"'(;::'
puBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 4450
AWARD NO. 30
NMB CASE NO.
30
UNION CASE NO. c - 362 - 784
COMPANY CASE NO. 9202852
PARTIES TO THE DISPUTE:
UNION PACIFIC RAXLROAD COMPANY
Western Region
for the territory Los Angeles - Salt Lake City
- and BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
Claim of Engineer K. S. Schuh for 118 miles account
mishandling as shown on timeslip #520 dated May 20, 1992.
CMS
OPINION OF BOARD:
On May 20, 1992, Engineer K. W. Schuh held assignments on the
Engineer's extra board at LaGrande, Oregon.
was called in lIRelief Service II
board.
On that date Claimant
from his position on the extra
He reported for duty at 12: 00 PM to be transported eastward
to provide relief service for the road crew, OGRBA/15, which had
tied up under the Federal Hours of Service Law.
to LaGrande at approximately 3:50 PM.
Claimant returned
In the meantime the road
crew of the 2/0GRBA/15, had tied up at the station of North Powder
under the Federal Hours of Service Law.
Claimant was transported
Eastward from LaGrande to North Powder to provide relief service
for that road crew.
Claimant arrived back into LaGrande at 9:10 PM
and registered off duty at 10:10 PM.
The total on duty time in
AWARD NO. 30
NMB CASE NO. 30
UNION CASE NO. c - 362 - 784
COMPANY CASE NO. 9202852
2
"Relief Service" for which Claimant had been called was 10'10 11
•
Claimant submitted two (2) time slips, identified as Trip Slip
Nos. 520 and 520C on which he made claim on behalf of himself.
TRIP SLIP NO. 520
Covering the combination transport and
service trip LaGrande - North Powder
LaGrande, 3:50 PM to 10:10 PM.
139 miles
TRIP SLIP NO. 520C
118 miles
Penalty due to being required to dogcatch
two trains.
For the service performed on May 20,
1992,
Claimant requested
payment on Trip Slip Nos. 520 and 520Ca total of 257 miles.
The
Carrier's Timekeeper allowed Claimant a total of 117 miles, plus 2
hours 10 minutes overtime and declined payment of the additional
118 miles requested by Claimant as claimed on Trip Slip No. 520C.
The facts, rules and contract language presented for review in
this
case
are
identical
in
every
significant
presented and decided by the Board in Award 17.
~
(Seidenberg), NRAB 1-22873
5028-3
(Van Wort)
way with
See also PLB 1348-
(Dolnick), PLB 2703-10 (Ables), PLB
and PLB 4450. Awards 24,
25 and 27
For reasons set forth fully in the cited decisions,
likewise must be denied.
those
(Eischen).
this claim
AWARD NO. 30
NMB CASE NO. 30
UNION CASE NO. c - 362 - 784
COMPANY CASE NO. 9202852
3
AWARD
Claim denied.
~
-c ~===-=::::=--s:>~
Dana Edward- Eischen,
--
Cha~rman
-
Dated at Ithaca, New York on December 2. 1994
Union Member
Dated at
on
/2,/;61
_
Dated"t
on
.st:*~
IZ (
~
_