ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
FOR THE PROPOSED
NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN
(De Beers Pass Section)
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
SCOPING: COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
NOVEMBER 2010
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONT ENT S..................................................................................................................... 2
SECT ION 1:
COMMEN TS SUBMITTED IN WRIT IN G BY I&APS (FAX/EMAIL/POST)................... 4
SECT ON 2:
COMMEN TS RAISED AT THE INFORMATION SHARING SESSIONS................... 92
SECT ION 3:
COMMEN TS RAISED AT THE KEY STAKEH OLDER AND AUTHORITIES
MEETING ............................................................................................................. 104
SECT ION 4:
COMMEN TS RAISED AT FOCUS GROUP MEETINGS ....................................... 105
- Emnambithi/Ladysmith Local Municipality........................................................105
- Mr Earl Leathern (Ladysmith & District Farmers Association)...........................106
- Harrismith Business Forum............................................................................107
SECT ION 5:
COMMEN TS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DU RING THE R OU TE LOCAT ION
INITIATIVE PROCESS 2008/2009 ........................................................................ 108
2
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
1. Purpose of the Comments and Response Report
The purpose of the Comments and Response Report (CRR) is to create a single document that fullfills the
following objectives:
 To provide a formal record of all comments raised to date.
 To provide a manageable and easy-to read document to a wide audience that includes N3TC, the
Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA) and importantly Interested and Affected Parties (I&APs).
 To provide a report that allows for checks and balances necessary to ensure that comments raised by
I&APs have been considered and, where applicable, addressed by the EIA Team.
2. Source of comments raised by Interested and Affected Parties
Various opportunities were afforded to I&APs to participate during the Scoping. The various sources of the
comments contained in this CRR include:





Section 1 - Comments faxed, e-mailed and mailed.
Section 2 - Records of Information Sharing Sessions.
Section 3 - Record of Key Stakeholders and Authorities’ Meeting.
Section 4 - Records of Focus Group Meetings.
Section 5 - Comments raised by landowners during the Route Location Initiative process.
3. Summary of Key Issues
The key issues that have been raised are summarised in Table 1. The detailed comments received are
tabulated in the sections that follow.
3
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
Table 1- Summary of Key Issues
No
Key Issue
1
Ecological Impacts and Biodiversity Conservation
 Negative impacts on Red Data bird species, reptiles especially
the Sungazer lizard and amphibians.
 The road will impact on wetlands along the DBPR and
Alternative B, particularly in the area of the upper Wilge River
and its tributaries that are currently are in a good ecological
condition.
 Increased erosion.
 Threatened and endemic fauna should not be detrimentally
affected.
 Impacts on ecosystem functioning and habitat connectivity
should be mitigated.
2
3
Air Quality
 Increase in vehicles which will result in increased pollution and
increased carbon emissions and detrimental to climate change
Response

The specialist studies have considered the
various issues raised in respect to ecological
and biodiversity impacts. Where significant
impacts have been identified, various mitigation
measures have been developed and are
included in the EMP. Where it was deemed that
mitigation could be less than effective, additional
deviations have been considered to avoid or
lesson such impacts.

The DBPR will attract more of the current vehicle
stream because of its shorter distance and much
gentler alignment. Hence traffic volumes will be
split equitability between the DBPR and the
existing R103 roughly in a 70/30 ratio. Because
of lower traffic volumes on the longer and less
efficient R103 route overall carbon emission will
be reduced. The specialist air quality study
estimate a carbon emission reduction of 16%
compared to the existing N3/R103.
Climatic Conditions
 At high altitudes, the mist levels become thick and almost
impenetrable; this poses a major safety threat on roads
 High wind levels pose threats in terms of fires
4
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
Key Issue
4
Job creation and economic opportunities
 Opportunities for job creation during construction.
 Potential loss of jobs for garage workers.
 Loss of employment in Harrismith town.

5
Response

The Local and Regional Economic Impact Study
has investigated the various impacts on the
affected towns namely Van Reenen, Harrismith
and Warden. The study indicates that during the
construction period there will be increased
economic activity in the affected towns due to
the demand for goods and services by the
contractors and their support staff. At the same
time job opportunities for local inhabitants will be
created by the project. The perceived job losses
or jobs at risk which are reliant on transient
traffic on the N3 pertain to a finite amount in the
goods and services sector. The jobs at risk have
been quantified and the study indicates that
these are in fact displaced jobs in that the new
road will create additional job opportunities. The
macroeconomic impact study states the
estimated job creation opportunity of the project,
the benefits to the economy, positive fiscal
impact, income to households etc. (Harrismith
30, Van Reenen 10 etc)

See above. The Social Study has considered the
various issues raised and where significant
impacts have been identified, various mitigation
measures have been developed.
Impact on growth of Warden
Social and socio-economic issues
 Benefits associated with the upgrading of roads in the area and
upgrading of living standards.
 Social and financial impacts at Swinburne, Harrismith and Van
Reenen.
 Harrismith is a transport hub and of regional importance.
 Potential increase in crime rate due to loss of jobs (should N3 be
less busier).
 Impact of access road closures on N3.
5
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
Key Issue
6
Land tenure and compensation
 Expropriation of land.
 Impact on property values.
 Opportunities for land swap with SANRAL for land previously
expropriated.
7
8
Tourism Impacts
 Impact on the value of the property Sungazer Paradise Holiday
House Development
 Destruction of landscape in the study area which has tourism
potential
 Impact on De Angelus Estate
 Impact of the road running at the foot of the Platberg Nature
Reserve
 Inability to market holiday destinations based on the immaculate
views as highway would distract the aesthetic value of the
tourism developments.
Noise
 Noise is great aggravation in Van Reenen
 Highway noise is a concern for landowners residing within close
proximity of the proposed routes and the perceived impact on
livestock feeding patterns
Response

Refer to SANRAL Act 7 of 1998. All land
required for road reserves must be acquired in
terms of Act 7 which is on a willing seller willing
buyer basis. Where land is expropriated
compensation on fair market value must be paid.
The land required for the DBPR has already
been acquired and is owned by SANRAL.

The De Beers pass route is likely to enhance
property
values
and
other
proposed
developments:
o
New accessibility to a very attractive area of
South Africa, is likely to increase tourism
and tourism potential.
o
DBPR will not impact negatively on De
Angelus Estate or the Sungazer Paradise
Holiday House Development whereas all the
alternative alignments will have significant
negative impacts on them. In fact the DBPR
is likely to have a significant positive impact
on these developments as a result of easier
access.

As above
6
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
Key Issue
Response
9
Tolling
 The negative impact of construction of tollgate in towns
(Harrismith and Warden).

There will be no additional toll plazas for the
DBPR.

Refer to SANRAL mandate as per the Act. There
has been discussion and interaction with
Transnet and the FDM results have been shared
and indicate that there will still be demand for
increased road infrastructure capacity. Historic
growth rates indicate that road transport will still
be significant and be required, and that
assuming 100% rail friendly freight capture, the
current road (R103/N3) will reach full capacity.
Therefore, for mobility and safety the project will
need to be implemented.

The DBPR will not cause significant loss to
cultivated farm land as the road reserve had
been acquired in the 1990’s. The improved
access to the land is likely to increase the land
10
Strategic Planning Issues
 The potential negative impact of the DBPR on the Transport
Logistics Infrastructure Facility planned to be located in
Harrismith.
 Holistic approach to create transportation facilities for goods and
people between KZN and Gauteng.
 Reduce road traffic and improve rail.
 Railway is an environmentally friendly option which is
underdeveloped.
 Money that will be spent on highway extension should be
redirected to improving the railway network.
11
Technical (construction and operational issues)
 Upgrading of interchanges on National Road 3
 The law is not specific regarding who is responsible for the
maintenance of the fence along the N3
 Impact on local economy due to loss of livestock as a result of
negligence, vehicles broken barrier fencing and the delays in
repairing of fences (livestock roam out onto highways also
presenting a safety hazard to road users)
 Burning and maintenance of firebreaks
12
Agriculture and farming operations
 Loss of agricultural land and impact on economic viability
 Inability of farmers to compete with construction companies’
high salaries which attract landowner’s best labourers
 Reduced food production due to loss of land
7
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
Key Issue
 Farm accesses and entrances alongside N3
 Right of way for farmers and/or existence of cattle passes
 Impact on boreholes and windmills being cut off by highway
impacting on farming activities
 Stock theft due to ease of access to farms
 Increase in theft of commercial livestock due to introduction of
more contractors during construction
13
Cultural Heritage Resource Management
 Palaentology of the area is significant
 Impact of the development on the heritage resources
 Impact on ancestral graves
14
Project Alternatives (road alignments)
 Investigate western bypass
 Van Reenen cannot handle additional traffic
 Alignment of Alternative A and impact on Platberg Nature
Reserve (annual marathon route goes through this reserve)
 Compliance to standard crossing requirements and conditions
for the NMPP Pipeline
Response
values and increase production by significantly
reducing supply chain costs (reduced transport
input/output costs)
 There will be no at grade accesses on the
DBPR. Access to the DBPR will be provided at
interchanges such as between Warden and
Villiers

The DBPR will facilitate the preservation of
Palaentological and Heritage finds in the area.
All requirements in respect of the Heritage Act
will be adhered to.

The DBPR is not a by-pass to Harrismith. It is
the
completion
of
the
N3
between
Keeversfontein (Tugela Plaza) and Warden. The
DBPR is located about 24 km Northeast of
Harrismith (roughly have the distance to
Warden)
All of the alternatives cannot meet and satisfy
the needs and desirability of the DBPR, in
particular they cannot provide a significantly
shorter route nor can they provide and
alternative when one route is blocked
Alternative A and variations thereof will impact
negatively on the Van Reenen Village and the
Platberg Nature Reserve


8
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
Key Issue
15
Borrow Pits
 Location of the Borrow Pits for the road
 Processes for rehabilitation of borrow pits after completion of
construction
16
17
EIA Process (technical)
 Clear motivation and rationale for the proposed road
 A qualified archaeologist or any relevant heritage specialist must
be appointed to identify and assess potential archaeological
sites and material, and other resources such as graves and
buildings older than 60 years
 It is perceived that the ownership of land by SANRAL on DBPR
will affect the decision-making process
 Consideration of cumulative impacts on river catchments which
may impact the provision of water quality
EIA Process (public participation)
 The process needs to be transparent
 All Interested and affected parties should be represented in the
process.
 The public should be given opportunities to comment on the
proposed development and be updated on the progress of
project
 Messages communicated by SANRAL, Department of Transport
(National) and the EIA team about the De Beers Pass Route to
the public should not be contradictory.
Response

Borrow pits and Quarries will be identified,
investigated and environmental and other
approvals obtained during the detail design and
implementation phase

The Scoping and EIA process followed meets
the requirements of the relevant NEMA
legislation and regulations as amended

All the requirements for public participation as
stipulated by the relevant legislation and
regulations will be adhered to or acceded
9
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
1.
SECTION 1:
COMMENTS SUBMITTED IN WRITING BY I&APS
(FAX/EMAIL/POST/BY HAND)
No
Name
Organisation
1
Mr AW Bechman
Something Small Gift Shop/ Warden and Ezenzeleni
2
Mr Mezbauddin Bhuiyan
Supavalu - 2 (Warden)
3
Mr JH Bosch
Platberg Reserve
4
Mr Diederik Bouckaert
Pt 1 Farm Das Krantz Nr 6
5
Mr John Bristow
Scheurklip Conservancy
6
Mr Alastair Campbell
Uithoek – R/E of Farm Uithoek 460
7
Mr Isaac Cebekhulu
Greater Harrismith Socio Economic Development Forum
8
Mr James Cebekhulu
Community member (Warden)
9
Ms Thandazo Cebekhulu
Community member (Warden)
10
Ms Hleliphi Cebekhulu
ANC
11
Miss Lanying Chen
Community member (Warden)
12
Miss Malefu Cindi
Community member (Warden)
13
Mr Nacelle B Collins
Free State Department of Economic Development, Tourism and
Environmental Affairs
14
Mr Sam Cronje
Next C&IS (Pty) Ltd
15
Mr Uys L de Jager
Franshoek Est., Harrismith
16
Mr Bernard Deysel
Highway Group
17
Mr Shadrack Dhladla
Community member (Warden)
18
Mr Mandla Dhlalisa
Community leader (Warden)
19
Mr Bongani Dlamini
Community member (Warden)
20
Mr Khulu E Dlamini
ANCYL
21
Miss Thulisile Dlamini
Community member (Warden)
22
Mr S Dladla
Community member (Warden)
23
Mr Lucky Duma
Community member (Warden)
24
Mr JS du Plessis
N3 Access Property Owners
25
Mr Jannie du Plessis
Interested and Affected Party (Harrismith)
26
Mr Pierre du Plessis
Bergview Complex
27
Mr PG du Plessis
PG Building and Civil Engineering
28
Mr HL du Plooy
HC du Plooy Plant
29
Dr J du Toit
Marathon Club
30
Mr Omar Faruk
Warden Mini Market
31
Mr CMJ Fouche
Maluti-a-Phofung Local Municipality
32
Miss Sibongile Gama
Community member (Warden)
33
Ms EN Gamede
Interested and Affected Party
34
Mr G O Gary
Shell SA Marketing (Pty) Ltd
35
Mr Mathew George
Teacher (Warden)
10
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
Name
Organisation
36
Dr Gideon Groenewald
Metsi Metseng Geological Services
37
Mr MT Hadebe
Transnet Pipelines
38
Mr Mlondolozi Hadebe
Community member (Warden)
39
Mr Siyabonga Hadebe
Community member (Warden)
40
Mr Pat Hadebe
Community member (Warden)
41
Ms Nomahlubi Hadebe
Community member (Warden)
42
Mr George Hadebe
Community member (Warden)
43
Mr Petros Hadebe
Community member (Warden)
44
Mrs Nobelungu Hadebe
Community member (Warden)
45
Mr Nkosinathi Hadebe
Community member (Warden)
46
Mrs Thembelihle Hadebe
ANC (Warden)
47
Ms Sbongile Hadebe
ANC (Warden)
48
Mr Phakamane Hadebe
Community member (Warden)
49
Mrs MMJ Harris
Green Lantern Inn, Van Reenen
50
Ms CL Henderson
BirdLife South Africa
51
Ms CL Henderson
BirdLife South Africa
52
Mr Sguqa Hlongwane
Community member (Warden)
53
Mr Skwelete Hlongwane
Community member (Warden)
54
Ms Elsie Hlongwane
Community member (Warden)
55
Mr Graham Hobbs
Meijer’s Geluk and Schaapdrift Farms
56
Mrs Margaret Hobbs
Meijer’s Geluk and Schaapdrift Farms
57
Mr Cas Human
Reality Dynamic (Pty) Ltd/Highland Farm Estate
58
Mr CF Cornelius Jacobs
N3 Farm Accesses
59
Mr Mkiti Jele
Community member (Warden)
60
Mr Francois Joubert.
Infrastructure Consulting Engineers/Total SA
61
Ms Mdake Julia
Community member
62
Mr PR Kameel
Community member (Warden)
63
Mr RS Kau
Maluti-a-Phofung Local Municipality
64
Ms Jane Khanye
ANC
65
Mr Madoda Khathide
Emnambithi/Ladysmith Local Municipality
66
Ms Rebecca Kheswa
Community Leader (Warden)
67
Ms Lucy Kheswa
Community Leader (Warden)
68
Mr Sam Owen Kheswa
Community member (Warden)
69
Mr Martin Kheswa
Community Leader (Warden)
70
Miss Mitshidiso Kgwasi
Community member (Warden)
71
Miss Maci Khumalo
Community member (Warden)
72
Mrs Nomasonto Khumalo
Community member (Warden)
73
Ms Celiwe Khumalo
Community member (Warden)
74
Miss Mankomo Khumalo
Community member (Warden)
75
Mr Sifiso Khoza
Community member (Warden)
11
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
Name
Organisation
76
Mr K Karen Kohler
Tourism KwaZulu-Natal
77
Cllr LM Kleinhans
Maluti-a-Phofung Local Municipality
78
Mrs A Kleynhans
Interested and affected Party (Harrismith)
79
Ms Jeanet M Komako
Community member (Warden)
80
Miss Matshediso Komoko
Community member (Warden)
81
Miss Jane Mpho Komako
Community member (Warden)
82
Miss Nthabiseng Maria Komalo
Community member (Warden)
83
Mr TR Kumalo
84
Mr Eric Kumalo
Community member (Warden)
Community member (Warden)
85
Miss Nonhlanhla Kumalo
Community member (Warden)
86
Miss Thembisile Kumalo
ANC
87
Mr JT Kunene
Phumelela Local Municipality
88
Mr Casper Landman
SANRAL
89
Ds Teboho Lefu
90
Mrs Miriam Lekele
Kerk Predikant (Warden)
Community member (Warden)
91
Mrs Puleng Lekele
Community member (Warden)
92
Mr George Lekele
Community member (Warden)
93
Ms Melita Lekele
Community member (Warden)
94
Mr Mohammed Lipu
Super value (Warden)
95
Dr IT Little
96
Mrs Madinja Lukhele
Endangered Wildlife Trust
Community member (Warden)
97
Mrs Ntswaki Mabe
Community member (Warden)
98
Mr Oupa Mabula
Community member (Warden)
99
Ms Ntshabiseng Mabula
Community member (Warden)
100
Miss Busisiwe Madlala
Community member (Warden)
101
Mrs Lusia Madlala
Community member (Warden)
102
Miss Selinah Maduna
Community member (Warden)
103
Ms Maria Maduna
Community member (Warden)
104
Miss OC Maduna
105
Miss Nozizwe Maduna
ANC
Community member (Warden)
106
Mr Joseph Maduna
Community member (Warden)
107
July Maduna
Community member (Warden)
108
Mrs Virginia Mahlaba
ANC
109
Ms Pinky Mahlaba
ANC
110
Ms Zanele Mahlaba
Community member (Warden)
111
Miss Sibongile Mahlaba
Community member (Warden)
112
Mrs Paulina Mahlasela
Community member (Warden)
113
Ms DL Mahomane
Community member (Warden)
114
Mr MR Makhubo
Community member (Warden)
115
Mr RM Makhubo
Community member (Warden)
12
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
Name
Organisation
116
Mr Dumisani Makhubo
Community member (Warden)
117
Miss Moetsuoa Makhoathi
Community member (Warden)
118
Ms Maria Makhubo
Community member (Warden)
119
Miss Amelia Makhubo
Community member (Warden)
120
Mr Petros Makhubo
Community member (Warden)
121
Ms Khanyisile Makhubu
Community member (Warden)
122
Mrs Sheila Makhubu
Community member (Warden)
123
Mr Mxolisi Makhubu
Community member (Warden)
124
Mr Samuel Makhubu
Community member (Warden)
125
Mrs Elizabeth Makhubo
Community member (Warden)
126
Ms Anti Makhubo
Community member (Warden)
127
Ellak Maleka
Community member (Warden)
128
Ms Sibongile Malinga
Community member (Warden)
129
Hessie Jane Malinga
Moahi
130
Mr David Maphisa
131
Ms Mmathutu Mashiloane
Birdlife South Africa
Community member (Warden)
132
Mr Mohobo Mashioane
Community member (Warden)
133
Ms Mateboho Mashilwane
Community member (Warden)
134
Mrs MM Mashinini
Community member (Warden)
135
Ms Thoko Johanna Mashinini
Community member (Warden)
136
Mnr De wet Mashinini
Community member (Warden)
137
Mr Mabuti Mashinini
Community member (Warden)
138
Mr Bongani Mashinini
Community member (Warden)
139
Mrs Sibongile Mashinini
Community member (Warden)
140
Mrs MF Masiteng
141
Mr Oupa Masiteng
CPF
Community member (Warden)
142
Mrs Thandi Nelisiwe Masiteng
Community member (Warden)
143
Ms Nomshado Masiteng
Community member (Warden)
144
Ms SJB Matjoa
Free State, Department of Police, Roads and Transport
145
Mr FM Mazibuko
ANC
146
Mr Vusi Mazibuko
Community member (Warden)
147
Mrs KG Mbele
Community member (Warden)
148
Miss Zandile Mbele
Community member (Warden)
149
Miss Lungile Mdladla
Community member (Warden)
150
Mrs Tryphina Mdladla
Community member (Warden)
151
Mr B Mekoa
Free State Development Corporation
152
Mrs B Boitumelo Melato
153
Ms Theresia Mfupi
Department of Water Affairs (Free State)
Community member (Warden)
154
Ms Lizzie Miller
Community member (Warden)
155
Miss Lerato Miya
Community member (Warden)
13
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
Name
Organisation
156
Mr T Mkhonza
157
Mr Mkhulisi Mkuni
Maluti-a-Phofung Local Municipality
Community member (Warden)
158
Mr Mandla Mkhwanazi
Community member (Warden)
159
Mr Aaron Mkhwanazi
Community member (Warden)
160
Nthabiseng E Mkhwanazi
Community member (Warden)
161
Ms Dimakatso Mkhasibe
Community member (Warden)
162
Mr Enos Willy Mkhatshwa
Community member (Warden)
163
Miss Thabitha Mlaba
Community member (Warden)
164
Miss Alina Mlaba
Community member (Warden)
165
Ms Sonto Sese Mlangeni
Community member (Warden)
166
Ms Thabile Mlangeni
Community member (Warden)
167
Mr Tholakele Mlangeni
Community member (Warden)
168
Mr James Mlangeni
Community member (Warden)
169
Christina Mlangeni
Community member (Warden)
170
Mr Sele Mlotshwa
Community member (Warden)
171
Mr MF Mnguni
Community member (Warden)
172
Ms Hlakaniphile Mntungwa
Community member (Warden)
173
Mr T E Moeketsi
Community member (Warden)
174
Louise Mofokeng
Community member (Warden)
175
Ms Maserame Portia Mofokeng
Community member (Warden)
176
Miss Popie Mofokeng
Community member (Warden)
177
Mr Kabelo Mofokeng
Community member (Warden)
178
Ms Puleng Miriam Mofokeng
Community member (Warden)
179
Telly Teboho Mofokeng
Community member (Warden)
180
Mr Jeremia Lefu Mofokeng
Community member (Warden)
181
Mr Teboho Mofokeng
Community member (Warden)
182
Ms M Mogopodi
183
Kamohelo Mathew Mohlabine
Thabo Mofutsanyana District Municipality
Community member (Warden)
184
Ms Puseletso Mohlakoana
Community member (Warden)
185
Mr Lucky I Mokoena
Community member (Warden)
186
Mr EB Mokoena
Traffic Department – Warden
187
Mr MG Mokoena
ANC
188
Ms Zanele Mokoena
189
Mr Klalepula Mokoena
ANC
Community member (Warden)
190
Ms Esther Mokoena
Community member (Warden)
191
Miss Semobi Mokoena
Community member (Warden)
192
Mr Slas Mokoena
Community member (Warden)
193
Miss Ntumeleng Mokoena
Community member (Warden)
194
Miss Cebile Priscilla Mokoena
Community member (Warden)
195
Miss Nomthandazo Mokoena
Community member (Warden)
14
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
Name
Organisation
196
Ms Makresmas Mokoena
Community member (Warden)
197
Mrs Paulinah Mokoena
Community member (Warden)
198
Mr Motsamazi Mokoena
Community member (Warden)
199
Mr Nhlanhla Mokoena
Community member (Warden)
200
Mr Laban Mokoena
Community member (Warden)
201
Mr Fanyana Mokoena
Community member (Warden)
202
Ms Ditshepiso Molefe
Community member (Warden)
203
Miss Lua Molefe
Community member (Warden)
204
Ms Seneri Dina Mollo
Community member (Warden)
205
Mr L M Molloyi
NAFCOC
206
Mr MA Moloi
207
Ms MF Moloi
XR3 Construction and Maintenance
Community member (Warden)
208
Mr MS Moloi
Community member (Warden)
209
Mr MS Moloi
Community member (Warden)
210
Ms Mpho Moloi
211
Mr Petros Moloi
ANC
Community member (Warden)
212
Ms Nokuthula Moloi
Community member (Warden)
213
Mrs Bertina Moloi
Community member (Warden)
214
Mr Thabo Moloi
Community member (Warden)
215
Ms Lydia Moloi
Community member (Warden)
216
Mrs Johanna Moloi
Community member (Warden)
217
Mr Alfred Moloi
Community member (Warden)
218
Mrs Constance Morajane
Community member (Warden)
219
Mr Sunnyboy Morajane
Community member (Warden)
220
Ms Seboka Mosiea
Community member (Warden)
221
Miss Agnes Refina Mosima
Community member (Warden)
222
Mrs Alna Motaung
Community member (Warden)
223
Mrs Dazi Motaung
224
Miss Mphakiseng Motaung
ANC
Community member (Warden)
225
Mr Mbuyiselwa Motaung
Community member (Warden)
226
Miss Puleng Motaung
Community member (Warden)
227
Ms Balifile Motaung
Community member (Warden)
228
Mr Shadrack Motaung
Community member (Warden)
229
Mrs Evelinah Motaung
Community member (Warden)
230
Mrs Ntsamaeng Motaung
Community member (Warden)
231
Aletta Motaung
Community member (Warden)
232
Mrs Ntombizodwa Motsoeneng
Community member (Warden)
233
Mr Isak Mpele
Community member (Warden)
234
Ms Sellinah Mpele
Community member (Warden)
235
Ms Ngwananokoena Mpele
Community member (Warden)
15
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
Name
Organisation
236
Mr Patrick Mphuthi
Community member (Warden)
237
Miss Ntswaki Mphuthi
Community member (Warden)
238
Ms TR Mpofu
239
Ms Elsie Msibi
Free State Department of Economic Development, Tourism and
Environmental Affairs
Community member (Warden)
240
Ms Miriam Msibi
Community member (Warden)
241
Miss Semami Msimanga
Community member (Warden)
242
Miss Mavis Msimanga
Community member (Warden)
243
Mrs Popi Msimanga
Community member (Warden)
244
Mr Siphiwe James Mtambo
Community member (Warden)
245
Ms Lucy Mthahane
246
Ms Lizie Mthembu
Moahi – Warden
Community member (Warden)
247
Mrs Emely Mthembu
Community member (Warden)
248
Mrs Duduzile Mthembu
Community member (Warden)
249
Ms MJ Mthembu
Phumelela Municipality
250
Mrs Thabile Mthombeni
Community member (Warden)
251
Mr Keith R Muller
252
Ms Zandile Mvelase
HSR/ Hardustria Environmental Conservation (Harrismith)
Community member (Warden)
253
Mr Innocent Mthoko Mvelase
Community member (Warden)
254
Mr Themba Joseph Mvelase
Community member (Warden)
255
Miss Mavis Mzinyane
Community member (Warden)
256
Nhlanhla Mziyane
Community member (Warden)
257
Mr Japie Nala
Community member (Warden)
258
Mr Billy Ncala
259
Miss Eva Ncongwane
SAPS – Warden
Community member (Warden)
260
Miss Busisiwe Ndaba
Community member (Warden)
261
Mr WR Ndlebe
262
Mrs Ntamfuthi Ngobese
Thabo Mofutsanyana District Municipality
Community member (Warden)
263
Mr Mandlenkosi Nhlapho
Community member (Warden)
264
Miss Vangile Nkabinde
Community member (Warden)
265
Mr Vusumuzi Nkabinde
Community member (Warden)
266
Miss Nonhlanhla Nkabinde
Community member (Warden)
267
Miss BK Nkabinde
268
Mr Mthelezi Nkabinde
ANC Womans League
Community member (Warden)
269
Mr Phillip Dingane Nkobande
Community member (Warden)
270
Ms Cynthia Nkosi
Community member (Warden)
271
Ms Elizabeth Nqubuka
Community member (Warden)
272
Mr Given Nsibande
Community member (Warden)
273
Miss Makhazasi Nsibanyoni
Community member (Warden)
274
Mr Xolani Nsibanyoni
Community member (Warden)
16
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
Name
Organisation
275
Mr David Ntjhingila
Community member (Warden)
276
Mrs AM Oates
Oatesdale Farm
277
Mr EW Oates
278
Mr EW Oates
Trafalgar No 839 & Nelson’s Kop 250
Trafalgar No 839 & Nelson’s Kop 250
279
Mr EW Oates
Trafalgar No 839 & Nelson’s Kop 250
280
Mrs Alison Oates
Oatesdale Farm
281
Mr Momello Pali
Community member (Warden)
282
Motshidisi Pali
Community member (Warden)
283
Mr Joseph Phatholi
Community member (Warden)
284
Mrs Mpho Radebe
Community member (Warden)
285
Mr Sibusiso Radebe
Community member (Warden)
286
Mr Sibusiso Radebe
Community member (Warden)
287
Mrs Mavis I Radebe
Community member (Warden)
288
Ms Nomathemba Radebe
Community member (Warden)
289
Mrs Sdudla Radebe
Community member (Warden)
290
Mr Tammy Radebe
Community member (Warden)
291
Mrs Sibongile Radebe
Community member (Warden)
292
Mr Bongani Radebe
Community member (Warden)
293
Ms Maud Zanele Radebe
Community member (Warden)
294
Mrs Bhuna Lydia Radebe
Community member (Warden)
295
Mrs Evelina Radebe
Community member (Warden)
296
Mr Ayanda Radebe
Community member (Warden)
297
Ms Palesa Radebe
Community member (Warden)
298
Mr Themba Radebe
Community member (Warden)
299
Mr MA Radebe
Community member (Warden)
300
Miss Sandra Radebe
Community member (Warden)
301
Ms Sesi Radebe
Community member (Warden)
302
Mr Mohammed Razaak
Smart Price
303
Mr AM Robertshaw
NMPP Alliance
304
Mrs EL Roberts
Warden Business Chamber
305
Mr H Roberts
Warden Business Chamber
306
Mnr Johan Saayman
AAA Vleismark – Warden
307
Mrs C Schwegman
WESSA (KZN Region)
308
Mrs JH Schwulst
309
Miss Masabata Sekhoto
Hazelhope Estate CC (Harrismith)
Community member (Warden)
310
Mr Johannes Selepe
Community member (Warden)
311
Miss Nomvula Selepe
Community member (Warden)
312
Mr RP Shibambo
313
Mrs Lillian Sibanyoni
Department of Water Affairs (Pretoria)
Community member (Warden)
314
Mr Buyani Sigasa
Community member (Warden)
17
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
Name
Organisation
315
Mrs Thembi Sigasa
Community member (Warden)
316
Mr Bongani Sigasa
Community member (Warden)
317
Ms Thembi Pretty Sigasa
Community member (Warden)
318
Mr Simon Sikhona
Community member (Warden)
319
Mr Sipho Sikhosana
ANC
320
Mr Richard Simelane
Interested and Affected Party
321
Miss Nthoto S’khosana
Community member (Warden)
322
Miss Phindle S’khosana
Community member (Warden)
323
Mrs Gaklina S’khosana
Community member (Warden)
324
Mrs DJ Skosana
Phumelela Local Municipality
325
Mrs ML Smith
Interested and Affected Party (Warden)
326
Mr Chris Sparks
Maritz Drift No. 1169 Rem and Ptn 2 (of 1)
327
Mr Pierre Swart
Landowner (Harrismith)
328
Mr PG Swart
Landowner (Harrismith)
329
Mr PG Swart
Landowner (Harrismith)
330
Mr Pierre Swart
Interested and Affected Party
331
Mr IN Taylex
332
Mrs Jabulile Thabethe
Bergview 1 Stop
Community member (Warden)
333
Mr Nico Theron
NMPP Alliaince
334
Mr Patrick J Thomas
Natal Airways Corporation
335
Ms Selina Thwala
Community Leader (Warden)
336
Miss Busisiwe Thwala
Community member (Warden)
337
Mr Gabriel Tlhapi
South African Heritage Resources Agency
338
Mrs CE Tolmay
Interested and Affected Party (Warden)
339
Mr PB Tshabalala
Interested and Affected Party (Warden)
340
Cllr SE Tshabalala
Phumelela Local Municipality
341
Mr TML Tshabalala
342
Mr Lucky Tshabalala
Interested and Affected Party (Warden)
Community member (Warden)
343
Ms Anty Tshabalala
Community member (Warden)
344
Mr Piet Tshabalala
Community member (Warden)
345
Mr Kabelo Tshabablala
Community member (Warden)
346
Ms Nomaswazi Tshabalala
Community member (Warden)
347
Mr Oupa Tshabalala
Community member (Warden)
348
Mr Elias Tshabalala
Community member (Warden)
349
Miss Cynthia Tshabalala
Community member (Warden)
350
Miss Faith Tshabalala
Community member (Warden)
351
Mr Linda Tshabalala
Community member (Warden)
352
Mr Mphikeleli Tshabalala
Community member (Warden)
353
Mrs Emely Tshabalala
Community member (Warden)
354
Mr Abel Tshabalala
Community member (Warden)
18
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
Name
Organisation
355
Miss Puleng Tshabalala
Community member (Warden)
356
Mr S’thembiso Tshabalala
357
Ms Sibongile Tshabalala
ANC
Community member (Warden)
358
Mr S’guqa Tshabalala
Community member (Warden)
359
Mr Tsetsi Tsotetsi
Community member (Warden)
360
Miss Maria Tsotetsi
Community member (Warden)
361
Miss Puleng Tsotetsi
Community member (Warden)
362
Mrs Zandile Tsotetsi
Community member (Warden)
363
Mr AJ Van Der Hoven
364
Mrs Elizabeth Vilakazi
Interested and Affected Party (Harrismith)
Community member (Warden)
365
Ms JP Viljoen
Warden Resident
366
Mrs AS Wasserman
Praxos – Warden
367
Mr Roy Watt-Pringle
Bergview Complex
368
Mr Mark R Watt-Pringle
369
Mr Fanyana Xaba
Harrismith Wimpy, Harrismith Mugg & Bean
Community member (Warden)
370
Ms Lindiwe Zamisa
Community member (Warden)
371
Ms Nthabiseng Zimu
Community member (Warden)
372
Cllr TR Zwane
Phumelela Local Municipality
19
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
1
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
Faxed Comment
Sheet
10 September
2010
Mr AW Bechman
Something Small Gift Shop
Warden and Ezenzeleni
ISSUES/COMMENTS
Business will get more clients because of all the job opportunities.
The alternative routes must be studied closely. It has a lot of benefits
regarding the infrastructure of the town, water schemes etc, which
will lead to better living standards and more job opportunities in the
short term.
The construction of the new tollgate must not influence the town
negatively.
More businesses will open and job creation in the town.
Upgrading of the existing N3 must get preference. Impact study of
(misgronde) at the Lincoln Interchange as well as wetlands and
geological findings. The De Beers pass route, alternative route A is
recommended. The problem is also at Van Reenen which cannot
handle any more traffic.
2
October 2010
Mr Mezbauddin Bhuiyan
Supavalu -2 (Warden)
Our business will die.
3
30 September
2010
Mr JH Bosch
Platberg Reserve
I suggest that the Western bypass be investigated.
RESPONSE
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-section 6, 7, 13,
14) in chapters 7; 8 ;9; and 10 of the DEIR
for an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss, job creation, SMME
opportunites, and service infrastructure
and provison. Also, refer the summary of
key issues No.4 and 5 of the DEIR.
Toll is addressed under the SANRAL Act
and will be addressed at the appropriate
time.
The
existing
N3
between
Keeversfontein and Harrismith does not
comply with geometric standards for a
highway. Hence the need for alternatives
and realignments. Refer to the Summary
of Key Issues No.9 of the DEIR .
Refer to section 4, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for a summary of the
Wetland specialist studies and impact
assessments for sections. Also, refer the
Summary of Key Issues No.1. of the
DEIR.
Refer to section 9, (sub-section 18), in
chapters 7; 8 ;9; and 10 of the DEIR for
the Traffic Impact Assessment.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapter 11, of the DEIR for
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 and 5 of the DEIR .
In the late 1980’s when the Eastern
Bypass was upgraded there was talk of
the Western Bypass. Due to public
pressure, the decision was then taken not
20
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
4
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
Email
12 September
2010
Mr Diederik Bouckaert
Sungazer-Paradise
Pt 1 Farm Das Krantz Nr 6
ISSUES/COMMENTS
Effect of DBPR option B
The very negative effects this new highway will have on the value of
one property “Sungazer” Paradise holiday House Development
Why am I concerned?
 Because I own a holiday house development just opposite
proposed “route B” and my main sales argument is the
pristine view over this stunning area. This stunning view will
be destroyed by this highway alternative and the value of
the property will be very reduced.
 I believe in tourism to be a major driver in the economy of
South Africa and destroying landscape is not the way to go.
It would very negatively affect the tourism industry in this
particular area.
 I totally disagree with further destruction of the environment
in general, especially if this destruction is paired to a further
increase of pollution in the widest sense; since 1999 when
the first DBPR ROD was produced and today there has
been a massive change in knowhow and about what is
happening to this world. All developed countries have
agreed to drastically reduce emissions and pollution; this
includes agreements signed by South Africa. There is no
more doubt about the fact that pollution is creating havoc
with the climate of this planet and that these changes are
having terrible consequences for the population of this
world.
 The proposed routes A and B promote a “new Van Reenen
Pass”. This new van Reenen pass will go through a very
positive ”De Angelus” development that would be of great
social benefit for the area.
I strongly disagree with these new highway options for the simple
reason that any of the alternatives will cause facilitation for road
traffic and that road traffic, one of the worst polluters, will increase.
The modern and more logic alternative would be to reduce road
traffic by improving other alternatives like rail cargo and by facilitating
passenger traffic by rail. Railway alternatives, considered as very
environmental friendly options are very underdeveloped.
RESPONSE
to build the Western Bypass
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 6 in chapters 7; 8 ;9; and
10 of the DEIR for the visual impact
assessment. Also, refer to the Summary
of Key Issues No.7 of the DEIR .
Refer to chapter 11, of the DEIR for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also, refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4; 5 and of the DEIR .
Refer to section 7 and 8, in chapters 7; 8;
9; and 10 of the DEIR for the Air Qaulity
and Noise specialist studies and impact
assessments for sections. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.1; 2 and 8 of
the DEIR .
Refer to section 9, (sub-section 18), in
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR
Volume 2 for the assessment on Traffic
disruptions. Also refer to the Summary of
Key Issues No.10 of the DEIR .
This EIA process is in response to the
economic demand for road transportation.
The consideration of alternative modes of
transport falls outside the scope of this
process. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.14 of the DEIR .
21
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
In a holistic approach to create better transportation facilities for
goods and people between KZN and Gauteng this option should be
favoured in comparison to the proposed road alternatives.
It would be good to extend the EIA by including the alternatives
mentioned above.
All the efforts, studies and meetings concerning the new or extended
N3 highway and its possible alternatives seem to be a total loss of
time and money and there should be NO new highway at all.
Why?
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
At the middle/end of the nineties, government entities have
decided to build a new stretch of highway between
Keeversfontein and Warden (DBPR) as soon the traffic
levels on the existing highway would reach 13.900 vehicles
per day on average.
By building a new and expensive stretch of highway, a
further increase of vehicles and their pollution would be
guaranteed. Such an investment would just facilitate traffic
by road.
In these “good old days” N3TC signed a contract to build
that road or one of its alternatives. This process is now
ongoing and N3TC is strictly following their contractual
obligations.... signed in the nineties....that’s probably the
only reason we now have all these meetings.
All actions emanating from this contractual obligation-->
identifying alternative routes, launching many expensive
studies and assessments, involving the public and other
stakeholders, organising meetings etc. should now be
evaluated against a completely different background;
Decisions taken 13-15 years ago cannot be up to date
anymore because the world has changed a lot and it is now
very clear that increasing carbon emissions is very
detrimental to our climate and the wellbeing of all living
creatures on this planet. South Africa has signed several
agreements on international level and agreed to take great
effort to reduce such emissions......this new highway
initiative is diametrical to this.
22
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
In conclusion of the above, the only logical path to follow is for the
government to go back to the drawing boards and to look at the
much wider picture of transportation of goods and people between
the coast and Gauteng.
They must take all the new elements into consideration that have
arisen during the past 10/15 years.
It is true that transportation by rail seems to have suffered a lot and
that not much progress has taken place, but if one looks at a
worldwide trend and the positives involving transportation by rail,
then we can only say that it is by far the most environmental friendly
and effective alternative.
The billions that would be spent on a highway extension should go to
an improvement of the railway network.
If not, these billions will be wasted.
5
Email
01 October 2010
Mr John Bristow
Scheurklip Conservancy
Can you and your organization please explain to me why the meeting
should not be a public meeting? The building of a new National
Road through the eastern Free State is a major and expensive
undertaking which will have many impacts. It is being paid for with
tax payers money, and many interested and affected parties are not
represented and do not trust organizations to represent them. I for
one and the Scheurklip Conservancy questions your decision to
exclude public participants in a process that is supposed by its very
nature to be transparent?
The Public Participation
conducted in terms of
legislation which allows
meetings to be by invitation.
of such meetings does not
negate
other
public
opportunities.
6
Email
01 October 2010
Mr Alastair Campbell
Uithoek – R/E of Farm
Uithoek 460
There are a number of issues that your EIA should be focussing on
and which are particularly relevant to the land in the immediate
vicinity of my property (which includes the proposed DBPR and Alt B
routes). These are:
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA





Refer to section 3, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on the
Avifauna and the Summary of Key Issues
No.1 of the DEIR .

The nesting sites of the endangered Wattled crane
The habitat of the rare Botha’s lark
The habitat of the sacred ibis, many of which live in the area
The location of the habitat of the “Ou volk” or Sungazer lizard
There are numerous wetlands along routes DBPR and
Alternative B
There are number of prehistoric petrified forests located along
Process is
applicable
for certain
The holding
in any way
participation
Refer to section 2, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on the
23
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS

DBPR and Alt B specifically near my farm
Please provide guidance as to where the Borrow Pits for the
road are going to be located
RESPONSE
Flora and Fauna
and refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.15 of the
DEIR regarding location of borrow pits.
Finally – the original DBPR route was proposed at a time (20 years
ago) when it did not appear viable to construct an alternative route
down Van Reenens pass. The technology and construction knowhow to build this road is now available and therefore the most logical
route down to Keeversfontein should be Alt A.
Similarly, at the time the DBPR was proposed, the people of
Harrismith did not support a large highway through the middle of the
city. Over the last two decades that situation has changed
significantly and the regional importance of Harrismith as a transport
hub is now clear to most people. It is logical therefore that the arterial
route from Durban to Joburg should go through Harrismith, further
justifying Alt A.
Alt A is clearly the best route for the following reasons:




The road is already there and widening it will not have as
devastating environmental impact on the farmers in the area
(myself included) as Alt B of DBPR will have
The scenery and ecology will not be as adversely impacted
The entire farming community from Van Reenen to Warden will
not be as adversely impacted under this route as they would be
under DBPR and Alt B
Harrismith will not be bypassed
Refer to chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for an impact assessment and refer
to the Summary of Key Issues No.1 and 5;
of the DEIR.
I look forward to being a part of the debate surrounding the
alternative routes.
7
Comment Sheet
6 October 2010
Mr Isaac Cebekhulu
Greater Harrismith Socio
Economic
Development
I suggest the following issues be investigated in the EIA:

Wilge wetlands

Need for tunnels – destroying pristine countryside and
waterfalls

Wattled crane nesting areas as well as sacred ibis

Petrified forest locations along routes (DBPR and Alt B)

Where are the borrow pits going to be located
Refer to section 4, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for a summary of the
Wetland specialist study and impact
assessments for sections. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.1 and 5; of the
DEIR.
The logistical hub is in progress the new route will disadvantage our
society as well as our town.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
24
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
Forum
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
The society impact of this alternative route and the economic impact
for or greater Harrismith.
We should consider that our government for the people has promised
all the stakeholders in Harrismith that this route (De Beers Pass
Route) won’t happen.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts and chapter 11, for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 and 5; of the DEIR.
N3TC is not aware of any formal decision
that is contrary to their contractual
obligations.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-section 3) in
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically Crime and Security. Also refer
to the Summary of Key Issues No. 5 of the
DEIR.
October 2010
Mr James Cebekhulu
Community
member
(Warden)
The potential increase of crime rate.
October 2010
Ms Thandazo Cebekhulu
Community
member
(Warden)
The economy of Warden will be negatively impacted.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapter 11, for the economic
assessments relating to the project. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No. 5
of the DEIR.
10
October 2010
Ms Hleliphi Cebekhulu
ANC
It will make a positive effect towards economy and the development
of our community. Develop and extend the N3 to be able to work.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts and chapter 11, for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No. 5 of the DEIR.
11
October 2010
Miss Lanying Chen
Community
member
(Warden)
I am from China, and think N3 is better because it helps me so much,
it keeps me safe all the time, don’t close that route please, we will
suffer.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
8
9
25
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
12
13
DATE
October 2010
October 2010
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
Miss Malefu Cindi
Community
member
(Warden)
Mr NB Collins
Free
State
Dept
of
Economic
Development,
Tourism
and
Environmental Affairs
I have a dream to make business for catering so I have hope about
people going into that road / N3.
Noted.
IMPACTS OF ROADS ON WETLANDS
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Wetlands are a function of their hydroperiod, i.e. a wetland is the
product of the frequency, timing, volume and duration of flooding. A
change to any one of these hydrological characteristics is considered
undesirable as they ultimate result in reduced wetland ecological
status.
Roads are often the cause of wetland loss because of the way in
which they alter the hydrological regime of wetlands. This can
manifest through:

Increase erosion
Culverts are often constructed underneath roads in an attempt
to minimize the impact of the road on wetland hydrology. The
consequence is that the water which under normal
circumstances would have flowed evenly through the wetland is
now restricted (focused) to certain points. This creates high
energy environments which ultimately results in the initiation of
erosion, often upstream and downstream of the culverts. Such
erosion, once initiated often advances upstream and
downstream of the wetland resulting in an altered hydrological
regime and in worst cases wetland loss.

Negatively affected the hydroperiod
Roads crossing wetlands act as physical barriers that impede
the surface flow of water across wetlands. This ultimately
results in changed hydrological regime of the wetland in both
the upstream and downstream portions thereof. Although
culverts usually allow water to flow from the one side of the
road to the other, the impact is considered to be undesirable of
which the extent of the impact is site dependent.
Roads are also associated with increased risks of fire and pollution.
The former can, depending on the nature of the wetland and the
specific fauna and flora, have devastating effects. This especially
where the soils are of high organic matter or where the wetland
serves as habitat for winter breeding birds. The linear nature of
wetlands makes them especially susceptible to the negative effect of
RESPONSE
Refer to section 4, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for a summary of the
Wetland specialist study and impact
assessments for sections. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No. 1 of the
DEIR.
Refer to sections 7; and 9,( sub-section 5)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Air pollution and Fire
Hazards. Also refer to the Summary of
Key Issues No. 5 of the DEIR.
26
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
spills. When water is flowing spills are often difficult to contain.
Where spills occur in non-wetland areas the impacted area is
localized and be contained. This is not the case with wetlands where
spills are often washed downstream. Wetland should therefore, from
a risk management point of view, be avoided when constructing
roads as they introduce the potential to amplify the negative effects
of spills, especially where such spills are in the form of toxic fluids.
The environmental impact therefore does not affect the terrestrial
system only, but also the aquatic system.
Roads also serve have a direct and indirect impact on the
environment. The footprint of the road (direct impact) and its potential
negative effects have already been mentioned. Roads also have an
indirect impact through the noise and movement that they introduce
into an area. This can be significant in areas where species that are
sensitive to such disturbances are present within wetlands (or any
other habitat in close proximity to the road).
The Upper Wilge River and its tributaries is currently classified as
being in good ecological condition. The freshwater ecosystems of
the Free State (and indeed South Africa) are in a much worse state
then the terrestrial environment. High levels of pollution of the rivers
and the large number of rivers that are polluted is a consequence of
their linear nature. Any further potential degradation of the natural
freshwater ecosystems, especially those that are still in good
condition, should be avoided. This especially for those systems that
are located at the top of the catchments as they often mitigate
impacts lower down by way of dilution.
14
Email
12 September
2010
Mr Sam Cronje
Nexxt C&IS (Pty)Ltd
(Bryanston)
I suggest that the issues be investigated in the EIA process: Social
Impact of the proposed realignment of the N3.
Refer to section 2 (sub-sections 1and 2)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Habitat loss and
displacement of wildlife as a result of
noise. This should be read in conjunction
with section 4, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10
of the DEIR for a summary of the Wetland
specialist study and impact assessments
for sections. Also refer to the Summary of
Key Issues No. 1 of the DEIR.
This was taken into account in the Social
Impact Assessment, specialist study
(Appendix K of DEIR Volume 2) which
also formed part of the impact assessment
phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts. Also refer to the Summary
of Key Issues No. 5 and 17 of the DEIR.
15
Comment Sheet
Mr Uys L de Jager
Social and Financial Impacts at Swinburne, Harrismith, Van Reenen.
These issues were taken into account in
27
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
12/13
September 2010
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
Franshoek Est.
All businesses in Van Reenen, Swinburne, Harrismith and all
business from the N3 Tugela Toll plaza to Warden.
Cost comparison new route proposed route versus alternatives old
existing road. Cost comparison connecting at Kiesheen – crossing S 790 – S 800 GPS - S 28, 20, 785, E 29, 16, 397.
16
Comment sheet
(faxed)
03 Septermber
2010
Mr Bernard Deysel
Highway Group
The current N3 to remain with necessary upgrades at intersections.
Alternatives for Van Reenen Pass
The N3 freeway is the lifeblood of this community by moving the
roadway from Harrismith will bring disastrous consequences to this
town.
17
18
October 2010
October 2010
Mr Shadrack Dhladla
Community
member
(Warden)
Mr Mandla Dhlalisa
Community
member
RESPONSE
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts and chapter 11, for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No. 4 and 5 of the DEIR.
Project costs are a contractual matter
between N3TC and SANRAL.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts and chapter 11, for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No. 4 and 5 of the DEIR.
This road passing Warden is very important it links Warden and
Harrismith.
These issues will be taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
People will lose their jobs especially the garage workers.
The tollgate must be installed in N3, please.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts. Also refer to the Summary
of Key Issues No. 4 and 5 of the DEIR.
Jobs will be lost.
Toll is addressed under the SANRAL Act
and will be addressed at the appropriate
time
This issue will be taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
28
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
(Warden)
19
20
October 2010
October 2010
RESPONSE
Mr Bongani Dlamini
Community
member
(Warden)
Mr Khulu E Dlamini
Community
member
(Warden)
Crime rate will be a serious problem.
You must investigate the negative impact that you are going to cause
for the economy of Phumelela Municipality. Food security must also
be considered. Just forget about this road. Build it some where else,
thank you.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No. 4
and 5 of the DEIR.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-section 3) in
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an
assessment
on
Social
Impacts,
specifically crime and security. Also refer
to the Summary of Key Issues No. 5 of the
DEIR.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts and chapter 11, for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No. 4; 5 and 11 of the DEIR.
21
October 2010
Miss Thulisile Dlamini
Community
member
(Warden)
We need that road, we benefit from it as a Zenzeleni community, in
Warden.
Noted.
22
October 2010
Mr S Dladla
Community
(Warden)
Expand N3.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
23
October 2010
Mr Lucky Duma
Community
member
member
This road must not be closed because it is a short cut for farm
workers and this road has been here for years now.
Refer to to chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No. 11 of the DEIR.
The existing N3 will continue to be in
operation.
29
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
24
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
Email
21 September
2010
(Warden)
Mr JS du Plessis
N3
Access
Property
Owners
I suggest the following issues be investigated in the EIA process:
Access to N3.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
Harrismith
residents
have
been
represented at the KSAM through the
Municipal Manager.
25
Email
02 October 2010
Mr Jannie du Plessis
Interested and Affected
Party (Harrismith)
My major concern, as a landowner next to N3, is the access to the
N3.
26
Email
04 October 2010
Mr Pierre du Plessis
PG Projects
All Harrismith residents are “Key Stakeholders” as we all work and
live here.
If the road is to follow any of the suggested routes we will no longer
be able to provide employment to many local (previously
disadvantaged) residents. In our company we have 52 employees.
Please add to your EIA as per your page 3, “Preliminary List of
Environment Issues”
Loss of Employment by Harrismith Residents
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. This
should be read in conjunction with
chapter 11, for the economic assessments
relating to the project.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No. 4 of the DEIR.
27
28
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Mr PG du Plessis
PG Building and
Engineering
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Mr HL du Plooy
HC du Plooy Plant
Meet with local residents to get their input.
Public participation is being undertaken as
a requirement of the EIA. Written
submissions are also invited. Also refer to
the Summary of Key Issues No. 17 of the
DEIR.
The Harrismith Platberg route will go through my workshop and my
house on the farm.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA
Refer to chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for a summary of specialist studies
and impact assessments for sections.
Civil
Will construction be moved or will it be accommodated by the
planning of the route?
30
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
29
DATE
Email
28 September
2010
NAME & ORGANISATION
Dr J du Toit
Harrismith Marathon Club
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
I had no consultation with SANRAL when I bought my farm in 2004
regarding the route.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No. 10 of the DEIR.
In connection with the Alternative A route before Harrismith, that is
planned to go through the Platberg Nature reserve. Harrismith
Marathon Club would like to point out that our annual marathon's
route goes through this nature reserve.
Attached herewith the route of the marathon and as you will notice,
Alternative route A crosses this route twice. We would not like to end
this annual marathon as the history of it started in 1922 and this is
what makes it the oldest marathon in our country. This traditional
marathon attracts athletes across the country and therefore it is an
economic injection for our town.
The potential impact on the property will
be dealt with in terms of SANRAL policy.
Noted.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts.
Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No. 7 of the
DEIR.
I hope you will take the above information in consideration and that
you will consult us regarding the process of the planning, dissensions
and impact studies.
30
October 2010
A map accompanied this submission.
My business is going to die, people will lose their jobs. Forget about
this road.
Mr Omar Faruk
Warden Mini Market
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
chapter 11, for the economic assessments
relating to the project. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No. 4; 5 and 12 of
the DEIR.
31
Comment Sheet
6/7
October
2010
Mr CMJ Fouche
Maluti-a-Phofung
Municipality
Wetlands, economic impact, etc.
Local
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 4, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
31
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
10 of the DEIR for a summary of the
Wetland specialist study and impact
assessments for sections. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No. 1;4;5 of the
DEIR.
This should be read in conjucntion with
chapter 11, for the economic assessments
relating to the project.
32
33
October 2010
Miss Sibongile Gama
Community Member
(Warden)
Jobs will be a problem.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR ]
for an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No. 5
of the DEIR.
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Ms EN Gamede
Interested and
Party
The N3 bypass should be stopped and come with an alternative
route.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Affected
Refer to to chapters 4 and 5 of the DEIR.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No. 11 and 14 of the DEIR.
34
35
Email
13 September
2010
Mr GO Kirk??
Shell SA Marketing (Pty)
Ltd
The effect that the chosen De Beers Pass route may have upon
existing service station facilities as well as proposed new facilities.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9,(sub-section 13 and 14)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No. 5
of the DEIR.
October 2010
Mr Mathew George
Teacher – Warden
This will affect the growth of Warden.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
32
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts and chapter 11, for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No. 4 of the DEIR.
36
37
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Email
07 September
2010
Dr Gideon Groenewald
Metsi Metseng Geological
Services
Mr MT Hadebe
Transnet Pipelines
The palaeontology of the area is of significance and all information
regarding this field should be noted officially.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Important Palaeontological data was gathered during construction of
the Ingula pumped storage scheme and the multipurpose pipeline in
the area. This information can assist in gathering data that will be
significant for the EIA process.
Refer to section 5, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Heritage Resources. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No. 13 of the
DEIR.
Transnet Pipelines (ex-Petronet), being a division of Transnet
Limited, has no objection in principle to the proposed National Road
3 (De Beers Pass Section) crossing and running parallel to the
323,8mm diameter pipeline within Transnet’s 12,2m wide pipeline
servitudes as indicated on your cadastral map, subject to compliance
to our standard crossing conditions and requirements. Our NMPP
pipeline currently under construction shall also be affected by the
proposal. The information on the NMPP may be requested from Mr
Andy Robertshaw of NMPP Project Team. His e-mail address is
[email protected] A plan depicting pipeline routes within
the affected area is included for your information and reference.
This authority to proceed shall only be valid for 12 months from the
date of this letter. If it is envisaged that the work will commence at a
later stage an extension of time must be requested timeously.
The N3TC engineering team has
consulted with the NMPP project team.
The NMPP pipeline has taken the DBP
route and its alternatives into account and
not vice versa.
CONDITIONS
1. A culvert shall be constructed around the pipeline for the full
width of the road where it crosses the pipeline servitudes.
The design and construction of the culvert shall be
undertaken by yourselves and a print of the final layout
submitted to this office for approval. Structural design
approval of the culvert will be your responsibility. One print
of drawing number PL 0007/7/01714 showing a typical
culvert is enclosed for your information and reference.
2.
The pipelines shall be double-wrapped for the length of the
33
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
road plus 3m on either side. Transnet Pipelines will supply
primer and wrapping tape and will examine, prime and
double-wrap the pipelines where necessary.
3.
4.
The cover over the top pipeline shall not be less than 1m.
Excavation and backfilling within the pipeline servitudes
shall be undertaken by you. Such excavation and backfilling
shall be undertaken by hand without the use of mechanical
or power equipment. Where exposed the pipelines shall not
be left unsupported for lengths greater than 10m. In
backfilling the excavation the applicant shall provide a
minimum of 150mm of selected soft padding around the
pipeline/s where it /they was/were exposed. The padding
must be properly compacted, in layers, by hand. (Culvert
box protecting gas pipeline/s shall be sand filled as per gas
pipeline governing standards.)
This padding sand must meet with the approval of Transnet
Pipelines’ representative on site. The pH value much not
less than 5,5. The bedding and padding material must be
fine sand or fine non-cohesive soil, free from stone, gravel,
lumps and which does not cake or form lumps when drying
out. The P.I. (Plasticity Index) must not exceed 6. The
diameter of the largest particle of sand must not be greater
than 2mm. Prior to any delivery to site an independent lab
test will be required of the sand to be delivered on site and
any number of tests may be conducted.
Examples of padding sand which have been used in the
past, amongst other, include the following:
i.
plaster sand
ii.
washed Umgeni River sand (KwaZulu-Natal)
iii.
suitably leached mine sand (Gauteng)
It should, however, be noted that crusher dust is not
acceptable
No backfilling may be carried out unless authorized by
Transnet Pipelines representative.
5.
The pipeline shall not be left exposed unnecessarily.
6.
The new wrapping shall not be left exposed to the sunrays
for more than three days.
7.
All costs for the crossing, including labour and material shall
be to your account.
34
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
8.
NO BLASTING IS ALLOWED WITHIN A PIPELINE
SERVITUDE. Application to carry out blasting within 500m
of a pipeline must be made to this office in writing in terms
of paragraph 17.1, chapter 10 of the regulations embodied
in the Explosives Act and Regulations (Act 26 of 1956) as
amended.
9.
Transnet shall not be liable for any damage, including
consequential loss or damage whether direct or indirect,
which might be caused to the applicant’s service during
normal operations, routine maintenance and repairs to the
pipeline/s.
RESPONSE
10. a) The APPLICANT shall and hereby does indemnify
TRANSNET againsti.
any damage to TRANSNET’s own property,
whether movable or immovable, including any
consequential damage directly flowing from
physical damage to such property;
ii.
liability in respect of any damage to the property,
whether movable or immovable of the APPLICANT
or third parties;
iii.
liability in respect of death of or injury to any
employees of TRANSNET or the APPLICANT or
any third party;
iv.
any legal costs of any of the foregoing;
whenever such damage, injury or death is due to
or arises out of the construction, installation or
existence of the WORKS or any portion thereof, or
the use thereof by the APPLICANT, provided that
the APPLICANT shall incur no liability for any
damage, injury or death which is due to wilful
misconduct or gross negligence on the part of
TRANSNET or any of its employees.
b) TRANSNET shall notify the APPLICANT forthwith of the
occurrence of any damage or the receipt of any claim or
damage for or against which APPLICANT is prima facie
liable to indemnify TRANSNET in terms of paragraph (a)
35
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
of the clause and shall, in respect of such claim or
demand abide by the directions of the APPLICANT as to
whether and on what terms it shall be settled,
compromised or contested, it being understood and
agreed that whatever action may be taken by
TRANSNET pursuant to such directions of the
APPLICANT shall be at the APPLICANT’s risk and
expense.
11. These conditions only apply to construction of the
applicant’s service across Transnet’s pipeline servitude/s
and do not grant you the right to do any excavations in
future for repair or maintenance purposes. Should such
future excavations within the servitude area/s be necessary
permission will have to be requested timeously from this
office? In cases of emergency, this office of Transnet
Pipelines’ representative as mentioned above, may be
contacted telephonically for such permission.
38
October 2010
Mr Mlondolozi Hadebe
Community
member
(Warden)
For agricultural reasons.
Poverty.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9 and 10, in chapters 7; 8;
9; and 10 of the DEIR for an assessment
on Social and Agricultural Impacts. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No. 4;
5 and 12 of the DEIR.
This should be read in conjunction with
chapter 11, for the economic assessments
relating to the project.
39
October 2010
Mr Siyabonga Hadebe
Community
member
(Warden)
Please do not remove N3 because it brings economy to Warden e.g.
garages, café, guest houses, etc. Let us prevent poverty.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts and chapter 11, for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
36
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
Issues No. 4 of the DEIR.
40
October 2010
Mr Pat Hadebe
Community
(Warden)
member
Our agriculture will be affected.
Stop destroying our nature.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 2, 3, 4, 9 and 10, in
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for a
summary of specialist studies and impact
assessments for sections. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No. 1 and 12 of
the DEIR.
41
October 2010
Ms Nomahlubi Hadebe
Community
member
(Warden)
Immigration, loosing of jobs from this farms.
Please do not destroy farms.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation.
Refer to section 10, in chapters 7; 8; 9;
and 10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Agricultural Impacts.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No. 4 and 12 of the DEIR.
42
October 2010
Mr George Hadebe
Community
member
(Warden)
Our population at the location.
Poverty.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No. 4; 5 and 12 of the DEIR.
43
October 2010
Mr Petros Hadebe
Community
member
(Warden)
Poverty will be a big problem at Warden.
We like and want N3 as it is.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
37
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No. 4; 5 and 12 of the DEIR.
44
October 2010
Mrs Nobelungu Hadebe
Community
member
(Warden)
We will lose our jobs in our town.
Our economy will be affected.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts and chapter 11, for the
economic assessments relating to the
project.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No. 4; 5 and 12 of the DEIR.
45
October 2010
Mr Nkosinathi Hadebe
Community
member
(Warden)
Loss of jobs, close of farms, decrease of food products.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9 and 10, in chapters 7; 8;
9; and 10 of the DEIR for an assessment
on Social and Agricultural impacts and
chapter 11, for the economic assessments
relating to the project.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No. 4; 5 and 12 of the DEIR.
46
October 2010
Mrs Thembelihle Hadebe
ANC - Warden
It will affect our economy e.g. garage workers.
Widen the National Road N3.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
47
October 2010
Ms Sbongile Hadebe
ANC - Warden
It will affect our economy and jobs, e.g. garage workers.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
38
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts and chapter 11, for the
economic assessments relating to the
project.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No. 4 and 5 of the DEIR.
48
49
October 2010
Mr Phakamane Hadebe
Community
member
(Warden)
We do not like a new road rather fix the existing N3 to be in a good
condition.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
Comment Sheet
6/7
October
2010
Mrs MMJ Harris
Green Lantern Inn
I must complement ACER on a constructive and well informed
meeting – Thank you. Not only are your team friendly, but very
professional!
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
We, in Van Reenen, are already “sandwiched” between the N3 and a
railway line

Present noise is great aggravation as well as pollution.

Both present health hazards and already impact on ay tourism
in the area.
Refer to section 7, 8 and 9 in chapters 7;
8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for a summary of
specialist studies and impact assessments
for sections. Also refer to the Summary of
Key Issues No. 7; 8 and 11 of the DEIR.
Van Reenen’s Pass is notoriously known as extremely dangerous
with the amount of traffic especially heavy trucks. Could be
eliminated if trucks used De Beers at a reduced toll fee and N3
concentrated on a meander!
50
51
Comment Sheet
6/7
October
2010
Email
Ms CL Henderson
BirdLife South Africa
Ms CL Henderson
Environmental, especially relatively to bird species (threatened or
otherwise). Also other animal species: amphibians, reptiles,
mammals & invertebrates and habitants.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
There herpet fauna (reptiles and amphibians), the avifauna
(migratory falcons: Amur and lesser kestrels) loss of food source &
more knocked over due to higher speed and another; also grass and
marsh owls).
Refer to section 2 and 3, in chapters 7; 8;
9; and 10 of the DEIR for a summary of
specialist studies and impact assessments
for sections. Also refer to the Summary of
Key Issues No. 1 of the DEIR.
Comments continued for N3 toll road meeting (7th October 2010)
These issues were taken into account in
39
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
22 October 2010
NAME & ORGANISATION
BirdLife South Africa
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
as requested.
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
I mentioned the reptiles and amphibians (herpetofauna) and Dr
Michael Cunningham will have put in a detailed account of them in
his comments.
Refer to section 2, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for a summary of specialist
studies and impact assessments for
sections. Also refer to the Summary of
Key Issues No. 1 of the DEIR.
The wetlands would have been commented on by my colleague,
David Maphisa (BirdLife South Africa), from the Ingula project. The
De Beers Pass Route and the De Beers Pass Route Alternative B do
pass through smaller wetlands though I realize they were plotted to
miss the major wetlands. They also cross several rivers. The Whitewinged Flufftail (Critically Endangered) occurs in some of the
wetlands in the area and, as not all of the wetlands have been
surveyed for this species in the area, it may not yet have been picked
up.
I also mentioned the loss of habitat for the migratory kestrels: Amur
Falcons and Lesser Kestrels (Vulnerable) - these species come from
China, Mongolia and Russia - and the problems of higher speeds
(120kms/hour for the whole new 98/104kms of the De Beers Pass
Route and the De Beers Pass Route Alternative B) on the proposed
roads causing more mortalities to the migratory kestrels and to Grass
Owls (Vulnerable).
Refer to section 4, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for a summary of the
Wetland specialist study and impact
assessments for sections.
Refer to section 3, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for a summary of the
Avifauna specialist study and impact
assessments for sections.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No. 4; 5 and 12 of the DEIR.
This same loss of habitat and high-speed mortalities will be a
problem for many other bird species in the area including
Whitebellied Korhaan (Vulnerable), Blue Korhaans (Nearthreatened), Secretary birds (Near-threatened), Black-harriers (Nearthreatened), Peregrine Falcons (Near-threatened), Lanner Falcons
(Near-threatened), white storks (migratory species) and many small
grassland passerines, some of which are threatened e.g. Rudd’s lark
40
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
(Critically Endangered), Botha’s lark (Endangered) and Yellowbreasted pipit (Vulnerable). Not all of these species are prone to
being knocked down regularly as they have different behavioural
habits (foraging-patterns, flight-patterns, breeding patterns), but all
are in the area and may be at risk. Bearded Vultures (Endangered)
and Cape Vultures (Vulnerable) are often seen feeding and roosting
in the areas above where the De Beers and De Beers Alternative B
routes go through. Although the adults usually avoid roads and
collisions with cars/trucks, a pair of Bearded Vultures breeds near
where the end of Alternative B goes through at Van Reenen.
Youngsters may be more vulnerable to being knocked down whilst
still honing their flying skills.
There are other threatened species in the area, such as the Southern
Bald Ibis (Vulnerable) and two of the crane species that occur and
breed in the area. The crane species are Wattled Crane (Critically
Endangered), Blue Crane (Vulnerable) and also the Crowned Crane.
Winter flocks of cranes congregate in the Alexpan / Lentevlakte/
Greyville area and would be very vulnerable to the road going
through that area (De Beers Pass Route and Alternative B). Alexpan
1529 is an Important Bird Area (SA042) and well documented for its
importance to many bird species and also to the Sungazer lizard
(Ouvolk).
Of the three routes, the De Beers Pass Alternative A would have the
least impact on the bird species of the area. However, we would
choose the option of upgrading the existing N3 as that has even less
of an impact on plant and animal species.
52
Mail
October 2010
Mr Sguqa Hlongwane
Community
member
(Warden)
Job loss will be a problem.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
41
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No. 4
of the DEIR.
53
Mail
October 2010
Mr Skwelete Hlongwane
Community
member
(Warden)
Poverty will be a problem.
These issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9 in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts. Also refer to the Summary
of Key Issues No. 4 of the DEIR.
54
October 2010
Ms Elsie Hlongwane
Community
member
(Warden)
There is an increase in crime rate because of poverty.
Noted.
Refer to section 9, (sub-section 3) in
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an
assessment
on
Social
Impacts,
specifically crime and security.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No. 5 of the DEIR.
55
Email
04 October 2010
Mr Graham Hobbs
Meijer’sGeluk
Schaapdrift Farms
Thanks for the email. As my wife informed you after your meeting in
Harrismith our closest access to the Harrismith Chronical is some
40Km away. I was thus unaware of the meeting outlined in your
email. However as I did not receive formal invitation I assume that I
am not invited. Could you kindly inform me: 1) Who will be
representing my interests at this meeting so I am able to brief them of
my concerns prior to the meeting 2) Are we not invited to the meeting
so that we may be sidelined as in the previous EIA process.
I will assume that if you do not furnish me with the name of the
representative who will be in a position to address my concerns at
this meeting that I will be welcome to attend the meeting to represent
myself. If so kindly let me have details as to the venue and time of
the meeting.
Key
Stakeholders
and
Authorities’
Meetings are typically used in EIAs for
large and complex projects and are
intended for government officials and
people
holding
key
positions
in
organizations that represent society
across a range of key sectors, including
agriculture, tourism, business, transport
and conservation.
and
It is with disappointment that I receive such an email. It smacks of an
attempt at censorship. The meeting in Harrismith was certainly not
conducive to adequate public participation. I was under the
impression that the EIA public participation process was for all
interested and affected parties. I am not aware of any provision in the
EIA process for participation of only Key Stakeholders and
42
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
Authorities (determined by who!) that effectively sidelines the general
public.
Lastly I have received no confirmation of receipt nor response to my
email addressed to ACER 26-09-2010
56
Email
26 September
2010
Mrs Margaret Hobbs
Meijer’sGeluk
Schaapdrift Farms
and
RESPONSE TO OPEN MEETING HELD IN HARRISMITH 13 SEP
2010
1)
I am told that the purpose of EIA regulation is to invite public
participation in decision-making. It provides the public with
information as to what action is being planned and the
procedure that will be followed, in order for the public to
determine whether their rights will be infringed upon or not. It is
for these reasons that public participation is required before
any decision is made that may affect the environment. The email forwarded to me dated 19 August 2010 refers to an EIA
REF. NO. 12/12/20/1992. It is this reference that indicates that
an EIA procedure was begun in 1992.
a) May I please have a copy of the EIA procedure undertaken
in 1992?
2)
The above-mentioned e-mail refers to an agreement reached
between DEAT, SANRAL and the N3TC. This agreement
requires the N3TC to undertake another EIA process to
determine alternatives to the DBPR.
a) Is this agreement as a result of the EIA procedures done
between 1992-1999 being considered procedurally flawed
thus necessitating yet another EIA?
b)
The fact that DEAT is involved in this agreement indicates
that they never supported the Department of Transport’s
decision to consider the construction of one route, namely
the DBPR. The agreement also indicates that the unilateral
decision made by the Department of Transport to consider
only one route could be challenged by DEAT by the
implementation of the precautionary principle in the RoD.
The precautionary principle is applied in situations of
scientific uncertainty where a course of action may cause
harm to the environment. DEAT was also uncertain as to
what legislation would be in place at the time of
construction. In order to prevent the shameful attempt to
circumvent NEMA; DEAT in the RoD instructed further
Your email dated 26 September 2010,
submitted by Mrs Margaret Hobbs is
captured in this Comments and Response
Report (refer to comment number 56) .
1) The reference no is the no. allocated by
DEA to this process.
2a) There are new regulations in place
and therefore the De Beers Pass Route
and its alternatives needs to be studied in
accordance with the new regulations.
2b) Noted
2c) This EIA process is being carried out
according to the applicable regulations.
2d) This issue falls outside the scope of
this EIA process.
3a) Alternatives had been considered
during the 1992-1999 period.
3b) Alternatives need to be investigated to
avoid certain impacts.
4a) Notwithstanding prior processes, this
process is being done under the
appropriate regulations.
5a) The Team has no knowledge of any
procedurally incorrect process.
5b) This issue is not in the scope of this
EIA process.
5c) This issue is not in the scope of this
EIA process. Public documents can be
accessed through the appropriate means.
43
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
specialist reports that would be conducted under legislation
closer to the time of construction. In so doing subjecting the
construction of the DBPR to NEMA, the Water act as well as
the Biodiversity Legislation by means of the specialist
reports. DEAT was empowered to do this as a result of the
sub regulations made to the ECA in September1997. It is
clear that as from that date the Department of Transport
could not make the unilateral decision to declare any
developmental project to be for public purpose without
environmental authorization permitting its construction.
c)
I would like to know how this new agreement addresses
decisions that the public were entitled to make because of
the information provided during the previous EIA
procedure?
d)
How is the Department of Transport intending to address
the unilateral decision they were not entitled to make by
considering the construction of the DBPR to be for public
purposes without environmental authorization for its
construction?
3)
Mr Galloway points out that the motivation given in 1996 for
the construction of the DBPR was the inability of the Van
Reenen pass to accommodate the traffic flow. Mr. Tolmie
agreed that the Van Reenen to Warden section of the N3 could
be upgraded to the required standards. Mr. Cave said that he
did try to suggest alternative routes to the DBPR in 1999, but
was never told why they were not considered. It is evident from
the meeting held in Harrismith 2010 that the people of greater
Harrismith feel that they have never meaningfully participated
in any decision-making between 1998-1999 and that it is
politically and socially totally unacceptable to have considered
only the DBPR for construction between 1992-1999.
a) Can Mr. Tolmie please explain why one route was considered
during the EIA procedure of 1999 namely, the DBPR, to be
for public purpose when it was clearly not in public interest.
b) How can the RoD instruct the re-alignment of the DBPR if the
alignment there of was presented as being definite in the
previous EIA’s?
4)
I would like to point out that the RoD makes no mention of
traffic flow to determine the construction date of the DBPR, but
44
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
refers to the project organogram as presented in the scoping
report. Which requires the construction of the DBPR to
commence in 2008/2009 and to be completed in 2013.The RoD
requires that the re-alignment of the DBPR to be addressed in
the EMP to avoid wetland. The EMP instructs careful
consideration of the use of culverts and an increased number
thereof; where wetlands cannot be avoided the impact there of
is to be offset by investing in other wetland and the property
expropriated must be subject to transparent independent
environmental audit and to minimum standards of resource
management by a third party ( via ecotourism operator,
conservation group, farmer ) It must also be remembered that
in the 1980’s the DBPR was no longer considered for
construction because of the cost thereof. Subsequently the Van
Reenen pass was widened to accommodate the increase in
traffic.
a) Why was the unilateral decision made to consider one
alignment in spite of environmental legislation that could
enforce NEMA in the RoD preventing a unilateral decision
from being made?
5)
Once more the EIA procedure is being way delayed by those
with their own agenda. This legal procedure can’t function
under these circumstances. People’s rights become infringed
upon and the EIA process inevitably ends up being
procedurally incorrect and re-done to accommodate decisions
changed. Facts don’t change.
a) The decisions made under procedurally incorrect EIA
procedures, by ACER’s own admitting, have to be
withdrawn. Decisions made can’t be wiped away as
suggested at the meeting held in Harrismith people are
entitled to make decisions on information provided during
EIA procedure.
b) Should it be necessary to consider alternatives now, for
whatever reason, it would mean that the expropriation was
issued prematurely and was based on the assumption that
the DBPR would obtain environmental authorization
permitting its construction. My decision not to challenge the
expropriation served on me in 1997 was base on
information provided at the time, being that, the construction
45
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
of the DBPR was definite. This information now appears to
have been incorrect as the RoD could prevent the
construction of the DBPR. Consequently I have been denied
the right to challenge the inappropriate timing of the
expropriation.
c) How are the violations of my rights going to be addressed in
the agreement between DEAT, SANRAL and the N3TC?
The latest background report claims that the DBPR was proclaimed
to be a national road and then a toll road in 1999. Mr. Landman
informs me that SANRAL’s legal advisor a Mr. Hornsby has the
proclamation. I have requested this proclamation on many previous
occasions. I formally request that ACER obtain a copy of the
proclamation, and make it publically available.
57
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Mr Cas Human
Reality
Dynamic
(Pty)
Ltd/Highland Farm Estate
We are existing developers. We own Highlands farm, which is a
proclaimed town bordering onto the N3. If the new road will be
considered it will probably cross Van Reenen and there is a
possibility that we will have a big problem with uncontrollable traffic
and trucks.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
This will be a big loss for my development, in which I already spend a
large amount of money, as well as my clients. To ensure sufficient
parking for trucks, Realty Dynamic is busy looking into an EIA
process of a Truck Stop, Convince Centre and Warehouse facilities.
Refer to section 9, (sub-section 18) in
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an
assessment on Social Impact, specifically
Traffic. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No. 4 and 7 of the DEIR.
We would appreciate it if the of-ramp could be a bridge across the
railway line and if you could keep us up dated regarding the planning
of the process.
58
Comment Sheet
6/7
October
2010
Mr CF Cornelius Jacobs
N3 Farm Accesses
Please consider the farm accesses /
neighbouring the N3. Safety is our concern.
entrances
alongside/
Remember the closing of farm accesses will be to the detriment of
farm activities – the people who try to put food On the table.
Noted
As a registered Interested and Affected
Party on the database, you will receive all
future correspondence for this EIA.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
46
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
Social Impacts. Also refer to the Summary
of Key Issues No. 12 of the DEIR.
59
October 2010
Mr Mkiti Jele
Community
(Warden)
member
What is going to happen to Warden’s economy?
People will lose their jobs because N3 will no longer be busy.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR
Volume 2 for an assessment on Social
Impacts, specifically job loss and job
creation.
Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR Volume 2
for the economic assessments relating to
the project.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No. 4 of the DEIR.
60
Email
13 October 2010
Mr Francois Joubert
Infrastructure
Consulting
Engineers.
Total South Africa requested Infrastructure Consulting Engineers to
attend this meeting on their behalf.
Total South Africa is the owner of Portions 2 and 3 of the Farm
Somers Vlakte 1178. These properties are located adjacent to the
original De Beers Pass alignment of National Route 3. Total SA
acquired these properties with the intention to develop a direct
access rest and service facility to serve the travelling public along the
new alignment. Total SA is therefore directly affected by the new
road alignment between Keeversfontein and Warden.
The interest of Total South Africa is noted.
As a registered Interested and Affected
Party on the database, you will receive all
future correspondence for this EIA.
Rest and service facilities form an integral part of the road scheme. It
provides an opportunity for drivers and passengers to rest and
therefore forms part of the road safety infrastructure. The facilities
have become very popular with the travelling public. The travelling
public also has a need to experience the natural beauty of the
environment. This is particularly applicable in this case where the
proposed new alignment of Route 3 passes through a beautiful
natural landscape.
47
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
Modern rest and service facilities consist of a full interchange that
provides access from the freeway to the rest and service facility. This
arrangement provides the opportunity to integrate other facilities at
the interchange such as road side assistance, emergency services,
informal trade facilities and road maintenance infrastructure. The
land owned by Total is approximately 36 ha in size. This is adequate
to accommodate all the mentioned services.
Total SA is of opinion that this rest and service facility should be
designed as an integral part of the freeway scheme and that the
environmental authorization process should recognize that. Total SA
therefore requests that the available geometric design information of
the proposed road as it passes the mentioned properties be made
available.
Total SA is also the owner of an existing rest and service facility at
Swinburne along the current alignment of Route 3. Based on the
available information and depending on the selected alignment of the
proposed new road, Total will strongly consider closing this facility
permanently.
61
October 2010
Ms Mdake Julia
Community
(Warden)
member
What is going to happen to Warden’s economy?
People will lose their jobs because this road will no longer be busy.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No. 4
of the DEIR.
This should be read in conjucntion with
chapter 11 of the DEIR for the economic
assessments relating to the project.
62
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Mr PR Kameel
Community
(Warden)
I just want to say we have to extend N3 so that we can get jobs.
member
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
48
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
63
DATE
Comment Sheet
6/7
October
2010
NAME & ORGANISATION
Mr RS Kau
Maluti-o-Phofung
Municipality
Local
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
Upgrading the railway line(s) is alternative introduction of speed
railway trains.
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No. 4 of the DEIR.
The consideration of alternative modes of
transport falls outside this scope.
What does the first Scoping Report say?
I suggest that the Govt of Free State be involved in the process.
64
October 2010
Ms Jane Khanye
ANC
E tla ba moruo wa Warden. Ba kgutlise tsela ya N3. Ba atise tsela ya
N3.
Translation
It will affect the economy of Warden. They must keep the N3 road.
They must broaden the N3.
65
22 October 2010
Mr MP Khathide
Emnambithi/Ladysmith
Municipality
Social and economic impact on local communities.
The Free State Provincial Government
have participated officially in the EIA
public participation process.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts. Also refer to the Summary
of Key Issues No. 4 of the DEIR.
This should be read in conjuction with
chapter 11 of the DEIR Volume 2 for the
economic assessments relating to the
project.
66
October 2010
Ms Rebecca Kheswa
Warden community Leader
Batho ba mapolasing ba tla hlopheha hobane tlala e tla poka,
ditapole re tla di nka kae le moruo wa naha [sebaka] o tla wa. Ke le
community leader ya Ezenzeleni (Warden) ke re ha ke e batle tsela e
ntjha.
Translation
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts. Also refer to the Summary
of Key Issues No. 4 of the DEIR.
49
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
67
DATE
October 2010
NAME & ORGANISATION
Ms Lucy Kheswa
Community
(Warden)
Leader
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
The farm workers will suffer because they will go hungry, where will
we get the potatoes from and the economy of the country [area] will
go down. As a community leader of Ezenzeleni (Warden) I say I do
not want the new road.
This should be read in conjuction with
chapter 11 of the DEIR Volume 2 for the
economic assessments relating to the
project.
Ha ba atise tsela ena . E a re thusa haholo hobane le digarage di a
kgona ho fumana disente hobane dikoloi di a kena di tshele petrol.(c)
Community Leader, ke re e se ke ya kwala Warden Ezenzeleni
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Translation
Let them broaden this road. It helps us a great deal because garages
are able to get a few cents [make some income] because the
vehicles enter [the town] and fill up with petrol.(c) Community
leader, I say it must not be closed [at] Warden Ezenzeleni
68
October 2010
Mr Sam Owen Kheswa
Community
member
(Warden)
Create something for N3.
The same road is fine, just extend it.
69
October 2010
Mr Martin Kheswa
Community
(Warden)
This process will affect people from farms.
Leader
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts. Also refer to the Summary
of Key Issues No. 4 and 5 of the DEIR.
This should be read in conjuction with
chapter 11 of the DEIR Volume 2 for the
economic assessments relating to the
project.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9 and 10, in chapters 7;
8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an
assessment on Social Impacts and
Agriculture.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No. 12 of the DEIR.
70
October 2010
Miss Mitshidiso Kgwasi
Community
(Warden)
member
If we agree on the development of other roads, Warden is going to
be a downfall since people won’t get jobs from anywhere, at least
here at Warden there will be a permanent jobs. The other thing is if
we can build a shopping centre next to the road that also will give
The project addresses the De Beers Pass
Route and alternatives to it.
50
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
71
October 2010
Miss Maci Khumalo
Community
member
(Warden)
72
October 2010
Mrs Nomasonto Khumalo
Community
member
(Warden)
ISSUES/COMMENTS
better life to many people.
N3 should not be closed because it is important to us.
Shortest route that connects many areas.
RESPONSE
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR Volume 2. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No. 11 and 16 of
the DEIR.
73
October 2010
Ms Celiwe Khumalo
Community
member
(Warden)
It is a short cut going to many places and we can get transport easily
and quicker. s
Noted
74
October 2010
Miss Mankomo Khumalo
Community
member
(Warden)
People who are working on the farms - what is going to happen to
them? N3 must be extended.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9 and 10, in chapters 7;
8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an
assessment on Social Impacts and
Agriculture. Also refer to the Summary of
Key Issues No. 4 and 12 of the DEIR.
75
76
October 2010
Email
27 September
2010
Mr Sifiso Khoza
Community
(Warden)
Expand N3 or develop N3.
member
Mr K Karen Kohler
Tourism KwaZulu-Natal
In a discussion with my CEO, Mr Ndabo Khoza, a few moment ago,
there is one more issue which it is imperative is included in
considerations around this road project. The high speed rail link
between Durban and Johannesburg should be part of this overall
process and project. In planning for the future, it would make the
most sense, economically, strategically, construction-wise and from a
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
These issues will be taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
The consideration of alternative modes of
transport falls outside this scope.
51
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
tourism and business perspective, to include consideration of space
and construction for the high speed rail link along with the upgrading
of this road link, rather than as a separate issue and project. In that
way, transport for decades into the future would be assured, and the
road itself would last longer with fewer vehicles and less freight using
it.
I suggest that the following issues be investigated in the EIA process:
From a tourism perspective, the De Beers Pass project of an
improvement in the road between the main centre of population
concentration and the KZN coast is very positive. A reduction in
driving time and an increase in safety - often linked - is to be viewed
in a very supportive light.
RESPONSE
Refer to section 9 (Sub-section 17), in
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR
Volume 2 for an assessment on Social
Impacts, specifically Tourism. Also refer to
the Summary of Key Issues No. 7 of the
DEIR
There are a few concerns but perhaps these will be dealt with during
the EIA process and subsequently.
The first is the issue of another toll gate or plaza at Warden North.
Visitors between Gauteng and KZN already pay dearly for their trips
and this would be an added burden. If that burden could be kept as
small as possible and possibly subsidized, this would be strongly
supported.
The second issue is that of the cost of the new section or route. It
would appear that Option A requires far less actual new construction
as, for the most part, it consists of a widening of the existing road.
This would also probably mean far less in terms of land
expropriation, new construction, and thus lower costs overall.
Finally, the other two options appear to cross wetlands in the vicinity
of the Wilge River. In view of the scarcity and fragility of wetlands, as
well as of their value - to biodiversity and to tourism - any destruction
of wetlands is to be strongly avoided.
Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the
economic assessments relating to the
project.
Refer to section 4, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for a summary of the
Wetland specialist study and impact
assessments for sections.
Refer to Chapter 5 of the DEIR for the
Technical Assessment.
Another area of concern with regards to the DBPR is the proposed
construction of a gorge tunnel of half a kilometre long. Not only are
such tunnels extremely costly, but they are also costly and difficult to
enlarge. At some time in the future this tunnel will become a bottleneck and further construction of that road at that point will become
necessary, whether it be a second tunnel, or some other option.
77
Comment Sheet
12/13
Cllr LM Kleinhans
Maluti-a-Phofung
Please relook at the Western bypass at Harrismith.
Local
In the late 1980’s when the Eastern
Bypass was upgraded there was talk of
52
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
78
79
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
September 2010
Municipality
Email
28 September
2010
Mrs A Kleynhans
Interested and Affected
Party (Harrismith)
October 2010
Ms Jeanet M Komako
Community
member
(Warden)
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
the Western Bypass. Due to public
pressure, the decision was then taken not
to build the Western Bypass.
I am positive about this project as the noise from the N3 is not out of
control. The person who wants to go through Harrismith will still do
so and I cannot think how this can influence the tourist from driving
through Harrismith.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
I also contact a Sound Engineer from England to come and measure
the sound on the houses nearby the highway.
Refer to section 8, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Noise Impacts. Also refer to the Summary
of Key Issues No. 8 of the DEIR.
Nna Jeanet ke kopa hore mmuso o se ke wa kwala tsela eno hobane
e bohlokwa ha holo ho nna ka transport hobane e mahareng a
toropo ya ka e nnyane.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
Translation
I Jeanet, request that the government should not close that road
because it is very important to me with regards to transport because
it is in the middle of my small town.
80
October 2010
Matshediso Komako
Community
member
(Warden)
Maikutlo a ka ke hore tsela ena e se ke ya kwalwa hobane e
mahareng a Durban to Gauteng. Jwale kene kopa hore e mpe e
eketswe ka kopo. Hobane e molemo haholo mabapi le transport
Jwale ka ha ke ne ke hlalositse ka re e mahareng.
Translation
My feeling is that this road should not be closed because it is in the
middle of Durban to Gauteng. Now I request that it should rather be
widened [upgraded] please. Because it is of great benefit with
regards to transport as I have already indicated that it is in the
middle.
81
October 2010
82
October 2010
Miss Jane Mpho Komako
Community
member
(Warden)
Miss Nthabiseng Maria
Komalo
Community
member
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments. It is a contractual obligation
that N3TC maintain the existing N3
throughout the concession period.
Please don’t close that road but must be extended.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
That road must be closed.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
53
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
83
84
DATE
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
October 2010
NAME & ORGANISATION
(Warden)
Mr TR Kumalo
Community
(Warden)
Mr Eric Kumalo
Community
(Warden)
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
I am happy with road, because it will create jobs
Noted
Loss of jobs, Warden economy, close of some businesses, farm.
Community. I don’t want this road because it is going to affect some
businesses and that lead to lose of some people jobs.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
member
member
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts and chapter 11, for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No. 4 and of the DEIR.
85
October 2010
Miss Nonhlanhla Kumalo
Community
member
(Warden)
Not being done much development.
I don’t want this road.
86
October 2010
Miss Thembisile Kumalo
ANC
Loss of jobs, close of some businesses.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts and chapter 11, for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No. 4 of the DEIR.
87
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Mr JT Kunene
Phumelela
Municipality
Local
The reason for construction of De Beers Pass.
The possibility of enlargement of the existing N3 the socio-economic
factor and the agricultural factor
The reason for the construction of de
Beers Pass is provided in response to
Issue number 1 on page 95 of this
document.
We will be disadvantaged by De Beers Pass.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
54
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts and chapter 11, for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No. 4 of the DEIR.
88
89
Comment Sheet
20 September
2010
Mr Casper Landman
SANRAL
October 2010
Ds Teboho Lefu
Kerk Predikant (Warden)
The National road proposed by N3TC will become SANRAL’s
eventually and De Beers Pass was declared as a National Road by
SANRAL’s predecessor.
Noted.
(a) Hoe staan Warden – want N3 is belangrik vir die mense van
besegheid – Winkels kaffe en filling stasie.
(c) N3 is belangrik van die mense en die dorp van Warden.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Translation
The N3 is very important for the people and businesses of Warden
(shops and filling stations).
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts and chapter 11, for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No. 4 of the DEIR.
N3 is very important for the residents of Warden.
90
October 2010
Miriam Lekele
Community
(Warden)
member
Dipolasi tseo di a re fepa ho a lengwa ho jalwe ha ho fediswa
dipolasi re tla phela ka eng?. Bana ba holang batla phela jwang ka
moso? Batho ba ahileng moo ba tla leba kae, mosebetsi ba o
fumane kae? Nahana ka bokamoso.
Translation
Those farms provide us with food they [fields] are ploughed [and
crops] planted [and] if farming is discontinued, how will we survive?
These children who are growing up, how will they live in future? (c)
Those people who live on farms, where will they go, [and] where will
they get jobs from? Think of the future.
91
October 2010
Puleng Lekele
Community
member
Re tlo hloka diambulance ho tswa Phumelela ho ya Betlehem
Harrismith le Qwaqwa. Dipolasi di ya re fepa
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9 and 10, in chapters 7; 8;
9; and 10 of the DEIR for an assessment
on Social and Agricultural Impacts. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No. 4
and 12 of the DEIR.
Noted.
55
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
(Warden)
Translation
We will need ambulances from Phumelela to Bethlehem, Harrismith
and QwaQwa. Farms are providing us with food.
92
October 2010
Mr George Lekele
Community
member
(Warden)
Batho ba ahileng moo ba tla leba kae, masebetsi ba o fumane kae?
Nahana ka bokameso. Dipolasi tseo di a re fepa ho tla lengwa ho
jalwe [kae] ha ho fediswa dipolasi re tla phela ka eng, bana ba
holang ba tla phela jwang bokamoso?
Translation
Where will people who are staying there [on farms] go, there are no
job opportunities? Think about the future. These farms provide us
with food, where will ploughing and crops planting take place if farms
are discontinued, how will we survive, these children who are
growing up how will they live in future?
93
94
October 2010
October 2010
Ms Melita Lekele
Community
(Warden)
member
Mr Mohammed Lipu
Super value (Warden)
I do not think it is a right thing because many people are using N3 to
reach Harrismith and Bethlehem even Qwaqwa, so as our town is
small we are buying from Harrismith. If the N3 closes down it means
no life for us.
Our business will die.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9 and 10, in chapters 7; 8;
9; and 10 of the DEIR for an assessment
on Social and Agricultural Impacts.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No. 4 and 12 of the DEIR.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No. 5 of the DEIR.
95
Faxed Comment
Sheet
14
October
2010
Dr IT Little
Endangered Wildlife Trust
1.
2.
3.
Threatened and /or endemic fauna and flora should not be
detrimentally affected.
Ecosystem functioning and habitat connectivity should be
mitigated as far as possible. (Roads are an ecological barrier,
this should be mitigated as far as possible
Mitigation for habitat loss
We (EWT) along with partner are particularly interested in the impact
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to sections, 2; 3 and 4 in chapters 7;
8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an impact
56
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
96
October 2010
Mrs Madinja Lukhele
Community
member
(Warden)
97
October 2010
Mrs Ntswaki Mabe
Community
member
(Warden)
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
to Giant Girdled lizards (Sungazers/Ouvolk). This spp requires
research and monitoring to understand the effects of habitat
fragmentation and individual translocation.
assessment on Flora and Fauna, Avifauna
and Wetlands. Also refer to the Summary
of Key Issues No. 1 of the DEIR.
This road must continue to operate under one condition - that it is
helpful to us. We catch transport in a reasonable fare when we are
going to Durban or Johannesburg and when hitch hiking to private
cars.
Re ka thabela ho bona motse wa Warden o tswetse pele, ho
molemo hore ho atiswe tsela ya N3 e seng e le teng ho na le hore ho
qalwe tsela e ntjha. Re ka thabela ho bona ho ahilwe dikaratje. Le
shopping complex next to Warden
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
Translation
We will be grateful to see the town of Warden developing, it is better
to broaden the present N3 instead of building a new road. We will be
grateful to see the building of new garages and shopping complex in
Warden.
98
99
100
October 2010
October 2010
October 2010
Mr Oupa Mabula
Community
(Warden)
Abantu bazophelelwa umsebenzi nabanye ngeke bacoshwe.
member
Ms Nthabiseng Mabula
Community
member
(Warden)
Ms Busiswe Madlala
Community
member
(Warden)
Translation
People will lose jobs and the others will not be unable to find
transport.
Lutho, siyithanda injalo, nifake itoll gate nje kuphela kuyona lendlela.
Translation
We like it as it is. The only need is a toll gate.
Ngithi mina i-N3 mayingavalwa ngoba lapha eWarden sizosokola
futhi nemali ngeke isangena kakhulu ilungile iN3 mayiyekwe nje.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No. 4 of the DEIR.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6; 7 and
18) in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for an assessment on Social
Impacts. Also refer to the Summary of
Key Issues No. 4 of the DEIR.
Noted.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
Translation
57
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
101
DATE
October 2010
NAME & ORGANISATION
Mrs Lusia Madlala
Community
member
(Warden)
ISSUES/COMMENTS
N3 must not be closed because Warden community will suffer. If
closed, there will be no much money coming in. Existing N3 is fine as
is.
Loss of jobs and crime will be high.
RESPONSE
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 3; 6 and
7) in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR
for an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically crime;
job loss and job
creation.
102
103
October 2010
October 2010
Miss Selinah Maduna
Community
member
(Warden)
Ms Maria Maduna
Community
member
(Warden)
Sinezifiso ezinkulu ngoba abantu abadlula nge N3 basipha
umsebenzi futhi bangena edolobheni lethu bathenge.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Translation
We have many wishes because people who use N3 provide us with
jobs, come into our town and buy some goods from us.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No. 4
of the DEIR.
Sizoswela umsebenzi.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Translation
We are going to lose jobs.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No. 4
of the DEIR.
104
105
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Comment Sheet
12/13
Miss OC Maduna
ANC
I am happy about the road because it will create more jobs.
Noted
Miss Nozizwe Maduna
I am happy because this road will create job opportunities for all of
us.
Noted
58
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
106
September 2010
October 2010
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
Mr Joseph Maduna
Community
member
(Warden)
Mina bengithi ungavalwa uN3 ngoba abantu base Warden
bazoswela umsebenzi ngoba manje namagalaji azovalwa.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No. 4 of the
DEIR.
Translation
N3 must not be closed because people of Warden will lose their jobs
and the garages will be closed.
107
108
October 2010
October 2010
July Mduna
Community
(Warden)
They must expand N3.
Noted
Hier het werk.
Noted
member
Mrs Virginia Mahlaba
ANC
Translation
With the existence of the road, we have work.
109
110
111
October 2010
October 2010
October 2010
Ms Pinky Mahlaba
ANC
Ms Zanele Mahlaba
Community
member
(Warden)
Ms Sibongile Mahlaba
Community
member
(Warden)
Bazolahlekelwa imisebenzi lokho kusiholela ezinhluphekweni.
Khulisani uN3.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Translation
People are going to lose their jobs and that will lead to poverty.
Expand N3.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No. 4
of the DEIR.
Lendlela iyasiza kakhulu abantu basemapulazini iyabasiza. Yekani
lendlela ningayivali.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
Translation
This road is of great help to farm workers. Do not close the road.
This will affect farming agriculture and tourism more people from the
farms will come and form informed settlement. Unemployment rate
will rise and crime will also increase. It is going to disadvantage us,
do not ever think of building this road.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6; 7 and
17) in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for an assessment on Social
59
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
Impacts, specifically job loss and job
creation as well as tourism.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No. 4; 5 and 7 of the DEIR.
112
113
October 2010
Mrs Paulina Mhlasela
Community
member
(Warden)
I request that the road must not be closed because we will suffer for
the ambulances as they travel from Warden to Vrede to go to
Harrismith now it is not ok.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Ms DL Mahomane
Community
member
(Warden)
I suggest that the EIA investigate on the way this process is going to
affect our economy as people, How is the community going to benefit
from this process.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Comment: I don’t see any point in building a new road because that
is going to affect people on losing jobs, so why not improve the
existing N3 road and bring new business and create new jobs.
114
115
116
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
October 2010
Mr Makhubo
Community
member
(Warden)
Mr RM Makhubo
Community
member
(Warden)
Mr Dumisani Makhubo
Community
member
(Warden)
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No. 4
of the DEIR.
This should be read in conjuction with
Chapter 5 of the DEIR for the Technical
Assessment.
No.
Noted.
I want this kind of a job any time.
Noted.
Loss of jobs, economy of Warden.
I do not want this road.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation and
chapter 11 for the economic assessments
relating to the project. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No. 4 of the
60
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
DEIR.
117
118
October 2010
October 2010
Mr Moetsuoa Makhoathi
Community
member
(Warden)
Ms Maria Makhubo
Community
member
(Warden)
Ke bona hore Ezenzeleni Warden ha e fuwe monyetla wa hore e
hole ho tshwanela hore yona tsela eo e fumantshwe kapa ebe le bo
filing station, mall le dintho tseo bafetakatsela ba dihlokang, tsela ena
yona e hloka feela dintlafatso eseng eng kapa eng.
Translation
I notice that Ezenzeleni Warden is not given an opportunity to grow,
that road must be provided with or must have filling stations, mall and
other things which travellers need. This road needs improvements
and nothing else.
I do not think it is a good idea because the garages will be closed
and people will lose jobs. Our town is very small, so we need jobs in
our town.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts and chapter 11 for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No. 4 of the DEIR.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts and chapter 11 for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No. 4 of the DEIR.
119
October 2010
Ms Amelia Makhubo
Community
member
(Warden)
Ha ho kwalwa N3 re tla sokola hahalo – re tla fellwa ke mosebetsi. Di
garage di tla kwalwa, dihotel le dikafe. Hlopheho e tla ba ngata.
Borapolasi le di business manager....... [batla tsamaya]. N3 e thusa
hore re fihle Harrismith, Bethlehem, Qwaqwa le Warden ka potlako.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
Translation
When the N3 is closed we will suffer very much – we will lose jobs.
Garages will close down, hotels and cafes [will close]. There will be
lot of hardships. Farmers and business managers..... [will leave]. The
N3 helps us to get to Harrismith, Bethlehem, QwaQwa and Warden
quickly.
120
October 2010
Mr Petros Makhubo
Sizoswela umsebenzi ngoba indlela iyohamba kude namagaraji ka
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
61
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
Community
(Warden)
member
ISSUES/COMMENTS
petrol nama restaurant kanye nama hotel netransport iyoba kude
nathi. Amapulazi asinceda ngokudla.
Translation
We are going to need jobs because the road will be far from the
petrol stations, restaurants, as well as the hotels and transport will be
far from us. Farms help us with food.
121
October 2010
122
October 2010
Ms Khanyisile Makhubu
Community
member
(Warden)
Mrs Sheila Makhubu
Community
member
(Warden)
RESPONSE
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9 and 10, in chapters 7; 8;
9; and 10 of the DEIR for an assessment
on Social Impacts and an assessment on
Agricultural Impacts. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No. 4 and 12 of
the DEIR.
Expand/develop N3.
Noted
Expand N3 and develop it as it will contribute towards the
development of Warden economy.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No. 4 of the DEIR.
123
October 2010
Mr Mxolisi Makhubu
Community
member
(Warden)
A lot of tourists pass Warden by, and that maybe a potential income
generator if the N3 is expanded and amended
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9,(sub-section 17) in
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an
assessment
on
Social
Impacts,
specifically Tourism. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No. 4 and 7 of the
DEIR.
124
October 2010
Mr Samuel Makhubu
Community
member
(Warden)
Ha re ba tle ho lahlehelwa ke mosebetsi. Re kopa le tlohele N3 e le
jwalo.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Translation
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
62
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
125
DATE
October 2010
NAME & ORGANISATION
Mrs Elizabeth Makhubo
Community
(Warden)
member
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
We do not want to lose our jobs. We request that the N3 should be
left as is.
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No. 4
of the DEIR.
If you move people from the farming areas, where will they go?
There are no additional residential areas, this includes our location.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 9) in
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an
assessment
on
Social
Impacts,
specifically relocation. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No. 6 of the
DEIR.
126
October 2010
Ms Anti Makhubo
Warden
community
member
We do not want to lose our jobs.
N3 is our hope.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No. 4
of the DEIR.
127
128
October 2010
October 2010
Ellak Maleka
Community
(Warden)
member
Ms Sibongile Malinga
Community
member
(Warden)
Ke re tsela e seke ya kwala hobane e ya re thusa ha re ilo palama
tseleng mola. Ho betere ke re ba e atise. Ke re ha e se ka kwala
Translation
The road should not be closed as we depend on it for transport. It will
be better if they widen it.
Sizakuphelelwa umsebenzi. Yekelani ukusihluphekisa
Translation
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
63
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
We will lose jobs. Please do not create poverty for us.
129
130
October 2010
Comment Sheet
7 October 2010
Ms Hessie Jane Malinga
Community
member
(Warden)
Mr David Maphisa
Birdlife South Africa
RESPONSE
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No. 4
of the DEIR.
Ke lakatsa jwalo. Ke thabela mosebetsi - batho ba tlo fumana
mosebetsi.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Translation
It is my wish. I am grateful for jobs - people will get jobs.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No. 4
of the DEIR.
Impact of each of the proposed route on avifauna (birds) butterflies,
wetlands, reptiles.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to sections 2; 3 and 4 in chapters 7;
8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for a summary of
specialist studies and impact assessments
for sections. Also refer to the Summary of
Key Issues No. 1 of the DEIR.
131
132
October 2010
October 2010
Ms Mmathutu Mashiloane
Community
member
(Warden)
Mr Mohobo Mashioane
Sizoswela umsebenzi nendlala izosiqeda.
Translation
We are going to lose jobs and we will die from hunger.
Please expand N3
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No. 4
of the DEIR.
Noted.
64
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
Community
(Warden)
133
October 2010
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
member
Ms Mateboho Mashilwane
Community
member
(Warden)
Tlala e tlo ba mathata
Translation
People will go hungry.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation.
Also refer to section 10, in chapters 7; 8;
9; and 10 of the DEIR for an assessment
on Agricultural Impacts. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No. 4 and 12 of
the DEIR.
134
October 2010
Mrs MM Mashinini
Community
member
(Warden)
Indlela edlula e Warden ibalulekile kakhulu ngicela kwandiswe lo N3
abemkhulu ukuze abantu bazothola umsebenzi lo N3 akadlule
eWarden aye eHarrismith. Itollgate mayifakwe khona la uN3 siyacela
abantubathole umsebenzi.
Translation
The existing N3 from Warden to Harrismith is important to us and
must be extended so that people can get jobs. Also, a toll gate must
be built on N3 so that jobs can be created.
135
October 2010
Ms
Thoko
Mashinini
Community
(Warden)
Johanna
member
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No. 4
and 9 of the DEIR.
Ngibona kungesingumbono omuhle ukuthi kwakhiwe omunye
umgwaqo kungukuthi omunye umgwaqo ukhona. Nabantu
bazoswela umsebenzi kanti amagaraji nama (restaurants) azothutha
aye lapho. Akukhuliswe idolobha kungabiyindlela kuphela.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
Translation
It is not a good idea to build another road if there is one available.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
65
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
136
DATE
October 2010
NAME & ORGANISATION
Mr De Wet Mashinini
Community
member
(Warden)
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
People will lose jobs as garages and restaurants will move away to
the new road. The town must also be expanded not only the road.
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
of the DEIR.
(a) Ek stem nie saam met die mense wat ‘n ander pad wil bou want
dit gaan ons dorp se ekonomie af ekteer op ‘n slegte manier. Die
mense wat bestuur of het karre sal nie meer die petrl stasie wat in
die dorp is gebruik. Hulle sal kaarkop toe gaan en die mense wat
werk by die petrol stasie sal hulle werk verloor.
(b) Ek stel oor dat hulle moet nie die pad bou nie.
(c) Mense wat in hierdie (Warden) lokasie bly gaan hulle werk
verloor.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Translation
I do not agree with the person who wants to build a new road, which
will affect our town in a bad way. People with cars or drivers will stop
using the filling station that is in town. In addition, all employees who
work at the filling station will lose their jobs.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation and
chapter 11 for the economic assessments
relating to the project. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
I recommend that they do not build a new road. People staying in
Warden will lose their jobs.
137
138
October 2010
October 2010
Mr Mabuti Mashinini
Community
member
(Warden)
Mr Bongani Mashinini
Community
member
(Warden)
Mina ngibona kungcono kwengezwe uN3. Zonke izinto abafuna
ukuzenza bazenzele la kuN3 ngoba nezikhala ziningi kakhulu futhi
sizoluza kakhulu thina abahlala eduze kweN3 ngoba kuzoba into
yesikhashana.
Translation
I think it is better to widen N3. All proposed developments must be
for the existing N3 because there is space for the widening of the
road.
Crime will be more and affect agriculture.
Upgrade N3.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
and section 10 in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10
of the DEIR for an assessment on Social
Impacts, specifically job loss and job
66
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
creation and for an assessment on
Agricultural Impacts. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.4 and 12 of
the DEIR.
139
October 2010
Mrs Sibongile Mashinini
Community
member
(Warden)
What happens with the farms where the road passes? Will people of
Ezenzeleni/Warden have permanent jobs?
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
and section 10 in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10
of the DEIR for an assessment on Social
Impacts, specifically job loss and job
creation and for an assessment on
Agricultural Impacts. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.4 and 12 of
the DEIR.
140
141
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
October 2010
Mrs MF Masiteng
CPF (Warden)
The project should go on as long as it will benefit us economically.
Noted
Mr Oupa Masiteng
Community
member
(Warden)
Poverty will be a problem.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
of the DEIR.
142
October 2010
Mrs
Thandi
Masiteng
Community
(Warden)
Nelisiwe
member
The farm workers will lose their jobs because they depend on farms.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
and section 10 in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10
of the DEIR for an assessment on Social
67
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
Impacts, specifically job loss and job
creation and for an assessment on
Agricultural Impacts. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.4 and 12 of
the DEIR.
143
144
145
October 2010
Nomshado Masiteng
Community
member
(Warden)
Tsela ena e tla pota hole, ebile le petrol ho batho ba dikoloi e tla ba
mathata
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Translation
This road will by-pass [the town] too far, and petrol to car owners will
be a problem.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 13) in
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an
assessment
on
Social
Impacts,
specifically service infrastructure and
provision. Also refer to the Summary of
Key Issues No.4 and 5 of the DEIR.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Comment Sheet
7 October 2010
Ms SJB Matjoa
Department
of
Police,
Roads and Transport
Economic Impact on road moving on Platberg.
The importance of upgrading the road vis a vis building a new road.
Comment Sheet
Mr FM Mazibuko
ANC
Impact towards the community regarding jobs. To involve community
at all levels.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
of the DEIR.
146
October 2010
Mr Vusi Mazibuko
Community
member
(Warden)
What will happen to our economy?
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. . Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
68
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
Mrs KG Mbele
Community
member
(Warden)
Ms Zandile Mbele
Community
member
(Warden)
I support the building of the new De Beers Pass – more jobs will be
created. This is going to be good for Warden.
Noted
148
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
October 2010
Please leave N3 alone and build garages and malls.
149
October 2010
Miss Lungile Mdladla
Community
member
(Warden)
More crime, more poverty. We don’t need that road because N3 is
here and we feel it.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments. The project addresses the
De Beers Pass Route and alternatives to
it.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
No
147
RESPONSE
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 3, 6 and
7) in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR
for an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically crime, job loss and job
creation. . Also refer to the Summary of
Key Issues No.4 and 5 of the DEIR.
150
October 2010
Mrs Tryphina Mdladla
Community
member
(Warden)
More crime, more poverty. We don’t need that road because N3 is
here and we feel it.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections3, 6 and
7) in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR
for an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically crime, job loss and job
creation. . Also refer to the Summary of
Key Issues No.4 and 5 of the DEIR.
151
Comment Sheet
6/7
October
2010
Mr B Mekoa
Free State Development
Corporation
Economic impact on the area viewed against the background that
there are plans in place to establish a logistical hub in this area that
would have a major economic boast to the area.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. . Also refer to the Summary of Key
69
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
152
153
Comment Sheet
6/7
October
2010
Mrs B Boitumelo Melato
Department
of
Water
Affairs (Free State)
Should the project go ahead Water Affairs must be consulted for the
following:

To comment on the wetland studies to be conducted

Obtain a water use authorization for 21 (c) and (i) as the road
will be crossing water resources. This must be obtained
before commencement of the project.
The EIA process
legislation.
will
comply
with
October 2010
Ms Theresia Mfupi
Community
member
(Warden)
Because Warden is going to be poor.
Extend the road N3.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. . Also refer to the Summary of
Key Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
154
155
156
October 2010
October 2010
Comment Sheet
6/7
October
2010
Ms Lizzie Miller
Community
(Warden)
Ke kopa le atolose tselayona ena entseng eleteng.
member
Translation
I want the current road to be widened.
Miss Lerato Miya
Community
member
(Warden)
Mr T Mkhonza
Maluti-a-Phofung
Municipality
Local
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
Asiyidingi indlela entsha ngoba abantu abaningi bazolahlekelwa
umsebenzi.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Translation
We do not need a new road because too many people will lose their
jobs.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 3, 6 and
7) in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR
for an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically crime, job loss and job
creation. . Also refer to the Summary of
Key Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
Social impact particularly business, unemployment
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 3, 6 and
7) in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR
70
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
for an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically crime, job loss and job
creation. Also refer to the Summary of
Key Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
157
October 2010
158
October 2010
Mr Mkhulisi Mkuni
Community
member
(Warden)
Mr Mandla Mkhwanazi
Community
member
(Warden)
The ambulances from Vrede to Harrismith will take a long time if N3
road could be closed.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
More crime, more poverty. We do not need that road because N3 is
here and we feel it.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 3, 6 and
7) in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR
for an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically crime, job loss and job
creation. . Also refer to the Summary of
Key Issues No.4 and 5 of the DEIR.
159
October 2010
Mr Aaron Mkhwanazi
Community
member
(Warden)
Rape will be more, alcohol will be more.
Upgrade N3 and create more work for us.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 3, 6 and
7) in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR
for an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically crime, job loss and job
creation. . Also refer to the Summary of
Key Issues No.4 and 5 of the DEIR.
160
October 2010
Ms Nthabiseng
E
Mkhwanazi
Community
member
(Warden)
Increase in crime cause problems.
Upgrade N3
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-section 3) in
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an
assessment
on
Social
Impacts,
specifically crime and security. . Also refer
71
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
to the Summary of Key Issues No.5 of the
DEIR.
161
October 2010
Ms Dimakatso Mkhasibe
Community
member
(Warden)
Crime rate will be high because of poverty
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-section 3) in
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an
assessment
on
Social
Impacts,
specifically crime and security. Also refer
to the Summary of Key Issues No.5 of the
DEIR.
162
October 2010
163
October 2010
164
165
October 2010
October 2010
Enos Willy Mkhatshwa
Community
member
(Warden)
Ms Thabitha Mlaba
Community
member
(Warden)
Ms Alinah Mlaba
Community
member
(Warden)
Ms Sonto Sese Mlangeni
Community
member
(Warden)
Because the petrol is too expensive.
Noted
Ngicela ukuthi indlela ingakhiwa ngoba abantu abaningi bazoswela
indawo yokuhlala kanye nomsebenzi.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Translation
The proposed road must not be built because many people will lose
their jobs and place to stay.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6, 7 and)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss, job creation and
relocation. . Also refer to the Summary of
Key Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
Asiyidingi indawo entsha yomgwaqo ozokwakhiwa ngoba abantu
abahlala emaphandleni bazoswela indawo yokuhlala nomsebenzi.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Translation
We do not need a new road because people fom the rural areas will
lose their areas of residence as well as their jobs.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6, 7 and)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss, job creation and
relocation.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
People will lose jobs.
72
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR
Volume 2 for an assessment on Social
Impacts, specifically job loss and job
creation. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
166
October 2010
Ms Thabile Mlangeni
Community
member
(Warden)
167
October 2010
Ms Tholakele Mlangeni
Community
member
(Warden)
What is going to happen with transport, trucks, buses, taxis if this
road is closed? Which alternative will be used for an example when
we come back from overseas wanting to go to Durban? If this road
can be closed we will suffer scarcity of jobs, shortage of transport
and emergency services. Economy of South Africa will go down,
communities are not going to get quick emergency help in a good
way e.g. ambulances, police, etc.
Tlala e tlo ja setsi.
Translation
People will go hungry.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation.
Refer to section 10, in chapters 7; 8; 9;
and 10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Agricultural Impacts.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No.4, 5 and 12 of the DEIR.
168
October 2010
Mr James Mlangeni
Community
member
(Warden)
Kuyosweleka amathuba emisebenzi kanti emagarage abantu
bayophelelwa imisebenzi. Osomankontilaka angeke banikezane
ngemisebenzi ngoba bazobe bengasekho eduzane ne Warden.
Siyoswela itransport ngoba kuyobe kungasekho busy ngalendlela
yokuthi angeke bavumele izimoto zabo zihambele ubala.
Translation
Job opportunities will be lost particularly for people who are working
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts.
Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
73
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
in the garages. Another matter, contractors will not give jobs to
people of Warden because they will be far away from the area.
Lastly, we will need transport because it will not be busy anymore
and transport owners will not allow their vehicles to travel when there
is little/no business.
169
October 2010
Ms Christina Mlangeni
Community
member
(Warden)
It will have a positive affect towards economy and the development
of our community. Develop and extend the N3.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
170
171
172
October 2010
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
October 2010
Mr Sele Mlotshwa
Community
member
(Warden)
Mr MF Mnguni
Community
(Warden)
member
Ms Hlakaniphile Mntungwa
Community
member
(Warden)
Izimoto zosizo oluphambili noma lokuqala zihamba kuleyondlela
ngalokho ngiyibona ibalulekile.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Translation
N3 is important because emergency transport and ambulances
use/travel on it.
Refer to section 9,(sub-section 13) in
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an
assessment
on
Social
Impacts,
specifically service infrastructure and
provision. Also refer to the Summary of
Key Issues No.5 of the DEIR
Noted.
Anytime we are ready. We can support you.
I am a Zulu speaking person, the work must be done.
Poverty will increase in our location.
This issues was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR
Volume 2 for an assessment on Social
Impacts, specifically job loss and job
creation. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 and 5 of the DEIR
173
Comment Sheet
1 October 2010
Mr T E Moeketsi
Community
Roads management as well as constructions.
member
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
74
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
(Warden)
ISSUES/COMMENTS
Please maintain the existing N3 Road and no other roads.
RESPONSE
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9,(sub-section 13 and 18)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically service infrastructure and
provision as well as traffic disruptions.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No.5 of the DEIR
174
October 2010
Louise Mofokeng
Community
member
(Warden)
We do not need another road, you can extend N3 so that they can’t
have traffic during holiday time. No, we don’t need another road. N3
is good for us and we’re satisfied with it.
Noted
175
October 2010
Ms
Maserame
Portia
Mofokeng
Community
member
(Warden)
I-N3 iyonandlela ejwayelekile kakhulu kanti kunokuthi kwakhiwe
indlela entsha, kungamane kwengezelwe uN3. Indlela enkulu lapho
kudlula khona ama truck amakhulu. Kungamane kufakwe isiporo
sesitimela njengezi indawo. Ukumosha nje imali kahulumeni kuphela
nje. Cha, siyabonga ngendlela entsha ngoba la eVoti akunamanzi
kanti nendawo ayikho bazohlala
kuphi labantu abaqhamuka
emapulazini (farms) abayosuswa lapho indlela iyohamba khona.
Uma besuswa lapho behlezikhona, bayohlalaphi?
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Translation
N3 is the main road and we are used to it. Instead of building a new
road rather extend the existing N3 as it is the main road which is
used by big trucks. Another option would be to build railway lines like
other places. This proposal is a waste of governments’ money.
At Voti we have no water and there are no additional residential
areas. People who are currently staying in farms will be moved to
accommodate the new road, where will they be moved to?
176
October 2010
Miss Popie Mofokeng
Community
member
(Warden)
Umnotho awukho kahle edolobheni lethu (Warden) uma indlela
enkulu ivalwa eduze nedolobha lethu kuzoba nzima ukufinyelela
lapho izovulwa khona. Kuhle uma lendlela ilapha eduzane.
The consideration of alternative modes of
transport falls outside the scope of this
EIA process.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 9) in
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically relocation. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.6 and 12 of
the DEIR.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
75
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
Translation
The economic activities in our town, Warden, are relatively low. If this
big road (N3) which is closer to our town is closed, it would be
difficult to access the new road. It is better to keep the road near us.
177
178
October 2010
October 2010
Mr Kabelo Mofokeng
Community
member
(Warden)
Ms
Puleng
Mofokeng
Community
(Warden)
Miriam
member
Poverty will be a problem.
There’s no need of making a new roads who is going to drive there at
that road they are many things need to be done in our N3 example
(extending the road etc) What about other drivers from different
places example (KZN, GP, etc). With that Government / money can’t
you fix N3 rather than wasting it. As a community member, I suggest
no road should be made that’s a waste, N3 is our highway no need
for new N3 we are satisfied with our old one. What about the
people’s life that live in that farm think first before you do!
179
October 2010
Telly Teboho Mofokeng
Community
member
(Warden)
I suggest that no road should be made because N3 is a highway that
all people prefer it. No road should be made and N3 is the road that
exist in the right way.
180
October 2010
More people in our community work for farmers.
181
October 2010
Mr
Jeremiah
Lefu
Mofokeng
Community
member
(Warden)
Mr Teboho Mofokeng
Community
member
(Warden)
Umsebenzi uzoba yinkinga ngoba sizowuswela.
Translation
Job opportunities might be a challenge. We might lose jobs.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR
Volume 2 for an assessment on Social
Impacts, specifically job loss and job
creation. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 of the DEIR
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
Noted
This issue will be taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
76
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR
Volume 2 for an assessment on Social
Impacts, specifically job loss and job
creation.
182
Comment Sheet
6/7
October
2010
Ms M Mogopodi
Thabo
Mofutsanyana
District Municipality
My interest is to make sure that the route is not going to kill economic
activity of Free State Province. Therefore I reject the construction of
the proposed route.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
The Socio-Economic impact the project is going to bring to Thabo
Mofutsanyana District Municipal (Harrismisth) and the Free State
Province general.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts. Also refer to the Summary
of Key Issues No.4 and 5 of the DEIR.
Business organisations, environment, religious and political parties
because their constituencies are going to political parties because
their constituencies are going to be negatively affected especially in
the Free State.
183
184
185
October 2010
October 2010
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Kamohelo
Mohlabine
Community
(Warden)
Matthew
member
Ms Puseletso Mohlakoana
Community
member
(Warden)
Mr Lucky I Mokoena
Community
member
(Warden)
I recommend that the solution is to expand the existing road, have at
least more two lanes dedicated to heavy vehicles e.g. trucks
I suggest that no road should be made because N3 is a highway that
all people prefer it. No road should be made and N3 is the road that
exists in the right way.
This road should not be closed because the goods and services are
transported by road transport. This N3 help the community to link’s
with other big communities that will like invest in our communities.
No to De Beers by Pass because it kills Harrismith it is a Ghost town
now, Harrismith its already death.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.5 of the DEIR
186
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Mr EB Mokoena
Traffic
Department
Warden
–
My comment on proposal is that the existing N3 needs to be
upgraded, Warden is under developed so I foresee growth and
business opportunities, We are a poor community.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
77
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
187
188
189
190
191
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Mr MG Mokoena
ANC
The cost of the new road should be compared to the cost of the
existing road.
October 2010
Zanele Mokoena
ANC
No to De Beers Pass.
Kwehla i-economy yase Warden.
Khulisa i-N3.
October 2010
October 2010
October 2010
Mr Klalepula Mokoena
Community
member
(Warden)
Ms Esther Mokoena
Community
member
(Warden)
Miss Semobi Mokoena
Community
member
(Warden)
Project costs are a contractual matter
between N3TC and SANRAL.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Translation
The economy of Warden will decrease.
Expand N3.
Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 of the DEIR
Ho tla etsahalang ka batho ba sebetsang dipolasing? Moruo wa
Warden o itshitlehile ho tsa temo, jwale le re re le setjhaba re phele
ka eng?
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Translation
What will happen to farm workers? The economy of Warden is
dependent on agriculture, as a community, where will our livelihood
come from?
Refer to section 10, in chapters 7; 8; 9;
and 10 of the DEIR Volume 2 for an
assessment on Agricultural Impacts. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4;
5 and 12 of the DEIR.
They will be no jobs.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
As I’m a community member don’t agree to that decisions that
Municipality takes because most of people wants jobs so they want
to get jobs. We are here to think before we act.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
of the DEIR
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
78
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
of the DEIR
192
193
194
195
October 2010
October 2010
October 2010
October 2010
Mr Slas Mokoena
Community
member
(Warden)
Miss Ntumeleng Mokoena
Community
member
(Warden)
Miss
Cebile
Mokoena
Community
(Warden)
Priscilla
Poverty will be a problem.
More crime, more poverty. We don’t need that road because N3 is
here and we feel it.
Affect agriculture.
Upgrade N3
member
Miss
Nomthandazo
Mokoena
Community
member
(Warden)
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
of the DEIR
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 3; 6 and
7) in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR
for an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically crime, job loss and job
creation. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 and 5 of the DEIR
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 10, in chapters 7; 8; 9;
and 10 of the DEIR Volume 2 for an
assessment on Agricultural Impacts. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.12
of the DEIR
Because many people get jobs and get opportunity to make our own
business.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
79
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
of the DEIR.
196
197
October 2010
October 2010
Ms Makresmas Mokoena
Community
member
(Warden)
Mrs Paulinah Mokoena
Community
member
(Warden)
Sizoswela umsebenzi.
Translation
We are going to lose jobs.
Poverty and crime will rise because of job loss.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
of the DEIR.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 3, 6 and
7) in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR
for an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically crime,
job loss and job
creation. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 and 5 of the DEIR.
198
October 2010
Mr Motsamazi Mokoena
Community
member
(Warden)
The challenge facing our people in this country is unemployment, so
if you destroy other people’s jobs where are they going to find
another jobs?
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
of the DEIR.
199
October 2010
Mr Nhlanhla Mokoena
Community
member
(Warden)
I am a farm worker of this town, so if you buy or destroy the farms
where we going to get jobs?
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
80
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
and section 10 in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10
of the DEIR for an assessment on Social
Impacts, specifically job loss and job
creation and for an assessment on
Agricultural Impacts.
200
October 2010
Mr Laban Mokoena
Community
member
(Warden)
There will be no jobs, so the rate of crime will rise.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No.4 and 12 of the DEIR.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 3, 6 and
7) in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR
for an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically crime,
job loss and job
creation. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 and 5 of the DEIR.
201
202
October 2010
October 2010
Mr Fanyana Mokoena
Community
member
(Warden)
Ms Ditshepiso Molefe
Community
member
(Warden)
The economy of Warden depends on the farms you want to destroy,
so which you are destroying our economy robustly so. What about
our brothers and sisters who are working on these farms, where will
they get proper jobs?
Our economy will drop.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
and section 10 in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10
of the DEIR for an assessment on Social
Impacts, specifically job loss and job
creation and for an assessment on
Agricultural Impacts.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No.4 and 12 of the DEIR.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
81
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
203
October 2010
Miss Lua Molefe
Community
(Warden)
member
I will never allow N3TC to do that silly mistake that will cost our lives,
so I do not support the idea at all, please stop. Give us that money to
create more jobs in Warden. Stop thinking like hyenas.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts and chapter 11, for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
204
October 2010
Ms Seneri Dina Mollo
Community
member
(Warden)
Thina singabantu abampofu siphila ngokutshala emapulazini. Uma
nithatha amapulazi nithi siphile ngani thina singabantu.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Translation
We are impoverished community that survive through planting and/or
ploughing at the farms. If you take away farms from us, how are we
going to survive?
Refer to section 10, in chapters 7; 8; 9;
and 10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Agricultural Impacts.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No.4 and 12 of the DEIR.
205
206
Comment Sheet
6/7
October
2010
Mr L M Molloyi
NAFCOC
Faxed Comment
Sheet
29 September
2010
Mr MA Moloi
XR3 Construction
Maintenance
and
The future at the town is at Stake!
The road should remain as is!!!
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
BEE, procurement process.
Skills Development.
Consideration of emerging contractors, especially those who are
from rural areas.
A minimum of 15% of contract value will
be awarded to Previously Disadvantaged
Enterprises. Training will take place as
required. Local skills will be utilised.
82
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Ms MF Moloi
Community
(Warden)
member
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Mr MS Moloi
Community
(Warden)
member
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
October 2010
Mr MS Moloi
Community
(Warden)
member
October 2010
October 2010
October 2010
Ms Mpho Moloi
ANC
Mr Petros Moloi
Community
(Warden)
Nokuthula Moloi
Community
(Warden)
ISSUES/COMMENTS
The jobs must be for the people because we are suffering as people
here in Warden. Do the EIA, create jobs for people, the road must
proceed.
Noted.
I want this tollgate to be build, even the community.
Anytime I am ready.
The proposed toll plaza, just north of
Warden, does not form part of this EIA
process.
No.
Noted.
Kwehla i-economy yase Warden.
Hodisang e N3.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Translation
The economy of Warden will decrease.
Expand N3.
Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
Abantu bazohlupheka.
Translation
People will suffer.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts. Also refer to the Summary
of Key Issues No.4, 5 and 12 of the DEIR.
Lutho, i-N3 ilunge injalo ke fakani i-tollgate kuyo lendlela.
Noted
member
member
Mrs Bertina Moloi
Community
member
(Warden)
RESPONSE
Translation
N3 is fine as is. You only need to build a tollgate.
Job loss rate will be high. Crime will be a problem.
Toll is addressed under the SANRAL Act
and will be addressed at the appropriate
time
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 3, 6 and
7) in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR
for an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically crime,
job loss and job
83
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
creation. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 and 5 of the DEIR.
214
215
October 2010
October 2010
Mr Thabo Moloi
Community
(Warden)
Ms Lydia Moloi
Community
(Warden)
member
member
In my opinion Warden N3 most transport take it short way, and it
helps with the petrol garage to Harrismith. If taken the other way on
the farm, farms will be closed and where in this little location people
will stay?
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
It will affect our economy, e.g. garage workers.
Extend the National Road, N3.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-section 9,) in
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an
assessment
on
Social
Impacts,
specifically relocation. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.4; 6 and 12 of
the DEIR.
Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
216
October 2010
Mrs Johanna Moloi
Community
member
(Warden)
217
October 2010
Mr Alfred Moloi
Community
(Warden)
218
October 2010
219
October 2010
Why can’t you extend the existing road of N3 instead of making
another one, after five ten years what will Warden benefit? These
people from Warden who will be working there during that process,
are they going to get perment jobs all of them?
Ke ne ke kopa hore e se ke ya kwalwa empe e eketswe.
member
Mrs Constance Morajane
Community
member
(Warden)
Mr Sunnyboy Morajane
Translation
I request that it must not be closed but should be widened.
This road should not be closed because the goods and services are
transported by the road transport. This road it makes our local
community to be well known as a small location.
The N3 EIA should not be closed because it helps each and every
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
84
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
Community
(Warden)
220
October 2010
member
Ms Seboka Mosiea
Community
member
(Warden)
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
person to get through where she/he wishes to go. This N3 helps
community to link with other big communities that will like invest in
our communities.
We will suffer from poverty.
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
of the DEIR.
221
October 2010
Miss Agnes Refina Mosima
Community
member
(Warden)
No road should be made and N3 is the road that exist the right way.
222
October 2010
Mrs Alna Motaung
Community
member
(Warden)
N3 e feta toropo ya rona, hape e na le tshebedisano mmoho le
ba palami e bile e kgona le ho boloka sephethe – phethe se
bolokehile ka dinako tsohle.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
Noted
Translation
The N3 passes at our town and there is cooperation with travellers
and they [traffic officers] are able to regulate traffic at all times.
223
October 2010
Mrs Dazi Motaung
ANC
Izoqeda umnotho.
Translation
Our economy will diminish.
224
October 2010
Miss Mphakiseng Motaung
Community
member
Siyayithanda leyondlela ngoba izoke iqede isimiyaminya esikuN3
kakhulukazi ngamaholide izophungula nezingozi kwi N3.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
Noted.
85
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
(Warden)
225
October 2010
Mr Mbuyiselwa Motaung
Community
member
(Warden)
Translation
We like the new road because it will decrease the amount of traffic in
N3, espcially during holidays and will reduce accidents on N3.
Our economy will drop.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
226
October 2010
Miss Puleng Motaung
Community
member
(Warden)
N3 is better and is okay, we do not want another road.
227
October 2010
Ms Balifile Motaung
Warden
community
member
Our economy is based on agriculture so when you think you will build
a new road our farm people they will suffer. Our economy is very
poor if you take farm, farm people they will be very poor.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 and 12 of the DEIR.
Also refer to section 10, in chapters 7; 8;
9; and 10 of the DEIR for an assessment
on Agricultural Impacts.
228
October 2010
Mr Shadrack Motaung
Warden
community
member
Engineer N3.
Noted
229
October 2010
Mrs Evelinah Motaung
Warden
community
member
Poverty will be a problem.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
86
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
of the DEIR.
230
231
232
233
October 2010
October 2010
October 2010
October 2010
Mrs Ntsamaeng Motaung
Warden
community
member
Aletta Motaung
Community
(Warden)
member
Mrs
Ntombizodwa
Motsoeneng
Community
member
(Warden)
Isak Mpele
Community
(Warden)
member
Mathata ke mosebetsi le bonokwane.
Translation
The problems are [lack of] jobs and crime.
It will have a positive affect towards economy and the development
of our community.
Develop and extend the N3 to be able to dream
Our economy will drop.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 3, 6 and
7) in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR
for an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically crime,
job loss and job
creation. Also refer to the Summary of
Key Issues No.4 and 5 of the DEIR.
Noted
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
Ke batla tsela ena e atiswe yona ena e leng teng hobone tsela e
batlwanang ho kgatwa e feta hole.
Translation
I want the current road to be widened because the proposed road is
too far.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
87
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
234
235
236
DATE
October 2010
October 2010
October 2010
NAME & ORGANISATION
Ms Sellinah Mpele
Community
member
(Warden)
Ngwanomokoena Mpele
Community
member
(Warden)
Mr Patrick Mphuthi
Community
member
(Warden)
ISSUES/COMMENTS
Ke batla tsela e atiswe yona ena e Bekgolo.
Translation
I want this Bokgolo road to be widened.
Ke batla tsela e atiswe yona ema eleng teng.
Translation
I want the current road to be widened.
Many people will lose their jobs, because the old road will not be
utilized anymore
RESPONSE
The project addresses the De Beers Pass
Route and alternatives to it.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
of the DEIR.
237
October 2010
Ms Ntswaki Mphuthi
Community
member
(Warden)
I will lose my job as a person, and many others also lose jobs. It will
destroy agriculture and the economy of Phumelela Municipality, and
South Asfrica as a whole. There is no need for this road.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
and section 10 in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10
of the DEIR for an assessment on Social
Impacts, specifically job loss and job
creation as well as agricultural impacts.
This should be read in conjunction with
refer chapter 11 of the DEIR for the
economic assessments relating to the
project.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No.4 of the DEIR.
238
Comment Sheet
Ms TR Mpofu

Carbon emission and climate change (effects by transport
These issues were taken into account in
88
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
DATE
No
6/7
2010
October
NAME & ORGANISATION
Free
State
Dept
of
Economic
Development,
Tourism
and
Environmental Affairs
ISSUES/COMMENTS

activities) due to increase in traffic
Effects on wildlife on around the Platberg area if alternative A
is considered.
See Mr Nacelle Collins (FS DEDTEA) comment
RESPONSE
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 2, 3, 4, and 7, in chapters
7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for a summary
of
specialist
studies
and
impact
assessments for sections.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No.1 and 2 of the DEIR.
239
October 2010
Ms Elsie Msibi
Warden
community
member
Ke kopa hore tsela ena e se ke ya kwalwa hobane lekesheni la rona
le lenyane hape mosebetsi ha o yo ha tsela ena e kwalwa re tlo
hloka dintho tse ngata [tse kang] metsi petrol garage le ho hongota
mona ha rona. Ho molemo ho hodiswe tsela re tlo fumana mosebetsi
hobane ha re na mosebetsi mona tulong ya rona ha tsela ena e
kwalwa ke bothata fela mona ha rona.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
Translation
I request that this road should not be closed because our location is
small and there are no jobs. If this road is closed we will lack many
things [such as] water, petrol garage and many other things in our
area. It is better to widen the road so that jobs can be created in our
area. If this road is closed there will be lot of hardships in our area.
240
October 2010
Ms Miriam Msibi
Community
(Warden)
member
Re kopa hore tsela ena e se ke ya kwalwa hobane lekeishini lena la
rona le lenyane hape mosebetsi ha o yo, ha tsela e kwelwa re tla
hloka dintho tse ngata [tse kang] metsi petrol garage le ho hongata
ho molemo ho hodiswe tsela ena re tle re fumane motsebetsi
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
Translation
We request that the road should not be closed because our location
is small and there are no jobs, if the road is closed we will lack many
things [such as] water and petrol garage and many other things. It is
better to broaden this road so that we get jobs.
89
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
241
242
DATE
October 2010
October 2010
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
Miss Semami Msimanga
Community
member
(Warden)
Ke kopa hore tsela eo ya N3 e se ke ya kwalwa lebaka ke hore
letsatsi le le leng makoloi arona a bakudi a dula a tsamaya moo
tseleng eo.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
Miss Mavis Msimanga
Community
member
(Warden)
Translation
I request that the N3 road should not be closed, the reason being
that ambulances use that road.
Sikhathele sizwile izingozi ezenzeka ku N3 sicela ushintsho
singawujabulela umgwaqo omusha.
Noted
Translation
We are tired, we have heard about accidents happening on N3, we
would like a change. We will be very happy with the new road.
243
244
October 2010
October 2010
Mrs Popi Msimanga
Community
member
(Warden)
Mr Siphiwe James Mtambo
Community
member
(Warden)
Tlala e tlo ba ngata hobane mosebetsi ha o no ba teng.
Translation
People will go hungry because there will be no jobs.
Mina nginguSiphiwe ngicela ukuthi indlela leyo ingavalwa ngokuba
ibalulekile kakhulu kimi.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
of the DEIR.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
Translation
My name is Siphiwe and would like to request that the road must not
be closed because it is very important me.
245
October 2010
Ms Lucy Mthahane
Moahi – Warden
Ke ya ananela. Tollgate.
Translation
I support it. Tollgate.
Toll is addressed under the SANRAL Act
and will be addressed at the appropriate
time
90
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
We will struggle to get petrol when we coming from afar and when
Warden Town is not accessible.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
246
October 2010
Ms Lizie Mthembu
Community
member
(Warden)
247
October 2010
Mrs Emely Mthembu
Community
member
(Warden)
248
October 2010
Mrs Duduzile Mthembu
Community
member
(Warden)
People are working at the garages and they will lose their jobs.
Ingabe nithini ngomnotho wethu thina singabantu abaphila
ngokusebenza kubelungu. Naze nahlukumeza umhlaba wenu
esiphila ngawo. Thina siphila ngokusebenza emapulazini ngoba
akunamsbenzi.
Translation
What about our economy? We survive by working as domestic
workers for white people. We also work at the farms because there is
no work.
The rate of crime will be high.
This issue will be taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts and chapter 11, for the
economic assessments relating to the
project.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-section 3) in
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an
assessment
on
Social
Impacts,
specifically crime and security. Also refer
to the Summary of Key Issues No.5 of the
DEIR.
249
Comment Sheet
7 October 2010
Ms MJ Mthembu
Phumelela Municipality
Economic Development.
Socio Economic and Business
Report on the EIA to be forwarded to us (Scoping Report)
These issues was taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Reports will be made available in terms of
the relevant legislation.
Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
250
October 2010
Mrs Thabile Mthombeni
Community
member
Rate of crime will be high.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
91
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
(Warden)
Refer to section 9, (sub-section 3) in
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an
assessment
on
Social
Impacts,
specifically crime and security. Also refer
to the Summary of Key Issues No.5 of the
DEIR.
251
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Mr Keith R Muller
HSR/Hardustria
Environmental
Conservation (Harrismith)
Business, environmental and Socio economics.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for a summary of specialist studies
and impact assessments for sections.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No.1, 4 and 5 of the DEIR.
252
253
October 2010
October 2010
Ms Zandile Mvelase
Community
member
(Warden)
Innocent Mthoko Mvelase
Community
member
(Warden)
Mina Zandile angisiboni isidingo saleyondlela entsha. Bengithi cha
ngiyayala ngoba abantu bakithi baphelelwa imisebenzi.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Translation
My name is Zandile and I do not see the need for the new road. I do
not support the new road because people will lose jobs.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
of the DEIR.
Poverty and lack of jobs.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
of the DEIR.
92
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
254
255
DATE
October 2010
October 2010
NAME & ORGANISATION
Mr
Themba
Mvelase
Community
(Warden)
Mavis Mzinyane
Community
(Warden)
Joseph
ISSUES/COMMENTS
Poverty and crime.
member
RESPONSE
These issues was taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 3, 6 and
7) in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR
for an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically crime,
job loss and job
creation. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 and 5 of the DEIR.
member
Mina ngithi lendlela mayingavalwa. Ngoba abantu bathola umsebenzi
ngoba iseduzane kwethu. Nabamagaraji bazophelelwa umsebenzi
ngoba akusenamoto ezongena ithele upetrol.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
Translation
This road must not be closed. Our community get jobs because the
road is near us. In addition, all businesses such as garages will lose
business because vehicles will no longer be using their services and
to buy fuel.
256
October 2010
Nhlanhla Mzinyane
Community
member
(Warden)
257
October 2010
Mr Japie Nala
Community
(Warden)
258
October 2010
It will have a positive affect towards economy and the development
of our community.
Develop and extend N3.
Expand N3.
Noted.
Noted.
member
Billy Ncala
SAPS - Warden
Survival of Warden and other neighbouring towns after the project
has been completed better enlarge and upgrade N3 route for future.
Build some garages refreshing areas nearby N3.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 14 ) in
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an
assessment on SMME opportunities. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.5
93
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
of the DEIR.
259
October 2010
Miss Eva Ncongwane
Community
member
(Warden)
I think that road is ok because of lack of poverty in our place and
maybe when get the job or we can earn something in that opportunity
of that road.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
of the DEIR.
260
261
October 2010
Comment Sheet
7 October 2010
Ms Busisiwe Ndaba
Community
member
(Warden)
Mr WR Ndlebe
Thabo
Mofutsanyana
District
Yekani umgwaqo we N3 ngoba iWarden ifile izofa okokugcina.
Thuthukisani iWarden, nakhe amaMalls namagarage.
Translation
Keep the existing N3 because Warden is already an inactive town. If
you move N3, Warden will die. Please expand Warden and build
malls and garages.
Local economic growth.
Take care of government policy.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
262
October 2010
Ms Ntamfuthi Ngobese
Community
member
(Warden)
Job loss will be our problem.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
of the DEIR.
94
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
263
DATE
October 2010
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
Mr Mandlenkosi Nhlapho
Community
member
(Warden)
This will give people from other places like KwaZulu-Natal to come
and commit crime easily at our places as we have a big problem
about a stock theft it will be easy to them.(c) To commit crime
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 3) in
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an
assessment
on
Social
Impacts,
specifically crime. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.4 and 5 of the
DEIR.
264
265
266
October 2010
October 2010
October 2010
Miss Vangile Nkabinde
Community
member
(Warden)
Mr Vusumuzi Nkabinde
Community
member
(Warden)
Miss Nonhlanhla Nkabinde
Community
member
(Warden)
Tlohelang tsela ya N3. Tlhahiso ke hore atisang tsela eo. (c) Re kopa
le di filing station near N3.
Translation
Leave the N3 road alone. I propose that road should be widened. We
request filling stations to be built near N3.
Bantu bakithi yekani umgwaqo we N3.
Translation
Our community leave N3 road alone. Please extend N3.
Rape is high, accidents are high. Upgrade N3
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR Volume 2 for an
assessment on Social Impacts. Also refer
to the Summary of Key Issues No.5 of the
DEIR.
267
268
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Comment Sheet
12/13
Miss BK Nkabinde
ANC Womans League
I am happy with the road because it will create more jobs.
Noted.
Mr Mthelezi Nkabinde
Community
member
The construction of De Beers Pass must be reviewed before it could
go on.
That is the purpose of this EIA process.
95
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
269
270
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
September 2010
(Warden)
October 2010
Mr
Phillip
Nkabinde
Community
(Warden)
October 2010
Cynthia Nkosi
Community
(Warden)
Dingane
ISSUES/COMMENTS
People will suffer from poverty.
member
RESPONSE
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
of the DEIR.
member
The existing N3 is the economic boost to Warden and Ezenzelelni.
What are your plans after completion of this road? Forget about De
Beers Pass route, it is just a nightmare.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
271
October 2010
Ms Elizabeth Nqubuka
Community
member
(Warden)
Lendlela lena izakubhoda kude ngoba lendlela sesiyejwayele
kuzothatha isikhathi ukuba sijwayele leyondlela. Ngoba sivele
lendlela ikhona sihamba ngayo ayingasuswa siyacela.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
Translation
We are used to the existing road. It will take a long time for us to get
used to a new route because it will be far and be difficult to access it.
Do not remove the road, we have used it since we were born.
272
October 2010
Mr Given Nsibande
Community
member
(Warden)
Poverty will increase in our area.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the
economic assessments relating to the
project.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
96
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No.4 and 5 of the DEIR.
273
274
October 2010
October 2010
Miss
Nsibanyoni
Community
(Warden)
Makhazasi
The farm people will suffer because they work in farms.
member
Mr Xolani Nsibanyoni
Community
member
(Warden)
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
of the DEIR.
It will take more jobs away. Let us upgrade the old road N3.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
of the DEIR.
275
276
October 2010
Comment Sheet
30 September
2010
Mr David Ntjingila
Community
member
(Warden)
Ms AM Oates
Oatesdale Farm
Mina ngithi mayingavalwa ngoba imqoka kakhulu kithi zakhamuzi
zase Warden.
Translation
The road must not be closed, it is very important to the citizens of
Warden.
I have the following comments about your proposal for building the
new N3 close to Harrismith and through my farm Oatesdale.
Thank you for your comments. Please
note that if either the De Beer’s Pass route
or Alternative B is built, the existing N3 will
continue to be in operation and will be
maintained.
Blasting a massive area
You will need to blast massive area of hill next to existing N3. Over
The contractor responsible for the road
97
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
the hill are 4 farm workers homesteads and a right of way. Need to
consider the safety of farm people, homesteads, livestock, current N3
road, N3 users, and springs located on the top of this rock out crop.
construction will comply with the
Occupational Safety and Health Act and
Regulations.
You will pay me for this rock and soil?
The cut to fill of the road construction will
most likely balance. The road reserve is
the property of SANRAL.
Right of way 7x16
At approx 7x16 across my farm there is a right of way, farm worker
car access to their houses, and my cattle path under the N3 close to
the mill spruit. This will need to be maintained under the new N3 and
be accessible in rainy seasons.
Noted. Thank you for the information. All
access aspects will be addressed in detail
and in consultations with landowners in
the design stage of the selected route.
Access for tractors in 3 places
I have no underpass for vehicles across the current N3. But have the
right to cross it (not travel along it) with un licensed vehicles and un
licensed drivers at approx 19.00, 17.00 and the Monta Rosa, Rainfall
Farm N3 access. Presumably these accesses will remain. It is
important to have these accesses so that veld fires can be quickly
reached. In the summer the south western section of my farm can
only be reached by a tractor this way.
See above.
Humans will also need access at these places in order to catch
buses to Harrismith and Ladysmith.
Large area encompassed by new and old N3
The building of the new N3 will result in a section of my farm
emcompassed by the old and N3. This area will have to have new
internal fences, a new waters supply and access which will allow
vehicle access and the droving of cattle into the camp down at the
river, and out at the top of the hill to cattle handling facilities at the
farm house on the northern side. If this camp needs to be burned,
one road ( old or new N3) will have to be closed. Currently it is
functionally impossible to close the road. N3tc say it is the traffic
cop's job and the traffic cops duck and dive. There is also a bad
donga in this camp. Storm water from the road will have to be very
carefully managed.
Thank you for this information. See above
response. Where
required
specific
solutions will be specified in the
Environmental Management Plan (EMP).
98
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
Other camps affected
Probably at least five other camps will have to be preplanned (careful
informed consideration, moved fences and my fencing materials
won't rise to that challenge, and new water sources found).
Noted
The road attracts tramps, who thrive in areas with seclusion, water,
shelter and fuel. The plantations of the Platberg will be ideal for
them. At very least we will need a short road bulldozed through a
small ridge on my farm (near Mr du Plooi ) for access to that side of
the
farm
and
Platberg
Nature
Reserve
Noted
Firebreaks
Currently I have approx 9.8km boundary with the N3tc. The
proposed road could add another 6km. The N3tc are very good
about shouldering their responsibility for burning their side of the
boundary. However they expect their neighbours to help burn,
farmers are expected to widen the firebreak on their side, and the
N3tc don't want the road reserve fence burned. All very fair, but
onerous if you have almost 16km to burn. I think it would be fair if on
the new sections of the road, that the reserve would be at least 20m
on each side and the owner/tenant of the road would undertake to be
totally responsible for burning a 20m fire break in the road reserve in
this
section.
This management issue is noted – thank
you.
Stormwater
Storm water from the existing N3 is already causing problems. The
new N3 right next to the old N3 will create more problems.
Storm water and management thereof will
be addressed in detail during the design
stage of the selected route.
Farmworker rights
A large proportion of the new road will be going through my labour's
cattle camp. What rights will be compromised under tenure rights? I
don't propose being solely responsible for finding a solution to this
problem.
Thank you for this information.
Unmarked graves
In this camp there are a lot of unmarked graves. Probably at least 30.
Your will need to find out where the relatives are, and will need to
find another place, (not donated by me, to re burry them. This place
The location of these graves will be given
to the heritage specialist for investigation.
Social impacts will also be considered.
99
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
will need access by relatives). Traditionally I assist with funerals, eg
supplying wood, labour, etc, I don't intend to do this the second time
around.
Historical sites
At the top of the hill there is a kraal that predates the Boer War, a
sheep dip made of dressed stone, ruins of the first Oates home stead
and old trees planted by them.
Accidents
Don't forget there are many accidents at the bottom of the "banana
split" ( approx 7x 16.4) and you need place for them to fall and be
recovered.. The new road may reduce the number but it is unlikely
they will stop.
The heritage specialist will be advised of
historical sites on the farm.
Comment noted.
Retaining agricultural classification.
A section of the farm Sommerso owned by Mr du Plooi will be cut off
from the rest of his farm. Will this remain agriculturally classified?
This issue will be dealt with when land
acquisition for the road reserve is
negotiated.
Area involved
How many ha will you expropriate from the farm Oatesdale? Who
determines the price? When will this happen? If you do expropriate
will you definitely build the road?
See above
How close will the road be to my house?
The alignment has not been finalised.
Inprovements planned.
I have certain improvements planned, eg new water supplies to
camps and planting of pasture. These, if the road is built will prove to
be a waste of time, money and effort. Do you expect me to wait with
these improvements until you eventually decide what you are going
to do, bearing in mind that you do take a long time to decide and then
you have been known to change your mind? If not, will you
compensate me for these improvements?
These aspects will require discussion
during negotiations for the road reserve
land acquisition.
Noise pollution
100
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
I may have the confluence of two of Africa's most busy roads (N3 and
N5) meters from my house. One of my farm workers will be even
closer. What plans do you have to control noise pollution and
security?
A noise impact study was carried out
during the EIA phase and mitigation
measures will be included in the EMP.
Refer to section 8, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Noise.
Eskom line
The new road will require a Eskom line to my house to be moved. I
had to pay for the line my self, so I doubt if Eskom will do it for you.
Assess at Swinburne
I don't know the number of the district road that crosses the N3 near
Swinburne, but that will have to continue to have animal access
through Mr Spark's farm under the N3, vehicle and human access.
Heavy lorries
The lorries have to have places which they find acceptable, to pull
over and for the drivers to sleep / rest / relieve themselves / and if
they intend, to avail themselves of prostitutes. ( of course I don't
approve of the latter, but my lack of approval doesn't seem to stop
them). I don't see why farmers should be expected to put up with
lorries parked by the side of the road. The availability of a certain
amount of parking should be a requirement for the building of the
road.
Tramps
The road attracts tramps. No one takes responsibility for them, and
farmers suffer from their fires, eg two massive fires at Eeram this
season. The building of the road should be linked to addressing this
issue. The road owners have a social responsibility.
Access to Harrismith
The burgers of Harrismith value access to the town from the N3.
Where will this be in the Harrisimith bypass option? It seems to me it
will be on my farm or at Sarclett on the northern side. Scarcely what
the inmates had in mind I think.
Platberg Nature Reserve
101
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
The Platberg Nature Reserve has a fair amount of game. You may
have to consider game fencing the road reserve. Baboons may also
be a problem.
The reserve is also prone to runaway fires. There will have to be at
least two underpasses in the nature reserve which will allow access
to fight fire and escape them if necessary. If we cannot stop fires in
the reserve, they get up a lot of power and smoke and have frightful
consequences on the N3.
Rock art
Comment noted – thank you.
The issue of access for fire fighting
vehicles will be addressed in the detail
design phase.
Over looking the golf course there is a rock art site. The road will
probably go through the site of the Boer War concentration camp
Pollution from the N3.
We are learning that small amounts of pollutants can be more
dangerous than large amounts. We should be regularly monitoring
pollution from the N3.
Some transport companies are very responsible in their cleanups
whilst others are far from responsible,. Example the residue of the
split sulfur compound left on road at 7x 17.0 Maundy Thursday
2010. It should be the responsibility of the owner/ tenant of the N3 to
clean up, not the responsibility of the transporter who ducks and
dives and is not held responsible by anyone.
I&AP
Comment noted. The heritage specialist
will investigate these sites.
Pollution aspects will be addressed in
relevant specialist reports.
Management of spills that result in
pollution will be addressed by the existing
hazard response unit that operates along
the N3 at present.
I wish to register as an I&AP. I would like my notifications by letter
mail, summaries by paper, and in English. You are going through my
farm. I have business, financial, personal, emotional, safety, peace
and quiet, respect for my history, etc interests.
I suggest you consider the effects of global warming, talked about
high speed train links, and heavy goods rail transport (on the TV
news this week) and the effects of air transport. Talk to these people.
Let them convince you they cannot take up the additional demand.
You have been registered on the project
database as an Interested and Affected
Party as well as in your capacity as the
Secretary
of
Swinburne
Farmers
Association.
Comments noted.
I love Harrismith and hope that my children will raise their children
102
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
here, but it is foolish to place global and national interest above local
interest. Our municipalities', communities and local business'
concern for developing tourism doesn't carry much depth. i.e. apart
from individuals, many of whom don't live in the town, not much has
been done to extend the opportunity. Given that many owners of
filling stations don't even live in Harrismith, and with franchises who
don't buy locally and take royalties out, and low fuel margins, the
multiplier effect of money spent at filling stations is low. The town is
far more dependent on agriculture. You already have expropriated
farm land. Why not continue to use it and build the de Beers Pass?
At least getting some one to do the maths would be valuable
I would like to know who the shareholders of the N3TC are, and as
you want me to declare my financial interests, I would like to know
theirs.
The requirement for Interested and
Affected parties to disclose their interests
in the approval or refusal of the application
is as per EIA regulations, Section 58(1) c
of GNR 385.
277
278
279
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Mr EW Oates
Trafalgar
No
839
Nelson’s Kop 250
&
Email
07 September
2010
Mr EW Oates
Trafalgar
No
839
Nelson’s Kop 250
&
Email
04 October 2010
Mr EW Oates
Trafalgar
No
839
Nelson’s Kop 250
&
We were advised that due to the Wetlands lost in the huge Eskom
project the green route was no longer a consideration, why is it on
the table again?
The DBPR has always been under
consideration.
Am interested to know what routes you are considering, intend
attending the meeting at Green Lantern, would like to know in
advance what the options are. I own a piece of land in the Wetlands
at the foot of Nelsons Kop and am concerned about the roud passing
through it. We were advised that due to the new Eskom project
already severely compromising precarious wetlands, the new road
would avoid the wetlands, am concerned that government may not
keep to this undertaking. In any case will attend the meeting but
would appreciate maps/routes emailed to this address.
A response was provided to Mr Oates on
07 September 2010 and was requested to
download the map showing all alternatives
from www.acerafrica.co.za/N3EIA link.
I have to say you seem to have done a turnaround as regards public
participation...you have already expropriated on my berg farm and
are going 200metres from my home with your alternative route...Your
choice of route is going to have a huge influence on my farming and
indeed I may even have to move from my present place of residence
if the road comes too close. I am therefore concerned as to your
Key
Stakeholders
and
Authorities’
Meetings are typically used in EIAs for
large and complex projects and are
intended for government officials and
people
holding
key
positions
in
organizations that represent society
Mr Oates also attended the Information
Sharing Session at Green Lantern Inn
where maps showing alternatives routes
were displayed.
103
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
280
DATE
Email
04 October 2010
NAME & ORGANISATION
Mrs Alison Oates
Oatesdale Farm
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
decision and would appreciate your informing me as to
developments....must say cant understand why you seem to be trying
to prevent affected persons like me from attending....but so be it.
across a range of key sectors, including
agriculture, tourism, business, transport
and conservation.
Just to let you know that even within farmers there is a degree of
unhappiness about this meeting.
All Chairpersons of the Farmers
Associations within the study area were
invited to the Key Stakeholders and
Authorities’ Meeting.
Please could you explain why this meeting is necessary, because to
be honest I don't really know? How will this meeting be different to
the public meetings you have already had. Why could the people
invited to this meeting, not have attended the public meetings? Aren't
you trying to manipulate the Farmer's Association into being
responsible for a flawed process? Aren't you trying to make deals
behind closed doors?
Key
Stakeholders
and
Authorities’
Meetings are typically used in EIAs for
large and complex projects and are
intended for government officials and
people
holding
key
positions
in
organizations that represent society
across a range of key sectors, including
agriculture, tourism, business, transport
and conservation.
We are having a meeting to discuss this on Wednesday night and
your help today would be appreciated as my phone is ringing off the
hook.
ACER provided a detailed explanation to
Mrs Oates via email on 05 October 2010.
On another issue I think it is important to know in the Harrismith
based option where will the accesses to Harrismith be. As far as I
can see it will be at my farm (10 km from Harrismith) and at Sarclett,
equally distant on the other side.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapters 3 of the DEIR for a
description of the project and also section
9 (Sub-section 1) in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts, specifically access.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No.12 of the DEIR.
281
October 2010
Mr Momello Pali
Community
(Warden)
member
(a) We are fine with the N3 because if there will be an extend of N 3
that’s where many people and children died, think there is a big road
we can now freely walk while its too or even more dangerous ways.
(c) We have to take long distances when we have to go to places
and living with adults who now cant walk long distances so from my
side a big NO!!!
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts. Also refer to the Summary
104
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
of Key Issues No.5 of the DEIR.
282
October 2010
Motshidisi Pali
Community
(Warden)
member
Cha ngiyala ngendlela evalwayo ngoba sifanelwe ukuvakashela
ekhaya uma indlela ivalwa kuzobakude futhi sizobhadala eningi imali
kuza ekhaya.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
Translation
I do not support the closing of the road because we use it when
going to vist our families. If the road is closed, it will be a long way
around to access the road home and we will have to pay a lot of
money to travel home.
283
284
October 2010
October 2010
Mr Joseph Phatholi
Community
member
(Warden)
Dis om nasionale pad van N3 bietjie groter te maak.
Mrs Mpho Radebe
Community
member
(Warden)
Our people will suffer from poverty because they work there in farms.
Translation
We suggest that you widen the existing N3 road.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
of the DEIR.
285
October 2010
Mr S’busiso Piet Radebe
Community
member
(Warden)
Mina Sibusiso bengicela ukuthi lowo mgwaqo ungavalwa ngoba
ngiyisakhamuzi sase Warden leyondlela mayingavalwa.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
Translation
I, Sibusiso, requests that this road must not be closed because I am
a citizen of Warden.
286
October 2010
Mr Sibusiso David Radebe
Community
member
Abantu bethu bazohlupheka.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
105
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
287
DATE
October 2010
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
(Warden)
Translation
Our people will suffer.
Mrs Mavis I Radebe
Community
member
(Warden)
Umnotho wethu usemapulazini uma nithatha amapulazi nithi abantu
bakithi baphile ngani? Ngoba abantu bethu baphila ngokuphatha
emapulazini.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Translation
Our economy is based on the existence of farms, if you take away
farms, how will our people survive? Our people are living through
working and managing the farms.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts. Also refer to the Summary
of Key Issues No.4 and 5 of the DEIR.
Refer to section 10, in chapters 7; 8; 9;
and 10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Agricultural Impacts.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No.4 and 12 of the DEIR.
288
October 2010
Nomathemba Radebe
Community
member
(Warden)
Poverty will be a problem.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts. Also refer to the Summary
of Key Issues No.4 and 5 of the DEIR.
289
October 2010
Mrs Sdudla Radebe
Community
member
(Warden)
This process will affect our people.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts. Also refer to the Summary
of Key Issues No.4 and 5 of the DEIR.
106
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
290
DATE
October 2010
NAME & ORGANISATION
Mr Tammy D Radebe
Community
member
(Warden)
ISSUES/COMMENTS
Poverty will increase and people will suffer.
That road will benefit capitalists.
RESPONSE
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts and chapter 11 of the
DEIR
for the economic assessments
relating to the project. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.4 and 5 of the
DEIR.
291
October 2010
Mrs Sibongile Radebe
Community
member
(Warden)
Our economy is based on farms.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 10, in chapters 7; 8; 9;
and 10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Agricultural Impact and chapter 11 for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 and 12 of the DEIR.
292
October 2010
Mr Bongani Radebe
Community
member
(Warden)
People will suffer from poverty.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No.4 of the DEIR.
293
October 2010
Ms Maud Zanele Radebe
Community
member
(Warden)
This process will affect people who are living in farm especially farm
workers. And it will affect our economy because most of people they
work with agriculture.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9 and 10, in chapters 7; 8;
9; and 10 of the DEIR for an assessment
107
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
on Social Impacts and Agriculture.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No.4 and 12 of the DEIR.
294
295
October 2010
October 2010
Mrs Bhuna Lydia Radebe
Community
member
(Warden)
Mrs Evelina Radebe
Community
member
(Warden)
Abantu abamnyama baphila ngokusebenza emapulazini, manje nithi
basebenze kuphi? Thina la siphila ngokulima.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Translation
Black people live and working on the farms, now where do you say
they must work? Farming is our livelihood or source of survival.
Refer to section 9 and 10, in chapters 7; 8;
9; and 10 of the DEIR for an assessment
on Social Impacts and Agriculture. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
and 12 of the DEIR.
Abantu abahlala emakhaya nithi benzenjani ngoba baphila
ngokusebenzela abelungu, nithi abantu benzenjani njengoba nithi
amapulazi niyawathatha na?
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Translation
People who live in rural areas survive by working as domestic
workers for white people. What should they do now if you are taking
away the farms?
296
October 2010
Mr Ayanda Radebe
Community
member
(Warden)
What will happen with Warden / Phumelela’s agricultural sector? Are
destroying farms where the road will pass? In the next ten years what
will be the economy of Phumelela particularly Warden.
Refer to section 9 and 10, in chapters 7; 8;
9; and 10 of the DEIR for an assessment
on Social Impacts and Agriculture.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No.4 and 12 of the DEIR.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 10, in chapters 7; 8; 9;
and 10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Agriculture and chapter 11 of the DEIR
for the economic assessments relating to
the project.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No.4 and 12 of the DEIR.
297
October 2010
Ms Palesa Radebe
If you make new N3 what about garages that every car need to go
This issue was taken into account in the
108
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
Community
(Warden)
298
299
300
301
302
October 2010
member
Mr Themba Radebe
Community
member
(Warden)
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
there and fill in the petrol (Caltex, Shell, Total, etc) there’s no many
cars that will pass through there’s going to be few cars that goes with
N3. What about those people who work in those garages where are
they going to work?
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR Volume 2 for an
assessment on Social Impacts. Also refer
to the Summary of Key Issues No.4 of the
DEIR.
Idolobha lethu lizofadalala emnothweni.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Translation
The impact on the economy of our town will be negative.
Also refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for
the economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Mr MA Radebe
Community
member
(Warden)
Miss Sandra Radebe
Community
member
(Warden)
Ms Sesi Radebe
Community
member
(Warden)
I am happy with road, because it will create jobs
Noted.
I am happy with new De Beers Pass will create more job
opportunities.
Noted.
We don’t like De Beers Pass, N3 must be fixed.
October 2010
Mr Mohammed Razaak
Smart Price
My business will die and the people working under me will lose their
jobs. No need for a road
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Harrismith people need jobs they are struggling.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation and
chapter 11 of the DEIR for the economic
assessments relating to the project.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No.4 of the DEIR.
109
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
303
KSAM
7 October 2010
Mr AM Robertshaw
NMPP Alliance
304
KSAM
7 October 2010
Mrs EL Roberts
Warden
Chamber
Business
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
Impact route B on Transnet Pipelines pump station near van
Reenen,

Clarify the route selection model, showing the balance
between economic /social / environment impacts.

Investigate the current economic benefit of N3 on Harrismith,
and impact if N3 routed around Harrismith.

Will the “comment and response” report include real answers
or will it only contain statements such as “note”?

If additional studies are suggested, will these be initiated?
Wetlands fossils rather just upgrade existing N3 route only Van
Reenen problem be solved.
The N3TC engineering team has
consulted with the NMPP project team.
The NMPP pipeline has taken the DBP
route and its alternatives into account.
These issues will be taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.

These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 4 and 5 in chapters 7; 8;
9; and 10 of the DEIR for an assessment
on Wetlands and Heritage Resources.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No.1 of the DEIR.
305
306
KSAM
07 October 2010
October 2010
Mr H Roberts
Warden
Chamber
Upgrading existing route: the red line on the map.
Mnr Johaan Saayman
AAA Vleismark - Warden
Good luck we need an upgrade and thanks for all the input in this
project.
Ek stel voor die rat moet nie gebou – word nie. Ons kan ons werk
verboor en hier gaan baie mense sonder werk sit ons gaan n spook
dropsie het. Wat van die mense se toekoms in Warden. Die
beesgheede mense wat hiergevsstug is.
Translation
I recommend that this route should not be build. We will lose our
jobs and a lot of people will be unemployed. This will then become a
ghost town. What about the people’s future in Warden and all the
businesses that has been established here?
307
Email
01 October 2010
Noted.
Business
Mrs C Schwegman
WESSA KZN Region
Our interest pertains mainly to the ecological aspects and we note
that route alternative A only follows an existing alignment for the
most part, while De Beers Pass route and alternative B may be along
areas not impacted on by road infrastructure. It would be preferable
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation and
chapter 11 of the DEIR for the economic
assessments relating to the project.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No.4 of the DEIR.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
110
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
308
DATE
Comment Sheet
09 September
2010
NAME & ORGANISATION
Mrs JH Schwulst
Hazelhope
Estate
(Harrismith)
CC
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
for the route to be closely aligned with existing roads or other service
provider servitudes in order to reduce the area of impact.
Refer to chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for a summary of specialist studies
and impact assessments for sections.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No.1 of the DEIR.
Impact on Environmental particularly wetlands, vlei, streams and
farmers water supply being jeopardised. Especially boreholes and
windmills being cut off by highway making farming impossible.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 4 in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Wetlands. Also refer to the Summary of
Key Issues No.1 of the DEIR.
309
October 2010
Ms Masabata Sekhoto
Community
member
(Warden)
Ke sisinya hore e se ke ya kwalwa hobane e re thusa ka makoloi ha
re ya bo Harrismith re patala tjhelete e tlase. Community leader ke re
e seke ya kwalwa roa.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
Translation
I propose that it should not be closed because we depend on it for
transport when we go to places like Harrismith we pay less transport
fare. Community leader I say it should not be closed.
310
October 2010
Mr Johannes Selepe
Community
member
(Warden)
Ho llo aba bonokwane
Translation
Crime will increase.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-section 3) in
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an
assessment
on
Social
Impacts,
specifically crime and security. Also refer
to the Summary of Key Issues No.5 of the
DEIR.
311
October 2010
Ms Nomvula Selepe
Community
member
Over population will be a problem.
Noted
111
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
312
DATE
Faxed Comment
Sheet
10 September
2010
NAME & ORGANISATION
(Warden)
Mr RP Shibambo
Dept of Water
(Pretoria)
Affairs
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
Impact on water resources river/stream crossing. Pollution and
emergency control caused by trucks or working equipment.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for a summary of specialist studies
and impact assessments for sections.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No.1 of the DEIR.
313
October 2010
Mrs Lillian Sibanyoni
Community
member
(Warden)
The rural people they will suffer because they work in farms.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts and chapter 11, for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4; 5 and of the DEIR.
314
October 2010
Mr Buyani Sigasa
Community
member
(Warden)
Poverty will be a problem.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts and chapter 11, for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
315
October 2010
Mrs Thembi Sigasa
Community
member
(Warden)
Job loss rate will be high and crime will be problem.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 3, 6 and
7) in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR
112
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
for an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically crime,
job loss and job
creation. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 and 5 of the DEIR.
316
October 2010
Mr Bongani Sigasa
Community
member
(Warden)
Poverty and jobs will be a problem.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
and 5 of the DEIR.
317
October 2010
Ms Thembi Pretty Sigasa
Community
member
(Warden)
318
October 2010
Mr Simon Sikhona
Community
member
(Warden)
319
October 2010
Mr Sipho Sikhosana
ANC
Abantu bethu baphila ngokutohoza.
Translation
Our people survive through temporal jobs.
N3 is next to our town and our rural areas premises. They can
develop work so that youth can get more jobs.
Noted.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
of the DEIR.
We are going to lose everything, we will suffer.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Extend N3.
Refer to chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for a summary of specialist studies
and impact assessments for sections.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
113
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
No.4 of the DEIR.
320
321
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
0ctober 2010
Mr Richard Simelane
Interested and Affected
Party
I am happy with the new road because it will create job opportunities.
Noted.
Miss Nthoto Skhosana
Community
member
(Warden)
Angisiboni isidingo sendlela entsha ilungile lena ekhona akulungiswe
yona ukuze idolobha lethu lithuhuke.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
Translation
I cannot see the need for the new road. This existing one is fine as
is. It needs to be fixed so that our town can develop.
322
323
324
325
326
October 2010
October 2010
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Fax
1 October 2010
Email
25 October 2010
Ms Phindile Skhosana
Community
member
(Warden)
Mrs Gaklina Skhosana
Community
member
(Warden)
Mrs DJ Skosana
Phumelela
Local
Municipality
Mrs ML Smith
Interested and Affected
Party (Warden)
Mr Chris Sparks
Maritz Drift No 1169 Rem
and Ptn 2 (of 1)
Akuthuthukiswe indlela ekhona ukuze nedolobha lethu lizothuthuka.
Translation
N3 must be widened so that our town can develop.
Mosebetsi ke mathata.
Translation
Lack of jobs is a problem.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
of the DEIR.
I agree with whatever if our place is going to benefit from this.
Noted.
No, my husband is a truck driver and it will be a problem when he
wants to come home.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
With reference to the proposed "Alternative A" route, the following:
This proposal impacts on 4 of my adjoining Title Deeds. The property
I currently own comprises nearly 900 hectares which forms one piece
(such a continious piece of land is worth a lot of money). My land
would be cut into a number of pieces. This would severely impact
Refer to chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for a summary of specialist studies
and impact assessments for sections.
114
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
on the value of the land as a whole.
RESPONSE
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No.6 of the DEIR.
We have previously had construction activity on our land and can
thus say from experience that construction would severely impact on
us as follows:
Half of our farming operation would be halted for the entire duration
of the construction period. We run 2 cattle Studs and 1 Arabian
Horse Stud. Stock numbers would have to be reduced which could
make farming un-economical; resulting in great financial loss. Our
entire water network would have to be re-looked at to ensure that the
new camps created, have water. An oak forest of over 90 years old
would be destroyed (note that this is protected as a Heritage
Treasure). Many additional unsightly bridges and cuts would be
necessary on this route to appease gradient requirements. The
tourism business run at Mount Olive Stables would be destroyed
forever, due to the close proximity of the road.
General:
The entire area has been promoting tourism with tranquility and
natural beauty as our draw-card. The Tourism Swinburne Cooperative have been working hard at this.
Also refer to section 9, (sub-sections 17)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically Tourism. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.7 of the DEIR.
Nobody in the area wants more roads. The original De Beers Pass
Route has been surveyed, land has been expropriated, people have
become accustomed to the idea, and so seems to be the best route.
327
Email
15 September
2010
Mr Pierre Swart
Landowner - Harrismith
I would like to make use of this opportunity to comment and is
looking forward to further interaction in future.
Due to working conditions I would be unable to attend any of the
public information sessions on the 13th of 14th of September 2010. I
have studied your BID as well as the map on your website and is
extremely excited about the proposed alternative for the De Beers
pass and that it is cutting out the existing eastern bypass through
Harrismith.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for a summary of specialist studies
and impact assessments for sections.
115
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
I am residing right next to the bypass and there is no way that this
pass will be able to pass an environmental impact study it its current
state and that it will cost millions to upgrade it (to mention one
aspect), it would be extremely bad for the residents on the eastern
side of the road and would like it if this will never be an option to
upgrade the existing road.
It is difficult to give any preference to any of these three routes, as all
the aspects will be considered in terms of cost in all these option. As
far as I know all the land for the original De Beers Pass has already
been purchased, but I noticed that there is a tunnel and that will
probably be costly to build. On the other hand to replace the
proposed route over the Van Reenens pass will be just as costly.
I will fully support any route that will take away the pain of the
existing eastern bypass and will do anything in my power to
fight against the upgrade of the existing road.
328
Email
05 August 2010
Mr PG Swart
Landowner - Harrismith
I would like to enquire after the progress being made with regards to
the construction of the De Beers Pass Road, which will relieve the
traffic on the N3 Eastern Bypass Road through Harrismith.
The reason for my enquiry is that I own a residential property
adjacent to the said bypass in Harrismith which is badly affected by
the traffic noise, exhaust fumes, security risks, etc. associated with
the road. An incredible number of heavy road vehicles make use of
the road and even at night their numbers hardly decrease any more.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 7, 8 and 9, in chapters 7;
8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an
assessment on Air, Noise and Social
Impacts. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No. 2 and 5 of the DEIR.
The Western Bypass option, which had been put an end to by the
court interdict selfishly obtained by a business owner against your
agency, would have offered tremendous relief to properties adjacent
to the Eastern Bypass. Our only hope now is the construction of the
De Beers Pass Road, which we hope will remove the heavy vehicles
from our doorstep.
The noise of trucks, sooty deposits on inside walls and curtains, rat
infestations from road reserves, fire risk when road reserves are
overgrown, increasing number of break-ins from the road, etc. have a
very serious detrimental effect on my property as well as on that of
several other owners.
116
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
329
DATE
Comment Sheet
09 September
2010
NAME & ORGANISATION
Mr PG Swart
Landowner (Harrismith)
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
Personal interest- Primary home next to N3 Eastern By Pass at
Harrismith. Affected by noise, pollution, fire risk, rabbit infestation,
crime, etc.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 7, 8 and 9, in chapters 7;
8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an
assessment on Air, Noise and Social
Impacts. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.7 and 5 of the DEIR.
Re-allignment of Eastern By Pass in Harrismith away from houses,
schools and hospital.
330
Email
02 October 2010
Mr Pierre Swart
Landowner (Harrismith)
I do not currently represent any group or organisation, although this
may change depending on the way the options for the proposed road
works go. In the early 1990s your company was also involved in the
Western v. Eastern bypass options at Harrismith when, in spite of the
support of the City Council at the time, the Chamber of Commerce
and a large part of the community, the SA Roads Agency and
[ACER] preferred to offer no resistance against being bullied by the
court order of a selfish businessman and went ahead with the
enlargement of the Eastern bypass. So please forgive me if I am a
little sceptical about your being involved again.
This issue will be taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for a summary of specialist studies
and impact assessments for sections.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No.11;16 and 17 of the DEIR.
The only thing I expect from you, N3TC and SANRAL is your
unconditional assurance that the Eastern bypass option will in no
way be an option again regarding the possible De Beers Pass routes.
If you are committed to that, I will not get involved at all, but should
you be led again by those who have only their own self-interest in
mind, I and others affected by the Eastern bypass will indeed
become involved with all our might. This time I’m after only one thing,
and that is that the Eastern bypass should be buried, all of it
ploughed over and made into erven so that Harrismith can expand in
that direction.
I have been waiting for more than 10 years for the De Beers Pass
road to bring us relief and this time no one can argue that it would kill
the town, or that his or her investment in businesses along the N3
would suffer (which is mere conjecture), as they have been fully
aware that this can become a reality any day and have had the
advantage of filling their pockets for more than 10 years.
However, if there should be a possibility of including the Eastern
bypass as one of the De Beers Pass options, I would like to see the
residents around the Eastern bypass included as stakeholders1 and
involved in the process. I would also like to know who have been
117
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
identified as the stakeholders involved in your meeting of 7 October
and would like to be informed of any decisions that are made at this
meeting.
331
Faxed Comment
Sheet
02 October 2010
Mr IN Taylex
Bergview 1 Stop
Please note that the enormous negative environmental impact of the
Eastern bypass on adjacent homes and other property is not a matter
of conjecture, but a reality!
The proposed road deviation at Harrismith will effectively ruin my
business as all business is from the Gauteng/Durban route.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts and chapter 11, for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
332
333
October 2010
Email
15 September
2010
Mrs Jabulile Thabethe
Community
member
(Warden)
Mr Nico Theron
NMPP Alliance
nokuqeda
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Translation
There will be a shortage of food due to impact on the farms – we
depend on them for survival.
Refer to section 10, in chapters 7; 8; 9;
and 10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Agricultural Impacts. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.12 of the
DEIR.
Sizoswela ukudla
ukutshala.
ngenxa
yamapulazi
aziphilisayo
I am currently working as Liaison Officer for the Transnet Petroleum
Pipeline which is in progress between Heidelberg and Durban and
my responsibility is between Vrede via Warden to Van Reenen.
As the Pipeline is off course going though Landowners property and
my one of my tasks is to Liaise with the Farmers and tried to keep
them happy during the construction, one question often arises from
them about the new N3 road that is going to be build some time in
future between Warden and Van Reenen. Farmers are uncertain and
some jump to conclusions which are ungrounded. Because I am part
of the Pipeline, they think that I must know more about the proposed
road.
118
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
334
335
336
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Mr Patrick J Thomas
October 2010
Ms Selina Thwala
Warden community Leader
October 2010
Ms Busisiwe Thwala
Community
member
(Warden)
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
Is there a possibility that you can e mail me some information
regarding this project as well as a map to indicate which farms are
affected?
As an interested and affected party I reserve my right to make a full
and detailed response at the appropriate time once the full
investigation is in progress.
A Background Information Document was
provided to Mr Theron on 15 September
2010.
Noted.
Mina ngiyisakhamuzi saseWarden ngithi indlela le mayingavalwa
ngoba iyasisiza thina.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
Translation
As a Warden citizen, I do not support the closing of the road because
it is helpful to us.
Crime will increase.
Upgrade N3
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-section 3) in
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an
assessment
on
Social
Impacts,
specifically crime and security. Also refer
to the Summary of Key Issues No.5 of the
DEIR.
337
Letter
22 September
2010
Mr Gabriel Tlhapi
South African Heritage
Resources Agency
We acknowledge to have received your letter and a copy of an
Environmental Impact Assessment regarding the above mentioned
proposed development on the 22-09-2010. We apologize that we
would not be able to attend the stake holder and authorities meeting
as invited.
We accept that the above mentioned development will exceed 5 000
square meters in extent in which the South African Heritage
Resources Act no 25 of 1999 if it is no already required by another
Act.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 5, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an impact assessment
on Heritage Resources. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.13 of the
DEIR.
In this event an evaluation of the impact of the development on the
heritage resources is already required in terms of the Environmental
Conservation Act of 1989 in which case such evaluation must fulfil
the requirements of the South African Heritage Resources Agency in
119
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
terms of subsection (3) of section 38 of the National Heritage
Resources Act no 25 of 1999.
In view of the above we require that a qualified archaeologist or any
relevant heritage specialist be appointed to identify and assess
potential archaeological sites and material as well as other heritage
resources such as graves and buildings older than 60 years that may
be affected by the proposed development. This report must contain
as a minimum the information specified in section 38 (3) of the above
mentioned Act.
338
Faxed Comment
Sheet
1 October 2010
Mrs C E Tolmay
Interested and
Party (Warden)
Affected
Please make sure that you provide us with a copy of the requested
heritage specialist report regarding the above-mentioned matter for
approval at least 14 days before the date a response is required in
order to allow us adequate and reasonable time to respond.
We don’t want the new road it will be detrimental for the business in
our town and it is unnecessary costs that should rather be used for
fixing up the Fee State roads that is in such a bad condition.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
339
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Mr PB Tshabalala
Interested and Affected
Party (Warden)
I suggest that they must extend the road it’s my opinion so that we
can get a job.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
of the DEIR.
340
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Cllr S E Tshabalala
Phumelela
Municipality
N3 must be expanded.
Noted.
Local
120
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
341
342
343
344
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Mr TML Tshabalala
Interested and Affected
Party (Warden)
The thing is we have to get jobs, so we must agree to extend a road.
Noted.
October 2010
Mr Lucky Tshabalala
Community
member
(Warden)
Ngisola
noma
nobudedengu.
zingaba
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Translation
I suspect and I would like to warn them that there might be criminal
activity.
Refer to section 9, (sub-section 3) in
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an
assessment
on
Social
Impacts,
specifically crime and security. Also refer
to the Summary of Key Issues No.5 of the
DEIR.
Abantu abasebenza emapulazini bazothenga kuphi na?
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
October 2010
October 2010
Ms Anty Tshabalala
Community
member
(Warden)
Mr Piet Tshabalala
Community
member
(Warden)
ngiyabaxwayisa
ngezitolo
RESPONSE
ukuthi
Translation
Where will people who work for farms buy their goods?
Kuyoluza amagarage nomphakathi uyoswela umsebenzi.
Translation
The garages will lose business and the community will lose their
jobs.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts and chapter 11, for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 and 5 of the DEIR.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6, 7 and
14) in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR
for an assessment on Social
Impacts, specifically job loss, job creation
and SMME opportunities. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.4 and 5 of the
DEIR.
121
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
345
DATE
October 2010
NAME & ORGANISATION
Mr Kabelo Tshabalala
Community
member
(Warden)
ISSUES/COMMENTS
Crime will increase because of poverty.
RESPONSE
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-section 3) in
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an
assessment
on
Social
Impacts,
specifically crime and security. Also refer
to the Summary of Key Issues No.5 of the
DEIR.
346
October 2010
Ms Nomaswazi Tshabalala
Community
member
(Warden)
We do not want the new road please make that one that we have to
be bigger so that we as youth can have work. If the road is far, how
can we get hope? So please make the one we have bigger.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
347
October 2010
Mr Oupa Tshabalala
Community
member
(Warden)
This process will affect our economy because many people they
work at farms. It will affect our economy and agriculture.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Also refer to section 10, in chapters 7; 8;
9; and 10 of the DEIR for an assessment
on Agricultural Impacts and chapter 11 of
the DEIR for the economic assessments
relating to the project. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.4; 5 and 12 of
the DEIR.
348
October 2010
Mr Elias Tshabalala
Community
member
(Warden)
Expand N3, develop N3.
Noted.
349
October 2010
Ms Cynthia Tshabalala
Community
member
(Warden)
Agriculture.
Upgrade N3.
Noted.
122
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
350
October 2010
Ms Faith Tshabalala
Community
member
(Warden)
N3 is useful and is the shortest route to Johannesburg from Warden.
Noted.
351
October 2010
Mr Linda Tshabalala
Community
member
(Warden)
Amagarage azongenisa imali kancane futhi abanye
umsebenzi uzophela ngoba indlela izobe ingasekho busy.
abantu
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Translation
The garages will slowly lose business and people will lose their jobs
because the road will be no longer busy.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts and chapter 11, for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.5 and of the DEIR.
Thina singabantu abaphila ngamatoho ngoba imisebenzi ayikho.
Noted.
352
353
354
October 2010
October 2010
October 2010
Mr Mphikeleli Tshabalala
Community
member
(Warden)
Mrs Emely Tshabalala
Community
member
(Warden)
Mr Abel Tshabalala
Community
member
(Warden)
Translation
We survive through temporal jobs and we also work for the farms.
Izowisa idolobha lethu ngoba ngeke kusangena imali upetrol ngeke
usatholakala eduze.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Translation
The economic activities in our town will be reduced resulting in less
money coming in. Also, fuel will no longer be available closer to our
area.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts and chapter 11, for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.5 of the DEIR.
Indlela edlula eWarden ibalulekile kakhulu ngoba yiwona mgwaqo
osetshenziswayo kakhulu ngakho-ke kumele kuqhutshekwe
nokuwusebenzisa ukuze nabantu bezokhona nemisebenzi yabo. Itollgate iyadingeka kuwo lomgwaqo u N3 ukuze nabantu bezothola
umsebenzi.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
123
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
Translation
The national road passing Warden is very important because it is the
main road that is used by majority of road users. Therefore, N3
should be operational so that people can continue with their work. A
tollgate should also be built so that people can get jobs.
355
October 2010
Ms Puleng Tshabalala
Community
member
(Warden)
Crime will be high and no jobs.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 3, 6 and
7) in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR
for an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically crime,
job loss and job
creation. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.5 of the DEIR.
356
October 2010
Mr S’thembiso Tshabalala
ANC
It will have a positive effect towards economy and the development
our community.
Develop and extend the N3.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for an assessment on
Social Impacts and chapter 11, for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
357
October 2010
Ms S’bongile Tshabalala
Community
member
(Warden)
Poverty and jobs will be major problems.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
of the DEIR.
124
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
358
359
DATE
October 2010
October 2010
NAME & ORGANISATION
Mr Sguqa Tshabalala
Community
member
(Warden)
Mr Tsetsi Tsotetsi
Community
member
(Warden)
ISSUES/COMMENTS
Sizoswela umsebenzi.
Translation
We will lose our jobs.
Yingoba sisebenzisa umgwaqo lona ukufinyelela ezindaweni eziningi
futhi ohlale uhlanzekile ngazo zonke izikhathi, ngoba lomgwaqo
angiboniphutha onalo akukho okubi engake ngakubona ngalendlela.
RESPONSE
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
of the DEIR.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
Translation
We use this road to go to many places. This road is also clean and in
good condition. To date, I have not seen anything wrong with the
existence of this road.
360
October 2010
Ms Maria Tsotetsi
Community
member
(Warden)
Poverty will be a problem.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7)
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for
an assessment on Social Impacts,
specifically job loss and job creation. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
of the DEIR.
361
October 2010
Ms Puleng Tsotetsi
Community
member
(Warden)
If it happens that the road is closed, what will happen to the cafes
and petrol stations and any other shops? That will lead to shops
being closed and most of our residents work there to make a living.
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
362
October 2010
Mrs Zandile Tsotetsi
Community
member
(Warden)
Indlala, ubugebengu kuzokwanda.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Translation
125
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
363
DATE
Email
30 September
2010
NAME & ORGANISATION
Mr AJ Van Der Hoven
Interested and Affected
Party (Harrismith)
ISSUES/COMMENTS
Poverty and crime will increase.
Refer to section 9, (sub-section 3) in
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an
assessment
on
Social
Impacts,
specifically crime and security. Also refer
to the Summary of Key Issues No.4 and 5
of the DEIR.
The sound and air pollution has an impact.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
The noise pollution of the current N3 bypass was not done as they
promised at the first process. Why not? How will it be corrected?
Can you explain how will the cost of the toll fees be calculated?
364
365
October 2010
Faxed Comment
Sheet
01 October 2010
Mrs Elizabeth Vilakazi
Community
member
(Warden)
Mr JP Viljoen
Warden Resident
RESPONSE
Uma kususwa abantu emapulazini bazoyaphi ngoba indawo ayikho.
Ngoba nala elokishini lethu ayikho indawo. Abalungise indlela lena
ekhona ukuze nedolobha lethu lithuthuke.
Translation
If people who live in the farms have to be moved, where will they go
because there are no residential areas in our location? The best
option would be to upgrade the existing road so that our town can
also develop.
I live in Warden for the last 34 years and the new road will just kill our
little town.
Rather use that money to fix our towns and roads.
Refer to section 7 and 8, in chapters 7; 8;
9; and 10 of the DEIR for an impact
assessment on Air and Noise. Also refer
to the Summary of Key Issues No.2 and 8
of the DEIR.
Noise mitigation berms have been
constructed.
Toll fees are normally charged at
approximately 37c per km.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 9, (sub-section 9) in
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an
assessment
on
Social
Impacts,
specifically relocation. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.6 of the DEIR.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
The project addresses the De Beers Pass
Route and alternatives to it.
Refer to chapter 11, for the economic
assessments relating to the project. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4
126
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
DATE
NAME & ORGANISATION
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
of the DEIR.
366
Faxed Comment
Sheet
10 September
2010
Mrs AS Wasserman
Praxos – Warden
Employment will be created.
Impact study re the maintenance of van Reenen and the volumes of
traffic it needs to carry.
The new N3 will also ease the traffic in pick traffic.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for a summary of specialist studies
and impact assessments for sections.
chapter 11, for the economic assessments
relating to the project. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
367
368
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Mr Roy Watt-Pringle
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Mr Mark R Watt-Pringle
Harrismith
Wimpy,
Harrismith Mugg & Bean
1.
Necessary of new road with exception of V.R. Pass portion be
seriously investigated,
2. Consideration be given to decrease of heavy vehicles once oil
pipeline operative
3. Money far better utilized in poverty alleviation 4. Education, Housing, Health, Electricity and water, Poverty relief.
5. Enormous Loss of the employment and death of vibrant town –
junction – Free State – Gauteng and KZN,
6. Construction employment temporary – similar to world cup
scenario.
Viability need of new road. New pipeline will take off approximately
400 tankers of the existing highway.
Affect a wetlands and grasslands.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway.
Hence the need for alternatives and
realignments.
The wetland and grassland issue will be
taken into account in the specialist studies
which are part of the impact assessment
phase of the EIA.
Cost of road – money could be spend on schools, housing, and relief
of poverty in the eastern Free state.
369
October 2010
Mr Fanyana Xaba
Community
member
(Warden)
Sizoswela umsebenzi emakhefini nasemahotela, kuzokwanda indlala
ezobanga ubugebengu.
These issues were taken into account in
the specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
127
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
370
DATE
October 2010
NAME & ORGANISATION
Ms Lindiwe Zamisa
Community
member
(Warden)
ISSUES/COMMENTS
RESPONSE
Translation
We are going to lose jobs from the cafes and hotels. Poverty and
hunger will increase which will ultimately lead to criminal activities.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR Volume 2 for an
assessment on Social Impacts. Also refer
to the Summary of Key Issues No.4 of the
DEIR.
The economy will be affected by that road.
This issue was taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the
impact assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the
economic assessments relating to the
project. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
371
372
October 2010
Comment Sheet
12/13
September 2010
Ms Nthabiseng Zimu
Community
member
(Warden)
Sandiseleni lowomgwaqo we N3.
Cllr TR Zwane
Phumelela
Municipality
The reason for construction of De Beers Pass.
Local
Noted.
Translation
Upgrade existing N3.
The possibility of enlargement of the existing N3, the socioeconomic factor and the agricultural factors.
I propose that the N3 road should not be closed because our
community will suffer from losing job.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein
and Harrismith does not comply with
geometric standards for a Highway. It is
N3TC’s contractual obligation to comply
with SANRAL’s standards in this regard.
De Beers Pass Route: Alternative A is one
of the EIA alternatives
It is a contractual obligation that N3TC
maintain the existing N3 throughout the
concession period.
128
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
2.
SECTION 2:
COMMENTS RAISED AT THE INFORMATION SHARING SESSIONS
Area
Venue
Date
Time
Van Reenen
Green Lantern Inn
13 September 2010
08h30 – 12h30
No. of I&APs who
registered*
44
Harrismith
Harrismith Inn
13 September 2010
14h30 – 18h30
184
Warden
Warden Town Hall
14 September 2010
08h30 – 12h30
95
* The head count at each meeting was higher than the number of people who actually registered.
The planned format for this public participation activity was that of an Information Sharing Session (similar to that of a Public Open Day) where members of the
public could register as I&APs, view information posters and maps and interact one-on-one with members of the project team (SANRAL, N3TC, CKA and ACER)
over a period of four hours at each of three publically accessible venues in the study area. It was advertised as such and approximately 400 pre-identified
stakeholders were sent personalised correspondence that notified them of the project and EIA process and invited them to attend the Information Sharing
Sessions.
While a number of people did participate in the intended format, most arrived expecting a meeting, most likely as a result of the front page article in the local
newspaper which appeared on the 13 September 2010 calling for people to attend “the meeting”.
In response, an impromptu meeting was held at each venue which ACER facilitated and took notes to record the various issues raised. Most of the issues were
noted and no response given at the time, with the understanding that these issues were to be addressed in the EIA process.
129
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
NO
1
2
NAME & ORGANISATION
QUESTION/COMMENT/ISSUE
Van Reenen Information Sharing Session (13 September 2010)
Mr Kaizer Khoza
He requested a detailed motivation and rationale for the proposed
Legal Advisor: Economic project.
Development
.
Free State Department of
Economic
Development,
Tourism and Environmental
Affairs
Mr Ephraim Buti Mathebula He stated the following:
Chief
Director: 
The argument for the construction of the De Beers Pass route
Environmental Affairs
which is based on the number of cars is shallow.
Free State Department of 
There is a wetland area near Eskom Ingula Pumped Storage
Economic
Development,
Scheme.
Tourism and Environmental 
There are also fossils in the area where the alternatives are
Affairs
proposed, which will create a new impact.

There is a huge amount of investment that has been done in the
area around Harrismith. Approximately 50% of the population in
the Free State province will be out of work if a new National Road
3 is built.
RESPONSE
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein and
Harrismith does not comply with geometric
standards for a Highway. It is N3TC’s contractual
obligation to comply with SANRAL’s standards in
this regard.
The traffic trigger for De Beers Pass is contractual.
The environmental comments are noted. These
issues were taken into account in the specialist
studies which are part of the impact assessment
phase of the EIA.
Refer to section 4 and 5, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and
10 of the DEIR for a summary of Wetland and
Heritage
specialist
studies
and
impact
assessments. Also refer to the Summary of Key
Issues No.1 and 13 of the DEIR.
3
I&AP
Van Reenen ISS
He wanted to know who is advising the Government. He asked if there
is an official present at the meeting who is advising the government.
4
Mrs Alison Oates
Swinburne
Farmers
Association
She questioned how the N3TC can be sure about the building of the
road this time around. She made reference to the fact that landowners
were expropriated previously and N3TC has since changed their minds.
SANRAL (South African National Roads Agency
Ltd) advises the National Minister of Transport.
SANRAL was represented at the meeting.
There has been no change of mind. N3TC is
complying with their contractual obligations
relating to the trigger date for De Beers Pass.
5
I&AP
Van Reenen ISS
I&AP
Van Reenen ISS
Adv George Galloway
Farmer
The expropriation of land ahead of time is an unfair process.
Comment noted.
He wanted to know what would happen to farms that were expropriated.
SANRAL has a policy relating to disposal of land
owned by SANRAL.
The contract document is not a public document.
6
7


He wanted to know if the contract between N3TC and SANRAL is
available.
He requested information on cost estimates for the 3 proposed
alternatives.
Project costs are a contractual matter between
N3TC and SANRAL and are not material in this
process.
130
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
NO
NAME & ORGANISATION
QUESTION/COMMENT/ISSUE
RESPONSE

Project costs are a contractual matter between
N3TC and SANRAL and are not material in this
process.
The separation on the large plan is a result of the
blow up of a smaller plan where the routes were
separated to show that they were on the same
alignment along that section. This was done for
legibility at that scale.
Van Reenens Pass cannot be made compliant
with Highway geometric standards due to steep
gradients and sharp curves.
The Black Route was at the time of the RLI
specialist studies found to have more negative
environmental impacts when compared to DBPR
Alt B and was therefore not included as an
alternative in this application,
Comments made and issues raised at this
information sharing session were noted by the
public participation consultant.
See response re project costs above.
The EIA process is compliant with legislation.
He wanted to know the cost of the construction of the De Beers
Pass route based on1997 estimates.
8
I&AP
Van Reenen ISS
The current upgrading of the Harrismith route crosses his farms dividing
it into 3 pieces. He asked the reasons for the 15m separation distance
between alternative routes?
9
I&AP
Van Reenen ISS
He needed clarity on the Van Reenen’s Pass and the gradient issue.
10
I&AP
Van Reenen ISS
He questioned why the black route, which was shown to landowners
during the RLI process, was not being investigated as part of the EIA
process?
11
Mr Ephraim Buti Mathebula
Chief
Director:
Environmental Affairs

Free State Department of
Economic
Development,
Tourism and Environmental
Affairs
12
13
I&AP
Van Reenen
Mr Kaizer Khoza
Legal Advisor: Economic
Affairs
Free State Department of
Economic
Development,
Tourism and Environmental
Affairs


In terms of the EIA regulations, public participation meetings
should be recorded as they form the basis of the EIA, in this case,
Scoping Report.
No response has been provided to the cost analysis question.
The EIA consultant cannot expect the public to record their
issues.
He further stated that he has been sent by the Premier of the Free State
to attend the meeting.

He also expressed concern around the absence of the officials
from the national Department of Environmental Affairs.

He informed the Project Team that the communities around
Harrismith have a lot of issues. A meeting has also been held with
the Harrismith Business Forum.

He questioned the EIA process in terms of its identification of key
stakeholders.
He asked about the tolling requirement and when it will be addressed.

He suggested that N3TC establishes if the 13 900 vehicle load
could be accommodated by upgrading/widening the existing N3
.

If the existing N3 can be upgraded, why are alternative routes
being looked at?
Noted.
Noted.
Noted.
The EIA process will comply with legislation.
Toll is addressed under the SANRAL Act and will
be addressed at the appropriate time.
The traffic trigger based on engineering
requirements. It has already been established that
the engineering requirements cannot be satisfied
by widening or upgrading the existing N3.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein and
Harrismith does not comply with geometric
standards for a highway. Hence the need for
131
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
NO
NAME & ORGANISATION
QUESTION/COMMENT/ISSUE

14
Mr George Makaukau
Deputy Director General
Free State Dept of Police,
Roads and Transport
His opinion based on previous indications is that road users will
not use the old route. People use the quickest road to their
destination.

Another matter for consideration is at what cost/ expense do we
look at proposing the new alternative route. He requested that all
alternatives be considered and all aspects be exhausted given
the possible negative impacts for the Harrismith area.

The Free State government is willing to engage and the relevant
Directors will attend meetings if necessary.

He criticised the EIA process in terms of its deadlines for I&APs to
register.
He stated the following:

They have a mandate in terms of the cooperative governance
initiative and had a seating with the Premier of the Free State and
the Cabinet. The Head of Department was supposed to be at the
Information Sharing Session.

The issue raised by the Executive Council is that all programmes
and projects should not be imposed on the public.


15
16
Mr Kaizer Khoza
Legal Advisor: Economic
Affairs
Free State Department of
Economic
Development,
Tourism and Environmental
Affairs
Landowner/Farmer
Van Reenen ISS
The discussions held with the public should be considered as
inputs to the process.
The fundamental issue is the understanding of socio-economic
aspects in addition to the engineering aspects.
What does N3TC mean by ‘contractual obligation’?
When does the contract period for N3TC end?
RESPONSE
alternatives and realignments.
Noted. This comment confirms the importance of
safety and distance saving on transport
economics.
The impact of all alternatives are being
investigated in this EIA process.
Stakeholder and Focus Group Meetings have
been arranged.
The EIA process will comply with legislation.
Noted.
The process that is being followed is set out by the
National Environmental Management Act (NEMA)
and the relevant regulations. These regulations
ensure that the EIA process followed cannot
impose projects on the public.
This is the function of this Information Sharing
Session.
Preliminary Social and Economic studies have
been done and these will be expanded in the EIA
phase. This Phase follows the Scoping Phase that
has just started.
Their obligation in terms of the Concession
Contract between N3TC and SANRAL.
2029
.
Has the noise impact been looked at? There is already noise pollution
in Harrismith.
In the Swinburne area, the N3 is a bad name to the farmers.

The N3 is a hassle and the worst case would be another lane
added to the existing N3.

The construction impacts on the farming community would make
farming impossible.
Noise is an impact that will be studied by a
specialist during the EIA phase. Refer to section 8,
in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for a
summary of the Noise specialist study and impact
assessments for sections. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.8 of the DEIR.
132
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
NO
NAME & ORGANISATION
QUESTION/COMMENT/ISSUE
RESPONSE
Noted.
Noted.
17
18
Mrs Alison Oates
Landowner/Secretary
Swinburne
Farmers
Association
Adv George Galloway
Farmer
She referred to EIA undertaken in 1998 and mentioned that there were
a number of issues that were raised by the public. She wanted
assurance that the N3TC will read the documents which are part of the
EIA.
She also expressed concern that two weeks notice was insufficient for
the Key Stakeholder Workshop.
He stated the following:

He appreciates the input from the government departments.

He referred to previous engagements and discussions with Mr
Nazir Ali and Mr Neil Tolmie where the De Beers Pass route was
discussed in detail.

He suggested that the existing N3 should be upgraded. If an
alternative route is chosen, the Harrismith area would suffer
forever.
The EIA process will comply with legislation.
The EIA process will comply with legislation.
Noted.
Noted.
This issue was taken into account in the specialist
studies which are part of the impact assessment
phase of the EIA
Refer to chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for a
summary of specialist studies and impact
assessments for sections and chapter 11 of the
DEIR for the economic assessments relating to
the project.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4 of
the DEIR.
19
I&AP
Van Reneen
Building a new road will cost even more.
Is it the traffic volumes that have informed the De Beers Pass Route?
20
21
Mrs Francesca Fondse
CEO
De Angelus Estates, TPI,
AUD. LDA, ACE, Metatron
Mr George Makaukau
She referred to the $100 million proposed development on her
properties that would be affected and requested the opportunity to
represent her interests directly at the key stakeholder workshop.
Project costs are a contractual matter between
N3TC and SANRAL and are not material in this
process
Traffic volume is the contractual trigger for De
beers Pass.
Confirmed as a key stakeholder.
He raised the following comments:
133
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
NO
NAME & ORGANISATION
QUESTION/COMMENT/ISSUE
RESPONSE
Deputy Director General
Free State Dept of Police,
Roads and Transport

N3TC is not aware of any formal decision that is
contrary to their contractual obligations.



22
Free State
Official
Government


Two years ago, a decision was taken by the Free State
government and the Minister of Transport, regarding the position
of the proposed De Beers Pass Route.
The current proposal creates a lot of doubt whether this issue is
about Van Reenen or something else.
If moving a road from Harrismith to the other area, who stands to
benefit?
He perceived these issues to be too technical for the meeting and
also understood them to be politically motivated.
His opinion was that the meeting would have been more
productive if the public was provided with discussion documents
which contain information about costs of the 3 alternative routes.
Another issue relates to Van Reenen. There are two routes which
avoid the Van Reenen area, which is a problem. The reasons for
further bypassing Harrismith after the bottle-neck in Van Reenen
has been solved are not clear.

23
24
25
26
Mr TJ Phahlo
Chief Director
Free State Department of
Police,
Roads
and
Transport
I&AP
Van Reenen
Mr Ephraim Buti Mathebula
Chief
Director:
Environmental Affairs
Free State Department of
Economic
Development,
Tourism and Environmental
Affairs
I&AP
He is concerned about the spirit in which the N3TC is engaging if
he considers the fact that N3TC is an agent of SANRAL and
SANRAL is an agent of government.

He stated that representatives who are present at the meeting
have power to stop the project.
He stated that the Executive Council has noted the contractual
obligation of SANRAL and N3TC of building the road by 2013.
He however stated that this matter needs to be dealt with at a higher
level, i.e. between national government and SANRAL.
A number of countries operate on an efficient rail system. He requested
that the government starts thinking about the opportunities for job
creation should a rail network be utilised efficiently in South Africa.
There is a master plan which talks about the rail system and its linkages
to the entire transport system. It therefore comes as a surprise to note
that SANRAL is not looking at the bigger picture.
What percentage change on vehicle load (heavy vehicles) has occurred
N3TC is complying with its contractual obligation.
The specialist studies will address this issue.
The EIA process will comply with legislation.
The Background Information Document on the
project was available to all interested and affected
parties. Project costs are a contractual matter
between N3TC and SANRAL and are not material
in this process.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein and
Harrismith does not comply with geometric
standards for a highway. Hence the need for
alternatives and realignments.
.
Noted.
The EIA process will comply with legislation.
Noted. The commencement date is based on a
traffic trigger.
This EIA process is in response to the economic
demand for road transportation. The consideration
of alternative modes of transport falls outside this
scope.
Refer to the response above.
The percentage heavy vehicles has grown from
134
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
NO
27
28
29
30
NAME & ORGANISATION
QUESTION/COMMENT/ISSUE
RESPONSE
Van Reenen
over the past 9 years?
approximately 20% to a current range of 30% 35% of total traffic
This information will be recorded during the
heritage specialist study in the EIA phase.
Mrs Alison Oates
She indicated that she is concerned about graves of members of
Swinburne
Farmers families who are no longer living in the area. She is of the opinion that
Association
time should be allocated to deal with this important aspect.
Harrismith Information Sharing Session (13 September 2010)
Dr Balekile Mzangwa
He indicated that it is misleading for the public to read and be made to
Executive Mayor
believe that all municipalities were consulted. He requested that the
Maluti A Phofung Local Background Information Document be updated to state that the Maluti A
Municipality
Phofung Municipality was not consulted during the RLI process.
I&AP
He stated that, a while ago, the Minister of Transport, Mr Jeff Radebe
Harrismith ISS
visited Harrismith and was asked about the De Beers Pass Route.
Minister Radebe’s response was that the De Beers Pass Route is not
going ahead. It therefore came as a surprise to the community of
Harrismith to note that the N3TC is going ahead despite what the
Minister said.
I&AP

SANRAL is supposed to be an agency of government and it
Harrismith ISS
would appear that SANRAL is operating against the
pronouncement of the Minister of Transport.

He further stated that he recently saw a notice board near
Keeversfontein that says N3TC wants to commit R305m.
32
I&AP
Harrismith ISS
Adv George Galloway
Farmer
33
See above.
Is the N3TC contract available for public information?

Noted.
His question would is ‘what is N3TC saying about Montrose and
Harrismith communities that will be affected’?

I&AP
Harrismith ISS
N3TC is not aware of any formal decision that is
contrary to their contractual obligations.
The notice board is a construction contract board
and refers to N3TC’s 2010 road rehabilitation
spend.
The communities have an opportunity to voice
their concerns through the EIA process. These
comments are taken into consideration in the
social and the economic specialist studies in the
EIA phase.
The project team is unaware of the Ladysmith hub
initiative.
Based on distance, the saving is:
DBPR In excess of R165 million per annum.
DBPR Alt A: In excess of R80 million per annum.
DBPR Alt B. In excess of R165 million per annum.
The contract document is not a public document.


31
The record shows that all municipalities were
contacted and consulted.
They understand that the Ladysmith town has been earmarked as
a logistics hub for transport.
What does the reduction in distance of road translate to in terms of cost
savings for each alternative?

He followed up on the matter regarding the availability of contract
and stated that SANRAL is a government agency and by
implication is using public money to fulfil its mandate.
He further stated that the sole reason for building De Beers Pass
Route was because of Van Reenen. Now that the bottleneck at
Van Reenen has been solved, why is N3TC continuing with the
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein and
Harrismith does not comply with geometric
standards for a Highway. Hence the need for
135
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
NO
NAME & ORGANISATION
QUESTION/COMMENT/ISSUE

34
I&AP
Harrismith ISS


35
I&APs
Harrismith ISS
De Beers Pass Route and bypass Harrismith?
He criticised the consultation process with landowners as part of
the RLI.
He suggested that N3TC should have brought all relevant and
responsible departments to the meeting. Although N3TC is an
autonomous organisation, they are still liable to SANRAL, the
government agency.
As far as he is concerned, the N3TC should be reporting back on
how they are dealing with the bottleneck at Van Reenen’s Pass.

The government is also busy with the rail network, which nullifies
the need of the proposed De Beers Pass Route.

He requested SANRAL to declare their interest towards the
proposed De Beers Pass Route alternatives.
They stated the following:

The existing N3 is the only route that should be considered for
widening or upgrading.

South Africa is a legitimate state, the people of Maluti A Phofur.

Bypasses must be abolished because they are killing towns.

In 2004, the people of Maluti a Phofung marched against the
proposed project and they still maintain that the residents are
against the proposed De Beers Pass Route.

The proposal in its entirety will kill the area.
RESPONSE
alternatives and realignments.
This criticism is not understood because Adv.
Galloway participated in the RLI process
In this regard the public participation consultant
has acted in accordance with the legal
requirements. SANRAL was represented at this
meeting.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein and
Harrismith does not comply with geometric
standards for a highway. Hence the need for
alternatives and realignments.
This EIA process is in response to the economic
demand for road transportation. The consideration
of alternative modes of transport falls outside this
scope.
SANRAL’s objective is to provide a safe and
efficient National Road Network while taking into
consideration the natural, social and economic
environment.
These issues were taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the impact
assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for a
summary of specialist studies and impact
assessments for sections and chapter 11 of the
DEIR for the economic assessments relating to
the project.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4 of
the DEIR.
The EIA process that is being followed will
determine the preferred route.
36
I&AP
Harrismith ISS
Based on the alternatives presented in the Background Information
Document, it appears that the one of the proposed routes will go
through the Platberg area and will impact negatively the tourism
potential of the area. Given this concern, he questioned if the route was
viable.
These issues were taken into account in the
specialist studies which are part of the impact
assessment phase of the EIA.
Refer to chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for a
summary of specialist studies and impact
136
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
NO
NAME & ORGANISATION
QUESTION/COMMENT/ISSUE
RESPONSE
He requested that the sustainability of the route be looked at from an
environmental point of view.
assessments for sections. Specifically refer to
section 9, (sub-sections 17) for an assessment on
Social Impacts, in particular Tourism. Also refer to
the Summary of Key Issues No.7 of the DEIR.
37
I&AP
Harrismith ISS
He stated that currently the Van Reenen’s Pass is being upgraded and
questioned the cost associated with the upgrading of that section of the
road.
38
I&AP
Harrismith ISS
Businesses in the area have invested money to prepare themselves for
the future. He is concerned about what would happen to Harrismith as a
town if the bypass were to be approved.
Harrismith and Maluti A Phofung are the main areas providing
employment opportunities for the community. The levels of
unemployment in the area are of a great concern.
The current work being undertaken is part of the
N3TC rehabilitation schedule. The existing N3 will
continue to be maintained to the required
standards irrespective of which route is
constructed.
The EIA process will identify the route with the
least environmental impact, but irrespective of
which route this is, the existing N3 will continue to
service Harrismith.
Refer to chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for a
summary of specialist studies and impact
assessments for sections.
Also Refer to section 9, (sub-sections 6 and 7) in
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an
assessment on Social Impacts, specifically job
loss and job creation. Also refer to the Summary of
Key Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
39
Dr Balekile Mzangwa
Executive Mayor
Maluti A Phofung Local
Municipality




According to the economic study that was done for the Maluti A
Phofung, the average income per household in the area is R 865.
Given the economic concerns, the community would like to speak
to SANRAL who is a government agency to understand the
complexities of the matter.
Representatives of community in their various capacities have
spoken and emphasis has been placed on the socio-economic
component.
The problem area, which is Van Reenen’s Pass has been solved,
therefore there is no need for the De Beers Pass Route.
Noted.
The relevant agencies of government will consider
the results of all specialist studies.
Noted.
Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the economic
assessments relating to the project. Also refer to
the Summary of Key Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein and
137
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
NO
NAME & ORGANISATION
QUESTION/COMMENT/ISSUE
RESPONSE

Harrismith does not comply with geometric
standards for a Highway. Hence the need for
alternatives and realignments.
An official submission will be made in this regard.
Noted.
40
Mr Kaizer Khoza
Legal Advisor: Economic
Affairs
Free State Department of
Economic
Development,
Tourism and Environmental
Affairs
41
Landowner
Harrismith ISS
42
I&AP
Trade Unionist
43
I&AP
Harrismith ISS
44
I&AP
Harrismith ISS
Mr Seiso Mohai
Member of the Executive
Council,
Free
State
Province
45
He stated the following:

SANRAL and N3TC received an ROD for the De Beers Pass
Route in 1999.

According to his understanding, that ROD is no longer applicable.
This is a new EIA process starting from scratch.

He then advised the public to cooperate in the EIA process as it
will inform what issues need to be investigated and well
understood.

The National Environmental Management Act looks at the
economic, social and biophysical environments.
He suggested that the existing N3 be upgraded. This should include the
upgrading of the interchanges and farmers’ accesses to the N3.
They are tired of retrenchments in the area. If the De Beers Pass Route
is built, where are people going to work. The key challenges in
Harrismith are unemployment and poverty.
The study area map does not mention the Western Bypass which used
to be shown on maps. He questioned its absence.
The concern was raised about the loss of jobs and the appeal made for
job creation and investment in the people of the region.
In closing, he made the following comments:

He firstly thanked the Programme Director, convenors of the
meeting, provincial government, business, labour and local
government.

He then mentioned that he has been sent by the Executive
Council of the Premier (Free State) as the province has interest
and views on the development.

He expressed his unhappiness about the absence of SANRAL
representatives at such an important meeting and indicated that it
is not right for SANRAL to delegate to the N3TC.

Valuable comments have been made at the meeting and need to
be taken seriously because Maluti A Phofung is an area that has
intense poverty.
Noted.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein and
Harrismith does not comply with geometric
standards for a Highway. Hence the need for
alternatives and realignments.
Noted.
In the late 1980’s when the Eastern Bypass was
upgraded there was talk of the Western Bypass.
Due to public pressure, the decision was then
taken not to build the Western Bypass..
Noted.
Noted.
Noted.
SANRAL was represented at the meeting.
The EIA process will consider all issues raised.
138
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
NO
NAME & ORGANISATION
QUESTION/COMMENT/ISSUE
RESPONSE

Noted.







Harrismith is a key area and a focus point for development in the
Free State
During the Minister’s visit in 2008, he persuaded the Minister to
listen to the community of Ntabazwe.
SANRAL is an agency of government and would have thought
that they listened to what the Minister had said. The Minister said
there will be no bypass. The cabinet looked at this area and
decided that there should be a logistics hub in Harrismith. The
Free State government would therefore expect all agencies to
familiarise themselves with the developmental agenda of the
area.
There is no reason why SANRAL should not conduct reviews and
advise the government.
The government has to act in the interest of the development in
the area.
The proposed road network will affect the development of the
town, create ghost towns and result in the unemployment related
issues.
The businesses of the area also shared similar views with the
Minister.
There are two major development hubs in the Free State which
are captured in the Freight and Logistics Strategy of 2005/2006.


46
I&AP
Warden ISS
It is important to ensure that the road network does not negatively
impact on the socio-economic development.

The MEC/Provincial Department will continue putting forward the
developmental agenda.

The Premier of the Free State has already communicated the
matter with the President.

He agrees with the views that have been expressed in the area
and that SANRAL will continue to reinforce the Agenda of the
government.
Warden Information Sharing Session (14 September 2010)
Why is money spent on a new road instead of upgrading the existing
N3?
47
I&AP
Warden ISS
Once the EIA process has been completed, what are the proposed
timeframes for construction?
Noted.
N3TC is not aware of any formal decision that is
contrary to their contractual obligations.
The relevant agencies of government will consider
the results of all specialist studies.
Noted
Noted.
Noted.
The project team has requested information on the
proposed Harrismith logistics hub from the Free
State Government.
The EIA process will address this issue.
Noted.
Noted.
Noted.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein and
Harrismith does not comply with geometric
standards for a Highway. It is N3TC’s contractual
obligation to comply with SANRAL’s standards in
this regard.
Upgrading the N3 in its current form will not
comply with SANRAL’s Highway standards.
Based on current traffic volumes and growth
predictions, the expected construction start is
139
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
NO
NAME & ORGANISATION
QUESTION/COMMENT/ISSUE
48
I&AP
Warden ISS
I&AP
Warden ISS
Will the proposed national road have toll gates?
49
50
Various I&APs
Warden ISS
He noted that the project was rejected at Harrismith because it will
create ghost towns and affect the social and economic environments.
The EIA process must stop. The MEC has put it clearly that proposal
will not go ahead.
If the proposal succeeds and the existing N3 closes, you would have
taken away the main economic activity and affected the livelihoods of
the three towns (Van Reenen, Harrismith and Warden).
Even though there is a distance saving for the travelers, the local
community will still lose because they do not have cars and will not be
using the road.
RESPONSE
2012/13 with completion after 3/ 4 years.
A new toll plaza is proposed near Warden. Refer
to BID map
The EIA process will comply with legislation.
The existing N3 will not close. It will remain fully
operational and will be maintained to SANRAL
standards.
Noted. The impact was determined by specialist
studies. Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the
economic assessments relating to the project. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4 of the
DEIR.
Also refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10
of the DEIR for an assessment on Social Impacts.
51
Mr August Beckman
Warden Business Chamber
He stated that from a Business Chamber perspective, he is of the
opinion that there could only be positive benefits from the proposed De
Beers Pass Route alternatives.
He believes that Warden town will benefit because the infrastructure will
be upgraded. The proposed N3 will create more job opportunities. He
could see the Warden community benefiting from such a project and
cannot foresee any negative impacts.
He has observed that the existing N3 cannot handle the traffic volumes
and something needs to be done to deal with the safety requirements
for a national road. He also made reference to the number of accidents
on N3 and the number of times that the road has been closed on a
monthly basis.
Noted. The impact was determined by specialist
studies. Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the
economic assessments relating to the project and
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 for a summary of
specialist studies and impact assessments for
sections. Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No.4 of the DEIR.
Also refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10
of the DEIR for an assessment on Social Impacts.
The existing N3 between Keeversfontein and
Harrismith does not comply with geometric
standards for a Highway. Hence the need for
alternatives and realignments.
140
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
NO
NAME & ORGANISATION
QUESTION/COMMENT/ISSUE
RESPONSE
52
I&AP
Warden ISS
He questioned the necessity for disturbing a completely new
environment instead of focusing in the already disturbed environment.
Noted. The impact was determined by specialist
studies.
Refer to chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for a
summary of specialist studies and impact
assessments for sections. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.1 of the DEIR.
53
I&AP
Warden ISS
Given the socio-economic conditions of the area and unemployment
particularly in Warden, is there a plan for redressing the negative
impacts that may arise as a result of the new N3?
54
I&AP
Warden ISS
I&AP
Warden ISS
I&AP
Warden ISS
If the proposed development will benefit the community, he will support
the proposed new route in addition to the existing N3.
He asked about the possibility of a Dry Dock being built in Warden. He
believes that a Dry Dock will create more job opportunities.
They have been notified that this EIA is being done for a second time.

Why did the initial process of building the De Beers Pass route
stop?
The Environmental Management Plan will address
all identified negative impacts of the road. This will
include the construction and operational phase of
the project.
Noted.
55
56


57
58
I&AP
Warden ISS
I&AP
Warden ISS
When will this process be finalized?
Are we going to dwell on the same issues which were raised
during the initial process?
If the proposed road goes ahead, he would to request that the tollgate
be placed on the northern side of Warden town.
He requested transparency in the manner in which the project is being
undertaken. His request is due to some information which indicates that
farmers have already been paid for the land to build a new road. He
requested clarity on the matter.
It is recommended that this issue is raised with
government.
There are new regulations in place and therefore
the De Beers Pass Route needs to be studied in
accordance with the new regulations.
On receipt of the environmental authorisation.
This is a new EIA process.
Toll is addressed under the SANRAL Act and will
be addressed at the appropriate time.
The land for the De Beers Pass Route was
acquired by SANRAL in the late 1990’s. The EIA
process will comply with legislation.
141
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
3.
SECTION 3:
COMMENTS RAISED AT THE KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND
AUTHORITIES MEETING
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
FOR THE PROPOSED
NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN
(De Beers Pass Section)
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
HELD AT LALA NATHI COUNTRY LODGE, HARRISMITH
ON 07 OCTOBER 2010
142
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA: 12/12/20/1992)
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS...................................................................................................................... 1
PREFACE.....
........................................................................................................................ 2
1.
ATTENDANCE 3
1.1. Attendance – Key Stakeholders and Authorities ............................................................. 3
1.2 Attendance – South African National Roads Agency Limited (SANRAL) ......................... 3
1.3 Attendance – N3 Toll Concession (Pty) Ltd (N3TC) ........................................................ 3
1.4 Attendance – Environmental Consulting Team (EIA Team) ............................................ 3
2.
WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS......................................................................................... 3
2.1 Facilitator’s introductory remarks.................................................................................... 3
3.
MEETING OBJECTIVES AND PARTICIPATION GUIDELINES ................................................ 4
3.1 Meeting objectives ......................................................................................................... 4
3.2 Participation Guidelines ................................................................................................. 4
4.
PRESENTATION: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ............................................... 4
5.
PRESENTATION: TECHNICAL ................................................................................................ 4
6.
ISSUES AND COMMENTS RAISED AND DISCUSSED ........................................................... 5
6.1 Issues and Comments raised ......................................................................................... 5
7.
SUMMARY AND WAY FORWARD........................................................................................... 5
7.1 Environmental Assessment Practitioner..... .................................................................... 5
7.2 SANRAL ........................................................................................................................ 5
8.
CLOSING REMARKS ............................................................................................................... 5
APPENDIX A: RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED AND DISCUSSED .............................................. 6
APPENDIX B: PRESENTATIONS .................................................................................................... 17
APPENDIX C: ATTENDANCE LIST.................................................................................................. 18
RECORD OF KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
07 OCTOBER 2010
1
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
PREFACE
“A Stakeholder” refers to a person who attended the meeting and verbally raised issues but whose
name is unclear. This in no way diminishes the value of the issue raised. Should you recognise your
input and would like to have your name recorded next to it, please advise the Public Participation
Office.
RECORD OF KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
07 OCTOBER 2010
2
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
1.
ATTENDANCE
1.1.
Attendance – Key Stakeholders and Authorities

1.2
As per attendance list provided in Appendix C.
Attendance – South African National Roads Agency Limited (SANRAL)
Name
Mr Stewart Wilson
1.3
Attendance – N3 Toll Concession (Pty) Ltd (N3TC)
Name
Mr Neil Tolmie
Mr Con Roux
Mr Koos Radebe
1.4
2.
Position/Role
Manager: Design and Construction
Position/Role
Chief Executive Officer
Commercial Manager
Traffic Engineer
Attendance – Environmental Consulting Team (EIA Team)
Name
Mr Alan Cave
Organisation
Cave Klapwijk and Associates
Role in the project
Environmental Assessment Practitioner
Ms Janice Tooley
ACER (Africa)
Environmental Consultant
Ms Bongi Shinga
ACER (Africa)
Public Participation Consultant
Ms Candace Sparg
ACER (Africa)
Public Participation Consultant
WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS
Ms Janice Tooley, ACER, introduced herself as the Facilitator for the meeting and thanked everyone
for attending the Key Stakeholders’ and Authorities (KSA) Meeting.
2.1
Facilitators introductory remarks
The facilitator, Ms Tooley explained that the National Road 3: Keeversfontein to Warden (De Beers
Pass Section) was a very important project of national, provincial, regional and local interest.
She went on to say that the receiving environment is quite diverse. The road will pass through
agriculture, tourism areas, business, transport and therefore a number of sectors will be affected.
RECORD OF KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
07 OCTOBER 2010
3
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
She stated that the project has a long history. She asked that stakeholders who are familiar with the
project be patient as they might have heard the information previously. However, the Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) process is being started from the beginning and it is a legal process which
has a set sequence that has to be followed. Equitable opportunities to participate have to be given to
everyone.
She introduced the Project Team to the stakeholders. She also asked the participants to introduce
themselves by stating (a) their names, (b) the organisations and/or sector they are representing and
(c) indicate their specific interest in the project and the EIA process. An attendance list is provided as
Appendix C.
3.
MEETING OBJECTIVES AND PARTICIPATION GUIDELINES
3.1
Meeting objectives
The objectives of the Key Stakeholders and Authorities’ Meeting were as follows:






3.2
Provide a description of the EIA process.
Provide a description of the project.
Provide an opportunity for key stakeholders and authorities to identify key issues for the EIA.
For those present to hear and understand issues identified and raised by other key
stakeholders.
Feedback information to constituents/colleagues
Facilitate co-operative governance which leads to a more informed decision making process.
Participation Guidelines
The Facilitator further read through the points presented on the slide, which provided guidelines with
respect to the conduct of all participants and for achieving a constructive debate and discussion.
These points are contained in the main presentation, which is provided in Appendix B.
4.
PRESENTATION: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Mr Alan Cave, the Environmental Assessment Practitioner (EAP), presented information on the EIA
process.
5.
PRESENTATION: TECHNICAL
Mr Neil Tolmie, CEO, N3TC presented the technical background for the proposed National Road 3:
Keeversfontein to Warden (De Beers Pass Section).
RECORD OF KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
07 OCTOBER 2010
4
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
6.
ISSUES AND COMMENTS RAISED AND DISCUSSED
6.1
Issues and Comments raised
The table contained in Appendix A: “Record of Issues Raised and Discussed” details the issues,
comments and concerns, which were raised and discussed at the meeting.
7.
SUMMARY AND WAY FORWARD
7.1
Environmental Assessment Practitioner
The EAP concluded with the following:
1. Reference was made to international countries where bypasses to towns are being built.
2. No particular route is being advocated at this stage of the process.
3. All concerns will be investigated and mitigation measures put forward
4. All issues raised will be presented in the draft Scoping Report to be distributed for comment
early in November 2010.
5. Further detailed specialist studies will be conducted after the Scoping Report is approved by
the DEA.
6. The final decision as to which route will be followed will be taken by the Authorities.
7. Everyone was thanked for their participation.
7.2
SANRAL
In addition to their prior response regarding the Harrismith Logistics Hub, SANRAL’S view that the De
Beers Pass and Harrismith Logistics Hub are not mutually exclusive was noted
8.
CLOSING REMARKS
Ms Tooley said that all the issues raised at this meeting are part of public record and will also be
included in the draft Scoping Report.
Ms Tooley stated that during the comment period for the draft Scoping Report there will be further
public meetings and focus group meetings. Landowner issues including interchanges will be
addressed at the various focus group meetings.
It is anticipated that the Draft Scoping Report will be available for public comment early in November
2010. She thanked everyone for their attendance and input and then closed the meeting.
Interactions between I&APs and the Project Team that took place after the meeting are not part of the
formal record.
RECORD OF KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
07 OCTOBER 2010
5
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
APPENDIX A: RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED AND DISCUSSED
KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
No
Name & Organisation
Comment
Response
1
Mr Ken Davie
Appin Investments
The saving referred to is a saving to the national economy.
2
Ms Matiro Mogopodi
Municipality Manager
Thabo Mofutsanyane
District Municipality
A Stakeholder
He stated that Mr Tolmie referred to approximately
R150m operational cost savings per year and also to
14km shorter route. He enquired how much of that
R150m will be Gauteng and how much will be
Harrismith.
What is the reason for building this road? If she could
get the answer to this she will be able to elaborate
further why she is asking this question.
Mr Cave had given a lot of emphasis on the conditions
put forward, that when they think about this alternative
route they should seriously consider the wetlands and
the environment. However, there was no emphasis in
terms of seriously considering the social impact. As far
as he is concerned, the constitution of South Africa says
that any development that is going to take place must
improve the lives of the people and not disadvantage the
lives of the people. He asked for clarification about all
the emphasis on nature and why the component of
social impacts was not considered.
In the EIA presentation the elements of the study were listed.
These are the natural environment, the social environment and
the economic environment. There is no favouring of any specific
environment.
3
To improve road safety and reduce road user costs.
As part of the specialist studies, a social impact assessment
and an economic evaluation was undertaken.
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an
assessment on Social Impacts. Also refer to the Social Impact
Assessment study (Appendix K of DEIR Volume 2).
Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the economic assessments
relating to the project.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4 and of the DEIR.
4
Mrs Francesca Fondse
De Angelus Estates Project
Mrs Fondse made an observation about the distance
and the gradient. Distance and gradient determines
national carbon footprint. National carbon footprint
determines how much you will be taxed in future. South
Africa is a co-signatory to three international accords. By
2012 all of the toll roads which by taking more of money
from people, can be interpreted as a further tax. This
money will be used to pay for the penalties of our
RECORD OF KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
07 OCTOBER 2010
6
It is acknowledged that carbon footprint is of national
importance and that a distance saving could reduce the carbon
footprint.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
No
5
Name & Organisation
Comment
Mr Ben Deysel
Chairman
Harrismith Business Forum
national economy as the country is not complying with
the international set standards of carbon footprints. By
signing the accord it was agreed to do something and if
we do not comply we must pay up. So the 13 or 14 km
that will be maintained on the existing road might cost
later in taxes.
He asked what is national interest. There is an existing
road built along a specific route. Harrismith, the town, is
150 years old (almost) and it was located in this area
because of the position on this very important route.
Billions of rands have been invested in the town and the
community over many years and by removing the road
all that investment would be depleted and destroyed.
The question therefore remains, what is “national
interest”.
Response
From a national Department of Transport perspective, the most
efficient and effective transportation solution is in the national
interest.
The fact that the road may be 14 km shorter might be a
specific saving, but at what cost? What is the cost of the
additional road to be built at R5 or R6 billion. The toll
fees will also probably double. Therefore, the ultimate
cost for the net transporter will probably be in excess of
what it is at current levels.
6
Ms Leona Kleynhans
Ward Councillor
Maluti a Phofung Local
Municipality
Safety is not a factor based purely on the condition of
the road. Law enforcement and the quality of driving are
also factors. At present, we do not have any law
enforcement after 18h00 or before 06h00. If the accident
statistics are examined, they do not occur during
daytime when there is law enforcement. The impact of
the current condition of the road can be negated, by
purely bringing in more effective law enforcement.
Ms Kleynhans noted that according to the presentation,
13,900 vehicles per day was the target. She asked that
the current number be divulged.
At the last meeting, she had asked how the Harrismith
Logistics Hub was going to affect the planning that is
being done around this road.
A few years ago, with the building of the Eastern Bypass
in Harrismith, there were two alternatives considered,
the Eastern and Western Bypass. She had been told
RECORD OF KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
07 OCTOBER 2010
7
It is acknowledged that law enforcement does improve road
safety but this is negated once the roads are degraded to levels
of service E and F.
Current traffic levels are in the order of about 11,500 vehicles
per day on average.
SANRAL and N3TC are not familiar with the development detail
of the Harrismith Logistics Hub. The Logistics Hub will not be
affected as the N3 in its current form will remain to provide
access to Harrismith and the Hub.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
No
7
Name & Organisation
Mr Henk Badenhorst
Chairman: Eastern Free
State
Democratic Alliance
Comment
Response
that that decision was final and that nothing more could
be done about it. However, now today it has been
revealed that another Eastern Bypass is being
considered and she wanted to know if it would be
possible to bring the Western Bypass back as an
alternative.
It is correct that in the late 1980s when the Eastern Bypass was
upgraded there was talk of the Western Bypass. Due to public
pressure, the decision was then taken not to build the Western
Bypass.. There has been a preliminary investigation of the
Western Bypass and it would add approximately 3 km of length
to the existing road.
The original N3 Toll Road declaration dated 1997 indicates a
toll plaza on the De Beer’s Pass Route.
The service road system was explained in the technical
presentation. If the existing N3 is upgraded, it will be upgraded
to 120 km design speed and to enable that, there must be a
parallel road system with interchanges, eliminating all at-grade
intersections.
He asked what the reason is for the tollgate at Warden.
In the original plan there was no tollgate with the open
option for road users to use the new De Beers Pass
route or to use the existing one.
At the meeting at the Harrismith Inn, the majority
expressed the wish that the existing road must be kept.
If the final decision is to keep the existing road, what
upgrading is going to be undertaken?
On the first set there was a plea for a service road and it
was not done so a service road is still a critical thing on
the existing road.
On the first one we pleaded for Verkykerskop
Interchange to be built and this was not done. This is still
a plea from this community.
8
Mr Andries Young
Director
Platberg Eco Park
9
A Stakeholder
His plea is therefore for a more detailed study on the
existing roads and to upgrade if that is the final decision.
He wanted to correct Mr Tolmie and Mr Cave, in their
presentations they both referred to Alternative A as an
upgrading of the existing road. This is not true because
of deviations going through Platberg mountain which will
still effectively cut out Harrismith as a town. This will
therefore have the same affect on the town as De Beer’s
Pass or Alternative B.
He has heard that they are about to stop the use of the
N3 and he has come today to hear what is going on. In
RECORD OF KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
07 OCTOBER 2010
8
There are preliminary service road plans available for viewing
for those who have land currently along the existing N3.
There has also been preliminary planning as to how current
accesses will be accommodated into a service road interchange
system.
The Verkykerskop Interchange will be considered as part of
alternative A.
The realignment through the Platberg was highlighted during
the technical presentation.
It is a contractual obligation from SANRAL that the existing N3
is maintained throughout the concession period. If alternative A
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
No
10
Name & Organisation
Mr Floyd Mazibuko
Secretary
ANC
Comment
Response
the opinion of the man in the street, that is the
perception, as they have heard that they are going go
close this road, this is going to badly affect the society,
especially in the area where the N3 has been used for a
long time and the benefit that the community has gained
from this.
is not built, motorists will have a choice between the existing N3
the new route.
Is there going to be any other alternative, will the people
be forced to use the new road that is going to be built or
will there be a choice?
At a previous meeting at Harrismith Inn they had raised
a point about the logistics hub. He is surprised that Mr
Tolmie does not know anything about the logistics hub.
In the speech by the Premier, he said that there is going
to be a hub in Harrismith. The previous Minister said that
the road was going to be stopped and there is going to
be a hub. The Cabinet has approved this. Now Mr
Tolmie says he does not know about the hub. This
matter was raised and they should have consulted about
the hub before they attended this meeting.
The community from this area say that even if the N3 is
maintained, constructing a new road will still affect this
area and will cause unemployment where there is
already a lot of unemployment. If the road is moved to
the other side of the mountain, this area will be affected,
especially if the distance is shorter to Ladysmith.
Consider the poverty in this area. Rather construct extra
lanes on the existing road. As the ANC, they do not
support the new road, and they are prepared to mobilise
the community. People were turned away from this
meeting today and they feel that they have been taken
out of the discussions because there is a plan to make
the township suffer.
11
Mr Dirk Bouckaert
Tourism van Reenen
Today, internationally governments all agree to protect
the environment, to reduce pollution in the wider sense,
to take measures to reduce traffic polluting the
environment and within that framework, it is totally
illogical to discuss a new highway that, in fact, will
promote more traffic and more pollution.
He feels that reduction in traffic should be discussed and
RECORD OF KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
07 OCTOBER 2010
9
See answer to Comment 6 above regarding the Harrismith
Logistics Hub.
The concerns raised regarding unemployment and poverty was
addressed in the specialist studies. Refer to section 9, (subsections 6 and 7) in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an
assessment on Social Impacts, specifically job loss and job
creation. Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4 of the
DEIR.
This EIA process is in response to the economic demand for
road transportation.
The consideration of alternative modes of transport falls outside
this scope.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
No
12
Name & Organisation
Mr Ratoolo Kau
Municipal Manager
Maluti a Phofung Local
Municipality
13
Mr Cas Human
Van Reenen Homeowners
Association Country Estate
14
Mr Rob Clarke
Hero Farm cc
Comment
Response
not to go over the level of 13, 900 vehicles per day. He
wants to know why the EIA is not examining this aspect.
The EIA only looks at where the best route would be for
a new highway.
It is very disturbing to hear certain sentiments being said
by the respondents that undermine his intelligence. The
question of the Logistics Hub is not something that is
being discussed at this meeting. It will go ahead. The
question is, if this route goes ahead, it will be legally
challenged. The community will be mobilised so that it
does not go ahead because unless the loss that
business people will experience will be subsidised and
unemployed people will be taken care of, the community
will mobilise.
He has read in the document that part of the concession
agreement is that an alternative route must be built. Now
the question is, why? Why do you have to start with the
first one when you gave the concession to the company?
Why do you not continue to maintain and upgrade the
existing one rather than reinventing the wheel? As a
municipality, they are not going to allow their people to
be taken for granted. It is as if in the Free State people
are not taken seriously. Therefore the Municipality says
no to the route.
There were contractual obligations by SANRAL and
N3TC years ago, 1997, etc. If SANRAL changed from
their decision at that time, will there be compensation for
people who have serious losses in terms thereof
because it is not happening?
Mr Tolmie mentioned the average per day at present is
11,500 vehicles, according to the N3TC website there
are 40 peak days in the year. If one were to remove
those 40 peak days what would the average then be?
It has also been stated that there is a contractual
obligation to maintain the existing road if the new road is
built. If the compliance with the contract is to be noted
along the route 103 from Villiers to Warden, one would
suggest that N3TC is in breach of contract. One would
hope that the road would not fall into disrepair as that
particular road has.
RECORD OF KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
07 OCTOBER 2010
10
See previous responses regarding logistics hubs.
This is a legal issue that falls outside the scope of this EIA
process.
The annual average daily traffic would reduce.
There is no contractual obligation on the part of N3TC to
maintain the R103. The R103 is a provincial responsibility.
The Concession Contract requires that the existing alignment of
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
No
Name & Organisation
Comment
Response
the N3 will continue to be a responsibility of N3TC, even if de
Beers Pass is built.
15
Dr Gideon Groenewald
Metsi Metseng Geological
Services
He asked if the purpose of the EIA study is to actually
make a decision on alternatives or is that decision taken
by engineers and politicians.
What is the weight of the local political and community
voice in the final outcome of this decision? Is the
problem today not the van Reenen’s Pass section of
road and not necessarily the section past Harrismith?
The EAP, through the EIA process, gathers all the information,
and makes a recommendation to the national Department of
Environment Affairs who make the final decision.
If the bottleneck at van Reenen’s could be fixed, the problem on
the pass itself will be solved, but there are other issues with the
alignment of the existing road which also need to be resolved.
The voice of the public, the man in the street is not ignored. The
John Ross Highway project was quoted as an example.
16
A Stakeholder
She was concerned that at a previous meeting many
issues were raised including what the Minister had said
to business people of Harrismith. Her expectation was
that issues raised by various stakeholders would be
investigated and feedback would be provided at this
meeting. It appears as though no progress has been
made because the same questions are being raised.
She requested that after each meeting, the team
investigate some of the issues and in the following
meeting brief stakeholders on their findings.
She was going to enquire if the outcome from the
previous EIA is going to be the same, but now it is her
understanding that the previous consultant who
undertook the EIA is in jail. She feels that the issue of
the EIA is not necessary because the standpoint of the
people of Harrismith is clear and how rail is going to be
utilised should be investigated.
Previous issues raised at the Information Sharing Sessions all
form part of the process, which culminates in the Scoping
Report.
It was clarified that scoping is the first phase of the EIA process.
There are a number of tools used during Scoping such as
public meetings, focus group meetings, key stakeholder
meetings; people submitting all their comments and this all
goes into a comments and response report. Here issues and
comments are listed and the responses are inserted. This is the
standard way that EIAs work. Responses will be given, but
sometimes patience is needed as the draft Scoping Report will
be produced in due time and it will be distributed to the public
and they can read the responses to specific questions.
For clarity, the consultant who was in jail was for another
project in Gauteng and was not involved in this project at all.
17
Ms Thembi Mpofu
Department of Economic
Development, Tourism and
Environmental Affairs (Free
When she examined the alternatives in the BID it seems
as though Harrismith is isolated. Therefore the Free
State Department of Economic Development, Tourism
and Environmental Affairs (DEDTEA) does not support
RECORD OF KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
07 OCTOBER 2010
11
There will be an official response to the Free State DEDTEA’s
views.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
No
Name & Organisation
Comment
State)
anything that will cut off Harrismith from social and
economic developments.
Response
She also stated that that route is going to go through the
Platberg mountain and there would be a great deal of
habitat loss along the proposed route because many of
the species would be isolated. She also said that the bird
life would be affected. The yellow and green routes pass
through many wetlands. The Upper Wilge River and its
tributaries are classified as being in a critical condition,
so the alternatives will affect everything downstream.
That is the reason that the Free State DEDTEA cannot
support this project.
18
Dr Michael Cunningham
University of the Free State
He said it was obvious that there was no easy option. He
is interested in the Sungazer Lizard. Most of the
development would occur throughout their distribution
area.
They
are
currently
listed
as
a
vulnerable/threatened species. Developments have used
the option of digging them out along the route and
moving them to a nature reserve and dumping them
there. There has been very little research on what would
happen to them afterwards. No-one knows if this will
work. He asked what plans were in place to mitigate this
issue.
The highway will have a continuing impact on this
species because one of the problems is poaching. If you
drive along the N3 they do occur on the current
alignment of the N3 but you never see them because
people stop and take them away. This will be an ongoing
impact along the two corridors i.e. De Beer’s Pass and
Alternative B. The Alternative A does not affect the
Sungazer (Ouvolk) lizard but there is in fact another
species of lizard which has probably gone under the
radar because it is recognised but is not currently
described as a species, that is however likely to happen
during the time of this project. It is known from five sites
just around the Harrismith area. The alignment over
Platberg would not go to two of those sites, this is a form
of the Transvaal Lizard. His overall question is therefore
what mitigation is planned.
RECORD OF KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
07 OCTOBER 2010
12
These lizards have been identified and specialist studies made
recommendations regarding mitigation. Refer to section 2, in
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an impact assessment
Flora and Fauna. Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.1
of the DEIR.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
No
Name & Organisation
Comment
Response
19
Mr Piet Venter
Marathon Club
Comment noted
20
Mr Graham Hobbs
Landowner
The Marathon Club is in exactly the same situation as
the lizards. If the road goes through Platberg the
Mountain Race will cease to exist.
Mr Hobbs stated that the legislation requiring an EIA
process and looking at alternatives was in place in 1997.
He asked why alternatives were not investigated during
the first Scoping Report.
He also asked if the De Beer’s Pass route is a preferred
option.
The email received before this EIA process was initiated,
refers to an agreement between SANRAL, N3TC and
DEAT to look at alternatives. It appears that the only
person who is benefiting from the alternative would be
the N3TC and their shareholders. How can they now
approach new landowners to expropriate land for a new
route when they already have an EIA with authorisation
to build the De Beer’s Pass route?
Alternatives investigated
presentation.
were
pointed
out
in
the
EIA
No, the three alternatives in the BID document are currently
being investigated.
Legislation requires that alternatives be investigated. This
process will determine whether or not additional land is
required.
See response regarding Mr Cas Human under comment 13
above
Mr Cas Human brought up an issue that was
misunderstood. He is saying that this De Beer’s Pass
road has been a given, it has been a definite since 1997.
Only in 2008 were the public notified that it was possibly
not an option. People have made decisions knowing
where that road is going, they have planned and
invested money and now De Beer’s Pass is not going to
be built, as alternatives are being investigated.
21
Mr Mike Wood
Ladysmith Chamber of
Commerce
He asked Mr Tolmie about the under- and over-passes.
Are any of these a definite or are they simply going to be
installed if it is cost-effective. If the cost of the underpass exceeds the value of the property, would that pass
be granted?
Mr Wood stated that the interest from the community
and from businesses around Harrismith, Warden and
Ladysmith shows that their lifeblood is derived in one
way or another directly or indirectly, and a huge dynamic
effect comes from the N3 passing close to their place of
residence or business.
He therefore asked if there was going to be some sort of
RECORD OF KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
07 OCTOBER 2010
13
Each case regarding over- and under- passes versus land
acquisition is assessed on its own merits.
Local user concessions will be considered.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
No
22
Name & Organisation
Adv George Galloway
Harrismith District Farmers
Association
Comment
Response
concession at the new proposed toll plaza at Warden,
firstly for the Warden residents, Harrismith residents,
Swinburne residents, Van Reenen residents and
Ladysmith residents, such as the Estcourt and
Ladysmith residents enjoy at the Mooi River Toll Plaza.
For these communities to continue to be viable and
sustain themselves, that concession now really becomes
a demand.
Mr Galloway asked when the draft Scoping Report would
be released.
He added that on 08 September 2008, at the Eeram
Farmers Association Hall he had asked if the ROD
referred to these alternative routes that are now being
investigated. Ms Karin Bowler said that they did not as
they have only recently been identified. The alternative
referred to is any alternative that would avoid the
environmentally sensitive areas. That is a deviation of
100 or 150 metres, but not these new alternatives.
He then said to Mr Tolmie that on that day a specific
question had been asked which was, is the existing N3
still an option and can links be accommodated to the
main N3 and Mr Tolmie had replied that this could be
accommodated by simple engineering, but that they
were only looking at transport engineering. Mr Galloway
asked Mr Tolmie to explain this statement.
He still wants to know the cost estimation of the three
different routes (Alternatives A, B and De Beer’s Pass).
He went on to say that on 26 April 1996 he had received
a letter from Mr Nazir Alli stating the following:
“Two alternatives, that is the upgrading of the existing
route and the new De Beer’s Pass alignment were
investigated in order to determine the most viable
solution regarding the existing and future capacity
constraints of the N3 between Warden and
Keeversfontein”.
According to Mr Nazir Alli at that point in time, the only
problem was Van Reenen’s Pass. It appears to him as if
that problem has indeed been solved. He then asked
RECORD OF KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
07 OCTOBER 2010
14
The draft Scoping Report is due out in early November 2010.
This will go out to the public for the prescribed comment period.
Legislation requires that alternatives be investigated.,
Although the existing N3 can be upgraded, the benefit of the
distance saving of the other alternatives to the national
economy cannot be ignored.
Notwithstanding specific comments made regarding the
problem of Van Reenen’s Pass, SANRAL’s standards apply to
all sections of the N3.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
No
23
24
Name & Organisation
Mrs Rosheila Thomas
Manager: Community
Services
Emnambithi Ladysmith
Municipality
Mr Wele Ndlebe
Councillor, LED, Tourism
and Environmental Officer
Thabo Mofutsunyane
District Municipality
Comment
Response
why they are not looking at the upgrading of the existing
N3 only, why are they proposing to spend a lot of money
on Alternative B and still on the De Beer’s Pass section.
Ms Thomas explained that her understanding of the EIA
is one of three assessments that need to be done. It had
been explained that there is a social assessment as well
as an economic assessment. She asked for clarity as to
whether these have started yet and whether information
or results can be obtained from these two assessments.
She said that when the municipality approaches the
community within the community participation process
regarding concessions, this is the kind of information
they require.
She also asked for timeframes when submissions should
be submitted, the process to be followed and to whom
exactly it should be addressed.
Mr Ndlebe stated that he was in charge of local
economic development, tourism and environmental
affairs.
He stated that when he looks at the map he noticed that
the De Beer’s Pass Bypass has a problem regarding
permanent employment:
There are three towns:
(a) Harrismith, where people will lose employment
and economic stability. The green line does not
pass through a town and only a small number of
people will be employed. The government has a
commitment to employ so many thousands of
people, full time.
(b) Swinburne, a small town which will not have a
great impact on the employment of people.
(c) Van Reenen is also a small town which will also
not have many people impacted by employment.
Furthermore Harrismith was earmarked by the previous
President, Mr Thabo Mbeki, as a very poor town
whereby people are unemployed. If you exclude
Harrismith you will create this problem again and
exacerbate poverty.
RECORD OF KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
07 OCTOBER 2010
15
Specialist Studies will be undertaken after acceptance of the
scoping Report by DEA (see Background Information
Document).
Comments noted and will be addressed by the specialist
studies.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
No
Name & Organisation
Comment
Response
The Minister, Mr Jeff Radebe, did promise the
community of Harrismith that the hub, which will create
jobs for them, will stay and this Bypass will not continue.
Remember that this is a political statement and it is a
policy from a Minister.
He asked what happened to the previous EIA and why
there was a fresh EIA. Also what happened to the idea of
the Minister, has his statement been down-played.
He then suggested that the N3 be improved rather than
constructing a new one. If the existing one is improved,
more people will be employed.
RECORD OF KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
07 OCTOBER 2010
16
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
APPENDIX B: PRESENTATIONS
Size of the EIA Process presentation is 1,789KB
Size of the Technical presentation is 1,276KB
All presentations can be requested from ACER (Africa) at 086 010 4958 or by notifying Candace Sparg at [email protected]
RECORD OF KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
07 OCTOBER 2010
17
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
APPENDIX C: ATTENDANCE LIST
No
Name
Surname
Position
Organisation
1
Henk
Badenhorst
Chairman: Eastern Free State
Democratic Alliance
1
2
Hermanus
Bosch
Director
Platberg Eco Park
1
3
Dirk
Bouckaert
Member
Tourism Van Reenen
1
4
Alan
Cave
EAP
CKA
1
5
Robert
Clark
Member
Hero Farm CC
1
6
Michael
Cunningham (Dr)
University of the Free State (QwaQwa Campus)
1
7
Ken
Davie
CEO
Appin Investments
1
8
Ben
Deysel
Chairman
Harrismith Business Forum
1
9
Benno
Deysel
Financial Director
Harrismith Highway Group
1
10
Jannie
du Plessis
11
Jean Luc
Erero
Senior Economist Statistician
Dept of Economic Development and Tourism (KZN)
1
12
Basil
Ferreira
Branch Manager
First National Bank
1
13
Francesca
Fondse
CEO
De Angelus Estates Project
1
14
Alwyn
Froneman
Principal
Harrismith Primary School
1
15
George
Galloway (Adv)
Chairman
Harrismith District Farmers Union
1
16
Bashan
Govender
Department of Water Affairs (Head Office)
17
Gideon
Groenewald (Dr)
Metsi Metseng Geological Services
1
18
Attended
N3 Access Property Owners
1
1
Thokozani
Hadebe
Assistant Manager
Dept of Public Works (KZN)
1
19
Lew
Harris
Partner/Member
The Green Lantern Inn/Van Reenen Tourism
1
20
Maria
Harris
Partner/Member
The Green Lantern Inn/Van Reenen Tourism
1
21
Kate
Henderson
Project Manager
Birdlife SA - Southern Bald Ibis Project
1
22
Graham
Hobbs
Landowner
Van Reenen Farmers Association
1
23
Anna
Human
Director
Realty Dynamix 7 (Pty) Ltd
1
24
Cas
Human
Director
Van Reenen Country Estate Home Owners Association
1
25
Roelf
Human
Risk/Fire Snr.
Transnet Pipelines
1
26
Neels
Jacobs
Chairman
N3 Farm Accesses
1
27
Francois
Joubert
Infrastructure Consulting Engineers/ Total SA
1
28
Douglas
Judd
Technical Manager
N3TC
29
Ratoolo
Kau
Municipal Manager
Maluti a Phofung Local Municipality
1
30
Themba
Khumalo
Deputy Manager
Dept of Public Works (KZN)
1
RECORD OF KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
07 OCTOBER 2010
18
Apologised
1
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
Name
Surname
Position
Organisation
31
Jabu
Khumalo (Cllr)
Mayoral Committee
Maluti a Phofung Local Municipality
32
Menno
Klapwijk
EAP
CKA
33
Leona
Kleynhans (Mrs)
Councillor: Ward 22
Maluti a Phofung Local Municipality
34
Karen
Kohler
Research Manager
Tourism KwaZulu-Natal
35
Bertie
Le Roux
Assistant Manager: Economic Development
Emnambithi/Ladysmith Local Municipality
1
36
Selby
Lengoabala
Manager: Office of the Executive Mayor
Thabo Mofutsanyane District Municipality
1
37
Eliot
Lithudzha
Manager
South African National Biodiversity Institute
1
38
Ian
Little
Endangered Wildlife Trust
1
39
Frans
Louwinger
40
Joseph
Makhaza
ANC Member
African National Congress
1
41
David
Maphisa
Manager
Birdlife SA
1
42
DCP
Mazibuko
Mayor
Emnambithi / Ladysmith Local Municipality
43
Floyd
Mazibuko
ANC Secretary
African National Congress
1
44
Bonny
Mekoa
Property Manager
Free State Development Corporation
1
45
Boitumelo
Melato
Senior Water Pollution Control Officer
Dept of Water Affairs (Free State Region)
1
46
Fifi
Meyer
Head of Visitors Centre
Eskom Ingula Pumped Storage Scheme
1
47
Thabiso
Mkhonza (Cllr)
Chairman : LED & Tourism
Maluti a Phofung Local Municipality
1
48
Dan
Mkhwanazi
District Manager
Dept of Agriculture, Environmental Affairs & Rural Dev
1
49
Matiro
Mogopodi (Ms)
Municipal Manager
Thabo Mofutsanyane District Municipality
1
50
Seiso
Mohai
Member of Executive Council
Free State Province: Department of Treasury
51
Pinky
Mopeli
Executive Mayor
1
Attended
1
1
1
Eskom
1
1
1
Thembi
Mpofu
Environmental Officer
Thabo Mofutsanyane District Municipality
Dept of Economic Development, Tourism and Environmental
Affairs (FS)
53
Muhle Joyce
Mthembu
Municipal Manager
Phumelela Local Municipality
1
54
Wele Richard
Ndlebe (Cllr)
Thabo Mofutsanyane District Municipality
1
52
Nonofho
Ndobochani
Cllr, LED, Tourism & Environmental Officer
Manager: Archaeology, Palaeontology &
Meteorites Unit
56
Peter
Nelson
Conservation Manager
Eskom Ingula Pumped Storage Scheme
57
Phindile
Ngcobo
Town Planner
Emnambithi/Ladysmith Local Municipality
58
Rienus
Niemand
Speaker
Emnambithi/Ladysmith Local Municipality
59
Pieta
Niemandt
Public Officer
Warden District Farmers Assoc
60
TJ
Phahlo (Adv)
Chief Director
Dept of Police, Roads & Transport (FS)
61
Koos
Radebe
Traffic Engineer
N3TC
55
RECORD OF KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
07 OCTOBER 2010
19
Apologised
1
1
SAHRA - Archaeology, Palaeontology & Meteorites Unit
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No
Name
Surname
Position
Organisation
62
Keith
Raine
Environmental Officer
Eskom Ingula Pumped Storage Scheme
1
63
Elmarie
Roberts
Representative
Warden Business Chamber
1
64
Heinke
Roberts
Warden Business Chamber
1
65
Jeremy
Robertsen
Ladysmith Chamber of Commerce & Industry
1
66
Andy
Robertshaw
Transnet/NMPP Alliance.
1
67
Con
Roux
Commercial Manager
N3TC
1
68
Andrew
Salomon
Heritage Impact Assessor
SAHRA - Archaeology, Palaeontology & Meteorites Unit
1
69
Carolyn
Schwegman
EIA Coordinator
WESSA (KZN Region)
1
70
TMG
Sexwale
Minister
Dept of Human Settlement
1
71
Phillemon
Shibambo
72
Bongi
Shinga
PPP Team
ACER
1
73
Candace
Sparg
PPP Team
ACER
1
74
Dinesree
Thambu
Principal Conservation Planner
Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife
75
Nico
Theron
Construction/Land Liaison Officer
NMPP Alliance
1
76
Rosheila
Thomas (Mrs)
Manager: Community Services
Emnambithi/Ladysmith Local Municipality
1
77
Gabriel
Tlhapi
Provincial Manager
SAHRA (Free State)
78
Neil
Tolmie
CEO
N3TC
1
79
Janice
Tooley
PPP Team
ACER
1
80
Barbara
van der Hoven
Vice Chairman
Harrismith Marathon Club
81
Braam
van der Hoven
Director
Platberg Eco Park
1
82
Klaas Janse
van Rensburg
Director
Aurecon
1
83
Gert
van Tonder
Committee Member
Harrismith Business Forum
1
84
Cobus
van Wyk
Chairman
Swinburne Farmers Association
1
85
P
Venter
Onder Voorsitter
Harrismith Marathon Club
1
86
Norman
Ward
Deputy Chief Engineer
Dept of Water Affairs (KZN Region)
1
87
Abie
Wentzel
Route Development Specialist
Tourism KwaZulu-Natal
88
Stewart
Wilson
Manager: Design & Construction
SANRAL: Eastern Region
1
89
Mike
Wood
Executive Member
Ladysmith Chamber of Commerce
1
90
Andries Cornelius
Young
Director
Platberg Eco Park
1
91
Mike
Zondagh
Land Liaison
NMPP Alliance
1
President
Attended
Dept of Water Affairs (Head Office)
RECORD OF KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND AUTHORITIES’ MEETING
07 OCTOBER 2010
20
Apologised
1
1
1
1
1
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
4.
SECTION 4:
COMMENTS RAISED AT FOCUS GROUP MEETINGS
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
FOR THE PROPOSED
NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN
(De Beers Pass Section)
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
EMNAMBITHI/LADYSMITH MUNICIPALITY FOCUS GROUP MEETING.
HELD AT COUNCIL CHAMBERS, LADYSMITH
06 OCTOBER 2010.
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING WITH EMNAMBITHI/LADYSMITH LOCAL MUNICIPALITY
07 OCTOBER 2010
105
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS...................................................................................................................... 1
1.
ATTENDANCE ........................................................................................................................ 2
1.1. Attendance – Emnambithi/Ladysmith Municipality .......................................................... 2
1.2 Attendance – N3 Toll Concession (Pty) Ltd (N3TC) ........................................................ 2
1.3 Attendance – Environmental Consulting Team (EIA Team) ............................................ 2
2.
WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS......................................................................................... 2
3.
PRESENTATION: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ............................................... 3
4.
PRESENTATION: TECHNICAL ................................................................................................ 3
5.
ISSUES AND COMMENTS RAISED AND DISCUSSED ........................................................... 3
6.
WAY FORWARD AND CLOSURE ............................................................................................ 3
APPENDIX A: RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED AND DISCUSSED .............................................. 4
APPENDIX B: PRESENTATIONS ...................................................................................................... 7
APPENDIX C: ATTENDANCE LIST.................................................................................................... 8
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING WITH EMNAMBITHI/LADYSMITH LOCAL MUNICIPALITY
06 OCTOBER 2010
1
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
1.
ATTENDANCE
1.1.
Attendance – Emnambithi/Ladysmith Municipality
Name
Mr Ashokan Sompersadh
Mr Mduduzi Victor Hadebe
Mr Rienus Niemand
Mrs Rosheila Thomas
Ms Farah Williamson
Mr TE Ndlovu
Ms Ria Sanker
1.2
Attendance – N3 Toll Concession (Pty) Ltd (N3TC)
Name
Mr Neil Tolmie
Mr Con Roux
Mr Koos Radebe
1.3
2.
Position
Manager: Engineering Services
Assistant Manager: Engineering Services
Speaker
Manager: Community Services
Information Officer
Councillor
Information Officer
Position/Role
Chief Executive Officer
Commercial Manager
Traffic Engineer
Attendance – Environmental Consulting Team (EIA Team)
Name
Mr Alan Cave
Organisation
Cave Klapwijk and Associates
Role in the project
Environmental Assessment Practitioner
Ms Janice Tooley
ACER (Africa)
Public Participation Consultant
Ms Bongi Shinga
ACER (Africa)
Public Participation Consultant
Ms Candace Sparg
ACER (Africa)
Public Participation Consultant
WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS
Mr Rienus Niemand, Speaker, Emnambithi/Ladysmith Municipality welcomed all present. By
way of introduction, he stated that the Emnambithi/Ladysmith Municipality is interested in the
proposed National Road 3: Keeversfontein to Warden (De Beers Pass Section) project as their
area of jurisdiction goes up to Van Reenen.
Recognising the absence of some representatives from the Emnambithi/Ladysmith
Municipality, Mr Niemand requested the EIA team to provide copies of the presentation for
distribution to those who were unable to attend the meeting.
He thanked the project team for the opportunity offered to Emnambithi/Ladysmith Municipality
and requested the Environmental Assessment Practitioner to proceed with the presentation.
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING WITH EMNAMBITHI/LADYSMITH LOCAL MUNICIPALITY
06 OCTOBER 2010
2
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
3.
PRESENTATION: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Mr Alan Cave, the Environmental Assessment Practitioner, presented information on
Environmental Impact Assessment process.
4.
PRESENTATION: TECHNICAL
Mr Neil Tolmie, CEO, N3TC presented the technical background for the proposed National
Road 3: Keeversfontein to Warden (De Beers Pass Ssection).
5.
ISSUES AND COMMENTS RAISED AND DISCUSSED
The table contained in Appendix A: “Record of Issues Raised and Discussed” details the
issues, comments and concerns, which were raised and discussed at the meeting.
6.
WAY FORWARD AND CLOSURE
Mr Niemand thanked the project team and closed the meeting. He added that he will ensure
that the Emnambithi/Ladysmith Municipality is represented at the Key Stakeholders and
Authorities’ Meeting.
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING WITH EMNAMBITHI/LADYSMITH LOCAL MUNICIPALITY
06 OCTOBER 2010
3
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
APPENDIX A: RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED AND DISCUSSED
FOCUS GROUP MEETING WITH EMNAMBITHI/LADYSMITH MUNICIPALITY
No
1
Name & Position
Cllr TE Ndlovu
Councillor
Comment
Are there any socio-economic impacts for each
alternative?
Response
2
Mr Rienus Niemand
Speaker
From the Emnambithi/Ladysmith Municipality’s point
of view it is extremely important that during the
construction phase that the town benefits to the
maximum extent. He understands that it is still early
days and the final route has not been determined.
Their Economic Development Department as well as
the Council as a whole become involved in any
development in the area. They make sure that
maximum employment takes place in terms of people
from this area, especially the type of categories that
do not require specialists. He asked that cognisance
be taken of this.
In terms of the concession contract there is an obligation for 15%
of the contract value to go to previously disadvantaged enterprises
Also the Small and Medium Businesses, the council
has been active in projects such as the Eskom Ingula
Pumped Storage Scheme which is a huge R30 billion
project. As a town of Ladysmith they have benefited
significantly from this project because the council has
ensured that whatever happens they are involved in
these types of projects.
He asked that an undertaking be given that on a
continuous basis they will take cognisance of the
town’s involvement in the project.
Mr Niemand said that Mr Khathide (082 497 8725)
should be contacted and he will provide N3TC with
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING WITH EMNAMBITHI/LADYSMITH LOCAL MUNICIPALITY
06 OCTOBER 2010
4
The socio-economic impacts formed part of the specialist studies.
Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the economic assessments
relating to the project. Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues
No.4 of the DEIR.
Training will take place as required. Local skills will be utilised.
The project team noted this information for future communication
and dealings with the Emnambithi/Ladysmith Municipality and
communities along the route.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
FOCUS GROUP MEETING WITH EMNAMBITHI/LADYSMITH MUNICIPALITY
No
Name & Position
3
Cllr TE Ndlovu
Councillor
4
Mrs Rosheila Thomas
Manager: Community
Services
Comment
details of sub-contractors, etc. There are lists of
people with specific types of qualifications and also
when it comes to labour, through his office, he can
make sure that people are provided with whatever
skills are required.
It was also added that Mr Khathide will also be able to
put the team in touch with the various business
chambers in the area.
He wanted to add that business organisations should
be contacted such as the Ladysmith Chamber of
Commerce and Industry and the Isibani Sezwe
Business Forum. Contacting these organisations will
assist the project team.
She asked about the meeting that was due to be held
the next day and asked if it was a public meeting.
Were there invitations issued to specific people.
Response
Comment noted. It was confirmed that the Ladysmith Chamber of
Commerce and Industry are already on the database and have
been invited to the Key Stakeholders and Authorities’ Meeting in
Harrismith.
Details of Isibani Sezwe Business Forum were also provided to
ACER for inclusion in the database.
The Key Stakeholder and Authorities meeting is being held by
invitation only and is mainly to government organisations and
chairpersons of various organisations representing agriculture,
tourism, business and transport.
Four invitations were sent to the Emnambithi/Ladysmith
Municipality, including the mayor, municipal manager and
infrastructure planning department. Invitations were also sent to
the Thukela District Municipality, the Business Forum and the
Ladysmith Chamber of Commerce and Industry.
When the EIA process was started, Information Sharing Sessions
were held, but if it is felt that others should be consulted, their
names should be forwarded to the Project Team.
5
6
Mr Rienus Niemand
Speaker
Cllr TE Ndlovu
He said there was a list of people and checks should
be made as to whether they have been consulted.
In terms of corporate governance, if you talk to the
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING WITH EMNAMBITHI/LADYSMITH LOCAL MUNICIPALITY
06 OCTOBER 2010
5
It was agreed that these lists would be checked and compared.
It was confirmed that the Thukela District Municipality is involved
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
FOCUS GROUP MEETING WITH EMNAMBITHI/LADYSMITH MUNICIPALITY
No
Name & Position
Councillor
7
Mr Rienus Niemand
Speaker
8
Mrs Rosheila Thomas
Manager: Community
Services
Comment
local people you must understand that there is a split
of competences within the district. There are two tiers
of government so it is also advisable to contact
Thukela District Municipality.
It would be advisable for the public of Ladysmith to be
given an opportunity to comment and he would like to
make sure that the press is present and informed
about what is happening. This will enable the
interaction to be expanded.
Response
Ms Thomas asked if it would be possible to request an
electronic copy of the presentations so that the
departments who could not attend could have a copy.
Copies of the presentations were provided to Mrs Thomas after
the meeting.
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING WITH EMNAMBITHI/LADYSMITH LOCAL MUNICIPALITY
06 OCTOBER 2010
6
in the process.
The project was announced by way of advertisement in a local
newspaper.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
APPENDIX B: PRESENTATIONS
Size of the EIA Process presentation is 1,789KB
Size of the Technical presentation is 1,276KB
All presentations can be requested from ACER (Africa) at 086 010 4958 or by notifying Candace Sparg at [email protected]
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING WITH MR EARL LEATHERN (LADYSMITH & DISTRICT FARMERS ASSOCIATION)
06 OCTOBER 2010
7
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
APPENDIX C: ATTENDANCE LIST
Title
Mr
Mr
Mr
First Names
Douglas
TE
Rienus
Position
Surname
Co/Org
Attended/Apologised
Judd
Technical Manager
N3TC
Apologised
Ndlovu
Councillor
Emnambithi/Ladysmith Local Municipality
Attended
Niemand
Speaker
Emnambithi/Ladysmith Local Municipality
Attended
Emnambithi/Ladysmith Local Municipality
Attended
N3TC
Mr
MV
Radebe
Mr
Koos
Radebe
Assistant Manager:
Engineering Services
Transport Engineer
Roux
Commercial Manager
N3TC
Attended
Attended
Emnambithi/Ladysmith Local Municipality
Attended
Mr
Con
Miss
Ria
Sanker
Information Officer: Tourism
Ms
Janice
Tooley
Environmental Consultant
ACER
Attended
Ms
Bongi
Shinga
Environmental Consultant
ACER
Attended
Emnambithi/Ladysmith Local Municipality
ACER
Attended
Mr
Ashokan
Sompersadh
Mrs
Candace
Sparg
Manager: Engineering
Services
Public Participation Officer
Mrs
Rosheila
Thomas
Manager: Community Services
Emnambithi/Ladysmith Local Municipality
Attended
N3TC
Attended
Emnambithi/Ladysmith Local Municipality
Attended
Mr
Neil
Tolmie
CEO
Miss
Farah
Williamson
Information Officer
Attended
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING WITH MR EARL LEATHERN (LADYSMITH & DISTRICT FARMERS ASSOCIATION)
06 OCTOBER 2010
8
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
FOR THE PROPOSED
NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN
(De Beers Pass Section)
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
MEETING WITH MR EARL LEATHERN (REPRESENTING FOCUS GROUP
– LADYSMITH AND DISTRICT FARMERS ASSOCIATION)
AT THE FARM (±5 km from N3 on Bergville Road)
13h30
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING WITH MR EARL LEATHERN (LADYSMITH & DISTRICT FARMERS ASSOCIATION)
06 OCTOBER 2010
106
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS...................................................................................................................... 1
1.
ATTENDANCE ........................................................................................................................ 2
1.1 Attendance – N3 Toll Concession (Pty) Ltd (N3TC) ........................................................ 2
1.2 Attendance – Environmental Consulting Team (EIA Team) ............................................ 2
2.
INTRODUCTIONS AND BACKGROUND TO THE PROJECT................................................... 2
3.
ISSUES AND COMMENTS RAISED AND DISCUSSED ........................................................... 3
4.
WAY FORWARD AND CLOSURE ............................................................................................ 3
RECORD OF MEETING WITH MR EARL LEATHERN
06 OCTOBER 2010
1
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
NOTE:
ACER, the Public Participation Consultant for the proposed National Road 3: Keeversfontein to
Wardern (De Beers Pass Section) contacted Mr Alan Green, the Chairperson of the Ladysmith and
District Farmers Association and requested to have a meeting with the members of the association in
order to discuss the proposed project.
Mr Green advised ACER that a meeting with all the members of the association would not be
necessary as the only landowner affected is Mr Earl Leathern. As a result, a meeting was arranged
with Mr Leathern.
1.
ATTENDANCE
1.1
Attendance – N3 Toll Concession (Pty) Ltd (N3TC)
Name
Mr Neil Tolmie
Mr Con Roux
Mr Koos Radebe
1.2
2.
Position/Role
Chief Executive Officer
Commercial Manager
Traffic Engineer
Attendance – Environmental Consulting Team (EIA Team)
Name
Mr Alan Cave
Organisation
Cave Klapwijk and Associates
Role in the project
Environmental Assessment Practitioner
Ms Janice Tooley
ACER (Africa)
Public Participation Consultant
Ms Bongi Shinga
ACER (Africa)
Public Participation Consultant
Ms Candace Sparg
ACER (Africa)
Public Participation Consultant
INTRODUCTIONS AND BACKGROUND TO THE PROJECT
All team representatives (as per sections 1.1 and 1.2) introduced themselves to Mr Earl
Leathern.
Mr Alan Cave, the Independent Environmental Assessment Practitioner (EAP), presented the
background of the proposed National Road 3: Keeversfontein to Warden (De Beers Pass
Section) as well as the overview of the Environmental Impact Assessment process.
Using an A0 map and the Background Information Document, Mr Cave explained all the
alternative routes that are being investigated in the EIA.
RECORD OF MEETING WITH MR EARL LEATHERN (LADYSMITH & DISTRICT FARMERS ASSOCIATION)
06 OCTOBER 2010
2
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
3.
ISSUES AND COMMENTS RAISED AND DISCUSSED
The table contained in Appendix A: “Record of Issues Raised and Discussed” details the
issues, comments and concerns, which were raised and discussed at the meeting.
4.
WAY FORWARD AND CLOSURE
N3TC representatives and the EIA team thanked Mr Leathern for his time and opportunity to
discuss the proposed project.
The EIA team indicated that they would be contacting the Chairperson of the Ladysmith and
District Farmers Association, Mr Alan Green with a view to discuss the proposed project and
ensure that all potentially affected landowners are notified and will therefore be able to
participate in the EIA process.
RECORD OF MEETING WITH MR EARL LEATHERN (LADYSMITH & DISTRICT FARMERS ASSOCIATION)
06 OCTOBER 2010
3
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
APPENDIX A: RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED AND DISCUSSED
FOCUS GROUP MEETING WITH MR EARL LEATHERN (LADYSMITH & DISTRICT FARMERS ASSOCIATION)
No
1
Name & Position
Mr Earl Leathern
Landowner
2
Mr Earl Leathern
Landowner
3
Mr Earl Leathern
Landowner
Comment
He advised the team that he owns a farm on the
proposed De Beers Pass Route. His farm is located
in a sensitive area and due to the wetlands they are
not allowed to cultivate crops on their farm.
Eskom expropriated one of his farms for the
purposes of construction of the road to Ingula
Pumped Storage Scheme.
He stated that there has been a lot of development
in the area due to the Ingula Pumped Storage
Scheme and it would be detrimental to have more
development.
Response
Comment noted.
Comment noted.
Comment noted.
The EIA specialist studies will
determine the impacts of development on the
environment.
Refer to chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for a summary of
specialist studies and impact assessments for sections. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.11 and 16 of the DEIR.
4
5
6
Mr Earl Leathern
Landowner
Mr Earl Leathern
Landowner
Mr Earl Leathern
Landowner
He stated that he considered the upgrading of the
existing N3 to be the best option.
He requested the team to note the following:

Right of way for farmers/existence of the
cattle passes between Swinburne and the
Biltong Shop.

There may be a need for under/over passes,
as in some instances the road would
separate the farmer from the water source.
Mr Malcolm Green, a landowner and a member of
the Ladysmith and District Farmers Association
appears to be affected by one of the proposed
alternative routes.
He also pointed out the following:

There is no leverage for landowners to
negotiate because the land has already been
RECORD OF MEETING WITH MR EARL LEATHERN (LADYSMITH & DISTRICT FARMERS ASSOCIATION)
06 OCTOBER 2010
4
Comment noted.
N3TC is obliged to maintain the existing N3 for the full
concession period irrespective of any alternative route
being built.
Cross access will form part of any land acquisition
process.
Mr Malcolm Green will be added to the I&AP schedule.
Comment noted.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
FOCUS GROUP MEETING WITH MR EARL LEATHERN (LADYSMITH & DISTRICT FARMERS ASSOCIATION)
No
Name & Position
7
Mr Earl Leathern
Landowner
8
Mr Earl Leathern
Landowner
9
Mr Earl Leathern
Landowner
Comment
expropriated.
The law is not specific regarding who is responsible
for the maintenance of the fence along the N3.
He stated that he has a good working relationship
with N3TC, Anesh Madanlal and commended him
for being efficient.
He wanted to know about the interchanges on the
green route. His opinion is that interchanges on the
green route would open up tourism opportunities.
He indicated that he would share information with
the Ladysmith and District Farmers Association and
also pass on the Background Information
Documents to the Chairperson, Mr Alan Green and
Mr Malcolm Green (whom he believed is potentially
affected by the proposed routes).
RECORD OF MEETING WITH MR EARL LEATHERN (LADYSMITH & DISTRICT FARMERS ASSOCIATION)
06 OCTOBER 2010
5
Response
The concession contract requires N3TC to repair
damaged fences where such damage emanates from
the N3.
Comment noted.
Besides the interchanges at either end where the DBP
route joins the existing N3, there is only one interchange
proposed at Lincoln.
Refer to Item 4 in Notes of Meeting.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
FOR THE PROPOSED
NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN
(De Beers Pass Section)
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
FOCUS GROUP MEETING WITH HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
HELD AT HARRISMITH INN, HARRISMITH
ON 07 OCTOBER 2010
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING WITH HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
07 OCTOBER 2010
107
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS...................................................................................................................... 1
PREFACE
........................................................................................................................ 2
1.
ATTENDANCE ........................................................................................................................ 3
1.1. Attendance – Members of Harrismith Business Forum ................................................... 3
1.2 Attendance – South African National Roads Agency Limited (SANRAL) ......................... 3
1.3 Attendance – N3 Toll Concession (Pty) Ltd (N3TC) ........................................................ 3
1.4 Attendance – Environmental Consulting Team (EIA Team) ............................................ 3
2.
WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS......................................................................................... 3
3.
MEETING OBJECTIVES AND PARTICIPATION GUIDELINES ................................................ 4
3.1 Meeting objectives ......................................................................................................... 4
3.2 Participation Guidelines ................................................................................................. 4
4.
PRESENTATION: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ............................................... 5
5.
PRESENTATION: TECHNICAL ................................................................................................ 5
6.
ISSUES AND COMMENTS RAISED AND DISCUSSED ........................................................... 5
6.1 Issues and Comments raised ......................................................................................... 5
7.
SUMMARY AND WAY FORWARD........................................................................................... 5
7.1 Notes of Meetings .......................................................................................................... 5
7.2 Timeframes.................................................................................................................... 5
8.
CLOSING REMARKS ............................................................................................................... 5
9.
CLOSURE
........................................................................................................................ 6
APPENDIX A: RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED AND DISCUSSED .............................................. 7
APPENDIX B: PRESENTATIONS .................................................................................................... 21
APPENDIX C: ATTENDANCE LIST.................................................................................................. 22
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
07 OCTOBER 2010
1
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
PREFACE
Participants who attended the Harrismith Business Forum Meeting and who want to request changes
to the record of the meeting, please notify the Public Participation Office in writing within the comment
period allowed for in the Draft Scoping Report.
“An I&AP” refers to a person who attended the meeting and verbally raised issues but who’s name
was not recorded because it was not provided. This in no way diminishes the value of the issue
raised. Should you recognise your input and would like to have your name recorded next to it, please
advise the Public Participation Office.
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
07 OCTOBER 2010
2
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
1.
ATTENDANCE
1.1.
Attendance – Members of Harrismith Business Forum

1.2
As per attendance list provided in Appendix C.
Attendance – South African National Roads Agency Limited (SANRAL)
Name
Mr Stewart Wilson
1.3
Attendance – N3 Toll Concession (Pty) Ltd (N3TC)
Name
Mr Neil Tolmie
Mr Con Roux
Mr Koos Radebe
1.4
2.
Position/Role
Manager: Design & Construction
Position/Role
Chief Executive Officer
Commercial Manager
Traffic Engineer
Attendance – Environmental Consulting Team (EIA Team)
Name
Mr Alan Cave
Organisation
Cave Klapwijk and Associates
Role in the project
Environmental Assessment Practitioner
Ms Janice Tooley
ACER (Africa)
Public Participation Consultant
Ms Bongi Shinga
ACER (Africa)
Public Participation Consultant
Ms Candace Sparg
ACER (Africa)
Public Participation Consultant
WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS
Ms Janice Tooley, ACER, introduced herself as the Facilitator for the meeting and welcomed
everyone to the meeting.
2.1
Facilitators introductory remarks
She explained that it is important to engage with stakeholders by way of focus group meetings.
This is part of the planning and decision making process. The more input that is gained from
directly affected stakeholders the better the decision will be.
The EIA process is a legal process which has to follow a set sequence of steps. The project
and the facts will be presented today.
She asked for approval of the agenda.
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
07 OCTOBER 2010
3
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
The Facilitator then introduced Mr Ben Deysel, Chairman of Harrismith Business Forum who
she invited to give an introduction.
2.2
Opening Remarks by Chairman of Harrismith Business Forum
Mr Deysel thanked the Facilitator and everyone present for attending.
He said it is important that everyone understand that this is an open process and that everyone
is present in order to communicate objectively. He appealed to everyone to understand that this
is an emotional issue as livelihoods are at stake. There is huge investment in the Harrismith
town. There are families that must be taken care of and people here are regarded as leaders of
the business community and are therefore responsible for the development of Harrismith.
He feels that it is important that everyone understands that there is a process to be followed.
This road has been an issue for a long time. He stated that they feel that the existing road has
taken care of old issues and the people of Harrismith do not understand why the process needs
to continue. Clearly this town has become an icon, Harrismith’s location and the economy of
this town and the very lifeblood of the town has been driven by the road. Everyone, therefore
has different expectations and he hoped that people would be able to present this in a mature
way.
He requested that when reference is made to specific issues, the statements may be derived
from the socio-economic study that was undertaken two years ago at the request of Mr. Nazir
Alli from SANRAL. They presented a copy of the document to them and from that document it
would appear that Harrismith and the community would be negatively impacted should the road
move in any way.
He said that everyone wanted to participate and wanted to add value to this process.
3.
MEETING OBJECTIVES AND PARTICIPATION GUIDELINES
3.1
Meeting objectives
The objectives of the Focus Group Meeting were as follows:






3.2
Provide a description of the EIA process.
Provide a description of the project.
Provide an opportunity for Harrismith Business to identify key issues for the EIA.
For those present to hear and understand issues identified and raised by other
representatives (bigger picture & full scope of EIA).
Feedback information to constituents/colleagues.
Facilitate co-operative governance which leads to a more informed decision making
process.
Participation Guidelines
The Facilitator further read through the points presented on the slide, which provided guidelines
with respect to the conduct of all participants and for achieving a constructive debate and
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
07 OCTOBER 2010
4
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
discussion. These points are contained in the main presentation, which is provided in Appendix
B.
4.
PRESENTATION: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Mr. Alan Cave, the Independent Environmental Assessment Practitioner, presented information
on Environmental Impact Assessment process.
5.
PRESENTATION: TECHNICAL
Mr Neil Tolmie, CEO, N3TC presented the technical background for the proposed National
Road 3: Keeversfontein to Warden (De Beers Pass Section).
Mr Con Roux briefly talked about aspects as they relate to the N3TC’s contractual obligations.
The information covered the employment, contracting and construction opportunities that may
arise when the proposed project is authorised.
6.
ISSUES AND COMMENTS RAISED AND DISCUSSED
6.1
Issues and Comments raised
The table contained in Appendix A: “Record of Issues Raised and Discussed” details the
issues, comments and concerns, which were raised and discussed at the meeting.
7.
SUMMARY AND WAY FORWARD
7.1
Record of Meeting
Representatives of Harrismith Business will have an opportunity after distribution to verify the
record and provide their comments to the Public Participation Office.
7.2
Timeframes
It is anticipated that the Draft Scoping Report will be available for public comment in early
November 2010.
8.
CLOSING REMARKS
The EAP concluded with the following:

It had been an extremely interesting meeting. He has found it very enlightening that there
are so many different points of view. He added that all the points have been noted as
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
07 OCTOBER 2010
5
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
required during the Scoping Phase, and that they will be taken forward to the
Environmental Assessment Phase when the Specialist Studies are initiated.
9.

Concern has been raised regarding a negative impact on Harrismith should any route not
pass directly through Harrismith. Specialist studies would investigate these issues and
consider both positive and negative impacts.

He thanked everyone for their broad approach. There have been many ideas and
opinions and these have all been noted.
CLOSURE
Ms Tooley noted that there is a need for discussions to be held with affected communities in
the area so that they also have the opportunity to give their input. She asked if there were any
leaders of communities at the meeting to contact ACER to arrange meetings with particular
communities.
The Facilitator asked everyone to sign the Attendance Register so that they can be added to
the project database. This will ensure that people receive correspondence as well as the
proceedings from the meeting.
She thanked everyone for constructive engagement and encouraged stakeholders to submit
written comments and closed the meeting.
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
07 OCTOBER 2010
6
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
APPENDIX A: RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED AND DISCUSSED
FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
No
1
Name
Mr Joe Vogel
Balden Vogel and Partners
Comment
He presumed that studies have been done on what the
toll fees would be on the three new proposals in terms of
current rand value.
2
Ms Joy Matjoa
Project Manager Harrismith Logistical Hub
Free State Department of
Police, Roads and
Transport
She wanted to understand a few things about issues that
had been previously raised. She asked what kind of
detail was required in terms of economics.
The Harrismith Logistical Hub is a concept that was
devised by the Free State Development Corporation to
try and maximise the centrality of the Free State as an
attractive province along the busiest corridor in the
whole country. As you are aware the volume of vehicles
that pass through this corridor on a daily basis however
will focus precisely on the issue of the freight traffic
which is about 5,000 trucks.
The sentiment of the Harrismith Logistical Hub is to state
that Harrismith as a town is deriving very little from the
traffic that is passing through except for an overnight
venue and some other services. What is it that should be
done as a province to maximise the value that is being
derived from the corridor and also at the same time,
begin to develop the economy of the region as a whole.
This is where the concept of the Logistical Hub began –
as a Transport Logistics Infrastructure Facility which has
economic upstream. The manner is which the hub is
supposed to be designed is that the area you have the
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
07 OCTOBER 2010
7
Response
Preliminary toll fee studies are in progress. Additional toll fees
will provide for the required cost recovery. The current toll rate for
a light vehicle is around 37c per km for a heavy vehicle it is
around R1.34 per km.
Ms Matjoa was thanked for her contribution and a copy of the
studies that have been done was requested by SANRAL.
From a SANRAL perspective, the hub and De Beer’s Pass are
not seen as being mutually exclusive. It is important to note that
the existing N3 is not being replaced as it will remain and will be
maintained by N3TC for the remainder of the concession period.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
No
Name
Comment
cross section of the N3 and the N5 has been identified to
be an area where there will be an enhancement of the
model shift from road to rail, maximising the issue of the
gradients that occur from Harrismith to Durban and the
lower gradients that occur from Harrismith to
Johannesburg.
This should make it easy for people in Gauteng to bring
freight by road and shift from road to rail in Harrismith.
This will include maximising warehouse handling within
the town of Harrismith.
To be able to sell the Harrismith Logistical Hub to
industry, such as shipping companies, Transnet,
Portnet, etc. has two aspects. Firstly, to reduce turnaround time of delivering cargo to the harbour or to the
clearinghouse in City Deep in Johannesburg. Secondly,
the logistical efficiencies have to be improved. Industry
has stated that if Harrismith Logistical Hub is going to be
viable, what about the double handling of cargo? There
have been many economic logistics acrobatics to make
sure that the double handling of cargo is so efficient, that
it actually reduces the entire turn-around time.
The impact that this bypass is going to have is that
certain carriers are saying it would be so much easier to
bond the cargo at the port and send it directly to City
Deep in Johannesburg, even if they have to wait at City
Deep. The manufacturers in Gauteng state that it is easy
to bond the manufactured items and send them straight
through down the N3 to the harbour. The logistics hub
are stating that they can make it more efficient. If the
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
07 OCTOBER 2010
8
Response
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
No
Name
Comment
bypass happens and the road is outside Harrismith, that
entire project becomes much more difficult to sell to
corporate South Africa. From a transport logistics
efficiency point of view and from an economic efficiency
point of view.
She has met with the CEO of SANRAL and he said that
people are very emotional about this issue. It is not
really about people needing jobs, because people can
get jobs if you position yourself correctly. The Harrismith
Logistical Hub is bigger than having jobs for people in
Harrismith or Qwa qwa. Distribution efficiencies for the
entire province are at stake. For example, the cherry and
asparagus industry in Ficksburg, there are farmers that
need to export cherries and asparagus (and fresh
flowers) and these need to go to Amsterdam overnight.
These goods go onto a truck and travel to
Johannesburg. The efficiencies of this hub need to
ensure that the freight airport is incorporated. Therefore
when a farmer picks his cherries in the morning, by
12h00 they need to be on a truck coming through
Harrismith and then be put on a plane in Johannesburg
so that the next morning they are in Amsterdam ready
for auction at the markets.
She wanted understanding of the emotional aspects of
the process. Feasibility studies have been carried out,
Urban-Economics have done an economic study on the
impacts. It therefore goes beyond an emotional issue.
These studies will be made available to the team.
From a laymen’s point of view, there was a contractual
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
07 OCTOBER 2010
9
Response
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
No
Name
3
I&AP
Harrismith Business
Forum
4
Mr Ben Deysel
Harrismith Business
Forum
Comment
obligation spoken about, this was to make sure that they
travel at 120 km/hr, can this be done without bypassing
the town of Harrismith? Can another model be found
that could make sure that there is a 4 or 6-lane road that
will have 120 km/hr but that will not bypass Harrismith.
This whole issue of bypassing Harrismith is bigger than
jobs for people.
He accused the Facilitator of being a dictator as the
previous speaker is a government official and she has
been deprived of her platform. He said they were
representing the government and when they ask a
question, they need to be given the platform so that they
can present the position of the economy and the people.
He questioned why it is necessary for these
engagements to keep on being prolonged because all
the people in the previous engagement made their
positions clear. Local government, led by the mayor, the
provincial government led by the MEC, there were also
the business people and the communities represented
by various structures also attended. Economic structures
such as Labour organisations attended. Therefore there
was political and civic representation. They all made
their point clear. He asked who they are now wanting to
engage with. The gentleman who responded to the last
speaker was talking with arrogance.
Mr Deysel stated that there was a government meeting
that morning scheduled where specific government
officials were invited. It is important to allow the process.
There has been an agreement that the meeting will be
conducted in a specific format, he appealed to everyone
to abide by this agreement. The facilitator will allow Ms
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
07 OCTOBER 2010
10
Response
The facilitator requested the gentleman to raise his specific issue.
She explained that a legal process is being followed.
The facilitator asked for consensus that this would be done. Part
of the participation in Scoping is to speak to as many people as
possible and have as many opportunities as possible to hear the
voices. She appealed to the meeting to not loose the opportunity
to voice their concerns.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
No
Name
5
Mr Floyd Mazibuko
ANC
6
Mr Sipho Kubheka
Ward Councillor
Comment
Matjoa to repeat the question.
He stated that during the morning meeting the issue of
the hub was raised by the DA and the ANC and others.
Details had been requested at this meeting. This has
been presented in full detail.
He said that the issue that he has is a problem with the
people from SANRAL as they are an agency of
government. In the previous engagement, when both
local and provincial government raised the issue that it
will never happen. In 1999 there was a Record of
Decision issued, now there was non-compliance with the
new act and so there is a new process. Why are
SANRAL making an application when government has
withdrawn their record of decision?
Response
Provincial and Local government do not want this route
to go ahead. He asked if it is possible to go to the slides
with the alternatives. Using these slides he explained
that once the deviation is made Harrismith is being
deprived of the opportunity of have a Logistic Hub. He
feels that one particular route is being ‘sold’.
All route alternatives are being studied under the applicable
regulations. There is no preferred route until the studies are
completed. The existing N3 in its current form will not change
and will be maintained by N3TC until the end of the concession
contract.
He feels that there is a vested interest from SANRAL on
the one particular route. He wants it made clear to the
community and the business of Harrismith, why is there
a new application. It has been stated that the whole
process is starting afresh.
7
Mr Colin Liddell
Property Owner
He reminded SANRAL that they are an agency of
government and not the government.
He asked for some detail regarding the access roads. It
appears as though some of them would be quite long.
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
07 OCTOBER 2010
11
Refer to response under 2 above.
There are new regulations in place and therefore the De Beers
Pass Route needs to be studied in accordance with the new
regulations. There is no non-compliance.
Informal studies done during 2008 revealed that the alternative A
route should also be studied. A new EIA process is being
followed to assess the alternatives
Generally speaking access roads will not be the responsibility of
the concessionaire, they are collector roads and they either
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
No
Name
Comment
He asked who would be responsible for maintaining
those access roads, would they revert to Province?
Response
belong to the municipality or the province.
8
An I&AP
Harrismith Business
Forum
What affect will the road have all the factories that are
manufacturing in Qwaqwa and Tshiame, will there be
more difficult transport options for them, will this be more
costly? How many jobs are currently in Tshiame and in
the manufacturing area of Qwaqwa? If you think back
what happened to Qwaqwa in the past, the railroad that
should have been built in that area was never built. This
had a huge effect on what happened in this area. At
some stage the factories in this area almost came to a
halt. It was too costly to import and export their goods
from within this area.
These comments will be addressed in the specialist studies.
He also wanted to know what affect this will have on
Bethlehem and the economy of Bethlehem.
He enquired about employment figures at the filling
stations in the surrounding areas and how many people
do these employees in turn support. He estimated that
there is about 2,000 people employed in this sector and
if each of them supports 4/5 people, the easily 10,000
people will be affected.
He understands that if the new road is constructed there
will be some jobs created but in the long-term many jobs
will be destroyed. If the road goes through Harrismith, it
would be beneficial. However if the road goes anywhere
else, there will only be a short-term benefit and
Harrismith will be a ghost town.
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
07 OCTOBER 2010
12
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
No
Name
9
Adv George Galloway
Harrismith District Farmers
Association
Comment
The Free State Development Corporation should have
all the figures regarding the factories and numbers of
people employed, etc.
He asked if it was possible to tell everyone what the
estimated cost will be regarding the three possible
routes.
Response
He also asked if it was possible to move the
interchanges near Harrismith in Alternative A. The one
appears to be near Southwood that is a farm to the north
which is approximately 10 km outside Harrismith. The
other one is near Alison Oats’ farm which is also 5 km
from Harrismith towards Durban. Could those
interchanges be moved nearer to Harrismith?
The number of interchanges that have been indicated are
indicative so therefore interchanges can be moved during the
detailed design phase and in consultation with landowners.
He stated that if one visited Germany or Austria or the
Netherlands, it is possible to mitigate noise.
He explained that there are as many wetlands in
Alternative B as there are at the De Beer’s Pass route.
He knows them well.
Currently the cost of the De Beer’s Pass route and the various
alternatives vary in the order of about R4/5 billion.
Noise barriers would be very expensive and their effectiveness is
debatable.
The discussion is helpful in determining the degree of detail that
has to go into the economic study and in defining the terms of
reference for the economist. This would have to include where
the impact occurs and how far the impact gets diluted. Whether
Bethlehem is far enough away or not.
Regarding noise mitigation, there was environmental legislation
which was proposed but never signed into any legislation that
was to do with noise levels in municipal areas. If this does
become law it becomes binding on municipalities then there is
going to have to be a bypass to Harrismith. In fact, there will have
to be bypasses to all sorts of towns and cities all over the country
because the volumes of traffic that are on the roads cannot be
reduced to the levels that were being proposed in the draft
legislation.
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
07 OCTOBER 2010
13
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
No
Name
Comment
Response
10
Ms Kholeka Lentsoane
Secretary, ANCWL
Ms Lentsoane said that someone had said that they are
reacting on the economic demand. Could someone
explain what this means. Does this means the economy
that affects SANRAL or the people of South Africa as a
whole.
What is being referred to is a level of service and for simplicity it
takes the alphabet from A through to F, where A is the highest
level of service where you travel and there is uninterrupted travel.
F is the lowest level at which there are severe interruptions such
as queues and stop/go for long lengths of time.
Economic demand means that the rail lines are not working
efficiently so it is the preference for freight to be moved on road.
SANRAL do not make that choice. The more freight that goes by
road means more heavy vehicles are on the road and the levels
of service start to drop. There is a mix of light and heavy
vehicles, and the more light vehicles that are mixed with heavy
vehicles the more accidents occur.
11
Ms Joy Matjoa
Project Manager Harrismith Logistical Hub
Free State Department of
Police, Roads and
Transport
Ms Matjoa said she appreciates the gentleman (Mr
Cave) who had answered her question which was is it
possible to comply with the requirement of the contract
to have the 120 km/hr and still not bypass the town.
The answer had been yes it could be done but there will
be noise and the quality of life will be affected.
However, as she represents the provincial government
of the Free State and she has a mandate from her
Executive Council. She feels that if there was an
assessment or study of the people of Harrismith, she
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
07 OCTOBER 2010
14
SANRAL cannot tell industry that they cannot transport their
freight by road. SANRAL has to maintain and enhance the road
network. In terms of the transport industry, shorter means
cheaper for the total economy, including end user price..
SANRAL’s responsibility is to provide higher levels of service..
Comments noted.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
No
12
13
Name
Mr Johan Greyling
Businessman
Mrs Kholeka Lentsoane
Secretary, ANCWL
Comment
would rather lie in her bed at night and have a truck
shaking her window and buy a pair of earplugs than go
to bed hungry. The level of unemployment in this district
is 84%. If we were to take a vote from the people of this
area they would prefer 7,000 trucks going through their
town per day than the present situation that they have
whereby they have no jobs and no food to put on their
tables.
Response
Ms Matjoa referred to Mazlow’s hierarchy of needs and
she feels that quality of life comes long after basic food,
protection and shelter.
Mr Greyling said it seems that there is a division. On one
side there are people trying to fight for their town and the
other side there is big business opportunity and a lot of
money to be made.
He asked if the fact that land has already been
purchased to build the road, how would this effect this
whole decision-making process. He also asked what
weight their voices carried.
The fact that land has already been purchased will not affect the
decision making process.
Her problem is that the economic demand is in the point
of view of SANRAL. Looking at Harrismith someone said
that the unemployment figure is about 84%.
Social studies and Economic evaluations will form part of the
EIA. Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR
Volume 2 for an assessment on Social Impacts.
She said she was fighting for women’s empowerment.
She highlighted the importance of the Millennium
Development Goals of the Government. The first one is
Also refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR
assessments relating to the project.
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
07 OCTOBER 2010
15
Voices are very powerful and legal processes are in place via
environmental legislation.
An example is the John Ross
Highway.
for the economic
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
No
Name
Comment
the eradication of poverty. If you take the road out of
Harrismith, are you not fighting what the government is
trying to achieve?
Response
The second one is reducing child mortality. In the Free
State they are trying to reduce these things and making
sure the goals are not interrupted.
She is also worried about the safety of women going to
where the new road will be.
14
Adv George Galloway
Harrismith Business
Forum
15
Mr Mangaliso Tshabalala
ANC
Harrismith is a beautiful small town which is so important
to everyone and is the centre of the province, why would
anyone want to do this to the residents?
Adv Galloway said that there are 7 farms which were
bought out/expropriated. It is impossible to bring them
back to the open markets as they were transferred to
Land Affairs and they went to emerging farmers.
Mr Tshabalala feels that the red route would be the best
route because he knows for a fact that some taxi drivers
(between Johannesburg and Durban) have said that the
safest stop is Harrismith. He is not concerned about
SANRAL’s customers.
The other options will not have a filling station on that
side. Also there are no police stations or hospitals and
many high-jacking could occur in the other areas.
The other options also do not offer job opportunities.
There will only be temporary work offered.
His main concerns are crime and hospitals.
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
07 OCTOBER 2010
16
Comment noted.
Comments noted.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
No
16
Name
Mr Joe Vogel
Balden Vogel & Partners
Comment
Mr Vogel stated that the consensus in Harrismith is for
the red route. Regarding all the 12 new interchanges, it
is his understanding, the current red route will remain
the national route. If it is necessary to upgrade it and
there are 12 new interchanges (if that is the only route),
why is it not necessary if it is the alternative together
with the green and yellow. The upgrades will in any
event need to be done.
Response
Based on preliminary traffic projections, the traffic volumes that
will remain on the existing N3 will not warrant interchanges.
This comes from a previous statement regarding the toll
tariff which gave him the impression that it is going to be
the same price per km up the new green road as the red
road if the red road remains if the green road is
constructed. Everyone is then subsidising that
expensively new green road and it goes to the same
point. The 12 interchanges would still have to be built
even if the green route is constructed.
The red route is obviously best for Harrismith but
something that has not been noted is the severe impact
environmentally with the new 6-lane route running at the
foot of the Platberg. Platberg is probably one of the best
untapped reserves in Harrismith and it should be
promoted and this would be impossible with the road
running past. It is a very sensitive ecological area, he
enquired if studies have been done regarding the
environmental impact of that suggested route such as
the studies that were undertaken for the wetlands.
The Platberg Reserve is well known and has previously been
raised as a concern. This forms part of the studies.
He added that he is unaware that the Ntabazwe or 42nd
Hill Road is the place of big concern currently trafficwise. He is not aware of it being a high accident zone
N3TC has a contractual obligation to comply with SANRAL’s
highway standards.
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
07 OCTOBER 2010
17
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
No
Name
Comment
irrespective of the gradient and the curves. When he
drives this route even during peak times, the traffic
flows, even if it is slower. He asked if SANRAL wants to
see people driving at 120 km/hr to Johannesburg,
instead of driving at 90 – 100 km/hr up the Ntabazwe
Road. Is it worth causing all the suffering and the
damage to the town to have that small convenience?
Response
He added that in Pietermaritzburg this is the case.
17
Mr Ben Deysel
Harrismith Business
Forum
Mr Deysel explained that he was talking firstly as a
businessman and secondly as a transport economist
who has been in the transport industry for 32 years. He
was also talking as a father, a grandfather and a
Christian.
When a study such as this is undertaken it is not purely
issues about engineering standards and safety. It has a
lot to do with other issues. The country itself has
adopted the policy of a free market system and by
adopting this there has been a choice made that this is
the route that must be taken.
The issue of road versus rail has been raised. Rail was
protected for 100 years but rail served a specific
purpose and the free market when it was de-regulated in
the 1980s proved that road transport is far more
effective and efficient than rail. But in the national
interest, it is important that a huge portion of the freight
goes back to rail.
If the greater area of Harrismith is examined, there are in
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
07 OCTOBER 2010
18
Comments noted.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
No
Name
Comment
excess of 1 million people that live in poverty. No-one
can justify that. Now, by moving the road a few issues
may be served. The message that is being relayed is
that this is driven by the contract between SANRAL and
N3TC and he proposes that this contract be cancelled.
The conditions and the environment has changed and it
simply cannot be justified that this contract could cause
so much disruption and to increase the poverty of this
entire region.
If the Logistics Hub is examined, this is the hope of the
people. Harrismith has been identified as the key
economic development node of the province. This was
announced in the Premier’s speech for the past two
years. Mr Jeff Radebe when he addressed the people
two years ago said that this road will not be built.
The fact that moving the road 5 or 6 km against the
mountain is an issue. Platberg is five times the size of
Table Mountain which has become the icon of South
Africa. He asked why Platberg cannot become the icon
of the Free State. The road would destroy this. The
whole of Europe has been built around aesthetic values
and noise pollution has been taken care of. He
requested that this committee take all the issues into
consideration, but ultimately the people need to have
some certainty that in the last two years at least 5 huge
projects have been tabled to this province and they are
all still on the table. None of them have been actioned
simply because of the uncertainty of the road. If the
alternative road goes ahead this town will die and it will
not attract any investors.
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
07 OCTOBER 2010
19
Response
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
No
Name
Comment
Response
Attending this meeting is the new manager of Nestle and
Nestle’s Director told the Premier two months ago that
the first target should be to retain investors, before trying
to attract new investors. Moving the road will not retain
investors.
It has been said that we should try and look at it from a
manipulative point of view, and he requests this on
behalf of the Harrismith Business Forum and on behalf
of the community, that the road should remain as it is,.
Cost indications are that it would cost R1 billion to
improve the current road to international standards
versus R5 /6 billion to build the new road. This cannot be
justified. If the new road is built Harrismith faces a very
dark future.
In closing, he thanked everyone for the opportunity of
addressing the Harrismith Business Forum and thanked
everyone for attending and he hopes that there will be a
positive response from the committee.
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
07 OCTOBER 2010
20
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
APPENDIX B: PRESENTATIONS
Size of the EIA Process presentation is 1,789KB
Size of the Technical presentation is 1276KB
All presentations can be requested from ACER (Africa) at 086 010 4958 or by notifying Candace Sparg at [email protected]
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
07 OCTOBER 2010
21
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
APPENDIX C: ATTENDANCE LIST
Title
Miss
First
Names
Christene
Surname
Armstrong
Editor
Harrismith Chronicle
Attended/Apologised
Attended
Mr
Mr
Marcel
Alan
Boon
Cave
Factory Manager
Environmental Consultant
Nestle
Cave Klapwijk and Associates
Attended
Attended
Mr
Mr
Sipho
Emile
Cebekulu
de Beer
Owner
Subway Shell
Attended
Attended
Mr
Mr
Ben
Pierre
Deysel
du Plessis
Chairman
Highway Group and Harrismith Business Forum
PG Building and Civil Engineering / Bergview Complex
Attended
Attended
Mr
Mnr
H
Fred
Enslin
Enslin
Senior Accountant
Secretary
Enslins Harrismith Inc
Harrismith Business Forum
Attended
Attended
Mr
Mr
Johan
Karl
Greyling
Huisamen
Businessman
Manager
Montrose Country/Balmoral Ultra City
Attended
Attended
Mr
Mr
Douglas
Sipho
Judd
Kubheka
Technical Manager
N3TC
Apologised
Attended
Mrs
Mr
Kholeka
Colin
Lentsoane
Liddell
Secretary
Farmer
ANCWL
Attended
Attended
Mr
Mr
Ralph
Johannes
Luxford
Maduna
Member
Montrose Country Balmoral
Attended
Attended
Mr
Mr
Jabulani
Watson
Majozi
Makananise
Member
Taxi Association - Harrismith
Harrismith Business Forum
Attended
Attended
Mr
Ms
Joseph
Joy
Makhaza
Matjoa
Project Manager: Harrismith Logistical Hub
Department of Police, Roads and Transport
Attended
Attended
Mr
Mr
Floyd
Bheki
Mazibuko
Mazibuko
Secretary
ANC
Department of Police, Roads and Transport
Attended
Attended
Mr
Mr
JCK
LM
Mokoena
Molloyi
SANCO
NAFCOC
Attended
Attended
Mr
Mr
Moropeli
Nkosinathi
Motaung
Msibi
Member
ANC
SANCO
Attended
Attended
Mr
Mr
Koos
Con
Radebe
Roux
Traffic Engineer
Commercial Manager
N3TC
N3TC
Attended
Attended
Mr
Miss
Jim
Zama
Shannon
Shezi
Retired & Concerned Resident
Administrator
Constituency Office
Attended
Attended
Position
Co/Org
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
07 OCTOBER 2010
22
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
Title
Ms
First
Names
Bongi
Surname
Shinga
Position
Environmental Consultant
ACER
Attended/Apologised
Attended
Mrs
Mr
Candace
Neil
Sparg
Tolmie
Public Participation Officer
CEO
ACER
N3TC
Attended
Attended
Ms
Mr
Janice
Mangaliso
Tooley
Tshabalala
Environmental Consultant
ACER
Attended
Attended
Mr
Mr
Gert
Joe
van Tonder
Vogel
Director
Director
Entrawood/Harrismith Business Forum
Balden Vogel & Vennote
Attended
Attended
Mr
Stewart
Wilson
Manager: Design & Construction, Eastern
Region
SANRAL
Attended
Co/Org
RECORD OF FOCUS GROUP MEETING – HARRISMITH BUSINESS FORUM
07 OCTOBER 2010
23
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
7.
SECTION 5:
COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE
LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS 2008/2009
Note: The issues listed below have been extracted from the Comments and Response Report compiled
during the Route Location Initiative, which involved interaction with landowners along the De Beers Pass
Route alternatives. In response to a request of some landowners and a directive from the Department of
Environmental Affairs, these issues have been included as part of the formal record in this EIA process.
No.
1.
1.1
1.2.
1.3.
1.4.
1.5.
1.6.
1.7.
1.8.
1.9.
1.10.
1.11.
1.12.
1.13.
2.
2.1.
2.2.
2.3.
2.4.
2.5.
2.6.
2.7.
2.8.
3.
3.1.
3.2.
3.3.
3.4.
3.5.
3.6.
3.7.
3.8.
3.9.
3.10.
3.11.
4.
4.1.
4.2
5.
Issue
INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROCESS
National and provincial considerations
The De Beers Pass Base Case
Alternatives to De Beers Pass Route
Existing N3 as an Alternative
Environmental Investigations
EIA Authorisation process
Future EIA process
Expropriation
Other Legal frameworks and processes
Public Involvement Programme
Environmental Management Plan
Relocation
Other
ECONOMIC ISSUES
Transport Economics
Compensation issues
Adverse impacts on national, regional & local economy
Positive impacts on national, regional & local economy
Competition for labour during construction
Toll Fees
Affects on future planned tourism
Impacts on existing tourism
WELL-BEING
Unfairness, emotional impact and inconvenience to previously expropriated landowners
Crime and Security
Drug and Alcohol abuse
Prostitution
Construction activities and construction camps
Noise
Aesthetics
Nuisance factors
Loss of privacy
Location of construction camps
Other
ROAD SAFTEY
Regulations, services, facilities and signs
Climatic conditions
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
108
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
5.1.
5.2.
5.3.
5.4.
5.5
5.6.
6.
6.1.
7.
7.1.
7.2.
7.3.
7.4.
7.5.
8.
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.5.
9.
9.1
9.2
Issue
Wetlands
Fauna & flora (general)
Water quality and water courses
Borrow pits
Air quality
Animals
ARCHAEOLOGICAL, HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL ISSUES
Historical issues
FARMING-RELATED ISSUES
Theft & well-being of livestock
Fire
Loss of agricultural land and impact on economic viability
Infrastructure
Other
DESIGN & TECHNICAL ISSUES
Access onto/through farms
Access onto the highway
Geotechnical issues
Truck Stops
Distance
TRAFFIC
Construction traffic
Volumes
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
109
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
Name / organisation / farm
name
Comments raised
Response
1. INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROCESS
1.1 National and provincial considerations (Construction of N2; linkages to N5; Inland Port; Petronet Pipeline)
1.1.2
Mr Theunis Filmater
With the construction of the N2, the amount of traffic flow through Harrismith
Owner: Rooilaagte No. 1094
to get to the Eastern/Western Cape would dramatically decrease. Harrismith
& Draaipan No. 1093
would therefore not only be affected by the N2 loss of traffic, but it could also
be affected by the potential loss of the N3 traffic, should an alternative route
Mr Moloi
be decided upon.
Municipal Manager
Thabo Mofutsanyone District
The towns within the Thabo Mofutsanyone DM that are situated to the west of
Municipality
Harrismith are economically dependent on the N3 route. The town of
Harrismith is an interlinking town between Gauteng, KZN, the Free State
Mr Nick Leslie
(more specifically the N5). Any activities that would negatively impact on the
Owner: Elon No. 674 and
economic stability of the areas should be avoided.
Ebenhaezer No. 1117
The inland clearing port that is planned for Harrismith plays an important role
Dr Pieter van Eeden
in the future of the economy of this area. Will the proposed alternatives
Go EnviroScience
negatively impact on the inland Port or is there a possibility that one of the
Representative of Mrs
route alternatives and the inland port could be “supportive” of one another?
Francesca Fondse, Owner:
Nolans Volans Ptn 2 and Ptn
Can the inland port not serve as an alternative (as required by Chapter 5 of
6 on 2384, Paulina Ptn 1 of
NEMA) to the proposed alternative? i.e. by utilising the port, there could be a
1516 and Scotston Ptn 20 of
reduction in traffic on the roads.
4128
Mr Alan Tedder
Interested and Affected Party
These comments are noted, but irrespective of external
influences such as those mentioned, the trigger for the
implementation of the De Beers Pass Alternative is the
traffic volume reaching 13900 vehicles per day over
Van Reenen's Pass.
It should also be borne in mind that the ROD was
issued for the De Beers Pass Base Case (DBPBC) in
1997. The reason for the study to find an alternative to
the DBPBC is purely due to concern over the
environmental degradation to natural assets such as
the wetlands.
The inland port was in the planning stage after the
ROD was issued and before the alternative routing to
the base case became known.
Should an alternative to the DBPBC be adopted, these
issues will need to be looked at as part of the EIA
process. Importantly, the negative and positive
cumulative impacts will be investigated during the EIA
studies. Refer to chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for a summary of specialist studies and
impact assessments for sections.
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
1
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
1.1.3
Name / organisation / farm
name
Comments raised
Response
Mrs Margaret Hobbs
Owner:
Meijer’s Geluk No. 531 Ptn 3
and Schaapdrift No. 915
Was the Petronet pipeline not originally supposed to accompany the
proposed DBPBC (in 1998)?
Petronet realised that it was not possible for them to
put a pipeline through the wetlands and so had to
deviate their line.
Mrs Trudy Oates
Owner: Trafalgar No. 839 and
Nelson’s Kop No. 250
What impacts will the new pipeline have on the various proposed
alternatives?
Where the pipeline crosses the proposed new N3
alternatives N3TC and SANRAL’s conditions will apply.
N3TC has registered as an I&AP for the NMPP project.
The cumulative impacts of these national projects on
the proposed alternatives will be further investigated
during the EIA.
1.1.4
Mr Johannes Boshoff
Owner: Holkrantz No. 966
Rem, Halwepan No. 1450 and
Barber’s Pan No. 513
Please note that the Petronet pipeline runs through the eastern corner of
Holkrantz No. 966 Rem.
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
2
This comment is noted.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
1.1.5
Name / organisation / farm
name
Roelf Human
Transnet Pipelines
(Interview 14/11/08)
Comments raised
Response
The following key issues were raised during this interview:
Should this be applicable to the route selected, the
issues raised are duly noted and cognisance will be
taken during the design, construction and operation
phases of the N3 De Beers Pass alternative.
The New Multi-purpose Pipeline (NMPP) commissioned by Sept 2010.
Approximately a year after commissioning (end 2011), the existing pipeline
and pump station will be decommissioned.
Construction contract has been awarded, however The dates for
commencement of construction in the van Reenen area are unknown at
present.
New pump station near Van Reenen will be positioned on the “south” side
from existing Pump Station. .
In terms of potential areas of co-influence of the N3TC RLI and the NMPP,
the following issues are recorded:.
1. Where Van Reenen alt route “purple” passes the pump stations, there is
a concern that a major accident could result in vehicles falling onto pump
station.
2. Where possible the road levels must be determined now so that the
NMPP can be placed at a level to suit.
3. Normal care and communication with Transnet during construction must
apply.
1.1.6
Mr Alan Tedder
Interested and Affected Party
Isn’t the purple route (Section 1) close to the railway line?
It does not follow the railway line route, but does cross
it.
1.1.7
Dr Pieter van Eeden
Go EnviroScience
Representative of Mrs
Francesca Fondse (properties
listed above).
It is requested that DoT, in conjunction with Transnet and SANRAL develop
regulations that will force clients/couriers to use freight trains where there are
railway lines.
This comment is noted however this issue is not
related to the N3TC RLI. It is recommended that you
approach the Department of Transport, Transnet and
SANRAL directly in this regard.
1.2 The De Beers Pass Base Case
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
3
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
1.2.1
1.2.1
Name / organisation / farm
name
Comments raised
Response
Mrs Fondse
Owner: Nolans Volans Ptn 2
and Ptn 6 on 2384, Paulina
Ptn 1 of 1516 and Scotston
Ptn 20 of 4128
Should an alternative be constructed, the DBPBC is the preferred alternative.
The environmental impact mitigation measures contained in the ROD have to
be met.
Should the De Beers Pass be used, there is not a concern that visitors to the
proposed developments will have to travel by gravel road. This would be seen
as part of the spiritual experience of enjoying the natural beauty of the
environment. However, access should be provided to access the local roads.
This comment is noted.
Mr AlisterCampbell
Owner: Uithoek 460 Rem.
At the time of buying my property I was comfortable that the route would be
sufficiently far away from my farm, so as not to affect me in a material way.
This comment is noted. Please see discussions in
Section 1.3 regarding the background to this study.
1.3 Alternatives to De Beers Pass route
1.3.1
Mr Graham Hobbs
If the N3TC has been aware of the environmental problems on the De Beers
Owner:
Base Case Route since the first studies, why did it not avoid these to start
Meijer’s Geluk No. 531 Ptn 3
with and why is it now only considering alternatives?
and Schaapdrift No. 915
1.3.2.
Mr Graham Hobbs
Owner:
Meijer’s Geluk No. 531 Ptn 3
and Schaapdrift No. 915
Is the Brown route (Section 2C) not an option?
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
4
Please also see discussions under:
1. Integrated Environmental Management Process
2. Economic Issues
3. Well-being
8. Design & technical
The ROD issued in July 1999 stated that alternative
routes must be investigated to avoid wetlands.
Improved engineering technology has allowed the
N3TC to find a better environmental, alternative and
still satisfying the engineering requirements. N3TC
commenced with their study timeously to ensure
compliance with their contractual obligations.
See also discussion under:
1.5 Environment investigations.
Yes it is an option, however initial feedback from
experts is that there are environmental issues
associated with it. Please note that at the time of these
one on one sessions, specialists had only carried out
desktop studies. Field work is in progress.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
Name / organisation / farm
name
Comments raised
Response
Other than minor deviations, it is unlikely. The three
routes identified have been selected because initial
environmental investigation indicates the least impact
compared to other possible routes identified and all
three routes satisfy the engineering requirements.
Furthermore, the three alternatives are also believed to
be the shortest feasible alternatives and have already
been adjusted to avoid both environmental and socially
sensitive areas. The shortest routes that comply
geometrically, other than the De Beers Pass ‘Base
Case’ Route, are the purple and light green routes. In
terms of the impact on the environment these routes
were identified as being feasible. From Lincoln to
Warden all environmental issues associated with the
original ROD have been mitigated by minor route
deviations.
This comment is noted. Mr Grabe’s reasons for his
objections have been captured in relevant sections of
this document.
1.3.3
Mrs Margaret Hobbs
Owner:
Meijer’s Geluk No. 531 Ptn 3
and Schaapdrift No. 915
So there is a possibility that the N3TC may still add more alternatives to the
existing routes on the map? Will the N3TC alter the existing three routes?
1.3.4
Kobus Grabe
Owner: Vrede No. 1937 and
Bankspruit No. 790 1 and
Rem.
Mr Jacques van Niekerk
Owner: Schreiners Claim
It must please be noted that I am against all three of the proposed routes.
1.3.6
Mr Jacques van Niekerk
Owner: Schreiners Claim
Should no alternative route be chosen, other than the DBPBC currently
traversing Schreiner's Claim, then the DBPBC is preferred, as this route
transverses less of this property than Section 2A, Section 2B or Section 2C.
1.3.7
Mr Theunis Filmater
Owner: Rooilaagte No. 1094
and Draaipan No. 1093
Section 1 will address the Van Reenen’s Pass problem.
1.3.5
It is believed that N3TC taking on the route of Section 1 linking up with
Section 2A would not make any difference to the existing N3 highway.
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
5
The combination of Sections 1, 2A and 3 result in a
distance saving of approximately 14km compared to
the existing N3.
This comment is noted
This comment is noted.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
Name / organisation / farm
name
Mr Tony Christopher
Owner: Cotswold No 10382
Rem
1.3.8
1.3.9
Dr Pieter van Eeden
Go EnviroScience
Representative of
\ Mrs Francesca Fondse,
(farm
names
previously
stated)
Mr AlisterCampbell
Owner: Uithoek 460 Rem.
Comments raised
Response
The proposed route close to the existing Van Reenen’s pass and shown in
purple as “Section 1: New Van Reenen’s pass” is likely to have fewer impacts.
It is believed that the gradients of this road are much less severe than on the
proposed De Beers Pass Route, because the Van Reenen’s pass Route
would lie very close to the existing road, the environmental impacts are less
likely to be severe as any development that intrudes in a “Greenfields” area.
It was indicated (but not stated in as many words) that the alternative routes
as shown on the map are the preferred alternative to De Beers Pass,
although theoretically other alternatives could be found.
This comment is noted
All the routes at this stage of the RLI study carry equal
weighting; there is not one preferred alternative
Refer to discussions in section 1.3.3
From my perspective, neither Section 2A (the Highland Route), nor Section
2C (De Beers Pass deviation) is going to work for me. Both of these
alternatives run very close to my property and will therefore significantly affect
the resale value of my property.
Section 2A would be a complete disaster from my perspective as it would
involve a massive highway running approximately 300m from my front
veranda, while section 2C will run right across my Northern boundary which is
900, from my house.
These comments are noted.
These issues also receive attention in the following
sections:
1. Integrated Environmental Management Process
2. Economic Issues
3. Well-being
1.4. Existing N3 as an alternative (Harrismith Western bypass; upgrading existing N3 using various route & technical alternatives)
1.4.1
Mr Theunis Filmater
The Western Bypass around Harrismith would have worked; this route should Comment noted. The Harrismith western bypass
Owner: Rooilaagte No. 1094 have been pursued years ago.
referred to relates to a bottle-neck at Harrismith that
and Draaipan No. 1093
was rectified by constructing the Harrismith eastern
bypass in 2000/01
1.4.2
Mr Theunis Filmater
Owner: Rooilaagte No. 1094
and Draaipan No. 1093
The existing N3 highway should be upgraded to four lanes after the Van
Reenen’s Pass. If this is not done, it is believed that N3TC would not
maintain the existing N3 highway.
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
6
N3TC is obliged to maintain the existing N3 for the full
concession period irrespective of any alternative route
being built.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
Name / organisation / farm
name
Comments raised
Response
1.4.3
Mr Kevin and Mrs Sandra
Casey
Owner: Goede Hoop No. 76
Rem.
The best alternative for the new N3 highway would be Section 1 linking up
with the existing N3 and would NOT have a detrimental impact on Harrismith.
Irrespective of the route selected, the existing N3 will
remain and hence access to and from Harrismith will
not be affected.
1.4.4
Mr Jacques van Niekerk
Owner: Schreiners Claim
As above
As above
1.4.5
Mr Vernon Botha
Owner: Buckland Downs No.
1803 Rem of Ptn 1
Mrs Margaret Hobbs
Owner: Meijer’s Geluk No.
531 Ptn 3 and Schaapdrift No.
915
Mr Vernon Botha
Owner: Buckland Downs No.
1803 Rem of Ptn 1
I propose that we keep our existing route, past Harrismith, and just expand it
to two lanes with the trucks using the outer-side and the cars in the middle.
Comment noted
How feasible is it to maintain the old route over Van Reenen’s Pass? (existing
N3)
N3TC has a contractual obligation to maintain the
existing N3 after any alternative route is built.
The reasons for wanting to construct an alternative route to the existing N3
route are not fully understood.
The DBPBC offers a distance saving of approximately
14km that relates to substantial cost savings to the
broader economy.
In addition, the existing Van
Reenen’s does not comply with highway geometric
standards as required by SANRAL.
1.4.6
1.4.7
Harrismith’s economy is largely dependent on the passing traffic. The
construction of any of the alternatives could detrimentally impact on the
town’s economy resulting from a major decline in traffic volumes.
The economic benefits and disadvantages of constructing the proposed
alternatives on the town of Harrismith need to fully understood and evaluated
before a decision is made.
The EIA study will have to investigate the abovementioned variables provided by N3TC and
understand the implications of the savings to the
national economy within the context of the potential
impacts on the local economy of Harrismith.
Refer to chapter 11 of the DEIR for the economic
assessments relating to the project.
Also see discussions:
2. Transport Economics
1.4.8
Dr Pieter van Eeden
Go EnviroScience
Representative
of
Mrs
Francesca Fondse, (farm
names listed under owner)
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
7
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
Name / organisation / farm
name
1.4.9
Interested and Affected Party
1.4.10
Mr Jacques van Niekerk
Owner: Schreiners Claim
1.4.11
1.4.12
Comments raised
Response
Mr Alan Tedder
Interested and Affected Party
See discussions under 1.4.7 - 10
See response under 1.4.7 - 10
Mr Francesca Fondse
Owner: Nolans Volans Ptn 2
and Ptn 6 on 2384, Paulina
Ptn 1 of 1516 and Scotston
Ptn 20 of 4128
The alternative route (provided this is the De Beers Base Case Route) should
not have such a major impact on the Town of Harrismith. It is believed that
there will be a “natural economic and social” selection made by road users.
People will still use the existing N3 to travel to access the Drakensberg which
is a high tourist area. It is understood that increased traffic volumes could
potentially also have a negative impact on the town as well as the Pass.
This comment is noted and is in contradiction with the
issue raised by Mrs Fondse’s representative.
Please also see comments under:
1. Integrated Environmental Management Process
2. Economic issues
1.5. Environmental Investigations (Environmental impacts influencing routes; specialist investigation protocol)
1.5.1
Mrs Margaret Hobbs
Is it really the environmental issues that are pushing for a change in the Yes.
Please also see comments under:
Owner:
route?
1. Integrated Environmental Management Process
Meijer’s Geluk No. 531 Ptn 3
and Schaapdrift No. 915
1.5.2
Mr Kobus Grabe
All specialists must adhere to farm entry protocol.
All the specialists working on the RLI study have been
Owner: Vrede No. 1937 and
issued with the safety and security protocols. They
Bankspruit No. 790 ptn 1 and
have also been provided with the landowner details to
Rem.
arrange for visits.
1.6. EIA Authorisation process (Original ROD; process; alternative route studies)
1.6.1
Mr Graham Hobbs
When was the ROD issued?
26 March 1999.
Owner: Meijer’s Geluk No.
531 Ptn 3 and Schaapdrift No.
915
Various requests were made for the copies of the ROD.
Messrs Hobbs, Galloway and van Eeden have been
provided with copies as requested.
1.6.2
Mr George Galloway
Representative: Tygerskloof
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
8
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
Name / organisation / farm
name
Comments raised
Response
1.6.3
Mrs Margaret Hobbs
Owner: Meijer’s Geluk No.
531 Ptn 3 and Schaapdrift No.
915
How was the ROD approved by DEAT if the EIA was only requested in 1999?
The EIA was a requirement of the Regulations that
were promulgated in September 1997. Under the
Environmental Conservation Act no 17 of 1989. The
N3TC was awarded the Concession Contract for the
N3 between Heidelberg and Cedara. The Contract
requirements included construction of new carriageways. The EIA level Scoping Report was submitted to
DEAT in early 1999 and the ROD was issued in March
1999.
1.6.4
Mr George Galloway
Representative”: Tygerskloof
Does the ROD refer to these alternative routes that are now being
investigated?
No. The ROD refers to “An analysis of the current
alignment of the De Beers Pass / Warden route versus
alternative routing to avoid wetlands must be done”.
This is the initiative in progress.
If there are wetlands in the area of the De Beers Pass, then why was it
authorised?
The ROD was issued with conditions. The ROD refers
to “An analysis of the current alignment of the De
Beers Pass / Warden route versus alternative routing
to avoid wetlands must be done”.
Why does it take the authorities such a long time to determine that the
DBPBC is not the best option?
Alternative route investigation commenced some time
ago but feasible alternatives have only recently been
identified and further information gathering is in
progress. The results of the current initiative will
indicate the best option.
1.6.5
1.6.6
Mr Graham Hobbs
Owner: Meijer’s Geluk No.
531 Ptn 3 and Schaapdrift No.
915
Mr Graham Hobbs
Owner:
Meijer’s Geluk No. 531 Ptn 3
and Schaapdrift No. 915
Mr Martin Campher
Owner: Keeversfontein Ptn 7
(and 12)
1.7 Future EIA process
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
9
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
1.7.1
1.7.2
Name / organisation / farm
name
Comments raised
Response
Dr Pieter van Eeden
Go EnviroScience
Representative
of
Francesca Fondse,
listed under Owner)
My client refuses any building to take place on her property, so that is the end
of the purple route. Furthermore, My client will not be allowing access onto
her property by anyone involved with this process.
My client’s EIA started ages ago; we are already starting with our second
round of public meetings.
The SANRAL Act provides for access to private
property for projects of national interest.
Mr Henderson asked N3TC to please be clear about the cost analysis
associated with N3TC’s decision of the most appropriate routes to be taken
further into an EIA.
This issue was dealt with during the EIA process. Refer
to chapter 11 of the DEIR
for the economic
assessments relating to the project. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
Please also see discussion under:
2. Economic issues
The headwaters for the Braamhoek river on his property. A new servitude for
an additional Braamhoek Access road through his property has also recently
been expropriated. He feels that should N3TC decide to construct the N3 on
his property, he would not have any viable land for farming purposes left, and
that N3TC should rather purchase his whole property from him, should they
decide to go this route.
In terms of the concession contract, SANRAL will
acquire land in accordance with the SANRAL and
National Roads Act 7 of 1998.
Mrs
(farms
Mr Roland Henderson
Owner: Strathorn Ptn 2 and 3
(of 1)
1.8. Expropriation
1.8.1
Mr Roland Henderson & Mrs
Henderson
Owner: Strathorn Ptn 2 and 3
(of 1)
1.8.2
Mr Graham Hobbs
Owner:
Meijer’s Geluk No. 531 Ptn 3
and Schaapdrift No. 915
We have numerous concerns regarding the expropriation process. The
following issues need addressing:
Why was the decision made to expropriate and who would have given
SANRAL the authority to expropriate land from landowners in 1997 already?
The alternative route does not affect new property but in fact property that we
owned prior to the expropriation that is immediately adjacent to the
expropriated land, onto which we relocated. The expropriation notice was
received in 1998.
How legal was the original expropriation?
How will the expropriation be conducted this time?
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
10
See also discussion under
2. Economic issues
5. Natural Environment
7. Farming related issues.
1. Subsequent to the N3TC RLI formal
correspondence has been entered into between Mr
& Mrs Hobbs’ and SANRAL’s legal representatives..
2. Certain historical matters as they relate to the
expropriation of properties along the current De
Beers Pass route are being investigated.
Please also see discussion below (1.8.3):
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
Name / organisation / farm
name
Comments raised
Response
Dr Pieter van Eeden
Go EnviroScience
Representative
of
Mrs
Francesca Fondse, (Farms
listed under Owner)
I personally think that it is unfair for SANRAL to have expropriated property in
1998 and then expect landowners to purchase the property back at market
value, why not sell it back at the same price?
What is the current SANRAL Policy
SANRALS’ policy at the moment consists of three
options:
1.8.4
Dr Pieter van Eeden
Go EnviroScience
Representative
of
Mrs
Francesca Fondse, Owner:
(properties
listed
under
Owner)
Why the inconsistency of buying whole properties versus just servitudes.
1.8.5
Mrs Margaret Hobbs
Owner:
Meijer’s Geluk No. 531 Ptn 3
and Schaapdrift No. 915
The black alternative route (Section 2B) goes through an additional property
of mine. I feel that I should be able to say ‘No’ to it passing through my
property again; as I have already been expropriated on the DBPBC and have
already had to move.
In some cases it was the landowner’s decision,
however on others it could be the case where the cost
of providing cross-access exceeded the purchase cost
of the land. However, there were certain cases where
the landowner requested that if expropriation occurred,
they would prefer the entire farm to be expropriated,
rather than just the servitude.
Comment Noted.
1.8.3
1.8.6
Mr Flip de Jager (Jr)
Owner: Wagenbeentjies Rem
Ptn 4
It is unacceptable that landowners will have to purchase their land back from
SANRAL at market related prices because of poor planning. We reluctantly
went through the process the first time and came to accept the route, now we
are being told that this may have been for nothing. This is unacceptable,
particularly that some of us are now going to be affected by the proposed
alternatives. The N3TC should decide what it wants to do.
1.8.7
Mr Edward Oates
It makes no sense to me to purchase my land back from SANRAL at market
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
11
1. Certain Land (yellow portions) will be transferred to
the Department of Land Affairs for land Restitution;
2. If there is direct public access to the property, then
the property would be put out for tender; or
3. If there is no direct public access the property would
be offered back to the original landowner at market
related prices.
In terms of the concession contract, SANRAL will
acquire land in accordance with the SANRAL and
National Roads Act 7 of 1998.
Please also see discussion under
3. ‘Well-being.
Comment noted. SANRAL will have to consider its
policy in this regard and revert to the directly affected
landowners.
Comment noted.
SANRAL will have to consider its
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
Name / organisation / farm
name
Comments raised
Response
Owner: Trafalgar No. 839 and
Nelson’s Kop No. 250
value, after SANRAL purchased it from me at market value 10 years ago. The
market has changed substantially and there is a strong possibility that I may
be paying more for my property. This does not seem equitable.
policy in this regard and revert to the directly affected
landowners.
Dr Pieter van Eeden
Go EnviroScience
Representative
of
Mrs
Francesca Fondse (farms
listed under Owner)
Mr Rob Clarke and Ms
Heather Stevens
Co-owners: Alexpan Ptn 1
Will SANRAL consider forced expropriation?
SANRAL will acquire land in accordance with the
SANRAL and National Roads Act 7 of 1998.
Irregularities have occurred with previous landowners not informing new
landowners of proposed road servitude.
This is a matter between the buyer and seller.
1.8.9
Mr John Spiller:
Representative Total SA
Somersvlakte
Land straddles the De Beers Pass Route.
The status of SANRAL ownership to be confirmed
1.8.10
Mr Tony Christopher
Owner: Cotswold No 10382
Rem
Land was expropriated sometime ago by SANRAL and for that reason it
appears that the name of the Cotswold Farm Trust does not appear on your
list as an affected land owner.
Comment noted: status of SANRAL ownership to be
confirmed.
1.8.11
Mr AlisterCampbell
Owner: Uithoek 460 Rem.
While the road may not cross my land directly, it will nonetheless have a
material impact on my property value and the intrinsic value that it holds now
as a weekend getaway destination. Therefore, in the event that the proposed
road goes down either of these two routes, then I will seek reimbursement
from SANRAL for the loss in value in my property. This could be achieved in a
number of different ways:
SANRALS’ policy at the moment consists of three
options:
1.8.8
1.8.9
1.
2.
3.
SANRAL purchases my property, or
I am paid compensation for the difference between the current
market value and the revised selling price of the property post
completion of the road, or
My farm becomes a part of the solution given that its original
purpose will now be redundant. This would involve converting the
farm from being a holiday destination, to a commercial concern that
is part of the N3TC.
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
12
4. Certain Land (yellow portions) will be transferred to
the Department of Land Affairs for land Restitution;
5. If there is direct public access to the property, then
the property would be put out for tender; or
6. If there is no direct public access the property would
be offered back to the original landowner at market
related prices.
Mr Campbell’s correspondence has been received by
the N3TC and will be passed on to SANRAL.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
Name / organisation / farm
name
Comments raised
Response
I am happy to discuss each of these alternatives with whomever is handling
this process, but what I am not going to be prepared to live with, is a situation
where either Section 2A or 2C gets built and there is no compensation
forthcoming to me to take into consideration the loss in value in my property.
1.9. Other Legal frameworks and Processes (Legality of expropriation, Land redistribution, land swop & purchase of SANRAL property)
1.9.1
Mr Martin Campher
Mr Campher would be contacting the Department of Land affairs in order to Comment Noted.
Owner: Keeversfontein Ptn 7 negotiate a land swap between the land restitution tenants and his farm,
(and 12)
Bushbuckdowns (DBPBC). He believes that he would be able to get more
use out of his property should he swap a portion of it with the labour tenants.
1.9.2
Mr De Jager
Owner: Wagenbeetjies Rem
Ptn. 4
Interested in purchasing two SANRAL properties (Maritz Drift No. 1169 Ptn 7
and Welkom No. 1310 Ptn 3) which they are currently renting.
SANRALS’ policy on the disposal of land consists of
three options:
1. Certain Land (yellow portions) will be transferred to
the Department of Land Affairs for land Restitution;
2. If there is direct public access to the property, then
the property would be put out for tender; or
1.9.3
Mr Danie Cilliers
Owner: Keeversfontein No.
1268 Rem Ptn 4 and Ptn 14
(of 4)
Should Section 1 be chosen as the most environmentally acceptable route,
Mr Cilliers wishes to make a land swap with SANRAL for land that was
previously expropriated for DBPBC.
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
13
3. If there is no direct public access the property would
be offered back to the original landowner at market
related prices.
This matter will be dealt with by SANRAL in
accordance with their land acquisition policy.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
1.9.4
Name / organisation / farm
name
Mr Graham and Mrs Margaret
Hobbs
Owner: Meijer’s Geluk No.
531 Ptn 3 and Schaapdrift No.
915
Comments raised
Response
It is perceived by stakeholders that SANRAL prematurely, and in some cases
illegally, expropriated land from affected landowners along the DBPR. This
due to the fact that expropriation commenced before the finalisation and
submission of the EIAR. It is believed that expropriation commenced during
1997 whereas the EIAR was only authorised with clauses for mitigation in
1998
1. Subsequent to the N3TC RLI, formal
correspondence has been entered into between Mr
& Mrs Hobbs’ and SANRAL’s legal representatives..
Mr George Galloway
Representative: Tygerskloof
Mr Edward Oates
Owner: Trafalgar No. 839 and
Nelson’s Kop No. 250
1.9.5
Mr Graham and Mrs Margaret
Hobbs
Owner: Meijer’s Geluk No.
531 Ptn 3 and Schaapdrift No.
915
Mr George Galloway
Representative: Tygerskloof
Mr Edward Oates
Owner: Trafalgar No. 839 and
Nelson’s Kop No. 250
There are additional complications and confusion in terms of the necessity of
the EIAR on the DBPR in 1998 when the newly updated environmental
regulations only became available in late September 1997. This again relates
back to the illegality of the expropriation that took place back in 1997.
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
14
2. Certain historical matters as they relate to the
expropriation of properties along the current De
Beers Pass route are being investigated.
.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
Name / organisation / farm
name
1.10. Public Involvement Programme
1.10.1
Dr Pieter van Eeden
Go EnviroScience
Representative
of
Mrs
Francesca
Fondse,
(properties
listed
under
Owner)
Comments raised
Response
It must be noted that we (my client and I) were never informed about N3TC
and their plans for a new route.
This issue raised is incorrect and is covered
adequately in correspondence between N3TC and Go
Enviroscience.
It must be noted that I have a better relationship with Petronet than I do with
N3TC.
The comment regarding the working relationship with
Petronet is noted.
In addition, as part of the strategy to inform the directly
affected landowners through the Farmers’ Associations
in the area. Mrs Fondse was informed by Mr C
Campher of the process and arrangements to provide
her with an information pamphlet.
1.10.2
1.10.3
1.10.4
Dr Pieter van Eeden
Go EnviroScience
Representative of Mrs
Francesca Fondse,
(properties listed under
Owner)
Mr George Galloway
Representative: Tygerskloof
The N3TC has already started this process two years ago as they have dug
test holes on my clients’ farm already.
The feasibility study is a lengthy process and we are
now at the stage where it is appropriate to engage with
directly affected land owners.
Which municipalities have been consulted or notified about the project?
Mr Roland Henderson
Owner: Strathmorn Ptn. 2 and
3 (of 1).
How long will this feasibility phase take before a decision is made?
Consultation has taken place with all the affected
Municipalities along the proposed routes.
These
municipalities include:
Maluti a Phofung Local
Municipality,
Okhahlamba
Local
Municipality,
Phumelela, Uthukela District Municipality and Uthukela
District Municipality.
Correspondence from these
meetings is available.
N3TC is endeavouring to comply with a program to
report to their Board in February 2009 after which a
recommendation will be presented to SANRAL.
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
15
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
1.10.5
Name / organisation / farm
name
Mr Roland Henderson
Owner: Strathmorn Ptn. 2 and
3 (of 1).
Comments raised
Response
The public should be able to see the initiative report by November 2008?
The findings and responses from the report will be
made public when available.
It would be good for us to see the costing. Just the broad costs.
We will be able to present the broader costing; there
will obviously be some confidential issues that cannot
be placed in the public domain.
1.10.6
1.10.7
Mrs Margaret & Mr Graham
Hobbs
Owner: Meijer’s Geluk No.
531 Ptn 3 and Schaapdrift No.
915
Why is this process necessary? We have been through this all before, and we
have already all been expropriated.
Mr Desmond and Mrs June
Schwulst
Owner: Hopedale 1223 Rem.
We welcome the invitation to participate in the route determination of the 3/8
National Route.
If SANRAL and the N3TC have known about these routes for the past 10
years, why has it taken so long to become public?
1.11. Environmental Management Plan (availability; management control; fire management)
1.11.1
Mr George Galloway
The EMP, is it available for public review?
Mr Margaret Hobbs
Mr Mrs Sandra Casey
Landowners previously affected by construction processes request provision
Mr Johannes Boshoff
for construction control management in the EMP.
Mr Stephen Boshoff
Mr Peter Nelson
Include burning of firebreaks in the Environmental Management Plan.
Mr Mrs June Schwulst
Mr Roland Henderson
Mr Johan Du Plessis
Mr Gert Campher
Mr Kobus Grabe
1.12. Relocation
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
16
The ROD refers to “An analysis of the current
alignment of the De Beers Pass / Warden route versus
alternative routing to avoid wetlands must be done”.
This is the initiative in progress.
N3TC commenced with its study timeously to ensure
compliance with their contractual obligations.
Comment Noted.
Yes, upon request it will be made available. I&APs
were asked to indicate in the attendance register if they
wished to receive a copy of the ROD and/or the EMP.
The existing EMP will be updated to incorporate the
new issues relating to the construction period and
operations of the road.
Please also see discussion under
3. Well-being
7. Farming related issues
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
1.12.1
Name / organisation / farm
name
Mr Graham and Mrs Margaret
Hobbs
Owner: Meijer’s Geluk No.
531 Ptn 3 and Schaapdrift No.
915
Comments raised
Response
Historically, some stakeholders have had a negative experience in terms of
the expropriation process. Aggravated stakeholders believe that they should
not participate in the identification of possible new routes for the N3 due to the
fact that their property has already been expropriated back in 1998, thus
resulting in some voluntarily relocation of homesteads. The fear of
stakeholders originates from the possibility of them being negatively affected
again from the identification of new alternative routes to the original DBPBC.
Comment Noted.
It is desirable that all parties
participate to achieve and amicable solution.
Please also see discussions under:
1. Integrated Environmental Management Process
Mr George Galloway
Representative: Tygerskloof
Mr Edward Oates
Owner: Trafalgar No. 839 and
Nelson’s Kop No. 250
1.13. Other: (Farmers being unfairly disadvantaged; preferred routes)
1.13.1
Mr Albert (Boy) Venter
No one accepts responsibility for the burdens that the farmers have to carry
Owner: Plessisrust No. 1608 with all the developments that take place in the country that benefit others. .
and Gegund No. 532
We refuse to accept this process any longer unless we are recognised and
we are assured by the President that farmers will not continue to be
disadvantaged.
1.13.2
Dr Pieter van Eeden
Go EnviroScience
Representative
of
Mrs
Francesca Fondse, Owner:
(properties
listed
under
Owner)
2. ECONOMIC ISSUES
2.1 Transport Economics
2.1.1
Dr Pieter van Eeden
Comment noted
It was stated by N3TC that the computer program that they have used to
determine alternative route layouts uses information that a team has decided
upon beforehand. However, it is obvious that such a program can be
manipulated by the team that provides the input information to such an extent
that the outcome benefits them (being N3TC). However, a different set of
input information will generate different alternative locations. We therefore
request that the list of variables that was inputted into the program be
available and that we, as I&APs, can add or delete variables as we deem
necessary. Then let us see what alternative locations the program will
produce.
The allegation that the selection of routes was
manipulated is incorrect.
What are the economic reasons for building the alternatives when there is
The route selection relates to total transport economics
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
17
The variables used are the standard SANRAL design
criteria for Highways as well as expert environmental
input.
I&APs are at liberty to carry out independent studies at
their cost to prove the allegations.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
Name / organisation / farm
name
Go EnviroScience
Representative
of
Mrs
Francesca Fondse, Owner:
(farms have been listed under
owner)
Comments raised
Response
going to be such a massive impact on the Harrismith economy?
and national economics. The N3TC is obliged to find
an alternative that compares favourably with the
economics of the DBPBC.
What is the rand-value saving of the purple route? Please indicate how the
answer was calculated.
2.2 Compensation issues (resulting from expropriation)
2.2.1
Mr Graham and Mrs Margaret There are complications in terms of how compensation is negotiated on the
Hobbs
servitudes. If care is not taken with the financial package, this could result in
Owner: Meijer’s Geluk No. longer term losses in production and knock-on effects on the local and
531 Ptn 3 and Schaapdrift No. regional economy: In some instances, compensation for the entire property is
915
seen as a more lucrative option for farmers than to continue with farming
practices. The full economic impact of the servitude should be better
understood when negotiating compensation.
Mr George Galloway
Representative: Tygerskloof
The existing Van Reenen’s route and alternative
“purple” route are similar in length. The benefits of the
purple route relate to a higher operating speed and
flatter gradients that will result in shorter travel time
and reduced operating costs. The purple route has not
been considered in isolation as it forms part of the total
route. For example, the cost savings on the total route
for Class 4 heavy vehicles is approximately R185
million per annum based purely on distance saving.
SANRAL will acquire land in accordance with the
SANRAL and National Roads Act 7 of 1998. This is
done on the basis of “willing buyer, willing seller or if
agreement cannot be reached, the minister has the
right to expropriate.
Mr Edward Oates
Owner: Trafalgar No. 839 and
Nelson’s Kop No. 250
2.3. Adverse impacts on national, regional & local economy
2.3.1
Mr Roland Henderson & Mrs The headwaters for the Braamhoek river on his property. The Braamhoek
Henderson
river supplies water to the Eskom Pumped Storage Scheme on the Farm
Owner: Strathmorn Ptn 2 and Braamhoek. It is important that the quality of water is maintained. Any
3 (of 1)
impediments that could detrimentally impact on the quantity and quality of
water could impact on the functioning of the scheme and therefore on the
national economy.
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
18
Comment Noted.
This issue is regulated by DWAF and DEAT legislation
to which N3TC must comply.
See also discussion under:
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
2.3.2
2.3.3
Name / organisation / farm
name
Mr Stephan Boshoff
(on behalf of Mrs Fondse)
Owner: Geluk 969 Ptn 3
Comments raised
Response
There is a growing concern from many stakeholders that an increase in the
level of prostitution would result in the increase of the spread of HIV and other
diseases. This would no doubt affect the local economic levels due to the
intermittent loss of farm labourers within the surrounding areas.
5. Natural environment
Comment Noted.
These issues were taken into account in the specialist
studies which are part of the impact assessment phase
of the EIA.
Mr Desmond and Mrs June
Schwulst
Owner: Hopedale 1223 Rem.
See discussion above under 2.3.2
Refer to section 9, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR Volume 2 for an assessment on Social Impacts.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.4 and 5 of
the DEIR.
Please also see discussions under
3. Well-being.
See discussion above in response under 2.3.2
Mr Roland Henderson
Owner: Strathmorn Ptn. 2 and
3 (of 1)
See discussion above under 2.3.2
See discussion above in response under 2.3.2
Mr Theunis Filmater
Owner: Rooilaagte No. 1094
and Draaipan No. 1093
Landowners having to utilise alternative routes into town to deliver their
produce, would have significant financial consequences, not only on the
landowners themselves, however on the local economy as a whole. This
results from the fact that landowners would not have any other choice but to
escalate their produce prices in order to accommodate such changes.
Please bear in mind that the access the landowners
utilize at present onto national, provincial and district
routes will remain in place. Only access to the new
national road will be restricted to the indicated
interchanges.
Interchanges are planned at Keeversfontein, Van
Reenen village, Lincoln and Warden.
Any issues relating to access was confirmed during
the EIA process. Refer to section 9,(Sub-section 1) in
chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an assessment
on Social Impacts, specifically Access. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
19
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
2.3.4
2.3.5
2.3.6
2.3.7
2.3.8
Name / organisation / farm
name
Comments raised
Response
Mr Kobus Grabe
Owner: Vrede No. 1937 and
Bankspruit No. 790 1 and
Rem
Mr Albert (Boy) Venter
Owner: Plessisrust No. 1608
and Gegund No. 532
Mr Johannes Boshoff
Owner: Holkrantz No. 966
Rem, Halwepan No. 1450 and
Barber’s Pan No. 513
Landowners perceive that sheep farming within the surrounding areas would
decrease due to the introduction of the N3 highway. This perceived decrease
results from the financial loss for landowners around the ease of stealing such
livestock.
This matter was investigated during the EIA phase.
Refer to section 10, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for an assessment on Agriculture. Also refer to
the Summary of Key Issues No.12 of the DEIR.
Mr Stephen Boshoff
Owner: Geluk 969 Ptn 3 (No
Ref No.)
Landowners and the local economy will suffer due to loss of livestock through
the negligence of N3TC and the repairing of fences.
Mr Dirk Bouckaert
Owner: Das Krantz
Mr van Jacques van Niekerk
Owner: Schreiners Claim
Mr John Spiller:
Representative Total SA
This matter is to be raised with SANRAL during the
land acquisition process.
Please also see discussion under
7. Farming related issues.
2. Economic Issues
A highway alternative to the existing N3 would distract traffic from towns such
as Harrismith and Van Reenen. This would have a detrimental affect on local
businesses in these towns, as they have been relying on their tourism
potential.
Landowners may have to change their farming dynamics in order to
counteract the effect of the highway traversing their property. E.g. in some
cases the highway occupies most of the farms grazing land, thus adding a
financial constraint to farmers.
Total acquired this land at risk to establish a direct access service station on
the De Beers Pass Route. Relocating the route would render this business
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
20
N3TC has an obligation to maintain road reserve
fences.
For example, to improve its service to
adjoining land owners, the recent route services
contract awarded provides for temporary emergency
repairs to fences with permanent repairs being
undertaken by our maintenance teams.
Please also see discussion under
7. Farming related issues.
2. Economic Issues
Comment Noted. This issue should be raised during
the EIA Phase.
Please also see discussion under:
2. Economic Issues
Comment Noted. This issue should be raised during
the EIA Phase.
Please also see discussion under
7.3 Farming related issues.
It was agreed during the one on one discussion that
this was a business risk acknowledged by Total.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
Name / organisation / farm
name
Comments raised
Response
Somersvlakte
opportunity/development useless.
2.4. Positive impacts on national, provincial and local economy
2.4.1
Dr Pieter van Eeden
My client will put more capital into van Reenen than the amount of money that
Go EnviroScience
will be saved with building a shorter route.
Representative
of
Mrs
Francesca Fondse, Owner: It is requested that an assessment be undertaken to describe the short(farms listed under Owner)
medium- and long-term benefits and disadvantages of the new N3 for local
economies.
Comment Noted. All issues relevant to the N3 should
be raised in the EIA.
Please also see discussions under
2. Economic Issues
Mrs Fondse is proposing substantial development that will be impacted on by
particularly Section 1A. These are briefly listed below.
1117ha in extent comprising the following farms (percentage indicates extent
of each farm earmarked for development. Paulina (90%), Geluk (80%);
Nolans Volans 2 (30%), Scotston (0%) and Nolans Volans 6 (0%).Proposed
activities comprise agricultural developments including pecan nut production
unit, llama breeding and production, horticultural production unit for growth of
oil-rich herbs for pharmaceutical-grade oils. Conservation of wetlands for
endangered and Red Data listed birds.
2.4.1
Dr Pieter van Eeden
Go EnviroScience
Representative
of
Mrs
Francesca Fondse, Owner:
(farms listed under Owner)
Additional percentages Paulina (10%), Geluk (15%); Nolans Volans 2 (30%),
Scotston (20%) and Nolans Volans 6 (35%) have been earmarked for
accommodation (management, staff, accredited trainers and for leasing to
local and international investors).
Discussion continued from previous section:
There will also be an international school complex (science and classical arts
based in Dutch curriculum) and associated staff quarters. All training will be
accredited. One of the objectives is to provide integrated training to the
landowners who are recipients of redistributed land.
According to Mrs Fondse the government has set these farmers up for failure.
This development hub, provide much needed agricultural skills to candidates
that will come from all over the country and not just in KZN. This
development has been presented to the Ladysmith & District Municipality and
is supported also by the current MEC.
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
21
Comment Noted. All issues relevant to the N3 should
be raised in the EIA.
Please also see discussions under
2. Economic Issues
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
Name / organisation / farm
name
Comments raised
Response
An office park that comprises an oil press, distiller, classrooms, packing and
storage warehouse, offices etc is also planned. An international spiritual
retreat and wellness clinic and associated accommodation is envisaged
Currently Mrs Fondse is engaged in discussions with a top international hotel
group and should this development transpire an annual turnover of more than
R1bn is predicted. This low density development will be the first of its kind in
the world. The various developments aim to be self-sufficient with sustainable
energy generation.
Should you require further information, please visit the following website:
www.goenviro.biz
2.4.2
Mr Roland Henderson
Owner: Strathmorn Ptn 2 and
3 (of 1)
The Braamhoek pump storage project is seen to have a positive effect on the
local economy due to its proposed conservation area, which provides many
landowners with tourism opportunities.
2.5. Competition for labour during construction
2.5.1
Mr van Jacques van Niekerk
Previous experience with the construction of the Braamhoek pump storage
Mr Desmond and Mrs June access roads have left landowners apprehensive as to the potential loss of
Schwulst
their labourers. The landowners concerns arise from the inability to compete
Mr Johan Du Plessis
with certain construction companies’ high salaries, which attract many of the
Mr Edward Oates
landowner’s best labourers. Current labourer salaries on dairy farms are R1
Mr van Jacques van Niekerk
800 per month, whereas the sheep farming average salaries range between
Mr Desmond and Mrs June R1 300 and R1 800 per month.
Schwulst
It is believed that labour should be sourced from Harrismith and the
Mr Johan Du Plessis
surrounding areas, rather than from affected landowners.
Mr Edward Oates
2.6. Toll fees (avoidance of tolls; concession cards)
2.6.1
Mr Edward Oates
Is there any way of toll avoidance onto the R103?
Owner: Trafalgar No. 839 and
Nelson’s Kop No. 250
Do we get another concession card if an additional toll plaza is constructed?
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
22
Comment noted.
Please also see discussion under
2. Economic Issues.
Comment Noted. This issue should be raised during
the EIA Phase.
This depends on the Toll strategy to be implemented.
Interchange ramp plazas could be considered to
control toll avoidance
Concession card applications will be adjudicated on
merit.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
2.6.2
Name / organisation / farm
name
Comments raised
Response
Mrs Trudy Oates
Owner: Trafalgar No. 839 and
Nelson’s Kop No. 250
2.7. Affects on future planned tourism
2.7.1
Mr Peter Nelson (Eskom)
Many of the properties along the proposed Section 1 route (purple), have the
potential to be transformed into game farms due to their low veld grasslands.
Comment noted.
Also see discussion under
5. Natural environment
2.7.2
Mr Peter Nelson (Eskom)
It is felt that the Braamhoek Pump storage project is providing tourism
potential within the De Beers Pass area due to the introduction of a
conservation area.
Comment noted.
Also see discussion under:
2. Economic Issues
2.7.3
Mr Dirk Bouckaert
Owner: Das Krantz
Mr Dirk Bouckaert together with Ms MCM Botha propose to develop 10
holiday houses situated between Das Krantz Ptn 1 and 6 (Section 2A and
2B). They plan to market these holiday houses based on the immaculate
views, peace and tranquility of the setting, however having a highway traverse
their property would dramatically distract the aesthetic value of such a
development. It should be noted that the EIA for this development is close to
completion.
Commented noted.
These issues should be raised during the EIA Phase
Ms MCM Botha
Owner: Das Krantz 6
2.7.4
Mr Hendrick Eksteen
Owner: Karfontein DasKrantz
Mr Hendrik Eksteen plans to develop around his dam; however a highway
traversing their property would diminish such plans.
Comment noted.
These issues should be raised during the EIA Phase
2.7.5
Mr PA Jacobs
Owner: Keeversfontein Ptn 13
and Wagenbeetjieskop Ptn 23
and 24
Authorisation has been given to Mr PA Jacobs for the construction of a hotel
and shopping complex south of the existing N3 highway on his property,
Keeversfontein Ptn 13.
Comment Noted
These issues should be raised during the EIA Phase
2.7.6
Mr John Spiller:
Representative Total SA
Somersvlakte
A direct access service station has been planned on the De Beers Pass
Route alignment. This was planned to provide an additional stop for tourists
not travelling on the N3.
It was agreed during the one on one discussion that
this was a business risk acknowledged by Total. Any
alternative route does not preclude such direct access
to service station (DASC) initiatives at risk.
2.7.8
Mrs
Francesca
Fondse,
Owner: Nolans Volans Ptn 2
The KZN province is looking at a strategy that intends to improve van Reenen
as the Gateway between KZN and the Free State.
Comments Noted. All issues relevant to the N3 should
be raised in the EIA.
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
23
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
Name / organisation / farm
name
and Ptn 6 on 2384, Paulina
Ptn 1 of 1516 and Scotston
Ptn 20 of 4128
Comments raised
Response
This strategy will also look at much needed improvement of local historical
sites; such as the Little Church in Van Reenen. Mrs Fondse is prepared to
sponsor a fly-over (over the N3) to allow safe access for cars and pedestrians
to the little church, this will also create unity between the two “sides” of Van
Reenen which have been separated by the road.
There are natural, cultural and historical sites situated on the various
properties; Scotston (national heritage site), Nolans Volans (Monument
bridge) and the “Biele” to Lionshead. These sites have been identified and
registered. In keeping with the above, these sites are incredibly important as
they will form part of a wider (integrated) historical tourism strategy that is
being planned for the area. Market research has been conducted by Mrs
Fondse in conjunction with the National Geographic and there are numerous
untapped tourist destinations that could be accessed by the de Beers
alternative and the existing N3. The tourism strategy is aimed at creating new
potential (in what could be described as the ‘backwaters’ of the area;
protecting that which is there and revealing that which has not yet been
explored (e.g. the Lost Valley, Bushman Paintings).
2.7.9
Mr Albert (Boy) Venter
Owner: Plessisrust No. 1608
and Gegund No. 532)
Many properties in the surrounding areas have historical graves, dams or
monuments on them.
There is legislation dealing with these issues to which
any EIA studies as well as the N3TC is required to
comply.
Please also see discussion under:
6. Archaeological, Historical and Cultural issues
There is legislation dealing with these issues to which
any EIA studies as well as the N3TC is required to
comply.
Please also see discussion under:
6. Archaeological, Historical and Cultural issues
Mr Hendrick Eksteen
Owner: Karfontein Daskrantz
Dr Pieter van Eeden
Go EnviroScience
Representative of Mrs
Francesca Fondse,
2.8. Impacts on existing tourism
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
24
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
Name / organisation / farm
name
2.8.1
Comments raised
Response
Mr Peter Nelson (Eskom)
There is an existing birding route in which vultures can be seen along the
DPBCR.
2.8.2
Mr Edward Oates
Owner: Trafalgar No. 839 and
Nelson’s Kop No. 250
Existence of Baboons along the DPBCR
2.8.3
Mr Dirk Bouckaert
Owner: Das Krantz
Loss of tourism opportunities for Van Reenen village as well as Harrismith.
These issues should be raised and addressed during
the EIA phase.
Please also see discussion under
5. Natural Environment.
These issues should be raised and addressed during
the EIA phase.
Please also see discussion under
5. Natural Environment.
Please also see discussion under
2. Economic Issues
2.8.4
Mr Thomas Mapp
Owner: Bultfontein
It is perceived by many landowners that the N3 highway would not provide
any tourism opportunities due to the lack of local off ramps or access off of
the highway.
Additional Interchanges and ramps can be provided at
the cost of the applicant.
Please also see discussion under:
8. Design and Technical issues
2.8.5
Mr Dirk Bouckaert
Owner: Das Krantz
Delays in this project could inhibit tourism development within the greater van
Reenen area, as developers will be reluctant to commit to any major
investments if there is uncertainty in when/where the highway would be built.
Tourism activities in this area include hiking, horse riding, bird watching, polo
as well as mountain bike riding.
Comment Noted. However, the process followed
during EIA is according to legislated procedures. This
includes process and timeframes that cannot be
circumvented.
Also see comments under section:
2. Economic Issues.
3. WELL-BEING
3.1. Unfairness, emotional impact and inconvenience to previously expropriated landowners
3.1.1
Mrs Margaret Hobbs
Landowners who were originally expropriated on the DBPBC now face the
Owner:
potential of being expropriated on one or more of the proposed routes.
Meijer’s Geluk No. 531 Ptn 3
and Schaapdrift No. 915
3.2. Crime and Security
3.2.1
Mr and Mrs Schwulst
Mr Roland Henderson
Mr Willie Boshoff
Mr Edward Oates
Mrs Margaret Hobbs

Concern has been raised around the increase of personal safety and
security due to an increase in construction workers for the N3
Highway. In order to counteract this concern, there has been a
request for the erection of fences around the study area, before
construction of the N3 highway commences.
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
25
This is possible. An outcome of this initiative is to
establish which DBPBC previous land owners are
affected on the other alternative routes
Please also see discussions under
1. Integrated Environmental Management Process
N3TC is obliged to fence the road reserve according to
SANRAL standards. The construction contract will
allow for the erection of fencing to precede any other
construction activity.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.2.4
3.2.5
Name / organisation / farm
name
Comments raised
Response

It is perceived that the theft of wire from fences would also escalate
with the introduction of contractors. This perceived concern relates to
a fencing issue that landowners have concerning N3 and their
efficiency to maintain their fences.
N3TC is obliged to fence the road reserve according to
SANRAL standards. The construction contract will
allow for the erection of fencing to precede any other
construction activity.
Mr Danie Cilliers
Owner: Keeversfontein No.
1268 Rem Ptn 4 and Ptn 17
(of 4)

Mr Desmond and Mrs June
Schwulst
Owner: Hopedale 1223 Rem.
Mr Edward Oates
Owner: Trafalgar No. 839 and
Nelson’s Kop No. 250
The close proximity of the highway to landowners’ homesteads pose security
risks in terms of the ease for criminals to gain access to, and escape swiftly
from the property.
Section 1 is preferred due to associated safety issues.
Comment noted. N3TC has no law enforcement
mandate but will liaise with law enforcement agencies
in an endeavour to mitigate this issue.
Comment noted.
Mr Rob Clarke and Ms
Heather Stevens
Co-owners: Alexpan Ptn 1.
DLA should erect and properly manage the fence on the current SouthEastern boundary of the property.
To address this and other related issues, N3TC
initiated a subsequent meeting with DLA and the
Department of Agriculture, requesting them to address
this issue directly with the farmers associations.
Mr Albert (Boy) Venter
Mr Charles Stanley Mapp
Mr Andrew Green
Mr Gerrit Stein
Mr Danie Cilliers
Mr Rob Clarke
Ms Heather Stevens
Mr Kobus Grabe
Owner: Vrede No. 1937 and
Bankspruit No. 790 1 and
Rem
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
26
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
3.2.6
Name / organisation / farm
name
Mr Kiewiet Ferreira
Harrismith and District
Farmers’ Union Chairperson
3.3. Drug and Alcohol abuse
3.3.1
Mr Stephan Boshoff
(on behalf of Mrs Fondse)
Owner: Geluk 969 Ptn 3
Mr Desmond and Mrs June
Schwulst
Owner: Hopedale 1223 Rem.
Comments raised
Response

Please note that we as a farmers’ association are very concerned and
conscious about security issues, especially when farms are given/sold
to DLA for land restitution. It is believed that SANRAL needs to work
with Farmers Associations in order to clarify this concern.
To address this and other related issues, N3TC
initiated a subsequent meeting with DLA and the
Department of Agriculture, requesting them to address
this issue directly with the farmers associations.

The N3 highway is a National Road – the most important road in South
Africa, however one needs to remember that towns and communities
are also just as important.
With the recent Braamhoek Pump storage access road construction, it has
been seen that there has been an increase in the amount of drugs and
alcohol within the surrounding areas. This aggravates and raises great
concern in a number of landowners within the study area. It is perceived that
this amount of substance abuse is likely to intensify with the increase in
contractors and temporary labourers during the construction of the N3
highway.
Comment Noted. This issue should be raised during
the EIA Phase
Again, due to the recent Braamhoek Pump storage access road construction,
it has been seen that there has been a dramatic increase in the amount of
prostitution within the surrounding areas. This aggravates and raises great
concern in a number of landowners within the study area. It is perceived that
prostitution in the area would intensify with the increase in contractors and
temporary labourers during the construction of the N3 highway.
Comment Noted. This issue should be raised during
the EIA Phase. If deemed necessary, a community
safety initiative managed by N3TC can be considered.
Mr Roland Henderson
Owner: Strathmorn Ptn. 2 and
3 (of 1)
3.4. Prostitution
3.4.1
Mr Stephan Boshoff
(on behalf of Mrs Fondse)
Owner: Geluk 969 Ptn 3
Mr Desmond and Mrs June
Schwulst
Owner: Hopedale 1223 Rem.
Mr Roland Henderson
Owner: Strathmorn Ptn. 2 and
3 (of 1)
As a result of the intermittent increase in prostitution in the area, due to the
increase in labourer, it is a great concern from many stakeholders that there
would also be a dramatic increase in the spread of HIV and other diseases
within the area.
3.5. Construction activities and construction camps (blasting, noise; traffic; erosion control; polluting natural waterways)
3.5.1
Mr Margaret Hobbs
In conjunction to, and abiding with the Environmental Management Plan N3TC is required to comply with Environmental
Mr and Mrs Casey
(EMP), adequate construction control measures need be in place to manage legislation and the OHS Act and all such issues that
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
27
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
Name / organisation / farm
name
Mr Johannes Boshoff
3.5.2
Mr Peter Nelson (Eskom)
Mr and Mrs Schwulst
Mr Roland Henderson
Mr Willie Boshoff
Mr Charles Stanley Mapp
Mr and Mrs Schwulst
Mr Roland Henderson
Mr Willie Boshoff
Mr Charles Stanley Mapp
Comments raised
Response
all aspects of the construction process e.g. blasting, noise control, traffic
control, erosion control etc.
People residing in construction camps may pollute the area, including water
resources, resulting in health problems.
are identified in the EIA will have a mitigating measure
to be complied with by the construction contractors.
N3TC is required to comply with Environmental
legislation and the OHS Act and all such issues that
are identified in the EIA will have a mitigating measure
to be complied with by the construction contractors.
Similarly, during construction processes (away from the construction camp)
where no ablution facilities are provided, construction workers tend to use
nearby rivers, dams and streams.
Also see discussion under
5. Natural Environment.
3.5.3
Mr and Mrs Schwulst
Mr Roland Henderson
Mr Willie Boshoff
Mr Charles Stanley Mapp
Concern about contamination of underground springs, streams and rivers
through spillage of hazardous substances.
This issue is covered by DWAF legislation to which
N3TC is obliged to comply
Also see discussion under:
5 .Natural Environment
3.5.4
Mr Margaret Hobbs
Owner:
Meijer’s Geluk No. 531 Ptn 3
and Schaapdrift No. 915
Mr and Mrs Schwulst
Owner: Hopedale 1223 Rem.
Mr Danie Cilliers
Mr Roland Henderson
Mr Edward Oates
Mr Charles Stanley Mapp
Mr Johan Du Plessis
Mr Jacques van Niekerk
Mr Theunis Filmater
Where would N3TC obtain water from for the construction of the highway?
From approved water sources
Landowners fear the loss of their springs from road compaction processes.
This issue should be raised during the EIA Phase.
Landowners are concerned as to how they would access various parts of their
property, should the highway traverse their land.
Mr Flip De Jager
Owner: Wagenbeetjies Rem
Ptn 4
A request has been made that N3TC construct all access roads for
construction purposes to standard road quality; this includes the necessary
road drainage points.
Access to severed land will be dealt with as part of the
SANRAL land acquisition process However; This
potentially has an economic impact on the daily
management of agricultural practices. These issues
will be discussed in greater detail during the EIA
phase.
Please also see discussion under
2. Economic Issues
N3TC will comply with SANRAL’s engineering
requirements.
3.5.5
3.5.6
3.5.7
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
28
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
3.5.8
Name / organisation / farm
name
Mr Danie Cilliers
Owner: Keeversfontein No.
1268 Rem Ptn 4 and Ptn 17
(of 4)
Comments raised
Response
Please note that during the building of the existing N3, previous contractors
occupied 30 hectares of property during construction. This is unacceptable.
Comment Noted. Site specific requirements will be
agreed between the affected land owner and the
relevant party.
3.6. Noise (traffic; construction; impact on feeding habits of livestock)
3.6.1
Mr Danie Cilliers
Highway noise remains a significant concern for landowners residing within
Mr Roland Henderson
close proximity of the proposed routes. This concern is magnified within
Mr Edward Oates
Section 2A and 2B as a result of wind direction. It is perceived that, within the
Mr Charles Stanley Mapp
above-mentioned areas, there is an easterly wind blowing 10% and a westerly
Mr Johan Du Plessis
wind blowing 90% of the time, thus increasing the noise levels associated with
Mr Jacques van Niekerk
the highway.
Mr Theunis Filmater
Mr Flip De Jager
Ms MCM Botha
3.6.2
3.6.3
3.6.4
Mr AlisterCampbell
Mr Jacques van Niekerk
Owner: Schreiners Claim
Mr Mrs June Shwulst
Mr Johan Du Plessis
Mr Roland Henderson
Mr Jacques van Niekerk
Mr Willie Boshoff
Mr Edward Oates
Mr Theunis Filmater
Mr Mrs June Shwulst
Mr Johan Du Plessis
Mr Roland Henderson
Mr Jacques van Niekerk
Mr Willie Boshoff
Mr Edward Oates
Mr Theunis Filmater
Mr Gerrit Stein
These issues will be investigated during the EIA phase.
Please also see discussion under
4. Road Safety
If necessary, it is believed that Section 2A would result in the better option, for
some affected stakeholders, due to the quieter noise levels during the
evenings. The planting of trees to block out the noise levels has been given
as a suggested solution to this problem.
Comment Noted.
considered.
Several landowners have raised the concern that in some cases the highway
runs parallel to commercial livestock feedlots, and so impacting negatively on
the livestock’s’ feeding patterns.
This issue should be raised during the EIA Phase.
Several landowners are concerned about anticipated increase in noise levels
during construction.
There are regulations dealing with noise pollution. This
issue should be raised during the EIA Phase.
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
29
The solution suggested will be
Please also see discussion under:
7. Farming related issues.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
3.6.5
3.6.6
Name / organisation / farm
name
Mr Danie Cilliers
Mr Gert Loggenberg
Mr Jacques van Niekerk
Mr Johan Du Plessis
Mr Roland Henderson
Mr Edward Oates
Mr Charles Stanley Mapp
Mr Willie Boshoff
Mr Theunis Filmater
Mr Margaret Hobbs
Mr Danie Cilliers
Mr Rob Clarke and Ms
Heather Stevens
Co-owners: Alexpan Ptn 1
Comments raised
Response
The construction of the road will result in the disruption of the current peaceful
setting.
The comment on the impact of sense of place is noted.
The black route (Section 2B) will be particularly bad in terms of noise from the
road as the noise will be carried over the vlei area.
This issue should be raised during the EIA Phase.
3.7. Aesthetics & personal investment / enjoyment
3.7.1
Mr Jacques van Niekerk
DBPBC would be more visually obtrusive, as it is within close proximity to my
Owner: Schreiners Claim
homestead.
Comment Noted
3.7.2
Mr Dirk Bouckaert
Owner: Das Krantz
Should one route deem necessary to cross his property, Section 2B would be
the more acceptable route, as it would be less visually obtrusive.
Comment Noted
3.7.3
Mr AlisterCampbell
Owner: Uithoek 460 Rem.
Primary reason for purchasing the farm was for recreation purposes and to
date we have only used it as a holiday house. While the road may not cross
my land directly, it will nonetheless have a material impact on my property
value and the intrinsic value that it holds now as a weekend getaway
destination.
Comment Noted.
3.8. Nuisance Factors (littering; ablution facilities)
3.8.1
Mr Jacques van Niekerk
Littering from motorists (pollution).
Mr Johan Du Plessis
Mr Roland Henderson
Mr Edward Oates
Mr Charles Stanley Mapp
N3TC is responsible for litter collection.
N3TC
currently performs two clean-ups per month and are in
the process of assessing a recycling program.
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
30
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
Name / organisation / farm
name
Comments raised
Response
Due to no ablution facilities on-site, construction workers tend to use nearby
rivers, dams and streams.
Construction contracts force the contractors to provide
suitable self supporting latrine facilities.
The close proximity of the highway to residences results in a major loss of
privacy. In some cases the proposed routes run within a few hundred meters
of homesteads. This results in the perceived concern from stakeholders
about the safety and security of both themselves, as well as their livestock.
Comment Noted. This issue should be raised during
the EIA Phase.
See also issues discussed under:
7. Farming related issues
Mrs Margaret Hobbs
Mr Albert (Boy) Venter
Mr Charles Stanley Mapp
Mr Andrew Green
Mr Gert Loggenberg
Mr Gerrit Stein
Mr Danie Cilliers
See issue above in 3.9.1
See issue above in 3.9.1
Mr Rob Clarke and Ms
Heather Stevens
Co-owners: Alexpan Ptn 1.
The whole house will be lost if the black route (Section 2B) is built. The other
two routes (Section 2C and DBPR) will result in a total loss of privacy.
Comment Noted. This issue will form part of the
negotiation for land acquisition by SANRAL.
Mr Willie Boshoff
Mr Theunis Filmater
Mr Margaret Hobbs
Mr Danie Cilliers
3.8.2
Mr Peter Nelson (Eskom)
Mr and Mrs Schwulst
Mr Roland Henderson
Mr Willie Boshoff
Mr Charles Stanley Mapp
3.9. Loss of Privacy
3.9.1
Mr and Mrs Schwulst
Mr Roland Henderson
Mr Willie Boshoff
Mr Edward Oates
3.9.2
3.10. Location of Construction Camps
3.10.1
Mr van Jacques van Niekerk
It has been noted that Eskom have a sufficient number of camps, which have
Mr and Mrs Schwulst
the ability to house such labour.
Mr Johan Du Plessis
Mr Edward Oates
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
31
N3TC will contact ESKOM in this regard
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
Name / organisation / farm
name
3.11. Other
3.11.1
Mr Willie Boshoff
Owner: Greywell No. 1881
3.11.2
Dr Pieter van Eeden
Go EnviroScience
Representative
of
Mrs
Francesca Fondse, Owner:
(farms listed under Owner)
Comments raised
Response
There is uncertainty in terms of property planning, as everything has been
placed on hold until such a time as a preferred route has been decided upon.
Comment Noted. The process followed is according to
legislated procedures which occur within specified
processes and timeframes.
An assessment on human health, soil quality, vegetation health as well as the
possible impact on built structures must be done.
N3TC will follow the legislation with respect to the
issues during the EIA studies.
4. ROAD SAFTEY
4.1. Regulations, services, facilities and signs (maintenance of fences)
4.1.1
Mr Stephen Boshoff
N3TC need to indicate who is responsible for the construction and
Mr and Mrs Schwulst
maintenance of fences within the road reserve. It is believed that it should be
Mr Johan Du Plessis
N3TC’s responsibility to construct secure fencing along the entire servitude
Mr Gert Campher
purchased from the landowner.
Mr Lester Miller
Mr Willie Boshoff
Mr Edward Oates
Mr and Mrs Hobbs
There have been previous experiences, where vehicles have broken barrier
Mnr Flip de Jager
fencing due to accidents in wet weather. N3TC then take their time on fixing
Mr Albert (Boy) Venter
the broken fencing, or do not bother to fix the fencing at all. By this time,
livestock have managed to roam out onto the highways.
Furthermore, theft of fencing also results in the roaming of commercial
livestock on the highway, which presents a safety hazard.
4.1.2
Mr Stephen Boshoff
Mr and Mrs Schwulst
Mr Johan Du Plessis
Mr Gert Campher
Mr Lester Miller
Mr Willie Boshoff
Mr Edward Oates
Mr and Mrs Hobbs
Mnr Flip de Jager
Mr Albert (Boy) Venter
Appropriate and secure fencing should be constructed to comply with the
livestock occupying the property. It is no good placing fencing restricting the
roaming of cattle onto the highway, when smaller livestock, such as sheep
and lambs are able to move freely in-between.
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
32
N3TC has an obligation to maintain road reserve
fences. For example, to improve our service to
adjoining land owners, the recent route services
contract awarded provides for temporary emergency
repairs to fences with permanent repairs being
undertaken by our maintenance teams.
Where continuous theft of fences occurs, N3TC
considers other measures to prevent roaming of
livestock on the highway.
Please also see discussion under
7.1 Farming Related Issues
N3TC shall comply with SANRAL’s standards with
respect to fencing.
Please also refer to discussions above in 4.1.1.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
4.1.3
4.1.4
Name / organisation / farm
name
Mr Stephen Boshoff
Mr and Mrs Schwulst
Mr Johan Du Plessis
Mr Gert Campher
Mr Lester Miller
Mr Willie Boshoff
Mr Edward Oates
Mr and Mrs Hobbs
Mnr Flip de Jager
Mr Albert (Boy)
Mr Andrew Green
Mr Stephen Boshoff
Mr and Mrs Schwulst
Mr Johan Du Plessis
Mr Gert Campher
Mr Lester Miller
Mr Willie Boshoff
Mr Edward Oates
Mr and Mrs Hobbs
Mnr Flip de Jager
Mr Albert (Boy)
Mr Andrew Green
Comments raised
Response
It is perceived that the maintenance of fences, especially within the DLA land
restitution areas, should be done regularly by N3TC. This due to the
occupants of the land not maintaining or reporting broken fencing. This
causes their commercial livestock to roam onto the surrounding farms.
Recently it has become known that the tenants’ livestock are infecting
surrounding landowners’ livestock with a disease, which causes sterilisation in
cows.
The maintenance of fences between commercial farms
and DLA land restitution areas is not the responsibility
of the N3TC.
Livestock roaming freely onto the highway poses a major safety threat to
passing motorists.
N3TC has an obligation to maintain road reserve
fences.
For example, to improve its service to
adjoining land owners, the recent route services
contract awarded provides for temporary emergency
repairs to fences with permanent repairs being
undertaken by the N3TC’s maintenance teams.
To address this and other related issues, N3TC
initiated a subsequent meeting with DLA and the
Department of Agriculture, requesting them to address
this issue directly with the farmers associations.
Venter
Venter
4.2. Climatic conditions (wind direction; mist)
4.2.1
Mr Johan Du Plessis
High wind levels within Sections 2A and 2B, particularly in a westerly
Owner: Meijer’s Geluk No. direction, pose huge threats in terms of fires within the surrounding areas.
531 Ptn 4 and 6
These blow 90 % of the time
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
33
These issues was investigated during the EIA phase.
Refer to section 9,(Sub-section 5) in chapters 7; 8; 9;
and 10 of the DEIR for an assessment on Social
Impacts, specifically fire hazards. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.3 and 11 of the DEIR.
Please also see discussion under Section 3.6 (Noise
pollution) and 4.1 (Regulations, services, facilities and
signs).
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
Name / organisation / farm
name
Comments raised
Response
4.2.2
Mr Thomas Charles Stanley
Mapp
Owner: Bult Fontein
At high altitudes the mist levels within Sections 2A and 2B become thick and
almost impenetrable.
N3TC has an obligation to comply with the National
Veld and Forrest Fire Act. As part of this requirement,
N3TC burns fire breaks annually in conjunction with
adjacent land owners.
4.2.3
Mr Rob Clarke and Ms
Heather Stevens
Co-owners: Alexpan Ptn 1
Reside within a mist belt.
Adverse climatic conditions will be addressed through
appropriate permanent and variable message signage
to enhance road safety.
4.2.4
Mr Vernon Botha
Owner: Buckland Downs No.
1803 Rem of Ptn 1
Platberg is a monument of the Free State. On one side of the mountain there
is Harrismith, and the other side is a high mist zone – climatic conditions /
road safety.
Adverse climatic conditions will be addressed through
appropriate permanent and variable message signage
to enhance road safety.
The Department of Labour Affairs tenants have contributed to the degradation
of existing wetlands, within the DBPBC, due to the overgrazing of their
commercial livestock.
N3TC initiated a subsequent meeting with DLA and
the Department of Agriculture, requesting them to
address this issue directly with the farmers
associations
5. Natural Environment
5.1 Wetlands
5.1.1
Mr Gert Campher
Owner: Primrose No. 968
5.1.2
Mr Hendrick Eksteen
Owner: Karfontein No. 965
Ptn 1 – 4 and Rem. and Das
Krantz No. 6 Ptn 2 and 3.
There is the presence of a wetland on Karfontein No. 965 Ptn 4.
The EIA addressed this issue.
Refer to section 4 in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for a summary of Wetland specialist studies and
impact assessments for sections. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.1 of the DEIR.
5.1.3
Mr Rob Clarke and Ms
Heather Stevens
Co-owners: Alexpan Ptn 1
There is the presence of a wetland and a natural spring on Alexpan Ptn 1. Is
it possible for the road alignment (Section 2B) to be amended to miss the
wetlands?
The EIA addressed this issue.
5.2. Fauna & flora (general)
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
34
Refer to section 4 in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for a summary of Wetland specialist studies and
impact assessments for sections. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.1 of the DEIR.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
5.2.1
Name / organisation / farm
name
Mr Johan Gerricke
Representative : CJ RetiefTrust:
Wagenbeetjies Kop
No. 1253 11, 15, 17 and Rem.
Comments raised
Response
A large amount of properties along Section 1 comprise low veld grasslands.
The extent to which grasslands are affected by the
alternatives was addressed in the EIA stage of the
Project.
Refer to section 2 in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for a summary of Flora and Fauna specialist
studies and impact assessments for sections. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.1 of the DEIR.
5.2.2
5.2.3
5.2.4
5.2.5
Mr Peter Nelson (Eskom)
Mr Edward Oates
Owner: Trafalgar No. 839 and
Nelson’s Kop No. 250
Many bird species and baboons occupy the DBPBC.
An ornithologist will comment in the EIA on the route
alternatives.
Mr Stephan Boshoff
Owner: Geluk 969 Ptn 3 –
There is currently undisturbed indigenous bush within the surrounding area,
which would be ruined by the introduction of the Purple Route
This was addressed in the EIA
Mr Roland Henderson
Owner: Strathmorn Ptn. 2 and
3 (of 1)
Mr Henderson made mention of the ecological biodiversity within the study
area, with concern to there being fewer black wattle on the DBPBC than on
Section 1 (purple). He also mentioned that he has black wattle on both of this
properties and that Eskom is in the process of their rehabilitation.
This was addressed in the EIA
Mr PA and Mr MJM Jacobs
Owners:
Keeversfontein
Ptn13, Wagenbeetjieskop Ptn
Should the N3 take the route of Section 1, natural monuments as well as
game livestock would be affected.
An archaeologist and cultural historian will assess the
area.
Refer to section 3 in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for a summary of Avifauna specialist studies and
impact assessments for sections. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.1 of the DEIR.
Refer to section 2 in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for a summary of Flora and Fauna specialist
studies and impact assessments for sections. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.1 of the DEIR.
Refer to section 2 in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for a summary of Flora and Fauna specialist
studies and impact assessments for sections. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.1 of the DEIR.
Refer to section 2 in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
35
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
Name / organisation / farm
name
Comments raised
Response
21, 23 and 24.
DEIR for a summary of Flora and Fauna specialist
studies and impact assessments for sections. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.1 of the DEIR.
Refer to section 5 in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for a summary of Heritage Resources specialist
studies and impact assessments for sections. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.13 of the DEIR.
5.2.6
Ms MCM Botha
Owner: Das Krantz 6
A number of bird species reside within the area:
An ornithologist will comment in the EIA on the route
alternatives.
Blue cranes, wetland owls, Mahem’s (Das Krantz 6), grass owls, spurwing
geese (Alexpan Ptn 1) as well as Blue and crested cranes (Goede Hoop No.
76 Rem and Moffat No. 53 , Welgegund No. 165 and Alex Pan Ptn 1)
Refer to section 3 in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for a summary of Avifauna specialist studies and
impact assessments for sections. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.1 of the DEIR.
Mr and Mrs Casey
Owner: Goede Hoop No. 76
Rem and Moffat No. 53
Mr Francis Mandy
Owner: Welgegund No. 165.
Mr Rob Clarke and Ms
Heather Stevens
Co-owners: Alexpan (Ptn 1)
5.2.7
Mr Theunis Filmater
Owner: Rooilaagte No. 1094)
Mr Hendrick Eksteen
Owner: Karfontein Daskrantz
A number of bird species reside within the area:
Blue cranes, wetland owls, Mahem’s (Das Krantz 6), grass owls, spurwing
geese (Alexpan Ptn 1) as well as Blue and crested cranes (Goede Hoop No.
76 Rem and Moffat No. 53 , Welgegund No. 165 and Alex Pan Ptn 1)
There are a large number of “SunGazers” in the area.
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
36
An ornithologist will comment in the EIA on the route
alternatives.
Refer to section 3 in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for a summary of Avifauna specialist studies and
impact assessments for sections. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.1 of the DEIR.
This was addressed in the EIA.
Refer to section 2 in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for a summary of Flora and Fauna specialist
studies and impact assessments for sections. Also
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
Name / organisation / farm
name
Comments raised
Response
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.1 of the DEIR.
5.2.8
Dr Pieter van Eeden
Go EnviroScience
Representative
of
Mrs
Francesca Fondse, Owner:
(farms listed under Owner)
It is believed that the introduction of a new highway would impact on health of
plants and therefore limit the amount of oil they produce.
This was addressed in the EIA.
Refer to section 2 in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for a summary of Flora and Fauna specialist
studies and impact assessments for sections. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.1 of the DEIR.
5.2.9
Dr Pieter van Eeden
Go EnviroScience
Representative
of
Francesca Fondse,
listed under owner)
Within the area of Section 1, there are large indigenous forests with massive
Kiepersols that hide within deep gorges.
This was addressed in the EIA
Refer to section 2 in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for a summary of Flora and Fauna specialist
studies and impact assessments for sections. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.1 of the DEIR.
The land is a natural habitat to a number of rare and endangered species of
bird and mammal. Amongst these are the black eagle which for some years
nested in the gorge, bald Ibis which nest and roost in the gorge, and a
number of other bird species inclusive of raptors.
The mammal population would be affected in so far as its impact on the
mountain reedbuck (reputed sightings of oribi) red rock rabbit etc.
These issues were addressed in the EIA.
Refer to section 2 in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for a summary of Flora and Fauna specialist
studies and impact assessments for sections.
Refer to section 3 in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for a summary of Avifauna specialist studies and
impact assessments for sections.
Mrs
(farms
Mr Tony Christopher
Owner: Cotswold No 10382
Rem
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.1 of the
DEIR.
5.3. Water quality & water courses (construction activities)
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
37
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
5.3.1
5.3.2
Name / organisation / farm
name
Mr Peter Nelson (Eskom)
Mr and Mrs Schwulst
Mr Roland Henderson
Mr Willie Boshoff
Mr Charles Stanley Mapp
Mr Rob Clarke and Ms
Heather Stevens
Mr John Spiller:
(Representative Total SA)
Somersvlakte
Roland Henderson
Owner: Strathmorn Ptn 2 and
3
Mr Tony Christopher
Owner: Cotswold No 10382
Rem
5.3.3
5.3.4
5.3.5
Mr Graham and Mrs Margaret
Hobbs
Owner: Meijer’s Geluk No.
531 Ptn 3 and Schaapdrift No.
915
Mr Desmond and Mrs June
Schwulst
Owner: Hopedale 1223 Rem.
Mr Desmond and Mrs June
Schwulst
Owner: Hopedale 1223 Rem.
Comments raised
Response
Landowners are concerned about possible pollution from construction camps
as well as construction waste run-off and spillage of hazardous substances
leaking into their water sources, resulting in health problems.
This issue is regulated by DWAF and DEAT legislation
to which N3TC must comply.
This issue should also be raised during the EIA.
Landowners also fear that contractors would utilise the nearby rivers, dams
and streams as toilets and bathing areas should no facilities be supplied to
them.
Effects to water catchment areas is a major concern for many landowners,
especially to the Braamhoek pump storage project. This due to the fact that
any changes to the water catchments would ultimately affect the Braamhoek
dam.
After passing the gorge in a westerly direction the proposed route traverses
edge of some wetlands, which are the principal water supply to the gorge and
then to the Ngula Pumped storage Scheme, and any interference with the
supply to this enormous project is likely to be serious.
Landowners are concerned about N3TC using their springs, rivers and dams
as water sources during construction.
This issue is regulated by DWAF and DEAT legislation
to which N3TC must comply.
Fear of loss of springs from road compaction.
This issue should be raised during the EIA Phase.
A section of property that would be traversed by the highway occupies a
windmill, which provides two reservoirs and supplies approximately onequarter of the farm with necessary water. The landowners are largely
dependent on this windmill and the loss of this water source would have
detrimental affects should it be cut-off by the associated highway. Assurance
needs to be made from N3TC that this water source would be kept fully
operational during and upon completion of the highway.
There are means of providing access to severed land
portions (eg. Pipe culverts). This matter is to be raised
with SANRAL during the land acquisition process.
This issue should also be raised during the EIA
This issue is regulated by DWAF and DEAT legislation
to which N3TC must comply.
This issue should also be raised during the EIA.
These issues should also be raised during the EIA
phase.
Where relevant, the National Water Act will also apply.
5.3.6
Ms MCM Botha
Landowner has recently spent a considerable amount of money in upgrading
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
38
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
Name / organisation / farm
name
Comments raised
Owner:
Rem.
Das Krantz No. 6
her dam. The proposed Section 2A runs very close and would potentially
affect the water catchment area for this dam.
5.3.7
Mr PA and Mr MJM Jacobs
Owners:
Keeversfontein
Ptn13, Wagenbeetjieskop Ptn
21, 23 and 24.
Approximately 30% of the property would loose water access. Mr Jacobs
made mention that his water sources are situated on the Northwestern side of
Section 1 (purple route).
5.3.9
Mr Charles Stanley Mapp
Owner: Bult Fontein
There are numerous fountains and underground springs on this property and
during the rainy season the property is almost inaccessible.
No.
Response
This issue has been passed onto the wetland specialist
for inclusion in the EIA study.
Refer to chapter 6, for a description of the receiving
environment and chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR
for a summary of specialist studies and impact
assessments for sections. Also refer to the Summary
of Key Issues No.3 and 11 of the DEIR.
5.3.10
Dr Pieter van Eeden
Go EnviroScience
Representative
of
Mrs
Francesca Fondse, Owner:
(farms listed under owner)
5.4. Borrow pits
5.4.1
Mr Graham and Mrs Margaret
Hobbs
Owner: Meijer’s Geluk No.
531 Ptn 3 and Schaapdrift No.
915
The dam on Nolans Volans 4 is valuable in terms of water catchments.
Comment Noted; issues such as this were further
investigated in the EIA phase.
Refer to chapter 6, for a description of the receiving
environment and chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR
for a summary of specialist studies and impact
assessments for sections. Also refer to the Summary
of Key Issues No.1 of the DEIR.
What processes would be followed for the rehabilitation of borrow pits after
completion of construction on the highway?
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
39
The borrow pits will be rehabilitated to the satisfaction
of the Dept of Mineral and Energy Affairs and the
Landowner. The level and detail of the rehabilitation
will be set out in the Environmental Management
Program Report which is a document required by
DMEA before a decision is made to either proceed or
not to proceed with the removal of resources whether it
be rock or soil.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
Name / organisation / farm
name
5.5 Air Quality (pollution)
5.5.1
Mr Jacques van Niekerk
Mr Johan Du Plessis
Mr Roland Henderson
Mr Edward Oates
Mr Charles Stanley Mapp
Mr Willie Boshoff
Mr Theunis Filmater
Mr Margaret Hobbs
Mr Danie Cilliers
Dr Pieter van Eeden
5.5.2
Dr Pieter van Eeden
Go EnviroScience
Representative
of
Mrs
Francesca Fondse, Owner:
(farm names listed under
Owner)
Comments raised
Response
Decrease in air quality, caused by the fumes from passing vehicles.
Air quality studies in terms of air pollution were
conducted during the environmental assessment of the
project.
Refer to section 7, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for an assessment on Climate and Air Quality.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.2 and 3 of
the DEIR.
There is great concern in the increase in PM2 and PM1 particles, including a
number of known carcinogens such as benzene. A request is given for an
ambient air quality assessment that will include the measurement of PM10,
PM2 and PM1 as well as Nox and Sox and other indicator pollutants, as well
as various carcinogens (PAH, Pb, Mn, etc) and acid rain production. It is then
believed that these results must be extrapolated over time in relation to the
increase in traffic.
Air quality studies in terms of air pollution were
conducted during the environmental assessment of the
project.
Refer to section 7, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for an assessment on Climate and Air Quality.
Also refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.2 and 3 of
the DEIR.
It is believed that N3TC should plan in conjunction with the local/regional
municipality’s traffic police force and health department in order to reduce the
amount of diesel emissions into the environment.
5.6. Animals
5.6.1
Mr Rob Clarke and Ms
Heather Stevens
Co-owners: Alexpan Ptn 1.
This was addressed in the EIA.
Jackals reside on Alexpan Ptn 1.
Refer to section 2, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for an assessment on Flora and Fauna. Also
refer to the Summary of Key Issues No.1 of the DEIR.
6. ARCHAEOLOGICAL, HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL ISSUES
6.1. Historical sites
6.1.1
Mr Albert (Boy) Venter
The proposed road would run very close to ancient Voortrekker graves that
Owner: Plessisrust No. 1608 occupy the property.
and Gegund No. 532)
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
40
This was addressed in the EIA.
Refer to section 5, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
Name / organisation / farm
name
Comments raised
Response
DEIR for a summary of Heritage specialist studies and
impact assessments for sections. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.13 of the DEIR.
6.1.2
Mr Hendrick Eksteen
Owner: Karfontein Daskrantz
There are a large number of ancestral graves.
Some of these are still visited by families.
Mr Rob Clarke and Ms
Heather Stevens
Co-owners: Alexpan Ptn 1
6.1.3
Dr Pieter van Eeden
Go EnviroScience
Representative
of
Mrs
Francesca Fondse, Owner:
(properties
listed
under
Owner)
Nolans Volans 4 contains an historical dam. Furthermore, Mrs F Fondse
plans a tourism strategy aimed at creating new potential in possible areas
which have not yet been explored. E.g. The Lost Valley and Bushman
Paintings).
This was addressed in the EIA.
Refer to section 5, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for a summary of Heritage specialist studies and
impact assessments for sections. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.13 of the DEIR.
This issue should be raised during the EIA Phase
Refer to section 5, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for a summary of Heritage specialist studies and
impact assessments for sections. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.13 of the DEIR.
Also refer to section 9, (sub-section 17) in chapters 7;
8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for an assessment on Social
Impacts, specifically Tourism. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.7 of the DEIR.
6.1.4
Mr Rob Clarke and Ms
Heather Stevens
Co-owners: Alexpan Ptn 1
Original sandstone homestead on site, however, now reduced to rubble.
Unsure of age of current homestead.
The cultural historical studies were addressed during
the EIA.
Refer to section 5, in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of the
DEIR for a summary of Heritage specialist studies and
impact assessments for sections. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.13 of the DEIR.
6.1.5
Mr AlisterCampbell
Owner: Uithoek 460 Rem.
It is a beautiful property with an old sandstone farmhouse. The farm comes
with a lot of history pre-dating the Boer war.
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
41
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
Name / organisation / farm
name
Comments raised
Response
7. FARMING-RELATED ISSUES
7.1. Theft and Well-being of livestock
7.1.1
Mr Stephen Boshoff (on behalf The theft of commercial livestock remains a huge concern for landowners
of Mrs Fondse)
within the study area. Certain landowners are already experiencing an
Mr and Mrs Schwulst
increase in the livestock theft levels due to the introduction of contractors
Mr Jacques van Niekerk
working on the Braamhoek Pump storage access road construction, and
Mr Edward Oates
foresee that these levels will escalate with the introduction of more
Mr and Mrs Hobbs
contractors during the construction of the N3 highway.
Mr Albert (Boy) Venter
Mr T Charles Stanley Mapp
Landowners are concerned about the safety and well-being of their livestock,
Mr and Mrs Sandra Casey
especially sheep and lambs. This concern is raised due to the inaccurate
fencing put in place to prevent livestock roaming onto the highway.
Mr Gerrit Stein
Mr Hendrick Eksteen
Mr Andrew Green
7.1.2
Mr Stephen Boshoff (on behalf Safety during construction processes has also been raised as a significant
of Mrs Fondse)
issue for many landowners. In the past, no control during blasting activities
Mr and Mrs Schwulst
has lead to the fatality of cattle. A question pertaining to the use of rubber
Mr Jacques van Niekerk
mats during blasting was posed to the study team.
Mr Edward Oates
Mr and Mrs Hobbs
Mr Albert (Boy) Venter
Mr Charles Stanley Mapp
Mr and Mrs Casey
Mr Gerrit Stein
Mr Hendrick Eksteen
Mr Andrew Green
7.2 Fire (Fire breaks, management, losses, etc)
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
42
Please also see discussion under 2.3 – (Adverse
effects on local economy) and 4.1 (Regulations,
Services, Facilities and Signs).
Various Acts regulate these activities. (eg. OHS Act).
These issues should also be addressed in the
Environmental Management Plan.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
7.2.1
7.2.2
7.2.3
Name / organisation / farm
name
Mr Stephan Boshoff
Mr Peter Nelson
Mr and Mrs Schwulst
Mr Roland Henderson
Mr Johan Du Plessis
Mr Gert Campher
Mr Willie Boshoff
Mr Charles Stanley Mapp
Mr and Mrs t Hobbs
Mr Kobus Grabe
Mr Albert (Boy) Venter
Mr Hendrick Eksteen
Ms MCM Botha
Mr Donovan Smythe
Mr John Spiller:
Representative Total SA
Somersvlakte
Mr Stephan Boshoff
Mr Peter Nelson
Mr and Mrs Schwulst
Mr Roland Henderson
Mr Johan Du Plessis
Mr Gert Campher
Mr Willie Boshoff
Mr Charles Stanley Mapp
Mr and Mrs Hobbs
Mr Kobus Grabe
Mr Albert (Boy) Venter
Mr Hendrick Eksteen
Ms MCM Botha
Mr Donovan Smythe
Mr Willie Boshoff
Comments raised
Response
Due to the recent uncontrollable fires within the Free-State area, it is
understandably one of the major issues that need to be addressed with
regards to N3TC and the burning/maintenance of the firebreaks.
It is perceived that many of the large fires are started from the negligence of
drivers along the N3 highway, in addition to the carelessness of N3TC
contractors, to burn firebreaks on Code Red days. Contracting the burning of
firebreaks to affected landowners, as well as ensuring fire-fighters be on
stand-by during the dry seasons, have been given as suggested solutions, by
landowners, to prevent such problems.
Landowners also believe that one of the major causes of fires within the area
are the Department of Land Affairs (DLA), land restitution occupants, who do
not comply with firebreak regulations, thus causing fires started on their
property to spread to neighbouring properties. Please note there may be
some properties that have as yet not been transferred from SANRAL to DLA.
Proper fire management needs to be adhered to, especially during the
construction and operation of the new N3 highway.
It is believed that Section 2A and 2B are seen to reduce the risk of fires due to
the number of valleys that cause funnel effects, however should a fire start
within the region of the proposed Section 2B, or the western boundary on the
DBPR, the danger increases. This due to the Section 2B being largely
populated with veld grass and the DBPR wind speeds of 95 – 125km per
hour. Also there are limited access routes along Section 2B for fire fighters to
gain access to fight fires.
N3TC has an obligation to comply with the National
Veld and Forrest Fire Act. As part of this requirement,
N3TC burns fire breaks annually in conjunction with
adjacent land owners.
To address this and other related issues, N3TC
initiated a subsequent meeting with DLA and the
Department of Agriculture, requesting them to address
this issue directly with the farmers associations.
The Environmental Management Plan will prescribe
appropriate measure to mitigate the spread of veld
fires.
Also Refer to section 9 (sub-section 5), in chapters 7;
8; 9; and 10 of the DEIR for a summary of Social
Impacts, specifically fire hazards. Also refer to the
Summary of Key Issues No.3 of the DEIR.
N3TC has an obligation to comply with the National
Veld and Forrest Fire Act. As part of this requirement,
N3TC burns fire breaks annually in conjunction with
adjacent land owners.
Firebreaks within the Swinburne area were not timeously burnt during 2007.
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
43
N3TC has an obligation to comply with the National
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
Name / organisation / farm
name
Comments raised
Response
Owner: Greywell No. 1881
7.2.4
7.2.5
Mr Alan Tedder
Interested and Affected Party
Mr Rob Clarke and Ms
Heather Stevens
Co-owners: Alexpan Ptn 1
Veld and Forrest Fire Act. As part of this requirement,
N3TC burns fire breaks annually in conjunction with
adjacent land owners.
Fires cause emotional distress in many farmers, due to the helplessness they
feel when uncontrollable fires sweep through their livestock.
Property has not been affected by fire to date; this could be attributed to the
wind direction and also due to the fact that they are surrounded by mielie
crops. The current landowners of the mielie crops have a well managed fire
regime.
7.3. Loss of agricultural land and impact on economic viability
7.3.1
Mr Jacques van Niekerk
Should Section 2A be utilised, the entire farming dynamics on my property
Owner: Schreiners Claim
would have to change, as Section 2A occupies most of my grazing land.
7.3.2
Ms MCM Botha
Owner: Das Krantz 6
7.3.3
Mr Theunis Filmater
Owner: Rooilaagte No 1094
7.3.4
7.3.5
7.3.6
Comment Noted.
Comment Noted.
This matter is to be raised with SANRAL during the
land acquisition process.
At present Das Krantz is operating at full cattle capacity. Concerned is raised
regarding the effect that the potential loss in land would have on their loss of
income, due to the intermittent decrease in cattle to accommodate the loss of
land.
Section 2A is preferred as this route only cuts off a small corner of the
property opposed to Section 2B which cuts the property in half.
This matter is to be raised with SANRAL during the
land acquisition process.
Mr LB Leslie
Owner: Elon No. 674 and
Ebenhaezer No. 1117
Sub-section 2B is preferred as it runs through a smaller part of the property
than Sub-section 2A.
Comment Noted
Mr Francis Mandy
Owner: Moffat No. 53 and
Welgegund No. 165
Dr Pieter van Eeden
Go EnviroScience
Representative
of
Mrs
Francesca Fondse, Owner:
Nolans Volans Ptn 2 and Ptn
6 on 2384, Paulina Ptn 1 of
Section 3B is preferred to the DBPR as it cuts off less of his property as well
as moves further away from the original homestead.
Comment Noted
Brakwal farm, which has recently been secured for purchase by Tambura
Property Investments (Pty) is targeted for beef cattle production. This farm
will therefore be vital for organic beef and associated training purposes.
This matter is to be raised with SANRAL during the
land acquisition process.
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
44
Comment Noted
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
7.3.7
Name / organisation / farm
name
1516 and Scotston Ptn 20 of
4128
Mr PA Jacobs
Owner: Keeversfontein Ptn 13
and Wagenbeetjieskop Ptn 23
and 24
Comments raised
Response
Mr PA and Mr MJW Jacobs noted that should N3TC decide to take the route
of Section 1, they would rather N3TC purchase the whole property as the
highway would make the remainder of their property impractical and difficult to
manage
This matter is to be raised with SANRAL during the
land acquisition process.
At 142,065 hectares, my property is not big enough to be a viable farm.
This issue is noted. The issue of viability will be taken
up during the EIA and should also be raised with
SANRAL during the land acquisition process (if
relevant).
A large amount of money has just been spent on upgrading a dam, which is
now going to be of no use, due to the close proximity of the proposed
highway.
This matter is to be raised with SANRAL during the
land acquisition process.
This property occupies a farm school in the top right-hand corner. It is
believed that should Section 3B transverse this property there would be no
use for this portion of land and the school would suffer as a consequence.
Whether the school or the pupils attending the school
will be impeded on by the road will be further
investigated during the EIA phase. The N3TC will
investigate and consider suitable alternatives.
Mr MJW Jacobs
Owner:
Wagenbeetjieskop
Ptn 21
7.3.8
Mr AlisterCampbell
Owner: Uithoek 460 Rem.
7.4. Infrastructure
7.4.1
Ms MCM Botha
Owner: Das Krantz 6
7.4.2
Mr Martin Campher
Owner: Keeversfontein Ptn 7
and 12.
Mr Gert Loggenberg
Owner:
Gedachtenis No.
1109
Also Refer to section 9 in chapters 7; 8; 9; and 10 of
the DEIR for a summary of Social Impacts. Also refer
to the Summary of Key Issues No.4 of the DEIR.
7.5. Other
7.5.1
Mr Flip De Jager
Owner: Maritz Drift No. 1169
Rem and Ptn 2 (of 1)
Braamhoek No. 1220 Ptn 2
Interested in purchasing two SANRAL properties (Maritz Drift No. 1169 Ptn 7
and Welkom No. 1310 Ptn 3) which they are currently renting.
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
45
This issue must be taken up directly with SANRAL.
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
Name / organisation / farm
name
8. DESIGN & TECHNICAL ISSUES
8.1. Access onto/through farms
8.1.1
Mr Roland Henderson
Owner: Srathmorn Ptn 2 and
3 (of 1)
8.1.2
Mr Roland Henderson
Mr Johan Du Plessis
Mr Jacques van Niekerk
Mr Steve Clovelly
Mr Edward Oates
Mr Theunis Filmater
Mr Charles Stanley Mapp
Mr Francis Mandy
Ms MCM Botha
Mr Rob Clarke and Ms
Heather Stevens
8.2. Access onto the highway
8.2.1
Mr Johan Du Plessis
Mr Gert Campher
Mr Jacques van Niekerk
Mr Edward Oates
Mr Willie Boshoff
Mr Theunis Filmater
Mr Charles Stanley Mapp
Mr and Mrs Hobbs
Mr Kobus Grabe
Comments raised
Response
Access to many farms has already been cut-off due to the Braamhoek Pump
Storage Access road construction and servitude acquisition.
Please bear in mind that the access the landowners
utilize at present onto national, provincial and district
routes will remain in place. Only access to the new
national road will be restricted to the indicated
interchanges. Any issues relating to access will be
confirmed during the EIA process.
Cross access is to be addressed as part of the land
acquisition process
Landowners are concerned as in many cases; the new N3 highway will cut off
their general access routes. This would not only affect the associated
landowners, but a number of additional landowners as well, as many
landowners provide thoroughfare access from their farms. How would N3TC
rectify this problem?
It should be noted that many landowners within the study area rent land for
grazing from neighboring farmers. A highway traversing through these
properties would not only affect the owner of the property, but would also
have a knock-on effect to landowners dependent on additional land for
grazing.
An additional concern is the inability of landowners to access various parts of
their property should the new N3 highway cut their property in two. Would
N3TC be responsible for the construction and maintenance of sufficient
through-culverts or fly-overs?
Would landowners have sufficient capability to access the N3 highway from
their property? This concern is raised by the fact that many landowners fear
the additional costs involved should they have to utilise alternative routes into
Harrismith and the surrounding areas. The rising cost of fuel does not aid this
situation.
Please bear in mind that the access the landowners
utilize at present onto national, provincial and district
routes will remain in place. Only access to the new
national road will be restricted to the indicated
interchanges.
Interchanges are planned at Keeversfontein, Van
Reenen village, Lincoln and Warden.
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
46
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
8.2.2
8.2.3
Name / organisation / farm
name
Mr Albert Venter
Mr and Mrs Casey
Mr Johannes Boshoff
Mr Gert Loggenberg
Mr Gerrit Stein
Mr Charles Stanley Mapp
Owner: Bult Fontein
Mr John Spiller:
Representative Total SA
Somersvlakte
8.3. Geotechnical Issues
8.3.1
Mr Charles Stanley Mapp
Owner: Bult Fontein
8.3.2
Mr Tony Christopher
Owner: Cotswold No 10382
Rem
8.4. Truck Stops
8.4.1
Dr Pieter van Eeden
Go EnviroScience
Representative
of
Mrs
Francesca Fondse, (farms
listed under Owner)
8.5. Distance
8.5.1
Mr Andrew Green
Owner:
Lincoln No. 1887
Rem.
9. TRAFFIC FLOWS
9.1 Construction Traffic
9.1.1
Mr Willie Boshoff
Comments raised
Response
Any issues relating to access will be confirmed during
the EIA process.
Landowners perceive that the lack of local off ramps, on and off the highway,
will banish any potential tourism opportunities that the highway may bring to
the area.
Direct access is required off the highway to the service station.
Interchanges are planned at Keeversfontein, Van
Reenen village, Lincoln and Warden.
Additional Interchanges can be provided at the cost of
the applicant, as long as they comply with SANRAL
standards.
Access will be approved in accordance with SANRAL
requirements and standards.
It is believed that Section 2B has a sufficient number of geotechnical issues
and that many bridges would need to be built should N3TC decide to go this
route.
Comment Noted. N3TC is aware of this fact.
Close to the place where the road would traverse Cotswold lies a gorge and a
waterfall.
Construction of the road will be very expensive and the impact on the
landscape enormous and difficult to mitigate (e.g. tunnels, causeways,
cuttings etc).
Comment Noted. N3TC is aware of this fact.
It is believed that truck stops should be enforced at regular intervals. This can
therefore, be used to test the diesel emissions as well as the road-worthiness
of these vehicles.
The provision of truck stops is driven on the basis of
commercial viability.
The emission and roadworthiness issues are law enforcement issues and not
part of N3TC’s mandate.
What is the legal distance between a homestead and a highway?
SANRAL stipulates a 20m building restriction zone
from its road reserve boundary.
Please make a note that heavy vehicles (construction) should not be allowed
The enforcement of weight restrictions is the obligation
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
47
EIA: 12/12/20/1992
PROPOSED NATIONAL ROAD 3: KEEVERSFONTEIN TO WARDEN (DE BEERS PASS SECTION)
No.
Name / organisation / farm
name
Owner: Greywell No. 1881
9.2 Volumes
9.2.1
Dr Pieter van Eeden
Go EnviroScience
Representative
of
Mrs
Francesca Fondse, Owner:
(farms listed under Owner)
Comments raised
Response
in town, as this will disrupt traffic flow.
of the relevant road authority.
It is believed that the upgrade of the N3 does not intend to reduce the number
of trucks on the highway. We believe that DOT in conjunction with Transnet
and SANRAL develop a regulation to transfer transportation of goods to the
rail.
N3TC’s obligation is to provide a minimum level of
service (traffic capacity) that necessitates the
construction of the DBPBC or any of the alternatives.
Please address your issues of regulation to the
relevant authorities.
RECORD OF COMMENTS RAISED BY LANDOWNERS DURING THE ROUTE LOCATION INITIATIVE PROCESS
07 OCTOBER 2010
48