Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 257 (2003) 173–178 www.elsevier.com/locate/jcis Oxidation of activated carbon: application to vinegar decolorization Francisco López,a,∗ Francisco Medina,b Marin Prodanov,c and Carme Güell a a Departament d’Enginyeria Química, Unitat d’Enologia del CeRTA (Generalitat de Catalunya), Facultat d’Enologia, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Ramón y Cajal 70, 43005 Tarragona, Spain b Departament d’Enginyeria Química, ETSEQ, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Av. Païssos Catalans 26, 43007 Tarragona, Spain c Departamento de Ciencia y Tecnología Agroforestal, ETSIA, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 02071 Albacete, Spain Received 5 December 2001; accepted 22 October 2002 Abstract This article reports studies on the feasibility of increasing the decoloring capacity of a granular activated carbon (GAC) by using oxidation with air at 350 ◦ C to modify its surface activity and porosity. The GAC, obtained from olive stones, had a maximum decolorization capacity of 92% for doses of 20 g/l, while the maximum decolorization capacity of the modified granular activated carbon (MGAC) was about 96% at a dose of 10 g/l. The increase in decoloring capacity is thought to be due to an increase in mesopore area (from 129 to 340 m2 /g) in the MGAC. The maximum decoloring values and the doses needed to attain them are very close to values obtained in previous studies using coconut shell powder-activated carbon (94 and 98% for red and white vinegar for a dose of 10 g/l, respectively). 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved. Keywords: Vinegar; Decolorization; Activated carbon; Adsorption; Oxidation 1. Introduction In the production of some foods (molasses, fruit juices, vinegars, oils) the phenolic compounds must be removed [1–5]. These phenolic compounds are responsible for the color, the astringency, and the bitter taste, but in high concentrations they can produce oxidative reactions that diminish the initial quality [6]. The phenolic compounds must sometimes be removed to increase the stability of some foods and, therefore, their shelf life. It is common practice in the vinegar industry to decolor a fraction of vinegar and blend it with colored vinegar to obtain a standard final product of the same characteristics and quality. The method used for vinegar decolorization consists of mixing powder-activated carbon (PAC) with the vinegar, stirring, and then separating the activated carbon by filtration or settling. This process is a semicontinuous operation and small producers generally separate the activated carbon by settling, which means that considerable amounts of vinegar are lost and solid residue is generated. The settling process normally takes about 48 h. In the next step the vinegar is * Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (F. López). filtered to remove the remaining residues of the activated carbon. The decoloring process uses as much as 10–20 g/l PAC, which increases production costs. Achaerandio et al. [7] obtained a maximum decolorization of 94 and 98% for red and white vinegar, respectively using coconut shell powder-activated carbon at minimum doses of 10 g/l. Powder-activated carbon is used because its large surface area is effective at adsorbing large molecules and it also reduces diffusional problems. On the other hand, diffusional problems restrict the use of granular activated carbon (GAC). Nevertheless, activated carbon is a porous material that is used for its structural properties and surface functional groups. Carbons can be oxidized by heat treatment in carbon dioxide [8–11], steam [11–15], or air [8,14,16–18]. The oxidation can also be wet using hydrogen peroxide [13,16,18, 19], nitric acid [12,13,19–25], or phosphoric acid [26]. The main aim of oxidizing an activated carbon (AC) is to modify its chemical characteristics. If the AC is oxidized with nitric or phosphoric acid, a proportion of the final oxygen content of the AC can be attributed to surface phosphate or nitro groups [25,26]. If functional groups are inserted into the ACs the application of these modified carbons to the treatment of food may be limited. It is generally accepted that oxidation of carbons produces oxygen-containing functional groups at the edge sites 0021-9797/03/$ – see front matter 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/S0021-9797(02)00040-1 174 F. López et al. / Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 257 (2003) 173–178 of the graphitic planes. Furthermore the surface oxygen functional groups are mainly at the entrance to micropores [27,29]. It is well known that the adsorption capacity of ACs is related to their functionality. The adsorption of phenol on oxidized activated carbons is considerably lower than on nonoxidized activated carbons [17,21,23,24,28,29]. This is because the presence of oxygen surface groups can hinder the adsorption of phenol under conditions in which the phenol molecules are thought to be adsorbed in a planar position on the basal planes. It is proposed that aromatic compounds with a functional group capable of H bonding, such as phenol, do so with carboxylic and carbonyl oxygen groups on the surface. Then, increasing surface oxygen content leads to a higher adsorption capacity for phenol since the number of sites available for H bonding is increased [29]. This is in agreement with Teng and Hsieh’s [10] results, which show an increase in phenol adsorption with an oxidized AC. Nevskaia and Guerrero-Ruíz [24] found that the adsorption of nonylphenol is greater because a large molecule is hydrogen-bonded to the oxidized carbon surface by means of acidic groups. The nonyl group is rather voluminous and probably does not allow phenol ring interactions with the carbon surface because of steric hindrance. Tamon and Okazaki [28] observed hysteresis of adsorption and desorption in the low concentration of different adsorbates. This hysteresis suggested irreversible adsorption in aqueous solution. On the other hand, aromatic compounds with electronattracting groups showed no hysteresis and the adsorption was reversible. The influence of acidic surface oxides on the desorption characteristics of nitrobenzene and phenol was experimentally studied with activated carbon [28]. Although the amounts of nitrobenzene and phenol adsorbed decreased due to wet oxidation, the desorption characteristics improved. Such adsorption conditions as pH, temperature, and ionic strength can affect the adsorption process between the adsorbate and the activated carbon [10,26,29–31]. The second aim of oxidizing AC is to modify its structural characteristics, that is, BET surface area, pore volume, and pore distribution. There are many articles in the literature on how different treatments affect the physical characteristics of activated carbon. The oxidation of activated carbon with steam increases BET surface area, external surface area, total pore volume, and micropore volume [14,15]. In the wet oxidation of AC, BET surface area normally decreases and pore diameter normally increases, while micropore volume increases or decreases depending on the acid used for the treatment [13,18,24]. Furthermore, oxidation with air increases BET surface area, pore diameter, micropore volume, and, more clearly, pore size distribution [13,14,18, 29]. As a result of the treatment with air more mesopores, and many more micropores, are generated on the activated carbon. In a previous study, Achaerandio et al. [32] oxidized a GAC (coconut shell) with an air/Ar mixture. This oxidized GAC was used to decolor wine vinegar and considerably more color was removed than when untreated GAC was used (86 and 14%, respectively). The aim of this article is to study the feasibility of obtaining a new modified GAC by air oxidation that is capable of removing color from vinegar as efficiently as powder-activated carbon. The decolorization capacity of ACs is related to porosity, superficial area, and functionality. 2. Materials and methods 2.1. Materials Granular activated carbons (1–2 mm), obtained from olive stones, were provided by Productos Agrovin S.A., Alcázar de San Juan, Ciudad-Real (Spain). Badia Vinagres S.L., Mollerusa (Spain) supplied the white wine vinegar. 2.2. Vinegar characterization The color of the vinegar samples was characterized with modified color intensity (MCI), which is the sum of the absorbances at wavelengths of 420, 520, and 620 nm (1-cm pass). These wavelengths were measured using a Hitachi U-2000 spectrophotometer. To normalize the values for vinegar, decoloring efficiency (DE) was defined as: DE = 100(MCI0 − MCI)/MCI0, where MCI0 is the MCI of vinegar before it is treated in batch studies. 2.3. Batch experiments The performance of the activated carbons was evaluated in batch experiments, which were conducted at room temperature. In these experiments 20-ml volumes of vinegar were mixed with different amounts of activated carbon. The amber flasks containing the vinegar and the activated carbon were placed in a shaker and agitated for 72 h. Before analysis, the samples containing the activated carbon and vinegar were filtered through a 0.45-µm cellulose acetate Millipore membrane. Control samples were run using the same amount of vinegar without activated carbon. All experiments were run in triplicate. 2.4. Activated carbon modifications Modified granular activated carbon (MGAC) was prepared by placing 10 g of GAC in a tubular quartz glass reactor under an air flow of 5 ml/s. It was heated at a rate of 5 ◦ C/min up to 350 ◦ C, and this temperature was then kept constant for 4 or 8 h. We refer to the modified granular activated carbons as MGAC-4h and MGAC-8h for the 4- and 8-h treatments, respectively. F. López et al. / Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 257 (2003) 173–178 175 2.5. Determination of specific surface areas and pore-size distributions BET specific surface areas were determined by nitrogen adsorption at 77 K with a Micromeritics ASAP 2000 surface analyzer and taking a value of 0.162 nm2 for the cross sectional area of the nitrogen adsorbed molecule. The t-plot approach was used to determine micropore volumes and external area. The accuracy of these measurements was 5%. The same equipment was used to calculate the distribution of pore sizes using Barrett, Joyner, and Halenda’s method [33]. 2.6. FTIR measurements FTIR measurements were made with a Bruker Equinox 55, with diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) MCT detection. FTIR spectra were recorded in the range 400–4000 cm−1 , at a resolution of 4 cm−1 and with 200 scans per sample. Activated carbon was placed in a microsample holder. A previously recorded background spectrum was subtracted automatically from the spectrum of each sample. Fig. 1. N2 adsorption isotherms at 77 K on activated carbons. Solid symbols: adsorption; open symbols: desorption. 3. Results and discussion 3.1. Textural characteristics of activated carbon The characteristics of the activated carbon samples used in this study are given in Table 1. The oxidation of GAC increases BET and mesopore surface areas because micropores are transformed to mesopores. Micropore surface area decreases, but less drastically than the mesopore surface area increases. This may be because closed pores open, the existing micropores become wider or deeper [8,9], and new micropores are formed. At the same time the mesopore is formed as a result of micropore opening. The adsorption isotherms for nitrogen on the three activated carbons are given in Fig. 1. The isotherms are essentially Type IIa in the IUPAC classification. The oxidation treatment increases the hysteresis, indicating a more heterogeneous pore size distribution. Because of its high reactivity, oxygen tends to react at the entrance of the pores and does not penetrate into the narrow pores. As a consequence, oxidizing carbonized material with air produces an oxidized carbon with a predominantly macroporous structure. Petrov et al. [14] managed to in- crease BET surface area by oxidizing with air. They also reported an increase in pore volume (micro, meso, and macro). Their treatment was less drastic (350 ◦ C, air flow rate 8 l/h for 1 h). Mangun et al. [18] obtained an increase in micropore size and micropore volume by oxidation in air (400 ◦ C for 1 h), but, for the same GAC, aqueous oxidation with sulfuric acid, nitric acid, and hydrogen peroxide had very little effect on average micropore size and decreased micropore volume and BET surface area. Achaerandio et al. [32] also obtained an increase of nearly 100% in BET surface area with a coconut shell and a treatment of 2 h at 350 ◦ C and an air flow rate of 18 l/h. They also reported that the formation of micropores increased and that pore volume was larger. For treatments under 2 h micropores did not transform into mesopores. In the present study, oxidation times were higher and mesopore surface area increased notably (87 and 165% for 4 and 8 h of oxidation, respectively). This increase represents increased accessibility of vinegar polyphenols to the active point in GAC and, consequently, its adsorption capacity. The oxidation treatment led to an increase in average pore diameter and a decrease in micropore volume due to the Table 1 Characteristics of the activated carbons Activated carbon GAC MGAC-4h MGAC-8h BET area Meso area (m2 /g) (m2 /g) 791 873 915 129 240 340 Micro area (%) (m2 /g) 16.3 27.5 37.2 662 633 574 Micropore volume Mesopore volume Total volume Average pore (%) (cm3 /g) (cm3 /g) (cm3 /g) diameter (nm) 83.7 72.5 62.8 0.308 0.291 0.261 0.074 0.155 0.220 0.401 0.468 0.509 2.0 2.1 2.2 176 F. López et al. / Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 257 (2003) 173–178 Fig. 2. FTIR spectra for granular activated carbon (GAC) and modified granular activated carbon (MGAC-8h). increase in the porosity of activated carbon and the increase in mesopore volume. 3.2. Chemical functionality of activated carbon To determine the changes in functionality of the MGAC and GAC, we recorded and compared the FTIR spectra. The FTIR spectra summarized in Fig. 2 show three main bands. The band between 1550 and 1750 cm−1 was assigned to free carboxyl groups, esters, lactone groups, and carbonyl groups near the hydroxyl groups [13,34,35]. The oxidation treatment leads to an increase in the intensity of this band centered at about 1610 cm−1 . Moreno-Castilla et al. [13] in the region 1860–1650 cm−1 obtained bands more pronounced with the oxidized carbons than the original ones. Some functional groups identified were lactone, carbonyl, and carboxylic groups. This increase is larger for MGAC-8h. Between 1400 and 1530 cm−1 , functionality decreased with oxidation treatment. This band can be assigned to carboxylic groups [36,37]. In the band between 1200 and 1400 cm−1 oxidation treatment increased functionality. This band shows the presence of lactones, quinones, and/or carbonyl groups near hydroxyl groups due to the transformation of carboxylic groups [36,37]. The intensity of both bands increased because carboxylic groups in the band between 1400 and 1530 cm−1 transformed into conjugated ketones and quinones, which led to a decrease in the band [36]. The same tendency was observed by Achaerandio et al. [32] with a coconut shell-activated carbon and Petrov et al. [14] with activated carbon obtained from furfural. 3.3. Adsorption equilibrium Figure 3 shows the decoloring efficiency (DE) of granulated activated carbons (modified and nonmodified) for white vinegar. Each point is the average of three repeated experiments and the error bars are the standard deviations. The lines are the best fit to the experimental points. The max- Fig. 3. White vinegar adsorption isotherm on activated carbons. imum DE for GAC was 92%, while those for MGAC-4h and MGAC-8h were 94 and 96%, respectively. The minimum doses of MGAC-8h and GAC required for the maximum DE to be reached were approximately 10 and 20 g/l, respectively. A dose of 10 g/l MGAC-8h means that it is possible to run 1 l of vinegar with 10 g of MGAC-8h and obtain a DE of 96%. The Freundlich equation is an empirical one employed to describe the isotherm data by 1/n qe = KF Ce , were KF and n are empirical constants that determine the curvature and steepness of the isotherm. The experimental data were fitted with the Freundlich model, and the parameters are listed in Table 2. It can be seen that 1/n is less than unity, revealing that significant adsorption takes place at low concentrations, being notably smaller with MGAC-8h, indicating small amounts of this adsorbent are necessary to reach the maximum decolorization. The parameter KF is a measure of the adsorptive capacity of the adsorbent. Table 2 shows that the values of KF increase with oxidation treatment, reflecting the fact that the surface area and/or functionality are related to KF . Therefore, the treatment applied to modify the GAC and obtain the MGAC increased DE from 92 to 96%. However, more important than this is the decrease in the total amount of activated carbon needed to reach the maximum decolorization, because it means that the decolorization capacity of activated carbon is doubled. Franz et al. [29] concluded that surface oxygen groups, particularly carboxylic groups, adsorb water, creating water clusters through H bonding, which reduces accessibility and affinity to aromatic adsorbates and, thus, reduces adsorption capacity. Oxygen groups can enhance adsorption capacity in the absence of water, by forming H bonds with the aromatics. These authors, in their study of adsorption at pH 11.6, say that the majority of the carboxylic surface oxygen groups exist in the dissociated carboxylate form (COO− ), and water adsorption is increased, resulting in a F. López et al. / Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 257 (2003) 173–178 177 Table 2 Parameters of the Freundlich equation of the activated carbons Carbon KF 1/n r GAC MGAC-4h MGAC-8h 36.7 43.3 65.5 0.259 0.228 0.106 0.930 0.936 0.975 lower adsorption capacity with an oxidized carbon, while at an acid pH 3, the capacity decreases less with surface oxygenation, because a smaller amount of water adsorption is expected, since the carboxylic groups on the surface are essentially in neutral form. Vinegar is a product with a pH between 2.5 and 3.0 for 60 g/l acetic acid (commercial form) and about 2.0 for 100 g/l acetic acid (most common result of industrial production). The low pH of vinegar diminishes water adsorption according to Franz et al. [29], and favors the adsorption of polyphenols with surface oxygen groups of activated carbons. This fact could explain the increase in capacity of MGAC-8h with respect to GAC. However, in our previous study using carbon from coconut shell [32] the increase in decolorization capacity for vinegar was notably higher. Carbon obtained from olive stone (used in the present study) does not show such a high increase in decolorization capacity, mainly due to the fact that the initial carbon (before oxidation) was fairly acidic, as can be seen by its FTIR (Fig. 2). The adsorption capacity increases in the present work mainly because the surface area of the GAC also increases, from 791 to 915 m2 /g. It should be pointed out that the surface area of the mesopores increases by about 150% (from 129 to 340 m2 /g), which means that the oxidation is responsible for the microporous material changing to a mesoporous material (see Table 1). This change decreases the diffusional problems and increases the effective area for polyphenol adsorption. The main advantage of using oxidation instead of nitric or phosphoric acid is that functional groups such as nitrates and phosphates are not introduced into the carbon matrix, which may contaminate the vinegar and make it impossible to use this type of modified carbon commercially. The FTIR spectra in Fig. 4 are for MGAC-8h before and after the vinegar decolorization process. It can be seen that the intensity of the band between 1550 and 1750 cm−1 decreases. This band is assigned to the stretching vibration of carboxyl groups on the edges of the layer planes [38] or to conjugated carbonyl groups. This indicates that the carboxyl and conjugated carbonyl groups participate in the interaction between the polyphenols and the activated carbon by forming oxygen complexes. The band around 1300 cm−1 also diminishes (Fig. 4). This band was attributed to C–O single bonds, such as those in ethers, phenols, and hydroxyl groups and the decrease can also be assigned to hydrogen bonds between these groups and polyphenols from vinegar. Finally, it should be pointed out that there is a new band in the range 1750–1800 cm−1 because the formation of hydrogen bonds weakens and displaces the carbonyl bond. Fig. 4. FTIR spectra for modified granular activated carbon (MGAC-8h) and used modified granular activated carbon (MGAC-8h, used). 4. Conclusions The oxidation treatment applied to the granular activated carbon from olive stones increased BET surface area. This increase is mainly the result of an increase in mesopore area and average pore diameter, which in turn makes it easier for the compounds to access the active sites. The functionality of the modified granular activated carbon also increased. The decoloring efficiency of the MGAC (96%) is similar to that of the powder-activated carbon (98%), which is the adsorbent that is most widely used in the vinegar industry. This makes it possible to modify the decolorization process currently carried out in the vinegar industry by transforming the batch process into a continuous one using packed columns. Acknowledgments We are grateful to Badia Vinagres S.L. (Mollerussa, Spain), Productos Agrovin S.A. (Alcázar de San Juan, Spain), and the MCYT (AGL2000-0237-P4-04). References [1] L.S.M. Bento, Int. Sugar J. 92 (1990) 116. [2] R. Lyndon, Fruit Process. 6 (1996) 130. [3] A. Noomhorm, S. Kupongsak, S. Chandrkrachang, J. Sci. Food Agr. 76 (1998) 226. [4] K. Grohmann, J.A. Manthey, R.G. Cameron, B.S. Buslig, J. Agr. Food Chem. 47 (1999) 4859. [5] M.Z. Hussein, D. Kuang, Z. Zainal, T.K. Teck, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 235 (2001) 93, doi:10.1006/jcis.2000.7175. [6] F. Shahidi, M. Naczk, in: Food Phenolics: Sources, Chemistry Effects and Applications, Technomic, Lancaster, PA, 1995, pp. 1–4, 136–143. [7] I. Achaerandio, C. Güell, F. López, J. Food Eng. 51 (2002) 311. [8] P.L. Walker Jr., A. Almagro, Carbon 27 (1995) 13. [9] H. Teng, J.A. Ho, Y.F. Hsu, C.T. Hsieh, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 35 (1996) 4043. [10] H. Teng, C.T. Hsieh, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 37 (1998) 3618. 178 F. López et al. / Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 257 (2003) 173–178 [11] C. Brasquet, B. Rousseau, H. Estrade-Szwarckopf, P. Le Cloirec, Carbon 38 (2000) 407. [12] Y.F. Jia, K.M. Thomas, Langmuir 16 (2000) 1114. [13] C. Moreno-Castilla, M.V. López-Ramón, F. Carrasco-Marín, Carbon 38 (2000) 1995. [14] N. Petrov, T. Buninova, M. Razvigorova, E. Ekinci, F. Yardim, V. Minkova, Carbon 38 (2000) 2069. [15] R.S. Juang, R.L. Tseng, F.C. Wu, Adsorption 7 (2001) 65. [16] V. Gómez-Serrano, J. Pastor-Villegas, C.J. Durán-Valle, C. Valenzuela-Calahorro, Carbon 34 (1996) 533. [17] C.C. Leng, N.G. Pinto, Carbon 35 (1997) 1375. [18] C.L. Mangun, K.R. Benak, M.A. Daley, J. Economy, Chem. Mater. 11 (1999) 3476. [19] V. Gómez-Serrano, M. Acedo-Ramos, A.J. López-Peinado, C. Valenzuela-Calahorro, Fuel 73 (1994) 387. [20] Y. Zou, B.X. Han, Adsorp. Sci. Technol. 19 (2001) 59. [21] J.E. Kilduff, C.J. King, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 36 (1997) 1603. [22] S. Biniak, M. Pakula, G.S. Szymanski, A. Swiatkowski, Langmuir 15 (1999) 6177. [23] D.M. Nevskaia, A. Santianes, V. Muñoz, A. Guerrero-Ruíz, Carbon 37 (1999) 1065. [24] D.M. Nevskaia, A. Guerrero-Ruíz, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 234 (2001) 316, doi:10.1006/jcis.2001.7300. [25] I.I. Salame, T.J. Bandosz, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 240 (2001) 252, doi:10.1006/jcis.2001.7596. [26] P. Pendleton, R. Schumann, S. Hui Wong, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 240 (2001) 1, doi:10.1006/jcis.2001.7616. [27] R.C. Bansal, J.B. Donnet, F. Stoeckli, Active Carbon, Dekker, New York/Basel, 1988. [28] H. Tamon, M. Okazaki, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 179 (1996) 181, doi:10.1006/jcis.1996.0200. [29] M. Franz, H.A. Arafat, N.G. Pinto, Carbon 38 (2000) 1807. [30] J.E. Kilduff, T. Karanfil, W.J. Weber, Environ. Sci. Technol. 30 (1996) 1334. [31] R.D. Vidic, C.H. Tessmer, L.J. Uranowski, Carbon 35 (1997) 1349. [32] I. Achaerandio, C. Güell, F. Medina, R. Lamuela, F. López, Food Sci. Technol. Int. 8 (2002) 239. [33] E.P. Barrett, L.G. Joyner, P.P. Halenda, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 73 (1951) 373. [34] C. Sellitti, J.L. Koenig, H. Ishida, Carbon 28 (1990) 221. [35] A. Koch, A. Krzton, G. Finqueneisel, J.V. Weber, T. Zimny, Fuel 77 (1998) 563. [36] A.S. Politou, C. Morterra, M.J.D. Low, Carbon 28 (1990) 529. [37] A.S. Politou, C. Mortera, M.J.D. Low, Carbon 28 (1990) 855. [38] H.P. Boehm, Carbon 32 (1994) 759.
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz