Delineation Report_Armenia_March 2013 ”Environmental Protection of International River Basins” Activity 2.2: Water body identification and typology AKHURYAN PILOT BASIN, ARMENIA March 2013 Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................5 1. Criteria and Procedure of Delineation of Surface Water Bodies....................................................................5 1.1 Summary of the methodology for identifying surface water bodies .......................................................5 1.2 Coding of the Water Bodies in Akhuryan Basin Management Area ........................................................6 2. Identification and delineation of Surface Water Bodies ...............................................................................7 3. Typology of Delineated Water Bodies ............................................................................................................8 4. Identification of Heavily Modified and Artificial Surface Water Bodies .........................................................9 4.1 Identification of Artificial Surface Water Bodies ......................................................................................9 4.2 Identification of Heavily Modified Surface Water Bodies………………………………………..12 5. Identification of Surface Water Bodies “at risk” ............................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 6. Water Bodies within Protected Areas ............................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 7. Mapping of Delineated Water Bodies ......................................................................................................... 20 References ....................................................................................................................................................... 22 Annex I. List of Delineated Surface Water Bodies in Akhuryan BMA .............................................................. 23 Annex II Methodology for Identification, Delineation and Classification of Surface Water Bodies...24 Page 1 of 38 Abbreviations and Acronyms AMD Armenian Dram ASH Armenian State Hydro-meteorological and Monitoring Service AWB Artificial Water Body BOD Biological Oxygen Demand CIS Common Implementation Strategy CJSC Closed Joint-Stock Company COD Chemical Oxygen Demand CWME Country Water Management Expert EC European Commission EIMC Environmental Impact Monitoring Center EPIRB Environmental Protection of International River Basins Project ERICA European Rivers and Catchment Areas coding system EU European Union GIS Geographic Information Systems ha Hectare HGMC Hydro-Geological Monitoring Center HMWB Heavily Modified Water Body HPP Hydro-Power Plant IDC Identification, delineation and classification IWRM Integrated Water Resources Management JSC Joint Stock Company km Kilometer MAC Maximum Allowable Concentration MNP Ministry of Nature Protection RA Republic of Armenia RB River Basin RBD River Basin District RBMP River Basin Management Plan SWC ToR State Water Cadastre Terms of reference WB Water Body WBMA Water Basin Management Area WFD Water Framework Directive WRMA Water Resources Management Agency Page 2 of 38 Definitions Term Explanation Artificial water body A body of surface water created by human activity. Bad status Large portions of biological communities normally associated with the surface water type under undisturbed conditions are absent. Baseflow The usual, reliable, background level of flow in a river, maintained generally by seepage from groundwater storage, but also by interflow, which means that the river can maintain the base flow during dry periods. With prolonged drought, baseflow itself will diminish. Competent authority The authority or authorities identified by the Member States for the application of the rules of the Water Framework Directive within each River Basin District lying within their territory. Deep flow Deep flow is part of the groundwater flow, which through penetrating deep horizon flows outside of a given basin to other basin or flows in from other basin to a given basin. Driver An anthropogenic activity that may have an environmental effect. Ecoregion A recurring pattern of ecosystems associated with characteristic combinations of soil and landform that characterize that region, within which there is spatial coincidence in characteristics of geographical phenomena associated with differences in the quality, health, and integrity of ecosystems. Good Status Slight changes compared to the natural condition: The values of the biological quality elements for the surface water body type show low levels of distortion resulting from human activity, but deviate only slightly from those normally associated with the surface water body type under undisturbed conditions. Heavily modified water body A body of surface water which as a result of physical alterations by human activity is substantially changed in character. High status Little or no sign of anthropogenic disturbance. Impact The environmental effect of the pressure (e.g. fish killed, ecosystem modified). Interflow The lateral movement of water that occurs in the unsaturated zone. Interflow is the part of stream flow that has infiltrated the ground but has not entered the zone of saturation. Lake A body of standing surface water that is not linked to an ocean. Moderate status Moderate changes compared to the natural condition. Point source of pollution A point source of pollution is a single identifiable source of air, water, thermal, and noise or light pollution. Pond An artificial body of surface water, created by damming in the water with the help of dykes or by turning off the water flow, used for fish growing or irrigation etc, with a volume of water, at the normal retention level, up to one million m3. Poor status Biological communities deviate substantially from those normally associated with the surface water type under undisturbed conditions. Page 3 of 38 Term Explanation Pressure The direct effect of the driver for example, an effect that causes a change in flow or a change in the water chemistry. Reference condition Type specific biological reference conditions shall be established, representing the values of the biological quality elements at high ecological status for each surface water body type. Reservoir An artificial body of water, which constitutes a reserve of water, with possible use for different purposes, with a volume of water, at the normal retention level, over one million m3. Response The measures taken to improve the state of the water body (e.g. restricting abstraction, limiting point source discharges, developing best practice Guidance for agriculture). River basin The area of land from which all surface run-off flows through a sequence of streams, rivers and, possibly, lakes into the sea at a single river mouth, estuary or delta. River Basin District The area of land and sea, made up of one or more neighboring river basins together with their associated ground waters and coastal waters. River Basin Management Plan The River Basin Management Plan summarizes and presents the analysis, characterization, monitoring results and program of measures in one document, which can be used for the dialogue with the stakeholders (including the public information and consultation). Significant Pressure Any pressure that on its own, or in combination with other pressures, may lead to a failure to achieve the specified objective. State The condition of the water body resulting from both natural and anthropogenic factors (i.e. physical, chemical and biological characteristics). Status The biological or ecological behavior of a water body supported by hydromorphological and chemical data from the water body. Sub-basin An area of land within a river basin district from which all surface runoff flows through a series of streams, rivers and lakes to a particular point in a water course within that river basin district. Surface water All water standing and/or flowing on the surface of the land other than groundwater. Surface Water Body A discrete and significant element of surface water such as a lake, a reservoir, a stream, river or canal, part of a stream, river or canal, transitional water or a stretch of coastal water. Topology For each surface water category, the relevant surface water bodies within the river basin district shall be differentiated according to type. Water Body A coherent sub-unit in the river basin (district) to which the environmental objectives of the directive must apply. Hence, the main purpose of identifying “water bodies” is to enable the status to be accurately described and compared to environmental objectives. Water body “at risk” A water body that is identified as being at risk of failing the environmental quality objectives based upon the characterization as specified in article 5 of the WFD and results of operational monitoring as specified in article 8 of the WFD. Page 4 of 38 Page 5 of 38 Introduction The present report is prepared by the EPIRB Project key experts Tatjana Kolcova and Michael Jackman with cooperation of Aram Gevorgyan, “Environmental Policy Analysis” NGO and with the assistance of Vahagn Tonoyan, EPIRB project Country Water Management Expert (CWME) for Armenia. The technical implementation was made by “Environmental Policy Analysis” NGO under the contract for providing GIS services for Water Body Identification and Typology and preliminary classification of water bodies in Akhuryan pilot basin of Armenia. The following local experts dealing with hydromorphological and hydrochemical monitoring have been assisting in collecting information: Hamlet Melkonyan (ASH) Levon Azizyan (ASH), Hermes Tadevosyan (ASH), Edgar Misakyan (ASH), Seryan Minasyan (EIMC). Akhuryan pilot basin covers the Armenian part of the trans-boundary Akhuryan River and its basin and Metsamor River and its basin except tributary Qasakh River. The Akhuryan pilot basin is located in Western Armenia on the territory of the Akhuryan Water Basin Management Area (WBMA). Information on the Turkish part of the Akhuryan River Basin is not available on this stage of the project. River Basin Analysis for Akhuryan WBMA has been completed in December 2012 as a result of which the baseline information on geographic, social and economic situation was presented, and pressure-impact analysis of human activities was carried out. Identification, delineation, typology and preliminary classification of the water bodies in Akhuryan pilot basin have been implemented based on the mentioned analysis. To achieve this goal, the following specific activities were carried out: (1) Identification of surface water bodies in Akhuryan WBMA based on the results of anthropogenic pressure-impact analysis and hydromorphological assessment; (2) Determination of typology of identified surface water bodies; (3) Delineation and mapping of surface water bodies, including water bodies “at risk” (WBR), artificial water bodies (AWB), heavily modified water bodies (HMWB) and other natural water bodies; (4) Preliminary classification of the surface water bodies in Akhuryan pilot basin. The technical implementation of the above-described activities was based on practical application of elements of the WFD and CIS (Common Implementation Strategy) documents, particularly the CIS Guidance Document #2 “Identification of Water Bodies” and CIS Guidance Document #4: "Identification and Designation of Heavily Modified and Artificial Water Bodies". The outcomes of this activity will serve as a foundation for the next steps of development of the River Basin Management Plan for Akhuryan WBMA. 1. Criteria and Procedure of Delineation of Surface Water Bodies 1.1 Summary of the methodology for identifying surface water bodies According to EU WFD, Surface Water Body is defined as a discrete and significant element of surface water such as a lake, a reservoir, a stream, river or canal, part of a stream, river or canal, which differ from each other in specific natural characteristics, the nature of the impact of human activity, or any other significant and distinguishable parameters. Page 6 of 38 The process of identifying and delineating surface water bodies can be applied only for rivers (tributaries) with a catchment area of over 10 km2 and lakes (reservoirs) with a surface area over 0.5 km2. Smaller water object are not subject for delineating into as separate surface water bodies. The surface water bodies within the river basins were identified as falling within either one of two surface water categories: “rivers” or “lakes”. In addition, artificial water bodies (mainly canals and ponds) and heavily modified water bodies (mainly reservoirs) were identified. For each surface water body category, the relevant surface water body within the river basin was differentiated according to type. These types are defined using the system A of the WFD in accordance with the ToR of EPIRB Project. (Tab. 1). Table 1. System A: Rivers and Lakes Fixed typology Ecoregion Type RIVERS Descriptors LAKES Descriptors 24 (Caucasus) Altitude typology high: >800 m mid-altitude: 200 to 800 m lowland: <200 m Size typology based on catchment area small: 10 to 100 km2 medium: >100 to 1 000 km2 large: >1 000 to 10 000 km2 very large: >10 000 km2 Geology calcareous siliceous organic 24 (Caucasus) Altitude typology high: >800 m mid-altitude: 200 to 800 m lowland: <200 m Size typology based on surface area 0.5 to 1 km2 1 to 10 km2 10 to 100 km2 >100 km2 Depth typology based on mean depth <3 m 3 to 15 m >15 m Geology calcareous siliceous organic For artificial and heavily modified surface water bodies the differentiation was undertaken in accordance with the descriptors for whichever of the surface water categories most closely resembles the heavily modified or artificial water body concerned. The additional criteria while identification and delineation include (1) human influence on the physical status of water bodies (“at risk”); and (2) stricter protection requirements established for protected areas. 1.2 Coding of the Water Bodies in Akhuryan Water Basin Management Area The approach used for the coding of water bodies in Akhuryan BMA are in line with the methodology of European Rivers and Catchment Areas (ERICA) coding system. According to the mentioned system, each delineated water body in the Akhuryan BMA obtains a unique identifier using the following format: XXXXX – Y – WB ZZ [R] where XXXXX is a river code assigned according to ERICA coding system (see the table below) Y is the consecutive number of the given water body for the given river ZZ is the consecutive number of water bodies in Akhuryan Water Basin Management Area Page 7 of 38 [R] is an optional suffix added only if the given water body is identified as a Water Body “at risk” Table 2. Water body code identification scheme for Akhuryan Basin Management Area System 1 = Araks River basin 0 = Rivers flowing outside of the basin or into Lake Arpi First level tributary Second level tributary Third level tributary 1 = Karakhanget River 2 = Karmrajur River 3 = Yeghnajur River 4 = Ellarget River 5 = Dzknaget River 1 = Akhuryan River 1 = Gijget River 1 = Tsaghkashen River 2 = Ghukasyan River 1 = Khazanchi River 3 = Hartajur River 4 = Chair River 5 = Gtahsen River 6 = Kumayri River 7 = Haykavan River 8 = Mantash River 1 = Geghadzor River 2 = Saralanj River 3 = Artikjur River 4 = Metsdzorijur River 1 = Chlkan River 5 = Jajur River 1 = Jrarat River 2 = Karmrakar River 3 = Aygabats River 2 = Metsamor River Seasonal tributaries: non-coded For example if the second water body on Jrarat River is identified as water body “at risk” than ist unique identifier is 11851-2-WB31R. The rivers in Metsamor river basin, namely Selav-Mastara, Selav-Getap, Selav-Shamiram, Ashnak, Katnaghbyur and Sasnashen are of seasonal (temporary) nature and could not be designated as surface water bodies. The next sections of the report present the process of identification and delineation of surface water bodies in Akhuryan pilot basin in more details. 2. Identification and delineation of Surface Water Bodies The surface water bodies have been delineated according to criteria, mentioned in EU WFD CIS Guidance Document #2 on "Identification of Water Bodies". Thus, the following factors were taken into consideration: hydro-morphological characteristics; hydrological characteristics; having a status of protected area; Page 8 of 38 being located adjacent to state border. A methodological problem for water management regulation is the large number of identified river bodies and the consequent large volume of work required for studies, monitoring and surveillance. Aggregating and grouping river bodies, in particular, should be considered in the future to reduce administrative burden. The Methodology used for WB identification and delineation is mentioned in Annex II. In total 70 water bodies have been delineated in Akhuryan WBMA out of which: 50 are the water bodies in natural conditions; 13 are AWBs, including 12 canals and one group of ponds; 7 are HMWBs (canals). The following criteria are used for delineation into separate water bodies: Being a river section with a catchment area of over 10 km2 for the surface water bodies. Being a canal of more than 10 km in length for AWBs; Being a pond (or a group of ponds) with total surface area more than 0.5 km2 for AWBs; Being an artificial lake or reservoir with surface area more than 0.5 km2 for HMWBs; Out of 70 surface river water bodies delineated in Akhuryan pilot basin, 62 are of “River” type and 8 are of “Lake” type. One artificial lake and six reservoirs in the Akhuryan pilot basin have been identified as HMWBs and 1 group of ponds in the Metsamor RB have been identified as an AWB (refer to tables 3 and 4 below for statistics) Table 3. Number and total length of “River” water bodies of the Akhuryan pilot basin Natural river bodies Artificial water bodies Heavily modified water bodies Number Length, km Number Length, km Number Length, km 50 1279.78 12 410,45 - - Table 4. Number and total area of “Lake” water bodies in the Akhuryan pilot basin Natural lakes Artificial water bodies Number Area, km - - 2 Heavily modified water bodies Number Area, km 1 6,90 2 Number Area, km 7 73.53 2 3. Typology of Delineated Water Bodies On the basis of the ecoregion, altitude and geology factors, the 62 “River” type water bodies delineated in Akhuryan pilot basin belong to one single type, however they fall into the following three groups by the size of catchment area: Type I includes 22 water bodies with the small catchment area less than 100 km2; Type II includes 27 water bodies with the medium catchment area from 100 to 1000 km2; Type III includes 13 water bodies with the large catchment area 1000 to 10,000 km2. Table 5. Typology of “river” water bodies in Akhuryan pilot basin Descriptors I Types II III Page 9 of 38 Ecoregion Altitude Geology Catchment size, km2 <100 24 (Caucasus) >800 m Siliceous 100-1000 1000-10 000 Typology for 8 “lake” water bodies is also based on geographical and morphological properties. On the basis of the ecoregion, altitude and geology factors, all lake water bodies in Akhuryan pilot basin belong to one single type, meanwhile by the surface area size and the depth lakes fall into the following four groups: Type I includes 4 reservoirs (Mantash, Kaps, Tavshut, Vardakar) and the Metsamor ponds with surface area from 0.5 to 1 km2 and depth from 3 to 15 m; Type II includes 1 reservoir (Karnut) with surface area from 1 to 10km2 and depth from 3-15 m Type III includes 1 lake (Arpi) with surface area from 10 to 100 km2 and depth from 3-15 m; Type IV includes 1 reservoir (Akhuryan) with surface area from 10 to 100 km2 and depth >15m. Table 6. Typology of “lake” water bodies in the Akhuryan pilot basin Descriptors Ecoregion Altitude Geology Area size, km2 Depth, m I Types II 0.5-1 3-15 24 (Caucasus) >800 m Siliceous 1-10 3-15 III IV 10-100 3-15 >15 4. Identification of Heavily Modified and Artificial Surface Water Bodies According to EU WFD, “Heavily modified water body” and "Artificial water body" means a water body that can be designated only if it meets the following criteria: 1) Changes in the hydromorphological properties of the water body, which would be required to achieve a good ecological status, would have a significant negative impact on (a) the environment in general; (b) activities for which the water is abstracted, such as fisheries or irrigation; and (c) water regulation, protection against floods, or drainage. 2) Due to limited technical resources or excessive costs, the benefits resulting from the artificial nature of the water body would not be achievable through alternative methods, which would be more favorable for the environment. The initial identification of AWBs should include the surface water bodies with a catchment area (or area under irrigation) of more than 10 km2. 4.1 Identification of Artificial Surface Water Bodies According to the River Basin Analysis report, total 43 canals are currently operational in Akhuryan BMA. In Aghstev river basin the irrigation is carried out through 20 big and small canals, total irrigated area of which makes about 28,600 hectares (ha). In Metsamor river basin the irrigation is implemented through 23 canals with the total irrigation area reaching approximately 41,225 ha. The largest canals in Akhuryan river basin include Shirak Canal, with an irrigation area of 9,817 ha, Kaps canal (or Akhuryan right bank canal) – 4,230 ha, Aygabats Canal – 2,668 ha, and Akhuryan Canal – 2,826 ha. These 4 canals were identified as artificial water bodies in Akhuryan river basin. Page 10 of 38 Armavir Canal is the largest canal in Metsamor river basin, which amounts to 50 m 3/sec, and irrigation area accounts for almost half of the total irrigation area - 19,538 ha. Other large canals include Talin Canal with its distribution branches - 9,755 ha, Aknalich Canal - 1,325 ha, Jrarat Canal - 1440 ha, Bazmabed canal – 130 ha and Metsamor canal – 350 ha. These 6 canals were identified as artificial water bodies in Metsamor river basin. In addition to the mentioned 10 canals, the section of Arzni-Shamiram canal (29.2 km in length) and the section of Lower Hrazdan canal (31.8 km in length) pass through the Akhuryan BMA and are also considered as artificial water bodies. The last artificial water body identified in the basin is the group of 4 fish farm ponds near Metsamor, which are considered as a separate single AWB. (Refer to Tab. 7 and Fig. 1 below). Table 7. List of Artificial Surface Water Bodies in Akhuryan BMA ID 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 WB Code 11-1-AWB01 11-2-AWB02 11-3-AWB03 11851-1-AWB04 11-4-AWB05 1-1-AWB06 10-1-AWB07 10-2-AWB08 12-1-AWB09 12-2-AWB10 12-3-AWB11 12-4-AWB12 12-5-AWB13 Name Akhuryan main canal Kaps canal Shirak main canal Aygabats canal Talin main canal with its distributary branches Armavir main canal with its distributary branches Section of Arzni-Shamiram canal Section of Lower Hrazdan canal Bazmaberd canal Aknalich canal Metsamor canal Jrarat canal Metsamor ponds Length (km) 2 Area (km ) 27.87 12.46 26.86 16.51 103.29 108.74 29.23 31.75 11.57 11.45 16.08 14.64 6.9 Page 11 of 38 Figure 1. Artificial Water Bodies in Akhuryan pilot basin Page 12 of 38 4.2 Identification of Heavily Modified Surface Water Bodies According to WFD, Heavily modified water body (HMWB) means a body of surface water which as a result of physical alterations by human activity is substantially changed in character. On this stage of the project the HMWBs were desined preliminary. The HMWB designation process aims at justifying the reason of why the pre-designated HMWB should be finally classified as HMWB and therefore should have less stringent objectives in terms of ecological status improvements. The HMWB designation process consisted of the following steps: 1. Pre-designation: identification of the location, size, etc. of the water body, description of the hydromorphological changes and ecological alteration(s); 2. Characterization of the user(s) benefiting from the changes (subject or users that would benefit from the changes); 3. Identification of measures to restore good ecological status of the water body (hydromorphological characteristics); 4. Description of the impacts of the measure(s) on the user(s) and on the wider environment; 5. Test: Are the impacts significant? 6. Identification of potential alternative means for the user to achieve the same function; 7. Test: Are these alternatives feasible technically, economically and environmentally? In Akhuryan pilot basin 7 HMWBs are identified. The largest is Lake Arpi, which has been transformed into a lake-reservoir in 1951. The surface area of the reservoir increased from 5.0 to 22.1 km 2, volume of water – from 5 to 90 million m3. Waters of the reservoir are used for irrigation purpose and for Gyumri hydropower plant. The largest reservoir in the basin, as well as in Armenia is Akhuryan Reservoir, which was constructed in 1975-1982. The total volume of the reservoir is 525 mln. m3, the water surface area is 41.8 km2, the average depth is 46 m, and the width is 5.5 km. The length of the reservoir is about 20 km. The dam of the reservoir is concrete with a height of 59.1 m. In addition, 5 small reservoirs with a surface area of more than 0.5 km 2 were identified as HMWBs as well (see Tab. 8 and Fig. 2). Table 8. List of Heavily Modified Surface Water Bodies in Akhuryan pilot basin ID WB Code Name 2 Area (km ) 1 10-1-HMWB01 Lake Arpi 20.59 2 11-1-HMWB02 Akhuryan reservoir 48.39 3 118-1-HMWB03 Mantash reservoir 0.94 4 11851-1-HMWB04 Karnut reservoir 1.64 5 11-2-HMWB05 Kaps reservoir 0.78 6 111-1-HMWB06 Tavshut reservoir 0.58 7 118-2-HMWB07 Vardakar reservoir 0.57 5. Identification of Surface Water Bodies “at risk” The WB category “at risk“ means a risk not to achieve the “good” status of water till 2015 due to significant influence of the human activities. This category is the additional criteria for division of the WBs, which differ from natural water bodies owing to the impact of human activities. Within the pilot river basin the main Page 13 of 38 pressures that have been identified and the associated risks of not achieving good status on a physicochemical basis, are the following: Page 14 of 38 Figure 2. Heavily Modified WBs in Akhuryan pilot basin 1) Urban Waste Water, which can affect the oxygenation levels and increase the nutrient concentrations, usually from point source discharges. Page 15 of 38 2) Food industry wastewater, which can affect the oxygenation levels and increase nutrient concentrations from point discharge sources. 3) Cattle breeding, this can affect the oxygenation levels and increase nutrient concentrations usually from diffuse sources. 4) Extraction of construction materials which can affect certain physical parameters e.g. turbidity, total suspended solids (TSS) and liberate many non -priority specific pollutants e.g. sodium, magnesium, potassium, calcium, bromine, manganese, strontium, molybdenum, antimony, sulphate and chloride usually causing diffuse pollution. 5) Solid Waste can leach acid and heavy metals affecting the levels concentration of non-priority specific pollutants e.g. SO4, and also priority pollutants such as Pb and Cd causing diffuse pollution. 6) Overgrazing can lead to soil erosion, reducing the clarity of the water resulting in high turbidities and high concentrations of total suspended solids. 7) Fish farming can affect the oxygenation levels and increase the nutrient levels, which can be from a point source or from a non-point source. In the category of rivers, water bodies “at risk“ are those which are significantly affected by water abstraction, HPP, and water quality problems caused by anthropogenic pollution. - Water bodies “at risk due” to water abstraction are those which can undertake significant changes of the hydrological regime during low water, furthermore these low flows can reduce the dilution factor and self cleaning processes, and raising the concentrations of pollutants. As a threshold the e-flow should be used for the comparing of flow up – and downstream of water abstraction point. This category of water bodies “at risk” could include all WBs downstream of irrigation canals on Akhuryan and Metsamor rivers but the physico /chemical analyses of water on these river reaches has not been done and the hydro-biological data is absent. - There are no water bodies “at risk” due to HPP within the Akhuryan pilot basin. Evidently, HPP has a significant impact on the hydrological regime of rivers. However, no river affected by the HPP is regarded a water body “at risk” when monitoring data indicates good status of biological quality elements. The risk factors which determine the assignment of river water bodies in the Akhuryan pilot basin to the risk group are given in Table 9 below. Table 9. Water bodies “at risk” in the category of rivers in the Akhuryan pilot basin and risk (Factors “1” indicates a risk) Risk factors Water quality problems River HMWB Water Causes are Basin HPP Point Diffuse Abstraction not pollution pollution differentiate Akhuryan Metsamor 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 Number of WB Length, km 4 1 Water bodies “at risk” due to water quality problems include 5 water bodies (8% of 62 river WBs): Akhurian River reach from the confluence of Kumayri River to Akhurian Reservoir (WB22) has the significant impact from urban and food industry waste water discharge to the river. The main physico-chemical indicators of such pollution pressures are high nutrient loads and oxygenation conditions e.g. Biochemical Oxygen Demand & physical parameters such as Total Dissolved Solids (TDS). Page 16 of 38 Karmrakar River with its tributaries (WB 27) has the significant impact of urban and food industry waste water discharge to the river. The main physico-chemical indicators of such pollution pressures are high nutrient load and disturbed oxygenation conditions e.g. Biochemical Oxygen Demand & physical parameters such as Total Dissolved solids (TDS). Artikjuir River downstream Artik town (WB 41) has the significant pressure of extraction of construction materials and can release many non -priority specific pollutants e.g. sodium, magnesium, potassium, calcium, bromine, manganese, strontium, molybdenum, antimony, sulphate and chloride and can also affect the clarity of the water producing high turbidities and TSS. The main physico-chemical indicators of such pollution pressures are specific pollutants e.g. Mg, Ca, and physical parameters e.g. TDS and Total Suspended Solids (TSS). Metsdzorijur River downstream Maralik town to the confluence with Chlkan River (WB 44) has the significant impact of urban and several industries waste water discharge to the river and impact of the cattle breeding and overgrazing. The main physico-chemical indicators of such pollution pressures are nutrients and oxygenation conditions e.g. Biochemical Oxygen Demand & physical parameters such as Total Dissolved solids (TDS). Metsamor River downstream of confluence with Kazakh River (WB 50) has certain impact on quality of the water resources. The volume of pollution is impossible to differentiate by sources. The main pressures are: urban water discharge, including wastewater pits, wastewaters of food industry, fish-farming, cattle breeding and overgrazing and solid wastes. The main physicochemical indicators of such pollution pressures are high nutrients loads and disturbed oxygenation conditions e.g. Biochemical Oxygen Demand,& non –priority specific pollutants such as Cu, &. SO4, priority substances e.g. Pb & Cd physical parameters such as Total Dissolved Solids (TDS). This information in summarised in Table 10 which also includes the tentative values for the parameters that could be the upper concentration limits of the individual parameters., when the river is under normal flows, and excludes turbulent flood conditions. Unfortunately there is insufficient data available to accurately define these values, so these values are a basic starting point for an iterative approach. When the joint field survey is completed more data should be available to refine these results. Table 10. List of Water Bodies “at risk” in Akhuryan BMA ID WB_Cod e River name 22 11-7WB22R Akhuryan 27 11852-1WB27R Karmrakar Description Area, km Akhurian River section from the confluence of Kumayri River to Akhuryan reservoir Karmrakar river with its tributaries 913.11 Discharge Point (P) Diffuse(D) D&P 60.18 D&P 2 Pollutant Pressure Urban Wastewater. Food industry waste water. Urban Wastewater. Food industry waste water. Pollutant Physico/ Chemical Indicators BOD,(>5) Total N, NO3,(>2.5) PO4( > 0.1),Total P (>0.2), Cl,(>300), NH4 (>0.4), & TDS (>800) BOD,(>5) Total N, NO3,(>2.5) PO4( > 0.1),Total P (>0.2), Cl,(>300), NH4 (>0.4), & TDS (>800) Page 17 of 38 41 1183-2WB41R Artikjur Artikjur River after Artik settlement up to the Vardakar reservoir 71.92 D Extraction of construction materials 44 1184-2WB44R Metsdzorij ur Metsdzorijur River after Maralik settlement to the confluence with Chlkan River 168.89 D&P Urban Wastewater. Industrial waste water. Cattle Breeding. 50 12-2WB50R Metsamor Metsamor River after confluence of Qasakh River up to the confluence to Araks River 3631.31 D&P Urban Wastewater. Food industry wastewater. Fish Farming. Cattle Breeding. Over grazing . Solid waste. Na,(>300), Mg,(>100),K Ca,(>100), Mn (>0.5),Sr, Mo, Sb(>0.05) SO4 (>300), & Cl (>300) TDS (>800), TSS, (>30) Turbidity(>100). BOD,(>5) Total N, NO3,(>2.5) PO4( > 0.1),Total P (>0.2), Cl,(>300), NH4 (>0.4), & TDS (>800) BOD,(>5) Total N, NO3,(>2.5) PO4( > 0.1),Total P (>0.2), Cl,(>300), NH4 (>0.4), SO4 (>300), Pb(>0.05), Cd(>0.005) & Cu (> 1) 6. Water Bodies within Protected Areas The purpose of protecting various areas is to preserve and protect the environment in certain regions from the negative impact of human activities to preserve the people’s immediate living environment and a viable natural environment as a whole. In the territory of Akhuryan pilot basin two protected areas, namely “Arpilich” national park a “Vordan Karmir” state sanctuary are located. "Arpilich" national park includes the Lake Arpi itself, two small lakes Ardenis and Akna, as well as the basins and floodplains of the left tributaries of upper Akhuryan River. The territory of the park also includes the aspen forests of Ashotzq, ecosystems of Kaputan and wetlands of northern Armenia. The total area of the national park is about 62,000 ha. There are total four river water bodies (WB ## 2, 3, 4, 5) and one lake water body (HMWB 1) within the protected area. The national park includes also a part of WB #6. “Vordan Karmir” State Sanctuary is located in Ararat valley in Metsamor river basin. The territory of the sanctuary includes a small portion of halophyte ecosystem with a total area of 219.85 ha. Two artificial water bodies (AWB 9 and AWB 12) pass near the boundaries of the sanctuary. Page 18 of 38 Figure 3. Water Bodies “at risk” in Akhuryan pilot basin Page 19 of 38 7. Mapping of Delineated Water Bodies The mapping of the delineated surface water bodies of Akhuryan pilot basin has been implemented according to the provisions and recommendations of EU WFD CIS Guidance Document #9: “Implementing the Geographical Information Systems (GIS) of the Water Framework Directive”. The maps are designed under ArcGIS 10 environment. A base map of scale 1:25,000 is used. All the shapefiles are assembled into a single Geodatabase. The maps are constructed using standard GCS_WGS_1984 projection (Geographic Coordination System of the World Geodetic System) of the UTM coordinate system (Universal Transverse Mercator), Zone 38N. The following GIS vector layers and raster images were used during the implementation of activity: Boundary of Akhuryan WBMA Hydrological boundaries of Akhuryan RB and Metsamor RB Point and polygon layers with settlements in Akhuryan BMA River network of Akhuryan BMA – coded using ERICA system Catchment areas of all river streams more than 5km in length – coded using ERICA system Lakes and reservoirs of Akhuryan BMA Canals of Akhuryan BMA Protected areas Digital Elevation Model of Akhuryan BMA Satellite images of Akhuryan BMA The following GIS layers were generated as a result of activity: Surface water bodies of Akhuryan pilot basin Artificial surface water bodies of Akhuryan pilot basin Heavily modified surface water bodies of Akhuryan pilot basin Water bodies “at risk” Seasonal (temporary) rivers and streams of Akhuryan pilot basin Figure 4 below is presented a general delineation of surface water bodies in Akhuryan pilot basin Page 20 of 38 Figure 4. Delineated Surface Water Bodies in Akhuryan pilot basin Page 21 of 38 REFERENCES EU Water Framework Directive, (2000/60/EC), European Communities, 2000 EU Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) Common Implementation Strategy, Guidance Document #2: "Identification of Water Bodies", European Communities, 2003 EU Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) Common Implementation Strategy, Guidance Document #4: "Identification and Designation of Heavily Modified and Artificial Water Bodies", European Communities, 2003 EU Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) Common Implementation Strategy, Guidance Document #9: “Implementing the Geographical Information Systems (GIS) of the Water Framework Directive”, 2003. Methodology for Identification, Delineation and Classification of Surface Water Bodies, MCA-Moldova THVA Project - Irrigation Sector Reform Activity, 2012 River Basin Management Plan for Akhuryan Water Basin Management Area, Component A: River Basin Analysis, “Geoinfo” LLC, EPIRB Project, 2012 Page 22 of 38 ANNEX I: LIST OF DELINEATED SURFACE WATER BODIES IN AKHURYAN BMA ID WB_Code River name Basin 1 101-1-WB01 Karakhanget 2 102-1-WB02 Karmrajur Flowing out of basin Lake Arpi 3 103-1-WB03 Yeghnajur Lake Arpi 4 104-1-WB04 Ellarget 5 105-1-WB05 6 Description 2 Area (km ) Type Karakhanget River with its tributaries 115.89 2 Karmrajur River from river source to Lake Arpi 29.59 1 Yeghnajur River from river source to Lake Arpi 83.31 1 Lake Arpi Ellarget River from river source to Lake Arpi 17.08 1 Dzknaget Lake Arpi Dzknaget River from river source to Lake Arpi 32.39 1 11-1-WB06 Akhuryan Araks Akhuryan River section from Lake Arpi to confluence of Gijget River 248.24 2 7 111-2-WB07 Gijget Akhuryan Gijget River from the confluence of Tsaghkashen River to river mouth 117.63 2 8 1111-1-WB08 Tsaghkashen Gijget Tsaghkashen River with its tributaries 83.89 1 9 111-1-WB09 Gijget Akhuryan Gijget River from river source to the confluence of Tsaghkashen River 28.82 1 10 11-2-WB10 Akhuryan Araks Akhuryan River section between Gijget and Ghukasyan Rivers 371.17 2 11 1121-1-WB11 Khazanchi Ghukasyan Khazanchi River with its tributaries 48.18 1 12 112-1-WB12 Ghukasyan Akhuryan Ghukasyan River from river source to the confluence of Khazanchi River 138.62 2 13 112-2-WB13 Ghukasyan Akhuryan Ghukasyan River from confluence of Khazanchi river to river mouth 187.76 2 14 11-3-WB14 Akhuryan Araks Akhuryan River section between Ghukasyan and Hortajur rivers 620.11 2 15 113-1-WB15 Hortajur Akhuryan Hortajur River from river source to the confluence with Akhuryan River 30.83 1 16 11-4-WB16 Akhuryan Araks Akhuryan River section between Hortajur and Chair rivers 673.06 2 17 114-1-WB17 Chair Akhuryan Chair River with its tributaries 69.59 1 18 11-5-WB18 Akhuryan Araks Akhuryan River section between Chair river and Kaps reservoir 767.53 2 19 115-1-WB19 Gtashen Akhuryan Gtashen River to Kaps reservoir 14.48 1 20 11-6-WB20 Akhuryan Araks Akhurian River section betveen Kaps reservoir and confluence of Kumayri River 835.32 2 21 116-1-WB21 Kumayri Akhuryan Kumayi River with its tributaries 62.44 1 22 11-7-WB22R Akhuryan Araks Akhurian River section from the confluence of Kumayri River to Akhuryan reservoir 913.11 2 23 117-1-WB23 Haykavan Akhuryan Haykavan River with its tributaries 42.89 1 24 118-7-WB24 Mantash Akhuryan Mantash River section from the confluence of Jajur River to Akhuryan reservoir 1011.1 3 25 1185-4-WB25 Jajur Mantash Jajur River section from confluence of Aygabats River to River mouth 400.56 2 26 1185-3-WB26 Jajur Mantash Jajur River section between Karmrakar and Aygabats Rivers 357.43 2 27 11852-1-WB27R Karmrakar Jajur Karmrakar river with its tributaries 60.18 1 * Page 23 of 38 ID WB_Code River name Basin Description 2 Area (km ) Type 28 1185-2-WB28 Jajur Mantash Jajur River section between Jrarat and Karmrakar Rivers 296.2 2 29 1185-1-WB29 Jajur Mantash Jajur River from the river source to the confluence of Jrarat River 48.68 1 30 11851-1-WB30 Jrarat Jajur Jrarat River section from Karnut reservoir to the confluence with Jajur River 133.75 2 31 11851-2-WB31 Jrarat Jajur Jrarat River fror river source to Karnut reservoir 86.22 1 32 11853-1-WB32 Aygabats Jajur Aygabac River with its tributaries 42.08 1 33 118-6-WB33R Karkachun Akhuryan 606.94 2 34 118-5-WB34 Mantash Akhuryan 332.22 2 35 118-4-WB35 Mantash Akhuryan 249.65 2 36 118-3-WB36 Mantash Akhuryan 186.01 2 37 1181-1-WB37 Geghadzor Mantash Karkachun river: section between Metsdzorijur and Jajur Rivers Mantash River section from Vardakar reservoir up to the confluence of Metsdzorijur River Mantash River section from the confluence of Saralanj River up to the Vardakar reservoir Mantash River section from the confluence of Gegharot River to the confluence of Saralanj River Gegharot River with its tributaries 113.8 2 38 118-2-WB38 Mantash Akhuryan Mantash River from Mantash reservoir to the confluence of Gegharot River 66.89 1 39 118-1-WB39 Mantash Akhuryan Mantash River from river source up to Mantash reservoir 27.01 1 40 1182-1-WB40 Saralanj Mantash Saralanj River with its tributaries 53.53 1 41 1183-2-WB41R Artikjur Mantash Artikjur River after Artik setllement up to the Vardakar reservoir 71.92 1 42 1183-1-WB42 Artikjur Mantash Artikjur River from river source to Artik setllement 65.5 1 43 1184-3-WB43 Metsdzorijur Mantash Metsdzorijur River from the confluence with Chlkan to the river mouth 260.48 2 44 1184-2-WB44R Metsdzorijur Mantash Metsdzorijur River after Maralik settlement to the confluence with Chlkan River 168.89 2 45 1184-1-WB45 Metsdzorijur Mantash Metsdzorijur River from the river source to Maralik settlement 101.41 2 46 11841-1-WB46 Chlkan Metsdzorijur Chlkan River with its tributaries 87.5 1 47 11-8-WB47 Akhuryan Araks Akhuryan River section from Akhuryan reservoir to confluence with Araks River 2595.87 3 48 1-1-WB48 Araks Kura Araks River section between Akhuryan and Metsamor Rivers 2726.43 3 49 12-1-WB49 Metsamor Araks Metsamor River from the river source up to confluence of Qasakh River 2173.73 3 50 12-2-WB50R Metsamor Araks Metsamor River after confluence of Qasakh River up to the confluence to Araks River 3631.31 3 1 11-1-AWB01 Akhuryan canal Akhuryan Akhuryan main canal 27.87 2 11-2-AWB02 Kaps canal Akhuryan Kaps canal 12.46 3 11-3-AWB03 Shirak canal Akhuryan Shirak main canal 26.86 4 11851-1-AWB04 Aygabats canal Jajur Aygabats canal 16.51 * Artificial Water Bodies 2 2 2 2 Page 24 of 38 ID WB_Code River name Basin Description 2 Area (km ) Type 5 11-4-AWB05 Talin canal Akhuryan Talin main canal with its distributary branches 103.29 6 1-1-AWB06 Araks Armavir main canal with its distributary branches 108.74 7 10-1-AWB07 Arzni Section of Arzni-Shamiram canal 29.23 3 8 10-2-AWB08 Hrazdan Section of Lower Hrazdan canal 31.75 3 9 12-1-AWB09 Armavir canal Arzni-Shamiram canal Lower Hrazdan canal Bazmaberd canal 3 3 Metsamor Bazmaberd canal 11.57 10 12-2-AWB10 Aknalich canal Metsamor Aknalich canal 11.45 11 12-3-AWB11 Metsamor canal Metsamor Metsamor canal 16.08 12 12-4-AWB12 Jrarat canal Metsamor Jrarat canal 14.64 3 3 3 3 Akhuryan Lakes Water Bodies Lake Arpilich - the source of Akhuryan River 20.59 3 Akhuryan Akhuryan River Basin 48.39 4 Akhuryan Akhuryan River Basin 0.94 1 Akhuryan Akhuryan Akhuryan River Basin Akhuryan River Basin 1.64 0.78 2 1 Akhuryan Akhuryan River Basin 0.58 1 Akhuryan Akhuryan River Basin 0.57 1 Metsamor Metsamor River Basin 0,69 1 1 10-1-HMWB01 2 11-1-HMWB02 3 118-1-HMWB03 4 5 11851-1-HMWB04 11-2-HMWB05 6 111-1-HMWB06 7 118-2-HMWB07 8 12-5-AWB13 Lake Arpilich Akhuryan reservoir Mantash reservoir Karnut reservoir Kaps reservoir Tavshut reservoir Vardakar reservoir Metsamor ponds * Page 25 of 38 ANNEX II: Methodology for Identification, Delineation and Classification of Surface Water Bodies February 2013 Table of contents 1. Introduction ............................ .....................................................................................................................27 2. GIS................................................................................................................................................................ 27 3. Method for identification and delineation .................................................................................................. 27 4. Identification and delineation using system-A ............................................................................................ 28 4.1 Defining the boundaries of ecoregions ................................................................................................. 28 4.2 Definition of the categories of surface water ....................................................................................... 29 4.3 Altitude typology .................................................................................................................................. 32 4.4 Geology typology .................................................................................................................................. 32 4.5 Depth typology based on mean depth (for lakes and reservoirs)......................................................... 32 4.6 Size typology based on catchment area (for rivers) and surface area (for lakes)................................. 32 4.7 Others critera for the identification and delineation............................................................................ 32 5. Classification............ .................................................................................................................................... 35 5.1 Principles for classification .................................................................................................................... 35 6. Coding of surface water bodies ................................................................................................................... 35 Page 26 of 38 Definitions Artificial waterbody - a body of surface water created by human activity; Body of surface water - a discrete and significant element of surface water such as a lake, an reservoir, a pond, a stream, river or canal or part of a stream, river or canal or transitional water; Ecoregion – a recurring pattern of ecosystems associated with characteristic combinations of soil and landform that characterise that region, within which there is spatial coincidence in characteristics of geographical phenomena associated with differences in the quality, health, and integrity of ecosystems; Heavily modified water body - a body of surface water which as a result of physical alterations by human activity is substantially changed in character; Lake - a body of standing surface water that is not linked to an ocean; Point source of pollution - a point source of pollution is a single identifiable source of air, water, thermal, noise or light pollution; Pond - an artificial body of surface water, created by damming in the water with the help of dykes or by turning off the water flow, used for fish growing or irrigation etc, with a volume of water, at the normal retention level, up to one million m3; Reservoir- an artificial body of water, which constitutes a reserve of water, with possible use for different purposes, with a volume of water, at the normal retention level, over one million m3; River basin - the area of land from which all surface water run-off flows through a sequence of streams and rivers and possibly lakes into the sea at a single river mouth, estuary or delta, delimited by the water outline; Sub-basin - an area of land within a river basin district from which all surface runoff flows through a series of streams, rivers and lakes to a particular point in a water course within that river basin district; Surface water - all water standing and/or flowing on the surface of the land other than groundwater List of Abbreviations AWB artificial water body EU European Union GIS geographic information system HMWB heavily modified water body IDC identification, delineation and classification RBDMP River Basin District Management Plan Page 27 of 38 Methodology for identification, delineation and classification of surface water bodies 1. Introduction This part describes the methodology for identification, delineation and classification (IDC) of surface water bodies. The document is based on the material on the Methodology of identification and classification of water bodies, developed under the Project “Irrigation Sector Reform Activity” «Methodology for Identification, Delineation and Classification of Surface Water Bodies», September 2012. 2. GIS The methodology presumes theavailability of asupporting (GIS);development of such a GIS is not part of this methodology. geographic information system 3. Method for identification and delineation The method is elaborated in accordance with the requirements specified in Annex II of the EU Water Framework, based on the typology. Identification and delineation with the typology-based approach implies that surface water bodies can be classified in accordance with: type-specific reference conditions; type-specific criteria for physico-chemical, hydrobiological and hydromorphological parameters, in order to assess the chemical and ecological status of surface water bodies. The surface water bodies within the river basin district/sub-basin shall be identified as falling within either one of the following surface water categories —rivers, lakes, or transitional waters— or as artificial surface water bodies or heavily modified surface water bodies. For each surface water category, the relevant surface water bodies within the river basin district/sub-basin shall be differentiated according to type. These types are those defined using either system A (EPIRB) or system B. Application of system B involves similar steps as described for system A, but also involves additional steps and iterations in the case of additional factors characterizing water bodies. The criteria to be applied under the system-A typology for rivers and lakes are summarised in Table 1. For artificial and heavily modified surface water bodies the differentiation shall be undertaken in accordance with the descriptors for whichever of the surface water categories most closely resembles the heavily modified or artificial water body concerned. Table 1 System A: Rivers and lakes Fixed RIVERS typology Descriptors Ecoregion Ecoregions shown in Figure 11 Altitude typology Type high: >800 m mid-altitude: 200 to 800 m lowland: <200 m Size typology based on catchment area small: 10 to 100 km2 medium: >100 to 1 000 km2 LAKES Descriptors Ecoregions shown in Figure 11 Altitude typology high: >800 m mid-altitude: 200 to 800 m lowland: <200 m Size typology based on surface area 0.5 to 1 km2 1 to 10 km2 Page 28 of 38 large: >1 000 to 10 000 km2 very large: >10 000 km2 Geology calcareous siliceous organic 10 to 100 km2 >100 km2 Depth typology based on mean depth <3 m 3 to 15 m >15 m Geology calcareous siliceous organic Surface water, as defined and delineated in accordance with the method based on a typology that will not make much difference in river basin management planning without verification of type and criteria for chemical and ecological status of surface water bodies. In addition (in this case), to assess the status should be available compatible monitoring data. 4. Identification and delineation using system A 4.1 The ecoregion boundary Moldova and Ukraine are situated inside two ecoregions, as shown in Figure 11: 16: Eastern plains 12: Pontic province Belarus is located within 16 ecoregion (Eastern plains), Caucasus countries – within 24 ecoregion (Caucasus). For inclusion in the GIS, the boundaries of the ecoregions are defined in the (ZIP compressed) shape file (vector data, polygon): wfd_shp_ecoregions.zip, which can be downloaded from http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/ecoregions-for-rivers-and-lakes. Figure 1. Ecoregions for rivers and lakes Page 29 of 38 In case the ecoregion boundary crosses a water body, this leads to dividing it into two separate water bodies, as illustrated in the next two figures. Water body 1 Water body 2 Water body 3 Water body 4 Water body 5 Figure 2.Water bodies without ecoregion Water body 1 Water body 2 Water body 3 Water body 4 Water body 5 Water body 6 Ecoregion 12: Pontic province ` Ecoregion 16: Eastern planes Figure 3.Water bodies with ecoregion. 4.2 Designation of the surface water category A surface water body can comprise only one (and thus cannot overlap with) one of the following surface water categories: river; lake; reservoir; pond. Step 1: Define the boundaries of water bodies Figure 4 shows an example of a lake that is situated inside the course of a river, thus resulting in three separate water bodies. The same situation applies when a reservoir or pond has been created inside the river’s course. Page 30 of 38 Figure 4.The boundaries to the categories of surface water create boundaries to water bodies Following these principles, surface water bodies are designated in the sub-basins and along the main streams, in accordance with the corresponding categories. Lakes, ponds and reservoirs with a surface area less than 0.5 km2 (<0.5 km2) will not be identified as separate surface water bodies, in order to avoid an endless subdivision of surface water bodies. Nevertheless, they will have to be addressed by the corresponding RBMP. Step 2: Physical characteristics that are important in the delineation of water bodies The confluence of a tributary may lead to a sub-division into three water bodies as illustrated in Figure 55: the main stream upstream of the confluence point, the tributary itself, and the main stream after the confluence of the tributary. Figure 5.Example of the sub-division of a river based on physical features – in this case a river confluence In order to avoid an endless subdivision of surface water bodies, in sub-basins the confluence of a tributary will only be used for distinguishing separate surface water bodies if the length of this tributary is equal to or larger than 10 km (≥10 km). As a consequence, tributaries with a length less than 10 km (<10 km) will not be identified as separate surface water bodies. Nevertheless, they will have to be addressed by the corresponding RBMP. Page 31 of 38 In particular cases, the identification and delineation of surface water bodies along the main stream, the confluence of a tributary will only be used for distinguishing separate surface water bodies if the length of this tributary is equal to or larger than 100 km (≥100 km). The lake can be divided into more than one water body, if part of it is different from the rest of the physical characteristics of the lake (Fig. 6). Figure 6. Example of the sub-division of a lake based on the typology Step 3. Identification of Heavily modified and artificial water bodies In principle, the boundaries of heavily modified water bodies are primarily delineated by the extent of changes to the hydromorphological characteristics that is a result from physical alterations by human activity and prevent the achievement of good ecological status. See Step 1 for an example with a lake in the middle of the river, leading to the three surface WBs, and similarly, this applies to the ponds and reservoirs which are HMWB or AWB. In the next example, part of the river has been straightened (thus being ‘heavily modified’), rendering this stretch into a separate heavily modified water body. Page 32 of 38 Figure 7.The establishment of water body boundaries through the identification and subsequent designation of heavily modified water bodies 4.3 Apply the altitude typology The altitude criteria are mentioned in Table 1. The next two figures show how the altitude typology can result in different water bodies. The figures represent a river running downhill, with two lakes (reservoirs) inside its course. Figure 8.Water bodies before applying the altitude criterion (‘longitudinal view’) Figure 1.Water bodies after the applying altitude criterion (‘longitudinal view’) 4.4 Apply the geology typology The geology criteria are mentioned in Table 1. 4.5 Apply the depth typology (lakes, reservoirs, ponds) The depth criteria are mentioned in Table 1 and applied to natural lakes, as well as ponds and reservoirs. 4.6 Apply the catchment/surface area criteria The catchment and surface area criteria are mentioned in Table 1. The surface area criteria are applied to natural lakes, as well as ponds and reservoirs. Page 33 of 38 4.7 Other criteria for the water bodies delineation 4.7.1 Pressures and status of water The location of discharge of wastewater from a point source of pollution (such as a municipal wastewater treatment plant, an enterprise or the outlet of untreated municipal sewage) forms a boundary for further differentiation in surface water bodies. The section downstream of the wastewater discharge will be distinguished as a separate water body, as illustrated in Error! Reference source not found.10 and Figure 11. Water body 1 Water body 2 Water body 3 Water body 4 Water body 5 Figure 10.Water bodies without a wastewater discharge Figure 11.Water bodies with a wastewater discharge The major changes in the status of surface water should be used to delineate surface water body boundaries. If there is no sufficient information to accurately define the status of waters, the analysis on pressures and impacts should be used as a surrogate for status. As understanding of status improves, the boundaries of water bodies can be adjusted. Page 34 of 38 Figure 12: Identification of water bodies according to differences in status 4.7.2 Protected areas The boundaries of water bodies and protected areas will, in most cases, not coincide because both geographical areas are being defined for different purposes on the basis of different criteria. In case a water body would not fully be inside or outside a protected area, it may be considered to sub-divide the water bodies into two parts so that the boundaries coincide. Page 35 of 38 4.7.3 Wetlands In relation to wetlands, this means that those wetlands must be associated with a “water body”, which are directly influencing the status of the related “water body”. The boundaries of such wetlands must be identified in a pragmatic way in order to meet the requirement of a “discrete and significant” element. 5. Classification 5.1 Principles for classification The identified and delineated surface water bodies will be classified in accordance with the provisions of the WFD CIS Guidelines No.13 “Overall Approach to the Classification of Ecological Status and Ecological Potential” using the data of the biological, physical, chemical and hydromorphological monitoring. If no surface water quality monitoring data are available for the surface water body itself, the following approaches could be considered. a) In case the surface water body is situated between two monitoring sites, its classification might be interpolated from the monitoring data for both sites, while applying expert judgements and knowledge about the actual situation in the field. The latter includes for example the presence/absence of wastewater discharges between the two monitoring locationsand/or other factors affecting the surface water quality along this stretch. b) In case no downstream monitoring site exists, its classification might be inferred from the data of the nearest upstream monitoring site, while applying expert judgements and knowledge about the actual situation in the field. The latter includes for example the presence/absence of wastewater discharges, the inflow of tributaries inside this stretch, the distance between the surface water body and the monitoring site, et cetera. c) In case the surface water body cannot be reasonably linked to monitoring sites, it could be classified: a. Provisionally by inference from surface water bodies situated in other parts of the subbasin or other sub-basins with presumed comparable characteristics and overall settings. This requires expert judgements and a clear description of the arguments used for inference. Furthermore, it should be clearly indicated that it concerns a provisional classification. b. As “unknown”, implying that it cannot be addressed in the RBMP for example in terms of plans of measures. The Guidelines distinguishes five classes. In order to show the results of classification of surface water bodies in maps either when highlighting results in tables, the following colours will be used: (Use) Class I (Use) Class II (Use) Class III (Use) Class IV (Use) Class V unknown blue green yellow orange red no colour 6. Coding of surface water bodies The system for coding the identified and delineated surface waters will have to be developed in harmony with the structure and contents of the State Water Cadastre. Page 36 of 38 Examples of elements for coding identified and delineated surface water bodies are included in Table 2. It should, however, be noticed that the choice for a coding system will partially also depend on the selection of the method for identification and delineation of surface water bodies. Table 2 Examples of elements for coding surface water bodies Descriptor COUNTRY RIVER BASIN Elements Possible codes Georgia Chorokhi Adjaristskali all defined sub-basins ECOREGION 12 - Provincia pontică 24 - Caucasus 12 24 CATEGORY ALTITUDE+GEOLOGY lowland: <200 m mid-altitude: 200 to 800 m calcareous siliceous SUB-BASIN SEQUENCE NUMBER river lake reservoir pond HMWB AWB GE Cho Adj The first three letters of the name of the sub-basin RIV LAK RES PON HMWB AWB AG1: lowland + siliceous AG2: mid-altitude + siliceous AG3: lowland + calcareous AG4: mid-altitude + calcareous Remarks IDC of water bodies has to be done separately for the main stream, so additional codes have to be defined for these rivers The eco-region will not be determined during STAGE-I, but acts a placeholder for future developments placeholders for future use of ‘artificial water body’ and ‘heavily modified water body’ should be considered for the time being, only two generic types of geology are relevant: siliceous (dominating) and calcareous at some locations Numbering convention should be sufficiently flexible to allow for addition of more surface water bodies in the future as well as chances in the definition of existing water bodies Page 37 of 38 Page 38 of 38
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz