Ask class members who is wearing any kind of jewelry that includes a cross. See if anyone has a story as to the origins of how they came to own that jewelry and/or any particular sentimental value they attach to it. Crucifixion was a widespread method of execution in the ancient world. Cicero calls it the “most cruel and disgusting penalty” that inflicted “pain and agony” on its victims who endured the “worst extreme of the tortures inflicted on slaves.”1 Crucifixion wasn’t used for just any crime; it was reserved for rebels, insurrectionists, seditionists, and other threats to the government. For the Roman Empire in particular, crucifixion was used on slaves, extreme criminals, and others who were not citizens. (Roman citizens, on the whole, could not be crucified.) The historian Josephus notes that those inflicting this punishment hoped it would serve as a deterrent; this is why executioners would often set up crucifixions along busy highways. They wanted others to see what would happen if they caused problems with the government. While the Jews themselves didn’t typically practice crucifixion, their texts (mainly what we now call the Old Testament) know of its horrific nature. Even back in Deuteronomy, we read that people who were hung from trees were viewed as cursed (21:23). When the Romans executed someone, they would hang a list of the accusations against that person. This explains the sign “King of the Jews” hung above Jesus. This was an accusation, not just a mocking title. 1 Verr. 2.5.64.165-170, 2.5.66.169, quoted in John A. Dennis, “Death of Jesus,” Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels, 2nd ed, edited by Joel B. Green, Jeannine K. Brown, and Nicholas Perrin (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2013), 173. -1- Jesus extends forgiveness to a paralyzed man (Mark 2:5). o This would have angered the temple priests because Jesus was offering forgiveness outside the stipulated temple system. Jesus touches lepers and heals bleeding women. o Temple leaders would have seen Jesus disregarding purity laws and thus disgracing the temple. Jesus threatens the temple’s destruction (e.g., “destroy this temple and I will rebuild it in three days”). o Though Jesus never says that he will destroy the temple, that is exactly what people hear him saying. o In Mark’s Gospel, as soon as Jesus is finished cleansing the temple and then prophesying its destruction, “[t]he chief priests and the teachers of the law heard this and began looking for a way to kill him” (11:18). In other words, Jesus’ prediction about the temple destruction is what moves the temple leaders to try to kill him. Jesus claims (or doesn’t deny the charge) to be the “Son of God” and the “Messiah” (Matt 26:65-66; Mark 14:63-64). o The Jewish leaders heard Jesus making claims about being the “chosen one” that they did not believe to be true. According to their definition, Jesus couldn’t be the Messiah. Many episodes where Jesus gets into trouble feature the Pharisees accusing him of ignoring the law (e.g., eating with sinners, not properly washing dishes, healing on the Sabbath, etc.) One ancient source, the Babylonian Talmud, states that Jesus was crucified because he “practiced sorcery and enticed Israel to apostasy.”3 When the Jews, who are mainly upset above the things we’ve just mentioned, take Jesus to the Romans to be executed, they have to invent or emphasize charges that will get the Romans’ attention. 2 This section relies heavily on Dennis, 176. 3 Dennis, 175. -2- The Jews accuse Jesus of inciting a revolt and of telling people not to pay taxes (Luke 23:2). Putting together all the charges and threats above, maybe we can begin to construct a picture of why Jesus was executed, and why the method of crucifixion was chosen. Why did the Jews want Jesus killed? Why did the Romans want Jesus killed? What does the method of execution say about how the Romans viewed Jesus? Read Matthew 27:27-54 Imagine that you are a first century Jew hoping that God will finally send the new king, the Messiah, to make things right. Now imagine that you see this supposed king With a mocking crown of thorns on his head (Matt 27:29) Being forced to carry his own cross (27:32) Having his clothes gambled away (27:35) Being crucified in the middle of two rebellious criminals (27:38) Being easily insulted by onlookers (27:39ff) Unable to save himself from death (27:42) Asking God why he has been forsaken (27:46) What would your reaction be? What would you expect to happen/not happen to God’s new king, and how does that differ from what you’re seeing? First century Jews who were expecting a strong, triumphant king were surely disappointed to see Jesus being executed. How could God’s new king let himself be executed? Paul knows this problem. He knows it was true for the Jews, and it is true for us. He writes that “the message of the cross is foolishness” (1 Cor 1:18) and that a crucified savior is “a stumbling block to Jews and foolishness to Gentiles” (1 Cor 1:23). How was the cross foolish to first century Jews and Gentiles? What expectations do we have that might make a crucified Jesus seem like foolishness to us? Are you ever embarrassed of the story and message of Jesus? When does this most often happen? -3- How is Jesus’ death (and eventual resurrection) a triumph? What did it accomplish? Note: the results/meaning of Jesus’ death could be an entirely different lesson. Feel free to select a few scriptures along this line to share with the class. How does death on a cross go along with the broader theme we’ve seen of Jesus doing things that people were not expecting? Read the Gospel accounts of Jesus’ resurrection. -4-
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz