ARYL-β-C-LOCKED NUCLEIC ACID AS UNIVERSAL HYBRIDIZATION PROBES1 B Ravindra Babu and Jesper Wengel Nucleic Acid Center, Department of Chemistry, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5230, Odense M, Denmark Universal bases are able to bind isoenergically with each of the natural nucleotides. Almost all Universal bases reported are DNA analogues, which are known to adopt S-type furanose conformation predominantly due to the lack of an anomeric effect. A series of Aryl-2’-O,4’-C-methylene-ß-D-ribofuranosides, which are known to preorganise in locked C3’-endo (N-type) RNA like furanose conformation, were synthesised to study the effect of structural organisation on universal hybridization. OH OH OH Base Base Base O HO O O HO OH OH S-type conformation (B-form duplexes) Selective irradiation of the H3’ proton of compounds 13a-13e gave enhancement of signals of the aromatic aglycon (3.0% for 13a, 2.7% for 13b, 6.2% for 13c, 7.0% for 13d and 6.8% for 13e) which confirms the cis-positioning of the H3’-proton and the aglycon on the furanose ring and furthermore supports an Ntype furanose conformation. In addition, a single-crystal X-ray diffraction study was performed of the phenyl analogue 14a. O N-type conformation (A-form duplexes) Molecular structure (ORTEP-plot) of the Phenyl bicyclic C-glycoside14a. Locked Nucleic Acid (N-type conformation) Thermal denaturation studies Introduction A Universal base analogue forms base pairs with each of the natural DNA/RNA bases with little discrimination. Most of these analogues are non-hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic, aromatic bases which stabilize duplex DNA by stacking interactions.2 Such bases have attracted much attention due to their potential utility in the design of oligonucleotide primers or hybridization probes when the identity of one or more base in the target sequence is unknown. Promising universal bases with a 2-deoxy-β-D-ribofuranosyl moiety have been reported, e.g. 3-nitropyrrole, 5-nitroindole, isocarbostyril, 8-aza-7-deazaadenine and pyrene derivatives.2 There has been some success in the design of universal base analogues but examples which are able to hybridize without significant duplex destabilization are rare. Moreover, all of the universal bases that have been described are DNA analogues and very little work has been reported on ribonucleosides. Stimulated by the work of Kool and collaborators on hybridization using non-polar aromatic moieties as replacements of the natural bases3 and the desire to obtain improved binding affinity for universal hybridization,2 we became interested in studying LNA-type derivatives of aryl C-nucleosides containing various planar aromatic moieties as aglycons. The furanose ring of LNA (locked nucleic acid) monomeric nucleotide is known to be locked in North (3E) RNA like furanose conformation and it is characterized by very high binding affinity and efficient Watson-Crick discrimination when hybridized with single stranded DNA or RNA targets.4 5’-d(GTGAXATGC) DNA target 3’-d(CACTYTACG) X Ar A C G T 12 5 6 7 15 7 6 8 ON3 (17c) 15 7 6 9 ON4 (17d) 18 17 18 19 ON5 (17e) 13 6 6 7 ON6 (Abasic LNA) <3 - - - Reference (X=T) 28 11 12 ON1 (17a) F ON2 (17b) 19 14 • LNA-type C-glycoside monomers (17a-e, ON1-ON5) stabilize the duplex when compared to corresponding LNA-type abasic monomer (ON6) . • Unlike Phenyl-RNA monomer10, the Phenyl-LNA monomer (17a) didn’t behave in universal way, but showed preference for Adenine. • Similar results were obtained for the 4-fluoro-3-methylphenyl (17b), 1-naphthyl (17c) and 2,4,5-trimethylphenyl (17e) derivatives (ON2,ON3, and ON5). • The pyrenyl LNA nucleotide 17d displays more encouraging properties in relation to universal hybridization (Tm values all being within 17-19 oC). Extensively studied Universal base O HO N N O NO2 NO2 NH N HO O OH N HO N O Hypoxanthine deoxyribofuranoside (naturally occuring DNA) 6 N N O O OH 5-Nitroindole deoxyribofuranoside (destabilizing, Tm~2-5 oC) 3-Nitropyrrole deoxyribofuranoside (destabilizing, Tm~11-14 oC) • not indiscriminate in all sequence context • non.analysable data in primers containing multiple substitution HO OH OH 5 N 7 Isocarbostyril deoxyribofuranoside (destabilizing, Tm~2 oC) 8 In order to study the effect of the LNA-type β-C-aryl nucleotide monomers in A-type duplexes we synthesized ON7-ON9. The reference strand which, being composed entirely of 2’-OMe-RNA monomers, is known to structurally mimic an RNA strand.15 As mentioned above, increased binding affinity of universal hybridization probes is considered important and we therefore constructed ON7-ON9 as a mixture of six 2’-OMe-RNA monomers, one central LNA-type β-C-aryl glycoside monomer (17b, 17c or 17d), and two affinity-enhancing LNA thymine monomers TL. H N H N HO O HO N HO O OH OH 8-Aza-7-deazaadenine deoxyribofuranoside9 (Hydrogen bonding base analogue) OH The pyrenyl LNA nucleotide [∆Tm ~ -10 oC for 17d (ON5 relative to ON1)] is more destabilizing when compared to a pyrenyl DNA monomer11 [∆Tm ~ -5 oC]. It therefore appears that stacking (or intercalation) by the pyrene moiety is disfavoured by conformationally locking the furanose ring into an N-type (3E) conformation. However, comparison of the thermal stabilities of ON1, ON2, ON3 and ON5 with ON4 strongly indicates some productive interaction of the pyrenyl moiety with the helix, e.g. intercalation. O OH Pyrenyl ß-C-deoxyribofuranoside11 (destabilizing, Tm~5 oC) Phenyl-ß-C-ribofuranoside10 (destabilizing, Tm~16 oC) 5’-d(GOMeTLGOMeAOMeXAOMeTLGOMeCOMe) DNA target 3’-d(CACTYTACG) X Ar A C G T ON7 (17b) 31 25 26 27 ON8 (17c) 34 27 27 32 39 38 37 40 35 14 19 21 Synthesis of Aryl-2’-O,4’-C-methylene-ß-D-ribofuranosides F The key intermediate, aldehyde 11, was synthesized from the known furanoside 112 following two different routes. Coupling of the aldehyde 11 with different aryl Grignard reagents yielded stereoselectively one epimer of each of the compounds 12a-12e in good yields13. Subsequently, cyclization, debenzylation, dimethoxytritylation followed by phosphitylation afforded the phosphoramidite building blocks 16a-16e in satisfactory yields. O O i, ii O HO HO HO iii O O HO O O MPMO MsO iv O HO MPMO O 1 O MsO MPMO O O MsO v O 5’-d(G O MsO MPMO O 2 ON9 (17d) OMe OMe T OMe G OMe OMe A T OMe OMe A T G OMe OMe C ) OCH3 OH o Melting temperatures (Tm values/ C) measured as the maximum of the first derivative of the melting curve (A260 vs temperature) recorded in medium salt buffer (10 mM sodium phosphate, 100 mM sodium chloride, 0.1 mM EDTA, pH 7.0) using 1.5 µM concentrations of the two strands; A = adenin-9-yl monomer, C = cytosin-1-yl monomer, G = guanin-9-yl monomer, T = thymin-1-yl; AOMe, COMe, GOMe, TOMe are corresponding 2’-OMe-RNA monomers and TL = LNA thymine monomers. 3 ix vi MPMO MPMO v O MsO MPMO MsO MPMO 10 MPMO iv O OCH3 OH O 9 vi MsO O HO MPMO O O OCH3 O O 8 4 The Aryl-C-bicyclic nucleosides 14a-e were evaluated for antiviral activity16 against HIV-1 in MT-4 cells and were found to be inactive against HIV-1 at 300µM. vii MPMO Ar OH OH xi O MPMO MPMO x OH HO OCH3 O MPMO O OCH3 viii AcO O 6 OCH3 O MPMO O MPMO 7 11 12 ix O O O MPMO MPMO 5 xii MPMO Ar O O MPMO 13 xiii HO Ar O xiv, xv DMTO HO 14 Ar O O N O P xvi O 16 O O Ar O O O P O 12-17 a b c d e O 17 Ar phenyl 4-fluoro-3-methylphenyl 1-naphthyl 1-pyrenyl 2,4,5-trimethylphenyl CN Reagents and conditions (and yields): i. p-methoxybenzyl chloride, NaH, DMF (90%), ii. 80% aq. acetic acid (72%), iii a) sodium periodate, THF, H2O; b) formaldehyde, aq NaOH (1M), THF (88%), iv MsCl, pyridine (2: 93%; 9: 89%) v. H2O, HCl, CH3OH (1:1.5:8.5) (3: 86%; 10: 74%), vi. NaH, DMF [4: major isomer (74%) + minor isomer (13%); synthesis of 7 from 10: 85%], vii. KOAc, dioxane, 18-crown-6 (91%; 85%), viii. saturated methanolic ammonia (88%; 92%), • Preferential hybridization towards the target DNA containing the central adenine monomer for the 4-fluoro-3-methylphenyl (17b) and 1-naphthyl (17c) monomers, and universal hybridization for the pyrenyl monomer (17d) (Tm values for ON9: 37-40 oC towards the four targets). • The affinity-enhancing effect of the LNA thymine monomer TL is reflected in the satisfactory thermal stabilites obtained for ON7-ON9. O MPMO ix. p-methoxybenzyl chloride, NaH, THF [(synthesis of 7 from 6: 80%; 69%); 8:52%] x. 50% aq acetic acid (82%), xi. ArMgBr, THF (12a: 88%; 12b: 85%, 12c: 95%); 12d: 89%; 12e: 88%), xii. TMAD, Bu3P, C6H6 (13a: 77%; 13b: 84%; 13c: 78%; 13d: 79%; 13e: 80%), xiii. DDQ, CH2Cl2, H2O (14a: 66%; 14b: 67%; 14c: 67%; 14d: 75%; 14e: 65%), xiv. DMTCl, pyridine (15a: 71%; 15b: 61%; 15c: 60%; 15d: 61%; 15e: 78%), xv. NC(CH2)2OP(Cl)N(i-Pr)2, EtN(i-Pr)2, CH2Cl2 (16a: 66%; 16b: 66%; 16c: 60%; 16d: 68%; 16e: 63%), xvi. DNA synthesizer Conclusion • Synthesis of a series of LNA-type β-configured C-aryl nucleosides has been accomplished as has their efficient incorporation into short DNA and 2’-OMe-RNA/LNA strands using the phosphoramidite approach. • It has been shown that universal hybridization is achievable with a conformationally restricted monomer as demonstrated for the pyrene LNA monomer 17d, both in a DNA context (ON4) and in an RNA-like context (ON9). • Importantly, the problem of decreased affinity of the known universal hybridization probes can be solved by the incorporation of high-affinity monomers, e.g. 2’-OMe-RNA and/or LNA monomers Acknowledgements We thank the Danish Research Agency, the Danish National Research Foundation and Exiqon A/S for financial support. Ms Britta M. Dahl is thanked for oligonucleotide synthesis, and Dr Carl E. Olsen for MALDI-MS analyses. References: 1. 2. 3. 4. Babu, B. R.; Wengel, J. Chem. Commun. 2001, 2114; Babu, B. R.; Prasad, A. K.; Trikha, S.; Thorup, N.; Parmar, V. S.; Wengel, J. J. Chem.Soc., Perkin Trans 1 in press. Loakes, D. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29, 2437 and references cited therein. Kool, E. T.; Morales, J. C.; Guckian, K. M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 990 and references cited therein. Meldgaard, M.; Wengel, J. J. Chem.Soc., Perkin Trans 1 2000, 3539 and references cited therein. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Ohtsuka, E.; Matsuki, S.; Ikehara, M.; Takahashi, Y.; Matsubara, K. J. Biol. Chem. 1985, 260, 2605. Nichols, R.; Andrews, P. C.; Zhang, P.; Bergstrom, D. E. Nature 1994, 369, 492. Loakes, D.; Brown, D. M. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22, 4039. Berger, M., Wu, Y.; Ogawa, A. K.; McMinn, D. L.; Schultz, P. G.; Romesberg, F. E. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 2911. Seela, F.; Debelak, H. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 3224. Macmillan, T. A.; Mock, G. A.; Chauncey, M. A.; Patel, T.P.; Eaton, M.; Gunning, J.; Cutbush, S. D.; Neidle, S.; Mann, J. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984, 12, 7435. 11. 12. 13. 14 15. 16. Matray, T. J.; Kool, E. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6191. Yamaguchi, R.; Imanishi, T.; Kohgo, S.; Horie, H.; Ohrui, H. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1999, 63, 736. Hari, Y.; Obika, S.; Sakaki, M.; Morio, K.; Yamagata, Y.; Imanishi, Y. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 3051 Kværnø, L.; Wengel, J. Chem. Commun. 1999, 657. Blommers, M. J.; Pieles, U.; De Mesmaeker, A. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22, 4187 Danel, K.; Pedersen, E. B.; Nielsen, C. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 191.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz