PIERS Proceedings, Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA, March 27–30, 2012 864 Shadowing Effect Analysis at Multiple Moving Persons Tracking by UWB Radar Daniel Urdzı́k1 , Rudolf Zetı́k2 , Dušan Kocur1 , and Jana Rovňáková1 1 Technical University of Košice, Košice, Slovak Republic Ilmenau University of Technology, Ilmenau, Germany 2 Abstract— Ultra wideband (UWB) radars appear as the suitable technology for detection and tracking of moving people in critical situations and hazardous environments. Our experiences with such applications of UWB radar systems have shown that for the multiple moving person detection and tracking, a single radar with a small antenna array is capable to detect very often the person moving closest to the radar antennas only, whereas the other target (persons) are usually not detected. This is a serious and unsolved problem of UWB radar applications for detection and tracking of multiple moving persons. In this paper, we will outline the results of the series of measurements with short range UWB radar which were dedicated for examination and quantitative description of this negative effect. 1. INTRODUCTION The short range UWB radar appears to be an attractive and perspective solution for the detection and localization purposes. The UWB radar system is the special type of noise radar and can be used to detect and track moving targets in critical environments with an advantage. One of the possibilities of the UWB radar systems is their use for the various security, rescue and surveillance applications (e.g., through wall and through fire detection and tracking of moving targets during police or military operations, protection of facilities with high industrial or financial importance etc.) Their primary advantage comes from the large bandwidth of the transmitted stimulation signals of up to several GHz (typically between 100 MHz and 5 GHz). The large bandwidth results in an excellent localization precision of such UWB devices and to the ability to penetrate many common materials (e.g., walls, rubble, non-metallic obstacles). Then, such devices are able to detect moving person by measuring changes in the impulse response of the environments [1]. For detection and tracking applications outlined above, the short range UWB devices (range up to 20–25 m) are usually applied. Our experiences with such applications of UWB radar systems have shown that at multiple moving person scenarios, that a single radar with a small antenna array is able to detect very often the person moving closest to the radar antennas only. The other target (persons) are also detected but usually with a small reliability or none at all. This degradation of radar performance can be explained in such a way that the person located in front of the radar antenna array acts as an obstacle and creates an area with high attenuation of the energy of the electromagnetic waves behind his/her (so-called shadowing person). The area with the additional attenuation is referred to as the shadow zone. The shadowing person absorbs and reflects the energy of electromagnetic waves transmitted by the radar transmitting antenna and/or reflected by the other targets and hence, only a negligible part of the energy of the electromagnetic waves reflected by the other targets can be received by the radar. The presence of such shadowing persons and hence the shadow zones cause that the radar eventually cannot detect and track any of the persons which are located within these zones. This effect is referred to as shadowing effect. The outlined problem of due to shadowing effect has been addressed for the first time in [2], where a qualitative analysis of shadowing effect has been described. The main contribution of this paper is the quantitative analyses of attenuation within the shadow zone due to the person localized in front of the radar transmitting antenna. 2. ANALYSIS OF SHADOWING EFFECT In order to analyze the additional attenuation caused by the shadowing person the series of measurements had to be performed. The measurements took place in an empty large room (corridor) with dimensions of 5.2 m by 2.6 m. The scenarios were chosen in such a way to examine the additional attenuation in the shadow zone and its spatial shape. The measurements were performed with the UWB pseudo-noise radar using maximum-length-binary-sequence (M-sequence) as the stimulus signal. The system clock frequency of the experimental M-sequence UWB radar was about 7 GHz, Progress In Electromagnetics Research Symposium Proceedings, KL, MALAYSIA, March 27–30, 2012 865 which resulted in the operational base band of about DC-3.5 GHz. The M-sequence order emitted by radar is 12, i.e., the impulse response covers 4095 samples regularly spread over 1170 ns. This corresponds to an observation window of 585 ns leading to an unambiguous range of about 47 m. The radar system was equipped with one transmitting (Tx) and one receiving (Rx) omnidirectional antenna. The radar data acquired by such radar device can be interpreted as a set of impulse responses of the environment [h(t, τ )], through which the emitted signals were propagated. They are aligned to each other creating 2D picture called radargram, where the vertical axis is related to the time propagationt of the impulse response and the horizontal axis is related to the observation time τ . The measurement of the spatial shape of the shadow zone and the values of attenuation within was performed according to the scheme of the measurement shown in Fig. 1. The transmitting antenna (Tx) was placed in the fixed position. The radar receiving antenna (Rx) was situated subsequently in the different positions P (y, x) within the investigated area. At each position, the impulse responses was measured by the antenna without the shadowing person. Then the shadowing person was situated in front of the radar transmitting antenna (P ) to analyze the influence of his/her presence. In this position the person was performing a uniform rotating movement along his/her body axis and hence the amount of electromagnetic waves reflected/absorbed by the person. The recorded radargram for each analyzed position of P (y, x) contained a set of impulse responses with and without the information about the presence of the shadowing person. In this manner there was total 55 positions of the investigated area analyzed. By computing the corresponding attenuation for each of the positions of P (y, x), we were able to derive the shape of the shadow zone. In order to compute the attenuation for one position of P (y, x) the power level of electromagnetic waves had to be calculated from all of the impulse responses of the radargram. Because the impulse responses acquired by the radar device contain only the information about the magnitude of the electromagnetic waves the power level was computed as follows: Z t2 [PL (τ )] = (h(t, τ ))2 dt. (1) t1 The symbol h(t, τ ) denotes the impulse responses of the radargram. The value of [PL (τ )] is one dimensional vector of calculated power level of electromagnetic waves for the different time instants of measurement. The power level calculated from all the impulse responses of one radargram is shown in the Fig. 2. The result obtained by the calculation of the power level contains two parts which corresponds to the measured time intervals. The first part enclosed by the green rectangle [PLDW (τ )]ττ21 , represents the values of calculated power level when there was no shadowing person present. The values in the blue rectangle denoted as [PLAW (τ )]ττ43 , represent the calculated power level of electromagnetic waves, while the person was present in front of the transmitting antenna and performing a uniform 1.4 1.2 Power [mW] 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Time of observation [s] Figure 1: Scheme of the measurement of the shadowing effect. Figure 2: Power level of the direct and attenuated wave. PIERS Proceedings, Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA, March 27–30, 2012 866 rotating movement along his/her body axis. Because of the values of the non-shadowed electromagnetic waves appear as nearly constant in measured time interval hτ1 , τ2 i, one representative value can be estimated from this interval: PLDW R = mean([PLDW (τ )]ττ21 ). (2) The level of additional attenuation is then evaluated as the logarithmic ratio of the mean power level of the direct wave and the values of power level of attenuated wave computed for the time instant τ : µ ¶ PLDW R PdB (τ ) = 10 log . (3) [PLAW (τ )]ττ43 From the values of PdB (τ ) which represent the additive attenuation at different time measured instants τ , four quantities were estimated as the representative values of attenuation. These values are estimated by these statistical functions: PdBM AX = max(PdB (τ )), PdBM IN = min(PdB (τ )), PdBM EAN = mean(PdB (τ )), (4) (5) (6) and PdBM EDIAN = median(PdB (τ )). (7) Hence we get four different representative values of additional attenuation for one position of the antenna in the investigated area. By computing the additional attenuation for all of the 55 measured positions in the shadow zone we were able to derive its exact shape and the levels of attenuation within. (a) (b) (c) (d) Figure 3: Experimental results of the measurement of the additional attenuation in the shadow zone. (a) PdBM AX . (b) PdBM IN . (c) PdBM EAN . (d) PdBM EDIAN . Progress In Electromagnetics Research Symposium Proceedings, KL, MALAYSIA, March 27–30, 2012 867 3. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS The experimental results show the values of additional attenuation measured at the height of antenna 1.15 m in the operational base band of UWB radar device of about DC-3.5 GHz. The results are displayed in the Cartesian coordinates to display the attenuation values at different positions in the shadow zone behind the shadowing person. The results show the four cases when the values of the additional attenuation in the investigated area was evaluated as the representation of four different statistical estimations PdBM AX , PdBM IN , PdBM EAN and PdBM EDIAN . From the presented results it can be seen that the person situated in front of the radar transmitting antenna causes significant levels of attenuations behind him/her. The additional attenuation within the shadow zone due to shadowing person can take on values from 1 to +12 dB. By closer inspection of the results it can be also seen that the significant levels of attenuation are focused close behind the shadowing person and are proportionally downsizing with the distance from the person. 4. CONSCLUSIONS The experimental results obtained by the measurements by UWB radar have confirmed presence of shadowing effect that is caused by a person located in front to the radar antenna apparatus. It was shown that a person situated in front of any of the antennas creates a zone with an additional attenuation within. The obtained results show that the shape of shadow zones is approximately in the shape of the trapezoid. In the most of analyzed cases it has been found that there is the correlation between the width if the shadow zone and the distance between the antenna and the shadowing person. However the shadow zone properties are needed to be investigated further from different aspects. With regard to these facts, shadowing effect has to be taken into account in the case of the design of radar systems for multiple moving person detection and tracking. Such solution could lie in the utilization of two or more UWB radar sensor units for multiple target detection and tracking or development of advanced signal processing methods for these purposes. ACKNOWLEDGMENT We support research activities in Slovakia/Project is co-financed from EU funds. This paper was developed within the Project “Centrum excelentnosti integrovaného výskumu a využitia progresı́vnych materiálov a technológiı́ v oblasti automobilovej elektroniky”, ITMS 26220120055. REFERENCES 1. Withington, P., H. Fluhler, and S. Nag, “Enhancing homeland security with advanced UWB sensors,” Microwave Magazine, IEEE, Vol. 4, No. 3, 51–58, Sep. 2003. 2. Kocur, D., J. Rovnáková, and D. Urdzı́k, “Mutual shadowing effect of people tracked by the short-range UWB radar,” The 34th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP 2011), 302–306, Budapest, Hungary, Aug. 2011.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz