REVIEW ARTICLE
published: 23 September 2014
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00493
Cell cycle control and seed development
Ricardo A. Dante1 *, Brian A. Larkins 2,3 * and Paolo A. Sabelli 3 *
1
Embrapa Agricultural Informatics, Campinas, Brazil
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA
3
School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
2
Edited by:
Neelima Roy Sinha, University of
California, Davis, USA
Reviewed by:
A. Mark Settles, University of Florida,
USA
Pablo Daniel Jenik, Franklin &
Marshall College, USA
*Correspondence:
Ricardo A. Dante, Embrapa
Agricultural Informatics, Avenida
André Tosello 209, Campinas,
São Paulo 13083-886, Brazil
e-mail: [email protected];
Brian A. Larkins, Department of
Agronomy and Horticulture, University
of Nebraska, 230J Whittier Research
Center, 2200 Vine Street, Lincoln,
NE 68583-0857, USA
e-mail: [email protected];
Paolo A. Sabelli, School of Plant
Sciences, University of Arizona, 303
Forbes, 1140 East South Campus
Drive, Tucson, AZ 85721-0036, USA
e-mail: [email protected]
Seed development is a complex process that requires coordinated integration of many
genetic, metabolic, and physiological pathways and environmental cues. Different cell
cycle types, such as asymmetric cell division, acytokinetic mitosis, mitotic cell division,
and endoreduplication, frequently occur in sequential yet overlapping manner during
the development of the embryo and the endosperm, seed structures that are both
products of double fertilization. Asymmetric cell divisions in the embryo generate polarized
daughter cells with different cell fates. While nuclear and cell division cycles play a key
role in determining final seed cell numbers, endoreduplication is often associated with
processes such as cell enlargement and accumulation of storage metabolites that underlie
cell differentiation and growth of the different seed compartments. This review focuses
on recent advances in our understanding of different cell cycle mechanisms operating
during seed development and their impact on the growth, development, and function
of seed tissues. Particularly, the roles of core cell cycle regulators, such as cyclindependent-kinases and their inhibitors, the Retinoblastoma-Related/E2F pathway and the
proteasome-ubiquitin system, are discussed in the contexts of different cell cycle types
that characterize seed development. The contributions of nuclear and cellular proliferative
cycles and endoreduplication to cereal endosperm development are also discussed.
Keywords: cell division, cotyledon,
retinoblastoma-related, seed coat
INTRODUCTION
SEED DEVELOPMENT PHASES
Angiosperms reproduce sexually via the production of seeds,
which are typically derived from the fertilization of ovules, or asexually via apomixis. Mature seeds characteristically contain three
major structures: a sporophyte (the embryo), nutrient storage
tissues or organs (the endosperm and/or the embryonic cotyledons), which support embryogenesis and early post-embryonic
sporophyte development, and a protective structure (the seed coat
or testa). A prominent triploid endosperm is typically present in
mature monocot seeds, while most of its cells are consumed during dicot seed development. The seed coat is a maternal structure
derived from the ovule integuments that functions in seed protection, dormancy, germination, and, in some dicot species like
legumes (Fabaceae or Leguminoseae family), transiently in nutrient storage. In the monocot Poaceae family (grasses), the seed
coat is fused to the pericarp (the fruit coat). The maternal plant
makes significant contributions to seed production by providing nutrients, conveying hormonal and environmental cues and
imposing mechanical constraints on the floral structures within
which seeds develop. Consequently, seed production is influenced
by a range of zygotic, sporophytic, and environmental factors
(Egli, 2006).
The size of a multicellular organism, its organs and tissues
depend on the number and size of constituent cells. Cell number,
in turn, depends on the rate of cell division, the number of dividing
www.frontiersin.org
cyclin-dependent kinase,
embryo,
endoreduplication,
endosperm,
cells, and the duration of the cell proliferation phase during development, while the size of non-dividing cells is influenced by cell
growth and cell expansion (defined as increases in cell macromolecular mass and cell volume, respectively; Sugimoto-Shirasu
and Roberts, 2003). In plants, cell number generally seems to make
a larger contribution than cell size to the size of comparable organs
(reviewed by Mizukami, 2001). However, seed size and weight
are highly influenced by cell size via the growth and expansion
brought about by massive accumulation of storage compounds
(proteins, lipids, and/or carbohydrates) and water intake by cotyledon or endosperm cells. In cereal and legume crops, seed growth
and development typically comprise three partially overlapping
phases: an initial lag phase initiated at fertilization and characterized by cell proliferation and minimal dry weight gain (phase
I); seed filling, a linear phase of large dry weight gain associated
with cell enlargement and accumulation of storage compounds
(phase II); and a final phase of reduced dry weight gain associated with desiccation and dormancy (phase III; Egli, 2006). In
phase I, various seed tissues and domains are specified and established, including the vital transfer cells, a filial conduit with the
mother plant vascular tissue that nourishes the developing seed.
Phase I is also characterized by uptake of sucrose, which is rapidly
converted to hexoses via cell wall-bound invertase activity. Even
though phase I is critical for seed development and grain yield,
its contribution is indirect, as the cells generated in this phase
are very small and contribute little to seed biomass. However,
September 2014 | Volume 5 | Article 493 | 1
Dante et al.
during phase II most of the endosperm or cotyledon cells generated in phase I accumulate storage compounds. Thus, phase
II is characterized by cell enlargement due to cell growth and
cell expansion, and a peak in seed water content (Egli, 2006).
In storage cells of the cereal endosperm and legume cotyledons,
phase II is also characterized by endoreduplication (also known
as endopolyploidization, endocycling, or endoreplication), a type
of cell cycle that leads to polyploidy. During phase III, water concentration decreases dramatically and physiological maturity is
reached.
CELL CYCLE TYPES OCCURRING DURING SEED DEVELOPMENT
Briefly, the prototypical mitotic cycle consists of a DNA replication phase (S-phase), and a chromosome condensation and sister
chromatid segregation phase (M-phase), which are preceded by
G1 and G2 gap phases, respectively. Typically, this cell cycle is
associated with cell division, and M-phase is generally coupled to
karyokinesis and cytokinesis, which generate daughter cells with
chromosome number and nuclear DNA content identical to those
FIGURE 1 | Cell cycle types occurring during seed development. Triploid
endosperm mother cells (with two maternal and one paternal chromosomal
complements) are shown as an example. A hypothetical haploid number
n = 1 is assumed for simplicity. (A) Acytokinetic mitosis of endosperm nuclei
within the embryo sac central cell, resulting in a syncytium; (C) Cell
proliferation through mitotic cell division following syncytium cellularization;
(E) Endoreduplication of inner endosperm starchy cells. Cell number, size,
DNA content, and chromosome number correspond to one complete cell
Frontiers in Plant Science | Plant Evolution and Development
Cell cycle control and seed development
of their mother cell. However, in several plant tissues, cell types,
and developmental stages, alternative cell cycle types can occur. In
the context of seed development, frequently these are acytokinetic
mitosis and endoreduplication (Figure 1). In acytokinetic mitosis, the mitotic cell cycle is coupled to karyokinesis in the absence
of cytokinesis, thus producing a syncytium or multinucleate cell.
Endoreduplication is characterized by recurrent and alternating
gap and S-phase, without intervening sister chromatid segregation, karyokinesis and cytokinesis, thus resulting in polyploid
cells with an unaltered number of chromosomes, but with each
chromosome containing multiple chromatids (reviewed by Edgar
et al., 2014). All these different cell cycle types influence the growth
and development of seed structures. Early in development, asymmetric cell divisions in the embryo generate polarized daughter
cells that take on diverse differentiation paths, and rapid nuclear
proliferation and cellularization in the endosperm establish the
initial cell populations that occupy the embryo sac. Subsequent
intense cell proliferation, coupled to cell differentiation, essentially
produces all the embryo and endosperm cell types and tissues.
cycle round comprising S-phase and accompanying M-phase and karyokinesis
(A,C) and cytokinesis (C), and two complete endoreduplication cycle rounds
(each comprising S-phase not followed by M-phase, karyokinesis and
cytokinesis) (E). Interrupted cell boundaries in (A) indicate the large size of
the embryo sac central cell. C and n, DNA content and chromosome number
of a haploid cell, respectively. (B,D,F) show typical nuclear flow-cytometric
profiles obtained for tissues undergoing asynchronous, iterative acytokinetic
mitosis, mitotic cell division, and endoreduplication cycles, respectively.
September 2014 | Volume 5 | Article 493 | 2
Dante et al.
Finally, endoreduplication occurs, which is inherently associated
with cell enlargement and accumulation of storage compounds in
specialized cotyledon or endosperm cells.
Seed biology aspects such as comparative development and
anatomy of seed structures and their underlying signaling networks were reviewed in-depth recently (Sabelli and Larkins, 2009b;
Nowack et al., 2010; Lau et al., 2012; Sabelli, 2012b). Likewise, the
role of cell cycle regulation in plant growth and development has
also been reviewed thoroughly elsewhere (De Veylder et al., 2011;
Heyman and De Veylder, 2012; Edgar et al., 2014; Sabelli, 2014).
Hence, we focus on recent findings that clarify the role of core cell
cycle regulators and different cell cycle types in the development,
growth, and function of seed structures.
CELL CYCLE CONTROL AND CORE REGULATORS IN PLANTS:
AN OVERVIEW
CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASES AND CYCLINS
In eukaryotes, cell cycle progression is controlled by the periodic activity of various heterodimeric threonine/serine protein
kinases composed of catalytic and regulatory subunits, a cyclindependent kinase (CDK) and a cyclin, respectively. Plants possess
relatively large sets of genes encoding different CDKs and cyclins,
which can interact to form a potentially large number of combinations (Van Leene et al., 2011). Plants contain eight types of
CDK-like proteins (reviewed by Dudits et al., 2007). Among the
major CDKs involved with cell cycle regulation are members
of the A-type, which characteristically contain in their cyclininteracting α-helix a hallmark PSTAIRE amino acid motif; these
function during S-phase and at the G1/S and G2/M transitions.
In the plant-specific B-type CDKs, which function primarily at
the G2/M transition, the PSTAIRE motif is replaced by PPTALRE
(B1-subtype) or PPTTLRE (B2-subtype). D- and F-type CDKs,
also known as CDK-activating kinases (CAKs), regulate A- and Btype CDKs through phosphorylation of specific residues (reviewed
by Inzé and De Veylder, 2006). Angiosperm genomes possess a
cyclin complement of ∼50–60 genes organized into ∼10 types
(Wang et al., 2004; La et al., 2006; Hu et al., 2010; Ma et al.,
2013). The majority of D-type cyclins are involved in the control of the G1/S transition; A-type cyclins, S-phase, and the
G2/M transition; and B-type cyclins, G2/M, and intra-mitotic
transitions (Inzé and De Veylder, 2006). CDK/cyclin complexes
are subjected to different levels of regulation, including binding by non-catalytic CDK-specific inhibitors (CKIs), activating
or inhibitory phosphorylation of CDK subunits, and cell cycle
phase-specific cyclin synthesis and proteolysis, the latter of which
is mediated by the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS; Inzé
and De Veylder, 2006). A simplified diagram depicting some
major molecular mechanisms of the plant cell cycle is shown in
Figure 2.
THE RETINOBLASTOMA-RELATED PATHWAY
In higher eukaryotes, proteins of the retinoblastoma-related (RBR)
family are known as repressors of the G1/S transition for their
inhibitory effect on heterodimeric E2F/DP transcription factors.
These, in turn, control the expression of multiple genes required
for this cell cycle transition and S-phase progression, such as those
encoding the subunits of the helicase MINICHROMOSOME
www.frontiersin.org
Cell cycle control and seed development
MAINTENANCE2-7 (MCM2-7) and the replication processivity factor proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) complexes
(reviewed by Sabelli and Larkins, 2009c). RBR proteins are sequentially phosphorylated and inhibited by different CDK complexes,
which relieves the block on E2F/DP-dependent gene expression
and results in the transition into S-phase. In plants, CDK complexes containing D- and A-type cyclins seem to phosphorylate
and thus inhibit RBR proteins. Grasses possess a more numerous and functionally diverse set of RBR proteins than most dicots,
including Arabidopsis thaliana (Sabelli and Larkins, 2006, 2009c).
The maize (Zea mays) genome contains at least four RBR genes
that are grouped into two distinct types of duplicated genes, exemplified by RBR1 and RBR3 (Sabelli et al., 2005; Sabelli and Larkins,
2006). While RBR1 functions as a repressor of cell cycle progression (Sabelli et al., 2013), RBR3 stimulates the expression of
genes encoding MCM2–7 proteins and DNA replication (Sabelli
et al., 2009). RBR3 is itself an E2F/DP target whose expression is
negatively regulated by RBR1 (Sabelli et al., 2005).
DNA REPLICATION INITIATION FACTORS
Regulation of DNA replication in plants is generally believed to
follow conserved eukaryotic patterns (reviewed by Costas et al.,
2011). Initiation of S-phase requires priming of chromatin via the
assembly, at origins of replication, of the pre-replication complex
consisting of ORIGIN OF REPLICATION COMPLEX (ORC16), CDC6, CDT1, and MCM2-7 proteins. ORC1-6 associate with
origins of replication throughout the cell cycle but become sequentially bound by different proteins. Interaction of CDC6 and CDT1
with ORCs during G1 promotes the loading of MCM2-7, effectively licensing the origins for DNA replication (reviewed by Tuteja
et al., 2011). These replication origin complexes are activated by
CDKs at the G1/S transition, which leads to the recruitment of
the replication machinery, the unwinding of DNA through MCMdependent helicase activity, and DNA synthesis with the formation
of replication forks. MCM protein complexes are displaced from
replication origins as replication forks advance along the DNA,
which prevents re-licensing of origins until S-phase and M-phase
are completed. In endoreduplication cycles, DNA replication is
initiated independently of M-phase, resulting in repeated rounds
of DNA synthesis in the absence of mitosis. However, endoreduplication results from specific cell cycle modifications rather than
merely uncontrolled activation of replication origins, which would
cause over- and incomplete DNA replication (Costas et al., 2011;
De Veylder et al., 2011; Sabelli, 2012a).
UBIQUITIN-DEPENDENT PROTEOLYSIS
Ubiquitin-Proteasome System-mediated proteolysis promotes the
controlled destruction of several cell cycle regulators, which is critical for cell cycle phase transitions. Cyclins, CKIs, and other cell
cycle regulators are targeted to the proteasome via their selective modification by various ubiquitin-protein ligases. Among
the multimeric E3 ubiquitin-protein ligases functioning in plant
cell cycle control are the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome
(APC/C), the Skp1/Cullin/F-box complex, and the Cullin-RING
Ubiquitin Ligases (Heyman and De Veylder, 2012; Genschik
et al., 2013). During late mitosis and most of G1, CDK activity
is typically reduced via the targeting of A- and B-type cyclins
September 2014 | Volume 5 | Article 493 | 3
Dante et al.
FIGURE 2 | The prototypical mitotic cell division cycle and some key
molecular mechanisms that regulate its major transitions in plants. Cell
cycle progression through distinct phases is driven by periodic fluctuations of
cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) activity (solid red line). Green and red circles
labeled with a P letter show stimulatory and inhibitory phosphorylation,
respectively. For cells to make a transition from G1 into S-phase and execute
DNA replication, CDK activity must surpass an S-phase threshold (dashed
blue line). A further CDK activity increase above an M-phase threshold
(dashed green line) during G2 drives entry into mitosis. Both M-phase exit
and origin of replication licensing require CDK activity to be reduced at the
end of mitosis and maintained at low levels for most of G1. At the G1/S
transition, CDKA/CYCD complexes phosphorylate and thus inactivate
retinoblastoma-related (RBR), thus permitting heterodimeric E2F/DP
transcription factors to stimulate an S-phase gene expression program,
to the proteasome by the APC/C. In addition to its roles in
the cell division cycle, E3 ligases control endoreduplication cell
cycles, those occurring in trichome and root nodule cells being
perhaps the best characterized such examples (Cebolla et al.,
1999; Roodbarkelari et al., 2010; Heyman and De Veylder, 2012;
Genschik et al., 2013).
CDK-SPECIFIC INHIBITORS
Non-catalytic inhibitors of CDK/cyclin complex activity, generally termed CKIs, have been identified as chief cell cycle
regulators in all eukaryotes, and act by obstructing substrate
interaction and ATP binding. Two types of CKIs have been
identified and characterized in plants: INHIBITOR OF CDC2
KINASE/KIP-RELATED (ICK/KRP) and SIAMESE/SIAMESERELATED (Yi et al., 2014). ICK/KRPs typically bind to complexes containing A-type CDKs and D-type cyclins (Wang et al.,
2008), although interaction with B-type CDKs was also reported
(Nakai et al., 2006). Plant CKIs are targeted by several E3
ligases for degradation (Zhou et al., 2003; Weinl et al., 2005;
Jakoby et al., 2006; Ren et al., 2008; Roodbarkelari et al., 2010).
In mitotic cell cycles, ICKs/KRPs are phosphorylated by B1type CDKs and targeted for UPS-mediated degradation, with
consequent stimulation of A-type CDK activity and M-phase
(Verkest et al., 2005).
Frontiers in Plant Science | Plant Evolution and Development
Cell cycle control and seed development
which results in the expression of MCM2-7 and proliferating cell nuclear
antigen (PCNA) genes, among many others. CDKA/CYCD activity is positively
and negatively regulated by, respectively, CDK-activating kinase
(CAK)-dependent phosphorylation and binding by CKIs. Later in G2, CDK
activity requires association with mitotic cyclins and is also stimulated by
CAK and inhibited by CKIs. In addition, this CDK activity is inhibited by
phosphorylation at specific tyrosine residues by WEE1. Certain CDKs of the
B-type, whose expression is E2F/DP-dependent, promote M-phase
progression by mechanisms that include interaction with A-type cyclins and
stimulation of downstream CDK activity by phosphorylating and targeting
certain CKIs for proteolysis by the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) via
different E3 ubiquitin ligases. Conversely, mitotic cyclin proteolysis by the
UPS, via the APC/C, causes CDK activity to decline sharply, which is required
for M-phase exit.
The core molecular factors controlling the cell cycle in plants
conform, to a large extent, to those identified in other higher
eukaryotes. However, plant genomes are often characterized by a
larger complement of key cell cycle genes as well as by uniquely
possessing certain types of CDKs, E2Fs, and CKIs. The resulting
complexity in cell cycle regulatory mechanisms, which appears to
have considerable redundancy, may have evolved largely to finetune the cell cycle for the requirements of the sessile life style of
plants.
ROLES OF DIFFERENT CELL CYCLES AND REGULATORS IN
SEED DEVELOPMENT
EMBRYO
Cell proliferation, patterning, and morphogenesis during embryo
development
From the first zygotic division through the early globular (8–16
cells) stages, many aspects of embryo development in monocots
and dicots are conserved (Lau et al., 2012; Sabelli, 2012b). The
zygote divides asymmetrically and generates an apical cell with
dense cytoplasm and a large vacuolated basal cell at the chalazal
and micropylar ends of the embryo sac, respectively, establishing early embryo polarity and patterning. The apical and basal
cells produce, respectively, the proembryo and the suspensor,
which has an embryo proper-nourishing function. Afterwards, cell
September 2014 | Volume 5 | Article 493 | 4
Dante et al.
proliferation and differentiation occur coordinately to produce all
embryo cell types and tissues, including the cotyledon(s), which in
dicots accumulate storage compounds and typically occupy a large
fraction of the mature seed volume. In dicots, periclinal divisions
of the octant cells result in the globular embryo. Subsequently,
the heart stage is reached with the characteristic emergence of two
cotyledon primordia as opposite lateral extensions of the apical
end. Next, cell proliferation and differentiation of the basal cell tier
lead to the torpedo stage. As growth proceeds under mechanical
constraints imposed by the ovule, the embryo increasingly assumes
its typical curved shape. During development, monocot and dicot
embryos display increasingly different morphologies. Patterns of
cell division and cell lineages usually become less organized in
monocot embryos and while two prominent cotyledons emerge
in dicots, the origin of the single monocot cotyledon, the scutellum, is spatially more variable. In dicots, cotyledon cells undergo
endoreduplication (Dhillon and Miksche, 1983; Lemontey et al.,
2000; Rewers and Sliwinska, 2012).
The importance of cell cycle control during embryogenesis extends beyond its most recognizable aspects related to cell
division and endoreduplication cycles. In Arabidopsis thaliana
and Nicotiana tabacum, disruption of proper developmental patterns through lengthening or impairment of cell division by
interfering with CDKA;1 (Hemerly et al., 2000), DNA polymerase ε (Jenik et al., 2005), and A3-type cyclin (Yu et al., 2003)
indicates the dependence of embryo patterning and morphogenesis on the correct execution of cell divisions. Also, lossof-function of HOBBIT (HBT), which encodes a homolog of
the APC/C subunit CDC27 (Blilou et al., 2002), causes defects
in hypophyseal cell specification and basal embryo cell division, perturbing root meristem formation (Willemsen et al.,
1998). Recent investigation on Arabidopsis post-embryonic development indicates that moderate and high levels of CDKA;1
activity determine whether cells divide symmetrically or asymmetrically, respectively, and that CDKA;1 activity is conveyed
via RBR1 and its control over cell cycle- and differentiationrelated genes (Weimer et al., 2012). Similar mechanisms connecting CDKs and RBR1 appear to operate during embryogenesis (Nowack et al., 2012), and several studies have shed light
on the roles of the RBR/E2F pathway, CDKs, D-type cyclins,
CKIs, as well as additional APC/C components, in developing
Arabidopsis seeds, underscoring the importance of precise cell
cycle control for embryonic patterning, cell proliferation, and
endoreduplication.
The role of D-type cyclins in embryogenesis
Collins et al. (2012) carried out a comprehensive investigation
of D-type cyclin expression and function in developing Arabidopsis seeds. Various D-type cyclin genes show distinct and
overlapping tissue-specific expression patterns during seed development. Developmental progression characterized in loss-offunction mutants revealed that embryo development is slower
in the triple D3-type cyclin mutant, but not in single and double mutant combinations, indicating that this cyclin subtype is
necessary for normal development, with individual, partly redundant components. Ectopic CYCD3;1 expression delays progression
of embryonic development and causes atypical divisions in the
www.frontiersin.org
Cell cycle control and seed development
hypophysis and suspensor. In contrast to CYCD3;1, ectopic expression of CYCD7;1, a previously uncharacterized cyclin that is not
expressed in wild-type seeds, induces cell proliferation and cell
enlargement in the embryo (and endosperm), causing excessive
growth and higher seed lethality. These results suggest that adequate control of spatiotemporal patterns of cell division, through
the regulation of specific D-type cyclins and thus possibly their
CDK complexes, is important for embryo patterning and growth.
Roles of CDKs, the RBR pathway, and CKIs in embryogenesis
A combinatorial analysis of mutants recently allowed functional
dissection of five members of the ICK/KRP-type of CKIs during Arabidopsis seed development and revealed a link between
ICK/KRPs, the RBR/E2F pathway and cell proliferation (Cheng
et al., 2013). CDK activity gradually increased as individual
ICK/KRP T-DNA insertion mutants were combined, indicating
that ICK/KRPs act at least partially as dosage-dependent CDK
inhibitors. Although single-gene mutants and most multiple-gene
mutants have wild-type morphological phenotypes, the quadruple
ick1ick2ick6ick7, and the quintuple ick1ick2ick5ick6ick7 mutants
have a slightly altered leaf shape, suggesting some degree of redundancy among individual genes. The quintuple mutant has larger
cotyledons, leaves, petals, and seeds than wild type. The ICK/KRP
mutants generally have more numerous but smaller cells in all
organs examined, and this phenotype is enhanced as the number
of combined mutant genes is increased. The quintuple mutant
displays extensive up-regulation of the E2F pathway via increased
phosphorylation of RBR1, consistent with reduced inhibition of
CDK complexes.
An additional connection between CDKs and RBR1 was provided by combinatorial analyses of their corresponding mutants
(Nowack et al., 2012). Delayed development and drastically
altered cell numbers and sizes are observed during embryogenesis in null cdka;1 mutants (indicating that embryogenesis can adjust to variations of cell number and size), while
loss of function of both CDKA;1 and B1-type CDKs leads
to embryogenesis arrest. Because post-embryonic defects in
cdka;1 mutants can be restored by rbr1 mutations (Nowack
et al., 2012), CDKA;1 most likely acts via the RBR/E2F pathway to control embryogenic cell proliferation. Arabidopsis DEL1
encodes an E2F-DP-like DNA binding protein that was previously shown to be mostly expressed in dividing cells and
to inhibit endoreduplication (Vlieghe et al., 2005). A loss-offunction del1 mutant exhibits a small (∼11%) but significant
increase in seed size (Van Daele et al., 2012), although it was
not determined whether this phenotype is due to stimulated
endoreduplication. Collectively, these results suggest complex
interactions among plant ICK/KRPs, which can function redundantly, but also in a dosage-dependent manner, to control the
activity of CDK complexes, the RBR1/E2F pathway and cell
proliferation.
The influence of the APC/C in embryogenesis
Functional characterization of genes encoding APC/C subunits
and activators during embryogenesis revealed roles in cell-type
specification and morphogenesis, in addition to cell division and
endoreduplication. Mutations in both APC4 (Wang et al., 2012)
September 2014 | Volume 5 | Article 493 | 5
Dante et al.
and APC1 subunits (Wang et al., 2013) cause defective gametogenesis and developmental arrest during embryogenesis, which
seem to be associated with accumulation of B-type cyclin and
altered auxin distribution. SAMBA encodes a conserved plantspecific protein that binds to and potentially regulates the APC/C
(Eloy et al., 2012). SAMBA expression is high during embryogenesis and, to a lesser extent, early post-embryonic development.
Loss-of-function samba mutants have defective male gametogenesis and enlarged shoot and root apical meristems that result
in the production of larger seeds, embryos, leaves, and roots.
Increased organ size in samba mutants could be attributed to a
larger number of more highly endoreduplicated cells, rather than
to larger cells. SAMBA binds an A2-type cyclin, which is stabilized in samba mutants during early development. Thus, SAMBA
negatively regulates cell proliferation at least partially by targeting
A2-type cyclins for proteolysis via the APC/C.
In conclusion, precise cell cycle regulation, both spatially and
temporally, is critical for embryogenesis and plant reproduction.
The core cell cycle regulators CDKs, cyclins, RBR1, ICK/KRPs, and
the APC/C seem to play concerted roles and thus affect asymmetrical cell divisions, cell proliferation and endoreduplication during
embryogenesis.
ENDOSPERM
Patterns of endosperm development
The endosperm functions in nourishing the sporophyte during
embryogenesis and controlling germination and, mostly limited
to monocots, also during early post-embryonic development.
However, it also plays important roles in other aspects of seed
development, including epigenetic regulation, coordination of
cell patterning and proliferation, signaling among the major
seed structures and control of seed size (Berger et al., 2006;
Sabelli and Larkins, 2009b; Nowack et al., 2010; Fiume and
Fletcher, 2012; Costa et al., 2014). The different cell cycle types
occurring during the development of the persistent endosperm
in grasses have mostly been investigated in traditional biological models and valued crop species, such as maize and rice
(Oryza sativa).
The nuclear type of endosperm development is the most
frequently encountered pattern among Angiosperms, and with
regard to its early stages up to cellularization, is highly conserved
in monocots and dicots (Olsen, 2004; Sabelli and Larkins, 2009b;
Becraft and Gutierrez-Marcos, 2012). In this developmental type,
the primary endosperm nucleus and its derivatives undergo acytokinetic mitosis iteratively, resulting in a syncytium that can
comprise up to thousands of nuclei that are initially distributed
around the central vacuole of the central cell (Olsen, 2004). Anticlinal cell wall deposition, forming alveoli encasing individual nuclei,
creates the first endosperm cell layer, and reiteration of anticlinal
cell wall deposition, alveolation, periclinal cell wall formation and
periclinal cell division results in centripetal generation of additional cell layers, gradually replacing the space occupied by the
central vacuole with cells. Cellularization is typically completed
within three to six days after pollination (DAP) in cereals and by
the torpedo stage in Arabidopsis. In the following developmental stage, mitotic divisions coupled to cytokinesis result in cell
proliferation, thus producing most of the endosperm cells. Past
Frontiers in Plant Science | Plant Evolution and Development
Cell cycle control and seed development
the cell proliferation stage, in nonendospermic species, such as
Arabidopsis, the endosperm is absorbed by the rapidly developing embryo and is limited to a single or few cell layers at seed
maturity. In contrast, in endospermic species, the endosperm
is persistent and its development progresses through relatively
conserved stages, comprising a period of cell enlargement typically associated with endoreduplication, followed by maturation
involving programmed cell death (PCD) of specific cell types,
dehydration, and dormancy. The roles played by core cell cycle
regulators in the different cell cycles of cereal endosperm development are discussed in the following sections and summarized in
Figure 3.
Maize endosperm development: an overview
Endosperm development in maize (and related cereals) follows the
general monocot developmental pattern described earlier (Sabelli
and Larkins, 2009b). Starting around three DAP, as the syncytium
is cellularized, endosperm growth is mostly attained by an increase
in cell number through mitotic cell divisions, which peak at eight
to 10 DAP (Kiesselbach, 1949; Kowles and Phillips, 1985; Lur
and Setter, 1993). Initiating in the endosperm central regions,
also around eight to 10 DAP and then extending centrifugally,
cells gradually and asynchronously cease mitotic cell divisions and
switch to endoreduplication. As a result, the nuclei of many central
endosperm cells reach high DNA content levels (some in excess of
200C; C = DNA content of haploid nuclei) and contain multiple,
apparently uniform, copies of chromosomes (Bauer and Birchler, 2006). In agreement with the high correlation between ploidy
level and cell size observed in numerous cell types and organisms, the spatiotemporal pattern of mitosis-to-endoreduplication
switch in the maize endosperm creates a gradient of nuclear
ploidy and cell size. Small non- or under-endoreduplicated cells
are located mostly at the peripheral aleurone and sub-aleurone
layers, as opposed to the increasingly large and endoreduplicated inner starchy endosperm cells. By 16 DAP, the expanded
endoreduplicated cells account for most of the endosperm volume (Vilhar et al., 2002) and as many as 75% of its cells can
become endoreduplicated at later developmental stages (Dilkes
et al., 2002). Starchy endosperm cells typically display concomitant accumulation of starch and proteins with endoreduplication,
which has long suggested a causal relationship between these processes (Larkins et al., 2001; Kowles, 2009; Sabelli and Larkins,
2009a,b; Sabelli, 2012b). Starchy endosperm cells subsequently
undergo PCD (reviewed by Young and Gallie, 2000; Sabelli, 2012a),
and the peripheral aleurone layer persists as the only living tissue
past seed desiccation.
The contrasting endosperm development in Brachypodium
distachyon and other model cereals
In comparison with maize, rice, and other major cereals, initial analyses of seed development in the emerging grass model,
Brachypodium distachyon, have revealed important differences
with respect to cell cycle control and its possible relationship with
storage compound accumulation (Guillon et al., 2012; Trafford
et al., 2013). In contrast to its related species, barley (Hordeum
vulgare), Brachypodium endosperm displays reduced cell proliferation and enlargement. Also, the expression of a B1-type CDK and
September 2014 | Volume 5 | Article 493 | 6
Dante et al.
FIGURE 3 | Effects of core cell cycle regulators on the cereal
endosperm cell cycles. Core cell cycle regulators that positively or
negatively regulate proliferative (acytokinetic mitosis and mitotic cell
division) and endoreduplication cycles are shown. Net stimulatory or
inhibitory effects are assigned as a function of cell proliferation- and
an A3-type cyclin is reduced, in agreement with a withdrawal from
a mitotic cell cycle program, but >6C nuclei are absent, indicating
no occurrence of endoreduplication. Along with these differences,
Brachypodium endosperm cells exhibits limited starch deposition
and thickened cell walls, the cell wall polysaccharide, β-glucan,
representing the main seed storage carbohydrate. Accordingly, the
expression of genes involved with starch biosynthesis is reduced.
Thus, an interpretation of the contrasting endosperm developmental patterns in Brachypodium and other cereals is that starch
accumulation drives endosperm cell enlargement (Trafford et al.,
2013) and, consequently, high nuclear ploidy levels are correlated
with large cell sizes.
The importance of early nuclear and cell proliferation activities for
endosperm development
Regulation of the syncytium-to-cellularization transition seems
to be key for endosperm development and seed growth. Rice
THOUSAND-GRAIN WEIGHT 6 (TGW6), which encodes an
indole-3-acetic acid (IAA)-glucose hydrolase, appears to stimulate, by elevating IAA levels, the expression of CYCB2;2
and E2F1 during the first three days after fertilization; it
also stimulates premature cellularization of the syncytium and
reduces endosperm final cell number, grain length, and weight
(Ishimaru et al., 2013). In addition, suppressing the expression
of rice CYCB1;1 results in delayed endosperm cellularization
and seeds containing only an enlarged embryo at maturity
(Guo et al., 2010). Heat stress affects rice endosperm cellularization by interfering with the expression of the epigenetic
regulator FERTILIZATION-INDEPENDENT ENDOSPERM 1 of
the Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2), thus reducing
seed size (Folsom et al., 2014). In Arabidopsis, over-expression
www.frontiersin.org
Cell cycle control and seed development
ploidy-related phenotypes observed in mutant or transgenic analyses
carried out either in planta or plant cell cultures (red-colored fonts) or
inferred from a combination of expression analyses and biochemical
assays (black-colored fonts), as discussed in the text. Os, Oryza sativa;
Zm, Zea mays.
of SHORT HYPOCOTYL UNDER BLUE 1 (SHB1) promotes
early endosperm nuclear proliferation, a delay in cellularization,
enlarged chalazal endosperm, and enhanced proliferation and
expansion of embryo cells, leading consequently to increased
seed size (Zhou et al., 2009). It is possible that these effects
are mediated by members of the HAIKU pathway, which function downstream of SHB1 to promote syncytial endosperm
and seed growth via epigenetic control of cytokinin signaling
(Li et al., 2013).
The rate and duration of proliferative cell cycles seem to also
play an important role in maize seed size. Recently, Sekhon et al.
(2014) examined transcriptional and developmental changes during seed development of maize populations that were selected for
large and small seed sizes (termed KLS30 and KSS30, respectively).
KLS30 seeds are more than fourfold heavier and twofold larger
than KSS30 seeds and contain proportionally larger endosperms.
Metabolite and genome-wide expression analyses indicated that,
compared to KLS30 seeds, the linear phase of the grain filling (phase II) in KSS30 seeds initiates earlier, but it also
occurs at slower rates and terminates earlier. Notably, KLS30
endosperms, relative to their KSS30 counterparts, display upregulated sucrose metabolism and expression of the cell wall
invertase INCW2 (encoded by the MINIATURE 1 gene), which is
required for normal endosperm cell proliferation and expansion
(Vilhar et al., 2002; Chourey et al., 2006). KLS30 endosperms also
exhibit higher expression at 12–18 DAP of several genes encoding
D- and B-type cyclins and APC/C subunits. Although cell number, size, and nuclear ploidy were not determined in KLS30 and
KSS30 endosperms, these gene expression profiles suggest higher
mitotic activity in the former. The balance between cell proliferation and endoreduplication activities as a factor influencing
September 2014 | Volume 5 | Article 493 | 7
Dante et al.
endosperm and seed sizes is also supported by the analyses of
multiple small-seeded popcorn inbred lines in comparison to typically large-seeded dent inbred lines (Dilkes et al., 2002; Coelho
et al., 2007). Popcorn lines revealed higher endosperm ploidy
levels from as early as 13 DAP in comparison to dent inbred
lines. This difference could be attributed to an earlier transition between the cell division to endoreduplication stages, and/or
higher rates of endoreduplication in popcorn lines. The importance of correct timing for cessation of cell proliferation and
commencement of cell enlargement as an underlying factor for
growth has been documented (reviewed by Powell and Lenhard,
2012). Collectively, these studies suggest a causal relationship
between increased periods and/or rates of cell proliferation with
larger endosperms (and, consequently, larger seeds), by establishing a stronger-sink tissue, one possessing more numerous cells that
subsequently enlarge and accumulate larger amounts of storage
compounds.
SEED COAT DEVELOPMENT, CELL CYCLE CONTROL, AND EPIGENETIC
CONTROL OF SEED DEVELOPMENT
In most Angiosperms, the two ovule integuments that enclose the
nucellus differentiate into the seed coat following fertilization, and
develop through stages of cell division, cell elongation, differentiation, and PCD in coordination with embryo and endosperm
development (Haughn and Chaudhury, 2005). Investigation of
Arabidopsis seed coat development revealed the existence of complex communication and interaction between these seed structures
and that their underlying cell proliferation and enlargement are
major determinants of seed size (reviewed by Nowack et al.,
2010). Impairing the elongation of integument cells via the
transparent testa glabra 2 (ttg2) mutation reduces endosperm
and seed growth (Garcia et al., 2005). megaintegumenta/auxinresponse factor 2 (mnt/arf2) mutants exhibit more numerous
integument cells and enlarged seeds and embryos compared to
wild type (Schruff et al., 2006). Premature syncytium cellularization reduces endosperm growth and integument cell elongation
in haiku (iku) mutants (Garcia et al., 2005), whereas delayed
cellularization and extended endosperm cell proliferation is associated with integument cell elongation in the enlarged seeds of
apetala 2 (ap2) mutants (Ohto et al., 2009). The enhanced cell
proliferation in mnt/arf2 and ap2 mutants seems to be associated with increased expression of D3- and B1-type cyclins
(Schruff et al., 2006; Ohto et al., 2009), indicating that the corresponding transcription factors repress cell divisions through
a pathway that involves down-regulation of these core cell cycle
regulators.
Epigenetic mechanisms are particularly important for integrating growth and development of the seed coat, embryo, and
endosperm. Particularly among core cell cycle regulators, RBR1
is involved in gametophyte cell differentiation and endosperm
nuclear proliferation along with epigenetic regulators such as
PRC2 and DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE 1 (Ebel et al., 2004;
Ingouff et al., 2006; Johnston et al., 2008; Jullien et al., 2008).
rbr1 mutants display fertilization-independent endosperm development, reduced cell proliferation in the ovule integuments prior
to fertilization and impaired differentiation of the seed coat (Ebel
et al., 2004; Ingouff et al., 2006).
Frontiers in Plant Science | Plant Evolution and Development
Cell cycle control and seed development
In conclusion, there appears to be extensive crosstalk and
coordination, in which epigenetic control and RBR1 play significant roles, between cell cycle activity in the developing
seed coat and inner seed structures, such as the embryo and
endosperm. These mechanisms could modify both signaling and
mechanical constrains imposed by maternal tissues on developing seed structures, and consequently could control seed size
(Haughn and Chaudhury, 2005).
THE ROLE OF CORE CELL CYCLE REGULATORS IN THE CEREAL
ENDOSPERM: THE MAIZE PROTOTYPE AND RELATED
EXAMPLES
CONTROL OF ENDOREDUPLICATION IN ENDOSPERM
The mechanisms that control the transition from the mitotic
cell cycle into endoreduplication and its progression in various cell types and species have been recently reviewed in
detail (Edgar et al., 2014; Sabelli, 2014). Among plant core cell
cycle regulators, certain CDK/cyclin complexes, CKIs, APC/C
activators and the RBR/E2F pathway have been functionally
linked to the onset and/or rates of endoreduplication cycles.
Although these cell cycle regulators are widely conserved across
higher eukaryotes and appear to be recurrently deployed to produce cell cycle modifications that result in endoreduplication,
their individual contributions may be species- and cell-typespecific (Roodbarkelari et al., 2010; Edgar et al., 2014). In maize
endosperm, induced S-phase CDK activity and inhibited Mphase CDK activity were proposed to cause endoreduplication
cycles (Grafi and Larkins, 1995). In support of this model,
endoreduplication is inhibited and stimulated, respectively, by
over-expression of a catalytically inactive, dominant-negative
form of CDKA;1 (Leiva-Neto et al., 2004) and by decreased RBR1
activity and consequent up-regulation of E2F/DP-dependent gene
expression (Sabelli et al., 2013). In addition, developing maize
endosperm exhibits the contrasting expression of different CKIs
(Coelho et al., 2005) and functionally distinct RBR homologs
of the RBR1 and RBR3 types (Grafi et al., 1996; Sabelli et al.,
2005, 2009, 2013). Endosperm endoreduplication particularly correlates with the potential inhibitory phosphorylation of CDK
subunits by a WEE1 homolog (Sun et al., 1999a), differential
cyclin expression (Sun et al., 1999b; Dante et al., 2014) and
apparent down-regulation of UPS-mediated proteolysis of members of various cyclin types, including potential mitotic cyclins
(Dante et al., 2014).
CKIs
ICK/KRP-type CKIs appear to have variable roles in different
cell cycle types during cereal endosperm development. KRP;1
is expressed at nearly constant levels in 7–21 DAP endosperm,
while KRP;2 protein levels decline during this period, suggesting a more positive role in endoreduplicating cells for KRP;1
than KRP;2, which in contrast could be preferentially involved
with regulation of the mitotic cell cycle or its transition into
the endoreduplication cycle (Coelho et al., 2005). Biochemical assays showed KRP;1 activity corresponds partly to a CDK
inhibitory activity existing in endoreduplicating endosperm (Grafi
and Larkins, 1995). KRP;1 and KRP;2 are able to partially inhibit
September 2014 | Volume 5 | Article 493 | 8
Dante et al.
the complex CDK fraction that binds p13suc1 , and they specifically inhibit the CDK activity associated with A1- and D5-type
cyclins, but not that associated with CYCB1;3 (Coelho et al.,
2005). Overexpression of KRP;1 along with the wheat dwarf virus
RepA protein, which antagonizes RBR1 (Grafi et al., 1996; Xie
et al., 1996; Gordon-Kamm et al., 2002; Sabelli et al., 2005, 2009),
causes ectopic endoreduplication in cultured, proliferating maize
cells, indicating that coupling the stimulation of G1/S transition to the inhibition of certain CDK complexes is sufficient for
endoreduplication onset in otherwise dividing cells (Coelho et al.,
2005).
Expression and functional analyses in planta revealed that KRPs
impact rice endosperm development. KRP;1 RNA is preferentially
expressed at the mitosis-to-endoreduplication transition in wildtype rice plants, and its over-expression results in decreased kernel
weight and filling rate, in addition to perturbed production and
lower ploidy levels of endosperm cells (Barrôco et al., 2006). In
contrast, KRP;3 RNA is most highly expressed in the syncytial
endosperm, but its level declines subsequently in the cellularized
endosperm, suggesting a specific function in the syncytial cell cycle
or during the transition to cellularization (Mizutani et al., 2010).
THE CDK AND RBR PATHWAYS
Recently, Sabelli et al. (2013) showed that RBR1 controls multiple
molecular and cellular aspects of maize endosperm development.
RBR1 down-regulation via RNAi in endosperm cells results in
enhanced expression of RBR3-type, MCM2–7, and PCNA genes.
Mitotic and endoreduplication cell cycles are both stimulated
by the alleviated inhibition of RBR1 on the G1/S transition,
which causes RBR1-RNAi endosperm to have 58% more cells
and ∼70% more DNA than its wild type counterpart by 19 DAP.
However, this creates a surprising reduction in cell and nuclear
sizes, in spite of increased endoreduplication, thus ruling out a
causal and direct relationship between these processes, at least in
the specific context of RBR1 down-regulation. Larger cell numbers and higher ploidy levels together cause a 43% increase in
DNA content in mature endosperm upon RBR1 down-regulation,
although no measurably altered storage protein content or kernel weight (a proxy for starch accumulation) were observed.
Genetic interaction analysis of RBR1 and CDKA;1 (Leiva-Neto
et al., 2004), down-regulated individually or in combination,
indicated that CDKA;1 requires RBR1 for controlling endoreduplication, but conversely RBR1 represses downstream target genes
independently from CDKA;1. These observations suggest distinct RBR1 activities at controlling endoreduplication, in which
CDKA;1 probably participates via its inhibitory phosphorylation
of RBR1, and at repressing E2F-dependent gene expression in a
CDKA;1-independent manner. RBR1 down-regulated endosperm
exhibits levels of p13suc1 -adsorbed CDK activity similar to those
of wild-type endosperm even in the presence of dominantnegative CDKA;1, indicating that various CDK complexes and
RBR1 are negatively and reciprocally regulated, and implying
that CDKs other than CDKA;1 participate in cell cycle stimulation upon RBR1 down-regulation (Leiva-Neto et al., 2004; Sabelli
et al., 2013; Dante et al., 2014). Thus, perturbing RBR1 function revealed its key roles in integrating various processes in
maize endosperm, but this did not translate in altered seed size
www.frontiersin.org
Cell cycle control and seed development
and weight, suggesting the presence of a higher order, homeostatic regulation of endosperm development (discussed in next
section).
The stimulation of CDK activity in down-regulated RBR1
maize endosperm prompts the question of the identity of CDKs,
besides CKDA;1, controlling cell division and endoreduplication
cycles (Sabelli et al., 2013). The identification and expression of
different CDKs expressed in maize endosperm were reported
recently (Dante et al., 2014). Previously uncharacterized CDKs
of the A-type and B1-types, termed, respectively, CDKA;3 and
CDKB1;1, were found to be expressed in endosperm. Protein levels of A-type CDKs are nearly constant throughout endosperm
development, whereas expression of CDKB1;1 becomes markedly
reduced during the transition into the endoreduplication stage
and is stimulated upon RBR1 down-regulation. These observations are in agreement with the role of A-type CDKs in both
mitotic and endoreduplication cell cycles and that of B1-type
CDKs specifically in the mitotic cell cycle established in other
species. Similar expression patterns, cyclin binding properties, and
maintenance of nearly wild-type levels of CDK activity upon combined down-regulation of RBR1 and CDKA;1 collectively indicate
that CDKA;1 and CDKA;3 are partially redundant or function
coordinately (Sabelli et al., 2013; Dante et al., 2014). RBR1 downregulated endosperm possesses more numerous cells and also
exhibits higher ploidy levels, indicating that both cell division
and endoreduplication are stimulated in distinct spatiotemporal
patterns (Sabelli et al., 2013). These results suggest some redundancy among A-type CDKs and a specialized role for CDKB1;1 in
positively regulating cell division during maize endosperm development (Leiva-Neto et al., 2004; Sabelli et al., 2013; Dante et al.,
2014). Consistent with this interpretation, Arabidopsis possesses
a single A-type CDK, and its B1-type CDKs can drive progression through cell division, but not endoreduplication cycles, in
the absence of CDKA;1 and RBR1 (Nowack et al., 2012).
CYCLIN/CDK COMPLEXES
The spatiotemporal expression of A-, B-, and D-type cyclins and
their associated kinase activities in developing maize endosperm
were recently investigated (Dante et al., 2014). Two main transcript expression patterns are apparent, one characterized by
rapidly declining RNA levels with the onset of endoreduplication (A- and B-type cyclins), and the other with nearly constant
RNA levels throughout endosperm development (D-type cyclins).
However, these patterns are not consistent with those at the
protein level, as shown by a discrepancy between declining
CYCB1;3 RNA in endoreduplicating endosperm but sustained
levels of the encoded protein. While CYCB1;3 and CYCD2;1 proteins are localized to both the cytoplasm and nucleus of cells
throughout the endosperm, CYCD5 protein is localized solely
in the cytoplasm of peripheral cell layers. CDK activity associated with CYCA1 is tightly associated with cell division, while
CYCB1;3-, CYCD2;1-, and CYCD5-associated CDK activities are
highest at the transition from cell division to endoreduplication.
These patterns together suggest roles for CYCA1 and CYCD5
in the cell division cycle, while CYCB1;3 and CYCD2;1 could
participate in both cell division and endoreduplication. In particular, the switch to an endoreduplication program is marked
September 2014 | Volume 5 | Article 493 | 9
Dante et al.
by a drastic reduction in kinase activity associated with CYCA1.
A-, B-, and D-type cyclins are more resistant to proteasomedependent degradation in endoreduplicating compared to mitotic
endosperm, which potentially contributes to the sustained levels of proteins, particularly CYCB1;3, in endoreduplicating cells.
Consequently, the mitosis-to-endoreduplication transition and
the accompanying cell enlargement typical of starchy endosperm
cells are possibly associated with cell cycle modifications created
by reduced proteasome-dependent proteolysis of several types of
cyclins and, potentially, that of additional core cell cycle regulators
(Dante et al., 2014).
UPS-MEDIATED PROTEOLYSIS
Functional and expression analyses in rice revealed roles for
APC/C activators that seem in part distinct from those of
their homologs in dicots. Reduced expression of CELL CYCLE
SWITCH 52A (OsCCS52A), a homolog of the APC/C activating subunit, results in smaller seeds and, despite reduced
nuclear and cell size of endosperm cells, only modest reduction in their ploidy levels (Su’udi et al., 2012b). Also, reduced
expression of the related OsCCS52B protein negatively impacts
seed and cell sizes, but has no impact on endoreduplication
(Su’udi et al., 2012a). Thus, collectively, OsCCS52A and B seem
to play rather minor roles in rice endosperm endoreduplication, but have important roles in controlling cell and seed
sizes. Although plant CCS52 homologs are known to promote proteolysis of A- and B-type cyclins and endoreduplication
(reviewed by Heyman and De Veylder, 2012), the targets and
mechanisms by which OsCCS52A and B control cell and seed
sizes remain unknown. Some unidentified cyclins are presumably targeted by OsCCS52A and B, but the apparent downregulation of UPS-mediated cyclin degradation and its contribution to sustained CYCB1;3 expression in endoreduplicating
maize endosperm cells (Dante et al., 2014) further suggests that
CCS52 homologs have a more significant role in cyclin proteolysis in mitotic as opposed to endoreduplicating endosperm.
Also, these observations are consistent with others made in
dicot model species, underscoring that various plant cell cycle
regulators are targeted to UPS-mediated degradation by E3 ubiquitin ligases in cell-type- and cell cycle-type-dependent manners
(Roodbarkelari et al., 2010; Heyman and De Veylder, 2012).
Thus, dissecting the specific roles of E3 ubiquitin ligases and
the UPS at large in governing various aspects of endosperm
development, including cell cycle control, merits further
investigation.
Besides the apparently reduced UPS activity in endoreduplicating compared to mitotic endosperm, translational regulation
may also be responsible, at least in part, for sustained CYCB1;3
protein levels despite drastically reduced amounts of its RNA,
as cyclin expression is known to be regulated at this level. In
addition, many levels of gene expression regulation operate
extensively during seed development, as a comparative analysis of the developing maize seed transcriptome and proteome
revealed large discrepancies between cognate RNA and protein levels (Walley et al., 2013). Possible underlying mechanisms include
differential stability of RNA and protein pairs, transport of proteins between tissues and out-of-phase circadian accumulation
Frontiers in Plant Science | Plant Evolution and Development
Cell cycle control and seed development
of corresponding RNAs and proteins (Walley et al., 2013). Thus,
the expression of CYCB1;3 and other core cell cycle regulators in different seed structures may be subject to complex
regulation.
WHAT IS THE ROLE OF ENDOREDUPLICATION? EVIDENCE
FROM THE MAIZE ENDOSPERM
Proliferative cell cycles are ultimately responsible for establishing
the number of cells in a tissue, organ or body and, together with
cell enlargement, determine their overall size. Although increased
tissue/organ/body size resulting from stimulated cell proliferation
has been documented in plants, typically the proliferation and
enlargement of cells are inversely correlated, as more numerous
cells are compensated for at the tissue/organ level by reduced cell
size, essentially resulting in no overall differences (reviewed by
John and Qi, 2008; Powell and Lenhard, 2012; Sabelli, 2014). A
long-standing debate persists that opposes the “cell-based” or “cellular theory” (whereby cell proliferation and enlargement drive
tissue/organ/body growth in a cell-autonomous manner) and the
“organismal theory” (cell proliferation and enlargement follow a
higher-order, supra-cellular program; Beemster et al., 2006; John
and Qi, 2008; Sabelli, 2014).
While the impact of cell proliferation on tissue/organ/body
size can be easily appreciated, that of endoreduplication is
more controversial. Endoreduplication displays remarkable coincidence with cell enlargement in numerous cell types associated with different specialized functions. In an emerging
and unifying view, endoreduplication facilitates cell expansion,
growth, and accompanies differentiation in multiple cell types
in which the occurrence of cell division could impair their
function (Edgar et al., 2014). Among plant cells, the cellular
functional specializations and attributes commonly associated
with cell enlargement and endoreduplication include ability
for rapid cell elongation (e.g., hypocotyl cells), branched cell
morphology (e.g., trichomes), nutrient storage (e.g., cotyledons and endosperm of seeds and pericarp of fleshy fruits),
hosting endosymbiotic bacteria (e.g., nodule giant cells) and
interaction with pathogens and parasites (e.g., giant cells in
galls and feeding sites). Some functions of endoreduplication
in plant cells are only beginning to be elucidated (reviewed
by John and Qi, 2008; Chevalier et al., 2011, 2013; De Veylder
et al., 2011; Edgar et al., 2014; Sabelli, 2014). Recently, the
contribution of endoreduplication to cell morphogenesis and
cell identity maintenance (Bramsiepe et al., 2010), as well as
regulation of gene expression and karyoplasmic homeostasis (Bourdon et al., 2012) were investigated. Bramsiepe et al.
(2010) reported that, upon targeted reduction of endoreduplication levels by modification of core cell cycle gene expression, Arabidopsis trichome number is reduced due to dedifferentiation and resumption of mitosis by these cells. Conversely, promoting endoreduplication causes restoration of trichome cell identity, which revealed a role for endoreduplication in determining trichome cell fate. In endoreduplicated cells of the tomato pericarp, the nuclear surface
has extensive grooves that are filled with mitochondria, thus
allowing fairly constant nuclear surface/volume ratios, suggesting the existence of high ATP demand by nuclear processes
September 2014 | Volume 5 | Article 493 | 10
Dante et al.
(Bourdon et al., 2012). Accordingly, rRNA and mRNA transcription in individual nuclei is positively correlated with ploidy
levels.
In the terminally differentiated starchy cells of maize
endosperm, endoreduplication can be viewed as a mechanism that
supports increased gene expression and the enhanced metabolic
activity associated with cell enlargement and massive accumulation of starch and storage protein (Larkins et al., 2001; Sabelli
and Larkins, 2009a; Sabelli, 2014). However, modification of
endosperm endoreduplication, by perturbing the function of
core cell cycle regulators, has challenged some aspects of this
paradigm (Leiva-Neto et al., 2004; Sabelli et al., 2013). Similar to
maize kernels in which the expression of a dominant-negative
CDKA;1 reduces endoreduplication (Leiva-Neto et al., 2004), the
size, weight, and morphology of RBR1 down-regulated kernels are
essentially identical to their wild-type counterparts (Sabelli et al.,
2013). Thus, evidence from modification of maize endosperm
endoreduplication suggests this cell cycle does not contribute
to metabolic and growth processes, at least at a whole-tissue
level.
Surprisingly, RBR1 down-regulation in endosperm also results
in coordinated reduction in cell and nuclear sizes (Sabelli et al.,
2013). This indicates a role for RBR1 in coupling DNA content to nuclear and cell sizes. Importantly, these results invoke
the existence of a causal relationship between nuclear and cell
sizes in endosperm cells, which is not affected by perturbing RBR1 function, in support of the general karyoplasmic
ratio theory. In addition, the observation of a larger number
of smaller cells in RBR1 down-regulated endosperm seems to
agree with the organismal theory of development. Consequently,
one interpretation of the effects of RBR1 down-regulation in
maize endosperm is that suppression of RBR1 function leads
to enhanced cell proliferation, which results in a larger number
of cells that, nonetheless, undergo less pronounced enlargement imposed by supra-cellular control of tissue size. Nuclear
sizes are adjusted to the sizes of respective cells, regardless of
their higher ploidy levels, which are achieved via enhanced
endoreduplication. In RBR1 down-regulated endosperm, both
the uncoupling of ploidy levels from cell and nuclear size and
the reduced storage protein gene expression per unit of nuclear
DNA possibly arise from increased DNA methylation and chromatin condensation (Sabelli et al., 2013), in a fashion similar
to Arabidopsis cotyledon cells (van Zanten et al., 2011). Importantly, additional chromatin produced by enhanced endoreduplication in RBR1 down-regulated endosperm seems to be less
transcriptionally active (Sabelli et al., 2013), providing latent
transcriptional capacity in case cell enlargement is resumed or
continued. Consequently, at the individual cell level, endoreduplication in the endosperm could function in the adjustment
of nuclear size to cell size (thus preserving the karyoplasmic
ratio) through a process influencing chromatin condensation
states and transcription. This view seems to be supported by evidence from other model systems (Wu et al., 2010; Bourdon et al.,
2012).
A deeper understanding of the role endoreduplication plays
in endosperm development may require genetic analyses of
this cell cycle by perturbing individual genes other than those
www.frontiersin.org
Cell cycle control and seed development
encoding core cell cycle regulators, whose possible functions
at coupling endoreduplication to cellular outputs may produce
confounding results. The existence of compensatory mechanisms mediating tissue homeostasis may also require approaches
based on a suite of technologies such as transmission electron and fluorescence microscopy, immunohistochemistry, DNA
and RNA in situ hybridization, in vitro tissue culture and
flow cytometry/fluorescence-activated nuclear sorting to unmask
cell-autonomous effects (Gruis et al., 2006; Bourdon et al., 2012).
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Acytokinetic mitosis, symmetric and asymmetric cell division,
and cell enlargement greatly impact seed growth and development. During embryogenesis, correct execution of cell division
is required for patterning and morphogenesis. Both the rates of
proliferative and endoreduplication cell cycles (the latter of which
being typically integral to cell enlargement and differentiation in
storage compartments) and the timing of the developmental transitions between these cell cycles influence the final size of seed
structures and ultimately that of the whole seed. In Arabidopsis, a
pivotal role of its only RBR member, RBR1, in asymmetric cell divisions, gametogenesis and embryogenesis has been revealed, while
in the developing cereal endosperm the RBR1 homolog is central to
the control of cell proliferation and endoreduplication cycles and
nuclear and cell sizes, underscoring the importance of this family
of core cell cycle regulators for plant reproduction and development. Differential expansion of families of key cell cycle genes
in various plant species seems to allow the establishment of both
functional redundancy and specialization, creating complex cell
cycle regulatory networks. Genome-wide analyses and functional
gene characterization studies have recently begun to reveal potentially important differences in cell cycle control between dicots
and monocots. These differences are evident from genetic analyses of members of the RBR family, whose increased complexity in
grass species can allow functional diversification, as exemplified by
RBR1 and RBR3. The APC/C and cyclin proteolysis appear to play
less prominent roles in the control of cereal endosperm endoreduplication than in dicot root nodules, trichomes, and pericarp.
More investigation is needed to unravel the functions of different cell cycle types and their underlying regulatory pathways in
endosperm growth, development, and function.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Research on cell cycle regulation in the Larkins laboratory was
supported by grants from the Department of Energy (DEFGO3-95ER20183 and DE–96ER20242) and Pioneer Hi-Bred
International Inc. Ricardo A. Dante was supported by a graduate scholarship from the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento
Científico e Tecnológico of Brazil.
REFERENCES
Barrôco, R. M., Peres, A., Droual, A. M., De Veylder, L., Nguyen Le, S. L., De
Wolf, J., et al. (2006). The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor Orysa;KRP1 plays an
important role in seed development of rice. Plant Physiol. 142, 1053–1064. doi:
10.1104/pp.106.087056
Bauer, M. J., and Birchler, J. A. (2006). Organization of endoreduplicated chromosomes in the endosperm of Zea mays L. Chromosoma 115, 383–394. doi:
10.1007/s00412-006-0068-2
September 2014 | Volume 5 | Article 493 | 11
Dante et al.
Becraft, P. W., and Gutierrez-Marcos, J. (2012). Endosperm development: dynamic
processes and cellular innovations underlying sibling altruism. Wiley Interdiscip.
Rev. Dev. Biol. 1, 579–593. doi: 10.1002/wdev.31
Beemster, G. T., Vercruysse, S., De Veylder, L., Kuiper, M., and Inze, D. (2006). The
Arabidopsis leaf as a model system for investigating the role of cell cycle regulation
in organ growth. J. Plant Res. 119, 43–50. doi: 10.1007/s10265-005-0234-2
Berger, F., Grini, P. E., and Schnittger, A. (2006). Endosperm: an integrator
of seed growth and development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 9, 664–670. doi:
10.1016/j.pbi.2006.09.015
Blilou, I., Frugier, F., Folmer, S., Serralbo, O., Willemsen, V., Wolkenfelt, H., et al.
(2002). The Arabidopsis HOBBIT gene encodes a CDC27 homolog that links the
plant cell cycle to progression of cell differentiation. Genes Dev. 16, 2566–2575.
doi: 10.1101/gad.237302
Bourdon, M., Pirrello, J., Cheniclet, C., Coriton, O., Bourge, M., Brown, S., et al.
(2012). Evidence for karyoplasmic homeostasis during endoreduplication and
a ploidy-dependent increase in gene transcription during tomato fruit growth.
Development 139, 3817–3826. doi: 10.1242/dev.084053
Bramsiepe, J., Wester, K., Weinl, C., Roodbarkelari, F., Kasili, R., Larkin, J. C., et al.
(2010). Endoreplication controls cell fate maintenance. PLoS Genet. 6:e1000996.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000996
Cebolla, A., Vinardell, J. M., Kiss, E., Olah, B., Roudier, F., Kondorosi, A.,
et al. (1999). The mitotic inhibitor ccs52 is required for endoreduplication and
ploidy-dependent cell enlargement in plants. EMBO J. 18, 4476–4484. doi:
10.1093/emboj/18.16.4476
Cheng, Y., Cao, L., Wang, S., Li, Y., Shi, X., Liu, H., et al. (2013). Downregulation
of multiple CDK inhibitor ICK/KRP genes upregulates the E2F pathway and
increases cell proliferation, and organ and seed sizes in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 75,
642–655. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12228
Chevalier, C., Bourdon, M., Pirrello, J., Cheniclet, C., Gévaudant, F., and Frangne,
N. (2013). Endoreduplication and fruit growth in tomato: evidence in favour of
the karyoplasmic ratio theory. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 2731–2746. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert366
Chevalier, C., Nafati, M., Mathieu-Rivet, E., Bourdon, M., Frangne, N., Cheniclet, C., et al. (2011). Elucidating the functional role of endoreduplication
in tomato fruit development. Ann. Bot. 107, 1159–1169. doi: 10.1093/
aob/mcq257
Chourey, P. S., Jain, M., Li, Q. B., and Carlson, S. J. (2006). Genetic control of
cell wall invertases in developing endosperm of maize. Planta 223, 159–167. doi:
10.1007/s00425-005-0039-5
Coelho, C. M., Dante, R. A., Sabelli, P. A., Sun, Y., Dilkes, B. P., Gordon-Kamm,
W. J., et al. (2005). Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors in maize endosperm and
their potential role in endoreduplication. Plant Physiol. 138, 2323–2336. doi:
10.1104/pp.105.063917
Coelho, C. M., Wu, S., Li, Y., Hunter, B., Dante, R. A., Cui, Y., et al. (2007).
Identification of quantitative trait loci that affect endoreduplication in maize
endosperm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 115, 1147–1162. doi: 10.1007/s00122-007-0640-z
Collins, C., Dewitte, W., and Murray, J. A. (2012). D-type cyclins control cell division
and developmental rate during Arabidopsis seed development. J. Exp. Bot. 63,
3571–3586. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers015
Costa, L. M., Marshall, E., Tesfaye, M., Silverstein, K. A. T., Mori, M., Umetsu, Y.,
et al. (2014). Central cell–derived peptides regulate early embryo patterning in
flowering plants. Science 344, 168–172. doi: 10.1126/science.1243005
Costas, C., Sanchez, M. D. L., Sequeira-Mendes, J., and Gutierrez, C. (2011).
Progress in understanding DNA replication control. Plant Sci. 181, 203–209.
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.04.020
Dante, R. A., Sabelli, P. A., Nguyen, H. N., Leiva-Neto, J. T., Tao, Y., Lowe, K. S.,
et al. (2014). Cyclin-dependent kinase complexes in developing maize endosperm:
evidence for differential expression and functional specialization. Planta 239,
493–509. doi: 10.1007/s00425-013-1990-1
De Veylder, L., Larkin, J. C., and Schnittger, A. (2011). Molecular control and function of endoreplication in development and physiology. Trends Plant Sci. 16, 624–634. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2011.
07.001
Dhillon, S. S., and Miksche, J. P. (1983). DNA, RNA, protein and heterochromatin
changes during embryo development and germination of soybean (Glycine max
L.). Histochem. J. 15, 21–37. doi: 10.1007/BF01006069
Dilkes, B. P., Dante, R. A., Coelho, C., and Larkins, B. A. (2002). Genetic analyses of
endoreduplication in Zea mays endosperm: evidence of sporophytic and zygotic
maternal control. Genetics 160, 1163–1177.
Frontiers in Plant Science | Plant Evolution and Development
Cell cycle control and seed development
Dudits, D., Cserháti, M., Miskolczi, P., and Horváth, G. V. (2007). “The growing
family of plant Cyclin-Dependent Kinases with multiple functions in cellular and
developmental regulation,” in Annual Plant Reviews, Vol. 32, Cell Cycle Control
and Plant Development, ed. D. Inzé (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd), 1–30. doi:
10.1002/9780470988923.ch1
Ebel, C., Mariconti, L., and Gruissem, W. (2004). Plant retinoblastoma homologues
control nuclear proliferation in the female gametophyte. Nature 429, 776–780.
doi: 10.1038/nature02637
Edgar, B. A., Zielke, N., and Gutierrez, C. (2014). Endocycles: a recurrent evolutionary innovation for post-mitotic cell growth. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 197–210.
doi: 10.1038/nrm3756
Egli, D. B. (2006). The role of seed in the determination of yield of grain crops. Aust.
J. Agric. Res. 57, 1237–1247. doi: 10.1071/AR06133
Eloy, N. B., Gonzalez, N., Van Leene, J., Maleux, K., Vanhaeren, H., De Milde, L.,
et al. (2012). SAMBA, a plant-specific anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome
regulator is involved in early development and A-type cyclin stabilization. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 13853–13858. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211418109
Fiume, E., and Fletcher, J. C. (2012). Regulation of Arabidopsis embryo and
endosperm development by the polypeptide signaling molecule CLE8. Plant Cell
24, 1000–1012. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.094839
Folsom, J. J., Begcy, K., Hao, X., Wang, D., and Walia, H. (2014). Rice
Fertilization-Independent Endosperm1 regulates seed size under heat stress by
controlling early endosperm development. Plant Physiol. 165, 238–248. doi:
10.1104/pp.113.232413
Garcia, D., Fitz Gerald, J. N., and Berger, F. (2005). Maternal control of
integument cell elongation and zygotic control of endosperm growth are coordinated to determine seed size in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 17, 52–60. doi:
10.1105/tpc.104.027136
Genschik, P., Marrocco, K., Bach, L., Noir, S., and Criqui, M. C. (2013). Selective
protein degradation: a rheostat to modulate cell-cycle phase transitions. J. Exp.
Bot. 65, 2603–2615. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert426
Gordon-Kamm, W., Dilkes, B. P., Lowe, K., Hoerster, G., Sun, X., Ross, M., et al.
(2002). Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of
the plant retinoblastoma pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 11975–11980.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.142409899
Grafi, G., Burnett, R. J., Helentjaris, T., Larkins, B. A., Decaprio, J. A., Sellers,
W. R., et al. (1996). A maize cDNA encoding a member of the retinoblastoma
protein family: involvement in endoreduplication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
93, 8962–8967. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.17.8962
Grafi, G., and Larkins, B. A. (1995). Endoreduplication in maize endosperm:
involvement of M phase-promoting factor inhibition and induction of S phaserelated kinases. Science 269, 1262–1264. doi: 10.1126/science.269.5228.1262
Gruis, D. F., Guo, H., Selinger, D., Tian, Q., and Olsen, O. A. (2006). Surface position,
not signaling from surrounding maternal tissues, specifies aleurone epidermal cell
fate in maize. Plant Physiol. 141, 898–909. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.080945
Guillon, F., Larre, C., Petipas, F., Berger, A., Moussawi, J., Rogniaux, H., et al. (2012).
A comprehensive overview of grain development in Brachypodium distachyon
variety Bd21. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 739–755. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err298
Guo, J., Wang, F., Song, J., Sun, W., and Zhang, X. S. (2010). The expression of Orysa;CycB1;1 is essential for endosperm formation and causes embryo
enlargement in rice. Planta 231, 293–303. doi: 10.1007/s00425-009-1051-y
Haughn, G., and Chaudhury, A. (2005). Genetic analysis of seed coat development
in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci. 10, 472–477. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2005.08.005
Hemerly, A. S., Ferreira, P. C., Van Montagu, M., Engler, G., and Inze, D. (2000). Cell
division events are essential for embryo patterning and morphogenesis: studies
on dominant-negative cdc2aAt mutants of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 23, 123–130. doi:
10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00800.x
Heyman, J., and De Veylder, L. (2012). The anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome in control of plant development. Mol. Plant 5, 1182–1194. doi:
10.1093/mp/sss094
Hu, X., Cheng, X., Jiang, H., Zhu, S., Cheng, B., and Xiang, Y. (2010). Genomewide analysis of cyclins in maize (Zea mays). Genet. Mol. Res. 9, 1490–1503. doi:
10.4238/vol9-3gmr861
Ingouff, M., Jullien, P. E., and Berger, F. (2006). The female gametophyte and
the endosperm control cell proliferation and differentiation of the seed coat in
Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 18, 3491–3501. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.047266
Inzé, D., and De Veylder, L. (2006). Cell cycle regulation in plant development.
Annu. Rev. Genet. 40, 77–105. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090431
September 2014 | Volume 5 | Article 493 | 12
Dante et al.
Ishimaru, K., Hirotsu, N., Madoka, Y., Murakami, N., Hara, N., Onodera, H., et al.
(2013). Loss of function of the IAA-glucose hydrolase gene TGW6 enhances rice
grain weight and increases yield. Nat. Genet. 45, 707–711. doi: 10.1038/ng.2612
Jakoby, M. J., Weinl, C., Pusch, S., Kuijt, S. J., Merkle, T., Dissmeyer, N., et al. (2006).
Analysis of the subcellular localization, function, and proteolytic control of the
Arabidopsis cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor ICK1/KRP1. Plant Physiol. 141,
1293–1305. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.081406
Jenik, P. D., Jurkuta, R. E., and Barton, M. K. (2005). Interactions between the cell
cycle and embryonic patterning in Arabidopsis uncovered by a mutation in DNA
polymerase epsilon. Plant Cell 17, 3362–3377. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.036889
John, P. C., and Qi, R. (2008). Cell division and endoreduplication: doubtful engines of vegetative growth. Trends Plant Sci. 13, 121–127. doi:
10.1016/j.tplants.2008.01.004
Johnston, A. J., Matveeva, E., Kirioukhova, O., Grossniklaus, U., and Gruissem, W. (2008). A dynamic reciprocal RBR-PRC2 regulatory circuit controls Arabidopsis gametophyte development. Curr. Biol. 18, 1680–1686. doi:
10.1016/j.cub.2008.09.026
Jullien, P. E., Mosquna, A., Ingouff, M., Sakata, T., Ohad, N., and Berger, F. (2008).
Retinoblastoma and its binding partner MSI1 control imprinting in Arabidopsis.
PLoS Biol. 6:e194. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060194
Kiesselbach, T. (1949). The Structure and Reproduction of Corn. Lincoln: University
of Nebraska.
Kowles, R. V. (2009). The importance of DNA endoreduplication in the developing
endosperm of maize. Maydica 54, 387–399.
Kowles, R. V., and Phillips, R. L. (1985). DNA amplification patterns in maize
endosperm nuclei during kernel development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82,
7010–7014. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.20.7010
La, H., Li, J., Ji, Z., Cheng, Y., Li, X., Jiang, S., et al. (2006). Genome-wide analysis of
cyclin family in rice (Oryza Sativa L.). Mol. Genet. Genomics 275, 374–386. doi:
10.1007/s00438-005-0093-5
Larkins, B. A., Dilkes, B. P., Dante, R. A., Coelho, C. M., Woo, Y. M., and Liu, Y.
(2001). Investigating the hows and whys of DNA endoreduplication. J. Exp. Bot.
52, 183–192. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/52.355.183
Lau, S., Slane, D., Herud, O., Kong, J., and Jurgens, G. (2012). Early embryogenesis
in flowering plants: setting up the basic body pattern. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 63,
483–506. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105507
Leiva-Neto, J. T., Grafi, G., Sabelli, P. A., Dante, R. A., Woo, Y. M., Maddock, S.,
et al. (2004). A dominant negative mutant of cyclin-dependent kinase A reduces
endoreduplication but not cell size or gene expression in maize endosperm. Plant
Cell 16, 1854–1869. doi: 10.1105/tpc.022178
Lemontey, C., Mousset-Declas, C., Munier-Jolain, N., and Boutin, J. P. (2000).
Maternal genotype influences pea seed size by controlling both mitotic activity during early embryogenesis and final endoreduplication level/cotyledon
cell size in mature seed. J. Exp. Bot. 51, 167–175. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/51.
343.167
Li, J., Nie, X., Tan, J. L., and Berger, F. (2013). Integration of epigenetic and genetic
controls of seed size by cytokinin in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110,
15479–15484. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1305175110
Lur, H. S., and Setter, T. L. (1993). Role of auxin in maize endosperm development
(timing of nuclear DNA endoreduplication, zein expression, and cytokinin). Plant
Physiol. 103, 273–280.
Ma, Z., Wu, Y., Jin, J., Yan, J., Kuang, S., Zhou, M., et al. (2013). Phylogenetic analysis
reveals the evolution and diversification of cyclins in eukaryotes. Mol. Phylogenet.
Evol. 66, 1002–1010. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.12.007
Mizukami, Y. (2001). A matter of size: developmental control of organ size in plants.
Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4, 533–539. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5266(00)00212-0
Mizutani, M., Naganuma, T., Tsutsumi, K., and Saitoh, Y. (2010). The syncytiumspecific expression of the Orysa;KRP3 CDK inhibitor: implication of its involvement in the cell cycle control in the rice (Oryza sativa L.) syncytial endosperm. J.
Exp. Bot. 61, 791–798. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp343
Nakai, T., Kato, K., Shinmyo, A., and Sekine, M. (2006). Arabidopsis KRPs
have distinct inhibitory activity toward cyclin D2-associated kinases, including
plant-specific B-type cyclin-dependent kinase. FEBS Lett. 580, 336–340. doi:
10.1016/j.febslet.2005.12.018
Nowack, M. K., Harashima, H., Dissmeyer, N., Zhao, X., Bouyer, D.,
Weimer, A. K., et al. (2012). Genetic framework of cyclin-dependent kinase
function in Arabidopsis. Dev. Cell 22, 1030–1040. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.
2012.02.015
www.frontiersin.org
Cell cycle control and seed development
Nowack, M. K., Ungru, A., Bjerkan, K. N., Grini, P. E., and Schnittger, A. (2010).
Reproductive cross-talk: seed development in flowering plants. Biochem. Soc.
Trans. 38, 604–612. doi: 10.1042/bst0380604
Ohto, M. A., Floyd, S. K., Fischer, R. L., Goldberg, R. B., and Harada, J. J.
(2009). Effects of APETALA2 on embryo, endosperm, and seed coat development determine seed size in Arabidopsis. Sex. Plant Reprod. 22, 277–289. doi:
10.1007/s00497-009-0116-1
Olsen, O. A. (2004). Nuclear endosperm development in cereals and Arabidopsis
thaliana. Plant Cell 16(Suppl.), S214–S227. doi: 10.1105/tpc.017111
Powell, A. E., and Lenhard, M. (2012). Control of organ size in plants. Curr. Biol.
22, R360–R367. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.010
Ren, H., Santner, A., Del Pozo, J. C., Murray, J. A., and Estelle, M. (2008). Degradation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor KRP1 is regulated by two different
ubiquitin E3 ligases. Plant J. 53, 705–716. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03370.x
Rewers, M., and Sliwinska, E. (2012). Endoreduplication intensity as a marker
of seed developmental stage in the Fabaceae. Cytometry A 81, 1067–1075. doi:
10.1002/cyto.a.22202
Roodbarkelari, F., Bramsiepe, J., Weinl, C., Marquardt, S., Novak, B., Jakoby, M.
J., et al. (2010). Cullin 4-ring finger-ligase plays a key role in the control of
endoreplication cycles in Arabidopsis trichomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107,
15275–15280. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006941107
Sabelli, P. A. (2012a). Replicate and die for your own good: endoreduplication and cell death in the cereal endosperm. J. Cereal Sci. 56, 9–20. doi:
10.1016/j.jcs.2011.09.006
Sabelli, P. A. (2012b). “Seed development: a comparative overview on biology of
morphology, physiology, and biochemistry between monocot and dicot plants,”
in Seed Development: OMICS Technologies toward Improvement of Seed Quality
and Crop Yield, eds G. K. Agrawal and R. Rakwal (Amsterdam: Springer), 3–25.
doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-4749-4_1
Sabelli, P. A. (2014). “Cell cycle regulation and plant development,” in Handbook
of Plant and Crop Physiology, 3rd Edn, ed. M. Pessarakli (Boca Raton, FL: CRC
Press), 3–32.
Sabelli, P. A., Dante, R. A., Leiva-Neto, J. T., Jung, R., Gordon-Kamm, W. J., and
Larkins, B. A. (2005). RBR3, a member of the retinoblastoma-related family from
maize, is regulated by the RBR1/E2F pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102,
13005–13012. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506160102
Sabelli, P. A., Hoerster, G., Lizarraga, L. E., Brown, S. W., Gordon-Kamm, W. J., and
Larkins, B. A. (2009). Positive regulation of minichromosome maintenance gene
expression, DNA replication, and cell transformation by a plant retinoblastoma
gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 4042–4047. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813329106
Sabelli, P. A., and Larkins, B. A. (2006). Grasses like Mammals? Redundancy and
compensatory regulation within the retinoblastoma protein family. Cell Cycle 5,
352–355. doi: 10.4161/cc.5.4.2428
Sabelli, P. A., and Larkins, B. A. (2009a). The contribution of cell cycle regulation to
endosperm development. Sex. Plant Reprod. 22, 207–219. doi: 10.1007/s00497009-0105-4
Sabelli, P. A., and Larkins, B. A. (2009b). The development of endosperm in grasses.
Plant Physiol. 149, 14–26. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.129437
Sabelli, P. A., and Larkins, B. A. (2009c). Regulation and function of retinoblastomarelated plant genes. Plant Sci. 177, 540–548. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.09.012
Sabelli, P. A., Liu, Y., Dante, R. A., Lizarraga, L. E., Nguyen, H. N., Brown, S. W., et al.
(2013). Control of cell proliferation, endoreduplication, cell size, and cell death
by the retinoblastoma-related pathway in maize endosperm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 110, E1827–E1836. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1304903110
Schruff, M. C., Spielman, M., Tiwari, S., Adams, S., Fenby, N., and Scott, R. J. (2006).
The AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 2 gene of Arabidopsis links auxin signalling,
cell division, and the size of seeds and other organs. Development 133, 251–261.
doi: 10.1242/dev.02194
Sekhon, R. S., Hirsch, C. N., Childs, K. L., Breitzman, M. W., Kell, P., Duvick, S.,
et al. (2014). Phenotypic and transcriptional analysis of divergently selected maize
populations reveals the role of developmental timing in seed size determination.
Plant Physiol. 165, 658–669. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.235424
Su’udi, M., Cha, J. Y., Ahn, I.-P., Kwak, Y.-S., Woo, Y.-M., and Son, D. (2012a).
Functional characterization of a B-type cell cycle switch 52 in rice (OsCCS52B).
Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 111, 101–111. doi: 10.1007/s11240-012-0176-z
Su’udi, M., Cha, J. Y., Jung, M. H., Ermawati, N., Han, C. D., Kim, M. G., et al.
(2012b). Potential role of the rice OsCCS52A gene in endoreduplication. Planta
235, 387–397. doi: 10.1007/s00425-011-1515-8
September 2014 | Volume 5 | Article 493 | 13
Dante et al.
Sugimoto-Shirasu, K., and Roberts, K. (2003). “Big it up”: endoreduplication
and cell-size control in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 6, 544–553. doi:
10.1016/j.pbi.2003.09.009
Sun, Y., Dilkes, B. P., Zhang, C., Dante, R. A., Carneiro, N. P., Lowe, K. S.,
et al. (1999a). Characterization of maize (Zea mays L.) Wee1 and its activity
in developing endosperm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 4180–4185. doi:
10.1073/pnas.96.7.4180
Sun, Y., Flannigan, B. A., and Setter, T. L. (1999b). Regulation of endoreduplication
in maize (Zea mays L.) endosperm. Isolation of a novel B1-type cyclin and its
quantitative analysis. Plant Mol. Biol. 41, 245–258. doi: 10.1023/A:1006315625486
Trafford, K., Haleux, P., Henderson, M., Parker, M., Shirley, N. J., Tucker, M. R.,
et al. (2013). Grain development in Brachypodium and other grasses: possible
interactions between cell expansion, starch deposition, and cell-wall synthesis. J.
Exp. Bot. 64, 5033–5047. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert292
Tuteja, N., Tran, N. Q., Dang, H. Q., and Tuteja, R. (2011). Plant MCM proteins: role in DNA replication and beyond. Plant Mol. Biol. 77, 537–545. doi:
10.1007/s11103-011-9836-3
Van Daele, I., Gonzalez, N., Vercauteren, I., De Smet, L., Inzé, D., Roldan-Ruiz, I.,
et al. (2012). A comparative study of seed yield parameters in Arabidopsis thaliana
mutants and transgenics. Plant Biotechnol. J. 10, 488–500. doi: 10.1111/j.14677652.2012.00687.x
Van Leene, J., Boruc, J., De Jaeger, G., Russinova, E., and De Veylder, L. (2011). A
kaleidoscopic view of the Arabidopsis core cell cycle interactome. Trends Plant Sci.
16, 141–150. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.12.004
van Zanten, M., Koini, M. A., Geyer, R., Liu, Y., Brambilla, V., Bartels, D., et al.
(2011). Seed maturation in Arabidopsis thaliana is characterized by nuclear size
reduction and increased chromatin condensation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
108, 20219–20224. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117726108
Verkest, A., Manes, C. L., Vercruysse, S., Maes, S., Van Der Schueren, E., Beeckman, T., et al. (2005). The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor KRP2 controls the
onset of the endoreduplication cycle during Arabidopsis leaf development through
inhibition of mitotic CDKA;1 kinase complexes. Plant Cell 17, 1723–1736. doi:
10.1105/tpc.105.032383
Vilhar, B., Kladnik, A., Blejec, A., Chourey, P. S., and Dermastia, M. (2002). Cytometrical evidence that the loss of seed weight in the miniature1 seed mutant of
maize is associated with reduced mitotic activity in the developing endosperm.
Plant Physiol. 129, 23–30. doi: 10.1104/pp.001826
Vlieghe, K., Boudolf, V., Beemster, G. T., Maes, S., Magyar, Z., Atanassova, A.,
et al. (2005). The DP-E2F-like gene DEL1 controls the endocycle in Arabidopsis
thaliana. Curr. Biol. 15, 59–63. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.038
Walley, J. W., Shen, Z., Sartor, R., Wu, K. J., Osborn, J., Smith, L. G., et al. (2013).
Reconstruction of protein networks from an atlas of maize seed proteotypes. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, E4808–E4817. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319113110
Wang, G., Kong, H., Sun, Y., Zhang, X., Zhang, W., Altman, N., et al. (2004).
Genome-wide analysis of the cyclin family in Arabidopsis and comparative phylogenetic analysis of plant cyclin-like proteins. Plant Physiol. 135, 1084–1099. doi:
10.1104/pp.104.040436
Wang, H., Zhou, Y., Bird, D. A., and Fowke, L. C. (2008). Functions, regulation and
cellular localization of plant cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors. J. Microsc. 231,
234–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2008.02039.x
Wang, Y., Hou, Y., Gu, H., Kang, D., Chen, Z., Liu, J., et al. (2012). The Arabidopsis
APC4 subunit of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) is critical
for both female gametogenesis and embryogenesis. Plant J. 69, 227–240. doi:
10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04785.x
Frontiers in Plant Science | Plant Evolution and Development
Cell cycle control and seed development
Wang, Y., Hou, Y., Gu, H., Kang, D., Chen, Z. L., Liu, J., et al. (2013). The Arabidopsis anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome subunit 1 is critical for both
female gametogenesis and embryogenesis(F). J. Integr. Plant Biol. 55, 64–74. doi:
10.1111/jipb.12018
Weimer, A. K., Nowack, M. K., Bouyer, D., Zhao, X., Harashima, H., Naseer,
S., et al. (2012). Retinoblastoma related1 regulates asymmetric cell divisions in
Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24, 4083–4095. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.104620
Weinl, C., Marquardt, S., Kuijt, S. J., Nowack, M. K., Jakoby, M. J., Hulskamp,
M., et al. (2005). Novel functions of plant cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors,
ICK1/KRP1, can act non-cell-autonomously and inhibit entry into mitosis. Plant
Cell 17, 1704–1722. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.030486
Willemsen, V., Wolkenfelt, H., De Vrieze, G., Weisbeek, P., and Scheres, B. (1998). The
HOBBIT gene is required for formation of the root meristem in the Arabidopsis
embryo. Development 125, 521–531.
Wu, C.-Y., Rolfe, P. A., Gifford, D. K., and Fink, G. R. (2010). Control of transcription
by cell size. PLoS Biol. 8:e1000523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000523
Xie, Q., Sanz-Burgos, A. P., Hannon, G. J., and Gutierrez, C. (1996). Plant cells contain a novel member of the retinoblastoma family of growth regulatory proteins.
EMBO J. 15, 4900–4908.
Yi, D., Kamei, C. L., Cools, T., Vanderauwera, S., Takahashi, N., Okushima, Y.,
et al. (2014). The Arabidopsis SIAMESE-RELATED Cyclin-Dependent Kinase
Inhibitors SMR5 and SMR7 regulate the DNA damage checkpoint in response to
reactive oxygen species. Plant Cell 26, 296–309. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.118943
Young, T. E., and Gallie, D. R. (2000). Programmed cell death during
endosperm development. Plant Mol. Biol. 44, 283–301. doi: 10.1023/
A:1026588408152
Yu, Y., Steinmetz, A., Meyer, D., Brown, S., and Shen, W. H. (2003). The tobacco
A-type cyclin, Nicta;CYCA3;2, at the nexus of cell division and differentiation.
Plant Cell 15, 2763–2777. doi: 10.1105/tpc.015990
Zhou, Y., Li, G., Brandizzi, F., Fowke, L. C., and Wang, H. (2003). The plant
cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor ICK1 has distinct functional domains for in
vivo kinase inhibition, protein instability and nuclear localization. Plant J. 35,
476–489. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01821.x
Zhou, Y., Zhang, X., Kang, X., Zhao, X., Zhang, X., and Ni, M. (2009). SHORT
HYPOCOTYL UNDER BLUE1 associates with MINISEED3 and HAIKU2 promoters in vivo to regulate Arabidopsis seed development. Plant Cell 21, 106–117.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.064972
Conflict of Interest Statement: The authors declare that the research was conducted
in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed
as a potential conflict of interest.
Received: 18 June 2014; accepted: 05 September 2014; published online: 23 September
2014.
Citation: Dante RA, Larkins BA and Sabelli PA (2014) Cell cycle control and seed
development. Front. Plant Sci. 5:493. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00493
This article was submitted to Plant Evolution and Development, a section of the journal
Frontiers in Plant Science.
Copyright © 2014 Dante, Larkins and Sabelli. This is an open-access article distributed
under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s)
or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in
accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is
permitted which does not comply with these terms.
September 2014 | Volume 5 | Article 493 | 14