Rheumatology 1999;38:1279–1281 Prevalences of hepatitis A, B, C and E viruses in Behçet’s disease K. Aksu, Y. Kabasakal, A. Sayıner1, G. Keser, F. Oksel, A. Bilgiç1, G. Gümüşdiş and E. Doǧanavşargil Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine and 1Clinical Microbiology, Ege University School of Medicine, Bornova, İzmir, Turkey Abstract Objective. To determine whether Behçet’s disease (BD), being a systemic vasculitis of unknown aetiology, is associated with hepatitis viruses (HAV, HBV, HCV and HEV ). Methods. In addition to 124 patients [male:female (M/F ): 73/51], all fulfilling the diagnostic criteria of the International Study Group for BD (1991), 14 patients with systemic necrotizing vasculitis (M/F: 7/7), 47 patients with ankylosing spondylitis (M/F: 36/11) and 51 healthy controls (M/F: 22/29) were also included in this study. Serological markers of four different types of hepatitis (anti-HAV IgM, total anti-HAV, HBsAg, anti-HBs, total anti-HBc, anti-HBc IgM, anti-HCV and anti-HEV ) were studied in all cases. Results. There was no difference between the groups with respect to HAV, HCV and HEV serologies. Anti-HBs positivity was observed less frequently in BD compared with healthy controls and systemic vasculitis (P < 0.05). Conclusion. Serological evidence of previous HAV, HCV and HEV infections was not significantly different between Behçet’s patients and other groups. However, previous HBV infection was found in a significantly lower number of BD patients as compared with healthy controls and systemic vasculitic patients. K : Behçet’s disease, Hepatitis A virus (HAV ), Hepatitis B virus (HBV ), Hepatitis C virus (HCV ), Hepatitis E virus (HEV ), Prevalence. Behçet’s disease (BD) is accepted as a vasculitis of unknown aetiology that affects vessels of different type, size and localization, and with exacerbation and remission periods. It is well known that some microorganisms, especially viruses, can be a triggering factor via soluble immune complexes in vasculitic diseases. In this respect, some hepatitis viruses are associated with vasculitis. As an example, an important percentage of polyarteritis nodosa patients have a history of previous hepatitis B (HBV ) infection [1]. The rate of mixed cryoglobulinaemia is increased in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV )-related chronic liver disease and in HCV carriers [2]. Until today, in BD, only the association with HCV has been investigated and no such relationship has been found. In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence of hepatitis A (HAV ), B, C and E (HEV ) viruses in BD. Materials and methods In this cross-sectional and descriptive study, medical records of 137 Behçet’s patients who applied to the Ege University rheumatology out-patient department between May 1996 and November 1998, meeting the Submitted 24 February 1999; revised version accepted 4 June 1999. Correspondence to: K. Aksu, 80 Sokak No: 27/3, 35040 Bornova, İzmir, Turkey. criteria of the International Behçet’s Disease Study Group, were evaluated. All these patients were invited by mail to participate in our study. Those refusing to take part in this study or who had a history of hepatitis A or B vaccination, blood transfusion and/or drug abuse were excluded from the study. A total of 124 Behçet’s patients eligible for our study [male/female (M/F ): 73/51)] were studied. Fourteen patients with systemic vasculitis (SV ) (M/F: 7/7) and 51 healthy controls (M/F: 22/29) were also included. Since BD was accepted as a spondyloarthropathy by some authors, 47 patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) (M/F: 36/11) were also included in the control group. The healthy control group was selected from age-compatible blood donors. Hospital staff were not included in healthy controls. We excluded patients with drug abuse, hepatitis A or B vaccination history and previous blood transfusion from our healthy controls. Sera were tested for total anti-HAV, anti-HAV IgM (AXSYM System, Abbott Diagnostics, USA), HbsAg, anti-HBc IgM and total anti-Hbc, anti-HBs (Organon Teknika, The Netherlands), anti-HCV ( UBI, III generation, United Biomedical Inc., USA) and anti-HEV (Abbott Diagnostics, USA) antibodies. Sera were also tested for HCV antibodies by third-generation line immunoassay (LiaTek, HCV III, Organon Teknika, The Netherlands) when results of the enzyme immunoassay were positive. HCV RNA was tested by reverse tran- 1279 © 1999 British Society for Rheumatology K. Aksu et al. 1280 scription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (Cobas Amplicor, Roche Diagnostic Systems, USA) in antibody-positive patients. The data were evaluated under SPSSWIN by Mann– Whitney U, Wilcoxon, Fisher’s exact test and Pearson analyses using a two-sided P value of <0.05 as the level of significance. Results There was no significant difference between Behçet’s, AS patients and healthy controls with respect to age and sex. However, since SV is seen in a considerably higher age group, the mean age of this group was significantly higher than that of the other three groups. Demographic features of the patients are shown in Table 1. Serological evidence of previous HAV, HBV and HEV infections was found to be positive in 117 (94%), 39 (31%) and 9 (7%) patients with BD, respectively ( Table 2). In this group of patients, HBsAg positivity was 4% (5/124). One patient was diagnosed as having acute HAV infection. An episode of venous thrombosis was documented in 27% (34/124) of Behçet’s patients, but no significant association was found between these patients and the other subjects with respect to the serological markers studied. Anti-HCV antibodies were found in one case only (0.8%), which was confirmed by line immunoassay test. HCV RNA was negative in this patient. The frequency of HCV antibody positivity in BD patients was not significantly different than in the SV groups. Serological findings indicated previous HAV infection in 93% (13/14) and HBV infection in 57% (8/14) of the patients with SV. Anti-HBs positivity was significantly increased in the SV group when compared with Behçet’s (P = 0.0219) and AS patients (P = 0.0098). There was no significant difference in the anti-HBs positivity between patients with SV and healthy controls. None of the patients with SV were HBsAg carriers or antiHEV positive. Even though there was only one patient with anti-HCV positivity in the SV group, the difference was not significant when compared with BD patients (P > 0.05). In the AS group, 95% (45/47) anti-HAV, 2% (1/47) anti-HEV, 23% (11/47) anti-HBc and anti-HBs positivity were found. Only one patient in this group was an HbsAg carrier, while no HCV positivity was detected. In the healthy control group, the rate of previous HAV infection was 93% and HBV infection was 47%. Anti-HEV positivity was detected in 8% of the subjects. There were 4% HBsAg carriers and none with anti-HCV positivity. The rate of previous HBV infection was significantly lower with respect to the control group, BD (P = 0.0428) and AS groups (P = 0.0211). No significant difference was found between the BD patients and the other study groups regarding HAV, HCV and HEV prevalences. Discussion In the literature, we could find only two studies investigating the relationship of BD and HCV infection. In the first study, Hamuryudan et al. [3] found no anti-HCV positivity among 13 BD patients with arterial and pulmonary aneurysms. In the second study, performed by Oǧuz et al. [4], anti-HCV positivity was detected in only one in 224 patients with BD. Being consistent with these previous studies, anti-HCV positivity in our study was also one in 124 BD patients (0.8%) and this frequency was not significantly different from other groups, including normal controls. In an epidemiological study investigating anti-HCV prevalence in a Turkish population, anti-HCV positivity was found to be between 0.3 and 1.8% among blood donors and healthy subjects [5]. On the other hand, we could find no study in the literature regarding the relationship of BD with HAV, HBV and HEV. HBV infection has been well known to contribute to the aetiopathogenesis of SV. Anti-HBs positivity, as evidence of previous HBV infection, was significantly higher in our SV group than the BD group. Since the mean age in the SV group was higher than in T 1. Demographic features of cases BD Number of cases Female/male Mean age Mean disease period (months) Systemic vasculitis 124 51/73 34 ± 9 (16–61) 63 ± 62 14 7/7 51 ± 16 (23–76) 6 ± 19 Healthy controls 51 29/22 35 ± 13 (15–65) – AS 47 11/36 37 ± 12 (16–69) 111 ± 103 T 2. Hepatitis serologies of all groups HBV BD AS SV Healthy controls HAV Total anti-HAV positivity (%) Anti-HBs positivity (%) HbsAg positivity (%) HCV Anti-HCV positivity (%) HEV Total anti-HEV positivity (%) 94 95 93 93 31 23 57 47 4 2 – 4 0.8 – 7 – 7 2 – 8 Behçet’s disease and hepatitis viruses the other three groups, these patients may have been exposed to HBV more frequently, which might explain their higher anti-HBs positivity rate. Several epidemiological studies performed in different parts of Turkey have reported anti-HBs prevalence to range between 20.6 and 56.3%, and the rate of the HBsAg carrier state to range between 3.9 and 12.5% [5]. Unfortunately, there was no study performed to search for the prevalence of anti-HBs positivity in İzmir and the central Aegean of Turkey, where the patient population of our study was living. Being a unique SV, BD may also be expected to have a significantly higher frequency of HBsAg positivity, compared with normal controls. However, this was not the case in our study. Since ethnic differences are considerably higher in different parts of Turkey, this might have affected our results. Remembering the anti-HBs positivity rates in different regions of Turkey, the anti-HBs positivity rate of our healthy controls (47%), which is actually higher than that of our Behçet’s group, is not unacceptably high. The reason why anti-HBs positivity in BD and AS was lower than in healthy controls can be speculated on in two ways. Thirty-two out of 85 patients with antiHbs-negative BD had been receiving azathioprine treatment (2 mg/kg/day), as well as moderate doses of prednisolone (0.25–0.5 mg/kg/day). There were even some patients receiving pulse cyclophosphamide treatment. Since immunosuppressive treatment interferes with humoral immunity, this might well contribute to the reduction in titres of antibodies against HBsAg in patients with BD. One of the mechanisms of transmission of HBV infection is sexual. Eighty-six per cent (n = 106) of our patients with BD had recurrent genital ulceration. Genital ulceration might well prevent these patients from having frequent sexual intercourse. HAV and HEV are both transmitted by the faecal–oral route. HEV can cause fulminant hepatitis in 1281 the course of pregnancy, but none of the patients were pregnant during the study. In Turkey, seroprevalences of HAV and HEV in adults were reported to be 90 and 6%, respectively [6 ]. Similar rates have also been found in our study. Regarding positive HAV and HEV serology, there was no significant difference between BD and all the other groups, including healthy controls. In conclusion, seroprevalences of HAV, HCV and HEV infections were not significantly different between Behçet’s patients and other groups including healthy controls. While there was no significant difference between Behçet’s patients and other groups with respect to HBsAg positivity, anti-HBs positivity in Behçet’s patients was significantly lower than in the SV group. We may conclude that, despite the well-known role of hepatitis viruses in SV, BD does not seem to be related to these viruses. References 1. Valente RM, Hall S, O’Duffy JD, Conn DL. Rheumatology. In: Kelley WN, Ruddy S, Harris ED, Sledge CB, eds. Vasculitic syndromes, 5th edn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1997:1079–122. 2. Gay Robert M Jr, Ball Gene V. Arthritis and allied conditions. In: Koopman WJ, ed. Vasculitis, 13th edn. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1997:1491–524. 3. Hamuryudan V, Sonsuz A, Yurdakul S. More on hepatitis C virus and Behçet’s syndrome. [Letter]. Münke H, Stöckmann F, Ramadori G [reply]. N Engl J Med 1995;333:322. 4. Oǧuz A, Sametoǧlu F, Erdoǧan S. More on hepatitis C virus and Behçet’s syndrome. [Letter]. Münke H, Stöckmann F, Ramadori G [reply]. N Engl J Med 1995;333:322. 5. Yenen OS. Infections diseases. In: Topçu AW, Söyletir G, Doǧanay M, eds. Viral hepatitis, 1st edn. Istanbul: Nobel Medical Bookstore, 1996:641–700. 6. Thomas DL, Mahley RB, Badur S, Palaoǧlu KE, Quinn TC. Epidemiology of hepatitis E virus infection in Turkey. Lancet 1993;341:1561–2.
© Copyright 2024 Paperzz