Fred Korematsu v. United States - The Fred T. Korematsu Institute

Fred Korematsu v. United States - The Fred T. Korematsu Institute
http://korematsuinstitute.org/institute/aboutfred/internmentcases/fr...
The Fred T.
Korematsu
Institute
x
B
M
@korematsu
Home
About Us
About Fred Korematsu
Education
Teaching Kit
Photos
Donate
Contact
About Fred Korematsu Day
Fred Korematsu v. United States
Korematsu v. United States, 1944
Ruling: 6-3, United States Supreme Court
Fred Korematsu chose to defy the internment order
and carry on his life as an American citizen. He
underwent minor plastic surgery to alter his eyes in an
attempt to look less Japanese. He also changed his
name to Clyde Sarah and claimed to be of Spanish
and Hawaiian descent. On May 30, 1942, he was
arrested on a street corner in San Leandro, California,
and taken to San Francisco county jail. While in jail, he
was visited by Ernest Besig, the director of the San
Francisco oQice of the American Civil Liberties Union,
Photo courtesy of Karen Korematsu and
the Korematsu Institute
who asked Korematsu if he was willing to become the
test case to challenge the constitutionality of the
government’s imprisonment of Japanese Americans. On September 8, 1942, Korematsu was
convicted in federal court for violating the military orders issued under Executive Order 9066.
He was placed on a Wve-year probation. For several months, he lived at the Tanforan “Assembly
Center” in San Bruno, CA, one of the former horseracing tracks where Japanese Americans were
Wrst held before being sent to the more permanent American concentration camps. Korematsu
and his family were transferred from Tanforan to Topaz, Utah, where the government had set up
one of 10 incarceration camps for Japanese Americans.
1 of 5
3/30/15, 7:57 AM
Fred Korematsu v. United States - The Fred T. Korematsu Institute
http://korematsuinstitute.org/institute/aboutfred/internmentcases/fr...
Believing the discriminatory conviction went against freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution,
Korematsu appealed his case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. In its December 1944
landmark decision, the high court ruled against him in a 6 to 3 decision, declaring that the
incarceration was not caused by racism, and was justiWed by the Army’s claims that Japanese
Americans were radio-signaling enemy ships from shore and were prone to disloyalty. The court
called the incarceration a “military necessity.” In one of the three stinging dissents, Justice
Robert Jackson complained about the lack of any evidence to justify the incarceration, writing:
“the Court for all time has validated the principle of racial discrimination … The principle then
lies about like a loaded weapon, ready for the hand of any authority that can bring forward a
plausible claim of an urgent need.”
Following World War II and the release of Japanese Americans from the concentration camps,
Korematsu attempted to resume life as an American citizen. He moved to Detroit, Michigan
where his youngest brother resided. There, he met his soon-to-be wife, Kathryn, a student at
Wayne State University who was originally from South Carolina. At the time,
anti-miscegenation laws prohibited interracial marriage in states including California and South
Carolina, but mixed-race marriage was legal in Michigan. Fred and Kathryn Korematsu married
in Detroit before moving to the San Francisco Bay Area in 1949, where they raised two children,
Karen and Ken.
Korematsu maintained his innocence through the years, but his U.S. Supreme Court conviction
had a lasting impact on his basic rights, aQecting his ability to obtain employment.
In 1980, President Jimmy Carter appointed a special commission to instigate a federal review of
the facts and circumstances around the incarceration of Japanese Americans during World War
II. In June 1983, the Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians (CWRIC)
concluded that the decisions to remove those people of Japanese ancestry to U.S. prison camps
occurred because of “race prejudice, war hysteria, and a failure of political leadership.”
During this time, University of California San Diego political science professor Peter Irons,
together with researcher Aiko Herzig-Yoshinaga, stumbled upon secret Justice Department
documents while researching government archives. Among the documents were memos
written in 1943 and 1944 by Edward Ennis, the U.S. Justice Department attorney responsible for
supervising the drafting of the government’s brief. As Ennis began searching for evidence to
support the Army’s claim that the incarceration was of military necessity and justiWed, he found
precisely the opposite — that J. Edgar Hoover of the FBI, the FCC, the OQice of Naval
Intelligence and other authoritative intelligence agencies categorically denied that Japanese
Americans had committed any wrongdoing. These oQicial reports were never presented to the
U.S. Supreme Court, having been intentionally suppressed and, in one case, destroyed by
setting the report aWre.
2 of 5
3/30/15, 7:57 AM
Fred Korematsu v. United States - The Fred T. Korematsu Institute
http://korematsuinstitute.org/institute/aboutfred/internmentcases/fr...
It was on this basis — governmental misconduct — that a legal team of pro bono (voluntary
and free-of-charge) attorneys, most of whom were third-generation Japanese Americans,
successfully reopened Korematsu’s case in 1983, resulting in the overturning of his criminal
conviction for defying the incarceration. During the litigation, U.S. Justice Department lawyers
oQered a pardon to Korematsu if he would agree to drop his lawsuit. In rejecting the oQer,
Kathryn Korematsu remarked, “Fred was not interested in a pardon from the government;
instead, he always felt that it was the government who should seek a pardon from him and
from Japanese Americans for the wrong that was committed.”
On November 10, 1983, Judge Marilyn Hall Patel of the U.S. District Court of Northern California
in San Franciscoformally overturned Korematsu’s conviction. It was a pivotal moment in U.S.
civil rights history. Mr. Korematsu stood in front of Judge Patel and stated, “According to the
Supreme Court decision regarding my case, being an American citizen was not enough. They
say you have to look like one, otherwise they say you can’t tell a diQerence between a loyal and
a disloyal American. I thought that this decision was wrong and I still feel that way. As long as
my record stands in federal court, any American citizen can be held in prison or concentration
camps without a trial or a hearing. That is if they look like the enemy of our country. Therefore, I
would like to see the government admit that they were wrong and do something about it so this
will never happen again to any American citizen of any race, creed or color. ” Although Judge
Patel’s ruling cleared Korematsu’s conviction, the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1944 ruling still stands.
It would require a similar test case, involving a mass banishment of a single ethnic group, to
challenge the original Supreme Court decision.
Read Judge Patel’s full decision granting Korematsu’s petition for writ of coram nobis.584
F.Supp. 1406 (N.D. Cal. 1984)
Click here for biographies of Korematsu’s 1944 and 1983 legal team members.
l 1 Comment
One thought on “Fred Korematsu v. United States”
Pingback: People's Blog for the Constitution » Korematsu’s Legacy: Raise your voice against
government injustice
Comments are closed.
3 of 5
3/30/15, 7:57 AM
Fred Korematsu v. United States - The Fred T. Korematsu Institute
http://korematsuinstitute.org/institute/aboutfred/internmentcases/fr...
Join our mailing list!
Subscribe
Facebook.com
Fred T. Korematsu Institute
Like
Fred T. Korematsu
Institute
March 28 at 12:49pm
Min Yasui nominated by Senator
Mazie Hirono for a 2015 Presidential
Medal of Freedom, the White
House's highest civilian honor.
1,968 people like Fred T. Korematsu Institute.
4 of 5
3/30/15, 7:57 AM
Fred Korematsu v. United States - The Fred T. Korematsu Institute
http://korematsuinstitute.org/institute/aboutfred/internmentcases/fr...
Fred Korematsu Day, Jan. 30
Posts
fVirginia State Legislature Establishes
Korematsu Day
fNYC Social Studies Conference Honors
Korematsu Institute
fThe Korematsu Case and What it Means
to Us Today
© 2015 The Fred T. Korematsu Institute / Proudly powered by WordPress / Theme: The Box by design lab
5 of 5
3/30/15, 7:57 AM