Academic
Program Review
Program: Sciences
2012-2013
Prepared by: Cheryl Boice, Ph.D.
Approved by: Brian Dopson
Date Submitted: 7/21/2013
Program Review Report
Purpose of Program Review
Program review is part of Florida Gateway College’s (FGC) ongoing institutional effectiveness
process to achieve its mission and goals through strategic planning, research, evaluation, and
the use of information and data to guide decisions and actions. Academic programs,
administrative support, and academic and student support departments are systematically
reviewed as part of the process.
The purpose of program review is to evaluate the quality of education, efficiency of services
and processes, and adequacy of institutional resources. It is also a tool used to document the
achievement of goals and objectives. The results of evaluation are analyzed and actions are
taken to address areas that need improvement.
There are two parts to the Program Review Process:
•
•
Comprehensive Program Review, occurring approximately every five years, focuses on each
area’s courses, pedagogy, assessment plan, and future goals and objectives related to the
improvement of student learning.
Annual Program Review Update asks each area to address its needs for resources (faculty,
space, equipment, etc.) and to provide a report on outcomes assessment activities for the
prior year.
SACS Comprehensive Standard 3.3.1
The institution identifies expected outcomes, assesses the extent to which it achieves these
outcomes, and provides evidence of improvement based on analysis of the results in each of
the following areas:
3.3.1.1 educational programs, to include student learning outcomes
3.3.1.2 administrative support services
3.3.1.3 academic and student support services
3.3.1.4 research within its mission, if appropriate
3.3.1.5 community/public service within its mission, if appropriate. (Institutional Effectiveness)
Contact:
Department of Research and Institutional Effectiveness
Becky van Hoek, Coordinator of Planning & Accreditation
Ext. 4491
[email protected]
Page 2 of 22
Program Review Report
October
Academic Program
Recommended Program Review Timeline
Section 1- Overview
November
Section 2– Collaboration
December
Section 3– Resources
January
Section 4– Accomplishments
February
Section 5 – Learning Outcomes
March
Section 6 - Student Performance
April
Section 7 – Summary – Strengths & Weaknesses
May
Section 8 – Goals
June
Section 9 – Action Plan
July
Final Reports Due to RIE
July-August-September
Report Validations
October – November--December
Executive/Administrative Review Meetings
Page 3 of 22
Program Review Report
The Program Review should reflect the consensus of the faculty and staff within the program or
department. It is meant to provide a broad understanding of current trends related to student learning
and how the program or department serves to meet the overall mission and goals of Florida Gateway
College.
1. Overview
Mission: a statement defining what the program is supposed to accomplish on a daily basis.
The program mission is related to the Institutional mission and forms the basis for goals and
outcomes. It may help to ask the following questions when forming the mission statement:
Who are we? What are we trying to do? Who do we serve?
The mission of the Science Department at Florida Gateway College is to provide quality
instruction to enable students to satisfy the science education requirements for their chosen
field of study.
Description: a brief description of department functions, customers served, contribution to the
success of the College, other important characteristics
The Science department functions to introduce and educate students in the biological and
physical sciences. We strive to provide opportunities for superior education by providing
undergraduate research opportunities and improving the technology utilized for instruction
and learning. Students are prepared to achieve their academic and vocational pursuits after
graduation.
This is in support of the College’s mission to provide superior instruction, nurture individual
development, and enrich the community through quality higher education programs and
lifelong learning opportunities.
The sciences program covers both Life sciences and Physical Sciences. AA students are required
to successfully complete 9 hours of Science coursework with 3 hours in the Biological Sciences
prefixed BSC, BOT, MCB, or ZOO, and 3 hours in the Physical Sciences prefixed AST, CHM, PHY,
or PSC. The additional 3 hours may be in either Biological or Physical Sciences. A lab component
is also required.
Page 4 of 22
Program Review Report
2. Collaboration
Internal
Relationships with other college departments and programs.
What collaborative efforts have you undertaken with other departments and educational
programs?
The science department is involved in a number of collaborative efforts with other
departments and educational programs.
• We have collaborated with the Teachers academy to provide a more comprehensive
learning experience with labs for future educators.
• The Chemistry department is collaborating with the Wastewater technology program
on the analysis of water samples utilizing the chemistry’s robotic-online IC technology.
• The Physics and Anatomy and Physiology departments work in collaboration with our
Physical Therapy Assistant program to provide the students the necessary educational
foundation. The Microbiology and Anatomy and Physiology departments work in
collaboration with the Nursing program to provide the students the necessary
educational foundation.
• AP instructors, have taught sessions in the Nursing, Paramedic, and EMT programs.
• The Biology department has been collaborating with the Golf and landscaping
department, as well as the maintenance department to enhance the campus and
student learning by creating outdoor living labs, utilizing and updating greenhouses.
The physics instructor has been sponsoring a “Brian Bowl” quiz team for students at FGC.
The department has also been involved with several other departments in the “Gateway to
Green water initiative” to provide a reading/ study room focused on water and other natural
resources.
External
Community Service/Outreach Activities
List activities or projects you have undertaken with other educational institutions, the
community, or business/industry. How do you assess the effectiveness of these activities?
Community Service/Outreach Activity
Assessment
The physical science instructor has been
involved in the Suwannee Water
Management District meetings
The chemistry instructor has been providing
demonstrations and labs with a local Boy
Scouts of America troop
Sponsoring the Regional Science Fair
Feedback from the meetings, Faculty
evaluation form
Involved in the Science Olympiad with
preparing the labs and volunteering
Number of faculty involved and schools
participating
Faculty evaluation form
Number of regional schools participating
Page 5 of 22
Program Review Report
The biology instructor/ author has put in
“reading” appearances at local libraries
Local School volunteering
Faculty evaluation form
The microbiology instructor is a Pearson
Faculty advisor
Feedback from the meetings, Faculty
evaluation form
Faculty evaluation form
Page 6 of 22
Program Review Report
3. Resources
List faculty/staff, indicate status - full-time/part-time, courses taught, and their qualifications.
Name
FT/PT
Courses Taught
Staff Qualifications
Ms. Maureen AkeyFT
BSC 2010C,
M.S. Agricultural Sciences
Meyerson,
BSC2011C,
BSC2910,
BOT2010C
Dr. Cheryl Boice
FT
BSC 2010C, BSC
Ph.D. Microbiology
2011C, BSC 2910,
MCB 2010 and
MCBL 2010
Mr. James Givvines
FT
PHY 2048, PHY
M.S. applied mathematics,
2049, PHY 2053,
with 18 additional hours in
PHY 2054, AST
Physics and Astronomy
1002, PSC 1341
Dr. Juan Guzman
FT
BSC 2084, BSC
M.D. Specialist in Obstetrics
2085, BSCL 2085,
and Gynocology
BSC2086 BSCL
2086
Mr. John Hawes
FT
CHM 2045, CHML M.A. Chemistry
2045, CHM 2046,
CHML 2046, CHM
2210, CHML
2210, CHM 2211,
CHML 2211,
CHM2910
Dr. Mustapha Kane
FT
PSC 1341, GLY
Ph. D. Geology
1001
Dr. Doris Lombo
FT
BSC 2084, BSC
M.D.- medicine
2085, BSCL 2085,
BSC2086 BSCL
2086
Dr. Gabriel Pardo
FT
BSC 2084, BSC
M.D.- medicine
2085, BSCL 2085,
BSC2086 BSCL
2086
Mr. Yarricks
BSC 2010C,
M.S. Biology
BSC2011C,
Mr. Oman
PSC 1341, GLY
M.S. Geology- soil and water
1001
Sciences
Page 7 of 22
Program Review Report
List professional development activities of department staff:
Name
Professional Development Activity
Maureen Akey
University of Florida Hydroponic Growers
Symposium, Two NIH Grant Writing Conferences,
Two St. Johns Water Management Symposiums,
Water Quality Canoe Trip with Florida State
Representative and the Suwannee River Water
Management and local and state politicians.
Cheryl Boice
Pearson Leadership Conference, Florida Honor’s
Conference, IEC committee,
Mr. James Givvines
Florida Master Teacher Workshop, Technology
Committee, Brain Bowl Coach, Judge for Regional
Science Olympiad
Dr. Juan Guzman
HAPS conferences, USMLEworld, trimestral training
courses for Histology, Anatomy, Biochemistry,
pathology, statistics ,Microbiology ;Training course
from Kaplan.Acreditation as a Medical Doctor from
the Educational Commission of Foreign Medical
graduates ;Continuing Medical education
Medscape. BodyViz,Trainning
Mr. John Hawes
Dr. Mustapha Kane
Advances in Oceanography: Studying Climate
Change in Ocean Systems; Northwest Center for
Sustainable Resources: Wetlands Ecology and
Management; Preparing Students in Two-year
Colleges for Geoscience Degrees and Careers
Dr. Doris Lombo
Dr. Gabriel Pardo
Describe facilities, equipment, and technology and the extent to which they meet department
needs.
Facilities: The courses have separate class/lab rooms in building 009, 017, 018 to meet the
department needs; Earth Science rocks and minerals samples are located in a cabinet in the
classroom #150. Need more space in the earth science classrooms for cabinets to house the
rock collections but the space is limited.
Equipment: DNA analysis equipment, updated computerized microscopes, ultrasound,
cadaver, automated online IC, Nutrient Film Technique grow system, high quality digital pH
meter, Polymerase Chain Reaction Thermo cyclers for DNA amplification, digital photo gate
timers, lasers, digital multi-meters for electronics measures, wooden blocks on wooden
boards to measure acceleration due to gravity
Page 8 of 22
Program Review Report
Technology: Sympodia, Digital Field Trips, Digital Quizzes, Group Projects, body vis, several
faculty are working with collaborate for online. Vernier LabPro data acquisition systems
connected to PC’s for data collection and analysis.
Page 9 of 22
Program Review Report
4. Accomplishments
Response to Prior Review Recommendations/Action Plan
Action Plan
Goal
Goal 1: Increase average completion rate
of 77% from 75.1% overall in science
courses
Objectives
Tasks/Activities
1.1 Develop and implement methods to
obtain consistency in course content
1.2 Utilize more technology and provide
additional materials
1.1.1 develop standardized content, syllabi, policies
and procedures for the science courses and labs
1.2.1 Action: utilize standard teaching technology
and develop standardized materials for the science
courses.
Goal 2: To increase annual enrollment in
the courses offered (LTG # 2, 5, 7)
2.1 Disseminate information on additional
science courses offered through various
community and school activities.
2.2 Utilize more technology in science
electives to improve upon course content
2.3 Determine the market for the courses
offered.
Goal 3: Create standard policies and
procedures in the science courses (LTG #2,
7)
3.1 Create a standard attendance policy for
all courses and labs
3.2 Create a standard syllabi for all courses
and labs
3.3 Establish standard guidelines,
textbooks, and materials for all instructors.
To be reviewed annually.
3.4 Establish standard lab policy and
procedures for students
• Action: continue community activities such as,
the Envirothon, Governor’s Summer Program, and
the County and Regional Science and Engineering
Fairs.
� Action: utilize standard teaching technology and
develop standardized materials for the science
courses.
• Action: review data on current programs and
majors.
• Action: develop standardized content, syllabi,
policies and procedures for the science courses and
labs
• Action: develop standardized content, syllabi,
policies and procedures for the science courses and
labs
• Action: develop standard guidelines and
textbook, and materials for the courses.
• Action: develop standardized content, syllabi,
policies and procedures for the science courses and
Page 10 of 22
Program Review Report
labs
Outcome/Results
What were the actual results of the
tasks/activities? (Status)
Developed and utilize standard teaching
technology (Pearson- Mastering labs) and
have standardized exams for many of the
science courses.
Disseminated information on additional
science courses offered through various
community and school activities.
Reviewed the data on current programs
and majors.
Continue to work on standardizing
policies and materials
Gap Analysis
Describe the difference between the
expected outcome and actual outcome
The average completion rate was higher
than expected. The students seem more
prepared for the curricula, as shown by
the higher rates of greater than 80%.
The department has decreased in the
participation of the specific community
activities listed but have continued in
other community activities. The
enrollment has increased with the growth
of the college.
We actually reviewed all the science
courses offered. We removed some of the
courses and updated others during this
review period.
We expected to still be standardizing
policies and procedures in the labs as each
course has different requirements
Use of Results
What strategies will you use to make changes?
Continue to review syllabi, books, technology, and
online content to enhance the students
understanding in each course since some course
aren’t above the 77 %.
Find alternative methods to document and access
all the community activity we are involved in for
the task. Find a balance between the increase in
enrollment and the participation in community
activities.
Continue to periodically review the courses
offered and make changes as necessary and find
alternatives to disseminate information on the
sciences
Continue to work on standardizing general policies
and materials.
Other Significant Changes/Improvements
List significant changes and improvements that have occurred within the last 3 – 5 years that were not identified on the prior review. This
includes curricular improvements, improvements in the efficiency of department processes, integration of new technology, more effective
assessment processes, etc.
Standardized departmental exams in Biology.
Page 11 of 22
Program Review Report
Implemented a national standardized exam in Chemistry.
The science courses are utilizing Pearson Mastering to enhance instruction in the class and online.
Enhanced the technology in Anatomy and Physiology, Microbiology, Biology, and Chemistry laboratories:
Anatomy and Physiology: ultrasound and body vis software for diagnostic analysis of structure and function in the
human body.
Microbiology and Biology are utilizing DNA equipment for gene analysis computerized microscopes for instruction on
structure and function of various organisms.
Chemistry is using the automated online IC for chemical analysis.
Enhanced the materials in Anatomy and Physiology, and Biology laboratories:
Anatomy and Physiology: Obtained permission for an additional cadaver for structure and organization in the body
and an additional lab room for physiology.
Biology and Botany: are using living labs around campus and updated greenhouses to understand nutritional
requirements, growth of plants, and interactions between the plants and animals.
Development of research courses in the biological, physical, and chemical sciences.
Botany (BOT 2010) emphasizes high tech hydroponic growing systems; vertical growing; Bato system-a water
conservation, recycling system of tomato growing where nutrients are recirculated through expanded clay pelleted
medium, and Nutrient Film Technique (NFT)-a recirculating nutrient film bathes rock wool (expanded rock) and the
nutrients and water are continuously feeding crops of lettuce. The lettuce is later harvested and eaten by the
students.
Landscape Plants ORH1517 is being developed to support Ornamental Horticulture.
Page 12 of 22
Program Review Report
5. Learning Outcomes Assessment
Plan
1
Intended Learning Outcome
2
Related
Courses
3
Evaluation Method/Tool
(Research Paper, Speech, Essay,
Departmental Exam National
Exam)
4
Performance Standard
(How will you measure successful outcome
achievement)
Students will demonstrate an
understanding of fundamental
scientific principles and their
application to scientific research and
to society.
BSC 2085,
BSC2086 ,
CHM 2045,
BSC 2010
all courses
Nationally normed final exam
and departmental final exams.
Student success rates for all
courses
Measure success based on the national
norm for the national exam.
The average on the departmental exams.
The average SSR for the courses.
ETS Supporting Data
Student will demonstrate the ability
to utilize and apply technological
data to understand natural
phenomena.
BSC 2010
and MCB
2010
Research Paper with rubric
Structure: /5, organization:/5
quality: /5, amount:/5
sources:/5, info game/
unknown: /5
All Courses given a
standardized departmental
exam periodically
Based on the rubric points
ETS Supporting Data
Student will demonstrate the ability
to apply these steps of the scientific
method to solve problems by: a)
Observation of natural phenomena
b) Interpretation of the natural
phenomena through formulation of a
hypothesis which is a tentative
explanation of the observed
phenomena c) Acquisition of
scientific data through experiment or
continued observation d)
All Courses
The average on the exam for the course
ETS Supporting Data
Page 13 of 22
Program Review Report
formulation of a conclusion to
explain the results obtained and be
able to modify that conclusion when
new data is collected.
Student will demonstrate the ability
to integrate ideas and concepts from
different disciplines.
Students will demonstrate the ability
to question and evaluate information
(data, ideas or concepts) for
accuracy, objectivity and quality.
Student will demonstrate the ability
to analyze information (data, ideas,
or concepts) in context to draw
appropriate and well supported
conclusions.
Student will demonstrate the ability
to synthesize ideas from a variety of
sources producing an original
product.
BSC 2010
and MCB
2010
All courses
BSC 2010
and MCB
2010
All courses
All Courses
BSC 2010
and MCB
2010
Research Paper Rubric:
Structure: 5, organization:5
quality: 5, amount: 5
sources: 5, info game/
unknown: 5
Student success rates for all
courses
Research Paper Rubric:
Structure: 5, organization:5
quality: 5, amount: 5
sources: 5, info game/
unknown: 5
Student success rates for all
courses
All Courses given a
standardized departmental
exam periodically
Based on the rubric points
The average SSR for the courses
Research Paper Rubric:
Structure: 5, organization:5
quality: 5, amount: 5
sources: 5, info game/
unknown: 5
Based on the rubric points
Based on the rubric points
The average SSR for the courses
ETS Supporting Data
The average on the exam for the course
ETS Supporting Data
Page 14 of 22
Program Review Report
Results
Outcome/Result
What was the actual result of the
assessment?
We have consistently been above the national
norm for the AP and Chemistry courses taking
the national exam.
Biology had an average of 67% on the first
departmental exam
The student success rate in the sciences have
been over 80%
Rubric performance means:
Structure: 3/5
organization: 4/5
quality: 3.5/5
amount: 2.5/5
sources: 4.5/5
info game/unknown: 3.5/5
Gap Analysis
Describe the difference between the
expected outcome and actual outcome
The data indicates that these courses are
on the same level or above with other
courses nationwide. The biology
departmental final exam was little lower
than the expected 70%. The average
success rate has consistently been higher
than our expected 77%
The results were better than expected
21/25 instead of the baseline of 20/25.
Average of 66.9 % was obtained by the 405 students
who took the exam.
The results were less than the 70%
expected.
ETS assessment
The data average was 70% in natural
sciences 2012
Use of Result
What strategies will you use to make changes?
The biology courses plan to make adjustments in
the content, content delivery, and book to help
increase the average to at least 70% on the
departmental final.
The entire science department plans to continue to
utilize technology to facilitate the learning and
increase in student success.
The rubric didn’t work fort lab write-ups or
activities so the rubric will be modified to use with
labs that can be randomly collected and will
indicate the student’s ability to apply the concepts
and data to natural phenomena. By utilizing a
modified rubric we can utilize it in more courses.
The data collected periodically indicates we still
need to work on the application of the scientific
methodology.
To improve the learning outcomes and assessment
tools
Page 15 of 22
Program Review Report
6. Student Performance
# of Declared Majors in
Science Concentration Areas
Count of STUDENTID
Row Labels
SCIA-Marine Aquatic Biology
SCIG-Biology General
SCIM-Microbiology
Grand Total
# of
Graduates
Count of ID
Row Labels
SCIG
SCIM
Grand Total
Column Labels
2008-2009
20092010
16
107
8
131
Column Labels
20102011
2009-2010
1
20
72
9
101
20112012
7
29
6
42
Grand
Total
43
209
24
276
1
1
2
Grand
Total
5
1
6
1
20102011
6
1
7
Data Analysis – Student Success
Success in Science Courses by Academic Year – Includes All Delivery Methods
Academic Year
Total
Enrollment
Ws
ABC
DF
W
Rate
ABC
Rate
DF
Rate
2007-2008 Total
2008-2009 Total
2009-2010 Total
2010-2011 Total
2011-2012 Total
1506
1438
3058
3164
3255
193
146
168
73
117
1242
1245
2530
2753
2900
71
47
360
338
238
13%
10%
5%
2%
4%
82%
87%
83%
87%
89%
5%
3%
12%
11%
7%
Success in Science Courses by Academic Year – Distance Learning Delivery Only
Academic Year
Total
Enrollment
Ws
ABC
DF
W
Rate
ABC
Rate
DF
Rate
2009-2010 Total
2010-2011 Total
2011-2012 Total
1110
1115
944
71
33
28
884
959
849
155
123
67
6%
3%
3%
80%
86%
90%
14%
11%
7%
Success in Science Courses by Academic Year – Traditional Delivery Only
Academic Year
Total
Enrollment
Ws
ABC
DF
W
Rate
ABC
Rate
DF
Rate
2009-2010 Total
1948
97
1646
205
5%
84%
11%
Page 16 of 22
Program Review Report
2010-2011 Total
2011-2012 Total
2049
2311
40
89
1794
2051
215
171
2%
4%
88%
89%
10%
7%
Provide a brief analysis of the success data provided in the tables above:
The Success rates have consistently been over 80% which is higher than the 77% we hoped
to achieve since the last review. Based on the analysis in 2009-10, The average success rate
dropped to 83% from 87% but the enrollment more than doubled. The success rate went back
up to 87% in 2010-2011 even though the enrollment continued to stay up.
Page 17 of 22
Program Review Report
7. Summary – Strengths and Weaknesses
Based on the information in the review, summarize the strengths and weaknesses of the
program.
Strengths
Weaknesses
The faculty is committed to superior
education and will continue to acquire,
assess, standardize, and revise materials and
technology as needed.
The faculty is involved with several aspects of
community outreach
The faculty is involved in a number of
collaborative efforts
The learning outcomes and assessments.
The number of declared science majors.
The ratio of faculty to the number of
students and courses
Page 18 of 22
Program Review Report
8. Goals
What are the program goals? Which of the college’s strategic priorities do they support?
Department Goal
To increase and maintain the average completion rate from the 77% to 80% in
all courses.
Increase annual enrollment in the courses offered.
Create standard policy and procedures for all science courses
Revise the learning outcomes and assessments to meet the growing needs of
the department
Increase faculty and staff
Increase the number of students that have a declared major in the sciences.
Strategic
Priority #
#1
#4
#1, #2
#3
#2
#1, #4
Strategic Plan
Strategic Priority 1: STUDENT SUCCESS
Strategic Priority 2 – FACULTY, STAFF AND ADMINISTRATION
Strategic Priority 3 – INSTITUTIONAL PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT
Strategic Priority 4 - COMMUNITY AWARENESS AND INVOLVEMENT
Strategic Priority 5 – FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND AFFORDABILITY
Page 19 of 22
Program Review Report
9. Action Plan
Based on the summary of strengths and weaknesses, develop an action plan. The action plan should focus on objectives and outcomes
that will strengthen and improve the department and support the program goals stated above in section 7.
Program Outcomes
Objectives
What do you want to
achieve?
Tasks/Activities
How are you going to
do it?
Timeline
When will
you do it?
Outcome
What do you expect to
happen because of the
action?
Assessment Measure
How will you know if
you are successful?
Revise the learning
outcomes and
assessments to meet
the growing needs of
the department
Meeting to revise the
learning outcomes
and rubric to
measure lab writeups and activities
Fall 2013
Have better assessment
for the learning
outcomes
The usage and design
of the rubric
Find alternative
methods to document
and access all the
community activity we
are involved in.
Increase the SSR in
the course since some
course aren’t above
the 77 % of the last
review
Find alternative
methods to document
and access all the
community activity we
are involved in.
Continue to review
syllabi, books,
technology, and
online content to
enhance the students
understanding in each
course .
Fall 2013
More documentation
and follow-up on
community activity
The reports
No
Fall 2013on
An increase in SSR in the
sciences.
SSR reports
No
Fall 2013
An increase in the
number of students that
graduate with a
declared major in the
IEC reports
Yes
Increase the number
of declared majors in
the sciences
Develop alternative
methods for
disseminating
information about
Resource Needs
Do you need
additional resources
to achieve the
objective?
No
Page 20 of 22
Program Review Report
sciences
the sciences.
Learning Outcomes
Identify 2-3 of the most important Learning Outcomes for the courses of study that will be assessed during the time period before the next
review:
Intended Learning Outcomes
Students will demonstrate an
understanding of fundamental scientific
principles and their application to scientific
research and to society.
Related Courses
BSC 2085, BSC2086 ,
CHM 2045,
BSC 2010
all courses
Student will demonstrate the ability to
Lab courses
utilize and apply technological data to
standardized rubric
understand natural phenomena.
Student will demonstrate the ability to
All Courses
apply these steps of the scientific method
to solve problems by: a) Observation of
natural phenomena b) Interpretation of the
natural phenomena through formulation of
a hypothesis which is a tentative
explanation of the observed phenomena c)
Acquisition of scientific data through
experiment or continued observation d)
Evaluation Method/Tool
(Research Paper, Speech, Essay,
Departmental Exam National
Exam)
Performance Standard
(How will you measure
successful outcome
achievement)
Nationally normed final exam
and departmental final exams.
Student success rates for all
courses
Measure success based on
the national norm for the
national exam.
The average on the
departmental exams.
The average SSR for the
courses.
Lab manuals/ writeup
Based on the rubric points
All Courses given a
standardized departmental
exam periodically
The average on the exam
for the course
Page 21 of 22
Program Review Report
formulation of a conclusion to explain the
results obtained and be able to modify that
conclusion when new data is collected.
Page 22 of 22