Local Government Sustainability Objectives and Indicators DECEMBER 2011 Local Government Division Department of Premier and Cabinet SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS Areas of measurement Objective Indicator Indicator questions / descriptions Data source 1. Financial management To achieve and/or improve financial sustainability through meeting the requirements of sound fiscal management. Operating surplus Description: The difference between day-to-day income and expenses for the period. Comment: An operating surplus (or deficit) arises when operating income (excluding capital income) exceeds (or is less than) operating expenses for a period (usually a year). Calculation: Operating income (excluding amounts received specifically for new or upgraded assets and physical resources received free of charge) less operating expenses for the reporting period. Description: The percentage by which the major controllable income source plus operating grants varies from day to day expenses. Comment: The operating surplus ratio is the operating surplus (or deficit) expressed as a percentage of general and other rates and operating grants. Calculation: Operating surplus (or deficit) divided by general and other rate income and operating grants. AuditorGeneral Description: What is owed to others less money held, invested or owed to the entity. Comment: Net financial liabilities equals total liabilities less financial assets. Calculation: Total liabilities AuditorGeneral Operating surplus ratio Net financial liabilities Sustainability Objectives and Indicators Project AuditorGeneral 2/7 SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS Areas of measurement Objective Indicator Net financial liabilities ratio 2. Asset management To manage assets in a way that maximises asset service delivery, manages related risks and accounts for whole-of-life costs. Asset sustainability ratio Asset consumption ratio Sustainability Objectives and Indicators Project Indicator questions / descriptions less financial assets (cash and cash equivalents plus trade and other receivables plus other financial assets). Description: The significance of net amount owed compared with the period’s income. Comment: Indicates the extent to which net financial liabilities could be met by operating income. Calculation: Net financial liabilities divided by operating income. Description: The ratio of asset replacement expenditure relative to depreciation for a period. It measures whether assets are being replaced at the rate they are wearing out. Comment: Indicates whether the entity is replacing or renewing non-financial assets at the same rate that its overall stock of assets is wearing out for the period. Calculation: Capital expenditure on replacement / renewal of existing plant and equipment and infrastructure assets divided by their annual depreciation expense. Description: The average proportion of ‘as new’ condition left in assets. Comment: Shows the depreciated replacement cost of an entity’s depreciable assets relative to their ‘as new’ (replacement) value Data source AuditorGeneral AuditorGeneral AuditorGeneral 3/7 SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS Areas of measurement Objective Indicator Asset renewal funding ratio 3. Planning and development To develop, Percentage of Development implement and improve planning Applications (DAs) Sustainability Objectives and Indicators Project Indicator questions / descriptions Calculation: The depreciated replacement cost of plant, equipment and infrastructure assets divided by the current replacement cost of depreciable assets. Description: The ratio of net present value of asset renewal funding accommodated over a ten year period in a longterm financial plan relative to the net present value of the projected capital renewal expenditures identified in an asset management plan for the same period. Comment: Indicates whether the entity has the financial capacity to fund asset renewal as required and therefore continue to provide existing levels of asset-based services in the future without additional operating income or reductions in operating expenses, or an increase in net financial liabilities above that currently projected. Calculation: The net present value of projected ten-year capital renewal funding outlays in a long-term financial plan divided by the net present value of projected ten-year capital renewal expenditures in an asset management plan in current values. What percentage of DAs was completed within the statutory timeframe of 42 days? Data source AuditorGeneral CDC - Land Use and Planning Section 4/7 SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS Areas of measurement Objective Indicator and development practices that improve access to facilities and services, utilisation of resources, appropriate infrastructure provision and sustainable environmental practices. completed within statutory timeframe. Average days to process planning and development applications (statutory time as per legislation, exclude days where clock stopped). Percentage of decisions by the Resource Management and Planning Appeals Tribunal (RMPAT) in favour of the council. 4. Community satisfaction1 a) Planning and development To ensure communities are satisfied Indicator questions / descriptions What are the: Average number of calendar days to process applications: - planning: permitted use - planning: discretionary use - building Data source CDC - Land Use and Planning Section Total number of all planning applications lodged Total number of all building applications lodged How many council planning decisions were referred to RMPAT RMPAT? How many decisions were in favour of the council? LGAT survey Satisfaction with councils’ On a scale of 1-5, how do respondents rate their LGAT survey 1 The questions in the LGAT survey ask the respondent to rate their satisfaction on a Likert scale of 1 to 5; 1 indicates very dissatisfied and 5 indicates very satisfied. Sustainability Objectives and Indicators Project 5/7 SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS Areas of measurement Objective Indicator Indicator questions / descriptions with councils’ provision of services in the areas of: performance in planning and development. Satisfaction with councils’ performance in community involvement. satisfaction on their council’s performance in consistent and appropriate planning policies (see footnote 4 below) On a scale of 1-5, how do respondents rate their satisfaction on their council’s performance in community involvement in relation to: informing residents about Council activities involving residents in local decision making access to Councillors / Aldermen c) Infrastructure Safe and well maintained roads, pedestrian areas and local road networks. d) Environmental management / waste Waste management On a scale of 1-5, how do respondents rate their satisfaction on their council’s performance in providing: safe and well maintained local roads safe and well maintained pedestrian areas an efficient road network an effective stormwater system On a scale of 1-5, how do respondents rate their satisfaction on their council’s performance in: household garbage collection recycling services – including kerbside recycling and depots b) Community involvement a) Planning and development b) Community involvement c) Infrastrucure d) Environment al management / waste e) Recreation / culture f) Community health and safety g) Overall satisfaction Sustainability Objectives and Indicators Project Data source LGAT survey LGAT survey LGAT survey 6/7 SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS Areas of measurement Objective Indicator e) Recreation, cultural facilities and programs Provision and management of recreational and cultural facilities and programs. f) Community health and safety Hygiene standards of food outlets, restaurants and public facilities, council immunisation programs and animal control. Satisfaction with overall performance of council. g) Overall satisfaction Sustainability Objectives and Indicators Project Indicator questions / descriptions operation of local tip and transfer stations maintaining a clean and tidy city/town On a scale of 1-5, how do respondents rate their satisfaction on their council’s performance in: sports grounds and recreation facilities parks and playgrounds community centres and halls arts and entertainment facilities including museums and art galleries arts and entertainment activities and special events management of natural areas Data source LGAT survey On a scale of 1-5, how do respondents rate their satisfaction on their council’s performance in: hygiene standards of food outlets, restaurants and public facilities council immunisation programs animal control LGAT survey On a scale of 1-5, how satisfied are you with your council’s performance overall? LGAT survey 7/7
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz