TOTAL INTERNAL REFLECTION Kinematics properties Since the k vectors are coplanar, let’s consider the incident plane coincides with the XZ plane; hence kiy kry kty 0 . Consider the case in which the light is incident from the medium of higher index of refraction ni > nt. For incident angles greater than the critical angle C sin 1 (nt / ni ) , the horizontal component of ki ( i.e. the component kix of the incident wave) will be greater than the magnitude of the transmitted light’s vector kt = (2/) nt k' . This is shown in the figure below; notice kt is too small to satisfy the required kinematics boundary condition, ktx krx (19) Thus, there is no real vector k t to satisfy the condition (19) when i > C. Casei=C Z Z 2 ki ni k Casei>C Z t) ki kr c kt k' k' i Slower medium ni nt faster medium 2 nt nt < ni ki kr c k' kt X Snell’s law not being fulfilled Fig. 20 Total internal reflection. For i > C the length of the real-variable wavevector k t (transmitted wave) turns out to be too small to satisfy the boundary condition ktx krx . That is, it does not exist a real-variable k t wave-vector able to satisfy the kinematic conditions (Snell’s law) at the boundary. The implication is that the incident wave is fully reflected (there is no propagating transmitted wave penetrating in the –Z direction). Er There is a way to get around this limitation. We allow the kt to be a complex vector. Indeed, even though the magnitude of kt is fixed and equal to, kt 2 2 ( ktx ) ( ktz ) 2 2 nt k' 2 2 2 Notice, ktx could be greater than k' if ( ktz ) where negative; that is, if ktz were a pure complex number, 2 2 ktz i z * Accordingly, let’s consider a transmitted wave of complex vector kt , * kt (ktx , 0, i ) complex vector z (20) 2 2 whose modulus square kt ktx (0) ( j ) ktx is required to satisfy, z z 2 2 2 k * ktx t 2 2 z 2 2 nt k' 2 2 (20)’ 2 * The complex wave-vector kt (ktx , 0, j z ) is then able to satisfy the Snell’s law for incident angles i > C, ktx krx or kix , (21) ktx kt* k' (21)’ Notice also Casei=C Z Z ki Slower medium kr c ki ni kt nt Z i kr c 2 Casei>C nt 2 faster medium X nt ktx * kt (ktx , 0, i nt < ni z ) Complex vector Fig. 21 Notice on the right-side diagram that the evanescent wave propagates along the interface with wave-vector component ktx, ( ktx > (2/)nt ). Next, for a given incident angle i >C, let’s figure out the corresponding value of . z The kinematics condition ktx krx kix implies, ktx kix k Sin i ktx kix 2 ni Sin i 2 ni Sin i . (22) Using this value in (21), gives, 2 z ktx 2 kix 2 2 nt 2 2 nt 2 ni Sini 2 2 2 2 nt 2 2 2 2 ni Sini nt 2 2 2 ni Sini nt z Using C sin 1 (nt / ni ) (23) Er 2 ni z In summary, Sini 2 Sinc 2 for i >C (23)’ Incident wave Reflected wave j (ki r - t ) Ei Eoi e j ( kr r - t ) Er Eor e (24) (24)’ * j (kt * r - t ) Transmitted wave Et Eot e , where kt (ktx , 0, j ) z j(ktx x ktz z - ω t) Eot e j(k x j γz z - ω t) Eot e tx z j (k x - ωt ) Et Eot e z e t x For the particular case at hands, we take the positive sign (otherwise we would have a wave carrying infinite energy. γz z j(kt x x - ωt t) Et Eot Ei Eoi e ni nt nt < ni e e Z j (ki r - t ) ki c k' (24)” (for z < 0) j ( kr r - t ) Er Eor e kr k ktx kt* (ktx , 0, j z ) k' 2 2 ni nt X γ z j(k x - ω t) Et Eot e z e t x Fig. The refracted wave propagates only parallel to the surface (with wave-vector ktx) and it is attenuated exponentially (decay factor z) along the vertical direction in the medium of lower index of refraction. So, it does exist electromagnetic field in the medium of lower index of refraction, but it is attenuated exponentially beyond the interface. No energy flow (no propagating energy) crosses vertically the interface. Dynamics properties * How to incorporate the complex vector kt into the Fresnel equations? First, Snell’s law states ni sin i nt sint . In terms of the critical angle sin C nt / ni one has, Notice, Hence, sin i sint sinC (25) sint 1 (25)’ for i > C t is a complex angle when i > C . [ Notice, for a complex angle /2 j one obtains sin (/2 j ) 1 12 ( j )2 1 12 2 >1 ] Let’s evaluate also the cos of the complex angle t. 2 ktz k' Cos t nt Cos t , On one hand, we have ktz i , on the other hand z 2 which gives Using the expression for 2 z nt Cost i nt Cost i z given in (23), 2 2 ni Sini nt which gives, 2 2 Cost i n Sin i i 1 n t for i > C 2 i Sini 1 Sin c (26) Notice from (24) and (26) that the complex angle t satisfies, sin2t cos 2t 1 (27) The expression for cos t, obtained above for the case when i>C are inserted now in the Fresnel’s equations: For TE or s- polarization Ero niCosi nt Cost E n Cos n Cos r t i t io i Amplitude reflection coefficient Eto 2niCosi E n Cos n Cos t t i t io i Amplitude transmission coefficient Notice that for a complex Cost , as given in (26), the magnitude of r is equal to1, as expected in a total internal reflection case. r 1 For TM or p- polarization Ero nt Cosi niCost E n Cos n Cos r// t i t io // i Eto 2niCosi E n Cos n Cos t // t i t io // i (28) Amplitude reflection coefficient Amplitude transmission coefficient Notice also that (26) implies, r// 1 (26) Notice that in both cases, TE and TM polarization, the complex Cost given in (24) results in complex amplitude reflection coefficients. It implies that, under total internal reflection conditions, there is a change in the phase of the reflected wave. (27) Fresnel’s rhombus. These phase changes can be utilized to convert one type of polarization into another. For example in a Fresnel’s rhombus , linearly polarized light with equal TE and TM polarization amplitudes is converted by two successive internal reflections (each involving a relative phase change of 45o) into circularly polarized light.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz