3.2 (SUMMARY) β GENERAL SOLUTIONS OF LINEAR EQUATIONS Consider the π-th order linear equation π¦ (π) + ππβ1 (π₯)π¦ (πβ1) + β β β + π1 (π₯)π¦ β² + π0 (π₯)π¦ = π (π₯), (1) where π0 , . . . , ππβ1 and π are continuous functions. Example. π¦ β²β²β² + π₯4 π¦ β²β² β 3π¦ β² + π¦ = sin(π₯). Theorem 2. (Existence and uniqueness) For each choice of numbers π, π0 , π1 , . . . , ππβ1 β β, there exists exactly one solution of (1) that satisο¬es the initial conditions π¦(π) = π0 , π¦ β² (π) = π1 , . . . , π¦ (πβ1) (π) = ππβ1 . Proof: omitted. Remark. To ο¬nd this solution, we ο¬rst have to treat the homogeneous (π = 0) equation (2) π¦ (π) + ππβ1 (π₯)π¦ (πβ1) + β β β + π1 (π₯)π¦ β² + π0 (π₯)π¦ = 0 Theorem 1. (Superposition) If π¦1 , . . . , π¦π are solutions of the homogeneous DE (2) and π1 , . . . , ππ β β then the linear combination π¦ = π1 π¦1 + β β β + ππ π¦π (3) is also a solution of the homogeneous DE. Proof: exercise. Note. Superposition is valid for (2), not for the nonhomogeneous DE (1). Example. If π¦1 and π¦2 are solutions of (2), then so is 5π¦1 β 3π¦2 . Theorem 4. (General solution) Every solution of the homogeneous DE (2) can be written as a linear combination (3) of the solutions π¦1 , . . . , π¦π , provided that π¦1 , . . . , π¦π are linearly independent. Proof: omitted. Thus we can call π¦ = π1 π¦1 + β β β + ππ π¦π the general solution of the homogeneous DE. Linear independence means that no one of π¦1 , . . . , π¦π is equal to a linear combination of the others. [When π = 2, this new deο¬nition of linear independence for π¦1 , π¦2 is the same as the old one, which says that neither π¦1 nor π¦2 is a multiple of the other.] Conclusion. We should ο¬rst try to ο¬nd π linearly independent solutions of the homogeneous equation (2). Then since every solution can be written as a linear combination of π¦1 , . . . , π¦π , we can ο¬nd the desired solution by applying the initial conditions to π¦ = π1 π¦1 + β β β + ππ π¦π and solving for the coeο¬cients π1 , . . . , ππ . Question. For constant coeο¬cient homogeneous equations, we ο¬nd solutions by π¦ = πππ₯ . Then the characteristic polynomial has degree π, so it has π roots (counting repeated roots and complex roots). So our guess π¦ = πππ₯ will yield π solutions π¦1 , . . . , π¦π of the DE (provided we deal properly with repeated roots; see Sec. 3.1 and 3.3). But are these solutions linearly independent. . . ??? 1 Problems (examinable) 1. Suppose π1 < π2 < π3 . Show that the functions π¦1 = ππ1 π₯ , π¦2 = ππ2 π₯ , π¦3 = ππ3 π₯ are linearly independent. 2. Suppose π1 < π2 < . . . < ππ . Show that the functions π¦1 = ππ1 π₯ , π¦2 = ππ2 π₯ , . . . , π¦π = πππ π₯ are linearly independent. 3. Let π β β. Show that π¦1 = πππ₯ , π¦2 = π₯πππ₯ , π¦3 = π₯2 πππ₯ are linearly independent. 4. Show that the functions π¦1 = sin π₯, π¦2 = sin(2π₯) are linearly independent. Remark. By arguments like above, one can show that the π solutions of a constant coefο¬cient homogeneous linear equation that we ο¬nd by trying π¦ = πππ₯ will always be linearly independent. Wronskians β donβt use them! The textbook develops a method for checking linear independence of π¦1 , . . . , π¦π by using the Wronskian. This clever method relies on matrix algebra and the Existence and Uniqueness Theorem (or on other deep arguments). We will not use Wronskians in this course. Instead we emphasize the meaning of linear independence (that no one function can be written as a linear combination of the others, like in the Problems above).
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz