
trips constitutes an alternative mode of transportation. The suggested pilot project
provides for linkages from residential neighborhoods to key shopping destinations within
the Ridgewood Corridor.
The Transportation Element contains several policies that support an alternative
transportation network. Objective 8 requires that “The City shall establish a
comprehensive, non-vehicular transportation network linking residential areas, parks
and recreational facilities, major schools and important shopping and other commercial
areas.” While this objective is primarily directed at bicycle and pedestrian solutions, a
network for golf carts that responds to the objective’s intent certainly is supportive of the
objective.
Objective 11 of the Transportation Element presents the implementing strategies
for the TCEA. Several of these apply to the golf cart network. Policy 11-1 directs the
City to implement strategies that reduce the reliance on the automobile as the
predominant mode of transportation. The golf cart network uses the basic street system
in a manner that provides an alternative to automobile use. Policy 11-7 commits the City
to following “complete streets” principles in order to ensure that all modes of
transportation are incorporated into proposed plans. The golf cart program provides an
alternative mode of transportation that is integrated into street use. Policy 11-8 prohibits
the City from adversely affecting the Florida Intrastate Highway System and the Strategic
Intermodal System (SIS). The City has no SIS designated roads within the City limits,
24
and the required approval by FDOT of any crossings of U.S. 1, Nova Road or Beville
Road will ensure that there will be no negative impacts to the State road network.
Zoning and Code Enforcement Considerations
As noted earlier in this study, one of the factors that supports the use of golf carts
for a substantial volume of local convenience trips is the culture and climate of support in
the community. Where golf cart use is fully encouraged the volume of use is higher than
in areas where it is permitted or tolerated without any effort to create a supporting
physical and regulatory structure. Should the City elect to pursue a golf cart program, the
City may wish to consider zoning items that support cart use. Zoning actions might
include:
•
•
•
•
Approval to convert some vehicular parking spaces to golf cart parking
Encouragement of interconnected business sites that permit golf cart access to
multiple sites that do not require golf cart travel within arterial and collector road
rights-of-way
Consideration of supporting facilities such as recharging stations as accessory
uses to business and civic sites (these might also be used for electric cars.)
Consideration of golf cart garages as accessory uses for residential properties
As with any zoning activity there is the potential for some code enforcement issues to
emerge over time. One issue that is likely to cause some concern is parking golf carts on
residential properties. Owners should be encouraged to consider the golf carts as vehicles
that need to be parked in garages or on driveways when stored on residential properties.
This is an issue that can be addressed in the proposed safety and usage video.
25
APPENDIX
Appendix: Enabling Legislation
316.212 Operation of golf carts on certain roadways.--The operation of a golf cart upon the
public roads or streets of this state is prohibited except as provided herein:
(1) A golf cart may be operated only upon a county road that has been designated by a county,
or a municipal street that has been designated by a municipality, for use by golf carts. Prior to
making such a designation, the responsible local governmental entity must first determine that
golf carts may safely travel on or cross the public road or street, considering factors including the
speed, volume, and character of motor vehicle traffic using the road or street. Upon a
determination that golf carts may be safely operated on a designated road or street, the
responsible governmental entity shall post appropriate signs to indicate that such operation is
allowed.
(2) A golf cart may be operated on a part of the State Highway System only under the following
conditions:
(a) To cross a portion of the State Highway System which intersects a county road or municipal
street that has been designated for use by golf carts if the Department of Transportation has
reviewed and approved the location and design of the crossing and any traffic control devices
needed for safety purposes.
(b) To cross, at midblock, a part of the State Highway System where a golf course is constructed
on both sides of the highway if the Department of Transportation has reviewed and approved the
location and design of the crossing and any traffic control devices needed for safety purposes.
(c) A golf cart may be operated on a state road that has been designated for transfer to a local
government unit pursuant to s. 335.0415 if the Department of Transportation determines that the
operation of a golf cart within the right-of-way of the road will not impede the safe and efficient
flow of motor vehicular traffic. The department may authorize the operation of golf carts on such a
road if:
1. The road is the only available public road along which golf carts may travel or cross or the
road provides the safest travel route among alternative routes available; and
2. The speed, volume, and character of motor vehicular traffic using the road is considered in
making such a determination.
Upon its determination that golf carts may be operated on a given road, the department shall post
appropriate signs on the road to indicate that such operation is allowed.
(3) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, a golf cart may be operated for the
purpose of crossing a street or highway where a single mobile home park is located on both sides
of the street or highway and is divided by that street or highway, provided that the governmental
entity having original jurisdiction over such street or highway shall review and approve the
location of the crossing and require implementation of any traffic controls needed for safety
purposes. This subsection shall apply only to residents or guests of the mobile home park. If
notice is posted at the entrance and exit of any mobile home park where residents of the park
operate golf carts or electric vehicles within the confines of the park, it is not necessary for the
park to have a gate or other device at the entrance and exit in order for such golf carts or electric
vehicles to be lawfully operated in the park.
(4) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, if authorized by the Division of Recreation
and Parks of the Department of Environmental Protection, a golf cart may be operated on a road
that is part of the State Park Road System if the posted speed limit is 35 miles per hour or less.
Appendix: Enabling Legislation
(5) A golf cart may be operated only during the hours between sunrise and sunset, unless the
responsible governmental entity has determined that a golf cart may be operated during the hours
between sunset and sunrise and the golf cart is equipped with headlights, brake lights, turn
signals, and a windshield.
(6) A golf cart must be equipped with efficient brakes, reliable steering apparatus, safe tires, a
rearview mirror, and red reflectorized warning devices in both the front and rear.
(7) A golf cart may not be operated on public roads or streets by any person under the age of 14.
(8) A local governmental entity may enact an ordinance regarding golf cart operation and
equipment which is more restrictive than those enumerated in this section. Upon enactment of
such ordinance, the local governmental entity shall post appropriate signs or otherwise inform the
residents that such an ordinance exists and that it will be enforced within the local government's
jurisdictional territory. An ordinance referred to in this section must apply only to an unlicensed
driver.
(9) A violation of this section is a noncriminal traffic infraction, punishable pursuant to chapter
318 as a moving violation for infractions of subsections (1)-(5) or a local ordinance corresponding
thereto and enacted pursuant to subsection (8), or punishable pursuant to chapter 318 as a
nonmoving violation for infractions of subsection (6), subsection (7), or a local ordinance
corresponding thereto and enacted pursuant to subsection (8).
Appendix: Enabling Legislation
316.2122 Operation of a low-speed vehicle on certain roadways.--The operation of a lowspeed vehicle, as defined in s. 320.01(42), on any road as defined in s. 334.03(15) or (33), is
authorized with the following restrictions:
(1) A low-speed vehicle may be operated only on streets where the posted speed limit is 35
miles per hour or less. This does not prohibit a low-speed vehicle from crossing a road or street at
an intersection where the road or street has a posted speed limit of more than 35 miles per hour.
(2) A low-speed vehicle must be equipped with headlamps, stop lamps, turn signal lamps,
taillamps, reflex reflectors, parking brakes, rearview mirrors, windshields, seat belts, and vehicle
identification numbers.
(3) A low-speed vehicle must be registered and insured in accordance with s. 320.02.
(4) Any person operating a low-speed vehicle must have in his or her possession a valid driver's
license.
(5) A county or municipality may prohibit the operation of low-speed vehicles on any road under
its jurisdiction if the governing body of the county or municipality determines that such prohibition
is necessary in the interest of safety.
(6) The Department of Transportation may prohibit the operation of low-speed vehicles on any
road under its jurisdiction if it determines that such prohibition is necessary in the interest of
safety.
Appendix: Survey Response Tabulations
City of South Daytona Golf Cart Survey Results
After
Dark?
1
2
2
1
1
5
4
3
14
9
5
29
17
2
2
No
Yes
16-17
Age of
User
How Often
Likelihood
to Buy
Own Cart
18-62
63 and
over
3
3
4
5
6
PRODUCTION ZONES
7
8
9
10
4
11
12
1
3
1
10
19
5
1
13
14
15
1
1
20
17
2
3
12
149
109
1
16
1
10
2
10
4
2
23
14
4
7
12
2
15
1
4
9
1
5
6
3
13
8
3
6
15
6
5
1
4
8
1-3 Times
a Week
1
6
2
2
4
3
1
5
4
3
1
1
3
3-6 Times
a Week
2
1
6
1
1
1
1
3
1
2
Daily
Multiple
Times a
Day
Very
Likely
Likely
Unlikely
Definitely
Not
No
Yes
3
4
2
10
10
1
2
7
1
3
1
9
5
3
2
11
1
2
10
1
5
1
4
84
36
17
50
50
2
1
3
3
4
6
1
1
9
16
12
2
3
15
9
1
1
8
6
2
6
5
4
6
8
1
3
3
2
4
2
2
10
2
49
2
2
36
1
8
5
2
8
8
2
3
4
2
4
1
3
6
4
26
7
7
39
26
9
14
24
10
20
3
6
20
4
1
1
5
1
2
7
1
82
57
215
22
Appendix: Survey Response Tabulations
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
11
7
2
23
17
Zone 4
1
5
2
15
6
Zone 6
1
6
11
Zone 8
2
1
2
20
8
Zone 9
1
3
2
15
5
Zone 2
Destination
Zone
12
13
14
15
16
5
13
4
12
1
1
3
104
1
4
12
2
10
1
1
1
61
1
2
6
5
1
2
4
14
16
2
2
4
17
9
1
4
11
33
1
72
59
Zone 11
3
9
6
4
30
17
4
10
23
6
15
2
3
13
145
Zone 12
3
7
7
4
25
12
4
9
21
5
15
2
2
13
129
1
5
3
5
30
14
4
10
33
4
25
3
2
8
147
7
3
4
17
12
3
7
19
4
11
1
2
6
96
3
5
3
14
10
3
7
13
3
12
1
1
12
89
8
7
1
4
7
44
28
203
119
29
66
178
Zone 13
Zone 14
Zone 16
Other
TOTAL:
2
1
2
2
11
49
42
1
Brake Lights
Equipment
PRODUCTION ZONES
7
8
9
10
2
3
4
6
5
0
PRODUCTION ZONES
7
8
9
10
6
2
1
3
3
5
0
29
133
11
19
62
11
12
13
14
15
16
4
1
13
Headlights
7
4
2
18
Horn
Rearview
Mirror
Red Reflectors
in Front
5
3
1
2
2
13
7
3
1
3
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
Red Reflectors
in Rear
Seat Belts
Tail Lights or
Tail Lamp
7
Turn Signals
1
Windshield
6
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
3
6
8
3
1
2
18
1
4
16
2
1
1
1
18
Golf Carts
Appendix: Golf Cart Survey Form
on City Streets in
South Daytona?
SURVEY... WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU!
The City of South Daytona is evaluating the potential to permit the use
of golf carts on some city streets. State law gives the City the authority
to allow limited use of golf carts on public roads following an evaluation of
safety and operating considerations. If approved, the City believes golf carts
could provide a “green” alternative to using your car or truck for some local trips. This survey is asking for your help in
evaluating the interest level in using golf carts and what would be the most popular destinations.
Please take a few minutes to complete this survey and mail it to City Hall or you may drop it off at any
of the following locations: City Hall, Police Substation at Sunshine Park Mall or the Piggotte Center.
1). I currently own a golf cart for personal use:
Yes
No
2). My golf cart is equipped with (check all that apply):
___ Horn
___ Turn signals
___ Rearview mirror
___ Headlights
___ Brake lights
___ Tail lights or a tail lamp
___ Red reflectors in front
___ Red reflectors rear
___ Seat belts
___ Windshield
3). If the option to use a golf cart on City streets is
available I would consider purchasing a golf cart:
Very Likely Likely
Unlikely
Definitely Not
4). I would likely use a golf cart:
7). In which general zone do you live (1-16)?
REFER TO MAP ON OTHER SIDE ZONE #
8). I would use my golf cart to go to (check all that
apply): REFER TO MAP ON OTHER SIDE
A. South Daytona Elementary School
B. Piggotte Community Center
C. James Street Park
D. Magnolia Park
E. Melodie Park
F. Ned Wagner Park
G. City Hall
H. Sunshine Park Mall (Publix)
I. Riverfront Park
J. Reed Canal Park
K. Big Tree Ball Park
L. Big Tree Shopping Plaza
Other (please list)
Multiple times a day
Daily
1-3 times per week
3-6 Times per week
5). If I could use a golf cart after dark, I would be
willing to add lights and other safety equipment:
Yes
No
6). Golf cart drivers in my household would be (please
circle all applicable):
16-17
18–62
63 and over
Thank you for your participation!
If you will be mailing this back to City Hall, please fold twice,
using the guidelines on the other side, keeping the City Hall
address on the outside, tape closed and add postage.
CITY OF SOUTH DAYTONA
Golf Cart Survey
1672 S. Ridgewood Ave
South Daytona, FL 32119
Postage Here
Fold Line 2
Please indicate in which general ZONE you live. See #8 other side.
DESTINATIONS LEGEND
South Daytona Elementary School
Piggotte Community Center
James Street Park
Magnolia Park
Melodie Park
Ned Wagner Park
City Hall
Sunshine Park Mall
Riverfront Park
Reed Canal Park
Big Tree Ball Park
Big Tree Shopping Plaza
Fold Line 1
A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L. Appendix: Cart Travel Demand Map Series
ZONE 1
LEGEND:
# of Trips from So
Source
rce Zone
to Destination Zone
15
1-5
6-10
11-15
16 20
16-20
21-25
26-30
31-35
City of South Daytona
Golf Cart Transportation Analysis
N
Cart Travel Demand Map Series
Zone 1 - All Trips
Lassiter Transportation Group, Inc.
123 Live Oak Avenue – Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
Telephone: 386.257.2571 Fax: 386.257.6996 EB# 0009227
Appendix: Cart Travel Demand Map Series
ZONE 2
LEGEND:
# of Trips from So
Source
rce Zone
to Destination Zone
15
1-5
6-10
11-15
16 20
16-20
21-25
26-30
31-35
City of South Daytona
Golf Cart Transportation Analysis
N
Cart Travel Demand Map Series
Zone 2 - All Trips
Lassiter Transportation Group, Inc.
123 Live Oak Avenue – Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
Telephone: 386.257.2571 Fax: 386.257.6996 EB# 0009227
Appendix: Cart Travel Demand Map Series
ZONE 3
LEGEND:
# of Trips from So
Source
rce Zone
to Destination Zone
15
1-5
6-10
11-15
16 20
16-20
21-25
26-30
31-35
City of South Daytona
Golf Cart Transportation Analysis
N
Cart Travel Demand Map Series
Zone 3 - All Trips
Lassiter Transportation Group, Inc.
123 Live Oak Avenue – Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
Telephone: 386.257.2571 Fax: 386.257.6996 EB# 0009227
Appendix: Cart Travel Demand Map Series
ZONE 4
LEGEND:
# of Trips from So
Source
rce Zone
to Destination Zone
15
1-5
6-10
11-15
16 20
16-20
21-25
26-30
31-35
City of South Daytona
Golf Cart Transportation Analysis
N
Cart Travel Demand Map Series
Zone 4 - All Trips
Lassiter Transportation Group, Inc.
123 Live Oak Avenue – Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
Telephone: 386.257.2571 Fax: 386.257.6996 EB# 0009227
Appendix: Cart Travel Demand Map Series
ZONE 5
LEGEND:
# of Trips from So
Source
rce Zone
to Destination Zone
15
1-5
6-10
11-15
16 20
16-20
21-25
26-30
31-35
City of South Daytona
Golf Cart Transportation Analysis
N
Cart Travel Demand Map Series
Zone 5 - All Trips
Lassiter Transportation Group, Inc.
123 Live Oak Avenue – Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
Telephone: 386.257.2571 Fax: 386.257.6996 EB# 0009227
Appendix: Cart Travel Demand Map Series
ZONE 6
LEGEND:
# of Trips from So
Source
rce Zone
to Destination Zone
15
1-5
6-10
11-15
16 20
16-20
21-25
26-30
31-35
City of South Daytona
Golf Cart Transportation Analysis
N
Cart Travel Demand Map Series
Zone 6 - All Trips
Lassiter Transportation Group, Inc.
123 Live Oak Avenue – Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
Telephone: 386.257.2571 Fax: 386.257.6996 EB# 0009227
Appendix: Cart Travel Demand Map Series
ZONE 7
LEGEND:
# of Trips from So
Source
rce Zone
to Destination Zone
15
1-5
6-10
11-15
16 20
16-20
21-25
26-30
31-35
City of South Daytona
Golf Cart Transportation Analysis
N
Cart Travel Demand Map Series
Zone 7 - All Trips
Lassiter Transportation Group, Inc.
123 Live Oak Avenue – Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
Telephone: 386.257.2571 Fax: 386.257.6996 EB# 0009227
Appendix: Cart Travel Demand Map Series
ZONE 8
LEGEND:
# of Trips from So
Source
rce Zone
to Destination Zone
15
1-5
6-10
11-15
16 20
16-20
21-25
26-30
31-35
City of South Daytona
Golf Cart Transportation Analysis
N
Cart Travel Demand Map Series
Zone 8 - All Trips
Lassiter Transportation Group, Inc.
123 Live Oak Avenue – Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
Telephone: 386.257.2571 Fax: 386.257.6996 EB# 0009227
Appendix: Cart Travel Demand Map Series
ZONE 9
LEGEND:
# of Trips from So
Source
rce Zone
to Destination Zone
15
1-5
6-10
11-15
16 20
16-20
21-25
26-30
31-35
City of South Daytona
Golf Cart Transportation Analysis
N
Cart Travel Demand Map Series
Zone 9 - All Trips
Lassiter Transportation Group, Inc.
123 Live Oak Avenue – Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
Telephone: 386.257.2571 Fax: 386.257.6996 EB# 0009227
Appendix: Cart Travel Demand Map Series
ZONE 12
LEGEND:
# of Trips from So
Source
rce Zone
to Destination Zone
15
1-5
6-10
11-15
16 20
16-20
21-25
26-30
31-35
City of South Daytona
Golf Cart Transportation Analysis
N
Cart Travel Demand Map Series
Zone 12 - All Trips
Lassiter Transportation Group, Inc.
123 Live Oak Avenue – Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
Telephone: 386.257.2571 Fax: 386.257.6996 EB# 0009227
Appendix: Cart Travel Demand Map Series
ZONE 13
LEGEND:
# of Trips from So
Source
rce Zone
to Destination Zone
15
1-5
6-10
11-15
16 20
16-20
21-25
26-30
31-35
City of South Daytona
Golf Cart Transportation Analysis
N
Cart Travel Demand Map Series
Zone 13 - All Trips
Lassiter Transportation Group, Inc.
123 Live Oak Avenue – Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
Telephone: 386.257.2571 Fax: 386.257.6996 EB# 0009227
Appendix: Cart Travel Demand Map Series
ZONE 14
LEGEND:
# of Trips from So
Source
rce Zone
to Destination Zone
15
1-5
6-10
11-15
16 20
16-20
21-25
26-30
31-35
City of South Daytona
Golf Cart Transportation Analysis
N
Cart Travel Demand Map Series
Zone 14 - All Trips
Lassiter Transportation Group, Inc.
123 Live Oak Avenue – Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
Telephone: 386.257.2571 Fax: 386.257.6996 EB# 0009227
Appendix: Cart Travel Demand Map Series
ZONE 15
LEGEND:
# of Trips from So
Source
rce Zone
to Destination Zone
15
1-5
6-10
11-15
16 20
16-20
21-25
26-30
31-35
City of South Daytona
Golf Cart Transportation Analysis
N
Cart Travel Demand Map Series
Zone 15 - All Trips
Lassiter Transportation Group, Inc.
123 Live Oak Avenue – Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
Telephone: 386.257.2571 Fax: 386.257.6996 EB# 0009227
Appendix: Cart Travel Demand Map Series
ZONE 16
LEGEND:
# of Trips from So
Source
rce Zone
to Destination Zone
15
1-5
6-10
11-15
16 20
16-20
21-25
26-30
31-35
City of South Daytona
Golf Cart Transportation Analysis
N
Cart Travel Demand Map Series
Zone 16 - All Trips
Lassiter Transportation Group, Inc.
123 Live Oak Avenue – Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
Telephone: 386.257.2571 Fax: 386.257.6996 EB# 0009227
Appendix: Cart Travel Demand Map Series
ALL ZONES
WITH 1-5 TRIPS
1-5 Trips from Source Zone
to Destination Zone
City of South Daytona
Golf Cart Transportation Analysis
N
Cart Travel Demand Map Series
1-5 Trips Only for All Zone
Lassiter Transportation Group, Inc.
123 Live Oak Avenue – Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
Telephone: 386.257.2571 Fax: 386.257.6996 EB# 0009227
Appendix: Cart Travel Demand Map Series
ALL ZONES
WITH 6-10 TRIPS
6-10 Trips from Source Zone
to Destination Zone
City of South Daytona
Golf Cart Transportation Analysis
N
Cart Travel Demand Map Series
6-10 Trips Only for All Zone
Lassiter Transportation Group, Inc.
123 Live Oak Avenue – Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
Telephone: 386.257.2571 Fax: 386.257.6996 EB# 0009227
Appendix: Cart Travel Demand Map Series
ALL ZONES
WITH 11-15 TRIPS
11-15 Trips from Source Zone
to Destination Zone
City of South Daytona
Golf Cart Transportation Analysis
N
Cart Travel Demand Map Series
11-15 Trips Only for All Zone
Lassiter Transportation Group, Inc.
123 Live Oak Avenue – Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
Telephone: 386.257.2571 Fax: 386.257.6996 EB# 0009227
Appendix: Cart Travel Demand Map Series
ALL ZONES
WITH 16-20 TRIPS
16-20 Trips from Source Zone
to Destination Zone
City of South Daytona
Golf Cart Transportation Analysis
N
Cart Travel Demand Map Series
16-20 Trips Only for All Zone
Lassiter Transportation Group, Inc.
123 Live Oak Avenue – Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
Telephone: 386.257.2571 Fax: 386.257.6996 EB# 0009227
Appendix: Cart Travel Demand Map Series
ALL ZONES
WITH 21-25 TRIPS
21-25 Trips from Source Zone
to Destination Zone
City of South Daytona
Golf Cart Transportation Analysis
N
Cart Travel Demand Map Series
21-25 Trips Only for All Zone
Lassiter Transportation Group, Inc.
123 Live Oak Avenue – Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
Telephone: 386.257.2571 Fax: 386.257.6996 EB# 0009227
Appendix: Cart Travel Demand Map Series
ALL ZONES
WITH 26-35 TRIPS
City of South Daytona
Golf Cart Transportation Analysis
N
Cart Travel Demand Map Series
26-35 Trips Only for All Zone
Lassiter Transportation Group, Inc.
123 Live Oak Avenue – Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
Telephone: 386.257.2571 Fax: 386.257.6996 EB# 0009227
Appendix: Cart Travel Demand Map Series
City of South Daytona
Golf Cart Transportation Analysis
N
Cart Travel Demand Map Series
Lassiter Transportation Group, Inc.
123 Live Oak Avenue – Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
Telephone: 386.257.2571 Fax: 386.257.6996 EB# 0009227
Appendix: Cart Travel Demand Map Series
ALL ZONES
LEGEND:
# of Trips from So
Source
rce Zone
to Destination Zone
15
1-5
6-10
11-15
16 20
16-20
21-25
26-30
31-35
City of South Daytona
Golf Cart Transportation Analysis
N
Cart Travel Demand Map Series
All Trips for All Zones
Lassiter Transportation Group, Inc.
123 Live Oak Avenue – Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
Telephone: 386.257.2571 Fax: 386.257.6996 EB# 0009227