Pepperdine Law Review
Volume 15 | Issue 4
5-15-1988
Volume 15 Index
Eileen Lavigne
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr
Part of the Other Law Commons
Recommended Citation
Eileen Lavigne Volume 15 Index, 15 Pepp. L. Rev. 4 (1988)
Available at: http://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr/vol15/iss4/7
This Index is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at Pepperdine Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in
Pepperdine Law Review by an authorized administrator of Pepperdine Digital Commons. For more information, please contact
[email protected].
Article 7
VOLUME XV INDEX
Article Index
Avoiding the Insanity Defense Strait Jacket: The Mens Rea Route, Harlow M.
H uckabee .............................................................
Benign Sex Discrimination Revisited: Constitutional and Moral Issues in
Banning Sex-Selection Abortion, George Schedler ........................
Boiler Room Fraud: An Operational Plan Utilizing the Injunctions Against
Fraud Pursuant to U.S.C. § 1345, Robert M. Twiss ........................
Consumer Debt and Usury: A New Rationale For Usury, Robin A. Morris .....
Consumerism and Land Sales, Leonard Levin ................................
Employment-Privacy Law for the 1990's, Kurt H. Decker .....................
Liability of Political Candidates and Their Staffs For Campaign Committee
Obligations, Anthony J. Mohr ..........................................
Mediation of Marital Disputes Before It Is Too Late: A Proposal For
Premarital Contract Provisions For Mediation of Disputes Within the
Intact Family and at Separation, Robert F. Cochran, Jr...................
Nollan v. CaliforniaCoastal Commission: You Can't Always Get What You
Want, But Sometimes You Get What You Need, Timothy A. Bittle .......
The United States Government as Defendant-One Example of the Need for a
Uniform Liability Regime to Govern Outer Space and Space-Related
Activities, Joseph A. Bosco .............................................
15:1
15:295
15:503
15:151
15:131
15:551
15:33
15:51
15:345
15:581
Author Index
Bittle, Timothy A., Nollan v. CaliforniaCoastal Commission: You Can't
Always Get What You Want, But Sometimes You Get What You Need ...
Bosco, Joseph A., The United States Government as Defendant-One Example
of the Need for a Uniform Liability Regime to Govern Outer Space and
Space-Related Activities ................................................
Cochran, Robert F., Jr., Mediation of Marital Disputes Before It Is Too Late:
A Proposal For Premarital Contract Provisions For Mediation of Disputes
Within the Intact Family and at Separation ..............................
Decker, Kurt H., Employment-Privacy Law for the 1990's ....................
Huckabee, Harlow M., Avoiding the Insanity Defense Strait Jacket: The Mens
R ea Route .............................................................
Levin, Leonard, Consumerism and Land Sales ...............................
Mohr, Anthony J., Liability of Political Candidates and Their Staffs For
Campaign Committee Obligations .......................................
Morris, Robin A., Consumer Debt and Usury: A New Rationale For Usury ....
Schedler, George, Benign Sex Discrimination Revisited: Constitutional and
Moral Issues in Banning Sex-Selection Abortion .........................
Twiss, Robert M., Boiler Room Fraud: An Operational Plan Utilizing the
Injunctions Against Fraud Pursuant to U.S.C. § 1345 .....................
15:345
15:581
15:51
15:551
15:1
15:131
15:33
15:151
15:295
15:503
California Practicum Index
The Sanction Provision of the New California Civil Discovery Act, Section
2023: Will it Make a Difference or is it Just Another "Paper Tiger"? ......
15:401
Case Index
15:482, 483, 484, 485, 486, 487
Abbott Ford, Inc. v. Superior Court ....................
15:203
Adam s v. Howerton ........................................................
15:670
Addington v. Texas ........................................................
15:441
Aerojet General Corp. v. United States ......................................
15:214, 218, 352, 354, 356
Agins v. City of Tiburon ...................................
Agriculture Labor Relations Board v. Tex-Cal Land Management, Inc.......
15:268, 287, 288, 289
..........................................................
15:117
Agricultural Prorate Comm. v. Superior Court ...............................
15:295, 317
Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health .........................
15:121
Albrecht v. Herald Co ......................................................
15:101
Alicea v. Gagnon ...........................................................
15:134
Allen v. Currier Lumber Co ................................................
15:326
Alma Soc'y Inc. v. M ellon ..................................................
Altaville Drug Store, Inc. v. Employment Development Department .. 15:709, 710, 711
15:631
A lvarez v. W ilson ..........................................................
Amalgamated Transit Union v. Suscy .......................................
15:574
15:147
Amato v. Rathburn Realty, Inc ..............................................
15:602
American Airlines, Inc. v. United States .....................................
15:45
American Artworks, Inc. v. Republican State Comm ..........................
15:568
Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees v. Defense Gen ...............................
15:460
Ames v. City of Hermosa Beach ............................................
15:147
Anderson v. San Francisco Rent Stabilization and Arb. Bd ....................
15:291
Andrews v. Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co ...................................
15:203
Antoine-Dorcelli v. INS ....................................................
15:364
Anton v. San Antonio Community Hospital ..................................
15:104
Argersinger v. Ham lin .....................................................
15:123
Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society .................................
15:112
Ascherm an v. Natanson ....................................................
15:499, 500
Asdourian v. Araj ......................................................
Associated Home Builders, Inc. v. City of Walnut Creek ..... 15:350, 351, 352, 353, 356
15:214, 215
Attorney General v. Williams ...........................................
Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional Commission ....... 15:364
15:59, 60
Avitzur v. Avitzur .......................................................
15:349, 350
Ayres v. City Council of Los Angeles ....................................
15:591
Bachman, Emmerich & Co., Inc. v. United States ............................
15:489
B agby v. Beal ..............................................................
15:476, 477, 478, 479, 490
Baggett v. Gates ..........................................
15:605, 634, 637, 638, 639, 640
Baker v. Carr .........................................
15:147
Baker v. Surm an ..........................................................
15:650
Barenblatt v. United States .................................................
15:188, 198, 201
Bark v. INS .......................................................
15:28
B ates v. State ..............................................................
15:118
Bates v. State Bar of Arizona ...............................................
15:700
Batson v. K entucky ........................................................
Bayside Timber Co. v. Board of Supervisors .................................
15:459
15:606
Beattie v. United States ...............................................
15:138
............................
Becker v. IBM ................................
15:449
Bengzon v. Secretary of Justice .............................................
15:635
benShalome v. Secretary of the Army .......................................
15:631
Benvenuti v. Department of Defense ........................................
15:685
Berg v. M orris .............................................................
15:578
Berger v. Battaglia .........................................................
15:215, 217, 218
Berm an v. Parker ..................................................
15:415
Bernstein v. Allstate Ins. Co .................................................
15:596
Berrettoni v. United States .................................................
15:5, 6, 7, 28, 30
Bethea v. United States ...........................................
15:147
Bevins v. Ballard ..........................................................
15:323
Bigelow v. Virginia .........................................................
716
[Vol. 15: 715, 1988]
Volume XV Index
PEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW
Biggins v. H anson ..........................................................
15:571
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics ........
............................................
15:624, 630, 632, 633, 634
Bixby v. Pierno ............................................................
15:364
Bloom v. Vauclain .........................................................
15:37
Booth v. Mary Carter Paint Co ..............................................
15:482
Booth v. Maryland .........................................................
15:707
Bowers v. Hardwick ........................................................
15:340
Bradenburg v. Ohio ........................................................
15:319
Bradley v. Braker ..........................................................
15:134
Bradshaw v. State .............
; ............................................
15:28
Bray v. Peyton ............................................................
15:685
Brooks v. United States ....................................................
15:597
Brosnahan v. Brown .......................................................
15:449
Brown v. Quinn ........................................................... 15:138
Brow n v. State ............................................................
15:28
Brown v. Texas ............................................................
15:452
Brown v. Trigg ............................................................ 15:29
Brown v. United States ..............
......................................
15:466
Bruton v. United States ............................................
15:465, 466, 473
Buchanan v. W arley .......................................................
15:362
Buhler v. Stone ............................................................
15:221
Bulkin v. Western Kraft East, Inc ...........................................
15:571
Bullion v. Livesay ..........................................................
15:594
Burg v. M unicipal Court ....................................................
15:453
Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority ....................................
15:33
Cabana v. Bullock .................................................
15:467, 470, 472
Califano v. W ebster ........................................................
15:334
California v. Brown ........................................................
15:477
California Retail Liquor Dealers v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc ................
15:118, 119
Calvert Cliffs' Coordinating Comm. v. United States Atomic Energy Comm ....
........................................................
15:242, 243
Camara v. M unicipal Court .................................................
15:453
Cameron v. Calhoun-Smith Distrib. Co ......................................
15:133
Campbell v. W ainwright ..................................................
15:26, 30
Cantor v. Detroit Edison Co .................................................
15:118
Capili v. Shott .............................................................
15:117
Carlos v. Superior Court ..............................
15:467, 469, 470, 472, 473, 705
Carmel-by-the-Sea v. Bd. of Supervisors .............................
15:247, 248, 250
Caryl Richards, Inc. v. Superior Court ........................................
15:419
Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Comm.............
15:324, 328
Cham bers v. Mississippi ....................................................
15:684
Chan v. Bell ...............................................................
15:198
Chancellor v. State .........................................................
15:28
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire ..............................................
15:318
Chapman v. California .................................................
15:284, 694
Chappell v. Wallace ..................
15:602, 630, 631, 632, 633, 635, 636, 637, 638, 640
Charland v. United States ..................................................
15:597
Chelsea Neighborhood Ass'n v. United States Postal Serv .....................
15:244
Chrysler v. Brown .........................................................
15:441
Chute v. United States .....................................................
15:608
Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley ............................
15:489
City of Champaign v. Kroger Co ............................................
15:220
City of Coral Gables v. Wood ...........................................
15:211, 220
City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles County Flood Control ....................
15:349
717
City of Passaic v. Paterson Bill Posting Co ..............................
15:215, 217
City of Youngstown v. Kahn Bros. Building Co ..........................
15:210, 215
Civello v. Architectural Bd. of Review .......................................
15:214
Civello v. City of New Orleans ..............................................
15:214
Clancy v. State Bar ........................................................
15:70
Cleary v. American Airlines, Inc. ...........................................
15:557
Cohen v. California ........................................................
15:319
Colem an v. M iller .....................................................
15:637, 638
Colonnade Corp. v. United States ...........................................
15:453
Colony Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Harris ....................................
15:224
Commodore Home Sys., Inc. v. Superior Court ...............................
15:679
Community Communications Co. v. City of Boulder ..........................
15:118
Cody v. M arriot Corp ......................................................
15:269
Connally v. General Constr. Co .............................................
15:670
Connick v. M yers .............................................
15:319, 320, 321, 322
Continental T.V., Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc ..................................
15:124
Cox & Co. Inc. v. Giles .....................................................
15:146
Craig v. Boren .............................................................
15:333
Crane v. Intermountain Health Care, Inc. ...................................
15:117
Crockett v. Superior Court .................................................
15:476
Crom well v. Ferrier ........................................................
15:221
Crosley v. Comm issioner ...................................................
15:382
Crummey v. Commissioner .................................................
15:382
Cushing v. Tetter ..........................................................
15:635
Dabagian v. Civiletti ...............................................
15:194, 197, 198
Dalehite v. United States ...........................................
15:591, 600, 601
D'Anna v. United States ....................................................
15:593
Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial Hospital ........................
15:114
Darlington v. General Elec.....
...................................
15:553, 558
David Aaron, Ltd. v. Borough of Jenkintown ................................
15:221
D ean v. State ..............................................................
15:29
Dehne v. County of Santa Clara ............................................
5:247
De Lancie v. Superior Court ................................................
15:704
DeMille v. American Fed'n of Radio Artists .................................
15:38
D ennis v. State ............................................................
15:28
DeTomaso v. Pan American World Airways, Inc ......................
15:268, 290, 291
Detroit Bank and Trust Co. v. United States .................................
15:382
Detroit Edison Co. v. NLRB ................................................
15:566
D oe v. Bolton ..............................................................
15:295
Donaldson v. Superior Court ...............................................
15:704
John Donnelly & Sons v. Outdoor Advertising Bd .......................
15:216, 220
Downing v. Stiles ..........................................................
15:133
Dresser Indus. v. United States .............................................
15:567
Druid Homes, Inc. v. Cooper ................................................
15:139
Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors ...............................
15:364
Dumas v. President of the United States ....................................
15:633
Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc. ......................
15:321, 322
Dunseath v. Hallauer ......................................................
15:135
Duren v. Missouri ..................................................
15:690, 693, 699
Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing Commission ..................
15:679
Eastern Airlines v. Union Trust .............................................
15:592
Easton v. Strassburger .............................................
15:144, 145, 147
Eddings v. Oklahom a ......................................................
15:479
Edwards v. Superior Court .................................................
15:270
Eisenstadt v. Baird .....................................................
15:339, 340
Elam v. College Park Hospital ..........................................
15:114, 125
Elderkin v. Gaster .....................................................
15:134, 138
Ellis v. Ruislip-Northwood Urban Dist. Council ..............................
15:258
Ely v. V elde ...............................................................
15:211
Emmund v. Florida ................................................
15:467, 470, 472
718
(Vol. 15: 715, 1988]
Volume XV Index
PEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW
15:682
Enoch v. W illiams Packing Co ...............................................
15:807, 808, 851
Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Costle .........................
15:668
Erickson v. Dilgard ........................................................
15:382
Estate of Clay v. Commissioner .............................................
15:372
Estate of Gwinn v. Commissioner ...........................................
15:382
Estate of Kurihara v. Commissioner .........................................
15:449
Evans v. Superior Court ....................................................
15:602
Everitt v. United States ....................................................
15:608, 609, 610
Executive Jet Aviation v. City of Cleveland ..........................
15:572
Faniel v. Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. Co ....................................
15:100, 101
Faretta v. California ...................................................
15:702
Faretta v. State ............................................................
15:134
Fanger v. Leeder ..........................................................
15:437
Federal Crop Ins. v. M errill ................................................
15:140
Fegeas v. Sherrill ..........................................................
15:318
Feiner v. New York ........................................................
Feres v. United States .... 15:597, 598, 623, 624, 625, 626, 627, 630, 632, 633, 634, 640, 641
15:100
Ferguson v. Georgia ........................................................
15:670
Fhagen v. M iller ...........................................................
15:204
Fiallo v. B ell ..............................................................
15:382
First Nat'l Bank of Oregon v. United States .................................
15:30
Fisher v. United States .....................................................
15:489, 490
Folsom v. Butte County Ass'n of Gov'ts .................................
15:125
Franco v. District Court ....................................................
Franklin Builders, Inc. v. Sartin ............................................ 15:220
15:498
Frederick v. Cartright ......................................................
15:416
Fred Howland Co. v. Superior Court ........................................
15:348
Friedman v. City of Los Angeles ............................................
15:245, 246
Friends of Mammoth v. Bd. of Supervisors ..............................
15:336
Frontiero v. Richardson ....................................................
15:670
: ...................................
Fuentes v. Shevin ......................
15:134
Fulk v. William s ...........................................................
15:337
Fullilove v. Klutznick ......................................................
15:560
Fuls v. Shastina Properties .................................................
15:270
Fults v. Superior Court .....................................................
15:352, 363
Furey v. City of Sacramento ............................................
15:117
Furlong v. Long Island College Hospital .....................................
15:470
Furm an v. Georgia .........................................................
15:132
Gable v. Silver .............................................................
15:631, 648
Gaspard v. United States ...............................................
15:557
Geary v. United States Steel Corp ...........................................
15:334, 335
Geduldig v. Aiello ......................................................
15:591
General Mut. Ins. Co. v. United States .......................................
Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. California Coastal Commission .. 15:351, 352, 353, 354, 361, 364
15:104
Gideon v. W ainwright ......................................................
15:598
Gilliam v. United States ....................................................
15:634, 638
Gilligan v. Morgan .....................................................
15:320
Givhan v. Western Line Consolidated School District .........................
15:470
Godfrey v. Georgia .........................................................
15:349, 362
Goldblatt v. Town of Hempstead ........................................
15:118, 122
Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar ..........................................
15:637, 638
Goldman v. W einberger ................................................
15:634
Goldwater v. Carter ........................................................
15:112
Good Samaritan Hospital Ass'n v. Simon ....................................
15:572
Gordon v. Lancaster Osteopathic Hosp. Ass'n ................................
719
Gordon v. New York Stock Exchange, Inc....................................
15:119
Gouveia v. Citicorp Person-to-Person Fin. Center Inc .....................
15:147, 148
G ray v. L ucas ..............................................................
15:470
15:670
Grayned v. City of Rockford ................................................
15:416
Greenup v. Rodm an ........................................................
15:29
G resham v. State ..........................................................
15:231, 232, 240
Grigsby v. Mabry ..................................................
Griswold v. Connecticut ............................
15:196, 322, 339, 340, 341, 668
15:353, 356, 361
Grupe v. California Coastal Commission .............................
Gue v. D ennis .........................................................
15:288, 289
Guzman v. Hamblen Gauge Co ..............................................
15:418
Hafenbraedl v. LeTendre for Congress Comm ................................
15:41
Hall v. Arm strong Cork Inc .................................................
15:136
Hampton v. United States ..........................................
15:624, 631, 648
Harbor v. Deukm ejian .....................................................
15:448
Hare v. Gen. Contract Purchase Corp ........................................
15:154
Hark v. Antilles Airboats, Inc ...............................................
15:611
Harrington v. California ....................................................
15:466
Hayden v. Bracy ...........................................................
15:117
15:112
Hayden v. Foryt ...........................................................
15:147
Heliotis v. Schum an ........................................................
15:382
Helvering v. H utchings .....................................................
Henrick v. Lynn ...........................................................
15:140
15:592
Henz v. United States ......................................................
15:136
Herzog v. R oss .............................................................
Hess v. Indiana ............................................................
15:319
HFH, Ltd. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County .........................
15:352
Hinds v. State Bar .........................................................
15:108
15:34, 41, 48
Hoffenblum, Moilrich Communications, Inc. v. Ware ....................
15:553
Holden v. Heckler .........................................................
15:635
Holdiness v. Stroud ........................................................
Hollenbaugh v. Carnegie Free Library .......................................
15:563
Holtz v. Superior Court of San Francisco ....................................
15:348
15:594
Honeycutt v. United States .................................................
15:118, 119
Hoover v. Ronwin .....................................................
15:382
Hope v. United States ......................................................
15:138
Hopkins v. Hartman .......................................................
Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex Hospital ........................
15:116, 117
H ouse v. Thornton .........................................................
15:138
Housing Auth. of Alameda v. Gomez ........................................
15:414
15:703
Hovey v. Superior Court ...................................................
15:144
H ughes v. Stusser ..........................................................
15:673
.......................................
Hultzm an v. W einberger ...........
Humphers v. First Interstate Bank of Oregon ................................
15:326
H unt v. Davis .........................................................
15:40, 41, 45
15:118
Hybud Equipment Corp. v. City of Akron ...................................
Hyden v. Krustling ........................................................
15:611
Illinois v. A llen ............................................................
15:102
15:602, 603, 604, 641
Indian Towing Co. v. United States ............................
15:450, 452, 453, 455, 457
Ingersoll v. Palmer .......................................
15:648
In re "Agent Orange" ...... ................................................
In re Janice Assalone ......................................................
15:326
15:670
In re Byrne ...............................................................
15:460
In re N ancy C ..............................................................
In re Tony C ...........................................................
15:451, 452
In re C-Y-L ...........................................................
15:189, 190
15:71
In re Carroll ..............................................................
15:689
In re G .B..................................................................
15:461
In re Jam es D . ............................................................
15:687, 688, 689
In re M ichael G ....................................................
720
[Vol. 15: 715, 1988]
Volume XV Index
PEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW
In re Gonzalez-Portillo ..................................................... 15:197
In re H.................................................................... 15:197
In re Head ................................................................ 15:489
In re Hill .................................................................. 15:466
In re Jores ................................................................ 15:68
In re King ................................................................. 15:78
In re Korean Airlines Disaster of September 1, 1983 .......................... 15:605
In re Kostas ............................................................... 15:186
In re Lara ................................................................. 15:466
In re Laureano ............................................................ 15:188
In re Lenning ............................................................. 15:199
In re Lew ................................................................. 15:197
In re Malloy ............................................................... 15:106
In re Marriage of Barnes ............................................... 15:446, 447
In re Marriage of Doud .................................................... 15:447
In re Marriage of Flaherty ............................................. 15:418, 419
In re Marriage of M ikelson ................................................. 15:56
In re Marriage of M ilhan ................................................... 15:446
In re Martin .......................................... 15:682, 683, 684, 685, 686, 687
In re Martinez-Solis ........................................................ 15:197
In re Kathy P.............................................................. 15:491
In re Paris Air Crash of March 3, 1974 ...................................... 15:607
In re Repuyan ............................................................. 15:187
In re Riddle ............................................................... 15:684
In re Robinson ............................................................ 15:106
In re Ronald .............................................................. 15:689
In re Sears ................................................................ 15:466
In re Turner .............................................................. 15:670
In re W hitehorn ........................................................... 15:466
In re Y uen ................................................................ 15:187
Interest of Darlene C ....................................................... 15:689
Interest of D.L.D ........................................................... 15:689
Israel v.IN S ............................................................... 15:194
IT Corp. v. County of Imperial .............................................. 15:458
Jaffee v. United States .................................... 15:624, 630, 631, 648, 650
Jarvis v. First Nat'l Realty Corp ......................................... 15:132, 138
Jefferson v. United States .................................................. 15:626
Johnson v. California I.M.T. Assoc........................................... 15:38
Johnson v. O'Brien ........................................................ 15:144
Johnson v. Robison ........................................................ 15:644
Johnson v. State ........................................................... 15:28
Johnston v. McCullough .................................................... 15:56
Jones v. Kaiser Industries Corp ......................................... 15:268, 292
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Marshall ................................... 15:553
K ahn v. K ahn ............................................................. 15:415
Kahn v. Shevin .......
..............................................
15:334
Kaiser Aetna v. United States
.........................................
15:363
K ananos v. Murff .......................................................... 15:197
Kaplan v. Eldorado Ins. Co .................................................. 15:415
Katz v. United States ...................................................... 15:567
Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons ............................. 15:121
K elly v. Switch ............................................................ 15:611
Kelly v. United States ...................................................... 15:611
Keyes v. Guy Bailey Homes Inc ............................................. 15:139
Kilgrow v. Kilgrow ............................................ 15:60, 61, 62, 63, 64
721
K ing v. Meese .............................................................
15:457
Klor's Inc. v. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc.....................................
15:121
Kobeck v. Nabisco, Inc ......................................................
15:571
Korematsu v. United States ................................................
15:306
Lafayette v. Louisiana Power & Light Co................................
15:118
Laird v. Nelm s ............................................................
15:593
Lamas-Orlando Outdoor Advertising v. City of Ormond Beach ................
15:220
Landeros v. Flood ..........................................................
15:665
Lau v. Kiley ...............................................................
15:200
Leaf v. U nited States .......................................................
15:607
Leake v. City of Venice ..................................................
15:36, 43
Leary v. United States .....................................................
15:596
Le Blond v. W olfe .........................................................
15:498
Lee v. Illinois ..............................................................
15:466
Lessard v. Schm idt .........................................................
15:670
Lesser v. Huntington Harbor Corp ..........................................
15:418
Levin v. Cook .............................................................
15:134
Liberty Fin. Management Corp. v. Beneficial Data Processing Corp ............
15:230
Liberty v. California Coastal Comm'n .......................................
15:349
Lindenau v. Alexander .....................................................
15:635
Lingsch v. Savage ..........................................................
15:147
Lockert v. M cCree .........................................................
15:703
Lockett v. Ohio ........................................................
15:467, 479
Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. United States ....................................
15:598
Logue v. United States .....................................................
15:596
Lohm eyer v. Bower ........................................................
15:134
Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Co ...........................
15:354, 355
Loving v. Virginia ..........................................................
15:181
Lowe v. Philadelphia Newspaper, Inc ........................................
15:270
Lowery v. Cardwell ............
: ...........................................
15:76
Lum pkin v. Friedman ......................................................
15:415
Lutwak v. United States ............................................
15:182, 183, 200
M aas v. Municipal Court ...................................................
15:84
MacGregor v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board ......................
15:710
Magnuson v. Burlington-Northern, Inc .......................................
15:291
Maier v. Orr ........................................................ 15:635
Maimon v. Sisters of the Third Order of St. Francis ..........................
15:112
M alman v. United States ...................................................
15:591
M arbury v. Madison ........................................................
15:640
M arks v. W hitney ..........................................................
15:347
Marquette Nat'l Bank of Minneapolis v. First Omaha Serv. Corp .............
15:156
Marrese v. Interqual, Inc ............................................
15:112, 125, 126
M arshall v. Barlow's Inc ....................................................
15:453
M artarano v. United States .................................................
15:596
Martin v. Capital Cities Media, Inc ..........................................
15:553
Martin v. Hedder ....................................................
15:489
Maryland-National Capitol Park and Planning Comm'n v. United States Postal
Serv ...................................................................
15:210
M atchett v. Superior Court .................................................
15:114
M atter of Palmer ..........................................................
15:102
Matviuw v. Johnson and Alexian Brothers Medical Center ...................
15:112
M ayers v. Ridley ...........................................................
15:326
Mayes v. Sturdy Northern Sales, Inc .........................................
15:44
M aynard v. Hill ............................................................
15:181
M cCabe v. Goodfellow : ..................................................
15:37, 38
M cCarty v. McCarty ...................................................
15:446, 447
McDonough Power Equip. Co. v. Superior Court .............................
15:489
M cGrain v. Daugherty .....................................................
15:650
M cGuire v. McGuire .....................................................
15:60, 61
McLain v. Real Estate Board ...............................................
15:116
722
[Vol. 15: 715, 1988]
Volume XV Index
PEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW
15:181, 188, 200
M cLat v. Longo ....................................................
15:85
M cKissick v. United States .................................................
15:34, 41, 48
M cN ally v. Tharp .....................................................
15:198
M enezes v. INS ............................................................
15:131
Menne v. City of Fond Du Lac ..............................................
15:133, 134
Messer-Johnson Co. v. Security Sav. & Loan Co ..........................
15:211, 214, 219, 220
Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San Diego ..........................
15:334
Michael M . v. Superior Court ...............................................
15:602
Michelmore v. United States ................................................
Mid-Way Cabinet Fixture Mfg. v. County of San Joaquin .... 15:349, 350, 351, 354, 355
15:229
Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. Federal Frolich Fin. Corp ..........................
15:319
Miller v. California ........................................................
15:139
M iller v. Cannon Hills Estate ...............................................
15:574
Miller v. New York Stock Exch .............................................
15:133
M illikin Inc. v. Allen .......................................................
15:635
M indes v. Seaman .........................................................
15:117
Mishler v. St. Anthony's Hospital Systems ...................................
15:221
Mississippi State Highway Comm'n v. Roberts Enter. Inc ......................
15:334, 336
Mississippi Univ. for Women v. Hogan ...................................
15:124
M itchel v. Reynolds ........................................................
15:69
M itchell v. Superior Court ..................................................
15:2, 3
M 'Naghten's Case ..........................................................
15:631
M ollnow v. Carlton .......................................................
15:498
M onarco v. Lo Greco .......................................................
15:573
M onge v. Beebe Rubber Co .................................................
15:361, 362
Moore v. City of East Cleveland ........................................
15:220
M oore v. W ard ............................................................
15:415
M organ v. Ransom .........................................................
15:230
M organ v. S. Cent. Bell Tel. Co .............................................
15:141
Morgan, Olmstead, Kennedy & Gardner, Inc. v. Schipa .......................
15:154
Morris v. Capitol Furniture and Appliance Co ................................
15:352
Morse v. County of San Luis Obispo ........................................
15:348
Morton v. Superior Court of San Mateo .....................................
15:420
Motown Records Corp. v. Superior Court ....................................
15:139
Moxley v. Laramie Builders, Inc .............................................
15:441
M-R-S Mfg. Co. v. United States ............................................
15: 572
Mueller v. Union Pac. R.R .................................................
15:6, 8, 26, 29, 30, 31
Muench v. Israel ..............................................
15:670
Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co ...............................
15:591
Munro v. United States ....................................................
15:224
National Ass'n of Gov't Employees v. Rumsfield .............................
National Gerimedical Hospital & Gerontology Center v. Blue Cross ....... 15:119, 120
15:415
National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc ....................
15:121, 122, 124
National Society of Professional Engineers v. United States ...........
15:221
National Used Cars, Inc. v. City of Kalamazoo ...............................
15:28
Neaveill v. State ...........................................................
15:214
Nectow v. City of Cambridge ...............................................
15:118
New Motor Vehicles Board v. Orrin W. Fox Co ...............................
15:218
New Orleans v. Dukes .....................................................
15:85, 94, 101, 102, 103, 104, 106, 108, 109
Nix v. Whiteside ...........................
15:578
NLRB v. Apico Inns of Cal., Inc..............................................
15:578
NLRB v. Big Three Indus. Gas & Equip. Co ..................................
15:553
NLRB v. Blackstone Co ....................................................
15:555
NLRB v. Condenser Corp. of America .......................................
15:229
NLRB v. First Termite Control Co ..........................................
723
Nollan v. California Coastal Commission ....................................
.
.
15:345, 347, 348, 352, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 361, 363, 364, 365
Norsco Enterprises v. City of Fremont ..................................
15:351, 363
Northern Pacific Railroad Co. v. United States ...........................
15:116, 121
Norwood v. Baker .........................................................
15:363
Obbe v. Schlem eyer ................................................
15:140, 141, 144
O'Brien v. Papa Gino's of Am ...............................................
15:571
Ollm an v. Evans ...........................................................
15:230
Olm stead v. United States ..................................................
15:669
O 'N eal v. Dent ............................................................
15:181
Oregon City v. Hartke .....................................................
15:221
Orloff v. W illoughby .......................................................
15:636
Otero v. New York City ....................................................
15:334
O tt v. Midland .............................................................
15:142
Owen v. National Container Corp. of California ..............................
15:497
Owens v. Foundation for Ocean Research ....................................
15:498
Debra P. v. Turlington .................................................
15:229, 231
Maria P. v. Riles ................
..................................
15:488, 489, 490
Pacific Freight Lines v. Valley Motor Lines, Inc ..............................
15:35
Pacific Gas and Elec. Co. v. State Board of Equalization ......................
15:682
Palmateer v. Int'l Harvester Co .............................................
15:573
Parker v. Brown .......................................................
15:117, 118
Patrick v. Burget .............................................
15:112, 113, 119, 125
Patterson v. Central Coast Regional Comm'n ................................
15:364
Pattno v. United States .....................................................
15:595
Patton v. J.C. Penney Co ...................................................
15:571
Paul v. United States .......................................................
15:437
Pearson v. Agricultural Ins. Co ..............................................
15:41
Penagaricano v. Uenza ........
.......................................
15:635
Penn Cent. Transp. Co. v. New York City... ....
15:211, 214, 218, 345, 353, 354, 355
People v. Anderson ..............
15:464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 476, 477, 704, 705
People v. Aranda ..................................................
15:465, 466, 473
People v. Balderas .........................................................
15:476
People v. Banks ...........................................................
15:697
People v. Beivelman .......................................................
15:694
People v. Bell ................................................
15:690, 693, 694, 698
People v. Bergm an .........................................................
15:286
People v. Bravo ........................................................
15:267, 272
People v. Brown ...........................................................
15:477
People v. Bryant ...........................................................
15:685
People v. Buford ...........................................................
15:692
People v. Butter ...........................................................
15:475
People v. Carter ...........................................................
15:475
People v. Cook ............................................................
15:477
People v. Curtis ...........................................................
15:698
People v. Davis .........................................................
15:68, 700
People v. Deas .............................................................
15:286
People v. Drew ............................................................
15:3
People v. Durham .........................................................
15:708
People v. Easley ...........................................................
15:706
People ex re/ Younger v. Superior Court ....................................
15:494
People v. Fields ........................................................
15:270, 703
People v. Flores ...........................................................
15:466
People v. Floyd ............................................................
15:466
People v. Ford .............................................................
15:682
People v. Fosselm an ...................................................
15:475, 708
People v. Gale ..............................................................
15:452
People v. Gates ....................................................
15:473, 475, 476
People v. Ghent ..............................
15:268, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281
People v. Green ............................................................
15:695
724
[Vol. 15: 715, 1988]
Volume XV Index
PEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW
15:694, 695
People v. Guzm an .....................................................
15:470
People v. H allner ..........................................................
15:693
People v. H arris ...........................................................
15:268, 282
People v. Hendricks ....................................................
People v. Hyde ........................................................
15:452, 455
15:708
People v. Jackson ..........................................................
15:491
People v. Jeffers ...........................................................
15:700
People v. Johnson .........................................................
People v. Leach ............................................................
15:466
People v. Lee .......................................................... 15:268, 283
15:700
People v. Lewis ............................................................
15:285, 286
People v. Lohbauer ....................................................
People v. Lunafelix ........................................................
15:705
15:702
People v. Marsden .........................................................
15:286
People v. M arshall .........................................................
15:68
People v. M attson ..........................................................
15:694, 695
People v. M cDonald ....................................................
15:101
People v. M cKenzie ........................................................
People v. Miranda ............................
15:701, 702, 704, 705, 706, 707, 708, 709
People v. N ation ...........................................................
15:276
15:696
People v. Navarro ..........................................................
People v. N oah ............................................................
15:277
15:455
People v. One 1960 Cadillac Coupe ..........................................
15:476
People v. Perez ............................................................
15:708
People v. Pope .............................................................
15:471
People v. Ram os ...........................................................
15:706
People v. Robertson ........................................................
15:101
People v. Robles ...........................................................
15:107
People v. Salquerro ........................................................
People v. Schultheis ........................................................
15:71
People v. Schueren ........................................................
15:286
15:494
People v. Shirokow ........................................................
15:699
People v. Snow ............................................................
People v. Stover ...........................................................
15:211
People v. Taylor ...........................................................
15:697
15:476
People v. Teschara .........................................................
People v. Thom as ......................................................
15:268, 285
People v. Turner .......................................................
15:470, 471
People v. W arren ..........................................................
15:685
15:286
People v. W est .............................................................
People v. W etmore .........................................................
15:7
People v. W heeler .....................................................
15:699, 700
People v. White .........................................................
15:3, 4, 24
People v. W olff ............................................................
15:3
People v. W oodhead ........................................................
15:493
People v. Zimm erm an ......................................................
15:703
Perkins v. G ross ...........................................................
15:146
15:573
Perks v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co ........................................
Perlm utter v. Greene ......................................................
15:216
Perry v. M erideth .....................................................
15:38, 39, 45
Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Fenney .........................
15:335
Peterson v. Hubschman Constr. Co. Inc ......................................
15:138
Pfeiffer v. M aryland .....................................................
15:25, 26
Phillippe v. Shapell Industries, Inc .............................
15:494, 498, 499, 500
Pierce v. United States .....................................................
15:602
725
Pipe Line Co. v. State Board of Equalization .................................
15:681
Pitcher v. Iberia Parish School Bd ...........................................
15:574
Pittman v. M artin ....................................................
15:44, 45, 46
Pittsburg Press Co. v. Pittsburg Comm'n on Human Rights ...................
15:325
Pointer v. Texas ...........................................................
15:465
Polhemus v. American Medical Ass'n .......................................
15:116
Press v. Lucky Stores, Inc ..................................................
15:489
Public Util. Comm'n v. Pollack .........................................
15:551, 560
Pugh v. Holm es ........................................................
15:132, 138
Pugh v. See's Candies, Inc ..................................................
15:557
Quinones v. United States ..................................................
15:571
Raab v. Beatty .............................................................
15:138
Racine County v. Plourde ..................................................
15:221
Raven v. Panama Canal Co .................................................
15:567
Rayonier, Inc. v. United States ..............................................
15:641
Reste Realty Corp. v. Cooper ...............................................
15:132
Reynolds v. Sim s ..........................................................
15:302
Richards v. United States ...................................................
15:593
Richardson v. United States ....................
...........................
15:602
Richmond Advertising/Remhold Assoc., Inc. v. Del Giudice ..............
15:37, 39, 40
Rigolfi v. Superior Court ...................................................
15:70
Roberts v. Barbagallo ......................................................
15:141
Roberts v. Superior Court ..................................................
15:84
Roberts v. United States ....................................................
15:608
Robinson v. McGovern .....................................................
15:124
Robison v. Johnson ........................................................
15:644
Roe v. Wade .... 15:295, 296, 304, 306, 307, 308, 316, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332, 338, 339, 342
Rostker v. Goldberg ................................................
15:334, 637, 640
Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co ................................................
15:360
Rulon-M iller v. IBM Corp ..................................................
15:578
Ryerson v. United States ...................................................
15:382
Sam i v. United States ......................................................
15:607
Sandidge v. W ashington ....................................................
15:635
St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United States .................................
15:364
Salem Realty Co. v. Baston .................................................
15:138
Sanborn v. State ...........................................................
15:103
Sandstrom v. Montana .....................................................
15:315
San Franciscans For Reasonable Growth v. City of San Francisco .............
15:250
Saporta v. Barbagelata .....................................................
15:147
Satterlee v. B liss ...........................................................
15:70
Satz v. Perlm utter .....................................................
15:668, 670
Schecter v. Brewer .........................................................
15:146
Scherrer v. Plaza Marina Commercial Corp ..................................
15:416
Schlesinger v. Ballard ......................................................
15:334
Schm erber v. California ....................................................
15:574
Schm idt v. Superior Court ..................................................
15:459
Schneble v. Florida ........................................................
15:466
Scrutton v. County of Sacramento .............................
15:350, 351, 354, 355
Secor v. K night ............................................................
15:140
Security First National Bank v. Cooper ..........................
15:35, 36, 37, 38, 42
Sedco Int'l v. Cory .........................................................
15:141
See v. City of Seattle .......................................................
15:453
Select Base Materials v. Board of Equality ...................................
15:710
Seligson v. Young ..........................................................
15:146
Shaffer v. Thacher Co. Ltd..................................................
15:142
Shah v. Mt. Zion Hosp. & Medical Center ...................................
15:680
Shavers v. K elly ...........................................................
15:458
Shelley v. Kraem er ........................................................
15:326
Shelton v. Tucker ..........................................................
15:554
Silver v. New York Stock Exchange .........................................
15:119
726
[Vol. 15: 715, 1988]
Volume XV Index
PEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW
Singer Co. v. Gardner ......................................................
15:176
Smith v. Glen Alden Coal Co ...............................................
15:131
Smith v. State .............................................................
15:29
Sorrell v. Young .......................................................
15:140, 141
South Dakota v. Brown ....................................................
15:697
Southern Pacific Transp. Co. v. United States ................................
15:594
Spargnapani v. W right .....................................................
15:146
Spaulding v. United States ..................................................
15:602
Spring St. Co. v. City of Los Angeles ........................................
15:349
Stamper v. Commonwealth ...............................................
15:29, 30
Standal v. Armstrong Cork Co ..............................................
15:136
Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States .............................
15:124
Stanley v. Central Intelligence Agency ......................................
15:624
Stanley v. Georgia .........................................................
15:340
Stanley v. United States ...............................
15:602, 624, 631, 633, 636, 650
State v. Anderson ..........................................................
15:29
State v. Andrews ..........................................................
15:28
State v. Bernhard ..........................................................
15:221
State v. Bouwm an ..............................
..........................
15:28
State v. Buckley .......
..............................................
15:221
State v. Diam ond M otors ...................................................
15:220
State v. D oss .............................................................. 15:28
State v. Edwards ...........................................................
15:28
State ex reL L.E.A. v. Hammergren .........................................
15:689
State v. Flattum ...........................................................
15:29
State v. Gonzales ..........................................................
15:28
State v. H enderson .........................................................
15:85
State v. Jones .....................................................15:211, 214, 221
State v. K irkley ............................................................
15:28
State v. M arshall ..........................................................
15:28
State v. M iller .....................................................
15:213, 217, 221
State v. N ecaise ............................................................
15:28
State v. Norlund ...........................................................
15:689
State v. Repp ...............................................................
15:29
State v. Richardson ........................................................
15:28
State v. Sm ith .............................................................
15:221
State v. W elcom e ..........................................................
15:28
State v. W ilcox ............................................................
15:29
State Bar v. Langert .......................................................
15:68
Steele v. State .............................................................
15:29
Stencel Aero Eng'g Corp. v. United States ..........
15:624, 626, 627, 628, 629, 640, 645
Stinson v. Hornsby .........................................................
15:635
Stoyanoff v. Berkeley ......................................................
15:214
Strickland v. W ashington ...............................................
15:104, 105
Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Ass'n .................
15:364
Sturm v. United States .....................................................
15:433
Suffolk Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Hulse ....................................
15:221
Sun Oil Co. v. City of Madison Heights ......................................
15:213
Sullivan v. Ulrich ..........................................................
15:140
Suzuki v. Gateway Realty of America .......................................
15:147
Swanson v. United States ...........................................
15:593, 594, 601
Swinton v. Whitinsville Say. Bank ..........................................
15:140
Tambone v. Memorial Hospital .............................................
15:119
Taylor v. Louisiana ........................................................
15:692
Teachy v. United States ....................................................
15:611
727
Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward Clyde & Associates ............
15:482, 484, 485, 486, 487
Temple Baptist Church v. City of Albuquerque ..............................
15:221
Tenzer v. Superscope, Inc ..................................................
15:499
Terminal Plaza Corp. v. City of San Francisco ...............................
15:363
Terzian v. Superior Court ..................................................
15:326
T.S. Foulke & Co. v. Boutwell ..............................................
15:131
Thomas v. General Elec. Co .................................................
15:574
Thom as v. Luong ..........................................................
15:416
Thompson v. City of San Diego .....................................
15:480, 481, 482
Thornton v. United States ..................................................
15:85
Tison v. Arizona ...................................................
15:467, 470, 472
Tison v. Eskew ........................................................
15:134, 138
Tovar v. IN S ..............................................................
15:203
Trem ain v. State ...........................................................
15:28
Trent Meredity, Inc. v. City of Oxnard ..................................
15:352, 363
TVA v. H ill ................................................................
15:640
Union Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Superior Ct .....................................
15:410
United Advertising Corp. v. Borough of Metuchen ..........................
15:223
United Missouri Bank of Kansas City v. Danforth ............................
15:156
United Outdoor Advertising Co. Inc. v. Business, Transportation and Housing
A gency ........................................................
15:711, 712, 713
United States v. Acord .....................................................
15:592
United States v. Alberty ....................................................
15:591
United States v. Bifield .................................................
15:101, 102
United States v. Brawner ......................................
15:6, 7, 18, 19, 22, 23
United States v. Bright .....................................................
15:17
United States v. Biswell ....................................................
15:453
United States v. Brown .............................................
15:470, 630, 632
United States v. Columbia Pictures Corp ....................................
15:121
United States v. County Board ..............................................
15:211
United States v. Curtis .....................................................
15:102
United States v. 88 Cases, More or Less, Containing Bireley's Orange Beverage
....................................................
15:229
United States v. ex reL Wilcox v. Johnson ...................................
15:91
United States v. Frisbee ...............................................
15:10, 21, 24
United States v. General Motors Corp .......................................
15:362
United States v. Georgia Pub. Serv. Comm'n .................................
15:437
United States v. Grayson ...................................................
15:107
United States v. Griggs .....................................................
15:626
United States v. Hammond .................................................
15:686
United States v. Heyward ..................................................
15:650
United States v. Johnson ...................................................
15:597
United States v. Lawter ....................................................
15:602
United States v. M cLemore .................................................
15:625
United States v. M endenhall ................................................
15:463
United States v. M orrison ..............................................
15:682, 685
United States v. Muniz .................................................
15:629, 630
United States v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers .........................
15:119
United States v. Orleans ....................................................
15:596
United States v. Osserm an ..................................................
15:507
United States v. Raynor ....................................................
15:470
United States v. Shearer ......................................
15:624, 629, 630, 631
U nited States v. Sm ith .....................................................
15:685
United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co .....................................
15:121
United States v. Stanley .......................................
15:624, 632, 636, 637
United States v. Thom as ...................................................
15:686
United States v. Union Trust Co .............................................
15:593
United States v. Venenzuela Bernal .........................................
15:685
Universal Camera Corp. v. N.L.R.B .........................................
15:578
Vangsness v. Superior Court ................................................
15:108
728
Volume XV Index
[Vol. 15: 715, 1988]
PEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW
Van Hoomissen v. Xerox Corp ..............................................
15:680
Varney & Green v. Williams ................................................
15:219
Vendt v. Duenke ..........................................................
15:147
Veno v. Merideth ......................................................
15:553, 557
Veterans of Foreign Wars, Post 4264 v. City of Steamboat Springs .............
15:220
Village of Belle Terre v. Boraas .............................................
15:218
Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co .......................................
15:214
Vinson v. Superior Court ...............................................
15:267, 269
Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council ...... 15:323
Voneye v. Turner ..........................................................
15:168
W ahrlich v. Arizona ......................................................
15:29, 30
W ainwright v. W itt ....................................................
15:279, 706
W ard v. O choa .............................................................
15:482
15:684
W ashington v. Texas .......................................................
W ebb v. Texas .............................................................
15:684
W einberg v. W ilensk .......................................................
15:138
W eiss v. York Hospital .....................................................
15:117
W elch v. Swasey .......................................................
15:214, 218
W elcome v. Blackburn .....................................................
15:29
W endler v. DePaul .....................................................
15:563, 571
Wenzoski v. Central Banking System, Inc ................................
15:267, 271
Western Oil and Gas Association v. State Board of Equalization ...............
15:681
Westside Community for Indep. Living, Inc. v. Obledo ....................
15:489, 490
W hetstone v. INS ......................................................
15:198, 200
W hite v. Renck ............................................................
15:489
W hiteside v. Scurr .....................................................
15:101, 104
W illiams v. Alioto ..........................................................
15:489
W illiams v. Kleaveland .....................................................
15:117
W illiams v. Marsh .........................................................
15:670
W illiams v. St. Joseph Hospital .............................................
15:116
W illiams v. United States ...............................................
15:596, 635
W ilson v. Transocean Airlines ..............................................
15:609
W irin v. H orrall ...........................................................
15:452
W itherspoon v. Illinois .................................................
15:279, 705
W ood v. Riley .............................................................
15:449
Woodland Hills Residents Association v. City Council ................
5:251, 253, 490
Wright v. Southern Mono Hospital Dist ......................................
15:112
W ym an v. Jam es ...........................................................
15:453
Yen Eng v. Board of Bldg. and Safety Comm'rs ..............................
15:348
Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc .......................................
15:218
Young v. Joyce ............................................................
15:147
Zabkowicz v. W est Bend Co .................................................
15:270
Zeigler v. State ............................................................
15:28
Zeller v. United States .....................................................
15:568
Zippo Manufacturing v. Rogers Imports .................................
15:229, 230
Comment Index
Alienating Sham Marriages For Tougher Immigration Penalties: Congress
Enacts The Marriage Fraud Act ........................................
Antitrust Implications of Medical Peer Review: Balancing the Competing
Interests ..............................................................
Intramilitary Tort Immunity: A Constitutional Justification ...................
It Pays to Give it Away-Sometimes: Inter Vivos Charitable Remainder
Unitrusts in Estate Planning ............................................
15:181
15:111
15:623
15:367
729
Land Use Aesthetics: A Citizen Survey Approach to Decision Making .........
Mandatory Disclosure: California Bar Refuses to Adopt Proposed Rule to
Confront Client Perjury ................................................
The Not-So-Golden Years: The Legal Response to Elder Abuse ...............
15:207
15:65
15:653
Subject Index
Administrative Law
Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing Commission ..................
Western Oil and Gas Association v. State Board of Equalization ...............
15:679
15:681
Antitrust Law
Antitrust Implications of Medical Peer Review: Balancing the Competing
Interests .............................................................. 15:111
Banking
Consumer Debt and Usury: A New Rationale For Usury .....................
15:151
Civil Procedure
15:482
Abbott Ford, Inc. v. Superior Court .........................................
15:287
Agriculture Labor Relations Board v. Tex-Cal Land Management, Inc ........
15:446
In re Marriage of Barnes ...................................................
15:488
M aria P. v. Riles ...........................................................
The Sanction Provision of the California Civil Discovery Act, Section 2023: Will
15:401
it Make a Difference or is it Just Another "Paper Tiger"? ................
15:269
Vinson v. Superior Court ...................................................
15:271
Wenzoski v. Central Banking System, Inc ....................................
Civil Rights
The Not So Golden Years: The Legal Response to Elder Abuse ...............
15:653
Collective Bargaining
DeTomaso v. Pan American World Airways, Inc..............................
15:290
Commercial Law
Consumer Debt and Usury: A New Rationale For Usury .....................
15:151
Constitutional Law
Benign Sex Discrimination Revisited: Constitutional and Moral Issues in
Banning Sex-Selection Abortion ........................................
Harbor v. Deukmejian .....................................................
In re M artin ...............................................................
Intramilitary Tort Immunity: A Constitutional Justification ...................
Ingersoll v. Palm er ........................................................
K ing v. M eese .............................................................
People v. Bravo ............................................................
Schmidt v. Superior Court ..................................................
15:295
15:448
15:682
15:623
15:450
15:457
15:273
15:459
Consumer Rights
Consumer Debt and Usury: A New Rationale For Usury .....................
Consumerism and Land Sales ...............................................
15:151
15:131
Contract Law
Consumer Debt and Usury: A New Rationale For Usury .....................
Government Contracts Under the Federal Acquisition Regulation .............
15:151
15:433
[Vol. 15: 715, 1988]
Volume XV Index
PEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW
Criminal Law
Avoiding the Insanity Defense Strait Jacket: The Mens Rea Route ............
In re Jam es D . ............................................................
People v. Anderson ........................................................
People v. Gates ............................................................
People v. Jeffers ...........................................................
People v. W oodhead ........................................................
15:1
15:461
15:464
15:473
15:491
15:493
Criminal Procedure
Avoiding the Insanity Defense Strait Jacket: The Mens Rea Route ............
In re M ichael G ............................................................
People v. Bell .............................................................
People v. Bravo ............................................................
People v. Ghent ...........................................................
People v. Hendricks ........................................................
People v. Jeffers ...........................................................
People v. Lee ..............................................................
People v. Snow ............................................................
People v. Thom as ......... .................................................
15:1
15:687
15:690
15:273
15:275
15:282
15:491
15:283
15:699
15:285
Discovery
The Sanction Provision of the New California Civil Discovery Act, Section
2023: Will it Make a Difference or is it Just Another "Paper Tiger"? ......
Vinson v. Superior Court ...................................................
15:401
15:269
Discrimination
Benign Sex Discrimination Revisited: Constitutional and Moral Issues in
Banning Sex-Selection Abortion ........................................
15:295
Due Process
Nollan v. California Coastal Commission: You Can't Always Get What You
Want But Sometimes You Get What You Need ..........................
People v. Thom as ..........................................................
15:345
15:285
Employee Benefits
Jones v. Kaiser Industries Corp .............................................
15:292
Employment Law
Employment Privacy Law For The 1990's ....................................
15:551
Environmental Law
Consumerism and Land Sales ...............................................
Land Use Aesthetics: A Citizen Survey Approach to Decision Making .........
15:131
15:207
Equal Protection
Benign Sex Discrimination Revisited: Constitutional and Moral Issues in
Banning Sex-Selection Abortion ........................................
15:295
Evidence
People v. H endricks ........................................................
People v. M iranda .........................................................
15:282
15:701
Family Law
Alienating Sham Marriages For Tougher Immigration Penalties: Congress
Enacts the Marriage Fraud Act .........................................
Mediation of Marital Disputes Before It Is Too Late: A Proposal For
Premarital Contract Provisions For Mediation of Disputes Within the
Intact Family and at Separation .........................................
15:181
15:51
Federal Government
Government Contracts Under the Federal Acquisition Regulation .............
15:433
Immigration Law
Alienating Sham Marriages For Tougher Immigration Penalties: Congress
Enacts the Marriage Fraud Act .........................................
15:181
Insurance Law
Altaville Drug Store, Inc. v. Employment Development Department ..........
15:709
Intellectual Property Rights
Nollan v. CaliforniaCoastal Commission: You Can't Always Get What You
Want But Sometimes You Get What You Need ..........................
It Pays To Give It Away--Sometimes: Inter Vivos Charitable Remainder
Unitrusts in Estate Planning ............................................
15:345
15:367
Jurisdiction
Wenzoski v. Central Banking System, Inc ....................................
15:271
Labor Law
Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Tex-Cal Land Management, Inc .........
DeTomaso v. Pan American World Airways, Inc ..............................
15:287
15:290
Labor Relations
Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Tex-Cal Land Management, Inc .........
15:287
Land Use
Land Use Aesthetics: A Citizen Survey Approach to Decision Making .........
15:207
Legal Ethics
Mandatory Disclosure: California Bar Refuses to Adopt Proposed Rule to
Confront Perjury .......................................................
Local Government Law
United Outdoor Advertising Co., Inc. v. Business, Transportation and Housing
A gency ................................................................
Mediation
Mediation of Marital Disputes Before It Is Too Late: A Proposal For
Premarital Contract Provisions For Mediation of Disputes Within the
Intact Family and at Separation .........................................
15:65
15:711
15:51
Medical Peer Review
Antitrust Implications of Medical Peer Review: Balancing the Competing
. Interests ..............................................................
Pension and Profit Sharing
Thompson v. City of San Diego .............................................
732
15:111
15:480
[Vol. 15: 715, 1988]
Volume XV Index
PEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW
Political Liability
Liability of Political Candidates and Their Staffs For Campaign Committee
Obligations ............................................................
15:33
Professional Responsibility
Mandatory Disclosure: California Bar Refuses to Adopt Proposed Rule to
Confront Perjury ......................................................
15:65
Real Property
Consumerism and Land Sales ...............................................
Land Use Aesthetics: A Citizen Survey Approach to Decision Making .........
15:131
15:207
Securities Law
Boiler Room Fraud: An Operational Plan Utilizing the Injunction Against
Fraud Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1345 ......................................
15:503
Sentencing and Corrections
People v. W oodhead ........................................................
15:493
Space Law
The United States Government as Defendant-One Example of the Need for a
Uniform Liability Regime to Govern Outer Space and Space-Related
15:581
Activities ..............................................................
Statutes
Alienating Sham Marriages For Tougher Immigration Penalties: Congress
Enacts The Marriage Fraud Act ........................................
DeTomaso v. Pan American World Airways, Inc ..............................
15:181
15:290
Taxation
It Pays To Give It Away--Sometimes: Inter Vivos Charitable Remainder
Unitrusts in Estate Planning ............................................
15:367
Torts
DeTomaso v. Pan American World Airways, Inc ..............................
Intramilitary Tort Immunity: A Constitutional Justification ...................
Phillippe v. Shapell Industries, Inc ..........................................
15:290
15:623
15:494
Workers' Compensation
Jones v. Kaiser Industries Corp .............................................
15:292
Wrongful Death
Jones v. Kaiser Industries Corp .............................................
15:292